Good_老虎社区_美港股上老虎

54ae95d
2021-07-19

Good

Bill Ackman Was Too Clever for His Own Good

Pershing Square wanted to reinvent how SPACs operate. Now it’s back to the drawing board after the c

Bill Ackman Was Too Clever for His Own Good

免责声明：上述内容仅代表发帖人个人观点，不构成本平台的任何投资建议。

推荐
最新

暂无评论

热议股票

关于我们·老虎社区守则·老虎社区账号管理规范·老虎社区服务协议·老虎社区隐私政策

公司名称：北京至简风宜信息技术有限公司

违法和不良信息投诉：010-5681-3562（工作时间9:30-18:30）

邮箱：service@laohu8.com

营业执照：91110105MA01A4U55R

ICP备：京ICP备18016422号

网安备：京公网安备11010502036490

关注我们

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"data":{"magic":2,"id":171911175,"tweetId":"171911175","gmtCreate":1626702099397,"gmtModify":1631887528905,"author":{"id":3581547759733110,"idStr":"3581547759733110","authorId":3581547759733110,"authorIdStr":"3581547759733110","name":"54ae95d","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"userType":1,"introduction":"","boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"fanSize":13,"starInvestorFlag":false},"themes":[],"images":[],"coverImages":[],"extraTitle":"","html":"<html><head></head><body><p>Good</p></body></html>","htmlText":"<html><head></head><body><p>Good</p></body></html>","text":"Good","highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/171911175","repostId":1107082783,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1107082783","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1626700621,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1107082783?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-19 21:17","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Bill Ackman Was Too Clever for His Own Good","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1107082783","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"Pershing Square wanted to reinvent how SPACs operate. Now it’s back to the drawing board after the c","content":"<blockquote>\n Pershing Square wanted to reinvent how SPACs operate. Now it’s back to the drawing board&nbsp;after the complex Universal Music Group deal met opposition.\n</blockquote>\n<p>Bill Ackman wasn’t content just to raise the largest SPAC ever —&nbsp;the $4 billion Pershing Square Tontine Holdings Ltd. He wanted to reinvent how blank-check firms&nbsp;operate.&nbsp;The deal he proposedin June to purchase a stake in Universal Music Group was also one of the most complex the&nbsp;world of special purpose acquisition vehicles had&nbsp;ever known. Aslide deckoutlining its various contortions ran to 130&nbsp;pages.</p>\n<p>Ackman may now have to ponder whether there’s perhaps a thing as too much complexity. On Monday $PSTH, as it’s referred to by its retail investor devotees,&nbsp;announcedit will no longer&nbsp;proceed with the Universal transaction. The U.S.&nbsp;Securities and Exchange Commission raised objections and shareholders also gave the deal&nbsp;the thumbs down by pummeling the stock. So that Universal’s owner, Vivendi SE, isn’t left hanging, Ackman’s investment firm, Pershing Square Holdings Ltd., and affiliates will buy a Universal stake and assume the transaction costs. Universal will still become a public company, it’s just that Ackman’s SPAC won’t be involved.</p>\n<p>Ackman’s determination to innovate and reform SPACs remains admirable. They’re often ridden with conflicts, excessive fees and potential shareholder dilution. But confidence he can pull off a top-caliber&nbsp;deal has&nbsp;taken a hit here. In short: He was too clever for his own good.</p>\n<p>The SEC apparently had several issues with the way the Universal deal was structured. Pershing Square didn’t spell out precisely what these were but said the primary sticking point was whether the structure of the Universal&nbsp;deal qualified under New York Stock Exchange rules.</p>\n<p>It was certainly unique and complex undertaking. For starters, Universal wasn’t intending to take over PSTH’s stock market listing on the NYSE via a merger as is usually the case.&nbsp;Universal is being listed in Amsterdam and Ackman’s SPAC planned just to acquire a 10% stake and then distribute shares of the world’s largest music company to its&nbsp;shareholders. Instead of offering them&nbsp;a vote on the transaction, Ackman proposed a speedier redemption tender offer, whereby anyone who didn’t like the deal&nbsp;could&nbsp;get their money back (as they&nbsp;can in regular SPAC transactions).</p>\n<p>With the $1.6 billion cash left over after buying the Universal stake, Ackman’s SPAC&nbsp;planned to pursue another deal. And the final twist, shareholders would also get a right to put cash into another future Pershing Square transaction. He&nbsp;dubbed that a&nbsp;“SPARC,” a&nbsp;special purpose acquisition rights company. Instead of asking for money upfront, as most SPACs do, Ackman would find a target first and then shareholders could decide&nbsp;if they wanted to put money in. This would avoid expensive underwriting fees and investors parking money in the SPAC for a long period for little return. Unlike a regular blank-check firm, it wouldn’t be under time pressure to find a deal.</p>\n<p>Elements of this were&nbsp;quite attractive and Ackman was adamant the SPAC shareholders were getting a lot of value. However, it appears that the novel approach was a stretch too far for the SEC. PSTH decided the regulator’s&nbsp;objections couldn’t be overcome.</p>\n<p>It wasn’t just the SEC that had&nbsp;doubts though: Trading&nbsp;at a large premium to the value of its cash holdings prior to the Universal deal being announced,&nbsp;the stock has since declined 18% to $20.63, not far from&nbsp;the $20&nbsp;price at which shareholders could tender to get their money back. Surprisingly, the company said it hadn’t anticipated the potential impact on investors who couldn’t hold foreign securities, who margin their shares or who own call options on the stock.</p>\n<p>PSTH has a large cohort of retail investor followers and many of them were convinced Ackman would serve up a&nbsp;juicy transaction. Instead, they’ve received an unpleasant lesson that paying more for a blank-check firm share than the value of the cash it&nbsp;holds is risky when you don’t yet know what it will buy.</p>\n<p>When outlining the deal to shareholders last month, Ackman allowed himself a little boast: “I think I’ll put out a little advertisement —&nbsp;we’re pretty good at this stuff. And so if you’re a counterparty that has got some complex legal, tax, cross-border or other issues, we’re here to solve your problems.”</p>\n<p>Unfortunately, the plan brought on headaches instead. Ackman has 18 months to find an attractive target and restore the retail crowd’s faith in him. He’s promised that next time the deal will be structured as a “conventional SPAC merger.”&nbsp;After this searing experience, the simpler the better.</p>","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Bill Ackman Was Too Clever for His Own Good</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBill Ackman Was Too Clever for His Own Good\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-19 21:17 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2021-07-19/-psth-pulls-universal-music-deal-bill-ackman-was-too-clever-for-his-own-good?srnd=premium-asia><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Pershing Square wanted to reinvent how SPACs operate. Now it’s back to the drawing board after the complex Universal Music Group deal met opposition.\n\nBill Ackman wasn’t content just to raise the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2021-07-19/-psth-pulls-universal-music-deal-bill-ackman-was-too-clever-for-his-own-good?srnd=premium-asia\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"PSHZF":"Pershing Square Holdings Ltd."},"source_url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2021-07-19/-psth-pulls-universal-music-deal-bill-ackman-was-too-clever-for-his-own-good?srnd=premium-asia","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1107082783","content_text":"Pershing Square wanted to reinvent how SPACs operate. Now it’s back to the drawing board after the complex Universal Music Group deal met opposition.\n\nBill Ackman wasn’t content just to raise the largest SPAC ever — the $4 billion Pershing Square Tontine Holdings Ltd. He wanted to reinvent how blank-check firms operate. The deal he proposedin June to purchase a stake in Universal Music Group was also one of the most complex the world of special purpose acquisition vehicles had ever known. Aslide deckoutlining its various contortions ran to 130 pages.\nAckman may now have to ponder whether there’s perhaps a thing as too much complexity. On Monday $PSTH, as it’s referred to by its retail investor devotees, announcedit will no longer proceed with the Universal transaction. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission raised objections and shareholders also gave the deal the thumbs down by pummeling the stock. So that Universal’s owner, Vivendi SE, isn’t left hanging, Ackman’s investment firm, Pershing Square Holdings Ltd., and affiliates will buy a Universal stake and assume the transaction costs. Universal will still become a public company, it’s just that Ackman’s SPAC won’t be involved.\nAckman’s determination to innovate and reform SPACs remains admirable. They’re often ridden with conflicts, excessive fees and potential shareholder dilution. But confidence he can pull off a top-caliber deal has taken a hit here. In short: He was too clever for his own good.\nThe SEC apparently had several issues with the way the Universal deal was structured. Pershing Square didn’t spell out precisely what these were but said the primary sticking point was whether the structure of the Universal deal qualified under New York Stock Exchange rules.\nIt was certainly unique and complex undertaking. For starters, Universal wasn’t intending to take over PSTH’s stock market listing on the NYSE via a merger as is usually the case. Universal is being listed in Amsterdam and Ackman’s SPAC planned just to acquire a 10% stake and then distribute shares of the world’s largest music company to its shareholders. Instead of offering them a vote on the transaction, Ackman proposed a speedier redemption tender offer, whereby anyone who didn’t like the deal could get their money back (as they can in regular SPAC transactions).\nWith the $1.6 billion cash left over after buying the Universal stake, Ackman’s SPAC planned to pursue another deal. And the final twist, shareholders would also get a right to put cash into another future Pershing Square transaction. He dubbed that a “SPARC,” a special purpose acquisition rights company. Instead of asking for money upfront, as most SPACs do, Ackman would find a target first and then shareholders could decide if they wanted to put money in. This would avoid expensive underwriting fees and investors parking money in the SPAC for a long period for little return. Unlike a regular blank-check firm, it wouldn’t be under time pressure to find a deal.\nElements of this were quite attractive and Ackman was adamant the SPAC shareholders were getting a lot of value. However, it appears that the novel approach was a stretch too far for the SEC. PSTH decided the regulator’s objections couldn’t be overcome.\nIt wasn’t just the SEC that had doubts though: Trading at a large premium to the value of its cash holdings prior to the Universal deal being announced, the stock has since declined 18% to $20.63, not far from the $20 price at which shareholders could tender to get their money back. Surprisingly, the company said it hadn’t anticipated the potential impact on investors who couldn’t hold foreign securities, who margin their shares or who own call options on the stock.\nPSTH has a large cohort of retail investor followers and many of them were convinced Ackman would serve up a juicy transaction. Instead, they’ve received an unpleasant lesson that paying more for a blank-check firm share than the value of the cash it holds is risky when you don’t yet know what it will buy.\nWhen outlining the deal to shareholders last month, Ackman allowed himself a little boast: “I think I’ll put out a little advertisement — we’re pretty good at this stuff. And so if you’re a counterparty that has got some complex legal, tax, cross-border or other issues, we’re here to solve your problems.”\nUnfortunately, the plan brought on headaches instead. Ackman has 18 months to find an attractive target and restore the retail crowd’s faith in him. He’s promised that next time the deal will be structured as a “conventional SPAC merger.” After this searing experience, the simpler the better.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":127,"commentLimit":10,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"symbols":[],"verified":2,"subType":0,"readableState":1,"langContent":"EN","currentLanguage":"EN","warmUpFlag":false,"orderFlag":false,"shareable":true,"causeOfNotShareable":"","featuresForAnalytics":[],"commentAndTweetFlag":false,"andRepostAutoSelectedFlag":false,"upFlag":false,"length":4,"xxTargetLangEnum":"ORIG"},"commentList":[],"hasMoreComment":false,"orderType":2}

Bill Ackman Was Too Clever for His Own Good

评论（1）

热议股票