Apple Seeks to Delay Ruling Loosening Its Grip on App Store_老虎社区_美港股上老虎

Apple Seeks to Delay Ruling Loosening Its Grip on App Store

Bloomberg2021-10-09

(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store business model since the platform was launched in 2008, an overhaul that could cost the tech giant a ...

网页链接

免责声明：本文观点仅代表作者个人观点，不构成本平台的投资建议，本平台不对文章信息准确性、完整性和及时性做出任何保证，亦不对因使用或信赖文章信息引发的任何损失承担责任。

287

Tanyl
·2021-10-10
Need time to waite for Apple price grow high
回复
1
举报
Tanyl
·2021-10-10
Apple price increase rate is not high but still can invest
回复
1
举报
Tanyl
·2021-10-10
Apple is a very big potential share
回复
1
举报
Tanyl
·2021-10-10
I still waite for Apple price up up up !
回复
1
举报
Tanyl
·2021-10-09
Oh no, yesterday Apple price down again
回复
2
举报
Tanyl
·2021-10-09
Very exited to waite Apple price up
回复
1
举报
Dindindino
·2021-10-09
Like pls
回复
1
举报
收起
- DarrenyYSM:
  ok
  2021-10-09
  回复
  举报
ivy888
·2021-10-09
Ok
回复
3
举报
收起
- Sm9999:
  No
  2021-10-09
  回复
  举报
- BSK100:
  ok
  2021-10-09
  回复
  举报
ivy888
·2021-10-09
Like
回复
2
举报
收起
- CJoe独孤求胜:
  done
  2021-10-09
  回复
  举报
Bonds
·2021-10-09
Apples wil go up and up
回复
2
举报
收起
- Irene104:
  👍🏻
  2021-10-09
  回复
  举报
Chororo
·2021-10-09
.
回复
2
举报
收起
- Chororo:
  .
  2021-10-09
  回复
  举报
Calvin_GKH
·2021-10-09
👌
回复
1
举报
收起
- Calvin_GKH:
  👍
  2021-10-09
  回复
  举报
Al3x
·2021-10-09
like
回复
点赞
举报
Jsgoh28
·2021-10-09
Tell me your opinion about this news...
回复
3
举报
收起
- Jsgoh28:
  Like
  2021-10-09
  回复
  举报
- 55f64d08:
  k
  2021-10-09
  回复
  举报
kwwh
·2021-10-09
Okay
回复
3
举报
收起
- kwwh:
  good
  2021-10-09
  回复
  举报
- 747d3c45:
  Ok
  2021-10-09
  回复
  举报
JeromeAng
·2021-10-09
Nice
回复
4
举报
收起
- 79e89ab4:
  Hi
  2021-10-09
  回复
  举报
Zasper
·2021-10-09
Sad
回复
5
举报
收起
- tanpy:
  oops
  2021-10-09
  回复
  举报
- DingDang:
  Oo
  2021-10-09
  回复
  举报
- Couragesther:
  Heah
  2021-10-09
  回复
  举报
TinyRabbit
·2021-10-09
Wow
回复
5
举报
收起
- shutiing:
  wow
  2021-10-09
  回复
  举报
- siowthing:
  ok
  2021-10-09
  回复
  举报
- Zasper:
  Ok
  2021-10-09
  回复
  举报

热议股票

7x24

全部

关于我们·老虎社区守则·老虎社区账号管理规范·老虎社区服务协议·老虎社区隐私政策

公司名称：北京至简风宜信息技术有限公司

违法和不良信息投诉：010-5681-3562（工作时间9:30-18:30）

邮箱：service@laohu8.com

营业执照：91110105MA01A4U55R

ICP备：京ICP备18016422号

网安备：京公网安备11010502036490

关注我们

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"data":{"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1198772378?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","thumbnail":"","is_english":true,"pubTime":"2021-10-09 09:00","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","id":"1198772378","market":"us","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"Apple Seeks to Delay Ruling Loosening Its Grip on App Store","media":"Bloomberg","content":"<div>\n<p>(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store business model since the platform was launched in 2008, an overhaul that could cost the tech giant a ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-seeks-delay-ruling-loosening-230855311.html\">网页链接</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"lsy1612507957220","html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Seeks to Delay Ruling Loosening Its Grip on App Store</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Seeks to Delay Ruling Loosening Its Grip on App Store\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-10-09 09:00 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-seeks-delay-ruling-loosening-230855311.html><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store business model since the platform was launched in 2008, an overhaul that could cost the tech giant a ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-seeks-delay-ruling-loosening-230855311.html\">网页链接</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":"AAPL","symbol_name":"苹果","start_time":0,"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-seeks-delay-ruling-loosening-230855311.html","article_id":"1198772378","we_media_id":null,"thumbnails":[],"rights":null,"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1198772378","pubTimestamp":1633741203,"sourceInfo":{"source_id":"lsy1612507957220","name":"finance.yahoo"},"weMediaInfo":null,"summary":"(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store bu","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"yahoo.com","property":[],"viewcount":null,"language":"en","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"translate_title":"苹果寻求推迟裁决放松对应用商店的控制","themeId":null,"isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":null,"symbols_score_info":{"AAPL":0.9},"content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store business model since the platform was launched in 2008, an overhaul that could cost the tech giant a few billion dollars annually.\nThe iPhone maker gave notice Friday that will appeal a judge’s ruling in its fight with Epic Games Inc. ordering the Cupertino, California-based company to stop blocking developers from letting users complete in-app purchases on the web. It also asked the judge to put her Dec. 9 deadline for App Store rule changes on hold during the appeal, which if allowed could keep business as usual for Apple for at least a year.\nThe Sept. 10 ruling largely vindicated Apple’s business model that charges commissions on developers for App Store transactions, but the judge said Apple must allow direct communication between users and app makers and permit links to the web to complete transactions.\nBloomberg Intelligence has said that pressure on Apple to lower its commissions, which currently run as high as 30%, could squeeze revenue by $2 billion to $4 billion in a worst-case scenario.\nApple said in its filing that it wants to “maintain the status quo” as “there’s no reason to expend resources” on App Store changes during the appeals process. It also argued there could be “unintended downstream consequences for consumers and the iOS platform” if the judge’s order goes into effect Dec. 9. A postponement would give the company time to address concerns in a way that could potentially do away with the need to let developers allow consumers to make web purchases, Apple said.\n“Apple is working hard to address these difficult issues in a changing world, enhancing information flow without compromising the consumer experience,” the company said.\nA hearing on Apple’s stay request has been set for Nov. 16, but the company said in a briefing it’s seeking to move the proceeding to Nov. 2. If U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers refuses to grant the stay, Apple said, the company could go to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.\nWhen the ruling came out, following a three-week trial in May, Apple hailed it as a victory because the judge didn’t find that the company violated federal antitrust law. Tim Sweeney, Epic’s founder and chief executive officer, said in a tweet “the ruling isn’t a win for developers or for consumers” and his company promptly filed notice that it will appeal.\nEpic declined to comment on Apple’s appeal Friday but Sweeney tweeted an image of Agent Peely, a banana action figure in Epic’s popular battle-royale game Fortnite who briefly became a source of controversy in the trial.\nApple has announced that it plans to keep Fortnite off of the App Store until appeals are exhausted, a process that could take as long as five years if the fight goes all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.\nWhile Gonzalez Rogers said Apple can no longer ban developers from pointing users to the web to complete transactions -- bypassing the App Store’s in-app-purchase system -- the judge didn’t state outright that Apple can’t collect its commissions.\nThat has led some observers to believe that Apple could still take its cut of revenue via other means, but lawyers and analysts say doing so poses logistical hurdles and risks political blowback.\nPaul Gallant, an analyst at Cowen & Co., has said Apple would want to put off changing App Store rules “because things could get messy if developers get to do workarounds starting in December.” Gallant said in a research note last month that Apple has a good chance of winning a stay at the Ninth Circuit.\n“That would prevent developers from using non-Apple payment mechanisms (and avoiding the 30% commission) until at least late 2022,” he wrote.\nBefore the September ruling, Apple announced two App Store changes in settlements with small U.S. developers and the Japan Federal Trade Commission. Both concessions are similar to the court’s injunction.\nApple is letting developers directly communicate with users about alternative payment methods, and next year it will begin allowing so-called “reader” apps -- those that deal with media like video, photos, and news -- to point users to the web to subscribe, bypassing Apple’s fees. The company highlighted those changes in Friday’s filing.\nThe case is Epic Games Inc. v. Apple Inc., 20-cv-05640, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (San Francisco).","kind":null,"is_publish_news":true,"is_publish_highlight":true,"is_publish_live":false,"is_publish_wemedia":null,"editions":null,"column":"","sentiment":"0","news_tag":"","news_rank":0,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":1},"commentList":[{"id":828892894,"gmtCreate":1633879588909,"gmtModify":1633879589058,"author":{"id":"4087109808120260","authorId":"4087109808120260","name":"Tanyl","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/174329973340cf0f5b68791ee5b08afd","vip":1,"crmLevel":9,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Need time to waite for Apple price grow high","listText":"Need time to waite for Apple price grow high","text":"Need time to waite for Apple price grow high","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/828892894","repostId":1198772378,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1198772378","pubTimestamp":1633741203,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1198772378?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-09 09:00","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Seeks to Delay Ruling Loosening Its Grip on App Store","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1198772378","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store bu","content":"<p>(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store business model since the platform was launched in 2008, an overhaul that could cost the tech giant a few billion dollars annually.</p>\n<p>The iPhone maker gave notice Friday that will appeal a judge’s ruling in its fight with Epic Games Inc. ordering the Cupertino, California-based company to stop blocking developers from letting users complete in-app purchases on the web. It also asked the judge to put her Dec. 9 deadline for App Store rule changes on hold during the appeal, which if allowed could keep business as usual for Apple for at least a year.</p>\n<p>The Sept. 10 ruling largely vindicated Apple’s business model that charges commissions on developers for App Store transactions, but the judge said Apple must allow direct communication between users and app makers and permit links to the web to complete transactions.</p>\n<p>Bloomberg Intelligence has said that pressure on Apple to lower its commissions, which currently run as high as 30%, could squeeze revenue by $2 billion to $4 billion in a worst-case scenario.</p>\n<p>Apple said in its filing that it wants to “maintain the status quo” as “there’s no reason to expend resources” on App Store changes during the appeals process. It also argued there could be “unintended downstream consequences for consumers and the iOS platform” if the judge’s order goes into effect Dec. 9. A postponement would give the company time to address concerns in a way that could potentially do away with the need to let developers allow consumers to make web purchases, Apple said.</p>\n<p>“Apple is working hard to address these difficult issues in a changing world, enhancing information flow without compromising the consumer experience,” the company said.</p>\n<p>A hearing on Apple’s stay request has been set for Nov. 16, but the company said in a briefing it’s seeking to move the proceeding to Nov. 2. If U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers refuses to grant the stay, Apple said, the company could go to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.</p>\n<p>When the ruling came out, following a three-week trial in May, Apple hailed it as a victory because the judge didn’t find that the company violated federal antitrust law. Tim Sweeney, Epic’s founder and chief executive officer, said in a tweet “the ruling isn’t a win for developers or for consumers” and his company promptly filed notice that it will appeal.</p>\n<p>Epic declined to comment on Apple’s appeal Friday but Sweeney tweeted an image of Agent Peely, a banana action figure in Epic’s popular battle-royale game Fortnite who briefly became a source of controversy in the trial.</p>\n<p>Apple has announced that it plans to keep Fortnite off of the App Store until appeals are exhausted, a process that could take as long as five years if the fight goes all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.</p>\n<p>While Gonzalez Rogers said Apple can no longer ban developers from pointing users to the web to complete transactions -- bypassing the App Store’s in-app-purchase system -- the judge didn’t state outright that Apple can’t collect its commissions.</p>\n<p>That has led some observers to believe that Apple could still take its cut of revenue via other means, but lawyers and analysts say doing so poses logistical hurdles and risks political blowback.</p>\n<p>Paul Gallant, an analyst at Cowen &amp; Co., has said Apple would want to put off changing App Store rules “because things could get messy if developers get to do workarounds starting in December.” Gallant said in a research note last month that Apple has a good chance of winning a stay at the Ninth Circuit.</p>\n<p>“That would prevent developers from using non-Apple payment mechanisms (and avoiding the 30% commission) until at least late 2022,” he wrote.</p>\n<p>Before the September ruling, Apple announced two App Store changes in settlements with small U.S. developers and the Japan Federal Trade Commission. Both concessions are similar to the court’s injunction.</p>\n<p>Apple is letting developers directly communicate with users about alternative payment methods, and next year it will begin allowing so-called “reader” apps -- those that deal with media like video, photos, and news -- to point users to the web to subscribe, bypassing Apple’s fees. The company highlighted those changes in Friday’s filing.</p>\n<p>The case is Epic Games Inc. v. Apple Inc., 20-cv-05640, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (San Francisco).</p>","source":"lsy1612507957220","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Seeks to Delay Ruling Loosening Its Grip on App Store</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Seeks to Delay Ruling Loosening Its Grip on App Store\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-10-09 09:00 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-seeks-delay-ruling-loosening-230855311.html><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store business model since the platform was launched in 2008, an overhaul that could cost the tech giant a ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-seeks-delay-ruling-loosening-230855311.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-seeks-delay-ruling-loosening-230855311.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1198772378","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store business model since the platform was launched in 2008, an overhaul that could cost the tech giant a few billion dollars annually.\nThe iPhone maker gave notice Friday that will appeal a judge’s ruling in its fight with Epic Games Inc. ordering the Cupertino, California-based company to stop blocking developers from letting users complete in-app purchases on the web. It also asked the judge to put her Dec. 9 deadline for App Store rule changes on hold during the appeal, which if allowed could keep business as usual for Apple for at least a year.\nThe Sept. 10 ruling largely vindicated Apple’s business model that charges commissions on developers for App Store transactions, but the judge said Apple must allow direct communication between users and app makers and permit links to the web to complete transactions.\nBloomberg Intelligence has said that pressure on Apple to lower its commissions, which currently run as high as 30%, could squeeze revenue by $2 billion to $4 billion in a worst-case scenario.\nApple said in its filing that it wants to “maintain the status quo” as “there’s no reason to expend resources” on App Store changes during the appeals process. It also argued there could be “unintended downstream consequences for consumers and the iOS platform” if the judge’s order goes into effect Dec. 9. A postponement would give the company time to address concerns in a way that could potentially do away with the need to let developers allow consumers to make web purchases, Apple said.\n“Apple is working hard to address these difficult issues in a changing world, enhancing information flow without compromising the consumer experience,” the company said.\nA hearing on Apple’s stay request has been set for Nov. 16, but the company said in a briefing it’s seeking to move the proceeding to Nov. 2. If U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers refuses to grant the stay, Apple said, the company could go to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.\nWhen the ruling came out, following a three-week trial in May, Apple hailed it as a victory because the judge didn’t find that the company violated federal antitrust law. Tim Sweeney, Epic’s founder and chief executive officer, said in a tweet “the ruling isn’t a win for developers or for consumers” and his company promptly filed notice that it will appeal.\nEpic declined to comment on Apple’s appeal Friday but Sweeney tweeted an image of Agent Peely, a banana action figure in Epic’s popular battle-royale game Fortnite who briefly became a source of controversy in the trial.\nApple has announced that it plans to keep Fortnite off of the App Store until appeals are exhausted, a process that could take as long as five years if the fight goes all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.\nWhile Gonzalez Rogers said Apple can no longer ban developers from pointing users to the web to complete transactions -- bypassing the App Store’s in-app-purchase system -- the judge didn’t state outright that Apple can’t collect its commissions.\nThat has led some observers to believe that Apple could still take its cut of revenue via other means, but lawyers and analysts say doing so poses logistical hurdles and risks political blowback.\nPaul Gallant, an analyst at Cowen & Co., has said Apple would want to put off changing App Store rules “because things could get messy if developers get to do workarounds starting in December.” Gallant said in a research note last month that Apple has a good chance of winning a stay at the Ninth Circuit.\n“That would prevent developers from using non-Apple payment mechanisms (and avoiding the 30% commission) until at least late 2022,” he wrote.\nBefore the September ruling, Apple announced two App Store changes in settlements with small U.S. developers and the Japan Federal Trade Commission. Both concessions are similar to the court’s injunction.\nApple is letting developers directly communicate with users about alternative payment methods, and next year it will begin allowing so-called “reader” apps -- those that deal with media like video, photos, and news -- to point users to the web to subscribe, bypassing Apple’s fees. The company highlighted those changes in Friday’s filing.\nThe case is Epic Games Inc. v. Apple Inc., 20-cv-05640, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (San Francisco).","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"CN"},{"id":828892937,"gmtCreate":1633879543480,"gmtModify":1633879543571,"author":{"id":"4087109808120260","authorId":"4087109808120260","name":"Tanyl","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/174329973340cf0f5b68791ee5b08afd","vip":1,"crmLevel":9,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Apple price increase rate is not high but still can invest","listText":"Apple price increase rate is not high but still can invest","text":"Apple price increase rate is not high but still can invest","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/828892937","repostId":1198772378,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1198772378","pubTimestamp":1633741203,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1198772378?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-09 09:00","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Seeks to Delay Ruling Loosening Its Grip on App Store","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1198772378","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store bu","content":"<p>(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store business model since the platform was launched in 2008, an overhaul that could cost the tech giant a few billion dollars annually.</p>\n<p>The iPhone maker gave notice Friday that will appeal a judge’s ruling in its fight with Epic Games Inc. ordering the Cupertino, California-based company to stop blocking developers from letting users complete in-app purchases on the web. It also asked the judge to put her Dec. 9 deadline for App Store rule changes on hold during the appeal, which if allowed could keep business as usual for Apple for at least a year.</p>\n<p>The Sept. 10 ruling largely vindicated Apple’s business model that charges commissions on developers for App Store transactions, but the judge said Apple must allow direct communication between users and app makers and permit links to the web to complete transactions.</p>\n<p>Bloomberg Intelligence has said that pressure on Apple to lower its commissions, which currently run as high as 30%, could squeeze revenue by $2 billion to $4 billion in a worst-case scenario.</p>\n<p>Apple said in its filing that it wants to “maintain the status quo” as “there’s no reason to expend resources” on App Store changes during the appeals process. It also argued there could be “unintended downstream consequences for consumers and the iOS platform” if the judge’s order goes into effect Dec. 9. A postponement would give the company time to address concerns in a way that could potentially do away with the need to let developers allow consumers to make web purchases, Apple said.</p>\n<p>“Apple is working hard to address these difficult issues in a changing world, enhancing information flow without compromising the consumer experience,” the company said.</p>\n<p>A hearing on Apple’s stay request has been set for Nov. 16, but the company said in a briefing it’s seeking to move the proceeding to Nov. 2. If U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers refuses to grant the stay, Apple said, the company could go to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.</p>\n<p>When the ruling came out, following a three-week trial in May, Apple hailed it as a victory because the judge didn’t find that the company violated federal antitrust law. Tim Sweeney, Epic’s founder and chief executive officer, said in a tweet “the ruling isn’t a win for developers or for consumers” and his company promptly filed notice that it will appeal.</p>\n<p>Epic declined to comment on Apple’s appeal Friday but Sweeney tweeted an image of Agent Peely, a banana action figure in Epic’s popular battle-royale game Fortnite who briefly became a source of controversy in the trial.</p>\n<p>Apple has announced that it plans to keep Fortnite off of the App Store until appeals are exhausted, a process that could take as long as five years if the fight goes all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.</p>\n<p>While Gonzalez Rogers said Apple can no longer ban developers from pointing users to the web to complete transactions -- bypassing the App Store’s in-app-purchase system -- the judge didn’t state outright that Apple can’t collect its commissions.</p>\n<p>That has led some observers to believe that Apple could still take its cut of revenue via other means, but lawyers and analysts say doing so poses logistical hurdles and risks political blowback.</p>\n<p>Paul Gallant, an analyst at Cowen &amp; Co., has said Apple would want to put off changing App Store rules “because things could get messy if developers get to do workarounds starting in December.” Gallant said in a research note last month that Apple has a good chance of winning a stay at the Ninth Circuit.</p>\n<p>“That would prevent developers from using non-Apple payment mechanisms (and avoiding the 30% commission) until at least late 2022,” he wrote.</p>\n<p>Before the September ruling, Apple announced two App Store changes in settlements with small U.S. developers and the Japan Federal Trade Commission. Both concessions are similar to the court’s injunction.</p>\n<p>Apple is letting developers directly communicate with users about alternative payment methods, and next year it will begin allowing so-called “reader” apps -- those that deal with media like video, photos, and news -- to point users to the web to subscribe, bypassing Apple’s fees. The company highlighted those changes in Friday’s filing.</p>\n<p>The case is Epic Games Inc. v. Apple Inc., 20-cv-05640, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (San Francisco).</p>","source":"lsy1612507957220","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Seeks to Delay Ruling Loosening Its Grip on App Store</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Seeks to Delay Ruling Loosening Its Grip on App Store\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-10-09 09:00 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-seeks-delay-ruling-loosening-230855311.html><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store business model since the platform was launched in 2008, an overhaul that could cost the tech giant a ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-seeks-delay-ruling-loosening-230855311.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-seeks-delay-ruling-loosening-230855311.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1198772378","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store business model since the platform was launched in 2008, an overhaul that could cost the tech giant a few billion dollars annually.\nThe iPhone maker gave notice Friday that will appeal a judge’s ruling in its fight with Epic Games Inc. ordering the Cupertino, California-based company to stop blocking developers from letting users complete in-app purchases on the web. It also asked the judge to put her Dec. 9 deadline for App Store rule changes on hold during the appeal, which if allowed could keep business as usual for Apple for at least a year.\nThe Sept. 10 ruling largely vindicated Apple’s business model that charges commissions on developers for App Store transactions, but the judge said Apple must allow direct communication between users and app makers and permit links to the web to complete transactions.\nBloomberg Intelligence has said that pressure on Apple to lower its commissions, which currently run as high as 30%, could squeeze revenue by $2 billion to $4 billion in a worst-case scenario.\nApple said in its filing that it wants to “maintain the status quo” as “there’s no reason to expend resources” on App Store changes during the appeals process. It also argued there could be “unintended downstream consequences for consumers and the iOS platform” if the judge’s order goes into effect Dec. 9. A postponement would give the company time to address concerns in a way that could potentially do away with the need to let developers allow consumers to make web purchases, Apple said.\n“Apple is working hard to address these difficult issues in a changing world, enhancing information flow without compromising the consumer experience,” the company said.\nA hearing on Apple’s stay request has been set for Nov. 16, but the company said in a briefing it’s seeking to move the proceeding to Nov. 2. If U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers refuses to grant the stay, Apple said, the company could go to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.\nWhen the ruling came out, following a three-week trial in May, Apple hailed it as a victory because the judge didn’t find that the company violated federal antitrust law. Tim Sweeney, Epic’s founder and chief executive officer, said in a tweet “the ruling isn’t a win for developers or for consumers” and his company promptly filed notice that it will appeal.\nEpic declined to comment on Apple’s appeal Friday but Sweeney tweeted an image of Agent Peely, a banana action figure in Epic’s popular battle-royale game Fortnite who briefly became a source of controversy in the trial.\nApple has announced that it plans to keep Fortnite off of the App Store until appeals are exhausted, a process that could take as long as five years if the fight goes all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.\nWhile Gonzalez Rogers said Apple can no longer ban developers from pointing users to the web to complete transactions -- bypassing the App Store’s in-app-purchase system -- the judge didn’t state outright that Apple can’t collect its commissions.\nThat has led some observers to believe that Apple could still take its cut of revenue via other means, but lawyers and analysts say doing so poses logistical hurdles and risks political blowback.\nPaul Gallant, an analyst at Cowen & Co., has said Apple would want to put off changing App Store rules “because things could get messy if developers get to do workarounds starting in December.” Gallant said in a research note last month that Apple has a good chance of winning a stay at the Ninth Circuit.\n“That would prevent developers from using non-Apple payment mechanisms (and avoiding the 30% commission) until at least late 2022,” he wrote.\nBefore the September ruling, Apple announced two App Store changes in settlements with small U.S. developers and the Japan Federal Trade Commission. Both concessions are similar to the court’s injunction.\nApple is letting developers directly communicate with users about alternative payment methods, and next year it will begin allowing so-called “reader” apps -- those that deal with media like video, photos, and news -- to point users to the web to subscribe, bypassing Apple’s fees. The company highlighted those changes in Friday’s filing.\nThe case is Epic Games Inc. v. Apple Inc., 20-cv-05640, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (San Francisco).","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"CN"},{"id":828896478,"gmtCreate":1633879491560,"gmtModify":1633879491686,"author":{"id":"4087109808120260","authorId":"4087109808120260","name":"Tanyl","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/174329973340cf0f5b68791ee5b08afd","vip":1,"crmLevel":9,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Apple is a very big potential share","listText":"Apple is a very big potential share","text":"Apple is a very big potential share","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/828896478","repostId":1198772378,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1198772378","pubTimestamp":1633741203,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1198772378?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-09 09:00","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Seeks to Delay Ruling Loosening Its Grip on App Store","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1198772378","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store bu","content":"<p>(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store business model since the platform was launched in 2008, an overhaul that could cost the tech giant a few billion dollars annually.</p>\n<p>The iPhone maker gave notice Friday that will appeal a judge’s ruling in its fight with Epic Games Inc. ordering the Cupertino, California-based company to stop blocking developers from letting users complete in-app purchases on the web. It also asked the judge to put her Dec. 9 deadline for App Store rule changes on hold during the appeal, which if allowed could keep business as usual for Apple for at least a year.</p>\n<p>The Sept. 10 ruling largely vindicated Apple’s business model that charges commissions on developers for App Store transactions, but the judge said Apple must allow direct communication between users and app makers and permit links to the web to complete transactions.</p>\n<p>Bloomberg Intelligence has said that pressure on Apple to lower its commissions, which currently run as high as 30%, could squeeze revenue by $2 billion to $4 billion in a worst-case scenario.</p>\n<p>Apple said in its filing that it wants to “maintain the status quo” as “there’s no reason to expend resources” on App Store changes during the appeals process. It also argued there could be “unintended downstream consequences for consumers and the iOS platform” if the judge’s order goes into effect Dec. 9. A postponement would give the company time to address concerns in a way that could potentially do away with the need to let developers allow consumers to make web purchases, Apple said.</p>\n<p>“Apple is working hard to address these difficult issues in a changing world, enhancing information flow without compromising the consumer experience,” the company said.</p>\n<p>A hearing on Apple’s stay request has been set for Nov. 16, but the company said in a briefing it’s seeking to move the proceeding to Nov. 2. If U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers refuses to grant the stay, Apple said, the company could go to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.</p>\n<p>When the ruling came out, following a three-week trial in May, Apple hailed it as a victory because the judge didn’t find that the company violated federal antitrust law. Tim Sweeney, Epic’s founder and chief executive officer, said in a tweet “the ruling isn’t a win for developers or for consumers” and his company promptly filed notice that it will appeal.</p>\n<p>Epic declined to comment on Apple’s appeal Friday but Sweeney tweeted an image of Agent Peely, a banana action figure in Epic’s popular battle-royale game Fortnite who briefly became a source of controversy in the trial.</p>\n<p>Apple has announced that it plans to keep Fortnite off of the App Store until appeals are exhausted, a process that could take as long as five years if the fight goes all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.</p>\n<p>While Gonzalez Rogers said Apple can no longer ban developers from pointing users to the web to complete transactions -- bypassing the App Store’s in-app-purchase system -- the judge didn’t state outright that Apple can’t collect its commissions.</p>\n<p>That has led some observers to believe that Apple could still take its cut of revenue via other means, but lawyers and analysts say doing so poses logistical hurdles and risks political blowback.</p>\n<p>Paul Gallant, an analyst at Cowen &amp; Co., has said Apple would want to put off changing App Store rules “because things could get messy if developers get to do workarounds starting in December.” Gallant said in a research note last month that Apple has a good chance of winning a stay at the Ninth Circuit.</p>\n<p>“That would prevent developers from using non-Apple payment mechanisms (and avoiding the 30% commission) until at least late 2022,” he wrote.</p>\n<p>Before the September ruling, Apple announced two App Store changes in settlements with small U.S. developers and the Japan Federal Trade Commission. Both concessions are similar to the court’s injunction.</p>\n<p>Apple is letting developers directly communicate with users about alternative payment methods, and next year it will begin allowing so-called “reader” apps -- those that deal with media like video, photos, and news -- to point users to the web to subscribe, bypassing Apple’s fees. The company highlighted those changes in Friday’s filing.</p>\n<p>The case is Epic Games Inc. v. Apple Inc., 20-cv-05640, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (San Francisco).</p>","source":"lsy1612507957220","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Seeks to Delay Ruling Loosening Its Grip on App Store</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Seeks to Delay Ruling Loosening Its Grip on App Store\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-10-09 09:00 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-seeks-delay-ruling-loosening-230855311.html><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store business model since the platform was launched in 2008, an overhaul that could cost the tech giant a ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-seeks-delay-ruling-loosening-230855311.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-seeks-delay-ruling-loosening-230855311.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1198772378","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store business model since the platform was launched in 2008, an overhaul that could cost the tech giant a few billion dollars annually.\nThe iPhone maker gave notice Friday that will appeal a judge’s ruling in its fight with Epic Games Inc. ordering the Cupertino, California-based company to stop blocking developers from letting users complete in-app purchases on the web. It also asked the judge to put her Dec. 9 deadline for App Store rule changes on hold during the appeal, which if allowed could keep business as usual for Apple for at least a year.\nThe Sept. 10 ruling largely vindicated Apple’s business model that charges commissions on developers for App Store transactions, but the judge said Apple must allow direct communication between users and app makers and permit links to the web to complete transactions.\nBloomberg Intelligence has said that pressure on Apple to lower its commissions, which currently run as high as 30%, could squeeze revenue by $2 billion to $4 billion in a worst-case scenario.\nApple said in its filing that it wants to “maintain the status quo” as “there’s no reason to expend resources” on App Store changes during the appeals process. It also argued there could be “unintended downstream consequences for consumers and the iOS platform” if the judge’s order goes into effect Dec. 9. A postponement would give the company time to address concerns in a way that could potentially do away with the need to let developers allow consumers to make web purchases, Apple said.\n“Apple is working hard to address these difficult issues in a changing world, enhancing information flow without compromising the consumer experience,” the company said.\nA hearing on Apple’s stay request has been set for Nov. 16, but the company said in a briefing it’s seeking to move the proceeding to Nov. 2. If U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers refuses to grant the stay, Apple said, the company could go to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.\nWhen the ruling came out, following a three-week trial in May, Apple hailed it as a victory because the judge didn’t find that the company violated federal antitrust law. Tim Sweeney, Epic’s founder and chief executive officer, said in a tweet “the ruling isn’t a win for developers or for consumers” and his company promptly filed notice that it will appeal.\nEpic declined to comment on Apple’s appeal Friday but Sweeney tweeted an image of Agent Peely, a banana action figure in Epic’s popular battle-royale game Fortnite who briefly became a source of controversy in the trial.\nApple has announced that it plans to keep Fortnite off of the App Store until appeals are exhausted, a process that could take as long as five years if the fight goes all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.\nWhile Gonzalez Rogers said Apple can no longer ban developers from pointing users to the web to complete transactions -- bypassing the App Store’s in-app-purchase system -- the judge didn’t state outright that Apple can’t collect its commissions.\nThat has led some observers to believe that Apple could still take its cut of revenue via other means, but lawyers and analysts say doing so poses logistical hurdles and risks political blowback.\nPaul Gallant, an analyst at Cowen & Co., has said Apple would want to put off changing App Store rules “because things could get messy if developers get to do workarounds starting in December.” Gallant said in a research note last month that Apple has a good chance of winning a stay at the Ninth Circuit.\n“That would prevent developers from using non-Apple payment mechanisms (and avoiding the 30% commission) until at least late 2022,” he wrote.\nBefore the September ruling, Apple announced two App Store changes in settlements with small U.S. developers and the Japan Federal Trade Commission. Both concessions are similar to the court’s injunction.\nApple is letting developers directly communicate with users about alternative payment methods, and next year it will begin allowing so-called “reader” apps -- those that deal with media like video, photos, and news -- to point users to the web to subscribe, bypassing Apple’s fees. The company highlighted those changes in Friday’s filing.\nThe case is Epic Games Inc. v. Apple Inc., 20-cv-05640, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (San Francisco).","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"CN"},{"id":828896259,"gmtCreate":1633879462745,"gmtModify":1633879462880,"author":{"id":"4087109808120260","authorId":"4087109808120260","name":"Tanyl","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/174329973340cf0f5b68791ee5b08afd","vip":1,"crmLevel":9,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"I still waite for Apple price up up up !","listText":"I still waite for Apple price up up up !","text":"I still waite for Apple price up up up !","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/828896259","repostId":1198772378,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1198772378","pubTimestamp":1633741203,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1198772378?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-09 09:00","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Seeks to Delay Ruling Loosening Its Grip on App Store","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1198772378","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store bu","content":"<p>(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store business model since the platform was launched in 2008, an overhaul that could cost the tech giant a few billion dollars annually.</p>\n<p>The iPhone maker gave notice Friday that will appeal a judge’s ruling in its fight with Epic Games Inc. ordering the Cupertino, California-based company to stop blocking developers from letting users complete in-app purchases on the web. It also asked the judge to put her Dec. 9 deadline for App Store rule changes on hold during the appeal, which if allowed could keep business as usual for Apple for at least a year.</p>\n<p>The Sept. 10 ruling largely vindicated Apple’s business model that charges commissions on developers for App Store transactions, but the judge said Apple must allow direct communication between users and app makers and permit links to the web to complete transactions.</p>\n<p>Bloomberg Intelligence has said that pressure on Apple to lower its commissions, which currently run as high as 30%, could squeeze revenue by $2 billion to $4 billion in a worst-case scenario.</p>\n<p>Apple said in its filing that it wants to “maintain the status quo” as “there’s no reason to expend resources” on App Store changes during the appeals process. It also argued there could be “unintended downstream consequences for consumers and the iOS platform” if the judge’s order goes into effect Dec. 9. A postponement would give the company time to address concerns in a way that could potentially do away with the need to let developers allow consumers to make web purchases, Apple said.</p>\n<p>“Apple is working hard to address these difficult issues in a changing world, enhancing information flow without compromising the consumer experience,” the company said.</p>\n<p>A hearing on Apple’s stay request has been set for Nov. 16, but the company said in a briefing it’s seeking to move the proceeding to Nov. 2. If U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers refuses to grant the stay, Apple said, the company could go to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.</p>\n<p>When the ruling came out, following a three-week trial in May, Apple hailed it as a victory because the judge didn’t find that the company violated federal antitrust law. Tim Sweeney, Epic’s founder and chief executive officer, said in a tweet “the ruling isn’t a win for developers or for consumers” and his company promptly filed notice that it will appeal.</p>\n<p>Epic declined to comment on Apple’s appeal Friday but Sweeney tweeted an image of Agent Peely, a banana action figure in Epic’s popular battle-royale game Fortnite who briefly became a source of controversy in the trial.</p>\n<p>Apple has announced that it plans to keep Fortnite off of the App Store until appeals are exhausted, a process that could take as long as five years if the fight goes all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.</p>\n<p>While Gonzalez Rogers said Apple can no longer ban developers from pointing users to the web to complete transactions -- bypassing the App Store’s in-app-purchase system -- the judge didn’t state outright that Apple can’t collect its commissions.</p>\n<p>That has led some observers to believe that Apple could still take its cut of revenue via other means, but lawyers and analysts say doing so poses logistical hurdles and risks political blowback.</p>\n<p>Paul Gallant, an analyst at Cowen &amp; Co., has said Apple would want to put off changing App Store rules “because things could get messy if developers get to do workarounds starting in December.” Gallant said in a research note last month that Apple has a good chance of winning a stay at the Ninth Circuit.</p>\n<p>“That would prevent developers from using non-Apple payment mechanisms (and avoiding the 30% commission) until at least late 2022,” he wrote.</p>\n<p>Before the September ruling, Apple announced two App Store changes in settlements with small U.S. developers and the Japan Federal Trade Commission. Both concessions are similar to the court’s injunction.</p>\n<p>Apple is letting developers directly communicate with users about alternative payment methods, and next year it will begin allowing so-called “reader” apps -- those that deal with media like video, photos, and news -- to point users to the web to subscribe, bypassing Apple’s fees. The company highlighted those changes in Friday’s filing.</p>\n<p>The case is Epic Games Inc. v. Apple Inc., 20-cv-05640, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (San Francisco).</p>","source":"lsy1612507957220","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Seeks to Delay Ruling Loosening Its Grip on App Store</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Seeks to Delay Ruling Loosening Its Grip on App Store\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-10-09 09:00 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-seeks-delay-ruling-loosening-230855311.html><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store business model since the platform was launched in 2008, an overhaul that could cost the tech giant a ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-seeks-delay-ruling-loosening-230855311.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-seeks-delay-ruling-loosening-230855311.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1198772378","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store business model since the platform was launched in 2008, an overhaul that could cost the tech giant a few billion dollars annually.\nThe iPhone maker gave notice Friday that will appeal a judge’s ruling in its fight with Epic Games Inc. ordering the Cupertino, California-based company to stop blocking developers from letting users complete in-app purchases on the web. It also asked the judge to put her Dec. 9 deadline for App Store rule changes on hold during the appeal, which if allowed could keep business as usual for Apple for at least a year.\nThe Sept. 10 ruling largely vindicated Apple’s business model that charges commissions on developers for App Store transactions, but the judge said Apple must allow direct communication between users and app makers and permit links to the web to complete transactions.\nBloomberg Intelligence has said that pressure on Apple to lower its commissions, which currently run as high as 30%, could squeeze revenue by $2 billion to $4 billion in a worst-case scenario.\nApple said in its filing that it wants to “maintain the status quo” as “there’s no reason to expend resources” on App Store changes during the appeals process. It also argued there could be “unintended downstream consequences for consumers and the iOS platform” if the judge’s order goes into effect Dec. 9. A postponement would give the company time to address concerns in a way that could potentially do away with the need to let developers allow consumers to make web purchases, Apple said.\n“Apple is working hard to address these difficult issues in a changing world, enhancing information flow without compromising the consumer experience,” the company said.\nA hearing on Apple’s stay request has been set for Nov. 16, but the company said in a briefing it’s seeking to move the proceeding to Nov. 2. If U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers refuses to grant the stay, Apple said, the company could go to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.\nWhen the ruling came out, following a three-week trial in May, Apple hailed it as a victory because the judge didn’t find that the company violated federal antitrust law. Tim Sweeney, Epic’s founder and chief executive officer, said in a tweet “the ruling isn’t a win for developers or for consumers” and his company promptly filed notice that it will appeal.\nEpic declined to comment on Apple’s appeal Friday but Sweeney tweeted an image of Agent Peely, a banana action figure in Epic’s popular battle-royale game Fortnite who briefly became a source of controversy in the trial.\nApple has announced that it plans to keep Fortnite off of the App Store until appeals are exhausted, a process that could take as long as five years if the fight goes all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.\nWhile Gonzalez Rogers said Apple can no longer ban developers from pointing users to the web to complete transactions -- bypassing the App Store’s in-app-purchase system -- the judge didn’t state outright that Apple can’t collect its commissions.\nThat has led some observers to believe that Apple could still take its cut of revenue via other means, but lawyers and analysts say doing so poses logistical hurdles and risks political blowback.\nPaul Gallant, an analyst at Cowen & Co., has said Apple would want to put off changing App Store rules “because things could get messy if developers get to do workarounds starting in December.” Gallant said in a research note last month that Apple has a good chance of winning a stay at the Ninth Circuit.\n“That would prevent developers from using non-Apple payment mechanisms (and avoiding the 30% commission) until at least late 2022,” he wrote.\nBefore the September ruling, Apple announced two App Store changes in settlements with small U.S. developers and the Japan Federal Trade Commission. Both concessions are similar to the court’s injunction.\nApple is letting developers directly communicate with users about alternative payment methods, and next year it will begin allowing so-called “reader” apps -- those that deal with media like video, photos, and news -- to point users to the web to subscribe, bypassing Apple’s fees. The company highlighted those changes in Friday’s filing.\nThe case is Epic Games Inc. v. Apple Inc., 20-cv-05640, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (San Francisco).","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"CN"},{"id":821712551,"gmtCreate":1633789204222,"gmtModify":1633789204341,"author":{"id":"4087109808120260","authorId":"4087109808120260","name":"Tanyl","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/174329973340cf0f5b68791ee5b08afd","vip":1,"crmLevel":9,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Oh no, yesterday Apple price down again","listText":"Oh no, yesterday Apple price down again","text":"Oh no, yesterday Apple price down again","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/821712551","repostId":1198772378,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1198772378","pubTimestamp":1633741203,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1198772378?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-09 09:00","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Seeks to Delay Ruling Loosening Its Grip on App Store","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1198772378","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store bu","content":"<p>(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store business model since the platform was launched in 2008, an overhaul that could cost the tech giant a few billion dollars annually.</p>\n<p>The iPhone maker gave notice Friday that will appeal a judge’s ruling in its fight with Epic Games Inc. ordering the Cupertino, California-based company to stop blocking developers from letting users complete in-app purchases on the web. It also asked the judge to put her Dec. 9 deadline for App Store rule changes on hold during the appeal, which if allowed could keep business as usual for Apple for at least a year.</p>\n<p>The Sept. 10 ruling largely vindicated Apple’s business model that charges commissions on developers for App Store transactions, but the judge said Apple must allow direct communication between users and app makers and permit links to the web to complete transactions.</p>\n<p>Bloomberg Intelligence has said that pressure on Apple to lower its commissions, which currently run as high as 30%, could squeeze revenue by $2 billion to $4 billion in a worst-case scenario.</p>\n<p>Apple said in its filing that it wants to “maintain the status quo” as “there’s no reason to expend resources” on App Store changes during the appeals process. It also argued there could be “unintended downstream consequences for consumers and the iOS platform” if the judge’s order goes into effect Dec. 9. A postponement would give the company time to address concerns in a way that could potentially do away with the need to let developers allow consumers to make web purchases, Apple said.</p>\n<p>“Apple is working hard to address these difficult issues in a changing world, enhancing information flow without compromising the consumer experience,” the company said.</p>\n<p>A hearing on Apple’s stay request has been set for Nov. 16, but the company said in a briefing it’s seeking to move the proceeding to Nov. 2. If U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers refuses to grant the stay, Apple said, the company could go to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.</p>\n<p>When the ruling came out, following a three-week trial in May, Apple hailed it as a victory because the judge didn’t find that the company violated federal antitrust law. Tim Sweeney, Epic’s founder and chief executive officer, said in a tweet “the ruling isn’t a win for developers or for consumers” and his company promptly filed notice that it will appeal.</p>\n<p>Epic declined to comment on Apple’s appeal Friday but Sweeney tweeted an image of Agent Peely, a banana action figure in Epic’s popular battle-royale game Fortnite who briefly became a source of controversy in the trial.</p>\n<p>Apple has announced that it plans to keep Fortnite off of the App Store until appeals are exhausted, a process that could take as long as five years if the fight goes all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.</p>\n<p>While Gonzalez Rogers said Apple can no longer ban developers from pointing users to the web to complete transactions -- bypassing the App Store’s in-app-purchase system -- the judge didn’t state outright that Apple can’t collect its commissions.</p>\n<p>That has led some observers to believe that Apple could still take its cut of revenue via other means, but lawyers and analysts say doing so poses logistical hurdles and risks political blowback.</p>\n<p>Paul Gallant, an analyst at Cowen &amp; Co., has said Apple would want to put off changing App Store rules “because things could get messy if developers get to do workarounds starting in December.” Gallant said in a research note last month that Apple has a good chance of winning a stay at the Ninth Circuit.</p>\n<p>“That would prevent developers from using non-Apple payment mechanisms (and avoiding the 30% commission) until at least late 2022,” he wrote.</p>\n<p>Before the September ruling, Apple announced two App Store changes in settlements with small U.S. developers and the Japan Federal Trade Commission. Both concessions are similar to the court’s injunction.</p>\n<p>Apple is letting developers directly communicate with users about alternative payment methods, and next year it will begin allowing so-called “reader” apps -- those that deal with media like video, photos, and news -- to point users to the web to subscribe, bypassing Apple’s fees. The company highlighted those changes in Friday’s filing.</p>\n<p>The case is Epic Games Inc. v. Apple Inc., 20-cv-05640, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (San Francisco).</p>","source":"lsy1612507957220","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Seeks to Delay Ruling Loosening Its Grip on App Store</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Seeks to Delay Ruling Loosening Its Grip on App Store\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-10-09 09:00 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-seeks-delay-ruling-loosening-230855311.html><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store business model since the platform was launched in 2008, an overhaul that could cost the tech giant a ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-seeks-delay-ruling-loosening-230855311.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-seeks-delay-ruling-loosening-230855311.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1198772378","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store business model since the platform was launched in 2008, an overhaul that could cost the tech giant a few billion dollars annually.\nThe iPhone maker gave notice Friday that will appeal a judge’s ruling in its fight with Epic Games Inc. ordering the Cupertino, California-based company to stop blocking developers from letting users complete in-app purchases on the web. It also asked the judge to put her Dec. 9 deadline for App Store rule changes on hold during the appeal, which if allowed could keep business as usual for Apple for at least a year.\nThe Sept. 10 ruling largely vindicated Apple’s business model that charges commissions on developers for App Store transactions, but the judge said Apple must allow direct communication between users and app makers and permit links to the web to complete transactions.\nBloomberg Intelligence has said that pressure on Apple to lower its commissions, which currently run as high as 30%, could squeeze revenue by $2 billion to $4 billion in a worst-case scenario.\nApple said in its filing that it wants to “maintain the status quo” as “there’s no reason to expend resources” on App Store changes during the appeals process. It also argued there could be “unintended downstream consequences for consumers and the iOS platform” if the judge’s order goes into effect Dec. 9. A postponement would give the company time to address concerns in a way that could potentially do away with the need to let developers allow consumers to make web purchases, Apple said.\n“Apple is working hard to address these difficult issues in a changing world, enhancing information flow without compromising the consumer experience,” the company said.\nA hearing on Apple’s stay request has been set for Nov. 16, but the company said in a briefing it’s seeking to move the proceeding to Nov. 2. If U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers refuses to grant the stay, Apple said, the company could go to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.\nWhen the ruling came out, following a three-week trial in May, Apple hailed it as a victory because the judge didn’t find that the company violated federal antitrust law. Tim Sweeney, Epic’s founder and chief executive officer, said in a tweet “the ruling isn’t a win for developers or for consumers” and his company promptly filed notice that it will appeal.\nEpic declined to comment on Apple’s appeal Friday but Sweeney tweeted an image of Agent Peely, a banana action figure in Epic’s popular battle-royale game Fortnite who briefly became a source of controversy in the trial.\nApple has announced that it plans to keep Fortnite off of the App Store until appeals are exhausted, a process that could take as long as five years if the fight goes all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.\nWhile Gonzalez Rogers said Apple can no longer ban developers from pointing users to the web to complete transactions -- bypassing the App Store’s in-app-purchase system -- the judge didn’t state outright that Apple can’t collect its commissions.\nThat has led some observers to believe that Apple could still take its cut of revenue via other means, but lawyers and analysts say doing so poses logistical hurdles and risks political blowback.\nPaul Gallant, an analyst at Cowen & Co., has said Apple would want to put off changing App Store rules “because things could get messy if developers get to do workarounds starting in December.” Gallant said in a research note last month that Apple has a good chance of winning a stay at the Ninth Circuit.\n“That would prevent developers from using non-Apple payment mechanisms (and avoiding the 30% commission) until at least late 2022,” he wrote.\nBefore the September ruling, Apple announced two App Store changes in settlements with small U.S. developers and the Japan Federal Trade Commission. Both concessions are similar to the court’s injunction.\nApple is letting developers directly communicate with users about alternative payment methods, and next year it will begin allowing so-called “reader” apps -- those that deal with media like video, photos, and news -- to point users to the web to subscribe, bypassing Apple’s fees. The company highlighted those changes in Friday’s filing.\nThe case is Epic Games Inc. v. Apple Inc., 20-cv-05640, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (San Francisco).","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"CN"},{"id":821712262,"gmtCreate":1633789148402,"gmtModify":1633789148531,"author":{"id":"4087109808120260","authorId":"4087109808120260","name":"Tanyl","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/174329973340cf0f5b68791ee5b08afd","vip":1,"crmLevel":9,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Very exited to waite Apple price up","listText":"Very exited to waite Apple price up","text":"Very exited to waite Apple price up","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/821712262","repostId":1198772378,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1198772378","pubTimestamp":1633741203,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1198772378?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-09 09:00","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Seeks to Delay Ruling Loosening Its Grip on App Store","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1198772378","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store bu","content":"<p>(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store business model since the platform was launched in 2008, an overhaul that could cost the tech giant a few billion dollars annually.</p>\n<p>The iPhone maker gave notice Friday that will appeal a judge’s ruling in its fight with Epic Games Inc. ordering the Cupertino, California-based company to stop blocking developers from letting users complete in-app purchases on the web. It also asked the judge to put her Dec. 9 deadline for App Store rule changes on hold during the appeal, which if allowed could keep business as usual for Apple for at least a year.</p>\n<p>The Sept. 10 ruling largely vindicated Apple’s business model that charges commissions on developers for App Store transactions, but the judge said Apple must allow direct communication between users and app makers and permit links to the web to complete transactions.</p>\n<p>Bloomberg Intelligence has said that pressure on Apple to lower its commissions, which currently run as high as 30%, could squeeze revenue by $2 billion to $4 billion in a worst-case scenario.</p>\n<p>Apple said in its filing that it wants to “maintain the status quo” as “there’s no reason to expend resources” on App Store changes during the appeals process. It also argued there could be “unintended downstream consequences for consumers and the iOS platform” if the judge’s order goes into effect Dec. 9. A postponement would give the company time to address concerns in a way that could potentially do away with the need to let developers allow consumers to make web purchases, Apple said.</p>\n<p>“Apple is working hard to address these difficult issues in a changing world, enhancing information flow without compromising the consumer experience,” the company said.</p>\n<p>A hearing on Apple’s stay request has been set for Nov. 16, but the company said in a briefing it’s seeking to move the proceeding to Nov. 2. If U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers refuses to grant the stay, Apple said, the company could go to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.</p>\n<p>When the ruling came out, following a three-week trial in May, Apple hailed it as a victory because the judge didn’t find that the company violated federal antitrust law. Tim Sweeney, Epic’s founder and chief executive officer, said in a tweet “the ruling isn’t a win for developers or for consumers” and his company promptly filed notice that it will appeal.</p>\n<p>Epic declined to comment on Apple’s appeal Friday but Sweeney tweeted an image of Agent Peely, a banana action figure in Epic’s popular battle-royale game Fortnite who briefly became a source of controversy in the trial.</p>\n<p>Apple has announced that it plans to keep Fortnite off of the App Store until appeals are exhausted, a process that could take as long as five years if the fight goes all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.</p>\n<p>While Gonzalez Rogers said Apple can no longer ban developers from pointing users to the web to complete transactions -- bypassing the App Store’s in-app-purchase system -- the judge didn’t state outright that Apple can’t collect its commissions.</p>\n<p>That has led some observers to believe that Apple could still take its cut of revenue via other means, but lawyers and analysts say doing so poses logistical hurdles and risks political blowback.</p>\n<p>Paul Gallant, an analyst at Cowen &amp; Co., has said Apple would want to put off changing App Store rules “because things could get messy if developers get to do workarounds starting in December.” Gallant said in a research note last month that Apple has a good chance of winning a stay at the Ninth Circuit.</p>\n<p>“That would prevent developers from using non-Apple payment mechanisms (and avoiding the 30% commission) until at least late 2022,” he wrote.</p>\n<p>Before the September ruling, Apple announced two App Store changes in settlements with small U.S. developers and the Japan Federal Trade Commission. Both concessions are similar to the court’s injunction.</p>\n<p>Apple is letting developers directly communicate with users about alternative payment methods, and next year it will begin allowing so-called “reader” apps -- those that deal with media like video, photos, and news -- to point users to the web to subscribe, bypassing Apple’s fees. The company highlighted those changes in Friday’s filing.</p>\n<p>The case is Epic Games Inc. v. Apple Inc., 20-cv-05640, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (San Francisco).</p>","source":"lsy1612507957220","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Seeks to Delay Ruling Loosening Its Grip on App Store</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Seeks to Delay Ruling Loosening Its Grip on App Store\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-10-09 09:00 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-seeks-delay-ruling-loosening-230855311.html><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store business model since the platform was launched in 2008, an overhaul that could cost the tech giant a ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-seeks-delay-ruling-loosening-230855311.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-seeks-delay-ruling-loosening-230855311.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1198772378","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store business model since the platform was launched in 2008, an overhaul that could cost the tech giant a few billion dollars annually.\nThe iPhone maker gave notice Friday that will appeal a judge’s ruling in its fight with Epic Games Inc. ordering the Cupertino, California-based company to stop blocking developers from letting users complete in-app purchases on the web. It also asked the judge to put her Dec. 9 deadline for App Store rule changes on hold during the appeal, which if allowed could keep business as usual for Apple for at least a year.\nThe Sept. 10 ruling largely vindicated Apple’s business model that charges commissions on developers for App Store transactions, but the judge said Apple must allow direct communication between users and app makers and permit links to the web to complete transactions.\nBloomberg Intelligence has said that pressure on Apple to lower its commissions, which currently run as high as 30%, could squeeze revenue by $2 billion to $4 billion in a worst-case scenario.\nApple said in its filing that it wants to “maintain the status quo” as “there’s no reason to expend resources” on App Store changes during the appeals process. It also argued there could be “unintended downstream consequences for consumers and the iOS platform” if the judge’s order goes into effect Dec. 9. A postponement would give the company time to address concerns in a way that could potentially do away with the need to let developers allow consumers to make web purchases, Apple said.\n“Apple is working hard to address these difficult issues in a changing world, enhancing information flow without compromising the consumer experience,” the company said.\nA hearing on Apple’s stay request has been set for Nov. 16, but the company said in a briefing it’s seeking to move the proceeding to Nov. 2. If U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers refuses to grant the stay, Apple said, the company could go to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.\nWhen the ruling came out, following a three-week trial in May, Apple hailed it as a victory because the judge didn’t find that the company violated federal antitrust law. Tim Sweeney, Epic’s founder and chief executive officer, said in a tweet “the ruling isn’t a win for developers or for consumers” and his company promptly filed notice that it will appeal.\nEpic declined to comment on Apple’s appeal Friday but Sweeney tweeted an image of Agent Peely, a banana action figure in Epic’s popular battle-royale game Fortnite who briefly became a source of controversy in the trial.\nApple has announced that it plans to keep Fortnite off of the App Store until appeals are exhausted, a process that could take as long as five years if the fight goes all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.\nWhile Gonzalez Rogers said Apple can no longer ban developers from pointing users to the web to complete transactions -- bypassing the App Store’s in-app-purchase system -- the judge didn’t state outright that Apple can’t collect its commissions.\nThat has led some observers to believe that Apple could still take its cut of revenue via other means, but lawyers and analysts say doing so poses logistical hurdles and risks political blowback.\nPaul Gallant, an analyst at Cowen & Co., has said Apple would want to put off changing App Store rules “because things could get messy if developers get to do workarounds starting in December.” Gallant said in a research note last month that Apple has a good chance of winning a stay at the Ninth Circuit.\n“That would prevent developers from using non-Apple payment mechanisms (and avoiding the 30% commission) until at least late 2022,” he wrote.\nBefore the September ruling, Apple announced two App Store changes in settlements with small U.S. developers and the Japan Federal Trade Commission. Both concessions are similar to the court’s injunction.\nApple is letting developers directly communicate with users about alternative payment methods, and next year it will begin allowing so-called “reader” apps -- those that deal with media like video, photos, and news -- to point users to the web to subscribe, bypassing Apple’s fees. The company highlighted those changes in Friday’s filing.\nThe case is Epic Games Inc. v. Apple Inc., 20-cv-05640, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (San Francisco).","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"CN"},{"id":821260773,"gmtCreate":1633748276447,"gmtModify":1633748279930,"author":{"id":"3585008979244156","authorId":"3585008979244156","name":"Dindindino","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8aa54f4d7f1ed33d80d2d8d18918fb30","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Like pls","listText":"Like pls","text":"Like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/821260773","repostId":1198772378,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1198772378","pubTimestamp":1633741203,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1198772378?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-09 09:00","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Seeks to Delay Ruling Loosening Its Grip on App Store","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1198772378","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store bu","content":"<p>(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store business model since the platform was launched in 2008, an overhaul that could cost the tech giant a few billion dollars annually.</p>\n<p>The iPhone maker gave notice Friday that will appeal a judge’s ruling in its fight with Epic Games Inc. ordering the Cupertino, California-based company to stop blocking developers from letting users complete in-app purchases on the web. It also asked the judge to put her Dec. 9 deadline for App Store rule changes on hold during the appeal, which if allowed could keep business as usual for Apple for at least a year.</p>\n<p>The Sept. 10 ruling largely vindicated Apple’s business model that charges commissions on developers for App Store transactions, but the judge said Apple must allow direct communication between users and app makers and permit links to the web to complete transactions.</p>\n<p>Bloomberg Intelligence has said that pressure on Apple to lower its commissions, which currently run as high as 30%, could squeeze revenue by $2 billion to $4 billion in a worst-case scenario.</p>\n<p>Apple said in its filing that it wants to “maintain the status quo” as “there’s no reason to expend resources” on App Store changes during the appeals process. It also argued there could be “unintended downstream consequences for consumers and the iOS platform” if the judge’s order goes into effect Dec. 9. A postponement would give the company time to address concerns in a way that could potentially do away with the need to let developers allow consumers to make web purchases, Apple said.</p>\n<p>“Apple is working hard to address these difficult issues in a changing world, enhancing information flow without compromising the consumer experience,” the company said.</p>\n<p>A hearing on Apple’s stay request has been set for Nov. 16, but the company said in a briefing it’s seeking to move the proceeding to Nov. 2. If U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers refuses to grant the stay, Apple said, the company could go to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.</p>\n<p>When the ruling came out, following a three-week trial in May, Apple hailed it as a victory because the judge didn’t find that the company violated federal antitrust law. Tim Sweeney, Epic’s founder and chief executive officer, said in a tweet “the ruling isn’t a win for developers or for consumers” and his company promptly filed notice that it will appeal.</p>\n<p>Epic declined to comment on Apple’s appeal Friday but Sweeney tweeted an image of Agent Peely, a banana action figure in Epic’s popular battle-royale game Fortnite who briefly became a source of controversy in the trial.</p>\n<p>Apple has announced that it plans to keep Fortnite off of the App Store until appeals are exhausted, a process that could take as long as five years if the fight goes all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.</p>\n<p>While Gonzalez Rogers said Apple can no longer ban developers from pointing users to the web to complete transactions -- bypassing the App Store’s in-app-purchase system -- the judge didn’t state outright that Apple can’t collect its commissions.</p>\n<p>That has led some observers to believe that Apple could still take its cut of revenue via other means, but lawyers and analysts say doing so poses logistical hurdles and risks political blowback.</p>\n<p>Paul Gallant, an analyst at Cowen &amp; Co., has said Apple would want to put off changing App Store rules “because things could get messy if developers get to do workarounds starting in December.” Gallant said in a research note last month that Apple has a good chance of winning a stay at the Ninth Circuit.</p>\n<p>“That would prevent developers from using non-Apple payment mechanisms (and avoiding the 30% commission) until at least late 2022,” he wrote.</p>\n<p>Before the September ruling, Apple announced two App Store changes in settlements with small U.S. developers and the Japan Federal Trade Commission. Both concessions are similar to the court’s injunction.</p>\n<p>Apple is letting developers directly communicate with users about alternative payment methods, and next year it will begin allowing so-called “reader” apps -- those that deal with media like video, photos, and news -- to point users to the web to subscribe, bypassing Apple’s fees. The company highlighted those changes in Friday’s filing.</p>\n<p>The case is Epic Games Inc. v. Apple Inc., 20-cv-05640, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (San Francisco).</p>","source":"lsy1612507957220","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Seeks to Delay Ruling Loosening Its Grip on App Store</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Seeks to Delay Ruling Loosening Its Grip on App Store\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-10-09 09:00 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-seeks-delay-ruling-loosening-230855311.html><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store business model since the platform was launched in 2008, an overhaul that could cost the tech giant a ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-seeks-delay-ruling-loosening-230855311.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-seeks-delay-ruling-loosening-230855311.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1198772378","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store business model since the platform was launched in 2008, an overhaul that could cost the tech giant a few billion dollars annually.\nThe iPhone maker gave notice Friday that will appeal a judge’s ruling in its fight with Epic Games Inc. ordering the Cupertino, California-based company to stop blocking developers from letting users complete in-app purchases on the web. It also asked the judge to put her Dec. 9 deadline for App Store rule changes on hold during the appeal, which if allowed could keep business as usual for Apple for at least a year.\nThe Sept. 10 ruling largely vindicated Apple’s business model that charges commissions on developers for App Store transactions, but the judge said Apple must allow direct communication between users and app makers and permit links to the web to complete transactions.\nBloomberg Intelligence has said that pressure on Apple to lower its commissions, which currently run as high as 30%, could squeeze revenue by $2 billion to $4 billion in a worst-case scenario.\nApple said in its filing that it wants to “maintain the status quo” as “there’s no reason to expend resources” on App Store changes during the appeals process. It also argued there could be “unintended downstream consequences for consumers and the iOS platform” if the judge’s order goes into effect Dec. 9. A postponement would give the company time to address concerns in a way that could potentially do away with the need to let developers allow consumers to make web purchases, Apple said.\n“Apple is working hard to address these difficult issues in a changing world, enhancing information flow without compromising the consumer experience,” the company said.\nA hearing on Apple’s stay request has been set for Nov. 16, but the company said in a briefing it’s seeking to move the proceeding to Nov. 2. If U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers refuses to grant the stay, Apple said, the company could go to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.\nWhen the ruling came out, following a three-week trial in May, Apple hailed it as a victory because the judge didn’t find that the company violated federal antitrust law. Tim Sweeney, Epic’s founder and chief executive officer, said in a tweet “the ruling isn’t a win for developers or for consumers” and his company promptly filed notice that it will appeal.\nEpic declined to comment on Apple’s appeal Friday but Sweeney tweeted an image of Agent Peely, a banana action figure in Epic’s popular battle-royale game Fortnite who briefly became a source of controversy in the trial.\nApple has announced that it plans to keep Fortnite off of the App Store until appeals are exhausted, a process that could take as long as five years if the fight goes all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.\nWhile Gonzalez Rogers said Apple can no longer ban developers from pointing users to the web to complete transactions -- bypassing the App Store’s in-app-purchase system -- the judge didn’t state outright that Apple can’t collect its commissions.\nThat has led some observers to believe that Apple could still take its cut of revenue via other means, but lawyers and analysts say doing so poses logistical hurdles and risks political blowback.\nPaul Gallant, an analyst at Cowen & Co., has said Apple would want to put off changing App Store rules “because things could get messy if developers get to do workarounds starting in December.” Gallant said in a research note last month that Apple has a good chance of winning a stay at the Ninth Circuit.\n“That would prevent developers from using non-Apple payment mechanisms (and avoiding the 30% commission) until at least late 2022,” he wrote.\nBefore the September ruling, Apple announced two App Store changes in settlements with small U.S. developers and the Japan Federal Trade Commission. Both concessions are similar to the court’s injunction.\nApple is letting developers directly communicate with users about alternative payment methods, and next year it will begin allowing so-called “reader” apps -- those that deal with media like video, photos, and news -- to point users to the web to subscribe, bypassing Apple’s fees. The company highlighted those changes in Friday’s filing.\nThe case is Epic Games Inc. v. Apple Inc., 20-cv-05640, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (San Francisco).","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6143694,"gmtCreate":1633783023467,"gmtModify":1634717757789,"authorId":3586939965895816,"author":{"id":3586939965895816,"authorId":3586939965895816,"name":"DarrenyYSM","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7fb98b9b6cf4f7ff1919bf29b2d3c62f","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":821260773,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"ok","text":"ok","html":"ok"}],"langContent":"CN"},{"id":821211492,"gmtCreate":1633746631886,"gmtModify":1633746633018,"author":{"id":"3579641974902127","authorId":"3579641974902127","name":"ivy888","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/10358949b7fc96b011ec29ca7fd9c9a4","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/821211492","repostId":1198772378,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1198772378","pubTimestamp":1633741203,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1198772378?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-09 09:00","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Seeks to Delay Ruling Loosening Its Grip on App Store","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1198772378","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store bu","content":"<p>(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store business model since the platform was launched in 2008, an overhaul that could cost the tech giant a few billion dollars annually.</p>\n<p>The iPhone maker gave notice Friday that will appeal a judge’s ruling in its fight with Epic Games Inc. ordering the Cupertino, California-based company to stop blocking developers from letting users complete in-app purchases on the web. It also asked the judge to put her Dec. 9 deadline for App Store rule changes on hold during the appeal, which if allowed could keep business as usual for Apple for at least a year.</p>\n<p>The Sept. 10 ruling largely vindicated Apple’s business model that charges commissions on developers for App Store transactions, but the judge said Apple must allow direct communication between users and app makers and permit links to the web to complete transactions.</p>\n<p>Bloomberg Intelligence has said that pressure on Apple to lower its commissions, which currently run as high as 30%, could squeeze revenue by $2 billion to $4 billion in a worst-case scenario.</p>\n<p>Apple said in its filing that it wants to “maintain the status quo” as “there’s no reason to expend resources” on App Store changes during the appeals process. It also argued there could be “unintended downstream consequences for consumers and the iOS platform” if the judge’s order goes into effect Dec. 9. A postponement would give the company time to address concerns in a way that could potentially do away with the need to let developers allow consumers to make web purchases, Apple said.</p>\n<p>“Apple is working hard to address these difficult issues in a changing world, enhancing information flow without compromising the consumer experience,” the company said.</p>\n<p>A hearing on Apple’s stay request has been set for Nov. 16, but the company said in a briefing it’s seeking to move the proceeding to Nov. 2. If U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers refuses to grant the stay, Apple said, the company could go to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.</p>\n<p>When the ruling came out, following a three-week trial in May, Apple hailed it as a victory because the judge didn’t find that the company violated federal antitrust law. Tim Sweeney, Epic’s founder and chief executive officer, said in a tweet “the ruling isn’t a win for developers or for consumers” and his company promptly filed notice that it will appeal.</p>\n<p>Epic declined to comment on Apple’s appeal Friday but Sweeney tweeted an image of Agent Peely, a banana action figure in Epic’s popular battle-royale game Fortnite who briefly became a source of controversy in the trial.</p>\n<p>Apple has announced that it plans to keep Fortnite off of the App Store until appeals are exhausted, a process that could take as long as five years if the fight goes all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.</p>\n<p>While Gonzalez Rogers said Apple can no longer ban developers from pointing users to the web to complete transactions -- bypassing the App Store’s in-app-purchase system -- the judge didn’t state outright that Apple can’t collect its commissions.</p>\n<p>That has led some observers to believe that Apple could still take its cut of revenue via other means, but lawyers and analysts say doing so poses logistical hurdles and risks political blowback.</p>\n<p>Paul Gallant, an analyst at Cowen &amp; Co., has said Apple would want to put off changing App Store rules “because things could get messy if developers get to do workarounds starting in December.” Gallant said in a research note last month that Apple has a good chance of winning a stay at the Ninth Circuit.</p>\n<p>“That would prevent developers from using non-Apple payment mechanisms (and avoiding the 30% commission) until at least late 2022,” he wrote.</p>\n<p>Before the September ruling, Apple announced two App Store changes in settlements with small U.S. developers and the Japan Federal Trade Commission. Both concessions are similar to the court’s injunction.</p>\n<p>Apple is letting developers directly communicate with users about alternative payment methods, and next year it will begin allowing so-called “reader” apps -- those that deal with media like video, photos, and news -- to point users to the web to subscribe, bypassing Apple’s fees. The company highlighted those changes in Friday’s filing.</p>\n<p>The case is Epic Games Inc. v. Apple Inc., 20-cv-05640, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (San Francisco).</p>","source":"lsy1612507957220","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Seeks to Delay Ruling Loosening Its Grip on App Store</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Seeks to Delay Ruling Loosening Its Grip on App Store\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-10-09 09:00 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-seeks-delay-ruling-loosening-230855311.html><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store business model since the platform was launched in 2008, an overhaul that could cost the tech giant a ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-seeks-delay-ruling-loosening-230855311.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-seeks-delay-ruling-loosening-230855311.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1198772378","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store business model since the platform was launched in 2008, an overhaul that could cost the tech giant a few billion dollars annually.\nThe iPhone maker gave notice Friday that will appeal a judge’s ruling in its fight with Epic Games Inc. ordering the Cupertino, California-based company to stop blocking developers from letting users complete in-app purchases on the web. It also asked the judge to put her Dec. 9 deadline for App Store rule changes on hold during the appeal, which if allowed could keep business as usual for Apple for at least a year.\nThe Sept. 10 ruling largely vindicated Apple’s business model that charges commissions on developers for App Store transactions, but the judge said Apple must allow direct communication between users and app makers and permit links to the web to complete transactions.\nBloomberg Intelligence has said that pressure on Apple to lower its commissions, which currently run as high as 30%, could squeeze revenue by $2 billion to $4 billion in a worst-case scenario.\nApple said in its filing that it wants to “maintain the status quo” as “there’s no reason to expend resources” on App Store changes during the appeals process. It also argued there could be “unintended downstream consequences for consumers and the iOS platform” if the judge’s order goes into effect Dec. 9. A postponement would give the company time to address concerns in a way that could potentially do away with the need to let developers allow consumers to make web purchases, Apple said.\n“Apple is working hard to address these difficult issues in a changing world, enhancing information flow without compromising the consumer experience,” the company said.\nA hearing on Apple’s stay request has been set for Nov. 16, but the company said in a briefing it’s seeking to move the proceeding to Nov. 2. If U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers refuses to grant the stay, Apple said, the company could go to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.\nWhen the ruling came out, following a three-week trial in May, Apple hailed it as a victory because the judge didn’t find that the company violated federal antitrust law. Tim Sweeney, Epic’s founder and chief executive officer, said in a tweet “the ruling isn’t a win for developers or for consumers” and his company promptly filed notice that it will appeal.\nEpic declined to comment on Apple’s appeal Friday but Sweeney tweeted an image of Agent Peely, a banana action figure in Epic’s popular battle-royale game Fortnite who briefly became a source of controversy in the trial.\nApple has announced that it plans to keep Fortnite off of the App Store until appeals are exhausted, a process that could take as long as five years if the fight goes all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.\nWhile Gonzalez Rogers said Apple can no longer ban developers from pointing users to the web to complete transactions -- bypassing the App Store’s in-app-purchase system -- the judge didn’t state outright that Apple can’t collect its commissions.\nThat has led some observers to believe that Apple could still take its cut of revenue via other means, but lawyers and analysts say doing so poses logistical hurdles and risks political blowback.\nPaul Gallant, an analyst at Cowen & Co., has said Apple would want to put off changing App Store rules “because things could get messy if developers get to do workarounds starting in December.” Gallant said in a research note last month that Apple has a good chance of winning a stay at the Ninth Circuit.\n“That would prevent developers from using non-Apple payment mechanisms (and avoiding the 30% commission) until at least late 2022,” he wrote.\nBefore the September ruling, Apple announced two App Store changes in settlements with small U.S. developers and the Japan Federal Trade Commission. Both concessions are similar to the court’s injunction.\nApple is letting developers directly communicate with users about alternative payment methods, and next year it will begin allowing so-called “reader” apps -- those that deal with media like video, photos, and news -- to point users to the web to subscribe, bypassing Apple’s fees. The company highlighted those changes in Friday’s filing.\nThe case is Epic Games Inc. v. Apple Inc., 20-cv-05640, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (San Francisco).","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6139909,"gmtCreate":1633747955387,"gmtModify":1634718045104,"authorId":3556603880908436,"author":{"id":3556603880908436,"authorId":3556603880908436,"name":"Sm9999","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f22a01c260a2d3210c64d83a162185c8","vip":1,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":821211492,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"No","text":"No","html":"No"},{"id":6143387,"gmtCreate":1633778872859,"gmtModify":1634717781407,"authorId":4087271497625750,"author":{"id":4087271497625750,"authorId":4087271497625750,"name":"BSK100","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":821211492,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"<u>ok</u>","text":"<u>ok</u>","html":"<u>ok</u>"}],"langContent":"CN"},{"id":821219945,"gmtCreate":1633746422998,"gmtModify":1633746424086,"author":{"id":"3579641974902127","authorId":"3579641974902127","name":"ivy888","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/10358949b7fc96b011ec29ca7fd9c9a4","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Like&nbsp;","listText":"Like&nbsp;","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/821219945","repostId":1198772378,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1198772378","pubTimestamp":1633741203,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1198772378?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-09 09:00","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Seeks to Delay Ruling Loosening Its Grip on App Store","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1198772378","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store bu","content":"<p>(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store business model since the platform was launched in 2008, an overhaul that could cost the tech giant a few billion dollars annually.</p>\n<p>The iPhone maker gave notice Friday that will appeal a judge’s ruling in its fight with Epic Games Inc. ordering the Cupertino, California-based company to stop blocking developers from letting users complete in-app purchases on the web. It also asked the judge to put her Dec. 9 deadline for App Store rule changes on hold during the appeal, which if allowed could keep business as usual for Apple for at least a year.</p>\n<p>The Sept. 10 ruling largely vindicated Apple’s business model that charges commissions on developers for App Store transactions, but the judge said Apple must allow direct communication between users and app makers and permit links to the web to complete transactions.</p>\n<p>Bloomberg Intelligence has said that pressure on Apple to lower its commissions, which currently run as high as 30%, could squeeze revenue by $2 billion to $4 billion in a worst-case scenario.</p>\n<p>Apple said in its filing that it wants to “maintain the status quo” as “there’s no reason to expend resources” on App Store changes during the appeals process. It also argued there could be “unintended downstream consequences for consumers and the iOS platform” if the judge’s order goes into effect Dec. 9. A postponement would give the company time to address concerns in a way that could potentially do away with the need to let developers allow consumers to make web purchases, Apple said.</p>\n<p>“Apple is working hard to address these difficult issues in a changing world, enhancing information flow without compromising the consumer experience,” the company said.</p>\n<p>A hearing on Apple’s stay request has been set for Nov. 16, but the company said in a briefing it’s seeking to move the proceeding to Nov. 2. If U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers refuses to grant the stay, Apple said, the company could go to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.</p>\n<p>When the ruling came out, following a three-week trial in May, Apple hailed it as a victory because the judge didn’t find that the company violated federal antitrust law. Tim Sweeney, Epic’s founder and chief executive officer, said in a tweet “the ruling isn’t a win for developers or for consumers” and his company promptly filed notice that it will appeal.</p>\n<p>Epic declined to comment on Apple’s appeal Friday but Sweeney tweeted an image of Agent Peely, a banana action figure in Epic’s popular battle-royale game Fortnite who briefly became a source of controversy in the trial.</p>\n<p>Apple has announced that it plans to keep Fortnite off of the App Store until appeals are exhausted, a process that could take as long as five years if the fight goes all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.</p>\n<p>While Gonzalez Rogers said Apple can no longer ban developers from pointing users to the web to complete transactions -- bypassing the App Store’s in-app-purchase system -- the judge didn’t state outright that Apple can’t collect its commissions.</p>\n<p>That has led some observers to believe that Apple could still take its cut of revenue via other means, but lawyers and analysts say doing so poses logistical hurdles and risks political blowback.</p>\n<p>Paul Gallant, an analyst at Cowen &amp; Co., has said Apple would want to put off changing App Store rules “because things could get messy if developers get to do workarounds starting in December.” Gallant said in a research note last month that Apple has a good chance of winning a stay at the Ninth Circuit.</p>\n<p>“That would prevent developers from using non-Apple payment mechanisms (and avoiding the 30% commission) until at least late 2022,” he wrote.</p>\n<p>Before the September ruling, Apple announced two App Store changes in settlements with small U.S. developers and the Japan Federal Trade Commission. Both concessions are similar to the court’s injunction.</p>\n<p>Apple is letting developers directly communicate with users about alternative payment methods, and next year it will begin allowing so-called “reader” apps -- those that deal with media like video, photos, and news -- to point users to the web to subscribe, bypassing Apple’s fees. The company highlighted those changes in Friday’s filing.</p>\n<p>The case is Epic Games Inc. v. Apple Inc., 20-cv-05640, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (San Francisco).</p>","source":"lsy1612507957220","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Seeks to Delay Ruling Loosening Its Grip on App Store</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Seeks to Delay Ruling Loosening Its Grip on App Store\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-10-09 09:00 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-seeks-delay-ruling-loosening-230855311.html><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store business model since the platform was launched in 2008, an overhaul that could cost the tech giant a ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-seeks-delay-ruling-loosening-230855311.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-seeks-delay-ruling-loosening-230855311.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1198772378","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store business model since the platform was launched in 2008, an overhaul that could cost the tech giant a few billion dollars annually.\nThe iPhone maker gave notice Friday that will appeal a judge’s ruling in its fight with Epic Games Inc. ordering the Cupertino, California-based company to stop blocking developers from letting users complete in-app purchases on the web. It also asked the judge to put her Dec. 9 deadline for App Store rule changes on hold during the appeal, which if allowed could keep business as usual for Apple for at least a year.\nThe Sept. 10 ruling largely vindicated Apple’s business model that charges commissions on developers for App Store transactions, but the judge said Apple must allow direct communication between users and app makers and permit links to the web to complete transactions.\nBloomberg Intelligence has said that pressure on Apple to lower its commissions, which currently run as high as 30%, could squeeze revenue by $2 billion to $4 billion in a worst-case scenario.\nApple said in its filing that it wants to “maintain the status quo” as “there’s no reason to expend resources” on App Store changes during the appeals process. It also argued there could be “unintended downstream consequences for consumers and the iOS platform” if the judge’s order goes into effect Dec. 9. A postponement would give the company time to address concerns in a way that could potentially do away with the need to let developers allow consumers to make web purchases, Apple said.\n“Apple is working hard to address these difficult issues in a changing world, enhancing information flow without compromising the consumer experience,” the company said.\nA hearing on Apple’s stay request has been set for Nov. 16, but the company said in a briefing it’s seeking to move the proceeding to Nov. 2. If U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers refuses to grant the stay, Apple said, the company could go to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.\nWhen the ruling came out, following a three-week trial in May, Apple hailed it as a victory because the judge didn’t find that the company violated federal antitrust law. Tim Sweeney, Epic’s founder and chief executive officer, said in a tweet “the ruling isn’t a win for developers or for consumers” and his company promptly filed notice that it will appeal.\nEpic declined to comment on Apple’s appeal Friday but Sweeney tweeted an image of Agent Peely, a banana action figure in Epic’s popular battle-royale game Fortnite who briefly became a source of controversy in the trial.\nApple has announced that it plans to keep Fortnite off of the App Store until appeals are exhausted, a process that could take as long as five years if the fight goes all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.\nWhile Gonzalez Rogers said Apple can no longer ban developers from pointing users to the web to complete transactions -- bypassing the App Store’s in-app-purchase system -- the judge didn’t state outright that Apple can’t collect its commissions.\nThat has led some observers to believe that Apple could still take its cut of revenue via other means, but lawyers and analysts say doing so poses logistical hurdles and risks political blowback.\nPaul Gallant, an analyst at Cowen & Co., has said Apple would want to put off changing App Store rules “because things could get messy if developers get to do workarounds starting in December.” Gallant said in a research note last month that Apple has a good chance of winning a stay at the Ninth Circuit.\n“That would prevent developers from using non-Apple payment mechanisms (and avoiding the 30% commission) until at least late 2022,” he wrote.\nBefore the September ruling, Apple announced two App Store changes in settlements with small U.S. developers and the Japan Federal Trade Commission. Both concessions are similar to the court’s injunction.\nApple is letting developers directly communicate with users about alternative payment methods, and next year it will begin allowing so-called “reader” apps -- those that deal with media like video, photos, and news -- to point users to the web to subscribe, bypassing Apple’s fees. The company highlighted those changes in Friday’s filing.\nThe case is Epic Games Inc. v. Apple Inc., 20-cv-05640, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (San Francisco).","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6139521,"gmtCreate":1633746461652,"gmtModify":1634718077515,"authorId":3582446967606185,"author":{"id":3582446967606185,"authorId":3582446967606185,"name":"CJoe独孤求胜","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":821219945,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"<u>done</u>","text":"<u>done</u>","html":"<u>done</u>"}],"langContent":"CN"},{"id":821210915,"gmtCreate":1633746340152,"gmtModify":1633746340528,"author":{"id":"3582366643541036","authorId":"3582366643541036","name":"Bonds","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7927febac32666ca13d21b532f0ff6f6","vip":1,"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Apples wil go up and up","listText":"Apples wil go up and up","text":"Apples wil go up and up","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/821210915","repostId":1198772378,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1198772378","pubTimestamp":1633741203,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1198772378?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-09 09:00","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Seeks to Delay Ruling Loosening Its Grip on App Store","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1198772378","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store bu","content":"<p>(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store business model since the platform was launched in 2008, an overhaul that could cost the tech giant a few billion dollars annually.</p>\n<p>The iPhone maker gave notice Friday that will appeal a judge’s ruling in its fight with Epic Games Inc. ordering the Cupertino, California-based company to stop blocking developers from letting users complete in-app purchases on the web. It also asked the judge to put her Dec. 9 deadline for App Store rule changes on hold during the appeal, which if allowed could keep business as usual for Apple for at least a year.</p>\n<p>The Sept. 10 ruling largely vindicated Apple’s business model that charges commissions on developers for App Store transactions, but the judge said Apple must allow direct communication between users and app makers and permit links to the web to complete transactions.</p>\n<p>Bloomberg Intelligence has said that pressure on Apple to lower its commissions, which currently run as high as 30%, could squeeze revenue by $2 billion to $4 billion in a worst-case scenario.</p>\n<p>Apple said in its filing that it wants to “maintain the status quo” as “there’s no reason to expend resources” on App Store changes during the appeals process. It also argued there could be “unintended downstream consequences for consumers and the iOS platform” if the judge’s order goes into effect Dec. 9. A postponement would give the company time to address concerns in a way that could potentially do away with the need to let developers allow consumers to make web purchases, Apple said.</p>\n<p>“Apple is working hard to address these difficult issues in a changing world, enhancing information flow without compromising the consumer experience,” the company said.</p>\n<p>A hearing on Apple’s stay request has been set for Nov. 16, but the company said in a briefing it’s seeking to move the proceeding to Nov. 2. If U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers refuses to grant the stay, Apple said, the company could go to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.</p>\n<p>When the ruling came out, following a three-week trial in May, Apple hailed it as a victory because the judge didn’t find that the company violated federal antitrust law. Tim Sweeney, Epic’s founder and chief executive officer, said in a tweet “the ruling isn’t a win for developers or for consumers” and his company promptly filed notice that it will appeal.</p>\n<p>Epic declined to comment on Apple’s appeal Friday but Sweeney tweeted an image of Agent Peely, a banana action figure in Epic’s popular battle-royale game Fortnite who briefly became a source of controversy in the trial.</p>\n<p>Apple has announced that it plans to keep Fortnite off of the App Store until appeals are exhausted, a process that could take as long as five years if the fight goes all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.</p>\n<p>While Gonzalez Rogers said Apple can no longer ban developers from pointing users to the web to complete transactions -- bypassing the App Store’s in-app-purchase system -- the judge didn’t state outright that Apple can’t collect its commissions.</p>\n<p>That has led some observers to believe that Apple could still take its cut of revenue via other means, but lawyers and analysts say doing so poses logistical hurdles and risks political blowback.</p>\n<p>Paul Gallant, an analyst at Cowen &amp; Co., has said Apple would want to put off changing App Store rules “because things could get messy if developers get to do workarounds starting in December.” Gallant said in a research note last month that Apple has a good chance of winning a stay at the Ninth Circuit.</p>\n<p>“That would prevent developers from using non-Apple payment mechanisms (and avoiding the 30% commission) until at least late 2022,” he wrote.</p>\n<p>Before the September ruling, Apple announced two App Store changes in settlements with small U.S. developers and the Japan Federal Trade Commission. Both concessions are similar to the court’s injunction.</p>\n<p>Apple is letting developers directly communicate with users about alternative payment methods, and next year it will begin allowing so-called “reader” apps -- those that deal with media like video, photos, and news -- to point users to the web to subscribe, bypassing Apple’s fees. The company highlighted those changes in Friday’s filing.</p>\n<p>The case is Epic Games Inc. v. Apple Inc., 20-cv-05640, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (San Francisco).</p>","source":"lsy1612507957220","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Seeks to Delay Ruling Loosening Its Grip on App Store</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Seeks to Delay Ruling Loosening Its Grip on App Store\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-10-09 09:00 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-seeks-delay-ruling-loosening-230855311.html><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store business model since the platform was launched in 2008, an overhaul that could cost the tech giant a ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-seeks-delay-ruling-loosening-230855311.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-seeks-delay-ruling-loosening-230855311.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1198772378","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store business model since the platform was launched in 2008, an overhaul that could cost the tech giant a few billion dollars annually.\nThe iPhone maker gave notice Friday that will appeal a judge’s ruling in its fight with Epic Games Inc. ordering the Cupertino, California-based company to stop blocking developers from letting users complete in-app purchases on the web. It also asked the judge to put her Dec. 9 deadline for App Store rule changes on hold during the appeal, which if allowed could keep business as usual for Apple for at least a year.\nThe Sept. 10 ruling largely vindicated Apple’s business model that charges commissions on developers for App Store transactions, but the judge said Apple must allow direct communication between users and app makers and permit links to the web to complete transactions.\nBloomberg Intelligence has said that pressure on Apple to lower its commissions, which currently run as high as 30%, could squeeze revenue by $2 billion to $4 billion in a worst-case scenario.\nApple said in its filing that it wants to “maintain the status quo” as “there’s no reason to expend resources” on App Store changes during the appeals process. It also argued there could be “unintended downstream consequences for consumers and the iOS platform” if the judge’s order goes into effect Dec. 9. A postponement would give the company time to address concerns in a way that could potentially do away with the need to let developers allow consumers to make web purchases, Apple said.\n“Apple is working hard to address these difficult issues in a changing world, enhancing information flow without compromising the consumer experience,” the company said.\nA hearing on Apple’s stay request has been set for Nov. 16, but the company said in a briefing it’s seeking to move the proceeding to Nov. 2. If U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers refuses to grant the stay, Apple said, the company could go to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.\nWhen the ruling came out, following a three-week trial in May, Apple hailed it as a victory because the judge didn’t find that the company violated federal antitrust law. Tim Sweeney, Epic’s founder and chief executive officer, said in a tweet “the ruling isn’t a win for developers or for consumers” and his company promptly filed notice that it will appeal.\nEpic declined to comment on Apple’s appeal Friday but Sweeney tweeted an image of Agent Peely, a banana action figure in Epic’s popular battle-royale game Fortnite who briefly became a source of controversy in the trial.\nApple has announced that it plans to keep Fortnite off of the App Store until appeals are exhausted, a process that could take as long as five years if the fight goes all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.\nWhile Gonzalez Rogers said Apple can no longer ban developers from pointing users to the web to complete transactions -- bypassing the App Store’s in-app-purchase system -- the judge didn’t state outright that Apple can’t collect its commissions.\nThat has led some observers to believe that Apple could still take its cut of revenue via other means, but lawyers and analysts say doing so poses logistical hurdles and risks political blowback.\nPaul Gallant, an analyst at Cowen & Co., has said Apple would want to put off changing App Store rules “because things could get messy if developers get to do workarounds starting in December.” Gallant said in a research note last month that Apple has a good chance of winning a stay at the Ninth Circuit.\n“That would prevent developers from using non-Apple payment mechanisms (and avoiding the 30% commission) until at least late 2022,” he wrote.\nBefore the September ruling, Apple announced two App Store changes in settlements with small U.S. developers and the Japan Federal Trade Commission. Both concessions are similar to the court’s injunction.\nApple is letting developers directly communicate with users about alternative payment methods, and next year it will begin allowing so-called “reader” apps -- those that deal with media like video, photos, and news -- to point users to the web to subscribe, bypassing Apple’s fees. The company highlighted those changes in Friday’s filing.\nThe case is Epic Games Inc. v. Apple Inc., 20-cv-05640, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (San Francisco).","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6140453,"gmtCreate":1633751022627,"gmtModify":1634717998874,"authorId":3579485832735627,"author":{"id":3579485832735627,"authorId":3579485832735627,"name":"Irene104","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/51a81271b5c1b4f1ca7b728f547fc3ba","vip":1,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":821210915,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"👍🏻","text":"👍🏻","html":"👍🏻"}],"langContent":"CN"},{"id":821236269,"gmtCreate":1633746130892,"gmtModify":1633746271103,"author":{"id":"3548890322785063","authorId":"3548890322785063","name":"Chororo","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0cbcbb673621a63bd8bb2f8219eded23","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":".&nbsp;","listText":".&nbsp;","text":".","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/821236269","repostId":1198772378,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1198772378","pubTimestamp":1633741203,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1198772378?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-09 09:00","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Seeks to Delay Ruling Loosening Its Grip on App Store","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1198772378","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store bu","content":"<p>(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store business model since the platform was launched in 2008, an overhaul that could cost the tech giant a few billion dollars annually.</p>\n<p>The iPhone maker gave notice Friday that will appeal a judge’s ruling in its fight with Epic Games Inc. ordering the Cupertino, California-based company to stop blocking developers from letting users complete in-app purchases on the web. It also asked the judge to put her Dec. 9 deadline for App Store rule changes on hold during the appeal, which if allowed could keep business as usual for Apple for at least a year.</p>\n<p>The Sept. 10 ruling largely vindicated Apple’s business model that charges commissions on developers for App Store transactions, but the judge said Apple must allow direct communication between users and app makers and permit links to the web to complete transactions.</p>\n<p>Bloomberg Intelligence has said that pressure on Apple to lower its commissions, which currently run as high as 30%, could squeeze revenue by $2 billion to $4 billion in a worst-case scenario.</p>\n<p>Apple said in its filing that it wants to “maintain the status quo” as “there’s no reason to expend resources” on App Store changes during the appeals process. It also argued there could be “unintended downstream consequences for consumers and the iOS platform” if the judge’s order goes into effect Dec. 9. A postponement would give the company time to address concerns in a way that could potentially do away with the need to let developers allow consumers to make web purchases, Apple said.</p>\n<p>“Apple is working hard to address these difficult issues in a changing world, enhancing information flow without compromising the consumer experience,” the company said.</p>\n<p>A hearing on Apple’s stay request has been set for Nov. 16, but the company said in a briefing it’s seeking to move the proceeding to Nov. 2. If U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers refuses to grant the stay, Apple said, the company could go to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.</p>\n<p>When the ruling came out, following a three-week trial in May, Apple hailed it as a victory because the judge didn’t find that the company violated federal antitrust law. Tim Sweeney, Epic’s founder and chief executive officer, said in a tweet “the ruling isn’t a win for developers or for consumers” and his company promptly filed notice that it will appeal.</p>\n<p>Epic declined to comment on Apple’s appeal Friday but Sweeney tweeted an image of Agent Peely, a banana action figure in Epic’s popular battle-royale game Fortnite who briefly became a source of controversy in the trial.</p>\n<p>Apple has announced that it plans to keep Fortnite off of the App Store until appeals are exhausted, a process that could take as long as five years if the fight goes all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.</p>\n<p>While Gonzalez Rogers said Apple can no longer ban developers from pointing users to the web to complete transactions -- bypassing the App Store’s in-app-purchase system -- the judge didn’t state outright that Apple can’t collect its commissions.</p>\n<p>That has led some observers to believe that Apple could still take its cut of revenue via other means, but lawyers and analysts say doing so poses logistical hurdles and risks political blowback.</p>\n<p>Paul Gallant, an analyst at Cowen &amp; Co., has said Apple would want to put off changing App Store rules “because things could get messy if developers get to do workarounds starting in December.” Gallant said in a research note last month that Apple has a good chance of winning a stay at the Ninth Circuit.</p>\n<p>“That would prevent developers from using non-Apple payment mechanisms (and avoiding the 30% commission) until at least late 2022,” he wrote.</p>\n<p>Before the September ruling, Apple announced two App Store changes in settlements with small U.S. developers and the Japan Federal Trade Commission. Both concessions are similar to the court’s injunction.</p>\n<p>Apple is letting developers directly communicate with users about alternative payment methods, and next year it will begin allowing so-called “reader” apps -- those that deal with media like video, photos, and news -- to point users to the web to subscribe, bypassing Apple’s fees. The company highlighted those changes in Friday’s filing.</p>\n<p>The case is Epic Games Inc. v. Apple Inc., 20-cv-05640, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (San Francisco).</p>","source":"lsy1612507957220","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Seeks to Delay Ruling Loosening Its Grip on App Store</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Seeks to Delay Ruling Loosening Its Grip on App Store\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-10-09 09:00 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-seeks-delay-ruling-loosening-230855311.html><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store business model since the platform was launched in 2008, an overhaul that could cost the tech giant a ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-seeks-delay-ruling-loosening-230855311.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-seeks-delay-ruling-loosening-230855311.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1198772378","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store business model since the platform was launched in 2008, an overhaul that could cost the tech giant a few billion dollars annually.\nThe iPhone maker gave notice Friday that will appeal a judge’s ruling in its fight with Epic Games Inc. ordering the Cupertino, California-based company to stop blocking developers from letting users complete in-app purchases on the web. It also asked the judge to put her Dec. 9 deadline for App Store rule changes on hold during the appeal, which if allowed could keep business as usual for Apple for at least a year.\nThe Sept. 10 ruling largely vindicated Apple’s business model that charges commissions on developers for App Store transactions, but the judge said Apple must allow direct communication between users and app makers and permit links to the web to complete transactions.\nBloomberg Intelligence has said that pressure on Apple to lower its commissions, which currently run as high as 30%, could squeeze revenue by $2 billion to $4 billion in a worst-case scenario.\nApple said in its filing that it wants to “maintain the status quo” as “there’s no reason to expend resources” on App Store changes during the appeals process. It also argued there could be “unintended downstream consequences for consumers and the iOS platform” if the judge’s order goes into effect Dec. 9. A postponement would give the company time to address concerns in a way that could potentially do away with the need to let developers allow consumers to make web purchases, Apple said.\n“Apple is working hard to address these difficult issues in a changing world, enhancing information flow without compromising the consumer experience,” the company said.\nA hearing on Apple’s stay request has been set for Nov. 16, but the company said in a briefing it’s seeking to move the proceeding to Nov. 2. If U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers refuses to grant the stay, Apple said, the company could go to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.\nWhen the ruling came out, following a three-week trial in May, Apple hailed it as a victory because the judge didn’t find that the company violated federal antitrust law. Tim Sweeney, Epic’s founder and chief executive officer, said in a tweet “the ruling isn’t a win for developers or for consumers” and his company promptly filed notice that it will appeal.\nEpic declined to comment on Apple’s appeal Friday but Sweeney tweeted an image of Agent Peely, a banana action figure in Epic’s popular battle-royale game Fortnite who briefly became a source of controversy in the trial.\nApple has announced that it plans to keep Fortnite off of the App Store until appeals are exhausted, a process that could take as long as five years if the fight goes all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.\nWhile Gonzalez Rogers said Apple can no longer ban developers from pointing users to the web to complete transactions -- bypassing the App Store’s in-app-purchase system -- the judge didn’t state outright that Apple can’t collect its commissions.\nThat has led some observers to believe that Apple could still take its cut of revenue via other means, but lawyers and analysts say doing so poses logistical hurdles and risks political blowback.\nPaul Gallant, an analyst at Cowen & Co., has said Apple would want to put off changing App Store rules “because things could get messy if developers get to do workarounds starting in December.” Gallant said in a research note last month that Apple has a good chance of winning a stay at the Ninth Circuit.\n“That would prevent developers from using non-Apple payment mechanisms (and avoiding the 30% commission) until at least late 2022,” he wrote.\nBefore the September ruling, Apple announced two App Store changes in settlements with small U.S. developers and the Japan Federal Trade Commission. Both concessions are similar to the court’s injunction.\nApple is letting developers directly communicate with users about alternative payment methods, and next year it will begin allowing so-called “reader” apps -- those that deal with media like video, photos, and news -- to point users to the web to subscribe, bypassing Apple’s fees. The company highlighted those changes in Friday’s filing.\nThe case is Epic Games Inc. v. Apple Inc., 20-cv-05640, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (San Francisco).","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6139418,"gmtCreate":1633746135450,"gmtModify":1634718086958,"authorId":3548890322785063,"author":{"id":3548890322785063,"authorId":3548890322785063,"name":"Chororo","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0cbcbb673621a63bd8bb2f8219eded23","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":821236269,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":".","text":".","html":"."}],"langContent":"CN"},{"id":821238177,"gmtCreate":1633746005815,"gmtModify":1633746005995,"author":{"id":"3583232588242926","authorId":"3583232588242926","name":"Calvin_GKH","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/562335042bbb987f5b9370e6664fc2dc","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"👌","listText":"👌","text":"👌","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/821238177","repostId":1198772378,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1198772378","pubTimestamp":1633741203,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1198772378?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-09 09:00","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Seeks to Delay Ruling Loosening Its Grip on App Store","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1198772378","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store bu","content":"<p>(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store business model since the platform was launched in 2008, an overhaul that could cost the tech giant a few billion dollars annually.</p>\n<p>The iPhone maker gave notice Friday that will appeal a judge’s ruling in its fight with Epic Games Inc. ordering the Cupertino, California-based company to stop blocking developers from letting users complete in-app purchases on the web. It also asked the judge to put her Dec. 9 deadline for App Store rule changes on hold during the appeal, which if allowed could keep business as usual for Apple for at least a year.</p>\n<p>The Sept. 10 ruling largely vindicated Apple’s business model that charges commissions on developers for App Store transactions, but the judge said Apple must allow direct communication between users and app makers and permit links to the web to complete transactions.</p>\n<p>Bloomberg Intelligence has said that pressure on Apple to lower its commissions, which currently run as high as 30%, could squeeze revenue by $2 billion to $4 billion in a worst-case scenario.</p>\n<p>Apple said in its filing that it wants to “maintain the status quo” as “there’s no reason to expend resources” on App Store changes during the appeals process. It also argued there could be “unintended downstream consequences for consumers and the iOS platform” if the judge’s order goes into effect Dec. 9. A postponement would give the company time to address concerns in a way that could potentially do away with the need to let developers allow consumers to make web purchases, Apple said.</p>\n<p>“Apple is working hard to address these difficult issues in a changing world, enhancing information flow without compromising the consumer experience,” the company said.</p>\n<p>A hearing on Apple’s stay request has been set for Nov. 16, but the company said in a briefing it’s seeking to move the proceeding to Nov. 2. If U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers refuses to grant the stay, Apple said, the company could go to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.</p>\n<p>When the ruling came out, following a three-week trial in May, Apple hailed it as a victory because the judge didn’t find that the company violated federal antitrust law. Tim Sweeney, Epic’s founder and chief executive officer, said in a tweet “the ruling isn’t a win for developers or for consumers” and his company promptly filed notice that it will appeal.</p>\n<p>Epic declined to comment on Apple’s appeal Friday but Sweeney tweeted an image of Agent Peely, a banana action figure in Epic’s popular battle-royale game Fortnite who briefly became a source of controversy in the trial.</p>\n<p>Apple has announced that it plans to keep Fortnite off of the App Store until appeals are exhausted, a process that could take as long as five years if the fight goes all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.</p>\n<p>While Gonzalez Rogers said Apple can no longer ban developers from pointing users to the web to complete transactions -- bypassing the App Store’s in-app-purchase system -- the judge didn’t state outright that Apple can’t collect its commissions.</p>\n<p>That has led some observers to believe that Apple could still take its cut of revenue via other means, but lawyers and analysts say doing so poses logistical hurdles and risks political blowback.</p>\n<p>Paul Gallant, an analyst at Cowen &amp; Co., has said Apple would want to put off changing App Store rules “because things could get messy if developers get to do workarounds starting in December.” Gallant said in a research note last month that Apple has a good chance of winning a stay at the Ninth Circuit.</p>\n<p>“That would prevent developers from using non-Apple payment mechanisms (and avoiding the 30% commission) until at least late 2022,” he wrote.</p>\n<p>Before the September ruling, Apple announced two App Store changes in settlements with small U.S. developers and the Japan Federal Trade Commission. Both concessions are similar to the court’s injunction.</p>\n<p>Apple is letting developers directly communicate with users about alternative payment methods, and next year it will begin allowing so-called “reader” apps -- those that deal with media like video, photos, and news -- to point users to the web to subscribe, bypassing Apple’s fees. The company highlighted those changes in Friday’s filing.</p>\n<p>The case is Epic Games Inc. v. Apple Inc., 20-cv-05640, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (San Francisco).</p>","source":"lsy1612507957220","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Seeks to Delay Ruling Loosening Its Grip on App Store</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Seeks to Delay Ruling Loosening Its Grip on App Store\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-10-09 09:00 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-seeks-delay-ruling-loosening-230855311.html><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store business model since the platform was launched in 2008, an overhaul that could cost the tech giant a ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-seeks-delay-ruling-loosening-230855311.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-seeks-delay-ruling-loosening-230855311.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1198772378","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store business model since the platform was launched in 2008, an overhaul that could cost the tech giant a few billion dollars annually.\nThe iPhone maker gave notice Friday that will appeal a judge’s ruling in its fight with Epic Games Inc. ordering the Cupertino, California-based company to stop blocking developers from letting users complete in-app purchases on the web. It also asked the judge to put her Dec. 9 deadline for App Store rule changes on hold during the appeal, which if allowed could keep business as usual for Apple for at least a year.\nThe Sept. 10 ruling largely vindicated Apple’s business model that charges commissions on developers for App Store transactions, but the judge said Apple must allow direct communication between users and app makers and permit links to the web to complete transactions.\nBloomberg Intelligence has said that pressure on Apple to lower its commissions, which currently run as high as 30%, could squeeze revenue by $2 billion to $4 billion in a worst-case scenario.\nApple said in its filing that it wants to “maintain the status quo” as “there’s no reason to expend resources” on App Store changes during the appeals process. It also argued there could be “unintended downstream consequences for consumers and the iOS platform” if the judge’s order goes into effect Dec. 9. A postponement would give the company time to address concerns in a way that could potentially do away with the need to let developers allow consumers to make web purchases, Apple said.\n“Apple is working hard to address these difficult issues in a changing world, enhancing information flow without compromising the consumer experience,” the company said.\nA hearing on Apple’s stay request has been set for Nov. 16, but the company said in a briefing it’s seeking to move the proceeding to Nov. 2. If U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers refuses to grant the stay, Apple said, the company could go to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.\nWhen the ruling came out, following a three-week trial in May, Apple hailed it as a victory because the judge didn’t find that the company violated federal antitrust law. Tim Sweeney, Epic’s founder and chief executive officer, said in a tweet “the ruling isn’t a win for developers or for consumers” and his company promptly filed notice that it will appeal.\nEpic declined to comment on Apple’s appeal Friday but Sweeney tweeted an image of Agent Peely, a banana action figure in Epic’s popular battle-royale game Fortnite who briefly became a source of controversy in the trial.\nApple has announced that it plans to keep Fortnite off of the App Store until appeals are exhausted, a process that could take as long as five years if the fight goes all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.\nWhile Gonzalez Rogers said Apple can no longer ban developers from pointing users to the web to complete transactions -- bypassing the App Store’s in-app-purchase system -- the judge didn’t state outright that Apple can’t collect its commissions.\nThat has led some observers to believe that Apple could still take its cut of revenue via other means, but lawyers and analysts say doing so poses logistical hurdles and risks political blowback.\nPaul Gallant, an analyst at Cowen & Co., has said Apple would want to put off changing App Store rules “because things could get messy if developers get to do workarounds starting in December.” Gallant said in a research note last month that Apple has a good chance of winning a stay at the Ninth Circuit.\n“That would prevent developers from using non-Apple payment mechanisms (and avoiding the 30% commission) until at least late 2022,” he wrote.\nBefore the September ruling, Apple announced two App Store changes in settlements with small U.S. developers and the Japan Federal Trade Commission. Both concessions are similar to the court’s injunction.\nApple is letting developers directly communicate with users about alternative payment methods, and next year it will begin allowing so-called “reader” apps -- those that deal with media like video, photos, and news -- to point users to the web to subscribe, bypassing Apple’s fees. The company highlighted those changes in Friday’s filing.\nThe case is Epic Games Inc. v. Apple Inc., 20-cv-05640, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (San Francisco).","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6139379,"gmtCreate":1633746014790,"gmtModify":1634718089666,"authorId":3583232588242926,"author":{"id":3583232588242926,"authorId":3583232588242926,"name":"Calvin_GKH","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/562335042bbb987f5b9370e6664fc2dc","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":821238177,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"👍","text":"👍","html":"👍"}],"langContent":"CN"},{"id":821239083,"gmtCreate":1633745776882,"gmtModify":1633745804186,"author":{"id":"4088815138354210","authorId":"4088815138354210","name":"Al3x","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76537eea7f5e56814a3866c383a688d2","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"like","listText":"like","text":"like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/821239083","repostId":1198772378,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1198772378","pubTimestamp":1633741203,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1198772378?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-09 09:00","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Seeks to Delay Ruling Loosening Its Grip on App Store","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1198772378","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store bu","content":"<p>(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store business model since the platform was launched in 2008, an overhaul that could cost the tech giant a few billion dollars annually.</p>\n<p>The iPhone maker gave notice Friday that will appeal a judge’s ruling in its fight with Epic Games Inc. ordering the Cupertino, California-based company to stop blocking developers from letting users complete in-app purchases on the web. It also asked the judge to put her Dec. 9 deadline for App Store rule changes on hold during the appeal, which if allowed could keep business as usual for Apple for at least a year.</p>\n<p>The Sept. 10 ruling largely vindicated Apple’s business model that charges commissions on developers for App Store transactions, but the judge said Apple must allow direct communication between users and app makers and permit links to the web to complete transactions.</p>\n<p>Bloomberg Intelligence has said that pressure on Apple to lower its commissions, which currently run as high as 30%, could squeeze revenue by $2 billion to $4 billion in a worst-case scenario.</p>\n<p>Apple said in its filing that it wants to “maintain the status quo” as “there’s no reason to expend resources” on App Store changes during the appeals process. It also argued there could be “unintended downstream consequences for consumers and the iOS platform” if the judge’s order goes into effect Dec. 9. A postponement would give the company time to address concerns in a way that could potentially do away with the need to let developers allow consumers to make web purchases, Apple said.</p>\n<p>“Apple is working hard to address these difficult issues in a changing world, enhancing information flow without compromising the consumer experience,” the company said.</p>\n<p>A hearing on Apple’s stay request has been set for Nov. 16, but the company said in a briefing it’s seeking to move the proceeding to Nov. 2. If U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers refuses to grant the stay, Apple said, the company could go to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.</p>\n<p>When the ruling came out, following a three-week trial in May, Apple hailed it as a victory because the judge didn’t find that the company violated federal antitrust law. Tim Sweeney, Epic’s founder and chief executive officer, said in a tweet “the ruling isn’t a win for developers or for consumers” and his company promptly filed notice that it will appeal.</p>\n<p>Epic declined to comment on Apple’s appeal Friday but Sweeney tweeted an image of Agent Peely, a banana action figure in Epic’s popular battle-royale game Fortnite who briefly became a source of controversy in the trial.</p>\n<p>Apple has announced that it plans to keep Fortnite off of the App Store until appeals are exhausted, a process that could take as long as five years if the fight goes all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.</p>\n<p>While Gonzalez Rogers said Apple can no longer ban developers from pointing users to the web to complete transactions -- bypassing the App Store’s in-app-purchase system -- the judge didn’t state outright that Apple can’t collect its commissions.</p>\n<p>That has led some observers to believe that Apple could still take its cut of revenue via other means, but lawyers and analysts say doing so poses logistical hurdles and risks political blowback.</p>\n<p>Paul Gallant, an analyst at Cowen &amp; Co., has said Apple would want to put off changing App Store rules “because things could get messy if developers get to do workarounds starting in December.” Gallant said in a research note last month that Apple has a good chance of winning a stay at the Ninth Circuit.</p>\n<p>“That would prevent developers from using non-Apple payment mechanisms (and avoiding the 30% commission) until at least late 2022,” he wrote.</p>\n<p>Before the September ruling, Apple announced two App Store changes in settlements with small U.S. developers and the Japan Federal Trade Commission. Both concessions are similar to the court’s injunction.</p>\n<p>Apple is letting developers directly communicate with users about alternative payment methods, and next year it will begin allowing so-called “reader” apps -- those that deal with media like video, photos, and news -- to point users to the web to subscribe, bypassing Apple’s fees. The company highlighted those changes in Friday’s filing.</p>\n<p>The case is Epic Games Inc. v. Apple Inc., 20-cv-05640, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (San Francisco).</p>","source":"lsy1612507957220","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Seeks to Delay Ruling Loosening Its Grip on App Store</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Seeks to Delay Ruling Loosening Its Grip on App Store\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-10-09 09:00 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-seeks-delay-ruling-loosening-230855311.html><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store business model since the platform was launched in 2008, an overhaul that could cost the tech giant a ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-seeks-delay-ruling-loosening-230855311.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-seeks-delay-ruling-loosening-230855311.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1198772378","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store business model since the platform was launched in 2008, an overhaul that could cost the tech giant a few billion dollars annually.\nThe iPhone maker gave notice Friday that will appeal a judge’s ruling in its fight with Epic Games Inc. ordering the Cupertino, California-based company to stop blocking developers from letting users complete in-app purchases on the web. It also asked the judge to put her Dec. 9 deadline for App Store rule changes on hold during the appeal, which if allowed could keep business as usual for Apple for at least a year.\nThe Sept. 10 ruling largely vindicated Apple’s business model that charges commissions on developers for App Store transactions, but the judge said Apple must allow direct communication between users and app makers and permit links to the web to complete transactions.\nBloomberg Intelligence has said that pressure on Apple to lower its commissions, which currently run as high as 30%, could squeeze revenue by $2 billion to $4 billion in a worst-case scenario.\nApple said in its filing that it wants to “maintain the status quo” as “there’s no reason to expend resources” on App Store changes during the appeals process. It also argued there could be “unintended downstream consequences for consumers and the iOS platform” if the judge’s order goes into effect Dec. 9. A postponement would give the company time to address concerns in a way that could potentially do away with the need to let developers allow consumers to make web purchases, Apple said.\n“Apple is working hard to address these difficult issues in a changing world, enhancing information flow without compromising the consumer experience,” the company said.\nA hearing on Apple’s stay request has been set for Nov. 16, but the company said in a briefing it’s seeking to move the proceeding to Nov. 2. If U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers refuses to grant the stay, Apple said, the company could go to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.\nWhen the ruling came out, following a three-week trial in May, Apple hailed it as a victory because the judge didn’t find that the company violated federal antitrust law. Tim Sweeney, Epic’s founder and chief executive officer, said in a tweet “the ruling isn’t a win for developers or for consumers” and his company promptly filed notice that it will appeal.\nEpic declined to comment on Apple’s appeal Friday but Sweeney tweeted an image of Agent Peely, a banana action figure in Epic’s popular battle-royale game Fortnite who briefly became a source of controversy in the trial.\nApple has announced that it plans to keep Fortnite off of the App Store until appeals are exhausted, a process that could take as long as five years if the fight goes all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.\nWhile Gonzalez Rogers said Apple can no longer ban developers from pointing users to the web to complete transactions -- bypassing the App Store’s in-app-purchase system -- the judge didn’t state outright that Apple can’t collect its commissions.\nThat has led some observers to believe that Apple could still take its cut of revenue via other means, but lawyers and analysts say doing so poses logistical hurdles and risks political blowback.\nPaul Gallant, an analyst at Cowen & Co., has said Apple would want to put off changing App Store rules “because things could get messy if developers get to do workarounds starting in December.” Gallant said in a research note last month that Apple has a good chance of winning a stay at the Ninth Circuit.\n“That would prevent developers from using non-Apple payment mechanisms (and avoiding the 30% commission) until at least late 2022,” he wrote.\nBefore the September ruling, Apple announced two App Store changes in settlements with small U.S. developers and the Japan Federal Trade Commission. Both concessions are similar to the court’s injunction.\nApple is letting developers directly communicate with users about alternative payment methods, and next year it will begin allowing so-called “reader” apps -- those that deal with media like video, photos, and news -- to point users to the web to subscribe, bypassing Apple’s fees. The company highlighted those changes in Friday’s filing.\nThe case is Epic Games Inc. v. Apple Inc., 20-cv-05640, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (San Francisco).","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"CN"},{"id":821290386,"gmtCreate":1633745007140,"gmtModify":1633745755401,"author":{"id":"3575601609818315","authorId":"3575601609818315","name":"Jsgoh28","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/90196128a465db6b3437dd55043048f8","vip":1,"crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Tell me your opinion about this news...","listText":"Tell me your opinion about this news...","text":"Tell me your opinion about this news...","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/821290386","repostId":1198772378,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1198772378","pubTimestamp":1633741203,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1198772378?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-09 09:00","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Seeks to Delay Ruling Loosening Its Grip on App Store","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1198772378","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store bu","content":"<p>(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store business model since the platform was launched in 2008, an overhaul that could cost the tech giant a few billion dollars annually.</p>\n<p>The iPhone maker gave notice Friday that will appeal a judge’s ruling in its fight with Epic Games Inc. ordering the Cupertino, California-based company to stop blocking developers from letting users complete in-app purchases on the web. It also asked the judge to put her Dec. 9 deadline for App Store rule changes on hold during the appeal, which if allowed could keep business as usual for Apple for at least a year.</p>\n<p>The Sept. 10 ruling largely vindicated Apple’s business model that charges commissions on developers for App Store transactions, but the judge said Apple must allow direct communication between users and app makers and permit links to the web to complete transactions.</p>\n<p>Bloomberg Intelligence has said that pressure on Apple to lower its commissions, which currently run as high as 30%, could squeeze revenue by $2 billion to $4 billion in a worst-case scenario.</p>\n<p>Apple said in its filing that it wants to “maintain the status quo” as “there’s no reason to expend resources” on App Store changes during the appeals process. It also argued there could be “unintended downstream consequences for consumers and the iOS platform” if the judge’s order goes into effect Dec. 9. A postponement would give the company time to address concerns in a way that could potentially do away with the need to let developers allow consumers to make web purchases, Apple said.</p>\n<p>“Apple is working hard to address these difficult issues in a changing world, enhancing information flow without compromising the consumer experience,” the company said.</p>\n<p>A hearing on Apple’s stay request has been set for Nov. 16, but the company said in a briefing it’s seeking to move the proceeding to Nov. 2. If U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers refuses to grant the stay, Apple said, the company could go to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.</p>\n<p>When the ruling came out, following a three-week trial in May, Apple hailed it as a victory because the judge didn’t find that the company violated federal antitrust law. Tim Sweeney, Epic’s founder and chief executive officer, said in a tweet “the ruling isn’t a win for developers or for consumers” and his company promptly filed notice that it will appeal.</p>\n<p>Epic declined to comment on Apple’s appeal Friday but Sweeney tweeted an image of Agent Peely, a banana action figure in Epic’s popular battle-royale game Fortnite who briefly became a source of controversy in the trial.</p>\n<p>Apple has announced that it plans to keep Fortnite off of the App Store until appeals are exhausted, a process that could take as long as five years if the fight goes all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.</p>\n<p>While Gonzalez Rogers said Apple can no longer ban developers from pointing users to the web to complete transactions -- bypassing the App Store’s in-app-purchase system -- the judge didn’t state outright that Apple can’t collect its commissions.</p>\n<p>That has led some observers to believe that Apple could still take its cut of revenue via other means, but lawyers and analysts say doing so poses logistical hurdles and risks political blowback.</p>\n<p>Paul Gallant, an analyst at Cowen &amp; Co., has said Apple would want to put off changing App Store rules “because things could get messy if developers get to do workarounds starting in December.” Gallant said in a research note last month that Apple has a good chance of winning a stay at the Ninth Circuit.</p>\n<p>“That would prevent developers from using non-Apple payment mechanisms (and avoiding the 30% commission) until at least late 2022,” he wrote.</p>\n<p>Before the September ruling, Apple announced two App Store changes in settlements with small U.S. developers and the Japan Federal Trade Commission. Both concessions are similar to the court’s injunction.</p>\n<p>Apple is letting developers directly communicate with users about alternative payment methods, and next year it will begin allowing so-called “reader” apps -- those that deal with media like video, photos, and news -- to point users to the web to subscribe, bypassing Apple’s fees. The company highlighted those changes in Friday’s filing.</p>\n<p>The case is Epic Games Inc. v. Apple Inc., 20-cv-05640, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (San Francisco).</p>","source":"lsy1612507957220","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Seeks to Delay Ruling Loosening Its Grip on App Store</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Seeks to Delay Ruling Loosening Its Grip on App Store\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-10-09 09:00 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-seeks-delay-ruling-loosening-230855311.html><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store business model since the platform was launched in 2008, an overhaul that could cost the tech giant a ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-seeks-delay-ruling-loosening-230855311.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-seeks-delay-ruling-loosening-230855311.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1198772378","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store business model since the platform was launched in 2008, an overhaul that could cost the tech giant a few billion dollars annually.\nThe iPhone maker gave notice Friday that will appeal a judge’s ruling in its fight with Epic Games Inc. ordering the Cupertino, California-based company to stop blocking developers from letting users complete in-app purchases on the web. It also asked the judge to put her Dec. 9 deadline for App Store rule changes on hold during the appeal, which if allowed could keep business as usual for Apple for at least a year.\nThe Sept. 10 ruling largely vindicated Apple’s business model that charges commissions on developers for App Store transactions, but the judge said Apple must allow direct communication between users and app makers and permit links to the web to complete transactions.\nBloomberg Intelligence has said that pressure on Apple to lower its commissions, which currently run as high as 30%, could squeeze revenue by $2 billion to $4 billion in a worst-case scenario.\nApple said in its filing that it wants to “maintain the status quo” as “there’s no reason to expend resources” on App Store changes during the appeals process. It also argued there could be “unintended downstream consequences for consumers and the iOS platform” if the judge’s order goes into effect Dec. 9. A postponement would give the company time to address concerns in a way that could potentially do away with the need to let developers allow consumers to make web purchases, Apple said.\n“Apple is working hard to address these difficult issues in a changing world, enhancing information flow without compromising the consumer experience,” the company said.\nA hearing on Apple’s stay request has been set for Nov. 16, but the company said in a briefing it’s seeking to move the proceeding to Nov. 2. If U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers refuses to grant the stay, Apple said, the company could go to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.\nWhen the ruling came out, following a three-week trial in May, Apple hailed it as a victory because the judge didn’t find that the company violated federal antitrust law. Tim Sweeney, Epic’s founder and chief executive officer, said in a tweet “the ruling isn’t a win for developers or for consumers” and his company promptly filed notice that it will appeal.\nEpic declined to comment on Apple’s appeal Friday but Sweeney tweeted an image of Agent Peely, a banana action figure in Epic’s popular battle-royale game Fortnite who briefly became a source of controversy in the trial.\nApple has announced that it plans to keep Fortnite off of the App Store until appeals are exhausted, a process that could take as long as five years if the fight goes all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.\nWhile Gonzalez Rogers said Apple can no longer ban developers from pointing users to the web to complete transactions -- bypassing the App Store’s in-app-purchase system -- the judge didn’t state outright that Apple can’t collect its commissions.\nThat has led some observers to believe that Apple could still take its cut of revenue via other means, but lawyers and analysts say doing so poses logistical hurdles and risks political blowback.\nPaul Gallant, an analyst at Cowen & Co., has said Apple would want to put off changing App Store rules “because things could get messy if developers get to do workarounds starting in December.” Gallant said in a research note last month that Apple has a good chance of winning a stay at the Ninth Circuit.\n“That would prevent developers from using non-Apple payment mechanisms (and avoiding the 30% commission) until at least late 2022,” he wrote.\nBefore the September ruling, Apple announced two App Store changes in settlements with small U.S. developers and the Japan Federal Trade Commission. Both concessions are similar to the court’s injunction.\nApple is letting developers directly communicate with users about alternative payment methods, and next year it will begin allowing so-called “reader” apps -- those that deal with media like video, photos, and news -- to point users to the web to subscribe, bypassing Apple’s fees. The company highlighted those changes in Friday’s filing.\nThe case is Epic Games Inc. v. Apple Inc., 20-cv-05640, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (San Francisco).","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6139050,"gmtCreate":1633745018223,"gmtModify":1634718114779,"authorId":3575601609818315,"author":{"id":3575601609818315,"authorId":3575601609818315,"name":"Jsgoh28","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/90196128a465db6b3437dd55043048f8","vip":1,"crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":821290386,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Like","text":"Like","html":"Like"},{"id":6139280,"gmtCreate":1633745745544,"gmtModify":1634718097856,"authorId":3575420754880245,"author":{"id":3575420754880245,"authorId":3575420754880245,"name":"55f64d08","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":821290386,"type":1,"supId":6139050,"prevId":0,"content":"<u>k</u>","text":"<u>k</u>","html":"<u>k</u>"}],"langContent":"CN"},{"id":821203001,"gmtCreate":1633744458850,"gmtModify":1633744689302,"author":{"id":"3555838262565974","authorId":"3555838262565974","name":"kwwh","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/537cfa6ca69686b3f03387d7bc23d203","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Okay","listText":"Okay","text":"Okay","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/821203001","repostId":1198772378,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1198772378","pubTimestamp":1633741203,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1198772378?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-09 09:00","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Seeks to Delay Ruling Loosening Its Grip on App Store","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1198772378","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store bu","content":"<p>(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store business model since the platform was launched in 2008, an overhaul that could cost the tech giant a few billion dollars annually.</p>\n<p>The iPhone maker gave notice Friday that will appeal a judge’s ruling in its fight with Epic Games Inc. ordering the Cupertino, California-based company to stop blocking developers from letting users complete in-app purchases on the web. It also asked the judge to put her Dec. 9 deadline for App Store rule changes on hold during the appeal, which if allowed could keep business as usual for Apple for at least a year.</p>\n<p>The Sept. 10 ruling largely vindicated Apple’s business model that charges commissions on developers for App Store transactions, but the judge said Apple must allow direct communication between users and app makers and permit links to the web to complete transactions.</p>\n<p>Bloomberg Intelligence has said that pressure on Apple to lower its commissions, which currently run as high as 30%, could squeeze revenue by $2 billion to $4 billion in a worst-case scenario.</p>\n<p>Apple said in its filing that it wants to “maintain the status quo” as “there’s no reason to expend resources” on App Store changes during the appeals process. It also argued there could be “unintended downstream consequences for consumers and the iOS platform” if the judge’s order goes into effect Dec. 9. A postponement would give the company time to address concerns in a way that could potentially do away with the need to let developers allow consumers to make web purchases, Apple said.</p>\n<p>“Apple is working hard to address these difficult issues in a changing world, enhancing information flow without compromising the consumer experience,” the company said.</p>\n<p>A hearing on Apple’s stay request has been set for Nov. 16, but the company said in a briefing it’s seeking to move the proceeding to Nov. 2. If U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers refuses to grant the stay, Apple said, the company could go to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.</p>\n<p>When the ruling came out, following a three-week trial in May, Apple hailed it as a victory because the judge didn’t find that the company violated federal antitrust law. Tim Sweeney, Epic’s founder and chief executive officer, said in a tweet “the ruling isn’t a win for developers or for consumers” and his company promptly filed notice that it will appeal.</p>\n<p>Epic declined to comment on Apple’s appeal Friday but Sweeney tweeted an image of Agent Peely, a banana action figure in Epic’s popular battle-royale game Fortnite who briefly became a source of controversy in the trial.</p>\n<p>Apple has announced that it plans to keep Fortnite off of the App Store until appeals are exhausted, a process that could take as long as five years if the fight goes all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.</p>\n<p>While Gonzalez Rogers said Apple can no longer ban developers from pointing users to the web to complete transactions -- bypassing the App Store’s in-app-purchase system -- the judge didn’t state outright that Apple can’t collect its commissions.</p>\n<p>That has led some observers to believe that Apple could still take its cut of revenue via other means, but lawyers and analysts say doing so poses logistical hurdles and risks political blowback.</p>\n<p>Paul Gallant, an analyst at Cowen &amp; Co., has said Apple would want to put off changing App Store rules “because things could get messy if developers get to do workarounds starting in December.” Gallant said in a research note last month that Apple has a good chance of winning a stay at the Ninth Circuit.</p>\n<p>“That would prevent developers from using non-Apple payment mechanisms (and avoiding the 30% commission) until at least late 2022,” he wrote.</p>\n<p>Before the September ruling, Apple announced two App Store changes in settlements with small U.S. developers and the Japan Federal Trade Commission. Both concessions are similar to the court’s injunction.</p>\n<p>Apple is letting developers directly communicate with users about alternative payment methods, and next year it will begin allowing so-called “reader” apps -- those that deal with media like video, photos, and news -- to point users to the web to subscribe, bypassing Apple’s fees. The company highlighted those changes in Friday’s filing.</p>\n<p>The case is Epic Games Inc. v. Apple Inc., 20-cv-05640, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (San Francisco).</p>","source":"lsy1612507957220","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Seeks to Delay Ruling Loosening Its Grip on App Store</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Seeks to Delay Ruling Loosening Its Grip on App Store\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-10-09 09:00 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-seeks-delay-ruling-loosening-230855311.html><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store business model since the platform was launched in 2008, an overhaul that could cost the tech giant a ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-seeks-delay-ruling-loosening-230855311.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-seeks-delay-ruling-loosening-230855311.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1198772378","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store business model since the platform was launched in 2008, an overhaul that could cost the tech giant a few billion dollars annually.\nThe iPhone maker gave notice Friday that will appeal a judge’s ruling in its fight with Epic Games Inc. ordering the Cupertino, California-based company to stop blocking developers from letting users complete in-app purchases on the web. It also asked the judge to put her Dec. 9 deadline for App Store rule changes on hold during the appeal, which if allowed could keep business as usual for Apple for at least a year.\nThe Sept. 10 ruling largely vindicated Apple’s business model that charges commissions on developers for App Store transactions, but the judge said Apple must allow direct communication between users and app makers and permit links to the web to complete transactions.\nBloomberg Intelligence has said that pressure on Apple to lower its commissions, which currently run as high as 30%, could squeeze revenue by $2 billion to $4 billion in a worst-case scenario.\nApple said in its filing that it wants to “maintain the status quo” as “there’s no reason to expend resources” on App Store changes during the appeals process. It also argued there could be “unintended downstream consequences for consumers and the iOS platform” if the judge’s order goes into effect Dec. 9. A postponement would give the company time to address concerns in a way that could potentially do away with the need to let developers allow consumers to make web purchases, Apple said.\n“Apple is working hard to address these difficult issues in a changing world, enhancing information flow without compromising the consumer experience,” the company said.\nA hearing on Apple’s stay request has been set for Nov. 16, but the company said in a briefing it’s seeking to move the proceeding to Nov. 2. If U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers refuses to grant the stay, Apple said, the company could go to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.\nWhen the ruling came out, following a three-week trial in May, Apple hailed it as a victory because the judge didn’t find that the company violated federal antitrust law. Tim Sweeney, Epic’s founder and chief executive officer, said in a tweet “the ruling isn’t a win for developers or for consumers” and his company promptly filed notice that it will appeal.\nEpic declined to comment on Apple’s appeal Friday but Sweeney tweeted an image of Agent Peely, a banana action figure in Epic’s popular battle-royale game Fortnite who briefly became a source of controversy in the trial.\nApple has announced that it plans to keep Fortnite off of the App Store until appeals are exhausted, a process that could take as long as five years if the fight goes all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.\nWhile Gonzalez Rogers said Apple can no longer ban developers from pointing users to the web to complete transactions -- bypassing the App Store’s in-app-purchase system -- the judge didn’t state outright that Apple can’t collect its commissions.\nThat has led some observers to believe that Apple could still take its cut of revenue via other means, but lawyers and analysts say doing so poses logistical hurdles and risks political blowback.\nPaul Gallant, an analyst at Cowen & Co., has said Apple would want to put off changing App Store rules “because things could get messy if developers get to do workarounds starting in December.” Gallant said in a research note last month that Apple has a good chance of winning a stay at the Ninth Circuit.\n“That would prevent developers from using non-Apple payment mechanisms (and avoiding the 30% commission) until at least late 2022,” he wrote.\nBefore the September ruling, Apple announced two App Store changes in settlements with small U.S. developers and the Japan Federal Trade Commission. Both concessions are similar to the court’s injunction.\nApple is letting developers directly communicate with users about alternative payment methods, and next year it will begin allowing so-called “reader” apps -- those that deal with media like video, photos, and news -- to point users to the web to subscribe, bypassing Apple’s fees. The company highlighted those changes in Friday’s filing.\nThe case is Epic Games Inc. v. Apple Inc., 20-cv-05640, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (San Francisco).","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6138885,"gmtCreate":1633744464268,"gmtModify":1634718128676,"authorId":3555838262565974,"author":{"id":3555838262565974,"authorId":3555838262565974,"name":"kwwh","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/537cfa6ca69686b3f03387d7bc23d203","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":821203001,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"<u>good</u>","text":"<u>good</u>","html":"<u>good</u>"},{"id":6138900,"gmtCreate":1633744505858,"gmtModify":1634718127485,"authorId":3559090315468647,"author":{"id":3559090315468647,"authorId":3559090315468647,"name":"747d3c45","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":821203001,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Ok","text":"Ok","html":"Ok"}],"langContent":"CN"},{"id":821679169,"gmtCreate":1633743813169,"gmtModify":1633743813315,"author":{"id":"4087625047599080","authorId":"4087625047599080","name":"JeromeAng","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3d1fd245884a2b62379fc1adb18bc69b","vip":1,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Nice","listText":"Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/821679169","repostId":1198772378,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1198772378","pubTimestamp":1633741203,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1198772378?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-09 09:00","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Seeks to Delay Ruling Loosening Its Grip on App Store","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1198772378","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store bu","content":"<p>(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store business model since the platform was launched in 2008, an overhaul that could cost the tech giant a few billion dollars annually.</p>\n<p>The iPhone maker gave notice Friday that will appeal a judge’s ruling in its fight with Epic Games Inc. ordering the Cupertino, California-based company to stop blocking developers from letting users complete in-app purchases on the web. It also asked the judge to put her Dec. 9 deadline for App Store rule changes on hold during the appeal, which if allowed could keep business as usual for Apple for at least a year.</p>\n<p>The Sept. 10 ruling largely vindicated Apple’s business model that charges commissions on developers for App Store transactions, but the judge said Apple must allow direct communication between users and app makers and permit links to the web to complete transactions.</p>\n<p>Bloomberg Intelligence has said that pressure on Apple to lower its commissions, which currently run as high as 30%, could squeeze revenue by $2 billion to $4 billion in a worst-case scenario.</p>\n<p>Apple said in its filing that it wants to “maintain the status quo” as “there’s no reason to expend resources” on App Store changes during the appeals process. It also argued there could be “unintended downstream consequences for consumers and the iOS platform” if the judge’s order goes into effect Dec. 9. A postponement would give the company time to address concerns in a way that could potentially do away with the need to let developers allow consumers to make web purchases, Apple said.</p>\n<p>“Apple is working hard to address these difficult issues in a changing world, enhancing information flow without compromising the consumer experience,” the company said.</p>\n<p>A hearing on Apple’s stay request has been set for Nov. 16, but the company said in a briefing it’s seeking to move the proceeding to Nov. 2. If U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers refuses to grant the stay, Apple said, the company could go to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.</p>\n<p>When the ruling came out, following a three-week trial in May, Apple hailed it as a victory because the judge didn’t find that the company violated federal antitrust law. Tim Sweeney, Epic’s founder and chief executive officer, said in a tweet “the ruling isn’t a win for developers or for consumers” and his company promptly filed notice that it will appeal.</p>\n<p>Epic declined to comment on Apple’s appeal Friday but Sweeney tweeted an image of Agent Peely, a banana action figure in Epic’s popular battle-royale game Fortnite who briefly became a source of controversy in the trial.</p>\n<p>Apple has announced that it plans to keep Fortnite off of the App Store until appeals are exhausted, a process that could take as long as five years if the fight goes all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.</p>\n<p>While Gonzalez Rogers said Apple can no longer ban developers from pointing users to the web to complete transactions -- bypassing the App Store’s in-app-purchase system -- the judge didn’t state outright that Apple can’t collect its commissions.</p>\n<p>That has led some observers to believe that Apple could still take its cut of revenue via other means, but lawyers and analysts say doing so poses logistical hurdles and risks political blowback.</p>\n<p>Paul Gallant, an analyst at Cowen &amp; Co., has said Apple would want to put off changing App Store rules “because things could get messy if developers get to do workarounds starting in December.” Gallant said in a research note last month that Apple has a good chance of winning a stay at the Ninth Circuit.</p>\n<p>“That would prevent developers from using non-Apple payment mechanisms (and avoiding the 30% commission) until at least late 2022,” he wrote.</p>\n<p>Before the September ruling, Apple announced two App Store changes in settlements with small U.S. developers and the Japan Federal Trade Commission. Both concessions are similar to the court’s injunction.</p>\n<p>Apple is letting developers directly communicate with users about alternative payment methods, and next year it will begin allowing so-called “reader” apps -- those that deal with media like video, photos, and news -- to point users to the web to subscribe, bypassing Apple’s fees. The company highlighted those changes in Friday’s filing.</p>\n<p>The case is Epic Games Inc. v. Apple Inc., 20-cv-05640, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (San Francisco).</p>","source":"lsy1612507957220","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Seeks to Delay Ruling Loosening Its Grip on App Store</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Seeks to Delay Ruling Loosening Its Grip on App Store\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-10-09 09:00 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-seeks-delay-ruling-loosening-230855311.html><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store business model since the platform was launched in 2008, an overhaul that could cost the tech giant a ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-seeks-delay-ruling-loosening-230855311.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-seeks-delay-ruling-loosening-230855311.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1198772378","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store business model since the platform was launched in 2008, an overhaul that could cost the tech giant a few billion dollars annually.\nThe iPhone maker gave notice Friday that will appeal a judge’s ruling in its fight with Epic Games Inc. ordering the Cupertino, California-based company to stop blocking developers from letting users complete in-app purchases on the web. It also asked the judge to put her Dec. 9 deadline for App Store rule changes on hold during the appeal, which if allowed could keep business as usual for Apple for at least a year.\nThe Sept. 10 ruling largely vindicated Apple’s business model that charges commissions on developers for App Store transactions, but the judge said Apple must allow direct communication between users and app makers and permit links to the web to complete transactions.\nBloomberg Intelligence has said that pressure on Apple to lower its commissions, which currently run as high as 30%, could squeeze revenue by $2 billion to $4 billion in a worst-case scenario.\nApple said in its filing that it wants to “maintain the status quo” as “there’s no reason to expend resources” on App Store changes during the appeals process. It also argued there could be “unintended downstream consequences for consumers and the iOS platform” if the judge’s order goes into effect Dec. 9. A postponement would give the company time to address concerns in a way that could potentially do away with the need to let developers allow consumers to make web purchases, Apple said.\n“Apple is working hard to address these difficult issues in a changing world, enhancing information flow without compromising the consumer experience,” the company said.\nA hearing on Apple’s stay request has been set for Nov. 16, but the company said in a briefing it’s seeking to move the proceeding to Nov. 2. If U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers refuses to grant the stay, Apple said, the company could go to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.\nWhen the ruling came out, following a three-week trial in May, Apple hailed it as a victory because the judge didn’t find that the company violated federal antitrust law. Tim Sweeney, Epic’s founder and chief executive officer, said in a tweet “the ruling isn’t a win for developers or for consumers” and his company promptly filed notice that it will appeal.\nEpic declined to comment on Apple’s appeal Friday but Sweeney tweeted an image of Agent Peely, a banana action figure in Epic’s popular battle-royale game Fortnite who briefly became a source of controversy in the trial.\nApple has announced that it plans to keep Fortnite off of the App Store until appeals are exhausted, a process that could take as long as five years if the fight goes all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.\nWhile Gonzalez Rogers said Apple can no longer ban developers from pointing users to the web to complete transactions -- bypassing the App Store’s in-app-purchase system -- the judge didn’t state outright that Apple can’t collect its commissions.\nThat has led some observers to believe that Apple could still take its cut of revenue via other means, but lawyers and analysts say doing so poses logistical hurdles and risks political blowback.\nPaul Gallant, an analyst at Cowen & Co., has said Apple would want to put off changing App Store rules “because things could get messy if developers get to do workarounds starting in December.” Gallant said in a research note last month that Apple has a good chance of winning a stay at the Ninth Circuit.\n“That would prevent developers from using non-Apple payment mechanisms (and avoiding the 30% commission) until at least late 2022,” he wrote.\nBefore the September ruling, Apple announced two App Store changes in settlements with small U.S. developers and the Japan Federal Trade Commission. Both concessions are similar to the court’s injunction.\nApple is letting developers directly communicate with users about alternative payment methods, and next year it will begin allowing so-called “reader” apps -- those that deal with media like video, photos, and news -- to point users to the web to subscribe, bypassing Apple’s fees. The company highlighted those changes in Friday’s filing.\nThe case is Epic Games Inc. v. Apple Inc., 20-cv-05640, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (San Francisco).","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6138953,"gmtCreate":1633744669127,"gmtModify":1634718122805,"authorId":3582186770863797,"author":{"id":3582186770863797,"authorId":3582186770863797,"name":"79e89ab4","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":821679169,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Hi","text":"Hi","html":"Hi"}],"langContent":"CN"},{"id":821624494,"gmtCreate":1633742210226,"gmtModify":1633742210357,"author":{"id":"3575188860884045","authorId":"3575188860884045","name":"Zasper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/647533310e84099eea8515d90e6e2f94","vip":1,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Sad","listText":"Sad","text":"Sad","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/821624494","repostId":1198772378,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1198772378","pubTimestamp":1633741203,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1198772378?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-09 09:00","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Seeks to Delay Ruling Loosening Its Grip on App Store","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1198772378","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store bu","content":"<p>(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store business model since the platform was launched in 2008, an overhaul that could cost the tech giant a few billion dollars annually.</p>\n<p>The iPhone maker gave notice Friday that will appeal a judge’s ruling in its fight with Epic Games Inc. ordering the Cupertino, California-based company to stop blocking developers from letting users complete in-app purchases on the web. It also asked the judge to put her Dec. 9 deadline for App Store rule changes on hold during the appeal, which if allowed could keep business as usual for Apple for at least a year.</p>\n<p>The Sept. 10 ruling largely vindicated Apple’s business model that charges commissions on developers for App Store transactions, but the judge said Apple must allow direct communication between users and app makers and permit links to the web to complete transactions.</p>\n<p>Bloomberg Intelligence has said that pressure on Apple to lower its commissions, which currently run as high as 30%, could squeeze revenue by $2 billion to $4 billion in a worst-case scenario.</p>\n<p>Apple said in its filing that it wants to “maintain the status quo” as “there’s no reason to expend resources” on App Store changes during the appeals process. It also argued there could be “unintended downstream consequences for consumers and the iOS platform” if the judge’s order goes into effect Dec. 9. A postponement would give the company time to address concerns in a way that could potentially do away with the need to let developers allow consumers to make web purchases, Apple said.</p>\n<p>“Apple is working hard to address these difficult issues in a changing world, enhancing information flow without compromising the consumer experience,” the company said.</p>\n<p>A hearing on Apple’s stay request has been set for Nov. 16, but the company said in a briefing it’s seeking to move the proceeding to Nov. 2. If U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers refuses to grant the stay, Apple said, the company could go to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.</p>\n<p>When the ruling came out, following a three-week trial in May, Apple hailed it as a victory because the judge didn’t find that the company violated federal antitrust law. Tim Sweeney, Epic’s founder and chief executive officer, said in a tweet “the ruling isn’t a win for developers or for consumers” and his company promptly filed notice that it will appeal.</p>\n<p>Epic declined to comment on Apple’s appeal Friday but Sweeney tweeted an image of Agent Peely, a banana action figure in Epic’s popular battle-royale game Fortnite who briefly became a source of controversy in the trial.</p>\n<p>Apple has announced that it plans to keep Fortnite off of the App Store until appeals are exhausted, a process that could take as long as five years if the fight goes all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.</p>\n<p>While Gonzalez Rogers said Apple can no longer ban developers from pointing users to the web to complete transactions -- bypassing the App Store’s in-app-purchase system -- the judge didn’t state outright that Apple can’t collect its commissions.</p>\n<p>That has led some observers to believe that Apple could still take its cut of revenue via other means, but lawyers and analysts say doing so poses logistical hurdles and risks political blowback.</p>\n<p>Paul Gallant, an analyst at Cowen &amp; Co., has said Apple would want to put off changing App Store rules “because things could get messy if developers get to do workarounds starting in December.” Gallant said in a research note last month that Apple has a good chance of winning a stay at the Ninth Circuit.</p>\n<p>“That would prevent developers from using non-Apple payment mechanisms (and avoiding the 30% commission) until at least late 2022,” he wrote.</p>\n<p>Before the September ruling, Apple announced two App Store changes in settlements with small U.S. developers and the Japan Federal Trade Commission. Both concessions are similar to the court’s injunction.</p>\n<p>Apple is letting developers directly communicate with users about alternative payment methods, and next year it will begin allowing so-called “reader” apps -- those that deal with media like video, photos, and news -- to point users to the web to subscribe, bypassing Apple’s fees. The company highlighted those changes in Friday’s filing.</p>\n<p>The case is Epic Games Inc. v. Apple Inc., 20-cv-05640, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (San Francisco).</p>","source":"lsy1612507957220","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Seeks to Delay Ruling Loosening Its Grip on App Store</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Seeks to Delay Ruling Loosening Its Grip on App Store\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-10-09 09:00 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-seeks-delay-ruling-loosening-230855311.html><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store business model since the platform was launched in 2008, an overhaul that could cost the tech giant a ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-seeks-delay-ruling-loosening-230855311.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-seeks-delay-ruling-loosening-230855311.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1198772378","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store business model since the platform was launched in 2008, an overhaul that could cost the tech giant a few billion dollars annually.\nThe iPhone maker gave notice Friday that will appeal a judge’s ruling in its fight with Epic Games Inc. ordering the Cupertino, California-based company to stop blocking developers from letting users complete in-app purchases on the web. It also asked the judge to put her Dec. 9 deadline for App Store rule changes on hold during the appeal, which if allowed could keep business as usual for Apple for at least a year.\nThe Sept. 10 ruling largely vindicated Apple’s business model that charges commissions on developers for App Store transactions, but the judge said Apple must allow direct communication between users and app makers and permit links to the web to complete transactions.\nBloomberg Intelligence has said that pressure on Apple to lower its commissions, which currently run as high as 30%, could squeeze revenue by $2 billion to $4 billion in a worst-case scenario.\nApple said in its filing that it wants to “maintain the status quo” as “there’s no reason to expend resources” on App Store changes during the appeals process. It also argued there could be “unintended downstream consequences for consumers and the iOS platform” if the judge’s order goes into effect Dec. 9. A postponement would give the company time to address concerns in a way that could potentially do away with the need to let developers allow consumers to make web purchases, Apple said.\n“Apple is working hard to address these difficult issues in a changing world, enhancing information flow without compromising the consumer experience,” the company said.\nA hearing on Apple’s stay request has been set for Nov. 16, but the company said in a briefing it’s seeking to move the proceeding to Nov. 2. If U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers refuses to grant the stay, Apple said, the company could go to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.\nWhen the ruling came out, following a three-week trial in May, Apple hailed it as a victory because the judge didn’t find that the company violated federal antitrust law. Tim Sweeney, Epic’s founder and chief executive officer, said in a tweet “the ruling isn’t a win for developers or for consumers” and his company promptly filed notice that it will appeal.\nEpic declined to comment on Apple’s appeal Friday but Sweeney tweeted an image of Agent Peely, a banana action figure in Epic’s popular battle-royale game Fortnite who briefly became a source of controversy in the trial.\nApple has announced that it plans to keep Fortnite off of the App Store until appeals are exhausted, a process that could take as long as five years if the fight goes all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.\nWhile Gonzalez Rogers said Apple can no longer ban developers from pointing users to the web to complete transactions -- bypassing the App Store’s in-app-purchase system -- the judge didn’t state outright that Apple can’t collect its commissions.\nThat has led some observers to believe that Apple could still take its cut of revenue via other means, but lawyers and analysts say doing so poses logistical hurdles and risks political blowback.\nPaul Gallant, an analyst at Cowen & Co., has said Apple would want to put off changing App Store rules “because things could get messy if developers get to do workarounds starting in December.” Gallant said in a research note last month that Apple has a good chance of winning a stay at the Ninth Circuit.\n“That would prevent developers from using non-Apple payment mechanisms (and avoiding the 30% commission) until at least late 2022,” he wrote.\nBefore the September ruling, Apple announced two App Store changes in settlements with small U.S. developers and the Japan Federal Trade Commission. Both concessions are similar to the court’s injunction.\nApple is letting developers directly communicate with users about alternative payment methods, and next year it will begin allowing so-called “reader” apps -- those that deal with media like video, photos, and news -- to point users to the web to subscribe, bypassing Apple’s fees. The company highlighted those changes in Friday’s filing.\nThe case is Epic Games Inc. v. Apple Inc., 20-cv-05640, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (San Francisco).","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6138432,"gmtCreate":1633742279245,"gmtModify":1634718164245,"authorId":3581815189387023,"author":{"id":3581815189387023,"authorId":3581815189387023,"name":"tanpy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ff3c5e4042dc24a526ab5f37a6d66137","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":821624494,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"oops","text":"oops","html":"oops"},{"id":6138538,"gmtCreate":1633742894727,"gmtModify":1634718155999,"authorId":3553254172092293,"author":{"id":3553254172092293,"authorId":3553254172092293,"name":"DingDang","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d2a0c38ce6f3c2661fa15b7d1f52eeaf","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":821624494,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Oo","text":"Oo","html":"Oo"},{"id":6138646,"gmtCreate":1633743314158,"gmtModify":1634718147118,"authorId":3557433279201512,"author":{"id":3557433279201512,"authorId":3557433279201512,"name":"Couragesther","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fb776fde22322bb11f3651d216a6b06e","vip":1,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":821624494,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Heah","text":"Heah","html":"Heah"}],"langContent":"CN"},{"id":821665735,"gmtCreate":1633741318302,"gmtModify":1633741319629,"author":{"id":"3586854302245038","authorId":"3586854302245038","name":"TinyRabbit","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6685482ed446811291c305271d57d5ed","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Wow","listText":"Wow","text":"Wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/821665735","repostId":1198772378,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1198772378","pubTimestamp":1633741203,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1198772378?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-09 09:00","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Seeks to Delay Ruling Loosening Its Grip on App Store","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1198772378","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store bu","content":"<p>(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store business model since the platform was launched in 2008, an overhaul that could cost the tech giant a few billion dollars annually.</p>\n<p>The iPhone maker gave notice Friday that will appeal a judge’s ruling in its fight with Epic Games Inc. ordering the Cupertino, California-based company to stop blocking developers from letting users complete in-app purchases on the web. It also asked the judge to put her Dec. 9 deadline for App Store rule changes on hold during the appeal, which if allowed could keep business as usual for Apple for at least a year.</p>\n<p>The Sept. 10 ruling largely vindicated Apple’s business model that charges commissions on developers for App Store transactions, but the judge said Apple must allow direct communication between users and app makers and permit links to the web to complete transactions.</p>\n<p>Bloomberg Intelligence has said that pressure on Apple to lower its commissions, which currently run as high as 30%, could squeeze revenue by $2 billion to $4 billion in a worst-case scenario.</p>\n<p>Apple said in its filing that it wants to “maintain the status quo” as “there’s no reason to expend resources” on App Store changes during the appeals process. It also argued there could be “unintended downstream consequences for consumers and the iOS platform” if the judge’s order goes into effect Dec. 9. A postponement would give the company time to address concerns in a way that could potentially do away with the need to let developers allow consumers to make web purchases, Apple said.</p>\n<p>“Apple is working hard to address these difficult issues in a changing world, enhancing information flow without compromising the consumer experience,” the company said.</p>\n<p>A hearing on Apple’s stay request has been set for Nov. 16, but the company said in a briefing it’s seeking to move the proceeding to Nov. 2. If U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers refuses to grant the stay, Apple said, the company could go to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.</p>\n<p>When the ruling came out, following a three-week trial in May, Apple hailed it as a victory because the judge didn’t find that the company violated federal antitrust law. Tim Sweeney, Epic’s founder and chief executive officer, said in a tweet “the ruling isn’t a win for developers or for consumers” and his company promptly filed notice that it will appeal.</p>\n<p>Epic declined to comment on Apple’s appeal Friday but Sweeney tweeted an image of Agent Peely, a banana action figure in Epic’s popular battle-royale game Fortnite who briefly became a source of controversy in the trial.</p>\n<p>Apple has announced that it plans to keep Fortnite off of the App Store until appeals are exhausted, a process that could take as long as five years if the fight goes all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.</p>\n<p>While Gonzalez Rogers said Apple can no longer ban developers from pointing users to the web to complete transactions -- bypassing the App Store’s in-app-purchase system -- the judge didn’t state outright that Apple can’t collect its commissions.</p>\n<p>That has led some observers to believe that Apple could still take its cut of revenue via other means, but lawyers and analysts say doing so poses logistical hurdles and risks political blowback.</p>\n<p>Paul Gallant, an analyst at Cowen &amp; Co., has said Apple would want to put off changing App Store rules “because things could get messy if developers get to do workarounds starting in December.” Gallant said in a research note last month that Apple has a good chance of winning a stay at the Ninth Circuit.</p>\n<p>“That would prevent developers from using non-Apple payment mechanisms (and avoiding the 30% commission) until at least late 2022,” he wrote.</p>\n<p>Before the September ruling, Apple announced two App Store changes in settlements with small U.S. developers and the Japan Federal Trade Commission. Both concessions are similar to the court’s injunction.</p>\n<p>Apple is letting developers directly communicate with users about alternative payment methods, and next year it will begin allowing so-called “reader” apps -- those that deal with media like video, photos, and news -- to point users to the web to subscribe, bypassing Apple’s fees. The company highlighted those changes in Friday’s filing.</p>\n<p>The case is Epic Games Inc. v. Apple Inc., 20-cv-05640, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (San Francisco).</p>","source":"lsy1612507957220","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Seeks to Delay Ruling Loosening Its Grip on App Store</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Seeks to Delay Ruling Loosening Its Grip on App Store\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-10-09 09:00 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-seeks-delay-ruling-loosening-230855311.html><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store business model since the platform was launched in 2008, an overhaul that could cost the tech giant a ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-seeks-delay-ruling-loosening-230855311.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-seeks-delay-ruling-loosening-230855311.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1198772378","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store business model since the platform was launched in 2008, an overhaul that could cost the tech giant a few billion dollars annually.\nThe iPhone maker gave notice Friday that will appeal a judge’s ruling in its fight with Epic Games Inc. ordering the Cupertino, California-based company to stop blocking developers from letting users complete in-app purchases on the web. It also asked the judge to put her Dec. 9 deadline for App Store rule changes on hold during the appeal, which if allowed could keep business as usual for Apple for at least a year.\nThe Sept. 10 ruling largely vindicated Apple’s business model that charges commissions on developers for App Store transactions, but the judge said Apple must allow direct communication between users and app makers and permit links to the web to complete transactions.\nBloomberg Intelligence has said that pressure on Apple to lower its commissions, which currently run as high as 30%, could squeeze revenue by $2 billion to $4 billion in a worst-case scenario.\nApple said in its filing that it wants to “maintain the status quo” as “there’s no reason to expend resources” on App Store changes during the appeals process. It also argued there could be “unintended downstream consequences for consumers and the iOS platform” if the judge’s order goes into effect Dec. 9. A postponement would give the company time to address concerns in a way that could potentially do away with the need to let developers allow consumers to make web purchases, Apple said.\n“Apple is working hard to address these difficult issues in a changing world, enhancing information flow without compromising the consumer experience,” the company said.\nA hearing on Apple’s stay request has been set for Nov. 16, but the company said in a briefing it’s seeking to move the proceeding to Nov. 2. If U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers refuses to grant the stay, Apple said, the company could go to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.\nWhen the ruling came out, following a three-week trial in May, Apple hailed it as a victory because the judge didn’t find that the company violated federal antitrust law. Tim Sweeney, Epic’s founder and chief executive officer, said in a tweet “the ruling isn’t a win for developers or for consumers” and his company promptly filed notice that it will appeal.\nEpic declined to comment on Apple’s appeal Friday but Sweeney tweeted an image of Agent Peely, a banana action figure in Epic’s popular battle-royale game Fortnite who briefly became a source of controversy in the trial.\nApple has announced that it plans to keep Fortnite off of the App Store until appeals are exhausted, a process that could take as long as five years if the fight goes all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.\nWhile Gonzalez Rogers said Apple can no longer ban developers from pointing users to the web to complete transactions -- bypassing the App Store’s in-app-purchase system -- the judge didn’t state outright that Apple can’t collect its commissions.\nThat has led some observers to believe that Apple could still take its cut of revenue via other means, but lawyers and analysts say doing so poses logistical hurdles and risks political blowback.\nPaul Gallant, an analyst at Cowen & Co., has said Apple would want to put off changing App Store rules “because things could get messy if developers get to do workarounds starting in December.” Gallant said in a research note last month that Apple has a good chance of winning a stay at the Ninth Circuit.\n“That would prevent developers from using non-Apple payment mechanisms (and avoiding the 30% commission) until at least late 2022,” he wrote.\nBefore the September ruling, Apple announced two App Store changes in settlements with small U.S. developers and the Japan Federal Trade Commission. Both concessions are similar to the court’s injunction.\nApple is letting developers directly communicate with users about alternative payment methods, and next year it will begin allowing so-called “reader” apps -- those that deal with media like video, photos, and news -- to point users to the web to subscribe, bypassing Apple’s fees. The company highlighted those changes in Friday’s filing.\nThe case is Epic Games Inc. v. Apple Inc., 20-cv-05640, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (San Francisco).","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6138231,"gmtCreate":1633741532869,"gmtModify":1634718184010,"authorId":4087286829505350,"author":{"id":4087286829505350,"authorId":4087286829505350,"name":"shutiing","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d9570bb377b17d1dc03714978c63e96c","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":821665735,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"<u>wow</u>","text":"<u>wow</u>","html":"<u>wow</u>"},{"id":6138312,"gmtCreate":1633741774050,"gmtModify":1634718175649,"authorId":3569986866622229,"author":{"id":3569986866622229,"authorId":3569986866622229,"name":"siowthing","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8107ee6f14735fa1f43f4387de9461ec","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":821665735,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"<u>ok</u>","text":"<u>ok</u>","html":"<u>ok</u>"},{"id":6138415,"gmtCreate":1633742216468,"gmtModify":1634718166095,"authorId":3575188860884045,"author":{"id":3575188860884045,"authorId":3575188860884045,"name":"Zasper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/647533310e84099eea8515d90e6e2f94","vip":1,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":821665735,"type":1,"supId":6138231,"prevId":0,"content":"<u>Ok</u>","text":"<u>Ok</u>","html":"<u>Ok</u>"}],"langContent":"CN"}],"hasMoreComments":true,"newsSizeData":{"likeSize":287,"commentSize":18,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false}}