FAANG is Dead. Long Live MANAMANA_老虎社区_美港股上老虎

FAANG is Dead. Long Live MANAMANA

Motley Fool2021-11-05

In 2013 Mad Money's Jim Cramer casually launched one of the more widely adopted business mnemonics in history, describing the Four Horsemen of Big Tech by the acronym FANG. These companies were ...

网页链接

免责声明：本文观点仅代表作者个人观点，不构成本平台的投资建议，本平台不对文章信息准确性、完整性和及时性做出任何保证，亦不对因使用或信赖文章信息引发的任何损失承担责任。

242

SPOT_ON
·2021-11-08
Like n follow
回复
2
举报
收起
- SPOT_ON:
  👍 👌 💛 😙 🥰
  2021-11-08
  回复
  举报
- b1uesky:
  like
  2021-11-08
  回复
  举报
meowmeowme
·2021-11-08
U sound lost...
回复
3
举报
857857a8787
·2021-11-07
lol what...
回复
1
举报
Dita
·2021-11-07
Manamana = Wherewhere
回复
1
举报
Priscyn
·2021-11-06
manamana singalong
回复
1
举报
Dazz
·2021-11-06
Serious?
回复
点赞
举报
收起
- YPT:
  Ha
  2021-11-07
  回复
  举报
SSVC
·2021-11-06
Hmm.. Appreciate your response and comments Thanks
回复
2
举报
收起
- gl8089:
  nice
  2021-11-06
  回复
  举报
wywy
·2021-11-06
All the way. DCA
回复
1
举报
收起
- wywy:
  Good point
  2021-11-06
  回复
  举报
- HMHu:
  Where is TSLA?
  2021-11-06
  回复
  举报
vincentheng8
·2021-11-06
All in!
回复
3
举报
收起
- vincentheng8:
  all in
  2021-11-06
  回复
  举报
missreenaa
·2021-11-06
MANAMANA 😂👍
回复
13
举报
收起
- chiapopo:
  Funny sia [龇牙] [龇牙]
  2021-11-06
  回复
  举报
IZLIN
·2021-11-06
@Meow17 @Sagi08 @simplydkam[Surprised]
回复
4
举报
收起
- Yuyu1988:
  😊😊😊😊
  2021-11-06
  回复
  举报
QArmieeQ
·2021-11-06
MANAMANA means wherever in Malay.
回复
3
举报
收起
- 滚股怪:
  Wio
  2021-11-06
  回复
  举报
boonk
·2021-11-06
Meta to 1k next year
回复
2
举报
Kitsonlin
·2021-11-06
Morning
回复
2
举报
Kevin92
·2021-11-06
Like
回复
2
举报
收起
- Kitsonlin:
  up
  2021-11-06
  回复
  举报
andrew123
·2021-11-06
Nice
回复
3
举报
收起
- Kevin92:
  Like
  2021-11-06
  回复
  举报
yigenxiaohai
·2021-11-06
Ok
回复
4
举报
收起
- Jaja2000:
  ok
  2021-11-06
  回复
  举报
GoG
·2021-11-06
No Tsla?
回复
3
举报
Gaik11
·2021-11-06
Okay
回复
3
举报
收起
- Gaik11:
  Ok
  2021-11-06
  回复
  举报
Bull_Lion
·2021-11-06
The fool is great for writing silly articles like this one. 😂. But I wouldn’t put money on any of its recommendations
回复
2
举报

热议股票

7x24

全部

关于我们·老虎社区守则·老虎社区账号管理规范·老虎社区服务协议·老虎社区隐私政策

公司名称：北京至简风宜信息技术有限公司

违法和不良信息投诉：010-5681-3562（工作时间9:30-18:30）

邮箱：service@laohu8.com

营业执照：91110105MA01A4U55R

ICP备：京ICP备18016422号

网安备：京公网安备11010502036490

关注我们

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"data":{"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2181748650?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","thumbnail":"","is_english":true,"pubTime":"2021-11-05 23:08","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","id":"2181748650","market":"us","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"FAANG is Dead. Long Live MANAMANA","media":"Motley Fool","content":"<div>\nIn 2013 Mad Money's Jim Cramer casually launched one of the more widely adopted business mnemonics in history, describing the Four Horsemen of Big Tech by the acronym FANG.\nThese companies were ...\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/05/faang-is-dead-long-live-manamana/\">网页链接</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"fool_stock","html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>FAANG is Dead. Long Live MANAMANA</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFAANG is Dead. Long Live MANAMANA\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-11-05 23:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/05/faang-is-dead-long-live-manamana/>Motley Fool</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nIn 2013 Mad Money's Jim Cramer casually launched one of the more widely adopted business mnemonics in history, describing the Four Horsemen of Big Tech by the acronym FANG.\nThese companies were ...\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/05/faang-is-dead-long-live-manamana/\">网页链接</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":"GOOGL","symbol_name":"谷歌A","start_time":0,"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/05/faang-is-dead-long-live-manamana/","article_id":"2181748650","we_media_id":null,"thumbnails":[],"rights":null,"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2181748650","pubTimestamp":1636124925,"sourceInfo":{"source_id":"fool_stock","name":"Motley Fool"},"weMediaInfo":null,"summary":"With new top dogs, it's time to update the infamous acronym.","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"fool.com","property":[],"viewcount":null,"language":"en","relate_stocks":{"GOOGL":"谷歌A","ADBE":"Adobe","NVDA":"英伟达","MSFT":"微软","AMZN":"亚马逊","NFLX":"奈飞","AAPL":"苹果"},"translate_title":"法昂死了。马纳马纳万岁","themeId":null,"isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":null,"symbols_score_info":{"AAPL":0.9,"ADBE":0.9,"AMZN":0.9,"FB":0.9,"GOOGL":0.9,"MSFT":0.9,"NFLX":0.9,"NVDA":0.9},"content_text":"In 2013 Mad Money's Jim Cramer casually launched one of the more widely adopted business mnemonics in history, describing the Four Horsemen of Big Tech by the acronym FANG.\nThese companies were Facebook, Amazon.com (NASDAQ:AMZN), Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) and Google. Almost immediately the weakness in this appellation became clear:\nWhere in the world was Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL)? OK, let's call it FAANG.\nAnd hey! Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) is really not as dead as people thought it would be! OK. How about FAANG+M? FANMAG?\n(Actually, Microsoft is very not dead, as at $2.5 trillion it is the largest public company in the world not named Saudi Aramco and has outperformed all of the other FAANGs.)\nWelp, turns out Google wants to change its name to Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG)(NASDAQ:GOOGL). OK, that gets awkward. On the Motley Fool Morning Show, we renamed the whole agglomeration of big cap tech \"FANAMA.\" Try and say that without hearing David Lee Roth's voice.\nSource: Getty Images.\nAnd then, this last week, Facebook changed its name to Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:FB). I was rooting for them to change it to Sugar Mountain, but no dice. All of this means that we can keep trying to shoehorn FAANG into some new acronym (Cramer decided to go with MAMAA, which, I mean...I guess.), or we can rethink this whole thing.\nAnd fear not, for the Morning Show team have done just that. We thought about the most influential consumer technology companies, and we came up with a list of eight.\nMicrosoft\nApple\nNetflix\nAmazon.com\nMeta Platforms\nAdobe (NASDAQ:ADBE)\nNvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA)\nAlphabet\nWhich spells out the incredibly great acronym MANAMANA. Go ahead, go listen to the song. We'll be right here.\nMANAMANA incorporates eight consumer technology companies ranging from $300 billion in market capitalization (Netflix) up to $2.5 trillion (Microsoft). Combined these companies are worth $10.8 trillion, which is 22% of the total market capitalization of all US public companies. In the last reported year these companies generated a combined $1.4 trillion in revenues. They are consumer technology monsters. Mutant companies.\nIn fact, I'd go so far as to say that as goes MANAMANA (doo doo de doo doo), so goes the US economy.\nNow, I know what you're saying right now. Adobe? Really? Yes, absolutely. For one, there is this:\nMSFT data by YCharts\nAdobe shares have outperformed every FANAMA company, and only trails Nvidia in MANAMANA. But perhaps more importantly, Adobe was at the forefront of of a sales model in the tech industry that is now commonplace to the point of cliché: Software as a Service. In 2012 Adobe changed its business model from buy-release-upgrade for Acrobat, Photoshop and inDesign to one where users paid a subscription and as a result got consistent upgrades to the most recent versions. This was a revolutionary move, and not only has it worked out quite satisfactorily for Adobe and its shareholders, but for thousands of other tech and non-tech companies. It is in all ways a societally important company.\nWith MANAMANA we capture an enormous swath of the American technology industry. With the addition of Adobe and Nvidia, this bellwether gains exposure to two segments of the technology that FANG, FAANG, FANAMA and MAMAA miss: creation and publication, and the power behind graphics processing units. These are massively important, growing segments of technology, and Nvidia and Adobe are without question the leaders.\nAnd ultimately that's the point of a bellwether -- to serve as a proxy to track something larger. FAANG was a great placeholder for American large cap technology for the better part of a decade.\nBut now it's time for MANAMANA. (Doo doo de doo doo.)","kind":null,"is_publish_news":true,"is_publish_highlight":true,"is_publish_live":null,"is_publish_wemedia":null,"editions":null,"column":"","sentiment":"","news_tag":"","news_rank":0,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":1},"commentList":[{"id":845804986,"gmtCreate":1636326384931,"gmtModify":1636326393522,"author":{"id":"3582922989777578","authorId":"3582922989777578","name":"SPOT_ON","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/080f029371339d9db26930961de6adb1","vip":1,"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Like n follow&nbsp;","listText":"Like n follow&nbsp;","text":"Like n follow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/845804986","repostId":2181748650,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2181748650","pubTimestamp":1636124925,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2181748650?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-05 23:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"FAANG is Dead. Long Live MANAMANA","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2181748650","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"With new top dogs, it's time to update the infamous acronym.","content":"In 2013 Mad Money's Jim Cramer casually launched one of the more widely adopted business mnemonics in history, describing the Four Horsemen of Big Tech by the acronym FANG.\nThese companies were Facebook, Amazon.com (NASDAQ:AMZN), Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) and Google. Almost immediately the weakness in this appellation became clear:\nWhere in the world was Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL)? OK, let's call it FAANG.\nAnd hey! Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) is really not as dead as people thought it would be! OK. How about FAANG+M? FANMAG?\n(Actually, Microsoft is very not dead, as at $2.5 trillion it is the largest public company in the world not named Saudi Aramco and has outperformed all of the other FAANGs.)\nWelp, turns out Google wants to change its name to Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG)(NASDAQ:GOOGL). OK, that gets awkward. On the Motley Fool Morning Show, we renamed the whole agglomeration of big cap tech \"FANAMA.\" Try and say that without hearing David Lee Roth's voice.\n<img src=\"https://g.foolcdn.com/image/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fg.foolcdn.com%2Feditorial%2Fimages%2F650833%2Fgettyimages-1348369701.jpg&amp;w=700&amp;op=resize\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">Source: Getty Images.\nAnd then, this last week, Facebook changed its name to <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FB\">Meta Platforms</a> (NASDAQ:FB). I was rooting for them to change it to Sugar Mountain, but no dice. All of this means that we can keep trying to shoehorn FAANG into some new acronym (Cramer decided to go with MAMAA, which, I mean...I guess.), or we can rethink this whole thing.\nAnd fear not, for the Morning Show team have done just that. We thought about the most influential consumer technology companies, and we came up with a list of eight.\nMicrosoft\nApple\nNetflix\nAmazon.com\nMeta Platforms\n<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ADBE\">Adobe</a> (NASDAQ:ADBE)\nNvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA)\nAlphabet\nWhich spells out the incredibly great acronym MANAMANA. Go ahead, go listen to the song. We'll be right here.\nMANAMANA incorporates eight consumer technology companies ranging from $300 billion in market capitalization (Netflix) up to $2.5 trillion (Microsoft). Combined these companies are worth $10.8 trillion, which is 22% of the total market capitalization of all US public companies. In the last reported year these companies generated a combined $1.4 trillion in revenues. They are consumer technology monsters. Mutant companies.\nIn fact, I'd go so far as to say that as goes MANAMANA (doo doo de doo doo), so goes the US economy.\nNow, I know what you're saying right now. Adobe? Really? Yes, absolutely. For one, there is this:\n<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad3d8664a4dd91b540d98c471291318b\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"551\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">MSFT data by YCharts\nAdobe shares have outperformed every FANAMA company, and only trails Nvidia in MANAMANA. But perhaps more importantly, Adobe was at the forefront of of a sales model in the tech industry that is now commonplace to the point of cliché: Software as a Service. In 2012 Adobe changed its business model from buy-release-upgrade for Acrobat, Photoshop and inDesign to one where users paid a subscription and as a result got consistent upgrades to the most recent versions. This was a revolutionary move, and not only has it worked out quite satisfactorily for Adobe and its shareholders, but for thousands of other tech and non-tech companies. It is in all ways a societally important company.\nWith MANAMANA we capture an enormous swath of the American technology industry. With the addition of Adobe and Nvidia, this bellwether gains exposure to two segments of the technology that FANG, FAANG, FANAMA and MAMAA miss: creation and publication, and the power behind graphics processing units. These are massively important, growing segments of technology, and Nvidia and Adobe are without question the leaders.\nAnd ultimately that's the point of a bellwether -- to serve as a proxy to track something larger. FAANG was a great placeholder for American large cap technology for the better part of a decade.\nBut now it's time for MANAMANA. (Doo doo de doo doo.)","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>FAANG is Dead. Long Live MANAMANA</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFAANG is Dead. Long Live MANAMANA\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-11-05 23:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/05/faang-is-dead-long-live-manamana/>Motley Fool</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nIn 2013 Mad Money's Jim Cramer casually launched one of the more widely adopted business mnemonics in history, describing the Four Horsemen of Big Tech by the acronym FANG.\nThese companies were ...\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/05/faang-is-dead-long-live-manamana/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NVDA":"英伟达","AMZN":"亚马逊","MSFT":"微软","GOOGL":"谷歌A","ADBE":"Adobe","AAPL":"苹果","NFLX":"奈飞"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/05/faang-is-dead-long-live-manamana/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2181748650","content_text":"In 2013 Mad Money's Jim Cramer casually launched one of the more widely adopted business mnemonics in history, describing the Four Horsemen of Big Tech by the acronym FANG.\nThese companies were Facebook, Amazon.com (NASDAQ:AMZN), Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) and Google. Almost immediately the weakness in this appellation became clear:\nWhere in the world was Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL)? OK, let's call it FAANG.\nAnd hey! Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) is really not as dead as people thought it would be! OK. How about FAANG+M? FANMAG?\n(Actually, Microsoft is very not dead, as at $2.5 trillion it is the largest public company in the world not named Saudi Aramco and has outperformed all of the other FAANGs.)\nWelp, turns out Google wants to change its name to Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG)(NASDAQ:GOOGL). OK, that gets awkward. On the Motley Fool Morning Show, we renamed the whole agglomeration of big cap tech \"FANAMA.\" Try and say that without hearing David Lee Roth's voice.\nSource: Getty Images.\nAnd then, this last week, Facebook changed its name to Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:FB). I was rooting for them to change it to Sugar Mountain, but no dice. All of this means that we can keep trying to shoehorn FAANG into some new acronym (Cramer decided to go with MAMAA, which, I mean...I guess.), or we can rethink this whole thing.\nAnd fear not, for the Morning Show team have done just that. We thought about the most influential consumer technology companies, and we came up with a list of eight.\nMicrosoft\nApple\nNetflix\nAmazon.com\nMeta Platforms\nAdobe (NASDAQ:ADBE)\nNvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA)\nAlphabet\nWhich spells out the incredibly great acronym MANAMANA. Go ahead, go listen to the song. We'll be right here.\nMANAMANA incorporates eight consumer technology companies ranging from $300 billion in market capitalization (Netflix) up to $2.5 trillion (Microsoft). Combined these companies are worth $10.8 trillion, which is 22% of the total market capitalization of all US public companies. In the last reported year these companies generated a combined $1.4 trillion in revenues. They are consumer technology monsters. Mutant companies.\nIn fact, I'd go so far as to say that as goes MANAMANA (doo doo de doo doo), so goes the US economy.\nNow, I know what you're saying right now. Adobe? Really? Yes, absolutely. For one, there is this:\nMSFT data by YCharts\nAdobe shares have outperformed every FANAMA company, and only trails Nvidia in MANAMANA. But perhaps more importantly, Adobe was at the forefront of of a sales model in the tech industry that is now commonplace to the point of cliché: Software as a Service. In 2012 Adobe changed its business model from buy-release-upgrade for Acrobat, Photoshop and inDesign to one where users paid a subscription and as a result got consistent upgrades to the most recent versions. This was a revolutionary move, and not only has it worked out quite satisfactorily for Adobe and its shareholders, but for thousands of other tech and non-tech companies. It is in all ways a societally important company.\nWith MANAMANA we capture an enormous swath of the American technology industry. With the addition of Adobe and Nvidia, this bellwether gains exposure to two segments of the technology that FANG, FAANG, FANAMA and MAMAA miss: creation and publication, and the power behind graphics processing units. These are massively important, growing segments of technology, and Nvidia and Adobe are without question the leaders.\nAnd ultimately that's the point of a bellwether -- to serve as a proxy to track something larger. FAANG was a great placeholder for American large cap technology for the better part of a decade.\nBut now it's time for MANAMANA. (Doo doo de doo doo.)","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6491105,"gmtCreate":1636327521761,"gmtModify":1636327521863,"authorId":3582922989777578,"author":{"id":3582922989777578,"authorId":3582922989777578,"name":"SPOT_ON","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/080f029371339d9db26930961de6adb1","vip":1,"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":845804986,"type":1,"supId":6490942,"prevId":0,"content":"👍 👌 💛 😙 🥰","text":"👍 👌 💛 😙 🥰","html":"👍 👌 💛 😙 🥰"},{"id":6490942,"gmtCreate":1636326870166,"gmtModify":1636326870200,"authorId":4096368443831390,"author":{"id":4096368443831390,"authorId":4096368443831390,"name":"b1uesky","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/87ef9b02e19a8acfaa7ae5b147b70882","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":845804986,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"like","text":"like","html":"like"}],"langContent":"CN"},{"id":845178673,"gmtCreate":1636325210154,"gmtModify":1636325213674,"author":{"id":"3572057948118382","authorId":"3572057948118382","name":"meowmeowme","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ff35c63639130db9306c87ac66c94640","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"U sound lost...","listText":"U sound lost...","text":"U sound lost...","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/845178673","repostId":2181748650,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2181748650","pubTimestamp":1636124925,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2181748650?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-05 23:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"FAANG is Dead. Long Live MANAMANA","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2181748650","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"With new top dogs, it's time to update the infamous acronym.","content":"In 2013 Mad Money's Jim Cramer casually launched one of the more widely adopted business mnemonics in history, describing the Four Horsemen of Big Tech by the acronym FANG.\nThese companies were Facebook, Amazon.com (NASDAQ:AMZN), Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) and Google. Almost immediately the weakness in this appellation became clear:\nWhere in the world was Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL)? OK, let's call it FAANG.\nAnd hey! Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) is really not as dead as people thought it would be! OK. How about FAANG+M? FANMAG?\n(Actually, Microsoft is very not dead, as at $2.5 trillion it is the largest public company in the world not named Saudi Aramco and has outperformed all of the other FAANGs.)\nWelp, turns out Google wants to change its name to Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG)(NASDAQ:GOOGL). OK, that gets awkward. On the Motley Fool Morning Show, we renamed the whole agglomeration of big cap tech \"FANAMA.\" Try and say that without hearing David Lee Roth's voice.\n<img src=\"https://g.foolcdn.com/image/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fg.foolcdn.com%2Feditorial%2Fimages%2F650833%2Fgettyimages-1348369701.jpg&amp;w=700&amp;op=resize\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">Source: Getty Images.\nAnd then, this last week, Facebook changed its name to <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FB\">Meta Platforms</a> (NASDAQ:FB). I was rooting for them to change it to Sugar Mountain, but no dice. All of this means that we can keep trying to shoehorn FAANG into some new acronym (Cramer decided to go with MAMAA, which, I mean...I guess.), or we can rethink this whole thing.\nAnd fear not, for the Morning Show team have done just that. We thought about the most influential consumer technology companies, and we came up with a list of eight.\nMicrosoft\nApple\nNetflix\nAmazon.com\nMeta Platforms\n<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ADBE\">Adobe</a> (NASDAQ:ADBE)\nNvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA)\nAlphabet\nWhich spells out the incredibly great acronym MANAMANA. Go ahead, go listen to the song. We'll be right here.\nMANAMANA incorporates eight consumer technology companies ranging from $300 billion in market capitalization (Netflix) up to $2.5 trillion (Microsoft). Combined these companies are worth $10.8 trillion, which is 22% of the total market capitalization of all US public companies. In the last reported year these companies generated a combined $1.4 trillion in revenues. They are consumer technology monsters. Mutant companies.\nIn fact, I'd go so far as to say that as goes MANAMANA (doo doo de doo doo), so goes the US economy.\nNow, I know what you're saying right now. Adobe? Really? Yes, absolutely. For one, there is this:\n<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad3d8664a4dd91b540d98c471291318b\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"551\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">MSFT data by YCharts\nAdobe shares have outperformed every FANAMA company, and only trails Nvidia in MANAMANA. But perhaps more importantly, Adobe was at the forefront of of a sales model in the tech industry that is now commonplace to the point of cliché: Software as a Service. In 2012 Adobe changed its business model from buy-release-upgrade for Acrobat, Photoshop and inDesign to one where users paid a subscription and as a result got consistent upgrades to the most recent versions. This was a revolutionary move, and not only has it worked out quite satisfactorily for Adobe and its shareholders, but for thousands of other tech and non-tech companies. It is in all ways a societally important company.\nWith MANAMANA we capture an enormous swath of the American technology industry. With the addition of Adobe and Nvidia, this bellwether gains exposure to two segments of the technology that FANG, FAANG, FANAMA and MAMAA miss: creation and publication, and the power behind graphics processing units. These are massively important, growing segments of technology, and Nvidia and Adobe are without question the leaders.\nAnd ultimately that's the point of a bellwether -- to serve as a proxy to track something larger. FAANG was a great placeholder for American large cap technology for the better part of a decade.\nBut now it's time for MANAMANA. (Doo doo de doo doo.)","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>FAANG is Dead. Long Live MANAMANA</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFAANG is Dead. Long Live MANAMANA\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-11-05 23:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/05/faang-is-dead-long-live-manamana/>Motley Fool</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nIn 2013 Mad Money's Jim Cramer casually launched one of the more widely adopted business mnemonics in history, describing the Four Horsemen of Big Tech by the acronym FANG.\nThese companies were ...\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/05/faang-is-dead-long-live-manamana/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NVDA":"英伟达","AMZN":"亚马逊","MSFT":"微软","GOOGL":"谷歌A","ADBE":"Adobe","AAPL":"苹果","NFLX":"奈飞"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/05/faang-is-dead-long-live-manamana/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2181748650","content_text":"In 2013 Mad Money's Jim Cramer casually launched one of the more widely adopted business mnemonics in history, describing the Four Horsemen of Big Tech by the acronym FANG.\nThese companies were Facebook, Amazon.com (NASDAQ:AMZN), Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) and Google. Almost immediately the weakness in this appellation became clear:\nWhere in the world was Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL)? OK, let's call it FAANG.\nAnd hey! Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) is really not as dead as people thought it would be! OK. How about FAANG+M? FANMAG?\n(Actually, Microsoft is very not dead, as at $2.5 trillion it is the largest public company in the world not named Saudi Aramco and has outperformed all of the other FAANGs.)\nWelp, turns out Google wants to change its name to Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG)(NASDAQ:GOOGL). OK, that gets awkward. On the Motley Fool Morning Show, we renamed the whole agglomeration of big cap tech \"FANAMA.\" Try and say that without hearing David Lee Roth's voice.\nSource: Getty Images.\nAnd then, this last week, Facebook changed its name to Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:FB). I was rooting for them to change it to Sugar Mountain, but no dice. All of this means that we can keep trying to shoehorn FAANG into some new acronym (Cramer decided to go with MAMAA, which, I mean...I guess.), or we can rethink this whole thing.\nAnd fear not, for the Morning Show team have done just that. We thought about the most influential consumer technology companies, and we came up with a list of eight.\nMicrosoft\nApple\nNetflix\nAmazon.com\nMeta Platforms\nAdobe (NASDAQ:ADBE)\nNvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA)\nAlphabet\nWhich spells out the incredibly great acronym MANAMANA. Go ahead, go listen to the song. We'll be right here.\nMANAMANA incorporates eight consumer technology companies ranging from $300 billion in market capitalization (Netflix) up to $2.5 trillion (Microsoft). Combined these companies are worth $10.8 trillion, which is 22% of the total market capitalization of all US public companies. In the last reported year these companies generated a combined $1.4 trillion in revenues. They are consumer technology monsters. Mutant companies.\nIn fact, I'd go so far as to say that as goes MANAMANA (doo doo de doo doo), so goes the US economy.\nNow, I know what you're saying right now. Adobe? Really? Yes, absolutely. For one, there is this:\nMSFT data by YCharts\nAdobe shares have outperformed every FANAMA company, and only trails Nvidia in MANAMANA. But perhaps more importantly, Adobe was at the forefront of of a sales model in the tech industry that is now commonplace to the point of cliché: Software as a Service. In 2012 Adobe changed its business model from buy-release-upgrade for Acrobat, Photoshop and inDesign to one where users paid a subscription and as a result got consistent upgrades to the most recent versions. This was a revolutionary move, and not only has it worked out quite satisfactorily for Adobe and its shareholders, but for thousands of other tech and non-tech companies. It is in all ways a societally important company.\nWith MANAMANA we capture an enormous swath of the American technology industry. With the addition of Adobe and Nvidia, this bellwether gains exposure to two segments of the technology that FANG, FAANG, FANAMA and MAMAA miss: creation and publication, and the power behind graphics processing units. These are massively important, growing segments of technology, and Nvidia and Adobe are without question the leaders.\nAnd ultimately that's the point of a bellwether -- to serve as a proxy to track something larger. FAANG was a great placeholder for American large cap technology for the better part of a decade.\nBut now it's time for MANAMANA. (Doo doo de doo doo.)","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"CN"},{"id":842755329,"gmtCreate":1636247984853,"gmtModify":1636247984961,"author":{"id":"3579568061487787","authorId":"3579568061487787","name":"857857a8787","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2841ebff6c4c7cf041a090151a1a2a2f","vip":1,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"lol what...","listText":"lol what...","text":"lol what...","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/842755329","repostId":2181748650,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2181748650","pubTimestamp":1636124925,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2181748650?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-05 23:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"FAANG is Dead. Long Live MANAMANA","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2181748650","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"With new top dogs, it's time to update the infamous acronym.","content":"In 2013 Mad Money's Jim Cramer casually launched one of the more widely adopted business mnemonics in history, describing the Four Horsemen of Big Tech by the acronym FANG.\nThese companies were Facebook, Amazon.com (NASDAQ:AMZN), Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) and Google. Almost immediately the weakness in this appellation became clear:\nWhere in the world was Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL)? OK, let's call it FAANG.\nAnd hey! Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) is really not as dead as people thought it would be! OK. How about FAANG+M? FANMAG?\n(Actually, Microsoft is very not dead, as at $2.5 trillion it is the largest public company in the world not named Saudi Aramco and has outperformed all of the other FAANGs.)\nWelp, turns out Google wants to change its name to Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG)(NASDAQ:GOOGL). OK, that gets awkward. On the Motley Fool Morning Show, we renamed the whole agglomeration of big cap tech \"FANAMA.\" Try and say that without hearing David Lee Roth's voice.\n<img src=\"https://g.foolcdn.com/image/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fg.foolcdn.com%2Feditorial%2Fimages%2F650833%2Fgettyimages-1348369701.jpg&amp;w=700&amp;op=resize\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">Source: Getty Images.\nAnd then, this last week, Facebook changed its name to <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FB\">Meta Platforms</a> (NASDAQ:FB). I was rooting for them to change it to Sugar Mountain, but no dice. All of this means that we can keep trying to shoehorn FAANG into some new acronym (Cramer decided to go with MAMAA, which, I mean...I guess.), or we can rethink this whole thing.\nAnd fear not, for the Morning Show team have done just that. We thought about the most influential consumer technology companies, and we came up with a list of eight.\nMicrosoft\nApple\nNetflix\nAmazon.com\nMeta Platforms\n<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ADBE\">Adobe</a> (NASDAQ:ADBE)\nNvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA)\nAlphabet\nWhich spells out the incredibly great acronym MANAMANA. Go ahead, go listen to the song. We'll be right here.\nMANAMANA incorporates eight consumer technology companies ranging from $300 billion in market capitalization (Netflix) up to $2.5 trillion (Microsoft). Combined these companies are worth $10.8 trillion, which is 22% of the total market capitalization of all US public companies. In the last reported year these companies generated a combined $1.4 trillion in revenues. They are consumer technology monsters. Mutant companies.\nIn fact, I'd go so far as to say that as goes MANAMANA (doo doo de doo doo), so goes the US economy.\nNow, I know what you're saying right now. Adobe? Really? Yes, absolutely. For one, there is this:\n<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad3d8664a4dd91b540d98c471291318b\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"551\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">MSFT data by YCharts\nAdobe shares have outperformed every FANAMA company, and only trails Nvidia in MANAMANA. But perhaps more importantly, Adobe was at the forefront of of a sales model in the tech industry that is now commonplace to the point of cliché: Software as a Service. In 2012 Adobe changed its business model from buy-release-upgrade for Acrobat, Photoshop and inDesign to one where users paid a subscription and as a result got consistent upgrades to the most recent versions. This was a revolutionary move, and not only has it worked out quite satisfactorily for Adobe and its shareholders, but for thousands of other tech and non-tech companies. It is in all ways a societally important company.\nWith MANAMANA we capture an enormous swath of the American technology industry. With the addition of Adobe and Nvidia, this bellwether gains exposure to two segments of the technology that FANG, FAANG, FANAMA and MAMAA miss: creation and publication, and the power behind graphics processing units. These are massively important, growing segments of technology, and Nvidia and Adobe are without question the leaders.\nAnd ultimately that's the point of a bellwether -- to serve as a proxy to track something larger. FAANG was a great placeholder for American large cap technology for the better part of a decade.\nBut now it's time for MANAMANA. (Doo doo de doo doo.)","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>FAANG is Dead. Long Live MANAMANA</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFAANG is Dead. Long Live MANAMANA\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-11-05 23:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/05/faang-is-dead-long-live-manamana/>Motley Fool</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nIn 2013 Mad Money's Jim Cramer casually launched one of the more widely adopted business mnemonics in history, describing the Four Horsemen of Big Tech by the acronym FANG.\nThese companies were ...\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/05/faang-is-dead-long-live-manamana/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NVDA":"英伟达","AMZN":"亚马逊","MSFT":"微软","GOOGL":"谷歌A","ADBE":"Adobe","AAPL":"苹果","NFLX":"奈飞"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/05/faang-is-dead-long-live-manamana/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2181748650","content_text":"In 2013 Mad Money's Jim Cramer casually launched one of the more widely adopted business mnemonics in history, describing the Four Horsemen of Big Tech by the acronym FANG.\nThese companies were Facebook, Amazon.com (NASDAQ:AMZN), Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) and Google. Almost immediately the weakness in this appellation became clear:\nWhere in the world was Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL)? OK, let's call it FAANG.\nAnd hey! Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) is really not as dead as people thought it would be! OK. How about FAANG+M? FANMAG?\n(Actually, Microsoft is very not dead, as at $2.5 trillion it is the largest public company in the world not named Saudi Aramco and has outperformed all of the other FAANGs.)\nWelp, turns out Google wants to change its name to Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG)(NASDAQ:GOOGL). OK, that gets awkward. On the Motley Fool Morning Show, we renamed the whole agglomeration of big cap tech \"FANAMA.\" Try and say that without hearing David Lee Roth's voice.\nSource: Getty Images.\nAnd then, this last week, Facebook changed its name to Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:FB). I was rooting for them to change it to Sugar Mountain, but no dice. All of this means that we can keep trying to shoehorn FAANG into some new acronym (Cramer decided to go with MAMAA, which, I mean...I guess.), or we can rethink this whole thing.\nAnd fear not, for the Morning Show team have done just that. We thought about the most influential consumer technology companies, and we came up with a list of eight.\nMicrosoft\nApple\nNetflix\nAmazon.com\nMeta Platforms\nAdobe (NASDAQ:ADBE)\nNvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA)\nAlphabet\nWhich spells out the incredibly great acronym MANAMANA. Go ahead, go listen to the song. We'll be right here.\nMANAMANA incorporates eight consumer technology companies ranging from $300 billion in market capitalization (Netflix) up to $2.5 trillion (Microsoft). Combined these companies are worth $10.8 trillion, which is 22% of the total market capitalization of all US public companies. In the last reported year these companies generated a combined $1.4 trillion in revenues. They are consumer technology monsters. Mutant companies.\nIn fact, I'd go so far as to say that as goes MANAMANA (doo doo de doo doo), so goes the US economy.\nNow, I know what you're saying right now. Adobe? Really? Yes, absolutely. For one, there is this:\nMSFT data by YCharts\nAdobe shares have outperformed every FANAMA company, and only trails Nvidia in MANAMANA. But perhaps more importantly, Adobe was at the forefront of of a sales model in the tech industry that is now commonplace to the point of cliché: Software as a Service. In 2012 Adobe changed its business model from buy-release-upgrade for Acrobat, Photoshop and inDesign to one where users paid a subscription and as a result got consistent upgrades to the most recent versions. This was a revolutionary move, and not only has it worked out quite satisfactorily for Adobe and its shareholders, but for thousands of other tech and non-tech companies. It is in all ways a societally important company.\nWith MANAMANA we capture an enormous swath of the American technology industry. With the addition of Adobe and Nvidia, this bellwether gains exposure to two segments of the technology that FANG, FAANG, FANAMA and MAMAA miss: creation and publication, and the power behind graphics processing units. These are massively important, growing segments of technology, and Nvidia and Adobe are without question the leaders.\nAnd ultimately that's the point of a bellwether -- to serve as a proxy to track something larger. FAANG was a great placeholder for American large cap technology for the better part of a decade.\nBut now it's time for MANAMANA. (Doo doo de doo doo.)","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"CN"},{"id":842753116,"gmtCreate":1636247536727,"gmtModify":1636247536954,"author":{"id":"3586570913312333","authorId":"3586570913312333","name":"Dita","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/65d7d6dfd0f69d1147ebd56a8f6651f5","vip":1,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Manamana =&nbsp;Wherewhere","listText":"Manamana =&nbsp;Wherewhere","text":"Manamana = Wherewhere","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/842753116","repostId":2181748650,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2181748650","pubTimestamp":1636124925,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2181748650?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-05 23:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"FAANG is Dead. Long Live MANAMANA","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2181748650","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"With new top dogs, it's time to update the infamous acronym.","content":"In 2013 Mad Money's Jim Cramer casually launched one of the more widely adopted business mnemonics in history, describing the Four Horsemen of Big Tech by the acronym FANG.\nThese companies were Facebook, Amazon.com (NASDAQ:AMZN), Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) and Google. Almost immediately the weakness in this appellation became clear:\nWhere in the world was Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL)? OK, let's call it FAANG.\nAnd hey! Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) is really not as dead as people thought it would be! OK. How about FAANG+M? FANMAG?\n(Actually, Microsoft is very not dead, as at $2.5 trillion it is the largest public company in the world not named Saudi Aramco and has outperformed all of the other FAANGs.)\nWelp, turns out Google wants to change its name to Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG)(NASDAQ:GOOGL). OK, that gets awkward. On the Motley Fool Morning Show, we renamed the whole agglomeration of big cap tech \"FANAMA.\" Try and say that without hearing David Lee Roth's voice.\n<img src=\"https://g.foolcdn.com/image/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fg.foolcdn.com%2Feditorial%2Fimages%2F650833%2Fgettyimages-1348369701.jpg&amp;w=700&amp;op=resize\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">Source: Getty Images.\nAnd then, this last week, Facebook changed its name to <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FB\">Meta Platforms</a> (NASDAQ:FB). I was rooting for them to change it to Sugar Mountain, but no dice. All of this means that we can keep trying to shoehorn FAANG into some new acronym (Cramer decided to go with MAMAA, which, I mean...I guess.), or we can rethink this whole thing.\nAnd fear not, for the Morning Show team have done just that. We thought about the most influential consumer technology companies, and we came up with a list of eight.\nMicrosoft\nApple\nNetflix\nAmazon.com\nMeta Platforms\n<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ADBE\">Adobe</a> (NASDAQ:ADBE)\nNvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA)\nAlphabet\nWhich spells out the incredibly great acronym MANAMANA. Go ahead, go listen to the song. We'll be right here.\nMANAMANA incorporates eight consumer technology companies ranging from $300 billion in market capitalization (Netflix) up to $2.5 trillion (Microsoft). Combined these companies are worth $10.8 trillion, which is 22% of the total market capitalization of all US public companies. In the last reported year these companies generated a combined $1.4 trillion in revenues. They are consumer technology monsters. Mutant companies.\nIn fact, I'd go so far as to say that as goes MANAMANA (doo doo de doo doo), so goes the US economy.\nNow, I know what you're saying right now. Adobe? Really? Yes, absolutely. For one, there is this:\n<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad3d8664a4dd91b540d98c471291318b\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"551\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">MSFT data by YCharts\nAdobe shares have outperformed every FANAMA company, and only trails Nvidia in MANAMANA. But perhaps more importantly, Adobe was at the forefront of of a sales model in the tech industry that is now commonplace to the point of cliché: Software as a Service. In 2012 Adobe changed its business model from buy-release-upgrade for Acrobat, Photoshop and inDesign to one where users paid a subscription and as a result got consistent upgrades to the most recent versions. This was a revolutionary move, and not only has it worked out quite satisfactorily for Adobe and its shareholders, but for thousands of other tech and non-tech companies. It is in all ways a societally important company.\nWith MANAMANA we capture an enormous swath of the American technology industry. With the addition of Adobe and Nvidia, this bellwether gains exposure to two segments of the technology that FANG, FAANG, FANAMA and MAMAA miss: creation and publication, and the power behind graphics processing units. These are massively important, growing segments of technology, and Nvidia and Adobe are without question the leaders.\nAnd ultimately that's the point of a bellwether -- to serve as a proxy to track something larger. FAANG was a great placeholder for American large cap technology for the better part of a decade.\nBut now it's time for MANAMANA. (Doo doo de doo doo.)","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>FAANG is Dead. Long Live MANAMANA</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFAANG is Dead. Long Live MANAMANA\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-11-05 23:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/05/faang-is-dead-long-live-manamana/>Motley Fool</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nIn 2013 Mad Money's Jim Cramer casually launched one of the more widely adopted business mnemonics in history, describing the Four Horsemen of Big Tech by the acronym FANG.\nThese companies were ...\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/05/faang-is-dead-long-live-manamana/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NVDA":"英伟达","AMZN":"亚马逊","MSFT":"微软","GOOGL":"谷歌A","ADBE":"Adobe","AAPL":"苹果","NFLX":"奈飞"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/05/faang-is-dead-long-live-manamana/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2181748650","content_text":"In 2013 Mad Money's Jim Cramer casually launched one of the more widely adopted business mnemonics in history, describing the Four Horsemen of Big Tech by the acronym FANG.\nThese companies were Facebook, Amazon.com (NASDAQ:AMZN), Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) and Google. Almost immediately the weakness in this appellation became clear:\nWhere in the world was Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL)? OK, let's call it FAANG.\nAnd hey! Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) is really not as dead as people thought it would be! OK. How about FAANG+M? FANMAG?\n(Actually, Microsoft is very not dead, as at $2.5 trillion it is the largest public company in the world not named Saudi Aramco and has outperformed all of the other FAANGs.)\nWelp, turns out Google wants to change its name to Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG)(NASDAQ:GOOGL). OK, that gets awkward. On the Motley Fool Morning Show, we renamed the whole agglomeration of big cap tech \"FANAMA.\" Try and say that without hearing David Lee Roth's voice.\nSource: Getty Images.\nAnd then, this last week, Facebook changed its name to Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:FB). I was rooting for them to change it to Sugar Mountain, but no dice. All of this means that we can keep trying to shoehorn FAANG into some new acronym (Cramer decided to go with MAMAA, which, I mean...I guess.), or we can rethink this whole thing.\nAnd fear not, for the Morning Show team have done just that. We thought about the most influential consumer technology companies, and we came up with a list of eight.\nMicrosoft\nApple\nNetflix\nAmazon.com\nMeta Platforms\nAdobe (NASDAQ:ADBE)\nNvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA)\nAlphabet\nWhich spells out the incredibly great acronym MANAMANA. Go ahead, go listen to the song. We'll be right here.\nMANAMANA incorporates eight consumer technology companies ranging from $300 billion in market capitalization (Netflix) up to $2.5 trillion (Microsoft). Combined these companies are worth $10.8 trillion, which is 22% of the total market capitalization of all US public companies. In the last reported year these companies generated a combined $1.4 trillion in revenues. They are consumer technology monsters. Mutant companies.\nIn fact, I'd go so far as to say that as goes MANAMANA (doo doo de doo doo), so goes the US economy.\nNow, I know what you're saying right now. Adobe? Really? Yes, absolutely. For one, there is this:\nMSFT data by YCharts\nAdobe shares have outperformed every FANAMA company, and only trails Nvidia in MANAMANA. But perhaps more importantly, Adobe was at the forefront of of a sales model in the tech industry that is now commonplace to the point of cliché: Software as a Service. In 2012 Adobe changed its business model from buy-release-upgrade for Acrobat, Photoshop and inDesign to one where users paid a subscription and as a result got consistent upgrades to the most recent versions. This was a revolutionary move, and not only has it worked out quite satisfactorily for Adobe and its shareholders, but for thousands of other tech and non-tech companies. It is in all ways a societally important company.\nWith MANAMANA we capture an enormous swath of the American technology industry. With the addition of Adobe and Nvidia, this bellwether gains exposure to two segments of the technology that FANG, FAANG, FANAMA and MAMAA miss: creation and publication, and the power behind graphics processing units. These are massively important, growing segments of technology, and Nvidia and Adobe are without question the leaders.\nAnd ultimately that's the point of a bellwether -- to serve as a proxy to track something larger. FAANG was a great placeholder for American large cap technology for the better part of a decade.\nBut now it's time for MANAMANA. (Doo doo de doo doo.)","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"CN"},{"id":842505540,"gmtCreate":1636193728272,"gmtModify":1636193728566,"author":{"id":"3574922224515422","authorId":"3574922224515422","name":"Priscyn","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f8d975ba47d25b1cd747c29f03928d8d","vip":1,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"manamana singalong","listText":"manamana singalong","text":"manamana singalong","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/842505540","repostId":2181748650,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2181748650","pubTimestamp":1636124925,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2181748650?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-05 23:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"FAANG is Dead. Long Live MANAMANA","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2181748650","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"With new top dogs, it's time to update the infamous acronym.","content":"In 2013 Mad Money's Jim Cramer casually launched one of the more widely adopted business mnemonics in history, describing the Four Horsemen of Big Tech by the acronym FANG.\nThese companies were Facebook, Amazon.com (NASDAQ:AMZN), Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) and Google. Almost immediately the weakness in this appellation became clear:\nWhere in the world was Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL)? OK, let's call it FAANG.\nAnd hey! Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) is really not as dead as people thought it would be! OK. How about FAANG+M? FANMAG?\n(Actually, Microsoft is very not dead, as at $2.5 trillion it is the largest public company in the world not named Saudi Aramco and has outperformed all of the other FAANGs.)\nWelp, turns out Google wants to change its name to Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG)(NASDAQ:GOOGL). OK, that gets awkward. On the Motley Fool Morning Show, we renamed the whole agglomeration of big cap tech \"FANAMA.\" Try and say that without hearing David Lee Roth's voice.\n<img src=\"https://g.foolcdn.com/image/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fg.foolcdn.com%2Feditorial%2Fimages%2F650833%2Fgettyimages-1348369701.jpg&amp;w=700&amp;op=resize\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">Source: Getty Images.\nAnd then, this last week, Facebook changed its name to <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FB\">Meta Platforms</a> (NASDAQ:FB). I was rooting for them to change it to Sugar Mountain, but no dice. All of this means that we can keep trying to shoehorn FAANG into some new acronym (Cramer decided to go with MAMAA, which, I mean...I guess.), or we can rethink this whole thing.\nAnd fear not, for the Morning Show team have done just that. We thought about the most influential consumer technology companies, and we came up with a list of eight.\nMicrosoft\nApple\nNetflix\nAmazon.com\nMeta Platforms\n<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ADBE\">Adobe</a> (NASDAQ:ADBE)\nNvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA)\nAlphabet\nWhich spells out the incredibly great acronym MANAMANA. Go ahead, go listen to the song. We'll be right here.\nMANAMANA incorporates eight consumer technology companies ranging from $300 billion in market capitalization (Netflix) up to $2.5 trillion (Microsoft). Combined these companies are worth $10.8 trillion, which is 22% of the total market capitalization of all US public companies. In the last reported year these companies generated a combined $1.4 trillion in revenues. They are consumer technology monsters. Mutant companies.\nIn fact, I'd go so far as to say that as goes MANAMANA (doo doo de doo doo), so goes the US economy.\nNow, I know what you're saying right now. Adobe? Really? Yes, absolutely. For one, there is this:\n<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad3d8664a4dd91b540d98c471291318b\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"551\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">MSFT data by YCharts\nAdobe shares have outperformed every FANAMA company, and only trails Nvidia in MANAMANA. But perhaps more importantly, Adobe was at the forefront of of a sales model in the tech industry that is now commonplace to the point of cliché: Software as a Service. In 2012 Adobe changed its business model from buy-release-upgrade for Acrobat, Photoshop and inDesign to one where users paid a subscription and as a result got consistent upgrades to the most recent versions. This was a revolutionary move, and not only has it worked out quite satisfactorily for Adobe and its shareholders, but for thousands of other tech and non-tech companies. It is in all ways a societally important company.\nWith MANAMANA we capture an enormous swath of the American technology industry. With the addition of Adobe and Nvidia, this bellwether gains exposure to two segments of the technology that FANG, FAANG, FANAMA and MAMAA miss: creation and publication, and the power behind graphics processing units. These are massively important, growing segments of technology, and Nvidia and Adobe are without question the leaders.\nAnd ultimately that's the point of a bellwether -- to serve as a proxy to track something larger. FAANG was a great placeholder for American large cap technology for the better part of a decade.\nBut now it's time for MANAMANA. (Doo doo de doo doo.)","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>FAANG is Dead. Long Live MANAMANA</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFAANG is Dead. Long Live MANAMANA\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-11-05 23:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/05/faang-is-dead-long-live-manamana/>Motley Fool</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nIn 2013 Mad Money's Jim Cramer casually launched one of the more widely adopted business mnemonics in history, describing the Four Horsemen of Big Tech by the acronym FANG.\nThese companies were ...\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/05/faang-is-dead-long-live-manamana/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NVDA":"英伟达","AMZN":"亚马逊","MSFT":"微软","GOOGL":"谷歌A","ADBE":"Adobe","AAPL":"苹果","NFLX":"奈飞"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/05/faang-is-dead-long-live-manamana/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2181748650","content_text":"In 2013 Mad Money's Jim Cramer casually launched one of the more widely adopted business mnemonics in history, describing the Four Horsemen of Big Tech by the acronym FANG.\nThese companies were Facebook, Amazon.com (NASDAQ:AMZN), Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) and Google. Almost immediately the weakness in this appellation became clear:\nWhere in the world was Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL)? OK, let's call it FAANG.\nAnd hey! Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) is really not as dead as people thought it would be! OK. How about FAANG+M? FANMAG?\n(Actually, Microsoft is very not dead, as at $2.5 trillion it is the largest public company in the world not named Saudi Aramco and has outperformed all of the other FAANGs.)\nWelp, turns out Google wants to change its name to Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG)(NASDAQ:GOOGL). OK, that gets awkward. On the Motley Fool Morning Show, we renamed the whole agglomeration of big cap tech \"FANAMA.\" Try and say that without hearing David Lee Roth's voice.\nSource: Getty Images.\nAnd then, this last week, Facebook changed its name to Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:FB). I was rooting for them to change it to Sugar Mountain, but no dice. All of this means that we can keep trying to shoehorn FAANG into some new acronym (Cramer decided to go with MAMAA, which, I mean...I guess.), or we can rethink this whole thing.\nAnd fear not, for the Morning Show team have done just that. We thought about the most influential consumer technology companies, and we came up with a list of eight.\nMicrosoft\nApple\nNetflix\nAmazon.com\nMeta Platforms\nAdobe (NASDAQ:ADBE)\nNvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA)\nAlphabet\nWhich spells out the incredibly great acronym MANAMANA. Go ahead, go listen to the song. We'll be right here.\nMANAMANA incorporates eight consumer technology companies ranging from $300 billion in market capitalization (Netflix) up to $2.5 trillion (Microsoft). Combined these companies are worth $10.8 trillion, which is 22% of the total market capitalization of all US public companies. In the last reported year these companies generated a combined $1.4 trillion in revenues. They are consumer technology monsters. Mutant companies.\nIn fact, I'd go so far as to say that as goes MANAMANA (doo doo de doo doo), so goes the US economy.\nNow, I know what you're saying right now. Adobe? Really? Yes, absolutely. For one, there is this:\nMSFT data by YCharts\nAdobe shares have outperformed every FANAMA company, and only trails Nvidia in MANAMANA. But perhaps more importantly, Adobe was at the forefront of of a sales model in the tech industry that is now commonplace to the point of cliché: Software as a Service. In 2012 Adobe changed its business model from buy-release-upgrade for Acrobat, Photoshop and inDesign to one where users paid a subscription and as a result got consistent upgrades to the most recent versions. This was a revolutionary move, and not only has it worked out quite satisfactorily for Adobe and its shareholders, but for thousands of other tech and non-tech companies. It is in all ways a societally important company.\nWith MANAMANA we capture an enormous swath of the American technology industry. With the addition of Adobe and Nvidia, this bellwether gains exposure to two segments of the technology that FANG, FAANG, FANAMA and MAMAA miss: creation and publication, and the power behind graphics processing units. These are massively important, growing segments of technology, and Nvidia and Adobe are without question the leaders.\nAnd ultimately that's the point of a bellwether -- to serve as a proxy to track something larger. FAANG was a great placeholder for American large cap technology for the better part of a decade.\nBut now it's time for MANAMANA. (Doo doo de doo doo.)","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"CN"},{"id":842506057,"gmtCreate":1636193138111,"gmtModify":1636193138257,"author":{"id":"3580043263355101","authorId":"3580043263355101","name":"Dazz","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Serious?","listText":"Serious?","text":"Serious?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/842506057","repostId":2181748650,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2181748650","pubTimestamp":1636124925,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2181748650?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-05 23:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"FAANG is Dead. Long Live MANAMANA","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2181748650","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"With new top dogs, it's time to update the infamous acronym.","content":"In 2013 Mad Money's Jim Cramer casually launched one of the more widely adopted business mnemonics in history, describing the Four Horsemen of Big Tech by the acronym FANG.\nThese companies were Facebook, Amazon.com (NASDAQ:AMZN), Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) and Google. Almost immediately the weakness in this appellation became clear:\nWhere in the world was Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL)? OK, let's call it FAANG.\nAnd hey! Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) is really not as dead as people thought it would be! OK. How about FAANG+M? FANMAG?\n(Actually, Microsoft is very not dead, as at $2.5 trillion it is the largest public company in the world not named Saudi Aramco and has outperformed all of the other FAANGs.)\nWelp, turns out Google wants to change its name to Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG)(NASDAQ:GOOGL). OK, that gets awkward. On the Motley Fool Morning Show, we renamed the whole agglomeration of big cap tech \"FANAMA.\" Try and say that without hearing David Lee Roth's voice.\n<img src=\"https://g.foolcdn.com/image/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fg.foolcdn.com%2Feditorial%2Fimages%2F650833%2Fgettyimages-1348369701.jpg&amp;w=700&amp;op=resize\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">Source: Getty Images.\nAnd then, this last week, Facebook changed its name to <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FB\">Meta Platforms</a> (NASDAQ:FB). I was rooting for them to change it to Sugar Mountain, but no dice. All of this means that we can keep trying to shoehorn FAANG into some new acronym (Cramer decided to go with MAMAA, which, I mean...I guess.), or we can rethink this whole thing.\nAnd fear not, for the Morning Show team have done just that. We thought about the most influential consumer technology companies, and we came up with a list of eight.\nMicrosoft\nApple\nNetflix\nAmazon.com\nMeta Platforms\n<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ADBE\">Adobe</a> (NASDAQ:ADBE)\nNvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA)\nAlphabet\nWhich spells out the incredibly great acronym MANAMANA. Go ahead, go listen to the song. We'll be right here.\nMANAMANA incorporates eight consumer technology companies ranging from $300 billion in market capitalization (Netflix) up to $2.5 trillion (Microsoft). Combined these companies are worth $10.8 trillion, which is 22% of the total market capitalization of all US public companies. In the last reported year these companies generated a combined $1.4 trillion in revenues. They are consumer technology monsters. Mutant companies.\nIn fact, I'd go so far as to say that as goes MANAMANA (doo doo de doo doo), so goes the US economy.\nNow, I know what you're saying right now. Adobe? Really? Yes, absolutely. For one, there is this:\n<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad3d8664a4dd91b540d98c471291318b\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"551\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">MSFT data by YCharts\nAdobe shares have outperformed every FANAMA company, and only trails Nvidia in MANAMANA. But perhaps more importantly, Adobe was at the forefront of of a sales model in the tech industry that is now commonplace to the point of cliché: Software as a Service. In 2012 Adobe changed its business model from buy-release-upgrade for Acrobat, Photoshop and inDesign to one where users paid a subscription and as a result got consistent upgrades to the most recent versions. This was a revolutionary move, and not only has it worked out quite satisfactorily for Adobe and its shareholders, but for thousands of other tech and non-tech companies. It is in all ways a societally important company.\nWith MANAMANA we capture an enormous swath of the American technology industry. With the addition of Adobe and Nvidia, this bellwether gains exposure to two segments of the technology that FANG, FAANG, FANAMA and MAMAA miss: creation and publication, and the power behind graphics processing units. These are massively important, growing segments of technology, and Nvidia and Adobe are without question the leaders.\nAnd ultimately that's the point of a bellwether -- to serve as a proxy to track something larger. FAANG was a great placeholder for American large cap technology for the better part of a decade.\nBut now it's time for MANAMANA. (Doo doo de doo doo.)","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>FAANG is Dead. Long Live MANAMANA</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFAANG is Dead. Long Live MANAMANA\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-11-05 23:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/05/faang-is-dead-long-live-manamana/>Motley Fool</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nIn 2013 Mad Money's Jim Cramer casually launched one of the more widely adopted business mnemonics in history, describing the Four Horsemen of Big Tech by the acronym FANG.\nThese companies were ...\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/05/faang-is-dead-long-live-manamana/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NVDA":"英伟达","AMZN":"亚马逊","MSFT":"微软","GOOGL":"谷歌A","ADBE":"Adobe","AAPL":"苹果","NFLX":"奈飞"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/05/faang-is-dead-long-live-manamana/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2181748650","content_text":"In 2013 Mad Money's Jim Cramer casually launched one of the more widely adopted business mnemonics in history, describing the Four Horsemen of Big Tech by the acronym FANG.\nThese companies were Facebook, Amazon.com (NASDAQ:AMZN), Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) and Google. Almost immediately the weakness in this appellation became clear:\nWhere in the world was Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL)? OK, let's call it FAANG.\nAnd hey! Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) is really not as dead as people thought it would be! OK. How about FAANG+M? FANMAG?\n(Actually, Microsoft is very not dead, as at $2.5 trillion it is the largest public company in the world not named Saudi Aramco and has outperformed all of the other FAANGs.)\nWelp, turns out Google wants to change its name to Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG)(NASDAQ:GOOGL). OK, that gets awkward. On the Motley Fool Morning Show, we renamed the whole agglomeration of big cap tech \"FANAMA.\" Try and say that without hearing David Lee Roth's voice.\nSource: Getty Images.\nAnd then, this last week, Facebook changed its name to Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:FB). I was rooting for them to change it to Sugar Mountain, but no dice. All of this means that we can keep trying to shoehorn FAANG into some new acronym (Cramer decided to go with MAMAA, which, I mean...I guess.), or we can rethink this whole thing.\nAnd fear not, for the Morning Show team have done just that. We thought about the most influential consumer technology companies, and we came up with a list of eight.\nMicrosoft\nApple\nNetflix\nAmazon.com\nMeta Platforms\nAdobe (NASDAQ:ADBE)\nNvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA)\nAlphabet\nWhich spells out the incredibly great acronym MANAMANA. Go ahead, go listen to the song. We'll be right here.\nMANAMANA incorporates eight consumer technology companies ranging from $300 billion in market capitalization (Netflix) up to $2.5 trillion (Microsoft). Combined these companies are worth $10.8 trillion, which is 22% of the total market capitalization of all US public companies. In the last reported year these companies generated a combined $1.4 trillion in revenues. They are consumer technology monsters. Mutant companies.\nIn fact, I'd go so far as to say that as goes MANAMANA (doo doo de doo doo), so goes the US economy.\nNow, I know what you're saying right now. Adobe? Really? Yes, absolutely. For one, there is this:\nMSFT data by YCharts\nAdobe shares have outperformed every FANAMA company, and only trails Nvidia in MANAMANA. But perhaps more importantly, Adobe was at the forefront of of a sales model in the tech industry that is now commonplace to the point of cliché: Software as a Service. In 2012 Adobe changed its business model from buy-release-upgrade for Acrobat, Photoshop and inDesign to one where users paid a subscription and as a result got consistent upgrades to the most recent versions. This was a revolutionary move, and not only has it worked out quite satisfactorily for Adobe and its shareholders, but for thousands of other tech and non-tech companies. It is in all ways a societally important company.\nWith MANAMANA we capture an enormous swath of the American technology industry. With the addition of Adobe and Nvidia, this bellwether gains exposure to two segments of the technology that FANG, FAANG, FANAMA and MAMAA miss: creation and publication, and the power behind graphics processing units. These are massively important, growing segments of technology, and Nvidia and Adobe are without question the leaders.\nAnd ultimately that's the point of a bellwether -- to serve as a proxy to track something larger. FAANG was a great placeholder for American large cap technology for the better part of a decade.\nBut now it's time for MANAMANA. (Doo doo de doo doo.)","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6479474,"gmtCreate":1636214682232,"gmtModify":1636214682326,"authorId":3579838075158745,"author":{"id":3579838075158745,"authorId":3579838075158745,"name":"YPT","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/10baea998b9915ab14ba326ad1c4a2a6","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":842506057,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Ha","text":"Ha","html":"Ha"}],"langContent":"CN"},{"id":842225389,"gmtCreate":1636185276642,"gmtModify":1636185279767,"author":{"id":"3574906731000207","authorId":"3574906731000207","name":"SSVC","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/545a5ea462ff4ac7cc100bd3d8d97f72","vip":1,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Hmm.. Appreciate your response and comments Thanks&nbsp;","listText":"Hmm.. Appreciate your response and comments Thanks&nbsp;","text":"Hmm.. Appreciate your response and comments Thanks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/842225389","repostId":2181748650,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2181748650","pubTimestamp":1636124925,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2181748650?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-05 23:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"FAANG is Dead. Long Live MANAMANA","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2181748650","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"With new top dogs, it's time to update the infamous acronym.","content":"In 2013 Mad Money's Jim Cramer casually launched one of the more widely adopted business mnemonics in history, describing the Four Horsemen of Big Tech by the acronym FANG.\nThese companies were Facebook, Amazon.com (NASDAQ:AMZN), Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) and Google. Almost immediately the weakness in this appellation became clear:\nWhere in the world was Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL)? OK, let's call it FAANG.\nAnd hey! Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) is really not as dead as people thought it would be! OK. How about FAANG+M? FANMAG?\n(Actually, Microsoft is very not dead, as at $2.5 trillion it is the largest public company in the world not named Saudi Aramco and has outperformed all of the other FAANGs.)\nWelp, turns out Google wants to change its name to Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG)(NASDAQ:GOOGL). OK, that gets awkward. On the Motley Fool Morning Show, we renamed the whole agglomeration of big cap tech \"FANAMA.\" Try and say that without hearing David Lee Roth's voice.\n<img src=\"https://g.foolcdn.com/image/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fg.foolcdn.com%2Feditorial%2Fimages%2F650833%2Fgettyimages-1348369701.jpg&amp;w=700&amp;op=resize\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">Source: Getty Images.\nAnd then, this last week, Facebook changed its name to <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FB\">Meta Platforms</a> (NASDAQ:FB). I was rooting for them to change it to Sugar Mountain, but no dice. All of this means that we can keep trying to shoehorn FAANG into some new acronym (Cramer decided to go with MAMAA, which, I mean...I guess.), or we can rethink this whole thing.\nAnd fear not, for the Morning Show team have done just that. We thought about the most influential consumer technology companies, and we came up with a list of eight.\nMicrosoft\nApple\nNetflix\nAmazon.com\nMeta Platforms\n<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ADBE\">Adobe</a> (NASDAQ:ADBE)\nNvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA)\nAlphabet\nWhich spells out the incredibly great acronym MANAMANA. Go ahead, go listen to the song. We'll be right here.\nMANAMANA incorporates eight consumer technology companies ranging from $300 billion in market capitalization (Netflix) up to $2.5 trillion (Microsoft). Combined these companies are worth $10.8 trillion, which is 22% of the total market capitalization of all US public companies. In the last reported year these companies generated a combined $1.4 trillion in revenues. They are consumer technology monsters. Mutant companies.\nIn fact, I'd go so far as to say that as goes MANAMANA (doo doo de doo doo), so goes the US economy.\nNow, I know what you're saying right now. Adobe? Really? Yes, absolutely. For one, there is this:\n<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad3d8664a4dd91b540d98c471291318b\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"551\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">MSFT data by YCharts\nAdobe shares have outperformed every FANAMA company, and only trails Nvidia in MANAMANA. But perhaps more importantly, Adobe was at the forefront of of a sales model in the tech industry that is now commonplace to the point of cliché: Software as a Service. In 2012 Adobe changed its business model from buy-release-upgrade for Acrobat, Photoshop and inDesign to one where users paid a subscription and as a result got consistent upgrades to the most recent versions. This was a revolutionary move, and not only has it worked out quite satisfactorily for Adobe and its shareholders, but for thousands of other tech and non-tech companies. It is in all ways a societally important company.\nWith MANAMANA we capture an enormous swath of the American technology industry. With the addition of Adobe and Nvidia, this bellwether gains exposure to two segments of the technology that FANG, FAANG, FANAMA and MAMAA miss: creation and publication, and the power behind graphics processing units. These are massively important, growing segments of technology, and Nvidia and Adobe are without question the leaders.\nAnd ultimately that's the point of a bellwether -- to serve as a proxy to track something larger. FAANG was a great placeholder for American large cap technology for the better part of a decade.\nBut now it's time for MANAMANA. (Doo doo de doo doo.)","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>FAANG is Dead. Long Live MANAMANA</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFAANG is Dead. Long Live MANAMANA\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-11-05 23:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/05/faang-is-dead-long-live-manamana/>Motley Fool</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nIn 2013 Mad Money's Jim Cramer casually launched one of the more widely adopted business mnemonics in history, describing the Four Horsemen of Big Tech by the acronym FANG.\nThese companies were ...\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/05/faang-is-dead-long-live-manamana/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NVDA":"英伟达","AMZN":"亚马逊","MSFT":"微软","GOOGL":"谷歌A","ADBE":"Adobe","AAPL":"苹果","NFLX":"奈飞"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/05/faang-is-dead-long-live-manamana/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2181748650","content_text":"In 2013 Mad Money's Jim Cramer casually launched one of the more widely adopted business mnemonics in history, describing the Four Horsemen of Big Tech by the acronym FANG.\nThese companies were Facebook, Amazon.com (NASDAQ:AMZN), Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) and Google. Almost immediately the weakness in this appellation became clear:\nWhere in the world was Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL)? OK, let's call it FAANG.\nAnd hey! Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) is really not as dead as people thought it would be! OK. How about FAANG+M? FANMAG?\n(Actually, Microsoft is very not dead, as at $2.5 trillion it is the largest public company in the world not named Saudi Aramco and has outperformed all of the other FAANGs.)\nWelp, turns out Google wants to change its name to Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG)(NASDAQ:GOOGL). OK, that gets awkward. On the Motley Fool Morning Show, we renamed the whole agglomeration of big cap tech \"FANAMA.\" Try and say that without hearing David Lee Roth's voice.\nSource: Getty Images.\nAnd then, this last week, Facebook changed its name to Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:FB). I was rooting for them to change it to Sugar Mountain, but no dice. All of this means that we can keep trying to shoehorn FAANG into some new acronym (Cramer decided to go with MAMAA, which, I mean...I guess.), or we can rethink this whole thing.\nAnd fear not, for the Morning Show team have done just that. We thought about the most influential consumer technology companies, and we came up with a list of eight.\nMicrosoft\nApple\nNetflix\nAmazon.com\nMeta Platforms\nAdobe (NASDAQ:ADBE)\nNvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA)\nAlphabet\nWhich spells out the incredibly great acronym MANAMANA. Go ahead, go listen to the song. We'll be right here.\nMANAMANA incorporates eight consumer technology companies ranging from $300 billion in market capitalization (Netflix) up to $2.5 trillion (Microsoft). Combined these companies are worth $10.8 trillion, which is 22% of the total market capitalization of all US public companies. In the last reported year these companies generated a combined $1.4 trillion in revenues. They are consumer technology monsters. Mutant companies.\nIn fact, I'd go so far as to say that as goes MANAMANA (doo doo de doo doo), so goes the US economy.\nNow, I know what you're saying right now. Adobe? Really? Yes, absolutely. For one, there is this:\nMSFT data by YCharts\nAdobe shares have outperformed every FANAMA company, and only trails Nvidia in MANAMANA. But perhaps more importantly, Adobe was at the forefront of of a sales model in the tech industry that is now commonplace to the point of cliché: Software as a Service. In 2012 Adobe changed its business model from buy-release-upgrade for Acrobat, Photoshop and inDesign to one where users paid a subscription and as a result got consistent upgrades to the most recent versions. This was a revolutionary move, and not only has it worked out quite satisfactorily for Adobe and its shareholders, but for thousands of other tech and non-tech companies. It is in all ways a societally important company.\nWith MANAMANA we capture an enormous swath of the American technology industry. With the addition of Adobe and Nvidia, this bellwether gains exposure to two segments of the technology that FANG, FAANG, FANAMA and MAMAA miss: creation and publication, and the power behind graphics processing units. These are massively important, growing segments of technology, and Nvidia and Adobe are without question the leaders.\nAnd ultimately that's the point of a bellwether -- to serve as a proxy to track something larger. FAANG was a great placeholder for American large cap technology for the better part of a decade.\nBut now it's time for MANAMANA. (Doo doo de doo doo.)","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6476987,"gmtCreate":1636188285326,"gmtModify":1636188285362,"authorId":3564973527542193,"author":{"id":3564973527542193,"authorId":3564973527542193,"name":"gl8089","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":842225389,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"nice","text":"nice","html":"nice"}],"langContent":"CN"},{"id":842663237,"gmtCreate":1636170913062,"gmtModify":1636170914693,"author":{"id":"3566982670449095","authorId":"3566982670449095","name":"wywy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76ed86374fc7b16c12094c45ea30787c","vip":2,"crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"All the way. DCA","listText":"All the way. DCA","text":"All the way. DCA","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/842663237","repostId":2181748650,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2181748650","pubTimestamp":1636124925,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2181748650?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-05 23:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"FAANG is Dead. Long Live MANAMANA","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2181748650","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"With new top dogs, it's time to update the infamous acronym.","content":"In 2013 Mad Money's Jim Cramer casually launched one of the more widely adopted business mnemonics in history, describing the Four Horsemen of Big Tech by the acronym FANG.\nThese companies were Facebook, Amazon.com (NASDAQ:AMZN), Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) and Google. Almost immediately the weakness in this appellation became clear:\nWhere in the world was Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL)? OK, let's call it FAANG.\nAnd hey! Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) is really not as dead as people thought it would be! OK. How about FAANG+M? FANMAG?\n(Actually, Microsoft is very not dead, as at $2.5 trillion it is the largest public company in the world not named Saudi Aramco and has outperformed all of the other FAANGs.)\nWelp, turns out Google wants to change its name to Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG)(NASDAQ:GOOGL). OK, that gets awkward. On the Motley Fool Morning Show, we renamed the whole agglomeration of big cap tech \"FANAMA.\" Try and say that without hearing David Lee Roth's voice.\n<img src=\"https://g.foolcdn.com/image/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fg.foolcdn.com%2Feditorial%2Fimages%2F650833%2Fgettyimages-1348369701.jpg&amp;w=700&amp;op=resize\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">Source: Getty Images.\nAnd then, this last week, Facebook changed its name to <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FB\">Meta Platforms</a> (NASDAQ:FB). I was rooting for them to change it to Sugar Mountain, but no dice. All of this means that we can keep trying to shoehorn FAANG into some new acronym (Cramer decided to go with MAMAA, which, I mean...I guess.), or we can rethink this whole thing.\nAnd fear not, for the Morning Show team have done just that. We thought about the most influential consumer technology companies, and we came up with a list of eight.\nMicrosoft\nApple\nNetflix\nAmazon.com\nMeta Platforms\n<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ADBE\">Adobe</a> (NASDAQ:ADBE)\nNvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA)\nAlphabet\nWhich spells out the incredibly great acronym MANAMANA. Go ahead, go listen to the song. We'll be right here.\nMANAMANA incorporates eight consumer technology companies ranging from $300 billion in market capitalization (Netflix) up to $2.5 trillion (Microsoft). Combined these companies are worth $10.8 trillion, which is 22% of the total market capitalization of all US public companies. In the last reported year these companies generated a combined $1.4 trillion in revenues. They are consumer technology monsters. Mutant companies.\nIn fact, I'd go so far as to say that as goes MANAMANA (doo doo de doo doo), so goes the US economy.\nNow, I know what you're saying right now. Adobe? Really? Yes, absolutely. For one, there is this:\n<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad3d8664a4dd91b540d98c471291318b\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"551\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">MSFT data by YCharts\nAdobe shares have outperformed every FANAMA company, and only trails Nvidia in MANAMANA. But perhaps more importantly, Adobe was at the forefront of of a sales model in the tech industry that is now commonplace to the point of cliché: Software as a Service. In 2012 Adobe changed its business model from buy-release-upgrade for Acrobat, Photoshop and inDesign to one where users paid a subscription and as a result got consistent upgrades to the most recent versions. This was a revolutionary move, and not only has it worked out quite satisfactorily for Adobe and its shareholders, but for thousands of other tech and non-tech companies. It is in all ways a societally important company.\nWith MANAMANA we capture an enormous swath of the American technology industry. With the addition of Adobe and Nvidia, this bellwether gains exposure to two segments of the technology that FANG, FAANG, FANAMA and MAMAA miss: creation and publication, and the power behind graphics processing units. These are massively important, growing segments of technology, and Nvidia and Adobe are without question the leaders.\nAnd ultimately that's the point of a bellwether -- to serve as a proxy to track something larger. FAANG was a great placeholder for American large cap technology for the better part of a decade.\nBut now it's time for MANAMANA. (Doo doo de doo doo.)","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>FAANG is Dead. Long Live MANAMANA</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFAANG is Dead. Long Live MANAMANA\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-11-05 23:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/05/faang-is-dead-long-live-manamana/>Motley Fool</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nIn 2013 Mad Money's Jim Cramer casually launched one of the more widely adopted business mnemonics in history, describing the Four Horsemen of Big Tech by the acronym FANG.\nThese companies were ...\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/05/faang-is-dead-long-live-manamana/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NVDA":"英伟达","AMZN":"亚马逊","MSFT":"微软","GOOGL":"谷歌A","ADBE":"Adobe","AAPL":"苹果","NFLX":"奈飞"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/05/faang-is-dead-long-live-manamana/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2181748650","content_text":"In 2013 Mad Money's Jim Cramer casually launched one of the more widely adopted business mnemonics in history, describing the Four Horsemen of Big Tech by the acronym FANG.\nThese companies were Facebook, Amazon.com (NASDAQ:AMZN), Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) and Google. Almost immediately the weakness in this appellation became clear:\nWhere in the world was Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL)? OK, let's call it FAANG.\nAnd hey! Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) is really not as dead as people thought it would be! OK. How about FAANG+M? FANMAG?\n(Actually, Microsoft is very not dead, as at $2.5 trillion it is the largest public company in the world not named Saudi Aramco and has outperformed all of the other FAANGs.)\nWelp, turns out Google wants to change its name to Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG)(NASDAQ:GOOGL). OK, that gets awkward. On the Motley Fool Morning Show, we renamed the whole agglomeration of big cap tech \"FANAMA.\" Try and say that without hearing David Lee Roth's voice.\nSource: Getty Images.\nAnd then, this last week, Facebook changed its name to Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:FB). I was rooting for them to change it to Sugar Mountain, but no dice. All of this means that we can keep trying to shoehorn FAANG into some new acronym (Cramer decided to go with MAMAA, which, I mean...I guess.), or we can rethink this whole thing.\nAnd fear not, for the Morning Show team have done just that. We thought about the most influential consumer technology companies, and we came up with a list of eight.\nMicrosoft\nApple\nNetflix\nAmazon.com\nMeta Platforms\nAdobe (NASDAQ:ADBE)\nNvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA)\nAlphabet\nWhich spells out the incredibly great acronym MANAMANA. Go ahead, go listen to the song. We'll be right here.\nMANAMANA incorporates eight consumer technology companies ranging from $300 billion in market capitalization (Netflix) up to $2.5 trillion (Microsoft). Combined these companies are worth $10.8 trillion, which is 22% of the total market capitalization of all US public companies. In the last reported year these companies generated a combined $1.4 trillion in revenues. They are consumer technology monsters. Mutant companies.\nIn fact, I'd go so far as to say that as goes MANAMANA (doo doo de doo doo), so goes the US economy.\nNow, I know what you're saying right now. Adobe? Really? Yes, absolutely. For one, there is this:\nMSFT data by YCharts\nAdobe shares have outperformed every FANAMA company, and only trails Nvidia in MANAMANA. But perhaps more importantly, Adobe was at the forefront of of a sales model in the tech industry that is now commonplace to the point of cliché: Software as a Service. In 2012 Adobe changed its business model from buy-release-upgrade for Acrobat, Photoshop and inDesign to one where users paid a subscription and as a result got consistent upgrades to the most recent versions. This was a revolutionary move, and not only has it worked out quite satisfactorily for Adobe and its shareholders, but for thousands of other tech and non-tech companies. It is in all ways a societally important company.\nWith MANAMANA we capture an enormous swath of the American technology industry. With the addition of Adobe and Nvidia, this bellwether gains exposure to two segments of the technology that FANG, FAANG, FANAMA and MAMAA miss: creation and publication, and the power behind graphics processing units. These are massively important, growing segments of technology, and Nvidia and Adobe are without question the leaders.\nAnd ultimately that's the point of a bellwether -- to serve as a proxy to track something larger. FAANG was a great placeholder for American large cap technology for the better part of a decade.\nBut now it's time for MANAMANA. (Doo doo de doo doo.)","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6476015,"gmtCreate":1636179384924,"gmtModify":1636179384951,"authorId":3566982670449095,"author":{"id":3566982670449095,"authorId":3566982670449095,"name":"wywy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76ed86374fc7b16c12094c45ea30787c","vip":2,"crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":842663237,"type":1,"supId":6475967,"prevId":0,"content":"Good point","text":"Good point","html":"Good point"},{"id":6475967,"gmtCreate":1636179009895,"gmtModify":1636179010009,"authorId":3572311447359724,"author":{"id":3572311447359724,"authorId":3572311447359724,"name":"HMHu","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/888bfb834561a78ede559705b3ce7ca8","vip":1,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":842663237,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Where is TSLA?","text":"Where is TSLA?","html":"Where is TSLA?"}],"langContent":"CN"},{"id":842602021,"gmtCreate":1636166539987,"gmtModify":1636166539987,"author":{"id":"3577147024133490","authorId":"3577147024133490","name":"vincentheng8","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/177fda2264ab2bd83ccfc55eb70c57a4","vip":1,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"All in!","listText":"All in!","text":"All in!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/842602021","repostId":2181748650,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2181748650","pubTimestamp":1636124925,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2181748650?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-05 23:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"FAANG is Dead. Long Live MANAMANA","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2181748650","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"With new top dogs, it's time to update the infamous acronym.","content":"In 2013 Mad Money's Jim Cramer casually launched one of the more widely adopted business mnemonics in history, describing the Four Horsemen of Big Tech by the acronym FANG.\nThese companies were Facebook, Amazon.com (NASDAQ:AMZN), Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) and Google. Almost immediately the weakness in this appellation became clear:\nWhere in the world was Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL)? OK, let's call it FAANG.\nAnd hey! Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) is really not as dead as people thought it would be! OK. How about FAANG+M? FANMAG?\n(Actually, Microsoft is very not dead, as at $2.5 trillion it is the largest public company in the world not named Saudi Aramco and has outperformed all of the other FAANGs.)\nWelp, turns out Google wants to change its name to Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG)(NASDAQ:GOOGL). OK, that gets awkward. On the Motley Fool Morning Show, we renamed the whole agglomeration of big cap tech \"FANAMA.\" Try and say that without hearing David Lee Roth's voice.\n<img src=\"https://g.foolcdn.com/image/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fg.foolcdn.com%2Feditorial%2Fimages%2F650833%2Fgettyimages-1348369701.jpg&amp;w=700&amp;op=resize\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">Source: Getty Images.\nAnd then, this last week, Facebook changed its name to <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FB\">Meta Platforms</a> (NASDAQ:FB). I was rooting for them to change it to Sugar Mountain, but no dice. All of this means that we can keep trying to shoehorn FAANG into some new acronym (Cramer decided to go with MAMAA, which, I mean...I guess.), or we can rethink this whole thing.\nAnd fear not, for the Morning Show team have done just that. We thought about the most influential consumer technology companies, and we came up with a list of eight.\nMicrosoft\nApple\nNetflix\nAmazon.com\nMeta Platforms\n<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ADBE\">Adobe</a> (NASDAQ:ADBE)\nNvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA)\nAlphabet\nWhich spells out the incredibly great acronym MANAMANA. Go ahead, go listen to the song. We'll be right here.\nMANAMANA incorporates eight consumer technology companies ranging from $300 billion in market capitalization (Netflix) up to $2.5 trillion (Microsoft). Combined these companies are worth $10.8 trillion, which is 22% of the total market capitalization of all US public companies. In the last reported year these companies generated a combined $1.4 trillion in revenues. They are consumer technology monsters. Mutant companies.\nIn fact, I'd go so far as to say that as goes MANAMANA (doo doo de doo doo), so goes the US economy.\nNow, I know what you're saying right now. Adobe? Really? Yes, absolutely. For one, there is this:\n<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad3d8664a4dd91b540d98c471291318b\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"551\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">MSFT data by YCharts\nAdobe shares have outperformed every FANAMA company, and only trails Nvidia in MANAMANA. But perhaps more importantly, Adobe was at the forefront of of a sales model in the tech industry that is now commonplace to the point of cliché: Software as a Service. In 2012 Adobe changed its business model from buy-release-upgrade for Acrobat, Photoshop and inDesign to one where users paid a subscription and as a result got consistent upgrades to the most recent versions. This was a revolutionary move, and not only has it worked out quite satisfactorily for Adobe and its shareholders, but for thousands of other tech and non-tech companies. It is in all ways a societally important company.\nWith MANAMANA we capture an enormous swath of the American technology industry. With the addition of Adobe and Nvidia, this bellwether gains exposure to two segments of the technology that FANG, FAANG, FANAMA and MAMAA miss: creation and publication, and the power behind graphics processing units. These are massively important, growing segments of technology, and Nvidia and Adobe are without question the leaders.\nAnd ultimately that's the point of a bellwether -- to serve as a proxy to track something larger. FAANG was a great placeholder for American large cap technology for the better part of a decade.\nBut now it's time for MANAMANA. (Doo doo de doo doo.)","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>FAANG is Dead. Long Live MANAMANA</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFAANG is Dead. Long Live MANAMANA\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-11-05 23:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/05/faang-is-dead-long-live-manamana/>Motley Fool</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nIn 2013 Mad Money's Jim Cramer casually launched one of the more widely adopted business mnemonics in history, describing the Four Horsemen of Big Tech by the acronym FANG.\nThese companies were ...\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/05/faang-is-dead-long-live-manamana/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NVDA":"英伟达","AMZN":"亚马逊","MSFT":"微软","GOOGL":"谷歌A","ADBE":"Adobe","AAPL":"苹果","NFLX":"奈飞"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/05/faang-is-dead-long-live-manamana/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2181748650","content_text":"In 2013 Mad Money's Jim Cramer casually launched one of the more widely adopted business mnemonics in history, describing the Four Horsemen of Big Tech by the acronym FANG.\nThese companies were Facebook, Amazon.com (NASDAQ:AMZN), Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) and Google. Almost immediately the weakness in this appellation became clear:\nWhere in the world was Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL)? OK, let's call it FAANG.\nAnd hey! Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) is really not as dead as people thought it would be! OK. How about FAANG+M? FANMAG?\n(Actually, Microsoft is very not dead, as at $2.5 trillion it is the largest public company in the world not named Saudi Aramco and has outperformed all of the other FAANGs.)\nWelp, turns out Google wants to change its name to Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG)(NASDAQ:GOOGL). OK, that gets awkward. On the Motley Fool Morning Show, we renamed the whole agglomeration of big cap tech \"FANAMA.\" Try and say that without hearing David Lee Roth's voice.\nSource: Getty Images.\nAnd then, this last week, Facebook changed its name to Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:FB). I was rooting for them to change it to Sugar Mountain, but no dice. All of this means that we can keep trying to shoehorn FAANG into some new acronym (Cramer decided to go with MAMAA, which, I mean...I guess.), or we can rethink this whole thing.\nAnd fear not, for the Morning Show team have done just that. We thought about the most influential consumer technology companies, and we came up with a list of eight.\nMicrosoft\nApple\nNetflix\nAmazon.com\nMeta Platforms\nAdobe (NASDAQ:ADBE)\nNvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA)\nAlphabet\nWhich spells out the incredibly great acronym MANAMANA. Go ahead, go listen to the song. We'll be right here.\nMANAMANA incorporates eight consumer technology companies ranging from $300 billion in market capitalization (Netflix) up to $2.5 trillion (Microsoft). Combined these companies are worth $10.8 trillion, which is 22% of the total market capitalization of all US public companies. In the last reported year these companies generated a combined $1.4 trillion in revenues. They are consumer technology monsters. Mutant companies.\nIn fact, I'd go so far as to say that as goes MANAMANA (doo doo de doo doo), so goes the US economy.\nNow, I know what you're saying right now. Adobe? Really? Yes, absolutely. For one, there is this:\nMSFT data by YCharts\nAdobe shares have outperformed every FANAMA company, and only trails Nvidia in MANAMANA. But perhaps more importantly, Adobe was at the forefront of of a sales model in the tech industry that is now commonplace to the point of cliché: Software as a Service. In 2012 Adobe changed its business model from buy-release-upgrade for Acrobat, Photoshop and inDesign to one where users paid a subscription and as a result got consistent upgrades to the most recent versions. This was a revolutionary move, and not only has it worked out quite satisfactorily for Adobe and its shareholders, but for thousands of other tech and non-tech companies. It is in all ways a societally important company.\nWith MANAMANA we capture an enormous swath of the American technology industry. With the addition of Adobe and Nvidia, this bellwether gains exposure to two segments of the technology that FANG, FAANG, FANAMA and MAMAA miss: creation and publication, and the power behind graphics processing units. These are massively important, growing segments of technology, and Nvidia and Adobe are without question the leaders.\nAnd ultimately that's the point of a bellwether -- to serve as a proxy to track something larger. FAANG was a great placeholder for American large cap technology for the better part of a decade.\nBut now it's time for MANAMANA. (Doo doo de doo doo.)","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6473870,"gmtCreate":1636166550675,"gmtModify":1636166550702,"authorId":3577147024133490,"author":{"id":3577147024133490,"authorId":3577147024133490,"name":"vincentheng8","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/177fda2264ab2bd83ccfc55eb70c57a4","vip":1,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":842602021,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"all in","text":"all in","html":"all in"}],"langContent":"CN"},{"id":842869892,"gmtCreate":1636162687283,"gmtModify":1636162885940,"author":{"id":"3575460669959467","authorId":"3575460669959467","name":"missreenaa","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/aca8e1a20d7f8ea555aea51ad669de58","vip":1,"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"MANAMANA 😂👍","listText":"MANAMANA 😂👍","text":"MANAMANA 😂👍","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":13,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/842869892","repostId":2181748650,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2181748650","pubTimestamp":1636124925,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2181748650?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-05 23:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"FAANG is Dead. Long Live MANAMANA","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2181748650","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"With new top dogs, it's time to update the infamous acronym.","content":"In 2013 Mad Money's Jim Cramer casually launched one of the more widely adopted business mnemonics in history, describing the Four Horsemen of Big Tech by the acronym FANG.\nThese companies were Facebook, Amazon.com (NASDAQ:AMZN), Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) and Google. Almost immediately the weakness in this appellation became clear:\nWhere in the world was Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL)? OK, let's call it FAANG.\nAnd hey! Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) is really not as dead as people thought it would be! OK. How about FAANG+M? FANMAG?\n(Actually, Microsoft is very not dead, as at $2.5 trillion it is the largest public company in the world not named Saudi Aramco and has outperformed all of the other FAANGs.)\nWelp, turns out Google wants to change its name to Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG)(NASDAQ:GOOGL). OK, that gets awkward. On the Motley Fool Morning Show, we renamed the whole agglomeration of big cap tech \"FANAMA.\" Try and say that without hearing David Lee Roth's voice.\n<img src=\"https://g.foolcdn.com/image/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fg.foolcdn.com%2Feditorial%2Fimages%2F650833%2Fgettyimages-1348369701.jpg&amp;w=700&amp;op=resize\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">Source: Getty Images.\nAnd then, this last week, Facebook changed its name to <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FB\">Meta Platforms</a> (NASDAQ:FB). I was rooting for them to change it to Sugar Mountain, but no dice. All of this means that we can keep trying to shoehorn FAANG into some new acronym (Cramer decided to go with MAMAA, which, I mean...I guess.), or we can rethink this whole thing.\nAnd fear not, for the Morning Show team have done just that. We thought about the most influential consumer technology companies, and we came up with a list of eight.\nMicrosoft\nApple\nNetflix\nAmazon.com\nMeta Platforms\n<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ADBE\">Adobe</a> (NASDAQ:ADBE)\nNvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA)\nAlphabet\nWhich spells out the incredibly great acronym MANAMANA. Go ahead, go listen to the song. We'll be right here.\nMANAMANA incorporates eight consumer technology companies ranging from $300 billion in market capitalization (Netflix) up to $2.5 trillion (Microsoft). Combined these companies are worth $10.8 trillion, which is 22% of the total market capitalization of all US public companies. In the last reported year these companies generated a combined $1.4 trillion in revenues. They are consumer technology monsters. Mutant companies.\nIn fact, I'd go so far as to say that as goes MANAMANA (doo doo de doo doo), so goes the US economy.\nNow, I know what you're saying right now. Adobe? Really? Yes, absolutely. For one, there is this:\n<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad3d8664a4dd91b540d98c471291318b\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"551\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">MSFT data by YCharts\nAdobe shares have outperformed every FANAMA company, and only trails Nvidia in MANAMANA. But perhaps more importantly, Adobe was at the forefront of of a sales model in the tech industry that is now commonplace to the point of cliché: Software as a Service. In 2012 Adobe changed its business model from buy-release-upgrade for Acrobat, Photoshop and inDesign to one where users paid a subscription and as a result got consistent upgrades to the most recent versions. This was a revolutionary move, and not only has it worked out quite satisfactorily for Adobe and its shareholders, but for thousands of other tech and non-tech companies. It is in all ways a societally important company.\nWith MANAMANA we capture an enormous swath of the American technology industry. With the addition of Adobe and Nvidia, this bellwether gains exposure to two segments of the technology that FANG, FAANG, FANAMA and MAMAA miss: creation and publication, and the power behind graphics processing units. These are massively important, growing segments of technology, and Nvidia and Adobe are without question the leaders.\nAnd ultimately that's the point of a bellwether -- to serve as a proxy to track something larger. FAANG was a great placeholder for American large cap technology for the better part of a decade.\nBut now it's time for MANAMANA. (Doo doo de doo doo.)","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>FAANG is Dead. Long Live MANAMANA</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFAANG is Dead. Long Live MANAMANA\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-11-05 23:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/05/faang-is-dead-long-live-manamana/>Motley Fool</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nIn 2013 Mad Money's Jim Cramer casually launched one of the more widely adopted business mnemonics in history, describing the Four Horsemen of Big Tech by the acronym FANG.\nThese companies were ...\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/05/faang-is-dead-long-live-manamana/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NVDA":"英伟达","AMZN":"亚马逊","MSFT":"微软","GOOGL":"谷歌A","ADBE":"Adobe","AAPL":"苹果","NFLX":"奈飞"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/05/faang-is-dead-long-live-manamana/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2181748650","content_text":"In 2013 Mad Money's Jim Cramer casually launched one of the more widely adopted business mnemonics in history, describing the Four Horsemen of Big Tech by the acronym FANG.\nThese companies were Facebook, Amazon.com (NASDAQ:AMZN), Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) and Google. Almost immediately the weakness in this appellation became clear:\nWhere in the world was Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL)? OK, let's call it FAANG.\nAnd hey! Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) is really not as dead as people thought it would be! OK. How about FAANG+M? FANMAG?\n(Actually, Microsoft is very not dead, as at $2.5 trillion it is the largest public company in the world not named Saudi Aramco and has outperformed all of the other FAANGs.)\nWelp, turns out Google wants to change its name to Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG)(NASDAQ:GOOGL). OK, that gets awkward. On the Motley Fool Morning Show, we renamed the whole agglomeration of big cap tech \"FANAMA.\" Try and say that without hearing David Lee Roth's voice.\nSource: Getty Images.\nAnd then, this last week, Facebook changed its name to Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:FB). I was rooting for them to change it to Sugar Mountain, but no dice. All of this means that we can keep trying to shoehorn FAANG into some new acronym (Cramer decided to go with MAMAA, which, I mean...I guess.), or we can rethink this whole thing.\nAnd fear not, for the Morning Show team have done just that. We thought about the most influential consumer technology companies, and we came up with a list of eight.\nMicrosoft\nApple\nNetflix\nAmazon.com\nMeta Platforms\nAdobe (NASDAQ:ADBE)\nNvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA)\nAlphabet\nWhich spells out the incredibly great acronym MANAMANA. Go ahead, go listen to the song. We'll be right here.\nMANAMANA incorporates eight consumer technology companies ranging from $300 billion in market capitalization (Netflix) up to $2.5 trillion (Microsoft). Combined these companies are worth $10.8 trillion, which is 22% of the total market capitalization of all US public companies. In the last reported year these companies generated a combined $1.4 trillion in revenues. They are consumer technology monsters. Mutant companies.\nIn fact, I'd go so far as to say that as goes MANAMANA (doo doo de doo doo), so goes the US economy.\nNow, I know what you're saying right now. Adobe? Really? Yes, absolutely. For one, there is this:\nMSFT data by YCharts\nAdobe shares have outperformed every FANAMA company, and only trails Nvidia in MANAMANA. But perhaps more importantly, Adobe was at the forefront of of a sales model in the tech industry that is now commonplace to the point of cliché: Software as a Service. In 2012 Adobe changed its business model from buy-release-upgrade for Acrobat, Photoshop and inDesign to one where users paid a subscription and as a result got consistent upgrades to the most recent versions. This was a revolutionary move, and not only has it worked out quite satisfactorily for Adobe and its shareholders, but for thousands of other tech and non-tech companies. It is in all ways a societally important company.\nWith MANAMANA we capture an enormous swath of the American technology industry. With the addition of Adobe and Nvidia, this bellwether gains exposure to two segments of the technology that FANG, FAANG, FANAMA and MAMAA miss: creation and publication, and the power behind graphics processing units. These are massively important, growing segments of technology, and Nvidia and Adobe are without question the leaders.\nAnd ultimately that's the point of a bellwether -- to serve as a proxy to track something larger. FAANG was a great placeholder for American large cap technology for the better part of a decade.\nBut now it's time for MANAMANA. (Doo doo de doo doo.)","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6474800,"gmtCreate":1636171397922,"gmtModify":1636171397956,"authorId":3554640535164305,"author":{"id":3554640535164305,"authorId":3554640535164305,"name":"chiapopo","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2957ce010338093c9faf4ac1d533b533","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":842869892,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Funny sia [龇牙] [龇牙]","text":"Funny sia [龇牙] [龇牙]","html":"Funny sia [龇牙] [龇牙]"}],"langContent":"CN"},{"id":842172507,"gmtCreate":1636159099056,"gmtModify":1636159099680,"author":{"id":"3581848609787274","authorId":"3581848609787274","name":"IZLIN","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f2241963762942310c858a3aae49c0d1","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/U/3581561113691319\">@Meow17</a><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/U/3582026494482473\">@Sagi08</a><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/U/3582502706085184\">@simplydkam</a>[Surprised]&nbsp;","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/U/3581561113691319\">@Meow17</a><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/U/3582026494482473\">@Sagi08</a><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/U/3582502706085184\">@simplydkam</a>[Surprised]&nbsp;","text":"@Meow17@Sagi08@simplydkam[Surprised]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/842172507","repostId":2181748650,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2181748650","pubTimestamp":1636124925,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2181748650?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-05 23:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"FAANG is Dead. Long Live MANAMANA","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2181748650","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"With new top dogs, it's time to update the infamous acronym.","content":"In 2013 Mad Money's Jim Cramer casually launched one of the more widely adopted business mnemonics in history, describing the Four Horsemen of Big Tech by the acronym FANG.\nThese companies were Facebook, Amazon.com (NASDAQ:AMZN), Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) and Google. Almost immediately the weakness in this appellation became clear:\nWhere in the world was Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL)? OK, let's call it FAANG.\nAnd hey! Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) is really not as dead as people thought it would be! OK. How about FAANG+M? FANMAG?\n(Actually, Microsoft is very not dead, as at $2.5 trillion it is the largest public company in the world not named Saudi Aramco and has outperformed all of the other FAANGs.)\nWelp, turns out Google wants to change its name to Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG)(NASDAQ:GOOGL). OK, that gets awkward. On the Motley Fool Morning Show, we renamed the whole agglomeration of big cap tech \"FANAMA.\" Try and say that without hearing David Lee Roth's voice.\n<img src=\"https://g.foolcdn.com/image/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fg.foolcdn.com%2Feditorial%2Fimages%2F650833%2Fgettyimages-1348369701.jpg&amp;w=700&amp;op=resize\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">Source: Getty Images.\nAnd then, this last week, Facebook changed its name to <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FB\">Meta Platforms</a> (NASDAQ:FB). I was rooting for them to change it to Sugar Mountain, but no dice. All of this means that we can keep trying to shoehorn FAANG into some new acronym (Cramer decided to go with MAMAA, which, I mean...I guess.), or we can rethink this whole thing.\nAnd fear not, for the Morning Show team have done just that. We thought about the most influential consumer technology companies, and we came up with a list of eight.\nMicrosoft\nApple\nNetflix\nAmazon.com\nMeta Platforms\n<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ADBE\">Adobe</a> (NASDAQ:ADBE)\nNvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA)\nAlphabet\nWhich spells out the incredibly great acronym MANAMANA. Go ahead, go listen to the song. We'll be right here.\nMANAMANA incorporates eight consumer technology companies ranging from $300 billion in market capitalization (Netflix) up to $2.5 trillion (Microsoft). Combined these companies are worth $10.8 trillion, which is 22% of the total market capitalization of all US public companies. In the last reported year these companies generated a combined $1.4 trillion in revenues. They are consumer technology monsters. Mutant companies.\nIn fact, I'd go so far as to say that as goes MANAMANA (doo doo de doo doo), so goes the US economy.\nNow, I know what you're saying right now. Adobe? Really? Yes, absolutely. For one, there is this:\n<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad3d8664a4dd91b540d98c471291318b\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"551\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">MSFT data by YCharts\nAdobe shares have outperformed every FANAMA company, and only trails Nvidia in MANAMANA. But perhaps more importantly, Adobe was at the forefront of of a sales model in the tech industry that is now commonplace to the point of cliché: Software as a Service. In 2012 Adobe changed its business model from buy-release-upgrade for Acrobat, Photoshop and inDesign to one where users paid a subscription and as a result got consistent upgrades to the most recent versions. This was a revolutionary move, and not only has it worked out quite satisfactorily for Adobe and its shareholders, but for thousands of other tech and non-tech companies. It is in all ways a societally important company.\nWith MANAMANA we capture an enormous swath of the American technology industry. With the addition of Adobe and Nvidia, this bellwether gains exposure to two segments of the technology that FANG, FAANG, FANAMA and MAMAA miss: creation and publication, and the power behind graphics processing units. These are massively important, growing segments of technology, and Nvidia and Adobe are without question the leaders.\nAnd ultimately that's the point of a bellwether -- to serve as a proxy to track something larger. FAANG was a great placeholder for American large cap technology for the better part of a decade.\nBut now it's time for MANAMANA. (Doo doo de doo doo.)","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>FAANG is Dead. Long Live MANAMANA</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFAANG is Dead. Long Live MANAMANA\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-11-05 23:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/05/faang-is-dead-long-live-manamana/>Motley Fool</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nIn 2013 Mad Money's Jim Cramer casually launched one of the more widely adopted business mnemonics in history, describing the Four Horsemen of Big Tech by the acronym FANG.\nThese companies were ...\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/05/faang-is-dead-long-live-manamana/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NVDA":"英伟达","AMZN":"亚马逊","MSFT":"微软","GOOGL":"谷歌A","ADBE":"Adobe","AAPL":"苹果","NFLX":"奈飞"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/05/faang-is-dead-long-live-manamana/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2181748650","content_text":"In 2013 Mad Money's Jim Cramer casually launched one of the more widely adopted business mnemonics in history, describing the Four Horsemen of Big Tech by the acronym FANG.\nThese companies were Facebook, Amazon.com (NASDAQ:AMZN), Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) and Google. Almost immediately the weakness in this appellation became clear:\nWhere in the world was Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL)? OK, let's call it FAANG.\nAnd hey! Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) is really not as dead as people thought it would be! OK. How about FAANG+M? FANMAG?\n(Actually, Microsoft is very not dead, as at $2.5 trillion it is the largest public company in the world not named Saudi Aramco and has outperformed all of the other FAANGs.)\nWelp, turns out Google wants to change its name to Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG)(NASDAQ:GOOGL). OK, that gets awkward. On the Motley Fool Morning Show, we renamed the whole agglomeration of big cap tech \"FANAMA.\" Try and say that without hearing David Lee Roth's voice.\nSource: Getty Images.\nAnd then, this last week, Facebook changed its name to Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:FB). I was rooting for them to change it to Sugar Mountain, but no dice. All of this means that we can keep trying to shoehorn FAANG into some new acronym (Cramer decided to go with MAMAA, which, I mean...I guess.), or we can rethink this whole thing.\nAnd fear not, for the Morning Show team have done just that. We thought about the most influential consumer technology companies, and we came up with a list of eight.\nMicrosoft\nApple\nNetflix\nAmazon.com\nMeta Platforms\nAdobe (NASDAQ:ADBE)\nNvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA)\nAlphabet\nWhich spells out the incredibly great acronym MANAMANA. Go ahead, go listen to the song. We'll be right here.\nMANAMANA incorporates eight consumer technology companies ranging from $300 billion in market capitalization (Netflix) up to $2.5 trillion (Microsoft). Combined these companies are worth $10.8 trillion, which is 22% of the total market capitalization of all US public companies. In the last reported year these companies generated a combined $1.4 trillion in revenues. They are consumer technology monsters. Mutant companies.\nIn fact, I'd go so far as to say that as goes MANAMANA (doo doo de doo doo), so goes the US economy.\nNow, I know what you're saying right now. Adobe? Really? Yes, absolutely. For one, there is this:\nMSFT data by YCharts\nAdobe shares have outperformed every FANAMA company, and only trails Nvidia in MANAMANA. But perhaps more importantly, Adobe was at the forefront of of a sales model in the tech industry that is now commonplace to the point of cliché: Software as a Service. In 2012 Adobe changed its business model from buy-release-upgrade for Acrobat, Photoshop and inDesign to one where users paid a subscription and as a result got consistent upgrades to the most recent versions. This was a revolutionary move, and not only has it worked out quite satisfactorily for Adobe and its shareholders, but for thousands of other tech and non-tech companies. It is in all ways a societally important company.\nWith MANAMANA we capture an enormous swath of the American technology industry. With the addition of Adobe and Nvidia, this bellwether gains exposure to two segments of the technology that FANG, FAANG, FANAMA and MAMAA miss: creation and publication, and the power behind graphics processing units. These are massively important, growing segments of technology, and Nvidia and Adobe are without question the leaders.\nAnd ultimately that's the point of a bellwether -- to serve as a proxy to track something larger. FAANG was a great placeholder for American large cap technology for the better part of a decade.\nBut now it's time for MANAMANA. (Doo doo de doo doo.)","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6475433,"gmtCreate":1636175663947,"gmtModify":1636175664049,"authorId":3579600897400043,"author":{"id":3579600897400043,"authorId":3579600897400043,"name":"Yuyu1988","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/34360b9887bbf562af82f13ffcd1affb","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":842172507,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"😊😊😊😊","text":"😊😊😊😊","html":"😊😊😊😊"}],"langContent":"CN"},{"id":842178746,"gmtCreate":1636158988581,"gmtModify":1636158989251,"author":{"id":"3572474257232421","authorId":"3572474257232421","name":"QArmieeQ","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4880f6ec2e047cce565a00b5fd10d91f","vip":1,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"MANAMANA means wherever in Malay.&nbsp;","listText":"MANAMANA means wherever in Malay.&nbsp;","text":"MANAMANA means wherever in Malay.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/842178746","repostId":2181748650,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2181748650","pubTimestamp":1636124925,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2181748650?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-05 23:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"FAANG is Dead. Long Live MANAMANA","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2181748650","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"With new top dogs, it's time to update the infamous acronym.","content":"In 2013 Mad Money's Jim Cramer casually launched one of the more widely adopted business mnemonics in history, describing the Four Horsemen of Big Tech by the acronym FANG.\nThese companies were Facebook, Amazon.com (NASDAQ:AMZN), Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) and Google. Almost immediately the weakness in this appellation became clear:\nWhere in the world was Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL)? OK, let's call it FAANG.\nAnd hey! Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) is really not as dead as people thought it would be! OK. How about FAANG+M? FANMAG?\n(Actually, Microsoft is very not dead, as at $2.5 trillion it is the largest public company in the world not named Saudi Aramco and has outperformed all of the other FAANGs.)\nWelp, turns out Google wants to change its name to Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG)(NASDAQ:GOOGL). OK, that gets awkward. On the Motley Fool Morning Show, we renamed the whole agglomeration of big cap tech \"FANAMA.\" Try and say that without hearing David Lee Roth's voice.\n<img src=\"https://g.foolcdn.com/image/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fg.foolcdn.com%2Feditorial%2Fimages%2F650833%2Fgettyimages-1348369701.jpg&amp;w=700&amp;op=resize\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">Source: Getty Images.\nAnd then, this last week, Facebook changed its name to <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FB\">Meta Platforms</a> (NASDAQ:FB). I was rooting for them to change it to Sugar Mountain, but no dice. All of this means that we can keep trying to shoehorn FAANG into some new acronym (Cramer decided to go with MAMAA, which, I mean...I guess.), or we can rethink this whole thing.\nAnd fear not, for the Morning Show team have done just that. We thought about the most influential consumer technology companies, and we came up with a list of eight.\nMicrosoft\nApple\nNetflix\nAmazon.com\nMeta Platforms\n<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ADBE\">Adobe</a> (NASDAQ:ADBE)\nNvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA)\nAlphabet\nWhich spells out the incredibly great acronym MANAMANA. Go ahead, go listen to the song. We'll be right here.\nMANAMANA incorporates eight consumer technology companies ranging from $300 billion in market capitalization (Netflix) up to $2.5 trillion (Microsoft). Combined these companies are worth $10.8 trillion, which is 22% of the total market capitalization of all US public companies. In the last reported year these companies generated a combined $1.4 trillion in revenues. They are consumer technology monsters. Mutant companies.\nIn fact, I'd go so far as to say that as goes MANAMANA (doo doo de doo doo), so goes the US economy.\nNow, I know what you're saying right now. Adobe? Really? Yes, absolutely. For one, there is this:\n<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad3d8664a4dd91b540d98c471291318b\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"551\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">MSFT data by YCharts\nAdobe shares have outperformed every FANAMA company, and only trails Nvidia in MANAMANA. But perhaps more importantly, Adobe was at the forefront of of a sales model in the tech industry that is now commonplace to the point of cliché: Software as a Service. In 2012 Adobe changed its business model from buy-release-upgrade for Acrobat, Photoshop and inDesign to one where users paid a subscription and as a result got consistent upgrades to the most recent versions. This was a revolutionary move, and not only has it worked out quite satisfactorily for Adobe and its shareholders, but for thousands of other tech and non-tech companies. It is in all ways a societally important company.\nWith MANAMANA we capture an enormous swath of the American technology industry. With the addition of Adobe and Nvidia, this bellwether gains exposure to two segments of the technology that FANG, FAANG, FANAMA and MAMAA miss: creation and publication, and the power behind graphics processing units. These are massively important, growing segments of technology, and Nvidia and Adobe are without question the leaders.\nAnd ultimately that's the point of a bellwether -- to serve as a proxy to track something larger. FAANG was a great placeholder for American large cap technology for the better part of a decade.\nBut now it's time for MANAMANA. (Doo doo de doo doo.)","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>FAANG is Dead. Long Live MANAMANA</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFAANG is Dead. Long Live MANAMANA\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-11-05 23:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/05/faang-is-dead-long-live-manamana/>Motley Fool</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nIn 2013 Mad Money's Jim Cramer casually launched one of the more widely adopted business mnemonics in history, describing the Four Horsemen of Big Tech by the acronym FANG.\nThese companies were ...\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/05/faang-is-dead-long-live-manamana/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NVDA":"英伟达","AMZN":"亚马逊","MSFT":"微软","GOOGL":"谷歌A","ADBE":"Adobe","AAPL":"苹果","NFLX":"奈飞"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/05/faang-is-dead-long-live-manamana/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2181748650","content_text":"In 2013 Mad Money's Jim Cramer casually launched one of the more widely adopted business mnemonics in history, describing the Four Horsemen of Big Tech by the acronym FANG.\nThese companies were Facebook, Amazon.com (NASDAQ:AMZN), Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) and Google. Almost immediately the weakness in this appellation became clear:\nWhere in the world was Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL)? OK, let's call it FAANG.\nAnd hey! Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) is really not as dead as people thought it would be! OK. How about FAANG+M? FANMAG?\n(Actually, Microsoft is very not dead, as at $2.5 trillion it is the largest public company in the world not named Saudi Aramco and has outperformed all of the other FAANGs.)\nWelp, turns out Google wants to change its name to Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG)(NASDAQ:GOOGL). OK, that gets awkward. On the Motley Fool Morning Show, we renamed the whole agglomeration of big cap tech \"FANAMA.\" Try and say that without hearing David Lee Roth's voice.\nSource: Getty Images.\nAnd then, this last week, Facebook changed its name to Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:FB). I was rooting for them to change it to Sugar Mountain, but no dice. All of this means that we can keep trying to shoehorn FAANG into some new acronym (Cramer decided to go with MAMAA, which, I mean...I guess.), or we can rethink this whole thing.\nAnd fear not, for the Morning Show team have done just that. We thought about the most influential consumer technology companies, and we came up with a list of eight.\nMicrosoft\nApple\nNetflix\nAmazon.com\nMeta Platforms\nAdobe (NASDAQ:ADBE)\nNvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA)\nAlphabet\nWhich spells out the incredibly great acronym MANAMANA. Go ahead, go listen to the song. We'll be right here.\nMANAMANA incorporates eight consumer technology companies ranging from $300 billion in market capitalization (Netflix) up to $2.5 trillion (Microsoft). Combined these companies are worth $10.8 trillion, which is 22% of the total market capitalization of all US public companies. In the last reported year these companies generated a combined $1.4 trillion in revenues. They are consumer technology monsters. Mutant companies.\nIn fact, I'd go so far as to say that as goes MANAMANA (doo doo de doo doo), so goes the US economy.\nNow, I know what you're saying right now. Adobe? Really? Yes, absolutely. For one, there is this:\nMSFT data by YCharts\nAdobe shares have outperformed every FANAMA company, and only trails Nvidia in MANAMANA. But perhaps more importantly, Adobe was at the forefront of of a sales model in the tech industry that is now commonplace to the point of cliché: Software as a Service. In 2012 Adobe changed its business model from buy-release-upgrade for Acrobat, Photoshop and inDesign to one where users paid a subscription and as a result got consistent upgrades to the most recent versions. This was a revolutionary move, and not only has it worked out quite satisfactorily for Adobe and its shareholders, but for thousands of other tech and non-tech companies. It is in all ways a societally important company.\nWith MANAMANA we capture an enormous swath of the American technology industry. With the addition of Adobe and Nvidia, this bellwether gains exposure to two segments of the technology that FANG, FAANG, FANAMA and MAMAA miss: creation and publication, and the power behind graphics processing units. These are massively important, growing segments of technology, and Nvidia and Adobe are without question the leaders.\nAnd ultimately that's the point of a bellwether -- to serve as a proxy to track something larger. FAANG was a great placeholder for American large cap technology for the better part of a decade.\nBut now it's time for MANAMANA. (Doo doo de doo doo.)","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6474506,"gmtCreate":1636169480245,"gmtModify":1636169480275,"authorId":4091089381144950,"author":{"id":4091089381144950,"authorId":4091089381144950,"name":"滚股怪","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b67621b4133ca0db91bff9766152a448","vip":1,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":842178746,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Wio","text":"Wio","html":"Wio"}],"langContent":"CN"},{"id":842156872,"gmtCreate":1636157877991,"gmtModify":1636157878902,"author":{"id":"3580955744929134","authorId":"3580955744929134","name":"boonk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6e58310c6a80ddfbcb69e0989cda7858","vip":1,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Meta to 1k next year&nbsp;","listText":"Meta to 1k next year&nbsp;","text":"Meta to 1k next year","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/842156872","repostId":2181748650,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2181748650","pubTimestamp":1636124925,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2181748650?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-05 23:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"FAANG is Dead. Long Live MANAMANA","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2181748650","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"With new top dogs, it's time to update the infamous acronym.","content":"In 2013 Mad Money's Jim Cramer casually launched one of the more widely adopted business mnemonics in history, describing the Four Horsemen of Big Tech by the acronym FANG.\nThese companies were Facebook, Amazon.com (NASDAQ:AMZN), Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) and Google. Almost immediately the weakness in this appellation became clear:\nWhere in the world was Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL)? OK, let's call it FAANG.\nAnd hey! Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) is really not as dead as people thought it would be! OK. How about FAANG+M? FANMAG?\n(Actually, Microsoft is very not dead, as at $2.5 trillion it is the largest public company in the world not named Saudi Aramco and has outperformed all of the other FAANGs.)\nWelp, turns out Google wants to change its name to Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG)(NASDAQ:GOOGL). OK, that gets awkward. On the Motley Fool Morning Show, we renamed the whole agglomeration of big cap tech \"FANAMA.\" Try and say that without hearing David Lee Roth's voice.\n<img src=\"https://g.foolcdn.com/image/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fg.foolcdn.com%2Feditorial%2Fimages%2F650833%2Fgettyimages-1348369701.jpg&amp;w=700&amp;op=resize\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">Source: Getty Images.\nAnd then, this last week, Facebook changed its name to <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FB\">Meta Platforms</a> (NASDAQ:FB). I was rooting for them to change it to Sugar Mountain, but no dice. All of this means that we can keep trying to shoehorn FAANG into some new acronym (Cramer decided to go with MAMAA, which, I mean...I guess.), or we can rethink this whole thing.\nAnd fear not, for the Morning Show team have done just that. We thought about the most influential consumer technology companies, and we came up with a list of eight.\nMicrosoft\nApple\nNetflix\nAmazon.com\nMeta Platforms\n<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ADBE\">Adobe</a> (NASDAQ:ADBE)\nNvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA)\nAlphabet\nWhich spells out the incredibly great acronym MANAMANA. Go ahead, go listen to the song. We'll be right here.\nMANAMANA incorporates eight consumer technology companies ranging from $300 billion in market capitalization (Netflix) up to $2.5 trillion (Microsoft). Combined these companies are worth $10.8 trillion, which is 22% of the total market capitalization of all US public companies. In the last reported year these companies generated a combined $1.4 trillion in revenues. They are consumer technology monsters. Mutant companies.\nIn fact, I'd go so far as to say that as goes MANAMANA (doo doo de doo doo), so goes the US economy.\nNow, I know what you're saying right now. Adobe? Really? Yes, absolutely. For one, there is this:\n<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad3d8664a4dd91b540d98c471291318b\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"551\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">MSFT data by YCharts\nAdobe shares have outperformed every FANAMA company, and only trails Nvidia in MANAMANA. But perhaps more importantly, Adobe was at the forefront of of a sales model in the tech industry that is now commonplace to the point of cliché: Software as a Service. In 2012 Adobe changed its business model from buy-release-upgrade for Acrobat, Photoshop and inDesign to one where users paid a subscription and as a result got consistent upgrades to the most recent versions. This was a revolutionary move, and not only has it worked out quite satisfactorily for Adobe and its shareholders, but for thousands of other tech and non-tech companies. It is in all ways a societally important company.\nWith MANAMANA we capture an enormous swath of the American technology industry. With the addition of Adobe and Nvidia, this bellwether gains exposure to two segments of the technology that FANG, FAANG, FANAMA and MAMAA miss: creation and publication, and the power behind graphics processing units. These are massively important, growing segments of technology, and Nvidia and Adobe are without question the leaders.\nAnd ultimately that's the point of a bellwether -- to serve as a proxy to track something larger. FAANG was a great placeholder for American large cap technology for the better part of a decade.\nBut now it's time for MANAMANA. (Doo doo de doo doo.)","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>FAANG is Dead. Long Live MANAMANA</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFAANG is Dead. Long Live MANAMANA\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-11-05 23:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/05/faang-is-dead-long-live-manamana/>Motley Fool</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nIn 2013 Mad Money's Jim Cramer casually launched one of the more widely adopted business mnemonics in history, describing the Four Horsemen of Big Tech by the acronym FANG.\nThese companies were ...\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/05/faang-is-dead-long-live-manamana/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NVDA":"英伟达","AMZN":"亚马逊","MSFT":"微软","GOOGL":"谷歌A","ADBE":"Adobe","AAPL":"苹果","NFLX":"奈飞"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/05/faang-is-dead-long-live-manamana/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2181748650","content_text":"In 2013 Mad Money's Jim Cramer casually launched one of the more widely adopted business mnemonics in history, describing the Four Horsemen of Big Tech by the acronym FANG.\nThese companies were Facebook, Amazon.com (NASDAQ:AMZN), Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) and Google. Almost immediately the weakness in this appellation became clear:\nWhere in the world was Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL)? OK, let's call it FAANG.\nAnd hey! Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) is really not as dead as people thought it would be! OK. How about FAANG+M? FANMAG?\n(Actually, Microsoft is very not dead, as at $2.5 trillion it is the largest public company in the world not named Saudi Aramco and has outperformed all of the other FAANGs.)\nWelp, turns out Google wants to change its name to Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG)(NASDAQ:GOOGL). OK, that gets awkward. On the Motley Fool Morning Show, we renamed the whole agglomeration of big cap tech \"FANAMA.\" Try and say that without hearing David Lee Roth's voice.\nSource: Getty Images.\nAnd then, this last week, Facebook changed its name to Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:FB). I was rooting for them to change it to Sugar Mountain, but no dice. All of this means that we can keep trying to shoehorn FAANG into some new acronym (Cramer decided to go with MAMAA, which, I mean...I guess.), or we can rethink this whole thing.\nAnd fear not, for the Morning Show team have done just that. We thought about the most influential consumer technology companies, and we came up with a list of eight.\nMicrosoft\nApple\nNetflix\nAmazon.com\nMeta Platforms\nAdobe (NASDAQ:ADBE)\nNvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA)\nAlphabet\nWhich spells out the incredibly great acronym MANAMANA. Go ahead, go listen to the song. We'll be right here.\nMANAMANA incorporates eight consumer technology companies ranging from $300 billion in market capitalization (Netflix) up to $2.5 trillion (Microsoft). Combined these companies are worth $10.8 trillion, which is 22% of the total market capitalization of all US public companies. In the last reported year these companies generated a combined $1.4 trillion in revenues. They are consumer technology monsters. Mutant companies.\nIn fact, I'd go so far as to say that as goes MANAMANA (doo doo de doo doo), so goes the US economy.\nNow, I know what you're saying right now. Adobe? Really? Yes, absolutely. For one, there is this:\nMSFT data by YCharts\nAdobe shares have outperformed every FANAMA company, and only trails Nvidia in MANAMANA. But perhaps more importantly, Adobe was at the forefront of of a sales model in the tech industry that is now commonplace to the point of cliché: Software as a Service. In 2012 Adobe changed its business model from buy-release-upgrade for Acrobat, Photoshop and inDesign to one where users paid a subscription and as a result got consistent upgrades to the most recent versions. This was a revolutionary move, and not only has it worked out quite satisfactorily for Adobe and its shareholders, but for thousands of other tech and non-tech companies. It is in all ways a societally important company.\nWith MANAMANA we capture an enormous swath of the American technology industry. With the addition of Adobe and Nvidia, this bellwether gains exposure to two segments of the technology that FANG, FAANG, FANAMA and MAMAA miss: creation and publication, and the power behind graphics processing units. These are massively important, growing segments of technology, and Nvidia and Adobe are without question the leaders.\nAnd ultimately that's the point of a bellwether -- to serve as a proxy to track something larger. FAANG was a great placeholder for American large cap technology for the better part of a decade.\nBut now it's time for MANAMANA. (Doo doo de doo doo.)","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"CN"},{"id":842184009,"gmtCreate":1636156153451,"gmtModify":1636156507369,"author":{"id":"4088412711170620","authorId":"4088412711170620","name":"Kitsonlin","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f4c50ef7ee78d822dd86b84cd4150c59","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Morning","listText":"Morning","text":"Morning","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/842184009","repostId":2181748650,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2181748650","pubTimestamp":1636124925,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2181748650?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-05 23:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"FAANG is Dead. Long Live MANAMANA","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2181748650","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"With new top dogs, it's time to update the infamous acronym.","content":"In 2013 Mad Money's Jim Cramer casually launched one of the more widely adopted business mnemonics in history, describing the Four Horsemen of Big Tech by the acronym FANG.\nThese companies were Facebook, Amazon.com (NASDAQ:AMZN), Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) and Google. Almost immediately the weakness in this appellation became clear:\nWhere in the world was Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL)? OK, let's call it FAANG.\nAnd hey! Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) is really not as dead as people thought it would be! OK. How about FAANG+M? FANMAG?\n(Actually, Microsoft is very not dead, as at $2.5 trillion it is the largest public company in the world not named Saudi Aramco and has outperformed all of the other FAANGs.)\nWelp, turns out Google wants to change its name to Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG)(NASDAQ:GOOGL). OK, that gets awkward. On the Motley Fool Morning Show, we renamed the whole agglomeration of big cap tech \"FANAMA.\" Try and say that without hearing David Lee Roth's voice.\n<img src=\"https://g.foolcdn.com/image/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fg.foolcdn.com%2Feditorial%2Fimages%2F650833%2Fgettyimages-1348369701.jpg&amp;w=700&amp;op=resize\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">Source: Getty Images.\nAnd then, this last week, Facebook changed its name to <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FB\">Meta Platforms</a> (NASDAQ:FB). I was rooting for them to change it to Sugar Mountain, but no dice. All of this means that we can keep trying to shoehorn FAANG into some new acronym (Cramer decided to go with MAMAA, which, I mean...I guess.), or we can rethink this whole thing.\nAnd fear not, for the Morning Show team have done just that. We thought about the most influential consumer technology companies, and we came up with a list of eight.\nMicrosoft\nApple\nNetflix\nAmazon.com\nMeta Platforms\n<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ADBE\">Adobe</a> (NASDAQ:ADBE)\nNvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA)\nAlphabet\nWhich spells out the incredibly great acronym MANAMANA. Go ahead, go listen to the song. We'll be right here.\nMANAMANA incorporates eight consumer technology companies ranging from $300 billion in market capitalization (Netflix) up to $2.5 trillion (Microsoft). Combined these companies are worth $10.8 trillion, which is 22% of the total market capitalization of all US public companies. In the last reported year these companies generated a combined $1.4 trillion in revenues. They are consumer technology monsters. Mutant companies.\nIn fact, I'd go so far as to say that as goes MANAMANA (doo doo de doo doo), so goes the US economy.\nNow, I know what you're saying right now. Adobe? Really? Yes, absolutely. For one, there is this:\n<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad3d8664a4dd91b540d98c471291318b\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"551\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">MSFT data by YCharts\nAdobe shares have outperformed every FANAMA company, and only trails Nvidia in MANAMANA. But perhaps more importantly, Adobe was at the forefront of of a sales model in the tech industry that is now commonplace to the point of cliché: Software as a Service. In 2012 Adobe changed its business model from buy-release-upgrade for Acrobat, Photoshop and inDesign to one where users paid a subscription and as a result got consistent upgrades to the most recent versions. This was a revolutionary move, and not only has it worked out quite satisfactorily for Adobe and its shareholders, but for thousands of other tech and non-tech companies. It is in all ways a societally important company.\nWith MANAMANA we capture an enormous swath of the American technology industry. With the addition of Adobe and Nvidia, this bellwether gains exposure to two segments of the technology that FANG, FAANG, FANAMA and MAMAA miss: creation and publication, and the power behind graphics processing units. These are massively important, growing segments of technology, and Nvidia and Adobe are without question the leaders.\nAnd ultimately that's the point of a bellwether -- to serve as a proxy to track something larger. FAANG was a great placeholder for American large cap technology for the better part of a decade.\nBut now it's time for MANAMANA. (Doo doo de doo doo.)","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>FAANG is Dead. Long Live MANAMANA</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFAANG is Dead. Long Live MANAMANA\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-11-05 23:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/05/faang-is-dead-long-live-manamana/>Motley Fool</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nIn 2013 Mad Money's Jim Cramer casually launched one of the more widely adopted business mnemonics in history, describing the Four Horsemen of Big Tech by the acronym FANG.\nThese companies were ...\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/05/faang-is-dead-long-live-manamana/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NVDA":"英伟达","AMZN":"亚马逊","MSFT":"微软","GOOGL":"谷歌A","ADBE":"Adobe","AAPL":"苹果","NFLX":"奈飞"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/05/faang-is-dead-long-live-manamana/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2181748650","content_text":"In 2013 Mad Money's Jim Cramer casually launched one of the more widely adopted business mnemonics in history, describing the Four Horsemen of Big Tech by the acronym FANG.\nThese companies were Facebook, Amazon.com (NASDAQ:AMZN), Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) and Google. Almost immediately the weakness in this appellation became clear:\nWhere in the world was Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL)? OK, let's call it FAANG.\nAnd hey! Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) is really not as dead as people thought it would be! OK. How about FAANG+M? FANMAG?\n(Actually, Microsoft is very not dead, as at $2.5 trillion it is the largest public company in the world not named Saudi Aramco and has outperformed all of the other FAANGs.)\nWelp, turns out Google wants to change its name to Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG)(NASDAQ:GOOGL). OK, that gets awkward. On the Motley Fool Morning Show, we renamed the whole agglomeration of big cap tech \"FANAMA.\" Try and say that without hearing David Lee Roth's voice.\nSource: Getty Images.\nAnd then, this last week, Facebook changed its name to Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:FB). I was rooting for them to change it to Sugar Mountain, but no dice. All of this means that we can keep trying to shoehorn FAANG into some new acronym (Cramer decided to go with MAMAA, which, I mean...I guess.), or we can rethink this whole thing.\nAnd fear not, for the Morning Show team have done just that. We thought about the most influential consumer technology companies, and we came up with a list of eight.\nMicrosoft\nApple\nNetflix\nAmazon.com\nMeta Platforms\nAdobe (NASDAQ:ADBE)\nNvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA)\nAlphabet\nWhich spells out the incredibly great acronym MANAMANA. Go ahead, go listen to the song. We'll be right here.\nMANAMANA incorporates eight consumer technology companies ranging from $300 billion in market capitalization (Netflix) up to $2.5 trillion (Microsoft). Combined these companies are worth $10.8 trillion, which is 22% of the total market capitalization of all US public companies. In the last reported year these companies generated a combined $1.4 trillion in revenues. They are consumer technology monsters. Mutant companies.\nIn fact, I'd go so far as to say that as goes MANAMANA (doo doo de doo doo), so goes the US economy.\nNow, I know what you're saying right now. Adobe? Really? Yes, absolutely. For one, there is this:\nMSFT data by YCharts\nAdobe shares have outperformed every FANAMA company, and only trails Nvidia in MANAMANA. But perhaps more importantly, Adobe was at the forefront of of a sales model in the tech industry that is now commonplace to the point of cliché: Software as a Service. In 2012 Adobe changed its business model from buy-release-upgrade for Acrobat, Photoshop and inDesign to one where users paid a subscription and as a result got consistent upgrades to the most recent versions. This was a revolutionary move, and not only has it worked out quite satisfactorily for Adobe and its shareholders, but for thousands of other tech and non-tech companies. It is in all ways a societally important company.\nWith MANAMANA we capture an enormous swath of the American technology industry. With the addition of Adobe and Nvidia, this bellwether gains exposure to two segments of the technology that FANG, FAANG, FANAMA and MAMAA miss: creation and publication, and the power behind graphics processing units. These are massively important, growing segments of technology, and Nvidia and Adobe are without question the leaders.\nAnd ultimately that's the point of a bellwether -- to serve as a proxy to track something larger. FAANG was a great placeholder for American large cap technology for the better part of a decade.\nBut now it's time for MANAMANA. (Doo doo de doo doo.)","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"CN"},{"id":842189584,"gmtCreate":1636155714092,"gmtModify":1636155715295,"author":{"id":"3576274545052910","authorId":"3576274545052910","name":"Kevin92","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5ff4addbbdb8d9d15fec29f9709b0c3","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/842189584","repostId":2181748650,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2181748650","pubTimestamp":1636124925,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2181748650?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-05 23:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"FAANG is Dead. Long Live MANAMANA","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2181748650","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"With new top dogs, it's time to update the infamous acronym.","content":"In 2013 Mad Money's Jim Cramer casually launched one of the more widely adopted business mnemonics in history, describing the Four Horsemen of Big Tech by the acronym FANG.\nThese companies were Facebook, Amazon.com (NASDAQ:AMZN), Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) and Google. Almost immediately the weakness in this appellation became clear:\nWhere in the world was Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL)? OK, let's call it FAANG.\nAnd hey! Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) is really not as dead as people thought it would be! OK. How about FAANG+M? FANMAG?\n(Actually, Microsoft is very not dead, as at $2.5 trillion it is the largest public company in the world not named Saudi Aramco and has outperformed all of the other FAANGs.)\nWelp, turns out Google wants to change its name to Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG)(NASDAQ:GOOGL). OK, that gets awkward. On the Motley Fool Morning Show, we renamed the whole agglomeration of big cap tech \"FANAMA.\" Try and say that without hearing David Lee Roth's voice.\n<img src=\"https://g.foolcdn.com/image/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fg.foolcdn.com%2Feditorial%2Fimages%2F650833%2Fgettyimages-1348369701.jpg&amp;w=700&amp;op=resize\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">Source: Getty Images.\nAnd then, this last week, Facebook changed its name to <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FB\">Meta Platforms</a> (NASDAQ:FB). I was rooting for them to change it to Sugar Mountain, but no dice. All of this means that we can keep trying to shoehorn FAANG into some new acronym (Cramer decided to go with MAMAA, which, I mean...I guess.), or we can rethink this whole thing.\nAnd fear not, for the Morning Show team have done just that. We thought about the most influential consumer technology companies, and we came up with a list of eight.\nMicrosoft\nApple\nNetflix\nAmazon.com\nMeta Platforms\n<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ADBE\">Adobe</a> (NASDAQ:ADBE)\nNvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA)\nAlphabet\nWhich spells out the incredibly great acronym MANAMANA. Go ahead, go listen to the song. We'll be right here.\nMANAMANA incorporates eight consumer technology companies ranging from $300 billion in market capitalization (Netflix) up to $2.5 trillion (Microsoft). Combined these companies are worth $10.8 trillion, which is 22% of the total market capitalization of all US public companies. In the last reported year these companies generated a combined $1.4 trillion in revenues. They are consumer technology monsters. Mutant companies.\nIn fact, I'd go so far as to say that as goes MANAMANA (doo doo de doo doo), so goes the US economy.\nNow, I know what you're saying right now. Adobe? Really? Yes, absolutely. For one, there is this:\n<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad3d8664a4dd91b540d98c471291318b\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"551\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">MSFT data by YCharts\nAdobe shares have outperformed every FANAMA company, and only trails Nvidia in MANAMANA. But perhaps more importantly, Adobe was at the forefront of of a sales model in the tech industry that is now commonplace to the point of cliché: Software as a Service. In 2012 Adobe changed its business model from buy-release-upgrade for Acrobat, Photoshop and inDesign to one where users paid a subscription and as a result got consistent upgrades to the most recent versions. This was a revolutionary move, and not only has it worked out quite satisfactorily for Adobe and its shareholders, but for thousands of other tech and non-tech companies. It is in all ways a societally important company.\nWith MANAMANA we capture an enormous swath of the American technology industry. With the addition of Adobe and Nvidia, this bellwether gains exposure to two segments of the technology that FANG, FAANG, FANAMA and MAMAA miss: creation and publication, and the power behind graphics processing units. These are massively important, growing segments of technology, and Nvidia and Adobe are without question the leaders.\nAnd ultimately that's the point of a bellwether -- to serve as a proxy to track something larger. FAANG was a great placeholder for American large cap technology for the better part of a decade.\nBut now it's time for MANAMANA. (Doo doo de doo doo.)","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>FAANG is Dead. Long Live MANAMANA</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFAANG is Dead. Long Live MANAMANA\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-11-05 23:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/05/faang-is-dead-long-live-manamana/>Motley Fool</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nIn 2013 Mad Money's Jim Cramer casually launched one of the more widely adopted business mnemonics in history, describing the Four Horsemen of Big Tech by the acronym FANG.\nThese companies were ...\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/05/faang-is-dead-long-live-manamana/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NVDA":"英伟达","AMZN":"亚马逊","MSFT":"微软","GOOGL":"谷歌A","ADBE":"Adobe","AAPL":"苹果","NFLX":"奈飞"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/05/faang-is-dead-long-live-manamana/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2181748650","content_text":"In 2013 Mad Money's Jim Cramer casually launched one of the more widely adopted business mnemonics in history, describing the Four Horsemen of Big Tech by the acronym FANG.\nThese companies were Facebook, Amazon.com (NASDAQ:AMZN), Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) and Google. Almost immediately the weakness in this appellation became clear:\nWhere in the world was Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL)? OK, let's call it FAANG.\nAnd hey! Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) is really not as dead as people thought it would be! OK. How about FAANG+M? FANMAG?\n(Actually, Microsoft is very not dead, as at $2.5 trillion it is the largest public company in the world not named Saudi Aramco and has outperformed all of the other FAANGs.)\nWelp, turns out Google wants to change its name to Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG)(NASDAQ:GOOGL). OK, that gets awkward. On the Motley Fool Morning Show, we renamed the whole agglomeration of big cap tech \"FANAMA.\" Try and say that without hearing David Lee Roth's voice.\nSource: Getty Images.\nAnd then, this last week, Facebook changed its name to Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:FB). I was rooting for them to change it to Sugar Mountain, but no dice. All of this means that we can keep trying to shoehorn FAANG into some new acronym (Cramer decided to go with MAMAA, which, I mean...I guess.), or we can rethink this whole thing.\nAnd fear not, for the Morning Show team have done just that. We thought about the most influential consumer technology companies, and we came up with a list of eight.\nMicrosoft\nApple\nNetflix\nAmazon.com\nMeta Platforms\nAdobe (NASDAQ:ADBE)\nNvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA)\nAlphabet\nWhich spells out the incredibly great acronym MANAMANA. Go ahead, go listen to the song. We'll be right here.\nMANAMANA incorporates eight consumer technology companies ranging from $300 billion in market capitalization (Netflix) up to $2.5 trillion (Microsoft). Combined these companies are worth $10.8 trillion, which is 22% of the total market capitalization of all US public companies. In the last reported year these companies generated a combined $1.4 trillion in revenues. They are consumer technology monsters. Mutant companies.\nIn fact, I'd go so far as to say that as goes MANAMANA (doo doo de doo doo), so goes the US economy.\nNow, I know what you're saying right now. Adobe? Really? Yes, absolutely. For one, there is this:\nMSFT data by YCharts\nAdobe shares have outperformed every FANAMA company, and only trails Nvidia in MANAMANA. But perhaps more importantly, Adobe was at the forefront of of a sales model in the tech industry that is now commonplace to the point of cliché: Software as a Service. In 2012 Adobe changed its business model from buy-release-upgrade for Acrobat, Photoshop and inDesign to one where users paid a subscription and as a result got consistent upgrades to the most recent versions. This was a revolutionary move, and not only has it worked out quite satisfactorily for Adobe and its shareholders, but for thousands of other tech and non-tech companies. It is in all ways a societally important company.\nWith MANAMANA we capture an enormous swath of the American technology industry. With the addition of Adobe and Nvidia, this bellwether gains exposure to two segments of the technology that FANG, FAANG, FANAMA and MAMAA miss: creation and publication, and the power behind graphics processing units. These are massively important, growing segments of technology, and Nvidia and Adobe are without question the leaders.\nAnd ultimately that's the point of a bellwether -- to serve as a proxy to track something larger. FAANG was a great placeholder for American large cap technology for the better part of a decade.\nBut now it's time for MANAMANA. (Doo doo de doo doo.)","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6471240,"gmtCreate":1636156166606,"gmtModify":1636156166705,"authorId":4088412711170620,"author":{"id":4088412711170620,"authorId":4088412711170620,"name":"Kitsonlin","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f4c50ef7ee78d822dd86b84cd4150c59","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":842189584,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"up","text":"up","html":"up"}],"langContent":"CN"},{"id":842132487,"gmtCreate":1636154561029,"gmtModify":1636154562905,"author":{"id":"3576260758860416","authorId":"3576260758860416","name":"andrew123","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Nice","listText":"Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/842132487","repostId":2181748650,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2181748650","pubTimestamp":1636124925,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2181748650?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-05 23:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"FAANG is Dead. Long Live MANAMANA","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2181748650","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"With new top dogs, it's time to update the infamous acronym.","content":"In 2013 Mad Money's Jim Cramer casually launched one of the more widely adopted business mnemonics in history, describing the Four Horsemen of Big Tech by the acronym FANG.\nThese companies were Facebook, Amazon.com (NASDAQ:AMZN), Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) and Google. Almost immediately the weakness in this appellation became clear:\nWhere in the world was Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL)? OK, let's call it FAANG.\nAnd hey! Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) is really not as dead as people thought it would be! OK. How about FAANG+M? FANMAG?\n(Actually, Microsoft is very not dead, as at $2.5 trillion it is the largest public company in the world not named Saudi Aramco and has outperformed all of the other FAANGs.)\nWelp, turns out Google wants to change its name to Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG)(NASDAQ:GOOGL). OK, that gets awkward. On the Motley Fool Morning Show, we renamed the whole agglomeration of big cap tech \"FANAMA.\" Try and say that without hearing David Lee Roth's voice.\n<img src=\"https://g.foolcdn.com/image/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fg.foolcdn.com%2Feditorial%2Fimages%2F650833%2Fgettyimages-1348369701.jpg&amp;w=700&amp;op=resize\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">Source: Getty Images.\nAnd then, this last week, Facebook changed its name to <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FB\">Meta Platforms</a> (NASDAQ:FB). I was rooting for them to change it to Sugar Mountain, but no dice. All of this means that we can keep trying to shoehorn FAANG into some new acronym (Cramer decided to go with MAMAA, which, I mean...I guess.), or we can rethink this whole thing.\nAnd fear not, for the Morning Show team have done just that. We thought about the most influential consumer technology companies, and we came up with a list of eight.\nMicrosoft\nApple\nNetflix\nAmazon.com\nMeta Platforms\n<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ADBE\">Adobe</a> (NASDAQ:ADBE)\nNvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA)\nAlphabet\nWhich spells out the incredibly great acronym MANAMANA. Go ahead, go listen to the song. We'll be right here.\nMANAMANA incorporates eight consumer technology companies ranging from $300 billion in market capitalization (Netflix) up to $2.5 trillion (Microsoft). Combined these companies are worth $10.8 trillion, which is 22% of the total market capitalization of all US public companies. In the last reported year these companies generated a combined $1.4 trillion in revenues. They are consumer technology monsters. Mutant companies.\nIn fact, I'd go so far as to say that as goes MANAMANA (doo doo de doo doo), so goes the US economy.\nNow, I know what you're saying right now. Adobe? Really? Yes, absolutely. For one, there is this:\n<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad3d8664a4dd91b540d98c471291318b\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"551\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">MSFT data by YCharts\nAdobe shares have outperformed every FANAMA company, and only trails Nvidia in MANAMANA. But perhaps more importantly, Adobe was at the forefront of of a sales model in the tech industry that is now commonplace to the point of cliché: Software as a Service. In 2012 Adobe changed its business model from buy-release-upgrade for Acrobat, Photoshop and inDesign to one where users paid a subscription and as a result got consistent upgrades to the most recent versions. This was a revolutionary move, and not only has it worked out quite satisfactorily for Adobe and its shareholders, but for thousands of other tech and non-tech companies. It is in all ways a societally important company.\nWith MANAMANA we capture an enormous swath of the American technology industry. With the addition of Adobe and Nvidia, this bellwether gains exposure to two segments of the technology that FANG, FAANG, FANAMA and MAMAA miss: creation and publication, and the power behind graphics processing units. These are massively important, growing segments of technology, and Nvidia and Adobe are without question the leaders.\nAnd ultimately that's the point of a bellwether -- to serve as a proxy to track something larger. FAANG was a great placeholder for American large cap technology for the better part of a decade.\nBut now it's time for MANAMANA. (Doo doo de doo doo.)","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>FAANG is Dead. Long Live MANAMANA</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFAANG is Dead. Long Live MANAMANA\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-11-05 23:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/05/faang-is-dead-long-live-manamana/>Motley Fool</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nIn 2013 Mad Money's Jim Cramer casually launched one of the more widely adopted business mnemonics in history, describing the Four Horsemen of Big Tech by the acronym FANG.\nThese companies were ...\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/05/faang-is-dead-long-live-manamana/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NVDA":"英伟达","AMZN":"亚马逊","MSFT":"微软","GOOGL":"谷歌A","ADBE":"Adobe","AAPL":"苹果","NFLX":"奈飞"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/05/faang-is-dead-long-live-manamana/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2181748650","content_text":"In 2013 Mad Money's Jim Cramer casually launched one of the more widely adopted business mnemonics in history, describing the Four Horsemen of Big Tech by the acronym FANG.\nThese companies were Facebook, Amazon.com (NASDAQ:AMZN), Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) and Google. Almost immediately the weakness in this appellation became clear:\nWhere in the world was Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL)? OK, let's call it FAANG.\nAnd hey! Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) is really not as dead as people thought it would be! OK. How about FAANG+M? FANMAG?\n(Actually, Microsoft is very not dead, as at $2.5 trillion it is the largest public company in the world not named Saudi Aramco and has outperformed all of the other FAANGs.)\nWelp, turns out Google wants to change its name to Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG)(NASDAQ:GOOGL). OK, that gets awkward. On the Motley Fool Morning Show, we renamed the whole agglomeration of big cap tech \"FANAMA.\" Try and say that without hearing David Lee Roth's voice.\nSource: Getty Images.\nAnd then, this last week, Facebook changed its name to Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:FB). I was rooting for them to change it to Sugar Mountain, but no dice. All of this means that we can keep trying to shoehorn FAANG into some new acronym (Cramer decided to go with MAMAA, which, I mean...I guess.), or we can rethink this whole thing.\nAnd fear not, for the Morning Show team have done just that. We thought about the most influential consumer technology companies, and we came up with a list of eight.\nMicrosoft\nApple\nNetflix\nAmazon.com\nMeta Platforms\nAdobe (NASDAQ:ADBE)\nNvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA)\nAlphabet\nWhich spells out the incredibly great acronym MANAMANA. Go ahead, go listen to the song. We'll be right here.\nMANAMANA incorporates eight consumer technology companies ranging from $300 billion in market capitalization (Netflix) up to $2.5 trillion (Microsoft). Combined these companies are worth $10.8 trillion, which is 22% of the total market capitalization of all US public companies. In the last reported year these companies generated a combined $1.4 trillion in revenues. They are consumer technology monsters. Mutant companies.\nIn fact, I'd go so far as to say that as goes MANAMANA (doo doo de doo doo), so goes the US economy.\nNow, I know what you're saying right now. Adobe? Really? Yes, absolutely. For one, there is this:\nMSFT data by YCharts\nAdobe shares have outperformed every FANAMA company, and only trails Nvidia in MANAMANA. But perhaps more importantly, Adobe was at the forefront of of a sales model in the tech industry that is now commonplace to the point of cliché: Software as a Service. In 2012 Adobe changed its business model from buy-release-upgrade for Acrobat, Photoshop and inDesign to one where users paid a subscription and as a result got consistent upgrades to the most recent versions. This was a revolutionary move, and not only has it worked out quite satisfactorily for Adobe and its shareholders, but for thousands of other tech and non-tech companies. It is in all ways a societally important company.\nWith MANAMANA we capture an enormous swath of the American technology industry. With the addition of Adobe and Nvidia, this bellwether gains exposure to two segments of the technology that FANG, FAANG, FANAMA and MAMAA miss: creation and publication, and the power behind graphics processing units. These are massively important, growing segments of technology, and Nvidia and Adobe are without question the leaders.\nAnd ultimately that's the point of a bellwether -- to serve as a proxy to track something larger. FAANG was a great placeholder for American large cap technology for the better part of a decade.\nBut now it's time for MANAMANA. (Doo doo de doo doo.)","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6471115,"gmtCreate":1636155724458,"gmtModify":1636155724549,"authorId":3576274545052910,"author":{"id":3576274545052910,"authorId":3576274545052910,"name":"Kevin92","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5ff4addbbdb8d9d15fec29f9709b0c3","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":842132487,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Like","text":"Like","html":"Like"}],"langContent":"CN"},{"id":842131084,"gmtCreate":1636154259374,"gmtModify":1636154259877,"author":{"id":"3555200317437246","authorId":"3555200317437246","name":"yigenxiaohai","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/493bca1476b5cd25c281ec3581efdc01","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/842131084","repostId":2181748650,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2181748650","pubTimestamp":1636124925,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2181748650?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-05 23:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"FAANG is Dead. Long Live MANAMANA","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2181748650","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"With new top dogs, it's time to update the infamous acronym.","content":"In 2013 Mad Money's Jim Cramer casually launched one of the more widely adopted business mnemonics in history, describing the Four Horsemen of Big Tech by the acronym FANG.\nThese companies were Facebook, Amazon.com (NASDAQ:AMZN), Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) and Google. Almost immediately the weakness in this appellation became clear:\nWhere in the world was Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL)? OK, let's call it FAANG.\nAnd hey! Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) is really not as dead as people thought it would be! OK. How about FAANG+M? FANMAG?\n(Actually, Microsoft is very not dead, as at $2.5 trillion it is the largest public company in the world not named Saudi Aramco and has outperformed all of the other FAANGs.)\nWelp, turns out Google wants to change its name to Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG)(NASDAQ:GOOGL). OK, that gets awkward. On the Motley Fool Morning Show, we renamed the whole agglomeration of big cap tech \"FANAMA.\" Try and say that without hearing David Lee Roth's voice.\n<img src=\"https://g.foolcdn.com/image/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fg.foolcdn.com%2Feditorial%2Fimages%2F650833%2Fgettyimages-1348369701.jpg&amp;w=700&amp;op=resize\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">Source: Getty Images.\nAnd then, this last week, Facebook changed its name to <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FB\">Meta Platforms</a> (NASDAQ:FB). I was rooting for them to change it to Sugar Mountain, but no dice. All of this means that we can keep trying to shoehorn FAANG into some new acronym (Cramer decided to go with MAMAA, which, I mean...I guess.), or we can rethink this whole thing.\nAnd fear not, for the Morning Show team have done just that. We thought about the most influential consumer technology companies, and we came up with a list of eight.\nMicrosoft\nApple\nNetflix\nAmazon.com\nMeta Platforms\n<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ADBE\">Adobe</a> (NASDAQ:ADBE)\nNvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA)\nAlphabet\nWhich spells out the incredibly great acronym MANAMANA. Go ahead, go listen to the song. We'll be right here.\nMANAMANA incorporates eight consumer technology companies ranging from $300 billion in market capitalization (Netflix) up to $2.5 trillion (Microsoft). Combined these companies are worth $10.8 trillion, which is 22% of the total market capitalization of all US public companies. In the last reported year these companies generated a combined $1.4 trillion in revenues. They are consumer technology monsters. Mutant companies.\nIn fact, I'd go so far as to say that as goes MANAMANA (doo doo de doo doo), so goes the US economy.\nNow, I know what you're saying right now. Adobe? Really? Yes, absolutely. For one, there is this:\n<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad3d8664a4dd91b540d98c471291318b\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"551\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">MSFT data by YCharts\nAdobe shares have outperformed every FANAMA company, and only trails Nvidia in MANAMANA. But perhaps more importantly, Adobe was at the forefront of of a sales model in the tech industry that is now commonplace to the point of cliché: Software as a Service. In 2012 Adobe changed its business model from buy-release-upgrade for Acrobat, Photoshop and inDesign to one where users paid a subscription and as a result got consistent upgrades to the most recent versions. This was a revolutionary move, and not only has it worked out quite satisfactorily for Adobe and its shareholders, but for thousands of other tech and non-tech companies. It is in all ways a societally important company.\nWith MANAMANA we capture an enormous swath of the American technology industry. With the addition of Adobe and Nvidia, this bellwether gains exposure to two segments of the technology that FANG, FAANG, FANAMA and MAMAA miss: creation and publication, and the power behind graphics processing units. These are massively important, growing segments of technology, and Nvidia and Adobe are without question the leaders.\nAnd ultimately that's the point of a bellwether -- to serve as a proxy to track something larger. FAANG was a great placeholder for American large cap technology for the better part of a decade.\nBut now it's time for MANAMANA. (Doo doo de doo doo.)","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>FAANG is Dead. Long Live MANAMANA</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFAANG is Dead. Long Live MANAMANA\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-11-05 23:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/05/faang-is-dead-long-live-manamana/>Motley Fool</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nIn 2013 Mad Money's Jim Cramer casually launched one of the more widely adopted business mnemonics in history, describing the Four Horsemen of Big Tech by the acronym FANG.\nThese companies were ...\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/05/faang-is-dead-long-live-manamana/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NVDA":"英伟达","AMZN":"亚马逊","MSFT":"微软","GOOGL":"谷歌A","ADBE":"Adobe","AAPL":"苹果","NFLX":"奈飞"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/05/faang-is-dead-long-live-manamana/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2181748650","content_text":"In 2013 Mad Money's Jim Cramer casually launched one of the more widely adopted business mnemonics in history, describing the Four Horsemen of Big Tech by the acronym FANG.\nThese companies were Facebook, Amazon.com (NASDAQ:AMZN), Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) and Google. Almost immediately the weakness in this appellation became clear:\nWhere in the world was Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL)? OK, let's call it FAANG.\nAnd hey! Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) is really not as dead as people thought it would be! OK. How about FAANG+M? FANMAG?\n(Actually, Microsoft is very not dead, as at $2.5 trillion it is the largest public company in the world not named Saudi Aramco and has outperformed all of the other FAANGs.)\nWelp, turns out Google wants to change its name to Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG)(NASDAQ:GOOGL). OK, that gets awkward. On the Motley Fool Morning Show, we renamed the whole agglomeration of big cap tech \"FANAMA.\" Try and say that without hearing David Lee Roth's voice.\nSource: Getty Images.\nAnd then, this last week, Facebook changed its name to Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:FB). I was rooting for them to change it to Sugar Mountain, but no dice. All of this means that we can keep trying to shoehorn FAANG into some new acronym (Cramer decided to go with MAMAA, which, I mean...I guess.), or we can rethink this whole thing.\nAnd fear not, for the Morning Show team have done just that. We thought about the most influential consumer technology companies, and we came up with a list of eight.\nMicrosoft\nApple\nNetflix\nAmazon.com\nMeta Platforms\nAdobe (NASDAQ:ADBE)\nNvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA)\nAlphabet\nWhich spells out the incredibly great acronym MANAMANA. Go ahead, go listen to the song. We'll be right here.\nMANAMANA incorporates eight consumer technology companies ranging from $300 billion in market capitalization (Netflix) up to $2.5 trillion (Microsoft). Combined these companies are worth $10.8 trillion, which is 22% of the total market capitalization of all US public companies. In the last reported year these companies generated a combined $1.4 trillion in revenues. They are consumer technology monsters. Mutant companies.\nIn fact, I'd go so far as to say that as goes MANAMANA (doo doo de doo doo), so goes the US economy.\nNow, I know what you're saying right now. Adobe? Really? Yes, absolutely. For one, there is this:\nMSFT data by YCharts\nAdobe shares have outperformed every FANAMA company, and only trails Nvidia in MANAMANA. But perhaps more importantly, Adobe was at the forefront of of a sales model in the tech industry that is now commonplace to the point of cliché: Software as a Service. In 2012 Adobe changed its business model from buy-release-upgrade for Acrobat, Photoshop and inDesign to one where users paid a subscription and as a result got consistent upgrades to the most recent versions. This was a revolutionary move, and not only has it worked out quite satisfactorily for Adobe and its shareholders, but for thousands of other tech and non-tech companies. It is in all ways a societally important company.\nWith MANAMANA we capture an enormous swath of the American technology industry. With the addition of Adobe and Nvidia, this bellwether gains exposure to two segments of the technology that FANG, FAANG, FANAMA and MAMAA miss: creation and publication, and the power behind graphics processing units. These are massively important, growing segments of technology, and Nvidia and Adobe are without question the leaders.\nAnd ultimately that's the point of a bellwether -- to serve as a proxy to track something larger. FAANG was a great placeholder for American large cap technology for the better part of a decade.\nBut now it's time for MANAMANA. (Doo doo de doo doo.)","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6474634,"gmtCreate":1636170110787,"gmtModify":1636170110820,"authorId":3583303538758982,"author":{"id":3583303538758982,"authorId":3583303538758982,"name":"Jaja2000","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9058adeb729c44f0908d5e0c46c03489","vip":1,"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":842131084,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"ok","text":"ok","html":"ok"}],"langContent":"CN"},{"id":842197138,"gmtCreate":1636153852167,"gmtModify":1636153852688,"author":{"id":"3570186020309805","authorId":"3570186020309805","name":"GoG","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1c9fbe31d027bcf439a17955df60352f","vip":1,"crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"No Tsla?","listText":"No Tsla?","text":"No Tsla?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/842197138","repostId":2181748650,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2181748650","pubTimestamp":1636124925,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2181748650?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-05 23:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"FAANG is Dead. Long Live MANAMANA","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2181748650","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"With new top dogs, it's time to update the infamous acronym.","content":"In 2013 Mad Money's Jim Cramer casually launched one of the more widely adopted business mnemonics in history, describing the Four Horsemen of Big Tech by the acronym FANG.\nThese companies were Facebook, Amazon.com (NASDAQ:AMZN), Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) and Google. Almost immediately the weakness in this appellation became clear:\nWhere in the world was Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL)? OK, let's call it FAANG.\nAnd hey! Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) is really not as dead as people thought it would be! OK. How about FAANG+M? FANMAG?\n(Actually, Microsoft is very not dead, as at $2.5 trillion it is the largest public company in the world not named Saudi Aramco and has outperformed all of the other FAANGs.)\nWelp, turns out Google wants to change its name to Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG)(NASDAQ:GOOGL). OK, that gets awkward. On the Motley Fool Morning Show, we renamed the whole agglomeration of big cap tech \"FANAMA.\" Try and say that without hearing David Lee Roth's voice.\n<img src=\"https://g.foolcdn.com/image/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fg.foolcdn.com%2Feditorial%2Fimages%2F650833%2Fgettyimages-1348369701.jpg&amp;w=700&amp;op=resize\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">Source: Getty Images.\nAnd then, this last week, Facebook changed its name to <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FB\">Meta Platforms</a> (NASDAQ:FB). I was rooting for them to change it to Sugar Mountain, but no dice. All of this means that we can keep trying to shoehorn FAANG into some new acronym (Cramer decided to go with MAMAA, which, I mean...I guess.), or we can rethink this whole thing.\nAnd fear not, for the Morning Show team have done just that. We thought about the most influential consumer technology companies, and we came up with a list of eight.\nMicrosoft\nApple\nNetflix\nAmazon.com\nMeta Platforms\n<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ADBE\">Adobe</a> (NASDAQ:ADBE)\nNvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA)\nAlphabet\nWhich spells out the incredibly great acronym MANAMANA. Go ahead, go listen to the song. We'll be right here.\nMANAMANA incorporates eight consumer technology companies ranging from $300 billion in market capitalization (Netflix) up to $2.5 trillion (Microsoft). Combined these companies are worth $10.8 trillion, which is 22% of the total market capitalization of all US public companies. In the last reported year these companies generated a combined $1.4 trillion in revenues. They are consumer technology monsters. Mutant companies.\nIn fact, I'd go so far as to say that as goes MANAMANA (doo doo de doo doo), so goes the US economy.\nNow, I know what you're saying right now. Adobe? Really? Yes, absolutely. For one, there is this:\n<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad3d8664a4dd91b540d98c471291318b\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"551\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">MSFT data by YCharts\nAdobe shares have outperformed every FANAMA company, and only trails Nvidia in MANAMANA. But perhaps more importantly, Adobe was at the forefront of of a sales model in the tech industry that is now commonplace to the point of cliché: Software as a Service. In 2012 Adobe changed its business model from buy-release-upgrade for Acrobat, Photoshop and inDesign to one where users paid a subscription and as a result got consistent upgrades to the most recent versions. This was a revolutionary move, and not only has it worked out quite satisfactorily for Adobe and its shareholders, but for thousands of other tech and non-tech companies. It is in all ways a societally important company.\nWith MANAMANA we capture an enormous swath of the American technology industry. With the addition of Adobe and Nvidia, this bellwether gains exposure to two segments of the technology that FANG, FAANG, FANAMA and MAMAA miss: creation and publication, and the power behind graphics processing units. These are massively important, growing segments of technology, and Nvidia and Adobe are without question the leaders.\nAnd ultimately that's the point of a bellwether -- to serve as a proxy to track something larger. FAANG was a great placeholder for American large cap technology for the better part of a decade.\nBut now it's time for MANAMANA. (Doo doo de doo doo.)","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>FAANG is Dead. Long Live MANAMANA</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFAANG is Dead. Long Live MANAMANA\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-11-05 23:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/05/faang-is-dead-long-live-manamana/>Motley Fool</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nIn 2013 Mad Money's Jim Cramer casually launched one of the more widely adopted business mnemonics in history, describing the Four Horsemen of Big Tech by the acronym FANG.\nThese companies were ...\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/05/faang-is-dead-long-live-manamana/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NVDA":"英伟达","AMZN":"亚马逊","MSFT":"微软","GOOGL":"谷歌A","ADBE":"Adobe","AAPL":"苹果","NFLX":"奈飞"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/05/faang-is-dead-long-live-manamana/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2181748650","content_text":"In 2013 Mad Money's Jim Cramer casually launched one of the more widely adopted business mnemonics in history, describing the Four Horsemen of Big Tech by the acronym FANG.\nThese companies were Facebook, Amazon.com (NASDAQ:AMZN), Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) and Google. Almost immediately the weakness in this appellation became clear:\nWhere in the world was Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL)? OK, let's call it FAANG.\nAnd hey! Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) is really not as dead as people thought it would be! OK. How about FAANG+M? FANMAG?\n(Actually, Microsoft is very not dead, as at $2.5 trillion it is the largest public company in the world not named Saudi Aramco and has outperformed all of the other FAANGs.)\nWelp, turns out Google wants to change its name to Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG)(NASDAQ:GOOGL). OK, that gets awkward. On the Motley Fool Morning Show, we renamed the whole agglomeration of big cap tech \"FANAMA.\" Try and say that without hearing David Lee Roth's voice.\nSource: Getty Images.\nAnd then, this last week, Facebook changed its name to Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:FB). I was rooting for them to change it to Sugar Mountain, but no dice. All of this means that we can keep trying to shoehorn FAANG into some new acronym (Cramer decided to go with MAMAA, which, I mean...I guess.), or we can rethink this whole thing.\nAnd fear not, for the Morning Show team have done just that. We thought about the most influential consumer technology companies, and we came up with a list of eight.\nMicrosoft\nApple\nNetflix\nAmazon.com\nMeta Platforms\nAdobe (NASDAQ:ADBE)\nNvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA)\nAlphabet\nWhich spells out the incredibly great acronym MANAMANA. Go ahead, go listen to the song. We'll be right here.\nMANAMANA incorporates eight consumer technology companies ranging from $300 billion in market capitalization (Netflix) up to $2.5 trillion (Microsoft). Combined these companies are worth $10.8 trillion, which is 22% of the total market capitalization of all US public companies. In the last reported year these companies generated a combined $1.4 trillion in revenues. They are consumer technology monsters. Mutant companies.\nIn fact, I'd go so far as to say that as goes MANAMANA (doo doo de doo doo), so goes the US economy.\nNow, I know what you're saying right now. Adobe? Really? Yes, absolutely. For one, there is this:\nMSFT data by YCharts\nAdobe shares have outperformed every FANAMA company, and only trails Nvidia in MANAMANA. But perhaps more importantly, Adobe was at the forefront of of a sales model in the tech industry that is now commonplace to the point of cliché: Software as a Service. In 2012 Adobe changed its business model from buy-release-upgrade for Acrobat, Photoshop and inDesign to one where users paid a subscription and as a result got consistent upgrades to the most recent versions. This was a revolutionary move, and not only has it worked out quite satisfactorily for Adobe and its shareholders, but for thousands of other tech and non-tech companies. It is in all ways a societally important company.\nWith MANAMANA we capture an enormous swath of the American technology industry. With the addition of Adobe and Nvidia, this bellwether gains exposure to two segments of the technology that FANG, FAANG, FANAMA and MAMAA miss: creation and publication, and the power behind graphics processing units. These are massively important, growing segments of technology, and Nvidia and Adobe are without question the leaders.\nAnd ultimately that's the point of a bellwether -- to serve as a proxy to track something larger. FAANG was a great placeholder for American large cap technology for the better part of a decade.\nBut now it's time for MANAMANA. (Doo doo de doo doo.)","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"CN"},{"id":842199386,"gmtCreate":1636153162199,"gmtModify":1636153162724,"author":{"id":"3578020712938440","authorId":"3578020712938440","name":"Gaik11","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Okay","listText":"Okay","text":"Okay","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/842199386","repostId":2181748650,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2181748650","pubTimestamp":1636124925,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2181748650?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-05 23:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"FAANG is Dead. Long Live MANAMANA","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2181748650","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"With new top dogs, it's time to update the infamous acronym.","content":"In 2013 Mad Money's Jim Cramer casually launched one of the more widely adopted business mnemonics in history, describing the Four Horsemen of Big Tech by the acronym FANG.\nThese companies were Facebook, Amazon.com (NASDAQ:AMZN), Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) and Google. Almost immediately the weakness in this appellation became clear:\nWhere in the world was Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL)? OK, let's call it FAANG.\nAnd hey! Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) is really not as dead as people thought it would be! OK. How about FAANG+M? FANMAG?\n(Actually, Microsoft is very not dead, as at $2.5 trillion it is the largest public company in the world not named Saudi Aramco and has outperformed all of the other FAANGs.)\nWelp, turns out Google wants to change its name to Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG)(NASDAQ:GOOGL). OK, that gets awkward. On the Motley Fool Morning Show, we renamed the whole agglomeration of big cap tech \"FANAMA.\" Try and say that without hearing David Lee Roth's voice.\n<img src=\"https://g.foolcdn.com/image/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fg.foolcdn.com%2Feditorial%2Fimages%2F650833%2Fgettyimages-1348369701.jpg&amp;w=700&amp;op=resize\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">Source: Getty Images.\nAnd then, this last week, Facebook changed its name to <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FB\">Meta Platforms</a> (NASDAQ:FB). I was rooting for them to change it to Sugar Mountain, but no dice. All of this means that we can keep trying to shoehorn FAANG into some new acronym (Cramer decided to go with MAMAA, which, I mean...I guess.), or we can rethink this whole thing.\nAnd fear not, for the Morning Show team have done just that. We thought about the most influential consumer technology companies, and we came up with a list of eight.\nMicrosoft\nApple\nNetflix\nAmazon.com\nMeta Platforms\n<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ADBE\">Adobe</a> (NASDAQ:ADBE)\nNvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA)\nAlphabet\nWhich spells out the incredibly great acronym MANAMANA. Go ahead, go listen to the song. We'll be right here.\nMANAMANA incorporates eight consumer technology companies ranging from $300 billion in market capitalization (Netflix) up to $2.5 trillion (Microsoft). Combined these companies are worth $10.8 trillion, which is 22% of the total market capitalization of all US public companies. In the last reported year these companies generated a combined $1.4 trillion in revenues. They are consumer technology monsters. Mutant companies.\nIn fact, I'd go so far as to say that as goes MANAMANA (doo doo de doo doo), so goes the US economy.\nNow, I know what you're saying right now. Adobe? Really? Yes, absolutely. For one, there is this:\n<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad3d8664a4dd91b540d98c471291318b\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"551\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">MSFT data by YCharts\nAdobe shares have outperformed every FANAMA company, and only trails Nvidia in MANAMANA. But perhaps more importantly, Adobe was at the forefront of of a sales model in the tech industry that is now commonplace to the point of cliché: Software as a Service. In 2012 Adobe changed its business model from buy-release-upgrade for Acrobat, Photoshop and inDesign to one where users paid a subscription and as a result got consistent upgrades to the most recent versions. This was a revolutionary move, and not only has it worked out quite satisfactorily for Adobe and its shareholders, but for thousands of other tech and non-tech companies. It is in all ways a societally important company.\nWith MANAMANA we capture an enormous swath of the American technology industry. With the addition of Adobe and Nvidia, this bellwether gains exposure to two segments of the technology that FANG, FAANG, FANAMA and MAMAA miss: creation and publication, and the power behind graphics processing units. These are massively important, growing segments of technology, and Nvidia and Adobe are without question the leaders.\nAnd ultimately that's the point of a bellwether -- to serve as a proxy to track something larger. FAANG was a great placeholder for American large cap technology for the better part of a decade.\nBut now it's time for MANAMANA. (Doo doo de doo doo.)","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>FAANG is Dead. Long Live MANAMANA</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFAANG is Dead. Long Live MANAMANA\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-11-05 23:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/05/faang-is-dead-long-live-manamana/>Motley Fool</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nIn 2013 Mad Money's Jim Cramer casually launched one of the more widely adopted business mnemonics in history, describing the Four Horsemen of Big Tech by the acronym FANG.\nThese companies were ...\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/05/faang-is-dead-long-live-manamana/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NVDA":"英伟达","AMZN":"亚马逊","MSFT":"微软","GOOGL":"谷歌A","ADBE":"Adobe","AAPL":"苹果","NFLX":"奈飞"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/05/faang-is-dead-long-live-manamana/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2181748650","content_text":"In 2013 Mad Money's Jim Cramer casually launched one of the more widely adopted business mnemonics in history, describing the Four Horsemen of Big Tech by the acronym FANG.\nThese companies were Facebook, Amazon.com (NASDAQ:AMZN), Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) and Google. Almost immediately the weakness in this appellation became clear:\nWhere in the world was Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL)? OK, let's call it FAANG.\nAnd hey! Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) is really not as dead as people thought it would be! OK. How about FAANG+M? FANMAG?\n(Actually, Microsoft is very not dead, as at $2.5 trillion it is the largest public company in the world not named Saudi Aramco and has outperformed all of the other FAANGs.)\nWelp, turns out Google wants to change its name to Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG)(NASDAQ:GOOGL). OK, that gets awkward. On the Motley Fool Morning Show, we renamed the whole agglomeration of big cap tech \"FANAMA.\" Try and say that without hearing David Lee Roth's voice.\nSource: Getty Images.\nAnd then, this last week, Facebook changed its name to Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:FB). I was rooting for them to change it to Sugar Mountain, but no dice. All of this means that we can keep trying to shoehorn FAANG into some new acronym (Cramer decided to go with MAMAA, which, I mean...I guess.), or we can rethink this whole thing.\nAnd fear not, for the Morning Show team have done just that. We thought about the most influential consumer technology companies, and we came up with a list of eight.\nMicrosoft\nApple\nNetflix\nAmazon.com\nMeta Platforms\nAdobe (NASDAQ:ADBE)\nNvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA)\nAlphabet\nWhich spells out the incredibly great acronym MANAMANA. Go ahead, go listen to the song. We'll be right here.\nMANAMANA incorporates eight consumer technology companies ranging from $300 billion in market capitalization (Netflix) up to $2.5 trillion (Microsoft). Combined these companies are worth $10.8 trillion, which is 22% of the total market capitalization of all US public companies. In the last reported year these companies generated a combined $1.4 trillion in revenues. They are consumer technology monsters. Mutant companies.\nIn fact, I'd go so far as to say that as goes MANAMANA (doo doo de doo doo), so goes the US economy.\nNow, I know what you're saying right now. Adobe? Really? Yes, absolutely. For one, there is this:\nMSFT data by YCharts\nAdobe shares have outperformed every FANAMA company, and only trails Nvidia in MANAMANA. But perhaps more importantly, Adobe was at the forefront of of a sales model in the tech industry that is now commonplace to the point of cliché: Software as a Service. In 2012 Adobe changed its business model from buy-release-upgrade for Acrobat, Photoshop and inDesign to one where users paid a subscription and as a result got consistent upgrades to the most recent versions. This was a revolutionary move, and not only has it worked out quite satisfactorily for Adobe and its shareholders, but for thousands of other tech and non-tech companies. It is in all ways a societally important company.\nWith MANAMANA we capture an enormous swath of the American technology industry. With the addition of Adobe and Nvidia, this bellwether gains exposure to two segments of the technology that FANG, FAANG, FANAMA and MAMAA miss: creation and publication, and the power behind graphics processing units. These are massively important, growing segments of technology, and Nvidia and Adobe are without question the leaders.\nAnd ultimately that's the point of a bellwether -- to serve as a proxy to track something larger. FAANG was a great placeholder for American large cap technology for the better part of a decade.\nBut now it's time for MANAMANA. (Doo doo de doo doo.)","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6470645,"gmtCreate":1636153173141,"gmtModify":1636153173224,"authorId":3578020712938440,"author":{"id":3578020712938440,"authorId":3578020712938440,"name":"Gaik11","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":842199386,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Ok","text":"Ok","html":"Ok"}],"langContent":"CN"},{"id":842109226,"gmtCreate":1636152042910,"gmtModify":1636162044186,"author":{"id":"3573540190522229","authorId":"3573540190522229","name":"Bull_Lion","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/97c7d011186160cd333508e7d9191f74","vip":1,"crmLevel":7,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"The fool is great for writing silly articles like this one. 😂.&nbsp;But I wouldn’t put money on any of its recommendations&nbsp;","listText":"The fool is great for writing silly articles like this one. 😂.&nbsp;But I wouldn’t put money on any of its recommendations&nbsp;","text":"The fool is great for writing silly articles like this one. 😂. But I wouldn’t put money on any of its recommendations","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/842109226","repostId":2181748650,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2181748650","pubTimestamp":1636124925,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2181748650?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-05 23:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"FAANG is Dead. Long Live MANAMANA","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2181748650","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"With new top dogs, it's time to update the infamous acronym.","content":"In 2013 Mad Money's Jim Cramer casually launched one of the more widely adopted business mnemonics in history, describing the Four Horsemen of Big Tech by the acronym FANG.\nThese companies were Facebook, Amazon.com (NASDAQ:AMZN), Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) and Google. Almost immediately the weakness in this appellation became clear:\nWhere in the world was Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL)? OK, let's call it FAANG.\nAnd hey! Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) is really not as dead as people thought it would be! OK. How about FAANG+M? FANMAG?\n(Actually, Microsoft is very not dead, as at $2.5 trillion it is the largest public company in the world not named Saudi Aramco and has outperformed all of the other FAANGs.)\nWelp, turns out Google wants to change its name to Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG)(NASDAQ:GOOGL). OK, that gets awkward. On the Motley Fool Morning Show, we renamed the whole agglomeration of big cap tech \"FANAMA.\" Try and say that without hearing David Lee Roth's voice.\n<img src=\"https://g.foolcdn.com/image/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fg.foolcdn.com%2Feditorial%2Fimages%2F650833%2Fgettyimages-1348369701.jpg&amp;w=700&amp;op=resize\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">Source: Getty Images.\nAnd then, this last week, Facebook changed its name to <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FB\">Meta Platforms</a> (NASDAQ:FB). I was rooting for them to change it to Sugar Mountain, but no dice. All of this means that we can keep trying to shoehorn FAANG into some new acronym (Cramer decided to go with MAMAA, which, I mean...I guess.), or we can rethink this whole thing.\nAnd fear not, for the Morning Show team have done just that. We thought about the most influential consumer technology companies, and we came up with a list of eight.\nMicrosoft\nApple\nNetflix\nAmazon.com\nMeta Platforms\n<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ADBE\">Adobe</a> (NASDAQ:ADBE)\nNvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA)\nAlphabet\nWhich spells out the incredibly great acronym MANAMANA. Go ahead, go listen to the song. We'll be right here.\nMANAMANA incorporates eight consumer technology companies ranging from $300 billion in market capitalization (Netflix) up to $2.5 trillion (Microsoft). Combined these companies are worth $10.8 trillion, which is 22% of the total market capitalization of all US public companies. In the last reported year these companies generated a combined $1.4 trillion in revenues. They are consumer technology monsters. Mutant companies.\nIn fact, I'd go so far as to say that as goes MANAMANA (doo doo de doo doo), so goes the US economy.\nNow, I know what you're saying right now. Adobe? Really? Yes, absolutely. For one, there is this:\n<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad3d8664a4dd91b540d98c471291318b\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"551\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">MSFT data by YCharts\nAdobe shares have outperformed every FANAMA company, and only trails Nvidia in MANAMANA. But perhaps more importantly, Adobe was at the forefront of of a sales model in the tech industry that is now commonplace to the point of cliché: Software as a Service. In 2012 Adobe changed its business model from buy-release-upgrade for Acrobat, Photoshop and inDesign to one where users paid a subscription and as a result got consistent upgrades to the most recent versions. This was a revolutionary move, and not only has it worked out quite satisfactorily for Adobe and its shareholders, but for thousands of other tech and non-tech companies. It is in all ways a societally important company.\nWith MANAMANA we capture an enormous swath of the American technology industry. With the addition of Adobe and Nvidia, this bellwether gains exposure to two segments of the technology that FANG, FAANG, FANAMA and MAMAA miss: creation and publication, and the power behind graphics processing units. These are massively important, growing segments of technology, and Nvidia and Adobe are without question the leaders.\nAnd ultimately that's the point of a bellwether -- to serve as a proxy to track something larger. FAANG was a great placeholder for American large cap technology for the better part of a decade.\nBut now it's time for MANAMANA. (Doo doo de doo doo.)","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>FAANG is Dead. Long Live MANAMANA</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFAANG is Dead. Long Live MANAMANA\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-11-05 23:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/05/faang-is-dead-long-live-manamana/>Motley Fool</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nIn 2013 Mad Money's Jim Cramer casually launched one of the more widely adopted business mnemonics in history, describing the Four Horsemen of Big Tech by the acronym FANG.\nThese companies were ...\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/05/faang-is-dead-long-live-manamana/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NVDA":"英伟达","AMZN":"亚马逊","MSFT":"微软","GOOGL":"谷歌A","ADBE":"Adobe","AAPL":"苹果","NFLX":"奈飞"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/05/faang-is-dead-long-live-manamana/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2181748650","content_text":"In 2013 Mad Money's Jim Cramer casually launched one of the more widely adopted business mnemonics in history, describing the Four Horsemen of Big Tech by the acronym FANG.\nThese companies were Facebook, Amazon.com (NASDAQ:AMZN), Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) and Google. Almost immediately the weakness in this appellation became clear:\nWhere in the world was Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL)? OK, let's call it FAANG.\nAnd hey! Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) is really not as dead as people thought it would be! OK. How about FAANG+M? FANMAG?\n(Actually, Microsoft is very not dead, as at $2.5 trillion it is the largest public company in the world not named Saudi Aramco and has outperformed all of the other FAANGs.)\nWelp, turns out Google wants to change its name to Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG)(NASDAQ:GOOGL). OK, that gets awkward. On the Motley Fool Morning Show, we renamed the whole agglomeration of big cap tech \"FANAMA.\" Try and say that without hearing David Lee Roth's voice.\nSource: Getty Images.\nAnd then, this last week, Facebook changed its name to Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:FB). I was rooting for them to change it to Sugar Mountain, but no dice. All of this means that we can keep trying to shoehorn FAANG into some new acronym (Cramer decided to go with MAMAA, which, I mean...I guess.), or we can rethink this whole thing.\nAnd fear not, for the Morning Show team have done just that. We thought about the most influential consumer technology companies, and we came up with a list of eight.\nMicrosoft\nApple\nNetflix\nAmazon.com\nMeta Platforms\nAdobe (NASDAQ:ADBE)\nNvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA)\nAlphabet\nWhich spells out the incredibly great acronym MANAMANA. Go ahead, go listen to the song. We'll be right here.\nMANAMANA incorporates eight consumer technology companies ranging from $300 billion in market capitalization (Netflix) up to $2.5 trillion (Microsoft). Combined these companies are worth $10.8 trillion, which is 22% of the total market capitalization of all US public companies. In the last reported year these companies generated a combined $1.4 trillion in revenues. They are consumer technology monsters. Mutant companies.\nIn fact, I'd go so far as to say that as goes MANAMANA (doo doo de doo doo), so goes the US economy.\nNow, I know what you're saying right now. Adobe? Really? Yes, absolutely. For one, there is this:\nMSFT data by YCharts\nAdobe shares have outperformed every FANAMA company, and only trails Nvidia in MANAMANA. But perhaps more importantly, Adobe was at the forefront of of a sales model in the tech industry that is now commonplace to the point of cliché: Software as a Service. In 2012 Adobe changed its business model from buy-release-upgrade for Acrobat, Photoshop and inDesign to one where users paid a subscription and as a result got consistent upgrades to the most recent versions. This was a revolutionary move, and not only has it worked out quite satisfactorily for Adobe and its shareholders, but for thousands of other tech and non-tech companies. It is in all ways a societally important company.\nWith MANAMANA we capture an enormous swath of the American technology industry. With the addition of Adobe and Nvidia, this bellwether gains exposure to two segments of the technology that FANG, FAANG, FANAMA and MAMAA miss: creation and publication, and the power behind graphics processing units. These are massively important, growing segments of technology, and Nvidia and Adobe are without question the leaders.\nAnd ultimately that's the point of a bellwether -- to serve as a proxy to track something larger. FAANG was a great placeholder for American large cap technology for the better part of a decade.\nBut now it's time for MANAMANA. (Doo doo de doo doo.)","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"CN"}],"hasMoreComments":true,"newsSizeData":{"likeSize":242,"commentSize":38,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":3,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false}}