great_老虎社区_美港股上老虎

AnnieTan
2021-04-22

great

Credit Suisse's Archegos Exposure Was Reportedly Over $20 Billion

Justminutes after the SEC is reportedly"exploring how to increase transparency for the types of deri

Credit Suisse's Archegos Exposure Was Reportedly Over $20 Billion

免责声明：上述内容仅代表发帖人个人观点，不构成本平台的任何投资建议。

推荐
最新

暂无评论

热议股票

关于我们·老虎社区守则·老虎社区账号管理规范·老虎社区服务协议·老虎社区隐私政策

公司名称：北京至简风宜信息技术有限公司

违法和不良信息投诉：010-5681-3562（工作时间9:30-18:30）

邮箱：service@laohu8.com

营业执照：91110105MA01A4U55R

ICP备：京ICP备18016422号

网安备：京公网安备11010502036490

关注我们

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"data":{"magic":2,"id":378443063,"tweetId":"378443063","gmtCreate":1619057259552,"gmtModify":1634288873669,"author":{"id":3581758210988297,"idStr":"3581758210988297","authorId":3581758210988297,"authorIdStr":"3581758210988297","name":"AnnieTan","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ec52ac806a23a3d57463277890148afd","vip":1,"userType":1,"introduction":"","boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"fanSize":1,"starInvestorFlag":false},"themes":[],"images":[],"coverImages":[],"extraTitle":"","html":"<html><head></head><body><p>great</p></body></html>","htmlText":"<html><head></head><body><p>great</p></body></html>","text":"great","highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/378443063","repostId":1163748793,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1163748793","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1619056674,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1163748793?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-04-22 09:57","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Credit Suisse's Archegos Exposure Was Reportedly Over $20 Billion","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1163748793","media":"zerohedge","summary":"Justminutes after the SEC is reportedly\"exploring how to increase transparency for the types of deri","content":"<p>Justminutes after the SEC is reportedly<b>\"exploring how to increase transparency for the types of derivative bets that sank Archegos,\"</b>The Wall Street Journal reportsthat Credit Suisse Group AG had somehow allowed a massive exposure to investments related to Archegos Capital Management or<b>more than $20 billion</b>.</p>\n<p>While the bank has said that its losses on the positions amounted to $4.7 billion,WSJ, citing people familiar with the matter, reports that Archegos' bets on a collection of stocks swelled in the lead-up to its March collapse, but<b>parts of the investment bank hadn't fully implemented systems to keep pace with Archegos's fast growth</b>.</p>\n<p>Some inside the bank who were familiar with Archegos's exposure had<b>thought it was a fraction of the roughly $20 billion figure</b>, one of the people familiar with the matter said.</p>\n<p>As the 'perp walk' of various executives and risk managers at the historic Swiss bank grows longer,we suspect this is not the last we will hear, as Credit Suisse has said its dealings with both Archegos and Greensill need \"substantial further review and scrutiny.\"</p>\n<p>Finally, we note none of this is really surprising given that,as we just detailed, Bloomberg on Wednesday published an anonymously sourced story laying the blame for the Archegos blowup at the feet of<b>Parshu Shah.</b></p>\n<p>Reportedly, thanks to a gutting of the compliance function at the bank,<b>Shah</b>,<b>who served as the salesman in charge of nurturing the bank's relationship with Archegos...</b>.<b>had also been head of risk at the bank's prime-services business.</b></p>\n<p>So, no wonder he never got the tap on the shoulder...</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Credit Suisse's Archegos Exposure Was Reportedly Over $20 Billion</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nCredit Suisse's Archegos Exposure Was Reportedly Over $20 Billion\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-04-22 09:57 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/credit-suisses-archegos-exposure-was-reportedly-over-20-billion><strong>zerohedge</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Justminutes after the SEC is reportedly\"exploring how to increase transparency for the types of derivative bets that sank Archegos,\"The Wall Street Journal reportsthat Credit Suisse Group AG had ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/credit-suisses-archegos-exposure-was-reportedly-over-20-billion\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/credit-suisses-archegos-exposure-was-reportedly-over-20-billion","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1163748793","content_text":"Justminutes after the SEC is reportedly\"exploring how to increase transparency for the types of derivative bets that sank Archegos,\"The Wall Street Journal reportsthat Credit Suisse Group AG had somehow allowed a massive exposure to investments related to Archegos Capital Management ormore than $20 billion.\nWhile the bank has said that its losses on the positions amounted to $4.7 billion,WSJ, citing people familiar with the matter, reports that Archegos' bets on a collection of stocks swelled in the lead-up to its March collapse, butparts of the investment bank hadn't fully implemented systems to keep pace with Archegos's fast growth.\nSome inside the bank who were familiar with Archegos's exposure hadthought it was a fraction of the roughly $20 billion figure, one of the people familiar with the matter said.\nAs the 'perp walk' of various executives and risk managers at the historic Swiss bank grows longer,we suspect this is not the last we will hear, as Credit Suisse has said its dealings with both Archegos and Greensill need \"substantial further review and scrutiny.\"\nFinally, we note none of this is really surprising given that,as we just detailed, Bloomberg on Wednesday published an anonymously sourced story laying the blame for the Archegos blowup at the feet ofParshu Shah.\nReportedly, thanks to a gutting of the compliance function at the bank,Shah,who served as the salesman in charge of nurturing the bank's relationship with Archegos....had also been head of risk at the bank's prime-services business.\nSo, no wonder he never got the tap on the shoulder...","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":105,"commentLimit":10,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"symbols":[],"verified":2,"subType":0,"readableState":1,"langContent":"EN","currentLanguage":"EN","warmUpFlag":false,"orderFlag":false,"shareable":true,"causeOfNotShareable":"","featuresForAnalytics":[],"commentAndTweetFlag":false,"andRepostAutoSelectedFlag":false,"upFlag":false,"length":5,"xxTargetLangEnum":"ORIG"},"commentList":[],"hasMoreComment":false,"orderType":2}