Like and comment_老虎社区_美港股上老虎

JKLah
2021-06-18

Like and comment

Lordstown Insists Vehicle Purchase Agreements are Not Binding – Report

Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according

Lordstown Insists Vehicle Purchase Agreements are Not Binding – Report

免责声明：上述内容仅代表发帖人个人观点，不构成本平台的任何投资建议。

推荐
最新

暂无评论

热议股票

关于我们·老虎社区守则·老虎社区账号管理规范·老虎社区服务协议·老虎社区隐私政策

公司名称：北京至简风宜信息技术有限公司

违法和不良信息投诉：010-5681-3562（工作时间9:30-18:30）

邮箱：service@laohu8.com

营业执照：91110105MA01A4U55R

ICP备：京ICP备18016422号

网安备：京公网安备11010502036490

关注我们

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"data":{"magic":2,"id":166430481,"tweetId":"166430481","gmtCreate":1624021621643,"gmtModify":1634024011994,"author":{"id":3573174104481531,"idStr":"3573174104481531","authorId":3573174104481531,"authorIdStr":"3573174104481531","name":"JKLah","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"userType":1,"introduction":"","boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"fanSize":1,"starInvestorFlag":false},"themes":[],"images":[],"coverImages":[],"extraTitle":"","html":"<html><head></head><body><p>Like and comment</p></body></html>","htmlText":"<html><head></head><body><p>Like and comment</p></body></html>","text":"Like and comment","highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/166430481","repostId":2144779346,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2144779346","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1624020610,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2144779346?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-06-18 20:50","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Lordstown Insists Vehicle Purchase Agreements are Not Binding – Report","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2144779346","media":"SmarterAnalyst","summary":"Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according","content":"<p>Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according to a regulatory filing submitted by Lordstown Motors (<b>RIDE</b>). The filing came just a day after the company’s President stated it had “pretty binding” preorders to sustain its operations through 2022, reports the <i>Wall Street Journal</i>.</p>\n<p>The vehicle purchase agreements are valid for about 3 to 5 years and include Lordstown as the preferred supplier. They also come with down payment terms. According to the embattled electric truck company, the purchase orders only act as an indicator of demand in the market.</p>\n<p>Lordstown has seen its prospects turn sour in recent months, having already warned that it does not have sufficient capital to oversee commercial production, let alone operate for another year. Top leaders resigning unexpectedly following inaccuracies on the company’s truck preorders have only continued to arouse concerns.</p>\n<p>Amid the uncertainty around Lordstown's long-term prospects, R.F. Lafferty analyst Jaime Perez has downgraded the stock to a Sell from a Hold. Perez commented, \"With the level of uncertainty increasing in the future of Lordstown, we find it prudent to lower our rating to Sell. In addition, we reduced our price target by $6 to $3 per share.\"</p>\n<p>The analyst's revised price target implies 70.9% downside potential to current levels.</p>\n<p>Consensus among analysts is a Moderate Sell based on 1 Buy, 3 Holds, and 4 Sells. The Lordstown average analyst price target of $9 implies 12.71% downside potential to current levels.</p>\n<p>RIDE scores a 1 out of 10 on TipRanks’ Smart Score rating system, suggesting that the stock is likely to underperform market averages.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fdc71c24833b1f062f8ce7dd04c7a3c0\" tg-width=\"870\" tg-height=\"363\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>","source":"yahoofinance","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Lordstown Insists Vehicle Purchase Agreements are Not Binding – Report</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nLordstown Insists Vehicle Purchase Agreements are Not Binding – Report\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-18 20:50 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/lordstown-insists-vehicle-purchase-agreements-122210593.html><strong>SmarterAnalyst</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according to a regulatory filing submitted by Lordstown Motors (RIDE). The filing came just a day after the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/lordstown-insists-vehicle-purchase-agreements-122210593.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/lordstown-insists-vehicle-purchase-agreements-122210593.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5f26f4a48f9cb3e29be4d71d3ba8c038","article_id":"2144779346","content_text":"Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according to a regulatory filing submitted by Lordstown Motors (RIDE). The filing came just a day after the company’s President stated it had “pretty binding” preorders to sustain its operations through 2022, reports the Wall Street Journal.\nThe vehicle purchase agreements are valid for about 3 to 5 years and include Lordstown as the preferred supplier. They also come with down payment terms. According to the embattled electric truck company, the purchase orders only act as an indicator of demand in the market.\nLordstown has seen its prospects turn sour in recent months, having already warned that it does not have sufficient capital to oversee commercial production, let alone operate for another year. Top leaders resigning unexpectedly following inaccuracies on the company’s truck preorders have only continued to arouse concerns.\nAmid the uncertainty around Lordstown's long-term prospects, R.F. Lafferty analyst Jaime Perez has downgraded the stock to a Sell from a Hold. Perez commented, \"With the level of uncertainty increasing in the future of Lordstown, we find it prudent to lower our rating to Sell. In addition, we reduced our price target by $6 to $3 per share.\"\nThe analyst's revised price target implies 70.9% downside potential to current levels.\nConsensus among analysts is a Moderate Sell based on 1 Buy, 3 Holds, and 4 Sells. The Lordstown average analyst price target of $9 implies 12.71% downside potential to current levels.\nRIDE scores a 1 out of 10 on TipRanks’ Smart Score rating system, suggesting that the stock is likely to underperform market averages.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":161,"commentLimit":10,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"symbols":[],"verified":2,"subType":0,"readableState":1,"langContent":"EN","currentLanguage":"EN","warmUpFlag":false,"orderFlag":false,"shareable":true,"causeOfNotShareable":"","featuresForAnalytics":[],"commentAndTweetFlag":false,"andRepostAutoSelectedFlag":false,"upFlag":false,"length":14,"xxTargetLangEnum":"ORIG"},"commentList":[],"hasMoreComment":false,"orderType":2}