ok_老虎社区_美港股上老虎

LeoTWY
2021-11-25

JPMorgan Balks at Taking Back Trader After Unfair Firing Ruling

JPMorgan Chase & Co. doesn’t want to give a former trader his job back despite a finding that he was

JPMorgan Balks at Taking Back Trader After Unfair Firing Ruling

免责声明：上述内容仅代表发帖人个人观点，不构成本平台的任何投资建议。

推荐
最新

暂无评论

热议股票

关于我们·老虎社区守则·老虎社区账号管理规范·老虎社区服务协议·老虎社区隐私政策

公司名称：北京至简风宜信息技术有限公司

违法和不良信息投诉：010-5681-3562（工作时间9:30-18:30）

邮箱：service@laohu8.com

营业执照：91110105MA01A4U55R

ICP备：京ICP备18016422号

网安备：京公网安备11010502036490

关注我们

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"data":{"magic":2,"id":874538037,"tweetId":"874538037","gmtCreate":1637799831068,"gmtModify":1637799831068,"author":{"id":4097040509001420,"authorId":4097040509001420,"authorIdStr":"4097040509001420","name":"LeoTWY","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8829ac3c3b10e8fb42299abeba5ea9f9","vip":1,"userType":1,"introduction":"","boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"crmLevel":7,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"fanSize":4,"starInvestorFlag":false},"themes":[],"images":[],"coverImages":[],"extraTitle":"","html":"<html><head></head><body><p>ok</p></body></html>","htmlText":"<html><head></head><body><p>ok</p></body></html>","text":"ok","highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/874538037","repostId":1174244276,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1174244276","pubTimestamp":1637796235,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1174244276?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-25 07:23","market":"us","language":"en","title":"JPMorgan Balks at Taking Back Trader After Unfair Firing Ruling","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1174244276","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"JPMorgan Chase & Co. doesn’t want to give a former trader his job back despite a finding that he was","content":"<p>JPMorgan Chase &amp; Co. doesn’t want to give a former trader his job back despite a finding that he was unfairly dismissed by the bank to “appease its regulators” in a market-spoofing probe.</p>\n<p>Bradley Jones, a former cash equities trader, is this week arguing for an order of reinstatement from the London employment tribunal that ruled in his favor in July. The U.S. bank contends his job no longer exists and no comparable role is available. It also said it wasn’t confident that Jones could be certified as fit and proper under market regulator’s guidelines, despite his successful wrongful termination claim.</p>\n<p>JPMorgan, which is appealing that ruling, further argues Jones doesn’t genuinely wish to work there again and is merely attempting to circumvent the nearly 90,000-pound cap on compensation awards in U.K. employment cases.</p>\n<p>The bank declined to comment on the matter. A lawyer for Jones didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.</p>\n<p>Jones successfully argued to the tribunal earlier this year that he was only fired because the bank wanted to show it was taking a tougher line on a spoofing scandal that cost it close to $1 billion in penalties.</p>\n<p>The tribunal judge in his earlier ruling rejected JPMorgan’s claims that Jones engaged in spoofing himself and found the bank fired him “because of its desire to appease its regulators by showing it was ‘cleaning up its act.’”</p>\n<p>On the witness stand in April, Jones expressed a desire to return to his old job, noting that some of his colleagues walked out of the bank’s London office the day he was fired.</p>\n<p>“My colleagues at JPM are my friends, and some of them are my best friends,” Jones said in a witness statement released Wednesday. “I would like to work with them again, as I did previously, before this unfortunate, disruptive and frankly upsetting period in my life.”</p>","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>JPMorgan Balks at Taking Back Trader After Unfair Firing Ruling</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nJPMorgan Balks at Taking Back Trader After Unfair Firing Ruling\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-11-25 07:23 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/jpmorgan-balks-taking-back-trader-164546607.html><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>JPMorgan Chase & Co. doesn’t want to give a former trader his job back despite a finding that he was unfairly dismissed by the bank to “appease its regulators” in a market-spoofing probe.\nBradley ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/jpmorgan-balks-taking-back-trader-164546607.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"JPM":"摩根大通"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/jpmorgan-balks-taking-back-trader-164546607.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1174244276","content_text":"JPMorgan Chase & Co. doesn’t want to give a former trader his job back despite a finding that he was unfairly dismissed by the bank to “appease its regulators” in a market-spoofing probe.\nBradley Jones, a former cash equities trader, is this week arguing for an order of reinstatement from the London employment tribunal that ruled in his favor in July. The U.S. bank contends his job no longer exists and no comparable role is available. It also said it wasn’t confident that Jones could be certified as fit and proper under market regulator’s guidelines, despite his successful wrongful termination claim.\nJPMorgan, which is appealing that ruling, further argues Jones doesn’t genuinely wish to work there again and is merely attempting to circumvent the nearly 90,000-pound cap on compensation awards in U.K. employment cases.\nThe bank declined to comment on the matter. A lawyer for Jones didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.\nJones successfully argued to the tribunal earlier this year that he was only fired because the bank wanted to show it was taking a tougher line on a spoofing scandal that cost it close to $1 billion in penalties.\nThe tribunal judge in his earlier ruling rejected JPMorgan’s claims that Jones engaged in spoofing himself and found the bank fired him “because of its desire to appease its regulators by showing it was ‘cleaning up its act.’”\nOn the witness stand in April, Jones expressed a desire to return to his old job, noting that some of his colleagues walked out of the bank’s London office the day he was fired.\n“My colleagues at JPM are my friends, and some of them are my best friends,” Jones said in a witness statement released Wednesday. “I would like to work with them again, as I did previously, before this unfortunate, disruptive and frankly upsetting period in my life.”","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1268,"commentLimit":10,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"symbols":[],"verified":2,"subType":0,"readableState":1,"langContent":"CN","currentLanguage":"CN","warmUpFlag":false,"orderFlag":false,"shareable":true,"causeOfNotShareable":"","featuresForAnalytics":[],"commentAndTweetFlag":false,"upFlag":false,"length":2,"xxTargetLangEnum":"ZH_CN"},"commentList":[],"hasMoreComment":false,"orderType":2}

JPMorgan Balks at Taking Back Trader After Unfair Firing Ruling

评论（1）

热议股票