Thats the correct way. Mark sh_老虎社区_美港股上老虎

JackBeast
2021-09-22

Thats the correct way. Mark should be the visionary person for Facebook and shouldn’t be called upon unnecessarily to answer basic questions.

Facebook overpaid FTC fine as 'quid pro quo' to protect Zuckerberg from liability, shareholders claim

Lawsuits claim directors protected CEO from being held personally liable for Cambridge Analytica bre

Facebook overpaid FTC fine as 'quid pro quo' to protect Zuckerberg from liability, shareholders claim

免责声明：上述内容仅代表发帖人个人观点，不构成本平台的任何投资建议。

推荐
最新

暂无评论

热议股票

关于我们·老虎社区守则·老虎社区账号管理规范·老虎社区服务协议·老虎社区隐私政策

公司名称：北京至简风宜信息技术有限公司

违法和不良信息投诉：010-5681-3562（工作时间9:30-18:30）

邮箱：service@laohu8.com

营业执照：91110105MA01A4U55R

ICP备：京ICP备18016422号

网安备：京公网安备11010502036490

关注我们

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"data":{"magic":2,"id":869637513,"tweetId":"869637513","gmtCreate":1632278666832,"gmtModify":1632801526418,"author":{"id":3586156816377281,"idStr":"3586156816377281","authorId":3586156816377281,"authorIdStr":"3586156816377281","name":"JackBeast","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5b9e488830be90f3caa40b434e085878","vip":1,"userType":1,"introduction":"","boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"fanSize":3,"starInvestorFlag":false},"themes":[],"images":[],"coverImages":[],"extraTitle":"","html":"<html><head></head><body><p>Thats the correct way. Mark should be the visionary person for Facebook and shouldn’t be called upon unnecessarily to answer basic questions.</p></body></html>","htmlText":"<html><head></head><body><p>Thats the correct way. Mark should be the visionary person for Facebook and shouldn’t be called upon unnecessarily to answer basic questions.</p></body></html>","text":"Thats the correct way. Mark should be the visionary person for Facebook and shouldn’t be called upon unnecessarily to answer basic questions.","highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/869637513","repostId":2169658327,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2169658327","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1632278040,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2169658327?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-09-22 10:34","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Facebook overpaid FTC fine as 'quid pro quo' to protect Zuckerberg from liability, shareholders claim","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2169658327","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"Lawsuits claim directors protected CEO from being held personally liable for Cambridge Analytica bre","content":"<p>Lawsuits claim directors protected CEO from being held personally liable for Cambridge Analytica breach</p>\n<p>Facebook Inc. overpaid billions of dollars to the Federal Trade Commission as part of an agreement to keep CEO Mark Zuckerberg from being personally sued, shareholders claim in a pair of lawsuits.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWOA.U\">Two</a> separate groups of Facebook (FB) shareholders filed suit Tuesday, Politico first reported, alleging that Facebook's board approved an over-payment on its settlement with the FTC over the Cambridge Analytica scandal to protect Zuckerberg.</p>\n<p>One of the lawsuits claimed that in early 2019, a draft complaint from the FTC named both Facebook and Zuckerberg as defendants.</p>\n<p>The suit cited minutes from a subsequent Facebook board meeting, and claimed \"Zuckerberg, [COO Sheryl] Sandberg, and other Facebook directors agreed to authorize a multi-billion settlement with the FTC as an express quid pro quo to protect Zuckerberg from being named in the FTC's complaint, made subject to personal liability, or even required to sit for a deposition.\"</p>\n<p>Also read:Facebook to review its practice of separate rules for high-profile users</p>\n<p>In July 2019, Facebook agreed to pay the FTC a record fine of $5 billion to settle the investigation into the Cambridge Analytics data breach.</p>\n<p>The suit was filed on behalf of the Employees' Retirement System of Rhode Island and the City of Warwick (R.I.) Retirement System.</p>\n<p>The second lawsuit also claimed Facebook has failed in its obligation to protect the private data of its users, and alleged that the Cambridge Analytics' data scraping was a \"destined consequence\" of Facebook's business plan.</p>\n<p>Plaintiffs in that suit include the California State Teachers' Retirement System, New York's construction and laborers' Local No. 79 general fund, the City of Birmingham (Ala.) retirement system and Firemen's Retirement System of St. Louis.</p>\n<p>Facebook did not immediately respond for a request for comment Tuesday night.</p>\n<p>Facebook shares have fallen 5% over the past week, following a revelatory series of investigations by the Wall Street Journal, which the company called a collection of \"mischaracterizations.\" But the stock is still up 31% year to date, compared to the S&amp;P 500's 16% gain.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Facebook overpaid FTC fine as 'quid pro quo' to protect Zuckerberg from liability, shareholders claim</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFacebook overpaid FTC fine as 'quid pro quo' to protect Zuckerberg from liability, shareholders claim\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-09-22 10:34</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Lawsuits claim directors protected CEO from being held personally liable for Cambridge Analytica breach</p>\n<p>Facebook Inc. overpaid billions of dollars to the Federal Trade Commission as part of an agreement to keep CEO Mark Zuckerberg from being personally sued, shareholders claim in a pair of lawsuits.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWOA.U\">Two</a> separate groups of Facebook (FB) shareholders filed suit Tuesday, Politico first reported, alleging that Facebook's board approved an over-payment on its settlement with the FTC over the Cambridge Analytica scandal to protect Zuckerberg.</p>\n<p>One of the lawsuits claimed that in early 2019, a draft complaint from the FTC named both Facebook and Zuckerberg as defendants.</p>\n<p>The suit cited minutes from a subsequent Facebook board meeting, and claimed \"Zuckerberg, [COO Sheryl] Sandberg, and other Facebook directors agreed to authorize a multi-billion settlement with the FTC as an express quid pro quo to protect Zuckerberg from being named in the FTC's complaint, made subject to personal liability, or even required to sit for a deposition.\"</p>\n<p>Also read:Facebook to review its practice of separate rules for high-profile users</p>\n<p>In July 2019, Facebook agreed to pay the FTC a record fine of $5 billion to settle the investigation into the Cambridge Analytics data breach.</p>\n<p>The suit was filed on behalf of the Employees' Retirement System of Rhode Island and the City of Warwick (R.I.) Retirement System.</p>\n<p>The second lawsuit also claimed Facebook has failed in its obligation to protect the private data of its users, and alleged that the Cambridge Analytics' data scraping was a \"destined consequence\" of Facebook's business plan.</p>\n<p>Plaintiffs in that suit include the California State Teachers' Retirement System, New York's construction and laborers' Local No. 79 general fund, the City of Birmingham (Ala.) retirement system and Firemen's Retirement System of St. Louis.</p>\n<p>Facebook did not immediately respond for a request for comment Tuesday night.</p>\n<p>Facebook shares have fallen 5% over the past week, following a revelatory series of investigations by the Wall Street Journal, which the company called a collection of \"mischaracterizations.\" But the stock is still up 31% year to date, compared to the S&amp;P 500's 16% gain.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2169658327","content_text":"Lawsuits claim directors protected CEO from being held personally liable for Cambridge Analytica breach\nFacebook Inc. overpaid billions of dollars to the Federal Trade Commission as part of an agreement to keep CEO Mark Zuckerberg from being personally sued, shareholders claim in a pair of lawsuits.\nTwo separate groups of Facebook (FB) shareholders filed suit Tuesday, Politico first reported, alleging that Facebook's board approved an over-payment on its settlement with the FTC over the Cambridge Analytica scandal to protect Zuckerberg.\nOne of the lawsuits claimed that in early 2019, a draft complaint from the FTC named both Facebook and Zuckerberg as defendants.\nThe suit cited minutes from a subsequent Facebook board meeting, and claimed \"Zuckerberg, [COO Sheryl] Sandberg, and other Facebook directors agreed to authorize a multi-billion settlement with the FTC as an express quid pro quo to protect Zuckerberg from being named in the FTC's complaint, made subject to personal liability, or even required to sit for a deposition.\"\nAlso read:Facebook to review its practice of separate rules for high-profile users\nIn July 2019, Facebook agreed to pay the FTC a record fine of $5 billion to settle the investigation into the Cambridge Analytics data breach.\nThe suit was filed on behalf of the Employees' Retirement System of Rhode Island and the City of Warwick (R.I.) Retirement System.\nThe second lawsuit also claimed Facebook has failed in its obligation to protect the private data of its users, and alleged that the Cambridge Analytics' data scraping was a \"destined consequence\" of Facebook's business plan.\nPlaintiffs in that suit include the California State Teachers' Retirement System, New York's construction and laborers' Local No. 79 general fund, the City of Birmingham (Ala.) retirement system and Firemen's Retirement System of St. Louis.\nFacebook did not immediately respond for a request for comment Tuesday night.\nFacebook shares have fallen 5% over the past week, following a revelatory series of investigations by the Wall Street Journal, which the company called a collection of \"mischaracterizations.\" But the stock is still up 31% year to date, compared to the S&P 500's 16% gain.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":109,"commentLimit":10,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"symbols":[],"verified":2,"subType":0,"readableState":1,"langContent":"EN","currentLanguage":"EN","warmUpFlag":false,"orderFlag":false,"shareable":true,"causeOfNotShareable":"","featuresForAnalytics":[],"commentAndTweetFlag":false,"andRepostAutoSelectedFlag":false,"upFlag":false,"length":120,"xxTargetLangEnum":"ORIG"},"commentList":[],"hasMoreComment":false,"orderType":2}