个人中心 - 老虎社区

ShawnLing

IP属地：未知

帖子 · 6帖子 · 6
关注 · 0关注 · 0
粉丝 · 0粉丝 · 0

- ShawnLingShawnLing
  ·2021-03-30
  Hm
  Amazon.com pursues its own networking chip amid frosty Broadcom relationship - report
  Amazon.com (AMZN-1%) isdeveloping a chip to power the hardware switches used in networking, The Info
  Amazon.com pursues its own networking chip amid frosty Broadcom relationship - report
  103 评论
  1
  分享
  举报
- ShawnLingShawnLing
  ·2021-03-30
  Toh
  Archegos? Argh, Chaos More Like
  I noted yesterday that the expected market turbulence caused by the Archegos sell-off was not repres
  Archegos? Argh, Chaos More Like
  125 评论
  2
  分享
  举报
- ShawnLingShawnLing
  ·2021-03-25
  Big red
  非常抱歉，此主贴已删除
  101 1
  4
  分享
  举报
- ShawnLingShawnLing
  ·2021-03-25
  like and test save my red portfolio
  非常抱歉，此主贴已删除
  43 2
  3
  分享
  举报
- ShawnLingShawnLing
  ·2021-03-11
  Test
  Better Buy: Netflix vs. Amazon
  Comparing the two pioneers of industry.
  Better Buy: Netflix vs. Amazon
  89 评论
  点赞
  分享
  举报
- ShawnLingShawnLing
  ·2021-03-11
  Test
  Warren Buffett is now worth $100 billion
  New York/Hong Kong - Warren Buffett has just joined the world's most exclusive club of the mega rich.The legendary American investor was worth $100 billion on Thursday, according to the Bloomberg Billionaire's Index. That puts him in the company of just five other men above that threshold. And he's now the sixth richest person in the world, ranking just behindFacebookCEO Mark Zuckerberg.The 90-year-old Buffett has added nearly $13 billion to his net worth this year as shares in his industrial a
  Warren Buffett is now worth $100 billion
  144 评论
  1
  分享
  举报

热议股票

关于我们·老虎社区守则·老虎社区账号管理规范·老虎社区服务协议·老虎社区隐私政策

公司名称：北京至简风宜信息技术有限公司

违法和不良信息投诉：010-5681-3562（工作时间9:30-18:30）

邮箱：service@laohu8.com

老虎社区侵权投诉指引

中国互联网举报中心·北京互联网举报中心

网络谣言曝光台·扫黄打非举报中心

网络110报警服务

© 2018-2024 老虎社区版权所有

营业执照：91110105MA01A4U55R

ICP备：京ICP备18016422号

网安备：京公网安备11010502036490

qrcode

关注我们

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"isCurrentUser":false,"userPageInfo":{"id":"3562916867510024","uuid":"3562916867510024","gmtCreate":1599830465052,"gmtModify":1617026881430,"name":"ShawnLing","pinyin":"shawnling","introduction":"","introductionEn":null,"signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/edd8f7bb778d2da2f9d3f7732c5523a7","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":0,"headSize":7,"tweetSize":6,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":0,"name":"","nameTw":"","represent":"","factor":"","iconColor":"","bgColor":""},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":null,"userBadges":[{"badgeId":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561-1","templateUuid":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561","name":"出道虎友","description":"加入老虎社区500天","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0e4d0ca1da0456dc7894c946d44bf9ab","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0f2f65e8ce4cfaae8db2bea9b127f58b","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5948a31b6edf154422335b265235809","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.02.01","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a-1","templateUuid":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a","name":"实盘交易者","description":"完成一笔实盘交易","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":2,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":"未知","starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"page":1,"watchlist":null,"tweetList":[{"id":354044980,"gmtCreate":1617114678340,"gmtModify":1634522574334,"author":{"id":"3562916867510024","authorId":"3562916867510024","name":"ShawnLing","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/edd8f7bb778d2da2f9d3f7732c5523a7","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562916867510024","authorIdStr":"3562916867510024"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hm","listText":"Hm","text":"Hm","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/354044980","repostId":"1185065950","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1185065950","pubTimestamp":1617114074,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1185065950?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-30 22:21","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Amazon.com pursues its own networking chip amid frosty Broadcom relationship - report","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1185065950","media":"seekingalpha","summary":"Amazon.com (AMZN-1%) isdeveloping a chip to power the hardware switches used in networking, The Info","content":"<p>Amazon.com (AMZN-1%) isdeveloping a chip to power the hardware switches used in networking, The Information reports - amove that could reduce its reliance on Broadcom (AVGO-2.9%), with which it has a cool relationship.</p>\n<p>For years Amazon has designed its own semiconductors to speed performance in its Amazon Web Services/AI operations.</p>\n<p>Now, tapping its Annapurna Labs unit, Amazon is making a bigger step toward taking control over a key part of its technologies. A hardware switch chip would be part of a broader effort to make the performance of its cloud servers indistinguishable from those in private data centers.</p>\n<p>AWS also plans to design an array of networking hardware components and software to cut latency and move data quickly, according to the report.</p>\n<p>The company is initially expected to use switches powered by its chip to run the internal network, though it might not be surprising if services based off the switches were offered to AWS customers.</p>\n<p>For years Amazon has bought Broadcom chips in bulk, helping it reduce its reliance on more expensive networking silicon from the likes of Cisco Systems (CSCO-2%) and Juniper Networks (JNPR-1.8%).</p>\n<p>But that relationship is frosty, according to the report, in part because Broadcom CEO Hock Tan is known for hardball negotiation tactics (including surprise price hikes, pressing for exclusivity deals and dramatically extending lead times if customers push back).</p>\n<p>And while Amazon will move away from using Broadcom, it may still buy chips from other networking players like Marvell (MRVL-0.5%) and Intel (INTC-1.3%), the report says.</p>","source":"seekingalpha","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Amazon.com pursues its own networking chip amid frosty Broadcom relationship - report</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAmazon.com pursues its own networking chip amid frosty Broadcom relationship - report\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-30 22:21 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/news/3677611-amazoncom-pursues-its-own-networking-chip-amid-frosty-broadcom-relationship-report><strong>seekingalpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Amazon.com (AMZN-1%) isdeveloping a chip to power the hardware switches used in networking, The Information reports - amove that could reduce its reliance on Broadcom (AVGO-2.9%), with which it has a ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/news/3677611-amazoncom-pursues-its-own-networking-chip-amid-frosty-broadcom-relationship-report\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fe94fc940e9c4fcf157bb67f28e9ff8e","relate_stocks":{"AMZN":"亚马逊"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/news/3677611-amazoncom-pursues-its-own-networking-chip-amid-frosty-broadcom-relationship-report","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5a36db9d73b4222bc376d24ccc48c8a4","article_id":"1185065950","content_text":"Amazon.com (AMZN-1%) isdeveloping a chip to power the hardware switches used in networking, The Information reports - amove that could reduce its reliance on Broadcom (AVGO-2.9%), with which it has a cool relationship.\nFor years Amazon has designed its own semiconductors to speed performance in its Amazon Web Services/AI operations.\nNow, tapping its Annapurna Labs unit, Amazon is making a bigger step toward taking control over a key part of its technologies. A hardware switch chip would be part of a broader effort to make the performance of its cloud servers indistinguishable from those in private data centers.\nAWS also plans to design an array of networking hardware components and software to cut latency and move data quickly, according to the report.\nThe company is initially expected to use switches powered by its chip to run the internal network, though it might not be surprising if services based off the switches were offered to AWS customers.\nFor years Amazon has bought Broadcom chips in bulk, helping it reduce its reliance on more expensive networking silicon from the likes of Cisco Systems (CSCO-2%) and Juniper Networks (JNPR-1.8%).\nBut that relationship is frosty, according to the report, in part because Broadcom CEO Hock Tan is known for hardball negotiation tactics (including surprise price hikes, pressing for exclusivity deals and dramatically extending lead times if customers push back).\nAnd while Amazon will move away from using Broadcom, it may still buy chips from other networking players like Marvell (MRVL-0.5%) and Intel (INTC-1.3%), the report says.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":103,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":354045712,"gmtCreate":1617114654136,"gmtModify":1634522574454,"author":{"id":"3562916867510024","authorId":"3562916867510024","name":"ShawnLing","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/edd8f7bb778d2da2f9d3f7732c5523a7","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562916867510024","authorIdStr":"3562916867510024"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Toh","listText":"Toh","text":"Toh","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/354045712","repostId":"1149049776","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1149049776","pubTimestamp":1617114349,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1149049776?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-30 22:25","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Archegos? Argh, Chaos More Like","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1149049776","media":"zerohedge","summary":"I noted yesterday that the expected market turbulence caused by the Archegos sell-off was not repres","content":"<p>I noted yesterday that the expected market turbulence caused by the Archegos sell-off was not representative of the underlying structural issues that will guide markets going forwards. I stick by that claim, but even so what a messy day it was. Some individual stocks got hit hard, and US bond yields were up, presumably due to the need to sell anything to get liquidity, while the USD see-sawed.<b>Archegos? ‘</b><i><b>Argh, chaos</b></i><b>’ more like.</b></p><p>This overshadowed the good news that the Suez Canal is now open again. However, there is a link between the two:<b>both stories reveal how stupid the key infrastructure of the global economy and financial system still is. ‘Too big to sail and too big to fail’, as some dub the two halves of this dyad: and Joe Public can again see our system encourages entities to get so large and complex that when a simple incident happens, everything gets stuck.</b>Something surely needs to change, unless we are going to assume there can’t be any more ‘Argh, chaos’ “because markets”, or any more stuck giant ships in the Suez Canal “because boats”.</p><p>So, change? Fed Governor Waller spoke to the Peterson Institute for International Economics yesterday, where he<b>rejected any suggestions the Fed was close to embracing the MMT</b>: he wanted to “<i>definitively put that narrative to rest. It is simply wrong</i>”. Borrowing costs are<i>not</i>being kept low to help finance the government, apparently. (<b>It’s all inflation; and unemployment; and social justice; and the climate</b>?) Clearly there won’t be any need for an Operation Twist and Shout or for Yield Curve Control then…but can we get that in writing?</p><p>At the same time,<b>the press reports the Biden administration is planning a</b><i><b>further</b></i><b>Covid relief bill separate from a key infrastructure bill to be launched Wednesday; and the latter is now rumored to be for as much as</b><i><b>USD4 trillion</b></i><b>, or close to 20% of GDP</b>, funded by USD3 trillion of tax hikes on businesses and the rich, the largest hike in a generation, as opposed to the original idea of USD3 trillion in spending funded by USD1 trillion of taxes.</p><p>If the larger stimulus package is the one put forward, it means<b>there is no sign of MMT in the White House</b>either, because the net spend of USD1 trillion (over a decade) is hardly in the money-printing category. Instead,<b>there is a</b><b><i>redistributive</i></b><b>fiscal package that presumes USD3 trillion the rich have can be spent more productively on bridges, roads, and ports</b>, etc., than on $100m condos filled with gold-dusted caviar or stock buybacks. Cue a shift of political debate from ‘MMT’ vs. ‘no MMT’ to ‘The government doesn’t know what it’s doing!’ vs. ‘The rich<i>do</i>know what they are doing – turning the US into an oligarchic kleptocracy’. And may the best lobbyists win.</p><p>As a linked aside, yesterday I saw 1963 US plans for an alternative to the Suez Canal, because at the time Egypt was a Soviet client state. This was to use *530* nukes to blow a 160-mile long, 1,500 foot deep channel through Israel from its Mediterranean coast to the Red Sea, which would “<i>probably contribute greatly to the economic development of the surrounding area</i>”(!) That underlines the idiocy of central planning<i>and</i>of Cold War thinking. Which is doubly worrying given any new Cold War is again very likely going to see key global infrastructure in the hands of states not aligned with US geostrategic interests, and the US is already talking about its own Belt and Road rival (as China seems to slowly back away from the economic drain of its own).<b>Beware Americans bearing nukes.</b></p><p>Yet the economic national-security Hamiltonian model, the ideas of Henry George, and the fact Eisenhower built the US inter-state highway network partially to prevent Soviet invasion from either coast, still all hold as much water as the glow-in-the-dark 160-mile long monstrosity through Israel would have.</p><p>Meanwhile, as the US and nukes and the Middle East make headlines for different reasons today, but still leaving much of Israel feeling antsy, BOJ Governor Kuroda just stated he will continue to buy ETFs within a JPY12 trillion cap “<i>with a close eye on markets</i>” even after Covid is over; he won’t sell the BOJ’s stock of ETFs; and the inflation target stays at 2% (ROFL!). He also thinks that it is “<i>natural for the government to deploy fiscal stimulus flexibly, though Japan must also maintain market trust over its medium- and long-term fiscal health</i>.” (Will the people in the market who associate Japan with long-term fiscal health please stand up?) The BOJ will also “<i>support various entities’ efforts towards reform as Japan faces challenges in the post-Covid world</i>”: does he mean the local Olympic Games Committee? In short, more of the same is on offer from the BOJ – which has worked so magnificently for it so far.</p><p>That’s another lesson for the US.<b>Structural reform needs to be</b><i><b>structural</b></i>, not just cementing over river beds – or blowing up the Negev desert.</p><p>On which note, the FTSE Bond Index just announced that it is about to include Chinese government bonds (CGBs) in its world index, allowing global investors to buy both sides of the Cold War bet and all related public expenditures. But there is a sting in the tail:<b>the FTSE CGB weighting will be just 5.25%, not the 6.5% expected, starting October 29, and this will be tapered in over 36 months, not 12 months as originally believed</b>.</p><p>A few months ago, when China was seeing too much capital flow in for its liking, that slower pace might have been welcome. Indeed, and ironically, much of the capital that went in to Chinese markets from foreign funds is believed to have been encouraged to flow straight back out again via different channels to prevent excess appreciation pressure on the currency (and note that China’s FX reserves have hardly soared). Yet CNY and CNH are starting to move markedly lower again; and genuine capital outflows are being experienced as US yields rise, even despite bumper Covid-related trade surpluses (which will fade with the virus does). Moreover,<b>with the geopolitical backdrop this Cold, how could this most political of all FX crosses not eventually respond in kind?</b></p><p>One wonders what the Fed (and ECB and BOJ) would make of any sustained move lower in CNY, given what it will mean for inflation; and the White House, given what it means for jobs.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Archegos? Argh, Chaos More Like</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nArchegos? Argh, Chaos More Like\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-30 22:25 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/archegos-argh-chaos-more?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29><strong>zerohedge</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>I noted yesterday that the expected market turbulence caused by the Archegos sell-off was not representative of the underlying structural issues that will guide markets going forwards. I stick by that...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/archegos-argh-chaos-more?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/487980eafa9a1c606a77e47e87065651","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/archegos-argh-chaos-more?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1149049776","content_text":"I noted yesterday that the expected market turbulence caused by the Archegos sell-off was not representative of the underlying structural issues that will guide markets going forwards. I stick by that claim, but even so what a messy day it was. Some individual stocks got hit hard, and US bond yields were up, presumably due to the need to sell anything to get liquidity, while the USD see-sawed.Archegos? ‘Argh, chaos’ more like.This overshadowed the good news that the Suez Canal is now open again. However, there is a link between the two:both stories reveal how stupid the key infrastructure of the global economy and financial system still is. ‘Too big to sail and too big to fail’, as some dub the two halves of this dyad: and Joe Public can again see our system encourages entities to get so large and complex that when a simple incident happens, everything gets stuck.Something surely needs to change, unless we are going to assume there can’t be any more ‘Argh, chaos’ “because markets”, or any more stuck giant ships in the Suez Canal “because boats”.So, change? Fed Governor Waller spoke to the Peterson Institute for International Economics yesterday, where herejected any suggestions the Fed was close to embracing the MMT: he wanted to “definitively put that narrative to rest. It is simply wrong”. Borrowing costs arenotbeing kept low to help finance the government, apparently. (It’s all inflation; and unemployment; and social justice; and the climate?) Clearly there won’t be any need for an Operation Twist and Shout or for Yield Curve Control then…but can we get that in writing?At the same time,the press reports the Biden administration is planning afurtherCovid relief bill separate from a key infrastructure bill to be launched Wednesday; and the latter is now rumored to be for as much asUSD4 trillion, or close to 20% of GDP, funded by USD3 trillion of tax hikes on businesses and the rich, the largest hike in a generation, as opposed to the original idea of USD3 trillion in spending funded by USD1 trillion of taxes.If the larger stimulus package is the one put forward, it meansthere is no sign of MMT in the White Houseeither, because the net spend of USD1 trillion (over a decade) is hardly in the money-printing category. Instead,there is aredistributivefiscal package that presumes USD3 trillion the rich have can be spent more productively on bridges, roads, and ports, etc., than on $100m condos filled with gold-dusted caviar or stock buybacks. Cue a shift of political debate from ‘MMT’ vs. ‘no MMT’ to ‘The government doesn’t know what it’s doing!’ vs. ‘The richdoknow what they are doing – turning the US into an oligarchic kleptocracy’. And may the best lobbyists win.As a linked aside, yesterday I saw 1963 US plans for an alternative to the Suez Canal, because at the time Egypt was a Soviet client state. This was to use *530* nukes to blow a 160-mile long, 1,500 foot deep channel through Israel from its Mediterranean coast to the Red Sea, which would “probably contribute greatly to the economic development of the surrounding area”(!) That underlines the idiocy of central planningandof Cold War thinking. Which is doubly worrying given any new Cold War is again very likely going to see key global infrastructure in the hands of states not aligned with US geostrategic interests, and the US is already talking about its own Belt and Road rival (as China seems to slowly back away from the economic drain of its own).Beware Americans bearing nukes.Yet the economic national-security Hamiltonian model, the ideas of Henry George, and the fact Eisenhower built the US inter-state highway network partially to prevent Soviet invasion from either coast, still all hold as much water as the glow-in-the-dark 160-mile long monstrosity through Israel would have.Meanwhile, as the US and nukes and the Middle East make headlines for different reasons today, but still leaving much of Israel feeling antsy, BOJ Governor Kuroda just stated he will continue to buy ETFs within a JPY12 trillion cap “with a close eye on markets” even after Covid is over; he won’t sell the BOJ’s stock of ETFs; and the inflation target stays at 2% (ROFL!). He also thinks that it is “natural for the government to deploy fiscal stimulus flexibly, though Japan must also maintain market trust over its medium- and long-term fiscal health.” (Will the people in the market who associate Japan with long-term fiscal health please stand up?) The BOJ will also “support various entities’ efforts towards reform as Japan faces challenges in the post-Covid world”: does he mean the local Olympic Games Committee? In short, more of the same is on offer from the BOJ – which has worked so magnificently for it so far.That’s another lesson for the US.Structural reform needs to bestructural, not just cementing over river beds – or blowing up the Negev desert.On which note, the FTSE Bond Index just announced that it is about to include Chinese government bonds (CGBs) in its world index, allowing global investors to buy both sides of the Cold War bet and all related public expenditures. But there is a sting in the tail:the FTSE CGB weighting will be just 5.25%, not the 6.5% expected, starting October 29, and this will be tapered in over 36 months, not 12 months as originally believed.A few months ago, when China was seeing too much capital flow in for its liking, that slower pace might have been welcome. Indeed, and ironically, much of the capital that went in to Chinese markets from foreign funds is believed to have been encouraged to flow straight back out again via different channels to prevent excess appreciation pressure on the currency (and note that China’s FX reserves have hardly soared). Yet CNY and CNH are starting to move markedly lower again; and genuine capital outflows are being experienced as US yields rise, even despite bumper Covid-related trade surpluses (which will fade with the virus does). Moreover,with the geopolitical backdrop this Cold, how could this most political of all FX crosses not eventually respond in kind?One wonders what the Fed (and ECB and BOJ) would make of any sustained move lower in CNY, given what it will mean for inflation; and the White House, given what it means for jobs.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":125,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":358807857,"gmtCreate":1616677848779,"gmtModify":1634524609162,"author":{"id":"3562916867510024","authorId":"3562916867510024","name":"ShawnLing","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/edd8f7bb778d2da2f9d3f7732c5523a7","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562916867510024","authorIdStr":"3562916867510024"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Big red","listText":"Big red","text":"Big red","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/358807857","repostId":"1156972629","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":101,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":358804192,"gmtCreate":1616677802116,"gmtModify":1634524609845,"author":{"id":"3562916867510024","authorId":"3562916867510024","name":"ShawnLing","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/edd8f7bb778d2da2f9d3f7732c5523a7","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562916867510024","authorIdStr":"3562916867510024"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"like and test save my red portfolio","listText":"like and test save my red portfolio","text":"like and test save my red portfolio","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/358804192","repostId":"1142620967","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":43,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":328904146,"gmtCreate":1615477384885,"gmtModify":1703489748983,"author":{"id":"3562916867510024","authorId":"3562916867510024","name":"ShawnLing","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/edd8f7bb778d2da2f9d3f7732c5523a7","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562916867510024","authorIdStr":"3562916867510024"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Test","listText":"Test","text":"Test","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/328904146","repostId":"2118984296","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2118984296","pubTimestamp":1615475224,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2118984296?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-11 23:07","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Better Buy: Netflix vs. Amazon","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2118984296","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Comparing the two pioneers of industry.","content":"<p>Investors comparing <b>Netflix</b> (NASDAQ:NFLX) and <b>Amazon </b>(NASDAQ:AMZN) may think first of the companies' rivalry in streaming video -- but&nbsp;these stocks' efforts to begin new industries probably serve as a more important commonality. Amazon stood out by spawning two different powerhouse business segments: e-commerce and cloud computing. While that advantage could make Amazon the better bet over the streaming video pioneer, investors should take a closer look at both to evaluate which stock holds more potential for higher returns.</p>\n<h2>Comparing the businesses</h2>\n<p>Netflix has definitely benefited from its own strategic decision-making. It transitioned away from mail-in DVDs as soon as technology allowed for streaming. It also pivoted to proprietary content as competitors began to emerge. Today, Netflix leads the streaming market with almost 204 million subscribers as it dominates the Golden Globes. This subscriber count far outpaces its nearest competitor, <b>Disney</b>'s Disney+, with around 95 million subscribers.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c33886ce245b1d455d6d469bd098609e\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\"><span>Image source: Getty Images</span></p>\n<p>Amazon similarly leads in e-commerce, selling nearly $341 billion in goods in 2020. While that still lags <b>Walmart</b>'s (NYSE:WMT) $555 billion in net sales, Walmart earns most revenue from in-store retailing.&nbsp;Also, Amazon has started a successful cloud computing business, AWS. It maintains a significant market lead over competitors, controlling about <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a>-third of the market, according to ParkMyCloud. Additionally, AWS accounts for the majority of Amazon's profits.</p>\n<p>As mentioned before, both operate streaming video platforms. Nonetheless, Amazon treats streaming as an added benefit for subscribing to its Prime service and does not release specific financial figures on Prime Video. Thus, for purposes of comparing stocks, investors should not view the two companies as \"competitors.\"</p>\n<h2>Competitive advantages</h2>\n<p>Instead, investors should look more closely at what each company's financials reveal about its true strengths and weaknesses.</p>\n<p>In fiscal 2020, Netflix's revenue increased by 24% year over year to nearly $25 billion. Its net income rose 48% to just under $2.8 billion over the same period. Income surged as slower growth in operating expenses more than offset Netflix's rising cost of interest and foreign exchange losses.</p>\n<p>Nonetheless, investors should take Netflix's net income with a grain of salt. Debt moved higher as content spending steadily rose. BMO Capital Markets forecasted over $17 billion in content spending in 2020. The pandemic shut down production for much of the year, and Netflix did not confirm that figure or reveal how much it allocated to content in 2020.</p>\n<p>Nonetheless, the company spent $15 billion in content development in 2019. This conflicts with the $12.4 billion reported in cost of revenue that year, meaning debt likely financed some development costs.</p>\n<p>As a result, total debt has risen from under $3.4 billion in 2016 to over $16.3 billion in 2020. This far exceeds equity of just under $11.1 billion, the company's value after subtracting liabilities from assets, and leaves the debt-to-equity ratio at almost 1.5.</p>\n<p>Nonetheless, for 2020 Netflix reported free cash flow of more than $1.9 billion, its first year of positive free cash flow since 2011. This covered the $767 million in interest expenses for 2020. Still, the negative cash flow in previous years leads to questions about how Netflix will cover interest expenses if production spending again leads to negative cash flow.</p>\n<p>Knowing this discrepancy, investors should question how long Netflix can finance content development through debt. Eventually, the company may have to dilute shares or scale back development to maintain its financial stability.&nbsp;</p>\n<p>This approach stands in stark contrast to Amazon's financial picture. Its net sales grew by 38% from year-ago levels to $386.1 billion, and net income rose by 84% to $11.1 billion. Income surged as operating expense growth lagged revenue increases, and, unlike in 2019, Amazon turned a non-operating profit in 2020.</p>\n<p>Amazon's leadership in two industries also serves as an advantage. AWS accounted for $13.5 billion of Amazon's $22.9 billion in operating income in 2020. This allows AWS to subsidize competitive initiatives.</p>\n<p>In 2019, net income grew modestly for retailing as the company switched from two-day to <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a>-day shipping. As a result, overall shipping costs in 2019 rose by more than $10 billion, or 37% from year-ago levels, during a period when retail sales revenue increased by just over 18%, or $38 billion during that period. However, since AWS increased operating income by 26%, the company still grew net income by 15%.</p>\n<p>Amazon also supports a more stable balance sheet. In 2020, long-term debt increased by more than $8 billion to $31.8 billion. Nonetheless, the $31 billion in annual free cash flow easily covered interest expenses of just over $1.6 billion.&nbsp;Also, since Amazon supports an equity value of $93.4 billion, its debt-to-equity ratio comes in at a more comfortable 0.3. This makes debt a less significant burden for Amazon than for Netflix.</p>\n<h2>Netflix or Amazon?</h2>\n<p>That debt picture also helps Amazon come out a clear winner among these tech stocks. Netflix appears headed for a hard choice between financial stability and staying ahead in the content race. In contrast, the profit levels of AWS can insulate Amazon amid a highly competitive retail environment. This success in two different industries of its own creation makes Amazon difficult to challenge.</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Better Buy: Netflix vs. Amazon</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBetter Buy: Netflix vs. Amazon\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-11 23:07 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/11/better-buy-netflix-vs-amazon/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Investors comparing Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) and Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN) may think first of the companies' rivalry in streaming video -- but these stocks' efforts to begin new industries probably serve as a...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/11/better-buy-netflix-vs-amazon/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NFLX":"奈飞","AMZN":"亚马逊"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/11/better-buy-netflix-vs-amazon/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2118984296","content_text":"Investors comparing Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) and Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN) may think first of the companies' rivalry in streaming video -- but these stocks' efforts to begin new industries probably serve as a more important commonality. Amazon stood out by spawning two different powerhouse business segments: e-commerce and cloud computing. While that advantage could make Amazon the better bet over the streaming video pioneer, investors should take a closer look at both to evaluate which stock holds more potential for higher returns.\nComparing the businesses\nNetflix has definitely benefited from its own strategic decision-making. It transitioned away from mail-in DVDs as soon as technology allowed for streaming. It also pivoted to proprietary content as competitors began to emerge. Today, Netflix leads the streaming market with almost 204 million subscribers as it dominates the Golden Globes. This subscriber count far outpaces its nearest competitor, Disney's Disney+, with around 95 million subscribers.\nImage source: Getty Images\nAmazon similarly leads in e-commerce, selling nearly $341 billion in goods in 2020. While that still lags Walmart's (NYSE:WMT) $555 billion in net sales, Walmart earns most revenue from in-store retailing. Also, Amazon has started a successful cloud computing business, AWS. It maintains a significant market lead over competitors, controlling about one-third of the market, according to ParkMyCloud. Additionally, AWS accounts for the majority of Amazon's profits.\nAs mentioned before, both operate streaming video platforms. Nonetheless, Amazon treats streaming as an added benefit for subscribing to its Prime service and does not release specific financial figures on Prime Video. Thus, for purposes of comparing stocks, investors should not view the two companies as \"competitors.\"\nCompetitive advantages\nInstead, investors should look more closely at what each company's financials reveal about its true strengths and weaknesses.\nIn fiscal 2020, Netflix's revenue increased by 24% year over year to nearly $25 billion. Its net income rose 48% to just under $2.8 billion over the same period. Income surged as slower growth in operating expenses more than offset Netflix's rising cost of interest and foreign exchange losses.\nNonetheless, investors should take Netflix's net income with a grain of salt. Debt moved higher as content spending steadily rose. BMO Capital Markets forecasted over $17 billion in content spending in 2020. The pandemic shut down production for much of the year, and Netflix did not confirm that figure or reveal how much it allocated to content in 2020.\nNonetheless, the company spent $15 billion in content development in 2019. This conflicts with the $12.4 billion reported in cost of revenue that year, meaning debt likely financed some development costs.\nAs a result, total debt has risen from under $3.4 billion in 2016 to over $16.3 billion in 2020. This far exceeds equity of just under $11.1 billion, the company's value after subtracting liabilities from assets, and leaves the debt-to-equity ratio at almost 1.5.\nNonetheless, for 2020 Netflix reported free cash flow of more than $1.9 billion, its first year of positive free cash flow since 2011. This covered the $767 million in interest expenses for 2020. Still, the negative cash flow in previous years leads to questions about how Netflix will cover interest expenses if production spending again leads to negative cash flow.\nKnowing this discrepancy, investors should question how long Netflix can finance content development through debt. Eventually, the company may have to dilute shares or scale back development to maintain its financial stability. \nThis approach stands in stark contrast to Amazon's financial picture. Its net sales grew by 38% from year-ago levels to $386.1 billion, and net income rose by 84% to $11.1 billion. Income surged as operating expense growth lagged revenue increases, and, unlike in 2019, Amazon turned a non-operating profit in 2020.\nAmazon's leadership in two industries also serves as an advantage. AWS accounted for $13.5 billion of Amazon's $22.9 billion in operating income in 2020. This allows AWS to subsidize competitive initiatives.\nIn 2019, net income grew modestly for retailing as the company switched from two-day to one-day shipping. As a result, overall shipping costs in 2019 rose by more than $10 billion, or 37% from year-ago levels, during a period when retail sales revenue increased by just over 18%, or $38 billion during that period. However, since AWS increased operating income by 26%, the company still grew net income by 15%.\nAmazon also supports a more stable balance sheet. In 2020, long-term debt increased by more than $8 billion to $31.8 billion. Nonetheless, the $31 billion in annual free cash flow easily covered interest expenses of just over $1.6 billion. Also, since Amazon supports an equity value of $93.4 billion, its debt-to-equity ratio comes in at a more comfortable 0.3. This makes debt a less significant burden for Amazon than for Netflix.\nNetflix or Amazon?\nThat debt picture also helps Amazon come out a clear winner among these tech stocks. Netflix appears headed for a hard choice between financial stability and staying ahead in the content race. In contrast, the profit levels of AWS can insulate Amazon amid a highly competitive retail environment. This success in two different industries of its own creation makes Amazon difficult to challenge.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":89,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":328905219,"gmtCreate":1615477360331,"gmtModify":1703489748291,"author":{"id":"3562916867510024","authorId":"3562916867510024","name":"ShawnLing","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/edd8f7bb778d2da2f9d3f7732c5523a7","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562916867510024","authorIdStr":"3562916867510024"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Test","listText":"Test","text":"Test","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/328905219","repostId":"1119544264","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1119544264","pubTimestamp":1615476407,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1119544264?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-11 23:26","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Warren Buffett is now worth $100 billion","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1119544264","media":"CNN Business","summary":"New York/Hong Kong  - Warren Buffett has just joined the world's most exclusive club of the mega rich.The legendary American investor was worth $100 billion on Thursday, according to the Bloomberg Billionaire's Index. That puts him in the company of just five other men above that threshold. And he's now the sixth richest person in the world, ranking just behindFacebookCEO Mark Zuckerberg.The 90-year-old Buffett has added nearly $13 billion to his net worth this year as shares in his industrial a","content":"<p><b>New York/Hong Kong (CNN Business)&nbsp;-&nbsp;</b>Warren Buffett has just joined the world's most exclusive club of the mega rich.</p>\n<p>The legendary American investor was worth $100 billion on Thursday, according to the&nbsp;Bloomberg Billionaire's Index. That puts him in the company of just five other men above that threshold. And he's now the sixth richest person in the world, ranking just behindFacebook(FB)CEO Mark&nbsp;Zuckerberg.</p>\n<p>The 90-year-old&nbsp;Buffett&nbsp;has added nearly $13 billion to his net worth this year as shares in his industrial and insurance conglomerate have surged.Berkshire Hathaway(BRKA)is up nearly 15% in 2021, giving the company a market capitalization of more than $600 billion.</p>\n<p>Buffett and Berkshire Hathaway are famous for investing primarily in slow growth, \"value\" stocks — many of which have done very well this year as markets continue to recover from the pandemic-fueled crash a year ago. He recently revealed that Berkshire&nbsp;bought stakes in Dow components&nbsp;Chevron and Verizon, indicating a new interest in Big Oil, telecom and media.</p>\n<p>Chevron(CVX)is up 31% as&nbsp;crude prices recover the ground they lost&nbsp;during the early months of the pandemic.Verizon(VZ)&nbsp;hasn't fared nearly as well — the stock is down nearly 3% this year — but it's still above the lows it hit in March 2020.</p>\n<p>While Buffett has cracked the $100 billion mark, he's still a long way behind the world's richest person,Amazon(AMZN)CEO Jeff Bezos, who is worth $180 billion, according to Bloomberg. Bezos has been trading the title withTesla(TSLA)CEO Elon Musk, who's now worth $173 billion&nbsp;as shares in his electric carmaker rallyfrom recent losses.</p>\n<p>Microsoft(MSFT)co-founder Bill Gates is No. 3 on the list at $138 billion, while Bernard Arnault, the chairman of luxury goods groupLVMH(LVMHF), ranks No. 4 with $122 billion. Arnault is the wealthiest non-American on the list. Zuckerberg is No. 5 with a net worth of $101 billion.Buffett has donated billions of dollars to philanthropic causes, and in 2006, pledged to give away&nbsp;almost all of his fortune to charity.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Warren Buffett is now worth $100 billion</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWarren Buffett is now worth $100 billion\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-11 23:26 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://edition.cnn.com/2021/03/11/business/warren-buffett-net-worth-intl-hnk/index.html><strong>CNN Business</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>New York/Hong Kong (CNN Business) - Warren Buffett has just joined the world's most exclusive club of the mega rich.\nThe legendary American investor was worth $100 billion on Thursday, according to ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/03/11/business/warren-buffett-net-worth-intl-hnk/index.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BRK.A":"伯克希尔","BRK.B":"伯克希尔B"},"source_url":"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/03/11/business/warren-buffett-net-worth-intl-hnk/index.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1119544264","content_text":"New York/Hong Kong (CNN Business) - Warren Buffett has just joined the world's most exclusive club of the mega rich.\nThe legendary American investor was worth $100 billion on Thursday, according to the Bloomberg Billionaire's Index. That puts him in the company of just five other men above that threshold. And he's now the sixth richest person in the world, ranking just behindFacebook(FB)CEO Mark Zuckerberg.\nThe 90-year-old Buffett has added nearly $13 billion to his net worth this year as shares in his industrial and insurance conglomerate have surged.Berkshire Hathaway(BRKA)is up nearly 15% in 2021, giving the company a market capitalization of more than $600 billion.\nBuffett and Berkshire Hathaway are famous for investing primarily in slow growth, \"value\" stocks — many of which have done very well this year as markets continue to recover from the pandemic-fueled crash a year ago. He recently revealed that Berkshire bought stakes in Dow components Chevron and Verizon, indicating a new interest in Big Oil, telecom and media.\nChevron(CVX)is up 31% as crude prices recover the ground they lost during the early months of the pandemic.Verizon(VZ) hasn't fared nearly as well — the stock is down nearly 3% this year — but it's still above the lows it hit in March 2020.\nWhile Buffett has cracked the $100 billion mark, he's still a long way behind the world's richest person,Amazon(AMZN)CEO Jeff Bezos, who is worth $180 billion, according to Bloomberg. Bezos has been trading the title withTesla(TSLA)CEO Elon Musk, who's now worth $173 billion as shares in his electric carmaker rallyfrom recent losses.\nMicrosoft(MSFT)co-founder Bill Gates is No. 3 on the list at $138 billion, while Bernard Arnault, the chairman of luxury goods groupLVMH(LVMHF), ranks No. 4 with $122 billion. Arnault is the wealthiest non-American on the list. Zuckerberg is No. 5 with a net worth of $101 billion.Buffett has donated billions of dollars to philanthropic causes, and in 2006, pledged to give away almost all of his fortune to charity.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":144,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"defaultTab":"posts","isTTM":false}