+关注
4ba6ec5c
暂无个人介绍
IP属地:海外
44
关注
24
粉丝
11
主题
0
勋章
主贴
热门
4ba6ec5c
2023-07-07
$WTI原油主连 2308(CLmain)$
4ba6ec5c
2021-10-22
买了行权价82的看跌期权
@寇健:
$小天然气主连(QGmain)$
$天然气主连(NGmain)$
$WTI原油主连(CLmain)$
$NQ100指数主连(NQmain)$
$黄金主连(GCmain)$
,现在再追多原油,风险已经越来越大,我从原油的期货价格结构中判断出了油价的关键点位,还有天然气的未来走势判断,来听听这节课,仔细聊了聊通胀预期下的能源品种走势。
4ba6ec5c
2021-09-01
$阿里巴巴(BABA)$
这煎饼 香
4ba6ec5c
2021-09-01
$拼多多(PDD)$
捡漏专业户
4ba6ec5c
2021-06-21
有没有比这个更好的呢? 首先因子模型没有好坏,只有适合,模拟了比较适合我python初学者认知的单因子模型(市值),筛选赛道:申万一级市场“衣食住行”。执行市值最小的企业做滚动买卖策略(每周满仓单只股票)08开始,满仓12年之后,竟能跑出1149倍收益。当然尝试不同筛选,也跑出不同结果,但该策略最大回撤是最理想。比如图三,是基于大市值的结果。总结:这个策略可行,思路不复杂;只是写代码老费劲了,上网跟着牛人反复写代码再修改;策略+思路必须有,再摸索自己的那套,然后不断剔除哪些(沉淀下觉得和以往对股票认识又不太一样);剩下最难的最难的也最有价值的是找数据,拼接数据(不得不说,还是[捂脸]花钱买吧) 。 因子模型复杂与否,怎么量化是个难度。 有没有人对其他因子有想法的?跑出来的如何聊一下。这是一个更适合机器执行的好策略,另外一个比较友好的策略:rule 1, 做一个左侧交易者rule 2, 做一个无聊的孤独的左侧交易者如果以上两条还不足以令你账户收益, 就该想一想是不是赛道和习惯错了, 并重新执行rule 1和2。 (虽然不是很想蹭价值投资的热度) 然而很多人(绝大部分,包括我)都执行不了,可能看到25-50%的收益时,就会卖出, 看到-5-15%亏损时,就会止损( 这并不是不对)。是平衡的问题,能将纪律和收益放在时间天平的两端,平衡好这三者的关系,目测范围内都已经是骨灰级的。 最后来老虎社区关注我,同步分享,一起学习畅谈,自由信仰,一起粉碎记录,长空翱翔。#A股
@苏北刘强东
@扑克投资家
4ba6ec5c
2021-05-30
中国政府只是区别对待了区块链技术和比特币, 前者将作为技术运用, 后者因为不稳定的货币价格、交易属性而被禁止。从长远的角度,区块链的技术属于前沿,而矿池里面的奖励机制,比特币是无法凭空消失,它会长期存在与这个世界。 那最后的价值基石,就会回归到 “需求( gmv)”。 elon 暂停比特币购车,和中国政府严谨挖矿和交易,只是在在需求端给了一猛击。而每次暴跌,将叠加心理层面(恐慌),更像是交易层面的一场流动性考验。从货币属性角度,美国政府不禁止比特币,而只是提醒其价格波动剧烈的原因,是他直接和美金挂钩,需求层面目前并不撼动美元地位;但中国禁止数字货币,更多是以货币流通环节的不可控和人民币数字化保护。 假如比特币以人民币计价,那跳出来反对和禁止的,就会是美国了。 货币演化,在其交易过程中,曾出现过无数,类似贝壳,铜币,白银等,能被广泛使用就是基于历史认可度和需求。从传统定价角度, 一家企业能从现金流,市值等角度解决估值和定价,那想想黄金的定价,未来数字资产的定价呢? ark的报告虽然没有关于比特币的估值范式, 但里面罗列了数十条区块链技术可以触及的行业和生态,也正是木头姐能看好比特币的一个重要依据,撇开货币属性, 需求上,比特币会得到更多释放。尽管比特币有数字支付属性,而太坊能解决智能合约问题; 并且随着技术的到来,需求层面来说,未来一定有更多运用空间, 即定价基石的逻辑还在。 但很多反对者,譬如芒格等老人家,我想他们是不需要将自己的智慧和敏锐放到一个产生不了稳定现金流的数字资产上,就如巴菲特说过句话,“永远不要拿你输不起的东西,去博你不需要的东西。”当有1000亿美金在手的时候,存银行,都会是价值投资。长期并坚定看好比特币,以太坊等数字货币的发展和运用。但从不否认在交易层面,关注价格本身和市场情绪,并准备好安全降落的准备。#bitcoin #tesla #做空
4ba6ec5c
2021-05-13
理清了一个线。将两个之前弱相关东西,说清楚,分享给大家。。。一个是美股(就纳斯达克吧),一个是美元指数。 我的判断哦,和结论是,大方向最终会保 美元。1. 首先我很难去找到这两者的关联性。 但现在的情况是,这两者表现的都很弱。 尤其是美元指数,对一揽子货币是弱得不行。这才让,大宗商品价格的一路狂欢。2. 美股一周前很强,而这周开始几乎嗅到了崩盘的味道了(看tesla[偷笑])。我没依据说,是美元指数带崩了美股,但事实就是现在这样。3. 而目前这种双螺旋向下状态,是慢慢得到共识,难被打破。但她们不可能坐视不管,任由两者同向下坠。那美元指数下坠的影响大,还是股市下坠影响大? 这将是考验。 我只能说我的看法是,保美元。 美元一旦进入贬值节奏,将带崩经济面,抛美债,资本外流,面子挂不住,而且以美元(锚)计价的所有元素都会反方向上涨,原材料还会再涨,直到各大国考虑是否会脱钩美元,运回黄金(这个世界格局都要变了,会很夸张)。 里子也会崩,刚复苏的经济就因资金离开本国,而步履艰难。当然他们会关注的数据和经济增长方面会更多。而美股下跌,结束10多年的牛市,对本国经济面影响毕竟有限,可能这次会跌的很惨。 但没有国家因股市崩盘而,却有很多国家因货币崩盘而进入长期萧条的。那为何说,这两者不能同时保。 这是个好问题,我前面车里也在想。因为没辙了,已经量化宽松太久了,太多了,财政手段, 货币也没有空间(再印钱,带崩美元指数是大概率)。记得前几周吧,耶伦说,2023年前不加息, 但好像她前几天又说会提前加息。 不管怎么样, 加息就是以为着直接拉美元指数,并且从经济层面正式代表,美国的经济没问题。有色等周期品种将结束上涨周期,并且快速回落。比特币也偏悲观。 国内市场会独善其身吗?有可能。 甚至我们会看到,无论你持有什么资产品种,甚至毫无关联的交易品种,都会是同向大幅下跌,引发流动性风险。。。。(扯远了,
4ba6ec5c
2021-05-11
感谢上海消保委[流泪]
4ba6ec5c
2021-05-11
提醒一下喔,有色铜(价) 飘得有点高。尽管 现货短缺,期货新高(止盈)。 三周前说 all in有色铜的股票,目前已传导到二级市场了(铜,的属性不如其他有色,应激反应来的比较慢),刚看了一群“铜”的股票,应该是差不多了,去留自己定吧。 大周期没改变,短期反应爆表了。备好降落伞#铜
4ba6ec5c
2021-05-05
$特斯拉(TSLA)$
tesla 's Minsky Moment is approaching
4ba6ec5c
2021-05-02
这篇文章不错,转发给大家看
抱歉,原内容已删除
4ba6ec5c
2021-04-24
专注
@价值投资为王:怎样才能成为巴菲特?答案只有2个字!
4ba6ec5c
2021-04-14
言之有理
抱歉,原内容已删除
4ba6ec5c
2021-03-30
Ark 这两天分别再进百度
@巴伦周刊:史上最大单日亏损?中概股暴跌的传闻与事实
4ba6ec5c
2021-03-27
价值和价格的作用力与反作用力
@桃李春风益点财:基金经理们极端转向价值股,该抛掉科技股、中概股、成长股吗?
4ba6ec5c
2021-03-23
[财迷]
Jury out on whether ARK Innovation returns are due to Cathie Wood’s skill or luck
4ba6ec5c
2021-03-22
想要数据。。。谢谢啦
@瓦砾村夫:木头姐最新特斯拉目标价的几个问题
4ba6ec5c
2021-03-22
大数据
@价值投资为王:大胆预言,核心资产大底初现!
4ba6ec5c
2021-03-21
想了想,还是说下吧:一个希望。假设之前是对的话,那A50极有可能在下周结束下跌,并开始修复(动态中仍存隐忧,美债利率从长期看,进入上升通道,所以消化和修复也是个漫长的过程)。 短周级别可以入场做多a50,茅台稳住,A50稳住。(A50杀估值+中美会谈之前的不确定性是一个短空策略基础,目前差不多结束了)# 比起不确定性的合作# 腾讯看跌下周可以止盈# 激进点的话,tesla继续持有并加 4月份的call option#大宗商品,铜的路径相对清晰,中长看涨#黄金很尴尬#比特币没毛病
抱歉,原内容已删除
4ba6ec5c
2021-03-14
这些因素不像积木那样可以累积起来, 他们更多是结构性自生和相互融合,最后成为精密的仪器。 真是太厉害了。 既反人性, 又反市场一般的神存在
@生财小王子:你为什么永远不能成为巴菲特?马克·塞勒尔在哈佛大学的演讲
去老虎APP查看更多动态
{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"3553462730947141","uuid":"3553462730947141","gmtCreate":1590368710008,"gmtModify":1618798307414,"name":"4ba6ec5c","pinyin":"ykyikan","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":24,"headSize":44,"tweetSize":32,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":3,"name":"书生虎","nameTw":"書生虎","represent":"努力向上","factor":"发布10条非转发主帖,其中5条获得他人回复或点赞","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":11,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":1,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":null,"userBadges":[{"badgeId":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561-3","templateUuid":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561","name":"偶像虎友","description":"加入老虎社区1500天","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8b40ae7da5bf081a1c84df14bf9e6367","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f160eceddd7c284a8e1136557615cfad","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/11792805c468334a9b31c39f95a41c6a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2024.07.04","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"228c86a078844d74991fff2b7ab2428d-1","templateUuid":"228c86a078844d74991fff2b7ab2428d","name":"投资经理虎","description":"证券账户累计交易金额达到10万美元","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c8dfc27c1ee0e25db1c93e9d0b641101","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f43908c142f8a33c78f5bdf0e2897488","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/82165ff19cb8a786e8919f92acee5213","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.07.14","exceedPercentage":"60.26%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101},{"badgeId":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37-1","templateUuid":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37","name":"博闻投资者","description":"累计交易超过10只正股","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a-1","templateUuid":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a","name":"实盘交易者","description":"完成一笔实盘交易","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969-2","templateUuid":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969","name":"宗师交易员","description":"证券或期货账户累计交易次数达到100次","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad22cfbe2d05aa393b18e9226e4b0307","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/36702e6ff3ffe46acafee66cc85273ca","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d52eb88fa385cf5abe2616ed63781765","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":"80.03%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":5,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":"海外","starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"post","tweets":[{"id":195379731677400,"gmtCreate":1688737199262,"gmtModify":1688737200198,"author":{"id":"3553462730947141","authorId":"3553462730947141","name":"4ba6ec5c","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3553462730947141","idStr":"3553462730947141"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/FUT/CLmain\">$WTI原油主连 2308(CLmain)$ </a><v-v data-views=\"0\"></v-v>","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/FUT/CLmain\">$WTI原油主连 2308(CLmain)$ </a><v-v data-views=\"0\"></v-v>","text":"$WTI原油主连 2308(CLmain)$","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/195379731677400","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":191,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":851526370,"gmtCreate":1634915580685,"gmtModify":1634915580685,"author":{"id":"3553462730947141","authorId":"3553462730947141","name":"4ba6ec5c","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3553462730947141","idStr":"3553462730947141"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"买了行权价82的看跌期权","listText":"买了行权价82的看跌期权","text":"买了行权价82的看跌期权","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/851526370","repostId":"851359144","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":851359144,"gmtCreate":1634872782084,"gmtModify":1634952339667,"author":{"id":"3580807725993787","authorId":"3580807725993787","name":"寇健","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/89441ad4219daeab85f6c707819e1dc6","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3580807725993787","idStr":"3580807725993787"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"\n \n \n <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/FUT/QGmain\">$小天然气主连(QGmain)$</a> <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/FUT/NGmain\">$天然气主连(NGmain)$</a> <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/FUT/CLmain\">$WTI原油主连(CLmain)$</a> <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/FUT/NQmain\">$NQ100指数主连(NQmain)$</a> <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/FUT/GCmain\">$黄金主连(GCmain)$</a> ,现在再追多原油,风险已经越来越大,我从原油的期货价格结构中判断出了油价的关键点位,还有天然气的未来走势判断,来听听这节课,仔细聊了聊通胀预期下的能源品种走势。\n \n","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/FUT/QGmain\">$小天然气主连(QGmain)$</a> <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/FUT/NGmain\">$天然气主连(NGmain)$</a> <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/FUT/CLmain\">$WTI原油主连(CLmain)$</a> <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/FUT/NQmain\">$NQ100指数主连(NQmain)$</a> <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/FUT/GCmain\">$黄金主连(GCmain)$</a> ,现在再追多原油,风险已经越来越大,我从原油的期货价格结构中判断出了油价的关键点位,还有天然气的未来走势判断,来听听这节课,仔细聊了聊通胀预期下的能源品种走势。","text":"$小天然气主连(QGmain)$ $天然气主连(NGmain)$ $WTI原油主连(CLmain)$ $NQ100指数主连(NQmain)$ $黄金主连(GCmain)$ ,现在再追多原油,风险已经越来越大,我从原油的期货价格结构中判断出了油价的关键点位,还有天然气的未来走势判断,来听听这节课,仔细聊了聊通胀预期下的能源品种走势。","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":2,"essential":2,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/851359144","isVote":1,"tweetType":2,"object":{"id":"795c51fc713c44b2bf8e9b382c3ab320","tweetId":"851359144","title":"我对天然气和原油走势的最新研究:要留心天然气的底和原油的顶","videoUrl":"https://1254107296.vod2.myqcloud.com/e2ad4227vodcq1254107296/b1a52d0f8602268010786658368/f0.mp4","poster":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8725a044d1c77bb2d68a3142bf1bc282","shareLink":"https://laohu8.com/RN?name=RNLive&rndata=%7B%22liveId%22:%2216347147014453%22%7D"},"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2403,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":816515580,"gmtCreate":1630507127640,"gmtModify":1630507127640,"author":{"id":"3553462730947141","authorId":"3553462730947141","name":"4ba6ec5c","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3553462730947141","idStr":"3553462730947141"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BABA\">$阿里巴巴(BABA)$</a>这煎饼 香","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BABA\">$阿里巴巴(BABA)$</a>这煎饼 香","text":"$阿里巴巴(BABA)$这煎饼 香","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1cf20122b9b5d18d1eabb29b01a0afc8","width":"720","height":"1280"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/816515580","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2535,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":816512977,"gmtCreate":1630507089599,"gmtModify":1630507089599,"author":{"id":"3553462730947141","authorId":"3553462730947141","name":"4ba6ec5c","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3553462730947141","idStr":"3553462730947141"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PDD\">$拼多多(PDD)$</a>捡漏专业户","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PDD\">$拼多多(PDD)$</a>捡漏专业户","text":"$拼多多(PDD)$捡漏专业户","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0ca8e89b605cffc7897e4a0771a037a8","width":"720","height":"1280"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/816512977","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2088,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":164240798,"gmtCreate":1624213456814,"gmtModify":1624240154890,"author":{"id":"3553462730947141","authorId":"3553462730947141","name":"4ba6ec5c","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3553462730947141","idStr":"3553462730947141"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"有没有比这个更好的呢? 首先因子模型没有好坏,只有适合,模拟了比较适合我python初学者认知的单因子模型(市值),筛选赛道:申万一级市场“衣食住行”。执行市值最小的企业做滚动买卖策略(每周满仓单只股票)08开始,满仓12年之后,竟能跑出1149倍收益。当然尝试不同筛选,也跑出不同结果,但该策略最大回撤是最理想。比如图三,是基于大市值的结果。总结:这个策略可行,思路不复杂;只是写代码老费劲了,上网跟着牛人反复写代码再修改;策略+思路必须有,再摸索自己的那套,然后不断剔除哪些(沉淀下觉得和以往对股票认识又不太一样);剩下最难的最难的也最有价值的是找数据,拼接数据(不得不说,还是[捂脸]花钱买吧) 。 因子模型复杂与否,怎么量化是个难度。 有没有人对其他因子有想法的?跑出来的如何聊一下。这是一个更适合机器执行的好策略,另外一个比较友好的策略:rule 1, 做一个左侧交易者rule 2, 做一个无聊的孤独的左侧交易者如果以上两条还不足以令你账户收益, 就该想一想是不是赛道和习惯错了, 并重新执行rule 1和2。 (虽然不是很想蹭价值投资的热度) 然而很多人(绝大部分,包括我)都执行不了,可能看到25-50%的收益时,就会卖出, 看到-5-15%亏损时,就会止损( 这并不是不对)。是平衡的问题,能将纪律和收益放在时间天平的两端,平衡好这三者的关系,目测范围内都已经是骨灰级的。 最后来老虎社区关注我,同步分享,一起学习畅谈,自由信仰,一起粉碎记录,长空翱翔。#A股 <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/U/3469666730588285\">@苏北刘强东</a><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/U/3524105581449289\">@扑克投资家</a>","listText":"有没有比这个更好的呢? 首先因子模型没有好坏,只有适合,模拟了比较适合我python初学者认知的单因子模型(市值),筛选赛道:申万一级市场“衣食住行”。执行市值最小的企业做滚动买卖策略(每周满仓单只股票)08开始,满仓12年之后,竟能跑出1149倍收益。当然尝试不同筛选,也跑出不同结果,但该策略最大回撤是最理想。比如图三,是基于大市值的结果。总结:这个策略可行,思路不复杂;只是写代码老费劲了,上网跟着牛人反复写代码再修改;策略+思路必须有,再摸索自己的那套,然后不断剔除哪些(沉淀下觉得和以往对股票认识又不太一样);剩下最难的最难的也最有价值的是找数据,拼接数据(不得不说,还是[捂脸]花钱买吧) 。 因子模型复杂与否,怎么量化是个难度。 有没有人对其他因子有想法的?跑出来的如何聊一下。这是一个更适合机器执行的好策略,另外一个比较友好的策略:rule 1, 做一个左侧交易者rule 2, 做一个无聊的孤独的左侧交易者如果以上两条还不足以令你账户收益, 就该想一想是不是赛道和习惯错了, 并重新执行rule 1和2。 (虽然不是很想蹭价值投资的热度) 然而很多人(绝大部分,包括我)都执行不了,可能看到25-50%的收益时,就会卖出, 看到-5-15%亏损时,就会止损( 这并不是不对)。是平衡的问题,能将纪律和收益放在时间天平的两端,平衡好这三者的关系,目测范围内都已经是骨灰级的。 最后来老虎社区关注我,同步分享,一起学习畅谈,自由信仰,一起粉碎记录,长空翱翔。#A股 <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/U/3469666730588285\">@苏北刘强东</a><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/U/3524105581449289\">@扑克投资家</a>","text":"有没有比这个更好的呢? 首先因子模型没有好坏,只有适合,模拟了比较适合我python初学者认知的单因子模型(市值),筛选赛道:申万一级市场“衣食住行”。执行市值最小的企业做滚动买卖策略(每周满仓单只股票)08开始,满仓12年之后,竟能跑出1149倍收益。当然尝试不同筛选,也跑出不同结果,但该策略最大回撤是最理想。比如图三,是基于大市值的结果。总结:这个策略可行,思路不复杂;只是写代码老费劲了,上网跟着牛人反复写代码再修改;策略+思路必须有,再摸索自己的那套,然后不断剔除哪些(沉淀下觉得和以往对股票认识又不太一样);剩下最难的最难的也最有价值的是找数据,拼接数据(不得不说,还是[捂脸]花钱买吧) 。 因子模型复杂与否,怎么量化是个难度。 有没有人对其他因子有想法的?跑出来的如何聊一下。这是一个更适合机器执行的好策略,另外一个比较友好的策略:rule 1, 做一个左侧交易者rule 2, 做一个无聊的孤独的左侧交易者如果以上两条还不足以令你账户收益, 就该想一想是不是赛道和习惯错了, 并重新执行rule 1和2。 (虽然不是很想蹭价值投资的热度) 然而很多人(绝大部分,包括我)都执行不了,可能看到25-50%的收益时,就会卖出, 看到-5-15%亏损时,就会止损( 这并不是不对)。是平衡的问题,能将纪律和收益放在时间天平的两端,平衡好这三者的关系,目测范围内都已经是骨灰级的。 最后来老虎社区关注我,同步分享,一起学习畅谈,自由信仰,一起粉碎记录,长空翱翔。#A股 @苏北刘强东@扑克投资家","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7643ac02dead5901087797244d5cba38","width":"1915","height":"1043"},{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/aaf6a83298493e677bd9b6a06e7ec8d3","width":"381","height":"251"},{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/12e0122d4e417effea5d08679b84bc61","width":"368","height":"248"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/164240798","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":4222,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[{"author":{"id":"3469666730588285","authorId":"3469666730588285","name":"东哥不疾而速","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/353822250870391f1f67a74a8438da99","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3469666730588285","idStr":"3469666730588285"},"content":"蛮好的思路,不过A股我还是无脑满仓 $贵州茅台(600519)$ 和 $片仔癀(600436)$ 就好","text":"蛮好的思路,不过A股我还是无脑满仓 $贵州茅台(600519)$ 和 $片仔癀(600436)$ 就好","html":"蛮好的思路,不过A股我还是无脑满仓 $贵州茅台(600519)$ 和 $片仔癀(600436)$ 就好"}],"imageCount":3,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":137445752,"gmtCreate":1622383150176,"gmtModify":1622638673680,"author":{"id":"3553462730947141","authorId":"3553462730947141","name":"4ba6ec5c","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3553462730947141","idStr":"3553462730947141"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"中国政府只是区别对待了区块链技术和比特币, 前者将作为技术运用, 后者因为不稳定的货币价格、交易属性而被禁止。从长远的角度,区块链的技术属于前沿,而矿池里面的奖励机制,比特币是无法凭空消失,它会长期存在与这个世界。 那最后的价值基石,就会回归到 “需求( gmv)”。 elon 暂停比特币购车,和中国政府严谨挖矿和交易,只是在在需求端给了一猛击。而每次暴跌,将叠加心理层面(恐慌),更像是交易层面的一场流动性考验。从货币属性角度,美国政府不禁止比特币,而只是提醒其价格波动剧烈的原因,是他直接和美金挂钩,需求层面目前并不撼动美元地位;但中国禁止数字货币,更多是以货币流通环节的不可控和人民币数字化保护。 假如比特币以人民币计价,那跳出来反对和禁止的,就会是美国了。 货币演化,在其交易过程中,曾出现过无数,类似贝壳,铜币,白银等,能被广泛使用就是基于历史认可度和需求。从传统定价角度, 一家企业能从现金流,市值等角度解决估值和定价,那想想黄金的定价,未来数字资产的定价呢? ark的报告虽然没有关于比特币的估值范式, 但里面罗列了数十条区块链技术可以触及的行业和生态,也正是木头姐能看好比特币的一个重要依据,撇开货币属性, 需求上,比特币会得到更多释放。尽管比特币有数字支付属性,而太坊能解决智能合约问题; 并且随着技术的到来,需求层面来说,未来一定有更多运用空间, 即定价基石的逻辑还在。 但很多反对者,譬如芒格等老人家,我想他们是不需要将自己的智慧和敏锐放到一个产生不了稳定现金流的数字资产上,就如巴菲特说过句话,“永远不要拿你输不起的东西,去博你不需要的东西。”当有1000亿美金在手的时候,存银行,都会是价值投资。长期并坚定看好比特币,以太坊等数字货币的发展和运用。但从不否认在交易层面,关注价格本身和市场情绪,并准备好安全降落的准备。#bitcoin #tesla #做空<a href=\"\"></a>","listText":"中国政府只是区别对待了区块链技术和比特币, 前者将作为技术运用, 后者因为不稳定的货币价格、交易属性而被禁止。从长远的角度,区块链的技术属于前沿,而矿池里面的奖励机制,比特币是无法凭空消失,它会长期存在与这个世界。 那最后的价值基石,就会回归到 “需求( gmv)”。 elon 暂停比特币购车,和中国政府严谨挖矿和交易,只是在在需求端给了一猛击。而每次暴跌,将叠加心理层面(恐慌),更像是交易层面的一场流动性考验。从货币属性角度,美国政府不禁止比特币,而只是提醒其价格波动剧烈的原因,是他直接和美金挂钩,需求层面目前并不撼动美元地位;但中国禁止数字货币,更多是以货币流通环节的不可控和人民币数字化保护。 假如比特币以人民币计价,那跳出来反对和禁止的,就会是美国了。 货币演化,在其交易过程中,曾出现过无数,类似贝壳,铜币,白银等,能被广泛使用就是基于历史认可度和需求。从传统定价角度, 一家企业能从现金流,市值等角度解决估值和定价,那想想黄金的定价,未来数字资产的定价呢? ark的报告虽然没有关于比特币的估值范式, 但里面罗列了数十条区块链技术可以触及的行业和生态,也正是木头姐能看好比特币的一个重要依据,撇开货币属性, 需求上,比特币会得到更多释放。尽管比特币有数字支付属性,而太坊能解决智能合约问题; 并且随着技术的到来,需求层面来说,未来一定有更多运用空间, 即定价基石的逻辑还在。 但很多反对者,譬如芒格等老人家,我想他们是不需要将自己的智慧和敏锐放到一个产生不了稳定现金流的数字资产上,就如巴菲特说过句话,“永远不要拿你输不起的东西,去博你不需要的东西。”当有1000亿美金在手的时候,存银行,都会是价值投资。长期并坚定看好比特币,以太坊等数字货币的发展和运用。但从不否认在交易层面,关注价格本身和市场情绪,并准备好安全降落的准备。#bitcoin #tesla #做空<a href=\"\"></a>","text":"中国政府只是区别对待了区块链技术和比特币, 前者将作为技术运用, 后者因为不稳定的货币价格、交易属性而被禁止。从长远的角度,区块链的技术属于前沿,而矿池里面的奖励机制,比特币是无法凭空消失,它会长期存在与这个世界。 那最后的价值基石,就会回归到 “需求( gmv)”。 elon 暂停比特币购车,和中国政府严谨挖矿和交易,只是在在需求端给了一猛击。而每次暴跌,将叠加心理层面(恐慌),更像是交易层面的一场流动性考验。从货币属性角度,美国政府不禁止比特币,而只是提醒其价格波动剧烈的原因,是他直接和美金挂钩,需求层面目前并不撼动美元地位;但中国禁止数字货币,更多是以货币流通环节的不可控和人民币数字化保护。 假如比特币以人民币计价,那跳出来反对和禁止的,就会是美国了。 货币演化,在其交易过程中,曾出现过无数,类似贝壳,铜币,白银等,能被广泛使用就是基于历史认可度和需求。从传统定价角度, 一家企业能从现金流,市值等角度解决估值和定价,那想想黄金的定价,未来数字资产的定价呢? ark的报告虽然没有关于比特币的估值范式, 但里面罗列了数十条区块链技术可以触及的行业和生态,也正是木头姐能看好比特币的一个重要依据,撇开货币属性, 需求上,比特币会得到更多释放。尽管比特币有数字支付属性,而太坊能解决智能合约问题; 并且随着技术的到来,需求层面来说,未来一定有更多运用空间, 即定价基石的逻辑还在。 但很多反对者,譬如芒格等老人家,我想他们是不需要将自己的智慧和敏锐放到一个产生不了稳定现金流的数字资产上,就如巴菲特说过句话,“永远不要拿你输不起的东西,去博你不需要的东西。”当有1000亿美金在手的时候,存银行,都会是价值投资。长期并坚定看好比特币,以太坊等数字货币的发展和运用。但从不否认在交易层面,关注价格本身和市场情绪,并准备好安全降落的准备。#bitcoin #tesla #做空","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/abb6d07c8219a77f90ffd517508c80d3","width":"720","height":"1600"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":2,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/137445752","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":12878,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[{"author":{"id":"3507927418932492","authorId":"3507927418932492","name":"扯个犊子","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/be1a05065b5e524f452b72c601018fd5","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3507927418932492","idStr":"3507927418932492"},"content":"at我干啥🤣","text":"at我干啥🤣","html":"at我干啥🤣"}],"imageCount":2,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":191971282,"gmtCreate":1620838375546,"gmtModify":1620913946278,"author":{"id":"3553462730947141","authorId":"3553462730947141","name":"4ba6ec5c","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3553462730947141","idStr":"3553462730947141"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"理清了一个线。将两个之前弱相关东西,说清楚,分享给大家。。。一个是美股(就纳斯达克吧),一个是美元指数。 我的判断哦,和结论是,大方向最终会保 美元。1. 首先我很难去找到这两者的关联性。 但现在的情况是,这两者表现的都很弱。 尤其是美元指数,对一揽子货币是弱得不行。这才让,大宗商品价格的一路狂欢。2. 美股一周前很强,而这周开始几乎嗅到了崩盘的味道了(看tesla[偷笑])。我没依据说,是美元指数带崩了美股,但事实就是现在这样。3. 而目前这种双螺旋向下状态,是慢慢得到共识,难被打破。但她们不可能坐视不管,任由两者同向下坠。那美元指数下坠的影响大,还是股市下坠影响大? 这将是考验。 我只能说我的看法是,保美元。 美元一旦进入贬值节奏,将带崩经济面,抛美债,资本外流,面子挂不住,而且以美元(锚)计价的所有元素都会反方向上涨,原材料还会再涨,直到各大国考虑是否会脱钩美元,运回黄金(这个世界格局都要变了,会很夸张)。 里子也会崩,刚复苏的经济就因资金离开本国,而步履艰难。当然他们会关注的数据和经济增长方面会更多。而美股下跌,结束10多年的牛市,对本国经济面影响毕竟有限,可能这次会跌的很惨。 但没有国家因股市崩盘而,却有很多国家因货币崩盘而进入长期萧条的。那为何说,这两者不能同时保。 这是个好问题,我前面车里也在想。因为没辙了,已经量化宽松太久了,太多了,财政手段, 货币也没有空间(再印钱,带崩美元指数是大概率)。记得前几周吧,耶伦说,2023年前不加息, 但好像她前几天又说会提前加息。 不管怎么样, 加息就是以为着直接拉美元指数,并且从经济层面正式代表,美国的经济没问题。有色等周期品种将结束上涨周期,并且快速回落。比特币也偏悲观。 国内市场会独善其身吗?有可能。 甚至我们会看到,无论你持有什么资产品种,甚至毫无关联的交易品种,都会是同向大幅下跌,引发流动性风险。。。。(扯远了,","listText":"理清了一个线。将两个之前弱相关东西,说清楚,分享给大家。。。一个是美股(就纳斯达克吧),一个是美元指数。 我的判断哦,和结论是,大方向最终会保 美元。1. 首先我很难去找到这两者的关联性。 但现在的情况是,这两者表现的都很弱。 尤其是美元指数,对一揽子货币是弱得不行。这才让,大宗商品价格的一路狂欢。2. 美股一周前很强,而这周开始几乎嗅到了崩盘的味道了(看tesla[偷笑])。我没依据说,是美元指数带崩了美股,但事实就是现在这样。3. 而目前这种双螺旋向下状态,是慢慢得到共识,难被打破。但她们不可能坐视不管,任由两者同向下坠。那美元指数下坠的影响大,还是股市下坠影响大? 这将是考验。 我只能说我的看法是,保美元。 美元一旦进入贬值节奏,将带崩经济面,抛美债,资本外流,面子挂不住,而且以美元(锚)计价的所有元素都会反方向上涨,原材料还会再涨,直到各大国考虑是否会脱钩美元,运回黄金(这个世界格局都要变了,会很夸张)。 里子也会崩,刚复苏的经济就因资金离开本国,而步履艰难。当然他们会关注的数据和经济增长方面会更多。而美股下跌,结束10多年的牛市,对本国经济面影响毕竟有限,可能这次会跌的很惨。 但没有国家因股市崩盘而,却有很多国家因货币崩盘而进入长期萧条的。那为何说,这两者不能同时保。 这是个好问题,我前面车里也在想。因为没辙了,已经量化宽松太久了,太多了,财政手段, 货币也没有空间(再印钱,带崩美元指数是大概率)。记得前几周吧,耶伦说,2023年前不加息, 但好像她前几天又说会提前加息。 不管怎么样, 加息就是以为着直接拉美元指数,并且从经济层面正式代表,美国的经济没问题。有色等周期品种将结束上涨周期,并且快速回落。比特币也偏悲观。 国内市场会独善其身吗?有可能。 甚至我们会看到,无论你持有什么资产品种,甚至毫无关联的交易品种,都会是同向大幅下跌,引发流动性风险。。。。(扯远了,","text":"理清了一个线。将两个之前弱相关东西,说清楚,分享给大家。。。一个是美股(就纳斯达克吧),一个是美元指数。 我的判断哦,和结论是,大方向最终会保 美元。1. 首先我很难去找到这两者的关联性。 但现在的情况是,这两者表现的都很弱。 尤其是美元指数,对一揽子货币是弱得不行。这才让,大宗商品价格的一路狂欢。2. 美股一周前很强,而这周开始几乎嗅到了崩盘的味道了(看tesla[偷笑])。我没依据说,是美元指数带崩了美股,但事实就是现在这样。3. 而目前这种双螺旋向下状态,是慢慢得到共识,难被打破。但她们不可能坐视不管,任由两者同向下坠。那美元指数下坠的影响大,还是股市下坠影响大? 这将是考验。 我只能说我的看法是,保美元。 美元一旦进入贬值节奏,将带崩经济面,抛美债,资本外流,面子挂不住,而且以美元(锚)计价的所有元素都会反方向上涨,原材料还会再涨,直到各大国考虑是否会脱钩美元,运回黄金(这个世界格局都要变了,会很夸张)。 里子也会崩,刚复苏的经济就因资金离开本国,而步履艰难。当然他们会关注的数据和经济增长方面会更多。而美股下跌,结束10多年的牛市,对本国经济面影响毕竟有限,可能这次会跌的很惨。 但没有国家因股市崩盘而,却有很多国家因货币崩盘而进入长期萧条的。那为何说,这两者不能同时保。 这是个好问题,我前面车里也在想。因为没辙了,已经量化宽松太久了,太多了,财政手段, 货币也没有空间(再印钱,带崩美元指数是大概率)。记得前几周吧,耶伦说,2023年前不加息, 但好像她前几天又说会提前加息。 不管怎么样, 加息就是以为着直接拉美元指数,并且从经济层面正式代表,美国的经济没问题。有色等周期品种将结束上涨周期,并且快速回落。比特币也偏悲观。 国内市场会独善其身吗?有可能。 甚至我们会看到,无论你持有什么资产品种,甚至毫无关联的交易品种,都会是同向大幅下跌,引发流动性风险。。。。(扯远了,","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":2,"essential":2,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":10,"repostSize":3,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/191971282","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":13003,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[{"author":{"id":"143574265413378","authorId":"143574265413378","name":"Elpis","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e99b2d6691d38830f3434641ea4d60f6","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"authorIdStr":"143574265413378","idStr":"143574265413378"},"content":"我觉得你想太多了,美股估值太高了跌是很正常的,只要估值回到正常还会涨上去的,不会跌太多,正常调整而已。","text":"我觉得你想太多了,美股估值太高了跌是很正常的,只要估值回到正常还会涨上去的,不会跌太多,正常调整而已。","html":"我觉得你想太多了,美股估值太高了跌是很正常的,只要估值回到正常还会涨上去的,不会跌太多,正常调整而已。"}],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":199923026,"gmtCreate":1620664708365,"gmtModify":1620664708365,"author":{"id":"3553462730947141","authorId":"3553462730947141","name":"4ba6ec5c","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3553462730947141","idStr":"3553462730947141"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"感谢上海消保委[流泪] ","listText":"感谢上海消保委[流泪] ","text":"感谢上海消保委[流泪]","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e433289a17587bef224c0c1df9a30f68","width":"720","height":"1600"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/199923026","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2454,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":199929510,"gmtCreate":1620664676130,"gmtModify":1620664676130,"author":{"id":"3553462730947141","authorId":"3553462730947141","name":"4ba6ec5c","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3553462730947141","idStr":"3553462730947141"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"提醒一下喔,有色铜(价) 飘得有点高。尽管 现货短缺,期货新高(止盈)。 三周前说 all in有色铜的股票,目前已传导到二级市场了(铜,的属性不如其他有色,应激反应来的比较慢),刚看了一群“铜”的股票,应该是差不多了,去留自己定吧。 大周期没改变,短期反应爆表了。备好降落伞#铜","listText":"提醒一下喔,有色铜(价) 飘得有点高。尽管 现货短缺,期货新高(止盈)。 三周前说 all in有色铜的股票,目前已传导到二级市场了(铜,的属性不如其他有色,应激反应来的比较慢),刚看了一群“铜”的股票,应该是差不多了,去留自己定吧。 大周期没改变,短期反应爆表了。备好降落伞#铜","text":"提醒一下喔,有色铜(价) 飘得有点高。尽管 现货短缺,期货新高(止盈)。 三周前说 all in有色铜的股票,目前已传导到二级市场了(铜,的属性不如其他有色,应激反应来的比较慢),刚看了一群“铜”的股票,应该是差不多了,去留自己定吧。 大周期没改变,短期反应爆表了。备好降落伞#铜","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/199929510","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2219,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":106734138,"gmtCreate":1620144326724,"gmtModify":1620144326724,"author":{"id":"3553462730947141","authorId":"3553462730947141","name":"4ba6ec5c","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3553462730947141","idStr":"3553462730947141"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">$特斯拉(TSLA)$</a>tesla 's Minsky Moment is approaching","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">$特斯拉(TSLA)$</a>tesla 's Minsky Moment is approaching","text":"$特斯拉(TSLA)$tesla 's Minsky Moment is approaching","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/106734138","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":4210,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":101430347,"gmtCreate":1619928961289,"gmtModify":1619928961289,"author":{"id":"3553462730947141","authorId":"3553462730947141","name":"4ba6ec5c","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3553462730947141","idStr":"3553462730947141"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"这篇文章不错,转发给大家看","listText":"这篇文章不错,转发给大家看","text":"这篇文章不错,转发给大家看","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/101430347","repostId":"1120703707","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2367,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":372420749,"gmtCreate":1619235338481,"gmtModify":1619235338481,"author":{"id":"3553462730947141","authorId":"3553462730947141","name":"4ba6ec5c","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3553462730947141","idStr":"3553462730947141"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"专注","listText":"专注","text":"专注","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/372420749","repostId":"372392815","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":372392815,"gmtCreate":1619175130734,"gmtModify":1619205132853,"author":{"id":"21347731130544","authorId":"21347731130544","name":"价值投资为王","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/89ffffc59ff9ac9cb9cb74f596418d44","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"21347731130544","idStr":"21347731130544"},"themes":[],"title":"怎样才能成为巴菲特?答案只有2个字!","htmlText":"虽然我的头像是巴菲特老爷子,虽然在老虎的名称叫价值投资为王,但说实话,在几天之前,我很少看过巴菲特的内容、书籍或采访。 个中缘由一直觉得相关的书籍大多翻译而来,内容颇为枯燥,始终无法沉下心来学习。 恰好几天之前,我知道有一个纪录片叫《成为巴菲特》,是HBO出品,巴菲特亲自出镜,88分钟的纪录片讲述了巴菲特的成长经历和投资理念,非常值得观看。 网上也很多关于此纪录片的感触,我看了2遍,最大的感触也即回答了片名:如何《成为巴菲特》? 多数人对此有很多建议,如多阅读、寻找有护城河的股票、在能力圈内投资。 不同于他们,我对如何成为巴菲特只有2个字的答案,即专注。 在纪录片开头,巴菲特说道他上班的路程只有5分钟车程,持续了54年。 众所周知,巴菲特工作和生活的地方在一个叫奥马哈的小城,如果不是巴菲特成为股神,这个小地方恐怕无人知晓。 回头审视我们自己,有多少一线城市的人,上班的路程需要花费一个小时甚至更久? 大量的时间浪费在路上,投入在学习上的时间就会变得很短,比如阅读。巴菲特在5分钟的车程途中,还能把早餐解决,回到办公室,每天有5-6小时的阅读时间。 注意巴菲特的早餐是2-3美元的麦当劳。 对吃不讲究、对上班的地方也不挑剔,只因巴菲特过于专注在投资这件事,集中精力于一处,别再无其他心思用在他处,如生活上的巴菲特是个**,连照顾生病的妻子都吃力! 再来看巴菲特的投资理念是如何展现专注的内核的。 巴菲特的父亲做过股票交易员,而后自己开了一家投资公司,青年时期的巴菲特便把父亲办公室里的投资书籍看了一遍。 后来因为搬家,巴菲特一时没能适应新环境,学习成绩下滑,本来想申请哈佛MBA,结果被拒,机缘巧合之下,投入了“恩师”格雷汉姆的旗下。 自此,价值投资之路开始萌芽。只不过早期的价投还沉迷在捡烟蒂,只买入是市值低于(流动资产减去总负债)三分之一以下的股票。 这种投资方法让巴菲特尝到甜头之后,便","listText":"虽然我的头像是巴菲特老爷子,虽然在老虎的名称叫价值投资为王,但说实话,在几天之前,我很少看过巴菲特的内容、书籍或采访。 个中缘由一直觉得相关的书籍大多翻译而来,内容颇为枯燥,始终无法沉下心来学习。 恰好几天之前,我知道有一个纪录片叫《成为巴菲特》,是HBO出品,巴菲特亲自出镜,88分钟的纪录片讲述了巴菲特的成长经历和投资理念,非常值得观看。 网上也很多关于此纪录片的感触,我看了2遍,最大的感触也即回答了片名:如何《成为巴菲特》? 多数人对此有很多建议,如多阅读、寻找有护城河的股票、在能力圈内投资。 不同于他们,我对如何成为巴菲特只有2个字的答案,即专注。 在纪录片开头,巴菲特说道他上班的路程只有5分钟车程,持续了54年。 众所周知,巴菲特工作和生活的地方在一个叫奥马哈的小城,如果不是巴菲特成为股神,这个小地方恐怕无人知晓。 回头审视我们自己,有多少一线城市的人,上班的路程需要花费一个小时甚至更久? 大量的时间浪费在路上,投入在学习上的时间就会变得很短,比如阅读。巴菲特在5分钟的车程途中,还能把早餐解决,回到办公室,每天有5-6小时的阅读时间。 注意巴菲特的早餐是2-3美元的麦当劳。 对吃不讲究、对上班的地方也不挑剔,只因巴菲特过于专注在投资这件事,集中精力于一处,别再无其他心思用在他处,如生活上的巴菲特是个**,连照顾生病的妻子都吃力! 再来看巴菲特的投资理念是如何展现专注的内核的。 巴菲特的父亲做过股票交易员,而后自己开了一家投资公司,青年时期的巴菲特便把父亲办公室里的投资书籍看了一遍。 后来因为搬家,巴菲特一时没能适应新环境,学习成绩下滑,本来想申请哈佛MBA,结果被拒,机缘巧合之下,投入了“恩师”格雷汉姆的旗下。 自此,价值投资之路开始萌芽。只不过早期的价投还沉迷在捡烟蒂,只买入是市值低于(流动资产减去总负债)三分之一以下的股票。 这种投资方法让巴菲特尝到甜头之后,便","text":"虽然我的头像是巴菲特老爷子,虽然在老虎的名称叫价值投资为王,但说实话,在几天之前,我很少看过巴菲特的内容、书籍或采访。 个中缘由一直觉得相关的书籍大多翻译而来,内容颇为枯燥,始终无法沉下心来学习。 恰好几天之前,我知道有一个纪录片叫《成为巴菲特》,是HBO出品,巴菲特亲自出镜,88分钟的纪录片讲述了巴菲特的成长经历和投资理念,非常值得观看。 网上也很多关于此纪录片的感触,我看了2遍,最大的感触也即回答了片名:如何《成为巴菲特》? 多数人对此有很多建议,如多阅读、寻找有护城河的股票、在能力圈内投资。 不同于他们,我对如何成为巴菲特只有2个字的答案,即专注。 在纪录片开头,巴菲特说道他上班的路程只有5分钟车程,持续了54年。 众所周知,巴菲特工作和生活的地方在一个叫奥马哈的小城,如果不是巴菲特成为股神,这个小地方恐怕无人知晓。 回头审视我们自己,有多少一线城市的人,上班的路程需要花费一个小时甚至更久? 大量的时间浪费在路上,投入在学习上的时间就会变得很短,比如阅读。巴菲特在5分钟的车程途中,还能把早餐解决,回到办公室,每天有5-6小时的阅读时间。 注意巴菲特的早餐是2-3美元的麦当劳。 对吃不讲究、对上班的地方也不挑剔,只因巴菲特过于专注在投资这件事,集中精力于一处,别再无其他心思用在他处,如生活上的巴菲特是个**,连照顾生病的妻子都吃力! 再来看巴菲特的投资理念是如何展现专注的内核的。 巴菲特的父亲做过股票交易员,而后自己开了一家投资公司,青年时期的巴菲特便把父亲办公室里的投资书籍看了一遍。 后来因为搬家,巴菲特一时没能适应新环境,学习成绩下滑,本来想申请哈佛MBA,结果被拒,机缘巧合之下,投入了“恩师”格雷汉姆的旗下。 自此,价值投资之路开始萌芽。只不过早期的价投还沉迷在捡烟蒂,只买入是市值低于(流动资产减去总负债)三分之一以下的股票。 这种投资方法让巴菲特尝到甜头之后,便","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fc5f1d604f63ca58c39f3b2a15aa44ab","width":"931","height":"529"},{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8ccf4800455f1c15a10d2556ce2afbfd","width":"919","height":"518"},{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7d994e7304c11970ed9e94fcf432f3ea","width":"931","height":"521"}],"top":1,"highlighted":2,"essential":2,"paper":2,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/372392815","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":5,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1496,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":344535278,"gmtCreate":1618414317894,"gmtModify":1618414317894,"author":{"id":"3553462730947141","authorId":"3553462730947141","name":"4ba6ec5c","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3553462730947141","idStr":"3553462730947141"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"言之有理","listText":"言之有理","text":"言之有理","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/344535278","repostId":"2127255041","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":612,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":355885179,"gmtCreate":1617060784691,"gmtModify":1617060784691,"author":{"id":"3553462730947141","authorId":"3553462730947141","name":"4ba6ec5c","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3553462730947141","idStr":"3553462730947141"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ark 这两天分别再进百度","listText":"Ark 这两天分别再进百度","text":"Ark 这两天分别再进百度","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/355885179","repostId":"355032489","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":355032489,"gmtCreate":1617011340000,"gmtModify":1617018325753,"author":{"id":"3524030243818067","authorId":"3524030243818067","name":"巴伦周刊","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a88e8bd37e8c66a6dfdca78e1466369","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3524030243818067","idStr":"3524030243818067"},"themes":[],"title":"史上最大单日亏损?中概股暴跌的传闻与事实","htmlText":"文 | 《巴伦周刊》中文版撰稿人 彭韧 编辑 | 康娟 许多信息来自于碎片、流言和报道,以及圈内朋友的讨论,我们将它们串联成了一幅有逻辑联系的拼图。 从3月24日开始,部分中概股发生诡异暴跌,之所以说诡异,是因为跌幅巨大而且走势异常一致:爱奇艺、唯品会和腾讯音乐都是在几天内跌去近半,跟谁学更是一天内就完成腰斩,而同期大盘相对稳定,于是市场开始浮现不少传闻,周末一篇名为《人类史上最大单日亏损》的文章在网络刷屏,长相酷似岳云鹏的韩国人Bill Hwang和他的家族办公室Archegos Capital浮出海面。 不过,到目前为止,所有关于Bill Hwang和Archegos Capital的报道都是基于一些坊间传闻和不明消息源的猜测,尽管这些猜测逻辑缜密,合丝严缝,同时也能够获得股价走势的佐证,但它们仍然只是猜测。《巴伦周刊》中文版与最早分析此事的大V之一、资深美股投资人陈达聊了聊近日中概股的诡异走势,以及它对于投资者的警示。 图:Bill Hwang,图源网络 《巴伦周刊》中文版:上周部分中概股发生暴跌,但这一轮下跌跟去年三月的全市场大跌并不一样,暴跌集中在中概股中的教育股、部分视频网站和百度、唯品会这几家公司,并没有扩大到所有中概股,而同期美股大盘也相对稳定,对于其背后的原因众说纷纭,比如有人认为跟SEC声称正开始推进《外国公司问责法案》有关,也有人指出这是由于某基金爆仓所导致的,您认为近期中概股异动背后是什么原因,或者说,我们现在真的能知道背后的原因吗? 陈达:我们先来梳理一下事实的时间线。首先是在3月23日左右,交易圈里爆出高盛正在为一宗美股大宗交易( block trade)寻找买家,这笔大宗交易包含1000万股百度,185美元到市价出;5000万股腾讯音乐,17.6美元到市价出,3200万股唯品会,27.6美元到市价出,这笔大宗交易不但交易量极大,而且都比当时的市","listText":"文 | 《巴伦周刊》中文版撰稿人 彭韧 编辑 | 康娟 许多信息来自于碎片、流言和报道,以及圈内朋友的讨论,我们将它们串联成了一幅有逻辑联系的拼图。 从3月24日开始,部分中概股发生诡异暴跌,之所以说诡异,是因为跌幅巨大而且走势异常一致:爱奇艺、唯品会和腾讯音乐都是在几天内跌去近半,跟谁学更是一天内就完成腰斩,而同期大盘相对稳定,于是市场开始浮现不少传闻,周末一篇名为《人类史上最大单日亏损》的文章在网络刷屏,长相酷似岳云鹏的韩国人Bill Hwang和他的家族办公室Archegos Capital浮出海面。 不过,到目前为止,所有关于Bill Hwang和Archegos Capital的报道都是基于一些坊间传闻和不明消息源的猜测,尽管这些猜测逻辑缜密,合丝严缝,同时也能够获得股价走势的佐证,但它们仍然只是猜测。《巴伦周刊》中文版与最早分析此事的大V之一、资深美股投资人陈达聊了聊近日中概股的诡异走势,以及它对于投资者的警示。 图:Bill Hwang,图源网络 《巴伦周刊》中文版:上周部分中概股发生暴跌,但这一轮下跌跟去年三月的全市场大跌并不一样,暴跌集中在中概股中的教育股、部分视频网站和百度、唯品会这几家公司,并没有扩大到所有中概股,而同期美股大盘也相对稳定,对于其背后的原因众说纷纭,比如有人认为跟SEC声称正开始推进《外国公司问责法案》有关,也有人指出这是由于某基金爆仓所导致的,您认为近期中概股异动背后是什么原因,或者说,我们现在真的能知道背后的原因吗? 陈达:我们先来梳理一下事实的时间线。首先是在3月23日左右,交易圈里爆出高盛正在为一宗美股大宗交易( block trade)寻找买家,这笔大宗交易包含1000万股百度,185美元到市价出;5000万股腾讯音乐,17.6美元到市价出,3200万股唯品会,27.6美元到市价出,这笔大宗交易不但交易量极大,而且都比当时的市","text":"文 | 《巴伦周刊》中文版撰稿人 彭韧 编辑 | 康娟 许多信息来自于碎片、流言和报道,以及圈内朋友的讨论,我们将它们串联成了一幅有逻辑联系的拼图。 从3月24日开始,部分中概股发生诡异暴跌,之所以说诡异,是因为跌幅巨大而且走势异常一致:爱奇艺、唯品会和腾讯音乐都是在几天内跌去近半,跟谁学更是一天内就完成腰斩,而同期大盘相对稳定,于是市场开始浮现不少传闻,周末一篇名为《人类史上最大单日亏损》的文章在网络刷屏,长相酷似岳云鹏的韩国人Bill Hwang和他的家族办公室Archegos Capital浮出海面。 不过,到目前为止,所有关于Bill Hwang和Archegos Capital的报道都是基于一些坊间传闻和不明消息源的猜测,尽管这些猜测逻辑缜密,合丝严缝,同时也能够获得股价走势的佐证,但它们仍然只是猜测。《巴伦周刊》中文版与最早分析此事的大V之一、资深美股投资人陈达聊了聊近日中概股的诡异走势,以及它对于投资者的警示。 图:Bill Hwang,图源网络 《巴伦周刊》中文版:上周部分中概股发生暴跌,但这一轮下跌跟去年三月的全市场大跌并不一样,暴跌集中在中概股中的教育股、部分视频网站和百度、唯品会这几家公司,并没有扩大到所有中概股,而同期美股大盘也相对稳定,对于其背后的原因众说纷纭,比如有人认为跟SEC声称正开始推进《外国公司问责法案》有关,也有人指出这是由于某基金爆仓所导致的,您认为近期中概股异动背后是什么原因,或者说,我们现在真的能知道背后的原因吗? 陈达:我们先来梳理一下事实的时间线。首先是在3月23日左右,交易圈里爆出高盛正在为一宗美股大宗交易( block trade)寻找买家,这笔大宗交易包含1000万股百度,185美元到市价出;5000万股腾讯音乐,17.6美元到市价出,3200万股唯品会,27.6美元到市价出,这笔大宗交易不但交易量极大,而且都比当时的市","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/90e72b5ee284418892b301bbe3653c3e","width":"1080","height":"720"}],"top":1,"highlighted":2,"essential":2,"paper":2,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/355032489","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":2,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1707,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":352982292,"gmtCreate":1616859164216,"gmtModify":1616859164216,"author":{"id":"3553462730947141","authorId":"3553462730947141","name":"4ba6ec5c","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3553462730947141","idStr":"3553462730947141"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"价值和价格的作用力与反作用力","listText":"价值和价格的作用力与反作用力","text":"价值和价格的作用力与反作用力","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/352982292","repostId":"356317948","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":356317948,"gmtCreate":1616755677484,"gmtModify":1616756010753,"author":{"id":"3497328009582754","authorId":"3497328009582754","name":"桃李春风益点财","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/dc8827e0d2ccb8087a4e15cbe447ad5c","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3497328009582754","idStr":"3497328009582754"},"themes":[],"title":"基金经理们极端转向价值股,该抛掉科技股、中概股、成长股吗?","htmlText":"本文聚焦: 基金经理们极端押注价值股未来,对成长股失去信心 贝瑞研究历史量化统计分析,成长股不一定输 注:区分成长股与价值股,一般从每股收益和净资产收益率、每股营收三个指标来判定。前两者高的是成长股,低的是价值股。成长股是指处于飞速发展阶段的公司所发行的股票。成长性股票多为普通股,专指那些虽不见得立即就能获得高额股利或其他优惠条件,但未来前景看好的股票。成长股一般规模相对较小,处于持续上升的过程中,市场参与的长期投资者居多。价值股是指相对于它们的现有业绩收益,股价被低估的一类股票。这类股票通常具有低市盈率与市净率、高股息的特征。价值股一般规模相对较大、稳定性较强,市场参与的中短期投资者居多。贝瑞研究声明:文中观点基于公开市场信息及数据,分析观点仅供交流,据此操作后果自负,如有疑问,欢迎留言。一、基金经理们极端押注价值股未来,对成长股失去信心近期, 纳指从2月中旬到3月8日的大约三周内下跌了10%。之后,科技股为主的指数开始反弹,纳斯达克指数自3月份短期触底以来也上涨了5%。根据彭博数据,近几周来价值股连续吸引资金流入,追踪价值投资的ETF已经连续10周迎来新资金;11月初以来,资金流入和市场反弹推动该部分资产增长1000亿美元。更多资金也正在来的路上。彭博表示,这类追踪价值投资的ETF产品有望在本季度获得有史以来表现最好的资金流入。此外,本周我们关注到了基金经理投资理念的重大转变。不过,一些基金经理正对成长型股票失去信心。在接受美国银行基金经理调查的基金经理中,超过52%的人预期后续一年价值股将跑赢成长股。美国银行美林证券全球基金经理调查报告上周出炉,这份报告调查了大约200个管理着6300亿美元总资产的基金经理。透过这份调查报告,我们深入了解到这些职业基金经理对市场的看法。如今,他们中的大多数人正从成长型股转向价值型股。就连“女版巴菲特,”牛市女皇Cathie Wood的","listText":"本文聚焦: 基金经理们极端押注价值股未来,对成长股失去信心 贝瑞研究历史量化统计分析,成长股不一定输 注:区分成长股与价值股,一般从每股收益和净资产收益率、每股营收三个指标来判定。前两者高的是成长股,低的是价值股。成长股是指处于飞速发展阶段的公司所发行的股票。成长性股票多为普通股,专指那些虽不见得立即就能获得高额股利或其他优惠条件,但未来前景看好的股票。成长股一般规模相对较小,处于持续上升的过程中,市场参与的长期投资者居多。价值股是指相对于它们的现有业绩收益,股价被低估的一类股票。这类股票通常具有低市盈率与市净率、高股息的特征。价值股一般规模相对较大、稳定性较强,市场参与的中短期投资者居多。贝瑞研究声明:文中观点基于公开市场信息及数据,分析观点仅供交流,据此操作后果自负,如有疑问,欢迎留言。一、基金经理们极端押注价值股未来,对成长股失去信心近期, 纳指从2月中旬到3月8日的大约三周内下跌了10%。之后,科技股为主的指数开始反弹,纳斯达克指数自3月份短期触底以来也上涨了5%。根据彭博数据,近几周来价值股连续吸引资金流入,追踪价值投资的ETF已经连续10周迎来新资金;11月初以来,资金流入和市场反弹推动该部分资产增长1000亿美元。更多资金也正在来的路上。彭博表示,这类追踪价值投资的ETF产品有望在本季度获得有史以来表现最好的资金流入。此外,本周我们关注到了基金经理投资理念的重大转变。不过,一些基金经理正对成长型股票失去信心。在接受美国银行基金经理调查的基金经理中,超过52%的人预期后续一年价值股将跑赢成长股。美国银行美林证券全球基金经理调查报告上周出炉,这份报告调查了大约200个管理着6300亿美元总资产的基金经理。透过这份调查报告,我们深入了解到这些职业基金经理对市场的看法。如今,他们中的大多数人正从成长型股转向价值型股。就连“女版巴菲特,”牛市女皇Cathie Wood的","text":"本文聚焦: 基金经理们极端押注价值股未来,对成长股失去信心 贝瑞研究历史量化统计分析,成长股不一定输 注:区分成长股与价值股,一般从每股收益和净资产收益率、每股营收三个指标来判定。前两者高的是成长股,低的是价值股。成长股是指处于飞速发展阶段的公司所发行的股票。成长性股票多为普通股,专指那些虽不见得立即就能获得高额股利或其他优惠条件,但未来前景看好的股票。成长股一般规模相对较小,处于持续上升的过程中,市场参与的长期投资者居多。价值股是指相对于它们的现有业绩收益,股价被低估的一类股票。这类股票通常具有低市盈率与市净率、高股息的特征。价值股一般规模相对较大、稳定性较强,市场参与的中短期投资者居多。贝瑞研究声明:文中观点基于公开市场信息及数据,分析观点仅供交流,据此操作后果自负,如有疑问,欢迎留言。一、基金经理们极端押注价值股未来,对成长股失去信心近期, 纳指从2月中旬到3月8日的大约三周内下跌了10%。之后,科技股为主的指数开始反弹,纳斯达克指数自3月份短期触底以来也上涨了5%。根据彭博数据,近几周来价值股连续吸引资金流入,追踪价值投资的ETF已经连续10周迎来新资金;11月初以来,资金流入和市场反弹推动该部分资产增长1000亿美元。更多资金也正在来的路上。彭博表示,这类追踪价值投资的ETF产品有望在本季度获得有史以来表现最好的资金流入。此外,本周我们关注到了基金经理投资理念的重大转变。不过,一些基金经理正对成长型股票失去信心。在接受美国银行基金经理调查的基金经理中,超过52%的人预期后续一年价值股将跑赢成长股。美国银行美林证券全球基金经理调查报告上周出炉,这份报告调查了大约200个管理着6300亿美元总资产的基金经理。透过这份调查报告,我们深入了解到这些职业基金经理对市场的看法。如今,他们中的大多数人正从成长型股转向价值型股。就连“女版巴菲特,”牛市女皇Cathie Wood的","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8dfbbac69962f17b86cdbfcd0f16209f","width":"605","height":"401"},{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4ec3e6b06e0adbb6b57e3e4efc698625","width":"502","height":"129"},{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7ec5cdd952fdeb0740ae3b4598076683","width":"1020","height":"1350"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":2,"paper":2,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/356317948","isVote":2,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"vote":{"id":1390,"gmtBegin":1616755677481,"gmtEnd":1617360254448,"type":1,"upper":1,"title":"后续你认为是价值股还是成长股的胜算更大?","choices":[{"id":5166,"sort":1,"name":"价值股","userSize":13,"voted":false},{"id":5167,"sort":2,"name":"成长股","userSize":23,"voted":false},{"id":5168,"sort":3,"name":"还不清楚","userSize":3,"voted":false}]},"comments":[],"imageCount":3,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":930,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":353484279,"gmtCreate":1616513288591,"gmtModify":1616513288591,"author":{"id":"3553462730947141","authorId":"3553462730947141","name":"4ba6ec5c","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3553462730947141","idStr":"3553462730947141"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[财迷]","listText":"[财迷]","text":"[财迷]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/353484279","repostId":"1137063642","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1137063642","pubTimestamp":1616505836,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1137063642?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-23 21:23","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Jury out on whether ARK Innovation returns are due to Cathie Wood’s skill or luck","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1137063642","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"Statistical scrutiny brings this high-flying ETF down to earth\nYou could have performed as well as t","content":"<p>Statistical scrutiny brings this high-flying ETF down to earth</p>\n<p>You could have performed as well as the high-flying ARK Innovation ETF by investing in the Nasdaq 100 Index.</p>\n<p>I know that seems hard to believe, given the stunning performance chief investment officer Cathie Wood has produced with ARK Innovation— a 229% gain over the past year, according to FactSet. Meanwhile, the Invesco QQQ Trust (which is benchmarked to the Nasdaq 100), gained 78%. Since its creation in October 2014, ARK Innovation has produced an annualized gain of 34.6%, versus 20.6% for the QQQ.</p>\n<p>At the same time, ARK Innovation has been extremely volatile and risky, making an apples-to-apples comparison with the Nasdaq 100 misleading. As measured by the standard deviation of monthly returns, ARK Innovation has been 73% more volatile than QQQ. That’s really saying something, since QQQ is itself more volatile than broad market indices such as the S&P 500.</p>\n<p>One approach statisticians use to create an apples-to-apples comparison is with a metric known as the Sharpe Ratio, invented by William Sharpe, the 1990 Nobel laureate in economics. It is the ratio of a fund’s average returns to the standard deviation of those returns. The Sharpe Ratio of ARK Innovation’s monthly returns since 2014 is almost precisely the same as the QQQ’s.</p>\n<p>If you’re like some of my clients, your reaction is not to care about the Sharpe Ratio. “You can’t take the Sharpe Ratio to the bank,” you in effect tell me. It’s raw performance that counts, and on that basis there’s no doubt that the ARKK did far better.</p>\n<p>This reaction is confused, however. In fact you can take the Sharpe Ratio to the bank. If you had been willing to incur the ARK Innovation’s increased volatility, you could have made just as much by leveraging an investment in the QQQ. That is, you would have made just as much by increasing your portfolio allocation to QQQ, or by buying it on sufficient margin. This is illustrated in the chart below:</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13b81e9f1962e464faeb2d45cdd0e5f9\" tg-width=\"1260\" tg-height=\"849\"></p>\n<p>The Sharpe Ratio is not the only method that statisticians employ for measuring adviser performance on a level playing field, but other widely used approaches reach the same conclusion. Perhaps the best known, at least in academic circles, is the Fama-French factor model, named for University of Chicago finance professor Eugene Fama (the 2013 Nobel laureate in economics) and Dartmouth College professor Ken French. Their model involves an econometric test to see if a mutual fund’s return is significantly better than a combination of index funds benchmarked to factors such as small-cap, growth, and momentum.</p>\n<p>The answer for ARK Innovation is “no” — an overweight allocation to a small-cap growth fund would have produced the same overall return since November 2014.</p>\n<p><b>Luck versus skill</b></p>\n<p>Note carefully that these statistical tests do not prove that ARK Innovation’s performance is due solely to luck. Instead, those tests tell us that we cannot conclude that its performance was not due to luck. In this case, the double negative is not the same as the positive; this is a subtle, but important, difference.</p>\n<p>This goes to show just how difficult it is to prove that an investment manager has genuine market-beating ability. If beating an index fund by more than 10 percentage points annualized over a 6-plus-year period is not enough, then what is? (An email to ARK Investment Management requesting comment was not immediately answered.)</p>\n<p>The answer: Satisfying traditional standards of statistical significance requires beating the market by a larger amount over a much longer period.</p>\n<p>An example of a fund that does jump over this much-higher hurdle is Renaissance Technologies’ Medallion Fund, a hedge fund that has produced an incredible 39% annualized return over the 33 calendar years through 2020, versus “just” 11% annualized for an index fund. Bradford Cornell, an emeritus finance professor at UCLA, told me in an interview that it is impossible to attribute that fund’s outperformance to mere luck. (Unfortunately, this fund is only available to current and former partners at Renaissance Technologies.)</p>\n<p>In the meantime, it’s too early to render anything close to a final verdict on ARK Innovation’s stunning performance. Its performance over the next several years may prove to be good enough to eventually satisfy traditional standards of statistical significance. Until then we can’t be sure. This is yet another reason why index funds are the default investment of choice.</p>","source":"market_watch","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Jury out on whether ARK Innovation returns are due to Cathie Wood’s skill or luck</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nJury out on whether ARK Innovation returns are due to Cathie Wood’s skill or luck\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-23 21:23 GMT+8 <a href=https://www.marketwatch.com/story/the-jury-is-out-on-whether-ark-innovations-red-hot-returns-are-due-to-cathie-woods-skill-or-luck-11616460092?mod=home-page><strong>MarketWatch</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Statistical scrutiny brings this high-flying ETF down to earth\nYou could have performed as well as the high-flying ARK Innovation ETF by investing in the Nasdaq 100 Index.\nI know that seems hard to ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/the-jury-is-out-on-whether-ark-innovations-red-hot-returns-are-due-to-cathie-woods-skill-or-luck-11616460092?mod=home-page\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/the-jury-is-out-on-whether-ark-innovations-red-hot-returns-are-due-to-cathie-woods-skill-or-luck-11616460092?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/599a65733b8245fcf7868668ef9ad712","article_id":"1137063642","content_text":"Statistical scrutiny brings this high-flying ETF down to earth\nYou could have performed as well as the high-flying ARK Innovation ETF by investing in the Nasdaq 100 Index.\nI know that seems hard to believe, given the stunning performance chief investment officer Cathie Wood has produced with ARK Innovation— a 229% gain over the past year, according to FactSet. Meanwhile, the Invesco QQQ Trust (which is benchmarked to the Nasdaq 100), gained 78%. Since its creation in October 2014, ARK Innovation has produced an annualized gain of 34.6%, versus 20.6% for the QQQ.\nAt the same time, ARK Innovation has been extremely volatile and risky, making an apples-to-apples comparison with the Nasdaq 100 misleading. As measured by the standard deviation of monthly returns, ARK Innovation has been 73% more volatile than QQQ. That’s really saying something, since QQQ is itself more volatile than broad market indices such as the S&P 500.\nOne approach statisticians use to create an apples-to-apples comparison is with a metric known as the Sharpe Ratio, invented by William Sharpe, the 1990 Nobel laureate in economics. It is the ratio of a fund’s average returns to the standard deviation of those returns. The Sharpe Ratio of ARK Innovation’s monthly returns since 2014 is almost precisely the same as the QQQ’s.\nIf you’re like some of my clients, your reaction is not to care about the Sharpe Ratio. “You can’t take the Sharpe Ratio to the bank,” you in effect tell me. It’s raw performance that counts, and on that basis there’s no doubt that the ARKK did far better.\nThis reaction is confused, however. In fact you can take the Sharpe Ratio to the bank. If you had been willing to incur the ARK Innovation’s increased volatility, you could have made just as much by leveraging an investment in the QQQ. That is, you would have made just as much by increasing your portfolio allocation to QQQ, or by buying it on sufficient margin. This is illustrated in the chart below:\n\nThe Sharpe Ratio is not the only method that statisticians employ for measuring adviser performance on a level playing field, but other widely used approaches reach the same conclusion. Perhaps the best known, at least in academic circles, is the Fama-French factor model, named for University of Chicago finance professor Eugene Fama (the 2013 Nobel laureate in economics) and Dartmouth College professor Ken French. Their model involves an econometric test to see if a mutual fund’s return is significantly better than a combination of index funds benchmarked to factors such as small-cap, growth, and momentum.\nThe answer for ARK Innovation is “no” — an overweight allocation to a small-cap growth fund would have produced the same overall return since November 2014.\nLuck versus skill\nNote carefully that these statistical tests do not prove that ARK Innovation’s performance is due solely to luck. Instead, those tests tell us that we cannot conclude that its performance was not due to luck. In this case, the double negative is not the same as the positive; this is a subtle, but important, difference.\nThis goes to show just how difficult it is to prove that an investment manager has genuine market-beating ability. If beating an index fund by more than 10 percentage points annualized over a 6-plus-year period is not enough, then what is? (An email to ARK Investment Management requesting comment was not immediately answered.)\nThe answer: Satisfying traditional standards of statistical significance requires beating the market by a larger amount over a much longer period.\nAn example of a fund that does jump over this much-higher hurdle is Renaissance Technologies’ Medallion Fund, a hedge fund that has produced an incredible 39% annualized return over the 33 calendar years through 2020, versus “just” 11% annualized for an index fund. Bradford Cornell, an emeritus finance professor at UCLA, told me in an interview that it is impossible to attribute that fund’s outperformance to mere luck. (Unfortunately, this fund is only available to current and former partners at Renaissance Technologies.)\nIn the meantime, it’s too early to render anything close to a final verdict on ARK Innovation’s stunning performance. Its performance over the next several years may prove to be good enough to eventually satisfy traditional standards of statistical significance. Until then we can’t be sure. This is yet another reason why index funds are the default investment of choice.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1213,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":359445568,"gmtCreate":1616421959754,"gmtModify":1616421959754,"author":{"id":"3553462730947141","authorId":"3553462730947141","name":"4ba6ec5c","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3553462730947141","idStr":"3553462730947141"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"想要数据。。。谢谢啦","listText":"想要数据。。。谢谢啦","text":"想要数据。。。谢谢啦","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/359445568","repostId":"359930717","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":359930717,"gmtCreate":1616315117739,"gmtModify":1616424775606,"author":{"id":"3498793713433943","authorId":"3498793713433943","name":"瓦砾村夫","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/63e7d31ba0d8809e3bc841623b7e641f","crmLevel":8,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3498793713433943","idStr":"3498793713433943"},"themes":[],"title":"木头姐最新特斯拉目标价的几个问题","htmlText":"今天把ARK新的<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">$特斯拉(TSLA)$</a> 目标价文章和他们同时公布的估价模型源文件看了一遍(excel源文件大家可以在github上搜Ark Tesla Price,也可以私信找我要)。和去年类似,他们的模型首先设定了一些关键指标,同时给出了指标的预估范围这里的bear case假设最大毛利率40%,单车制造资本支出8000刀,最大年度产能增长率65%,从而2025年产销550万辆+。2025年,有40%的车用于人工驾驶的出租车,全自动驾驶未实现,从而robotaxi比例为0%。这个参数组合推导出的2025年股价为1500+。Bull case假设最大毛利率25%,单车制造资本支出6000刀,最大年度年度产能增长90%,从而2025年产销1000万辆+。2025年全自动驾驶车辆(robotaxi)比例60%(虽然标注的用于人工驾驶的出租车比例仍然为40%,但在自动驾驶实现的前提下,这个比例会在模型里被抹成0%)。这个参数组合推导出的2025年股价为4000+。以这两组为基准,在更大的参数范围内模拟四万次,得到的2025平均股价预期为3000。概率/估值曲线如下图这里有几个问题:1/ 这次的估值模型新增了特斯拉自营保险业务(Tesla Insurance)。这块的模型没太看懂,有了解的朋友可以分享下。方舟的结论是,2025年保险业务的营收,bear case为230亿,bull case为60亿(如果robotaxi实现,用户缴纳的平台叫车费用中会包含保费)不过无论怎样,保险这部分业务对估值的贡献比不高。2/ 这次的估值模型没有包含特斯拉电池/太阳能业务。方舟做了简单的","listText":"今天把ARK新的<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">$特斯拉(TSLA)$</a> 目标价文章和他们同时公布的估价模型源文件看了一遍(excel源文件大家可以在github上搜Ark Tesla Price,也可以私信找我要)。和去年类似,他们的模型首先设定了一些关键指标,同时给出了指标的预估范围这里的bear case假设最大毛利率40%,单车制造资本支出8000刀,最大年度产能增长率65%,从而2025年产销550万辆+。2025年,有40%的车用于人工驾驶的出租车,全自动驾驶未实现,从而robotaxi比例为0%。这个参数组合推导出的2025年股价为1500+。Bull case假设最大毛利率25%,单车制造资本支出6000刀,最大年度年度产能增长90%,从而2025年产销1000万辆+。2025年全自动驾驶车辆(robotaxi)比例60%(虽然标注的用于人工驾驶的出租车比例仍然为40%,但在自动驾驶实现的前提下,这个比例会在模型里被抹成0%)。这个参数组合推导出的2025年股价为4000+。以这两组为基准,在更大的参数范围内模拟四万次,得到的2025平均股价预期为3000。概率/估值曲线如下图这里有几个问题:1/ 这次的估值模型新增了特斯拉自营保险业务(Tesla Insurance)。这块的模型没太看懂,有了解的朋友可以分享下。方舟的结论是,2025年保险业务的营收,bear case为230亿,bull case为60亿(如果robotaxi实现,用户缴纳的平台叫车费用中会包含保费)不过无论怎样,保险这部分业务对估值的贡献比不高。2/ 这次的估值模型没有包含特斯拉电池/太阳能业务。方舟做了简单的","text":"今天把ARK新的$特斯拉(TSLA)$ 目标价文章和他们同时公布的估价模型源文件看了一遍(excel源文件大家可以在github上搜Ark Tesla Price,也可以私信找我要)。和去年类似,他们的模型首先设定了一些关键指标,同时给出了指标的预估范围这里的bear case假设最大毛利率40%,单车制造资本支出8000刀,最大年度产能增长率65%,从而2025年产销550万辆+。2025年,有40%的车用于人工驾驶的出租车,全自动驾驶未实现,从而robotaxi比例为0%。这个参数组合推导出的2025年股价为1500+。Bull case假设最大毛利率25%,单车制造资本支出6000刀,最大年度年度产能增长90%,从而2025年产销1000万辆+。2025年全自动驾驶车辆(robotaxi)比例60%(虽然标注的用于人工驾驶的出租车比例仍然为40%,但在自动驾驶实现的前提下,这个比例会在模型里被抹成0%)。这个参数组合推导出的2025年股价为4000+。以这两组为基准,在更大的参数范围内模拟四万次,得到的2025平均股价预期为3000。概率/估值曲线如下图这里有几个问题:1/ 这次的估值模型新增了特斯拉自营保险业务(Tesla Insurance)。这块的模型没太看懂,有了解的朋友可以分享下。方舟的结论是,2025年保险业务的营收,bear case为230亿,bull case为60亿(如果robotaxi实现,用户缴纳的平台叫车费用中会包含保费)不过无论怎样,保险这部分业务对估值的贡献比不高。2/ 这次的估值模型没有包含特斯拉电池/太阳能业务。方舟做了简单的","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/72bd757017827290c984322a23efe95f","width":"688","height":"405"}],"top":1,"highlighted":2,"essential":2,"paper":2,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/359930717","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":4,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1636,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":359435731,"gmtCreate":1616419442523,"gmtModify":1616419442523,"author":{"id":"3553462730947141","authorId":"3553462730947141","name":"4ba6ec5c","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3553462730947141","idStr":"3553462730947141"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"大数据","listText":"大数据","text":"大数据","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/359435731","repostId":"327336694","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":327336694,"gmtCreate":1616057893918,"gmtModify":1703496993276,"author":{"id":"21347731130544","authorId":"21347731130544","name":"价值投资为王","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/89ffffc59ff9ac9cb9cb74f596418d44","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"21347731130544","idStr":"21347731130544"},"themes":[],"title":"大胆预言,核心资产大底初现!","htmlText":"经过3月初的一波狂跌,以农夫山泉为代表的高估值龙头股,一口气大跌了近40%!这阵仗,让刚刚形成龙头股信仰的韭菜们慌了,诸多基金经理已被骂出内伤,以至于目前新发基金的建仓比例不足5%!被吓傻的不止韭菜,还有爱护羽毛的基金经理们!但根据我初步的测算,以农夫山泉、药明生物等龙头股为代表的核心资产,估值已来到合理区间,龙头股的大底已经初步显现!在预言之前,先回顾下泡沫破裂前的提示,也算是给本次预测做个背书,详细可见今年1月8日发布的文章《<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/TW/336291208\" target=\"_blank\">100倍PE的农夫山泉还甜不甜?</a>》,当时对农夫的判断摘抄如下:“不考虑收购因素,农夫的估值已经透支了未来3年。这三年内,流动性收紧或其他风险事件发生是大概率事件,因此,此时的农夫只有投机价值,若长期持有,风险收益比并不合适。”文章发布之后,农夫山泉第二天大跌6.9%,史无前例的泡沫从1月8日之后开始崩塌!能预测到泡沫破裂,这里或许能指点一下未来,即核心资产大底初现!理由1:腰斩是泡沫破裂见底的信号历史上,股市引发的泡沫破裂跌幅往往在腰斩附近。比如2008年金融危机期间,美股两大指数跌幅在55%左右;再如2015年后,上证指数从5178下跌至2440点,跌幅53%。再看几个极端案例:2007年,A股最高达到6124点,之后泡沫破裂,跌到1664点,跌幅72.8%;1999年,纳斯达克互联网泡沫破裂,指数从5132点跌到1108点,跌幅78.4%;上世纪90年度,台湾股市大崩盘,指数从12495点跌到2560点,跌幅79.5%;1929美国大萧条,指数从386点跌到40点,跌幅89%!这几个案例都是极端情况,且泡沫膨胀程度可以载入史册,而农夫山泉的泡沫程度,显然比不上6124、更别提1929了。甚至,农夫山泉的泡沫程度无论是涨幅还","listText":"经过3月初的一波狂跌,以农夫山泉为代表的高估值龙头股,一口气大跌了近40%!这阵仗,让刚刚形成龙头股信仰的韭菜们慌了,诸多基金经理已被骂出内伤,以至于目前新发基金的建仓比例不足5%!被吓傻的不止韭菜,还有爱护羽毛的基金经理们!但根据我初步的测算,以农夫山泉、药明生物等龙头股为代表的核心资产,估值已来到合理区间,龙头股的大底已经初步显现!在预言之前,先回顾下泡沫破裂前的提示,也算是给本次预测做个背书,详细可见今年1月8日发布的文章《<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/TW/336291208\" target=\"_blank\">100倍PE的农夫山泉还甜不甜?</a>》,当时对农夫的判断摘抄如下:“不考虑收购因素,农夫的估值已经透支了未来3年。这三年内,流动性收紧或其他风险事件发生是大概率事件,因此,此时的农夫只有投机价值,若长期持有,风险收益比并不合适。”文章发布之后,农夫山泉第二天大跌6.9%,史无前例的泡沫从1月8日之后开始崩塌!能预测到泡沫破裂,这里或许能指点一下未来,即核心资产大底初现!理由1:腰斩是泡沫破裂见底的信号历史上,股市引发的泡沫破裂跌幅往往在腰斩附近。比如2008年金融危机期间,美股两大指数跌幅在55%左右;再如2015年后,上证指数从5178下跌至2440点,跌幅53%。再看几个极端案例:2007年,A股最高达到6124点,之后泡沫破裂,跌到1664点,跌幅72.8%;1999年,纳斯达克互联网泡沫破裂,指数从5132点跌到1108点,跌幅78.4%;上世纪90年度,台湾股市大崩盘,指数从12495点跌到2560点,跌幅79.5%;1929美国大萧条,指数从386点跌到40点,跌幅89%!这几个案例都是极端情况,且泡沫膨胀程度可以载入史册,而农夫山泉的泡沫程度,显然比不上6124、更别提1929了。甚至,农夫山泉的泡沫程度无论是涨幅还","text":"经过3月初的一波狂跌,以农夫山泉为代表的高估值龙头股,一口气大跌了近40%!这阵仗,让刚刚形成龙头股信仰的韭菜们慌了,诸多基金经理已被骂出内伤,以至于目前新发基金的建仓比例不足5%!被吓傻的不止韭菜,还有爱护羽毛的基金经理们!但根据我初步的测算,以农夫山泉、药明生物等龙头股为代表的核心资产,估值已来到合理区间,龙头股的大底已经初步显现!在预言之前,先回顾下泡沫破裂前的提示,也算是给本次预测做个背书,详细可见今年1月8日发布的文章《100倍PE的农夫山泉还甜不甜?》,当时对农夫的判断摘抄如下:“不考虑收购因素,农夫的估值已经透支了未来3年。这三年内,流动性收紧或其他风险事件发生是大概率事件,因此,此时的农夫只有投机价值,若长期持有,风险收益比并不合适。”文章发布之后,农夫山泉第二天大跌6.9%,史无前例的泡沫从1月8日之后开始崩塌!能预测到泡沫破裂,这里或许能指点一下未来,即核心资产大底初现!理由1:腰斩是泡沫破裂见底的信号历史上,股市引发的泡沫破裂跌幅往往在腰斩附近。比如2008年金融危机期间,美股两大指数跌幅在55%左右;再如2015年后,上证指数从5178下跌至2440点,跌幅53%。再看几个极端案例:2007年,A股最高达到6124点,之后泡沫破裂,跌到1664点,跌幅72.8%;1999年,纳斯达克互联网泡沫破裂,指数从5132点跌到1108点,跌幅78.4%;上世纪90年度,台湾股市大崩盘,指数从12495点跌到2560点,跌幅79.5%;1929美国大萧条,指数从386点跌到40点,跌幅89%!这几个案例都是极端情况,且泡沫膨胀程度可以载入史册,而农夫山泉的泡沫程度,显然比不上6124、更别提1929了。甚至,农夫山泉的泡沫程度无论是涨幅还","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/708f346808b4588e6fb6cf570c93b4ed","width":"688","height":"254"}],"top":1,"highlighted":2,"essential":2,"paper":2,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/327336694","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":2,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1141,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":359097254,"gmtCreate":1616298257078,"gmtModify":1616298257078,"author":{"id":"3553462730947141","authorId":"3553462730947141","name":"4ba6ec5c","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3553462730947141","idStr":"3553462730947141"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"想了想,还是说下吧:一个希望。假设之前是对的话,那A50极有可能在下周结束下跌,并开始修复(动态中仍存隐忧,美债利率从长期看,进入上升通道,所以消化和修复也是个漫长的过程)。 短周级别可以入场做多a50,茅台稳住,A50稳住。(A50杀估值+中美会谈之前的不确定性是一个短空策略基础,目前差不多结束了)# 比起不确定性的合作# 腾讯看跌下周可以止盈# 激进点的话,tesla继续持有并加 4月份的call option#大宗商品,铜的路径相对清晰,中长看涨#黄金很尴尬#比特币没毛病","listText":"想了想,还是说下吧:一个希望。假设之前是对的话,那A50极有可能在下周结束下跌,并开始修复(动态中仍存隐忧,美债利率从长期看,进入上升通道,所以消化和修复也是个漫长的过程)。 短周级别可以入场做多a50,茅台稳住,A50稳住。(A50杀估值+中美会谈之前的不确定性是一个短空策略基础,目前差不多结束了)# 比起不确定性的合作# 腾讯看跌下周可以止盈# 激进点的话,tesla继续持有并加 4月份的call option#大宗商品,铜的路径相对清晰,中长看涨#黄金很尴尬#比特币没毛病","text":"想了想,还是说下吧:一个希望。假设之前是对的话,那A50极有可能在下周结束下跌,并开始修复(动态中仍存隐忧,美债利率从长期看,进入上升通道,所以消化和修复也是个漫长的过程)。 短周级别可以入场做多a50,茅台稳住,A50稳住。(A50杀估值+中美会谈之前的不确定性是一个短空策略基础,目前差不多结束了)# 比起不确定性的合作# 腾讯看跌下周可以止盈# 激进点的话,tesla继续持有并加 4月份的call option#大宗商品,铜的路径相对清晰,中长看涨#黄金很尴尬#比特币没毛病","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/359097254","repostId":"1105091378","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2452,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":326454969,"gmtCreate":1615701745651,"gmtModify":1703492237053,"author":{"id":"3553462730947141","authorId":"3553462730947141","name":"4ba6ec5c","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3553462730947141","idStr":"3553462730947141"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"这些因素不像积木那样可以累积起来, 他们更多是结构性自生和相互融合,最后成为精密的仪器。 真是太厉害了。 既反人性, 又反市场一般的神存在","listText":"这些因素不像积木那样可以累积起来, 他们更多是结构性自生和相互融合,最后成为精密的仪器。 真是太厉害了。 既反人性, 又反市场一般的神存在","text":"这些因素不像积木那样可以累积起来, 他们更多是结构性自生和相互融合,最后成为精密的仪器。 真是太厉害了。 既反人性, 又反市场一般的神存在","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/326454969","repostId":"320879364","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":320879364,"gmtCreate":1615085353358,"gmtModify":1703484605625,"author":{"id":"3473897258980608","authorId":"3473897258980608","name":"生财小王子","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a3dda8b36c8158f92ecbc8381b5c65c3","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3473897258980608","idStr":"3473897258980608"},"themes":[],"title":"你为什么永远不能成为巴菲特?马克·塞勒尔在哈佛大学的演讲","htmlText":"马克·塞勒尔——对冲基金Sellers Capital Fund创始人,曾在晨星担任首席股权战略师,本文为其2008年在哈佛所做演讲。马克·塞勒尔在哈佛大学演讲一、你几乎没有机会变成为大的投资者我即将告诉你们的是:我不是来教你们怎样成为一个伟大投资者的。相反,我是来告诉你们,为何你们中只有极少数人敢奢望成为这样的人。如果你花了足够的时间去研究查理·芒格、沃伦·巴菲特、布鲁斯·博克维茨、比尔·米勒、埃迪·兰伯特和比尔·阿克曼等投资界巨子,你们就会明白我是什么意思。我知道这里的每一个人都有超越常人的智力,并且是经过艰苦的努力才达到今天的水平。你们是聪明人中最聪明的人。不过,即便我今天说的其他东西你们都没听进去,至少应该记住一件事:你们几乎已经没有机会成为一个伟大的投资者。你们只有非常、非常低的可能性,比如2%,甚至更少。极少数人才能成为巴菲特芒格一样的投资者这已经考虑到你们都是高智商且工作努力的人,并且很快就能从这个国家最顶级的商学院之一拿到MBA学位的事实。如果在座的仅仅是从大量人口中随机抽取的一个样本,那么成为伟大投资者的可能性将会更小,比如5000分之一。你们会比一般投资者拥有更多优势,但长期来说你们几乎没有机会从人群中脱颖而出。其原因是,你的智商是多少、看过多少书报杂志、拥有或者在今后的职业中将拥有多少经验,都不起作用。很多人都有这些素质,但几乎没有人在整个职业生涯中使复合回报率达到20%或25%。我知道有人会不同意这个观点,我也无意冒犯在座诸位。我不是指着某个人说:“你几乎没有机会变得伟大了。” 这个房间中可能会出现一两个能在职业生涯中实现20%复合回报率的人,但在不了解你们的情况下很难提前断言那会是谁。往好的方面讲,虽然你们中的大多数人都无法在职业生涯中达到20%的复合回报率,但你们依然会比普通投资者做得好,因为你们是哈佛的MBA。二、哈佛这种高等教育只能培养出一般","listText":"马克·塞勒尔——对冲基金Sellers Capital Fund创始人,曾在晨星担任首席股权战略师,本文为其2008年在哈佛所做演讲。马克·塞勒尔在哈佛大学演讲一、你几乎没有机会变成为大的投资者我即将告诉你们的是:我不是来教你们怎样成为一个伟大投资者的。相反,我是来告诉你们,为何你们中只有极少数人敢奢望成为这样的人。如果你花了足够的时间去研究查理·芒格、沃伦·巴菲特、布鲁斯·博克维茨、比尔·米勒、埃迪·兰伯特和比尔·阿克曼等投资界巨子,你们就会明白我是什么意思。我知道这里的每一个人都有超越常人的智力,并且是经过艰苦的努力才达到今天的水平。你们是聪明人中最聪明的人。不过,即便我今天说的其他东西你们都没听进去,至少应该记住一件事:你们几乎已经没有机会成为一个伟大的投资者。你们只有非常、非常低的可能性,比如2%,甚至更少。极少数人才能成为巴菲特芒格一样的投资者这已经考虑到你们都是高智商且工作努力的人,并且很快就能从这个国家最顶级的商学院之一拿到MBA学位的事实。如果在座的仅仅是从大量人口中随机抽取的一个样本,那么成为伟大投资者的可能性将会更小,比如5000分之一。你们会比一般投资者拥有更多优势,但长期来说你们几乎没有机会从人群中脱颖而出。其原因是,你的智商是多少、看过多少书报杂志、拥有或者在今后的职业中将拥有多少经验,都不起作用。很多人都有这些素质,但几乎没有人在整个职业生涯中使复合回报率达到20%或25%。我知道有人会不同意这个观点,我也无意冒犯在座诸位。我不是指着某个人说:“你几乎没有机会变得伟大了。” 这个房间中可能会出现一两个能在职业生涯中实现20%复合回报率的人,但在不了解你们的情况下很难提前断言那会是谁。往好的方面讲,虽然你们中的大多数人都无法在职业生涯中达到20%的复合回报率,但你们依然会比普通投资者做得好,因为你们是哈佛的MBA。二、哈佛这种高等教育只能培养出一般","text":"马克·塞勒尔——对冲基金Sellers Capital Fund创始人,曾在晨星担任首席股权战略师,本文为其2008年在哈佛所做演讲。马克·塞勒尔在哈佛大学演讲一、你几乎没有机会变成为大的投资者我即将告诉你们的是:我不是来教你们怎样成为一个伟大投资者的。相反,我是来告诉你们,为何你们中只有极少数人敢奢望成为这样的人。如果你花了足够的时间去研究查理·芒格、沃伦·巴菲特、布鲁斯·博克维茨、比尔·米勒、埃迪·兰伯特和比尔·阿克曼等投资界巨子,你们就会明白我是什么意思。我知道这里的每一个人都有超越常人的智力,并且是经过艰苦的努力才达到今天的水平。你们是聪明人中最聪明的人。不过,即便我今天说的其他东西你们都没听进去,至少应该记住一件事:你们几乎已经没有机会成为一个伟大的投资者。你们只有非常、非常低的可能性,比如2%,甚至更少。极少数人才能成为巴菲特芒格一样的投资者这已经考虑到你们都是高智商且工作努力的人,并且很快就能从这个国家最顶级的商学院之一拿到MBA学位的事实。如果在座的仅仅是从大量人口中随机抽取的一个样本,那么成为伟大投资者的可能性将会更小,比如5000分之一。你们会比一般投资者拥有更多优势,但长期来说你们几乎没有机会从人群中脱颖而出。其原因是,你的智商是多少、看过多少书报杂志、拥有或者在今后的职业中将拥有多少经验,都不起作用。很多人都有这些素质,但几乎没有人在整个职业生涯中使复合回报率达到20%或25%。我知道有人会不同意这个观点,我也无意冒犯在座诸位。我不是指着某个人说:“你几乎没有机会变得伟大了。” 这个房间中可能会出现一两个能在职业生涯中实现20%复合回报率的人,但在不了解你们的情况下很难提前断言那会是谁。往好的方面讲,虽然你们中的大多数人都无法在职业生涯中达到20%的复合回报率,但你们依然会比普通投资者做得好,因为你们是哈佛的MBA。二、哈佛这种高等教育只能培养出一般","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/637f0843d78aae0ce26f38f56c7b9dde","width":"600","height":"338"},{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ea3e7f41a9af1961b0d2b47a18dee544","width":"1080","height":"620"},{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0211afa884316de29fa7099b640e9145","width":"1280","height":"852"}],"top":1,"highlighted":2,"essential":2,"paper":2,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/320879364","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":8,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1126,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":191971282,"gmtCreate":1620838375546,"gmtModify":1620913946278,"author":{"id":"3553462730947141","authorId":"3553462730947141","name":"4ba6ec5c","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3553462730947141","authorIdStr":"3553462730947141"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"理清了一个线。将两个之前弱相关东西,说清楚,分享给大家。。。一个是美股(就纳斯达克吧),一个是美元指数。 我的判断哦,和结论是,大方向最终会保 美元。1. 首先我很难去找到这两者的关联性。 但现在的情况是,这两者表现的都很弱。 尤其是美元指数,对一揽子货币是弱得不行。这才让,大宗商品价格的一路狂欢。2. 美股一周前很强,而这周开始几乎嗅到了崩盘的味道了(看tesla[偷笑])。我没依据说,是美元指数带崩了美股,但事实就是现在这样。3. 而目前这种双螺旋向下状态,是慢慢得到共识,难被打破。但她们不可能坐视不管,任由两者同向下坠。那美元指数下坠的影响大,还是股市下坠影响大? 这将是考验。 我只能说我的看法是,保美元。 美元一旦进入贬值节奏,将带崩经济面,抛美债,资本外流,面子挂不住,而且以美元(锚)计价的所有元素都会反方向上涨,原材料还会再涨,直到各大国考虑是否会脱钩美元,运回黄金(这个世界格局都要变了,会很夸张)。 里子也会崩,刚复苏的经济就因资金离开本国,而步履艰难。当然他们会关注的数据和经济增长方面会更多。而美股下跌,结束10多年的牛市,对本国经济面影响毕竟有限,可能这次会跌的很惨。 但没有国家因股市崩盘而,却有很多国家因货币崩盘而进入长期萧条的。那为何说,这两者不能同时保。 这是个好问题,我前面车里也在想。因为没辙了,已经量化宽松太久了,太多了,财政手段, 货币也没有空间(再印钱,带崩美元指数是大概率)。记得前几周吧,耶伦说,2023年前不加息, 但好像她前几天又说会提前加息。 不管怎么样, 加息就是以为着直接拉美元指数,并且从经济层面正式代表,美国的经济没问题。有色等周期品种将结束上涨周期,并且快速回落。比特币也偏悲观。 国内市场会独善其身吗?有可能。 甚至我们会看到,无论你持有什么资产品种,甚至毫无关联的交易品种,都会是同向大幅下跌,引发流动性风险。。。。(扯远了,","listText":"理清了一个线。将两个之前弱相关东西,说清楚,分享给大家。。。一个是美股(就纳斯达克吧),一个是美元指数。 我的判断哦,和结论是,大方向最终会保 美元。1. 首先我很难去找到这两者的关联性。 但现在的情况是,这两者表现的都很弱。 尤其是美元指数,对一揽子货币是弱得不行。这才让,大宗商品价格的一路狂欢。2. 美股一周前很强,而这周开始几乎嗅到了崩盘的味道了(看tesla[偷笑])。我没依据说,是美元指数带崩了美股,但事实就是现在这样。3. 而目前这种双螺旋向下状态,是慢慢得到共识,难被打破。但她们不可能坐视不管,任由两者同向下坠。那美元指数下坠的影响大,还是股市下坠影响大? 这将是考验。 我只能说我的看法是,保美元。 美元一旦进入贬值节奏,将带崩经济面,抛美债,资本外流,面子挂不住,而且以美元(锚)计价的所有元素都会反方向上涨,原材料还会再涨,直到各大国考虑是否会脱钩美元,运回黄金(这个世界格局都要变了,会很夸张)。 里子也会崩,刚复苏的经济就因资金离开本国,而步履艰难。当然他们会关注的数据和经济增长方面会更多。而美股下跌,结束10多年的牛市,对本国经济面影响毕竟有限,可能这次会跌的很惨。 但没有国家因股市崩盘而,却有很多国家因货币崩盘而进入长期萧条的。那为何说,这两者不能同时保。 这是个好问题,我前面车里也在想。因为没辙了,已经量化宽松太久了,太多了,财政手段, 货币也没有空间(再印钱,带崩美元指数是大概率)。记得前几周吧,耶伦说,2023年前不加息, 但好像她前几天又说会提前加息。 不管怎么样, 加息就是以为着直接拉美元指数,并且从经济层面正式代表,美国的经济没问题。有色等周期品种将结束上涨周期,并且快速回落。比特币也偏悲观。 国内市场会独善其身吗?有可能。 甚至我们会看到,无论你持有什么资产品种,甚至毫无关联的交易品种,都会是同向大幅下跌,引发流动性风险。。。。(扯远了,","text":"理清了一个线。将两个之前弱相关东西,说清楚,分享给大家。。。一个是美股(就纳斯达克吧),一个是美元指数。 我的判断哦,和结论是,大方向最终会保 美元。1. 首先我很难去找到这两者的关联性。 但现在的情况是,这两者表现的都很弱。 尤其是美元指数,对一揽子货币是弱得不行。这才让,大宗商品价格的一路狂欢。2. 美股一周前很强,而这周开始几乎嗅到了崩盘的味道了(看tesla[偷笑])。我没依据说,是美元指数带崩了美股,但事实就是现在这样。3. 而目前这种双螺旋向下状态,是慢慢得到共识,难被打破。但她们不可能坐视不管,任由两者同向下坠。那美元指数下坠的影响大,还是股市下坠影响大? 这将是考验。 我只能说我的看法是,保美元。 美元一旦进入贬值节奏,将带崩经济面,抛美债,资本外流,面子挂不住,而且以美元(锚)计价的所有元素都会反方向上涨,原材料还会再涨,直到各大国考虑是否会脱钩美元,运回黄金(这个世界格局都要变了,会很夸张)。 里子也会崩,刚复苏的经济就因资金离开本国,而步履艰难。当然他们会关注的数据和经济增长方面会更多。而美股下跌,结束10多年的牛市,对本国经济面影响毕竟有限,可能这次会跌的很惨。 但没有国家因股市崩盘而,却有很多国家因货币崩盘而进入长期萧条的。那为何说,这两者不能同时保。 这是个好问题,我前面车里也在想。因为没辙了,已经量化宽松太久了,太多了,财政手段, 货币也没有空间(再印钱,带崩美元指数是大概率)。记得前几周吧,耶伦说,2023年前不加息, 但好像她前几天又说会提前加息。 不管怎么样, 加息就是以为着直接拉美元指数,并且从经济层面正式代表,美国的经济没问题。有色等周期品种将结束上涨周期,并且快速回落。比特币也偏悲观。 国内市场会独善其身吗?有可能。 甚至我们会看到,无论你持有什么资产品种,甚至毫无关联的交易品种,都会是同向大幅下跌,引发流动性风险。。。。(扯远了,","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":2,"essential":2,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":10,"repostSize":3,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/191971282","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":13003,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[{"author":{"id":"143574265413378","authorId":"143574265413378","name":"Elpis","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e99b2d6691d38830f3434641ea4d60f6","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"idStr":"143574265413378","authorIdStr":"143574265413378"},"content":"我觉得你想太多了,美股估值太高了跌是很正常的,只要估值回到正常还会涨上去的,不会跌太多,正常调整而已。","text":"我觉得你想太多了,美股估值太高了跌是很正常的,只要估值回到正常还会涨上去的,不会跌太多,正常调整而已。","html":"我觉得你想太多了,美股估值太高了跌是很正常的,只要估值回到正常还会涨上去的,不会跌太多,正常调整而已。"}],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":137445752,"gmtCreate":1622383150176,"gmtModify":1622638673680,"author":{"id":"3553462730947141","authorId":"3553462730947141","name":"4ba6ec5c","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3553462730947141","authorIdStr":"3553462730947141"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"中国政府只是区别对待了区块链技术和比特币, 前者将作为技术运用, 后者因为不稳定的货币价格、交易属性而被禁止。从长远的角度,区块链的技术属于前沿,而矿池里面的奖励机制,比特币是无法凭空消失,它会长期存在与这个世界。 那最后的价值基石,就会回归到 “需求( gmv)”。 elon 暂停比特币购车,和中国政府严谨挖矿和交易,只是在在需求端给了一猛击。而每次暴跌,将叠加心理层面(恐慌),更像是交易层面的一场流动性考验。从货币属性角度,美国政府不禁止比特币,而只是提醒其价格波动剧烈的原因,是他直接和美金挂钩,需求层面目前并不撼动美元地位;但中国禁止数字货币,更多是以货币流通环节的不可控和人民币数字化保护。 假如比特币以人民币计价,那跳出来反对和禁止的,就会是美国了。 货币演化,在其交易过程中,曾出现过无数,类似贝壳,铜币,白银等,能被广泛使用就是基于历史认可度和需求。从传统定价角度, 一家企业能从现金流,市值等角度解决估值和定价,那想想黄金的定价,未来数字资产的定价呢? ark的报告虽然没有关于比特币的估值范式, 但里面罗列了数十条区块链技术可以触及的行业和生态,也正是木头姐能看好比特币的一个重要依据,撇开货币属性, 需求上,比特币会得到更多释放。尽管比特币有数字支付属性,而太坊能解决智能合约问题; 并且随着技术的到来,需求层面来说,未来一定有更多运用空间, 即定价基石的逻辑还在。 但很多反对者,譬如芒格等老人家,我想他们是不需要将自己的智慧和敏锐放到一个产生不了稳定现金流的数字资产上,就如巴菲特说过句话,“永远不要拿你输不起的东西,去博你不需要的东西。”当有1000亿美金在手的时候,存银行,都会是价值投资。长期并坚定看好比特币,以太坊等数字货币的发展和运用。但从不否认在交易层面,关注价格本身和市场情绪,并准备好安全降落的准备。#bitcoin #tesla #做空<a href=\"\"></a>","listText":"中国政府只是区别对待了区块链技术和比特币, 前者将作为技术运用, 后者因为不稳定的货币价格、交易属性而被禁止。从长远的角度,区块链的技术属于前沿,而矿池里面的奖励机制,比特币是无法凭空消失,它会长期存在与这个世界。 那最后的价值基石,就会回归到 “需求( gmv)”。 elon 暂停比特币购车,和中国政府严谨挖矿和交易,只是在在需求端给了一猛击。而每次暴跌,将叠加心理层面(恐慌),更像是交易层面的一场流动性考验。从货币属性角度,美国政府不禁止比特币,而只是提醒其价格波动剧烈的原因,是他直接和美金挂钩,需求层面目前并不撼动美元地位;但中国禁止数字货币,更多是以货币流通环节的不可控和人民币数字化保护。 假如比特币以人民币计价,那跳出来反对和禁止的,就会是美国了。 货币演化,在其交易过程中,曾出现过无数,类似贝壳,铜币,白银等,能被广泛使用就是基于历史认可度和需求。从传统定价角度, 一家企业能从现金流,市值等角度解决估值和定价,那想想黄金的定价,未来数字资产的定价呢? ark的报告虽然没有关于比特币的估值范式, 但里面罗列了数十条区块链技术可以触及的行业和生态,也正是木头姐能看好比特币的一个重要依据,撇开货币属性, 需求上,比特币会得到更多释放。尽管比特币有数字支付属性,而太坊能解决智能合约问题; 并且随着技术的到来,需求层面来说,未来一定有更多运用空间, 即定价基石的逻辑还在。 但很多反对者,譬如芒格等老人家,我想他们是不需要将自己的智慧和敏锐放到一个产生不了稳定现金流的数字资产上,就如巴菲特说过句话,“永远不要拿你输不起的东西,去博你不需要的东西。”当有1000亿美金在手的时候,存银行,都会是价值投资。长期并坚定看好比特币,以太坊等数字货币的发展和运用。但从不否认在交易层面,关注价格本身和市场情绪,并准备好安全降落的准备。#bitcoin #tesla #做空<a href=\"\"></a>","text":"中国政府只是区别对待了区块链技术和比特币, 前者将作为技术运用, 后者因为不稳定的货币价格、交易属性而被禁止。从长远的角度,区块链的技术属于前沿,而矿池里面的奖励机制,比特币是无法凭空消失,它会长期存在与这个世界。 那最后的价值基石,就会回归到 “需求( gmv)”。 elon 暂停比特币购车,和中国政府严谨挖矿和交易,只是在在需求端给了一猛击。而每次暴跌,将叠加心理层面(恐慌),更像是交易层面的一场流动性考验。从货币属性角度,美国政府不禁止比特币,而只是提醒其价格波动剧烈的原因,是他直接和美金挂钩,需求层面目前并不撼动美元地位;但中国禁止数字货币,更多是以货币流通环节的不可控和人民币数字化保护。 假如比特币以人民币计价,那跳出来反对和禁止的,就会是美国了。 货币演化,在其交易过程中,曾出现过无数,类似贝壳,铜币,白银等,能被广泛使用就是基于历史认可度和需求。从传统定价角度, 一家企业能从现金流,市值等角度解决估值和定价,那想想黄金的定价,未来数字资产的定价呢? ark的报告虽然没有关于比特币的估值范式, 但里面罗列了数十条区块链技术可以触及的行业和生态,也正是木头姐能看好比特币的一个重要依据,撇开货币属性, 需求上,比特币会得到更多释放。尽管比特币有数字支付属性,而太坊能解决智能合约问题; 并且随着技术的到来,需求层面来说,未来一定有更多运用空间, 即定价基石的逻辑还在。 但很多反对者,譬如芒格等老人家,我想他们是不需要将自己的智慧和敏锐放到一个产生不了稳定现金流的数字资产上,就如巴菲特说过句话,“永远不要拿你输不起的东西,去博你不需要的东西。”当有1000亿美金在手的时候,存银行,都会是价值投资。长期并坚定看好比特币,以太坊等数字货币的发展和运用。但从不否认在交易层面,关注价格本身和市场情绪,并准备好安全降落的准备。#bitcoin #tesla #做空","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/abb6d07c8219a77f90ffd517508c80d3","width":"720","height":"1600"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":2,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/137445752","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":12878,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[{"author":{"id":"3507927418932492","authorId":"3507927418932492","name":"扯个犊子","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/be1a05065b5e524f452b72c601018fd5","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3507927418932492","authorIdStr":"3507927418932492"},"content":"at我干啥🤣","text":"at我干啥🤣","html":"at我干啥🤣"}],"imageCount":2,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":314226752,"gmtCreate":1612357070776,"gmtModify":1703760756362,"author":{"id":"3553462730947141","authorId":"3553462730947141","name":"4ba6ec5c","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3553462730947141","authorIdStr":"3553462730947141"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SNDL\">$Sundial Growers Inc.(SNDL)$</a>起飞吧。成本$1.04","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SNDL\">$Sundial Growers Inc.(SNDL)$</a>起飞吧。成本$1.04","text":"$Sundial Growers Inc.(SNDL)$起飞吧。成本$1.04","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":10,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":1,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/314226752","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2176,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[{"author":{"id":"3557575629963896","authorId":"3557575629963896","name":"黑色幽默nio","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1e0a1166faa0ed5410c5d3b5c93de803","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3557575629963896","authorIdStr":"3557575629963896"},"content":"静等起风……","text":"静等起风……","html":"静等起风……"}],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":164240798,"gmtCreate":1624213456814,"gmtModify":1624240154890,"author":{"id":"3553462730947141","authorId":"3553462730947141","name":"4ba6ec5c","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3553462730947141","authorIdStr":"3553462730947141"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"有没有比这个更好的呢? 首先因子模型没有好坏,只有适合,模拟了比较适合我python初学者认知的单因子模型(市值),筛选赛道:申万一级市场“衣食住行”。执行市值最小的企业做滚动买卖策略(每周满仓单只股票)08开始,满仓12年之后,竟能跑出1149倍收益。当然尝试不同筛选,也跑出不同结果,但该策略最大回撤是最理想。比如图三,是基于大市值的结果。总结:这个策略可行,思路不复杂;只是写代码老费劲了,上网跟着牛人反复写代码再修改;策略+思路必须有,再摸索自己的那套,然后不断剔除哪些(沉淀下觉得和以往对股票认识又不太一样);剩下最难的最难的也最有价值的是找数据,拼接数据(不得不说,还是[捂脸]花钱买吧) 。 因子模型复杂与否,怎么量化是个难度。 有没有人对其他因子有想法的?跑出来的如何聊一下。这是一个更适合机器执行的好策略,另外一个比较友好的策略:rule 1, 做一个左侧交易者rule 2, 做一个无聊的孤独的左侧交易者如果以上两条还不足以令你账户收益, 就该想一想是不是赛道和习惯错了, 并重新执行rule 1和2。 (虽然不是很想蹭价值投资的热度) 然而很多人(绝大部分,包括我)都执行不了,可能看到25-50%的收益时,就会卖出, 看到-5-15%亏损时,就会止损( 这并不是不对)。是平衡的问题,能将纪律和收益放在时间天平的两端,平衡好这三者的关系,目测范围内都已经是骨灰级的。 最后来老虎社区关注我,同步分享,一起学习畅谈,自由信仰,一起粉碎记录,长空翱翔。#A股 <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/U/3469666730588285\">@苏北刘强东</a><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/U/3524105581449289\">@扑克投资家</a>","listText":"有没有比这个更好的呢? 首先因子模型没有好坏,只有适合,模拟了比较适合我python初学者认知的单因子模型(市值),筛选赛道:申万一级市场“衣食住行”。执行市值最小的企业做滚动买卖策略(每周满仓单只股票)08开始,满仓12年之后,竟能跑出1149倍收益。当然尝试不同筛选,也跑出不同结果,但该策略最大回撤是最理想。比如图三,是基于大市值的结果。总结:这个策略可行,思路不复杂;只是写代码老费劲了,上网跟着牛人反复写代码再修改;策略+思路必须有,再摸索自己的那套,然后不断剔除哪些(沉淀下觉得和以往对股票认识又不太一样);剩下最难的最难的也最有价值的是找数据,拼接数据(不得不说,还是[捂脸]花钱买吧) 。 因子模型复杂与否,怎么量化是个难度。 有没有人对其他因子有想法的?跑出来的如何聊一下。这是一个更适合机器执行的好策略,另外一个比较友好的策略:rule 1, 做一个左侧交易者rule 2, 做一个无聊的孤独的左侧交易者如果以上两条还不足以令你账户收益, 就该想一想是不是赛道和习惯错了, 并重新执行rule 1和2。 (虽然不是很想蹭价值投资的热度) 然而很多人(绝大部分,包括我)都执行不了,可能看到25-50%的收益时,就会卖出, 看到-5-15%亏损时,就会止损( 这并不是不对)。是平衡的问题,能将纪律和收益放在时间天平的两端,平衡好这三者的关系,目测范围内都已经是骨灰级的。 最后来老虎社区关注我,同步分享,一起学习畅谈,自由信仰,一起粉碎记录,长空翱翔。#A股 <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/U/3469666730588285\">@苏北刘强东</a><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/U/3524105581449289\">@扑克投资家</a>","text":"有没有比这个更好的呢? 首先因子模型没有好坏,只有适合,模拟了比较适合我python初学者认知的单因子模型(市值),筛选赛道:申万一级市场“衣食住行”。执行市值最小的企业做滚动买卖策略(每周满仓单只股票)08开始,满仓12年之后,竟能跑出1149倍收益。当然尝试不同筛选,也跑出不同结果,但该策略最大回撤是最理想。比如图三,是基于大市值的结果。总结:这个策略可行,思路不复杂;只是写代码老费劲了,上网跟着牛人反复写代码再修改;策略+思路必须有,再摸索自己的那套,然后不断剔除哪些(沉淀下觉得和以往对股票认识又不太一样);剩下最难的最难的也最有价值的是找数据,拼接数据(不得不说,还是[捂脸]花钱买吧) 。 因子模型复杂与否,怎么量化是个难度。 有没有人对其他因子有想法的?跑出来的如何聊一下。这是一个更适合机器执行的好策略,另外一个比较友好的策略:rule 1, 做一个左侧交易者rule 2, 做一个无聊的孤独的左侧交易者如果以上两条还不足以令你账户收益, 就该想一想是不是赛道和习惯错了, 并重新执行rule 1和2。 (虽然不是很想蹭价值投资的热度) 然而很多人(绝大部分,包括我)都执行不了,可能看到25-50%的收益时,就会卖出, 看到-5-15%亏损时,就会止损( 这并不是不对)。是平衡的问题,能将纪律和收益放在时间天平的两端,平衡好这三者的关系,目测范围内都已经是骨灰级的。 最后来老虎社区关注我,同步分享,一起学习畅谈,自由信仰,一起粉碎记录,长空翱翔。#A股 @苏北刘强东@扑克投资家","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7643ac02dead5901087797244d5cba38","width":"1915","height":"1043"},{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/aaf6a83298493e677bd9b6a06e7ec8d3","width":"381","height":"251"},{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/12e0122d4e417effea5d08679b84bc61","width":"368","height":"248"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/164240798","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":4222,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[{"author":{"id":"3469666730588285","authorId":"3469666730588285","name":"东哥不疾而速","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/353822250870391f1f67a74a8438da99","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3469666730588285","authorIdStr":"3469666730588285"},"content":"蛮好的思路,不过A股我还是无脑满仓 $贵州茅台(600519)$ 和 $片仔癀(600436)$ 就好","text":"蛮好的思路,不过A股我还是无脑满仓 $贵州茅台(600519)$ 和 $片仔癀(600436)$ 就好","html":"蛮好的思路,不过A股我还是无脑满仓 $贵州茅台(600519)$ 和 $片仔癀(600436)$ 就好"}],"imageCount":3,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":388185349,"gmtCreate":1613036984581,"gmtModify":1703768616310,"author":{"id":"3553462730947141","authorId":"3553462730947141","name":"4ba6ec5c","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3553462730947141","authorIdStr":"3553462730947141"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SNDL\">$Sundial Growers Inc.(SNDL)$</a>没什么想法。","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SNDL\">$Sundial Growers Inc.(SNDL)$</a>没什么想法。","text":"$Sundial Growers Inc.(SNDL)$没什么想法。","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/971d416b66df76ff1c03aa7459b56d6b","width":"720","height":"1280"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/388185349","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":543,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":816515580,"gmtCreate":1630507127640,"gmtModify":1630507127640,"author":{"id":"3553462730947141","authorId":"3553462730947141","name":"4ba6ec5c","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3553462730947141","authorIdStr":"3553462730947141"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BABA\">$阿里巴巴(BABA)$</a>这煎饼 香","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BABA\">$阿里巴巴(BABA)$</a>这煎饼 香","text":"$阿里巴巴(BABA)$这煎饼 香","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1cf20122b9b5d18d1eabb29b01a0afc8","width":"720","height":"1280"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/816515580","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2535,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":199929510,"gmtCreate":1620664676130,"gmtModify":1620664676130,"author":{"id":"3553462730947141","authorId":"3553462730947141","name":"4ba6ec5c","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3553462730947141","authorIdStr":"3553462730947141"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"提醒一下喔,有色铜(价) 飘得有点高。尽管 现货短缺,期货新高(止盈)。 三周前说 all in有色铜的股票,目前已传导到二级市场了(铜,的属性不如其他有色,应激反应来的比较慢),刚看了一群“铜”的股票,应该是差不多了,去留自己定吧。 大周期没改变,短期反应爆表了。备好降落伞#铜","listText":"提醒一下喔,有色铜(价) 飘得有点高。尽管 现货短缺,期货新高(止盈)。 三周前说 all in有色铜的股票,目前已传导到二级市场了(铜,的属性不如其他有色,应激反应来的比较慢),刚看了一群“铜”的股票,应该是差不多了,去留自己定吧。 大周期没改变,短期反应爆表了。备好降落伞#铜","text":"提醒一下喔,有色铜(价) 飘得有点高。尽管 现货短缺,期货新高(止盈)。 三周前说 all in有色铜的股票,目前已传导到二级市场了(铜,的属性不如其他有色,应激反应来的比较慢),刚看了一群“铜”的股票,应该是差不多了,去留自己定吧。 大周期没改变,短期反应爆表了。备好降落伞#铜","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/199929510","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2219,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":816512977,"gmtCreate":1630507089599,"gmtModify":1630507089599,"author":{"id":"3553462730947141","authorId":"3553462730947141","name":"4ba6ec5c","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3553462730947141","authorIdStr":"3553462730947141"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PDD\">$拼多多(PDD)$</a>捡漏专业户","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PDD\">$拼多多(PDD)$</a>捡漏专业户","text":"$拼多多(PDD)$捡漏专业户","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0ca8e89b605cffc7897e4a0771a037a8","width":"720","height":"1280"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/816512977","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2088,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":359097254,"gmtCreate":1616298257078,"gmtModify":1616298257078,"author":{"id":"3553462730947141","authorId":"3553462730947141","name":"4ba6ec5c","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3553462730947141","authorIdStr":"3553462730947141"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"想了想,还是说下吧:一个希望。假设之前是对的话,那A50极有可能在下周结束下跌,并开始修复(动态中仍存隐忧,美债利率从长期看,进入上升通道,所以消化和修复也是个漫长的过程)。 短周级别可以入场做多a50,茅台稳住,A50稳住。(A50杀估值+中美会谈之前的不确定性是一个短空策略基础,目前差不多结束了)# 比起不确定性的合作# 腾讯看跌下周可以止盈# 激进点的话,tesla继续持有并加 4月份的call option#大宗商品,铜的路径相对清晰,中长看涨#黄金很尴尬#比特币没毛病","listText":"想了想,还是说下吧:一个希望。假设之前是对的话,那A50极有可能在下周结束下跌,并开始修复(动态中仍存隐忧,美债利率从长期看,进入上升通道,所以消化和修复也是个漫长的过程)。 短周级别可以入场做多a50,茅台稳住,A50稳住。(A50杀估值+中美会谈之前的不确定性是一个短空策略基础,目前差不多结束了)# 比起不确定性的合作# 腾讯看跌下周可以止盈# 激进点的话,tesla继续持有并加 4月份的call option#大宗商品,铜的路径相对清晰,中长看涨#黄金很尴尬#比特币没毛病","text":"想了想,还是说下吧:一个希望。假设之前是对的话,那A50极有可能在下周结束下跌,并开始修复(动态中仍存隐忧,美债利率从长期看,进入上升通道,所以消化和修复也是个漫长的过程)。 短周级别可以入场做多a50,茅台稳住,A50稳住。(A50杀估值+中美会谈之前的不确定性是一个短空策略基础,目前差不多结束了)# 比起不确定性的合作# 腾讯看跌下周可以止盈# 激进点的话,tesla继续持有并加 4月份的call option#大宗商品,铜的路径相对清晰,中长看涨#黄金很尴尬#比特币没毛病","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/359097254","repostId":"1105091378","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2452,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":329818197,"gmtCreate":1615219843919,"gmtModify":1703485937975,"author":{"id":"3553462730947141","authorId":"3553462730947141","name":"4ba6ec5c","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3553462730947141","authorIdStr":"3553462730947141"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GME\">$游戏驿站(GME)$</a>独立思考","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GME\">$游戏驿站(GME)$</a>独立思考","text":"$游戏驿站(GME)$独立思考","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/00b41a6e5c59268dfa09a24fa0b16787","width":"720","height":"1280"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/329818197","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1408,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":195379731677400,"gmtCreate":1688737199262,"gmtModify":1688737200198,"author":{"id":"3553462730947141","authorId":"3553462730947141","name":"4ba6ec5c","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3553462730947141","authorIdStr":"3553462730947141"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/FUT/CLmain\">$WTI原油主连 2308(CLmain)$ </a><v-v data-views=\"0\"></v-v>","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/FUT/CLmain\">$WTI原油主连 2308(CLmain)$ </a><v-v data-views=\"0\"></v-v>","text":"$WTI原油主连 2308(CLmain)$","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/195379731677400","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":191,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":851526370,"gmtCreate":1634915580685,"gmtModify":1634915580685,"author":{"id":"3553462730947141","authorId":"3553462730947141","name":"4ba6ec5c","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3553462730947141","authorIdStr":"3553462730947141"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"买了行权价82的看跌期权","listText":"买了行权价82的看跌期权","text":"买了行权价82的看跌期权","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/851526370","repostId":"851359144","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":851359144,"gmtCreate":1634872782084,"gmtModify":1634952339667,"author":{"id":"3580807725993787","authorId":"3580807725993787","name":"寇健","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/89441ad4219daeab85f6c707819e1dc6","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3580807725993787","authorIdStr":"3580807725993787"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"\n \n \n <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/FUT/QGmain\">$小天然气主连(QGmain)$</a> <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/FUT/NGmain\">$天然气主连(NGmain)$</a> <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/FUT/CLmain\">$WTI原油主连(CLmain)$</a> <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/FUT/NQmain\">$NQ100指数主连(NQmain)$</a> <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/FUT/GCmain\">$黄金主连(GCmain)$</a> ,现在再追多原油,风险已经越来越大,我从原油的期货价格结构中判断出了油价的关键点位,还有天然气的未来走势判断,来听听这节课,仔细聊了聊通胀预期下的能源品种走势。\n \n","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/FUT/QGmain\">$小天然气主连(QGmain)$</a> <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/FUT/NGmain\">$天然气主连(NGmain)$</a> <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/FUT/CLmain\">$WTI原油主连(CLmain)$</a> <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/FUT/NQmain\">$NQ100指数主连(NQmain)$</a> <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/FUT/GCmain\">$黄金主连(GCmain)$</a> ,现在再追多原油,风险已经越来越大,我从原油的期货价格结构中判断出了油价的关键点位,还有天然气的未来走势判断,来听听这节课,仔细聊了聊通胀预期下的能源品种走势。","text":"$小天然气主连(QGmain)$ $天然气主连(NGmain)$ $WTI原油主连(CLmain)$ $NQ100指数主连(NQmain)$ $黄金主连(GCmain)$ ,现在再追多原油,风险已经越来越大,我从原油的期货价格结构中判断出了油价的关键点位,还有天然气的未来走势判断,来听听这节课,仔细聊了聊通胀预期下的能源品种走势。","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":2,"essential":2,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/851359144","isVote":1,"tweetType":2,"object":{"id":"795c51fc713c44b2bf8e9b382c3ab320","tweetId":"851359144","title":"我对天然气和原油走势的最新研究:要留心天然气的底和原油的顶","videoUrl":"https://1254107296.vod2.myqcloud.com/e2ad4227vodcq1254107296/b1a52d0f8602268010786658368/f0.mp4","poster":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8725a044d1c77bb2d68a3142bf1bc282","shareLink":"https://laohu8.com/RN?name=RNLive&rndata=%7B%22liveId%22:%2216347147014453%22%7D"},"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2403,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":199923026,"gmtCreate":1620664708365,"gmtModify":1620664708365,"author":{"id":"3553462730947141","authorId":"3553462730947141","name":"4ba6ec5c","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3553462730947141","authorIdStr":"3553462730947141"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"感谢上海消保委[流泪] ","listText":"感谢上海消保委[流泪] ","text":"感谢上海消保委[流泪]","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e433289a17587bef224c0c1df9a30f68","width":"720","height":"1600"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/199923026","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2454,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":106734138,"gmtCreate":1620144326724,"gmtModify":1620144326724,"author":{"id":"3553462730947141","authorId":"3553462730947141","name":"4ba6ec5c","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3553462730947141","authorIdStr":"3553462730947141"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">$特斯拉(TSLA)$</a>tesla 's Minsky Moment is approaching","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">$特斯拉(TSLA)$</a>tesla 's Minsky Moment is approaching","text":"$特斯拉(TSLA)$tesla 's Minsky Moment is approaching","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/106734138","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":4210,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":101430347,"gmtCreate":1619928961289,"gmtModify":1619928961289,"author":{"id":"3553462730947141","authorId":"3553462730947141","name":"4ba6ec5c","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3553462730947141","authorIdStr":"3553462730947141"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"这篇文章不错,转发给大家看","listText":"这篇文章不错,转发给大家看","text":"这篇文章不错,转发给大家看","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/101430347","repostId":"1120703707","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2367,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":372420749,"gmtCreate":1619235338481,"gmtModify":1619235338481,"author":{"id":"3553462730947141","authorId":"3553462730947141","name":"4ba6ec5c","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3553462730947141","authorIdStr":"3553462730947141"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"专注","listText":"专注","text":"专注","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/372420749","repostId":"372392815","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":372392815,"gmtCreate":1619175130734,"gmtModify":1619205132853,"author":{"id":"21347731130544","authorId":"21347731130544","name":"价值投资为王","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/89ffffc59ff9ac9cb9cb74f596418d44","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"21347731130544","authorIdStr":"21347731130544"},"themes":[],"title":"怎样才能成为巴菲特?答案只有2个字!","htmlText":"虽然我的头像是巴菲特老爷子,虽然在老虎的名称叫价值投资为王,但说实话,在几天之前,我很少看过巴菲特的内容、书籍或采访。 个中缘由一直觉得相关的书籍大多翻译而来,内容颇为枯燥,始终无法沉下心来学习。 恰好几天之前,我知道有一个纪录片叫《成为巴菲特》,是HBO出品,巴菲特亲自出镜,88分钟的纪录片讲述了巴菲特的成长经历和投资理念,非常值得观看。 网上也很多关于此纪录片的感触,我看了2遍,最大的感触也即回答了片名:如何《成为巴菲特》? 多数人对此有很多建议,如多阅读、寻找有护城河的股票、在能力圈内投资。 不同于他们,我对如何成为巴菲特只有2个字的答案,即专注。 在纪录片开头,巴菲特说道他上班的路程只有5分钟车程,持续了54年。 众所周知,巴菲特工作和生活的地方在一个叫奥马哈的小城,如果不是巴菲特成为股神,这个小地方恐怕无人知晓。 回头审视我们自己,有多少一线城市的人,上班的路程需要花费一个小时甚至更久? 大量的时间浪费在路上,投入在学习上的时间就会变得很短,比如阅读。巴菲特在5分钟的车程途中,还能把早餐解决,回到办公室,每天有5-6小时的阅读时间。 注意巴菲特的早餐是2-3美元的麦当劳。 对吃不讲究、对上班的地方也不挑剔,只因巴菲特过于专注在投资这件事,集中精力于一处,别再无其他心思用在他处,如生活上的巴菲特是个**,连照顾生病的妻子都吃力! 再来看巴菲特的投资理念是如何展现专注的内核的。 巴菲特的父亲做过股票交易员,而后自己开了一家投资公司,青年时期的巴菲特便把父亲办公室里的投资书籍看了一遍。 后来因为搬家,巴菲特一时没能适应新环境,学习成绩下滑,本来想申请哈佛MBA,结果被拒,机缘巧合之下,投入了“恩师”格雷汉姆的旗下。 自此,价值投资之路开始萌芽。只不过早期的价投还沉迷在捡烟蒂,只买入是市值低于(流动资产减去总负债)三分之一以下的股票。 这种投资方法让巴菲特尝到甜头之后,便","listText":"虽然我的头像是巴菲特老爷子,虽然在老虎的名称叫价值投资为王,但说实话,在几天之前,我很少看过巴菲特的内容、书籍或采访。 个中缘由一直觉得相关的书籍大多翻译而来,内容颇为枯燥,始终无法沉下心来学习。 恰好几天之前,我知道有一个纪录片叫《成为巴菲特》,是HBO出品,巴菲特亲自出镜,88分钟的纪录片讲述了巴菲特的成长经历和投资理念,非常值得观看。 网上也很多关于此纪录片的感触,我看了2遍,最大的感触也即回答了片名:如何《成为巴菲特》? 多数人对此有很多建议,如多阅读、寻找有护城河的股票、在能力圈内投资。 不同于他们,我对如何成为巴菲特只有2个字的答案,即专注。 在纪录片开头,巴菲特说道他上班的路程只有5分钟车程,持续了54年。 众所周知,巴菲特工作和生活的地方在一个叫奥马哈的小城,如果不是巴菲特成为股神,这个小地方恐怕无人知晓。 回头审视我们自己,有多少一线城市的人,上班的路程需要花费一个小时甚至更久? 大量的时间浪费在路上,投入在学习上的时间就会变得很短,比如阅读。巴菲特在5分钟的车程途中,还能把早餐解决,回到办公室,每天有5-6小时的阅读时间。 注意巴菲特的早餐是2-3美元的麦当劳。 对吃不讲究、对上班的地方也不挑剔,只因巴菲特过于专注在投资这件事,集中精力于一处,别再无其他心思用在他处,如生活上的巴菲特是个**,连照顾生病的妻子都吃力! 再来看巴菲特的投资理念是如何展现专注的内核的。 巴菲特的父亲做过股票交易员,而后自己开了一家投资公司,青年时期的巴菲特便把父亲办公室里的投资书籍看了一遍。 后来因为搬家,巴菲特一时没能适应新环境,学习成绩下滑,本来想申请哈佛MBA,结果被拒,机缘巧合之下,投入了“恩师”格雷汉姆的旗下。 自此,价值投资之路开始萌芽。只不过早期的价投还沉迷在捡烟蒂,只买入是市值低于(流动资产减去总负债)三分之一以下的股票。 这种投资方法让巴菲特尝到甜头之后,便","text":"虽然我的头像是巴菲特老爷子,虽然在老虎的名称叫价值投资为王,但说实话,在几天之前,我很少看过巴菲特的内容、书籍或采访。 个中缘由一直觉得相关的书籍大多翻译而来,内容颇为枯燥,始终无法沉下心来学习。 恰好几天之前,我知道有一个纪录片叫《成为巴菲特》,是HBO出品,巴菲特亲自出镜,88分钟的纪录片讲述了巴菲特的成长经历和投资理念,非常值得观看。 网上也很多关于此纪录片的感触,我看了2遍,最大的感触也即回答了片名:如何《成为巴菲特》? 多数人对此有很多建议,如多阅读、寻找有护城河的股票、在能力圈内投资。 不同于他们,我对如何成为巴菲特只有2个字的答案,即专注。 在纪录片开头,巴菲特说道他上班的路程只有5分钟车程,持续了54年。 众所周知,巴菲特工作和生活的地方在一个叫奥马哈的小城,如果不是巴菲特成为股神,这个小地方恐怕无人知晓。 回头审视我们自己,有多少一线城市的人,上班的路程需要花费一个小时甚至更久? 大量的时间浪费在路上,投入在学习上的时间就会变得很短,比如阅读。巴菲特在5分钟的车程途中,还能把早餐解决,回到办公室,每天有5-6小时的阅读时间。 注意巴菲特的早餐是2-3美元的麦当劳。 对吃不讲究、对上班的地方也不挑剔,只因巴菲特过于专注在投资这件事,集中精力于一处,别再无其他心思用在他处,如生活上的巴菲特是个**,连照顾生病的妻子都吃力! 再来看巴菲特的投资理念是如何展现专注的内核的。 巴菲特的父亲做过股票交易员,而后自己开了一家投资公司,青年时期的巴菲特便把父亲办公室里的投资书籍看了一遍。 后来因为搬家,巴菲特一时没能适应新环境,学习成绩下滑,本来想申请哈佛MBA,结果被拒,机缘巧合之下,投入了“恩师”格雷汉姆的旗下。 自此,价值投资之路开始萌芽。只不过早期的价投还沉迷在捡烟蒂,只买入是市值低于(流动资产减去总负债)三分之一以下的股票。 这种投资方法让巴菲特尝到甜头之后,便","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fc5f1d604f63ca58c39f3b2a15aa44ab","width":"931","height":"529"},{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8ccf4800455f1c15a10d2556ce2afbfd","width":"919","height":"518"},{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7d994e7304c11970ed9e94fcf432f3ea","width":"931","height":"521"}],"top":1,"highlighted":2,"essential":2,"paper":2,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/372392815","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":5,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1496,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":344535278,"gmtCreate":1618414317894,"gmtModify":1618414317894,"author":{"id":"3553462730947141","authorId":"3553462730947141","name":"4ba6ec5c","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3553462730947141","authorIdStr":"3553462730947141"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"言之有理","listText":"言之有理","text":"言之有理","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/344535278","repostId":"2127255041","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":612,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":355885179,"gmtCreate":1617060784691,"gmtModify":1617060784691,"author":{"id":"3553462730947141","authorId":"3553462730947141","name":"4ba6ec5c","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3553462730947141","authorIdStr":"3553462730947141"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ark 这两天分别再进百度","listText":"Ark 这两天分别再进百度","text":"Ark 这两天分别再进百度","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/355885179","repostId":"355032489","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":355032489,"gmtCreate":1617011340000,"gmtModify":1617018325753,"author":{"id":"3524030243818067","authorId":"3524030243818067","name":"巴伦周刊","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a88e8bd37e8c66a6dfdca78e1466369","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3524030243818067","authorIdStr":"3524030243818067"},"themes":[],"title":"史上最大单日亏损?中概股暴跌的传闻与事实","htmlText":"文 | 《巴伦周刊》中文版撰稿人 彭韧 编辑 | 康娟 许多信息来自于碎片、流言和报道,以及圈内朋友的讨论,我们将它们串联成了一幅有逻辑联系的拼图。 从3月24日开始,部分中概股发生诡异暴跌,之所以说诡异,是因为跌幅巨大而且走势异常一致:爱奇艺、唯品会和腾讯音乐都是在几天内跌去近半,跟谁学更是一天内就完成腰斩,而同期大盘相对稳定,于是市场开始浮现不少传闻,周末一篇名为《人类史上最大单日亏损》的文章在网络刷屏,长相酷似岳云鹏的韩国人Bill Hwang和他的家族办公室Archegos Capital浮出海面。 不过,到目前为止,所有关于Bill Hwang和Archegos Capital的报道都是基于一些坊间传闻和不明消息源的猜测,尽管这些猜测逻辑缜密,合丝严缝,同时也能够获得股价走势的佐证,但它们仍然只是猜测。《巴伦周刊》中文版与最早分析此事的大V之一、资深美股投资人陈达聊了聊近日中概股的诡异走势,以及它对于投资者的警示。 图:Bill Hwang,图源网络 《巴伦周刊》中文版:上周部分中概股发生暴跌,但这一轮下跌跟去年三月的全市场大跌并不一样,暴跌集中在中概股中的教育股、部分视频网站和百度、唯品会这几家公司,并没有扩大到所有中概股,而同期美股大盘也相对稳定,对于其背后的原因众说纷纭,比如有人认为跟SEC声称正开始推进《外国公司问责法案》有关,也有人指出这是由于某基金爆仓所导致的,您认为近期中概股异动背后是什么原因,或者说,我们现在真的能知道背后的原因吗? 陈达:我们先来梳理一下事实的时间线。首先是在3月23日左右,交易圈里爆出高盛正在为一宗美股大宗交易( block trade)寻找买家,这笔大宗交易包含1000万股百度,185美元到市价出;5000万股腾讯音乐,17.6美元到市价出,3200万股唯品会,27.6美元到市价出,这笔大宗交易不但交易量极大,而且都比当时的市","listText":"文 | 《巴伦周刊》中文版撰稿人 彭韧 编辑 | 康娟 许多信息来自于碎片、流言和报道,以及圈内朋友的讨论,我们将它们串联成了一幅有逻辑联系的拼图。 从3月24日开始,部分中概股发生诡异暴跌,之所以说诡异,是因为跌幅巨大而且走势异常一致:爱奇艺、唯品会和腾讯音乐都是在几天内跌去近半,跟谁学更是一天内就完成腰斩,而同期大盘相对稳定,于是市场开始浮现不少传闻,周末一篇名为《人类史上最大单日亏损》的文章在网络刷屏,长相酷似岳云鹏的韩国人Bill Hwang和他的家族办公室Archegos Capital浮出海面。 不过,到目前为止,所有关于Bill Hwang和Archegos Capital的报道都是基于一些坊间传闻和不明消息源的猜测,尽管这些猜测逻辑缜密,合丝严缝,同时也能够获得股价走势的佐证,但它们仍然只是猜测。《巴伦周刊》中文版与最早分析此事的大V之一、资深美股投资人陈达聊了聊近日中概股的诡异走势,以及它对于投资者的警示。 图:Bill Hwang,图源网络 《巴伦周刊》中文版:上周部分中概股发生暴跌,但这一轮下跌跟去年三月的全市场大跌并不一样,暴跌集中在中概股中的教育股、部分视频网站和百度、唯品会这几家公司,并没有扩大到所有中概股,而同期美股大盘也相对稳定,对于其背后的原因众说纷纭,比如有人认为跟SEC声称正开始推进《外国公司问责法案》有关,也有人指出这是由于某基金爆仓所导致的,您认为近期中概股异动背后是什么原因,或者说,我们现在真的能知道背后的原因吗? 陈达:我们先来梳理一下事实的时间线。首先是在3月23日左右,交易圈里爆出高盛正在为一宗美股大宗交易( block trade)寻找买家,这笔大宗交易包含1000万股百度,185美元到市价出;5000万股腾讯音乐,17.6美元到市价出,3200万股唯品会,27.6美元到市价出,这笔大宗交易不但交易量极大,而且都比当时的市","text":"文 | 《巴伦周刊》中文版撰稿人 彭韧 编辑 | 康娟 许多信息来自于碎片、流言和报道,以及圈内朋友的讨论,我们将它们串联成了一幅有逻辑联系的拼图。 从3月24日开始,部分中概股发生诡异暴跌,之所以说诡异,是因为跌幅巨大而且走势异常一致:爱奇艺、唯品会和腾讯音乐都是在几天内跌去近半,跟谁学更是一天内就完成腰斩,而同期大盘相对稳定,于是市场开始浮现不少传闻,周末一篇名为《人类史上最大单日亏损》的文章在网络刷屏,长相酷似岳云鹏的韩国人Bill Hwang和他的家族办公室Archegos Capital浮出海面。 不过,到目前为止,所有关于Bill Hwang和Archegos Capital的报道都是基于一些坊间传闻和不明消息源的猜测,尽管这些猜测逻辑缜密,合丝严缝,同时也能够获得股价走势的佐证,但它们仍然只是猜测。《巴伦周刊》中文版与最早分析此事的大V之一、资深美股投资人陈达聊了聊近日中概股的诡异走势,以及它对于投资者的警示。 图:Bill Hwang,图源网络 《巴伦周刊》中文版:上周部分中概股发生暴跌,但这一轮下跌跟去年三月的全市场大跌并不一样,暴跌集中在中概股中的教育股、部分视频网站和百度、唯品会这几家公司,并没有扩大到所有中概股,而同期美股大盘也相对稳定,对于其背后的原因众说纷纭,比如有人认为跟SEC声称正开始推进《外国公司问责法案》有关,也有人指出这是由于某基金爆仓所导致的,您认为近期中概股异动背后是什么原因,或者说,我们现在真的能知道背后的原因吗? 陈达:我们先来梳理一下事实的时间线。首先是在3月23日左右,交易圈里爆出高盛正在为一宗美股大宗交易( block trade)寻找买家,这笔大宗交易包含1000万股百度,185美元到市价出;5000万股腾讯音乐,17.6美元到市价出,3200万股唯品会,27.6美元到市价出,这笔大宗交易不但交易量极大,而且都比当时的市","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/90e72b5ee284418892b301bbe3653c3e","width":"1080","height":"720"}],"top":1,"highlighted":2,"essential":2,"paper":2,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/355032489","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":2,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1707,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":352982292,"gmtCreate":1616859164216,"gmtModify":1616859164216,"author":{"id":"3553462730947141","authorId":"3553462730947141","name":"4ba6ec5c","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3553462730947141","authorIdStr":"3553462730947141"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"价值和价格的作用力与反作用力","listText":"价值和价格的作用力与反作用力","text":"价值和价格的作用力与反作用力","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/352982292","repostId":"356317948","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":356317948,"gmtCreate":1616755677484,"gmtModify":1616756010753,"author":{"id":"3497328009582754","authorId":"3497328009582754","name":"桃李春风益点财","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/dc8827e0d2ccb8087a4e15cbe447ad5c","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3497328009582754","authorIdStr":"3497328009582754"},"themes":[],"title":"基金经理们极端转向价值股,该抛掉科技股、中概股、成长股吗?","htmlText":"本文聚焦: 基金经理们极端押注价值股未来,对成长股失去信心 贝瑞研究历史量化统计分析,成长股不一定输 注:区分成长股与价值股,一般从每股收益和净资产收益率、每股营收三个指标来判定。前两者高的是成长股,低的是价值股。成长股是指处于飞速发展阶段的公司所发行的股票。成长性股票多为普通股,专指那些虽不见得立即就能获得高额股利或其他优惠条件,但未来前景看好的股票。成长股一般规模相对较小,处于持续上升的过程中,市场参与的长期投资者居多。价值股是指相对于它们的现有业绩收益,股价被低估的一类股票。这类股票通常具有低市盈率与市净率、高股息的特征。价值股一般规模相对较大、稳定性较强,市场参与的中短期投资者居多。贝瑞研究声明:文中观点基于公开市场信息及数据,分析观点仅供交流,据此操作后果自负,如有疑问,欢迎留言。一、基金经理们极端押注价值股未来,对成长股失去信心近期, 纳指从2月中旬到3月8日的大约三周内下跌了10%。之后,科技股为主的指数开始反弹,纳斯达克指数自3月份短期触底以来也上涨了5%。根据彭博数据,近几周来价值股连续吸引资金流入,追踪价值投资的ETF已经连续10周迎来新资金;11月初以来,资金流入和市场反弹推动该部分资产增长1000亿美元。更多资金也正在来的路上。彭博表示,这类追踪价值投资的ETF产品有望在本季度获得有史以来表现最好的资金流入。此外,本周我们关注到了基金经理投资理念的重大转变。不过,一些基金经理正对成长型股票失去信心。在接受美国银行基金经理调查的基金经理中,超过52%的人预期后续一年价值股将跑赢成长股。美国银行美林证券全球基金经理调查报告上周出炉,这份报告调查了大约200个管理着6300亿美元总资产的基金经理。透过这份调查报告,我们深入了解到这些职业基金经理对市场的看法。如今,他们中的大多数人正从成长型股转向价值型股。就连“女版巴菲特,”牛市女皇Cathie Wood的","listText":"本文聚焦: 基金经理们极端押注价值股未来,对成长股失去信心 贝瑞研究历史量化统计分析,成长股不一定输 注:区分成长股与价值股,一般从每股收益和净资产收益率、每股营收三个指标来判定。前两者高的是成长股,低的是价值股。成长股是指处于飞速发展阶段的公司所发行的股票。成长性股票多为普通股,专指那些虽不见得立即就能获得高额股利或其他优惠条件,但未来前景看好的股票。成长股一般规模相对较小,处于持续上升的过程中,市场参与的长期投资者居多。价值股是指相对于它们的现有业绩收益,股价被低估的一类股票。这类股票通常具有低市盈率与市净率、高股息的特征。价值股一般规模相对较大、稳定性较强,市场参与的中短期投资者居多。贝瑞研究声明:文中观点基于公开市场信息及数据,分析观点仅供交流,据此操作后果自负,如有疑问,欢迎留言。一、基金经理们极端押注价值股未来,对成长股失去信心近期, 纳指从2月中旬到3月8日的大约三周内下跌了10%。之后,科技股为主的指数开始反弹,纳斯达克指数自3月份短期触底以来也上涨了5%。根据彭博数据,近几周来价值股连续吸引资金流入,追踪价值投资的ETF已经连续10周迎来新资金;11月初以来,资金流入和市场反弹推动该部分资产增长1000亿美元。更多资金也正在来的路上。彭博表示,这类追踪价值投资的ETF产品有望在本季度获得有史以来表现最好的资金流入。此外,本周我们关注到了基金经理投资理念的重大转变。不过,一些基金经理正对成长型股票失去信心。在接受美国银行基金经理调查的基金经理中,超过52%的人预期后续一年价值股将跑赢成长股。美国银行美林证券全球基金经理调查报告上周出炉,这份报告调查了大约200个管理着6300亿美元总资产的基金经理。透过这份调查报告,我们深入了解到这些职业基金经理对市场的看法。如今,他们中的大多数人正从成长型股转向价值型股。就连“女版巴菲特,”牛市女皇Cathie Wood的","text":"本文聚焦: 基金经理们极端押注价值股未来,对成长股失去信心 贝瑞研究历史量化统计分析,成长股不一定输 注:区分成长股与价值股,一般从每股收益和净资产收益率、每股营收三个指标来判定。前两者高的是成长股,低的是价值股。成长股是指处于飞速发展阶段的公司所发行的股票。成长性股票多为普通股,专指那些虽不见得立即就能获得高额股利或其他优惠条件,但未来前景看好的股票。成长股一般规模相对较小,处于持续上升的过程中,市场参与的长期投资者居多。价值股是指相对于它们的现有业绩收益,股价被低估的一类股票。这类股票通常具有低市盈率与市净率、高股息的特征。价值股一般规模相对较大、稳定性较强,市场参与的中短期投资者居多。贝瑞研究声明:文中观点基于公开市场信息及数据,分析观点仅供交流,据此操作后果自负,如有疑问,欢迎留言。一、基金经理们极端押注价值股未来,对成长股失去信心近期, 纳指从2月中旬到3月8日的大约三周内下跌了10%。之后,科技股为主的指数开始反弹,纳斯达克指数自3月份短期触底以来也上涨了5%。根据彭博数据,近几周来价值股连续吸引资金流入,追踪价值投资的ETF已经连续10周迎来新资金;11月初以来,资金流入和市场反弹推动该部分资产增长1000亿美元。更多资金也正在来的路上。彭博表示,这类追踪价值投资的ETF产品有望在本季度获得有史以来表现最好的资金流入。此外,本周我们关注到了基金经理投资理念的重大转变。不过,一些基金经理正对成长型股票失去信心。在接受美国银行基金经理调查的基金经理中,超过52%的人预期后续一年价值股将跑赢成长股。美国银行美林证券全球基金经理调查报告上周出炉,这份报告调查了大约200个管理着6300亿美元总资产的基金经理。透过这份调查报告,我们深入了解到这些职业基金经理对市场的看法。如今,他们中的大多数人正从成长型股转向价值型股。就连“女版巴菲特,”牛市女皇Cathie Wood的","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8dfbbac69962f17b86cdbfcd0f16209f","width":"605","height":"401"},{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4ec3e6b06e0adbb6b57e3e4efc698625","width":"502","height":"129"},{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7ec5cdd952fdeb0740ae3b4598076683","width":"1020","height":"1350"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":2,"paper":2,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/356317948","isVote":2,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"vote":{"id":1390,"gmtBegin":1616755677481,"gmtEnd":1617360254448,"type":1,"upper":1,"title":"后续你认为是价值股还是成长股的胜算更大?","choices":[{"id":5166,"sort":1,"name":"价值股","userSize":13,"voted":false},{"id":5167,"sort":2,"name":"成长股","userSize":23,"voted":false},{"id":5168,"sort":3,"name":"还不清楚","userSize":3,"voted":false}]},"comments":[],"imageCount":3,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":930,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":353484279,"gmtCreate":1616513288591,"gmtModify":1616513288591,"author":{"id":"3553462730947141","authorId":"3553462730947141","name":"4ba6ec5c","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3553462730947141","authorIdStr":"3553462730947141"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[财迷]","listText":"[财迷]","text":"[财迷]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/353484279","repostId":"1137063642","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1137063642","pubTimestamp":1616505836,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1137063642?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-23 21:23","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Jury out on whether ARK Innovation returns are due to Cathie Wood’s skill or luck","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1137063642","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"Statistical scrutiny brings this high-flying ETF down to earth\nYou could have performed as well as t","content":"<p>Statistical scrutiny brings this high-flying ETF down to earth</p>\n<p>You could have performed as well as the high-flying ARK Innovation ETF by investing in the Nasdaq 100 Index.</p>\n<p>I know that seems hard to believe, given the stunning performance chief investment officer Cathie Wood has produced with ARK Innovation— a 229% gain over the past year, according to FactSet. Meanwhile, the Invesco QQQ Trust (which is benchmarked to the Nasdaq 100), gained 78%. Since its creation in October 2014, ARK Innovation has produced an annualized gain of 34.6%, versus 20.6% for the QQQ.</p>\n<p>At the same time, ARK Innovation has been extremely volatile and risky, making an apples-to-apples comparison with the Nasdaq 100 misleading. As measured by the standard deviation of monthly returns, ARK Innovation has been 73% more volatile than QQQ. That’s really saying something, since QQQ is itself more volatile than broad market indices such as the S&P 500.</p>\n<p>One approach statisticians use to create an apples-to-apples comparison is with a metric known as the Sharpe Ratio, invented by William Sharpe, the 1990 Nobel laureate in economics. It is the ratio of a fund’s average returns to the standard deviation of those returns. The Sharpe Ratio of ARK Innovation’s monthly returns since 2014 is almost precisely the same as the QQQ’s.</p>\n<p>If you’re like some of my clients, your reaction is not to care about the Sharpe Ratio. “You can’t take the Sharpe Ratio to the bank,” you in effect tell me. It’s raw performance that counts, and on that basis there’s no doubt that the ARKK did far better.</p>\n<p>This reaction is confused, however. In fact you can take the Sharpe Ratio to the bank. If you had been willing to incur the ARK Innovation’s increased volatility, you could have made just as much by leveraging an investment in the QQQ. That is, you would have made just as much by increasing your portfolio allocation to QQQ, or by buying it on sufficient margin. This is illustrated in the chart below:</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13b81e9f1962e464faeb2d45cdd0e5f9\" tg-width=\"1260\" tg-height=\"849\"></p>\n<p>The Sharpe Ratio is not the only method that statisticians employ for measuring adviser performance on a level playing field, but other widely used approaches reach the same conclusion. Perhaps the best known, at least in academic circles, is the Fama-French factor model, named for University of Chicago finance professor Eugene Fama (the 2013 Nobel laureate in economics) and Dartmouth College professor Ken French. Their model involves an econometric test to see if a mutual fund’s return is significantly better than a combination of index funds benchmarked to factors such as small-cap, growth, and momentum.</p>\n<p>The answer for ARK Innovation is “no” — an overweight allocation to a small-cap growth fund would have produced the same overall return since November 2014.</p>\n<p><b>Luck versus skill</b></p>\n<p>Note carefully that these statistical tests do not prove that ARK Innovation’s performance is due solely to luck. Instead, those tests tell us that we cannot conclude that its performance was not due to luck. In this case, the double negative is not the same as the positive; this is a subtle, but important, difference.</p>\n<p>This goes to show just how difficult it is to prove that an investment manager has genuine market-beating ability. If beating an index fund by more than 10 percentage points annualized over a 6-plus-year period is not enough, then what is? (An email to ARK Investment Management requesting comment was not immediately answered.)</p>\n<p>The answer: Satisfying traditional standards of statistical significance requires beating the market by a larger amount over a much longer period.</p>\n<p>An example of a fund that does jump over this much-higher hurdle is Renaissance Technologies’ Medallion Fund, a hedge fund that has produced an incredible 39% annualized return over the 33 calendar years through 2020, versus “just” 11% annualized for an index fund. Bradford Cornell, an emeritus finance professor at UCLA, told me in an interview that it is impossible to attribute that fund’s outperformance to mere luck. (Unfortunately, this fund is only available to current and former partners at Renaissance Technologies.)</p>\n<p>In the meantime, it’s too early to render anything close to a final verdict on ARK Innovation’s stunning performance. Its performance over the next several years may prove to be good enough to eventually satisfy traditional standards of statistical significance. Until then we can’t be sure. This is yet another reason why index funds are the default investment of choice.</p>","source":"market_watch","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Jury out on whether ARK Innovation returns are due to Cathie Wood’s skill or luck</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nJury out on whether ARK Innovation returns are due to Cathie Wood’s skill or luck\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-23 21:23 GMT+8 <a href=https://www.marketwatch.com/story/the-jury-is-out-on-whether-ark-innovations-red-hot-returns-are-due-to-cathie-woods-skill-or-luck-11616460092?mod=home-page><strong>MarketWatch</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Statistical scrutiny brings this high-flying ETF down to earth\nYou could have performed as well as the high-flying ARK Innovation ETF by investing in the Nasdaq 100 Index.\nI know that seems hard to ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/the-jury-is-out-on-whether-ark-innovations-red-hot-returns-are-due-to-cathie-woods-skill-or-luck-11616460092?mod=home-page\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/the-jury-is-out-on-whether-ark-innovations-red-hot-returns-are-due-to-cathie-woods-skill-or-luck-11616460092?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/599a65733b8245fcf7868668ef9ad712","article_id":"1137063642","content_text":"Statistical scrutiny brings this high-flying ETF down to earth\nYou could have performed as well as the high-flying ARK Innovation ETF by investing in the Nasdaq 100 Index.\nI know that seems hard to believe, given the stunning performance chief investment officer Cathie Wood has produced with ARK Innovation— a 229% gain over the past year, according to FactSet. Meanwhile, the Invesco QQQ Trust (which is benchmarked to the Nasdaq 100), gained 78%. Since its creation in October 2014, ARK Innovation has produced an annualized gain of 34.6%, versus 20.6% for the QQQ.\nAt the same time, ARK Innovation has been extremely volatile and risky, making an apples-to-apples comparison with the Nasdaq 100 misleading. As measured by the standard deviation of monthly returns, ARK Innovation has been 73% more volatile than QQQ. That’s really saying something, since QQQ is itself more volatile than broad market indices such as the S&P 500.\nOne approach statisticians use to create an apples-to-apples comparison is with a metric known as the Sharpe Ratio, invented by William Sharpe, the 1990 Nobel laureate in economics. It is the ratio of a fund’s average returns to the standard deviation of those returns. The Sharpe Ratio of ARK Innovation’s monthly returns since 2014 is almost precisely the same as the QQQ’s.\nIf you’re like some of my clients, your reaction is not to care about the Sharpe Ratio. “You can’t take the Sharpe Ratio to the bank,” you in effect tell me. It’s raw performance that counts, and on that basis there’s no doubt that the ARKK did far better.\nThis reaction is confused, however. In fact you can take the Sharpe Ratio to the bank. If you had been willing to incur the ARK Innovation’s increased volatility, you could have made just as much by leveraging an investment in the QQQ. That is, you would have made just as much by increasing your portfolio allocation to QQQ, or by buying it on sufficient margin. This is illustrated in the chart below:\n\nThe Sharpe Ratio is not the only method that statisticians employ for measuring adviser performance on a level playing field, but other widely used approaches reach the same conclusion. Perhaps the best known, at least in academic circles, is the Fama-French factor model, named for University of Chicago finance professor Eugene Fama (the 2013 Nobel laureate in economics) and Dartmouth College professor Ken French. Their model involves an econometric test to see if a mutual fund’s return is significantly better than a combination of index funds benchmarked to factors such as small-cap, growth, and momentum.\nThe answer for ARK Innovation is “no” — an overweight allocation to a small-cap growth fund would have produced the same overall return since November 2014.\nLuck versus skill\nNote carefully that these statistical tests do not prove that ARK Innovation’s performance is due solely to luck. Instead, those tests tell us that we cannot conclude that its performance was not due to luck. In this case, the double negative is not the same as the positive; this is a subtle, but important, difference.\nThis goes to show just how difficult it is to prove that an investment manager has genuine market-beating ability. If beating an index fund by more than 10 percentage points annualized over a 6-plus-year period is not enough, then what is? (An email to ARK Investment Management requesting comment was not immediately answered.)\nThe answer: Satisfying traditional standards of statistical significance requires beating the market by a larger amount over a much longer period.\nAn example of a fund that does jump over this much-higher hurdle is Renaissance Technologies’ Medallion Fund, a hedge fund that has produced an incredible 39% annualized return over the 33 calendar years through 2020, versus “just” 11% annualized for an index fund. Bradford Cornell, an emeritus finance professor at UCLA, told me in an interview that it is impossible to attribute that fund’s outperformance to mere luck. (Unfortunately, this fund is only available to current and former partners at Renaissance Technologies.)\nIn the meantime, it’s too early to render anything close to a final verdict on ARK Innovation’s stunning performance. Its performance over the next several years may prove to be good enough to eventually satisfy traditional standards of statistical significance. Until then we can’t be sure. This is yet another reason why index funds are the default investment of choice.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1213,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}