$陆金所(LU)$陆_老虎社区_美港股上老虎

hatrjimmy
2020-10-23

$陆金所(LU)$陆金所上次c轮估值395亿，现在ipo才估330亿？看来剥离p2p后陆金所只能给金融股的估值，还不到蚂蚁的1/10，金融股的话打就没意思了，c轮的大佬们打折都要走，我们小散来接盘？

免责声明：上述内容仅代表发帖人个人观点，不构成本平台的任何投资建议。

推荐
最新

暂无评论

热议股票

关于我们·老虎社区守则·老虎社区账号管理规范·老虎社区服务协议·老虎社区隐私政策

公司名称：北京至简风宜信息技术有限公司

违法和不良信息投诉：010-5681-3562（工作时间9:30-18:30）

邮箱：service@laohu8.com

营业执照：91110105MA01A4U55R

ICP备：京ICP备18016422号

网安备：京公网安备11010502036490

关注我们

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"data":{"magic":2,"id":301843324,"tweetId":"301843324","gmtCreate":1603451476368,"gmtModify":1703830010570,"author":{"id":3546033757212992,"authorId":3546033757212992,"authorIdStr":"3546033757212992","name":"hatrjimmy","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"userType":1,"introduction":"","boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"fanSize":1,"starInvestorFlag":false},"themes":[],"images":[],"coverImages":[],"extraTitle":"","html":"<html><head></head><body><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LU\">$陆金所(LU)$</a>陆金所上次c轮估值395亿，现在ipo才估330亿？看来剥离p2p后陆金所只能给金融股的估值，还不到蚂蚁的1/10，金融股的话打就没意思了，c轮的大佬们打折都要走，我们小散来接盘？</p></body></html>","htmlText":"<html><head></head><body><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LU\">$陆金所(LU)$</a>陆金所上次c轮估值395亿，现在ipo才估330亿？看来剥离p2p后陆金所只能给金融股的估值，还不到蚂蚁的1/10，金融股的话打就没意思了，c轮的大佬们打折都要走，我们小散来接盘？</p></body></html>","text":"$陆金所(LU)$陆金所上次c轮估值395亿，现在ipo才估330亿？看来剥离p2p后陆金所只能给金融股的估值，还不到蚂蚁的1/10，金融股的话打就没意思了，c轮的大佬们打折都要走，我们小散来接盘？","highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/301843324","repostId":0,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":679,"commentLimit":10,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"symbols":["LU"],"verified":2,"subType":0,"readableState":1,"langContent":"CN","currentLanguage":"CN","warmUpFlag":false,"orderFlag":false,"shareable":true,"causeOfNotShareable":"","featuresForAnalytics":[],"commentAndTweetFlag":false,"upFlag":false,"length":167,"xxTargetLangEnum":"ZH_CN"},"commentList":[],"hasMoreComment":false,"orderType":2}