Apple Wins a Round in Payments Fight With Epic Games_老虎社区_美港股上老虎

Apple Wins a Round in Payments Fight With Epic Games

Barrons2021-12-09

Apple notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a stay, pending appeal, of a lower ...

网页链接

免责声明：本文观点仅代表作者个人观点，不构成本平台的投资建议，本平台不对文章信息准确性、完整性和及时性做出任何保证，亦不对因使用或信赖文章信息引发的任何损失承担责任。

JianWei666
·2021-12-09
Qq
回复
1
举报
收起
- JianWei666:
  Ww
  2021-12-09
  回复
  举报
Mumaizah
·2021-12-09
Great!
回复
3
举报
edgarbun
·2021-12-09
👍
回复
点赞
举报
SandDust
·2021-12-09
A bully the whole world.
回复
3
举报
NeedMoneyPls
·2021-12-09
Will never forgive Epic for destroying Unreal Tournament
回复
2
举报
GinOng
·2021-12-09
State of Play of Intelligent Automation will add buzz to Apple
回复
2
举报
JustBUYonly
·2021-12-09
Ok
回复
4
举报
收起
- GinOng:
  State of Play of Intelligent Automation will add buzz to Apple
  2021-12-09
  回复
  举报
3a4ebe3e
·2021-12-09
Ok
回复
2
举报
Aloylim1117
·2021-12-09
F
回复
1
举报
Pita2
·2021-12-09
Nice
回复
4
举报
Jliang
·2021-12-09
Please like
回复
2
举报
收起
- 3a4ebe3e:
  ok
  2021-12-09
  回复
  举报
- Aloylim1117:
  Ok
  2021-12-09
  回复
  举报
RobinChanKH
·2021-12-09
Huat ah
回复
3
举报
收起
- dandan_4896:
  bj
  2021-12-09
  回复
  举报
jazzspeed
·2021-12-09
huat ahhhhhhhhhhhh
回复
4
举报
收起
- dandan_4896:
  bj
  2021-12-09
  回复
  举报
AllFathers
·2021-12-09
Nice....
回复
3
举报
收起
- AllFathers:
  pls lik3
  2021-12-09
  回复
  举报
Iankoh
·2021-12-09
Ok
回复
4
举报
SiewLooiWan
·2021-12-09
Sure
回复
4
举报
PeterYC
·2021-12-09
Ok
回复
5
举报
收起
- SiewLooiWan:
  sure
  2021-12-09
  回复
  举报
- PeterYC:
  Ok
  2021-12-09
  回复
  举报
janspants
·2021-12-09
Ok
回复
5
举报
JoyceChew
·2021-12-09
Ok
回复
3
举报
收起
- janspants:
  Ok
  2021-12-09
  回复
  举报
TradeMore
·2021-12-09
Oh
回复
5
举报
收起
- JoyceChew:
  Ok
  2021-12-09
  回复
  举报

热议股票

7x24

全部

关于我们·老虎社区守则·老虎社区账号管理规范·老虎社区服务协议·老虎社区隐私政策

公司名称：北京至简风宜信息技术有限公司

违法和不良信息投诉：010-5681-3562（工作时间9:30-18:30）

邮箱：service@laohu8.com

营业执照：91110105MA01A4U55R

ICP备：京ICP备18016422号

网安备：京公网安备11010502036490

关注我们

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"data":{"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1147616327?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","thumbnail":"","is_english":true,"pubTime":"2021-12-09 16:52","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","id":"1147616327","market":"us","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"Apple Wins a Round in Payments Fight With Epic Games","media":"Barrons","content":"<div>\n<p>Apple notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a stay, pending appeal, of a lower ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-epic-games-in-app-payments-51639002173?mod=hp_LATEST\">网页链接</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"lsy1601382232898","html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Wins a Round in Payments Fight With Epic Games</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Wins a Round in Payments Fight With Epic Games\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-12-09 16:52 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-epic-games-in-app-payments-51639002173?mod=hp_LATEST><strong>Barrons</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Apple notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a stay, pending appeal, of a lower ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-epic-games-in-app-payments-51639002173?mod=hp_LATEST\">网页链接</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":"AAPL","symbol_name":"苹果","start_time":0,"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-epic-games-in-app-payments-51639002173?mod=hp_LATEST","article_id":"1147616327","we_media_id":null,"thumbnails":[],"rights":null,"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1147616327","pubTimestamp":1639039969,"sourceInfo":{"source_id":"lsy1601382232898","name":"Barrons"},"weMediaInfo":null,"summary":"Apple notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge pan","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"barrons.com","property":[],"viewcount":null,"language":"en","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"translate_title":"苹果赢得一轮支付战斗与史诗游戏","themeId":null,"isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":null,"symbols_score_info":{"AAPL":0.9},"content_text":"Apple notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a stay, pending appeal, of a lower court’s order that would make it easier for software developers to route around Apple’s payment system for in-game purchases.\nThe circuit-court decision on Wednesday specifically targets one element of a permanent injunction issued Sept. 10 by U.S. District Court Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Epic’s lawsuit against Apple over the way it operates the App Store. That provision barred Apple from stopping developers from including in their apps information on how to make purchases without buying via the app and therefore giving a cut to Apple.\nIn the two-page decision, the circuit court found that Apple “has demonstrated, at minimum, that its appeal raises serious questions on the merits of the district court’s determination that Epic Games … failed to show Apple’s conduct violated any antitrust laws but did show that the same conduct violated California’s Unfair Competition Law.” The court pointed to another decision that found that such a finding was contradictory—that if you conclude that conduct is not an unreasonable restraint of trade, then you can’t also argue that it is unfair to consumers.\nThe court also said Apple has “made a sufficient showing of irreparable harm,” and that the remaining factors weighed in favor of staying the provision of the lower-court injunction and maintaining the status quo pending appeal.\nApple said it was pleased with the ruling. “Our concern is that these changes would have created new privacy and security risks, and disrupted the user experience customers love about the App Store,” it said in a statement. “We want to thank the court for granting this stay while the appeals process continues.”\nEvercore ISI analyst Amit Daryanani said in a research note that the latest ruling allows Apple to avoid a Thursday deadline for complying with the order.\n“Being granted a stay is a win for Apple, as the possibility of the company being forced to allow developers to include in-app links to other payment platforms has been pushed out,” the analyst wrote. “We would note, however, that the overall appeals process outcome remains uncertain.”\nThe ruling was issued by Circuit Court Judges Diarmuid O’Scannlain, Sidney Thomas and Richard Tallman.\nApple shares rallied 2.3% in Wednesday trading, hitting a new closing high of $175.08. That lifted the company’s market capitalization to $2.87 trillion.","kind":null,"is_publish_news":true,"is_publish_highlight":true,"is_publish_live":null,"is_publish_wemedia":null,"editions":null,"column":"","sentiment":"0","news_tag":"","news_rank":0,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":1},"commentList":[{"id":602406425,"gmtCreate":1639051672651,"gmtModify":1639051673429,"author":{"id":"3580242628963893","authorId":"3580242628963893","name":"JianWei666","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a3fc98405baafeb9f9f9f0e84775c542","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Qq","listText":"Qq","text":"Qq","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/602406425","repostId":1147616327,"repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1147616327","pubTimestamp":1639039969,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1147616327?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-09 16:52","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Wins a Round in Payments Fight With Epic Games","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1147616327","media":"Barrons","summary":"Apple notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge pan","content":"<p>Apple&nbsp;notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a stay, pending appeal, of a lower court’s order that would make it easier for software developers to route around Apple’s payment system for in-game purchases.</p>\n<p>The circuit-court decision on Wednesday specifically targets one element of a permanent injunction issued Sept. 10 by U.S. District Court Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Epic’s lawsuit against Apple over the way it operates the App Store. That provision barred Apple from stopping developers from including in their apps information on how to make purchases without buying via the app and therefore giving a cut to Apple.</p>\n<p>In the two-page decision, the circuit court found that Apple “has demonstrated, at minimum, that its appeal raises serious questions on the merits of the district court’s determination that Epic Games … failed to show Apple’s conduct violated any antitrust laws but did show that the same conduct violated California’s Unfair Competition Law.” The court pointed to another decision that found that such a finding was contradictory—that if you conclude that conduct is not an unreasonable restraint of trade, then you can’t also argue that it is unfair to consumers.</p>\n<p>The court also said Apple has “made a sufficient showing of irreparable harm,” and that the remaining factors weighed in favor of staying the provision of the lower-court injunction and maintaining the status quo pending appeal.</p>\n<p>Apple said it was pleased with the ruling. “Our concern is that these changes would have created new privacy and security risks, and disrupted the user experience customers love about the App Store,” it said in a statement. “We want to thank the court for granting this stay while the appeals process continues.”</p>\n<p>Evercore ISI analyst Amit Daryanani said in a research note that the latest ruling allows Apple to avoid a Thursday deadline for complying with the order.</p>\n<p>“Being granted a stay is a win for Apple, as the possibility of the company being forced to allow developers to include in-app links to other payment platforms has been pushed out,” the analyst wrote. “We would note, however, that the overall appeals process outcome remains uncertain.”</p>\n<p>The ruling was issued by Circuit Court Judges Diarmuid O’Scannlain, Sidney Thomas and Richard Tallman.</p>\n<p>Apple shares rallied 2.3% in Wednesday trading, hitting a new closing high of $175.08. That lifted the company’s market capitalization to $2.87 trillion.</p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Wins a Round in Payments Fight With Epic Games</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Wins a Round in Payments Fight With Epic Games\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-12-09 16:52 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-epic-games-in-app-payments-51639002173?mod=hp_LATEST><strong>Barrons</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Apple notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a stay, pending appeal, of a lower ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-epic-games-in-app-payments-51639002173?mod=hp_LATEST\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-epic-games-in-app-payments-51639002173?mod=hp_LATEST","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1147616327","content_text":"Apple notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a stay, pending appeal, of a lower court’s order that would make it easier for software developers to route around Apple’s payment system for in-game purchases.\nThe circuit-court decision on Wednesday specifically targets one element of a permanent injunction issued Sept. 10 by U.S. District Court Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Epic’s lawsuit against Apple over the way it operates the App Store. That provision barred Apple from stopping developers from including in their apps information on how to make purchases without buying via the app and therefore giving a cut to Apple.\nIn the two-page decision, the circuit court found that Apple “has demonstrated, at minimum, that its appeal raises serious questions on the merits of the district court’s determination that Epic Games … failed to show Apple’s conduct violated any antitrust laws but did show that the same conduct violated California’s Unfair Competition Law.” The court pointed to another decision that found that such a finding was contradictory—that if you conclude that conduct is not an unreasonable restraint of trade, then you can’t also argue that it is unfair to consumers.\nThe court also said Apple has “made a sufficient showing of irreparable harm,” and that the remaining factors weighed in favor of staying the provision of the lower-court injunction and maintaining the status quo pending appeal.\nApple said it was pleased with the ruling. “Our concern is that these changes would have created new privacy and security risks, and disrupted the user experience customers love about the App Store,” it said in a statement. “We want to thank the court for granting this stay while the appeals process continues.”\nEvercore ISI analyst Amit Daryanani said in a research note that the latest ruling allows Apple to avoid a Thursday deadline for complying with the order.\n“Being granted a stay is a win for Apple, as the possibility of the company being forced to allow developers to include in-app links to other payment platforms has been pushed out,” the analyst wrote. “We would note, however, that the overall appeals process outcome remains uncertain.”\nThe ruling was issued by Circuit Court Judges Diarmuid O’Scannlain, Sidney Thomas and Richard Tallman.\nApple shares rallied 2.3% in Wednesday trading, hitting a new closing high of $175.08. That lifted the company’s market capitalization to $2.87 trillion.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6913493,"gmtCreate":1639051679787,"gmtModify":1639051679874,"authorId":3580242628963893,"author":{"id":3580242628963893,"authorId":3580242628963893,"name":"JianWei666","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a3fc98405baafeb9f9f9f0e84775c542","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":602406425,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Ww","text":"Ww","html":"Ww"}],"langContent":"CN"},{"id":602529791,"gmtCreate":1639043983731,"gmtModify":1639043983731,"author":{"id":"4096632226898790","authorId":"4096632226898790","name":"Mumaizah","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8fc41803d23fefb5d61d62d2d8bfa544","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Great!","listText":"Great!","text":"Great!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/602529791","repostId":1147616327,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1147616327","pubTimestamp":1639039969,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1147616327?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-09 16:52","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Wins a Round in Payments Fight With Epic Games","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1147616327","media":"Barrons","summary":"Apple notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge pan","content":"<p>Apple&nbsp;notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a stay, pending appeal, of a lower court’s order that would make it easier for software developers to route around Apple’s payment system for in-game purchases.</p>\n<p>The circuit-court decision on Wednesday specifically targets one element of a permanent injunction issued Sept. 10 by U.S. District Court Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Epic’s lawsuit against Apple over the way it operates the App Store. That provision barred Apple from stopping developers from including in their apps information on how to make purchases without buying via the app and therefore giving a cut to Apple.</p>\n<p>In the two-page decision, the circuit court found that Apple “has demonstrated, at minimum, that its appeal raises serious questions on the merits of the district court’s determination that Epic Games … failed to show Apple’s conduct violated any antitrust laws but did show that the same conduct violated California’s Unfair Competition Law.” The court pointed to another decision that found that such a finding was contradictory—that if you conclude that conduct is not an unreasonable restraint of trade, then you can’t also argue that it is unfair to consumers.</p>\n<p>The court also said Apple has “made a sufficient showing of irreparable harm,” and that the remaining factors weighed in favor of staying the provision of the lower-court injunction and maintaining the status quo pending appeal.</p>\n<p>Apple said it was pleased with the ruling. “Our concern is that these changes would have created new privacy and security risks, and disrupted the user experience customers love about the App Store,” it said in a statement. “We want to thank the court for granting this stay while the appeals process continues.”</p>\n<p>Evercore ISI analyst Amit Daryanani said in a research note that the latest ruling allows Apple to avoid a Thursday deadline for complying with the order.</p>\n<p>“Being granted a stay is a win for Apple, as the possibility of the company being forced to allow developers to include in-app links to other payment platforms has been pushed out,” the analyst wrote. “We would note, however, that the overall appeals process outcome remains uncertain.”</p>\n<p>The ruling was issued by Circuit Court Judges Diarmuid O’Scannlain, Sidney Thomas and Richard Tallman.</p>\n<p>Apple shares rallied 2.3% in Wednesday trading, hitting a new closing high of $175.08. That lifted the company’s market capitalization to $2.87 trillion.</p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Wins a Round in Payments Fight With Epic Games</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Wins a Round in Payments Fight With Epic Games\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-12-09 16:52 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-epic-games-in-app-payments-51639002173?mod=hp_LATEST><strong>Barrons</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Apple notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a stay, pending appeal, of a lower ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-epic-games-in-app-payments-51639002173?mod=hp_LATEST\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-epic-games-in-app-payments-51639002173?mod=hp_LATEST","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1147616327","content_text":"Apple notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a stay, pending appeal, of a lower court’s order that would make it easier for software developers to route around Apple’s payment system for in-game purchases.\nThe circuit-court decision on Wednesday specifically targets one element of a permanent injunction issued Sept. 10 by U.S. District Court Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Epic’s lawsuit against Apple over the way it operates the App Store. That provision barred Apple from stopping developers from including in their apps information on how to make purchases without buying via the app and therefore giving a cut to Apple.\nIn the two-page decision, the circuit court found that Apple “has demonstrated, at minimum, that its appeal raises serious questions on the merits of the district court’s determination that Epic Games … failed to show Apple’s conduct violated any antitrust laws but did show that the same conduct violated California’s Unfair Competition Law.” The court pointed to another decision that found that such a finding was contradictory—that if you conclude that conduct is not an unreasonable restraint of trade, then you can’t also argue that it is unfair to consumers.\nThe court also said Apple has “made a sufficient showing of irreparable harm,” and that the remaining factors weighed in favor of staying the provision of the lower-court injunction and maintaining the status quo pending appeal.\nApple said it was pleased with the ruling. “Our concern is that these changes would have created new privacy and security risks, and disrupted the user experience customers love about the App Store,” it said in a statement. “We want to thank the court for granting this stay while the appeals process continues.”\nEvercore ISI analyst Amit Daryanani said in a research note that the latest ruling allows Apple to avoid a Thursday deadline for complying with the order.\n“Being granted a stay is a win for Apple, as the possibility of the company being forced to allow developers to include in-app links to other payment platforms has been pushed out,” the analyst wrote. “We would note, however, that the overall appeals process outcome remains uncertain.”\nThe ruling was issued by Circuit Court Judges Diarmuid O’Scannlain, Sidney Thomas and Richard Tallman.\nApple shares rallied 2.3% in Wednesday trading, hitting a new closing high of $175.08. That lifted the company’s market capitalization to $2.87 trillion.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"CN"},{"id":602563219,"gmtCreate":1639042624049,"gmtModify":1639042851125,"author":{"id":"4101341454314990","authorId":"4101341454314990","name":"edgarbun","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"👍","listText":"👍","text":"👍","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/602563219","repostId":1147616327,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1147616327","pubTimestamp":1639039969,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1147616327?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-09 16:52","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Wins a Round in Payments Fight With Epic Games","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1147616327","media":"Barrons","summary":"Apple notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge pan","content":"<p>Apple&nbsp;notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a stay, pending appeal, of a lower court’s order that would make it easier for software developers to route around Apple’s payment system for in-game purchases.</p>\n<p>The circuit-court decision on Wednesday specifically targets one element of a permanent injunction issued Sept. 10 by U.S. District Court Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Epic’s lawsuit against Apple over the way it operates the App Store. That provision barred Apple from stopping developers from including in their apps information on how to make purchases without buying via the app and therefore giving a cut to Apple.</p>\n<p>In the two-page decision, the circuit court found that Apple “has demonstrated, at minimum, that its appeal raises serious questions on the merits of the district court’s determination that Epic Games … failed to show Apple’s conduct violated any antitrust laws but did show that the same conduct violated California’s Unfair Competition Law.” The court pointed to another decision that found that such a finding was contradictory—that if you conclude that conduct is not an unreasonable restraint of trade, then you can’t also argue that it is unfair to consumers.</p>\n<p>The court also said Apple has “made a sufficient showing of irreparable harm,” and that the remaining factors weighed in favor of staying the provision of the lower-court injunction and maintaining the status quo pending appeal.</p>\n<p>Apple said it was pleased with the ruling. “Our concern is that these changes would have created new privacy and security risks, and disrupted the user experience customers love about the App Store,” it said in a statement. “We want to thank the court for granting this stay while the appeals process continues.”</p>\n<p>Evercore ISI analyst Amit Daryanani said in a research note that the latest ruling allows Apple to avoid a Thursday deadline for complying with the order.</p>\n<p>“Being granted a stay is a win for Apple, as the possibility of the company being forced to allow developers to include in-app links to other payment platforms has been pushed out,” the analyst wrote. “We would note, however, that the overall appeals process outcome remains uncertain.”</p>\n<p>The ruling was issued by Circuit Court Judges Diarmuid O’Scannlain, Sidney Thomas and Richard Tallman.</p>\n<p>Apple shares rallied 2.3% in Wednesday trading, hitting a new closing high of $175.08. That lifted the company’s market capitalization to $2.87 trillion.</p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Wins a Round in Payments Fight With Epic Games</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Wins a Round in Payments Fight With Epic Games\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-12-09 16:52 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-epic-games-in-app-payments-51639002173?mod=hp_LATEST><strong>Barrons</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Apple notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a stay, pending appeal, of a lower ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-epic-games-in-app-payments-51639002173?mod=hp_LATEST\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-epic-games-in-app-payments-51639002173?mod=hp_LATEST","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1147616327","content_text":"Apple notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a stay, pending appeal, of a lower court’s order that would make it easier for software developers to route around Apple’s payment system for in-game purchases.\nThe circuit-court decision on Wednesday specifically targets one element of a permanent injunction issued Sept. 10 by U.S. District Court Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Epic’s lawsuit against Apple over the way it operates the App Store. That provision barred Apple from stopping developers from including in their apps information on how to make purchases without buying via the app and therefore giving a cut to Apple.\nIn the two-page decision, the circuit court found that Apple “has demonstrated, at minimum, that its appeal raises serious questions on the merits of the district court’s determination that Epic Games … failed to show Apple’s conduct violated any antitrust laws but did show that the same conduct violated California’s Unfair Competition Law.” The court pointed to another decision that found that such a finding was contradictory—that if you conclude that conduct is not an unreasonable restraint of trade, then you can’t also argue that it is unfair to consumers.\nThe court also said Apple has “made a sufficient showing of irreparable harm,” and that the remaining factors weighed in favor of staying the provision of the lower-court injunction and maintaining the status quo pending appeal.\nApple said it was pleased with the ruling. “Our concern is that these changes would have created new privacy and security risks, and disrupted the user experience customers love about the App Store,” it said in a statement. “We want to thank the court for granting this stay while the appeals process continues.”\nEvercore ISI analyst Amit Daryanani said in a research note that the latest ruling allows Apple to avoid a Thursday deadline for complying with the order.\n“Being granted a stay is a win for Apple, as the possibility of the company being forced to allow developers to include in-app links to other payment platforms has been pushed out,” the analyst wrote. “We would note, however, that the overall appeals process outcome remains uncertain.”\nThe ruling was issued by Circuit Court Judges Diarmuid O’Scannlain, Sidney Thomas and Richard Tallman.\nApple shares rallied 2.3% in Wednesday trading, hitting a new closing high of $175.08. That lifted the company’s market capitalization to $2.87 trillion.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"CN"},{"id":602587873,"gmtCreate":1639042124348,"gmtModify":1639042125062,"author":{"id":"3581331938298103","authorId":"3581331938298103","name":"SandDust","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ea6083d742fc232449a625fb122842c8","vip":1,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"A bully the whole world.&nbsp;","listText":"A bully the whole world.&nbsp;","text":"A bully the whole world.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/602587873","repostId":1147616327,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1147616327","pubTimestamp":1639039969,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1147616327?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-09 16:52","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Wins a Round in Payments Fight With Epic Games","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1147616327","media":"Barrons","summary":"Apple notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge pan","content":"<p>Apple&nbsp;notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a stay, pending appeal, of a lower court’s order that would make it easier for software developers to route around Apple’s payment system for in-game purchases.</p>\n<p>The circuit-court decision on Wednesday specifically targets one element of a permanent injunction issued Sept. 10 by U.S. District Court Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Epic’s lawsuit against Apple over the way it operates the App Store. That provision barred Apple from stopping developers from including in their apps information on how to make purchases without buying via the app and therefore giving a cut to Apple.</p>\n<p>In the two-page decision, the circuit court found that Apple “has demonstrated, at minimum, that its appeal raises serious questions on the merits of the district court’s determination that Epic Games … failed to show Apple’s conduct violated any antitrust laws but did show that the same conduct violated California’s Unfair Competition Law.” The court pointed to another decision that found that such a finding was contradictory—that if you conclude that conduct is not an unreasonable restraint of trade, then you can’t also argue that it is unfair to consumers.</p>\n<p>The court also said Apple has “made a sufficient showing of irreparable harm,” and that the remaining factors weighed in favor of staying the provision of the lower-court injunction and maintaining the status quo pending appeal.</p>\n<p>Apple said it was pleased with the ruling. “Our concern is that these changes would have created new privacy and security risks, and disrupted the user experience customers love about the App Store,” it said in a statement. “We want to thank the court for granting this stay while the appeals process continues.”</p>\n<p>Evercore ISI analyst Amit Daryanani said in a research note that the latest ruling allows Apple to avoid a Thursday deadline for complying with the order.</p>\n<p>“Being granted a stay is a win for Apple, as the possibility of the company being forced to allow developers to include in-app links to other payment platforms has been pushed out,” the analyst wrote. “We would note, however, that the overall appeals process outcome remains uncertain.”</p>\n<p>The ruling was issued by Circuit Court Judges Diarmuid O’Scannlain, Sidney Thomas and Richard Tallman.</p>\n<p>Apple shares rallied 2.3% in Wednesday trading, hitting a new closing high of $175.08. That lifted the company’s market capitalization to $2.87 trillion.</p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Wins a Round in Payments Fight With Epic Games</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Wins a Round in Payments Fight With Epic Games\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-12-09 16:52 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-epic-games-in-app-payments-51639002173?mod=hp_LATEST><strong>Barrons</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Apple notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a stay, pending appeal, of a lower ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-epic-games-in-app-payments-51639002173?mod=hp_LATEST\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-epic-games-in-app-payments-51639002173?mod=hp_LATEST","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1147616327","content_text":"Apple notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a stay, pending appeal, of a lower court’s order that would make it easier for software developers to route around Apple’s payment system for in-game purchases.\nThe circuit-court decision on Wednesday specifically targets one element of a permanent injunction issued Sept. 10 by U.S. District Court Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Epic’s lawsuit against Apple over the way it operates the App Store. That provision barred Apple from stopping developers from including in their apps information on how to make purchases without buying via the app and therefore giving a cut to Apple.\nIn the two-page decision, the circuit court found that Apple “has demonstrated, at minimum, that its appeal raises serious questions on the merits of the district court’s determination that Epic Games … failed to show Apple’s conduct violated any antitrust laws but did show that the same conduct violated California’s Unfair Competition Law.” The court pointed to another decision that found that such a finding was contradictory—that if you conclude that conduct is not an unreasonable restraint of trade, then you can’t also argue that it is unfair to consumers.\nThe court also said Apple has “made a sufficient showing of irreparable harm,” and that the remaining factors weighed in favor of staying the provision of the lower-court injunction and maintaining the status quo pending appeal.\nApple said it was pleased with the ruling. “Our concern is that these changes would have created new privacy and security risks, and disrupted the user experience customers love about the App Store,” it said in a statement. “We want to thank the court for granting this stay while the appeals process continues.”\nEvercore ISI analyst Amit Daryanani said in a research note that the latest ruling allows Apple to avoid a Thursday deadline for complying with the order.\n“Being granted a stay is a win for Apple, as the possibility of the company being forced to allow developers to include in-app links to other payment platforms has been pushed out,” the analyst wrote. “We would note, however, that the overall appeals process outcome remains uncertain.”\nThe ruling was issued by Circuit Court Judges Diarmuid O’Scannlain, Sidney Thomas and Richard Tallman.\nApple shares rallied 2.3% in Wednesday trading, hitting a new closing high of $175.08. That lifted the company’s market capitalization to $2.87 trillion.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"CN"},{"id":602584461,"gmtCreate":1639042010898,"gmtModify":1639042011177,"author":{"id":"3577168442576973","authorId":"3577168442576973","name":"NeedMoneyPls","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ae9445a785e57d1d8607eb2ae0dde618","vip":1,"crmLevel":7,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Will never forgive Epic for destroying Unreal Tournament","listText":"Will never forgive Epic for destroying Unreal Tournament","text":"Will never forgive Epic for destroying Unreal Tournament","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/602584461","repostId":1147616327,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1147616327","pubTimestamp":1639039969,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1147616327?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-09 16:52","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Wins a Round in Payments Fight With Epic Games","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1147616327","media":"Barrons","summary":"Apple notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge pan","content":"<p>Apple&nbsp;notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a stay, pending appeal, of a lower court’s order that would make it easier for software developers to route around Apple’s payment system for in-game purchases.</p>\n<p>The circuit-court decision on Wednesday specifically targets one element of a permanent injunction issued Sept. 10 by U.S. District Court Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Epic’s lawsuit against Apple over the way it operates the App Store. That provision barred Apple from stopping developers from including in their apps information on how to make purchases without buying via the app and therefore giving a cut to Apple.</p>\n<p>In the two-page decision, the circuit court found that Apple “has demonstrated, at minimum, that its appeal raises serious questions on the merits of the district court’s determination that Epic Games … failed to show Apple’s conduct violated any antitrust laws but did show that the same conduct violated California’s Unfair Competition Law.” The court pointed to another decision that found that such a finding was contradictory—that if you conclude that conduct is not an unreasonable restraint of trade, then you can’t also argue that it is unfair to consumers.</p>\n<p>The court also said Apple has “made a sufficient showing of irreparable harm,” and that the remaining factors weighed in favor of staying the provision of the lower-court injunction and maintaining the status quo pending appeal.</p>\n<p>Apple said it was pleased with the ruling. “Our concern is that these changes would have created new privacy and security risks, and disrupted the user experience customers love about the App Store,” it said in a statement. “We want to thank the court for granting this stay while the appeals process continues.”</p>\n<p>Evercore ISI analyst Amit Daryanani said in a research note that the latest ruling allows Apple to avoid a Thursday deadline for complying with the order.</p>\n<p>“Being granted a stay is a win for Apple, as the possibility of the company being forced to allow developers to include in-app links to other payment platforms has been pushed out,” the analyst wrote. “We would note, however, that the overall appeals process outcome remains uncertain.”</p>\n<p>The ruling was issued by Circuit Court Judges Diarmuid O’Scannlain, Sidney Thomas and Richard Tallman.</p>\n<p>Apple shares rallied 2.3% in Wednesday trading, hitting a new closing high of $175.08. That lifted the company’s market capitalization to $2.87 trillion.</p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Wins a Round in Payments Fight With Epic Games</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Wins a Round in Payments Fight With Epic Games\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-12-09 16:52 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-epic-games-in-app-payments-51639002173?mod=hp_LATEST><strong>Barrons</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Apple notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a stay, pending appeal, of a lower ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-epic-games-in-app-payments-51639002173?mod=hp_LATEST\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-epic-games-in-app-payments-51639002173?mod=hp_LATEST","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1147616327","content_text":"Apple notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a stay, pending appeal, of a lower court’s order that would make it easier for software developers to route around Apple’s payment system for in-game purchases.\nThe circuit-court decision on Wednesday specifically targets one element of a permanent injunction issued Sept. 10 by U.S. District Court Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Epic’s lawsuit against Apple over the way it operates the App Store. That provision barred Apple from stopping developers from including in their apps information on how to make purchases without buying via the app and therefore giving a cut to Apple.\nIn the two-page decision, the circuit court found that Apple “has demonstrated, at minimum, that its appeal raises serious questions on the merits of the district court’s determination that Epic Games … failed to show Apple’s conduct violated any antitrust laws but did show that the same conduct violated California’s Unfair Competition Law.” The court pointed to another decision that found that such a finding was contradictory—that if you conclude that conduct is not an unreasonable restraint of trade, then you can’t also argue that it is unfair to consumers.\nThe court also said Apple has “made a sufficient showing of irreparable harm,” and that the remaining factors weighed in favor of staying the provision of the lower-court injunction and maintaining the status quo pending appeal.\nApple said it was pleased with the ruling. “Our concern is that these changes would have created new privacy and security risks, and disrupted the user experience customers love about the App Store,” it said in a statement. “We want to thank the court for granting this stay while the appeals process continues.”\nEvercore ISI analyst Amit Daryanani said in a research note that the latest ruling allows Apple to avoid a Thursday deadline for complying with the order.\n“Being granted a stay is a win for Apple, as the possibility of the company being forced to allow developers to include in-app links to other payment platforms has been pushed out,” the analyst wrote. “We would note, however, that the overall appeals process outcome remains uncertain.”\nThe ruling was issued by Circuit Court Judges Diarmuid O’Scannlain, Sidney Thomas and Richard Tallman.\nApple shares rallied 2.3% in Wednesday trading, hitting a new closing high of $175.08. That lifted the company’s market capitalization to $2.87 trillion.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"CN"},{"id":602582271,"gmtCreate":1639041778284,"gmtModify":1639042771890,"author":{"id":"3585489224255758","authorId":"3585489224255758","name":"GinOng","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/dbc4f4af938fe9cbc71173da2486f50b","vip":1,"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"&nbsp;State of Play of Intelligent Automation will add buzz to Apple","listText":"&nbsp;State of Play of Intelligent Automation will add buzz to Apple","text":"State of Play of Intelligent Automation will add buzz to Apple","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/602582271","repostId":1147616327,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1147616327","pubTimestamp":1639039969,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1147616327?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-09 16:52","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Wins a Round in Payments Fight With Epic Games","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1147616327","media":"Barrons","summary":"Apple notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge pan","content":"<p>Apple&nbsp;notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a stay, pending appeal, of a lower court’s order that would make it easier for software developers to route around Apple’s payment system for in-game purchases.</p>\n<p>The circuit-court decision on Wednesday specifically targets one element of a permanent injunction issued Sept. 10 by U.S. District Court Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Epic’s lawsuit against Apple over the way it operates the App Store. That provision barred Apple from stopping developers from including in their apps information on how to make purchases without buying via the app and therefore giving a cut to Apple.</p>\n<p>In the two-page decision, the circuit court found that Apple “has demonstrated, at minimum, that its appeal raises serious questions on the merits of the district court’s determination that Epic Games … failed to show Apple’s conduct violated any antitrust laws but did show that the same conduct violated California’s Unfair Competition Law.” The court pointed to another decision that found that such a finding was contradictory—that if you conclude that conduct is not an unreasonable restraint of trade, then you can’t also argue that it is unfair to consumers.</p>\n<p>The court also said Apple has “made a sufficient showing of irreparable harm,” and that the remaining factors weighed in favor of staying the provision of the lower-court injunction and maintaining the status quo pending appeal.</p>\n<p>Apple said it was pleased with the ruling. “Our concern is that these changes would have created new privacy and security risks, and disrupted the user experience customers love about the App Store,” it said in a statement. “We want to thank the court for granting this stay while the appeals process continues.”</p>\n<p>Evercore ISI analyst Amit Daryanani said in a research note that the latest ruling allows Apple to avoid a Thursday deadline for complying with the order.</p>\n<p>“Being granted a stay is a win for Apple, as the possibility of the company being forced to allow developers to include in-app links to other payment platforms has been pushed out,” the analyst wrote. “We would note, however, that the overall appeals process outcome remains uncertain.”</p>\n<p>The ruling was issued by Circuit Court Judges Diarmuid O’Scannlain, Sidney Thomas and Richard Tallman.</p>\n<p>Apple shares rallied 2.3% in Wednesday trading, hitting a new closing high of $175.08. That lifted the company’s market capitalization to $2.87 trillion.</p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Wins a Round in Payments Fight With Epic Games</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Wins a Round in Payments Fight With Epic Games\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-12-09 16:52 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-epic-games-in-app-payments-51639002173?mod=hp_LATEST><strong>Barrons</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Apple notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a stay, pending appeal, of a lower ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-epic-games-in-app-payments-51639002173?mod=hp_LATEST\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-epic-games-in-app-payments-51639002173?mod=hp_LATEST","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1147616327","content_text":"Apple notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a stay, pending appeal, of a lower court’s order that would make it easier for software developers to route around Apple’s payment system for in-game purchases.\nThe circuit-court decision on Wednesday specifically targets one element of a permanent injunction issued Sept. 10 by U.S. District Court Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Epic’s lawsuit against Apple over the way it operates the App Store. That provision barred Apple from stopping developers from including in their apps information on how to make purchases without buying via the app and therefore giving a cut to Apple.\nIn the two-page decision, the circuit court found that Apple “has demonstrated, at minimum, that its appeal raises serious questions on the merits of the district court’s determination that Epic Games … failed to show Apple’s conduct violated any antitrust laws but did show that the same conduct violated California’s Unfair Competition Law.” The court pointed to another decision that found that such a finding was contradictory—that if you conclude that conduct is not an unreasonable restraint of trade, then you can’t also argue that it is unfair to consumers.\nThe court also said Apple has “made a sufficient showing of irreparable harm,” and that the remaining factors weighed in favor of staying the provision of the lower-court injunction and maintaining the status quo pending appeal.\nApple said it was pleased with the ruling. “Our concern is that these changes would have created new privacy and security risks, and disrupted the user experience customers love about the App Store,” it said in a statement. “We want to thank the court for granting this stay while the appeals process continues.”\nEvercore ISI analyst Amit Daryanani said in a research note that the latest ruling allows Apple to avoid a Thursday deadline for complying with the order.\n“Being granted a stay is a win for Apple, as the possibility of the company being forced to allow developers to include in-app links to other payment platforms has been pushed out,” the analyst wrote. “We would note, however, that the overall appeals process outcome remains uncertain.”\nThe ruling was issued by Circuit Court Judges Diarmuid O’Scannlain, Sidney Thomas and Richard Tallman.\nApple shares rallied 2.3% in Wednesday trading, hitting a new closing high of $175.08. That lifted the company’s market capitalization to $2.87 trillion.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"CN"},{"id":602583185,"gmtCreate":1639041358457,"gmtModify":1639041390855,"author":{"id":"3557874766754501","authorId":"3557874766754501","name":"JustBUYonly","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fa6aa59a32ca636a6835e097038db26","vip":1,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/602583185","repostId":1147616327,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1147616327","pubTimestamp":1639039969,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1147616327?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-09 16:52","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Wins a Round in Payments Fight With Epic Games","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1147616327","media":"Barrons","summary":"Apple notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge pan","content":"<p>Apple&nbsp;notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a stay, pending appeal, of a lower court’s order that would make it easier for software developers to route around Apple’s payment system for in-game purchases.</p>\n<p>The circuit-court decision on Wednesday specifically targets one element of a permanent injunction issued Sept. 10 by U.S. District Court Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Epic’s lawsuit against Apple over the way it operates the App Store. That provision barred Apple from stopping developers from including in their apps information on how to make purchases without buying via the app and therefore giving a cut to Apple.</p>\n<p>In the two-page decision, the circuit court found that Apple “has demonstrated, at minimum, that its appeal raises serious questions on the merits of the district court’s determination that Epic Games … failed to show Apple’s conduct violated any antitrust laws but did show that the same conduct violated California’s Unfair Competition Law.” The court pointed to another decision that found that such a finding was contradictory—that if you conclude that conduct is not an unreasonable restraint of trade, then you can’t also argue that it is unfair to consumers.</p>\n<p>The court also said Apple has “made a sufficient showing of irreparable harm,” and that the remaining factors weighed in favor of staying the provision of the lower-court injunction and maintaining the status quo pending appeal.</p>\n<p>Apple said it was pleased with the ruling. “Our concern is that these changes would have created new privacy and security risks, and disrupted the user experience customers love about the App Store,” it said in a statement. “We want to thank the court for granting this stay while the appeals process continues.”</p>\n<p>Evercore ISI analyst Amit Daryanani said in a research note that the latest ruling allows Apple to avoid a Thursday deadline for complying with the order.</p>\n<p>“Being granted a stay is a win for Apple, as the possibility of the company being forced to allow developers to include in-app links to other payment platforms has been pushed out,” the analyst wrote. “We would note, however, that the overall appeals process outcome remains uncertain.”</p>\n<p>The ruling was issued by Circuit Court Judges Diarmuid O’Scannlain, Sidney Thomas and Richard Tallman.</p>\n<p>Apple shares rallied 2.3% in Wednesday trading, hitting a new closing high of $175.08. That lifted the company’s market capitalization to $2.87 trillion.</p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Wins a Round in Payments Fight With Epic Games</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Wins a Round in Payments Fight With Epic Games\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-12-09 16:52 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-epic-games-in-app-payments-51639002173?mod=hp_LATEST><strong>Barrons</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Apple notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a stay, pending appeal, of a lower ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-epic-games-in-app-payments-51639002173?mod=hp_LATEST\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-epic-games-in-app-payments-51639002173?mod=hp_LATEST","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1147616327","content_text":"Apple notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a stay, pending appeal, of a lower court’s order that would make it easier for software developers to route around Apple’s payment system for in-game purchases.\nThe circuit-court decision on Wednesday specifically targets one element of a permanent injunction issued Sept. 10 by U.S. District Court Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Epic’s lawsuit against Apple over the way it operates the App Store. That provision barred Apple from stopping developers from including in their apps information on how to make purchases without buying via the app and therefore giving a cut to Apple.\nIn the two-page decision, the circuit court found that Apple “has demonstrated, at minimum, that its appeal raises serious questions on the merits of the district court’s determination that Epic Games … failed to show Apple’s conduct violated any antitrust laws but did show that the same conduct violated California’s Unfair Competition Law.” The court pointed to another decision that found that such a finding was contradictory—that if you conclude that conduct is not an unreasonable restraint of trade, then you can’t also argue that it is unfair to consumers.\nThe court also said Apple has “made a sufficient showing of irreparable harm,” and that the remaining factors weighed in favor of staying the provision of the lower-court injunction and maintaining the status quo pending appeal.\nApple said it was pleased with the ruling. “Our concern is that these changes would have created new privacy and security risks, and disrupted the user experience customers love about the App Store,” it said in a statement. “We want to thank the court for granting this stay while the appeals process continues.”\nEvercore ISI analyst Amit Daryanani said in a research note that the latest ruling allows Apple to avoid a Thursday deadline for complying with the order.\n“Being granted a stay is a win for Apple, as the possibility of the company being forced to allow developers to include in-app links to other payment platforms has been pushed out,” the analyst wrote. “We would note, however, that the overall appeals process outcome remains uncertain.”\nThe ruling was issued by Circuit Court Judges Diarmuid O’Scannlain, Sidney Thomas and Richard Tallman.\nApple shares rallied 2.3% in Wednesday trading, hitting a new closing high of $175.08. That lifted the company’s market capitalization to $2.87 trillion.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6912058,"gmtCreate":1639041767340,"gmtModify":1639042021894,"authorId":3585489224255758,"author":{"id":3585489224255758,"authorId":3585489224255758,"name":"GinOng","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/dbc4f4af938fe9cbc71173da2486f50b","vip":1,"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":602583185,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":" State of Play of Intelligent Automation will add buzz to Apple","text":" State of Play of Intelligent Automation will add buzz to Apple","html":" State of Play of Intelligent Automation will add buzz to Apple"}],"langContent":"CN"},{"id":602580510,"gmtCreate":1639041192359,"gmtModify":1639041192616,"author":{"id":"3573107359557183","authorId":"3573107359557183","name":"3a4ebe3e","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/602580510","repostId":1147616327,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1147616327","pubTimestamp":1639039969,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1147616327?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-09 16:52","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Wins a Round in Payments Fight With Epic Games","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1147616327","media":"Barrons","summary":"Apple notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge pan","content":"<p>Apple&nbsp;notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a stay, pending appeal, of a lower court’s order that would make it easier for software developers to route around Apple’s payment system for in-game purchases.</p>\n<p>The circuit-court decision on Wednesday specifically targets one element of a permanent injunction issued Sept. 10 by U.S. District Court Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Epic’s lawsuit against Apple over the way it operates the App Store. That provision barred Apple from stopping developers from including in their apps information on how to make purchases without buying via the app and therefore giving a cut to Apple.</p>\n<p>In the two-page decision, the circuit court found that Apple “has demonstrated, at minimum, that its appeal raises serious questions on the merits of the district court’s determination that Epic Games … failed to show Apple’s conduct violated any antitrust laws but did show that the same conduct violated California’s Unfair Competition Law.” The court pointed to another decision that found that such a finding was contradictory—that if you conclude that conduct is not an unreasonable restraint of trade, then you can’t also argue that it is unfair to consumers.</p>\n<p>The court also said Apple has “made a sufficient showing of irreparable harm,” and that the remaining factors weighed in favor of staying the provision of the lower-court injunction and maintaining the status quo pending appeal.</p>\n<p>Apple said it was pleased with the ruling. “Our concern is that these changes would have created new privacy and security risks, and disrupted the user experience customers love about the App Store,” it said in a statement. “We want to thank the court for granting this stay while the appeals process continues.”</p>\n<p>Evercore ISI analyst Amit Daryanani said in a research note that the latest ruling allows Apple to avoid a Thursday deadline for complying with the order.</p>\n<p>“Being granted a stay is a win for Apple, as the possibility of the company being forced to allow developers to include in-app links to other payment platforms has been pushed out,” the analyst wrote. “We would note, however, that the overall appeals process outcome remains uncertain.”</p>\n<p>The ruling was issued by Circuit Court Judges Diarmuid O’Scannlain, Sidney Thomas and Richard Tallman.</p>\n<p>Apple shares rallied 2.3% in Wednesday trading, hitting a new closing high of $175.08. That lifted the company’s market capitalization to $2.87 trillion.</p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Wins a Round in Payments Fight With Epic Games</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Wins a Round in Payments Fight With Epic Games\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-12-09 16:52 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-epic-games-in-app-payments-51639002173?mod=hp_LATEST><strong>Barrons</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Apple notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a stay, pending appeal, of a lower ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-epic-games-in-app-payments-51639002173?mod=hp_LATEST\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-epic-games-in-app-payments-51639002173?mod=hp_LATEST","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1147616327","content_text":"Apple notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a stay, pending appeal, of a lower court’s order that would make it easier for software developers to route around Apple’s payment system for in-game purchases.\nThe circuit-court decision on Wednesday specifically targets one element of a permanent injunction issued Sept. 10 by U.S. District Court Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Epic’s lawsuit against Apple over the way it operates the App Store. That provision barred Apple from stopping developers from including in their apps information on how to make purchases without buying via the app and therefore giving a cut to Apple.\nIn the two-page decision, the circuit court found that Apple “has demonstrated, at minimum, that its appeal raises serious questions on the merits of the district court’s determination that Epic Games … failed to show Apple’s conduct violated any antitrust laws but did show that the same conduct violated California’s Unfair Competition Law.” The court pointed to another decision that found that such a finding was contradictory—that if you conclude that conduct is not an unreasonable restraint of trade, then you can’t also argue that it is unfair to consumers.\nThe court also said Apple has “made a sufficient showing of irreparable harm,” and that the remaining factors weighed in favor of staying the provision of the lower-court injunction and maintaining the status quo pending appeal.\nApple said it was pleased with the ruling. “Our concern is that these changes would have created new privacy and security risks, and disrupted the user experience customers love about the App Store,” it said in a statement. “We want to thank the court for granting this stay while the appeals process continues.”\nEvercore ISI analyst Amit Daryanani said in a research note that the latest ruling allows Apple to avoid a Thursday deadline for complying with the order.\n“Being granted a stay is a win for Apple, as the possibility of the company being forced to allow developers to include in-app links to other payment platforms has been pushed out,” the analyst wrote. “We would note, however, that the overall appeals process outcome remains uncertain.”\nThe ruling was issued by Circuit Court Judges Diarmuid O’Scannlain, Sidney Thomas and Richard Tallman.\nApple shares rallied 2.3% in Wednesday trading, hitting a new closing high of $175.08. That lifted the company’s market capitalization to $2.87 trillion.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"CN"},{"id":602580652,"gmtCreate":1639041179752,"gmtModify":1639041179977,"author":{"id":"3583746142103127","authorId":"3583746142103127","name":"Aloylim1117","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2b86fb55c253b95f20be8dace236d390","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"F","listText":"F","text":"F","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/602580652","repostId":1147616327,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1147616327","pubTimestamp":1639039969,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1147616327?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-09 16:52","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Wins a Round in Payments Fight With Epic Games","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1147616327","media":"Barrons","summary":"Apple notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge pan","content":"<p>Apple&nbsp;notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a stay, pending appeal, of a lower court’s order that would make it easier for software developers to route around Apple’s payment system for in-game purchases.</p>\n<p>The circuit-court decision on Wednesday specifically targets one element of a permanent injunction issued Sept. 10 by U.S. District Court Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Epic’s lawsuit against Apple over the way it operates the App Store. That provision barred Apple from stopping developers from including in their apps information on how to make purchases without buying via the app and therefore giving a cut to Apple.</p>\n<p>In the two-page decision, the circuit court found that Apple “has demonstrated, at minimum, that its appeal raises serious questions on the merits of the district court’s determination that Epic Games … failed to show Apple’s conduct violated any antitrust laws but did show that the same conduct violated California’s Unfair Competition Law.” The court pointed to another decision that found that such a finding was contradictory—that if you conclude that conduct is not an unreasonable restraint of trade, then you can’t also argue that it is unfair to consumers.</p>\n<p>The court also said Apple has “made a sufficient showing of irreparable harm,” and that the remaining factors weighed in favor of staying the provision of the lower-court injunction and maintaining the status quo pending appeal.</p>\n<p>Apple said it was pleased with the ruling. “Our concern is that these changes would have created new privacy and security risks, and disrupted the user experience customers love about the App Store,” it said in a statement. “We want to thank the court for granting this stay while the appeals process continues.”</p>\n<p>Evercore ISI analyst Amit Daryanani said in a research note that the latest ruling allows Apple to avoid a Thursday deadline for complying with the order.</p>\n<p>“Being granted a stay is a win for Apple, as the possibility of the company being forced to allow developers to include in-app links to other payment platforms has been pushed out,” the analyst wrote. “We would note, however, that the overall appeals process outcome remains uncertain.”</p>\n<p>The ruling was issued by Circuit Court Judges Diarmuid O’Scannlain, Sidney Thomas and Richard Tallman.</p>\n<p>Apple shares rallied 2.3% in Wednesday trading, hitting a new closing high of $175.08. That lifted the company’s market capitalization to $2.87 trillion.</p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Wins a Round in Payments Fight With Epic Games</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Wins a Round in Payments Fight With Epic Games\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-12-09 16:52 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-epic-games-in-app-payments-51639002173?mod=hp_LATEST><strong>Barrons</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Apple notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a stay, pending appeal, of a lower ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-epic-games-in-app-payments-51639002173?mod=hp_LATEST\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-epic-games-in-app-payments-51639002173?mod=hp_LATEST","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1147616327","content_text":"Apple notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a stay, pending appeal, of a lower court’s order that would make it easier for software developers to route around Apple’s payment system for in-game purchases.\nThe circuit-court decision on Wednesday specifically targets one element of a permanent injunction issued Sept. 10 by U.S. District Court Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Epic’s lawsuit against Apple over the way it operates the App Store. That provision barred Apple from stopping developers from including in their apps information on how to make purchases without buying via the app and therefore giving a cut to Apple.\nIn the two-page decision, the circuit court found that Apple “has demonstrated, at minimum, that its appeal raises serious questions on the merits of the district court’s determination that Epic Games … failed to show Apple’s conduct violated any antitrust laws but did show that the same conduct violated California’s Unfair Competition Law.” The court pointed to another decision that found that such a finding was contradictory—that if you conclude that conduct is not an unreasonable restraint of trade, then you can’t also argue that it is unfair to consumers.\nThe court also said Apple has “made a sufficient showing of irreparable harm,” and that the remaining factors weighed in favor of staying the provision of the lower-court injunction and maintaining the status quo pending appeal.\nApple said it was pleased with the ruling. “Our concern is that these changes would have created new privacy and security risks, and disrupted the user experience customers love about the App Store,” it said in a statement. “We want to thank the court for granting this stay while the appeals process continues.”\nEvercore ISI analyst Amit Daryanani said in a research note that the latest ruling allows Apple to avoid a Thursday deadline for complying with the order.\n“Being granted a stay is a win for Apple, as the possibility of the company being forced to allow developers to include in-app links to other payment platforms has been pushed out,” the analyst wrote. “We would note, however, that the overall appeals process outcome remains uncertain.”\nThe ruling was issued by Circuit Court Judges Diarmuid O’Scannlain, Sidney Thomas and Richard Tallman.\nApple shares rallied 2.3% in Wednesday trading, hitting a new closing high of $175.08. That lifted the company’s market capitalization to $2.87 trillion.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"CN"},{"id":602580995,"gmtCreate":1639041149168,"gmtModify":1639041149284,"author":{"id":"4088111569952180","authorId":"4088111569952180","name":"Pita2","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Nice","listText":"Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/602580995","repostId":1147616327,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1147616327","pubTimestamp":1639039969,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1147616327?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-09 16:52","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Wins a Round in Payments Fight With Epic Games","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1147616327","media":"Barrons","summary":"Apple notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge pan","content":"<p>Apple&nbsp;notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a stay, pending appeal, of a lower court’s order that would make it easier for software developers to route around Apple’s payment system for in-game purchases.</p>\n<p>The circuit-court decision on Wednesday specifically targets one element of a permanent injunction issued Sept. 10 by U.S. District Court Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Epic’s lawsuit against Apple over the way it operates the App Store. That provision barred Apple from stopping developers from including in their apps information on how to make purchases without buying via the app and therefore giving a cut to Apple.</p>\n<p>In the two-page decision, the circuit court found that Apple “has demonstrated, at minimum, that its appeal raises serious questions on the merits of the district court’s determination that Epic Games … failed to show Apple’s conduct violated any antitrust laws but did show that the same conduct violated California’s Unfair Competition Law.” The court pointed to another decision that found that such a finding was contradictory—that if you conclude that conduct is not an unreasonable restraint of trade, then you can’t also argue that it is unfair to consumers.</p>\n<p>The court also said Apple has “made a sufficient showing of irreparable harm,” and that the remaining factors weighed in favor of staying the provision of the lower-court injunction and maintaining the status quo pending appeal.</p>\n<p>Apple said it was pleased with the ruling. “Our concern is that these changes would have created new privacy and security risks, and disrupted the user experience customers love about the App Store,” it said in a statement. “We want to thank the court for granting this stay while the appeals process continues.”</p>\n<p>Evercore ISI analyst Amit Daryanani said in a research note that the latest ruling allows Apple to avoid a Thursday deadline for complying with the order.</p>\n<p>“Being granted a stay is a win for Apple, as the possibility of the company being forced to allow developers to include in-app links to other payment platforms has been pushed out,” the analyst wrote. “We would note, however, that the overall appeals process outcome remains uncertain.”</p>\n<p>The ruling was issued by Circuit Court Judges Diarmuid O’Scannlain, Sidney Thomas and Richard Tallman.</p>\n<p>Apple shares rallied 2.3% in Wednesday trading, hitting a new closing high of $175.08. That lifted the company’s market capitalization to $2.87 trillion.</p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Wins a Round in Payments Fight With Epic Games</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Wins a Round in Payments Fight With Epic Games\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-12-09 16:52 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-epic-games-in-app-payments-51639002173?mod=hp_LATEST><strong>Barrons</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Apple notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a stay, pending appeal, of a lower ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-epic-games-in-app-payments-51639002173?mod=hp_LATEST\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-epic-games-in-app-payments-51639002173?mod=hp_LATEST","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1147616327","content_text":"Apple notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a stay, pending appeal, of a lower court’s order that would make it easier for software developers to route around Apple’s payment system for in-game purchases.\nThe circuit-court decision on Wednesday specifically targets one element of a permanent injunction issued Sept. 10 by U.S. District Court Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Epic’s lawsuit against Apple over the way it operates the App Store. That provision barred Apple from stopping developers from including in their apps information on how to make purchases without buying via the app and therefore giving a cut to Apple.\nIn the two-page decision, the circuit court found that Apple “has demonstrated, at minimum, that its appeal raises serious questions on the merits of the district court’s determination that Epic Games … failed to show Apple’s conduct violated any antitrust laws but did show that the same conduct violated California’s Unfair Competition Law.” The court pointed to another decision that found that such a finding was contradictory—that if you conclude that conduct is not an unreasonable restraint of trade, then you can’t also argue that it is unfair to consumers.\nThe court also said Apple has “made a sufficient showing of irreparable harm,” and that the remaining factors weighed in favor of staying the provision of the lower-court injunction and maintaining the status quo pending appeal.\nApple said it was pleased with the ruling. “Our concern is that these changes would have created new privacy and security risks, and disrupted the user experience customers love about the App Store,” it said in a statement. “We want to thank the court for granting this stay while the appeals process continues.”\nEvercore ISI analyst Amit Daryanani said in a research note that the latest ruling allows Apple to avoid a Thursday deadline for complying with the order.\n“Being granted a stay is a win for Apple, as the possibility of the company being forced to allow developers to include in-app links to other payment platforms has been pushed out,” the analyst wrote. “We would note, however, that the overall appeals process outcome remains uncertain.”\nThe ruling was issued by Circuit Court Judges Diarmuid O’Scannlain, Sidney Thomas and Richard Tallman.\nApple shares rallied 2.3% in Wednesday trading, hitting a new closing high of $175.08. That lifted the company’s market capitalization to $2.87 trillion.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"CN"},{"id":602514632,"gmtCreate":1639040890688,"gmtModify":1639040896608,"author":{"id":"3578105588635717","authorId":"3578105588635717","name":"Jliang","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Please like","listText":"Please like","text":"Please like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/602514632","repostId":1147616327,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1147616327","pubTimestamp":1639039969,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1147616327?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-09 16:52","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Wins a Round in Payments Fight With Epic Games","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1147616327","media":"Barrons","summary":"Apple notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge pan","content":"<p>Apple&nbsp;notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a stay, pending appeal, of a lower court’s order that would make it easier for software developers to route around Apple’s payment system for in-game purchases.</p>\n<p>The circuit-court decision on Wednesday specifically targets one element of a permanent injunction issued Sept. 10 by U.S. District Court Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Epic’s lawsuit against Apple over the way it operates the App Store. That provision barred Apple from stopping developers from including in their apps information on how to make purchases without buying via the app and therefore giving a cut to Apple.</p>\n<p>In the two-page decision, the circuit court found that Apple “has demonstrated, at minimum, that its appeal raises serious questions on the merits of the district court’s determination that Epic Games … failed to show Apple’s conduct violated any antitrust laws but did show that the same conduct violated California’s Unfair Competition Law.” The court pointed to another decision that found that such a finding was contradictory—that if you conclude that conduct is not an unreasonable restraint of trade, then you can’t also argue that it is unfair to consumers.</p>\n<p>The court also said Apple has “made a sufficient showing of irreparable harm,” and that the remaining factors weighed in favor of staying the provision of the lower-court injunction and maintaining the status quo pending appeal.</p>\n<p>Apple said it was pleased with the ruling. “Our concern is that these changes would have created new privacy and security risks, and disrupted the user experience customers love about the App Store,” it said in a statement. “We want to thank the court for granting this stay while the appeals process continues.”</p>\n<p>Evercore ISI analyst Amit Daryanani said in a research note that the latest ruling allows Apple to avoid a Thursday deadline for complying with the order.</p>\n<p>“Being granted a stay is a win for Apple, as the possibility of the company being forced to allow developers to include in-app links to other payment platforms has been pushed out,” the analyst wrote. “We would note, however, that the overall appeals process outcome remains uncertain.”</p>\n<p>The ruling was issued by Circuit Court Judges Diarmuid O’Scannlain, Sidney Thomas and Richard Tallman.</p>\n<p>Apple shares rallied 2.3% in Wednesday trading, hitting a new closing high of $175.08. That lifted the company’s market capitalization to $2.87 trillion.</p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Wins a Round in Payments Fight With Epic Games</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Wins a Round in Payments Fight With Epic Games\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-12-09 16:52 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-epic-games-in-app-payments-51639002173?mod=hp_LATEST><strong>Barrons</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Apple notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a stay, pending appeal, of a lower ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-epic-games-in-app-payments-51639002173?mod=hp_LATEST\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-epic-games-in-app-payments-51639002173?mod=hp_LATEST","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1147616327","content_text":"Apple notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a stay, pending appeal, of a lower court’s order that would make it easier for software developers to route around Apple’s payment system for in-game purchases.\nThe circuit-court decision on Wednesday specifically targets one element of a permanent injunction issued Sept. 10 by U.S. District Court Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Epic’s lawsuit against Apple over the way it operates the App Store. That provision barred Apple from stopping developers from including in their apps information on how to make purchases without buying via the app and therefore giving a cut to Apple.\nIn the two-page decision, the circuit court found that Apple “has demonstrated, at minimum, that its appeal raises serious questions on the merits of the district court’s determination that Epic Games … failed to show Apple’s conduct violated any antitrust laws but did show that the same conduct violated California’s Unfair Competition Law.” The court pointed to another decision that found that such a finding was contradictory—that if you conclude that conduct is not an unreasonable restraint of trade, then you can’t also argue that it is unfair to consumers.\nThe court also said Apple has “made a sufficient showing of irreparable harm,” and that the remaining factors weighed in favor of staying the provision of the lower-court injunction and maintaining the status quo pending appeal.\nApple said it was pleased with the ruling. “Our concern is that these changes would have created new privacy and security risks, and disrupted the user experience customers love about the App Store,” it said in a statement. “We want to thank the court for granting this stay while the appeals process continues.”\nEvercore ISI analyst Amit Daryanani said in a research note that the latest ruling allows Apple to avoid a Thursday deadline for complying with the order.\n“Being granted a stay is a win for Apple, as the possibility of the company being forced to allow developers to include in-app links to other payment platforms has been pushed out,” the analyst wrote. “We would note, however, that the overall appeals process outcome remains uncertain.”\nThe ruling was issued by Circuit Court Judges Diarmuid O’Scannlain, Sidney Thomas and Richard Tallman.\nApple shares rallied 2.3% in Wednesday trading, hitting a new closing high of $175.08. That lifted the company’s market capitalization to $2.87 trillion.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6911989,"gmtCreate":1639041196764,"gmtModify":1639041196796,"authorId":3573107359557183,"author":{"id":3573107359557183,"authorId":3573107359557183,"name":"3a4ebe3e","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":602514632,"type":1,"supId":6911988,"prevId":0,"content":"<u>ok</u>","text":"<u>ok</u>","html":"<u>ok</u>"},{"id":6911988,"gmtCreate":1639041189258,"gmtModify":1639041189294,"authorId":3583746142103127,"author":{"id":3583746142103127,"authorId":3583746142103127,"name":"Aloylim1117","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2b86fb55c253b95f20be8dace236d390","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":602514632,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Ok","text":"Ok","html":"Ok"}],"langContent":"CN"},{"id":602512875,"gmtCreate":1639040751033,"gmtModify":1639040751484,"author":{"id":"3585125163446793","authorId":"3585125163446793","name":"RobinChanKH","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bf0ba843eca17a8812677bc4f2a46162","vip":1,"crmLevel":7,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Huat ah","listText":"Huat ah","text":"Huat ah","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/602512875","repostId":1147616327,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1147616327","pubTimestamp":1639039969,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1147616327?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-09 16:52","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Wins a Round in Payments Fight With Epic Games","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1147616327","media":"Barrons","summary":"Apple notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge pan","content":"<p>Apple&nbsp;notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a stay, pending appeal, of a lower court’s order that would make it easier for software developers to route around Apple’s payment system for in-game purchases.</p>\n<p>The circuit-court decision on Wednesday specifically targets one element of a permanent injunction issued Sept. 10 by U.S. District Court Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Epic’s lawsuit against Apple over the way it operates the App Store. That provision barred Apple from stopping developers from including in their apps information on how to make purchases without buying via the app and therefore giving a cut to Apple.</p>\n<p>In the two-page decision, the circuit court found that Apple “has demonstrated, at minimum, that its appeal raises serious questions on the merits of the district court’s determination that Epic Games … failed to show Apple’s conduct violated any antitrust laws but did show that the same conduct violated California’s Unfair Competition Law.” The court pointed to another decision that found that such a finding was contradictory—that if you conclude that conduct is not an unreasonable restraint of trade, then you can’t also argue that it is unfair to consumers.</p>\n<p>The court also said Apple has “made a sufficient showing of irreparable harm,” and that the remaining factors weighed in favor of staying the provision of the lower-court injunction and maintaining the status quo pending appeal.</p>\n<p>Apple said it was pleased with the ruling. “Our concern is that these changes would have created new privacy and security risks, and disrupted the user experience customers love about the App Store,” it said in a statement. “We want to thank the court for granting this stay while the appeals process continues.”</p>\n<p>Evercore ISI analyst Amit Daryanani said in a research note that the latest ruling allows Apple to avoid a Thursday deadline for complying with the order.</p>\n<p>“Being granted a stay is a win for Apple, as the possibility of the company being forced to allow developers to include in-app links to other payment platforms has been pushed out,” the analyst wrote. “We would note, however, that the overall appeals process outcome remains uncertain.”</p>\n<p>The ruling was issued by Circuit Court Judges Diarmuid O’Scannlain, Sidney Thomas and Richard Tallman.</p>\n<p>Apple shares rallied 2.3% in Wednesday trading, hitting a new closing high of $175.08. That lifted the company’s market capitalization to $2.87 trillion.</p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Wins a Round in Payments Fight With Epic Games</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Wins a Round in Payments Fight With Epic Games\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-12-09 16:52 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-epic-games-in-app-payments-51639002173?mod=hp_LATEST><strong>Barrons</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Apple notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a stay, pending appeal, of a lower ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-epic-games-in-app-payments-51639002173?mod=hp_LATEST\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-epic-games-in-app-payments-51639002173?mod=hp_LATEST","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1147616327","content_text":"Apple notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a stay, pending appeal, of a lower court’s order that would make it easier for software developers to route around Apple’s payment system for in-game purchases.\nThe circuit-court decision on Wednesday specifically targets one element of a permanent injunction issued Sept. 10 by U.S. District Court Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Epic’s lawsuit against Apple over the way it operates the App Store. That provision barred Apple from stopping developers from including in their apps information on how to make purchases without buying via the app and therefore giving a cut to Apple.\nIn the two-page decision, the circuit court found that Apple “has demonstrated, at minimum, that its appeal raises serious questions on the merits of the district court’s determination that Epic Games … failed to show Apple’s conduct violated any antitrust laws but did show that the same conduct violated California’s Unfair Competition Law.” The court pointed to another decision that found that such a finding was contradictory—that if you conclude that conduct is not an unreasonable restraint of trade, then you can’t also argue that it is unfair to consumers.\nThe court also said Apple has “made a sufficient showing of irreparable harm,” and that the remaining factors weighed in favor of staying the provision of the lower-court injunction and maintaining the status quo pending appeal.\nApple said it was pleased with the ruling. “Our concern is that these changes would have created new privacy and security risks, and disrupted the user experience customers love about the App Store,” it said in a statement. “We want to thank the court for granting this stay while the appeals process continues.”\nEvercore ISI analyst Amit Daryanani said in a research note that the latest ruling allows Apple to avoid a Thursday deadline for complying with the order.\n“Being granted a stay is a win for Apple, as the possibility of the company being forced to allow developers to include in-app links to other payment platforms has been pushed out,” the analyst wrote. “We would note, however, that the overall appeals process outcome remains uncertain.”\nThe ruling was issued by Circuit Court Judges Diarmuid O’Scannlain, Sidney Thomas and Richard Tallman.\nApple shares rallied 2.3% in Wednesday trading, hitting a new closing high of $175.08. That lifted the company’s market capitalization to $2.87 trillion.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6911895,"gmtCreate":1639040761500,"gmtModify":1639040761534,"authorId":3576232257279797,"author":{"id":3576232257279797,"authorId":3576232257279797,"name":"dandan_4896","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d8b00e27a4dd6f248e38c3d78f21f188","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":602512875,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"bj","text":"bj","html":"bj"}],"langContent":"CN"},{"id":602518204,"gmtCreate":1639040599225,"gmtModify":1639040599779,"author":{"id":"3580340700781087","authorId":"3580340700781087","name":"jazzspeed","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/67a9d1e66d305054bd7cfb57902f8d5c","vip":1,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"huat ahhhhhhhhhhhh&nbsp;","listText":"huat ahhhhhhhhhhhh&nbsp;","text":"huat ahhhhhhhhhhhh","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/602518204","repostId":1147616327,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1147616327","pubTimestamp":1639039969,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1147616327?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-09 16:52","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Wins a Round in Payments Fight With Epic Games","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1147616327","media":"Barrons","summary":"Apple notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge pan","content":"<p>Apple&nbsp;notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a stay, pending appeal, of a lower court’s order that would make it easier for software developers to route around Apple’s payment system for in-game purchases.</p>\n<p>The circuit-court decision on Wednesday specifically targets one element of a permanent injunction issued Sept. 10 by U.S. District Court Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Epic’s lawsuit against Apple over the way it operates the App Store. That provision barred Apple from stopping developers from including in their apps information on how to make purchases without buying via the app and therefore giving a cut to Apple.</p>\n<p>In the two-page decision, the circuit court found that Apple “has demonstrated, at minimum, that its appeal raises serious questions on the merits of the district court’s determination that Epic Games … failed to show Apple’s conduct violated any antitrust laws but did show that the same conduct violated California’s Unfair Competition Law.” The court pointed to another decision that found that such a finding was contradictory—that if you conclude that conduct is not an unreasonable restraint of trade, then you can’t also argue that it is unfair to consumers.</p>\n<p>The court also said Apple has “made a sufficient showing of irreparable harm,” and that the remaining factors weighed in favor of staying the provision of the lower-court injunction and maintaining the status quo pending appeal.</p>\n<p>Apple said it was pleased with the ruling. “Our concern is that these changes would have created new privacy and security risks, and disrupted the user experience customers love about the App Store,” it said in a statement. “We want to thank the court for granting this stay while the appeals process continues.”</p>\n<p>Evercore ISI analyst Amit Daryanani said in a research note that the latest ruling allows Apple to avoid a Thursday deadline for complying with the order.</p>\n<p>“Being granted a stay is a win for Apple, as the possibility of the company being forced to allow developers to include in-app links to other payment platforms has been pushed out,” the analyst wrote. “We would note, however, that the overall appeals process outcome remains uncertain.”</p>\n<p>The ruling was issued by Circuit Court Judges Diarmuid O’Scannlain, Sidney Thomas and Richard Tallman.</p>\n<p>Apple shares rallied 2.3% in Wednesday trading, hitting a new closing high of $175.08. That lifted the company’s market capitalization to $2.87 trillion.</p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Wins a Round in Payments Fight With Epic Games</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Wins a Round in Payments Fight With Epic Games\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-12-09 16:52 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-epic-games-in-app-payments-51639002173?mod=hp_LATEST><strong>Barrons</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Apple notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a stay, pending appeal, of a lower ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-epic-games-in-app-payments-51639002173?mod=hp_LATEST\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-epic-games-in-app-payments-51639002173?mod=hp_LATEST","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1147616327","content_text":"Apple notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a stay, pending appeal, of a lower court’s order that would make it easier for software developers to route around Apple’s payment system for in-game purchases.\nThe circuit-court decision on Wednesday specifically targets one element of a permanent injunction issued Sept. 10 by U.S. District Court Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Epic’s lawsuit against Apple over the way it operates the App Store. That provision barred Apple from stopping developers from including in their apps information on how to make purchases without buying via the app and therefore giving a cut to Apple.\nIn the two-page decision, the circuit court found that Apple “has demonstrated, at minimum, that its appeal raises serious questions on the merits of the district court’s determination that Epic Games … failed to show Apple’s conduct violated any antitrust laws but did show that the same conduct violated California’s Unfair Competition Law.” The court pointed to another decision that found that such a finding was contradictory—that if you conclude that conduct is not an unreasonable restraint of trade, then you can’t also argue that it is unfair to consumers.\nThe court also said Apple has “made a sufficient showing of irreparable harm,” and that the remaining factors weighed in favor of staying the provision of the lower-court injunction and maintaining the status quo pending appeal.\nApple said it was pleased with the ruling. “Our concern is that these changes would have created new privacy and security risks, and disrupted the user experience customers love about the App Store,” it said in a statement. “We want to thank the court for granting this stay while the appeals process continues.”\nEvercore ISI analyst Amit Daryanani said in a research note that the latest ruling allows Apple to avoid a Thursday deadline for complying with the order.\n“Being granted a stay is a win for Apple, as the possibility of the company being forced to allow developers to include in-app links to other payment platforms has been pushed out,” the analyst wrote. “We would note, however, that the overall appeals process outcome remains uncertain.”\nThe ruling was issued by Circuit Court Judges Diarmuid O’Scannlain, Sidney Thomas and Richard Tallman.\nApple shares rallied 2.3% in Wednesday trading, hitting a new closing high of $175.08. That lifted the company’s market capitalization to $2.87 trillion.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6911896,"gmtCreate":1639040768953,"gmtModify":1639040769048,"authorId":3576232257279797,"author":{"id":3576232257279797,"authorId":3576232257279797,"name":"dandan_4896","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d8b00e27a4dd6f248e38c3d78f21f188","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":602518204,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"bj","text":"bj","html":"bj"}],"langContent":"CN"},{"id":602518928,"gmtCreate":1639040545369,"gmtModify":1639040545544,"author":{"id":"4089502927615680","authorId":"4089502927615680","name":"AllFathers","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/919bc5fbaa10bcac5c605f3188081ff1","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Nice....","listText":"Nice....","text":"Nice....","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/602518928","repostId":1147616327,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1147616327","pubTimestamp":1639039969,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1147616327?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-09 16:52","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Wins a Round in Payments Fight With Epic Games","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1147616327","media":"Barrons","summary":"Apple notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge pan","content":"<p>Apple&nbsp;notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a stay, pending appeal, of a lower court’s order that would make it easier for software developers to route around Apple’s payment system for in-game purchases.</p>\n<p>The circuit-court decision on Wednesday specifically targets one element of a permanent injunction issued Sept. 10 by U.S. District Court Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Epic’s lawsuit against Apple over the way it operates the App Store. That provision barred Apple from stopping developers from including in their apps information on how to make purchases without buying via the app and therefore giving a cut to Apple.</p>\n<p>In the two-page decision, the circuit court found that Apple “has demonstrated, at minimum, that its appeal raises serious questions on the merits of the district court’s determination that Epic Games … failed to show Apple’s conduct violated any antitrust laws but did show that the same conduct violated California’s Unfair Competition Law.” The court pointed to another decision that found that such a finding was contradictory—that if you conclude that conduct is not an unreasonable restraint of trade, then you can’t also argue that it is unfair to consumers.</p>\n<p>The court also said Apple has “made a sufficient showing of irreparable harm,” and that the remaining factors weighed in favor of staying the provision of the lower-court injunction and maintaining the status quo pending appeal.</p>\n<p>Apple said it was pleased with the ruling. “Our concern is that these changes would have created new privacy and security risks, and disrupted the user experience customers love about the App Store,” it said in a statement. “We want to thank the court for granting this stay while the appeals process continues.”</p>\n<p>Evercore ISI analyst Amit Daryanani said in a research note that the latest ruling allows Apple to avoid a Thursday deadline for complying with the order.</p>\n<p>“Being granted a stay is a win for Apple, as the possibility of the company being forced to allow developers to include in-app links to other payment platforms has been pushed out,” the analyst wrote. “We would note, however, that the overall appeals process outcome remains uncertain.”</p>\n<p>The ruling was issued by Circuit Court Judges Diarmuid O’Scannlain, Sidney Thomas and Richard Tallman.</p>\n<p>Apple shares rallied 2.3% in Wednesday trading, hitting a new closing high of $175.08. That lifted the company’s market capitalization to $2.87 trillion.</p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Wins a Round in Payments Fight With Epic Games</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Wins a Round in Payments Fight With Epic Games\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-12-09 16:52 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-epic-games-in-app-payments-51639002173?mod=hp_LATEST><strong>Barrons</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Apple notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a stay, pending appeal, of a lower ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-epic-games-in-app-payments-51639002173?mod=hp_LATEST\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-epic-games-in-app-payments-51639002173?mod=hp_LATEST","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1147616327","content_text":"Apple notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a stay, pending appeal, of a lower court’s order that would make it easier for software developers to route around Apple’s payment system for in-game purchases.\nThe circuit-court decision on Wednesday specifically targets one element of a permanent injunction issued Sept. 10 by U.S. District Court Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Epic’s lawsuit against Apple over the way it operates the App Store. That provision barred Apple from stopping developers from including in their apps information on how to make purchases without buying via the app and therefore giving a cut to Apple.\nIn the two-page decision, the circuit court found that Apple “has demonstrated, at minimum, that its appeal raises serious questions on the merits of the district court’s determination that Epic Games … failed to show Apple’s conduct violated any antitrust laws but did show that the same conduct violated California’s Unfair Competition Law.” The court pointed to another decision that found that such a finding was contradictory—that if you conclude that conduct is not an unreasonable restraint of trade, then you can’t also argue that it is unfair to consumers.\nThe court also said Apple has “made a sufficient showing of irreparable harm,” and that the remaining factors weighed in favor of staying the provision of the lower-court injunction and maintaining the status quo pending appeal.\nApple said it was pleased with the ruling. “Our concern is that these changes would have created new privacy and security risks, and disrupted the user experience customers love about the App Store,” it said in a statement. “We want to thank the court for granting this stay while the appeals process continues.”\nEvercore ISI analyst Amit Daryanani said in a research note that the latest ruling allows Apple to avoid a Thursday deadline for complying with the order.\n“Being granted a stay is a win for Apple, as the possibility of the company being forced to allow developers to include in-app links to other payment platforms has been pushed out,” the analyst wrote. “We would note, however, that the overall appeals process outcome remains uncertain.”\nThe ruling was issued by Circuit Court Judges Diarmuid O’Scannlain, Sidney Thomas and Richard Tallman.\nApple shares rallied 2.3% in Wednesday trading, hitting a new closing high of $175.08. That lifted the company’s market capitalization to $2.87 trillion.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6911861,"gmtCreate":1639040561407,"gmtModify":1639040561433,"authorId":4089502927615680,"author":{"id":4089502927615680,"authorId":4089502927615680,"name":"AllFathers","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/919bc5fbaa10bcac5c605f3188081ff1","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":602518928,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"pls lik3","text":"pls lik3","html":"pls lik3"}],"langContent":"CN"},{"id":602513256,"gmtCreate":1639040384570,"gmtModify":1639040384800,"author":{"id":"3578734814169950","authorId":"3578734814169950","name":"Iankoh","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bb35a16ba417d6fd82438ce549c7492d","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/602513256","repostId":1147616327,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1147616327","pubTimestamp":1639039969,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1147616327?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-09 16:52","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Wins a Round in Payments Fight With Epic Games","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1147616327","media":"Barrons","summary":"Apple notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge pan","content":"<p>Apple&nbsp;notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a stay, pending appeal, of a lower court’s order that would make it easier for software developers to route around Apple’s payment system for in-game purchases.</p>\n<p>The circuit-court decision on Wednesday specifically targets one element of a permanent injunction issued Sept. 10 by U.S. District Court Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Epic’s lawsuit against Apple over the way it operates the App Store. That provision barred Apple from stopping developers from including in their apps information on how to make purchases without buying via the app and therefore giving a cut to Apple.</p>\n<p>In the two-page decision, the circuit court found that Apple “has demonstrated, at minimum, that its appeal raises serious questions on the merits of the district court’s determination that Epic Games … failed to show Apple’s conduct violated any antitrust laws but did show that the same conduct violated California’s Unfair Competition Law.” The court pointed to another decision that found that such a finding was contradictory—that if you conclude that conduct is not an unreasonable restraint of trade, then you can’t also argue that it is unfair to consumers.</p>\n<p>The court also said Apple has “made a sufficient showing of irreparable harm,” and that the remaining factors weighed in favor of staying the provision of the lower-court injunction and maintaining the status quo pending appeal.</p>\n<p>Apple said it was pleased with the ruling. “Our concern is that these changes would have created new privacy and security risks, and disrupted the user experience customers love about the App Store,” it said in a statement. “We want to thank the court for granting this stay while the appeals process continues.”</p>\n<p>Evercore ISI analyst Amit Daryanani said in a research note that the latest ruling allows Apple to avoid a Thursday deadline for complying with the order.</p>\n<p>“Being granted a stay is a win for Apple, as the possibility of the company being forced to allow developers to include in-app links to other payment platforms has been pushed out,” the analyst wrote. “We would note, however, that the overall appeals process outcome remains uncertain.”</p>\n<p>The ruling was issued by Circuit Court Judges Diarmuid O’Scannlain, Sidney Thomas and Richard Tallman.</p>\n<p>Apple shares rallied 2.3% in Wednesday trading, hitting a new closing high of $175.08. That lifted the company’s market capitalization to $2.87 trillion.</p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Wins a Round in Payments Fight With Epic Games</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Wins a Round in Payments Fight With Epic Games\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-12-09 16:52 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-epic-games-in-app-payments-51639002173?mod=hp_LATEST><strong>Barrons</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Apple notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a stay, pending appeal, of a lower ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-epic-games-in-app-payments-51639002173?mod=hp_LATEST\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-epic-games-in-app-payments-51639002173?mod=hp_LATEST","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1147616327","content_text":"Apple notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a stay, pending appeal, of a lower court’s order that would make it easier for software developers to route around Apple’s payment system for in-game purchases.\nThe circuit-court decision on Wednesday specifically targets one element of a permanent injunction issued Sept. 10 by U.S. District Court Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Epic’s lawsuit against Apple over the way it operates the App Store. That provision barred Apple from stopping developers from including in their apps information on how to make purchases without buying via the app and therefore giving a cut to Apple.\nIn the two-page decision, the circuit court found that Apple “has demonstrated, at minimum, that its appeal raises serious questions on the merits of the district court’s determination that Epic Games … failed to show Apple’s conduct violated any antitrust laws but did show that the same conduct violated California’s Unfair Competition Law.” The court pointed to another decision that found that such a finding was contradictory—that if you conclude that conduct is not an unreasonable restraint of trade, then you can’t also argue that it is unfair to consumers.\nThe court also said Apple has “made a sufficient showing of irreparable harm,” and that the remaining factors weighed in favor of staying the provision of the lower-court injunction and maintaining the status quo pending appeal.\nApple said it was pleased with the ruling. “Our concern is that these changes would have created new privacy and security risks, and disrupted the user experience customers love about the App Store,” it said in a statement. “We want to thank the court for granting this stay while the appeals process continues.”\nEvercore ISI analyst Amit Daryanani said in a research note that the latest ruling allows Apple to avoid a Thursday deadline for complying with the order.\n“Being granted a stay is a win for Apple, as the possibility of the company being forced to allow developers to include in-app links to other payment platforms has been pushed out,” the analyst wrote. “We would note, however, that the overall appeals process outcome remains uncertain.”\nThe ruling was issued by Circuit Court Judges Diarmuid O’Scannlain, Sidney Thomas and Richard Tallman.\nApple shares rallied 2.3% in Wednesday trading, hitting a new closing high of $175.08. That lifted the company’s market capitalization to $2.87 trillion.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"CN"},{"id":602513390,"gmtCreate":1639040339016,"gmtModify":1639040339341,"author":{"id":"3582061758353540","authorId":"3582061758353540","name":"SiewLooiWan","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/882a76fb2f3809d087f6c6ad77073f77","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Sure","listText":"Sure","text":"Sure","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/602513390","repostId":1147616327,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1147616327","pubTimestamp":1639039969,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1147616327?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-09 16:52","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Wins a Round in Payments Fight With Epic Games","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1147616327","media":"Barrons","summary":"Apple notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge pan","content":"<p>Apple&nbsp;notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a stay, pending appeal, of a lower court’s order that would make it easier for software developers to route around Apple’s payment system for in-game purchases.</p>\n<p>The circuit-court decision on Wednesday specifically targets one element of a permanent injunction issued Sept. 10 by U.S. District Court Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Epic’s lawsuit against Apple over the way it operates the App Store. That provision barred Apple from stopping developers from including in their apps information on how to make purchases without buying via the app and therefore giving a cut to Apple.</p>\n<p>In the two-page decision, the circuit court found that Apple “has demonstrated, at minimum, that its appeal raises serious questions on the merits of the district court’s determination that Epic Games … failed to show Apple’s conduct violated any antitrust laws but did show that the same conduct violated California’s Unfair Competition Law.” The court pointed to another decision that found that such a finding was contradictory—that if you conclude that conduct is not an unreasonable restraint of trade, then you can’t also argue that it is unfair to consumers.</p>\n<p>The court also said Apple has “made a sufficient showing of irreparable harm,” and that the remaining factors weighed in favor of staying the provision of the lower-court injunction and maintaining the status quo pending appeal.</p>\n<p>Apple said it was pleased with the ruling. “Our concern is that these changes would have created new privacy and security risks, and disrupted the user experience customers love about the App Store,” it said in a statement. “We want to thank the court for granting this stay while the appeals process continues.”</p>\n<p>Evercore ISI analyst Amit Daryanani said in a research note that the latest ruling allows Apple to avoid a Thursday deadline for complying with the order.</p>\n<p>“Being granted a stay is a win for Apple, as the possibility of the company being forced to allow developers to include in-app links to other payment platforms has been pushed out,” the analyst wrote. “We would note, however, that the overall appeals process outcome remains uncertain.”</p>\n<p>The ruling was issued by Circuit Court Judges Diarmuid O’Scannlain, Sidney Thomas and Richard Tallman.</p>\n<p>Apple shares rallied 2.3% in Wednesday trading, hitting a new closing high of $175.08. That lifted the company’s market capitalization to $2.87 trillion.</p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Wins a Round in Payments Fight With Epic Games</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Wins a Round in Payments Fight With Epic Games\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-12-09 16:52 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-epic-games-in-app-payments-51639002173?mod=hp_LATEST><strong>Barrons</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Apple notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a stay, pending appeal, of a lower ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-epic-games-in-app-payments-51639002173?mod=hp_LATEST\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-epic-games-in-app-payments-51639002173?mod=hp_LATEST","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1147616327","content_text":"Apple notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a stay, pending appeal, of a lower court’s order that would make it easier for software developers to route around Apple’s payment system for in-game purchases.\nThe circuit-court decision on Wednesday specifically targets one element of a permanent injunction issued Sept. 10 by U.S. District Court Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Epic’s lawsuit against Apple over the way it operates the App Store. That provision barred Apple from stopping developers from including in their apps information on how to make purchases without buying via the app and therefore giving a cut to Apple.\nIn the two-page decision, the circuit court found that Apple “has demonstrated, at minimum, that its appeal raises serious questions on the merits of the district court’s determination that Epic Games … failed to show Apple’s conduct violated any antitrust laws but did show that the same conduct violated California’s Unfair Competition Law.” The court pointed to another decision that found that such a finding was contradictory—that if you conclude that conduct is not an unreasonable restraint of trade, then you can’t also argue that it is unfair to consumers.\nThe court also said Apple has “made a sufficient showing of irreparable harm,” and that the remaining factors weighed in favor of staying the provision of the lower-court injunction and maintaining the status quo pending appeal.\nApple said it was pleased with the ruling. “Our concern is that these changes would have created new privacy and security risks, and disrupted the user experience customers love about the App Store,” it said in a statement. “We want to thank the court for granting this stay while the appeals process continues.”\nEvercore ISI analyst Amit Daryanani said in a research note that the latest ruling allows Apple to avoid a Thursday deadline for complying with the order.\n“Being granted a stay is a win for Apple, as the possibility of the company being forced to allow developers to include in-app links to other payment platforms has been pushed out,” the analyst wrote. “We would note, however, that the overall appeals process outcome remains uncertain.”\nThe ruling was issued by Circuit Court Judges Diarmuid O’Scannlain, Sidney Thomas and Richard Tallman.\nApple shares rallied 2.3% in Wednesday trading, hitting a new closing high of $175.08. That lifted the company’s market capitalization to $2.87 trillion.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"CN"},{"id":602513950,"gmtCreate":1639040312170,"gmtModify":1639040312373,"author":{"id":"3571448359169660","authorId":"3571448359169660","name":"PeterYC","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9ef14f774a72b511343eb2acc028573c","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/602513950","repostId":1147616327,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1147616327","pubTimestamp":1639039969,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1147616327?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-09 16:52","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Wins a Round in Payments Fight With Epic Games","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1147616327","media":"Barrons","summary":"Apple notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge pan","content":"<p>Apple&nbsp;notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a stay, pending appeal, of a lower court’s order that would make it easier for software developers to route around Apple’s payment system for in-game purchases.</p>\n<p>The circuit-court decision on Wednesday specifically targets one element of a permanent injunction issued Sept. 10 by U.S. District Court Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Epic’s lawsuit against Apple over the way it operates the App Store. That provision barred Apple from stopping developers from including in their apps information on how to make purchases without buying via the app and therefore giving a cut to Apple.</p>\n<p>In the two-page decision, the circuit court found that Apple “has demonstrated, at minimum, that its appeal raises serious questions on the merits of the district court’s determination that Epic Games … failed to show Apple’s conduct violated any antitrust laws but did show that the same conduct violated California’s Unfair Competition Law.” The court pointed to another decision that found that such a finding was contradictory—that if you conclude that conduct is not an unreasonable restraint of trade, then you can’t also argue that it is unfair to consumers.</p>\n<p>The court also said Apple has “made a sufficient showing of irreparable harm,” and that the remaining factors weighed in favor of staying the provision of the lower-court injunction and maintaining the status quo pending appeal.</p>\n<p>Apple said it was pleased with the ruling. “Our concern is that these changes would have created new privacy and security risks, and disrupted the user experience customers love about the App Store,” it said in a statement. “We want to thank the court for granting this stay while the appeals process continues.”</p>\n<p>Evercore ISI analyst Amit Daryanani said in a research note that the latest ruling allows Apple to avoid a Thursday deadline for complying with the order.</p>\n<p>“Being granted a stay is a win for Apple, as the possibility of the company being forced to allow developers to include in-app links to other payment platforms has been pushed out,” the analyst wrote. “We would note, however, that the overall appeals process outcome remains uncertain.”</p>\n<p>The ruling was issued by Circuit Court Judges Diarmuid O’Scannlain, Sidney Thomas and Richard Tallman.</p>\n<p>Apple shares rallied 2.3% in Wednesday trading, hitting a new closing high of $175.08. That lifted the company’s market capitalization to $2.87 trillion.</p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Wins a Round in Payments Fight With Epic Games</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Wins a Round in Payments Fight With Epic Games\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-12-09 16:52 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-epic-games-in-app-payments-51639002173?mod=hp_LATEST><strong>Barrons</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Apple notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a stay, pending appeal, of a lower ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-epic-games-in-app-payments-51639002173?mod=hp_LATEST\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-epic-games-in-app-payments-51639002173?mod=hp_LATEST","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1147616327","content_text":"Apple notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a stay, pending appeal, of a lower court’s order that would make it easier for software developers to route around Apple’s payment system for in-game purchases.\nThe circuit-court decision on Wednesday specifically targets one element of a permanent injunction issued Sept. 10 by U.S. District Court Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Epic’s lawsuit against Apple over the way it operates the App Store. That provision barred Apple from stopping developers from including in their apps information on how to make purchases without buying via the app and therefore giving a cut to Apple.\nIn the two-page decision, the circuit court found that Apple “has demonstrated, at minimum, that its appeal raises serious questions on the merits of the district court’s determination that Epic Games … failed to show Apple’s conduct violated any antitrust laws but did show that the same conduct violated California’s Unfair Competition Law.” The court pointed to another decision that found that such a finding was contradictory—that if you conclude that conduct is not an unreasonable restraint of trade, then you can’t also argue that it is unfair to consumers.\nThe court also said Apple has “made a sufficient showing of irreparable harm,” and that the remaining factors weighed in favor of staying the provision of the lower-court injunction and maintaining the status quo pending appeal.\nApple said it was pleased with the ruling. “Our concern is that these changes would have created new privacy and security risks, and disrupted the user experience customers love about the App Store,” it said in a statement. “We want to thank the court for granting this stay while the appeals process continues.”\nEvercore ISI analyst Amit Daryanani said in a research note that the latest ruling allows Apple to avoid a Thursday deadline for complying with the order.\n“Being granted a stay is a win for Apple, as the possibility of the company being forced to allow developers to include in-app links to other payment platforms has been pushed out,” the analyst wrote. “We would note, however, that the overall appeals process outcome remains uncertain.”\nThe ruling was issued by Circuit Court Judges Diarmuid O’Scannlain, Sidney Thomas and Richard Tallman.\nApple shares rallied 2.3% in Wednesday trading, hitting a new closing high of $175.08. That lifted the company’s market capitalization to $2.87 trillion.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6911838,"gmtCreate":1639040389037,"gmtModify":1639040389069,"authorId":3582061758353540,"author":{"id":3582061758353540,"authorId":3582061758353540,"name":"SiewLooiWan","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/882a76fb2f3809d087f6c6ad77073f77","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":602513950,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"<u>sure</u>","text":"<u>sure</u>","html":"<u>sure</u>"},{"id":6911832,"gmtCreate":1639040341994,"gmtModify":1639040342021,"authorId":3571448359169660,"author":{"id":3571448359169660,"authorId":3571448359169660,"name":"PeterYC","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9ef14f774a72b511343eb2acc028573c","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":602513950,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Ok","text":"Ok","html":"Ok"}],"langContent":"CN"},{"id":602519104,"gmtCreate":1639040214244,"gmtModify":1639040214662,"author":{"id":"3572224459642139","authorId":"3572224459642139","name":"janspants","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/77096f828a05738c9976f302380d4e4d","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/602519104","repostId":1147616327,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1147616327","pubTimestamp":1639039969,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1147616327?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-09 16:52","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Wins a Round in Payments Fight With Epic Games","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1147616327","media":"Barrons","summary":"Apple notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge pan","content":"<p>Apple&nbsp;notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a stay, pending appeal, of a lower court’s order that would make it easier for software developers to route around Apple’s payment system for in-game purchases.</p>\n<p>The circuit-court decision on Wednesday specifically targets one element of a permanent injunction issued Sept. 10 by U.S. District Court Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Epic’s lawsuit against Apple over the way it operates the App Store. That provision barred Apple from stopping developers from including in their apps information on how to make purchases without buying via the app and therefore giving a cut to Apple.</p>\n<p>In the two-page decision, the circuit court found that Apple “has demonstrated, at minimum, that its appeal raises serious questions on the merits of the district court’s determination that Epic Games … failed to show Apple’s conduct violated any antitrust laws but did show that the same conduct violated California’s Unfair Competition Law.” The court pointed to another decision that found that such a finding was contradictory—that if you conclude that conduct is not an unreasonable restraint of trade, then you can’t also argue that it is unfair to consumers.</p>\n<p>The court also said Apple has “made a sufficient showing of irreparable harm,” and that the remaining factors weighed in favor of staying the provision of the lower-court injunction and maintaining the status quo pending appeal.</p>\n<p>Apple said it was pleased with the ruling. “Our concern is that these changes would have created new privacy and security risks, and disrupted the user experience customers love about the App Store,” it said in a statement. “We want to thank the court for granting this stay while the appeals process continues.”</p>\n<p>Evercore ISI analyst Amit Daryanani said in a research note that the latest ruling allows Apple to avoid a Thursday deadline for complying with the order.</p>\n<p>“Being granted a stay is a win for Apple, as the possibility of the company being forced to allow developers to include in-app links to other payment platforms has been pushed out,” the analyst wrote. “We would note, however, that the overall appeals process outcome remains uncertain.”</p>\n<p>The ruling was issued by Circuit Court Judges Diarmuid O’Scannlain, Sidney Thomas and Richard Tallman.</p>\n<p>Apple shares rallied 2.3% in Wednesday trading, hitting a new closing high of $175.08. That lifted the company’s market capitalization to $2.87 trillion.</p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Wins a Round in Payments Fight With Epic Games</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Wins a Round in Payments Fight With Epic Games\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-12-09 16:52 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-epic-games-in-app-payments-51639002173?mod=hp_LATEST><strong>Barrons</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Apple notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a stay, pending appeal, of a lower ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-epic-games-in-app-payments-51639002173?mod=hp_LATEST\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-epic-games-in-app-payments-51639002173?mod=hp_LATEST","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1147616327","content_text":"Apple notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a stay, pending appeal, of a lower court’s order that would make it easier for software developers to route around Apple’s payment system for in-game purchases.\nThe circuit-court decision on Wednesday specifically targets one element of a permanent injunction issued Sept. 10 by U.S. District Court Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Epic’s lawsuit against Apple over the way it operates the App Store. That provision barred Apple from stopping developers from including in their apps information on how to make purchases without buying via the app and therefore giving a cut to Apple.\nIn the two-page decision, the circuit court found that Apple “has demonstrated, at minimum, that its appeal raises serious questions on the merits of the district court’s determination that Epic Games … failed to show Apple’s conduct violated any antitrust laws but did show that the same conduct violated California’s Unfair Competition Law.” The court pointed to another decision that found that such a finding was contradictory—that if you conclude that conduct is not an unreasonable restraint of trade, then you can’t also argue that it is unfair to consumers.\nThe court also said Apple has “made a sufficient showing of irreparable harm,” and that the remaining factors weighed in favor of staying the provision of the lower-court injunction and maintaining the status quo pending appeal.\nApple said it was pleased with the ruling. “Our concern is that these changes would have created new privacy and security risks, and disrupted the user experience customers love about the App Store,” it said in a statement. “We want to thank the court for granting this stay while the appeals process continues.”\nEvercore ISI analyst Amit Daryanani said in a research note that the latest ruling allows Apple to avoid a Thursday deadline for complying with the order.\n“Being granted a stay is a win for Apple, as the possibility of the company being forced to allow developers to include in-app links to other payment platforms has been pushed out,” the analyst wrote. “We would note, however, that the overall appeals process outcome remains uncertain.”\nThe ruling was issued by Circuit Court Judges Diarmuid O’Scannlain, Sidney Thomas and Richard Tallman.\nApple shares rallied 2.3% in Wednesday trading, hitting a new closing high of $175.08. That lifted the company’s market capitalization to $2.87 trillion.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"CN"},{"id":602510175,"gmtCreate":1639040126733,"gmtModify":1639040127194,"author":{"id":"3571889352436684","authorId":"3571889352436684","name":"JoyceChew","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bcd2a122cab87882e73eff3dc886ecec","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/602510175","repostId":1147616327,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1147616327","pubTimestamp":1639039969,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1147616327?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-09 16:52","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Wins a Round in Payments Fight With Epic Games","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1147616327","media":"Barrons","summary":"Apple notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge pan","content":"<p>Apple&nbsp;notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a stay, pending appeal, of a lower court’s order that would make it easier for software developers to route around Apple’s payment system for in-game purchases.</p>\n<p>The circuit-court decision on Wednesday specifically targets one element of a permanent injunction issued Sept. 10 by U.S. District Court Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Epic’s lawsuit against Apple over the way it operates the App Store. That provision barred Apple from stopping developers from including in their apps information on how to make purchases without buying via the app and therefore giving a cut to Apple.</p>\n<p>In the two-page decision, the circuit court found that Apple “has demonstrated, at minimum, that its appeal raises serious questions on the merits of the district court’s determination that Epic Games … failed to show Apple’s conduct violated any antitrust laws but did show that the same conduct violated California’s Unfair Competition Law.” The court pointed to another decision that found that such a finding was contradictory—that if you conclude that conduct is not an unreasonable restraint of trade, then you can’t also argue that it is unfair to consumers.</p>\n<p>The court also said Apple has “made a sufficient showing of irreparable harm,” and that the remaining factors weighed in favor of staying the provision of the lower-court injunction and maintaining the status quo pending appeal.</p>\n<p>Apple said it was pleased with the ruling. “Our concern is that these changes would have created new privacy and security risks, and disrupted the user experience customers love about the App Store,” it said in a statement. “We want to thank the court for granting this stay while the appeals process continues.”</p>\n<p>Evercore ISI analyst Amit Daryanani said in a research note that the latest ruling allows Apple to avoid a Thursday deadline for complying with the order.</p>\n<p>“Being granted a stay is a win for Apple, as the possibility of the company being forced to allow developers to include in-app links to other payment platforms has been pushed out,” the analyst wrote. “We would note, however, that the overall appeals process outcome remains uncertain.”</p>\n<p>The ruling was issued by Circuit Court Judges Diarmuid O’Scannlain, Sidney Thomas and Richard Tallman.</p>\n<p>Apple shares rallied 2.3% in Wednesday trading, hitting a new closing high of $175.08. That lifted the company’s market capitalization to $2.87 trillion.</p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Wins a Round in Payments Fight With Epic Games</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Wins a Round in Payments Fight With Epic Games\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-12-09 16:52 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-epic-games-in-app-payments-51639002173?mod=hp_LATEST><strong>Barrons</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Apple notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a stay, pending appeal, of a lower ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-epic-games-in-app-payments-51639002173?mod=hp_LATEST\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-epic-games-in-app-payments-51639002173?mod=hp_LATEST","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1147616327","content_text":"Apple notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a stay, pending appeal, of a lower court’s order that would make it easier for software developers to route around Apple’s payment system for in-game purchases.\nThe circuit-court decision on Wednesday specifically targets one element of a permanent injunction issued Sept. 10 by U.S. District Court Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Epic’s lawsuit against Apple over the way it operates the App Store. That provision barred Apple from stopping developers from including in their apps information on how to make purchases without buying via the app and therefore giving a cut to Apple.\nIn the two-page decision, the circuit court found that Apple “has demonstrated, at minimum, that its appeal raises serious questions on the merits of the district court’s determination that Epic Games … failed to show Apple’s conduct violated any antitrust laws but did show that the same conduct violated California’s Unfair Competition Law.” The court pointed to another decision that found that such a finding was contradictory—that if you conclude that conduct is not an unreasonable restraint of trade, then you can’t also argue that it is unfair to consumers.\nThe court also said Apple has “made a sufficient showing of irreparable harm,” and that the remaining factors weighed in favor of staying the provision of the lower-court injunction and maintaining the status quo pending appeal.\nApple said it was pleased with the ruling. “Our concern is that these changes would have created new privacy and security risks, and disrupted the user experience customers love about the App Store,” it said in a statement. “We want to thank the court for granting this stay while the appeals process continues.”\nEvercore ISI analyst Amit Daryanani said in a research note that the latest ruling allows Apple to avoid a Thursday deadline for complying with the order.\n“Being granted a stay is a win for Apple, as the possibility of the company being forced to allow developers to include in-app links to other payment platforms has been pushed out,” the analyst wrote. “We would note, however, that the overall appeals process outcome remains uncertain.”\nThe ruling was issued by Circuit Court Judges Diarmuid O’Scannlain, Sidney Thomas and Richard Tallman.\nApple shares rallied 2.3% in Wednesday trading, hitting a new closing high of $175.08. That lifted the company’s market capitalization to $2.87 trillion.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6911826,"gmtCreate":1639040231603,"gmtModify":1639040231635,"authorId":3572224459642139,"author":{"id":3572224459642139,"authorId":3572224459642139,"name":"janspants","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/77096f828a05738c9976f302380d4e4d","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":602510175,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Ok","text":"Ok","html":"Ok"}],"langContent":"CN"},{"id":602510999,"gmtCreate":1639040116600,"gmtModify":1639040116774,"author":{"id":"4097720712211120","authorId":"4097720712211120","name":"TradeMore","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/976c10f5e71e9a3b002205015f764d44","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Oh","listText":"Oh","text":"Oh","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/602510999","repostId":1147616327,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1147616327","pubTimestamp":1639039969,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1147616327?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-09 16:52","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Wins a Round in Payments Fight With Epic Games","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1147616327","media":"Barrons","summary":"Apple notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge pan","content":"<p>Apple&nbsp;notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a stay, pending appeal, of a lower court’s order that would make it easier for software developers to route around Apple’s payment system for in-game purchases.</p>\n<p>The circuit-court decision on Wednesday specifically targets one element of a permanent injunction issued Sept. 10 by U.S. District Court Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Epic’s lawsuit against Apple over the way it operates the App Store. That provision barred Apple from stopping developers from including in their apps information on how to make purchases without buying via the app and therefore giving a cut to Apple.</p>\n<p>In the two-page decision, the circuit court found that Apple “has demonstrated, at minimum, that its appeal raises serious questions on the merits of the district court’s determination that Epic Games … failed to show Apple’s conduct violated any antitrust laws but did show that the same conduct violated California’s Unfair Competition Law.” The court pointed to another decision that found that such a finding was contradictory—that if you conclude that conduct is not an unreasonable restraint of trade, then you can’t also argue that it is unfair to consumers.</p>\n<p>The court also said Apple has “made a sufficient showing of irreparable harm,” and that the remaining factors weighed in favor of staying the provision of the lower-court injunction and maintaining the status quo pending appeal.</p>\n<p>Apple said it was pleased with the ruling. “Our concern is that these changes would have created new privacy and security risks, and disrupted the user experience customers love about the App Store,” it said in a statement. “We want to thank the court for granting this stay while the appeals process continues.”</p>\n<p>Evercore ISI analyst Amit Daryanani said in a research note that the latest ruling allows Apple to avoid a Thursday deadline for complying with the order.</p>\n<p>“Being granted a stay is a win for Apple, as the possibility of the company being forced to allow developers to include in-app links to other payment platforms has been pushed out,” the analyst wrote. “We would note, however, that the overall appeals process outcome remains uncertain.”</p>\n<p>The ruling was issued by Circuit Court Judges Diarmuid O’Scannlain, Sidney Thomas and Richard Tallman.</p>\n<p>Apple shares rallied 2.3% in Wednesday trading, hitting a new closing high of $175.08. That lifted the company’s market capitalization to $2.87 trillion.</p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Wins a Round in Payments Fight With Epic Games</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Wins a Round in Payments Fight With Epic Games\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-12-09 16:52 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-epic-games-in-app-payments-51639002173?mod=hp_LATEST><strong>Barrons</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Apple notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a stay, pending appeal, of a lower ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-epic-games-in-app-payments-51639002173?mod=hp_LATEST\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-epic-games-in-app-payments-51639002173?mod=hp_LATEST","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1147616327","content_text":"Apple notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a stay, pending appeal, of a lower court’s order that would make it easier for software developers to route around Apple’s payment system for in-game purchases.\nThe circuit-court decision on Wednesday specifically targets one element of a permanent injunction issued Sept. 10 by U.S. District Court Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Epic’s lawsuit against Apple over the way it operates the App Store. That provision barred Apple from stopping developers from including in their apps information on how to make purchases without buying via the app and therefore giving a cut to Apple.\nIn the two-page decision, the circuit court found that Apple “has demonstrated, at minimum, that its appeal raises serious questions on the merits of the district court’s determination that Epic Games … failed to show Apple’s conduct violated any antitrust laws but did show that the same conduct violated California’s Unfair Competition Law.” The court pointed to another decision that found that such a finding was contradictory—that if you conclude that conduct is not an unreasonable restraint of trade, then you can’t also argue that it is unfair to consumers.\nThe court also said Apple has “made a sufficient showing of irreparable harm,” and that the remaining factors weighed in favor of staying the provision of the lower-court injunction and maintaining the status quo pending appeal.\nApple said it was pleased with the ruling. “Our concern is that these changes would have created new privacy and security risks, and disrupted the user experience customers love about the App Store,” it said in a statement. “We want to thank the court for granting this stay while the appeals process continues.”\nEvercore ISI analyst Amit Daryanani said in a research note that the latest ruling allows Apple to avoid a Thursday deadline for complying with the order.\n“Being granted a stay is a win for Apple, as the possibility of the company being forced to allow developers to include in-app links to other payment platforms has been pushed out,” the analyst wrote. “We would note, however, that the overall appeals process outcome remains uncertain.”\nThe ruling was issued by Circuit Court Judges Diarmuid O’Scannlain, Sidney Thomas and Richard Tallman.\nApple shares rallied 2.3% in Wednesday trading, hitting a new closing high of $175.08. That lifted the company’s market capitalization to $2.87 trillion.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6911814,"gmtCreate":1639040133192,"gmtModify":1639040133229,"authorId":3571889352436684,"author":{"id":3571889352436684,"authorId":3571889352436684,"name":"JoyceChew","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bcd2a122cab87882e73eff3dc886ecec","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":602510999,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Ok","text":"Ok","html":"Ok"}],"langContent":"CN"}],"hasMoreComments":true,"newsSizeData":{"likeSize":60,"commentSize":21,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false}}