Explainer-Five legal questions raised by Elon Musk's unorthodox share sales_老虎社区_美港股上老虎

Explainer-Five legal questions raised by Elon Musk's unorthodox share sales

StreetInsider2021-11-12

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - It's been another wild ride for Tesla investors after billionaire chief executive Elon Musk pledged via Twitter to sell 10% of his shares in the company. While the unorthodox ...

网页链接

免责声明：本文观点仅代表作者个人观点，不构成本平台的投资建议，本平台不对文章信息准确性、完整性和及时性做出任何保证，亦不对因使用或信赖文章信息引发的任何损失承担责任。

CHP1
·2021-11-12
Ok
回复
4
举报
Llle
·2021-11-12
Like n comment
回复
8
举报
收起
- Llle回复CHP1:
  Thanks
  2021-11-12
  回复
  举报
- Llle:
  [Cool]
  2021-11-12
  回复
  举报
- Llle:
  [LOL]
  2021-11-12
  回复
  举报
查看更多 2 条评论
sfleong1
·2021-11-12
Like n comment
回复
3
举报
收起
- JenneyJJ:
  Done, pls like and comment in return. Thanks
  2021-11-12
  回复
  举报
Yanda
·2021-11-12
Cool
回复
7
举报
收起
- LimYH:
  great
  2021-11-12
  回复
  举报
- Permapurps:
  Good
  2021-11-12
  回复
  举报
- Yanda:
  Nice
  2021-11-12
  回复
  举报
30a14519
·2021-11-12
Like
回复
4
举报
收起
- TLC88:
  Ok
  2021-11-12
  回复
  举报
Ryoori
·2021-11-12
Like pls
回复
4
举报
收起
- GohKS:
  Please like and comment. Thank you.
  2021-11-12
  回复
  举报
QQChai
·2021-11-12
Please like
回复
7
举报
收起
- 30a14519:
  O
  2021-11-12
  回复
  举报
- calebxiong:
  ok
  2021-11-12
  回复
  举报
- Ryoori:
  Ok
  2021-11-12
  回复
  举报
Chwhy
·2021-11-12
.
回复
6
举报
股惑仔79
·2021-11-12
[Smile]
回复
8
举报
收起
- 股惑仔79:
  Ok
  2021-11-13
  回复
  举报
- WZY999:
  [Smile]
  2021-11-13
  回复
  举报
- 股惑仔79:
  Okok
  2021-11-12
  回复
  举报
查看更多 2 条评论
天橋上的大爺
·2021-11-12
Pls like
回复
8
举报
收起
- 56219dde:
  done
  2021-11-12
  回复
  举报
- TJTan:
  liked
  2021-11-12
  回复
  举报
TJTan
·2021-11-12
like
回复
7
举报
收起
- 天橋上的大爺:
  Ok
  2021-11-12
  回复
  举报
- DSYH:
  done
  2021-11-12
  回复
  举报
DSYH
·2021-11-12
Like pls
回复
5
举报
收起
- 股惑仔79:
  Ok
  2021-11-12
  回复
  举报
JAMKKT
·2021-11-12
Ok
回复
8
举报
Jfierydragon
·2021-11-12
Like n coment
回复
4
举报
ChunHui
·2021-11-12
Like
回复
4
举报
收起
- Jfierydragon:
  ok
  2021-11-12
  回复
  举报
- PBL170:
  Ok
  2021-11-12
  回复
  举报

热议股票

7x24

全部

关于我们·老虎社区守则·老虎社区账号管理规范·老虎社区服务协议·老虎社区隐私政策

公司名称：北京至简风宜信息技术有限公司

违法和不良信息投诉：010-5681-3562（工作时间9:30-18:30）

邮箱：service@laohu8.com

营业执照：91110105MA01A4U55R

ICP备：京ICP备18016422号

网安备：京公网安备11010502036490

关注我们

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"data":{"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2182248064?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","thumbnail":"","is_english":true,"pubTime":"2021-11-12 07:33","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","id":"2182248064","market":"us","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"Explainer-Five legal questions raised by Elon Musk's unorthodox share sales","media":"StreetInsider","content":"<div>\n<p>WASHINGTON (Reuters) - It's been another wild ride for Tesla investors after billionaire chief executive Elon Musk pledged via Twitter to sell 10% of his shares in the company. While the unorthodox ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=19200483\">网页链接</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"highlight_streetinsider","html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Explainer-Five legal questions raised by Elon Musk's unorthodox share sales</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nExplainer-Five legal questions raised by Elon Musk's unorthodox share sales\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-11-12 07:33 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=19200483><strong>StreetInsider</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>WASHINGTON (Reuters) - It's been another wild ride for Tesla investors after billionaire chief executive Elon Musk pledged via Twitter to sell 10% of his shares in the company. While the unorthodox ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=19200483\">网页链接</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":"TSLA","symbol_name":"特斯拉","start_time":0,"source_url":"https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=19200483","article_id":"2182248064","we_media_id":null,"thumbnails":[],"rights":null,"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2182248064","pubTimestamp":1636673600,"sourceInfo":{"source_id":"highlight_streetinsider","name":"StreetInsider"},"weMediaInfo":null,"summary":"WASHINGTON (Reuters) - It's been another wild ride for Tesla investors after billionaire chief execu","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"streetinsider.com","property":["earning"],"viewcount":null,"language":"en","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"translate_title":"解释者--埃隆·马斯克非正统股票销售引发的五个法律问题","themeId":null,"isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":null,"symbols_score_info":{"TSLA":0.9},"content_text":"WASHINGTON (Reuters) - It's been another wild ride for Tesla investors after billionaire chief executive Elon Musk pledged via Twitter to sell 10% of his shares in the company. While the unorthodox way he went about it has raised eyebrows, it's unclear if he or Tesla have broken any rules.\nThe electric carmaker lost more than $150 billion in value after Musk asked his Twitter followers over the weekend if he should sell 10% of his Tesla stake to pay new taxes being discussed by Congress. Nearly 58% said he should.\nOn Wednesday, Tesla disclosed that Musk had offloaded 3% of his stock in recent days. A sixth of those shares were sold via a corporate \"trading plan\" - a legal agreement that allows insiders to trade in the company's shares at a pre-determined date - to satisfy tax obligations. The plan, adopted Sept. 14, pre-dated Musk's poll.\nThe filings did not say why Musk had sold the other 2.5% and as of Thursday it was unclear if the sales related to Musk's Twitter poll or if he had yet sold the remaining 7%.\nSpokespeople for the SEC and Tesla did not provide comment.\nThe episode has again raised questions as to whether the celebrity billionaire breached any rules or the settlement he agreed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for tweeting in 2018 that he had secured funding to take Tesla private when in fact he had not.\nHere are five questions Tesla-watchers are asking:\nDID MUSK BREACH HIS 2018 SEC SETTLEMENT?\nWe don't know. That settlement, which the SEC tightened up in 2019, requires Musk to check any Tweets material to Tesla investors with a company lawyer, but Tesla and the SEC have not said whether that happened. Given Musk's Tweet appeared to tank the stock, he would be in breach of the settlement had he failed to vet it, said lawyers.\nWHAT'S THE DEAL WITH THE TRADING PLAN SALES?\nThe \"Rule 10b5-1\" trading plans allow insiders to execute trades in the company's stock on a pre-determined future date, providing legal protection against potential allegations of insider trading on material non-public information.\nIt's common for corporate insiders to pre-plan trades, although they can trade without the plan too. As such, Musk's sales via the plan are not unusual.\nHowever, the plans themselves have more holes than a Swiss cheese, a problem SEC chair Gary Gensler has pledged to fix.\n\"Some amount of chicanery is legal. And it is the looseness in the rules covering 'pre-planned' stock sales that are to blame,\" said Daniel Taylor, an insider trading expert and professor at the University of Pennsylvania.\nSO DID MUSK OR TESLA BREACH SEC DISCLOSURE RULES THEN?\nThat's unclear. While announcing a huge share sale on Twitter may be unconventional for most chief executives, it's the norm for Musk and investors know to watch Musk's Twitter account for news. So the Tweets per se don't appear to violate any rules.\nIn fact, several securities lawyers said Musk could argue that by explaining he had to sell to pay his taxes, rather than leaving the market guessing, he softened the blow to the stock.\nHowever, the pre-planned sales raise the question of whether Musk had always intended to sell some stock for tax reasons, but said he was doing so at the behest of his followers.\nHoward Fischer, a partner at law firm Moses & Singer, said if Musk had concealed the real reason for his sales that could arguably be a disclosure violation, but at the same time there was a lot of public information on his reasoning for the sales.\nSO WILL THE SEC TAKE A LOOK AT THE SALES?\nThe SEC constantly monitors market-moving events and has kept an eye on Musk in the past. Since 2018, it has queried Tesla on at least three occasions as to whether Musk's Tweets complied with the settlement, public filings and internal SEC documents obtained via the Freedom of Information Act show.\nThe agency's new Democratic leadership is also eager to bring cases against big companies and their top executives.\n\"This case seems like yet another instance where regulators and private plaintiffs are going to spend years investigating what he knew, what he did, and why,\" said Ty Gellasch, head of investor group Healthy Markets.\nStill, the SEC may struggle to show Musk's actions harmed investors, typically a key threshold for successfully bringing a penalty, said lawyers.\nWAIT, SO MUSK HASN'T DONE ANYTHING WRONG?\nWhen it comes to the securities law, time will tell. From a corporate governance standpoint, his actions are problematic, said lawyers.\n\"If Tesla was a normal company, and Musk a normal executive, this kind of behavior would lead to a board rebuke or worse,\" said Fischer. But investors appear by now to accept Musk's \"oddities,\" he added.","kind":null,"is_publish_news":true,"is_publish_highlight":false,"is_publish_live":null,"is_publish_wemedia":null,"editions":null,"column":"","sentiment":"","news_tag":"","news_rank":0,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":1},"commentList":[{"id":879902843,"gmtCreate":1636674847900,"gmtModify":1636674848103,"author":{"id":"3581250600180292","authorId":"3581250600180292","name":"CHP1","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/879902843","repostId":2182248064,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2182248064","pubTimestamp":1636673600,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2182248064?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-12 07:33","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Explainer-Five legal questions raised by Elon Musk's unorthodox share sales","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2182248064","media":"StreetInsider","summary":"WASHINGTON (Reuters) - It's been another wild ride for Tesla investors after billionaire chief execu","content":"<p>WASHINGTON (Reuters) - It's been another wild ride for Tesla investors after billionaire chief executive Elon Musk pledged via <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWTR\">Twitter</a> to sell 10% of his shares in the company. While the unorthodox way he went about it has raised eyebrows, it's unclear if he or Tesla have broken any rules.</p>\n<p>The electric carmaker lost more than $150 billion in value after Musk asked his Twitter followers over the weekend if he should sell 10% of his Tesla stake to pay new taxes being discussed by Congress. Nearly 58% said he should.</p>\n<p>On Wednesday, Tesla disclosed that Musk had offloaded 3% of his stock in recent days. A sixth of those shares were sold via a corporate \"trading plan\" - a legal agreement that allows insiders to trade in the company's shares at a pre-determined date - to satisfy tax obligations. The plan, adopted Sept. 14, pre-dated Musk's poll.</p>\n<p>The filings did not say why Musk had sold the other 2.5% and as of Thursday it was unclear if the sales related to Musk's Twitter poll or if he had yet sold the remaining 7%.</p>\n<p>Spokespeople for the SEC and Tesla did not provide comment.</p>\n<p>The episode has again raised questions as to whether the celebrity billionaire breached any rules or the settlement he agreed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for tweeting in 2018 that he had secured funding to take Tesla private when in fact he had not.</p>\n<p>Here are five questions Tesla-watchers are asking:</p>\n<p>DID MUSK BREACH HIS 2018 SEC SETTLEMENT?</p>\n<p>We don't know. That settlement, which the SEC tightened up in 2019, requires Musk to check any Tweets material to Tesla investors with a company lawyer, but Tesla and the SEC have not said whether that happened. Given Musk's Tweet appeared to tank the stock, he would be in breach of the settlement had he failed to vet it, said lawyers.</p>\n<p>WHAT'S THE DEAL WITH THE TRADING PLAN SALES?</p>\n<p>The \"Rule 10b5-1\" trading plans allow insiders to execute trades in the company's stock on a pre-determined future date, providing legal protection against potential allegations of insider trading on material non-public information.</p>\n<p>It's common for corporate insiders to pre-plan trades, although they can trade without the plan too. As such, Musk's sales via the plan are not unusual.</p>\n<p>However, the plans themselves have more holes than a Swiss cheese, a problem SEC chair Gary Gensler has pledged to fix.</p>\n<p>\"Some amount of chicanery is legal. And it is the looseness in the rules covering 'pre-planned' stock sales that are to blame,\" said Daniel Taylor, an insider trading expert and professor at the University of Pennsylvania.</p>\n<p>SO DID MUSK OR TESLA BREACH SEC DISCLOSURE RULES THEN?</p>\n<p>That's unclear. While announcing a huge share sale on Twitter may be unconventional for most chief executives, it's the norm for Musk and investors know to watch Musk's Twitter account for news. So the Tweets per se don't appear to violate any rules.</p>\n<p>In fact, several securities lawyers said Musk could argue that by explaining he had to sell to pay his taxes, rather than leaving the market guessing, he softened the blow to the stock.</p>\n<p>However, the pre-planned sales raise the question of whether Musk had always intended to sell some stock for tax reasons, but said he was doing so at the behest of his followers.</p>\n<p>Howard Fischer, a partner at law firm Moses &amp; Singer, said if Musk had concealed the real reason for his sales that could arguably be a disclosure violation, but at the same time there was a lot of public information on his reasoning for the sales.</p>\n<p>SO WILL THE SEC TAKE A LOOK AT THE SALES?</p>\n<p>The SEC constantly monitors market-moving events and has kept an eye on Musk in the past. Since 2018, it has queried Tesla on at least three occasions as to whether Musk's Tweets complied with the settlement, public filings and internal SEC documents obtained via the Freedom of Information Act show.</p>\n<p>The agency's new Democratic leadership is also eager to bring cases against big companies and their top executives.</p>\n<p>\"This case seems like yet another instance where regulators and private plaintiffs are going to spend years investigating what he knew, what he did, and why,\" said Ty Gellasch, head of investor group Healthy Markets.</p>\n<p>Still, the SEC may struggle to show Musk's actions harmed investors, typically a key threshold for successfully bringing a penalty, said lawyers.</p>\n<p>WAIT, SO MUSK HASN'T DONE ANYTHING WRONG?</p>\n<p>When it comes to the securities law, time will tell. From a corporate governance standpoint, his actions are problematic, said lawyers.</p>\n<p>\"If Tesla was a normal company, and Musk a normal executive, this kind of behavior would lead to a board rebuke or worse,\" said Fischer. But investors appear by now to accept Musk's \"oddities,\" he added.</p>","source":"highlight_streetinsider","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Explainer-Five legal questions raised by Elon Musk's unorthodox share sales</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nExplainer-Five legal questions raised by Elon Musk's unorthodox share sales\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-11-12 07:33 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=19200483><strong>StreetInsider</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>WASHINGTON (Reuters) - It's been another wild ride for Tesla investors after billionaire chief executive Elon Musk pledged via Twitter to sell 10% of his shares in the company. While the unorthodox ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=19200483\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=19200483","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2182248064","content_text":"WASHINGTON (Reuters) - It's been another wild ride for Tesla investors after billionaire chief executive Elon Musk pledged via Twitter to sell 10% of his shares in the company. While the unorthodox way he went about it has raised eyebrows, it's unclear if he or Tesla have broken any rules.\nThe electric carmaker lost more than $150 billion in value after Musk asked his Twitter followers over the weekend if he should sell 10% of his Tesla stake to pay new taxes being discussed by Congress. Nearly 58% said he should.\nOn Wednesday, Tesla disclosed that Musk had offloaded 3% of his stock in recent days. A sixth of those shares were sold via a corporate \"trading plan\" - a legal agreement that allows insiders to trade in the company's shares at a pre-determined date - to satisfy tax obligations. The plan, adopted Sept. 14, pre-dated Musk's poll.\nThe filings did not say why Musk had sold the other 2.5% and as of Thursday it was unclear if the sales related to Musk's Twitter poll or if he had yet sold the remaining 7%.\nSpokespeople for the SEC and Tesla did not provide comment.\nThe episode has again raised questions as to whether the celebrity billionaire breached any rules or the settlement he agreed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for tweeting in 2018 that he had secured funding to take Tesla private when in fact he had not.\nHere are five questions Tesla-watchers are asking:\nDID MUSK BREACH HIS 2018 SEC SETTLEMENT?\nWe don't know. That settlement, which the SEC tightened up in 2019, requires Musk to check any Tweets material to Tesla investors with a company lawyer, but Tesla and the SEC have not said whether that happened. Given Musk's Tweet appeared to tank the stock, he would be in breach of the settlement had he failed to vet it, said lawyers.\nWHAT'S THE DEAL WITH THE TRADING PLAN SALES?\nThe \"Rule 10b5-1\" trading plans allow insiders to execute trades in the company's stock on a pre-determined future date, providing legal protection against potential allegations of insider trading on material non-public information.\nIt's common for corporate insiders to pre-plan trades, although they can trade without the plan too. As such, Musk's sales via the plan are not unusual.\nHowever, the plans themselves have more holes than a Swiss cheese, a problem SEC chair Gary Gensler has pledged to fix.\n\"Some amount of chicanery is legal. And it is the looseness in the rules covering 'pre-planned' stock sales that are to blame,\" said Daniel Taylor, an insider trading expert and professor at the University of Pennsylvania.\nSO DID MUSK OR TESLA BREACH SEC DISCLOSURE RULES THEN?\nThat's unclear. While announcing a huge share sale on Twitter may be unconventional for most chief executives, it's the norm for Musk and investors know to watch Musk's Twitter account for news. So the Tweets per se don't appear to violate any rules.\nIn fact, several securities lawyers said Musk could argue that by explaining he had to sell to pay his taxes, rather than leaving the market guessing, he softened the blow to the stock.\nHowever, the pre-planned sales raise the question of whether Musk had always intended to sell some stock for tax reasons, but said he was doing so at the behest of his followers.\nHoward Fischer, a partner at law firm Moses & Singer, said if Musk had concealed the real reason for his sales that could arguably be a disclosure violation, but at the same time there was a lot of public information on his reasoning for the sales.\nSO WILL THE SEC TAKE A LOOK AT THE SALES?\nThe SEC constantly monitors market-moving events and has kept an eye on Musk in the past. Since 2018, it has queried Tesla on at least three occasions as to whether Musk's Tweets complied with the settlement, public filings and internal SEC documents obtained via the Freedom of Information Act show.\nThe agency's new Democratic leadership is also eager to bring cases against big companies and their top executives.\n\"This case seems like yet another instance where regulators and private plaintiffs are going to spend years investigating what he knew, what he did, and why,\" said Ty Gellasch, head of investor group Healthy Markets.\nStill, the SEC may struggle to show Musk's actions harmed investors, typically a key threshold for successfully bringing a penalty, said lawyers.\nWAIT, SO MUSK HASN'T DONE ANYTHING WRONG?\nWhen it comes to the securities law, time will tell. From a corporate governance standpoint, his actions are problematic, said lawyers.\n\"If Tesla was a normal company, and Musk a normal executive, this kind of behavior would lead to a board rebuke or worse,\" said Fischer. But investors appear by now to accept Musk's \"oddities,\" he added.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"CN"},{"id":879909272,"gmtCreate":1636674513294,"gmtModify":1636676591360,"author":{"id":"4091611057314000","authorId":"4091611057314000","name":"Llle","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8dd2205ae9c1dce833edf40135ec7fc7","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Like n comment","listText":"Like n comment","text":"Like n comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":2,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":10,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/879909272","repostId":2182248064,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2182248064","pubTimestamp":1636673600,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2182248064?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-12 07:33","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Explainer-Five legal questions raised by Elon Musk's unorthodox share sales","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2182248064","media":"StreetInsider","summary":"WASHINGTON (Reuters) - It's been another wild ride for Tesla investors after billionaire chief execu","content":"<p>WASHINGTON (Reuters) - It's been another wild ride for Tesla investors after billionaire chief executive Elon Musk pledged via <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWTR\">Twitter</a> to sell 10% of his shares in the company. While the unorthodox way he went about it has raised eyebrows, it's unclear if he or Tesla have broken any rules.</p>\n<p>The electric carmaker lost more than $150 billion in value after Musk asked his Twitter followers over the weekend if he should sell 10% of his Tesla stake to pay new taxes being discussed by Congress. Nearly 58% said he should.</p>\n<p>On Wednesday, Tesla disclosed that Musk had offloaded 3% of his stock in recent days. A sixth of those shares were sold via a corporate \"trading plan\" - a legal agreement that allows insiders to trade in the company's shares at a pre-determined date - to satisfy tax obligations. The plan, adopted Sept. 14, pre-dated Musk's poll.</p>\n<p>The filings did not say why Musk had sold the other 2.5% and as of Thursday it was unclear if the sales related to Musk's Twitter poll or if he had yet sold the remaining 7%.</p>\n<p>Spokespeople for the SEC and Tesla did not provide comment.</p>\n<p>The episode has again raised questions as to whether the celebrity billionaire breached any rules or the settlement he agreed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for tweeting in 2018 that he had secured funding to take Tesla private when in fact he had not.</p>\n<p>Here are five questions Tesla-watchers are asking:</p>\n<p>DID MUSK BREACH HIS 2018 SEC SETTLEMENT?</p>\n<p>We don't know. That settlement, which the SEC tightened up in 2019, requires Musk to check any Tweets material to Tesla investors with a company lawyer, but Tesla and the SEC have not said whether that happened. Given Musk's Tweet appeared to tank the stock, he would be in breach of the settlement had he failed to vet it, said lawyers.</p>\n<p>WHAT'S THE DEAL WITH THE TRADING PLAN SALES?</p>\n<p>The \"Rule 10b5-1\" trading plans allow insiders to execute trades in the company's stock on a pre-determined future date, providing legal protection against potential allegations of insider trading on material non-public information.</p>\n<p>It's common for corporate insiders to pre-plan trades, although they can trade without the plan too. As such, Musk's sales via the plan are not unusual.</p>\n<p>However, the plans themselves have more holes than a Swiss cheese, a problem SEC chair Gary Gensler has pledged to fix.</p>\n<p>\"Some amount of chicanery is legal. And it is the looseness in the rules covering 'pre-planned' stock sales that are to blame,\" said Daniel Taylor, an insider trading expert and professor at the University of Pennsylvania.</p>\n<p>SO DID MUSK OR TESLA BREACH SEC DISCLOSURE RULES THEN?</p>\n<p>That's unclear. While announcing a huge share sale on Twitter may be unconventional for most chief executives, it's the norm for Musk and investors know to watch Musk's Twitter account for news. So the Tweets per se don't appear to violate any rules.</p>\n<p>In fact, several securities lawyers said Musk could argue that by explaining he had to sell to pay his taxes, rather than leaving the market guessing, he softened the blow to the stock.</p>\n<p>However, the pre-planned sales raise the question of whether Musk had always intended to sell some stock for tax reasons, but said he was doing so at the behest of his followers.</p>\n<p>Howard Fischer, a partner at law firm Moses &amp; Singer, said if Musk had concealed the real reason for his sales that could arguably be a disclosure violation, but at the same time there was a lot of public information on his reasoning for the sales.</p>\n<p>SO WILL THE SEC TAKE A LOOK AT THE SALES?</p>\n<p>The SEC constantly monitors market-moving events and has kept an eye on Musk in the past. Since 2018, it has queried Tesla on at least three occasions as to whether Musk's Tweets complied with the settlement, public filings and internal SEC documents obtained via the Freedom of Information Act show.</p>\n<p>The agency's new Democratic leadership is also eager to bring cases against big companies and their top executives.</p>\n<p>\"This case seems like yet another instance where regulators and private plaintiffs are going to spend years investigating what he knew, what he did, and why,\" said Ty Gellasch, head of investor group Healthy Markets.</p>\n<p>Still, the SEC may struggle to show Musk's actions harmed investors, typically a key threshold for successfully bringing a penalty, said lawyers.</p>\n<p>WAIT, SO MUSK HASN'T DONE ANYTHING WRONG?</p>\n<p>When it comes to the securities law, time will tell. From a corporate governance standpoint, his actions are problematic, said lawyers.</p>\n<p>\"If Tesla was a normal company, and Musk a normal executive, this kind of behavior would lead to a board rebuke or worse,\" said Fischer. But investors appear by now to accept Musk's \"oddities,\" he added.</p>","source":"highlight_streetinsider","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Explainer-Five legal questions raised by Elon Musk's unorthodox share sales</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nExplainer-Five legal questions raised by Elon Musk's unorthodox share sales\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-11-12 07:33 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=19200483><strong>StreetInsider</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>WASHINGTON (Reuters) - It's been another wild ride for Tesla investors after billionaire chief executive Elon Musk pledged via Twitter to sell 10% of his shares in the company. While the unorthodox ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=19200483\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=19200483","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2182248064","content_text":"WASHINGTON (Reuters) - It's been another wild ride for Tesla investors after billionaire chief executive Elon Musk pledged via Twitter to sell 10% of his shares in the company. While the unorthodox way he went about it has raised eyebrows, it's unclear if he or Tesla have broken any rules.\nThe electric carmaker lost more than $150 billion in value after Musk asked his Twitter followers over the weekend if he should sell 10% of his Tesla stake to pay new taxes being discussed by Congress. Nearly 58% said he should.\nOn Wednesday, Tesla disclosed that Musk had offloaded 3% of his stock in recent days. A sixth of those shares were sold via a corporate \"trading plan\" - a legal agreement that allows insiders to trade in the company's shares at a pre-determined date - to satisfy tax obligations. The plan, adopted Sept. 14, pre-dated Musk's poll.\nThe filings did not say why Musk had sold the other 2.5% and as of Thursday it was unclear if the sales related to Musk's Twitter poll or if he had yet sold the remaining 7%.\nSpokespeople for the SEC and Tesla did not provide comment.\nThe episode has again raised questions as to whether the celebrity billionaire breached any rules or the settlement he agreed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for tweeting in 2018 that he had secured funding to take Tesla private when in fact he had not.\nHere are five questions Tesla-watchers are asking:\nDID MUSK BREACH HIS 2018 SEC SETTLEMENT?\nWe don't know. That settlement, which the SEC tightened up in 2019, requires Musk to check any Tweets material to Tesla investors with a company lawyer, but Tesla and the SEC have not said whether that happened. Given Musk's Tweet appeared to tank the stock, he would be in breach of the settlement had he failed to vet it, said lawyers.\nWHAT'S THE DEAL WITH THE TRADING PLAN SALES?\nThe \"Rule 10b5-1\" trading plans allow insiders to execute trades in the company's stock on a pre-determined future date, providing legal protection against potential allegations of insider trading on material non-public information.\nIt's common for corporate insiders to pre-plan trades, although they can trade without the plan too. As such, Musk's sales via the plan are not unusual.\nHowever, the plans themselves have more holes than a Swiss cheese, a problem SEC chair Gary Gensler has pledged to fix.\n\"Some amount of chicanery is legal. And it is the looseness in the rules covering 'pre-planned' stock sales that are to blame,\" said Daniel Taylor, an insider trading expert and professor at the University of Pennsylvania.\nSO DID MUSK OR TESLA BREACH SEC DISCLOSURE RULES THEN?\nThat's unclear. While announcing a huge share sale on Twitter may be unconventional for most chief executives, it's the norm for Musk and investors know to watch Musk's Twitter account for news. So the Tweets per se don't appear to violate any rules.\nIn fact, several securities lawyers said Musk could argue that by explaining he had to sell to pay his taxes, rather than leaving the market guessing, he softened the blow to the stock.\nHowever, the pre-planned sales raise the question of whether Musk had always intended to sell some stock for tax reasons, but said he was doing so at the behest of his followers.\nHoward Fischer, a partner at law firm Moses & Singer, said if Musk had concealed the real reason for his sales that could arguably be a disclosure violation, but at the same time there was a lot of public information on his reasoning for the sales.\nSO WILL THE SEC TAKE A LOOK AT THE SALES?\nThe SEC constantly monitors market-moving events and has kept an eye on Musk in the past. Since 2018, it has queried Tesla on at least three occasions as to whether Musk's Tweets complied with the settlement, public filings and internal SEC documents obtained via the Freedom of Information Act show.\nThe agency's new Democratic leadership is also eager to bring cases against big companies and their top executives.\n\"This case seems like yet another instance where regulators and private plaintiffs are going to spend years investigating what he knew, what he did, and why,\" said Ty Gellasch, head of investor group Healthy Markets.\nStill, the SEC may struggle to show Musk's actions harmed investors, typically a key threshold for successfully bringing a penalty, said lawyers.\nWAIT, SO MUSK HASN'T DONE ANYTHING WRONG?\nWhen it comes to the securities law, time will tell. From a corporate governance standpoint, his actions are problematic, said lawyers.\n\"If Tesla was a normal company, and Musk a normal executive, this kind of behavior would lead to a board rebuke or worse,\" said Fischer. But investors appear by now to accept Musk's \"oddities,\" he added.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6543719,"gmtCreate":1636676591312,"gmtModify":1636676591348,"authorId":4091611057314000,"author":{"id":4091611057314000,"authorId":4091611057314000,"name":"Llle","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8dd2205ae9c1dce833edf40135ec7fc7","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":3581250600180292,"repliedAuthor":{"id":3581250600180292,"authorId":3581250600180292,"name":"CHP1","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"objectId":879909272,"type":1,"supId":6543087,"prevId":6543183,"content":"Thanks","text":"Thanks","html":"Thanks"},{"id":6543716,"gmtCreate":1636676583193,"gmtModify":1636676583276,"authorId":4091611057314000,"author":{"id":4091611057314000,"authorId":4091611057314000,"name":"Llle","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8dd2205ae9c1dce833edf40135ec7fc7","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":879909272,"type":1,"supId":6543087,"prevId":0,"content":"[Cool]","text":"[Cool]","html":"[Cool]"},{"id":6543712,"gmtCreate":1636676575636,"gmtModify":1636676575735,"authorId":4091611057314000,"author":{"id":4091611057314000,"authorId":4091611057314000,"name":"Llle","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8dd2205ae9c1dce833edf40135ec7fc7","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":879909272,"type":1,"supId":6543184,"prevId":0,"content":"[LOL]","text":"[LOL]","html":"[LOL]"},{"id":6543707,"gmtCreate":1636676569741,"gmtModify":1636676569842,"authorId":4091611057314000,"author":{"id":4091611057314000,"authorId":4091611057314000,"name":"Llle","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8dd2205ae9c1dce833edf40135ec7fc7","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":879909272,"type":1,"supId":6543187,"prevId":0,"content":"[Cool]","text":"[Cool]","html":"[Cool]"},{"id":6543706,"gmtCreate":1636676563616,"gmtModify":1636676563721,"authorId":4091611057314000,"author":{"id":4091611057314000,"authorId":4091611057314000,"name":"Llle","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8dd2205ae9c1dce833edf40135ec7fc7","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":879909272,"type":1,"supId":6543191,"prevId":0,"content":"[Cool]","text":"[Cool]","html":"[Cool]"}],"langContent":"CN"},{"id":879909680,"gmtCreate":1636674497132,"gmtModify":1636674497934,"author":{"id":"3583570345500843","authorId":"3583570345500843","name":"sfleong1","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2ec42f3f2b911279950a45a9140bc358","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Like n comment","listText":"Like n comment","text":"Like n comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/879909680","repostId":2182248064,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2182248064","pubTimestamp":1636673600,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2182248064?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-12 07:33","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Explainer-Five legal questions raised by Elon Musk's unorthodox share sales","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2182248064","media":"StreetInsider","summary":"WASHINGTON (Reuters) - It's been another wild ride for Tesla investors after billionaire chief execu","content":"<p>WASHINGTON (Reuters) - It's been another wild ride for Tesla investors after billionaire chief executive Elon Musk pledged via <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWTR\">Twitter</a> to sell 10% of his shares in the company. While the unorthodox way he went about it has raised eyebrows, it's unclear if he or Tesla have broken any rules.</p>\n<p>The electric carmaker lost more than $150 billion in value after Musk asked his Twitter followers over the weekend if he should sell 10% of his Tesla stake to pay new taxes being discussed by Congress. Nearly 58% said he should.</p>\n<p>On Wednesday, Tesla disclosed that Musk had offloaded 3% of his stock in recent days. A sixth of those shares were sold via a corporate \"trading plan\" - a legal agreement that allows insiders to trade in the company's shares at a pre-determined date - to satisfy tax obligations. The plan, adopted Sept. 14, pre-dated Musk's poll.</p>\n<p>The filings did not say why Musk had sold the other 2.5% and as of Thursday it was unclear if the sales related to Musk's Twitter poll or if he had yet sold the remaining 7%.</p>\n<p>Spokespeople for the SEC and Tesla did not provide comment.</p>\n<p>The episode has again raised questions as to whether the celebrity billionaire breached any rules or the settlement he agreed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for tweeting in 2018 that he had secured funding to take Tesla private when in fact he had not.</p>\n<p>Here are five questions Tesla-watchers are asking:</p>\n<p>DID MUSK BREACH HIS 2018 SEC SETTLEMENT?</p>\n<p>We don't know. That settlement, which the SEC tightened up in 2019, requires Musk to check any Tweets material to Tesla investors with a company lawyer, but Tesla and the SEC have not said whether that happened. Given Musk's Tweet appeared to tank the stock, he would be in breach of the settlement had he failed to vet it, said lawyers.</p>\n<p>WHAT'S THE DEAL WITH THE TRADING PLAN SALES?</p>\n<p>The \"Rule 10b5-1\" trading plans allow insiders to execute trades in the company's stock on a pre-determined future date, providing legal protection against potential allegations of insider trading on material non-public information.</p>\n<p>It's common for corporate insiders to pre-plan trades, although they can trade without the plan too. As such, Musk's sales via the plan are not unusual.</p>\n<p>However, the plans themselves have more holes than a Swiss cheese, a problem SEC chair Gary Gensler has pledged to fix.</p>\n<p>\"Some amount of chicanery is legal. And it is the looseness in the rules covering 'pre-planned' stock sales that are to blame,\" said Daniel Taylor, an insider trading expert and professor at the University of Pennsylvania.</p>\n<p>SO DID MUSK OR TESLA BREACH SEC DISCLOSURE RULES THEN?</p>\n<p>That's unclear. While announcing a huge share sale on Twitter may be unconventional for most chief executives, it's the norm for Musk and investors know to watch Musk's Twitter account for news. So the Tweets per se don't appear to violate any rules.</p>\n<p>In fact, several securities lawyers said Musk could argue that by explaining he had to sell to pay his taxes, rather than leaving the market guessing, he softened the blow to the stock.</p>\n<p>However, the pre-planned sales raise the question of whether Musk had always intended to sell some stock for tax reasons, but said he was doing so at the behest of his followers.</p>\n<p>Howard Fischer, a partner at law firm Moses &amp; Singer, said if Musk had concealed the real reason for his sales that could arguably be a disclosure violation, but at the same time there was a lot of public information on his reasoning for the sales.</p>\n<p>SO WILL THE SEC TAKE A LOOK AT THE SALES?</p>\n<p>The SEC constantly monitors market-moving events and has kept an eye on Musk in the past. Since 2018, it has queried Tesla on at least three occasions as to whether Musk's Tweets complied with the settlement, public filings and internal SEC documents obtained via the Freedom of Information Act show.</p>\n<p>The agency's new Democratic leadership is also eager to bring cases against big companies and their top executives.</p>\n<p>\"This case seems like yet another instance where regulators and private plaintiffs are going to spend years investigating what he knew, what he did, and why,\" said Ty Gellasch, head of investor group Healthy Markets.</p>\n<p>Still, the SEC may struggle to show Musk's actions harmed investors, typically a key threshold for successfully bringing a penalty, said lawyers.</p>\n<p>WAIT, SO MUSK HASN'T DONE ANYTHING WRONG?</p>\n<p>When it comes to the securities law, time will tell. From a corporate governance standpoint, his actions are problematic, said lawyers.</p>\n<p>\"If Tesla was a normal company, and Musk a normal executive, this kind of behavior would lead to a board rebuke or worse,\" said Fischer. But investors appear by now to accept Musk's \"oddities,\" he added.</p>","source":"highlight_streetinsider","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Explainer-Five legal questions raised by Elon Musk's unorthodox share sales</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nExplainer-Five legal questions raised by Elon Musk's unorthodox share sales\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-11-12 07:33 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=19200483><strong>StreetInsider</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>WASHINGTON (Reuters) - It's been another wild ride for Tesla investors after billionaire chief executive Elon Musk pledged via Twitter to sell 10% of his shares in the company. While the unorthodox ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=19200483\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=19200483","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2182248064","content_text":"WASHINGTON (Reuters) - It's been another wild ride for Tesla investors after billionaire chief executive Elon Musk pledged via Twitter to sell 10% of his shares in the company. While the unorthodox way he went about it has raised eyebrows, it's unclear if he or Tesla have broken any rules.\nThe electric carmaker lost more than $150 billion in value after Musk asked his Twitter followers over the weekend if he should sell 10% of his Tesla stake to pay new taxes being discussed by Congress. Nearly 58% said he should.\nOn Wednesday, Tesla disclosed that Musk had offloaded 3% of his stock in recent days. A sixth of those shares were sold via a corporate \"trading plan\" - a legal agreement that allows insiders to trade in the company's shares at a pre-determined date - to satisfy tax obligations. The plan, adopted Sept. 14, pre-dated Musk's poll.\nThe filings did not say why Musk had sold the other 2.5% and as of Thursday it was unclear if the sales related to Musk's Twitter poll or if he had yet sold the remaining 7%.\nSpokespeople for the SEC and Tesla did not provide comment.\nThe episode has again raised questions as to whether the celebrity billionaire breached any rules or the settlement he agreed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for tweeting in 2018 that he had secured funding to take Tesla private when in fact he had not.\nHere are five questions Tesla-watchers are asking:\nDID MUSK BREACH HIS 2018 SEC SETTLEMENT?\nWe don't know. That settlement, which the SEC tightened up in 2019, requires Musk to check any Tweets material to Tesla investors with a company lawyer, but Tesla and the SEC have not said whether that happened. Given Musk's Tweet appeared to tank the stock, he would be in breach of the settlement had he failed to vet it, said lawyers.\nWHAT'S THE DEAL WITH THE TRADING PLAN SALES?\nThe \"Rule 10b5-1\" trading plans allow insiders to execute trades in the company's stock on a pre-determined future date, providing legal protection against potential allegations of insider trading on material non-public information.\nIt's common for corporate insiders to pre-plan trades, although they can trade without the plan too. As such, Musk's sales via the plan are not unusual.\nHowever, the plans themselves have more holes than a Swiss cheese, a problem SEC chair Gary Gensler has pledged to fix.\n\"Some amount of chicanery is legal. And it is the looseness in the rules covering 'pre-planned' stock sales that are to blame,\" said Daniel Taylor, an insider trading expert and professor at the University of Pennsylvania.\nSO DID MUSK OR TESLA BREACH SEC DISCLOSURE RULES THEN?\nThat's unclear. While announcing a huge share sale on Twitter may be unconventional for most chief executives, it's the norm for Musk and investors know to watch Musk's Twitter account for news. So the Tweets per se don't appear to violate any rules.\nIn fact, several securities lawyers said Musk could argue that by explaining he had to sell to pay his taxes, rather than leaving the market guessing, he softened the blow to the stock.\nHowever, the pre-planned sales raise the question of whether Musk had always intended to sell some stock for tax reasons, but said he was doing so at the behest of his followers.\nHoward Fischer, a partner at law firm Moses & Singer, said if Musk had concealed the real reason for his sales that could arguably be a disclosure violation, but at the same time there was a lot of public information on his reasoning for the sales.\nSO WILL THE SEC TAKE A LOOK AT THE SALES?\nThe SEC constantly monitors market-moving events and has kept an eye on Musk in the past. Since 2018, it has queried Tesla on at least three occasions as to whether Musk's Tweets complied with the settlement, public filings and internal SEC documents obtained via the Freedom of Information Act show.\nThe agency's new Democratic leadership is also eager to bring cases against big companies and their top executives.\n\"This case seems like yet another instance where regulators and private plaintiffs are going to spend years investigating what he knew, what he did, and why,\" said Ty Gellasch, head of investor group Healthy Markets.\nStill, the SEC may struggle to show Musk's actions harmed investors, typically a key threshold for successfully bringing a penalty, said lawyers.\nWAIT, SO MUSK HASN'T DONE ANYTHING WRONG?\nWhen it comes to the securities law, time will tell. From a corporate governance standpoint, his actions are problematic, said lawyers.\n\"If Tesla was a normal company, and Musk a normal executive, this kind of behavior would lead to a board rebuke or worse,\" said Fischer. But investors appear by now to accept Musk's \"oddities,\" he added.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6543081,"gmtCreate":1636674517563,"gmtModify":1636674517594,"authorId":3573203718015318,"author":{"id":3573203718015318,"authorId":3573203718015318,"name":"JenneyJJ","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8886c72f606e31ed1eacbf1e0fb36fef","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":879909680,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Done, pls like and comment in return. Thanks","text":"Done, pls like and comment in return. Thanks","html":"Done, pls like and comment in return. Thanks"}],"langContent":"CN"},{"id":879072111,"gmtCreate":1636674135136,"gmtModify":1636674135539,"author":{"id":"3576790897131947","authorId":"3576790897131947","name":"Yanda","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a18793145d8e701bbc80926ad081518","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Cool","listText":"Cool","text":"Cool","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/879072111","repostId":2182248064,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2182248064","pubTimestamp":1636673600,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2182248064?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-12 07:33","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Explainer-Five legal questions raised by Elon Musk's unorthodox share sales","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2182248064","media":"StreetInsider","summary":"WASHINGTON (Reuters) - It's been another wild ride for Tesla investors after billionaire chief execu","content":"<p>WASHINGTON (Reuters) - It's been another wild ride for Tesla investors after billionaire chief executive Elon Musk pledged via <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWTR\">Twitter</a> to sell 10% of his shares in the company. While the unorthodox way he went about it has raised eyebrows, it's unclear if he or Tesla have broken any rules.</p>\n<p>The electric carmaker lost more than $150 billion in value after Musk asked his Twitter followers over the weekend if he should sell 10% of his Tesla stake to pay new taxes being discussed by Congress. Nearly 58% said he should.</p>\n<p>On Wednesday, Tesla disclosed that Musk had offloaded 3% of his stock in recent days. A sixth of those shares were sold via a corporate \"trading plan\" - a legal agreement that allows insiders to trade in the company's shares at a pre-determined date - to satisfy tax obligations. The plan, adopted Sept. 14, pre-dated Musk's poll.</p>\n<p>The filings did not say why Musk had sold the other 2.5% and as of Thursday it was unclear if the sales related to Musk's Twitter poll or if he had yet sold the remaining 7%.</p>\n<p>Spokespeople for the SEC and Tesla did not provide comment.</p>\n<p>The episode has again raised questions as to whether the celebrity billionaire breached any rules or the settlement he agreed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for tweeting in 2018 that he had secured funding to take Tesla private when in fact he had not.</p>\n<p>Here are five questions Tesla-watchers are asking:</p>\n<p>DID MUSK BREACH HIS 2018 SEC SETTLEMENT?</p>\n<p>We don't know. That settlement, which the SEC tightened up in 2019, requires Musk to check any Tweets material to Tesla investors with a company lawyer, but Tesla and the SEC have not said whether that happened. Given Musk's Tweet appeared to tank the stock, he would be in breach of the settlement had he failed to vet it, said lawyers.</p>\n<p>WHAT'S THE DEAL WITH THE TRADING PLAN SALES?</p>\n<p>The \"Rule 10b5-1\" trading plans allow insiders to execute trades in the company's stock on a pre-determined future date, providing legal protection against potential allegations of insider trading on material non-public information.</p>\n<p>It's common for corporate insiders to pre-plan trades, although they can trade without the plan too. As such, Musk's sales via the plan are not unusual.</p>\n<p>However, the plans themselves have more holes than a Swiss cheese, a problem SEC chair Gary Gensler has pledged to fix.</p>\n<p>\"Some amount of chicanery is legal. And it is the looseness in the rules covering 'pre-planned' stock sales that are to blame,\" said Daniel Taylor, an insider trading expert and professor at the University of Pennsylvania.</p>\n<p>SO DID MUSK OR TESLA BREACH SEC DISCLOSURE RULES THEN?</p>\n<p>That's unclear. While announcing a huge share sale on Twitter may be unconventional for most chief executives, it's the norm for Musk and investors know to watch Musk's Twitter account for news. So the Tweets per se don't appear to violate any rules.</p>\n<p>In fact, several securities lawyers said Musk could argue that by explaining he had to sell to pay his taxes, rather than leaving the market guessing, he softened the blow to the stock.</p>\n<p>However, the pre-planned sales raise the question of whether Musk had always intended to sell some stock for tax reasons, but said he was doing so at the behest of his followers.</p>\n<p>Howard Fischer, a partner at law firm Moses &amp; Singer, said if Musk had concealed the real reason for his sales that could arguably be a disclosure violation, but at the same time there was a lot of public information on his reasoning for the sales.</p>\n<p>SO WILL THE SEC TAKE A LOOK AT THE SALES?</p>\n<p>The SEC constantly monitors market-moving events and has kept an eye on Musk in the past. Since 2018, it has queried Tesla on at least three occasions as to whether Musk's Tweets complied with the settlement, public filings and internal SEC documents obtained via the Freedom of Information Act show.</p>\n<p>The agency's new Democratic leadership is also eager to bring cases against big companies and their top executives.</p>\n<p>\"This case seems like yet another instance where regulators and private plaintiffs are going to spend years investigating what he knew, what he did, and why,\" said Ty Gellasch, head of investor group Healthy Markets.</p>\n<p>Still, the SEC may struggle to show Musk's actions harmed investors, typically a key threshold for successfully bringing a penalty, said lawyers.</p>\n<p>WAIT, SO MUSK HASN'T DONE ANYTHING WRONG?</p>\n<p>When it comes to the securities law, time will tell. From a corporate governance standpoint, his actions are problematic, said lawyers.</p>\n<p>\"If Tesla was a normal company, and Musk a normal executive, this kind of behavior would lead to a board rebuke or worse,\" said Fischer. But investors appear by now to accept Musk's \"oddities,\" he added.</p>","source":"highlight_streetinsider","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Explainer-Five legal questions raised by Elon Musk's unorthodox share sales</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nExplainer-Five legal questions raised by Elon Musk's unorthodox share sales\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-11-12 07:33 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=19200483><strong>StreetInsider</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>WASHINGTON (Reuters) - It's been another wild ride for Tesla investors after billionaire chief executive Elon Musk pledged via Twitter to sell 10% of his shares in the company. While the unorthodox ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=19200483\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=19200483","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2182248064","content_text":"WASHINGTON (Reuters) - It's been another wild ride for Tesla investors after billionaire chief executive Elon Musk pledged via Twitter to sell 10% of his shares in the company. While the unorthodox way he went about it has raised eyebrows, it's unclear if he or Tesla have broken any rules.\nThe electric carmaker lost more than $150 billion in value after Musk asked his Twitter followers over the weekend if he should sell 10% of his Tesla stake to pay new taxes being discussed by Congress. Nearly 58% said he should.\nOn Wednesday, Tesla disclosed that Musk had offloaded 3% of his stock in recent days. A sixth of those shares were sold via a corporate \"trading plan\" - a legal agreement that allows insiders to trade in the company's shares at a pre-determined date - to satisfy tax obligations. The plan, adopted Sept. 14, pre-dated Musk's poll.\nThe filings did not say why Musk had sold the other 2.5% and as of Thursday it was unclear if the sales related to Musk's Twitter poll or if he had yet sold the remaining 7%.\nSpokespeople for the SEC and Tesla did not provide comment.\nThe episode has again raised questions as to whether the celebrity billionaire breached any rules or the settlement he agreed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for tweeting in 2018 that he had secured funding to take Tesla private when in fact he had not.\nHere are five questions Tesla-watchers are asking:\nDID MUSK BREACH HIS 2018 SEC SETTLEMENT?\nWe don't know. That settlement, which the SEC tightened up in 2019, requires Musk to check any Tweets material to Tesla investors with a company lawyer, but Tesla and the SEC have not said whether that happened. Given Musk's Tweet appeared to tank the stock, he would be in breach of the settlement had he failed to vet it, said lawyers.\nWHAT'S THE DEAL WITH THE TRADING PLAN SALES?\nThe \"Rule 10b5-1\" trading plans allow insiders to execute trades in the company's stock on a pre-determined future date, providing legal protection against potential allegations of insider trading on material non-public information.\nIt's common for corporate insiders to pre-plan trades, although they can trade without the plan too. As such, Musk's sales via the plan are not unusual.\nHowever, the plans themselves have more holes than a Swiss cheese, a problem SEC chair Gary Gensler has pledged to fix.\n\"Some amount of chicanery is legal. And it is the looseness in the rules covering 'pre-planned' stock sales that are to blame,\" said Daniel Taylor, an insider trading expert and professor at the University of Pennsylvania.\nSO DID MUSK OR TESLA BREACH SEC DISCLOSURE RULES THEN?\nThat's unclear. While announcing a huge share sale on Twitter may be unconventional for most chief executives, it's the norm for Musk and investors know to watch Musk's Twitter account for news. So the Tweets per se don't appear to violate any rules.\nIn fact, several securities lawyers said Musk could argue that by explaining he had to sell to pay his taxes, rather than leaving the market guessing, he softened the blow to the stock.\nHowever, the pre-planned sales raise the question of whether Musk had always intended to sell some stock for tax reasons, but said he was doing so at the behest of his followers.\nHoward Fischer, a partner at law firm Moses & Singer, said if Musk had concealed the real reason for his sales that could arguably be a disclosure violation, but at the same time there was a lot of public information on his reasoning for the sales.\nSO WILL THE SEC TAKE A LOOK AT THE SALES?\nThe SEC constantly monitors market-moving events and has kept an eye on Musk in the past. Since 2018, it has queried Tesla on at least three occasions as to whether Musk's Tweets complied with the settlement, public filings and internal SEC documents obtained via the Freedom of Information Act show.\nThe agency's new Democratic leadership is also eager to bring cases against big companies and their top executives.\n\"This case seems like yet another instance where regulators and private plaintiffs are going to spend years investigating what he knew, what he did, and why,\" said Ty Gellasch, head of investor group Healthy Markets.\nStill, the SEC may struggle to show Musk's actions harmed investors, typically a key threshold for successfully bringing a penalty, said lawyers.\nWAIT, SO MUSK HASN'T DONE ANYTHING WRONG?\nWhen it comes to the securities law, time will tell. From a corporate governance standpoint, his actions are problematic, said lawyers.\n\"If Tesla was a normal company, and Musk a normal executive, this kind of behavior would lead to a board rebuke or worse,\" said Fischer. But investors appear by now to accept Musk's \"oddities,\" he added.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6543943,"gmtCreate":1636677213027,"gmtModify":1636677213059,"authorId":3586223575744434,"author":{"id":3586223575744434,"authorId":3586223575744434,"name":"LimYH","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":879072111,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"great","text":"great","html":"great"},{"id":6543052,"gmtCreate":1636674362013,"gmtModify":1636674362113,"authorId":3576141127250570,"author":{"id":3576141127250570,"authorId":3576141127250570,"name":"Permapurps","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":879072111,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Good","text":"Good","html":"Good"},{"id":6542975,"gmtCreate":1636674141118,"gmtModify":1636674141210,"authorId":3576790897131947,"author":{"id":3576790897131947,"authorId":3576790897131947,"name":"Yanda","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a18793145d8e701bbc80926ad081518","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":879072111,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Nice","text":"Nice","html":"Nice"}],"langContent":"CN"},{"id":879072396,"gmtCreate":1636674129452,"gmtModify":1636674129757,"author":{"id":"3586138562927551","authorId":"3586138562927551","name":"30a14519","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/879072396","repostId":2182248064,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2182248064","pubTimestamp":1636673600,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2182248064?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-12 07:33","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Explainer-Five legal questions raised by Elon Musk's unorthodox share sales","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2182248064","media":"StreetInsider","summary":"WASHINGTON (Reuters) - It's been another wild ride for Tesla investors after billionaire chief execu","content":"<p>WASHINGTON (Reuters) - It's been another wild ride for Tesla investors after billionaire chief executive Elon Musk pledged via <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWTR\">Twitter</a> to sell 10% of his shares in the company. While the unorthodox way he went about it has raised eyebrows, it's unclear if he or Tesla have broken any rules.</p>\n<p>The electric carmaker lost more than $150 billion in value after Musk asked his Twitter followers over the weekend if he should sell 10% of his Tesla stake to pay new taxes being discussed by Congress. Nearly 58% said he should.</p>\n<p>On Wednesday, Tesla disclosed that Musk had offloaded 3% of his stock in recent days. A sixth of those shares were sold via a corporate \"trading plan\" - a legal agreement that allows insiders to trade in the company's shares at a pre-determined date - to satisfy tax obligations. The plan, adopted Sept. 14, pre-dated Musk's poll.</p>\n<p>The filings did not say why Musk had sold the other 2.5% and as of Thursday it was unclear if the sales related to Musk's Twitter poll or if he had yet sold the remaining 7%.</p>\n<p>Spokespeople for the SEC and Tesla did not provide comment.</p>\n<p>The episode has again raised questions as to whether the celebrity billionaire breached any rules or the settlement he agreed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for tweeting in 2018 that he had secured funding to take Tesla private when in fact he had not.</p>\n<p>Here are five questions Tesla-watchers are asking:</p>\n<p>DID MUSK BREACH HIS 2018 SEC SETTLEMENT?</p>\n<p>We don't know. That settlement, which the SEC tightened up in 2019, requires Musk to check any Tweets material to Tesla investors with a company lawyer, but Tesla and the SEC have not said whether that happened. Given Musk's Tweet appeared to tank the stock, he would be in breach of the settlement had he failed to vet it, said lawyers.</p>\n<p>WHAT'S THE DEAL WITH THE TRADING PLAN SALES?</p>\n<p>The \"Rule 10b5-1\" trading plans allow insiders to execute trades in the company's stock on a pre-determined future date, providing legal protection against potential allegations of insider trading on material non-public information.</p>\n<p>It's common for corporate insiders to pre-plan trades, although they can trade without the plan too. As such, Musk's sales via the plan are not unusual.</p>\n<p>However, the plans themselves have more holes than a Swiss cheese, a problem SEC chair Gary Gensler has pledged to fix.</p>\n<p>\"Some amount of chicanery is legal. And it is the looseness in the rules covering 'pre-planned' stock sales that are to blame,\" said Daniel Taylor, an insider trading expert and professor at the University of Pennsylvania.</p>\n<p>SO DID MUSK OR TESLA BREACH SEC DISCLOSURE RULES THEN?</p>\n<p>That's unclear. While announcing a huge share sale on Twitter may be unconventional for most chief executives, it's the norm for Musk and investors know to watch Musk's Twitter account for news. So the Tweets per se don't appear to violate any rules.</p>\n<p>In fact, several securities lawyers said Musk could argue that by explaining he had to sell to pay his taxes, rather than leaving the market guessing, he softened the blow to the stock.</p>\n<p>However, the pre-planned sales raise the question of whether Musk had always intended to sell some stock for tax reasons, but said he was doing so at the behest of his followers.</p>\n<p>Howard Fischer, a partner at law firm Moses &amp; Singer, said if Musk had concealed the real reason for his sales that could arguably be a disclosure violation, but at the same time there was a lot of public information on his reasoning for the sales.</p>\n<p>SO WILL THE SEC TAKE A LOOK AT THE SALES?</p>\n<p>The SEC constantly monitors market-moving events and has kept an eye on Musk in the past. Since 2018, it has queried Tesla on at least three occasions as to whether Musk's Tweets complied with the settlement, public filings and internal SEC documents obtained via the Freedom of Information Act show.</p>\n<p>The agency's new Democratic leadership is also eager to bring cases against big companies and their top executives.</p>\n<p>\"This case seems like yet another instance where regulators and private plaintiffs are going to spend years investigating what he knew, what he did, and why,\" said Ty Gellasch, head of investor group Healthy Markets.</p>\n<p>Still, the SEC may struggle to show Musk's actions harmed investors, typically a key threshold for successfully bringing a penalty, said lawyers.</p>\n<p>WAIT, SO MUSK HASN'T DONE ANYTHING WRONG?</p>\n<p>When it comes to the securities law, time will tell. From a corporate governance standpoint, his actions are problematic, said lawyers.</p>\n<p>\"If Tesla was a normal company, and Musk a normal executive, this kind of behavior would lead to a board rebuke or worse,\" said Fischer. But investors appear by now to accept Musk's \"oddities,\" he added.</p>","source":"highlight_streetinsider","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Explainer-Five legal questions raised by Elon Musk's unorthodox share sales</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nExplainer-Five legal questions raised by Elon Musk's unorthodox share sales\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-11-12 07:33 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=19200483><strong>StreetInsider</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>WASHINGTON (Reuters) - It's been another wild ride for Tesla investors after billionaire chief executive Elon Musk pledged via Twitter to sell 10% of his shares in the company. While the unorthodox ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=19200483\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=19200483","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2182248064","content_text":"WASHINGTON (Reuters) - It's been another wild ride for Tesla investors after billionaire chief executive Elon Musk pledged via Twitter to sell 10% of his shares in the company. While the unorthodox way he went about it has raised eyebrows, it's unclear if he or Tesla have broken any rules.\nThe electric carmaker lost more than $150 billion in value after Musk asked his Twitter followers over the weekend if he should sell 10% of his Tesla stake to pay new taxes being discussed by Congress. Nearly 58% said he should.\nOn Wednesday, Tesla disclosed that Musk had offloaded 3% of his stock in recent days. A sixth of those shares were sold via a corporate \"trading plan\" - a legal agreement that allows insiders to trade in the company's shares at a pre-determined date - to satisfy tax obligations. The plan, adopted Sept. 14, pre-dated Musk's poll.\nThe filings did not say why Musk had sold the other 2.5% and as of Thursday it was unclear if the sales related to Musk's Twitter poll or if he had yet sold the remaining 7%.\nSpokespeople for the SEC and Tesla did not provide comment.\nThe episode has again raised questions as to whether the celebrity billionaire breached any rules or the settlement he agreed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for tweeting in 2018 that he had secured funding to take Tesla private when in fact he had not.\nHere are five questions Tesla-watchers are asking:\nDID MUSK BREACH HIS 2018 SEC SETTLEMENT?\nWe don't know. That settlement, which the SEC tightened up in 2019, requires Musk to check any Tweets material to Tesla investors with a company lawyer, but Tesla and the SEC have not said whether that happened. Given Musk's Tweet appeared to tank the stock, he would be in breach of the settlement had he failed to vet it, said lawyers.\nWHAT'S THE DEAL WITH THE TRADING PLAN SALES?\nThe \"Rule 10b5-1\" trading plans allow insiders to execute trades in the company's stock on a pre-determined future date, providing legal protection against potential allegations of insider trading on material non-public information.\nIt's common for corporate insiders to pre-plan trades, although they can trade without the plan too. As such, Musk's sales via the plan are not unusual.\nHowever, the plans themselves have more holes than a Swiss cheese, a problem SEC chair Gary Gensler has pledged to fix.\n\"Some amount of chicanery is legal. And it is the looseness in the rules covering 'pre-planned' stock sales that are to blame,\" said Daniel Taylor, an insider trading expert and professor at the University of Pennsylvania.\nSO DID MUSK OR TESLA BREACH SEC DISCLOSURE RULES THEN?\nThat's unclear. While announcing a huge share sale on Twitter may be unconventional for most chief executives, it's the norm for Musk and investors know to watch Musk's Twitter account for news. So the Tweets per se don't appear to violate any rules.\nIn fact, several securities lawyers said Musk could argue that by explaining he had to sell to pay his taxes, rather than leaving the market guessing, he softened the blow to the stock.\nHowever, the pre-planned sales raise the question of whether Musk had always intended to sell some stock for tax reasons, but said he was doing so at the behest of his followers.\nHoward Fischer, a partner at law firm Moses & Singer, said if Musk had concealed the real reason for his sales that could arguably be a disclosure violation, but at the same time there was a lot of public information on his reasoning for the sales.\nSO WILL THE SEC TAKE A LOOK AT THE SALES?\nThe SEC constantly monitors market-moving events and has kept an eye on Musk in the past. Since 2018, it has queried Tesla on at least three occasions as to whether Musk's Tweets complied with the settlement, public filings and internal SEC documents obtained via the Freedom of Information Act show.\nThe agency's new Democratic leadership is also eager to bring cases against big companies and their top executives.\n\"This case seems like yet another instance where regulators and private plaintiffs are going to spend years investigating what he knew, what he did, and why,\" said Ty Gellasch, head of investor group Healthy Markets.\nStill, the SEC may struggle to show Musk's actions harmed investors, typically a key threshold for successfully bringing a penalty, said lawyers.\nWAIT, SO MUSK HASN'T DONE ANYTHING WRONG?\nWhen it comes to the securities law, time will tell. From a corporate governance standpoint, his actions are problematic, said lawyers.\n\"If Tesla was a normal company, and Musk a normal executive, this kind of behavior would lead to a board rebuke or worse,\" said Fischer. But investors appear by now to accept Musk's \"oddities,\" he added.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6543042,"gmtCreate":1636674307452,"gmtModify":1636674307488,"authorId":3579644221346646,"author":{"id":3579644221346646,"authorId":3579644221346646,"name":"TLC88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/70e92e6f93d89c4be15661304799bff0","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":879072396,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Ok","text":"Ok","html":"Ok"}],"langContent":"CN"},{"id":879076576,"gmtCreate":1636674098838,"gmtModify":1636674099372,"author":{"id":"3582017458119139","authorId":"3582017458119139","name":"Ryoori","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ef23a4636db1b89b681501385ddbdf82","vip":1,"crmLevel":8,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Like pls","listText":"Like pls","text":"Like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/879076576","repostId":2182248064,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2182248064","pubTimestamp":1636673600,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2182248064?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-12 07:33","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Explainer-Five legal questions raised by Elon Musk's unorthodox share sales","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2182248064","media":"StreetInsider","summary":"WASHINGTON (Reuters) - It's been another wild ride for Tesla investors after billionaire chief execu","content":"<p>WASHINGTON (Reuters) - It's been another wild ride for Tesla investors after billionaire chief executive Elon Musk pledged via <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWTR\">Twitter</a> to sell 10% of his shares in the company. While the unorthodox way he went about it has raised eyebrows, it's unclear if he or Tesla have broken any rules.</p>\n<p>The electric carmaker lost more than $150 billion in value after Musk asked his Twitter followers over the weekend if he should sell 10% of his Tesla stake to pay new taxes being discussed by Congress. Nearly 58% said he should.</p>\n<p>On Wednesday, Tesla disclosed that Musk had offloaded 3% of his stock in recent days. A sixth of those shares were sold via a corporate \"trading plan\" - a legal agreement that allows insiders to trade in the company's shares at a pre-determined date - to satisfy tax obligations. The plan, adopted Sept. 14, pre-dated Musk's poll.</p>\n<p>The filings did not say why Musk had sold the other 2.5% and as of Thursday it was unclear if the sales related to Musk's Twitter poll or if he had yet sold the remaining 7%.</p>\n<p>Spokespeople for the SEC and Tesla did not provide comment.</p>\n<p>The episode has again raised questions as to whether the celebrity billionaire breached any rules or the settlement he agreed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for tweeting in 2018 that he had secured funding to take Tesla private when in fact he had not.</p>\n<p>Here are five questions Tesla-watchers are asking:</p>\n<p>DID MUSK BREACH HIS 2018 SEC SETTLEMENT?</p>\n<p>We don't know. That settlement, which the SEC tightened up in 2019, requires Musk to check any Tweets material to Tesla investors with a company lawyer, but Tesla and the SEC have not said whether that happened. Given Musk's Tweet appeared to tank the stock, he would be in breach of the settlement had he failed to vet it, said lawyers.</p>\n<p>WHAT'S THE DEAL WITH THE TRADING PLAN SALES?</p>\n<p>The \"Rule 10b5-1\" trading plans allow insiders to execute trades in the company's stock on a pre-determined future date, providing legal protection against potential allegations of insider trading on material non-public information.</p>\n<p>It's common for corporate insiders to pre-plan trades, although they can trade without the plan too. As such, Musk's sales via the plan are not unusual.</p>\n<p>However, the plans themselves have more holes than a Swiss cheese, a problem SEC chair Gary Gensler has pledged to fix.</p>\n<p>\"Some amount of chicanery is legal. And it is the looseness in the rules covering 'pre-planned' stock sales that are to blame,\" said Daniel Taylor, an insider trading expert and professor at the University of Pennsylvania.</p>\n<p>SO DID MUSK OR TESLA BREACH SEC DISCLOSURE RULES THEN?</p>\n<p>That's unclear. While announcing a huge share sale on Twitter may be unconventional for most chief executives, it's the norm for Musk and investors know to watch Musk's Twitter account for news. So the Tweets per se don't appear to violate any rules.</p>\n<p>In fact, several securities lawyers said Musk could argue that by explaining he had to sell to pay his taxes, rather than leaving the market guessing, he softened the blow to the stock.</p>\n<p>However, the pre-planned sales raise the question of whether Musk had always intended to sell some stock for tax reasons, but said he was doing so at the behest of his followers.</p>\n<p>Howard Fischer, a partner at law firm Moses &amp; Singer, said if Musk had concealed the real reason for his sales that could arguably be a disclosure violation, but at the same time there was a lot of public information on his reasoning for the sales.</p>\n<p>SO WILL THE SEC TAKE A LOOK AT THE SALES?</p>\n<p>The SEC constantly monitors market-moving events and has kept an eye on Musk in the past. Since 2018, it has queried Tesla on at least three occasions as to whether Musk's Tweets complied with the settlement, public filings and internal SEC documents obtained via the Freedom of Information Act show.</p>\n<p>The agency's new Democratic leadership is also eager to bring cases against big companies and their top executives.</p>\n<p>\"This case seems like yet another instance where regulators and private plaintiffs are going to spend years investigating what he knew, what he did, and why,\" said Ty Gellasch, head of investor group Healthy Markets.</p>\n<p>Still, the SEC may struggle to show Musk's actions harmed investors, typically a key threshold for successfully bringing a penalty, said lawyers.</p>\n<p>WAIT, SO MUSK HASN'T DONE ANYTHING WRONG?</p>\n<p>When it comes to the securities law, time will tell. From a corporate governance standpoint, his actions are problematic, said lawyers.</p>\n<p>\"If Tesla was a normal company, and Musk a normal executive, this kind of behavior would lead to a board rebuke or worse,\" said Fischer. But investors appear by now to accept Musk's \"oddities,\" he added.</p>","source":"highlight_streetinsider","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Explainer-Five legal questions raised by Elon Musk's unorthodox share sales</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nExplainer-Five legal questions raised by Elon Musk's unorthodox share sales\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-11-12 07:33 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=19200483><strong>StreetInsider</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>WASHINGTON (Reuters) - It's been another wild ride for Tesla investors after billionaire chief executive Elon Musk pledged via Twitter to sell 10% of his shares in the company. While the unorthodox ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=19200483\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=19200483","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2182248064","content_text":"WASHINGTON (Reuters) - It's been another wild ride for Tesla investors after billionaire chief executive Elon Musk pledged via Twitter to sell 10% of his shares in the company. While the unorthodox way he went about it has raised eyebrows, it's unclear if he or Tesla have broken any rules.\nThe electric carmaker lost more than $150 billion in value after Musk asked his Twitter followers over the weekend if he should sell 10% of his Tesla stake to pay new taxes being discussed by Congress. Nearly 58% said he should.\nOn Wednesday, Tesla disclosed that Musk had offloaded 3% of his stock in recent days. A sixth of those shares were sold via a corporate \"trading plan\" - a legal agreement that allows insiders to trade in the company's shares at a pre-determined date - to satisfy tax obligations. The plan, adopted Sept. 14, pre-dated Musk's poll.\nThe filings did not say why Musk had sold the other 2.5% and as of Thursday it was unclear if the sales related to Musk's Twitter poll or if he had yet sold the remaining 7%.\nSpokespeople for the SEC and Tesla did not provide comment.\nThe episode has again raised questions as to whether the celebrity billionaire breached any rules or the settlement he agreed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for tweeting in 2018 that he had secured funding to take Tesla private when in fact he had not.\nHere are five questions Tesla-watchers are asking:\nDID MUSK BREACH HIS 2018 SEC SETTLEMENT?\nWe don't know. That settlement, which the SEC tightened up in 2019, requires Musk to check any Tweets material to Tesla investors with a company lawyer, but Tesla and the SEC have not said whether that happened. Given Musk's Tweet appeared to tank the stock, he would be in breach of the settlement had he failed to vet it, said lawyers.\nWHAT'S THE DEAL WITH THE TRADING PLAN SALES?\nThe \"Rule 10b5-1\" trading plans allow insiders to execute trades in the company's stock on a pre-determined future date, providing legal protection against potential allegations of insider trading on material non-public information.\nIt's common for corporate insiders to pre-plan trades, although they can trade without the plan too. As such, Musk's sales via the plan are not unusual.\nHowever, the plans themselves have more holes than a Swiss cheese, a problem SEC chair Gary Gensler has pledged to fix.\n\"Some amount of chicanery is legal. And it is the looseness in the rules covering 'pre-planned' stock sales that are to blame,\" said Daniel Taylor, an insider trading expert and professor at the University of Pennsylvania.\nSO DID MUSK OR TESLA BREACH SEC DISCLOSURE RULES THEN?\nThat's unclear. While announcing a huge share sale on Twitter may be unconventional for most chief executives, it's the norm for Musk and investors know to watch Musk's Twitter account for news. So the Tweets per se don't appear to violate any rules.\nIn fact, several securities lawyers said Musk could argue that by explaining he had to sell to pay his taxes, rather than leaving the market guessing, he softened the blow to the stock.\nHowever, the pre-planned sales raise the question of whether Musk had always intended to sell some stock for tax reasons, but said he was doing so at the behest of his followers.\nHoward Fischer, a partner at law firm Moses & Singer, said if Musk had concealed the real reason for his sales that could arguably be a disclosure violation, but at the same time there was a lot of public information on his reasoning for the sales.\nSO WILL THE SEC TAKE A LOOK AT THE SALES?\nThe SEC constantly monitors market-moving events and has kept an eye on Musk in the past. Since 2018, it has queried Tesla on at least three occasions as to whether Musk's Tweets complied with the settlement, public filings and internal SEC documents obtained via the Freedom of Information Act show.\nThe agency's new Democratic leadership is also eager to bring cases against big companies and their top executives.\n\"This case seems like yet another instance where regulators and private plaintiffs are going to spend years investigating what he knew, what he did, and why,\" said Ty Gellasch, head of investor group Healthy Markets.\nStill, the SEC may struggle to show Musk's actions harmed investors, typically a key threshold for successfully bringing a penalty, said lawyers.\nWAIT, SO MUSK HASN'T DONE ANYTHING WRONG?\nWhen it comes to the securities law, time will tell. From a corporate governance standpoint, his actions are problematic, said lawyers.\n\"If Tesla was a normal company, and Musk a normal executive, this kind of behavior would lead to a board rebuke or worse,\" said Fischer. But investors appear by now to accept Musk's \"oddities,\" he added.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6543143,"gmtCreate":1636674705843,"gmtModify":1636674705946,"authorId":3555032609535572,"author":{"id":3555032609535572,"authorId":3555032609535572,"name":"GohKS","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ddc1a9348de7602d7224f258a5a3fa00","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":879076576,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Please like and comment. Thank you.","text":"Please like and comment. Thank you.","html":"Please like and comment. Thank you."}],"langContent":"CN"},{"id":879076383,"gmtCreate":1636674050254,"gmtModify":1636674050594,"author":{"id":"4091269729215160","authorId":"4091269729215160","name":"QQChai","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/31148e862df7412ae3c07fc206cad89c","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Please like","listText":"Please like","text":"Please like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/879076383","repostId":2182248064,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2182248064","pubTimestamp":1636673600,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2182248064?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-12 07:33","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Explainer-Five legal questions raised by Elon Musk's unorthodox share sales","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2182248064","media":"StreetInsider","summary":"WASHINGTON (Reuters) - It's been another wild ride for Tesla investors after billionaire chief execu","content":"<p>WASHINGTON (Reuters) - It's been another wild ride for Tesla investors after billionaire chief executive Elon Musk pledged via <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWTR\">Twitter</a> to sell 10% of his shares in the company. While the unorthodox way he went about it has raised eyebrows, it's unclear if he or Tesla have broken any rules.</p>\n<p>The electric carmaker lost more than $150 billion in value after Musk asked his Twitter followers over the weekend if he should sell 10% of his Tesla stake to pay new taxes being discussed by Congress. Nearly 58% said he should.</p>\n<p>On Wednesday, Tesla disclosed that Musk had offloaded 3% of his stock in recent days. A sixth of those shares were sold via a corporate \"trading plan\" - a legal agreement that allows insiders to trade in the company's shares at a pre-determined date - to satisfy tax obligations. The plan, adopted Sept. 14, pre-dated Musk's poll.</p>\n<p>The filings did not say why Musk had sold the other 2.5% and as of Thursday it was unclear if the sales related to Musk's Twitter poll or if he had yet sold the remaining 7%.</p>\n<p>Spokespeople for the SEC and Tesla did not provide comment.</p>\n<p>The episode has again raised questions as to whether the celebrity billionaire breached any rules or the settlement he agreed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for tweeting in 2018 that he had secured funding to take Tesla private when in fact he had not.</p>\n<p>Here are five questions Tesla-watchers are asking:</p>\n<p>DID MUSK BREACH HIS 2018 SEC SETTLEMENT?</p>\n<p>We don't know. That settlement, which the SEC tightened up in 2019, requires Musk to check any Tweets material to Tesla investors with a company lawyer, but Tesla and the SEC have not said whether that happened. Given Musk's Tweet appeared to tank the stock, he would be in breach of the settlement had he failed to vet it, said lawyers.</p>\n<p>WHAT'S THE DEAL WITH THE TRADING PLAN SALES?</p>\n<p>The \"Rule 10b5-1\" trading plans allow insiders to execute trades in the company's stock on a pre-determined future date, providing legal protection against potential allegations of insider trading on material non-public information.</p>\n<p>It's common for corporate insiders to pre-plan trades, although they can trade without the plan too. As such, Musk's sales via the plan are not unusual.</p>\n<p>However, the plans themselves have more holes than a Swiss cheese, a problem SEC chair Gary Gensler has pledged to fix.</p>\n<p>\"Some amount of chicanery is legal. And it is the looseness in the rules covering 'pre-planned' stock sales that are to blame,\" said Daniel Taylor, an insider trading expert and professor at the University of Pennsylvania.</p>\n<p>SO DID MUSK OR TESLA BREACH SEC DISCLOSURE RULES THEN?</p>\n<p>That's unclear. While announcing a huge share sale on Twitter may be unconventional for most chief executives, it's the norm for Musk and investors know to watch Musk's Twitter account for news. So the Tweets per se don't appear to violate any rules.</p>\n<p>In fact, several securities lawyers said Musk could argue that by explaining he had to sell to pay his taxes, rather than leaving the market guessing, he softened the blow to the stock.</p>\n<p>However, the pre-planned sales raise the question of whether Musk had always intended to sell some stock for tax reasons, but said he was doing so at the behest of his followers.</p>\n<p>Howard Fischer, a partner at law firm Moses &amp; Singer, said if Musk had concealed the real reason for his sales that could arguably be a disclosure violation, but at the same time there was a lot of public information on his reasoning for the sales.</p>\n<p>SO WILL THE SEC TAKE A LOOK AT THE SALES?</p>\n<p>The SEC constantly monitors market-moving events and has kept an eye on Musk in the past. Since 2018, it has queried Tesla on at least three occasions as to whether Musk's Tweets complied with the settlement, public filings and internal SEC documents obtained via the Freedom of Information Act show.</p>\n<p>The agency's new Democratic leadership is also eager to bring cases against big companies and their top executives.</p>\n<p>\"This case seems like yet another instance where regulators and private plaintiffs are going to spend years investigating what he knew, what he did, and why,\" said Ty Gellasch, head of investor group Healthy Markets.</p>\n<p>Still, the SEC may struggle to show Musk's actions harmed investors, typically a key threshold for successfully bringing a penalty, said lawyers.</p>\n<p>WAIT, SO MUSK HASN'T DONE ANYTHING WRONG?</p>\n<p>When it comes to the securities law, time will tell. From a corporate governance standpoint, his actions are problematic, said lawyers.</p>\n<p>\"If Tesla was a normal company, and Musk a normal executive, this kind of behavior would lead to a board rebuke or worse,\" said Fischer. But investors appear by now to accept Musk's \"oddities,\" he added.</p>","source":"highlight_streetinsider","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Explainer-Five legal questions raised by Elon Musk's unorthodox share sales</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nExplainer-Five legal questions raised by Elon Musk's unorthodox share sales\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-11-12 07:33 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=19200483><strong>StreetInsider</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>WASHINGTON (Reuters) - It's been another wild ride for Tesla investors after billionaire chief executive Elon Musk pledged via Twitter to sell 10% of his shares in the company. While the unorthodox ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=19200483\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=19200483","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2182248064","content_text":"WASHINGTON (Reuters) - It's been another wild ride for Tesla investors after billionaire chief executive Elon Musk pledged via Twitter to sell 10% of his shares in the company. While the unorthodox way he went about it has raised eyebrows, it's unclear if he or Tesla have broken any rules.\nThe electric carmaker lost more than $150 billion in value after Musk asked his Twitter followers over the weekend if he should sell 10% of his Tesla stake to pay new taxes being discussed by Congress. Nearly 58% said he should.\nOn Wednesday, Tesla disclosed that Musk had offloaded 3% of his stock in recent days. A sixth of those shares were sold via a corporate \"trading plan\" - a legal agreement that allows insiders to trade in the company's shares at a pre-determined date - to satisfy tax obligations. The plan, adopted Sept. 14, pre-dated Musk's poll.\nThe filings did not say why Musk had sold the other 2.5% and as of Thursday it was unclear if the sales related to Musk's Twitter poll or if he had yet sold the remaining 7%.\nSpokespeople for the SEC and Tesla did not provide comment.\nThe episode has again raised questions as to whether the celebrity billionaire breached any rules or the settlement he agreed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for tweeting in 2018 that he had secured funding to take Tesla private when in fact he had not.\nHere are five questions Tesla-watchers are asking:\nDID MUSK BREACH HIS 2018 SEC SETTLEMENT?\nWe don't know. That settlement, which the SEC tightened up in 2019, requires Musk to check any Tweets material to Tesla investors with a company lawyer, but Tesla and the SEC have not said whether that happened. Given Musk's Tweet appeared to tank the stock, he would be in breach of the settlement had he failed to vet it, said lawyers.\nWHAT'S THE DEAL WITH THE TRADING PLAN SALES?\nThe \"Rule 10b5-1\" trading plans allow insiders to execute trades in the company's stock on a pre-determined future date, providing legal protection against potential allegations of insider trading on material non-public information.\nIt's common for corporate insiders to pre-plan trades, although they can trade without the plan too. As such, Musk's sales via the plan are not unusual.\nHowever, the plans themselves have more holes than a Swiss cheese, a problem SEC chair Gary Gensler has pledged to fix.\n\"Some amount of chicanery is legal. And it is the looseness in the rules covering 'pre-planned' stock sales that are to blame,\" said Daniel Taylor, an insider trading expert and professor at the University of Pennsylvania.\nSO DID MUSK OR TESLA BREACH SEC DISCLOSURE RULES THEN?\nThat's unclear. While announcing a huge share sale on Twitter may be unconventional for most chief executives, it's the norm for Musk and investors know to watch Musk's Twitter account for news. So the Tweets per se don't appear to violate any rules.\nIn fact, several securities lawyers said Musk could argue that by explaining he had to sell to pay his taxes, rather than leaving the market guessing, he softened the blow to the stock.\nHowever, the pre-planned sales raise the question of whether Musk had always intended to sell some stock for tax reasons, but said he was doing so at the behest of his followers.\nHoward Fischer, a partner at law firm Moses & Singer, said if Musk had concealed the real reason for his sales that could arguably be a disclosure violation, but at the same time there was a lot of public information on his reasoning for the sales.\nSO WILL THE SEC TAKE A LOOK AT THE SALES?\nThe SEC constantly monitors market-moving events and has kept an eye on Musk in the past. Since 2018, it has queried Tesla on at least three occasions as to whether Musk's Tweets complied with the settlement, public filings and internal SEC documents obtained via the Freedom of Information Act show.\nThe agency's new Democratic leadership is also eager to bring cases against big companies and their top executives.\n\"This case seems like yet another instance where regulators and private plaintiffs are going to spend years investigating what he knew, what he did, and why,\" said Ty Gellasch, head of investor group Healthy Markets.\nStill, the SEC may struggle to show Musk's actions harmed investors, typically a key threshold for successfully bringing a penalty, said lawyers.\nWAIT, SO MUSK HASN'T DONE ANYTHING WRONG?\nWhen it comes to the securities law, time will tell. From a corporate governance standpoint, his actions are problematic, said lawyers.\n\"If Tesla was a normal company, and Musk a normal executive, this kind of behavior would lead to a board rebuke or worse,\" said Fischer. But investors appear by now to accept Musk's \"oddities,\" he added.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6542973,"gmtCreate":1636674135856,"gmtModify":1636674135944,"authorId":3586138562927551,"author":{"id":3586138562927551,"authorId":3586138562927551,"name":"30a14519","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":879076383,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"O","text":"O","html":"O"},{"id":6542965,"gmtCreate":1636674109191,"gmtModify":1636674109224,"authorId":3573369466096628,"author":{"id":3573369466096628,"authorId":3573369466096628,"name":"calebxiong","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/08d48582a3126a51d85cbec3a72f9923","vip":1,"crmLevel":8,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":879076383,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"ok","text":"ok","html":"ok"},{"id":6542962,"gmtCreate":1636674104239,"gmtModify":1636674104273,"authorId":3582017458119139,"author":{"id":3582017458119139,"authorId":3582017458119139,"name":"Ryoori","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ef23a4636db1b89b681501385ddbdf82","vip":1,"crmLevel":8,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":879076383,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Ok","text":"Ok","html":"Ok"}],"langContent":"CN"},{"id":879076927,"gmtCreate":1636674043566,"gmtModify":1636674043820,"author":{"id":"3579497803522415","authorId":"3579497803522415","name":"Chwhy","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":".&nbsp;","listText":".&nbsp;","text":".","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/879076927","repostId":2182248064,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2182248064","pubTimestamp":1636673600,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2182248064?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-12 07:33","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Explainer-Five legal questions raised by Elon Musk's unorthodox share sales","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2182248064","media":"StreetInsider","summary":"WASHINGTON (Reuters) - It's been another wild ride for Tesla investors after billionaire chief execu","content":"<p>WASHINGTON (Reuters) - It's been another wild ride for Tesla investors after billionaire chief executive Elon Musk pledged via <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWTR\">Twitter</a> to sell 10% of his shares in the company. While the unorthodox way he went about it has raised eyebrows, it's unclear if he or Tesla have broken any rules.</p>\n<p>The electric carmaker lost more than $150 billion in value after Musk asked his Twitter followers over the weekend if he should sell 10% of his Tesla stake to pay new taxes being discussed by Congress. Nearly 58% said he should.</p>\n<p>On Wednesday, Tesla disclosed that Musk had offloaded 3% of his stock in recent days. A sixth of those shares were sold via a corporate \"trading plan\" - a legal agreement that allows insiders to trade in the company's shares at a pre-determined date - to satisfy tax obligations. The plan, adopted Sept. 14, pre-dated Musk's poll.</p>\n<p>The filings did not say why Musk had sold the other 2.5% and as of Thursday it was unclear if the sales related to Musk's Twitter poll or if he had yet sold the remaining 7%.</p>\n<p>Spokespeople for the SEC and Tesla did not provide comment.</p>\n<p>The episode has again raised questions as to whether the celebrity billionaire breached any rules or the settlement he agreed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for tweeting in 2018 that he had secured funding to take Tesla private when in fact he had not.</p>\n<p>Here are five questions Tesla-watchers are asking:</p>\n<p>DID MUSK BREACH HIS 2018 SEC SETTLEMENT?</p>\n<p>We don't know. That settlement, which the SEC tightened up in 2019, requires Musk to check any Tweets material to Tesla investors with a company lawyer, but Tesla and the SEC have not said whether that happened. Given Musk's Tweet appeared to tank the stock, he would be in breach of the settlement had he failed to vet it, said lawyers.</p>\n<p>WHAT'S THE DEAL WITH THE TRADING PLAN SALES?</p>\n<p>The \"Rule 10b5-1\" trading plans allow insiders to execute trades in the company's stock on a pre-determined future date, providing legal protection against potential allegations of insider trading on material non-public information.</p>\n<p>It's common for corporate insiders to pre-plan trades, although they can trade without the plan too. As such, Musk's sales via the plan are not unusual.</p>\n<p>However, the plans themselves have more holes than a Swiss cheese, a problem SEC chair Gary Gensler has pledged to fix.</p>\n<p>\"Some amount of chicanery is legal. And it is the looseness in the rules covering 'pre-planned' stock sales that are to blame,\" said Daniel Taylor, an insider trading expert and professor at the University of Pennsylvania.</p>\n<p>SO DID MUSK OR TESLA BREACH SEC DISCLOSURE RULES THEN?</p>\n<p>That's unclear. While announcing a huge share sale on Twitter may be unconventional for most chief executives, it's the norm for Musk and investors know to watch Musk's Twitter account for news. So the Tweets per se don't appear to violate any rules.</p>\n<p>In fact, several securities lawyers said Musk could argue that by explaining he had to sell to pay his taxes, rather than leaving the market guessing, he softened the blow to the stock.</p>\n<p>However, the pre-planned sales raise the question of whether Musk had always intended to sell some stock for tax reasons, but said he was doing so at the behest of his followers.</p>\n<p>Howard Fischer, a partner at law firm Moses &amp; Singer, said if Musk had concealed the real reason for his sales that could arguably be a disclosure violation, but at the same time there was a lot of public information on his reasoning for the sales.</p>\n<p>SO WILL THE SEC TAKE A LOOK AT THE SALES?</p>\n<p>The SEC constantly monitors market-moving events and has kept an eye on Musk in the past. Since 2018, it has queried Tesla on at least three occasions as to whether Musk's Tweets complied with the settlement, public filings and internal SEC documents obtained via the Freedom of Information Act show.</p>\n<p>The agency's new Democratic leadership is also eager to bring cases against big companies and their top executives.</p>\n<p>\"This case seems like yet another instance where regulators and private plaintiffs are going to spend years investigating what he knew, what he did, and why,\" said Ty Gellasch, head of investor group Healthy Markets.</p>\n<p>Still, the SEC may struggle to show Musk's actions harmed investors, typically a key threshold for successfully bringing a penalty, said lawyers.</p>\n<p>WAIT, SO MUSK HASN'T DONE ANYTHING WRONG?</p>\n<p>When it comes to the securities law, time will tell. From a corporate governance standpoint, his actions are problematic, said lawyers.</p>\n<p>\"If Tesla was a normal company, and Musk a normal executive, this kind of behavior would lead to a board rebuke or worse,\" said Fischer. But investors appear by now to accept Musk's \"oddities,\" he added.</p>","source":"highlight_streetinsider","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Explainer-Five legal questions raised by Elon Musk's unorthodox share sales</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nExplainer-Five legal questions raised by Elon Musk's unorthodox share sales\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-11-12 07:33 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=19200483><strong>StreetInsider</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>WASHINGTON (Reuters) - It's been another wild ride for Tesla investors after billionaire chief executive Elon Musk pledged via Twitter to sell 10% of his shares in the company. While the unorthodox ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=19200483\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=19200483","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2182248064","content_text":"WASHINGTON (Reuters) - It's been another wild ride for Tesla investors after billionaire chief executive Elon Musk pledged via Twitter to sell 10% of his shares in the company. While the unorthodox way he went about it has raised eyebrows, it's unclear if he or Tesla have broken any rules.\nThe electric carmaker lost more than $150 billion in value after Musk asked his Twitter followers over the weekend if he should sell 10% of his Tesla stake to pay new taxes being discussed by Congress. Nearly 58% said he should.\nOn Wednesday, Tesla disclosed that Musk had offloaded 3% of his stock in recent days. A sixth of those shares were sold via a corporate \"trading plan\" - a legal agreement that allows insiders to trade in the company's shares at a pre-determined date - to satisfy tax obligations. The plan, adopted Sept. 14, pre-dated Musk's poll.\nThe filings did not say why Musk had sold the other 2.5% and as of Thursday it was unclear if the sales related to Musk's Twitter poll or if he had yet sold the remaining 7%.\nSpokespeople for the SEC and Tesla did not provide comment.\nThe episode has again raised questions as to whether the celebrity billionaire breached any rules or the settlement he agreed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for tweeting in 2018 that he had secured funding to take Tesla private when in fact he had not.\nHere are five questions Tesla-watchers are asking:\nDID MUSK BREACH HIS 2018 SEC SETTLEMENT?\nWe don't know. That settlement, which the SEC tightened up in 2019, requires Musk to check any Tweets material to Tesla investors with a company lawyer, but Tesla and the SEC have not said whether that happened. Given Musk's Tweet appeared to tank the stock, he would be in breach of the settlement had he failed to vet it, said lawyers.\nWHAT'S THE DEAL WITH THE TRADING PLAN SALES?\nThe \"Rule 10b5-1\" trading plans allow insiders to execute trades in the company's stock on a pre-determined future date, providing legal protection against potential allegations of insider trading on material non-public information.\nIt's common for corporate insiders to pre-plan trades, although they can trade without the plan too. As such, Musk's sales via the plan are not unusual.\nHowever, the plans themselves have more holes than a Swiss cheese, a problem SEC chair Gary Gensler has pledged to fix.\n\"Some amount of chicanery is legal. And it is the looseness in the rules covering 'pre-planned' stock sales that are to blame,\" said Daniel Taylor, an insider trading expert and professor at the University of Pennsylvania.\nSO DID MUSK OR TESLA BREACH SEC DISCLOSURE RULES THEN?\nThat's unclear. While announcing a huge share sale on Twitter may be unconventional for most chief executives, it's the norm for Musk and investors know to watch Musk's Twitter account for news. So the Tweets per se don't appear to violate any rules.\nIn fact, several securities lawyers said Musk could argue that by explaining he had to sell to pay his taxes, rather than leaving the market guessing, he softened the blow to the stock.\nHowever, the pre-planned sales raise the question of whether Musk had always intended to sell some stock for tax reasons, but said he was doing so at the behest of his followers.\nHoward Fischer, a partner at law firm Moses & Singer, said if Musk had concealed the real reason for his sales that could arguably be a disclosure violation, but at the same time there was a lot of public information on his reasoning for the sales.\nSO WILL THE SEC TAKE A LOOK AT THE SALES?\nThe SEC constantly monitors market-moving events and has kept an eye on Musk in the past. Since 2018, it has queried Tesla on at least three occasions as to whether Musk's Tweets complied with the settlement, public filings and internal SEC documents obtained via the Freedom of Information Act show.\nThe agency's new Democratic leadership is also eager to bring cases against big companies and their top executives.\n\"This case seems like yet another instance where regulators and private plaintiffs are going to spend years investigating what he knew, what he did, and why,\" said Ty Gellasch, head of investor group Healthy Markets.\nStill, the SEC may struggle to show Musk's actions harmed investors, typically a key threshold for successfully bringing a penalty, said lawyers.\nWAIT, SO MUSK HASN'T DONE ANYTHING WRONG?\nWhen it comes to the securities law, time will tell. From a corporate governance standpoint, his actions are problematic, said lawyers.\n\"If Tesla was a normal company, and Musk a normal executive, this kind of behavior would lead to a board rebuke or worse,\" said Fischer. But investors appear by now to accept Musk's \"oddities,\" he added.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"CN"},{"id":879078251,"gmtCreate":1636673998277,"gmtModify":1636673999191,"author":{"id":"3577415105079753","authorId":"3577415105079753","name":"股惑仔79","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2521bf7235578dd93b9e7d10c59d5058","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"[Smile]&nbsp;","listText":"[Smile]&nbsp;","text":"[Smile]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":7,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/879078251","repostId":2182248064,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2182248064","pubTimestamp":1636673600,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2182248064?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-12 07:33","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Explainer-Five legal questions raised by Elon Musk's unorthodox share sales","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2182248064","media":"StreetInsider","summary":"WASHINGTON (Reuters) - It's been another wild ride for Tesla investors after billionaire chief execu","content":"<p>WASHINGTON (Reuters) - It's been another wild ride for Tesla investors after billionaire chief executive Elon Musk pledged via <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWTR\">Twitter</a> to sell 10% of his shares in the company. While the unorthodox way he went about it has raised eyebrows, it's unclear if he or Tesla have broken any rules.</p>\n<p>The electric carmaker lost more than $150 billion in value after Musk asked his Twitter followers over the weekend if he should sell 10% of his Tesla stake to pay new taxes being discussed by Congress. Nearly 58% said he should.</p>\n<p>On Wednesday, Tesla disclosed that Musk had offloaded 3% of his stock in recent days. A sixth of those shares were sold via a corporate \"trading plan\" - a legal agreement that allows insiders to trade in the company's shares at a pre-determined date - to satisfy tax obligations. The plan, adopted Sept. 14, pre-dated Musk's poll.</p>\n<p>The filings did not say why Musk had sold the other 2.5% and as of Thursday it was unclear if the sales related to Musk's Twitter poll or if he had yet sold the remaining 7%.</p>\n<p>Spokespeople for the SEC and Tesla did not provide comment.</p>\n<p>The episode has again raised questions as to whether the celebrity billionaire breached any rules or the settlement he agreed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for tweeting in 2018 that he had secured funding to take Tesla private when in fact he had not.</p>\n<p>Here are five questions Tesla-watchers are asking:</p>\n<p>DID MUSK BREACH HIS 2018 SEC SETTLEMENT?</p>\n<p>We don't know. That settlement, which the SEC tightened up in 2019, requires Musk to check any Tweets material to Tesla investors with a company lawyer, but Tesla and the SEC have not said whether that happened. Given Musk's Tweet appeared to tank the stock, he would be in breach of the settlement had he failed to vet it, said lawyers.</p>\n<p>WHAT'S THE DEAL WITH THE TRADING PLAN SALES?</p>\n<p>The \"Rule 10b5-1\" trading plans allow insiders to execute trades in the company's stock on a pre-determined future date, providing legal protection against potential allegations of insider trading on material non-public information.</p>\n<p>It's common for corporate insiders to pre-plan trades, although they can trade without the plan too. As such, Musk's sales via the plan are not unusual.</p>\n<p>However, the plans themselves have more holes than a Swiss cheese, a problem SEC chair Gary Gensler has pledged to fix.</p>\n<p>\"Some amount of chicanery is legal. And it is the looseness in the rules covering 'pre-planned' stock sales that are to blame,\" said Daniel Taylor, an insider trading expert and professor at the University of Pennsylvania.</p>\n<p>SO DID MUSK OR TESLA BREACH SEC DISCLOSURE RULES THEN?</p>\n<p>That's unclear. While announcing a huge share sale on Twitter may be unconventional for most chief executives, it's the norm for Musk and investors know to watch Musk's Twitter account for news. So the Tweets per se don't appear to violate any rules.</p>\n<p>In fact, several securities lawyers said Musk could argue that by explaining he had to sell to pay his taxes, rather than leaving the market guessing, he softened the blow to the stock.</p>\n<p>However, the pre-planned sales raise the question of whether Musk had always intended to sell some stock for tax reasons, but said he was doing so at the behest of his followers.</p>\n<p>Howard Fischer, a partner at law firm Moses &amp; Singer, said if Musk had concealed the real reason for his sales that could arguably be a disclosure violation, but at the same time there was a lot of public information on his reasoning for the sales.</p>\n<p>SO WILL THE SEC TAKE A LOOK AT THE SALES?</p>\n<p>The SEC constantly monitors market-moving events and has kept an eye on Musk in the past. Since 2018, it has queried Tesla on at least three occasions as to whether Musk's Tweets complied with the settlement, public filings and internal SEC documents obtained via the Freedom of Information Act show.</p>\n<p>The agency's new Democratic leadership is also eager to bring cases against big companies and their top executives.</p>\n<p>\"This case seems like yet another instance where regulators and private plaintiffs are going to spend years investigating what he knew, what he did, and why,\" said Ty Gellasch, head of investor group Healthy Markets.</p>\n<p>Still, the SEC may struggle to show Musk's actions harmed investors, typically a key threshold for successfully bringing a penalty, said lawyers.</p>\n<p>WAIT, SO MUSK HASN'T DONE ANYTHING WRONG?</p>\n<p>When it comes to the securities law, time will tell. From a corporate governance standpoint, his actions are problematic, said lawyers.</p>\n<p>\"If Tesla was a normal company, and Musk a normal executive, this kind of behavior would lead to a board rebuke or worse,\" said Fischer. But investors appear by now to accept Musk's \"oddities,\" he added.</p>","source":"highlight_streetinsider","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Explainer-Five legal questions raised by Elon Musk's unorthodox share sales</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nExplainer-Five legal questions raised by Elon Musk's unorthodox share sales\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-11-12 07:33 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=19200483><strong>StreetInsider</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>WASHINGTON (Reuters) - It's been another wild ride for Tesla investors after billionaire chief executive Elon Musk pledged via Twitter to sell 10% of his shares in the company. While the unorthodox ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=19200483\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=19200483","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2182248064","content_text":"WASHINGTON (Reuters) - It's been another wild ride for Tesla investors after billionaire chief executive Elon Musk pledged via Twitter to sell 10% of his shares in the company. While the unorthodox way he went about it has raised eyebrows, it's unclear if he or Tesla have broken any rules.\nThe electric carmaker lost more than $150 billion in value after Musk asked his Twitter followers over the weekend if he should sell 10% of his Tesla stake to pay new taxes being discussed by Congress. Nearly 58% said he should.\nOn Wednesday, Tesla disclosed that Musk had offloaded 3% of his stock in recent days. A sixth of those shares were sold via a corporate \"trading plan\" - a legal agreement that allows insiders to trade in the company's shares at a pre-determined date - to satisfy tax obligations. The plan, adopted Sept. 14, pre-dated Musk's poll.\nThe filings did not say why Musk had sold the other 2.5% and as of Thursday it was unclear if the sales related to Musk's Twitter poll or if he had yet sold the remaining 7%.\nSpokespeople for the SEC and Tesla did not provide comment.\nThe episode has again raised questions as to whether the celebrity billionaire breached any rules or the settlement he agreed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for tweeting in 2018 that he had secured funding to take Tesla private when in fact he had not.\nHere are five questions Tesla-watchers are asking:\nDID MUSK BREACH HIS 2018 SEC SETTLEMENT?\nWe don't know. That settlement, which the SEC tightened up in 2019, requires Musk to check any Tweets material to Tesla investors with a company lawyer, but Tesla and the SEC have not said whether that happened. Given Musk's Tweet appeared to tank the stock, he would be in breach of the settlement had he failed to vet it, said lawyers.\nWHAT'S THE DEAL WITH THE TRADING PLAN SALES?\nThe \"Rule 10b5-1\" trading plans allow insiders to execute trades in the company's stock on a pre-determined future date, providing legal protection against potential allegations of insider trading on material non-public information.\nIt's common for corporate insiders to pre-plan trades, although they can trade without the plan too. As such, Musk's sales via the plan are not unusual.\nHowever, the plans themselves have more holes than a Swiss cheese, a problem SEC chair Gary Gensler has pledged to fix.\n\"Some amount of chicanery is legal. And it is the looseness in the rules covering 'pre-planned' stock sales that are to blame,\" said Daniel Taylor, an insider trading expert and professor at the University of Pennsylvania.\nSO DID MUSK OR TESLA BREACH SEC DISCLOSURE RULES THEN?\nThat's unclear. While announcing a huge share sale on Twitter may be unconventional for most chief executives, it's the norm for Musk and investors know to watch Musk's Twitter account for news. So the Tweets per se don't appear to violate any rules.\nIn fact, several securities lawyers said Musk could argue that by explaining he had to sell to pay his taxes, rather than leaving the market guessing, he softened the blow to the stock.\nHowever, the pre-planned sales raise the question of whether Musk had always intended to sell some stock for tax reasons, but said he was doing so at the behest of his followers.\nHoward Fischer, a partner at law firm Moses & Singer, said if Musk had concealed the real reason for his sales that could arguably be a disclosure violation, but at the same time there was a lot of public information on his reasoning for the sales.\nSO WILL THE SEC TAKE A LOOK AT THE SALES?\nThe SEC constantly monitors market-moving events and has kept an eye on Musk in the past. Since 2018, it has queried Tesla on at least three occasions as to whether Musk's Tweets complied with the settlement, public filings and internal SEC documents obtained via the Freedom of Information Act show.\nThe agency's new Democratic leadership is also eager to bring cases against big companies and their top executives.\n\"This case seems like yet another instance where regulators and private plaintiffs are going to spend years investigating what he knew, what he did, and why,\" said Ty Gellasch, head of investor group Healthy Markets.\nStill, the SEC may struggle to show Musk's actions harmed investors, typically a key threshold for successfully bringing a penalty, said lawyers.\nWAIT, SO MUSK HASN'T DONE ANYTHING WRONG?\nWhen it comes to the securities law, time will tell. From a corporate governance standpoint, his actions are problematic, said lawyers.\n\"If Tesla was a normal company, and Musk a normal executive, this kind of behavior would lead to a board rebuke or worse,\" said Fischer. But investors appear by now to accept Musk's \"oddities,\" he added.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6554570,"gmtCreate":1636754776868,"gmtModify":1636754776903,"authorId":3577415105079753,"author":{"id":3577415105079753,"authorId":3577415105079753,"name":"股惑仔79","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2521bf7235578dd93b9e7d10c59d5058","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":879078251,"type":1,"supId":6554466,"prevId":0,"content":"Ok","text":"Ok","html":"Ok"},{"id":6554466,"gmtCreate":1636753602267,"gmtModify":1636753602309,"authorId":3575016351943711,"author":{"id":3575016351943711,"authorId":3575016351943711,"name":"WZY999","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b0a72c03704eca433b1e33c902b833b4","vip":1,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":879078251,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"[Smile]","text":"[Smile]","html":"[Smile]"},{"id":6545576,"gmtCreate":1636683215632,"gmtModify":1636683215721,"authorId":3577415105079753,"author":{"id":3577415105079753,"authorId":3577415105079753,"name":"股惑仔79","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2521bf7235578dd93b9e7d10c59d5058","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":879078251,"type":1,"supId":6542942,"prevId":0,"content":"Okok","text":"Okok","html":"Okok"},{"id":6545575,"gmtCreate":1636683209023,"gmtModify":1636683209047,"authorId":3577415105079753,"author":{"id":3577415105079753,"authorId":3577415105079753,"name":"股惑仔79","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2521bf7235578dd93b9e7d10c59d5058","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":879078251,"type":1,"supId":6542945,"prevId":0,"content":"Ok","text":"Ok","html":"Ok"},{"id":6545572,"gmtCreate":1636683197963,"gmtModify":1636683197994,"authorId":3577415105079753,"author":{"id":3577415105079753,"authorId":3577415105079753,"name":"股惑仔79","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2521bf7235578dd93b9e7d10c59d5058","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":879078251,"type":1,"supId":6542951,"prevId":0,"content":"Ok","text":"Ok","html":"Ok"}],"langContent":"CN"},{"id":879071731,"gmtCreate":1636673965307,"gmtModify":1636673965779,"author":{"id":"3581796785124701","authorId":"3581796785124701","name":"天橋上的大爺","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/74a9b70d7f2658b4a438eda788611bf6","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Pls like","listText":"Pls like","text":"Pls like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/879071731","repostId":2182248064,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2182248064","pubTimestamp":1636673600,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2182248064?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-12 07:33","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Explainer-Five legal questions raised by Elon Musk's unorthodox share sales","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2182248064","media":"StreetInsider","summary":"WASHINGTON (Reuters) - It's been another wild ride for Tesla investors after billionaire chief execu","content":"<p>WASHINGTON (Reuters) - It's been another wild ride for Tesla investors after billionaire chief executive Elon Musk pledged via <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWTR\">Twitter</a> to sell 10% of his shares in the company. While the unorthodox way he went about it has raised eyebrows, it's unclear if he or Tesla have broken any rules.</p>\n<p>The electric carmaker lost more than $150 billion in value after Musk asked his Twitter followers over the weekend if he should sell 10% of his Tesla stake to pay new taxes being discussed by Congress. Nearly 58% said he should.</p>\n<p>On Wednesday, Tesla disclosed that Musk had offloaded 3% of his stock in recent days. A sixth of those shares were sold via a corporate \"trading plan\" - a legal agreement that allows insiders to trade in the company's shares at a pre-determined date - to satisfy tax obligations. The plan, adopted Sept. 14, pre-dated Musk's poll.</p>\n<p>The filings did not say why Musk had sold the other 2.5% and as of Thursday it was unclear if the sales related to Musk's Twitter poll or if he had yet sold the remaining 7%.</p>\n<p>Spokespeople for the SEC and Tesla did not provide comment.</p>\n<p>The episode has again raised questions as to whether the celebrity billionaire breached any rules or the settlement he agreed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for tweeting in 2018 that he had secured funding to take Tesla private when in fact he had not.</p>\n<p>Here are five questions Tesla-watchers are asking:</p>\n<p>DID MUSK BREACH HIS 2018 SEC SETTLEMENT?</p>\n<p>We don't know. That settlement, which the SEC tightened up in 2019, requires Musk to check any Tweets material to Tesla investors with a company lawyer, but Tesla and the SEC have not said whether that happened. Given Musk's Tweet appeared to tank the stock, he would be in breach of the settlement had he failed to vet it, said lawyers.</p>\n<p>WHAT'S THE DEAL WITH THE TRADING PLAN SALES?</p>\n<p>The \"Rule 10b5-1\" trading plans allow insiders to execute trades in the company's stock on a pre-determined future date, providing legal protection against potential allegations of insider trading on material non-public information.</p>\n<p>It's common for corporate insiders to pre-plan trades, although they can trade without the plan too. As such, Musk's sales via the plan are not unusual.</p>\n<p>However, the plans themselves have more holes than a Swiss cheese, a problem SEC chair Gary Gensler has pledged to fix.</p>\n<p>\"Some amount of chicanery is legal. And it is the looseness in the rules covering 'pre-planned' stock sales that are to blame,\" said Daniel Taylor, an insider trading expert and professor at the University of Pennsylvania.</p>\n<p>SO DID MUSK OR TESLA BREACH SEC DISCLOSURE RULES THEN?</p>\n<p>That's unclear. While announcing a huge share sale on Twitter may be unconventional for most chief executives, it's the norm for Musk and investors know to watch Musk's Twitter account for news. So the Tweets per se don't appear to violate any rules.</p>\n<p>In fact, several securities lawyers said Musk could argue that by explaining he had to sell to pay his taxes, rather than leaving the market guessing, he softened the blow to the stock.</p>\n<p>However, the pre-planned sales raise the question of whether Musk had always intended to sell some stock for tax reasons, but said he was doing so at the behest of his followers.</p>\n<p>Howard Fischer, a partner at law firm Moses &amp; Singer, said if Musk had concealed the real reason for his sales that could arguably be a disclosure violation, but at the same time there was a lot of public information on his reasoning for the sales.</p>\n<p>SO WILL THE SEC TAKE A LOOK AT THE SALES?</p>\n<p>The SEC constantly monitors market-moving events and has kept an eye on Musk in the past. Since 2018, it has queried Tesla on at least three occasions as to whether Musk's Tweets complied with the settlement, public filings and internal SEC documents obtained via the Freedom of Information Act show.</p>\n<p>The agency's new Democratic leadership is also eager to bring cases against big companies and their top executives.</p>\n<p>\"This case seems like yet another instance where regulators and private plaintiffs are going to spend years investigating what he knew, what he did, and why,\" said Ty Gellasch, head of investor group Healthy Markets.</p>\n<p>Still, the SEC may struggle to show Musk's actions harmed investors, typically a key threshold for successfully bringing a penalty, said lawyers.</p>\n<p>WAIT, SO MUSK HASN'T DONE ANYTHING WRONG?</p>\n<p>When it comes to the securities law, time will tell. From a corporate governance standpoint, his actions are problematic, said lawyers.</p>\n<p>\"If Tesla was a normal company, and Musk a normal executive, this kind of behavior would lead to a board rebuke or worse,\" said Fischer. But investors appear by now to accept Musk's \"oddities,\" he added.</p>","source":"highlight_streetinsider","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Explainer-Five legal questions raised by Elon Musk's unorthodox share sales</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nExplainer-Five legal questions raised by Elon Musk's unorthodox share sales\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-11-12 07:33 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=19200483><strong>StreetInsider</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>WASHINGTON (Reuters) - It's been another wild ride for Tesla investors after billionaire chief executive Elon Musk pledged via Twitter to sell 10% of his shares in the company. While the unorthodox ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=19200483\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=19200483","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2182248064","content_text":"WASHINGTON (Reuters) - It's been another wild ride for Tesla investors after billionaire chief executive Elon Musk pledged via Twitter to sell 10% of his shares in the company. While the unorthodox way he went about it has raised eyebrows, it's unclear if he or Tesla have broken any rules.\nThe electric carmaker lost more than $150 billion in value after Musk asked his Twitter followers over the weekend if he should sell 10% of his Tesla stake to pay new taxes being discussed by Congress. Nearly 58% said he should.\nOn Wednesday, Tesla disclosed that Musk had offloaded 3% of his stock in recent days. A sixth of those shares were sold via a corporate \"trading plan\" - a legal agreement that allows insiders to trade in the company's shares at a pre-determined date - to satisfy tax obligations. The plan, adopted Sept. 14, pre-dated Musk's poll.\nThe filings did not say why Musk had sold the other 2.5% and as of Thursday it was unclear if the sales related to Musk's Twitter poll or if he had yet sold the remaining 7%.\nSpokespeople for the SEC and Tesla did not provide comment.\nThe episode has again raised questions as to whether the celebrity billionaire breached any rules or the settlement he agreed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for tweeting in 2018 that he had secured funding to take Tesla private when in fact he had not.\nHere are five questions Tesla-watchers are asking:\nDID MUSK BREACH HIS 2018 SEC SETTLEMENT?\nWe don't know. That settlement, which the SEC tightened up in 2019, requires Musk to check any Tweets material to Tesla investors with a company lawyer, but Tesla and the SEC have not said whether that happened. Given Musk's Tweet appeared to tank the stock, he would be in breach of the settlement had he failed to vet it, said lawyers.\nWHAT'S THE DEAL WITH THE TRADING PLAN SALES?\nThe \"Rule 10b5-1\" trading plans allow insiders to execute trades in the company's stock on a pre-determined future date, providing legal protection against potential allegations of insider trading on material non-public information.\nIt's common for corporate insiders to pre-plan trades, although they can trade without the plan too. As such, Musk's sales via the plan are not unusual.\nHowever, the plans themselves have more holes than a Swiss cheese, a problem SEC chair Gary Gensler has pledged to fix.\n\"Some amount of chicanery is legal. And it is the looseness in the rules covering 'pre-planned' stock sales that are to blame,\" said Daniel Taylor, an insider trading expert and professor at the University of Pennsylvania.\nSO DID MUSK OR TESLA BREACH SEC DISCLOSURE RULES THEN?\nThat's unclear. While announcing a huge share sale on Twitter may be unconventional for most chief executives, it's the norm for Musk and investors know to watch Musk's Twitter account for news. So the Tweets per se don't appear to violate any rules.\nIn fact, several securities lawyers said Musk could argue that by explaining he had to sell to pay his taxes, rather than leaving the market guessing, he softened the blow to the stock.\nHowever, the pre-planned sales raise the question of whether Musk had always intended to sell some stock for tax reasons, but said he was doing so at the behest of his followers.\nHoward Fischer, a partner at law firm Moses & Singer, said if Musk had concealed the real reason for his sales that could arguably be a disclosure violation, but at the same time there was a lot of public information on his reasoning for the sales.\nSO WILL THE SEC TAKE A LOOK AT THE SALES?\nThe SEC constantly monitors market-moving events and has kept an eye on Musk in the past. Since 2018, it has queried Tesla on at least three occasions as to whether Musk's Tweets complied with the settlement, public filings and internal SEC documents obtained via the Freedom of Information Act show.\nThe agency's new Democratic leadership is also eager to bring cases against big companies and their top executives.\n\"This case seems like yet another instance where regulators and private plaintiffs are going to spend years investigating what he knew, what he did, and why,\" said Ty Gellasch, head of investor group Healthy Markets.\nStill, the SEC may struggle to show Musk's actions harmed investors, typically a key threshold for successfully bringing a penalty, said lawyers.\nWAIT, SO MUSK HASN'T DONE ANYTHING WRONG?\nWhen it comes to the securities law, time will tell. From a corporate governance standpoint, his actions are problematic, said lawyers.\n\"If Tesla was a normal company, and Musk a normal executive, this kind of behavior would lead to a board rebuke or worse,\" said Fischer. But investors appear by now to accept Musk's \"oddities,\" he added.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6542941,"gmtCreate":1636674030449,"gmtModify":1636674030486,"authorId":3581634665667334,"author":{"id":3581634665667334,"authorId":3581634665667334,"name":"56219dde","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":879071731,"type":1,"supId":6542931,"prevId":0,"content":"done","text":"done","html":"done"},{"id":6542931,"gmtCreate":1636673974460,"gmtModify":1636673974491,"authorId":3579499293913149,"author":{"id":3579499293913149,"authorId":3579499293913149,"name":"TJTan","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8b35867ea0bdab884a0a2a77afaebc5a","vip":1,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":879071731,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"liked","text":"liked","html":"liked"}],"langContent":"CN"},{"id":879071274,"gmtCreate":1636673955788,"gmtModify":1636673956652,"author":{"id":"3579499293913149","authorId":"3579499293913149","name":"TJTan","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8b35867ea0bdab884a0a2a77afaebc5a","vip":1,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"like","listText":"like","text":"like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/879071274","repostId":2182248064,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2182248064","pubTimestamp":1636673600,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2182248064?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-12 07:33","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Explainer-Five legal questions raised by Elon Musk's unorthodox share sales","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2182248064","media":"StreetInsider","summary":"WASHINGTON (Reuters) - It's been another wild ride for Tesla investors after billionaire chief execu","content":"<p>WASHINGTON (Reuters) - It's been another wild ride for Tesla investors after billionaire chief executive Elon Musk pledged via <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWTR\">Twitter</a> to sell 10% of his shares in the company. While the unorthodox way he went about it has raised eyebrows, it's unclear if he or Tesla have broken any rules.</p>\n<p>The electric carmaker lost more than $150 billion in value after Musk asked his Twitter followers over the weekend if he should sell 10% of his Tesla stake to pay new taxes being discussed by Congress. Nearly 58% said he should.</p>\n<p>On Wednesday, Tesla disclosed that Musk had offloaded 3% of his stock in recent days. A sixth of those shares were sold via a corporate \"trading plan\" - a legal agreement that allows insiders to trade in the company's shares at a pre-determined date - to satisfy tax obligations. The plan, adopted Sept. 14, pre-dated Musk's poll.</p>\n<p>The filings did not say why Musk had sold the other 2.5% and as of Thursday it was unclear if the sales related to Musk's Twitter poll or if he had yet sold the remaining 7%.</p>\n<p>Spokespeople for the SEC and Tesla did not provide comment.</p>\n<p>The episode has again raised questions as to whether the celebrity billionaire breached any rules or the settlement he agreed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for tweeting in 2018 that he had secured funding to take Tesla private when in fact he had not.</p>\n<p>Here are five questions Tesla-watchers are asking:</p>\n<p>DID MUSK BREACH HIS 2018 SEC SETTLEMENT?</p>\n<p>We don't know. That settlement, which the SEC tightened up in 2019, requires Musk to check any Tweets material to Tesla investors with a company lawyer, but Tesla and the SEC have not said whether that happened. Given Musk's Tweet appeared to tank the stock, he would be in breach of the settlement had he failed to vet it, said lawyers.</p>\n<p>WHAT'S THE DEAL WITH THE TRADING PLAN SALES?</p>\n<p>The \"Rule 10b5-1\" trading plans allow insiders to execute trades in the company's stock on a pre-determined future date, providing legal protection against potential allegations of insider trading on material non-public information.</p>\n<p>It's common for corporate insiders to pre-plan trades, although they can trade without the plan too. As such, Musk's sales via the plan are not unusual.</p>\n<p>However, the plans themselves have more holes than a Swiss cheese, a problem SEC chair Gary Gensler has pledged to fix.</p>\n<p>\"Some amount of chicanery is legal. And it is the looseness in the rules covering 'pre-planned' stock sales that are to blame,\" said Daniel Taylor, an insider trading expert and professor at the University of Pennsylvania.</p>\n<p>SO DID MUSK OR TESLA BREACH SEC DISCLOSURE RULES THEN?</p>\n<p>That's unclear. While announcing a huge share sale on Twitter may be unconventional for most chief executives, it's the norm for Musk and investors know to watch Musk's Twitter account for news. So the Tweets per se don't appear to violate any rules.</p>\n<p>In fact, several securities lawyers said Musk could argue that by explaining he had to sell to pay his taxes, rather than leaving the market guessing, he softened the blow to the stock.</p>\n<p>However, the pre-planned sales raise the question of whether Musk had always intended to sell some stock for tax reasons, but said he was doing so at the behest of his followers.</p>\n<p>Howard Fischer, a partner at law firm Moses &amp; Singer, said if Musk had concealed the real reason for his sales that could arguably be a disclosure violation, but at the same time there was a lot of public information on his reasoning for the sales.</p>\n<p>SO WILL THE SEC TAKE A LOOK AT THE SALES?</p>\n<p>The SEC constantly monitors market-moving events and has kept an eye on Musk in the past. Since 2018, it has queried Tesla on at least three occasions as to whether Musk's Tweets complied with the settlement, public filings and internal SEC documents obtained via the Freedom of Information Act show.</p>\n<p>The agency's new Democratic leadership is also eager to bring cases against big companies and their top executives.</p>\n<p>\"This case seems like yet another instance where regulators and private plaintiffs are going to spend years investigating what he knew, what he did, and why,\" said Ty Gellasch, head of investor group Healthy Markets.</p>\n<p>Still, the SEC may struggle to show Musk's actions harmed investors, typically a key threshold for successfully bringing a penalty, said lawyers.</p>\n<p>WAIT, SO MUSK HASN'T DONE ANYTHING WRONG?</p>\n<p>When it comes to the securities law, time will tell. From a corporate governance standpoint, his actions are problematic, said lawyers.</p>\n<p>\"If Tesla was a normal company, and Musk a normal executive, this kind of behavior would lead to a board rebuke or worse,\" said Fischer. But investors appear by now to accept Musk's \"oddities,\" he added.</p>","source":"highlight_streetinsider","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Explainer-Five legal questions raised by Elon Musk's unorthodox share sales</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nExplainer-Five legal questions raised by Elon Musk's unorthodox share sales\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-11-12 07:33 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=19200483><strong>StreetInsider</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>WASHINGTON (Reuters) - It's been another wild ride for Tesla investors after billionaire chief executive Elon Musk pledged via Twitter to sell 10% of his shares in the company. While the unorthodox ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=19200483\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=19200483","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2182248064","content_text":"WASHINGTON (Reuters) - It's been another wild ride for Tesla investors after billionaire chief executive Elon Musk pledged via Twitter to sell 10% of his shares in the company. While the unorthodox way he went about it has raised eyebrows, it's unclear if he or Tesla have broken any rules.\nThe electric carmaker lost more than $150 billion in value after Musk asked his Twitter followers over the weekend if he should sell 10% of his Tesla stake to pay new taxes being discussed by Congress. Nearly 58% said he should.\nOn Wednesday, Tesla disclosed that Musk had offloaded 3% of his stock in recent days. A sixth of those shares were sold via a corporate \"trading plan\" - a legal agreement that allows insiders to trade in the company's shares at a pre-determined date - to satisfy tax obligations. The plan, adopted Sept. 14, pre-dated Musk's poll.\nThe filings did not say why Musk had sold the other 2.5% and as of Thursday it was unclear if the sales related to Musk's Twitter poll or if he had yet sold the remaining 7%.\nSpokespeople for the SEC and Tesla did not provide comment.\nThe episode has again raised questions as to whether the celebrity billionaire breached any rules or the settlement he agreed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for tweeting in 2018 that he had secured funding to take Tesla private when in fact he had not.\nHere are five questions Tesla-watchers are asking:\nDID MUSK BREACH HIS 2018 SEC SETTLEMENT?\nWe don't know. That settlement, which the SEC tightened up in 2019, requires Musk to check any Tweets material to Tesla investors with a company lawyer, but Tesla and the SEC have not said whether that happened. Given Musk's Tweet appeared to tank the stock, he would be in breach of the settlement had he failed to vet it, said lawyers.\nWHAT'S THE DEAL WITH THE TRADING PLAN SALES?\nThe \"Rule 10b5-1\" trading plans allow insiders to execute trades in the company's stock on a pre-determined future date, providing legal protection against potential allegations of insider trading on material non-public information.\nIt's common for corporate insiders to pre-plan trades, although they can trade without the plan too. As such, Musk's sales via the plan are not unusual.\nHowever, the plans themselves have more holes than a Swiss cheese, a problem SEC chair Gary Gensler has pledged to fix.\n\"Some amount of chicanery is legal. And it is the looseness in the rules covering 'pre-planned' stock sales that are to blame,\" said Daniel Taylor, an insider trading expert and professor at the University of Pennsylvania.\nSO DID MUSK OR TESLA BREACH SEC DISCLOSURE RULES THEN?\nThat's unclear. While announcing a huge share sale on Twitter may be unconventional for most chief executives, it's the norm for Musk and investors know to watch Musk's Twitter account for news. So the Tweets per se don't appear to violate any rules.\nIn fact, several securities lawyers said Musk could argue that by explaining he had to sell to pay his taxes, rather than leaving the market guessing, he softened the blow to the stock.\nHowever, the pre-planned sales raise the question of whether Musk had always intended to sell some stock for tax reasons, but said he was doing so at the behest of his followers.\nHoward Fischer, a partner at law firm Moses & Singer, said if Musk had concealed the real reason for his sales that could arguably be a disclosure violation, but at the same time there was a lot of public information on his reasoning for the sales.\nSO WILL THE SEC TAKE A LOOK AT THE SALES?\nThe SEC constantly monitors market-moving events and has kept an eye on Musk in the past. Since 2018, it has queried Tesla on at least three occasions as to whether Musk's Tweets complied with the settlement, public filings and internal SEC documents obtained via the Freedom of Information Act show.\nThe agency's new Democratic leadership is also eager to bring cases against big companies and their top executives.\n\"This case seems like yet another instance where regulators and private plaintiffs are going to spend years investigating what he knew, what he did, and why,\" said Ty Gellasch, head of investor group Healthy Markets.\nStill, the SEC may struggle to show Musk's actions harmed investors, typically a key threshold for successfully bringing a penalty, said lawyers.\nWAIT, SO MUSK HASN'T DONE ANYTHING WRONG?\nWhen it comes to the securities law, time will tell. From a corporate governance standpoint, his actions are problematic, said lawyers.\n\"If Tesla was a normal company, and Musk a normal executive, this kind of behavior would lead to a board rebuke or worse,\" said Fischer. But investors appear by now to accept Musk's \"oddities,\" he added.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6542930,"gmtCreate":1636673973558,"gmtModify":1636673973666,"authorId":3581796785124701,"author":{"id":3581796785124701,"authorId":3581796785124701,"name":"天橋上的大爺","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/74a9b70d7f2658b4a438eda788611bf6","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":879071274,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Ok","text":"Ok","html":"Ok"},{"id":6542926,"gmtCreate":1636673963316,"gmtModify":1636673963349,"authorId":3576529744197419,"author":{"id":3576529744197419,"authorId":3576529744197419,"name":"DSYH","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1b1ab721d954c8f8215155b381c73f72","vip":1,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":879071274,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"<u>done</u>","text":"<u>done</u>","html":"<u>done</u>"}],"langContent":"CN"},{"id":879071692,"gmtCreate":1636673955760,"gmtModify":1636673956367,"author":{"id":"3576529744197419","authorId":"3576529744197419","name":"DSYH","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1b1ab721d954c8f8215155b381c73f72","vip":1,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Like pls","listText":"Like pls","text":"Like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/879071692","repostId":2182248064,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2182248064","pubTimestamp":1636673600,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2182248064?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-12 07:33","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Explainer-Five legal questions raised by Elon Musk's unorthodox share sales","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2182248064","media":"StreetInsider","summary":"WASHINGTON (Reuters) - It's been another wild ride for Tesla investors after billionaire chief execu","content":"<p>WASHINGTON (Reuters) - It's been another wild ride for Tesla investors after billionaire chief executive Elon Musk pledged via <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWTR\">Twitter</a> to sell 10% of his shares in the company. While the unorthodox way he went about it has raised eyebrows, it's unclear if he or Tesla have broken any rules.</p>\n<p>The electric carmaker lost more than $150 billion in value after Musk asked his Twitter followers over the weekend if he should sell 10% of his Tesla stake to pay new taxes being discussed by Congress. Nearly 58% said he should.</p>\n<p>On Wednesday, Tesla disclosed that Musk had offloaded 3% of his stock in recent days. A sixth of those shares were sold via a corporate \"trading plan\" - a legal agreement that allows insiders to trade in the company's shares at a pre-determined date - to satisfy tax obligations. The plan, adopted Sept. 14, pre-dated Musk's poll.</p>\n<p>The filings did not say why Musk had sold the other 2.5% and as of Thursday it was unclear if the sales related to Musk's Twitter poll or if he had yet sold the remaining 7%.</p>\n<p>Spokespeople for the SEC and Tesla did not provide comment.</p>\n<p>The episode has again raised questions as to whether the celebrity billionaire breached any rules or the settlement he agreed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for tweeting in 2018 that he had secured funding to take Tesla private when in fact he had not.</p>\n<p>Here are five questions Tesla-watchers are asking:</p>\n<p>DID MUSK BREACH HIS 2018 SEC SETTLEMENT?</p>\n<p>We don't know. That settlement, which the SEC tightened up in 2019, requires Musk to check any Tweets material to Tesla investors with a company lawyer, but Tesla and the SEC have not said whether that happened. Given Musk's Tweet appeared to tank the stock, he would be in breach of the settlement had he failed to vet it, said lawyers.</p>\n<p>WHAT'S THE DEAL WITH THE TRADING PLAN SALES?</p>\n<p>The \"Rule 10b5-1\" trading plans allow insiders to execute trades in the company's stock on a pre-determined future date, providing legal protection against potential allegations of insider trading on material non-public information.</p>\n<p>It's common for corporate insiders to pre-plan trades, although they can trade without the plan too. As such, Musk's sales via the plan are not unusual.</p>\n<p>However, the plans themselves have more holes than a Swiss cheese, a problem SEC chair Gary Gensler has pledged to fix.</p>\n<p>\"Some amount of chicanery is legal. And it is the looseness in the rules covering 'pre-planned' stock sales that are to blame,\" said Daniel Taylor, an insider trading expert and professor at the University of Pennsylvania.</p>\n<p>SO DID MUSK OR TESLA BREACH SEC DISCLOSURE RULES THEN?</p>\n<p>That's unclear. While announcing a huge share sale on Twitter may be unconventional for most chief executives, it's the norm for Musk and investors know to watch Musk's Twitter account for news. So the Tweets per se don't appear to violate any rules.</p>\n<p>In fact, several securities lawyers said Musk could argue that by explaining he had to sell to pay his taxes, rather than leaving the market guessing, he softened the blow to the stock.</p>\n<p>However, the pre-planned sales raise the question of whether Musk had always intended to sell some stock for tax reasons, but said he was doing so at the behest of his followers.</p>\n<p>Howard Fischer, a partner at law firm Moses &amp; Singer, said if Musk had concealed the real reason for his sales that could arguably be a disclosure violation, but at the same time there was a lot of public information on his reasoning for the sales.</p>\n<p>SO WILL THE SEC TAKE A LOOK AT THE SALES?</p>\n<p>The SEC constantly monitors market-moving events and has kept an eye on Musk in the past. Since 2018, it has queried Tesla on at least three occasions as to whether Musk's Tweets complied with the settlement, public filings and internal SEC documents obtained via the Freedom of Information Act show.</p>\n<p>The agency's new Democratic leadership is also eager to bring cases against big companies and their top executives.</p>\n<p>\"This case seems like yet another instance where regulators and private plaintiffs are going to spend years investigating what he knew, what he did, and why,\" said Ty Gellasch, head of investor group Healthy Markets.</p>\n<p>Still, the SEC may struggle to show Musk's actions harmed investors, typically a key threshold for successfully bringing a penalty, said lawyers.</p>\n<p>WAIT, SO MUSK HASN'T DONE ANYTHING WRONG?</p>\n<p>When it comes to the securities law, time will tell. From a corporate governance standpoint, his actions are problematic, said lawyers.</p>\n<p>\"If Tesla was a normal company, and Musk a normal executive, this kind of behavior would lead to a board rebuke or worse,\" said Fischer. But investors appear by now to accept Musk's \"oddities,\" he added.</p>","source":"highlight_streetinsider","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Explainer-Five legal questions raised by Elon Musk's unorthodox share sales</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nExplainer-Five legal questions raised by Elon Musk's unorthodox share sales\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-11-12 07:33 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=19200483><strong>StreetInsider</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>WASHINGTON (Reuters) - It's been another wild ride for Tesla investors after billionaire chief executive Elon Musk pledged via Twitter to sell 10% of his shares in the company. While the unorthodox ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=19200483\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=19200483","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2182248064","content_text":"WASHINGTON (Reuters) - It's been another wild ride for Tesla investors after billionaire chief executive Elon Musk pledged via Twitter to sell 10% of his shares in the company. While the unorthodox way he went about it has raised eyebrows, it's unclear if he or Tesla have broken any rules.\nThe electric carmaker lost more than $150 billion in value after Musk asked his Twitter followers over the weekend if he should sell 10% of his Tesla stake to pay new taxes being discussed by Congress. Nearly 58% said he should.\nOn Wednesday, Tesla disclosed that Musk had offloaded 3% of his stock in recent days. A sixth of those shares were sold via a corporate \"trading plan\" - a legal agreement that allows insiders to trade in the company's shares at a pre-determined date - to satisfy tax obligations. The plan, adopted Sept. 14, pre-dated Musk's poll.\nThe filings did not say why Musk had sold the other 2.5% and as of Thursday it was unclear if the sales related to Musk's Twitter poll or if he had yet sold the remaining 7%.\nSpokespeople for the SEC and Tesla did not provide comment.\nThe episode has again raised questions as to whether the celebrity billionaire breached any rules or the settlement he agreed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for tweeting in 2018 that he had secured funding to take Tesla private when in fact he had not.\nHere are five questions Tesla-watchers are asking:\nDID MUSK BREACH HIS 2018 SEC SETTLEMENT?\nWe don't know. That settlement, which the SEC tightened up in 2019, requires Musk to check any Tweets material to Tesla investors with a company lawyer, but Tesla and the SEC have not said whether that happened. Given Musk's Tweet appeared to tank the stock, he would be in breach of the settlement had he failed to vet it, said lawyers.\nWHAT'S THE DEAL WITH THE TRADING PLAN SALES?\nThe \"Rule 10b5-1\" trading plans allow insiders to execute trades in the company's stock on a pre-determined future date, providing legal protection against potential allegations of insider trading on material non-public information.\nIt's common for corporate insiders to pre-plan trades, although they can trade without the plan too. As such, Musk's sales via the plan are not unusual.\nHowever, the plans themselves have more holes than a Swiss cheese, a problem SEC chair Gary Gensler has pledged to fix.\n\"Some amount of chicanery is legal. And it is the looseness in the rules covering 'pre-planned' stock sales that are to blame,\" said Daniel Taylor, an insider trading expert and professor at the University of Pennsylvania.\nSO DID MUSK OR TESLA BREACH SEC DISCLOSURE RULES THEN?\nThat's unclear. While announcing a huge share sale on Twitter may be unconventional for most chief executives, it's the norm for Musk and investors know to watch Musk's Twitter account for news. So the Tweets per se don't appear to violate any rules.\nIn fact, several securities lawyers said Musk could argue that by explaining he had to sell to pay his taxes, rather than leaving the market guessing, he softened the blow to the stock.\nHowever, the pre-planned sales raise the question of whether Musk had always intended to sell some stock for tax reasons, but said he was doing so at the behest of his followers.\nHoward Fischer, a partner at law firm Moses & Singer, said if Musk had concealed the real reason for his sales that could arguably be a disclosure violation, but at the same time there was a lot of public information on his reasoning for the sales.\nSO WILL THE SEC TAKE A LOOK AT THE SALES?\nThe SEC constantly monitors market-moving events and has kept an eye on Musk in the past. Since 2018, it has queried Tesla on at least three occasions as to whether Musk's Tweets complied with the settlement, public filings and internal SEC documents obtained via the Freedom of Information Act show.\nThe agency's new Democratic leadership is also eager to bring cases against big companies and their top executives.\n\"This case seems like yet another instance where regulators and private plaintiffs are going to spend years investigating what he knew, what he did, and why,\" said Ty Gellasch, head of investor group Healthy Markets.\nStill, the SEC may struggle to show Musk's actions harmed investors, typically a key threshold for successfully bringing a penalty, said lawyers.\nWAIT, SO MUSK HASN'T DONE ANYTHING WRONG?\nWhen it comes to the securities law, time will tell. From a corporate governance standpoint, his actions are problematic, said lawyers.\n\"If Tesla was a normal company, and Musk a normal executive, this kind of behavior would lead to a board rebuke or worse,\" said Fischer. But investors appear by now to accept Musk's \"oddities,\" he added.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6542936,"gmtCreate":1636674012217,"gmtModify":1636674012246,"authorId":3577415105079753,"author":{"id":3577415105079753,"authorId":3577415105079753,"name":"股惑仔79","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2521bf7235578dd93b9e7d10c59d5058","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":879071692,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Ok","text":"Ok","html":"Ok"}],"langContent":"CN"},{"id":879071884,"gmtCreate":1636673941566,"gmtModify":1636673943088,"author":{"id":"3580120666305176","authorId":"3580120666305176","name":"JAMKKT","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/879071884","repostId":2182248064,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2182248064","pubTimestamp":1636673600,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2182248064?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-12 07:33","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Explainer-Five legal questions raised by Elon Musk's unorthodox share sales","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2182248064","media":"StreetInsider","summary":"WASHINGTON (Reuters) - It's been another wild ride for Tesla investors after billionaire chief execu","content":"<p>WASHINGTON (Reuters) - It's been another wild ride for Tesla investors after billionaire chief executive Elon Musk pledged via <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWTR\">Twitter</a> to sell 10% of his shares in the company. While the unorthodox way he went about it has raised eyebrows, it's unclear if he or Tesla have broken any rules.</p>\n<p>The electric carmaker lost more than $150 billion in value after Musk asked his Twitter followers over the weekend if he should sell 10% of his Tesla stake to pay new taxes being discussed by Congress. Nearly 58% said he should.</p>\n<p>On Wednesday, Tesla disclosed that Musk had offloaded 3% of his stock in recent days. A sixth of those shares were sold via a corporate \"trading plan\" - a legal agreement that allows insiders to trade in the company's shares at a pre-determined date - to satisfy tax obligations. The plan, adopted Sept. 14, pre-dated Musk's poll.</p>\n<p>The filings did not say why Musk had sold the other 2.5% and as of Thursday it was unclear if the sales related to Musk's Twitter poll or if he had yet sold the remaining 7%.</p>\n<p>Spokespeople for the SEC and Tesla did not provide comment.</p>\n<p>The episode has again raised questions as to whether the celebrity billionaire breached any rules or the settlement he agreed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for tweeting in 2018 that he had secured funding to take Tesla private when in fact he had not.</p>\n<p>Here are five questions Tesla-watchers are asking:</p>\n<p>DID MUSK BREACH HIS 2018 SEC SETTLEMENT?</p>\n<p>We don't know. That settlement, which the SEC tightened up in 2019, requires Musk to check any Tweets material to Tesla investors with a company lawyer, but Tesla and the SEC have not said whether that happened. Given Musk's Tweet appeared to tank the stock, he would be in breach of the settlement had he failed to vet it, said lawyers.</p>\n<p>WHAT'S THE DEAL WITH THE TRADING PLAN SALES?</p>\n<p>The \"Rule 10b5-1\" trading plans allow insiders to execute trades in the company's stock on a pre-determined future date, providing legal protection against potential allegations of insider trading on material non-public information.</p>\n<p>It's common for corporate insiders to pre-plan trades, although they can trade without the plan too. As such, Musk's sales via the plan are not unusual.</p>\n<p>However, the plans themselves have more holes than a Swiss cheese, a problem SEC chair Gary Gensler has pledged to fix.</p>\n<p>\"Some amount of chicanery is legal. And it is the looseness in the rules covering 'pre-planned' stock sales that are to blame,\" said Daniel Taylor, an insider trading expert and professor at the University of Pennsylvania.</p>\n<p>SO DID MUSK OR TESLA BREACH SEC DISCLOSURE RULES THEN?</p>\n<p>That's unclear. While announcing a huge share sale on Twitter may be unconventional for most chief executives, it's the norm for Musk and investors know to watch Musk's Twitter account for news. So the Tweets per se don't appear to violate any rules.</p>\n<p>In fact, several securities lawyers said Musk could argue that by explaining he had to sell to pay his taxes, rather than leaving the market guessing, he softened the blow to the stock.</p>\n<p>However, the pre-planned sales raise the question of whether Musk had always intended to sell some stock for tax reasons, but said he was doing so at the behest of his followers.</p>\n<p>Howard Fischer, a partner at law firm Moses &amp; Singer, said if Musk had concealed the real reason for his sales that could arguably be a disclosure violation, but at the same time there was a lot of public information on his reasoning for the sales.</p>\n<p>SO WILL THE SEC TAKE A LOOK AT THE SALES?</p>\n<p>The SEC constantly monitors market-moving events and has kept an eye on Musk in the past. Since 2018, it has queried Tesla on at least three occasions as to whether Musk's Tweets complied with the settlement, public filings and internal SEC documents obtained via the Freedom of Information Act show.</p>\n<p>The agency's new Democratic leadership is also eager to bring cases against big companies and their top executives.</p>\n<p>\"This case seems like yet another instance where regulators and private plaintiffs are going to spend years investigating what he knew, what he did, and why,\" said Ty Gellasch, head of investor group Healthy Markets.</p>\n<p>Still, the SEC may struggle to show Musk's actions harmed investors, typically a key threshold for successfully bringing a penalty, said lawyers.</p>\n<p>WAIT, SO MUSK HASN'T DONE ANYTHING WRONG?</p>\n<p>When it comes to the securities law, time will tell. From a corporate governance standpoint, his actions are problematic, said lawyers.</p>\n<p>\"If Tesla was a normal company, and Musk a normal executive, this kind of behavior would lead to a board rebuke or worse,\" said Fischer. But investors appear by now to accept Musk's \"oddities,\" he added.</p>","source":"highlight_streetinsider","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Explainer-Five legal questions raised by Elon Musk's unorthodox share sales</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nExplainer-Five legal questions raised by Elon Musk's unorthodox share sales\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-11-12 07:33 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=19200483><strong>StreetInsider</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>WASHINGTON (Reuters) - It's been another wild ride for Tesla investors after billionaire chief executive Elon Musk pledged via Twitter to sell 10% of his shares in the company. While the unorthodox ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=19200483\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=19200483","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2182248064","content_text":"WASHINGTON (Reuters) - It's been another wild ride for Tesla investors after billionaire chief executive Elon Musk pledged via Twitter to sell 10% of his shares in the company. While the unorthodox way he went about it has raised eyebrows, it's unclear if he or Tesla have broken any rules.\nThe electric carmaker lost more than $150 billion in value after Musk asked his Twitter followers over the weekend if he should sell 10% of his Tesla stake to pay new taxes being discussed by Congress. Nearly 58% said he should.\nOn Wednesday, Tesla disclosed that Musk had offloaded 3% of his stock in recent days. A sixth of those shares were sold via a corporate \"trading plan\" - a legal agreement that allows insiders to trade in the company's shares at a pre-determined date - to satisfy tax obligations. The plan, adopted Sept. 14, pre-dated Musk's poll.\nThe filings did not say why Musk had sold the other 2.5% and as of Thursday it was unclear if the sales related to Musk's Twitter poll or if he had yet sold the remaining 7%.\nSpokespeople for the SEC and Tesla did not provide comment.\nThe episode has again raised questions as to whether the celebrity billionaire breached any rules or the settlement he agreed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for tweeting in 2018 that he had secured funding to take Tesla private when in fact he had not.\nHere are five questions Tesla-watchers are asking:\nDID MUSK BREACH HIS 2018 SEC SETTLEMENT?\nWe don't know. That settlement, which the SEC tightened up in 2019, requires Musk to check any Tweets material to Tesla investors with a company lawyer, but Tesla and the SEC have not said whether that happened. Given Musk's Tweet appeared to tank the stock, he would be in breach of the settlement had he failed to vet it, said lawyers.\nWHAT'S THE DEAL WITH THE TRADING PLAN SALES?\nThe \"Rule 10b5-1\" trading plans allow insiders to execute trades in the company's stock on a pre-determined future date, providing legal protection against potential allegations of insider trading on material non-public information.\nIt's common for corporate insiders to pre-plan trades, although they can trade without the plan too. As such, Musk's sales via the plan are not unusual.\nHowever, the plans themselves have more holes than a Swiss cheese, a problem SEC chair Gary Gensler has pledged to fix.\n\"Some amount of chicanery is legal. And it is the looseness in the rules covering 'pre-planned' stock sales that are to blame,\" said Daniel Taylor, an insider trading expert and professor at the University of Pennsylvania.\nSO DID MUSK OR TESLA BREACH SEC DISCLOSURE RULES THEN?\nThat's unclear. While announcing a huge share sale on Twitter may be unconventional for most chief executives, it's the norm for Musk and investors know to watch Musk's Twitter account for news. So the Tweets per se don't appear to violate any rules.\nIn fact, several securities lawyers said Musk could argue that by explaining he had to sell to pay his taxes, rather than leaving the market guessing, he softened the blow to the stock.\nHowever, the pre-planned sales raise the question of whether Musk had always intended to sell some stock for tax reasons, but said he was doing so at the behest of his followers.\nHoward Fischer, a partner at law firm Moses & Singer, said if Musk had concealed the real reason for his sales that could arguably be a disclosure violation, but at the same time there was a lot of public information on his reasoning for the sales.\nSO WILL THE SEC TAKE A LOOK AT THE SALES?\nThe SEC constantly monitors market-moving events and has kept an eye on Musk in the past. Since 2018, it has queried Tesla on at least three occasions as to whether Musk's Tweets complied with the settlement, public filings and internal SEC documents obtained via the Freedom of Information Act show.\nThe agency's new Democratic leadership is also eager to bring cases against big companies and their top executives.\n\"This case seems like yet another instance where regulators and private plaintiffs are going to spend years investigating what he knew, what he did, and why,\" said Ty Gellasch, head of investor group Healthy Markets.\nStill, the SEC may struggle to show Musk's actions harmed investors, typically a key threshold for successfully bringing a penalty, said lawyers.\nWAIT, SO MUSK HASN'T DONE ANYTHING WRONG?\nWhen it comes to the securities law, time will tell. From a corporate governance standpoint, his actions are problematic, said lawyers.\n\"If Tesla was a normal company, and Musk a normal executive, this kind of behavior would lead to a board rebuke or worse,\" said Fischer. But investors appear by now to accept Musk's \"oddities,\" he added.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"CN"},{"id":879071323,"gmtCreate":1636673938162,"gmtModify":1636673938624,"author":{"id":"3579028995240368","authorId":"3579028995240368","name":"Jfierydragon","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/32ea74904661b2d0a43f0cc648caae68","vip":1,"crmLevel":9,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Like n coment","listText":"Like n coment","text":"Like n coment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/879071323","repostId":2182248064,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2182248064","pubTimestamp":1636673600,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2182248064?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-12 07:33","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Explainer-Five legal questions raised by Elon Musk's unorthodox share sales","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2182248064","media":"StreetInsider","summary":"WASHINGTON (Reuters) - It's been another wild ride for Tesla investors after billionaire chief execu","content":"<p>WASHINGTON (Reuters) - It's been another wild ride for Tesla investors after billionaire chief executive Elon Musk pledged via <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWTR\">Twitter</a> to sell 10% of his shares in the company. While the unorthodox way he went about it has raised eyebrows, it's unclear if he or Tesla have broken any rules.</p>\n<p>The electric carmaker lost more than $150 billion in value after Musk asked his Twitter followers over the weekend if he should sell 10% of his Tesla stake to pay new taxes being discussed by Congress. Nearly 58% said he should.</p>\n<p>On Wednesday, Tesla disclosed that Musk had offloaded 3% of his stock in recent days. A sixth of those shares were sold via a corporate \"trading plan\" - a legal agreement that allows insiders to trade in the company's shares at a pre-determined date - to satisfy tax obligations. The plan, adopted Sept. 14, pre-dated Musk's poll.</p>\n<p>The filings did not say why Musk had sold the other 2.5% and as of Thursday it was unclear if the sales related to Musk's Twitter poll or if he had yet sold the remaining 7%.</p>\n<p>Spokespeople for the SEC and Tesla did not provide comment.</p>\n<p>The episode has again raised questions as to whether the celebrity billionaire breached any rules or the settlement he agreed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for tweeting in 2018 that he had secured funding to take Tesla private when in fact he had not.</p>\n<p>Here are five questions Tesla-watchers are asking:</p>\n<p>DID MUSK BREACH HIS 2018 SEC SETTLEMENT?</p>\n<p>We don't know. That settlement, which the SEC tightened up in 2019, requires Musk to check any Tweets material to Tesla investors with a company lawyer, but Tesla and the SEC have not said whether that happened. Given Musk's Tweet appeared to tank the stock, he would be in breach of the settlement had he failed to vet it, said lawyers.</p>\n<p>WHAT'S THE DEAL WITH THE TRADING PLAN SALES?</p>\n<p>The \"Rule 10b5-1\" trading plans allow insiders to execute trades in the company's stock on a pre-determined future date, providing legal protection against potential allegations of insider trading on material non-public information.</p>\n<p>It's common for corporate insiders to pre-plan trades, although they can trade without the plan too. As such, Musk's sales via the plan are not unusual.</p>\n<p>However, the plans themselves have more holes than a Swiss cheese, a problem SEC chair Gary Gensler has pledged to fix.</p>\n<p>\"Some amount of chicanery is legal. And it is the looseness in the rules covering 'pre-planned' stock sales that are to blame,\" said Daniel Taylor, an insider trading expert and professor at the University of Pennsylvania.</p>\n<p>SO DID MUSK OR TESLA BREACH SEC DISCLOSURE RULES THEN?</p>\n<p>That's unclear. While announcing a huge share sale on Twitter may be unconventional for most chief executives, it's the norm for Musk and investors know to watch Musk's Twitter account for news. So the Tweets per se don't appear to violate any rules.</p>\n<p>In fact, several securities lawyers said Musk could argue that by explaining he had to sell to pay his taxes, rather than leaving the market guessing, he softened the blow to the stock.</p>\n<p>However, the pre-planned sales raise the question of whether Musk had always intended to sell some stock for tax reasons, but said he was doing so at the behest of his followers.</p>\n<p>Howard Fischer, a partner at law firm Moses &amp; Singer, said if Musk had concealed the real reason for his sales that could arguably be a disclosure violation, but at the same time there was a lot of public information on his reasoning for the sales.</p>\n<p>SO WILL THE SEC TAKE A LOOK AT THE SALES?</p>\n<p>The SEC constantly monitors market-moving events and has kept an eye on Musk in the past. Since 2018, it has queried Tesla on at least three occasions as to whether Musk's Tweets complied with the settlement, public filings and internal SEC documents obtained via the Freedom of Information Act show.</p>\n<p>The agency's new Democratic leadership is also eager to bring cases against big companies and their top executives.</p>\n<p>\"This case seems like yet another instance where regulators and private plaintiffs are going to spend years investigating what he knew, what he did, and why,\" said Ty Gellasch, head of investor group Healthy Markets.</p>\n<p>Still, the SEC may struggle to show Musk's actions harmed investors, typically a key threshold for successfully bringing a penalty, said lawyers.</p>\n<p>WAIT, SO MUSK HASN'T DONE ANYTHING WRONG?</p>\n<p>When it comes to the securities law, time will tell. From a corporate governance standpoint, his actions are problematic, said lawyers.</p>\n<p>\"If Tesla was a normal company, and Musk a normal executive, this kind of behavior would lead to a board rebuke or worse,\" said Fischer. But investors appear by now to accept Musk's \"oddities,\" he added.</p>","source":"highlight_streetinsider","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Explainer-Five legal questions raised by Elon Musk's unorthodox share sales</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nExplainer-Five legal questions raised by Elon Musk's unorthodox share sales\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-11-12 07:33 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=19200483><strong>StreetInsider</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>WASHINGTON (Reuters) - It's been another wild ride for Tesla investors after billionaire chief executive Elon Musk pledged via Twitter to sell 10% of his shares in the company. While the unorthodox ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=19200483\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=19200483","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2182248064","content_text":"WASHINGTON (Reuters) - It's been another wild ride for Tesla investors after billionaire chief executive Elon Musk pledged via Twitter to sell 10% of his shares in the company. While the unorthodox way he went about it has raised eyebrows, it's unclear if he or Tesla have broken any rules.\nThe electric carmaker lost more than $150 billion in value after Musk asked his Twitter followers over the weekend if he should sell 10% of his Tesla stake to pay new taxes being discussed by Congress. Nearly 58% said he should.\nOn Wednesday, Tesla disclosed that Musk had offloaded 3% of his stock in recent days. A sixth of those shares were sold via a corporate \"trading plan\" - a legal agreement that allows insiders to trade in the company's shares at a pre-determined date - to satisfy tax obligations. The plan, adopted Sept. 14, pre-dated Musk's poll.\nThe filings did not say why Musk had sold the other 2.5% and as of Thursday it was unclear if the sales related to Musk's Twitter poll or if he had yet sold the remaining 7%.\nSpokespeople for the SEC and Tesla did not provide comment.\nThe episode has again raised questions as to whether the celebrity billionaire breached any rules or the settlement he agreed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for tweeting in 2018 that he had secured funding to take Tesla private when in fact he had not.\nHere are five questions Tesla-watchers are asking:\nDID MUSK BREACH HIS 2018 SEC SETTLEMENT?\nWe don't know. That settlement, which the SEC tightened up in 2019, requires Musk to check any Tweets material to Tesla investors with a company lawyer, but Tesla and the SEC have not said whether that happened. Given Musk's Tweet appeared to tank the stock, he would be in breach of the settlement had he failed to vet it, said lawyers.\nWHAT'S THE DEAL WITH THE TRADING PLAN SALES?\nThe \"Rule 10b5-1\" trading plans allow insiders to execute trades in the company's stock on a pre-determined future date, providing legal protection against potential allegations of insider trading on material non-public information.\nIt's common for corporate insiders to pre-plan trades, although they can trade without the plan too. As such, Musk's sales via the plan are not unusual.\nHowever, the plans themselves have more holes than a Swiss cheese, a problem SEC chair Gary Gensler has pledged to fix.\n\"Some amount of chicanery is legal. And it is the looseness in the rules covering 'pre-planned' stock sales that are to blame,\" said Daniel Taylor, an insider trading expert and professor at the University of Pennsylvania.\nSO DID MUSK OR TESLA BREACH SEC DISCLOSURE RULES THEN?\nThat's unclear. While announcing a huge share sale on Twitter may be unconventional for most chief executives, it's the norm for Musk and investors know to watch Musk's Twitter account for news. So the Tweets per se don't appear to violate any rules.\nIn fact, several securities lawyers said Musk could argue that by explaining he had to sell to pay his taxes, rather than leaving the market guessing, he softened the blow to the stock.\nHowever, the pre-planned sales raise the question of whether Musk had always intended to sell some stock for tax reasons, but said he was doing so at the behest of his followers.\nHoward Fischer, a partner at law firm Moses & Singer, said if Musk had concealed the real reason for his sales that could arguably be a disclosure violation, but at the same time there was a lot of public information on his reasoning for the sales.\nSO WILL THE SEC TAKE A LOOK AT THE SALES?\nThe SEC constantly monitors market-moving events and has kept an eye on Musk in the past. Since 2018, it has queried Tesla on at least three occasions as to whether Musk's Tweets complied with the settlement, public filings and internal SEC documents obtained via the Freedom of Information Act show.\nThe agency's new Democratic leadership is also eager to bring cases against big companies and their top executives.\n\"This case seems like yet another instance where regulators and private plaintiffs are going to spend years investigating what he knew, what he did, and why,\" said Ty Gellasch, head of investor group Healthy Markets.\nStill, the SEC may struggle to show Musk's actions harmed investors, typically a key threshold for successfully bringing a penalty, said lawyers.\nWAIT, SO MUSK HASN'T DONE ANYTHING WRONG?\nWhen it comes to the securities law, time will tell. From a corporate governance standpoint, his actions are problematic, said lawyers.\n\"If Tesla was a normal company, and Musk a normal executive, this kind of behavior would lead to a board rebuke or worse,\" said Fischer. But investors appear by now to accept Musk's \"oddities,\" he added.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"CN"},{"id":879047244,"gmtCreate":1636673730419,"gmtModify":1636673731175,"author":{"id":"3581852672614632","authorId":"3581852672614632","name":"ChunHui","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bc47341688d5ff26c7994db9a3a6f6ac","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Like&nbsp;","listText":"Like&nbsp;","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/879047244","repostId":2182248064,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2182248064","pubTimestamp":1636673600,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2182248064?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-12 07:33","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Explainer-Five legal questions raised by Elon Musk's unorthodox share sales","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2182248064","media":"StreetInsider","summary":"WASHINGTON (Reuters) - It's been another wild ride for Tesla investors after billionaire chief execu","content":"<p>WASHINGTON (Reuters) - It's been another wild ride for Tesla investors after billionaire chief executive Elon Musk pledged via <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWTR\">Twitter</a> to sell 10% of his shares in the company. While the unorthodox way he went about it has raised eyebrows, it's unclear if he or Tesla have broken any rules.</p>\n<p>The electric carmaker lost more than $150 billion in value after Musk asked his Twitter followers over the weekend if he should sell 10% of his Tesla stake to pay new taxes being discussed by Congress. Nearly 58% said he should.</p>\n<p>On Wednesday, Tesla disclosed that Musk had offloaded 3% of his stock in recent days. A sixth of those shares were sold via a corporate \"trading plan\" - a legal agreement that allows insiders to trade in the company's shares at a pre-determined date - to satisfy tax obligations. The plan, adopted Sept. 14, pre-dated Musk's poll.</p>\n<p>The filings did not say why Musk had sold the other 2.5% and as of Thursday it was unclear if the sales related to Musk's Twitter poll or if he had yet sold the remaining 7%.</p>\n<p>Spokespeople for the SEC and Tesla did not provide comment.</p>\n<p>The episode has again raised questions as to whether the celebrity billionaire breached any rules or the settlement he agreed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for tweeting in 2018 that he had secured funding to take Tesla private when in fact he had not.</p>\n<p>Here are five questions Tesla-watchers are asking:</p>\n<p>DID MUSK BREACH HIS 2018 SEC SETTLEMENT?</p>\n<p>We don't know. That settlement, which the SEC tightened up in 2019, requires Musk to check any Tweets material to Tesla investors with a company lawyer, but Tesla and the SEC have not said whether that happened. Given Musk's Tweet appeared to tank the stock, he would be in breach of the settlement had he failed to vet it, said lawyers.</p>\n<p>WHAT'S THE DEAL WITH THE TRADING PLAN SALES?</p>\n<p>The \"Rule 10b5-1\" trading plans allow insiders to execute trades in the company's stock on a pre-determined future date, providing legal protection against potential allegations of insider trading on material non-public information.</p>\n<p>It's common for corporate insiders to pre-plan trades, although they can trade without the plan too. As such, Musk's sales via the plan are not unusual.</p>\n<p>However, the plans themselves have more holes than a Swiss cheese, a problem SEC chair Gary Gensler has pledged to fix.</p>\n<p>\"Some amount of chicanery is legal. And it is the looseness in the rules covering 'pre-planned' stock sales that are to blame,\" said Daniel Taylor, an insider trading expert and professor at the University of Pennsylvania.</p>\n<p>SO DID MUSK OR TESLA BREACH SEC DISCLOSURE RULES THEN?</p>\n<p>That's unclear. While announcing a huge share sale on Twitter may be unconventional for most chief executives, it's the norm for Musk and investors know to watch Musk's Twitter account for news. So the Tweets per se don't appear to violate any rules.</p>\n<p>In fact, several securities lawyers said Musk could argue that by explaining he had to sell to pay his taxes, rather than leaving the market guessing, he softened the blow to the stock.</p>\n<p>However, the pre-planned sales raise the question of whether Musk had always intended to sell some stock for tax reasons, but said he was doing so at the behest of his followers.</p>\n<p>Howard Fischer, a partner at law firm Moses &amp; Singer, said if Musk had concealed the real reason for his sales that could arguably be a disclosure violation, but at the same time there was a lot of public information on his reasoning for the sales.</p>\n<p>SO WILL THE SEC TAKE A LOOK AT THE SALES?</p>\n<p>The SEC constantly monitors market-moving events and has kept an eye on Musk in the past. Since 2018, it has queried Tesla on at least three occasions as to whether Musk's Tweets complied with the settlement, public filings and internal SEC documents obtained via the Freedom of Information Act show.</p>\n<p>The agency's new Democratic leadership is also eager to bring cases against big companies and their top executives.</p>\n<p>\"This case seems like yet another instance where regulators and private plaintiffs are going to spend years investigating what he knew, what he did, and why,\" said Ty Gellasch, head of investor group Healthy Markets.</p>\n<p>Still, the SEC may struggle to show Musk's actions harmed investors, typically a key threshold for successfully bringing a penalty, said lawyers.</p>\n<p>WAIT, SO MUSK HASN'T DONE ANYTHING WRONG?</p>\n<p>When it comes to the securities law, time will tell. From a corporate governance standpoint, his actions are problematic, said lawyers.</p>\n<p>\"If Tesla was a normal company, and Musk a normal executive, this kind of behavior would lead to a board rebuke or worse,\" said Fischer. But investors appear by now to accept Musk's \"oddities,\" he added.</p>","source":"highlight_streetinsider","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Explainer-Five legal questions raised by Elon Musk's unorthodox share sales</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nExplainer-Five legal questions raised by Elon Musk's unorthodox share sales\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-11-12 07:33 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=19200483><strong>StreetInsider</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>WASHINGTON (Reuters) - It's been another wild ride for Tesla investors after billionaire chief executive Elon Musk pledged via Twitter to sell 10% of his shares in the company. While the unorthodox ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=19200483\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=19200483","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2182248064","content_text":"WASHINGTON (Reuters) - It's been another wild ride for Tesla investors after billionaire chief executive Elon Musk pledged via Twitter to sell 10% of his shares in the company. While the unorthodox way he went about it has raised eyebrows, it's unclear if he or Tesla have broken any rules.\nThe electric carmaker lost more than $150 billion in value after Musk asked his Twitter followers over the weekend if he should sell 10% of his Tesla stake to pay new taxes being discussed by Congress. Nearly 58% said he should.\nOn Wednesday, Tesla disclosed that Musk had offloaded 3% of his stock in recent days. A sixth of those shares were sold via a corporate \"trading plan\" - a legal agreement that allows insiders to trade in the company's shares at a pre-determined date - to satisfy tax obligations. The plan, adopted Sept. 14, pre-dated Musk's poll.\nThe filings did not say why Musk had sold the other 2.5% and as of Thursday it was unclear if the sales related to Musk's Twitter poll or if he had yet sold the remaining 7%.\nSpokespeople for the SEC and Tesla did not provide comment.\nThe episode has again raised questions as to whether the celebrity billionaire breached any rules or the settlement he agreed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for tweeting in 2018 that he had secured funding to take Tesla private when in fact he had not.\nHere are five questions Tesla-watchers are asking:\nDID MUSK BREACH HIS 2018 SEC SETTLEMENT?\nWe don't know. That settlement, which the SEC tightened up in 2019, requires Musk to check any Tweets material to Tesla investors with a company lawyer, but Tesla and the SEC have not said whether that happened. Given Musk's Tweet appeared to tank the stock, he would be in breach of the settlement had he failed to vet it, said lawyers.\nWHAT'S THE DEAL WITH THE TRADING PLAN SALES?\nThe \"Rule 10b5-1\" trading plans allow insiders to execute trades in the company's stock on a pre-determined future date, providing legal protection against potential allegations of insider trading on material non-public information.\nIt's common for corporate insiders to pre-plan trades, although they can trade without the plan too. As such, Musk's sales via the plan are not unusual.\nHowever, the plans themselves have more holes than a Swiss cheese, a problem SEC chair Gary Gensler has pledged to fix.\n\"Some amount of chicanery is legal. And it is the looseness in the rules covering 'pre-planned' stock sales that are to blame,\" said Daniel Taylor, an insider trading expert and professor at the University of Pennsylvania.\nSO DID MUSK OR TESLA BREACH SEC DISCLOSURE RULES THEN?\nThat's unclear. While announcing a huge share sale on Twitter may be unconventional for most chief executives, it's the norm for Musk and investors know to watch Musk's Twitter account for news. So the Tweets per se don't appear to violate any rules.\nIn fact, several securities lawyers said Musk could argue that by explaining he had to sell to pay his taxes, rather than leaving the market guessing, he softened the blow to the stock.\nHowever, the pre-planned sales raise the question of whether Musk had always intended to sell some stock for tax reasons, but said he was doing so at the behest of his followers.\nHoward Fischer, a partner at law firm Moses & Singer, said if Musk had concealed the real reason for his sales that could arguably be a disclosure violation, but at the same time there was a lot of public information on his reasoning for the sales.\nSO WILL THE SEC TAKE A LOOK AT THE SALES?\nThe SEC constantly monitors market-moving events and has kept an eye on Musk in the past. Since 2018, it has queried Tesla on at least three occasions as to whether Musk's Tweets complied with the settlement, public filings and internal SEC documents obtained via the Freedom of Information Act show.\nThe agency's new Democratic leadership is also eager to bring cases against big companies and their top executives.\n\"This case seems like yet another instance where regulators and private plaintiffs are going to spend years investigating what he knew, what he did, and why,\" said Ty Gellasch, head of investor group Healthy Markets.\nStill, the SEC may struggle to show Musk's actions harmed investors, typically a key threshold for successfully bringing a penalty, said lawyers.\nWAIT, SO MUSK HASN'T DONE ANYTHING WRONG?\nWhen it comes to the securities law, time will tell. From a corporate governance standpoint, his actions are problematic, said lawyers.\n\"If Tesla was a normal company, and Musk a normal executive, this kind of behavior would lead to a board rebuke or worse,\" said Fischer. But investors appear by now to accept Musk's \"oddities,\" he added.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6542921,"gmtCreate":1636673931879,"gmtModify":1636673931984,"authorId":3579028995240368,"author":{"id":3579028995240368,"authorId":3579028995240368,"name":"Jfierydragon","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/32ea74904661b2d0a43f0cc648caae68","vip":1,"crmLevel":9,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":879047244,"type":1,"supId":6542869,"prevId":0,"content":"<u>ok</u>","text":"<u>ok</u>","html":"<u>ok</u>"},{"id":6542869,"gmtCreate":1636673749153,"gmtModify":1636673749185,"authorId":4087190594214920,"author":{"id":4087190594214920,"authorId":4087190594214920,"name":"PBL170","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8ef4f93ba3e261ac276aef28c4467365","vip":1,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":879047244,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Ok","text":"Ok","html":"Ok"}],"langContent":"CN"}],"hasMoreComments":true,"newsSizeData":{"likeSize":92,"commentSize":15,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false}}