Apple did _老虎社区_美港股上老虎

Fayna
2021-11-01

Apple did not disappoint eventually!

Apple Disappointed -- and Quickly Rebounded. Here's Why.

Apple disappointed on fiscal Q3 earnings day, but the stock’s selloff did not last long. Here is the

Apple Disappointed -- and Quickly Rebounded. Here's Why.

免责声明：上述内容仅代表发帖人个人观点，不构成本平台的任何投资建议。

推荐
最新

暂无评论

热议股票

关于我们·老虎社区守则·老虎社区账号管理规范·老虎社区服务协议·老虎社区隐私政策

公司名称：北京至简风宜信息技术有限公司

违法和不良信息投诉：010-5681-3562（工作时间9:30-18:30）

邮箱：service@laohu8.com

营业执照：91110105MA01A4U55R

ICP备：京ICP备18016422号

网安备：京公网安备11010502036490

关注我们

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"data":{"magic":2,"id":843095271,"tweetId":"843095271","gmtCreate":1635780994685,"gmtModify":1635780994685,"author":{"id":3576151042223854,"idStr":"3576151042223854","authorId":3576151042223854,"authorIdStr":"3576151042223854","name":"Fayna","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d82d63e2a39fe69931574815c44edce8","vip":1,"userType":1,"introduction":"","boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"fanSize":1,"starInvestorFlag":false},"themes":[],"images":[],"coverImages":[],"extraTitle":"","html":"<html><head></head><body><p>Apple did not disappoint eventually!</p></body></html>","htmlText":"<html><head></head><body><p>Apple did not disappoint eventually!</p></body></html>","text":"Apple did not disappoint eventually!","highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/843095271","repostId":1175678891,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1175678891","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1635779942,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1175678891?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-01 23:19","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Disappointed -- and Quickly Rebounded. Here's Why.","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1175678891","media":"TheStreet","summary":"Apple disappointed on fiscal Q3 earnings day, but the stock’s selloff did not last long. Here is the","content":"<p>Apple disappointed on fiscal Q3 earnings day, but the stock’s selloff did not last long. Here is the most likely reason why AAPL shares rebounded as early as Friday.</p>\n<p>On October 28,Apple delivered fiscal Q4 results&nbsp;that lagged consensus for the first time in years. Despite revenue growth of 29% that most companies would find very solid, Apple stocksold off in after-hours action, losing as much as $125 billion in market cap right before the earnings call.</p>\n<p>Yet, by the end of day Friday, AAPL had erased the bulk of its short-lived losses. The Apple Maven thinks that the intraday recovery was driven primarily by analysts publishing reports that sounded much less bearish than the revenue miss may have implied at first.</p>\n<p>Below, we review some of the main takeaways from Wall Street experts on Apple’s earnings.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b3facec59ae76a6c28f4c5847600b4de\" tg-width=\"1240\" tg-height=\"886\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Figure 1: Apple store in New York, NY.</span></p>\n<p><b>Wall Street seemed comfortable</b></p>\n<p>TipRanks&nbsp;reported&nbsp;on 13 analysts that published earnings reviews on Apple. Among these, none changed the rating on AAPL stock, which remains a “moderate buy”: about three-fourths still recommend buying the shares.</p>\n<p>The traditionally optimistic analyst from Wedbush, Dan Ives, did notseereasons to worry about Apple and its business. He called the Cupertino company’s supply chain issues “painful noise in the near term” and remained confident that strong demand for Apple’s products and services should convert to delayed sales in 2022.</p>\n<p>Morgan Stanley’s Katy Huberty is another vocal bull that I like to track for her insightful opinions and analysis. She&nbsp;lowered&nbsp;her price target on AAPL stock by a meager $2 to $164, while still pointing at around 10% gain potential from here.</p>\n<p>According to the analyst, “supply constraints will dominate the headlines post Apple's September quarter earnings report”, which could put a damper on valuations and share price for a moment. But she made two other comments that sounded much more upbeat: (1) guidance commentary implies that fiscal Q1 revenue should be in line with consensus, and (2) the more important stories are impressive growth in services and Greater China segments.</p>\n<p>Even the much less bullish analysts did notseemtoo worried about Apple. Bernstein’s Tony Sacconaghi has a neutral rating on the stock and sees downside risk of over 10%. Still, the expert seemed to nod at solid fiscal Q1 guided growth of 6% to 9% and higher-than-expected gross margin, despite the challenges.</p>\n<p><b>Apple Maven’s take</b></p>\n<p>Investors had become accustomed to seeing Apple deliver impressive earnings beats in the past few years, even more so during the COVID-19 crisis. For this reason, the most recent revenue miss must have felt like a dip in ice-cold water.</p>\n<p>But under the hood, Apple’s recent performance has remained impressive. Despite all the supply chain issues, revenues still climbed 29%, albeit over easy 2020 comps. Gross margin increased substantially, and operating expenses remained under check. If not for some drag from below-the-line items that investors care little about, Apple would have delivered another EPS beat.</p>\n<p>I still find it hard to justify bearishness towards Apple, considering how well the company’s management team has been executing lately. It looks like the market has agreed with me, even if it took it a few hours on Friday to make up its mind.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Disappointed -- and Quickly Rebounded. Here's Why.</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Disappointed -- and Quickly Rebounded. Here's Why.\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-11-01 23:19 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.thestreet.com/apple/stock/this-is-why-apple-stock-rebounded-after-earnings><strong>TheStreet</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Apple disappointed on fiscal Q3 earnings day, but the stock’s selloff did not last long. Here is the most likely reason why AAPL shares rebounded as early as Friday.\nOn October 28,Apple delivered ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.thestreet.com/apple/stock/this-is-why-apple-stock-rebounded-after-earnings\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://www.thestreet.com/apple/stock/this-is-why-apple-stock-rebounded-after-earnings","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1175678891","content_text":"Apple disappointed on fiscal Q3 earnings day, but the stock’s selloff did not last long. Here is the most likely reason why AAPL shares rebounded as early as Friday.\nOn October 28,Apple delivered fiscal Q4 results that lagged consensus for the first time in years. Despite revenue growth of 29% that most companies would find very solid, Apple stocksold off in after-hours action, losing as much as $125 billion in market cap right before the earnings call.\nYet, by the end of day Friday, AAPL had erased the bulk of its short-lived losses. The Apple Maven thinks that the intraday recovery was driven primarily by analysts publishing reports that sounded much less bearish than the revenue miss may have implied at first.\nBelow, we review some of the main takeaways from Wall Street experts on Apple’s earnings.\nFigure 1: Apple store in New York, NY.\nWall Street seemed comfortable\nTipRanks reported on 13 analysts that published earnings reviews on Apple. Among these, none changed the rating on AAPL stock, which remains a “moderate buy”: about three-fourths still recommend buying the shares.\nThe traditionally optimistic analyst from Wedbush, Dan Ives, did notseereasons to worry about Apple and its business. He called the Cupertino company’s supply chain issues “painful noise in the near term” and remained confident that strong demand for Apple’s products and services should convert to delayed sales in 2022.\nMorgan Stanley’s Katy Huberty is another vocal bull that I like to track for her insightful opinions and analysis. She lowered her price target on AAPL stock by a meager $2 to $164, while still pointing at around 10% gain potential from here.\nAccording to the analyst, “supply constraints will dominate the headlines post Apple's September quarter earnings report”, which could put a damper on valuations and share price for a moment. But she made two other comments that sounded much more upbeat: (1) guidance commentary implies that fiscal Q1 revenue should be in line with consensus, and (2) the more important stories are impressive growth in services and Greater China segments.\nEven the much less bullish analysts did notseemtoo worried about Apple. Bernstein’s Tony Sacconaghi has a neutral rating on the stock and sees downside risk of over 10%. Still, the expert seemed to nod at solid fiscal Q1 guided growth of 6% to 9% and higher-than-expected gross margin, despite the challenges.\nApple Maven’s take\nInvestors had become accustomed to seeing Apple deliver impressive earnings beats in the past few years, even more so during the COVID-19 crisis. For this reason, the most recent revenue miss must have felt like a dip in ice-cold water.\nBut under the hood, Apple’s recent performance has remained impressive. Despite all the supply chain issues, revenues still climbed 29%, albeit over easy 2020 comps. Gross margin increased substantially, and operating expenses remained under check. If not for some drag from below-the-line items that investors care little about, Apple would have delivered another EPS beat.\nI still find it hard to justify bearishness towards Apple, considering how well the company’s management team has been executing lately. It looks like the market has agreed with me, even if it took it a few hours on Friday to make up its mind.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":552,"commentLimit":10,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"symbols":["AAPL"],"verified":2,"subType":0,"readableState":1,"langContent":"CN","currentLanguage":"CN","warmUpFlag":false,"orderFlag":false,"shareable":true,"causeOfNotShareable":"","featuresForAnalytics":[],"commentAndTweetFlag":false,"andRepostAutoSelectedFlag":false,"upFlag":false,"length":32,"xxTargetLangEnum":"ZH_CN"},"commentList":[],"hasMoreComment":false,"orderType":2}

Apple Disappointed -- and Quickly Rebounded. Here's Why.

评论（1）

热议股票