Who's stil_老虎社区_美港股上老虎

mathmadtiffy
2021-12-23

Who's still using Pinterest?

Pinterest Stock Has Slumped. Why One Analyst Doesn’t See Much of a Rebound.

Pinterest stock has shed nearly half its value in the past six months. An analyst at Citi Research j

Pinterest Stock Has Slumped. Why One Analyst Doesn’t See Much of a Rebound.

免责声明：上述内容仅代表发帖人个人观点，不构成本平台的任何投资建议。

推荐
最新

暂无评论

热议股票

关于我们·老虎社区守则·老虎社区账号管理规范·老虎社区服务协议·老虎社区隐私政策

公司名称：北京至简风宜信息技术有限公司

违法和不良信息投诉：010-5681-3562（工作时间9:30-18:30）

邮箱：service@laohu8.com

营业执照：91110105MA01A4U55R

ICP备：京ICP备18016422号

网安备：京公网安备11010502036490

关注我们

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"data":{"magic":2,"id":691546917,"tweetId":"691546917","gmtCreate":1640224238671,"gmtModify":1640224238939,"author":{"id":3577846121321034,"idStr":"3577846121321034","authorId":3577846121321034,"authorIdStr":"3577846121321034","name":"mathmadtiffy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e2f7f216ad2c7f8d1f8dca48f799f1c7","vip":1,"userType":1,"introduction":"","boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"fanSize":25,"starInvestorFlag":false},"themes":[],"images":[],"coverImages":[],"extraTitle":"","html":"<html><head></head><body><p>Who's still using Pinterest?</p></body></html>","htmlText":"<html><head></head><body><p>Who's still using Pinterest?</p></body></html>","text":"Who's still using Pinterest?","highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/691546917","repostId":1102948040,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1102948040","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1640224094,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1102948040?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-23 09:48","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Pinterest Stock Has Slumped. Why One Analyst Doesn’t See Much of a Rebound.","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1102948040","media":"Barrons","summary":"Pinterest stock has shed nearly half its value in the past six months. An analyst at Citi Research j","content":"<p>Pinterest&nbsp;stock has shed nearly half its value in the past six months. An analyst at Citi Research just trimmed his expectations.</p>\n<p>Shares of the image-sharing platform losed&nbsp;up 1.4%, at $37.26&nbsp;on&nbsp;Wednesday, while the&nbsp;S&amp;P 500 index&nbsp;rose 1%. The stock has fallen about 50% in the past six months, as investors largely steered clear of social-media platforms.</p>\n<p>Citi Research analyst Jason Bazinet cut his target price to $42 from $48 in a note on Wednesday. He has a Neutral rating. He says the lower target better reflects the company’s growth prospects relative to social-media peers, and he sees limited upside from recent levels.</p>\n<p>“The company continues to improve U.S. monetization, while also executing on its early efforts to monetize its large non-U.S. user base,” he wrote. “Additionally, 2021 Street estimates look reasonable to us. As such, we believe Pinterest’s growth opportunities are priced in at current levels.”</p>\n<p>Pinterest shares (ticker: PINS) surged in October amid reports about a potential acquisition by&nbsp;PayPal Holdings&nbsp;(PYPL). But the payments firm poured cold water on such a deal when it disclosed on Oct. 24 that it wasn’t pursuing an acquisition “at this time.” Pinterest stock sank on the news.</p>\n<p>Of the 30 analysts covering Pinterest stock, 12 have Buy or equivalent ratings, while 17 have Hold or equivalent ratings, according to FactSet. One analyst has a Sell rating. That said, the mean target price is $53.62, meaning more analysts will need to follow Bazinet and adjust their price targets if they don’t opt to call shares a Buy.</p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Pinterest Stock Has Slumped. Why One Analyst Doesn’t See Much of a Rebound.</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nPinterest Stock Has Slumped. Why One Analyst Doesn’t See Much of a Rebound.\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-12-23 09:48 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/pinterest-stock-has-slumped-why-one-analyst-doesnt-see-much-of-a-rebound-51640204997?mod=hp_LATEST><strong>Barrons</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Pinterest stock has shed nearly half its value in the past six months. An analyst at Citi Research just trimmed his expectations.\nShares of the image-sharing platform losed up 1.4%, at $37.26 on ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/pinterest-stock-has-slumped-why-one-analyst-doesnt-see-much-of-a-rebound-51640204997?mod=hp_LATEST\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"PINS":"Pinterest, Inc."},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/pinterest-stock-has-slumped-why-one-analyst-doesnt-see-much-of-a-rebound-51640204997?mod=hp_LATEST","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1102948040","content_text":"Pinterest stock has shed nearly half its value in the past six months. An analyst at Citi Research just trimmed his expectations.\nShares of the image-sharing platform losed up 1.4%, at $37.26 on Wednesday, while the S&P 500 index rose 1%. The stock has fallen about 50% in the past six months, as investors largely steered clear of social-media platforms.\nCiti Research analyst Jason Bazinet cut his target price to $42 from $48 in a note on Wednesday. He has a Neutral rating. He says the lower target better reflects the company’s growth prospects relative to social-media peers, and he sees limited upside from recent levels.\n“The company continues to improve U.S. monetization, while also executing on its early efforts to monetize its large non-U.S. user base,” he wrote. “Additionally, 2021 Street estimates look reasonable to us. As such, we believe Pinterest’s growth opportunities are priced in at current levels.”\nPinterest shares (ticker: PINS) surged in October amid reports about a potential acquisition by PayPal Holdings (PYPL). But the payments firm poured cold water on such a deal when it disclosed on Oct. 24 that it wasn’t pursuing an acquisition “at this time.” Pinterest stock sank on the news.\nOf the 30 analysts covering Pinterest stock, 12 have Buy or equivalent ratings, while 17 have Hold or equivalent ratings, according to FactSet. One analyst has a Sell rating. That said, the mean target price is $53.62, meaning more analysts will need to follow Bazinet and adjust their price targets if they don’t opt to call shares a Buy.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":969,"commentLimit":10,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"symbols":[],"verified":2,"subType":0,"readableState":1,"langContent":"CN","currentLanguage":"CN","warmUpFlag":false,"orderFlag":false,"shareable":true,"causeOfNotShareable":"","featuresForAnalytics":[],"commentAndTweetFlag":false,"andRepostAutoSelectedFlag":false,"upFlag":false,"length":25,"xxTargetLangEnum":"ZH_CN"},"commentList":[],"hasMoreComment":false,"orderType":2}