Has Palantir Gotten Too Expensive to Buy?_老虎社区_美港股上老虎

Has Palantir Gotten Too Expensive to Buy?

Motley Fool2023-11-30

Palantir Technologies is one of the most popular artificial intelligence (AI) stocks, and it's not hard to understand why: It has been deploying AI for much longer than its competition.With Palantir's...

网页链接

免责声明：本文观点仅代表作者个人观点，不构成本平台的投资建议，本平台不对文章信息准确性、完整性和及时性做出任何保证，亦不对因使用或信赖文章信息引发的任何损失承担责任。

梅爷
·2023-11-30
废话
回复
点赞
举报

热议股票

7x24

全部

关于我们·老虎社区守则·老虎社区账号管理规范·老虎社区服务协议·老虎社区隐私政策

公司名称：北京至简风宜信息技术有限公司

违法和不良信息投诉：010-5681-3562（工作时间9:30-18:30）

邮箱：service@laohu8.com

营业执照：91110105MA01A4U55R

ICP备：京ICP备18016422号

网安备：京公网安备11010502036490

关注我们

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"data":{"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2387430989?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","thumbnail":"","is_english":true,"pubTime":"2023-11-30 16:18","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","id":"2387430989","market":"us","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"Has Palantir Gotten Too Expensive to Buy?","media":"Motley Fool","content":"<div>\n<p>Palantir Technologies is one of the most popular artificial intelligence (AI) stocks, and it's not hard to understand why: It has been deploying AI for much longer than its competition.With Palantir's...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2023/11/29/has-this-popular-artificial-intelligence-ai-stock/\">网页链接</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"fool_stock","html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Has Palantir Gotten Too Expensive to Buy?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHas Palantir Gotten Too Expensive to Buy?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2023-11-30 16:18 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2023/11/29/has-this-popular-artificial-intelligence-ai-stock/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Palantir Technologies is one of the most popular artificial intelligence (AI) stocks, and it's not hard to understand why: It has been deploying AI for much longer than its competition.With Palantir's...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2023/11/29/has-this-popular-artificial-intelligence-ai-stock/\">网页链接</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":"PLTR","symbol_name":"Palantir Technologies Inc.","start_time":0,"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2023/11/29/has-this-popular-artificial-intelligence-ai-stock/","article_id":"2387430989","we_media_id":null,"thumbnails":[],"rights":null,"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2387430989","pubTimestamp":1701332312,"sourceInfo":{"source_id":"fool_stock","name":"Motley Fool"},"weMediaInfo":null,"summary":"Palantir is no longer cheap, but the stock might offer additional upside.","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"fool.com","property":[],"viewcount":null,"language":"en","relate_stocks":{"PLTR":"Palantir Technologies Inc."},"translate_title":"Palantir是不是太贵了，买不起？","themeId":"d5a154ad31824bafb78dd4878d009f3e","isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":null,"symbols_score_info":{"PLTR":0.9},"content_text":"Palantir Technologies is one of the most popular artificial intelligence (AI) stocks, and it's not hard to understand why: It has been deploying AI for much longer than its competition.With Palantir's experience, it's a top pick in this space, but the popularity also comes with a premium price tag. So, has the stock become too expensive right now?Commercial revenue is a vital part of the Palantir growth thesisPalantir's AI tools started out solely focused on government use. Its software takes in large data streams, interprets them using AI, and then gives insights on what action users should take.This was deployed by various intelligence agencies, the Defense Department, and other government offices, but Palantir eventually realized that this software could also be deployed in the civilian world.Still, government contracts are the largest part of Palantir's business: 55% of revenue came from this sector in the latest quarter.But commercial revenue is growing much faster, up 23% in the third quarter versus a 12% gain in government revenue. In the U.S., commercial revenue increased even quicker, rising 33%.These are great signs for Palantir bulls, as the growth rates are healthy and increasing over the commercial levels seen in the second quarter.But all of this comes at a price. The stock has risen around 200% in 2023, while its financials haven't increased at nearly that pace. This mechanism, known as multiple expansion, occurs when the market is willing to pay more for a stock than it previously had.With this increase, is Palantir too expensive? Let's compare it to another popular software company, Adobe, to see.Palantir's margins are improving, but are nowhere near Adobe'sAdobe is what many software companies aspire to be when fully mature. Its 29% profit margin is among the best in the software industry and dwarfs Palantir's 13%, but what if Palantir's levels were equal (which may happen when Palantir has reached maximum operating efficiency)?If it could duplicate Adobe's profit margins, it would have generated profits of $615 million over the past 12 months. With Palantir's $42 billion market cap, that would value the stock at 68 times earnings. For reference, Adobe trades for 56 times earnings right now and has averaged 50 times since the start of 2016.So, with Palantir growing much faster than Adobe, it probably deserves the slight premium. But remember: That's if Palantir can achieve the same profitability level as Adobe. Management has worked toward that goal by decreasing operating expenses, which has boosted the company's margins.PLTR total operating expenses (quarterly); data by YCharts.So the question remains: Is Palantir too expensive to buy? My answer: It depends.The price is expensive; there's no doubt about that. As a result, devoting a large portion of your portfolio to Palantir is a very risky proposition. However, if you want to take a small position to keep track of the company and cash in on the rise of AI, then it could be the stock for you.Investors must keep in mind that if the market decides Palantir is no longer worth its premium, the stock could fall even if the company is doing just fine. If you can accept that risk, then Palantir looks like it could be a great investment if you hold it over the next three to five years.But that's a big risk, and one that many investors have gotten caught by during multiple tech bubbles.","kind":null,"is_publish_news":true,"is_publish_highlight":true,"is_publish_live":null,"is_publish_wemedia":null,"editions":null,"column":"","sentiment":"0","news_tag":"","news_rank":0,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":1},"commentList":[{"id":247022245146880,"gmtCreate":1701329442164,"gmtModify":1701329474686,"author":{"id":"3564512863831272","authorId":"3564512863831272","name":"梅爷","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"废话","listText":"废话","text":"废话","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/247022245146880","repostId":2387430989,"repostType":2,"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"CN"}],"hasMoreComments":true,"newsSizeData":{"likeSize":0,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":1,"favoriteSize":0,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false}}