Seriously?_老虎社区_美港股上老虎

Upswing118
2021-12-21

Seriously?

Cathie Wood's 40% Return Prediction Draws Rebuke After Ark’s Rough Year

The latest projection from the star fund manager is highly unusual, according to investment professi

Cathie Wood's 40% Return Prediction Draws Rebuke After Ark’s Rough Year

免责声明：上述内容仅代表发帖人个人观点，不构成本平台的任何投资建议。

推荐
最新

暂无评论

热议股票

关于我们·老虎社区守则·老虎社区账号管理规范·老虎社区服务协议·老虎社区隐私政策

公司名称：北京至简风宜信息技术有限公司

违法和不良信息投诉：010-5681-3562（工作时间9:30-18:30）

邮箱：service@laohu8.com

营业执照：91110105MA01A4U55R

ICP备：京ICP备18016422号

网安备：京公网安备11010502036490

关注我们

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"data":{"magic":2,"id":693572744,"tweetId":"693572744","gmtCreate":1640054935790,"gmtModify":1640055790694,"author":{"id":4087685930931350,"authorId":4087685930931350,"authorIdStr":"4087685930931350","name":"Upswing118","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5ee810deeb4fd3c3d863b49cef1d9956","vip":1,"userType":1,"introduction":"","boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"fanSize":57,"starInvestorFlag":false},"themes":[],"images":[],"coverImages":[],"extraTitle":"","html":"<html><head></head><body><p>Seriously?&nbsp;</p></body></html>","htmlText":"<html><head></head><body><p>Seriously?&nbsp;</p></body></html>","text":"Seriously?","highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/693572744","repostId":1172639842,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1172639842","pubTimestamp":1640053496,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1172639842?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-21 10:24","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Cathie Wood's 40% Return Prediction Draws Rebuke After Ark’s Rough Year","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1172639842","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"The latest projection from the star fund manager is highly unusual, according to investment professi","content":"<p>The latest projection from the star fund manager is highly unusual, according to investment professionals.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3f316467319606e000308a3a621895ee\" tg-width=\"2000\" tg-height=\"1333\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Cathie Wood Photographer: Kyle Grillot/Bloomberg</span></p>\n<p>When Cathie Wood speaks, investors listen. But over the weekend, many weren’t so sure they were picking up what she was putting down.</p>\n<p>The famed active manager sparked some skepticism among investment professionals with&nbsp;a market commentary piece&nbsp;on Friday on her website, where she said her ARK Innovation ETF “could deliver a 40% compound annual rate of return during the next five years.”&nbsp;That’s a bold claim for the tail end of 2021, which has proved to be her worst year since she started her Ark Investment Management. Plus, there’s&nbsp;only been one other time Ark’s five-year projection has been that high, she noted: at the end of 2018.</p>\n<p>Wood is known for her relentless conviction and audacious marketing, but this projection surprised&nbsp;and inspired debate among the finance community that avidly discusses&nbsp;her on Twitter. A&nbsp;screenshot of Wood’s post&nbsp;expressing confusion garnered dozens of comments and likes.</p>\n<p>“It sure is odd that she set the bar so incredibly high for herself,” said Matt Maley, chief market strategist at Miller Tabak + Co. “Wall Street is an expectations game and the fact that she has set expectations for her fund so incredibly high is not a very good marketing strategy.”</p>\n<p>Despite Wood’s $17 billion flagship fund gaining almost 150% in 2020, it’s fallen about 24% year-to-date as changing expectations on interest rake hikes and general market swings have slammed her top bets. In the latest commentary, Wood discussed the “inherent volatility” of her strategy and how her concentrated portfolio tends to outperform as the market rebounds.</p>\n<p>The language used in the post would likely run afoul of regulators if used in a fund prospectus, according to&nbsp;Jeremy Senderowicz, an ETF lawyer at Vedder Price in New York. But since it’s included in Ark’s marketing material, and uses the crucial word “could,” it may not be breaking any rules, he said.</p>\n<p>Ark did not respond to a request for comment.</p>\n<p>Eric Balchunas, ETF analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence, said it “seems like a potential PR mistake to set the bar that high.”</p>\n<p>“Most active managers can’t say anything, let alone that. They are overburdened by lawyers and PR,” he said. “One of the reasons Cathie I think has been so successful is that she’s not, as the person running this small indie shop. That being said, it’s possible to go too far.”</p>\n<p>Although Wood’s funds have taken a hit this year, the sky-high projections may not be entirely unreasonable. After all, ARKK’s three-year return currently sits at about 37%.</p>\n<p>Still, as the investment adage goes: past performance —&nbsp;even by a money manager whose fame has reached such heights that&nbsp;her fund is selling&nbsp;merchandise&nbsp;— is no guarantee of future results.</p>\n<p>Beyond that, Wood’s prediction was&nbsp;certainly seen as&nbsp;an unusual tactic for any fund manager.</p>\n<p>“If, when I was running 40-Act strategies aimed at retail investors, I even suggested using an absolute return target my legal team would have run me out of the office with pitchforks,” said&nbsp;Max Gokhman, chief investment officer at AlphaTrAI.</p>","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Cathie Wood's 40% Return Prediction Draws Rebuke After Ark’s Rough Year</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nCathie Wood's 40% Return Prediction Draws Rebuke After Ark’s Rough Year\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-12-21 10:24 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-12-20/cathie-wood-s-40-return-prediction-draws-rebuke-after-ark-s-arkk-rough-year?srnd=premium><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The latest projection from the star fund manager is highly unusual, according to investment professionals.\nCathie Wood Photographer: Kyle Grillot/Bloomberg\nWhen Cathie Wood speaks, investors listen. ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-12-20/cathie-wood-s-40-return-prediction-draws-rebuke-after-ark-s-arkk-rough-year?srnd=premium\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"ARKF":"ARK Fintech Innovation ETF","ARKW":"ARK Next Generation Internation ETF","ARKG":"ARK Genomic Revolution ETF","ARKO":"ARKO Corp","ARKK":"ARK Innovation ETF"},"source_url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-12-20/cathie-wood-s-40-return-prediction-draws-rebuke-after-ark-s-arkk-rough-year?srnd=premium","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1172639842","content_text":"The latest projection from the star fund manager is highly unusual, according to investment professionals.\nCathie Wood Photographer: Kyle Grillot/Bloomberg\nWhen Cathie Wood speaks, investors listen. But over the weekend, many weren’t so sure they were picking up what she was putting down.\nThe famed active manager sparked some skepticism among investment professionals with a market commentary piece on Friday on her website, where she said her ARK Innovation ETF “could deliver a 40% compound annual rate of return during the next five years.” That’s a bold claim for the tail end of 2021, which has proved to be her worst year since she started her Ark Investment Management. Plus, there’s only been one other time Ark’s five-year projection has been that high, she noted: at the end of 2018.\nWood is known for her relentless conviction and audacious marketing, but this projection surprised and inspired debate among the finance community that avidly discusses her on Twitter. A screenshot of Wood’s post expressing confusion garnered dozens of comments and likes.\n“It sure is odd that she set the bar so incredibly high for herself,” said Matt Maley, chief market strategist at Miller Tabak + Co. “Wall Street is an expectations game and the fact that she has set expectations for her fund so incredibly high is not a very good marketing strategy.”\nDespite Wood’s $17 billion flagship fund gaining almost 150% in 2020, it’s fallen about 24% year-to-date as changing expectations on interest rake hikes and general market swings have slammed her top bets. In the latest commentary, Wood discussed the “inherent volatility” of her strategy and how her concentrated portfolio tends to outperform as the market rebounds.\nThe language used in the post would likely run afoul of regulators if used in a fund prospectus, according to Jeremy Senderowicz, an ETF lawyer at Vedder Price in New York. But since it’s included in Ark’s marketing material, and uses the crucial word “could,” it may not be breaking any rules, he said.\nArk did not respond to a request for comment.\nEric Balchunas, ETF analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence, said it “seems like a potential PR mistake to set the bar that high.”\n“Most active managers can’t say anything, let alone that. They are overburdened by lawyers and PR,” he said. “One of the reasons Cathie I think has been so successful is that she’s not, as the person running this small indie shop. That being said, it’s possible to go too far.”\nAlthough Wood’s funds have taken a hit this year, the sky-high projections may not be entirely unreasonable. After all, ARKK’s three-year return currently sits at about 37%.\nStill, as the investment adage goes: past performance — even by a money manager whose fame has reached such heights that her fund is selling merchandise — is no guarantee of future results.\nBeyond that, Wood’s prediction was certainly seen as an unusual tactic for any fund manager.\n“If, when I was running 40-Act strategies aimed at retail investors, I even suggested using an absolute return target my legal team would have run me out of the office with pitchforks,” said Max Gokhman, chief investment officer at AlphaTrAI.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":759,"commentLimit":10,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"symbols":[],"verified":2,"subType":0,"readableState":1,"langContent":"CN","currentLanguage":"CN","warmUpFlag":false,"orderFlag":false,"shareable":true,"causeOfNotShareable":"","featuresForAnalytics":[],"commentAndTweetFlag":false,"upFlag":false,"length":10,"xxTargetLangEnum":"ZH_CN"},"commentList":[],"hasMoreComment":false,"orderType":2}