Facebook questioned by oversight board over celebrity rules_老虎社区_美港股上老虎

Facebook questioned by oversight board over celebrity rules

The Straits Times2021-09-22

WASHINGTON (BLOOMBERG) - Facebook's de facto Supreme Court of content is calling on the social media giant to release more information about how it moderates posts by famous people. The Facebook ...

网页链接

免责声明：本文观点仅代表作者个人观点，不构成本平台的投资建议，本平台不对文章信息准确性、完整性和及时性做出任何保证，亦不对因使用或信赖文章信息引发的任何损失承担责任。

Rickyt089
·2021-09-22
Like pls
回复
1
举报
ALearner
·2021-09-22
Is this the reason that FB dropped so much today?
回复
2
举报
EY12
·2021-09-22
Hi
回复
1
举报
收起
- EY12:
  like
  2021-09-22
  回复
  举报
MN27
·2021-09-22
Like pls
回复
1
举报
Kitsonlin
·2021-09-22
Up
回复
1
举报
Andrewinho
·2021-09-22
Up n strong!!! 🤩🤩🤩
回复
1
举报
richcat
·2021-09-22
hmm
回复
1
举报
Missys
·2021-09-22
Hmmm
回复
3
举报
收起
- richcat:
  hmm
  2021-09-22
  回复
  举报
DansonYong
·2021-09-22
Yes
回复
1
举报
chiaguan
·2021-09-22
1
回复
3
举报
收起
- chiaguan:
  1
  2021-09-22
  回复
  举报
DanteD
·2021-09-22
Nice
回复
1
举报
收起
- Andrewinho:
  👏👏👏
  2021-09-22
  回复
  举报

热议股票

7x24

全部

关于我们·老虎社区守则·老虎社区账号管理规范·老虎社区服务协议·老虎社区隐私政策

公司名称：北京至简风宜信息技术有限公司

违法和不良信息投诉：010-5681-3562（工作时间9:30-18:30）

邮箱：service@laohu8.com

营业执照：91110105MA01A4U55R

ICP备：京ICP备18016422号

网安备：京公网安备11010502036490

关注我们

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"data":{"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2169630525?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","thumbnail":"","is_english":true,"pubTime":"2021-09-22 08:34","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","id":"2169630525","market":"us","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"Facebook questioned by oversight board over celebrity rules","media":"The Straits Times","content":"<div>\n<p>WASHINGTON (BLOOMBERG) - Facebook's de facto Supreme Court of content is calling on the social media giant to release more information about how it moderates posts by famous people.\nThe Facebook ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"http://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/facebook-questioned-by-oversight-board-over-celebrity-rules\">网页链接</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"straits_highlight","html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Facebook questioned by oversight board over celebrity rules</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFacebook questioned by oversight board over celebrity rules\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-09-22 08:34 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=http://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/facebook-questioned-by-oversight-board-over-celebrity-rules><strong>The Straits Times</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>WASHINGTON (BLOOMBERG) - Facebook's de facto Supreme Court of content is calling on the social media giant to release more information about how it moderates posts by famous people.\nThe Facebook ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"http://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/facebook-questioned-by-oversight-board-over-celebrity-rules\">网页链接</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":null,"symbol_name":null,"start_time":0,"source_url":"http://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/facebook-questioned-by-oversight-board-over-celebrity-rules","article_id":"2169630525","we_media_id":null,"thumbnails":[],"rights":{"source":"straits_highlight","url":"http://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/facebook-questioned-by-oversight-board-over-celebrity-rules","rn_cache_url":null,"customStyle":"","selectors":"body","filters":"","directOrigin":true},"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2169630525","pubTimestamp":1632270851,"sourceInfo":{"source_id":"straits_highlight","name":"Straits Times"},"weMediaInfo":null,"summary":"WASHINGTON (BLOOMBERG) - Facebook's de facto Supreme Court of content is calling on the social media","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"straitstimes.com","property":[],"viewcount":null,"language":"en","relate_stocks":{},"translate_title":"脸书因名人规则受到监督委员会的质疑","themeId":null,"isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":null,"symbols_score_info":{"FB":0.9},"content_text":"WASHINGTON (BLOOMBERG) - Facebook's de facto Supreme Court of content is calling on the social media giant to release more information about how it moderates posts by famous people.\nThe Facebook Oversight Board said in a statement on Tuesday (Sept 22) that it has asked Facebook to provide more clarity about a program designed to protect high-profile figures from having their posts mistakenly taken down.\nThe review by the Oversight Board follows a Wall Street Journal report revealing details about a system Facebook built to exempt high-profile users in politics, popular culture and journalism from enforcement action over posts that break their rules.\nThe program, known as \"cross check\", was designed to avoid public relations backlash over famous people who mistaken have their posts taken down, the newspaper reported.\nWhile Facebook told the oversight board the program affects only a \"small number of decisions\", it actually included at least 5.8 million users in 2020, according to the newspaper.\n\"In light of recent developments, we are looking into the degree to which Facebook has been fully forthcoming in its responses in relation to cross-check, including the practice of whitelisting,\" the board wrote.\nUsers who are \"whitelisted\" don't face enforcement actions, the newspaper reported.\n\"These disclosures have drawn renewed attention to the seemingly inconsistent way that the company makes decisions, and why greater transparency and independent oversight of Facebook matter so much for users,\" the board said.\nThe board said it expects to receive a briefing from Facebook in the coming days and will issue a public analysis next month.","kind":null,"is_publish_news":true,"is_publish_highlight":true,"is_publish_live":false,"is_publish_wemedia":null,"editions":null,"column":"","sentiment":"0","news_tag":"","news_rank":0,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":1},"commentList":[{"id":869731446,"gmtCreate":1632321075885,"gmtModify":1632801244518,"author":{"id":"3571612770300673","authorId":"3571612770300673","name":"Rickyt089","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4e75fb09fa53aa8d7db329d6599d40c1","vip":1,"crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3571612770300673","idStr":"3571612770300673"},"htmlText":"Like pls","listText":"Like pls","text":"Like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/869731446","repostId":2169630525,"repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2169630525","pubTimestamp":1632270851,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2169630525?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-09-22 08:34","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Facebook questioned by oversight board over celebrity rules","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2169630525","media":"The Straits Times","summary":"WASHINGTON (BLOOMBERG) - Facebook's de facto Supreme Court of content is calling on the social media","content":"<div>\n<p>WASHINGTON (BLOOMBERG) - Facebook's de facto Supreme Court of content is calling on the social media giant to release more information about how it moderates posts by famous people.\nThe Facebook ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"http://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/facebook-questioned-by-oversight-board-over-celebrity-rules\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"straits_highlight","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Facebook questioned by oversight board over celebrity rules</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFacebook questioned by oversight board over celebrity rules\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-09-22 08:34 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=http://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/facebook-questioned-by-oversight-board-over-celebrity-rules><strong>The Straits Times</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>WASHINGTON (BLOOMBERG) - Facebook's de facto Supreme Court of content is calling on the social media giant to release more information about how it moderates posts by famous people.\nThe Facebook ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"http://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/facebook-questioned-by-oversight-board-over-celebrity-rules\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"http://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/facebook-questioned-by-oversight-board-over-celebrity-rules","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2169630525","content_text":"WASHINGTON (BLOOMBERG) - Facebook's de facto Supreme Court of content is calling on the social media giant to release more information about how it moderates posts by famous people.\nThe Facebook Oversight Board said in a statement on Tuesday (Sept 22) that it has asked Facebook to provide more clarity about a program designed to protect high-profile figures from having their posts mistakenly taken down.\nThe review by the Oversight Board follows a Wall Street Journal report revealing details about a system Facebook built to exempt high-profile users in politics, popular culture and journalism from enforcement action over posts that break their rules.\nThe program, known as \"cross check\", was designed to avoid public relations backlash over famous people who mistaken have their posts taken down, the newspaper reported.\nWhile Facebook told the oversight board the program affects only a \"small number of decisions\", it actually included at least 5.8 million users in 2020, according to the newspaper.\n\"In light of recent developments, we are looking into the degree to which Facebook has been fully forthcoming in its responses in relation to cross-check, including the practice of whitelisting,\" the board wrote.\nUsers who are \"whitelisted\" don't face enforcement actions, the newspaper reported.\n\"These disclosures have drawn renewed attention to the seemingly inconsistent way that the company makes decisions, and why greater transparency and independent oversight of Facebook matter so much for users,\" the board said.\nThe board said it expects to receive a briefing from Facebook in the coming days and will issue a public analysis next month.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":869442474,"gmtCreate":1632319139698,"gmtModify":1632801274954,"author":{"id":"3581627611317712","authorId":"3581627611317712","name":"ALearner","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/dd4e09038044887c08337f0d263b9446","vip":1,"crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3581627611317712","idStr":"3581627611317712"},"htmlText":"Is this the reason that FB dropped so much today?&nbsp;","listText":"Is this the reason that FB dropped so much today?&nbsp;","text":"Is this the reason that FB dropped so much today?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/869442474","repostId":2169630525,"repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2169630525","pubTimestamp":1632270851,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2169630525?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-09-22 08:34","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Facebook questioned by oversight board over celebrity rules","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2169630525","media":"The Straits Times","summary":"WASHINGTON (BLOOMBERG) - Facebook's de facto Supreme Court of content is calling on the social media","content":"<div>\n<p>WASHINGTON (BLOOMBERG) - Facebook's de facto Supreme Court of content is calling on the social media giant to release more information about how it moderates posts by famous people.\nThe Facebook ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"http://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/facebook-questioned-by-oversight-board-over-celebrity-rules\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"straits_highlight","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Facebook questioned by oversight board over celebrity rules</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFacebook questioned by oversight board over celebrity rules\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-09-22 08:34 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=http://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/facebook-questioned-by-oversight-board-over-celebrity-rules><strong>The Straits Times</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>WASHINGTON (BLOOMBERG) - Facebook's de facto Supreme Court of content is calling on the social media giant to release more information about how it moderates posts by famous people.\nThe Facebook ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"http://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/facebook-questioned-by-oversight-board-over-celebrity-rules\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"http://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/facebook-questioned-by-oversight-board-over-celebrity-rules","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2169630525","content_text":"WASHINGTON (BLOOMBERG) - Facebook's de facto Supreme Court of content is calling on the social media giant to release more information about how it moderates posts by famous people.\nThe Facebook Oversight Board said in a statement on Tuesday (Sept 22) that it has asked Facebook to provide more clarity about a program designed to protect high-profile figures from having their posts mistakenly taken down.\nThe review by the Oversight Board follows a Wall Street Journal report revealing details about a system Facebook built to exempt high-profile users in politics, popular culture and journalism from enforcement action over posts that break their rules.\nThe program, known as \"cross check\", was designed to avoid public relations backlash over famous people who mistaken have their posts taken down, the newspaper reported.\nWhile Facebook told the oversight board the program affects only a \"small number of decisions\", it actually included at least 5.8 million users in 2020, according to the newspaper.\n\"In light of recent developments, we are looking into the degree to which Facebook has been fully forthcoming in its responses in relation to cross-check, including the practice of whitelisting,\" the board wrote.\nUsers who are \"whitelisted\" don't face enforcement actions, the newspaper reported.\n\"These disclosures have drawn renewed attention to the seemingly inconsistent way that the company makes decisions, and why greater transparency and independent oversight of Facebook matter so much for users,\" the board said.\nThe board said it expects to receive a briefing from Facebook in the coming days and will issue a public analysis next month.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":869858844,"gmtCreate":1632274322588,"gmtModify":1632801571192,"author":{"id":"3569935580474431","authorId":"3569935580474431","name":"EY12","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/103e86782b34598ff73873d5f9259adb","vip":1,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3569935580474431","idStr":"3569935580474431"},"htmlText":"Hi","listText":"Hi","text":"Hi","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/869858844","repostId":2169630525,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2169630525","pubTimestamp":1632270851,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2169630525?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-09-22 08:34","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Facebook questioned by oversight board over celebrity rules","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2169630525","media":"The Straits Times","summary":"WASHINGTON (BLOOMBERG) - Facebook's de facto Supreme Court of content is calling on the social media","content":"<div>\n<p>WASHINGTON (BLOOMBERG) - Facebook's de facto Supreme Court of content is calling on the social media giant to release more information about how it moderates posts by famous people.\nThe Facebook ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"http://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/facebook-questioned-by-oversight-board-over-celebrity-rules\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"straits_highlight","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Facebook questioned by oversight board over celebrity rules</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFacebook questioned by oversight board over celebrity rules\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-09-22 08:34 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=http://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/facebook-questioned-by-oversight-board-over-celebrity-rules><strong>The Straits Times</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>WASHINGTON (BLOOMBERG) - Facebook's de facto Supreme Court of content is calling on the social media giant to release more information about how it moderates posts by famous people.\nThe Facebook ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"http://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/facebook-questioned-by-oversight-board-over-celebrity-rules\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"http://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/facebook-questioned-by-oversight-board-over-celebrity-rules","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2169630525","content_text":"WASHINGTON (BLOOMBERG) - Facebook's de facto Supreme Court of content is calling on the social media giant to release more information about how it moderates posts by famous people.\nThe Facebook Oversight Board said in a statement on Tuesday (Sept 22) that it has asked Facebook to provide more clarity about a program designed to protect high-profile figures from having their posts mistakenly taken down.\nThe review by the Oversight Board follows a Wall Street Journal report revealing details about a system Facebook built to exempt high-profile users in politics, popular culture and journalism from enforcement action over posts that break their rules.\nThe program, known as \"cross check\", was designed to avoid public relations backlash over famous people who mistaken have their posts taken down, the newspaper reported.\nWhile Facebook told the oversight board the program affects only a \"small number of decisions\", it actually included at least 5.8 million users in 2020, according to the newspaper.\n\"In light of recent developments, we are looking into the degree to which Facebook has been fully forthcoming in its responses in relation to cross-check, including the practice of whitelisting,\" the board wrote.\nUsers who are \"whitelisted\" don't face enforcement actions, the newspaper reported.\n\"These disclosures have drawn renewed attention to the seemingly inconsistent way that the company makes decisions, and why greater transparency and independent oversight of Facebook matter so much for users,\" the board said.\nThe board said it expects to receive a briefing from Facebook in the coming days and will issue a public analysis next month.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":5953677,"gmtCreate":1632274332383,"gmtModify":1634789575741,"authorId":3569935580474431,"author":{"id":3569935580474431,"idStr":"3569935580474431","authorId":3569935580474431,"name":"EY12","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/103e86782b34598ff73873d5f9259adb","vip":1,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":869858844,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"<u>like</u>","text":"<u>like</u>","html":"<u>like</u>"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":869822718,"gmtCreate":1632273820334,"gmtModify":1632801578309,"author":{"id":"3585973860502184","authorId":"3585973860502184","name":"MN27","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0a11b544b50a084b6af0533c0b412c51","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3585973860502184","idStr":"3585973860502184"},"htmlText":"Like pls","listText":"Like pls","text":"Like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/869822718","repostId":2169630525,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2169630525","pubTimestamp":1632270851,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2169630525?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-09-22 08:34","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Facebook questioned by oversight board over celebrity rules","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2169630525","media":"The Straits Times","summary":"WASHINGTON (BLOOMBERG) - Facebook's de facto Supreme Court of content is calling on the social media","content":"<div>\n<p>WASHINGTON (BLOOMBERG) - Facebook's de facto Supreme Court of content is calling on the social media giant to release more information about how it moderates posts by famous people.\nThe Facebook ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"http://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/facebook-questioned-by-oversight-board-over-celebrity-rules\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"straits_highlight","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Facebook questioned by oversight board over celebrity rules</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFacebook questioned by oversight board over celebrity rules\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-09-22 08:34 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=http://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/facebook-questioned-by-oversight-board-over-celebrity-rules><strong>The Straits Times</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>WASHINGTON (BLOOMBERG) - Facebook's de facto Supreme Court of content is calling on the social media giant to release more information about how it moderates posts by famous people.\nThe Facebook ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"http://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/facebook-questioned-by-oversight-board-over-celebrity-rules\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"http://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/facebook-questioned-by-oversight-board-over-celebrity-rules","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2169630525","content_text":"WASHINGTON (BLOOMBERG) - Facebook's de facto Supreme Court of content is calling on the social media giant to release more information about how it moderates posts by famous people.\nThe Facebook Oversight Board said in a statement on Tuesday (Sept 22) that it has asked Facebook to provide more clarity about a program designed to protect high-profile figures from having their posts mistakenly taken down.\nThe review by the Oversight Board follows a Wall Street Journal report revealing details about a system Facebook built to exempt high-profile users in politics, popular culture and journalism from enforcement action over posts that break their rules.\nThe program, known as \"cross check\", was designed to avoid public relations backlash over famous people who mistaken have their posts taken down, the newspaper reported.\nWhile Facebook told the oversight board the program affects only a \"small number of decisions\", it actually included at least 5.8 million users in 2020, according to the newspaper.\n\"In light of recent developments, we are looking into the degree to which Facebook has been fully forthcoming in its responses in relation to cross-check, including the practice of whitelisting,\" the board wrote.\nUsers who are \"whitelisted\" don't face enforcement actions, the newspaper reported.\n\"These disclosures have drawn renewed attention to the seemingly inconsistent way that the company makes decisions, and why greater transparency and independent oversight of Facebook matter so much for users,\" the board said.\nThe board said it expects to receive a briefing from Facebook in the coming days and will issue a public analysis next month.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":869816121,"gmtCreate":1632271927863,"gmtModify":1632801605335,"author":{"id":"4088412711170620","authorId":"4088412711170620","name":"Kitsonlin","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f4c50ef7ee78d822dd86b84cd4150c59","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"4088412711170620","idStr":"4088412711170620"},"htmlText":"Up","listText":"Up","text":"Up","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/869816121","repostId":2169630525,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2169630525","pubTimestamp":1632270851,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2169630525?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-09-22 08:34","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Facebook questioned by oversight board over celebrity rules","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2169630525","media":"The Straits Times","summary":"WASHINGTON (BLOOMBERG) - Facebook's de facto Supreme Court of content is calling on the social media","content":"<div>\n<p>WASHINGTON (BLOOMBERG) - Facebook's de facto Supreme Court of content is calling on the social media giant to release more information about how it moderates posts by famous people.\nThe Facebook ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"http://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/facebook-questioned-by-oversight-board-over-celebrity-rules\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"straits_highlight","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Facebook questioned by oversight board over celebrity rules</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFacebook questioned by oversight board over celebrity rules\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-09-22 08:34 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=http://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/facebook-questioned-by-oversight-board-over-celebrity-rules><strong>The Straits Times</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>WASHINGTON (BLOOMBERG) - Facebook's de facto Supreme Court of content is calling on the social media giant to release more information about how it moderates posts by famous people.\nThe Facebook ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"http://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/facebook-questioned-by-oversight-board-over-celebrity-rules\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"http://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/facebook-questioned-by-oversight-board-over-celebrity-rules","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2169630525","content_text":"WASHINGTON (BLOOMBERG) - Facebook's de facto Supreme Court of content is calling on the social media giant to release more information about how it moderates posts by famous people.\nThe Facebook Oversight Board said in a statement on Tuesday (Sept 22) that it has asked Facebook to provide more clarity about a program designed to protect high-profile figures from having their posts mistakenly taken down.\nThe review by the Oversight Board follows a Wall Street Journal report revealing details about a system Facebook built to exempt high-profile users in politics, popular culture and journalism from enforcement action over posts that break their rules.\nThe program, known as \"cross check\", was designed to avoid public relations backlash over famous people who mistaken have their posts taken down, the newspaper reported.\nWhile Facebook told the oversight board the program affects only a \"small number of decisions\", it actually included at least 5.8 million users in 2020, according to the newspaper.\n\"In light of recent developments, we are looking into the degree to which Facebook has been fully forthcoming in its responses in relation to cross-check, including the practice of whitelisting,\" the board wrote.\nUsers who are \"whitelisted\" don't face enforcement actions, the newspaper reported.\n\"These disclosures have drawn renewed attention to the seemingly inconsistent way that the company makes decisions, and why greater transparency and independent oversight of Facebook matter so much for users,\" the board said.\nThe board said it expects to receive a briefing from Facebook in the coming days and will issue a public analysis next month.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":869813211,"gmtCreate":1632271781333,"gmtModify":1632801606819,"author":{"id":"3581563418944392","authorId":"3581563418944392","name":"Andrewinho","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3127e2bc40ab23064a5187a00a63e19b","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3581563418944392","idStr":"3581563418944392"},"htmlText":"Up n strong!!! 🤩🤩🤩","listText":"Up n strong!!! 🤩🤩🤩","text":"Up n strong!!! 🤩🤩🤩","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/869813211","repostId":2169630525,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2169630525","pubTimestamp":1632270851,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2169630525?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-09-22 08:34","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Facebook questioned by oversight board over celebrity rules","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2169630525","media":"The Straits Times","summary":"WASHINGTON (BLOOMBERG) - Facebook's de facto Supreme Court of content is calling on the social media","content":"<div>\n<p>WASHINGTON (BLOOMBERG) - Facebook's de facto Supreme Court of content is calling on the social media giant to release more information about how it moderates posts by famous people.\nThe Facebook ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"http://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/facebook-questioned-by-oversight-board-over-celebrity-rules\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"straits_highlight","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Facebook questioned by oversight board over celebrity rules</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFacebook questioned by oversight board over celebrity rules\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-09-22 08:34 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=http://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/facebook-questioned-by-oversight-board-over-celebrity-rules><strong>The Straits Times</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>WASHINGTON (BLOOMBERG) - Facebook's de facto Supreme Court of content is calling on the social media giant to release more information about how it moderates posts by famous people.\nThe Facebook ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"http://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/facebook-questioned-by-oversight-board-over-celebrity-rules\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"http://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/facebook-questioned-by-oversight-board-over-celebrity-rules","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2169630525","content_text":"WASHINGTON (BLOOMBERG) - Facebook's de facto Supreme Court of content is calling on the social media giant to release more information about how it moderates posts by famous people.\nThe Facebook Oversight Board said in a statement on Tuesday (Sept 22) that it has asked Facebook to provide more clarity about a program designed to protect high-profile figures from having their posts mistakenly taken down.\nThe review by the Oversight Board follows a Wall Street Journal report revealing details about a system Facebook built to exempt high-profile users in politics, popular culture and journalism from enforcement action over posts that break their rules.\nThe program, known as \"cross check\", was designed to avoid public relations backlash over famous people who mistaken have their posts taken down, the newspaper reported.\nWhile Facebook told the oversight board the program affects only a \"small number of decisions\", it actually included at least 5.8 million users in 2020, according to the newspaper.\n\"In light of recent developments, we are looking into the degree to which Facebook has been fully forthcoming in its responses in relation to cross-check, including the practice of whitelisting,\" the board wrote.\nUsers who are \"whitelisted\" don't face enforcement actions, the newspaper reported.\n\"These disclosures have drawn renewed attention to the seemingly inconsistent way that the company makes decisions, and why greater transparency and independent oversight of Facebook matter so much for users,\" the board said.\nThe board said it expects to receive a briefing from Facebook in the coming days and will issue a public analysis next month.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":869819526,"gmtCreate":1632271735965,"gmtModify":1632801607558,"author":{"id":"4089010991436220","authorId":"4089010991436220","name":"richcat","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/68e4b3561331a0d9fe709291122e6cea","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"4089010991436220","idStr":"4089010991436220"},"htmlText":"hmm","listText":"hmm","text":"hmm","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/869819526","repostId":2169630525,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2169630525","pubTimestamp":1632270851,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2169630525?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-09-22 08:34","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Facebook questioned by oversight board over celebrity rules","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2169630525","media":"The Straits Times","summary":"WASHINGTON (BLOOMBERG) - Facebook's de facto Supreme Court of content is calling on the social media","content":"<div>\n<p>WASHINGTON (BLOOMBERG) - Facebook's de facto Supreme Court of content is calling on the social media giant to release more information about how it moderates posts by famous people.\nThe Facebook ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"http://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/facebook-questioned-by-oversight-board-over-celebrity-rules\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"straits_highlight","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Facebook questioned by oversight board over celebrity rules</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFacebook questioned by oversight board over celebrity rules\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-09-22 08:34 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=http://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/facebook-questioned-by-oversight-board-over-celebrity-rules><strong>The Straits Times</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>WASHINGTON (BLOOMBERG) - Facebook's de facto Supreme Court of content is calling on the social media giant to release more information about how it moderates posts by famous people.\nThe Facebook ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"http://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/facebook-questioned-by-oversight-board-over-celebrity-rules\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"http://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/facebook-questioned-by-oversight-board-over-celebrity-rules","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2169630525","content_text":"WASHINGTON (BLOOMBERG) - Facebook's de facto Supreme Court of content is calling on the social media giant to release more information about how it moderates posts by famous people.\nThe Facebook Oversight Board said in a statement on Tuesday (Sept 22) that it has asked Facebook to provide more clarity about a program designed to protect high-profile figures from having their posts mistakenly taken down.\nThe review by the Oversight Board follows a Wall Street Journal report revealing details about a system Facebook built to exempt high-profile users in politics, popular culture and journalism from enforcement action over posts that break their rules.\nThe program, known as \"cross check\", was designed to avoid public relations backlash over famous people who mistaken have their posts taken down, the newspaper reported.\nWhile Facebook told the oversight board the program affects only a \"small number of decisions\", it actually included at least 5.8 million users in 2020, according to the newspaper.\n\"In light of recent developments, we are looking into the degree to which Facebook has been fully forthcoming in its responses in relation to cross-check, including the practice of whitelisting,\" the board wrote.\nUsers who are \"whitelisted\" don't face enforcement actions, the newspaper reported.\n\"These disclosures have drawn renewed attention to the seemingly inconsistent way that the company makes decisions, and why greater transparency and independent oversight of Facebook matter so much for users,\" the board said.\nThe board said it expects to receive a briefing from Facebook in the coming days and will issue a public analysis next month.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":869831301,"gmtCreate":1632271241103,"gmtModify":1632801614092,"author":{"id":"3560333139103013","authorId":"3560333139103013","name":"Missys","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d75cdb42cbca99e3666b7b1796540245","vip":1,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3560333139103013","idStr":"3560333139103013"},"htmlText":"Hmmm","listText":"Hmmm","text":"Hmmm","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/869831301","repostId":2169630525,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2169630525","pubTimestamp":1632270851,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2169630525?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-09-22 08:34","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Facebook questioned by oversight board over celebrity rules","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2169630525","media":"The Straits Times","summary":"WASHINGTON (BLOOMBERG) - Facebook's de facto Supreme Court of content is calling on the social media","content":"<div>\n<p>WASHINGTON (BLOOMBERG) - Facebook's de facto Supreme Court of content is calling on the social media giant to release more information about how it moderates posts by famous people.\nThe Facebook ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"http://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/facebook-questioned-by-oversight-board-over-celebrity-rules\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"straits_highlight","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Facebook questioned by oversight board over celebrity rules</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFacebook questioned by oversight board over celebrity rules\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-09-22 08:34 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=http://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/facebook-questioned-by-oversight-board-over-celebrity-rules><strong>The Straits Times</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>WASHINGTON (BLOOMBERG) - Facebook's de facto Supreme Court of content is calling on the social media giant to release more information about how it moderates posts by famous people.\nThe Facebook ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"http://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/facebook-questioned-by-oversight-board-over-celebrity-rules\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"http://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/facebook-questioned-by-oversight-board-over-celebrity-rules","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2169630525","content_text":"WASHINGTON (BLOOMBERG) - Facebook's de facto Supreme Court of content is calling on the social media giant to release more information about how it moderates posts by famous people.\nThe Facebook Oversight Board said in a statement on Tuesday (Sept 22) that it has asked Facebook to provide more clarity about a program designed to protect high-profile figures from having their posts mistakenly taken down.\nThe review by the Oversight Board follows a Wall Street Journal report revealing details about a system Facebook built to exempt high-profile users in politics, popular culture and journalism from enforcement action over posts that break their rules.\nThe program, known as \"cross check\", was designed to avoid public relations backlash over famous people who mistaken have their posts taken down, the newspaper reported.\nWhile Facebook told the oversight board the program affects only a \"small number of decisions\", it actually included at least 5.8 million users in 2020, according to the newspaper.\n\"In light of recent developments, we are looking into the degree to which Facebook has been fully forthcoming in its responses in relation to cross-check, including the practice of whitelisting,\" the board wrote.\nUsers who are \"whitelisted\" don't face enforcement actions, the newspaper reported.\n\"These disclosures have drawn renewed attention to the seemingly inconsistent way that the company makes decisions, and why greater transparency and independent oversight of Facebook matter so much for users,\" the board said.\nThe board said it expects to receive a briefing from Facebook in the coming days and will issue a public analysis next month.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":5952932,"gmtCreate":1632271747942,"gmtModify":1634789646677,"authorId":4089010991436220,"author":{"id":4089010991436220,"idStr":"4089010991436220","authorId":4089010991436220,"name":"richcat","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/68e4b3561331a0d9fe709291122e6cea","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":869831301,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"hmm","text":"hmm","html":"hmm"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":869839693,"gmtCreate":1632271169512,"gmtModify":1632801615700,"author":{"id":"3577608661218389","authorId":"3577608661218389","name":"DansonYong","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d847e6b2cafe58e68ceb1d9adcb8038f","vip":1,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3577608661218389","idStr":"3577608661218389"},"htmlText":"Yes","listText":"Yes","text":"Yes","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/869839693","repostId":2169630525,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2169630525","pubTimestamp":1632270851,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2169630525?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-09-22 08:34","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Facebook questioned by oversight board over celebrity rules","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2169630525","media":"The Straits Times","summary":"WASHINGTON (BLOOMBERG) - Facebook's de facto Supreme Court of content is calling on the social media","content":"<div>\n<p>WASHINGTON (BLOOMBERG) - Facebook's de facto Supreme Court of content is calling on the social media giant to release more information about how it moderates posts by famous people.\nThe Facebook ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"http://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/facebook-questioned-by-oversight-board-over-celebrity-rules\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"straits_highlight","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Facebook questioned by oversight board over celebrity rules</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFacebook questioned by oversight board over celebrity rules\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-09-22 08:34 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=http://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/facebook-questioned-by-oversight-board-over-celebrity-rules><strong>The Straits Times</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>WASHINGTON (BLOOMBERG) - Facebook's de facto Supreme Court of content is calling on the social media giant to release more information about how it moderates posts by famous people.\nThe Facebook ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"http://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/facebook-questioned-by-oversight-board-over-celebrity-rules\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"http://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/facebook-questioned-by-oversight-board-over-celebrity-rules","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2169630525","content_text":"WASHINGTON (BLOOMBERG) - Facebook's de facto Supreme Court of content is calling on the social media giant to release more information about how it moderates posts by famous people.\nThe Facebook Oversight Board said in a statement on Tuesday (Sept 22) that it has asked Facebook to provide more clarity about a program designed to protect high-profile figures from having their posts mistakenly taken down.\nThe review by the Oversight Board follows a Wall Street Journal report revealing details about a system Facebook built to exempt high-profile users in politics, popular culture and journalism from enforcement action over posts that break their rules.\nThe program, known as \"cross check\", was designed to avoid public relations backlash over famous people who mistaken have their posts taken down, the newspaper reported.\nWhile Facebook told the oversight board the program affects only a \"small number of decisions\", it actually included at least 5.8 million users in 2020, according to the newspaper.\n\"In light of recent developments, we are looking into the degree to which Facebook has been fully forthcoming in its responses in relation to cross-check, including the practice of whitelisting,\" the board wrote.\nUsers who are \"whitelisted\" don't face enforcement actions, the newspaper reported.\n\"These disclosures have drawn renewed attention to the seemingly inconsistent way that the company makes decisions, and why greater transparency and independent oversight of Facebook matter so much for users,\" the board said.\nThe board said it expects to receive a briefing from Facebook in the coming days and will issue a public analysis next month.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":869895916,"gmtCreate":1632271002235,"gmtModify":1632801619538,"author":{"id":"3586254581176175","authorId":"3586254581176175","name":"chiaguan","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8fdcac0f133f5908b89db95162453f46","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3586254581176175","idStr":"3586254581176175"},"htmlText":"1","listText":"1","text":"1","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/869895916","repostId":2169630525,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2169630525","pubTimestamp":1632270851,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2169630525?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-09-22 08:34","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Facebook questioned by oversight board over celebrity rules","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2169630525","media":"The Straits Times","summary":"WASHINGTON (BLOOMBERG) - Facebook's de facto Supreme Court of content is calling on the social media","content":"<div>\n<p>WASHINGTON (BLOOMBERG) - Facebook's de facto Supreme Court of content is calling on the social media giant to release more information about how it moderates posts by famous people.\nThe Facebook ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"http://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/facebook-questioned-by-oversight-board-over-celebrity-rules\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"straits_highlight","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Facebook questioned by oversight board over celebrity rules</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFacebook questioned by oversight board over celebrity rules\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-09-22 08:34 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=http://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/facebook-questioned-by-oversight-board-over-celebrity-rules><strong>The Straits Times</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>WASHINGTON (BLOOMBERG) - Facebook's de facto Supreme Court of content is calling on the social media giant to release more information about how it moderates posts by famous people.\nThe Facebook ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"http://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/facebook-questioned-by-oversight-board-over-celebrity-rules\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"http://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/facebook-questioned-by-oversight-board-over-celebrity-rules","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2169630525","content_text":"WASHINGTON (BLOOMBERG) - Facebook's de facto Supreme Court of content is calling on the social media giant to release more information about how it moderates posts by famous people.\nThe Facebook Oversight Board said in a statement on Tuesday (Sept 22) that it has asked Facebook to provide more clarity about a program designed to protect high-profile figures from having their posts mistakenly taken down.\nThe review by the Oversight Board follows a Wall Street Journal report revealing details about a system Facebook built to exempt high-profile users in politics, popular culture and journalism from enforcement action over posts that break their rules.\nThe program, known as \"cross check\", was designed to avoid public relations backlash over famous people who mistaken have their posts taken down, the newspaper reported.\nWhile Facebook told the oversight board the program affects only a \"small number of decisions\", it actually included at least 5.8 million users in 2020, according to the newspaper.\n\"In light of recent developments, we are looking into the degree to which Facebook has been fully forthcoming in its responses in relation to cross-check, including the practice of whitelisting,\" the board wrote.\nUsers who are \"whitelisted\" don't face enforcement actions, the newspaper reported.\n\"These disclosures have drawn renewed attention to the seemingly inconsistent way that the company makes decisions, and why greater transparency and independent oversight of Facebook matter so much for users,\" the board said.\nThe board said it expects to receive a briefing from Facebook in the coming days and will issue a public analysis next month.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":5952684,"gmtCreate":1632271008403,"gmtModify":1634789671094,"authorId":3586254581176175,"author":{"id":3586254581176175,"idStr":"3586254581176175","authorId":3586254581176175,"name":"chiaguan","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8fdcac0f133f5908b89db95162453f46","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":869895916,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"1","text":"1","html":"1"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":869892983,"gmtCreate":1632270960242,"gmtModify":1632801620529,"author":{"id":"3581669949903025","authorId":"3581669949903025","name":"DanteD","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/658e5be63b3b5632d81857961e8bb91c","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3581669949903025","idStr":"3581669949903025"},"htmlText":"Nice","listText":"Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/869892983","repostId":2169630525,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2169630525","pubTimestamp":1632270851,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2169630525?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-09-22 08:34","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Facebook questioned by oversight board over celebrity rules","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2169630525","media":"The Straits Times","summary":"WASHINGTON (BLOOMBERG) - Facebook's de facto Supreme Court of content is calling on the social media","content":"<div>\n<p>WASHINGTON (BLOOMBERG) - Facebook's de facto Supreme Court of content is calling on the social media giant to release more information about how it moderates posts by famous people.\nThe Facebook ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"http://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/facebook-questioned-by-oversight-board-over-celebrity-rules\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"straits_highlight","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Facebook questioned by oversight board over celebrity rules</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFacebook questioned by oversight board over celebrity rules\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-09-22 08:34 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=http://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/facebook-questioned-by-oversight-board-over-celebrity-rules><strong>The Straits Times</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>WASHINGTON (BLOOMBERG) - Facebook's de facto Supreme Court of content is calling on the social media giant to release more information about how it moderates posts by famous people.\nThe Facebook ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"http://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/facebook-questioned-by-oversight-board-over-celebrity-rules\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"http://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/facebook-questioned-by-oversight-board-over-celebrity-rules","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2169630525","content_text":"WASHINGTON (BLOOMBERG) - Facebook's de facto Supreme Court of content is calling on the social media giant to release more information about how it moderates posts by famous people.\nThe Facebook Oversight Board said in a statement on Tuesday (Sept 22) that it has asked Facebook to provide more clarity about a program designed to protect high-profile figures from having their posts mistakenly taken down.\nThe review by the Oversight Board follows a Wall Street Journal report revealing details about a system Facebook built to exempt high-profile users in politics, popular culture and journalism from enforcement action over posts that break their rules.\nThe program, known as \"cross check\", was designed to avoid public relations backlash over famous people who mistaken have their posts taken down, the newspaper reported.\nWhile Facebook told the oversight board the program affects only a \"small number of decisions\", it actually included at least 5.8 million users in 2020, according to the newspaper.\n\"In light of recent developments, we are looking into the degree to which Facebook has been fully forthcoming in its responses in relation to cross-check, including the practice of whitelisting,\" the board wrote.\nUsers who are \"whitelisted\" don't face enforcement actions, the newspaper reported.\n\"These disclosures have drawn renewed attention to the seemingly inconsistent way that the company makes decisions, and why greater transparency and independent oversight of Facebook matter so much for users,\" the board said.\nThe board said it expects to receive a briefing from Facebook in the coming days and will issue a public analysis next month.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":5952938,"gmtCreate":1632271767300,"gmtModify":1634789646022,"authorId":3581563418944392,"author":{"id":3581563418944392,"idStr":"3581563418944392","authorId":3581563418944392,"name":"Andrewinho","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3127e2bc40ab23064a5187a00a63e19b","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":869892983,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"👏👏👏","text":"👏👏👏","html":"👏👏👏"}],"langContent":"EN"}],"hasMoreComments":true,"newsSizeData":{"likeSize":74,"commentSize":11,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false}}