Why Is Snowflake Stock Down So Much?_老虎社区_美港股上老虎

Why Is Snowflake Stock Down So Much?

Motley Fool2021-03-09

The cloud data darling has lost nearly 50% of its value in just a few months. Investors who bet on cloud data companySnowflake (NYSE:SNOW) when it went public last year have been on quite the ...

网页链接

免责声明：本文观点仅代表作者个人观点，不构成本平台的投资建议，本平台不对文章信息准确性、完整性和及时性做出任何保证，亦不对因使用或信赖文章信息引发的任何损失承担责任。

Blackk
·2021-03-09
Yes good
回复
点赞
举报
Maydelyn
·2021-03-09
Although snowflake had dropped so much, maybe around 40% from its peak. My stand is not to buy yet. You may see some gains if you buy now due to tech stock dip but in long term revenue didn’t support the share level yet.
回复
点赞
举报
Keatz
·2021-03-09
Summer is coming
回复
点赞
举报
Cheekenrise
·2021-03-09
Definitely over valued at p-s 168 times!
回复
1
举报
Bearbear
·2021-03-09
What is snowflake?
回复
点赞
举报
WilliamTeo
·2021-03-09
Up up soon
回复
点赞
举报
JoeK
·2021-03-09
Going the same route as Teradata?
回复
点赞
举报
jimmylaw
·2021-03-09
Why
回复
点赞
举报
Kiteflying
·2021-03-09
Overvalued?
回复
点赞
举报
xoxoll
·2021-03-09
Help me like and comment
回复
3
举报
收起
- BeeL:
  over valued
  2021-03-09
  回复
  举报
- EV8:
  👍👍
  2021-03-10
  回复
  举报
Kanyon
·2021-03-09
Nice
回复
1
举报
drazil
·2021-03-09
It’s not just SNOW
回复
点赞
举报
收起
- AhShui:
  let it snow
  2021-03-09
  回复
  举报
shimmy
·2021-03-09
Wow
回复
3
举报
收起
- Jkcubz:
  Wow
  2021-03-09
  回复
  举报
- shimmy:
  💯
  2021-03-09
  回复
  举报

热议股票

7x24

全部

关于我们·老虎社区守则·老虎社区账号管理规范·老虎社区服务协议·老虎社区隐私政策

公司名称：北京至简风宜信息技术有限公司

违法和不良信息投诉：010-5681-3562（工作时间9:30-18:30）

邮箱：service@laohu8.com

营业执照：91110105MA01A4U55R

ICP备：京ICP备18016422号

网安备：京公网安备11010502036490

关注我们

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"data":{"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2118646392?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","thumbnail":"","is_english":true,"pubTime":"2021-03-09 22:12","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","id":"2118646392","market":"us","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"Why Is Snowflake Stock Down So Much?","media":"Motley Fool","content":"<div>\n<p>The cloud data darling has lost nearly 50% of its value in just a few months.\nInvestors who bet on cloud data companySnowflake (NYSE:SNOW) when it went public last year have been on quite the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/09/why-is-snowflake-stock-down-so-much/\">网页链接</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"fool_stock","html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Is Snowflake Stock Down So Much?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Is Snowflake Stock Down So Much?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-09 22:12 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/09/why-is-snowflake-stock-down-so-much/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The cloud data darling has lost nearly 50% of its value in just a few months.\nInvestors who bet on cloud data companySnowflake (NYSE:SNOW) when it went public last year have been on quite the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/09/why-is-snowflake-stock-down-so-much/\">网页链接</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":"SNOW","symbol_name":"Snowflake","start_time":0,"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/09/why-is-snowflake-stock-down-so-much/","article_id":"2118646392","we_media_id":null,"thumbnails":[],"rights":null,"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2118646392","pubTimestamp":1615299122,"columns":[],"sourceInfo":{"source_id":"fool_stock","name":"Motley Fool"},"weMediaInfo":null,"summary":"The cloud data darling has lost nearly 50% of its value in just a few months.","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"fool.com","property":[],"viewcount":null,"language":"en","relate_stocks":{"SNOW":"Snowflake"},"translate_title":"雪花股票为何下跌如此之多？","themeId":null,"isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":null,"symbols_score_info":{"SNOW":0.9},"content_text":"The cloud data darling has lost nearly 50% of its value in just a few months.\nInvestors who bet on cloud data companySnowflake (NYSE:SNOW) when it went public last year have been on quite the rollercoaster ride. The stock went public at $120 per share and shot up to around $240 per share on day one. It then soared to a high of $429 per share in early December. At its peak, the company was worth over $100 billion.\nThings have not gone well since then. Snowflake stock slumped as 2020 came to a close, and the recent sell-off in high-flying tech stocks led shares of Snowflake to dive again. The stock now trades for around $230 per share, down about 46% from its peak and below where it closed after its first day of trading.\nSNOW data by YCharts\nWhy is this happening? It's certainly not due to the performance of the company. Revenue soared 117% in Snowflake's latest quarter, and it guided for product revenue to nearly double in the first quarter of the current fiscal year. The company also reported a net revenue retention rate of 168%, which indicates that its current customers are ramping up spending at a healthy rate.\nSnowflake isn't profitable, and the bottom line is only getting worse, but the stock market hasn't really cared about profits any time recently. Growth has been all that matters. Snowflake booked a net loss of nearly $200 million in its latest quarter, and a net loss of over $500 million for the full fiscal year.\nImage source: Getty Images.\nThose massive losses are probably not the reason for the abysmal performance of Snowflake stock, or at least not the only reason. More likely, this is a case of a stock that has simply soared too high too fast.\nA crazy multiple\nSnowflake's rapid growth certainly implies that the stock deserves to be valued at a premium to slower-growing companies. But things got a little out of hand last year. Snowflake generated about $590 million of revenue in the fiscal year that ended in January. At its peak market capitalization of about $110 billion, the company was valued at a staggering 186 times annual sales.\nYes, revenue is still growing very quickly, so that multiple will come down fast over time. But to get a sense of exactly how expensive Snowflake was at its peak, here's a chart of price-to-sales ratios for some dot-com bubble darlings in the late 1990s and early 2000s:\nADBE PS Ratio data by YCharts\nOf course, many companies during the dot-com bubble had little or no revenue and were valued at hundreds of millions of dollars. Such a high price-to-sales ratio would be more understandable if Snowflake was much smaller. But this is a company that was valued at more than $100 billion at its peak.Microsoft's price-to-sales ratio when it was worth $100 billion in the late 1990s was around 10.\nEven after declining by nearly 50%, Snowflake stock still trades for over 80 times annual sales. If you knew the company would continue to nearly double revenue each year for the next few years, it could make sense to pay that much. But that kind of growth gets tougher to achieve as the numbers get bigger. Doubling revenue when you're doing a few hundred million dollars annually is a lot easier than when you're doing a few billion dollars annually.\nWhat happens next to Snowflake stock is anyone's guess. If investors get any whiff of a growth slowdown this year, the stock could very well keep tumbling. And even if Snowflake keep growing fast and beats analyst estimates at every turn, a sentiment shift away from profitless growth stocks could create a major headwind for the stock.\nHow much is Snowflake really worth? Who knows? But it's probably not worth 186 times sales.","kind":"news","is_publish_news":true,"is_publish_highlight":true,"is_publish_live":false,"is_publish_wemedia":null,"editions":null,"column":"","sentiment":"0","news_tag":"","news_rank":0,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":1},"commentList":[{"id":323309262,"gmtCreate":1615301826356,"gmtModify":1703487037874,"author":{"id":"3572770726668540","authorId":"3572770726668540","name":"Blackk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/93d9bfa23cdea8af3308e34dedf35d9e","vip":1,"crmLevel":9,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3572770726668540","authorIdStr":"3572770726668540"},"htmlText":"Yes good","listText":"Yes good","text":"Yes good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/323309262","repostId":2118646392,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2118646392","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1615299122,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2118646392?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-09 22:12","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Is Snowflake Stock Down So Much?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2118646392","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"The cloud data darling has lost nearly 50% of its value in just a few months.","content":"<p>The cloud data darling has lost nearly 50% of its value in just a few months.</p>\n<p>Investors who bet on cloud data company<b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SNOW\">Snowflake</a></b> (NYSE:SNOW) when it went public last year have been on quite the rollercoaster ride. The stock went public at $120 per share and shot up to around $240 per share on day <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a>. It then soared to a high of $429 per share in early December. At its peak, the company was worth over $100 billion.</p>\n<p>Things have not gone well since then. Snowflake stock slumped as 2020 came to a close, and the recent sell-off in high-flying tech stocks led shares of Snowflake to dive again. The stock now trades for around $230 per share, down about 46% from its peak and below where it closed after its first day of trading.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/259ec5d61514eb530db64fa4f28870e5\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"419\"><span>SNOW data by YCharts</span></p>\n<p>Why is this happening? It's certainly not due to the performance of the company. Revenue soared 117% in Snowflake's latest quarter, and it guided for product revenue to nearly double in the first quarter of the current fiscal year. The company also reported a net revenue retention rate of 168%, which indicates that its current customers are ramping up spending at a healthy rate.</p>\n<p>Snowflake isn't profitable, and the bottom line is only getting worse, but the stock market hasn't really cared about profits any time recently. Growth has been all that matters. Snowflake booked a net loss of nearly $200 million in its latest quarter, and a net loss of over $500 million for the full fiscal year.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/072d24471b48f7bdc551d253c1c8b0e2\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"393\"><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p>\n<p>Those massive losses are probably not the reason for the abysmal performance of Snowflake stock, or at least not the only reason. More likely, this is a case of a stock that has simply soared too high too fast.</p>\n<p><b>A crazy multiple</b></p>\n<p>Snowflake's rapid growth certainly implies that the stock deserves to be valued at a premium to slower-growing companies. But things got a little out of hand last year. Snowflake generated about $590 million of revenue in the fiscal year that ended in January. At its peak market capitalization of about $110 billion, the company was valued at a staggering 186 times annual sales.</p>\n<p>Yes, revenue is still growing very quickly, so that multiple will come down fast over time. But to get a sense of exactly how expensive Snowflake was at its peak, here's a chart of price-to-sales ratios for some dot-com bubble darlings in the late 1990s and early 2000s:</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3e395188c2dc374bb0edc0538d74b1f7\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"410\"><span>ADBE PS Ratio data by YCharts</span></p>\n<p>Of course, many companies during the dot-com bubble had little or no revenue and were valued at hundreds of millions of dollars. Such a high price-to-sales ratio would be more understandable if Snowflake was much smaller. But this is a company that was valued at more than $100 billion at its peak.<b>Microsoft</b>'s price-to-sales ratio when it was worth $100 billion in the late 1990s was around 10.</p>\n<p>Even after declining by nearly 50%, Snowflake stock still trades for over 80 times annual sales. If you knew the company would continue to nearly double revenue each year for the next few years, it could make sense to pay that much. But that kind of growth gets tougher to achieve as the numbers get bigger. Doubling revenue when you're doing a few hundred million dollars annually is a lot easier than when you're doing a few billion dollars annually.</p>\n<p>What happens next to Snowflake stock is anyone's guess. If investors get any whiff of a growth slowdown this year, the stock could very well keep tumbling. And even if Snowflake keep growing fast and beats analyst estimates at every turn, a sentiment shift away from profitless growth stocks could create a major headwind for the stock.</p>\n<p>How much is Snowflake really worth? Who knows? But it's probably not worth 186 times sales.</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Is Snowflake Stock Down So Much?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Is Snowflake Stock Down So Much?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-09 22:12 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/09/why-is-snowflake-stock-down-so-much/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The cloud data darling has lost nearly 50% of its value in just a few months.\nInvestors who bet on cloud data companySnowflake (NYSE:SNOW) when it went public last year have been on quite the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/09/why-is-snowflake-stock-down-so-much/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SNOW":"Snowflake"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/09/why-is-snowflake-stock-down-so-much/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2118646392","content_text":"The cloud data darling has lost nearly 50% of its value in just a few months.\nInvestors who bet on cloud data companySnowflake (NYSE:SNOW) when it went public last year have been on quite the rollercoaster ride. The stock went public at $120 per share and shot up to around $240 per share on day one. It then soared to a high of $429 per share in early December. At its peak, the company was worth over $100 billion.\nThings have not gone well since then. Snowflake stock slumped as 2020 came to a close, and the recent sell-off in high-flying tech stocks led shares of Snowflake to dive again. The stock now trades for around $230 per share, down about 46% from its peak and below where it closed after its first day of trading.\nSNOW data by YCharts\nWhy is this happening? It's certainly not due to the performance of the company. Revenue soared 117% in Snowflake's latest quarter, and it guided for product revenue to nearly double in the first quarter of the current fiscal year. The company also reported a net revenue retention rate of 168%, which indicates that its current customers are ramping up spending at a healthy rate.\nSnowflake isn't profitable, and the bottom line is only getting worse, but the stock market hasn't really cared about profits any time recently. Growth has been all that matters. Snowflake booked a net loss of nearly $200 million in its latest quarter, and a net loss of over $500 million for the full fiscal year.\nImage source: Getty Images.\nThose massive losses are probably not the reason for the abysmal performance of Snowflake stock, or at least not the only reason. More likely, this is a case of a stock that has simply soared too high too fast.\nA crazy multiple\nSnowflake's rapid growth certainly implies that the stock deserves to be valued at a premium to slower-growing companies. But things got a little out of hand last year. Snowflake generated about $590 million of revenue in the fiscal year that ended in January. At its peak market capitalization of about $110 billion, the company was valued at a staggering 186 times annual sales.\nYes, revenue is still growing very quickly, so that multiple will come down fast over time. But to get a sense of exactly how expensive Snowflake was at its peak, here's a chart of price-to-sales ratios for some dot-com bubble darlings in the late 1990s and early 2000s:\nADBE PS Ratio data by YCharts\nOf course, many companies during the dot-com bubble had little or no revenue and were valued at hundreds of millions of dollars. Such a high price-to-sales ratio would be more understandable if Snowflake was much smaller. But this is a company that was valued at more than $100 billion at its peak.Microsoft's price-to-sales ratio when it was worth $100 billion in the late 1990s was around 10.\nEven after declining by nearly 50%, Snowflake stock still trades for over 80 times annual sales. If you knew the company would continue to nearly double revenue each year for the next few years, it could make sense to pay that much. But that kind of growth gets tougher to achieve as the numbers get bigger. Doubling revenue when you're doing a few hundred million dollars annually is a lot easier than when you're doing a few billion dollars annually.\nWhat happens next to Snowflake stock is anyone's guess. If investors get any whiff of a growth slowdown this year, the stock could very well keep tumbling. And even if Snowflake keep growing fast and beats analyst estimates at every turn, a sentiment shift away from profitless growth stocks could create a major headwind for the stock.\nHow much is Snowflake really worth? Who knows? But it's probably not worth 186 times sales.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":323309994,"gmtCreate":1615301815818,"gmtModify":1703487037356,"author":{"id":"3577008220161864","authorId":"3577008220161864","name":"Maydelyn","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3577008220161864","authorIdStr":"3577008220161864"},"htmlText":"Although snowflake had dropped so much, maybe around 40% from its peak. My stand is not to buy yet. You may see some gains if you buy now due to tech stock dip but in long term revenue didn’t support the share&nbsp;level yet.","listText":"Although snowflake had dropped so much, maybe around 40% from its peak. My stand is not to buy yet. You may see some gains if you buy now due to tech stock dip but in long term revenue didn’t support the share&nbsp;level yet.","text":"Although snowflake had dropped so much, maybe around 40% from its peak. My stand is not to buy yet. You may see some gains if you buy now due to tech stock dip but in long term revenue didn’t support the share level yet.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/323309994","repostId":2118646392,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2118646392","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1615299122,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2118646392?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-09 22:12","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Is Snowflake Stock Down So Much?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2118646392","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"The cloud data darling has lost nearly 50% of its value in just a few months.","content":"<p>The cloud data darling has lost nearly 50% of its value in just a few months.</p>\n<p>Investors who bet on cloud data company<b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SNOW\">Snowflake</a></b> (NYSE:SNOW) when it went public last year have been on quite the rollercoaster ride. The stock went public at $120 per share and shot up to around $240 per share on day <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a>. It then soared to a high of $429 per share in early December. At its peak, the company was worth over $100 billion.</p>\n<p>Things have not gone well since then. Snowflake stock slumped as 2020 came to a close, and the recent sell-off in high-flying tech stocks led shares of Snowflake to dive again. The stock now trades for around $230 per share, down about 46% from its peak and below where it closed after its first day of trading.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/259ec5d61514eb530db64fa4f28870e5\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"419\"><span>SNOW data by YCharts</span></p>\n<p>Why is this happening? It's certainly not due to the performance of the company. Revenue soared 117% in Snowflake's latest quarter, and it guided for product revenue to nearly double in the first quarter of the current fiscal year. The company also reported a net revenue retention rate of 168%, which indicates that its current customers are ramping up spending at a healthy rate.</p>\n<p>Snowflake isn't profitable, and the bottom line is only getting worse, but the stock market hasn't really cared about profits any time recently. Growth has been all that matters. Snowflake booked a net loss of nearly $200 million in its latest quarter, and a net loss of over $500 million for the full fiscal year.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/072d24471b48f7bdc551d253c1c8b0e2\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"393\"><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p>\n<p>Those massive losses are probably not the reason for the abysmal performance of Snowflake stock, or at least not the only reason. More likely, this is a case of a stock that has simply soared too high too fast.</p>\n<p><b>A crazy multiple</b></p>\n<p>Snowflake's rapid growth certainly implies that the stock deserves to be valued at a premium to slower-growing companies. But things got a little out of hand last year. Snowflake generated about $590 million of revenue in the fiscal year that ended in January. At its peak market capitalization of about $110 billion, the company was valued at a staggering 186 times annual sales.</p>\n<p>Yes, revenue is still growing very quickly, so that multiple will come down fast over time. But to get a sense of exactly how expensive Snowflake was at its peak, here's a chart of price-to-sales ratios for some dot-com bubble darlings in the late 1990s and early 2000s:</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3e395188c2dc374bb0edc0538d74b1f7\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"410\"><span>ADBE PS Ratio data by YCharts</span></p>\n<p>Of course, many companies during the dot-com bubble had little or no revenue and were valued at hundreds of millions of dollars. Such a high price-to-sales ratio would be more understandable if Snowflake was much smaller. But this is a company that was valued at more than $100 billion at its peak.<b>Microsoft</b>'s price-to-sales ratio when it was worth $100 billion in the late 1990s was around 10.</p>\n<p>Even after declining by nearly 50%, Snowflake stock still trades for over 80 times annual sales. If you knew the company would continue to nearly double revenue each year for the next few years, it could make sense to pay that much. But that kind of growth gets tougher to achieve as the numbers get bigger. Doubling revenue when you're doing a few hundred million dollars annually is a lot easier than when you're doing a few billion dollars annually.</p>\n<p>What happens next to Snowflake stock is anyone's guess. If investors get any whiff of a growth slowdown this year, the stock could very well keep tumbling. And even if Snowflake keep growing fast and beats analyst estimates at every turn, a sentiment shift away from profitless growth stocks could create a major headwind for the stock.</p>\n<p>How much is Snowflake really worth? Who knows? But it's probably not worth 186 times sales.</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Is Snowflake Stock Down So Much?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Is Snowflake Stock Down So Much?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-09 22:12 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/09/why-is-snowflake-stock-down-so-much/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The cloud data darling has lost nearly 50% of its value in just a few months.\nInvestors who bet on cloud data companySnowflake (NYSE:SNOW) when it went public last year have been on quite the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/09/why-is-snowflake-stock-down-so-much/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SNOW":"Snowflake"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/09/why-is-snowflake-stock-down-so-much/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2118646392","content_text":"The cloud data darling has lost nearly 50% of its value in just a few months.\nInvestors who bet on cloud data companySnowflake (NYSE:SNOW) when it went public last year have been on quite the rollercoaster ride. The stock went public at $120 per share and shot up to around $240 per share on day one. It then soared to a high of $429 per share in early December. At its peak, the company was worth over $100 billion.\nThings have not gone well since then. Snowflake stock slumped as 2020 came to a close, and the recent sell-off in high-flying tech stocks led shares of Snowflake to dive again. The stock now trades for around $230 per share, down about 46% from its peak and below where it closed after its first day of trading.\nSNOW data by YCharts\nWhy is this happening? It's certainly not due to the performance of the company. Revenue soared 117% in Snowflake's latest quarter, and it guided for product revenue to nearly double in the first quarter of the current fiscal year. The company also reported a net revenue retention rate of 168%, which indicates that its current customers are ramping up spending at a healthy rate.\nSnowflake isn't profitable, and the bottom line is only getting worse, but the stock market hasn't really cared about profits any time recently. Growth has been all that matters. Snowflake booked a net loss of nearly $200 million in its latest quarter, and a net loss of over $500 million for the full fiscal year.\nImage source: Getty Images.\nThose massive losses are probably not the reason for the abysmal performance of Snowflake stock, or at least not the only reason. More likely, this is a case of a stock that has simply soared too high too fast.\nA crazy multiple\nSnowflake's rapid growth certainly implies that the stock deserves to be valued at a premium to slower-growing companies. But things got a little out of hand last year. Snowflake generated about $590 million of revenue in the fiscal year that ended in January. At its peak market capitalization of about $110 billion, the company was valued at a staggering 186 times annual sales.\nYes, revenue is still growing very quickly, so that multiple will come down fast over time. But to get a sense of exactly how expensive Snowflake was at its peak, here's a chart of price-to-sales ratios for some dot-com bubble darlings in the late 1990s and early 2000s:\nADBE PS Ratio data by YCharts\nOf course, many companies during the dot-com bubble had little or no revenue and were valued at hundreds of millions of dollars. Such a high price-to-sales ratio would be more understandable if Snowflake was much smaller. But this is a company that was valued at more than $100 billion at its peak.Microsoft's price-to-sales ratio when it was worth $100 billion in the late 1990s was around 10.\nEven after declining by nearly 50%, Snowflake stock still trades for over 80 times annual sales. If you knew the company would continue to nearly double revenue each year for the next few years, it could make sense to pay that much. But that kind of growth gets tougher to achieve as the numbers get bigger. Doubling revenue when you're doing a few hundred million dollars annually is a lot easier than when you're doing a few billion dollars annually.\nWhat happens next to Snowflake stock is anyone's guess. If investors get any whiff of a growth slowdown this year, the stock could very well keep tumbling. And even if Snowflake keep growing fast and beats analyst estimates at every turn, a sentiment shift away from profitless growth stocks could create a major headwind for the stock.\nHow much is Snowflake really worth? Who knows? But it's probably not worth 186 times sales.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":323975443,"gmtCreate":1615301676382,"gmtModify":1703487031820,"author":{"id":"3573786450103912","authorId":"3573786450103912","name":"Keatz","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1d9b7ee59cb880841cedfc6ffb49f187","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3573786450103912","authorIdStr":"3573786450103912"},"htmlText":"Summer is coming","listText":"Summer is coming","text":"Summer is coming","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/323975443","repostId":2118646392,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2118646392","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1615299122,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2118646392?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-09 22:12","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Is Snowflake Stock Down So Much?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2118646392","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"The cloud data darling has lost nearly 50% of its value in just a few months.","content":"<p>The cloud data darling has lost nearly 50% of its value in just a few months.</p>\n<p>Investors who bet on cloud data company<b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SNOW\">Snowflake</a></b> (NYSE:SNOW) when it went public last year have been on quite the rollercoaster ride. The stock went public at $120 per share and shot up to around $240 per share on day <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a>. It then soared to a high of $429 per share in early December. At its peak, the company was worth over $100 billion.</p>\n<p>Things have not gone well since then. Snowflake stock slumped as 2020 came to a close, and the recent sell-off in high-flying tech stocks led shares of Snowflake to dive again. The stock now trades for around $230 per share, down about 46% from its peak and below where it closed after its first day of trading.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/259ec5d61514eb530db64fa4f28870e5\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"419\"><span>SNOW data by YCharts</span></p>\n<p>Why is this happening? It's certainly not due to the performance of the company. Revenue soared 117% in Snowflake's latest quarter, and it guided for product revenue to nearly double in the first quarter of the current fiscal year. The company also reported a net revenue retention rate of 168%, which indicates that its current customers are ramping up spending at a healthy rate.</p>\n<p>Snowflake isn't profitable, and the bottom line is only getting worse, but the stock market hasn't really cared about profits any time recently. Growth has been all that matters. Snowflake booked a net loss of nearly $200 million in its latest quarter, and a net loss of over $500 million for the full fiscal year.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/072d24471b48f7bdc551d253c1c8b0e2\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"393\"><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p>\n<p>Those massive losses are probably not the reason for the abysmal performance of Snowflake stock, or at least not the only reason. More likely, this is a case of a stock that has simply soared too high too fast.</p>\n<p><b>A crazy multiple</b></p>\n<p>Snowflake's rapid growth certainly implies that the stock deserves to be valued at a premium to slower-growing companies. But things got a little out of hand last year. Snowflake generated about $590 million of revenue in the fiscal year that ended in January. At its peak market capitalization of about $110 billion, the company was valued at a staggering 186 times annual sales.</p>\n<p>Yes, revenue is still growing very quickly, so that multiple will come down fast over time. But to get a sense of exactly how expensive Snowflake was at its peak, here's a chart of price-to-sales ratios for some dot-com bubble darlings in the late 1990s and early 2000s:</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3e395188c2dc374bb0edc0538d74b1f7\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"410\"><span>ADBE PS Ratio data by YCharts</span></p>\n<p>Of course, many companies during the dot-com bubble had little or no revenue and were valued at hundreds of millions of dollars. Such a high price-to-sales ratio would be more understandable if Snowflake was much smaller. But this is a company that was valued at more than $100 billion at its peak.<b>Microsoft</b>'s price-to-sales ratio when it was worth $100 billion in the late 1990s was around 10.</p>\n<p>Even after declining by nearly 50%, Snowflake stock still trades for over 80 times annual sales. If you knew the company would continue to nearly double revenue each year for the next few years, it could make sense to pay that much. But that kind of growth gets tougher to achieve as the numbers get bigger. Doubling revenue when you're doing a few hundred million dollars annually is a lot easier than when you're doing a few billion dollars annually.</p>\n<p>What happens next to Snowflake stock is anyone's guess. If investors get any whiff of a growth slowdown this year, the stock could very well keep tumbling. And even if Snowflake keep growing fast and beats analyst estimates at every turn, a sentiment shift away from profitless growth stocks could create a major headwind for the stock.</p>\n<p>How much is Snowflake really worth? Who knows? But it's probably not worth 186 times sales.</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Is Snowflake Stock Down So Much?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Is Snowflake Stock Down So Much?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-09 22:12 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/09/why-is-snowflake-stock-down-so-much/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The cloud data darling has lost nearly 50% of its value in just a few months.\nInvestors who bet on cloud data companySnowflake (NYSE:SNOW) when it went public last year have been on quite the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/09/why-is-snowflake-stock-down-so-much/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SNOW":"Snowflake"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/09/why-is-snowflake-stock-down-so-much/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2118646392","content_text":"The cloud data darling has lost nearly 50% of its value in just a few months.\nInvestors who bet on cloud data companySnowflake (NYSE:SNOW) when it went public last year have been on quite the rollercoaster ride. The stock went public at $120 per share and shot up to around $240 per share on day one. It then soared to a high of $429 per share in early December. At its peak, the company was worth over $100 billion.\nThings have not gone well since then. Snowflake stock slumped as 2020 came to a close, and the recent sell-off in high-flying tech stocks led shares of Snowflake to dive again. The stock now trades for around $230 per share, down about 46% from its peak and below where it closed after its first day of trading.\nSNOW data by YCharts\nWhy is this happening? It's certainly not due to the performance of the company. Revenue soared 117% in Snowflake's latest quarter, and it guided for product revenue to nearly double in the first quarter of the current fiscal year. The company also reported a net revenue retention rate of 168%, which indicates that its current customers are ramping up spending at a healthy rate.\nSnowflake isn't profitable, and the bottom line is only getting worse, but the stock market hasn't really cared about profits any time recently. Growth has been all that matters. Snowflake booked a net loss of nearly $200 million in its latest quarter, and a net loss of over $500 million for the full fiscal year.\nImage source: Getty Images.\nThose massive losses are probably not the reason for the abysmal performance of Snowflake stock, or at least not the only reason. More likely, this is a case of a stock that has simply soared too high too fast.\nA crazy multiple\nSnowflake's rapid growth certainly implies that the stock deserves to be valued at a premium to slower-growing companies. But things got a little out of hand last year. Snowflake generated about $590 million of revenue in the fiscal year that ended in January. At its peak market capitalization of about $110 billion, the company was valued at a staggering 186 times annual sales.\nYes, revenue is still growing very quickly, so that multiple will come down fast over time. But to get a sense of exactly how expensive Snowflake was at its peak, here's a chart of price-to-sales ratios for some dot-com bubble darlings in the late 1990s and early 2000s:\nADBE PS Ratio data by YCharts\nOf course, many companies during the dot-com bubble had little or no revenue and were valued at hundreds of millions of dollars. Such a high price-to-sales ratio would be more understandable if Snowflake was much smaller. But this is a company that was valued at more than $100 billion at its peak.Microsoft's price-to-sales ratio when it was worth $100 billion in the late 1990s was around 10.\nEven after declining by nearly 50%, Snowflake stock still trades for over 80 times annual sales. If you knew the company would continue to nearly double revenue each year for the next few years, it could make sense to pay that much. But that kind of growth gets tougher to achieve as the numbers get bigger. Doubling revenue when you're doing a few hundred million dollars annually is a lot easier than when you're doing a few billion dollars annually.\nWhat happens next to Snowflake stock is anyone's guess. If investors get any whiff of a growth slowdown this year, the stock could very well keep tumbling. And even if Snowflake keep growing fast and beats analyst estimates at every turn, a sentiment shift away from profitless growth stocks could create a major headwind for the stock.\nHow much is Snowflake really worth? Who knows? But it's probably not worth 186 times sales.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":323958444,"gmtCreate":1615300763888,"gmtModify":1703486997222,"author":{"id":"3575071283005317","authorId":"3575071283005317","name":"Cheekenrise","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/92239632b288189725fddad7d9b0eef3","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3575071283005317","authorIdStr":"3575071283005317"},"htmlText":"Definitely over valued at p-s 168 times!","listText":"Definitely over valued at p-s 168 times!","text":"Definitely over valued at p-s 168 times!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/323958444","repostId":2118646392,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2118646392","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1615299122,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2118646392?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-09 22:12","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Is Snowflake Stock Down So Much?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2118646392","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"The cloud data darling has lost nearly 50% of its value in just a few months.","content":"<p>The cloud data darling has lost nearly 50% of its value in just a few months.</p>\n<p>Investors who bet on cloud data company<b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SNOW\">Snowflake</a></b> (NYSE:SNOW) when it went public last year have been on quite the rollercoaster ride. The stock went public at $120 per share and shot up to around $240 per share on day <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a>. It then soared to a high of $429 per share in early December. At its peak, the company was worth over $100 billion.</p>\n<p>Things have not gone well since then. Snowflake stock slumped as 2020 came to a close, and the recent sell-off in high-flying tech stocks led shares of Snowflake to dive again. The stock now trades for around $230 per share, down about 46% from its peak and below where it closed after its first day of trading.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/259ec5d61514eb530db64fa4f28870e5\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"419\"><span>SNOW data by YCharts</span></p>\n<p>Why is this happening? It's certainly not due to the performance of the company. Revenue soared 117% in Snowflake's latest quarter, and it guided for product revenue to nearly double in the first quarter of the current fiscal year. The company also reported a net revenue retention rate of 168%, which indicates that its current customers are ramping up spending at a healthy rate.</p>\n<p>Snowflake isn't profitable, and the bottom line is only getting worse, but the stock market hasn't really cared about profits any time recently. Growth has been all that matters. Snowflake booked a net loss of nearly $200 million in its latest quarter, and a net loss of over $500 million for the full fiscal year.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/072d24471b48f7bdc551d253c1c8b0e2\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"393\"><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p>\n<p>Those massive losses are probably not the reason for the abysmal performance of Snowflake stock, or at least not the only reason. More likely, this is a case of a stock that has simply soared too high too fast.</p>\n<p><b>A crazy multiple</b></p>\n<p>Snowflake's rapid growth certainly implies that the stock deserves to be valued at a premium to slower-growing companies. But things got a little out of hand last year. Snowflake generated about $590 million of revenue in the fiscal year that ended in January. At its peak market capitalization of about $110 billion, the company was valued at a staggering 186 times annual sales.</p>\n<p>Yes, revenue is still growing very quickly, so that multiple will come down fast over time. But to get a sense of exactly how expensive Snowflake was at its peak, here's a chart of price-to-sales ratios for some dot-com bubble darlings in the late 1990s and early 2000s:</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3e395188c2dc374bb0edc0538d74b1f7\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"410\"><span>ADBE PS Ratio data by YCharts</span></p>\n<p>Of course, many companies during the dot-com bubble had little or no revenue and were valued at hundreds of millions of dollars. Such a high price-to-sales ratio would be more understandable if Snowflake was much smaller. But this is a company that was valued at more than $100 billion at its peak.<b>Microsoft</b>'s price-to-sales ratio when it was worth $100 billion in the late 1990s was around 10.</p>\n<p>Even after declining by nearly 50%, Snowflake stock still trades for over 80 times annual sales. If you knew the company would continue to nearly double revenue each year for the next few years, it could make sense to pay that much. But that kind of growth gets tougher to achieve as the numbers get bigger. Doubling revenue when you're doing a few hundred million dollars annually is a lot easier than when you're doing a few billion dollars annually.</p>\n<p>What happens next to Snowflake stock is anyone's guess. If investors get any whiff of a growth slowdown this year, the stock could very well keep tumbling. And even if Snowflake keep growing fast and beats analyst estimates at every turn, a sentiment shift away from profitless growth stocks could create a major headwind for the stock.</p>\n<p>How much is Snowflake really worth? Who knows? But it's probably not worth 186 times sales.</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Is Snowflake Stock Down So Much?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Is Snowflake Stock Down So Much?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-09 22:12 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/09/why-is-snowflake-stock-down-so-much/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The cloud data darling has lost nearly 50% of its value in just a few months.\nInvestors who bet on cloud data companySnowflake (NYSE:SNOW) when it went public last year have been on quite the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/09/why-is-snowflake-stock-down-so-much/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SNOW":"Snowflake"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/09/why-is-snowflake-stock-down-so-much/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2118646392","content_text":"The cloud data darling has lost nearly 50% of its value in just a few months.\nInvestors who bet on cloud data companySnowflake (NYSE:SNOW) when it went public last year have been on quite the rollercoaster ride. The stock went public at $120 per share and shot up to around $240 per share on day one. It then soared to a high of $429 per share in early December. At its peak, the company was worth over $100 billion.\nThings have not gone well since then. Snowflake stock slumped as 2020 came to a close, and the recent sell-off in high-flying tech stocks led shares of Snowflake to dive again. The stock now trades for around $230 per share, down about 46% from its peak and below where it closed after its first day of trading.\nSNOW data by YCharts\nWhy is this happening? It's certainly not due to the performance of the company. Revenue soared 117% in Snowflake's latest quarter, and it guided for product revenue to nearly double in the first quarter of the current fiscal year. The company also reported a net revenue retention rate of 168%, which indicates that its current customers are ramping up spending at a healthy rate.\nSnowflake isn't profitable, and the bottom line is only getting worse, but the stock market hasn't really cared about profits any time recently. Growth has been all that matters. Snowflake booked a net loss of nearly $200 million in its latest quarter, and a net loss of over $500 million for the full fiscal year.\nImage source: Getty Images.\nThose massive losses are probably not the reason for the abysmal performance of Snowflake stock, or at least not the only reason. More likely, this is a case of a stock that has simply soared too high too fast.\nA crazy multiple\nSnowflake's rapid growth certainly implies that the stock deserves to be valued at a premium to slower-growing companies. But things got a little out of hand last year. Snowflake generated about $590 million of revenue in the fiscal year that ended in January. At its peak market capitalization of about $110 billion, the company was valued at a staggering 186 times annual sales.\nYes, revenue is still growing very quickly, so that multiple will come down fast over time. But to get a sense of exactly how expensive Snowflake was at its peak, here's a chart of price-to-sales ratios for some dot-com bubble darlings in the late 1990s and early 2000s:\nADBE PS Ratio data by YCharts\nOf course, many companies during the dot-com bubble had little or no revenue and were valued at hundreds of millions of dollars. Such a high price-to-sales ratio would be more understandable if Snowflake was much smaller. But this is a company that was valued at more than $100 billion at its peak.Microsoft's price-to-sales ratio when it was worth $100 billion in the late 1990s was around 10.\nEven after declining by nearly 50%, Snowflake stock still trades for over 80 times annual sales. If you knew the company would continue to nearly double revenue each year for the next few years, it could make sense to pay that much. But that kind of growth gets tougher to achieve as the numbers get bigger. Doubling revenue when you're doing a few hundred million dollars annually is a lot easier than when you're doing a few billion dollars annually.\nWhat happens next to Snowflake stock is anyone's guess. If investors get any whiff of a growth slowdown this year, the stock could very well keep tumbling. And even if Snowflake keep growing fast and beats analyst estimates at every turn, a sentiment shift away from profitless growth stocks could create a major headwind for the stock.\nHow much is Snowflake really worth? Who knows? But it's probably not worth 186 times sales.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":323953120,"gmtCreate":1615300672960,"gmtModify":1703486993589,"author":{"id":"3576739121603829","authorId":"3576739121603829","name":"Bearbear","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4baf9c7ac76b55d6c2add20637e2dd8b","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3576739121603829","authorIdStr":"3576739121603829"},"htmlText":"What is snowflake?&nbsp;","listText":"What is snowflake?&nbsp;","text":"What is snowflake?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/323953120","repostId":2118646392,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2118646392","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1615299122,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2118646392?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-09 22:12","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Is Snowflake Stock Down So Much?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2118646392","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"The cloud data darling has lost nearly 50% of its value in just a few months.","content":"<p>The cloud data darling has lost nearly 50% of its value in just a few months.</p>\n<p>Investors who bet on cloud data company<b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SNOW\">Snowflake</a></b> (NYSE:SNOW) when it went public last year have been on quite the rollercoaster ride. The stock went public at $120 per share and shot up to around $240 per share on day <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a>. It then soared to a high of $429 per share in early December. At its peak, the company was worth over $100 billion.</p>\n<p>Things have not gone well since then. Snowflake stock slumped as 2020 came to a close, and the recent sell-off in high-flying tech stocks led shares of Snowflake to dive again. The stock now trades for around $230 per share, down about 46% from its peak and below where it closed after its first day of trading.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/259ec5d61514eb530db64fa4f28870e5\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"419\"><span>SNOW data by YCharts</span></p>\n<p>Why is this happening? It's certainly not due to the performance of the company. Revenue soared 117% in Snowflake's latest quarter, and it guided for product revenue to nearly double in the first quarter of the current fiscal year. The company also reported a net revenue retention rate of 168%, which indicates that its current customers are ramping up spending at a healthy rate.</p>\n<p>Snowflake isn't profitable, and the bottom line is only getting worse, but the stock market hasn't really cared about profits any time recently. Growth has been all that matters. Snowflake booked a net loss of nearly $200 million in its latest quarter, and a net loss of over $500 million for the full fiscal year.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/072d24471b48f7bdc551d253c1c8b0e2\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"393\"><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p>\n<p>Those massive losses are probably not the reason for the abysmal performance of Snowflake stock, or at least not the only reason. More likely, this is a case of a stock that has simply soared too high too fast.</p>\n<p><b>A crazy multiple</b></p>\n<p>Snowflake's rapid growth certainly implies that the stock deserves to be valued at a premium to slower-growing companies. But things got a little out of hand last year. Snowflake generated about $590 million of revenue in the fiscal year that ended in January. At its peak market capitalization of about $110 billion, the company was valued at a staggering 186 times annual sales.</p>\n<p>Yes, revenue is still growing very quickly, so that multiple will come down fast over time. But to get a sense of exactly how expensive Snowflake was at its peak, here's a chart of price-to-sales ratios for some dot-com bubble darlings in the late 1990s and early 2000s:</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3e395188c2dc374bb0edc0538d74b1f7\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"410\"><span>ADBE PS Ratio data by YCharts</span></p>\n<p>Of course, many companies during the dot-com bubble had little or no revenue and were valued at hundreds of millions of dollars. Such a high price-to-sales ratio would be more understandable if Snowflake was much smaller. But this is a company that was valued at more than $100 billion at its peak.<b>Microsoft</b>'s price-to-sales ratio when it was worth $100 billion in the late 1990s was around 10.</p>\n<p>Even after declining by nearly 50%, Snowflake stock still trades for over 80 times annual sales. If you knew the company would continue to nearly double revenue each year for the next few years, it could make sense to pay that much. But that kind of growth gets tougher to achieve as the numbers get bigger. Doubling revenue when you're doing a few hundred million dollars annually is a lot easier than when you're doing a few billion dollars annually.</p>\n<p>What happens next to Snowflake stock is anyone's guess. If investors get any whiff of a growth slowdown this year, the stock could very well keep tumbling. And even if Snowflake keep growing fast and beats analyst estimates at every turn, a sentiment shift away from profitless growth stocks could create a major headwind for the stock.</p>\n<p>How much is Snowflake really worth? Who knows? But it's probably not worth 186 times sales.</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Is Snowflake Stock Down So Much?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Is Snowflake Stock Down So Much?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-09 22:12 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/09/why-is-snowflake-stock-down-so-much/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The cloud data darling has lost nearly 50% of its value in just a few months.\nInvestors who bet on cloud data companySnowflake (NYSE:SNOW) when it went public last year have been on quite the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/09/why-is-snowflake-stock-down-so-much/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SNOW":"Snowflake"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/09/why-is-snowflake-stock-down-so-much/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2118646392","content_text":"The cloud data darling has lost nearly 50% of its value in just a few months.\nInvestors who bet on cloud data companySnowflake (NYSE:SNOW) when it went public last year have been on quite the rollercoaster ride. The stock went public at $120 per share and shot up to around $240 per share on day one. It then soared to a high of $429 per share in early December. At its peak, the company was worth over $100 billion.\nThings have not gone well since then. Snowflake stock slumped as 2020 came to a close, and the recent sell-off in high-flying tech stocks led shares of Snowflake to dive again. The stock now trades for around $230 per share, down about 46% from its peak and below where it closed after its first day of trading.\nSNOW data by YCharts\nWhy is this happening? It's certainly not due to the performance of the company. Revenue soared 117% in Snowflake's latest quarter, and it guided for product revenue to nearly double in the first quarter of the current fiscal year. The company also reported a net revenue retention rate of 168%, which indicates that its current customers are ramping up spending at a healthy rate.\nSnowflake isn't profitable, and the bottom line is only getting worse, but the stock market hasn't really cared about profits any time recently. Growth has been all that matters. Snowflake booked a net loss of nearly $200 million in its latest quarter, and a net loss of over $500 million for the full fiscal year.\nImage source: Getty Images.\nThose massive losses are probably not the reason for the abysmal performance of Snowflake stock, or at least not the only reason. More likely, this is a case of a stock that has simply soared too high too fast.\nA crazy multiple\nSnowflake's rapid growth certainly implies that the stock deserves to be valued at a premium to slower-growing companies. But things got a little out of hand last year. Snowflake generated about $590 million of revenue in the fiscal year that ended in January. At its peak market capitalization of about $110 billion, the company was valued at a staggering 186 times annual sales.\nYes, revenue is still growing very quickly, so that multiple will come down fast over time. But to get a sense of exactly how expensive Snowflake was at its peak, here's a chart of price-to-sales ratios for some dot-com bubble darlings in the late 1990s and early 2000s:\nADBE PS Ratio data by YCharts\nOf course, many companies during the dot-com bubble had little or no revenue and were valued at hundreds of millions of dollars. Such a high price-to-sales ratio would be more understandable if Snowflake was much smaller. But this is a company that was valued at more than $100 billion at its peak.Microsoft's price-to-sales ratio when it was worth $100 billion in the late 1990s was around 10.\nEven after declining by nearly 50%, Snowflake stock still trades for over 80 times annual sales. If you knew the company would continue to nearly double revenue each year for the next few years, it could make sense to pay that much. But that kind of growth gets tougher to achieve as the numbers get bigger. Doubling revenue when you're doing a few hundred million dollars annually is a lot easier than when you're doing a few billion dollars annually.\nWhat happens next to Snowflake stock is anyone's guess. If investors get any whiff of a growth slowdown this year, the stock could very well keep tumbling. And even if Snowflake keep growing fast and beats analyst estimates at every turn, a sentiment shift away from profitless growth stocks could create a major headwind for the stock.\nHow much is Snowflake really worth? Who knows? But it's probably not worth 186 times sales.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":323920217,"gmtCreate":1615300163339,"gmtModify":1703486976491,"author":{"id":"3575416215572570","authorId":"3575416215572570","name":"WilliamTeo","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/665764fc5f5e89c64f2caa13df0fe1e3","vip":1,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3575416215572570","authorIdStr":"3575416215572570"},"htmlText":"Up up soon","listText":"Up up soon","text":"Up up soon","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/323920217","repostId":2118646392,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2118646392","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1615299122,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2118646392?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-09 22:12","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Is Snowflake Stock Down So Much?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2118646392","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"The cloud data darling has lost nearly 50% of its value in just a few months.","content":"<p>The cloud data darling has lost nearly 50% of its value in just a few months.</p>\n<p>Investors who bet on cloud data company<b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SNOW\">Snowflake</a></b> (NYSE:SNOW) when it went public last year have been on quite the rollercoaster ride. The stock went public at $120 per share and shot up to around $240 per share on day <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a>. It then soared to a high of $429 per share in early December. At its peak, the company was worth over $100 billion.</p>\n<p>Things have not gone well since then. Snowflake stock slumped as 2020 came to a close, and the recent sell-off in high-flying tech stocks led shares of Snowflake to dive again. The stock now trades for around $230 per share, down about 46% from its peak and below where it closed after its first day of trading.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/259ec5d61514eb530db64fa4f28870e5\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"419\"><span>SNOW data by YCharts</span></p>\n<p>Why is this happening? It's certainly not due to the performance of the company. Revenue soared 117% in Snowflake's latest quarter, and it guided for product revenue to nearly double in the first quarter of the current fiscal year. The company also reported a net revenue retention rate of 168%, which indicates that its current customers are ramping up spending at a healthy rate.</p>\n<p>Snowflake isn't profitable, and the bottom line is only getting worse, but the stock market hasn't really cared about profits any time recently. Growth has been all that matters. Snowflake booked a net loss of nearly $200 million in its latest quarter, and a net loss of over $500 million for the full fiscal year.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/072d24471b48f7bdc551d253c1c8b0e2\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"393\"><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p>\n<p>Those massive losses are probably not the reason for the abysmal performance of Snowflake stock, or at least not the only reason. More likely, this is a case of a stock that has simply soared too high too fast.</p>\n<p><b>A crazy multiple</b></p>\n<p>Snowflake's rapid growth certainly implies that the stock deserves to be valued at a premium to slower-growing companies. But things got a little out of hand last year. Snowflake generated about $590 million of revenue in the fiscal year that ended in January. At its peak market capitalization of about $110 billion, the company was valued at a staggering 186 times annual sales.</p>\n<p>Yes, revenue is still growing very quickly, so that multiple will come down fast over time. But to get a sense of exactly how expensive Snowflake was at its peak, here's a chart of price-to-sales ratios for some dot-com bubble darlings in the late 1990s and early 2000s:</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3e395188c2dc374bb0edc0538d74b1f7\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"410\"><span>ADBE PS Ratio data by YCharts</span></p>\n<p>Of course, many companies during the dot-com bubble had little or no revenue and were valued at hundreds of millions of dollars. Such a high price-to-sales ratio would be more understandable if Snowflake was much smaller. But this is a company that was valued at more than $100 billion at its peak.<b>Microsoft</b>'s price-to-sales ratio when it was worth $100 billion in the late 1990s was around 10.</p>\n<p>Even after declining by nearly 50%, Snowflake stock still trades for over 80 times annual sales. If you knew the company would continue to nearly double revenue each year for the next few years, it could make sense to pay that much. But that kind of growth gets tougher to achieve as the numbers get bigger. Doubling revenue when you're doing a few hundred million dollars annually is a lot easier than when you're doing a few billion dollars annually.</p>\n<p>What happens next to Snowflake stock is anyone's guess. If investors get any whiff of a growth slowdown this year, the stock could very well keep tumbling. And even if Snowflake keep growing fast and beats analyst estimates at every turn, a sentiment shift away from profitless growth stocks could create a major headwind for the stock.</p>\n<p>How much is Snowflake really worth? Who knows? But it's probably not worth 186 times sales.</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Is Snowflake Stock Down So Much?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Is Snowflake Stock Down So Much?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-09 22:12 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/09/why-is-snowflake-stock-down-so-much/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The cloud data darling has lost nearly 50% of its value in just a few months.\nInvestors who bet on cloud data companySnowflake (NYSE:SNOW) when it went public last year have been on quite the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/09/why-is-snowflake-stock-down-so-much/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SNOW":"Snowflake"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/09/why-is-snowflake-stock-down-so-much/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2118646392","content_text":"The cloud data darling has lost nearly 50% of its value in just a few months.\nInvestors who bet on cloud data companySnowflake (NYSE:SNOW) when it went public last year have been on quite the rollercoaster ride. The stock went public at $120 per share and shot up to around $240 per share on day one. It then soared to a high of $429 per share in early December. At its peak, the company was worth over $100 billion.\nThings have not gone well since then. Snowflake stock slumped as 2020 came to a close, and the recent sell-off in high-flying tech stocks led shares of Snowflake to dive again. The stock now trades for around $230 per share, down about 46% from its peak and below where it closed after its first day of trading.\nSNOW data by YCharts\nWhy is this happening? It's certainly not due to the performance of the company. Revenue soared 117% in Snowflake's latest quarter, and it guided for product revenue to nearly double in the first quarter of the current fiscal year. The company also reported a net revenue retention rate of 168%, which indicates that its current customers are ramping up spending at a healthy rate.\nSnowflake isn't profitable, and the bottom line is only getting worse, but the stock market hasn't really cared about profits any time recently. Growth has been all that matters. Snowflake booked a net loss of nearly $200 million in its latest quarter, and a net loss of over $500 million for the full fiscal year.\nImage source: Getty Images.\nThose massive losses are probably not the reason for the abysmal performance of Snowflake stock, or at least not the only reason. More likely, this is a case of a stock that has simply soared too high too fast.\nA crazy multiple\nSnowflake's rapid growth certainly implies that the stock deserves to be valued at a premium to slower-growing companies. But things got a little out of hand last year. Snowflake generated about $590 million of revenue in the fiscal year that ended in January. At its peak market capitalization of about $110 billion, the company was valued at a staggering 186 times annual sales.\nYes, revenue is still growing very quickly, so that multiple will come down fast over time. But to get a sense of exactly how expensive Snowflake was at its peak, here's a chart of price-to-sales ratios for some dot-com bubble darlings in the late 1990s and early 2000s:\nADBE PS Ratio data by YCharts\nOf course, many companies during the dot-com bubble had little or no revenue and were valued at hundreds of millions of dollars. Such a high price-to-sales ratio would be more understandable if Snowflake was much smaller. But this is a company that was valued at more than $100 billion at its peak.Microsoft's price-to-sales ratio when it was worth $100 billion in the late 1990s was around 10.\nEven after declining by nearly 50%, Snowflake stock still trades for over 80 times annual sales. If you knew the company would continue to nearly double revenue each year for the next few years, it could make sense to pay that much. But that kind of growth gets tougher to achieve as the numbers get bigger. Doubling revenue when you're doing a few hundred million dollars annually is a lot easier than when you're doing a few billion dollars annually.\nWhat happens next to Snowflake stock is anyone's guess. If investors get any whiff of a growth slowdown this year, the stock could very well keep tumbling. And even if Snowflake keep growing fast and beats analyst estimates at every turn, a sentiment shift away from profitless growth stocks could create a major headwind for the stock.\nHow much is Snowflake really worth? Who knows? But it's probably not worth 186 times sales.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":323965213,"gmtCreate":1615299994432,"gmtModify":1703486971648,"author":{"id":"3575261937306050","authorId":"3575261937306050","name":"JoeK","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/162445e8b6a553bd412b8a06e3f44c9e","vip":1,"crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3575261937306050","authorIdStr":"3575261937306050"},"htmlText":"Going the same route as Teradata?&nbsp;","listText":"Going the same route as Teradata?&nbsp;","text":"Going the same route as Teradata?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/323965213","repostId":2118646392,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2118646392","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1615299122,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2118646392?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-09 22:12","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Is Snowflake Stock Down So Much?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2118646392","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"The cloud data darling has lost nearly 50% of its value in just a few months.","content":"<p>The cloud data darling has lost nearly 50% of its value in just a few months.</p>\n<p>Investors who bet on cloud data company<b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SNOW\">Snowflake</a></b> (NYSE:SNOW) when it went public last year have been on quite the rollercoaster ride. The stock went public at $120 per share and shot up to around $240 per share on day <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a>. It then soared to a high of $429 per share in early December. At its peak, the company was worth over $100 billion.</p>\n<p>Things have not gone well since then. Snowflake stock slumped as 2020 came to a close, and the recent sell-off in high-flying tech stocks led shares of Snowflake to dive again. The stock now trades for around $230 per share, down about 46% from its peak and below where it closed after its first day of trading.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/259ec5d61514eb530db64fa4f28870e5\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"419\"><span>SNOW data by YCharts</span></p>\n<p>Why is this happening? It's certainly not due to the performance of the company. Revenue soared 117% in Snowflake's latest quarter, and it guided for product revenue to nearly double in the first quarter of the current fiscal year. The company also reported a net revenue retention rate of 168%, which indicates that its current customers are ramping up spending at a healthy rate.</p>\n<p>Snowflake isn't profitable, and the bottom line is only getting worse, but the stock market hasn't really cared about profits any time recently. Growth has been all that matters. Snowflake booked a net loss of nearly $200 million in its latest quarter, and a net loss of over $500 million for the full fiscal year.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/072d24471b48f7bdc551d253c1c8b0e2\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"393\"><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p>\n<p>Those massive losses are probably not the reason for the abysmal performance of Snowflake stock, or at least not the only reason. More likely, this is a case of a stock that has simply soared too high too fast.</p>\n<p><b>A crazy multiple</b></p>\n<p>Snowflake's rapid growth certainly implies that the stock deserves to be valued at a premium to slower-growing companies. But things got a little out of hand last year. Snowflake generated about $590 million of revenue in the fiscal year that ended in January. At its peak market capitalization of about $110 billion, the company was valued at a staggering 186 times annual sales.</p>\n<p>Yes, revenue is still growing very quickly, so that multiple will come down fast over time. But to get a sense of exactly how expensive Snowflake was at its peak, here's a chart of price-to-sales ratios for some dot-com bubble darlings in the late 1990s and early 2000s:</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3e395188c2dc374bb0edc0538d74b1f7\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"410\"><span>ADBE PS Ratio data by YCharts</span></p>\n<p>Of course, many companies during the dot-com bubble had little or no revenue and were valued at hundreds of millions of dollars. Such a high price-to-sales ratio would be more understandable if Snowflake was much smaller. But this is a company that was valued at more than $100 billion at its peak.<b>Microsoft</b>'s price-to-sales ratio when it was worth $100 billion in the late 1990s was around 10.</p>\n<p>Even after declining by nearly 50%, Snowflake stock still trades for over 80 times annual sales. If you knew the company would continue to nearly double revenue each year for the next few years, it could make sense to pay that much. But that kind of growth gets tougher to achieve as the numbers get bigger. Doubling revenue when you're doing a few hundred million dollars annually is a lot easier than when you're doing a few billion dollars annually.</p>\n<p>What happens next to Snowflake stock is anyone's guess. If investors get any whiff of a growth slowdown this year, the stock could very well keep tumbling. And even if Snowflake keep growing fast and beats analyst estimates at every turn, a sentiment shift away from profitless growth stocks could create a major headwind for the stock.</p>\n<p>How much is Snowflake really worth? Who knows? But it's probably not worth 186 times sales.</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Is Snowflake Stock Down So Much?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Is Snowflake Stock Down So Much?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-09 22:12 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/09/why-is-snowflake-stock-down-so-much/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The cloud data darling has lost nearly 50% of its value in just a few months.\nInvestors who bet on cloud data companySnowflake (NYSE:SNOW) when it went public last year have been on quite the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/09/why-is-snowflake-stock-down-so-much/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SNOW":"Snowflake"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/09/why-is-snowflake-stock-down-so-much/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2118646392","content_text":"The cloud data darling has lost nearly 50% of its value in just a few months.\nInvestors who bet on cloud data companySnowflake (NYSE:SNOW) when it went public last year have been on quite the rollercoaster ride. The stock went public at $120 per share and shot up to around $240 per share on day one. It then soared to a high of $429 per share in early December. At its peak, the company was worth over $100 billion.\nThings have not gone well since then. Snowflake stock slumped as 2020 came to a close, and the recent sell-off in high-flying tech stocks led shares of Snowflake to dive again. The stock now trades for around $230 per share, down about 46% from its peak and below where it closed after its first day of trading.\nSNOW data by YCharts\nWhy is this happening? It's certainly not due to the performance of the company. Revenue soared 117% in Snowflake's latest quarter, and it guided for product revenue to nearly double in the first quarter of the current fiscal year. The company also reported a net revenue retention rate of 168%, which indicates that its current customers are ramping up spending at a healthy rate.\nSnowflake isn't profitable, and the bottom line is only getting worse, but the stock market hasn't really cared about profits any time recently. Growth has been all that matters. Snowflake booked a net loss of nearly $200 million in its latest quarter, and a net loss of over $500 million for the full fiscal year.\nImage source: Getty Images.\nThose massive losses are probably not the reason for the abysmal performance of Snowflake stock, or at least not the only reason. More likely, this is a case of a stock that has simply soared too high too fast.\nA crazy multiple\nSnowflake's rapid growth certainly implies that the stock deserves to be valued at a premium to slower-growing companies. But things got a little out of hand last year. Snowflake generated about $590 million of revenue in the fiscal year that ended in January. At its peak market capitalization of about $110 billion, the company was valued at a staggering 186 times annual sales.\nYes, revenue is still growing very quickly, so that multiple will come down fast over time. But to get a sense of exactly how expensive Snowflake was at its peak, here's a chart of price-to-sales ratios for some dot-com bubble darlings in the late 1990s and early 2000s:\nADBE PS Ratio data by YCharts\nOf course, many companies during the dot-com bubble had little or no revenue and were valued at hundreds of millions of dollars. Such a high price-to-sales ratio would be more understandable if Snowflake was much smaller. But this is a company that was valued at more than $100 billion at its peak.Microsoft's price-to-sales ratio when it was worth $100 billion in the late 1990s was around 10.\nEven after declining by nearly 50%, Snowflake stock still trades for over 80 times annual sales. If you knew the company would continue to nearly double revenue each year for the next few years, it could make sense to pay that much. But that kind of growth gets tougher to achieve as the numbers get bigger. Doubling revenue when you're doing a few hundred million dollars annually is a lot easier than when you're doing a few billion dollars annually.\nWhat happens next to Snowflake stock is anyone's guess. If investors get any whiff of a growth slowdown this year, the stock could very well keep tumbling. And even if Snowflake keep growing fast and beats analyst estimates at every turn, a sentiment shift away from profitless growth stocks could create a major headwind for the stock.\nHow much is Snowflake really worth? Who knows? But it's probably not worth 186 times sales.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":323968296,"gmtCreate":1615299747715,"gmtModify":1703486966984,"author":{"id":"3570772304712620","authorId":"3570772304712620","name":"jimmylaw","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f6c847ae11f03f4682632e6fa4016040","vip":1,"crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3570772304712620","authorIdStr":"3570772304712620"},"htmlText":"Why","listText":"Why","text":"Why","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/323968296","repostId":2118646392,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2118646392","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1615299122,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2118646392?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-09 22:12","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Is Snowflake Stock Down So Much?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2118646392","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"The cloud data darling has lost nearly 50% of its value in just a few months.","content":"<p>The cloud data darling has lost nearly 50% of its value in just a few months.</p>\n<p>Investors who bet on cloud data company<b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SNOW\">Snowflake</a></b> (NYSE:SNOW) when it went public last year have been on quite the rollercoaster ride. The stock went public at $120 per share and shot up to around $240 per share on day <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a>. It then soared to a high of $429 per share in early December. At its peak, the company was worth over $100 billion.</p>\n<p>Things have not gone well since then. Snowflake stock slumped as 2020 came to a close, and the recent sell-off in high-flying tech stocks led shares of Snowflake to dive again. The stock now trades for around $230 per share, down about 46% from its peak and below where it closed after its first day of trading.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/259ec5d61514eb530db64fa4f28870e5\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"419\"><span>SNOW data by YCharts</span></p>\n<p>Why is this happening? It's certainly not due to the performance of the company. Revenue soared 117% in Snowflake's latest quarter, and it guided for product revenue to nearly double in the first quarter of the current fiscal year. The company also reported a net revenue retention rate of 168%, which indicates that its current customers are ramping up spending at a healthy rate.</p>\n<p>Snowflake isn't profitable, and the bottom line is only getting worse, but the stock market hasn't really cared about profits any time recently. Growth has been all that matters. Snowflake booked a net loss of nearly $200 million in its latest quarter, and a net loss of over $500 million for the full fiscal year.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/072d24471b48f7bdc551d253c1c8b0e2\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"393\"><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p>\n<p>Those massive losses are probably not the reason for the abysmal performance of Snowflake stock, or at least not the only reason. More likely, this is a case of a stock that has simply soared too high too fast.</p>\n<p><b>A crazy multiple</b></p>\n<p>Snowflake's rapid growth certainly implies that the stock deserves to be valued at a premium to slower-growing companies. But things got a little out of hand last year. Snowflake generated about $590 million of revenue in the fiscal year that ended in January. At its peak market capitalization of about $110 billion, the company was valued at a staggering 186 times annual sales.</p>\n<p>Yes, revenue is still growing very quickly, so that multiple will come down fast over time. But to get a sense of exactly how expensive Snowflake was at its peak, here's a chart of price-to-sales ratios for some dot-com bubble darlings in the late 1990s and early 2000s:</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3e395188c2dc374bb0edc0538d74b1f7\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"410\"><span>ADBE PS Ratio data by YCharts</span></p>\n<p>Of course, many companies during the dot-com bubble had little or no revenue and were valued at hundreds of millions of dollars. Such a high price-to-sales ratio would be more understandable if Snowflake was much smaller. But this is a company that was valued at more than $100 billion at its peak.<b>Microsoft</b>'s price-to-sales ratio when it was worth $100 billion in the late 1990s was around 10.</p>\n<p>Even after declining by nearly 50%, Snowflake stock still trades for over 80 times annual sales. If you knew the company would continue to nearly double revenue each year for the next few years, it could make sense to pay that much. But that kind of growth gets tougher to achieve as the numbers get bigger. Doubling revenue when you're doing a few hundred million dollars annually is a lot easier than when you're doing a few billion dollars annually.</p>\n<p>What happens next to Snowflake stock is anyone's guess. If investors get any whiff of a growth slowdown this year, the stock could very well keep tumbling. And even if Snowflake keep growing fast and beats analyst estimates at every turn, a sentiment shift away from profitless growth stocks could create a major headwind for the stock.</p>\n<p>How much is Snowflake really worth? Who knows? But it's probably not worth 186 times sales.</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Is Snowflake Stock Down So Much?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Is Snowflake Stock Down So Much?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-09 22:12 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/09/why-is-snowflake-stock-down-so-much/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The cloud data darling has lost nearly 50% of its value in just a few months.\nInvestors who bet on cloud data companySnowflake (NYSE:SNOW) when it went public last year have been on quite the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/09/why-is-snowflake-stock-down-so-much/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SNOW":"Snowflake"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/09/why-is-snowflake-stock-down-so-much/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2118646392","content_text":"The cloud data darling has lost nearly 50% of its value in just a few months.\nInvestors who bet on cloud data companySnowflake (NYSE:SNOW) when it went public last year have been on quite the rollercoaster ride. The stock went public at $120 per share and shot up to around $240 per share on day one. It then soared to a high of $429 per share in early December. At its peak, the company was worth over $100 billion.\nThings have not gone well since then. Snowflake stock slumped as 2020 came to a close, and the recent sell-off in high-flying tech stocks led shares of Snowflake to dive again. The stock now trades for around $230 per share, down about 46% from its peak and below where it closed after its first day of trading.\nSNOW data by YCharts\nWhy is this happening? It's certainly not due to the performance of the company. Revenue soared 117% in Snowflake's latest quarter, and it guided for product revenue to nearly double in the first quarter of the current fiscal year. The company also reported a net revenue retention rate of 168%, which indicates that its current customers are ramping up spending at a healthy rate.\nSnowflake isn't profitable, and the bottom line is only getting worse, but the stock market hasn't really cared about profits any time recently. Growth has been all that matters. Snowflake booked a net loss of nearly $200 million in its latest quarter, and a net loss of over $500 million for the full fiscal year.\nImage source: Getty Images.\nThose massive losses are probably not the reason for the abysmal performance of Snowflake stock, or at least not the only reason. More likely, this is a case of a stock that has simply soared too high too fast.\nA crazy multiple\nSnowflake's rapid growth certainly implies that the stock deserves to be valued at a premium to slower-growing companies. But things got a little out of hand last year. Snowflake generated about $590 million of revenue in the fiscal year that ended in January. At its peak market capitalization of about $110 billion, the company was valued at a staggering 186 times annual sales.\nYes, revenue is still growing very quickly, so that multiple will come down fast over time. But to get a sense of exactly how expensive Snowflake was at its peak, here's a chart of price-to-sales ratios for some dot-com bubble darlings in the late 1990s and early 2000s:\nADBE PS Ratio data by YCharts\nOf course, many companies during the dot-com bubble had little or no revenue and were valued at hundreds of millions of dollars. Such a high price-to-sales ratio would be more understandable if Snowflake was much smaller. But this is a company that was valued at more than $100 billion at its peak.Microsoft's price-to-sales ratio when it was worth $100 billion in the late 1990s was around 10.\nEven after declining by nearly 50%, Snowflake stock still trades for over 80 times annual sales. If you knew the company would continue to nearly double revenue each year for the next few years, it could make sense to pay that much. But that kind of growth gets tougher to achieve as the numbers get bigger. Doubling revenue when you're doing a few hundred million dollars annually is a lot easier than when you're doing a few billion dollars annually.\nWhat happens next to Snowflake stock is anyone's guess. If investors get any whiff of a growth slowdown this year, the stock could very well keep tumbling. And even if Snowflake keep growing fast and beats analyst estimates at every turn, a sentiment shift away from profitless growth stocks could create a major headwind for the stock.\nHow much is Snowflake really worth? Who knows? But it's probably not worth 186 times sales.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":323963303,"gmtCreate":1615299586102,"gmtModify":1703486963875,"author":{"id":"3559824795366750","authorId":"3559824795366750","name":"Kiteflying","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0c4e5c6dfeb378c0ccafe8d68fd396c2","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3559824795366750","authorIdStr":"3559824795366750"},"htmlText":"Overvalued?&nbsp;","listText":"Overvalued?&nbsp;","text":"Overvalued?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/323963303","repostId":2118646392,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2118646392","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1615299122,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2118646392?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-09 22:12","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Is Snowflake Stock Down So Much?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2118646392","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"The cloud data darling has lost nearly 50% of its value in just a few months.","content":"<p>The cloud data darling has lost nearly 50% of its value in just a few months.</p>\n<p>Investors who bet on cloud data company<b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SNOW\">Snowflake</a></b> (NYSE:SNOW) when it went public last year have been on quite the rollercoaster ride. The stock went public at $120 per share and shot up to around $240 per share on day <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a>. It then soared to a high of $429 per share in early December. At its peak, the company was worth over $100 billion.</p>\n<p>Things have not gone well since then. Snowflake stock slumped as 2020 came to a close, and the recent sell-off in high-flying tech stocks led shares of Snowflake to dive again. The stock now trades for around $230 per share, down about 46% from its peak and below where it closed after its first day of trading.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/259ec5d61514eb530db64fa4f28870e5\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"419\"><span>SNOW data by YCharts</span></p>\n<p>Why is this happening? It's certainly not due to the performance of the company. Revenue soared 117% in Snowflake's latest quarter, and it guided for product revenue to nearly double in the first quarter of the current fiscal year. The company also reported a net revenue retention rate of 168%, which indicates that its current customers are ramping up spending at a healthy rate.</p>\n<p>Snowflake isn't profitable, and the bottom line is only getting worse, but the stock market hasn't really cared about profits any time recently. Growth has been all that matters. Snowflake booked a net loss of nearly $200 million in its latest quarter, and a net loss of over $500 million for the full fiscal year.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/072d24471b48f7bdc551d253c1c8b0e2\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"393\"><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p>\n<p>Those massive losses are probably not the reason for the abysmal performance of Snowflake stock, or at least not the only reason. More likely, this is a case of a stock that has simply soared too high too fast.</p>\n<p><b>A crazy multiple</b></p>\n<p>Snowflake's rapid growth certainly implies that the stock deserves to be valued at a premium to slower-growing companies. But things got a little out of hand last year. Snowflake generated about $590 million of revenue in the fiscal year that ended in January. At its peak market capitalization of about $110 billion, the company was valued at a staggering 186 times annual sales.</p>\n<p>Yes, revenue is still growing very quickly, so that multiple will come down fast over time. But to get a sense of exactly how expensive Snowflake was at its peak, here's a chart of price-to-sales ratios for some dot-com bubble darlings in the late 1990s and early 2000s:</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3e395188c2dc374bb0edc0538d74b1f7\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"410\"><span>ADBE PS Ratio data by YCharts</span></p>\n<p>Of course, many companies during the dot-com bubble had little or no revenue and were valued at hundreds of millions of dollars. Such a high price-to-sales ratio would be more understandable if Snowflake was much smaller. But this is a company that was valued at more than $100 billion at its peak.<b>Microsoft</b>'s price-to-sales ratio when it was worth $100 billion in the late 1990s was around 10.</p>\n<p>Even after declining by nearly 50%, Snowflake stock still trades for over 80 times annual sales. If you knew the company would continue to nearly double revenue each year for the next few years, it could make sense to pay that much. But that kind of growth gets tougher to achieve as the numbers get bigger. Doubling revenue when you're doing a few hundred million dollars annually is a lot easier than when you're doing a few billion dollars annually.</p>\n<p>What happens next to Snowflake stock is anyone's guess. If investors get any whiff of a growth slowdown this year, the stock could very well keep tumbling. And even if Snowflake keep growing fast and beats analyst estimates at every turn, a sentiment shift away from profitless growth stocks could create a major headwind for the stock.</p>\n<p>How much is Snowflake really worth? Who knows? But it's probably not worth 186 times sales.</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Is Snowflake Stock Down So Much?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Is Snowflake Stock Down So Much?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-09 22:12 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/09/why-is-snowflake-stock-down-so-much/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The cloud data darling has lost nearly 50% of its value in just a few months.\nInvestors who bet on cloud data companySnowflake (NYSE:SNOW) when it went public last year have been on quite the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/09/why-is-snowflake-stock-down-so-much/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SNOW":"Snowflake"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/09/why-is-snowflake-stock-down-so-much/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2118646392","content_text":"The cloud data darling has lost nearly 50% of its value in just a few months.\nInvestors who bet on cloud data companySnowflake (NYSE:SNOW) when it went public last year have been on quite the rollercoaster ride. The stock went public at $120 per share and shot up to around $240 per share on day one. It then soared to a high of $429 per share in early December. At its peak, the company was worth over $100 billion.\nThings have not gone well since then. Snowflake stock slumped as 2020 came to a close, and the recent sell-off in high-flying tech stocks led shares of Snowflake to dive again. The stock now trades for around $230 per share, down about 46% from its peak and below where it closed after its first day of trading.\nSNOW data by YCharts\nWhy is this happening? It's certainly not due to the performance of the company. Revenue soared 117% in Snowflake's latest quarter, and it guided for product revenue to nearly double in the first quarter of the current fiscal year. The company also reported a net revenue retention rate of 168%, which indicates that its current customers are ramping up spending at a healthy rate.\nSnowflake isn't profitable, and the bottom line is only getting worse, but the stock market hasn't really cared about profits any time recently. Growth has been all that matters. Snowflake booked a net loss of nearly $200 million in its latest quarter, and a net loss of over $500 million for the full fiscal year.\nImage source: Getty Images.\nThose massive losses are probably not the reason for the abysmal performance of Snowflake stock, or at least not the only reason. More likely, this is a case of a stock that has simply soared too high too fast.\nA crazy multiple\nSnowflake's rapid growth certainly implies that the stock deserves to be valued at a premium to slower-growing companies. But things got a little out of hand last year. Snowflake generated about $590 million of revenue in the fiscal year that ended in January. At its peak market capitalization of about $110 billion, the company was valued at a staggering 186 times annual sales.\nYes, revenue is still growing very quickly, so that multiple will come down fast over time. But to get a sense of exactly how expensive Snowflake was at its peak, here's a chart of price-to-sales ratios for some dot-com bubble darlings in the late 1990s and early 2000s:\nADBE PS Ratio data by YCharts\nOf course, many companies during the dot-com bubble had little or no revenue and were valued at hundreds of millions of dollars. Such a high price-to-sales ratio would be more understandable if Snowflake was much smaller. But this is a company that was valued at more than $100 billion at its peak.Microsoft's price-to-sales ratio when it was worth $100 billion in the late 1990s was around 10.\nEven after declining by nearly 50%, Snowflake stock still trades for over 80 times annual sales. If you knew the company would continue to nearly double revenue each year for the next few years, it could make sense to pay that much. But that kind of growth gets tougher to achieve as the numbers get bigger. Doubling revenue when you're doing a few hundred million dollars annually is a lot easier than when you're doing a few billion dollars annually.\nWhat happens next to Snowflake stock is anyone's guess. If investors get any whiff of a growth slowdown this year, the stock could very well keep tumbling. And even if Snowflake keep growing fast and beats analyst estimates at every turn, a sentiment shift away from profitless growth stocks could create a major headwind for the stock.\nHow much is Snowflake really worth? Who knows? But it's probably not worth 186 times sales.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":323969594,"gmtCreate":1615299536018,"gmtModify":1703486963358,"author":{"id":"3572249185724220","authorId":"3572249185724220","name":"xoxoll","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8ed65c2962af2a6fbd414f4d6fe9e378","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3572249185724220","authorIdStr":"3572249185724220"},"htmlText":"Help me like and comment&nbsp;","listText":"Help me like and comment&nbsp;","text":"Help me like and comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/323969594","repostId":2118646392,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2118646392","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1615299122,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2118646392?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-09 22:12","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Is Snowflake Stock Down So Much?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2118646392","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"The cloud data darling has lost nearly 50% of its value in just a few months.","content":"<p>The cloud data darling has lost nearly 50% of its value in just a few months.</p>\n<p>Investors who bet on cloud data company<b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SNOW\">Snowflake</a></b> (NYSE:SNOW) when it went public last year have been on quite the rollercoaster ride. The stock went public at $120 per share and shot up to around $240 per share on day <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a>. It then soared to a high of $429 per share in early December. At its peak, the company was worth over $100 billion.</p>\n<p>Things have not gone well since then. Snowflake stock slumped as 2020 came to a close, and the recent sell-off in high-flying tech stocks led shares of Snowflake to dive again. The stock now trades for around $230 per share, down about 46% from its peak and below where it closed after its first day of trading.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/259ec5d61514eb530db64fa4f28870e5\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"419\"><span>SNOW data by YCharts</span></p>\n<p>Why is this happening? It's certainly not due to the performance of the company. Revenue soared 117% in Snowflake's latest quarter, and it guided for product revenue to nearly double in the first quarter of the current fiscal year. The company also reported a net revenue retention rate of 168%, which indicates that its current customers are ramping up spending at a healthy rate.</p>\n<p>Snowflake isn't profitable, and the bottom line is only getting worse, but the stock market hasn't really cared about profits any time recently. Growth has been all that matters. Snowflake booked a net loss of nearly $200 million in its latest quarter, and a net loss of over $500 million for the full fiscal year.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/072d24471b48f7bdc551d253c1c8b0e2\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"393\"><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p>\n<p>Those massive losses are probably not the reason for the abysmal performance of Snowflake stock, or at least not the only reason. More likely, this is a case of a stock that has simply soared too high too fast.</p>\n<p><b>A crazy multiple</b></p>\n<p>Snowflake's rapid growth certainly implies that the stock deserves to be valued at a premium to slower-growing companies. But things got a little out of hand last year. Snowflake generated about $590 million of revenue in the fiscal year that ended in January. At its peak market capitalization of about $110 billion, the company was valued at a staggering 186 times annual sales.</p>\n<p>Yes, revenue is still growing very quickly, so that multiple will come down fast over time. But to get a sense of exactly how expensive Snowflake was at its peak, here's a chart of price-to-sales ratios for some dot-com bubble darlings in the late 1990s and early 2000s:</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3e395188c2dc374bb0edc0538d74b1f7\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"410\"><span>ADBE PS Ratio data by YCharts</span></p>\n<p>Of course, many companies during the dot-com bubble had little or no revenue and were valued at hundreds of millions of dollars. Such a high price-to-sales ratio would be more understandable if Snowflake was much smaller. But this is a company that was valued at more than $100 billion at its peak.<b>Microsoft</b>'s price-to-sales ratio when it was worth $100 billion in the late 1990s was around 10.</p>\n<p>Even after declining by nearly 50%, Snowflake stock still trades for over 80 times annual sales. If you knew the company would continue to nearly double revenue each year for the next few years, it could make sense to pay that much. But that kind of growth gets tougher to achieve as the numbers get bigger. Doubling revenue when you're doing a few hundred million dollars annually is a lot easier than when you're doing a few billion dollars annually.</p>\n<p>What happens next to Snowflake stock is anyone's guess. If investors get any whiff of a growth slowdown this year, the stock could very well keep tumbling. And even if Snowflake keep growing fast and beats analyst estimates at every turn, a sentiment shift away from profitless growth stocks could create a major headwind for the stock.</p>\n<p>How much is Snowflake really worth? Who knows? But it's probably not worth 186 times sales.</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Is Snowflake Stock Down So Much?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Is Snowflake Stock Down So Much?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-09 22:12 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/09/why-is-snowflake-stock-down-so-much/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The cloud data darling has lost nearly 50% of its value in just a few months.\nInvestors who bet on cloud data companySnowflake (NYSE:SNOW) when it went public last year have been on quite the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/09/why-is-snowflake-stock-down-so-much/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SNOW":"Snowflake"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/09/why-is-snowflake-stock-down-so-much/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2118646392","content_text":"The cloud data darling has lost nearly 50% of its value in just a few months.\nInvestors who bet on cloud data companySnowflake (NYSE:SNOW) when it went public last year have been on quite the rollercoaster ride. The stock went public at $120 per share and shot up to around $240 per share on day one. It then soared to a high of $429 per share in early December. At its peak, the company was worth over $100 billion.\nThings have not gone well since then. Snowflake stock slumped as 2020 came to a close, and the recent sell-off in high-flying tech stocks led shares of Snowflake to dive again. The stock now trades for around $230 per share, down about 46% from its peak and below where it closed after its first day of trading.\nSNOW data by YCharts\nWhy is this happening? It's certainly not due to the performance of the company. Revenue soared 117% in Snowflake's latest quarter, and it guided for product revenue to nearly double in the first quarter of the current fiscal year. The company also reported a net revenue retention rate of 168%, which indicates that its current customers are ramping up spending at a healthy rate.\nSnowflake isn't profitable, and the bottom line is only getting worse, but the stock market hasn't really cared about profits any time recently. Growth has been all that matters. Snowflake booked a net loss of nearly $200 million in its latest quarter, and a net loss of over $500 million for the full fiscal year.\nImage source: Getty Images.\nThose massive losses are probably not the reason for the abysmal performance of Snowflake stock, or at least not the only reason. More likely, this is a case of a stock that has simply soared too high too fast.\nA crazy multiple\nSnowflake's rapid growth certainly implies that the stock deserves to be valued at a premium to slower-growing companies. But things got a little out of hand last year. Snowflake generated about $590 million of revenue in the fiscal year that ended in January. At its peak market capitalization of about $110 billion, the company was valued at a staggering 186 times annual sales.\nYes, revenue is still growing very quickly, so that multiple will come down fast over time. But to get a sense of exactly how expensive Snowflake was at its peak, here's a chart of price-to-sales ratios for some dot-com bubble darlings in the late 1990s and early 2000s:\nADBE PS Ratio data by YCharts\nOf course, many companies during the dot-com bubble had little or no revenue and were valued at hundreds of millions of dollars. Such a high price-to-sales ratio would be more understandable if Snowflake was much smaller. But this is a company that was valued at more than $100 billion at its peak.Microsoft's price-to-sales ratio when it was worth $100 billion in the late 1990s was around 10.\nEven after declining by nearly 50%, Snowflake stock still trades for over 80 times annual sales. If you knew the company would continue to nearly double revenue each year for the next few years, it could make sense to pay that much. But that kind of growth gets tougher to achieve as the numbers get bigger. Doubling revenue when you're doing a few hundred million dollars annually is a lot easier than when you're doing a few billion dollars annually.\nWhat happens next to Snowflake stock is anyone's guess. If investors get any whiff of a growth slowdown this year, the stock could very well keep tumbling. And even if Snowflake keep growing fast and beats analyst estimates at every turn, a sentiment shift away from profitless growth stocks could create a major headwind for the stock.\nHow much is Snowflake really worth? Who knows? But it's probably not worth 186 times sales.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":3752594,"gmtCreate":1615300140481,"gmtModify":1635756817133,"authorId":3569409177654344,"author":{"id":3569409177654344,"idStr":"3569409177654344","authorId":3569409177654344,"name":"BeeL","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/04fd117193f398e58143bed822f34e05","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":323969594,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"over valued","text":"over valued","html":"over valued"},{"id":3756810,"gmtCreate":1615341738935,"gmtModify":1635756586545,"authorId":3576472032670521,"author":{"id":3576472032670521,"idStr":"3576472032670521","authorId":3576472032670521,"name":"EV8","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":323969594,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"👍👍","text":"👍👍","html":"👍👍"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":323987786,"gmtCreate":1615299397545,"gmtModify":1703486960248,"author":{"id":"3567979712068924","authorId":"3567979712068924","name":"Kanyon","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5b4865bae805415342780f86469a2ba7","vip":1,"crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3567979712068924","authorIdStr":"3567979712068924"},"htmlText":"Nice","listText":"Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/323987786","repostId":2118646392,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2118646392","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1615299122,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2118646392?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-09 22:12","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Is Snowflake Stock Down So Much?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2118646392","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"The cloud data darling has lost nearly 50% of its value in just a few months.","content":"<p>The cloud data darling has lost nearly 50% of its value in just a few months.</p>\n<p>Investors who bet on cloud data company<b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SNOW\">Snowflake</a></b> (NYSE:SNOW) when it went public last year have been on quite the rollercoaster ride. The stock went public at $120 per share and shot up to around $240 per share on day <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a>. It then soared to a high of $429 per share in early December. At its peak, the company was worth over $100 billion.</p>\n<p>Things have not gone well since then. Snowflake stock slumped as 2020 came to a close, and the recent sell-off in high-flying tech stocks led shares of Snowflake to dive again. The stock now trades for around $230 per share, down about 46% from its peak and below where it closed after its first day of trading.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/259ec5d61514eb530db64fa4f28870e5\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"419\"><span>SNOW data by YCharts</span></p>\n<p>Why is this happening? It's certainly not due to the performance of the company. Revenue soared 117% in Snowflake's latest quarter, and it guided for product revenue to nearly double in the first quarter of the current fiscal year. The company also reported a net revenue retention rate of 168%, which indicates that its current customers are ramping up spending at a healthy rate.</p>\n<p>Snowflake isn't profitable, and the bottom line is only getting worse, but the stock market hasn't really cared about profits any time recently. Growth has been all that matters. Snowflake booked a net loss of nearly $200 million in its latest quarter, and a net loss of over $500 million for the full fiscal year.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/072d24471b48f7bdc551d253c1c8b0e2\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"393\"><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p>\n<p>Those massive losses are probably not the reason for the abysmal performance of Snowflake stock, or at least not the only reason. More likely, this is a case of a stock that has simply soared too high too fast.</p>\n<p><b>A crazy multiple</b></p>\n<p>Snowflake's rapid growth certainly implies that the stock deserves to be valued at a premium to slower-growing companies. But things got a little out of hand last year. Snowflake generated about $590 million of revenue in the fiscal year that ended in January. At its peak market capitalization of about $110 billion, the company was valued at a staggering 186 times annual sales.</p>\n<p>Yes, revenue is still growing very quickly, so that multiple will come down fast over time. But to get a sense of exactly how expensive Snowflake was at its peak, here's a chart of price-to-sales ratios for some dot-com bubble darlings in the late 1990s and early 2000s:</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3e395188c2dc374bb0edc0538d74b1f7\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"410\"><span>ADBE PS Ratio data by YCharts</span></p>\n<p>Of course, many companies during the dot-com bubble had little or no revenue and were valued at hundreds of millions of dollars. Such a high price-to-sales ratio would be more understandable if Snowflake was much smaller. But this is a company that was valued at more than $100 billion at its peak.<b>Microsoft</b>'s price-to-sales ratio when it was worth $100 billion in the late 1990s was around 10.</p>\n<p>Even after declining by nearly 50%, Snowflake stock still trades for over 80 times annual sales. If you knew the company would continue to nearly double revenue each year for the next few years, it could make sense to pay that much. But that kind of growth gets tougher to achieve as the numbers get bigger. Doubling revenue when you're doing a few hundred million dollars annually is a lot easier than when you're doing a few billion dollars annually.</p>\n<p>What happens next to Snowflake stock is anyone's guess. If investors get any whiff of a growth slowdown this year, the stock could very well keep tumbling. And even if Snowflake keep growing fast and beats analyst estimates at every turn, a sentiment shift away from profitless growth stocks could create a major headwind for the stock.</p>\n<p>How much is Snowflake really worth? Who knows? But it's probably not worth 186 times sales.</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Is Snowflake Stock Down So Much?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Is Snowflake Stock Down So Much?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-09 22:12 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/09/why-is-snowflake-stock-down-so-much/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The cloud data darling has lost nearly 50% of its value in just a few months.\nInvestors who bet on cloud data companySnowflake (NYSE:SNOW) when it went public last year have been on quite the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/09/why-is-snowflake-stock-down-so-much/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SNOW":"Snowflake"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/09/why-is-snowflake-stock-down-so-much/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2118646392","content_text":"The cloud data darling has lost nearly 50% of its value in just a few months.\nInvestors who bet on cloud data companySnowflake (NYSE:SNOW) when it went public last year have been on quite the rollercoaster ride. The stock went public at $120 per share and shot up to around $240 per share on day one. It then soared to a high of $429 per share in early December. At its peak, the company was worth over $100 billion.\nThings have not gone well since then. Snowflake stock slumped as 2020 came to a close, and the recent sell-off in high-flying tech stocks led shares of Snowflake to dive again. The stock now trades for around $230 per share, down about 46% from its peak and below where it closed after its first day of trading.\nSNOW data by YCharts\nWhy is this happening? It's certainly not due to the performance of the company. Revenue soared 117% in Snowflake's latest quarter, and it guided for product revenue to nearly double in the first quarter of the current fiscal year. The company also reported a net revenue retention rate of 168%, which indicates that its current customers are ramping up spending at a healthy rate.\nSnowflake isn't profitable, and the bottom line is only getting worse, but the stock market hasn't really cared about profits any time recently. Growth has been all that matters. Snowflake booked a net loss of nearly $200 million in its latest quarter, and a net loss of over $500 million for the full fiscal year.\nImage source: Getty Images.\nThose massive losses are probably not the reason for the abysmal performance of Snowflake stock, or at least not the only reason. More likely, this is a case of a stock that has simply soared too high too fast.\nA crazy multiple\nSnowflake's rapid growth certainly implies that the stock deserves to be valued at a premium to slower-growing companies. But things got a little out of hand last year. Snowflake generated about $590 million of revenue in the fiscal year that ended in January. At its peak market capitalization of about $110 billion, the company was valued at a staggering 186 times annual sales.\nYes, revenue is still growing very quickly, so that multiple will come down fast over time. But to get a sense of exactly how expensive Snowflake was at its peak, here's a chart of price-to-sales ratios for some dot-com bubble darlings in the late 1990s and early 2000s:\nADBE PS Ratio data by YCharts\nOf course, many companies during the dot-com bubble had little or no revenue and were valued at hundreds of millions of dollars. Such a high price-to-sales ratio would be more understandable if Snowflake was much smaller. But this is a company that was valued at more than $100 billion at its peak.Microsoft's price-to-sales ratio when it was worth $100 billion in the late 1990s was around 10.\nEven after declining by nearly 50%, Snowflake stock still trades for over 80 times annual sales. If you knew the company would continue to nearly double revenue each year for the next few years, it could make sense to pay that much. But that kind of growth gets tougher to achieve as the numbers get bigger. Doubling revenue when you're doing a few hundred million dollars annually is a lot easier than when you're doing a few billion dollars annually.\nWhat happens next to Snowflake stock is anyone's guess. If investors get any whiff of a growth slowdown this year, the stock could very well keep tumbling. And even if Snowflake keep growing fast and beats analyst estimates at every turn, a sentiment shift away from profitless growth stocks could create a major headwind for the stock.\nHow much is Snowflake really worth? Who knows? But it's probably not worth 186 times sales.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":323982230,"gmtCreate":1615299173420,"gmtModify":1703486955587,"author":{"id":"3562216862479883","authorId":"3562216862479883","name":"drazil","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b797dd9f65685cd5f745297d3b11e4c6","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3562216862479883","authorIdStr":"3562216862479883"},"htmlText":"It’s not just SNOW","listText":"It’s not just SNOW","text":"It’s not just SNOW","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/323982230","repostId":2118646392,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2118646392","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1615299122,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2118646392?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-09 22:12","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Is Snowflake Stock Down So Much?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2118646392","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"The cloud data darling has lost nearly 50% of its value in just a few months.","content":"<p>The cloud data darling has lost nearly 50% of its value in just a few months.</p>\n<p>Investors who bet on cloud data company<b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SNOW\">Snowflake</a></b> (NYSE:SNOW) when it went public last year have been on quite the rollercoaster ride. The stock went public at $120 per share and shot up to around $240 per share on day <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a>. It then soared to a high of $429 per share in early December. At its peak, the company was worth over $100 billion.</p>\n<p>Things have not gone well since then. Snowflake stock slumped as 2020 came to a close, and the recent sell-off in high-flying tech stocks led shares of Snowflake to dive again. The stock now trades for around $230 per share, down about 46% from its peak and below where it closed after its first day of trading.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/259ec5d61514eb530db64fa4f28870e5\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"419\"><span>SNOW data by YCharts</span></p>\n<p>Why is this happening? It's certainly not due to the performance of the company. Revenue soared 117% in Snowflake's latest quarter, and it guided for product revenue to nearly double in the first quarter of the current fiscal year. The company also reported a net revenue retention rate of 168%, which indicates that its current customers are ramping up spending at a healthy rate.</p>\n<p>Snowflake isn't profitable, and the bottom line is only getting worse, but the stock market hasn't really cared about profits any time recently. Growth has been all that matters. Snowflake booked a net loss of nearly $200 million in its latest quarter, and a net loss of over $500 million for the full fiscal year.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/072d24471b48f7bdc551d253c1c8b0e2\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"393\"><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p>\n<p>Those massive losses are probably not the reason for the abysmal performance of Snowflake stock, or at least not the only reason. More likely, this is a case of a stock that has simply soared too high too fast.</p>\n<p><b>A crazy multiple</b></p>\n<p>Snowflake's rapid growth certainly implies that the stock deserves to be valued at a premium to slower-growing companies. But things got a little out of hand last year. Snowflake generated about $590 million of revenue in the fiscal year that ended in January. At its peak market capitalization of about $110 billion, the company was valued at a staggering 186 times annual sales.</p>\n<p>Yes, revenue is still growing very quickly, so that multiple will come down fast over time. But to get a sense of exactly how expensive Snowflake was at its peak, here's a chart of price-to-sales ratios for some dot-com bubble darlings in the late 1990s and early 2000s:</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3e395188c2dc374bb0edc0538d74b1f7\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"410\"><span>ADBE PS Ratio data by YCharts</span></p>\n<p>Of course, many companies during the dot-com bubble had little or no revenue and were valued at hundreds of millions of dollars. Such a high price-to-sales ratio would be more understandable if Snowflake was much smaller. But this is a company that was valued at more than $100 billion at its peak.<b>Microsoft</b>'s price-to-sales ratio when it was worth $100 billion in the late 1990s was around 10.</p>\n<p>Even after declining by nearly 50%, Snowflake stock still trades for over 80 times annual sales. If you knew the company would continue to nearly double revenue each year for the next few years, it could make sense to pay that much. But that kind of growth gets tougher to achieve as the numbers get bigger. Doubling revenue when you're doing a few hundred million dollars annually is a lot easier than when you're doing a few billion dollars annually.</p>\n<p>What happens next to Snowflake stock is anyone's guess. If investors get any whiff of a growth slowdown this year, the stock could very well keep tumbling. And even if Snowflake keep growing fast and beats analyst estimates at every turn, a sentiment shift away from profitless growth stocks could create a major headwind for the stock.</p>\n<p>How much is Snowflake really worth? Who knows? But it's probably not worth 186 times sales.</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Is Snowflake Stock Down So Much?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Is Snowflake Stock Down So Much?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-09 22:12 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/09/why-is-snowflake-stock-down-so-much/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The cloud data darling has lost nearly 50% of its value in just a few months.\nInvestors who bet on cloud data companySnowflake (NYSE:SNOW) when it went public last year have been on quite the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/09/why-is-snowflake-stock-down-so-much/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SNOW":"Snowflake"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/09/why-is-snowflake-stock-down-so-much/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2118646392","content_text":"The cloud data darling has lost nearly 50% of its value in just a few months.\nInvestors who bet on cloud data companySnowflake (NYSE:SNOW) when it went public last year have been on quite the rollercoaster ride. The stock went public at $120 per share and shot up to around $240 per share on day one. It then soared to a high of $429 per share in early December. At its peak, the company was worth over $100 billion.\nThings have not gone well since then. Snowflake stock slumped as 2020 came to a close, and the recent sell-off in high-flying tech stocks led shares of Snowflake to dive again. The stock now trades for around $230 per share, down about 46% from its peak and below where it closed after its first day of trading.\nSNOW data by YCharts\nWhy is this happening? It's certainly not due to the performance of the company. Revenue soared 117% in Snowflake's latest quarter, and it guided for product revenue to nearly double in the first quarter of the current fiscal year. The company also reported a net revenue retention rate of 168%, which indicates that its current customers are ramping up spending at a healthy rate.\nSnowflake isn't profitable, and the bottom line is only getting worse, but the stock market hasn't really cared about profits any time recently. Growth has been all that matters. Snowflake booked a net loss of nearly $200 million in its latest quarter, and a net loss of over $500 million for the full fiscal year.\nImage source: Getty Images.\nThose massive losses are probably not the reason for the abysmal performance of Snowflake stock, or at least not the only reason. More likely, this is a case of a stock that has simply soared too high too fast.\nA crazy multiple\nSnowflake's rapid growth certainly implies that the stock deserves to be valued at a premium to slower-growing companies. But things got a little out of hand last year. Snowflake generated about $590 million of revenue in the fiscal year that ended in January. At its peak market capitalization of about $110 billion, the company was valued at a staggering 186 times annual sales.\nYes, revenue is still growing very quickly, so that multiple will come down fast over time. But to get a sense of exactly how expensive Snowflake was at its peak, here's a chart of price-to-sales ratios for some dot-com bubble darlings in the late 1990s and early 2000s:\nADBE PS Ratio data by YCharts\nOf course, many companies during the dot-com bubble had little or no revenue and were valued at hundreds of millions of dollars. Such a high price-to-sales ratio would be more understandable if Snowflake was much smaller. But this is a company that was valued at more than $100 billion at its peak.Microsoft's price-to-sales ratio when it was worth $100 billion in the late 1990s was around 10.\nEven after declining by nearly 50%, Snowflake stock still trades for over 80 times annual sales. If you knew the company would continue to nearly double revenue each year for the next few years, it could make sense to pay that much. But that kind of growth gets tougher to achieve as the numbers get bigger. Doubling revenue when you're doing a few hundred million dollars annually is a lot easier than when you're doing a few billion dollars annually.\nWhat happens next to Snowflake stock is anyone's guess. If investors get any whiff of a growth slowdown this year, the stock could very well keep tumbling. And even if Snowflake keep growing fast and beats analyst estimates at every turn, a sentiment shift away from profitless growth stocks could create a major headwind for the stock.\nHow much is Snowflake really worth? Who knows? But it's probably not worth 186 times sales.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":3752782,"gmtCreate":1615301067499,"gmtModify":1635756807704,"authorId":3572250480206178,"author":{"id":3572250480206178,"idStr":"3572250480206178","authorId":3572250480206178,"name":"AhShui","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e17900eb752bb98a2a90b76a16717e3c","vip":1,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":323982230,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"let it snow","text":"let it snow","html":"let it snow"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":323982079,"gmtCreate":1615299165791,"gmtModify":1703486954895,"author":{"id":"3572920853698790","authorId":"3572920853698790","name":"shimmy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cf91c395f224153b6fd0d7cd7f7104ce","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3572920853698790","authorIdStr":"3572920853698790"},"htmlText":"Wow","listText":"Wow","text":"Wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/323982079","repostId":2118646392,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2118646392","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1615299122,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2118646392?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-09 22:12","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Is Snowflake Stock Down So Much?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2118646392","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"The cloud data darling has lost nearly 50% of its value in just a few months.","content":"<p>The cloud data darling has lost nearly 50% of its value in just a few months.</p>\n<p>Investors who bet on cloud data company<b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SNOW\">Snowflake</a></b> (NYSE:SNOW) when it went public last year have been on quite the rollercoaster ride. The stock went public at $120 per share and shot up to around $240 per share on day <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a>. It then soared to a high of $429 per share in early December. At its peak, the company was worth over $100 billion.</p>\n<p>Things have not gone well since then. Snowflake stock slumped as 2020 came to a close, and the recent sell-off in high-flying tech stocks led shares of Snowflake to dive again. The stock now trades for around $230 per share, down about 46% from its peak and below where it closed after its first day of trading.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/259ec5d61514eb530db64fa4f28870e5\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"419\"><span>SNOW data by YCharts</span></p>\n<p>Why is this happening? It's certainly not due to the performance of the company. Revenue soared 117% in Snowflake's latest quarter, and it guided for product revenue to nearly double in the first quarter of the current fiscal year. The company also reported a net revenue retention rate of 168%, which indicates that its current customers are ramping up spending at a healthy rate.</p>\n<p>Snowflake isn't profitable, and the bottom line is only getting worse, but the stock market hasn't really cared about profits any time recently. Growth has been all that matters. Snowflake booked a net loss of nearly $200 million in its latest quarter, and a net loss of over $500 million for the full fiscal year.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/072d24471b48f7bdc551d253c1c8b0e2\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"393\"><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p>\n<p>Those massive losses are probably not the reason for the abysmal performance of Snowflake stock, or at least not the only reason. More likely, this is a case of a stock that has simply soared too high too fast.</p>\n<p><b>A crazy multiple</b></p>\n<p>Snowflake's rapid growth certainly implies that the stock deserves to be valued at a premium to slower-growing companies. But things got a little out of hand last year. Snowflake generated about $590 million of revenue in the fiscal year that ended in January. At its peak market capitalization of about $110 billion, the company was valued at a staggering 186 times annual sales.</p>\n<p>Yes, revenue is still growing very quickly, so that multiple will come down fast over time. But to get a sense of exactly how expensive Snowflake was at its peak, here's a chart of price-to-sales ratios for some dot-com bubble darlings in the late 1990s and early 2000s:</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3e395188c2dc374bb0edc0538d74b1f7\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"410\"><span>ADBE PS Ratio data by YCharts</span></p>\n<p>Of course, many companies during the dot-com bubble had little or no revenue and were valued at hundreds of millions of dollars. Such a high price-to-sales ratio would be more understandable if Snowflake was much smaller. But this is a company that was valued at more than $100 billion at its peak.<b>Microsoft</b>'s price-to-sales ratio when it was worth $100 billion in the late 1990s was around 10.</p>\n<p>Even after declining by nearly 50%, Snowflake stock still trades for over 80 times annual sales. If you knew the company would continue to nearly double revenue each year for the next few years, it could make sense to pay that much. But that kind of growth gets tougher to achieve as the numbers get bigger. Doubling revenue when you're doing a few hundred million dollars annually is a lot easier than when you're doing a few billion dollars annually.</p>\n<p>What happens next to Snowflake stock is anyone's guess. If investors get any whiff of a growth slowdown this year, the stock could very well keep tumbling. And even if Snowflake keep growing fast and beats analyst estimates at every turn, a sentiment shift away from profitless growth stocks could create a major headwind for the stock.</p>\n<p>How much is Snowflake really worth? Who knows? But it's probably not worth 186 times sales.</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Is Snowflake Stock Down So Much?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Is Snowflake Stock Down So Much?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-09 22:12 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/09/why-is-snowflake-stock-down-so-much/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The cloud data darling has lost nearly 50% of its value in just a few months.\nInvestors who bet on cloud data companySnowflake (NYSE:SNOW) when it went public last year have been on quite the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/09/why-is-snowflake-stock-down-so-much/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SNOW":"Snowflake"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/09/why-is-snowflake-stock-down-so-much/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2118646392","content_text":"The cloud data darling has lost nearly 50% of its value in just a few months.\nInvestors who bet on cloud data companySnowflake (NYSE:SNOW) when it went public last year have been on quite the rollercoaster ride. The stock went public at $120 per share and shot up to around $240 per share on day one. It then soared to a high of $429 per share in early December. At its peak, the company was worth over $100 billion.\nThings have not gone well since then. Snowflake stock slumped as 2020 came to a close, and the recent sell-off in high-flying tech stocks led shares of Snowflake to dive again. The stock now trades for around $230 per share, down about 46% from its peak and below where it closed after its first day of trading.\nSNOW data by YCharts\nWhy is this happening? It's certainly not due to the performance of the company. Revenue soared 117% in Snowflake's latest quarter, and it guided for product revenue to nearly double in the first quarter of the current fiscal year. The company also reported a net revenue retention rate of 168%, which indicates that its current customers are ramping up spending at a healthy rate.\nSnowflake isn't profitable, and the bottom line is only getting worse, but the stock market hasn't really cared about profits any time recently. Growth has been all that matters. Snowflake booked a net loss of nearly $200 million in its latest quarter, and a net loss of over $500 million for the full fiscal year.\nImage source: Getty Images.\nThose massive losses are probably not the reason for the abysmal performance of Snowflake stock, or at least not the only reason. More likely, this is a case of a stock that has simply soared too high too fast.\nA crazy multiple\nSnowflake's rapid growth certainly implies that the stock deserves to be valued at a premium to slower-growing companies. But things got a little out of hand last year. Snowflake generated about $590 million of revenue in the fiscal year that ended in January. At its peak market capitalization of about $110 billion, the company was valued at a staggering 186 times annual sales.\nYes, revenue is still growing very quickly, so that multiple will come down fast over time. But to get a sense of exactly how expensive Snowflake was at its peak, here's a chart of price-to-sales ratios for some dot-com bubble darlings in the late 1990s and early 2000s:\nADBE PS Ratio data by YCharts\nOf course, many companies during the dot-com bubble had little or no revenue and were valued at hundreds of millions of dollars. Such a high price-to-sales ratio would be more understandable if Snowflake was much smaller. But this is a company that was valued at more than $100 billion at its peak.Microsoft's price-to-sales ratio when it was worth $100 billion in the late 1990s was around 10.\nEven after declining by nearly 50%, Snowflake stock still trades for over 80 times annual sales. If you knew the company would continue to nearly double revenue each year for the next few years, it could make sense to pay that much. But that kind of growth gets tougher to achieve as the numbers get bigger. Doubling revenue when you're doing a few hundred million dollars annually is a lot easier than when you're doing a few billion dollars annually.\nWhat happens next to Snowflake stock is anyone's guess. If investors get any whiff of a growth slowdown this year, the stock could very well keep tumbling. And even if Snowflake keep growing fast and beats analyst estimates at every turn, a sentiment shift away from profitless growth stocks could create a major headwind for the stock.\nHow much is Snowflake really worth? Who knows? But it's probably not worth 186 times sales.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":3752430,"gmtCreate":1615299204567,"gmtModify":1635756825832,"authorId":3570709291573644,"author":{"id":3570709291573644,"idStr":"3570709291573644","authorId":3570709291573644,"name":"Jkcubz","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/454005a90377851a88dcde78f7b9fc15","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":323982079,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Wow","text":"Wow","html":"Wow"},{"id":3752441,"gmtCreate":1615299265450,"gmtModify":1635756825342,"authorId":3572920853698790,"author":{"id":3572920853698790,"idStr":"3572920853698790","authorId":3572920853698790,"name":"shimmy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cf91c395f224153b6fd0d7cd7f7104ce","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":323982079,"type":1,"supId":3752430,"prevId":0,"content":"💯","text":"💯","html":"💯"}],"langContent":"EN"}],"hasMoreComments":true,"newsSizeData":{"likeSize":32,"commentSize":13,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false}}