Rsstiget的个人主页 - 老虎社区

Rsstiget

暂无个人介绍

IP属地：未知

8关注

5粉丝

0主题

0勋章

2021-10-29

Still top command for hand phone

Apple sales miss expectations, supply issues cost company $6 billion

2021-10-25

Take profits soon

Are We Heading for a Repeat of the 2018 Stocks Selloff?

2021-10-22

Heng heng , going up

@社区小管家:10月22日老虎社区违规行为处罚公告

2021-10-19

Hoping up

Tesla Bull Cathie Wood Backs UP.Partners' $230M Fund For Mobility Startups

2021-10-08

Good number

TSMC revenue for September was approximately NT$152.69 billion,an increase of 19.7% YOY

2021-09-29

Palantir is the good choice

Don't Wait for a Market Crash: 2 Stocks to Buy Now

去老虎APP查看更多动态

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"userPageInfo":{"id":3585881140356055,"uuid":"3585881140356055","gmtCreate":1622787158877,"gmtModify":1622787158877,"name":"Rsstiget","pinyin":"rsstiget","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":5,"headSize":8,"tweetSize":12,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":1,"name":"萌萌虎","nameTw":"萌萌虎","represent":"呱呱坠地","factor":"评论帖子3次或发布1条主帖（非转发）","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":null,"userBadges":[{"badgeId":"228c86a078844d74991fff2b7ab2428d-2","templateUuid":"228c86a078844d74991fff2b7ab2428d","name":"投资总监虎","description":"证券账户累计交易金额达到30万美元","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9d20b23f1b6335407f882bc5c2ad12c0","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ada3b4533518ace8404a3f6dd192bd29","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/177f283ba21d1c077054dac07f88f3bd","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2024.06.11","exceedPercentage":"80.71%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101},{"badgeId":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969-1","templateUuid":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969","name":"精英交易员","description":"证券或期货账户累计交易次数达到30次","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ab0f87127c854ce3191a752d57b46edc","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c9835ce48b8c8743566d344ac7a7ba8c","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76754b53ce7a90019f132c1d2fbc698f","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.28","exceedPercentage":"60.76%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37-1","templateUuid":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37","name":"博闻投资者","description":"累计交易超过10只正股","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a-1","templateUuid":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a","name":"实盘交易者","description":"完成一笔实盘交易","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":4,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":"未知","starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"post","tweets":[{"id":854217268,"gmtCreate":1635462814675,"gmtModify":1635462814846,"author":{"id":"3585881140356055","authorId":"3585881140356055","name":"Rsstiget","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Still top command for hand phone&nbsp;","listText":"Still top command for hand phone&nbsp;","text":"Still top command for hand phone","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/854217268","repostId":"1178207364","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1178207364","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1635460531,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1178207364?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-29 06:35","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple sales miss expectations, supply issues cost company $6 billion","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1178207364","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Apple revenue fell short of Wall Street expectations in its fiscal fourth quarter on Thursday, which Apple CEO Tim Cook attributed to larger-than-expected supply constraints on iPhones, iPads, and Macs.\"We had a very strong performance despite larger than expected supply constraints, which we estimate to be around $6 billion,\" Cook said. \"The supply constraints were driven by the industry wide chip shortages that have been talked about a lot, and COVID-related manufacturing disruptions in Southe","content":"<p>Apple&nbsp;revenue fell short of Wall Street expectations in its fiscal fourth quarter on Thursday,&nbsp;which Apple CEO Tim Cook attributed to larger-than-expected supply constraints&nbsp;on iPhones, iPads, and Macs.</p>\n<p>Apple fell 3.7% in extended trading.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bd3b61df2acaab5e8ff56c1872221c60\" tg-width=\"847\" tg-height=\"621\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>\"We had a very strong performance despite larger than expected supply constraints, which we estimate to be around $6 billion,\" Cook said. \"The supply constraints were driven by the industry wide chip shortages that have been talked about a lot, and COVID-related manufacturing disruptions in Southeast Asia.\"Cook said that the impact will be even worse during the current holiday sales quarter.</p>\n<p>However, Apple's overall revenue was still up 29%&nbsp;and each of its product categories grew on an annual basis.</p>\n<p>Here's how Apple did versus Refinitiv consensus estimates:</p>\n<ul>\n <li><b>EPS:</b>&nbsp;$1.24 vs. $1.24&nbsp;estimated</li>\n <li><b>Revenue:</b>&nbsp;$83.36&nbsp;billion&nbsp;&nbsp;vs.&nbsp;$84.85&nbsp;billion&nbsp;estimated, up 29% year-over-year</li>\n <li><b>iPhone revenue:</b>&nbsp;$38.87&nbsp;billion&nbsp;vs. $41.51&nbsp;billion&nbsp;estimated, up 47% year-over-year</li>\n <li><b>Services revenue:</b>&nbsp;$18.28&nbsp;billion&nbsp;vs. $17.64&nbsp;billion&nbsp;estimated,&nbsp;up 25.6% year-over-year</li>\n <li><b>Other Products revenue:</b>&nbsp;$8.79&nbsp;billion&nbsp;vs. $9.33&nbsp;billion&nbsp;estimated, up 11.5% year-over-year</li>\n <li><b>Mac revenue:</b>&nbsp;$9.18&nbsp;billion&nbsp;vs. $9.23&nbsp;billion&nbsp;estimated, up 1.6% year-over-year</li>\n <li><b>iPad revenue:</b>&nbsp;$8.25&nbsp;billion&nbsp;vs. $7.23&nbsp;billion&nbsp;estimated, up 21.4% year-over-year</li>\n <li><b>Gross margin:</b>&nbsp;42.2% vs. 42.0% estimated</li>\n</ul>\n<p>iPhone sales were up 47% year-over-year, but still came in under Wall Street estimates.</p>\n<p>Apple's results were mixed in a fiscal fourth quarter seen as a lull before the high-sales holiday end of year.</p>\n<p>Apple said revenues and profits for the fiscal fourth quarter were $83.4 billion and $1.24 per share, compared with analyst estimates of $84.8 billion and $1.24 per share, according to IBES data from Refinitiv.</p>\n<p>The results were a rocky end to a fiscal year of above-expectations sales led by its iPhone 12 models and strong sales of Mac computers and iPads for working and learning from home during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>\n<p>Apple told investors in July that chip constraints would start to hit its iPhone and iPad lineups for the first time in the fourth quarter.</p>\n<p>Apple posted its results shortly after retailer Amazon.com&nbsp;forecast holiday-quarter sales well below Wall Street expectations, citing labor supply shortages and global supply chain issues in part.</p>\n<p>Apple has \"managed to navigate the problems fairly well, but hasn’t escaped unscathed, and an extended duration of these problems will spell trouble, especially because the market is unforgiving when it comes to Apple’s performance,\" said Sophie Lund-Yates, equity analyst at Hargreaves Lansdown.</p>\n<p><b>MISSES</b></p>\n<p>Apple missed expectations in two key categories.</p>\n<p>Apple said fourth-quarter iPhone sales were $38.9 billion, short of estimates of $41.5 billion, according to Refinitiv data.</p>\n<p>Cook said that chips made with older technology remain the key supply constraint. He said that Apple remains unsure whether the shortages will ease after the holiday shopping season.</p>\n<p>\"It's very difficult to call,\" Cook said.</p>\n<p>The company's accessories segment, which contains fast-growing categories like its AirPods wireless headphones, came in at $8.8 billion, half a billion dollars lower than analyst expectations of $9.3 billion, according to Refinitiv data.</p>\n<p>Other segments fared better. Sales for iPads and Macs were $8.3 billion and $9.2 billion, compared with analyst estimates of $7.2 billion and $9.2 billion, according to Refinitiv data.</p>\n<p>The company's services segment - which contains its App Store business - had sales of $18.3 billion in revenue, up 26%, compared with analyst expectations of $17.6 billion. Cook said that Apple now has 745 million paid subscribers to its platform, up from the 700 million it disclosed a quarter ago.</p>\n<p>\"Services were strong, and it shows the beauty and durability of software and services, as there are better margins and no supply issues, since software doesn't arrive on a container ship,\" said Hal Eddins, chief economist at Apple shareholder Capital Investment Companies.</p>\n<p>Another bright spot in the company's results were its sales in China, which were up 83% to $14.6 billion.</p>\n<p>The company said it returned $24 billion to shareholders during the quarter.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple sales miss expectations, supply issues cost company $6 billion</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple sales miss expectations, supply issues cost company $6 billion\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-10-29 06:35</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Apple&nbsp;revenue fell short of Wall Street expectations in its fiscal fourth quarter on Thursday,&nbsp;which Apple CEO Tim Cook attributed to larger-than-expected supply constraints&nbsp;on iPhones, iPads, and Macs.</p>\n<p>Apple fell 3.7% in extended trading.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bd3b61df2acaab5e8ff56c1872221c60\" tg-width=\"847\" tg-height=\"621\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>\"We had a very strong performance despite larger than expected supply constraints, which we estimate to be around $6 billion,\" Cook said. \"The supply constraints were driven by the industry wide chip shortages that have been talked about a lot, and COVID-related manufacturing disruptions in Southeast Asia.\"Cook said that the impact will be even worse during the current holiday sales quarter.</p>\n<p>However, Apple's overall revenue was still up 29%&nbsp;and each of its product categories grew on an annual basis.</p>\n<p>Here's how Apple did versus Refinitiv consensus estimates:</p>\n<ul>\n <li><b>EPS:</b>&nbsp;$1.24 vs. $1.24&nbsp;estimated</li>\n <li><b>Revenue:</b>&nbsp;$83.36&nbsp;billion&nbsp;&nbsp;vs.&nbsp;$84.85&nbsp;billion&nbsp;estimated, up 29% year-over-year</li>\n <li><b>iPhone revenue:</b>&nbsp;$38.87&nbsp;billion&nbsp;vs. $41.51&nbsp;billion&nbsp;estimated, up 47% year-over-year</li>\n <li><b>Services revenue:</b>&nbsp;$18.28&nbsp;billion&nbsp;vs. $17.64&nbsp;billion&nbsp;estimated,&nbsp;up 25.6% year-over-year</li>\n <li><b>Other Products revenue:</b>&nbsp;$8.79&nbsp;billion&nbsp;vs. $9.33&nbsp;billion&nbsp;estimated, up 11.5% year-over-year</li>\n <li><b>Mac revenue:</b>&nbsp;$9.18&nbsp;billion&nbsp;vs. $9.23&nbsp;billion&nbsp;estimated, up 1.6% year-over-year</li>\n <li><b>iPad revenue:</b>&nbsp;$8.25&nbsp;billion&nbsp;vs. $7.23&nbsp;billion&nbsp;estimated, up 21.4% year-over-year</li>\n <li><b>Gross margin:</b>&nbsp;42.2% vs. 42.0% estimated</li>\n</ul>\n<p>iPhone sales were up 47% year-over-year, but still came in under Wall Street estimates.</p>\n<p>Apple's results were mixed in a fiscal fourth quarter seen as a lull before the high-sales holiday end of year.</p>\n<p>Apple said revenues and profits for the fiscal fourth quarter were $83.4 billion and $1.24 per share, compared with analyst estimates of $84.8 billion and $1.24 per share, according to IBES data from Refinitiv.</p>\n<p>The results were a rocky end to a fiscal year of above-expectations sales led by its iPhone 12 models and strong sales of Mac computers and iPads for working and learning from home during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>\n<p>Apple told investors in July that chip constraints would start to hit its iPhone and iPad lineups for the first time in the fourth quarter.</p>\n<p>Apple posted its results shortly after retailer Amazon.com&nbsp;forecast holiday-quarter sales well below Wall Street expectations, citing labor supply shortages and global supply chain issues in part.</p>\n<p>Apple has \"managed to navigate the problems fairly well, but hasn’t escaped unscathed, and an extended duration of these problems will spell trouble, especially because the market is unforgiving when it comes to Apple’s performance,\" said Sophie Lund-Yates, equity analyst at Hargreaves Lansdown.</p>\n<p><b>MISSES</b></p>\n<p>Apple missed expectations in two key categories.</p>\n<p>Apple said fourth-quarter iPhone sales were $38.9 billion, short of estimates of $41.5 billion, according to Refinitiv data.</p>\n<p>Cook said that chips made with older technology remain the key supply constraint. He said that Apple remains unsure whether the shortages will ease after the holiday shopping season.</p>\n<p>\"It's very difficult to call,\" Cook said.</p>\n<p>The company's accessories segment, which contains fast-growing categories like its AirPods wireless headphones, came in at $8.8 billion, half a billion dollars lower than analyst expectations of $9.3 billion, according to Refinitiv data.</p>\n<p>Other segments fared better. Sales for iPads and Macs were $8.3 billion and $9.2 billion, compared with analyst estimates of $7.2 billion and $9.2 billion, according to Refinitiv data.</p>\n<p>The company's services segment - which contains its App Store business - had sales of $18.3 billion in revenue, up 26%, compared with analyst expectations of $17.6 billion. Cook said that Apple now has 745 million paid subscribers to its platform, up from the 700 million it disclosed a quarter ago.</p>\n<p>\"Services were strong, and it shows the beauty and durability of software and services, as there are better margins and no supply issues, since software doesn't arrive on a container ship,\" said Hal Eddins, chief economist at Apple shareholder Capital Investment Companies.</p>\n<p>Another bright spot in the company's results were its sales in China, which were up 83% to $14.6 billion.</p>\n<p>The company said it returned $24 billion to shareholders during the quarter.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1178207364","content_text":"Apple revenue fell short of Wall Street expectations in its fiscal fourth quarter on Thursday, which Apple CEO Tim Cook attributed to larger-than-expected supply constraints on iPhones, iPads, and Macs.\nApple fell 3.7% in extended trading.\n\n\"We had a very strong performance despite larger than expected supply constraints, which we estimate to be around $6 billion,\" Cook said. \"The supply constraints were driven by the industry wide chip shortages that have been talked about a lot, and COVID-related manufacturing disruptions in Southeast Asia.\"Cook said that the impact will be even worse during the current holiday sales quarter.\nHowever, Apple's overall revenue was still up 29% and each of its product categories grew on an annual basis.\nHere's how Apple did versus Refinitiv consensus estimates:\n\nEPS: $1.24 vs. $1.24 estimated\nRevenue: $83.36 billion  vs. $84.85 billion estimated, up 29% year-over-year\niPhone revenue: $38.87 billion vs. $41.51 billion estimated, up 47% year-over-year\nServices revenue: $18.28 billion vs. $17.64 billion estimated, up 25.6% year-over-year\nOther Products revenue: $8.79 billion vs. $9.33 billion estimated, up 11.5% year-over-year\nMac revenue: $9.18 billion vs. $9.23 billion estimated, up 1.6% year-over-year\niPad revenue: $8.25 billion vs. $7.23 billion estimated, up 21.4% year-over-year\nGross margin: 42.2% vs. 42.0% estimated\n\niPhone sales were up 47% year-over-year, but still came in under Wall Street estimates.\nApple's results were mixed in a fiscal fourth quarter seen as a lull before the high-sales holiday end of year.\nApple said revenues and profits for the fiscal fourth quarter were $83.4 billion and $1.24 per share, compared with analyst estimates of $84.8 billion and $1.24 per share, according to IBES data from Refinitiv.\nThe results were a rocky end to a fiscal year of above-expectations sales led by its iPhone 12 models and strong sales of Mac computers and iPads for working and learning from home during the COVID-19 pandemic.\nApple told investors in July that chip constraints would start to hit its iPhone and iPad lineups for the first time in the fourth quarter.\nApple posted its results shortly after retailer Amazon.com forecast holiday-quarter sales well below Wall Street expectations, citing labor supply shortages and global supply chain issues in part.\nApple has \"managed to navigate the problems fairly well, but hasn’t escaped unscathed, and an extended duration of these problems will spell trouble, especially because the market is unforgiving when it comes to Apple’s performance,\" said Sophie Lund-Yates, equity analyst at Hargreaves Lansdown.\nMISSES\nApple missed expectations in two key categories.\nApple said fourth-quarter iPhone sales were $38.9 billion, short of estimates of $41.5 billion, according to Refinitiv data.\nCook said that chips made with older technology remain the key supply constraint. He said that Apple remains unsure whether the shortages will ease after the holiday shopping season.\n\"It's very difficult to call,\" Cook said.\nThe company's accessories segment, which contains fast-growing categories like its AirPods wireless headphones, came in at $8.8 billion, half a billion dollars lower than analyst expectations of $9.3 billion, according to Refinitiv data.\nOther segments fared better. Sales for iPads and Macs were $8.3 billion and $9.2 billion, compared with analyst estimates of $7.2 billion and $9.2 billion, according to Refinitiv data.\nThe company's services segment - which contains its App Store business - had sales of $18.3 billion in revenue, up 26%, compared with analyst expectations of $17.6 billion. Cook said that Apple now has 745 million paid subscribers to its platform, up from the 700 million it disclosed a quarter ago.\n\"Services were strong, and it shows the beauty and durability of software and services, as there are better margins and no supply issues, since software doesn't arrive on a container ship,\" said Hal Eddins, chief economist at Apple shareholder Capital Investment Companies.\nAnother bright spot in the company's results were its sales in China, which were up 83% to $14.6 billion.\nThe company said it returned $24 billion to shareholders during the quarter.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":394,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":856111281,"gmtCreate":1635160063621,"gmtModify":1635160063780,"author":{"id":"3585881140356055","authorId":"3585881140356055","name":"Rsstiget","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Take profits soon","listText":"Take profits soon","text":"Take profits soon","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/856111281","repostId":"1129106781","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1129106781","pubTimestamp":1635144072,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1129106781?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-25 14:41","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Are We Heading for a Repeat of the 2018 Stocks Selloff?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1129106781","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"Bond breakevens look to have pushed Jerome Powell to his line in the sand. Once again, the market ma","content":"<p>Bond breakevens look to have pushed Jerome Powell to his line in the sand. Once again, the market may be overestimating inflation risks.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8d55902061e9e7e9d2b20373b962471e\" tg-width=\"3252\" tg-height=\"1996\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>What Jerome Powell is looking at? Photographer: kimichele/iStockphoto/Getty Images</span></p>\n<p><b>Breakevens&nbsp;Breakout</b></p>\n<p>Inflation breakevens crossed an important line Friday. Was it also an important line for Jerome Powell and the Federal Reserve?</p>\n<p>Five-year breakevens show the implicit bond market forecast for average CPI inflation over the next five years. In their 20-year history, they have never topped the upper limit of the Fed’s inflation target of 3% —&nbsp;until early in Friday morning trading:</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b12743307f49058028200ceb8a3e860e\" tg-width=\"1200\" tg-height=\"675\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>Coincidentally or otherwise,Powell appeared in a seminar&nbsp;held by the South African Reserve Bank,&nbsp;and chaired by Bloomberg’s Francine Lacqua, a few hours later. His comments can fairly be described as hawkish. He said:</p>\n<blockquote>\n The risks are clearly now to longer and more persistent bottlenecks, and thus to higher inflation… Supply constraints and elevated inflation are likely to last longer than previously expected and well into next year, and the same is true for pressure on wages. If we were to see a risk of inflation moving persistently higher, we would certainly use our tools.\n</blockquote>\n<p>Perhaps most significantly, he conceded those bottlenecks and energy price increases had created an&nbsp; inflation framework that the Fed's “patient”&nbsp;approach wasn't designed for.&nbsp;That is about as close to an admission of error as a central bank governor can get.</p>\n<p>It also had an impact on the thinking of people trading breakevens. Coming so soon after this psychological landmark,&nbsp;it looked as though Powell had come to his line in the sand. The 3% level was touched only briefly in early trading; the Powell comments took it well below 2.9%:</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6d8f219b50a000e07e149c04d87fe01e\" tg-width=\"1200\" tg-height=\"675\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>The way&nbsp;breakevens took off last week is startling, and had few obvious triggers. As I’ve been documenting, it has grown ever harder to maintain that the recent rise in inflation is only “transitory,”&nbsp;for the reasons that Powell gave. There’s no clear evidence yet that we should brace for a sustained rise above the levels of the last three decades, and there was no obvious evidence of this last week. This has the look of a market belatedly catching up with reality, and overshooting as it does so.</p>\n<p>For more evidence, look at industrial metals. Their prices obviously factor into inflationary calculations. A rise can be an early sign of factors, such as bottlenecks or falling supply, that can lead to broader inflation. And indeed Bloomberg’s industrial metals index rallied to a 10-year high at the beginning of last week, bringing it close to its peak from the last bull market. Since then, however, prices have fallen sharply:</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c9c43c0dbcd090d26c4ed37657bbbfa4\" tg-width=\"1200\" tg-height=\"675\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>Metals prices have had only had six worse weeks than this in the last decade; but this followed their best week since the top of the last bull market. Again this looks like a rather strange case of speculative excess, while the rally in breakevens, even as materials prices were going into a sharp retreat, begins to look very odd:</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6aa7da3e87d7e56fce769cdeec9268c1\" tg-width=\"1200\" tg-height=\"675\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>As for the impact on stocks, it has been surprisingly muted. I suspect this is primarily because real yields keep supporting them. Real 10-year yields sank below -1% yet again in the early hours of Friday, naturally enough because inflation expectations rose. That helped stocks to a good start. The Powell comments sparked a rise in real yields back above -1%, and a sharp equities selloff. But from then on, stocks clawed back ground, while real yields steadily fell. Even with higher inflation expectations, bond yields aren’t rising sharply, and in real terms fixed-income markets remain easy and supportive for stocks:</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f9dcfdb4e04a5c75393db345516f2819\" tg-width=\"1200\" tg-height=\"675\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>For another important cross-asset-class effect, look at the link between oil prices and equities. Crude has a persistent positive relationship with longer-term inflation expectations that it shouldn’t have; a big rise in oil prices now, all things equal, means future increases will be smaller, while paying&nbsp;more for fuel will cause people to cut back consumption of other things. Moreover, the economy is far less dependent on oil than it was during the great inflation of the 1970s.</p>\n<p>However, the relationship between oil prices on the one hand,&nbsp;and stocks’ performance relative to bonds on the other, remains spectacularly close. Over the last five years, as this chart shows, they have moved in almost perfect alignment:</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0d9e80c6394afb4d6714a0009fd7c6da\" tg-width=\"1200\" tg-height=\"675\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>This looks like another market relationship that is far closer than it should be. If driven by rising demand, a surge in oil should indeed be a reason for stocks to beat bonds. If driven by cramped supply, as appears to be the case, then it becomes far more complicated.</p>\n<p>Like metals, or inflation breakevens, oil might yet prove to have reached a turning point. Once the price moves much above $80 per barrel, it becomes more profitable to build up fracking production in the U.S. —&nbsp;a development that the OPEC cartel wants to avoid. The last time oil reached this height, in October 2018, it started a steep dive that took stocks with it. The S&amp;P 500 endured a sharp selloff that culminated in the “Christmas Eve Massacre.”</p>\n<p>That drop was driven in large part by hawkish rhetoric from Powell. It ended after three months, after what has come to be known as the “Powell Pivot,” when the Fed chairman decided against his previous declared policy of steadily reducing the central bank’s balance sheet. History seldom&nbsp;repeats itself directly. But once again, the market is signaling that inflation pressure is perhaps worse than it really is. And once again that has provoked the Fed into more aggressive language in favor of tightening.</p>\n<p>There is now going to be a break from Fedspeak until the next Federal Open Market Committee meeting, which will come in the week after Halloween. With the exception of third-quarter GDP numbers, due this coming week, there isn’t much important data between now and then. So this could be a useful week for re-examination, both at the Fed and in the dealing rooms. After a few months of underestimating inflation risks, has the dial been turned too far in the other direction? And are we really doomed to repeat the last months of 2018?</p>\n<p><b>Risks &amp; Returns</b></p>\n<p>I discussed all of this with Kriti Gupta (standing in for Lisa Abramowicz) in the regular&nbsp;Risks &amp; Rewards livestream on Friday, which&nbsp; awkwardly went out just as Powell was speaking. I hope it makes for interesting&nbsp; viewing —&nbsp;we did our best to cover the waterfront.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48e2b4634634a4aa7fe93da751a1c51\" tg-width=\"1023\" tg-height=\"573\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p><b>Capital, Labor and the Plague</b></p>\n<p>Critical to the inflation debate is the risk of a wage-price spiral. Historical evidence, as I covered last year&nbsp;here, is that pandemics strengthen the hand of labor. This was certainly case after the Black Death. Even though Covid-19 has had no remotely comparable demographic effect on the working-age population, it appears to be having a similar impact on demand for labor, with the “Great Resignation” now in full sway. Will this lead to a self-reinforcing cycle of rising earnings?</p>\n<p>There are some budding signs of it in the U.S., where wages of low-skilled workers have picked up significantly, even if they remain below headline inflation. Logically, the place with the greatest risk of a wage-price spiral is Germany, which has a tradition of corporatism and strong unions, and where there has been a particularly&nbsp;nasty spike in producer prices. That isn’t happening so far, as shown in&nbsp;this fascinating piece by colleagues Jana Randow and Alexander Weber. So far, unions are accepting deals significantly worse than they had originally sought, as illustrated by this chart from the story using Goldman Sachs Group Inc. data:</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/46944e88d9c5adaa5680362020dbab3a\" tg-width=\"863\" tg-height=\"659\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>That implies that, at least so far, unions don’t feel as empowered as history suggests they might. That’s good news if you’re worried about inflation, and not so good if you’re worried about inequality.</p>\n<p>Also, regular reader Matt Dubuque points out that there is historical precedent for clamping down ruthlessly on post-pandemic wage demands. Following the Black Death, England’s Edward III saw that laborers were using the sudden drop in the labor supply to demand&nbsp; higher wages. His response was the&nbsp;Statute of Laborers. It’s not a liberal document. Here is a chunk:</p>\n<blockquote>\n <i>we have seen fit to ordain: that every man and woman of our kingdom of England, of whatever condition, whether bond or free, who is able bodied and below the age of sixty years, not living from trade nor carrying on a fixed craft, nor having of his own the means of living, or land of his own with regard to the cultivation of which he might occupy himself, and not serving another, if he, considering his station, be sought after to serve in a suitable service, he shall be bound to serve him who has seen fit so to seek after him; and he shall take only the wages liveries, meed or salary which, in the places where he sought to serve, were accustomed to be paid in the twentieth year of our reign of England, or the five or six common years next preceding.</i>\n</blockquote>\n<p>The penalty was prison. An incomes policy&nbsp;this strict isn’t politically possible these days. On balance, history still suggests that workers are in a position to demand more money. Keep an eye on Germany to get an idea whether it’s going to happen.</p>\n<p><b>Fooled by Randomness, Baseball Edition</b></p>\n<p>Reversion to the mean is one of the constants of life, in baseball as in markets. Baseball is a game that can be analyzed deeply with statistics, that runs on money, and which inspires great passions —&nbsp;just like markets. The season finale is about to happen, with the Houston Astros meeting the Atlanta Braves in the World Series. The season is over for my own Boston Red Sox, who succumbed 4-2 to the Astros in six games. Should we be surprised, or disappointed?</p>\n<p>No. The Red Sox were maddeningly inconsistent all season, with long winning stretches interspersed with periods when they appeared incapable of anything. At the outset, they looked like the fourth-best team in the&nbsp;division. That’s roughly what they were, even though they survived longer than any of their divisional rivals. The Red Sox put together a nine-game winning streak and, in the penultimate week, a seven-win stretch. They did the latter wearing novelty yellow uniforms, which prompted the crowd to start dressing as bananas. But the&nbsp;seven-game streak was followed by losing three in a row at home to the New York Yankees, and then dropping two of three to the terrible Baltimore Orioles.</p>\n<p>Somehow they earned a home game against New York for a wild card to the play-offs, which they won easily. The narrative changed. Against Tampa Bay, who won nine games more than the Red Sox during the regular season, Boston reeled off three games in a row, thanks to a brilliant offense. Then in the first 27 innings of their series against the Astros, the Red Sox scored 27 times. Over the remaining 26 innings, they scored once. Both of these streaks in their own right seemed implausible; the overall series performance was about what you’d expect.</p>\n<p>You can try to attach narratives to this, but that would be unwise. The Red Sox had a good but erratic offense, meaning that over a full season they would do well but not superlatively. They might just beat a superior team in the post-season (as against Tampa), but&nbsp;as time went by, the odds increased that a better team would beat them. They reverted to the mean.&nbsp;Along the way, the clumps of good results to be expected in a random distribution&nbsp;gave me and many others lots of pleasure.</p>\n<p>What relevance does this have for markets? There are momentum effects,&nbsp;but the longer the season lasts, the more you can assume quality will out. If you want to bet on how things will go in the short run, you will have a lot of fun, but you are taking a much greater risk. Don’t be fooled by the market equivalent of banana-yellow uniforms. Stick with the fundamentals for the long term, be patient, and you’ll probably win.</p>\n<p><b>Survival Tips</b></p>\n<p>This weekend began with&nbsp;World Wombat Day.Wombats&nbsp;are wonderful, some of my&nbsp;favorite marsupials. Everyone should should appreciate them.Wombat Stew&nbsp;was one of my kids’ favorite songs when they were younger; it’s a&nbsp;great book to read aloud&nbsp;to pre-schoolers. And there’s even a&nbsp;decent band&nbsp;called&nbsp;the Wombats, who sing about&nbsp;moving to New York&nbsp;and many other things. You could&nbsp;give them a try.</p>\n<p>Have a good week, everyone.</p>","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Are We Heading for a Repeat of the 2018 Stocks Selloff?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAre We Heading for a Repeat of the 2018 Stocks Selloff?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-10-25 14:41 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2021-10-25/powell-s-hawkish-tilt-evokes-memories-of-2018-market-selloff?srnd=premium-asia><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Bond breakevens look to have pushed Jerome Powell to his line in the sand. Once again, the market may be overestimating inflation risks.\nWhat Jerome Powell is looking at? Photographer: kimichele/...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2021-10-25/powell-s-hawkish-tilt-evokes-memories-of-2018-market-selloff?srnd=premium-asia\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2021-10-25/powell-s-hawkish-tilt-evokes-memories-of-2018-market-selloff?srnd=premium-asia","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1129106781","content_text":"Bond breakevens look to have pushed Jerome Powell to his line in the sand. Once again, the market may be overestimating inflation risks.\nWhat Jerome Powell is looking at? Photographer: kimichele/iStockphoto/Getty Images\nBreakevens Breakout\nInflation breakevens crossed an important line Friday. Was it also an important line for Jerome Powell and the Federal Reserve?\nFive-year breakevens show the implicit bond market forecast for average CPI inflation over the next five years. In their 20-year history, they have never topped the upper limit of the Fed’s inflation target of 3% — until early in Friday morning trading:\n\nCoincidentally or otherwise,Powell appeared in a seminar held by the South African Reserve Bank, and chaired by Bloomberg’s Francine Lacqua, a few hours later. His comments can fairly be described as hawkish. He said:\n\n The risks are clearly now to longer and more persistent bottlenecks, and thus to higher inflation… Supply constraints and elevated inflation are likely to last longer than previously expected and well into next year, and the same is true for pressure on wages. If we were to see a risk of inflation moving persistently higher, we would certainly use our tools.\n\nPerhaps most significantly, he conceded those bottlenecks and energy price increases had created an  inflation framework that the Fed's “patient” approach wasn't designed for. That is about as close to an admission of error as a central bank governor can get.\nIt also had an impact on the thinking of people trading breakevens. Coming so soon after this psychological landmark, it looked as though Powell had come to his line in the sand. The 3% level was touched only briefly in early trading; the Powell comments took it well below 2.9%:\n\nThe way breakevens took off last week is startling, and had few obvious triggers. As I’ve been documenting, it has grown ever harder to maintain that the recent rise in inflation is only “transitory,” for the reasons that Powell gave. There’s no clear evidence yet that we should brace for a sustained rise above the levels of the last three decades, and there was no obvious evidence of this last week. This has the look of a market belatedly catching up with reality, and overshooting as it does so.\nFor more evidence, look at industrial metals. Their prices obviously factor into inflationary calculations. A rise can be an early sign of factors, such as bottlenecks or falling supply, that can lead to broader inflation. And indeed Bloomberg’s industrial metals index rallied to a 10-year high at the beginning of last week, bringing it close to its peak from the last bull market. Since then, however, prices have fallen sharply:\n\nMetals prices have had only had six worse weeks than this in the last decade; but this followed their best week since the top of the last bull market. Again this looks like a rather strange case of speculative excess, while the rally in breakevens, even as materials prices were going into a sharp retreat, begins to look very odd:\n\nAs for the impact on stocks, it has been surprisingly muted. I suspect this is primarily because real yields keep supporting them. Real 10-year yields sank below -1% yet again in the early hours of Friday, naturally enough because inflation expectations rose. That helped stocks to a good start. The Powell comments sparked a rise in real yields back above -1%, and a sharp equities selloff. But from then on, stocks clawed back ground, while real yields steadily fell. Even with higher inflation expectations, bond yields aren’t rising sharply, and in real terms fixed-income markets remain easy and supportive for stocks:\n\nFor another important cross-asset-class effect, look at the link between oil prices and equities. Crude has a persistent positive relationship with longer-term inflation expectations that it shouldn’t have; a big rise in oil prices now, all things equal, means future increases will be smaller, while paying more for fuel will cause people to cut back consumption of other things. Moreover, the economy is far less dependent on oil than it was during the great inflation of the 1970s.\nHowever, the relationship between oil prices on the one hand, and stocks’ performance relative to bonds on the other, remains spectacularly close. Over the last five years, as this chart shows, they have moved in almost perfect alignment:\n\nThis looks like another market relationship that is far closer than it should be. If driven by rising demand, a surge in oil should indeed be a reason for stocks to beat bonds. If driven by cramped supply, as appears to be the case, then it becomes far more complicated.\nLike metals, or inflation breakevens, oil might yet prove to have reached a turning point. Once the price moves much above $80 per barrel, it becomes more profitable to build up fracking production in the U.S. — a development that the OPEC cartel wants to avoid. The last time oil reached this height, in October 2018, it started a steep dive that took stocks with it. The S&P 500 endured a sharp selloff that culminated in the “Christmas Eve Massacre.”\nThat drop was driven in large part by hawkish rhetoric from Powell. It ended after three months, after what has come to be known as the “Powell Pivot,” when the Fed chairman decided against his previous declared policy of steadily reducing the central bank’s balance sheet. History seldom repeats itself directly. But once again, the market is signaling that inflation pressure is perhaps worse than it really is. And once again that has provoked the Fed into more aggressive language in favor of tightening.\nThere is now going to be a break from Fedspeak until the next Federal Open Market Committee meeting, which will come in the week after Halloween. With the exception of third-quarter GDP numbers, due this coming week, there isn’t much important data between now and then. So this could be a useful week for re-examination, both at the Fed and in the dealing rooms. After a few months of underestimating inflation risks, has the dial been turned too far in the other direction? And are we really doomed to repeat the last months of 2018?\nRisks & Returns\nI discussed all of this with Kriti Gupta (standing in for Lisa Abramowicz) in the regular Risks & Rewards livestream on Friday, which  awkwardly went out just as Powell was speaking. I hope it makes for interesting  viewing — we did our best to cover the waterfront.\n\nCapital, Labor and the Plague\nCritical to the inflation debate is the risk of a wage-price spiral. Historical evidence, as I covered last year here, is that pandemics strengthen the hand of labor. This was certainly case after the Black Death. Even though Covid-19 has had no remotely comparable demographic effect on the working-age population, it appears to be having a similar impact on demand for labor, with the “Great Resignation” now in full sway. Will this lead to a self-reinforcing cycle of rising earnings?\nThere are some budding signs of it in the U.S., where wages of low-skilled workers have picked up significantly, even if they remain below headline inflation. Logically, the place with the greatest risk of a wage-price spiral is Germany, which has a tradition of corporatism and strong unions, and where there has been a particularly nasty spike in producer prices. That isn’t happening so far, as shown in this fascinating piece by colleagues Jana Randow and Alexander Weber. So far, unions are accepting deals significantly worse than they had originally sought, as illustrated by this chart from the story using Goldman Sachs Group Inc. data:\n\nThat implies that, at least so far, unions don’t feel as empowered as history suggests they might. That’s good news if you’re worried about inflation, and not so good if you’re worried about inequality.\nAlso, regular reader Matt Dubuque points out that there is historical precedent for clamping down ruthlessly on post-pandemic wage demands. Following the Black Death, England’s Edward III saw that laborers were using the sudden drop in the labor supply to demand  higher wages. His response was the Statute of Laborers. It’s not a liberal document. Here is a chunk:\n\nwe have seen fit to ordain: that every man and woman of our kingdom of England, of whatever condition, whether bond or free, who is able bodied and below the age of sixty years, not living from trade nor carrying on a fixed craft, nor having of his own the means of living, or land of his own with regard to the cultivation of which he might occupy himself, and not serving another, if he, considering his station, be sought after to serve in a suitable service, he shall be bound to serve him who has seen fit so to seek after him; and he shall take only the wages liveries, meed or salary which, in the places where he sought to serve, were accustomed to be paid in the twentieth year of our reign of England, or the five or six common years next preceding.\n\nThe penalty was prison. An incomes policy this strict isn’t politically possible these days. On balance, history still suggests that workers are in a position to demand more money. Keep an eye on Germany to get an idea whether it’s going to happen.\nFooled by Randomness, Baseball Edition\nReversion to the mean is one of the constants of life, in baseball as in markets. Baseball is a game that can be analyzed deeply with statistics, that runs on money, and which inspires great passions — just like markets. The season finale is about to happen, with the Houston Astros meeting the Atlanta Braves in the World Series. The season is over for my own Boston Red Sox, who succumbed 4-2 to the Astros in six games. Should we be surprised, or disappointed?\nNo. The Red Sox were maddeningly inconsistent all season, with long winning stretches interspersed with periods when they appeared incapable of anything. At the outset, they looked like the fourth-best team in the division. That’s roughly what they were, even though they survived longer than any of their divisional rivals. The Red Sox put together a nine-game winning streak and, in the penultimate week, a seven-win stretch. They did the latter wearing novelty yellow uniforms, which prompted the crowd to start dressing as bananas. But the seven-game streak was followed by losing three in a row at home to the New York Yankees, and then dropping two of three to the terrible Baltimore Orioles.\nSomehow they earned a home game against New York for a wild card to the play-offs, which they won easily. The narrative changed. Against Tampa Bay, who won nine games more than the Red Sox during the regular season, Boston reeled off three games in a row, thanks to a brilliant offense. Then in the first 27 innings of their series against the Astros, the Red Sox scored 27 times. Over the remaining 26 innings, they scored once. Both of these streaks in their own right seemed implausible; the overall series performance was about what you’d expect.\nYou can try to attach narratives to this, but that would be unwise. The Red Sox had a good but erratic offense, meaning that over a full season they would do well but not superlatively. They might just beat a superior team in the post-season (as against Tampa), but as time went by, the odds increased that a better team would beat them. They reverted to the mean. Along the way, the clumps of good results to be expected in a random distribution gave me and many others lots of pleasure.\nWhat relevance does this have for markets? There are momentum effects, but the longer the season lasts, the more you can assume quality will out. If you want to bet on how things will go in the short run, you will have a lot of fun, but you are taking a much greater risk. Don’t be fooled by the market equivalent of banana-yellow uniforms. Stick with the fundamentals for the long term, be patient, and you’ll probably win.\nSurvival Tips\nThis weekend began with World Wombat Day.Wombats are wonderful, some of my favorite marsupials. Everyone should should appreciate them.Wombat Stew was one of my kids’ favorite songs when they were younger; it’s a great book to read aloud to pre-schoolers. And there’s even a decent band called the Wombats, who sing about moving to New York and many other things. You could give them a try.\nHave a good week, everyone.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":327,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":851187292,"gmtCreate":1634882054124,"gmtModify":1634882054231,"author":{"id":"3585881140356055","authorId":"3585881140356055","name":"Rsstiget","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Heng heng , going up","listText":"Heng heng , going up","text":"Heng heng , going up","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/851187292","repostId":"851186007","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":851186007,"gmtCreate":1634881376307,"gmtModify":1720268182121,"author":{"id":"3527667616426390","authorId":"3527667616426390","name":"社区小管家","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0afb2000fa4cb2e747dbc357b364235f","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"title":"10月22日老虎社区违规行为处罚公告","htmlText":"亲爱的虎友们，又到了每周五的通报时间了，祝大家周末愉快！ 老虎社区是为各位虎友提供市场信息、投资线索、分析研究、互动交流等有助于投资互动的服务，我们一直在为营造一个开放包容、尊重平等、友好和谐的社区氛围而努力。 但我们发现一些虎友存在不遵守社区规则，严重扰乱社区环境的行为，这些行为严重影响了其他虎友的日常体验。我们将以每日收集、每日查封等方式对违规的虎友进行处罚。小管家再次提醒广大虎友们友善发言，理性沟通，良好的社区环境需要大家共同来维护！ 相关释义： 敏感言论：社区鼓励大家理性讨论，但不要胡评妄议政策、体制等敏感内容，任何上升到国家政治层面的违规内容。一经发现，都会被小管家删除内容，并对违规虎友进行处罚。 股托水军：社区鼓励大家在各个股票标的下发表自己的看法，但是却有一些虎友以推介股票之名，行高位诱套之实，打着股票交易的名号带节奏，严重影响了其他虎友们的交易决策。对于这种恶劣行为，小管家绝不姑息，一经发现绝不手软。 广告水军：社区严禁任何形式的广告行为，包括但不限于添加微信或扫描二维码的方式引流荐股、推荐交易品种等。一经发现会被小管家从严、从重处罚。 言语辱骂：语言是把双刃剑，讨论交易心得，还请大家就事论事，不要用语言中伤他人，用语言羞辱、谩骂、攻击、骚扰、恐吓、威胁、诽谤等行为均不可取。一经发现，小管家会删除其内容，并对违规虎友进行处罚。 恶意灌水：社区禁止大家发布一连串没意义的文字、符号、字母、图片、表情等严重影响其他虎友获取信息，影响浏览体验的行为。一经发现，都会被小管家删除内容，并对违规虎友进行处罚。 现将一周的处罚名单进行公示（部分） 为了给虎友们提供更好的交流环境，我们欢迎大家对违规内容进行举报，常用的举报方式有以下两种： 方法一：违规内容举报 举报违规帖子，可以点击帖子右下角“...”，选择“举报按钮”；举报违规评论，长按评论，在弹出选项中找到“举报”键。","listText":"亲爱的虎友们，又到了每周五的通报时间了，祝大家周末愉快！ 老虎社区是为各位虎友提供市场信息、投资线索、分析研究、互动交流等有助于投资互动的服务，我们一直在为营造一个开放包容、尊重平等、友好和谐的社区氛围而努力。 但我们发现一些虎友存在不遵守社区规则，严重扰乱社区环境的行为，这些行为严重影响了其他虎友的日常体验。我们将以每日收集、每日查封等方式对违规的虎友进行处罚。小管家再次提醒广大虎友们友善发言，理性沟通，良好的社区环境需要大家共同来维护！ 相关释义： 敏感言论：社区鼓励大家理性讨论，但不要胡评妄议政策、体制等敏感内容，任何上升到国家政治层面的违规内容。一经发现，都会被小管家删除内容，并对违规虎友进行处罚。 股托水军：社区鼓励大家在各个股票标的下发表自己的看法，但是却有一些虎友以推介股票之名，行高位诱套之实，打着股票交易的名号带节奏，严重影响了其他虎友们的交易决策。对于这种恶劣行为，小管家绝不姑息，一经发现绝不手软。 广告水军：社区严禁任何形式的广告行为，包括但不限于添加微信或扫描二维码的方式引流荐股、推荐交易品种等。一经发现会被小管家从严、从重处罚。 言语辱骂：语言是把双刃剑，讨论交易心得，还请大家就事论事，不要用语言中伤他人，用语言羞辱、谩骂、攻击、骚扰、恐吓、威胁、诽谤等行为均不可取。一经发现，小管家会删除其内容，并对违规虎友进行处罚。 恶意灌水：社区禁止大家发布一连串没意义的文字、符号、字母、图片、表情等严重影响其他虎友获取信息，影响浏览体验的行为。一经发现，都会被小管家删除内容，并对违规虎友进行处罚。 现将一周的处罚名单进行公示（部分） 为了给虎友们提供更好的交流环境，我们欢迎大家对违规内容进行举报，常用的举报方式有以下两种： 方法一：违规内容举报 举报违规帖子，可以点击帖子右下角“...”，选择“举报按钮”；举报违规评论，长按评论，在弹出选项中找到“举报”键。","text":"亲爱的虎友们，又到了每周五的通报时间了，祝大家周末愉快！ 老虎社区是为各位虎友提供市场信息、投资线索、分析研究、互动交流等有助于投资互动的服务，我们一直在为营造一个开放包容、尊重平等、友好和谐的社区氛围而努力。 但我们发现一些虎友存在不遵守社区规则，严重扰乱社区环境的行为，这些行为严重影响了其他虎友的日常体验。我们将以每日收集、每日查封等方式对违规的虎友进行处罚。小管家再次提醒广大虎友们友善发言，理性沟通，良好的社区环境需要大家共同来维护！ 相关释义： 敏感言论：社区鼓励大家理性讨论，但不要胡评妄议政策、体制等敏感内容，任何上升到国家政治层面的违规内容。一经发现，都会被小管家删除内容，并对违规虎友进行处罚。 股托水军：社区鼓励大家在各个股票标的下发表自己的看法，但是却有一些虎友以推介股票之名，行高位诱套之实，打着股票交易的名号带节奏，严重影响了其他虎友们的交易决策。对于这种恶劣行为，小管家绝不姑息，一经发现绝不手软。 广告水军：社区严禁任何形式的广告行为，包括但不限于添加微信或扫描二维码的方式引流荐股、推荐交易品种等。一经发现会被小管家从严、从重处罚。 言语辱骂：语言是把双刃剑，讨论交易心得，还请大家就事论事，不要用语言中伤他人，用语言羞辱、谩骂、攻击、骚扰、恐吓、威胁、诽谤等行为均不可取。一经发现，小管家会删除其内容，并对违规虎友进行处罚。 恶意灌水：社区禁止大家发布一连串没意义的文字、符号、字母、图片、表情等严重影响其他虎友获取信息，影响浏览体验的行为。一经发现，都会被小管家删除内容，并对违规虎友进行处罚。 现将一周的处罚名单进行公示（部分） 为了给虎友们提供更好的交流环境，我们欢迎大家对违规内容进行举报，常用的举报方式有以下两种： 方法一：违规内容举报 举报违规帖子，可以点击帖子右下角“...”，选择“举报按钮”；举报违规评论，长按评论，在弹出选项中找到“举报”键。","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3da23b86e6428b04d0e7cf1ffd7c926b","width":"946","height":"833"},{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d483e955d4eabeb03642275a89521eda","width":"1280","height":"554"},{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/86b839b72758e43f7ed8cb09ee979b68","width":"429","height":"309"}],"top":1,"highlighted":2,"essential":1,"paper":2,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/851186007","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":3,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":378,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":859037399,"gmtCreate":1634636854712,"gmtModify":1634636950400,"author":{"id":"3585881140356055","authorId":"3585881140356055","name":"Rsstiget","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hoping up&nbsp;","listText":"Hoping up&nbsp;","text":"Hoping up","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/859037399","repostId":"1131439614","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1131439614","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1634632915,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1131439614?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-19 16:41","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tesla Bull Cathie Wood Backs UP.Partners' $230M Fund For Mobility Startups","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1131439614","media":"Benzinga","summary":"UP.Partners said on Monday Tesla Inc bull Cathie Woodis among a group of investors that have contrib","content":"<p><b>UP.Partners</b>&nbsp;said on Monday&nbsp;<b>Tesla Inc</b>&nbsp;bull&nbsp;<b>Cathie Wood</b>is among a group of investors that have contributed to its $230 million early-stage fund that would focus on mobility startups.</p>\n<p><b>What Happened:</b>&nbsp;The Santa Monica, California-based venture capital fund also named&nbsp;<b>Alaska Air Group Inc</b>,&nbsp;<b>WovenCapital</b>, a venture capital arm of&nbsp;<b>Toyota Motor Corp</b>&nbsp;subsidiary&nbsp;<b>Woven Planet</b>&nbsp;as investors.</p>\n<p>Wood, who leads the popular money managing firm Ark Investment Management, has put in money on the venture capital&nbsp;fund in a personal capacity. UP.Partners did not disclose the amount of Wood's investment.</p>\n<p>The fund would&nbsp;focus on emerging technologies and mobility solutions that are cleaner, faster, safer and come at a lower cost.&nbsp; These could include package delivery drones, electric vertical aircraft for urban air mobility, software for precise positioning, hydrogen-powered airliners, sustainable aviation fuel, ultra-low-cost Lidar&nbsp;sensors, micro-mobility scooters and e-bikes, and more, UP.Partners said in a statement.</p>\n<p><b>Why It Matters:</b>&nbsp;The Ark Invest CEO has been focused on emerging and disruptive technologies and some of her company’s exchange-traded funds go after newly listed companies with growth potential. These companies are spread across sectors from transportation, pharma, digital payments, social media, cryptocurrency to&nbsp;blockchain&nbsp;technology.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tesla Bull Cathie Wood Backs UP.Partners' $230M Fund For Mobility Startups</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTesla Bull Cathie Wood Backs UP.Partners' $230M Fund For Mobility Startups\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-10-19 16:41</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><b>UP.Partners</b>&nbsp;said on Monday&nbsp;<b>Tesla Inc</b>&nbsp;bull&nbsp;<b>Cathie Wood</b>is among a group of investors that have contributed to its $230 million early-stage fund that would focus on mobility startups.</p>\n<p><b>What Happened:</b>&nbsp;The Santa Monica, California-based venture capital fund also named&nbsp;<b>Alaska Air Group Inc</b>,&nbsp;<b>WovenCapital</b>, a venture capital arm of&nbsp;<b>Toyota Motor Corp</b>&nbsp;subsidiary&nbsp;<b>Woven Planet</b>&nbsp;as investors.</p>\n<p>Wood, who leads the popular money managing firm Ark Investment Management, has put in money on the venture capital&nbsp;fund in a personal capacity. UP.Partners did not disclose the amount of Wood's investment.</p>\n<p>The fund would&nbsp;focus on emerging technologies and mobility solutions that are cleaner, faster, safer and come at a lower cost.&nbsp; These could include package delivery drones, electric vertical aircraft for urban air mobility, software for precise positioning, hydrogen-powered airliners, sustainable aviation fuel, ultra-low-cost Lidar&nbsp;sensors, micro-mobility scooters and e-bikes, and more, UP.Partners said in a statement.</p>\n<p><b>Why It Matters:</b>&nbsp;The Ark Invest CEO has been focused on emerging and disruptive technologies and some of her company’s exchange-traded funds go after newly listed companies with growth potential. These companies are spread across sectors from transportation, pharma, digital payments, social media, cryptocurrency to&nbsp;blockchain&nbsp;technology.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1131439614","content_text":"UP.Partners said on Monday Tesla Inc bull Cathie Woodis among a group of investors that have contributed to its $230 million early-stage fund that would focus on mobility startups.\nWhat Happened: The Santa Monica, California-based venture capital fund also named Alaska Air Group Inc, WovenCapital, a venture capital arm of Toyota Motor Corp subsidiary Woven Planet as investors.\nWood, who leads the popular money managing firm Ark Investment Management, has put in money on the venture capital fund in a personal capacity. UP.Partners did not disclose the amount of Wood's investment.\nThe fund would focus on emerging technologies and mobility solutions that are cleaner, faster, safer and come at a lower cost.  These could include package delivery drones, electric vertical aircraft for urban air mobility, software for precise positioning, hydrogen-powered airliners, sustainable aviation fuel, ultra-low-cost Lidar sensors, micro-mobility scooters and e-bikes, and more, UP.Partners said in a statement.\nWhy It Matters: The Ark Invest CEO has been focused on emerging and disruptive technologies and some of her company’s exchange-traded funds go after newly listed companies with growth potential. These companies are spread across sectors from transportation, pharma, digital payments, social media, cryptocurrency to blockchain technology.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":339,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":821038447,"gmtCreate":1633671666160,"gmtModify":1633671666291,"author":{"id":"3585881140356055","authorId":"3585881140356055","name":"Rsstiget","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good number&nbsp;","listText":"Good number&nbsp;","text":"Good number","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/821038447","repostId":"1138936175","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1138936175","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1633671412,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1138936175?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-08 13:36","market":"us","language":"en","title":"TSMC revenue for September was approximately NT$152.69 billion,an increase of 19.7% YOY","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1138936175","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"TSMC today announced its net revenue for September 2021: On a consolidated basis, revenue for Septem","content":"<p>TSMC&nbsp;today announced its net revenue for September 2021: On a consolidated basis, revenue for September 2021 was approximately NT$152.69 billion, an increase of 11.1 percent from August 2021 and an increase of 19.7percent from September 2020. Revenue for January through September 2021 totaled NT$1,149.23 billion, an increase of 17.5 percent compared to the same period in 2020.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0e96c974ad4da3a78c740065da212fc0\" tg-width=\"746\" tg-height=\"152\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>\n<p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>TSMC revenue for September was approximately NT$152.69 billion,an increase of 19.7% YOY</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTSMC revenue for September was approximately NT$152.69 billion,an increase of 19.7% YOY\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-10-08 13:36</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>TSMC&nbsp;today announced its net revenue for September 2021: On a consolidated basis, revenue for September 2021 was approximately NT$152.69 billion, an increase of 11.1 percent from August 2021 and an increase of 19.7percent from September 2020. Revenue for January through September 2021 totaled NT$1,149.23 billion, an increase of 17.5 percent compared to the same period in 2020.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0e96c974ad4da3a78c740065da212fc0\" tg-width=\"746\" tg-height=\"152\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>\n<p></p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSM":"台积电"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1138936175","content_text":"TSMC today announced its net revenue for September 2021: On a consolidated basis, revenue for September 2021 was approximately NT$152.69 billion, an increase of 11.1 percent from August 2021 and an increase of 19.7percent from September 2020. Revenue for January through September 2021 totaled NT$1,149.23 billion, an increase of 17.5 percent compared to the same period in 2020.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":488,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":862466459,"gmtCreate":1632903273435,"gmtModify":1632903311206,"author":{"id":"3585881140356055","authorId":"3585881140356055","name":"Rsstiget","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Palantir is the good choice&nbsp;","listText":"Palantir is the good choice&nbsp;","text":"Palantir is the good choice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/862466459","repostId":"2170770176","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2170770176","pubTimestamp":1632837377,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2170770176?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-09-28 21:56","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Don't Wait for a Market Crash: 2 Stocks to Buy Now","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2170770176","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"The future looks bright for these tech companies.","content":"<p>Legendary investor Peter Lynch&nbsp;once said: \"Far more money has been lost by investors trying to anticipate corrections, than lost in the corrections themselves.\" In other words, even if a market crash seems imminent, no <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> actually knows the future, and trying to time the market often results in missed opportunities.</p>\n<p>From that perspective, it makes more sense to invest on a regular basis, even if it's a small sum of money. In doing so, you build positions through dollar-costing averaging, which helps protect your portfolio from short-term market volatility. With that in mind, <b>Elastic</b> (NYSE:ESTC) and <b>Palantir Technologies</b> (NYSE:PLTR) look like smart stocks to buy right now.</p>\n<p>Here's why.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d02e6cbf04a6fb81798056c8938fbcde\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p>\n<h2>1. Elastic</h2>\n<p>Elastic is a search company. At the core of its platform is the Elastic Stack, a set of software tools designed to ingest and log data from any source (e.g. software, infrastructure), then help clients search and analyze that information. Broadly speaking, these tools have three use cases: enterprise search, observability, and security.</p>\n<p>Elastic enterprise search is a workplace search engine. This application allows users to sift through corporate resources to find a particular item; it also allows developers to embed search bars in websites and mobile apps. Similarly, Elastic observability unifies logs, metrics, and application traces, allowing IT teams to analyze performance data, troubleshoot problems, and keep business-critical systems online. And Elastic security brings the same features to threat detection.</p>\n<p>Digital transformation has been a powerful growth driver for Elastic. As enterprises have adopted new technologies and digitized various processes, workplace search, observability, and security have become more critical. At the same time, Elastic's developer-friendly tools and freemium pricing model have helped the company win new customers at a rapid clip. In fact, Elastic is the most popular workplace search engine by a wide margin, according to DB-Engines.</p>\n<p>That advantage has helped the company grow its top line quickly. And while Elastic isn't profitable on a GAAP basis, it did generate $9.1 million in free cash flow over the last year.</p>\n<table>\n <thead>\n  <tr>\n   <th><p>Metric</p></th>\n   <th><p>Q1 2021 (TTM)</p></th>\n   <th><p>Q1 2022 (TTM)</p></th>\n   <th><p>CAGR</p></th>\n  </tr>\n </thead>\n <tbody>\n  <tr>\n   <td width=\"156\"><p>Revenue</p></td>\n   <td width=\"156\"><p>$466.8 million</p></td>\n   <td width=\"156\"><p>$672.7 million</p></td>\n   <td width=\"156\"><p>44%</p></td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p>Source: YCharts. Note: Q1 2022 ended July 31, 2021. TTM = trailing-12-months. CAGR = compound annual growth rate.</p>\n<p>Turning to the future, digital transformation should remain a tailwind for Elastic, and management is executing on a strong growth strategy.</p>\n<p>The company recently enhanced its security offering with the launch of an extended detection and response platform, a product that unifies security information and event management, endpoint protection, and cloud security. Elastic also rolled out new features for its enterprise search and observability applications, simplifying data ingestion and analytics to optimize search and automate root cause analysis.</p>\n<p>Management currently values the company's market opportunity at $78 billion, meaning Elastic has plenty of room to grow. And given its strong competitive position, I think shareholders will be well rewarded in the years ahead. That's why you should consider adding this growth stock to your portfolio.</p>\n<h2>2. Palantir Technologies</h2>\n<p>Palantir helps clients manage and make sense of big data. The company's software platforms -- Gotham (government sector) and Foundry (commercial sector) -- simplify data integration and analytics, allowing companies to unify siloed data sets, make informed decisions, and build AI models and data-driven applications.</p>\n<p>For example, Palantir's software helps manufacturers optimize supply chains, pharmaceutical companies accelerate drug discovery, and financial service providers detect and prevent fraud. Of course, data analytics is a trendy industry and Palantir faces plenty of competition, but its past gives it an edge over its rivals.</p>\n<p>Specifically, U.S. intelligence agencies (like the CIA and NSA) have used Palantir's software to handle classified information, demonstrating the company's expertise in data governance. Not surprisingly, Palantir's brand name has become synonymous with government-grade security, and that has translated into impressive financial results.</p>\n<p>The company's top line is growing at a steady clip, and Palantir generated $61.7 million in free cash flow over the past year.</p>\n<table>\n <thead>\n  <tr>\n   <th><p>Metric</p></th>\n   <th><p>Q2 2020 (TTM)</p></th>\n   <th><p>Q2 2021 (TTM)</p></th>\n   <th><p>CAGR</p></th>\n  </tr>\n </thead>\n <tbody>\n  <tr>\n   <td width=\"156\"><p>Revenue</p></td>\n   <td width=\"156\"><p>$901.1 million</p></td>\n   <td width=\"156\"><p>$1.3 billion</p></td>\n   <td width=\"156\"><p>47%</p></td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p>Source: YCharts. TTM = trailing-12-months. CAGR = compound annual growth rate.</p>\n<p>During the most recent quarter, Palantir closed 62 new deals worth at least $1 million, and 21 of those contracts are worth $10 million or more. The company also grew its commercial customers by 32%&nbsp;on a sequential basis. This should help supercharge revenue from the commercial sector, which has been growing more slowly than sales in the government sector.</p>\n<p>Going forward, digital transformation will continue to accelerate data production, and organizations that have the tools to harness that data stand to gain a competitive advantage. This tailwind should be a powerful growth driver for Palantir. That's why this growth stock looks like a good addition to a diversified portfolio.</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Don't Wait for a Market Crash: 2 Stocks to Buy Now</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nDon't Wait for a Market Crash: 2 Stocks to Buy Now\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-09-28 21:56 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/09/28/dont-wait-for-a-market-crash-2-stocks-to-buy-now/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Legendary investor Peter Lynch once said: \"Far more money has been lost by investors trying to anticipate corrections, than lost in the corrections themselves.\" In other words, even if a market crash ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/09/28/dont-wait-for-a-market-crash-2-stocks-to-buy-now/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"PLTR":"Palantir Technologies Inc.","ESTC":"Elastic N.V."},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/09/28/dont-wait-for-a-market-crash-2-stocks-to-buy-now/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2170770176","content_text":"Legendary investor Peter Lynch once said: \"Far more money has been lost by investors trying to anticipate corrections, than lost in the corrections themselves.\" In other words, even if a market crash seems imminent, no one actually knows the future, and trying to time the market often results in missed opportunities.\nFrom that perspective, it makes more sense to invest on a regular basis, even if it's a small sum of money. In doing so, you build positions through dollar-costing averaging, which helps protect your portfolio from short-term market volatility. With that in mind, Elastic (NYSE:ESTC) and Palantir Technologies (NYSE:PLTR) look like smart stocks to buy right now.\nHere's why.\nImage source: Getty Images.\n1. Elastic\nElastic is a search company. At the core of its platform is the Elastic Stack, a set of software tools designed to ingest and log data from any source (e.g. software, infrastructure), then help clients search and analyze that information. Broadly speaking, these tools have three use cases: enterprise search, observability, and security.\nElastic enterprise search is a workplace search engine. This application allows users to sift through corporate resources to find a particular item; it also allows developers to embed search bars in websites and mobile apps. Similarly, Elastic observability unifies logs, metrics, and application traces, allowing IT teams to analyze performance data, troubleshoot problems, and keep business-critical systems online. And Elastic security brings the same features to threat detection.\nDigital transformation has been a powerful growth driver for Elastic. As enterprises have adopted new technologies and digitized various processes, workplace search, observability, and security have become more critical. At the same time, Elastic's developer-friendly tools and freemium pricing model have helped the company win new customers at a rapid clip. In fact, Elastic is the most popular workplace search engine by a wide margin, according to DB-Engines.\nThat advantage has helped the company grow its top line quickly. And while Elastic isn't profitable on a GAAP basis, it did generate $9.1 million in free cash flow over the last year.\n\n\n\nMetric\nQ1 2021 (TTM)\nQ1 2022 (TTM)\nCAGR\n\n\n\n\nRevenue\n$466.8 million\n$672.7 million\n44%\n\n\n\nSource: YCharts. Note: Q1 2022 ended July 31, 2021. TTM = trailing-12-months. CAGR = compound annual growth rate.\nTurning to the future, digital transformation should remain a tailwind for Elastic, and management is executing on a strong growth strategy.\nThe company recently enhanced its security offering with the launch of an extended detection and response platform, a product that unifies security information and event management, endpoint protection, and cloud security. Elastic also rolled out new features for its enterprise search and observability applications, simplifying data ingestion and analytics to optimize search and automate root cause analysis.\nManagement currently values the company's market opportunity at $78 billion, meaning Elastic has plenty of room to grow. And given its strong competitive position, I think shareholders will be well rewarded in the years ahead. That's why you should consider adding this growth stock to your portfolio.\n2. Palantir Technologies\nPalantir helps clients manage and make sense of big data. The company's software platforms -- Gotham (government sector) and Foundry (commercial sector) -- simplify data integration and analytics, allowing companies to unify siloed data sets, make informed decisions, and build AI models and data-driven applications.\nFor example, Palantir's software helps manufacturers optimize supply chains, pharmaceutical companies accelerate drug discovery, and financial service providers detect and prevent fraud. Of course, data analytics is a trendy industry and Palantir faces plenty of competition, but its past gives it an edge over its rivals.\nSpecifically, U.S. intelligence agencies (like the CIA and NSA) have used Palantir's software to handle classified information, demonstrating the company's expertise in data governance. Not surprisingly, Palantir's brand name has become synonymous with government-grade security, and that has translated into impressive financial results.\nThe company's top line is growing at a steady clip, and Palantir generated $61.7 million in free cash flow over the past year.\n\n\n\nMetric\nQ2 2020 (TTM)\nQ2 2021 (TTM)\nCAGR\n\n\n\n\nRevenue\n$901.1 million\n$1.3 billion\n47%\n\n\n\nSource: YCharts. TTM = trailing-12-months. CAGR = compound annual growth rate.\nDuring the most recent quarter, Palantir closed 62 new deals worth at least $1 million, and 21 of those contracts are worth $10 million or more. The company also grew its commercial customers by 32% on a sequential basis. This should help supercharge revenue from the commercial sector, which has been growing more slowly than sales in the government sector.\nGoing forward, digital transformation will continue to accelerate data production, and organizations that have the tools to harness that data stand to gain a competitive advantage. This tailwind should be a powerful growth driver for Palantir. That's why this growth stock looks like a good addition to a diversified portfolio.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":519,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":821038447,"gmtCreate":1633671666160,"gmtModify":1633671666291,"author":{"id":"3585881140356055","authorId":"3585881140356055","name":"Rsstiget","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good number&nbsp;","listText":"Good number&nbsp;","text":"Good number","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/821038447","repostId":"1138936175","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1138936175","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1633671412,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1138936175?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-08 13:36","market":"us","language":"en","title":"TSMC revenue for September was approximately NT$152.69 billion,an increase of 19.7% YOY","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1138936175","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"TSMC today announced its net revenue for September 2021: On a consolidated basis, revenue for Septem","content":"<p>TSMC&nbsp;today announced its net revenue for September 2021: On a consolidated basis, revenue for September 2021 was approximately NT$152.69 billion, an increase of 11.1 percent from August 2021 and an increase of 19.7percent from September 2020. Revenue for January through September 2021 totaled NT$1,149.23 billion, an increase of 17.5 percent compared to the same period in 2020.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0e96c974ad4da3a78c740065da212fc0\" tg-width=\"746\" tg-height=\"152\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>\n<p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>TSMC revenue for September was approximately NT$152.69 billion,an increase of 19.7% YOY</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTSMC revenue for September was approximately NT$152.69 billion,an increase of 19.7% YOY\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-10-08 13:36</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>TSMC&nbsp;today announced its net revenue for September 2021: On a consolidated basis, revenue for September 2021 was approximately NT$152.69 billion, an increase of 11.1 percent from August 2021 and an increase of 19.7percent from September 2020. Revenue for January through September 2021 totaled NT$1,149.23 billion, an increase of 17.5 percent compared to the same period in 2020.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0e96c974ad4da3a78c740065da212fc0\" tg-width=\"746\" tg-height=\"152\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>\n<p></p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSM":"台积电"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1138936175","content_text":"TSMC today announced its net revenue for September 2021: On a consolidated basis, revenue for September 2021 was approximately NT$152.69 billion, an increase of 11.1 percent from August 2021 and an increase of 19.7percent from September 2020. Revenue for January through September 2021 totaled NT$1,149.23 billion, an increase of 17.5 percent compared to the same period in 2020.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":488,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":862466459,"gmtCreate":1632903273435,"gmtModify":1632903311206,"author":{"id":"3585881140356055","authorId":"3585881140356055","name":"Rsstiget","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Palantir is the good choice&nbsp;","listText":"Palantir is the good choice&nbsp;","text":"Palantir is the good choice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/862466459","repostId":"2170770176","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2170770176","pubTimestamp":1632837377,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2170770176?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-09-28 21:56","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Don't Wait for a Market Crash: 2 Stocks to Buy Now","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2170770176","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"The future looks bright for these tech companies.","content":"<p>Legendary investor Peter Lynch&nbsp;once said: \"Far more money has been lost by investors trying to anticipate corrections, than lost in the corrections themselves.\" In other words, even if a market crash seems imminent, no <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> actually knows the future, and trying to time the market often results in missed opportunities.</p>\n<p>From that perspective, it makes more sense to invest on a regular basis, even if it's a small sum of money. In doing so, you build positions through dollar-costing averaging, which helps protect your portfolio from short-term market volatility. With that in mind, <b>Elastic</b> (NYSE:ESTC) and <b>Palantir Technologies</b> (NYSE:PLTR) look like smart stocks to buy right now.</p>\n<p>Here's why.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d02e6cbf04a6fb81798056c8938fbcde\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p>\n<h2>1. Elastic</h2>\n<p>Elastic is a search company. At the core of its platform is the Elastic Stack, a set of software tools designed to ingest and log data from any source (e.g. software, infrastructure), then help clients search and analyze that information. Broadly speaking, these tools have three use cases: enterprise search, observability, and security.</p>\n<p>Elastic enterprise search is a workplace search engine. This application allows users to sift through corporate resources to find a particular item; it also allows developers to embed search bars in websites and mobile apps. Similarly, Elastic observability unifies logs, metrics, and application traces, allowing IT teams to analyze performance data, troubleshoot problems, and keep business-critical systems online. And Elastic security brings the same features to threat detection.</p>\n<p>Digital transformation has been a powerful growth driver for Elastic. As enterprises have adopted new technologies and digitized various processes, workplace search, observability, and security have become more critical. At the same time, Elastic's developer-friendly tools and freemium pricing model have helped the company win new customers at a rapid clip. In fact, Elastic is the most popular workplace search engine by a wide margin, according to DB-Engines.</p>\n<p>That advantage has helped the company grow its top line quickly. And while Elastic isn't profitable on a GAAP basis, it did generate $9.1 million in free cash flow over the last year.</p>\n<table>\n <thead>\n  <tr>\n   <th><p>Metric</p></th>\n   <th><p>Q1 2021 (TTM)</p></th>\n   <th><p>Q1 2022 (TTM)</p></th>\n   <th><p>CAGR</p></th>\n  </tr>\n </thead>\n <tbody>\n  <tr>\n   <td width=\"156\"><p>Revenue</p></td>\n   <td width=\"156\"><p>$466.8 million</p></td>\n   <td width=\"156\"><p>$672.7 million</p></td>\n   <td width=\"156\"><p>44%</p></td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p>Source: YCharts. Note: Q1 2022 ended July 31, 2021. TTM = trailing-12-months. CAGR = compound annual growth rate.</p>\n<p>Turning to the future, digital transformation should remain a tailwind for Elastic, and management is executing on a strong growth strategy.</p>\n<p>The company recently enhanced its security offering with the launch of an extended detection and response platform, a product that unifies security information and event management, endpoint protection, and cloud security. Elastic also rolled out new features for its enterprise search and observability applications, simplifying data ingestion and analytics to optimize search and automate root cause analysis.</p>\n<p>Management currently values the company's market opportunity at $78 billion, meaning Elastic has plenty of room to grow. And given its strong competitive position, I think shareholders will be well rewarded in the years ahead. That's why you should consider adding this growth stock to your portfolio.</p>\n<h2>2. Palantir Technologies</h2>\n<p>Palantir helps clients manage and make sense of big data. The company's software platforms -- Gotham (government sector) and Foundry (commercial sector) -- simplify data integration and analytics, allowing companies to unify siloed data sets, make informed decisions, and build AI models and data-driven applications.</p>\n<p>For example, Palantir's software helps manufacturers optimize supply chains, pharmaceutical companies accelerate drug discovery, and financial service providers detect and prevent fraud. Of course, data analytics is a trendy industry and Palantir faces plenty of competition, but its past gives it an edge over its rivals.</p>\n<p>Specifically, U.S. intelligence agencies (like the CIA and NSA) have used Palantir's software to handle classified information, demonstrating the company's expertise in data governance. Not surprisingly, Palantir's brand name has become synonymous with government-grade security, and that has translated into impressive financial results.</p>\n<p>The company's top line is growing at a steady clip, and Palantir generated $61.7 million in free cash flow over the past year.</p>\n<table>\n <thead>\n  <tr>\n   <th><p>Metric</p></th>\n   <th><p>Q2 2020 (TTM)</p></th>\n   <th><p>Q2 2021 (TTM)</p></th>\n   <th><p>CAGR</p></th>\n  </tr>\n </thead>\n <tbody>\n  <tr>\n   <td width=\"156\"><p>Revenue</p></td>\n   <td width=\"156\"><p>$901.1 million</p></td>\n   <td width=\"156\"><p>$1.3 billion</p></td>\n   <td width=\"156\"><p>47%</p></td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p>Source: YCharts. TTM = trailing-12-months. CAGR = compound annual growth rate.</p>\n<p>During the most recent quarter, Palantir closed 62 new deals worth at least $1 million, and 21 of those contracts are worth $10 million or more. The company also grew its commercial customers by 32%&nbsp;on a sequential basis. This should help supercharge revenue from the commercial sector, which has been growing more slowly than sales in the government sector.</p>\n<p>Going forward, digital transformation will continue to accelerate data production, and organizations that have the tools to harness that data stand to gain a competitive advantage. This tailwind should be a powerful growth driver for Palantir. That's why this growth stock looks like a good addition to a diversified portfolio.</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Don't Wait for a Market Crash: 2 Stocks to Buy Now</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nDon't Wait for a Market Crash: 2 Stocks to Buy Now\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-09-28 21:56 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/09/28/dont-wait-for-a-market-crash-2-stocks-to-buy-now/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Legendary investor Peter Lynch once said: \"Far more money has been lost by investors trying to anticipate corrections, than lost in the corrections themselves.\" In other words, even if a market crash ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/09/28/dont-wait-for-a-market-crash-2-stocks-to-buy-now/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"PLTR":"Palantir Technologies Inc.","ESTC":"Elastic N.V."},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/09/28/dont-wait-for-a-market-crash-2-stocks-to-buy-now/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2170770176","content_text":"Legendary investor Peter Lynch once said: \"Far more money has been lost by investors trying to anticipate corrections, than lost in the corrections themselves.\" In other words, even if a market crash seems imminent, no one actually knows the future, and trying to time the market often results in missed opportunities.\nFrom that perspective, it makes more sense to invest on a regular basis, even if it's a small sum of money. In doing so, you build positions through dollar-costing averaging, which helps protect your portfolio from short-term market volatility. With that in mind, Elastic (NYSE:ESTC) and Palantir Technologies (NYSE:PLTR) look like smart stocks to buy right now.\nHere's why.\nImage source: Getty Images.\n1. Elastic\nElastic is a search company. At the core of its platform is the Elastic Stack, a set of software tools designed to ingest and log data from any source (e.g. software, infrastructure), then help clients search and analyze that information. Broadly speaking, these tools have three use cases: enterprise search, observability, and security.\nElastic enterprise search is a workplace search engine. This application allows users to sift through corporate resources to find a particular item; it also allows developers to embed search bars in websites and mobile apps. Similarly, Elastic observability unifies logs, metrics, and application traces, allowing IT teams to analyze performance data, troubleshoot problems, and keep business-critical systems online. And Elastic security brings the same features to threat detection.\nDigital transformation has been a powerful growth driver for Elastic. As enterprises have adopted new technologies and digitized various processes, workplace search, observability, and security have become more critical. At the same time, Elastic's developer-friendly tools and freemium pricing model have helped the company win new customers at a rapid clip. In fact, Elastic is the most popular workplace search engine by a wide margin, according to DB-Engines.\nThat advantage has helped the company grow its top line quickly. And while Elastic isn't profitable on a GAAP basis, it did generate $9.1 million in free cash flow over the last year.\n\n\n\nMetric\nQ1 2021 (TTM)\nQ1 2022 (TTM)\nCAGR\n\n\n\n\nRevenue\n$466.8 million\n$672.7 million\n44%\n\n\n\nSource: YCharts. Note: Q1 2022 ended July 31, 2021. TTM = trailing-12-months. CAGR = compound annual growth rate.\nTurning to the future, digital transformation should remain a tailwind for Elastic, and management is executing on a strong growth strategy.\nThe company recently enhanced its security offering with the launch of an extended detection and response platform, a product that unifies security information and event management, endpoint protection, and cloud security. Elastic also rolled out new features for its enterprise search and observability applications, simplifying data ingestion and analytics to optimize search and automate root cause analysis.\nManagement currently values the company's market opportunity at $78 billion, meaning Elastic has plenty of room to grow. And given its strong competitive position, I think shareholders will be well rewarded in the years ahead. That's why you should consider adding this growth stock to your portfolio.\n2. Palantir Technologies\nPalantir helps clients manage and make sense of big data. The company's software platforms -- Gotham (government sector) and Foundry (commercial sector) -- simplify data integration and analytics, allowing companies to unify siloed data sets, make informed decisions, and build AI models and data-driven applications.\nFor example, Palantir's software helps manufacturers optimize supply chains, pharmaceutical companies accelerate drug discovery, and financial service providers detect and prevent fraud. Of course, data analytics is a trendy industry and Palantir faces plenty of competition, but its past gives it an edge over its rivals.\nSpecifically, U.S. intelligence agencies (like the CIA and NSA) have used Palantir's software to handle classified information, demonstrating the company's expertise in data governance. Not surprisingly, Palantir's brand name has become synonymous with government-grade security, and that has translated into impressive financial results.\nThe company's top line is growing at a steady clip, and Palantir generated $61.7 million in free cash flow over the past year.\n\n\n\nMetric\nQ2 2020 (TTM)\nQ2 2021 (TTM)\nCAGR\n\n\n\n\nRevenue\n$901.1 million\n$1.3 billion\n47%\n\n\n\nSource: YCharts. TTM = trailing-12-months. CAGR = compound annual growth rate.\nDuring the most recent quarter, Palantir closed 62 new deals worth at least $1 million, and 21 of those contracts are worth $10 million or more. The company also grew its commercial customers by 32% on a sequential basis. This should help supercharge revenue from the commercial sector, which has been growing more slowly than sales in the government sector.\nGoing forward, digital transformation will continue to accelerate data production, and organizations that have the tools to harness that data stand to gain a competitive advantage. This tailwind should be a powerful growth driver for Palantir. That's why this growth stock looks like a good addition to a diversified portfolio.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":519,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":856111281,"gmtCreate":1635160063621,"gmtModify":1635160063780,"author":{"id":"3585881140356055","authorId":"3585881140356055","name":"Rsstiget","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Take profits soon","listText":"Take profits soon","text":"Take profits soon","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/856111281","repostId":"1129106781","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1129106781","pubTimestamp":1635144072,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1129106781?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-25 14:41","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Are We Heading for a Repeat of the 2018 Stocks Selloff?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1129106781","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"Bond breakevens look to have pushed Jerome Powell to his line in the sand. Once again, the market ma","content":"<p>Bond breakevens look to have pushed Jerome Powell to his line in the sand. Once again, the market may be overestimating inflation risks.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8d55902061e9e7e9d2b20373b962471e\" tg-width=\"3252\" tg-height=\"1996\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>What Jerome Powell is looking at? Photographer: kimichele/iStockphoto/Getty Images</span></p>\n<p><b>Breakevens&nbsp;Breakout</b></p>\n<p>Inflation breakevens crossed an important line Friday. Was it also an important line for Jerome Powell and the Federal Reserve?</p>\n<p>Five-year breakevens show the implicit bond market forecast for average CPI inflation over the next five years. In their 20-year history, they have never topped the upper limit of the Fed’s inflation target of 3% —&nbsp;until early in Friday morning trading:</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b12743307f49058028200ceb8a3e860e\" tg-width=\"1200\" tg-height=\"675\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>Coincidentally or otherwise,Powell appeared in a seminar&nbsp;held by the South African Reserve Bank,&nbsp;and chaired by Bloomberg’s Francine Lacqua, a few hours later. His comments can fairly be described as hawkish. He said:</p>\n<blockquote>\n The risks are clearly now to longer and more persistent bottlenecks, and thus to higher inflation… Supply constraints and elevated inflation are likely to last longer than previously expected and well into next year, and the same is true for pressure on wages. If we were to see a risk of inflation moving persistently higher, we would certainly use our tools.\n</blockquote>\n<p>Perhaps most significantly, he conceded those bottlenecks and energy price increases had created an&nbsp; inflation framework that the Fed's “patient”&nbsp;approach wasn't designed for.&nbsp;That is about as close to an admission of error as a central bank governor can get.</p>\n<p>It also had an impact on the thinking of people trading breakevens. Coming so soon after this psychological landmark,&nbsp;it looked as though Powell had come to his line in the sand. The 3% level was touched only briefly in early trading; the Powell comments took it well below 2.9%:</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6d8f219b50a000e07e149c04d87fe01e\" tg-width=\"1200\" tg-height=\"675\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>The way&nbsp;breakevens took off last week is startling, and had few obvious triggers. As I’ve been documenting, it has grown ever harder to maintain that the recent rise in inflation is only “transitory,”&nbsp;for the reasons that Powell gave. There’s no clear evidence yet that we should brace for a sustained rise above the levels of the last three decades, and there was no obvious evidence of this last week. This has the look of a market belatedly catching up with reality, and overshooting as it does so.</p>\n<p>For more evidence, look at industrial metals. Their prices obviously factor into inflationary calculations. A rise can be an early sign of factors, such as bottlenecks or falling supply, that can lead to broader inflation. And indeed Bloomberg’s industrial metals index rallied to a 10-year high at the beginning of last week, bringing it close to its peak from the last bull market. Since then, however, prices have fallen sharply:</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c9c43c0dbcd090d26c4ed37657bbbfa4\" tg-width=\"1200\" tg-height=\"675\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>Metals prices have had only had six worse weeks than this in the last decade; but this followed their best week since the top of the last bull market. Again this looks like a rather strange case of speculative excess, while the rally in breakevens, even as materials prices were going into a sharp retreat, begins to look very odd:</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6aa7da3e87d7e56fce769cdeec9268c1\" tg-width=\"1200\" tg-height=\"675\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>As for the impact on stocks, it has been surprisingly muted. I suspect this is primarily because real yields keep supporting them. Real 10-year yields sank below -1% yet again in the early hours of Friday, naturally enough because inflation expectations rose. That helped stocks to a good start. The Powell comments sparked a rise in real yields back above -1%, and a sharp equities selloff. But from then on, stocks clawed back ground, while real yields steadily fell. Even with higher inflation expectations, bond yields aren’t rising sharply, and in real terms fixed-income markets remain easy and supportive for stocks:</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f9dcfdb4e04a5c75393db345516f2819\" tg-width=\"1200\" tg-height=\"675\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>For another important cross-asset-class effect, look at the link between oil prices and equities. Crude has a persistent positive relationship with longer-term inflation expectations that it shouldn’t have; a big rise in oil prices now, all things equal, means future increases will be smaller, while paying&nbsp;more for fuel will cause people to cut back consumption of other things. Moreover, the economy is far less dependent on oil than it was during the great inflation of the 1970s.</p>\n<p>However, the relationship between oil prices on the one hand,&nbsp;and stocks’ performance relative to bonds on the other, remains spectacularly close. Over the last five years, as this chart shows, they have moved in almost perfect alignment:</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0d9e80c6394afb4d6714a0009fd7c6da\" tg-width=\"1200\" tg-height=\"675\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>This looks like another market relationship that is far closer than it should be. If driven by rising demand, a surge in oil should indeed be a reason for stocks to beat bonds. If driven by cramped supply, as appears to be the case, then it becomes far more complicated.</p>\n<p>Like metals, or inflation breakevens, oil might yet prove to have reached a turning point. Once the price moves much above $80 per barrel, it becomes more profitable to build up fracking production in the U.S. —&nbsp;a development that the OPEC cartel wants to avoid. The last time oil reached this height, in October 2018, it started a steep dive that took stocks with it. The S&amp;P 500 endured a sharp selloff that culminated in the “Christmas Eve Massacre.”</p>\n<p>That drop was driven in large part by hawkish rhetoric from Powell. It ended after three months, after what has come to be known as the “Powell Pivot,” when the Fed chairman decided against his previous declared policy of steadily reducing the central bank’s balance sheet. History seldom&nbsp;repeats itself directly. But once again, the market is signaling that inflation pressure is perhaps worse than it really is. And once again that has provoked the Fed into more aggressive language in favor of tightening.</p>\n<p>There is now going to be a break from Fedspeak until the next Federal Open Market Committee meeting, which will come in the week after Halloween. With the exception of third-quarter GDP numbers, due this coming week, there isn’t much important data between now and then. So this could be a useful week for re-examination, both at the Fed and in the dealing rooms. After a few months of underestimating inflation risks, has the dial been turned too far in the other direction? And are we really doomed to repeat the last months of 2018?</p>\n<p><b>Risks &amp; Returns</b></p>\n<p>I discussed all of this with Kriti Gupta (standing in for Lisa Abramowicz) in the regular&nbsp;Risks &amp; Rewards livestream on Friday, which&nbsp; awkwardly went out just as Powell was speaking. I hope it makes for interesting&nbsp; viewing —&nbsp;we did our best to cover the waterfront.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48e2b4634634a4aa7fe93da751a1c51\" tg-width=\"1023\" tg-height=\"573\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p><b>Capital, Labor and the Plague</b></p>\n<p>Critical to the inflation debate is the risk of a wage-price spiral. Historical evidence, as I covered last year&nbsp;here, is that pandemics strengthen the hand of labor. This was certainly case after the Black Death. Even though Covid-19 has had no remotely comparable demographic effect on the working-age population, it appears to be having a similar impact on demand for labor, with the “Great Resignation” now in full sway. Will this lead to a self-reinforcing cycle of rising earnings?</p>\n<p>There are some budding signs of it in the U.S., where wages of low-skilled workers have picked up significantly, even if they remain below headline inflation. Logically, the place with the greatest risk of a wage-price spiral is Germany, which has a tradition of corporatism and strong unions, and where there has been a particularly&nbsp;nasty spike in producer prices. That isn’t happening so far, as shown in&nbsp;this fascinating piece by colleagues Jana Randow and Alexander Weber. So far, unions are accepting deals significantly worse than they had originally sought, as illustrated by this chart from the story using Goldman Sachs Group Inc. data:</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/46944e88d9c5adaa5680362020dbab3a\" tg-width=\"863\" tg-height=\"659\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>That implies that, at least so far, unions don’t feel as empowered as history suggests they might. That’s good news if you’re worried about inflation, and not so good if you’re worried about inequality.</p>\n<p>Also, regular reader Matt Dubuque points out that there is historical precedent for clamping down ruthlessly on post-pandemic wage demands. Following the Black Death, England’s Edward III saw that laborers were using the sudden drop in the labor supply to demand&nbsp; higher wages. His response was the&nbsp;Statute of Laborers. It’s not a liberal document. Here is a chunk:</p>\n<blockquote>\n <i>we have seen fit to ordain: that every man and woman of our kingdom of England, of whatever condition, whether bond or free, who is able bodied and below the age of sixty years, not living from trade nor carrying on a fixed craft, nor having of his own the means of living, or land of his own with regard to the cultivation of which he might occupy himself, and not serving another, if he, considering his station, be sought after to serve in a suitable service, he shall be bound to serve him who has seen fit so to seek after him; and he shall take only the wages liveries, meed or salary which, in the places where he sought to serve, were accustomed to be paid in the twentieth year of our reign of England, or the five or six common years next preceding.</i>\n</blockquote>\n<p>The penalty was prison. An incomes policy&nbsp;this strict isn’t politically possible these days. On balance, history still suggests that workers are in a position to demand more money. Keep an eye on Germany to get an idea whether it’s going to happen.</p>\n<p><b>Fooled by Randomness, Baseball Edition</b></p>\n<p>Reversion to the mean is one of the constants of life, in baseball as in markets. Baseball is a game that can be analyzed deeply with statistics, that runs on money, and which inspires great passions —&nbsp;just like markets. The season finale is about to happen, with the Houston Astros meeting the Atlanta Braves in the World Series. The season is over for my own Boston Red Sox, who succumbed 4-2 to the Astros in six games. Should we be surprised, or disappointed?</p>\n<p>No. The Red Sox were maddeningly inconsistent all season, with long winning stretches interspersed with periods when they appeared incapable of anything. At the outset, they looked like the fourth-best team in the&nbsp;division. That’s roughly what they were, even though they survived longer than any of their divisional rivals. The Red Sox put together a nine-game winning streak and, in the penultimate week, a seven-win stretch. They did the latter wearing novelty yellow uniforms, which prompted the crowd to start dressing as bananas. But the&nbsp;seven-game streak was followed by losing three in a row at home to the New York Yankees, and then dropping two of three to the terrible Baltimore Orioles.</p>\n<p>Somehow they earned a home game against New York for a wild card to the play-offs, which they won easily. The narrative changed. Against Tampa Bay, who won nine games more than the Red Sox during the regular season, Boston reeled off three games in a row, thanks to a brilliant offense. Then in the first 27 innings of their series against the Astros, the Red Sox scored 27 times. Over the remaining 26 innings, they scored once. Both of these streaks in their own right seemed implausible; the overall series performance was about what you’d expect.</p>\n<p>You can try to attach narratives to this, but that would be unwise. The Red Sox had a good but erratic offense, meaning that over a full season they would do well but not superlatively. They might just beat a superior team in the post-season (as against Tampa), but&nbsp;as time went by, the odds increased that a better team would beat them. They reverted to the mean.&nbsp;Along the way, the clumps of good results to be expected in a random distribution&nbsp;gave me and many others lots of pleasure.</p>\n<p>What relevance does this have for markets? There are momentum effects,&nbsp;but the longer the season lasts, the more you can assume quality will out. If you want to bet on how things will go in the short run, you will have a lot of fun, but you are taking a much greater risk. Don’t be fooled by the market equivalent of banana-yellow uniforms. Stick with the fundamentals for the long term, be patient, and you’ll probably win.</p>\n<p><b>Survival Tips</b></p>\n<p>This weekend began with&nbsp;World Wombat Day.Wombats&nbsp;are wonderful, some of my&nbsp;favorite marsupials. Everyone should should appreciate them.Wombat Stew&nbsp;was one of my kids’ favorite songs when they were younger; it’s a&nbsp;great book to read aloud&nbsp;to pre-schoolers. And there’s even a&nbsp;decent band&nbsp;called&nbsp;the Wombats, who sing about&nbsp;moving to New York&nbsp;and many other things. You could&nbsp;give them a try.</p>\n<p>Have a good week, everyone.</p>","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Are We Heading for a Repeat of the 2018 Stocks Selloff?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAre We Heading for a Repeat of the 2018 Stocks Selloff?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-10-25 14:41 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2021-10-25/powell-s-hawkish-tilt-evokes-memories-of-2018-market-selloff?srnd=premium-asia><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Bond breakevens look to have pushed Jerome Powell to his line in the sand. Once again, the market may be overestimating inflation risks.\nWhat Jerome Powell is looking at? Photographer: kimichele/...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2021-10-25/powell-s-hawkish-tilt-evokes-memories-of-2018-market-selloff?srnd=premium-asia\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2021-10-25/powell-s-hawkish-tilt-evokes-memories-of-2018-market-selloff?srnd=premium-asia","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1129106781","content_text":"Bond breakevens look to have pushed Jerome Powell to his line in the sand. Once again, the market may be overestimating inflation risks.\nWhat Jerome Powell is looking at? Photographer: kimichele/iStockphoto/Getty Images\nBreakevens Breakout\nInflation breakevens crossed an important line Friday. Was it also an important line for Jerome Powell and the Federal Reserve?\nFive-year breakevens show the implicit bond market forecast for average CPI inflation over the next five years. In their 20-year history, they have never topped the upper limit of the Fed’s inflation target of 3% — until early in Friday morning trading:\n\nCoincidentally or otherwise,Powell appeared in a seminar held by the South African Reserve Bank, and chaired by Bloomberg’s Francine Lacqua, a few hours later. His comments can fairly be described as hawkish. He said:\n\n The risks are clearly now to longer and more persistent bottlenecks, and thus to higher inflation… Supply constraints and elevated inflation are likely to last longer than previously expected and well into next year, and the same is true for pressure on wages. If we were to see a risk of inflation moving persistently higher, we would certainly use our tools.\n\nPerhaps most significantly, he conceded those bottlenecks and energy price increases had created an  inflation framework that the Fed's “patient” approach wasn't designed for. That is about as close to an admission of error as a central bank governor can get.\nIt also had an impact on the thinking of people trading breakevens. Coming so soon after this psychological landmark, it looked as though Powell had come to his line in the sand. The 3% level was touched only briefly in early trading; the Powell comments took it well below 2.9%:\n\nThe way breakevens took off last week is startling, and had few obvious triggers. As I’ve been documenting, it has grown ever harder to maintain that the recent rise in inflation is only “transitory,” for the reasons that Powell gave. There’s no clear evidence yet that we should brace for a sustained rise above the levels of the last three decades, and there was no obvious evidence of this last week. This has the look of a market belatedly catching up with reality, and overshooting as it does so.\nFor more evidence, look at industrial metals. Their prices obviously factor into inflationary calculations. A rise can be an early sign of factors, such as bottlenecks or falling supply, that can lead to broader inflation. And indeed Bloomberg’s industrial metals index rallied to a 10-year high at the beginning of last week, bringing it close to its peak from the last bull market. Since then, however, prices have fallen sharply:\n\nMetals prices have had only had six worse weeks than this in the last decade; but this followed their best week since the top of the last bull market. Again this looks like a rather strange case of speculative excess, while the rally in breakevens, even as materials prices were going into a sharp retreat, begins to look very odd:\n\nAs for the impact on stocks, it has been surprisingly muted. I suspect this is primarily because real yields keep supporting them. Real 10-year yields sank below -1% yet again in the early hours of Friday, naturally enough because inflation expectations rose. That helped stocks to a good start. The Powell comments sparked a rise in real yields back above -1%, and a sharp equities selloff. But from then on, stocks clawed back ground, while real yields steadily fell. Even with higher inflation expectations, bond yields aren’t rising sharply, and in real terms fixed-income markets remain easy and supportive for stocks:\n\nFor another important cross-asset-class effect, look at the link between oil prices and equities. Crude has a persistent positive relationship with longer-term inflation expectations that it shouldn’t have; a big rise in oil prices now, all things equal, means future increases will be smaller, while paying more for fuel will cause people to cut back consumption of other things. Moreover, the economy is far less dependent on oil than it was during the great inflation of the 1970s.\nHowever, the relationship between oil prices on the one hand, and stocks’ performance relative to bonds on the other, remains spectacularly close. Over the last five years, as this chart shows, they have moved in almost perfect alignment:\n\nThis looks like another market relationship that is far closer than it should be. If driven by rising demand, a surge in oil should indeed be a reason for stocks to beat bonds. If driven by cramped supply, as appears to be the case, then it becomes far more complicated.\nLike metals, or inflation breakevens, oil might yet prove to have reached a turning point. Once the price moves much above $80 per barrel, it becomes more profitable to build up fracking production in the U.S. — a development that the OPEC cartel wants to avoid. The last time oil reached this height, in October 2018, it started a steep dive that took stocks with it. The S&P 500 endured a sharp selloff that culminated in the “Christmas Eve Massacre.”\nThat drop was driven in large part by hawkish rhetoric from Powell. It ended after three months, after what has come to be known as the “Powell Pivot,” when the Fed chairman decided against his previous declared policy of steadily reducing the central bank’s balance sheet. History seldom repeats itself directly. But once again, the market is signaling that inflation pressure is perhaps worse than it really is. And once again that has provoked the Fed into more aggressive language in favor of tightening.\nThere is now going to be a break from Fedspeak until the next Federal Open Market Committee meeting, which will come in the week after Halloween. With the exception of third-quarter GDP numbers, due this coming week, there isn’t much important data between now and then. So this could be a useful week for re-examination, both at the Fed and in the dealing rooms. After a few months of underestimating inflation risks, has the dial been turned too far in the other direction? And are we really doomed to repeat the last months of 2018?\nRisks & Returns\nI discussed all of this with Kriti Gupta (standing in for Lisa Abramowicz) in the regular Risks & Rewards livestream on Friday, which  awkwardly went out just as Powell was speaking. I hope it makes for interesting  viewing — we did our best to cover the waterfront.\n\nCapital, Labor and the Plague\nCritical to the inflation debate is the risk of a wage-price spiral. Historical evidence, as I covered last year here, is that pandemics strengthen the hand of labor. This was certainly case after the Black Death. Even though Covid-19 has had no remotely comparable demographic effect on the working-age population, it appears to be having a similar impact on demand for labor, with the “Great Resignation” now in full sway. Will this lead to a self-reinforcing cycle of rising earnings?\nThere are some budding signs of it in the U.S., where wages of low-skilled workers have picked up significantly, even if they remain below headline inflation. Logically, the place with the greatest risk of a wage-price spiral is Germany, which has a tradition of corporatism and strong unions, and where there has been a particularly nasty spike in producer prices. That isn’t happening so far, as shown in this fascinating piece by colleagues Jana Randow and Alexander Weber. So far, unions are accepting deals significantly worse than they had originally sought, as illustrated by this chart from the story using Goldman Sachs Group Inc. data:\n\nThat implies that, at least so far, unions don’t feel as empowered as history suggests they might. That’s good news if you’re worried about inflation, and not so good if you’re worried about inequality.\nAlso, regular reader Matt Dubuque points out that there is historical precedent for clamping down ruthlessly on post-pandemic wage demands. Following the Black Death, England’s Edward III saw that laborers were using the sudden drop in the labor supply to demand  higher wages. His response was the Statute of Laborers. It’s not a liberal document. Here is a chunk:\n\nwe have seen fit to ordain: that every man and woman of our kingdom of England, of whatever condition, whether bond or free, who is able bodied and below the age of sixty years, not living from trade nor carrying on a fixed craft, nor having of his own the means of living, or land of his own with regard to the cultivation of which he might occupy himself, and not serving another, if he, considering his station, be sought after to serve in a suitable service, he shall be bound to serve him who has seen fit so to seek after him; and he shall take only the wages liveries, meed or salary which, in the places where he sought to serve, were accustomed to be paid in the twentieth year of our reign of England, or the five or six common years next preceding.\n\nThe penalty was prison. An incomes policy this strict isn’t politically possible these days. On balance, history still suggests that workers are in a position to demand more money. Keep an eye on Germany to get an idea whether it’s going to happen.\nFooled by Randomness, Baseball Edition\nReversion to the mean is one of the constants of life, in baseball as in markets. Baseball is a game that can be analyzed deeply with statistics, that runs on money, and which inspires great passions — just like markets. The season finale is about to happen, with the Houston Astros meeting the Atlanta Braves in the World Series. The season is over for my own Boston Red Sox, who succumbed 4-2 to the Astros in six games. Should we be surprised, or disappointed?\nNo. The Red Sox were maddeningly inconsistent all season, with long winning stretches interspersed with periods when they appeared incapable of anything. At the outset, they looked like the fourth-best team in the division. That’s roughly what they were, even though they survived longer than any of their divisional rivals. The Red Sox put together a nine-game winning streak and, in the penultimate week, a seven-win stretch. They did the latter wearing novelty yellow uniforms, which prompted the crowd to start dressing as bananas. But the seven-game streak was followed by losing three in a row at home to the New York Yankees, and then dropping two of three to the terrible Baltimore Orioles.\nSomehow they earned a home game against New York for a wild card to the play-offs, which they won easily. The narrative changed. Against Tampa Bay, who won nine games more than the Red Sox during the regular season, Boston reeled off three games in a row, thanks to a brilliant offense. Then in the first 27 innings of their series against the Astros, the Red Sox scored 27 times. Over the remaining 26 innings, they scored once. Both of these streaks in their own right seemed implausible; the overall series performance was about what you’d expect.\nYou can try to attach narratives to this, but that would be unwise. The Red Sox had a good but erratic offense, meaning that over a full season they would do well but not superlatively. They might just beat a superior team in the post-season (as against Tampa), but as time went by, the odds increased that a better team would beat them. They reverted to the mean. Along the way, the clumps of good results to be expected in a random distribution gave me and many others lots of pleasure.\nWhat relevance does this have for markets? There are momentum effects, but the longer the season lasts, the more you can assume quality will out. If you want to bet on how things will go in the short run, you will have a lot of fun, but you are taking a much greater risk. Don’t be fooled by the market equivalent of banana-yellow uniforms. Stick with the fundamentals for the long term, be patient, and you’ll probably win.\nSurvival Tips\nThis weekend began with World Wombat Day.Wombats are wonderful, some of my favorite marsupials. Everyone should should appreciate them.Wombat Stew was one of my kids’ favorite songs when they were younger; it’s a great book to read aloud to pre-schoolers. And there’s even a decent band called the Wombats, who sing about moving to New York and many other things. You could give them a try.\nHave a good week, everyone.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":327,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":854217268,"gmtCreate":1635462814675,"gmtModify":1635462814846,"author":{"id":"3585881140356055","authorId":"3585881140356055","name":"Rsstiget","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Still top command for hand phone&nbsp;","listText":"Still top command for hand phone&nbsp;","text":"Still top command for hand phone","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/854217268","repostId":"1178207364","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1178207364","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1635460531,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1178207364?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-29 06:35","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple sales miss expectations, supply issues cost company $6 billion","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1178207364","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Apple revenue fell short of Wall Street expectations in its fiscal fourth quarter on Thursday, which Apple CEO Tim Cook attributed to larger-than-expected supply constraints on iPhones, iPads, and Macs.\"We had a very strong performance despite larger than expected supply constraints, which we estimate to be around $6 billion,\" Cook said. \"The supply constraints were driven by the industry wide chip shortages that have been talked about a lot, and COVID-related manufacturing disruptions in Southe","content":"<p>Apple&nbsp;revenue fell short of Wall Street expectations in its fiscal fourth quarter on Thursday,&nbsp;which Apple CEO Tim Cook attributed to larger-than-expected supply constraints&nbsp;on iPhones, iPads, and Macs.</p>\n<p>Apple fell 3.7% in extended trading.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bd3b61df2acaab5e8ff56c1872221c60\" tg-width=\"847\" tg-height=\"621\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>\"We had a very strong performance despite larger than expected supply constraints, which we estimate to be around $6 billion,\" Cook said. \"The supply constraints were driven by the industry wide chip shortages that have been talked about a lot, and COVID-related manufacturing disruptions in Southeast Asia.\"Cook said that the impact will be even worse during the current holiday sales quarter.</p>\n<p>However, Apple's overall revenue was still up 29%&nbsp;and each of its product categories grew on an annual basis.</p>\n<p>Here's how Apple did versus Refinitiv consensus estimates:</p>\n<ul>\n <li><b>EPS:</b>&nbsp;$1.24 vs. $1.24&nbsp;estimated</li>\n <li><b>Revenue:</b>&nbsp;$83.36&nbsp;billion&nbsp;&nbsp;vs.&nbsp;$84.85&nbsp;billion&nbsp;estimated, up 29% year-over-year</li>\n <li><b>iPhone revenue:</b>&nbsp;$38.87&nbsp;billion&nbsp;vs. $41.51&nbsp;billion&nbsp;estimated, up 47% year-over-year</li>\n <li><b>Services revenue:</b>&nbsp;$18.28&nbsp;billion&nbsp;vs. $17.64&nbsp;billion&nbsp;estimated,&nbsp;up 25.6% year-over-year</li>\n <li><b>Other Products revenue:</b>&nbsp;$8.79&nbsp;billion&nbsp;vs. $9.33&nbsp;billion&nbsp;estimated, up 11.5% year-over-year</li>\n <li><b>Mac revenue:</b>&nbsp;$9.18&nbsp;billion&nbsp;vs. $9.23&nbsp;billion&nbsp;estimated, up 1.6% year-over-year</li>\n <li><b>iPad revenue:</b>&nbsp;$8.25&nbsp;billion&nbsp;vs. $7.23&nbsp;billion&nbsp;estimated, up 21.4% year-over-year</li>\n <li><b>Gross margin:</b>&nbsp;42.2% vs. 42.0% estimated</li>\n</ul>\n<p>iPhone sales were up 47% year-over-year, but still came in under Wall Street estimates.</p>\n<p>Apple's results were mixed in a fiscal fourth quarter seen as a lull before the high-sales holiday end of year.</p>\n<p>Apple said revenues and profits for the fiscal fourth quarter were $83.4 billion and $1.24 per share, compared with analyst estimates of $84.8 billion and $1.24 per share, according to IBES data from Refinitiv.</p>\n<p>The results were a rocky end to a fiscal year of above-expectations sales led by its iPhone 12 models and strong sales of Mac computers and iPads for working and learning from home during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>\n<p>Apple told investors in July that chip constraints would start to hit its iPhone and iPad lineups for the first time in the fourth quarter.</p>\n<p>Apple posted its results shortly after retailer Amazon.com&nbsp;forecast holiday-quarter sales well below Wall Street expectations, citing labor supply shortages and global supply chain issues in part.</p>\n<p>Apple has \"managed to navigate the problems fairly well, but hasn’t escaped unscathed, and an extended duration of these problems will spell trouble, especially because the market is unforgiving when it comes to Apple’s performance,\" said Sophie Lund-Yates, equity analyst at Hargreaves Lansdown.</p>\n<p><b>MISSES</b></p>\n<p>Apple missed expectations in two key categories.</p>\n<p>Apple said fourth-quarter iPhone sales were $38.9 billion, short of estimates of $41.5 billion, according to Refinitiv data.</p>\n<p>Cook said that chips made with older technology remain the key supply constraint. He said that Apple remains unsure whether the shortages will ease after the holiday shopping season.</p>\n<p>\"It's very difficult to call,\" Cook said.</p>\n<p>The company's accessories segment, which contains fast-growing categories like its AirPods wireless headphones, came in at $8.8 billion, half a billion dollars lower than analyst expectations of $9.3 billion, according to Refinitiv data.</p>\n<p>Other segments fared better. Sales for iPads and Macs were $8.3 billion and $9.2 billion, compared with analyst estimates of $7.2 billion and $9.2 billion, according to Refinitiv data.</p>\n<p>The company's services segment - which contains its App Store business - had sales of $18.3 billion in revenue, up 26%, compared with analyst expectations of $17.6 billion. Cook said that Apple now has 745 million paid subscribers to its platform, up from the 700 million it disclosed a quarter ago.</p>\n<p>\"Services were strong, and it shows the beauty and durability of software and services, as there are better margins and no supply issues, since software doesn't arrive on a container ship,\" said Hal Eddins, chief economist at Apple shareholder Capital Investment Companies.</p>\n<p>Another bright spot in the company's results were its sales in China, which were up 83% to $14.6 billion.</p>\n<p>The company said it returned $24 billion to shareholders during the quarter.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple sales miss expectations, supply issues cost company $6 billion</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple sales miss expectations, supply issues cost company $6 billion\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-10-29 06:35</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Apple&nbsp;revenue fell short of Wall Street expectations in its fiscal fourth quarter on Thursday,&nbsp;which Apple CEO Tim Cook attributed to larger-than-expected supply constraints&nbsp;on iPhones, iPads, and Macs.</p>\n<p>Apple fell 3.7% in extended trading.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bd3b61df2acaab5e8ff56c1872221c60\" tg-width=\"847\" tg-height=\"621\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>\"We had a very strong performance despite larger than expected supply constraints, which we estimate to be around $6 billion,\" Cook said. \"The supply constraints were driven by the industry wide chip shortages that have been talked about a lot, and COVID-related manufacturing disruptions in Southeast Asia.\"Cook said that the impact will be even worse during the current holiday sales quarter.</p>\n<p>However, Apple's overall revenue was still up 29%&nbsp;and each of its product categories grew on an annual basis.</p>\n<p>Here's how Apple did versus Refinitiv consensus estimates:</p>\n<ul>\n <li><b>EPS:</b>&nbsp;$1.24 vs. $1.24&nbsp;estimated</li>\n <li><b>Revenue:</b>&nbsp;$83.36&nbsp;billion&nbsp;&nbsp;vs.&nbsp;$84.85&nbsp;billion&nbsp;estimated, up 29% year-over-year</li>\n <li><b>iPhone revenue:</b>&nbsp;$38.87&nbsp;billion&nbsp;vs. $41.51&nbsp;billion&nbsp;estimated, up 47% year-over-year</li>\n <li><b>Services revenue:</b>&nbsp;$18.28&nbsp;billion&nbsp;vs. $17.64&nbsp;billion&nbsp;estimated,&nbsp;up 25.6% year-over-year</li>\n <li><b>Other Products revenue:</b>&nbsp;$8.79&nbsp;billion&nbsp;vs. $9.33&nbsp;billion&nbsp;estimated, up 11.5% year-over-year</li>\n <li><b>Mac revenue:</b>&nbsp;$9.18&nbsp;billion&nbsp;vs. $9.23&nbsp;billion&nbsp;estimated, up 1.6% year-over-year</li>\n <li><b>iPad revenue:</b>&nbsp;$8.25&nbsp;billion&nbsp;vs. $7.23&nbsp;billion&nbsp;estimated, up 21.4% year-over-year</li>\n <li><b>Gross margin:</b>&nbsp;42.2% vs. 42.0% estimated</li>\n</ul>\n<p>iPhone sales were up 47% year-over-year, but still came in under Wall Street estimates.</p>\n<p>Apple's results were mixed in a fiscal fourth quarter seen as a lull before the high-sales holiday end of year.</p>\n<p>Apple said revenues and profits for the fiscal fourth quarter were $83.4 billion and $1.24 per share, compared with analyst estimates of $84.8 billion and $1.24 per share, according to IBES data from Refinitiv.</p>\n<p>The results were a rocky end to a fiscal year of above-expectations sales led by its iPhone 12 models and strong sales of Mac computers and iPads for working and learning from home during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>\n<p>Apple told investors in July that chip constraints would start to hit its iPhone and iPad lineups for the first time in the fourth quarter.</p>\n<p>Apple posted its results shortly after retailer Amazon.com&nbsp;forecast holiday-quarter sales well below Wall Street expectations, citing labor supply shortages and global supply chain issues in part.</p>\n<p>Apple has \"managed to navigate the problems fairly well, but hasn’t escaped unscathed, and an extended duration of these problems will spell trouble, especially because the market is unforgiving when it comes to Apple’s performance,\" said Sophie Lund-Yates, equity analyst at Hargreaves Lansdown.</p>\n<p><b>MISSES</b></p>\n<p>Apple missed expectations in two key categories.</p>\n<p>Apple said fourth-quarter iPhone sales were $38.9 billion, short of estimates of $41.5 billion, according to Refinitiv data.</p>\n<p>Cook said that chips made with older technology remain the key supply constraint. He said that Apple remains unsure whether the shortages will ease after the holiday shopping season.</p>\n<p>\"It's very difficult to call,\" Cook said.</p>\n<p>The company's accessories segment, which contains fast-growing categories like its AirPods wireless headphones, came in at $8.8 billion, half a billion dollars lower than analyst expectations of $9.3 billion, according to Refinitiv data.</p>\n<p>Other segments fared better. Sales for iPads and Macs were $8.3 billion and $9.2 billion, compared with analyst estimates of $7.2 billion and $9.2 billion, according to Refinitiv data.</p>\n<p>The company's services segment - which contains its App Store business - had sales of $18.3 billion in revenue, up 26%, compared with analyst expectations of $17.6 billion. Cook said that Apple now has 745 million paid subscribers to its platform, up from the 700 million it disclosed a quarter ago.</p>\n<p>\"Services were strong, and it shows the beauty and durability of software and services, as there are better margins and no supply issues, since software doesn't arrive on a container ship,\" said Hal Eddins, chief economist at Apple shareholder Capital Investment Companies.</p>\n<p>Another bright spot in the company's results were its sales in China, which were up 83% to $14.6 billion.</p>\n<p>The company said it returned $24 billion to shareholders during the quarter.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1178207364","content_text":"Apple revenue fell short of Wall Street expectations in its fiscal fourth quarter on Thursday, which Apple CEO Tim Cook attributed to larger-than-expected supply constraints on iPhones, iPads, and Macs.\nApple fell 3.7% in extended trading.\n\n\"We had a very strong performance despite larger than expected supply constraints, which we estimate to be around $6 billion,\" Cook said. \"The supply constraints were driven by the industry wide chip shortages that have been talked about a lot, and COVID-related manufacturing disruptions in Southeast Asia.\"Cook said that the impact will be even worse during the current holiday sales quarter.\nHowever, Apple's overall revenue was still up 29% and each of its product categories grew on an annual basis.\nHere's how Apple did versus Refinitiv consensus estimates:\n\nEPS: $1.24 vs. $1.24 estimated\nRevenue: $83.36 billion  vs. $84.85 billion estimated, up 29% year-over-year\niPhone revenue: $38.87 billion vs. $41.51 billion estimated, up 47% year-over-year\nServices revenue: $18.28 billion vs. $17.64 billion estimated, up 25.6% year-over-year\nOther Products revenue: $8.79 billion vs. $9.33 billion estimated, up 11.5% year-over-year\nMac revenue: $9.18 billion vs. $9.23 billion estimated, up 1.6% year-over-year\niPad revenue: $8.25 billion vs. $7.23 billion estimated, up 21.4% year-over-year\nGross margin: 42.2% vs. 42.0% estimated\n\niPhone sales were up 47% year-over-year, but still came in under Wall Street estimates.\nApple's results were mixed in a fiscal fourth quarter seen as a lull before the high-sales holiday end of year.\nApple said revenues and profits for the fiscal fourth quarter were $83.4 billion and $1.24 per share, compared with analyst estimates of $84.8 billion and $1.24 per share, according to IBES data from Refinitiv.\nThe results were a rocky end to a fiscal year of above-expectations sales led by its iPhone 12 models and strong sales of Mac computers and iPads for working and learning from home during the COVID-19 pandemic.\nApple told investors in July that chip constraints would start to hit its iPhone and iPad lineups for the first time in the fourth quarter.\nApple posted its results shortly after retailer Amazon.com forecast holiday-quarter sales well below Wall Street expectations, citing labor supply shortages and global supply chain issues in part.\nApple has \"managed to navigate the problems fairly well, but hasn’t escaped unscathed, and an extended duration of these problems will spell trouble, especially because the market is unforgiving when it comes to Apple’s performance,\" said Sophie Lund-Yates, equity analyst at Hargreaves Lansdown.\nMISSES\nApple missed expectations in two key categories.\nApple said fourth-quarter iPhone sales were $38.9 billion, short of estimates of $41.5 billion, according to Refinitiv data.\nCook said that chips made with older technology remain the key supply constraint. He said that Apple remains unsure whether the shortages will ease after the holiday shopping season.\n\"It's very difficult to call,\" Cook said.\nThe company's accessories segment, which contains fast-growing categories like its AirPods wireless headphones, came in at $8.8 billion, half a billion dollars lower than analyst expectations of $9.3 billion, according to Refinitiv data.\nOther segments fared better. Sales for iPads and Macs were $8.3 billion and $9.2 billion, compared with analyst estimates of $7.2 billion and $9.2 billion, according to Refinitiv data.\nThe company's services segment - which contains its App Store business - had sales of $18.3 billion in revenue, up 26%, compared with analyst expectations of $17.6 billion. Cook said that Apple now has 745 million paid subscribers to its platform, up from the 700 million it disclosed a quarter ago.\n\"Services were strong, and it shows the beauty and durability of software and services, as there are better margins and no supply issues, since software doesn't arrive on a container ship,\" said Hal Eddins, chief economist at Apple shareholder Capital Investment Companies.\nAnother bright spot in the company's results were its sales in China, which were up 83% to $14.6 billion.\nThe company said it returned $24 billion to shareholders during the quarter.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":394,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":859037399,"gmtCreate":1634636854712,"gmtModify":1634636950400,"author":{"id":"3585881140356055","authorId":"3585881140356055","name":"Rsstiget","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hoping up&nbsp;","listText":"Hoping up&nbsp;","text":"Hoping up","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/859037399","repostId":"1131439614","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1131439614","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1634632915,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1131439614?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-19 16:41","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tesla Bull Cathie Wood Backs UP.Partners' $230M Fund For Mobility Startups","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1131439614","media":"Benzinga","summary":"UP.Partners said on Monday Tesla Inc bull Cathie Woodis among a group of investors that have contrib","content":"<p><b>UP.Partners</b>&nbsp;said on Monday&nbsp;<b>Tesla Inc</b>&nbsp;bull&nbsp;<b>Cathie Wood</b>is among a group of investors that have contributed to its $230 million early-stage fund that would focus on mobility startups.</p>\n<p><b>What Happened:</b>&nbsp;The Santa Monica, California-based venture capital fund also named&nbsp;<b>Alaska Air Group Inc</b>,&nbsp;<b>WovenCapital</b>, a venture capital arm of&nbsp;<b>Toyota Motor Corp</b>&nbsp;subsidiary&nbsp;<b>Woven Planet</b>&nbsp;as investors.</p>\n<p>Wood, who leads the popular money managing firm Ark Investment Management, has put in money on the venture capital&nbsp;fund in a personal capacity. UP.Partners did not disclose the amount of Wood's investment.</p>\n<p>The fund would&nbsp;focus on emerging technologies and mobility solutions that are cleaner, faster, safer and come at a lower cost.&nbsp; These could include package delivery drones, electric vertical aircraft for urban air mobility, software for precise positioning, hydrogen-powered airliners, sustainable aviation fuel, ultra-low-cost Lidar&nbsp;sensors, micro-mobility scooters and e-bikes, and more, UP.Partners said in a statement.</p>\n<p><b>Why It Matters:</b>&nbsp;The Ark Invest CEO has been focused on emerging and disruptive technologies and some of her company’s exchange-traded funds go after newly listed companies with growth potential. These companies are spread across sectors from transportation, pharma, digital payments, social media, cryptocurrency to&nbsp;blockchain&nbsp;technology.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tesla Bull Cathie Wood Backs UP.Partners' $230M Fund For Mobility Startups</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTesla Bull Cathie Wood Backs UP.Partners' $230M Fund For Mobility Startups\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-10-19 16:41</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><b>UP.Partners</b>&nbsp;said on Monday&nbsp;<b>Tesla Inc</b>&nbsp;bull&nbsp;<b>Cathie Wood</b>is among a group of investors that have contributed to its $230 million early-stage fund that would focus on mobility startups.</p>\n<p><b>What Happened:</b>&nbsp;The Santa Monica, California-based venture capital fund also named&nbsp;<b>Alaska Air Group Inc</b>,&nbsp;<b>WovenCapital</b>, a venture capital arm of&nbsp;<b>Toyota Motor Corp</b>&nbsp;subsidiary&nbsp;<b>Woven Planet</b>&nbsp;as investors.</p>\n<p>Wood, who leads the popular money managing firm Ark Investment Management, has put in money on the venture capital&nbsp;fund in a personal capacity. UP.Partners did not disclose the amount of Wood's investment.</p>\n<p>The fund would&nbsp;focus on emerging technologies and mobility solutions that are cleaner, faster, safer and come at a lower cost.&nbsp; These could include package delivery drones, electric vertical aircraft for urban air mobility, software for precise positioning, hydrogen-powered airliners, sustainable aviation fuel, ultra-low-cost Lidar&nbsp;sensors, micro-mobility scooters and e-bikes, and more, UP.Partners said in a statement.</p>\n<p><b>Why It Matters:</b>&nbsp;The Ark Invest CEO has been focused on emerging and disruptive technologies and some of her company’s exchange-traded funds go after newly listed companies with growth potential. These companies are spread across sectors from transportation, pharma, digital payments, social media, cryptocurrency to&nbsp;blockchain&nbsp;technology.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1131439614","content_text":"UP.Partners said on Monday Tesla Inc bull Cathie Woodis among a group of investors that have contributed to its $230 million early-stage fund that would focus on mobility startups.\nWhat Happened: The Santa Monica, California-based venture capital fund also named Alaska Air Group Inc, WovenCapital, a venture capital arm of Toyota Motor Corp subsidiary Woven Planet as investors.\nWood, who leads the popular money managing firm Ark Investment Management, has put in money on the venture capital fund in a personal capacity. UP.Partners did not disclose the amount of Wood's investment.\nThe fund would focus on emerging technologies and mobility solutions that are cleaner, faster, safer and come at a lower cost.  These could include package delivery drones, electric vertical aircraft for urban air mobility, software for precise positioning, hydrogen-powered airliners, sustainable aviation fuel, ultra-low-cost Lidar sensors, micro-mobility scooters and e-bikes, and more, UP.Partners said in a statement.\nWhy It Matters: The Ark Invest CEO has been focused on emerging and disruptive technologies and some of her company’s exchange-traded funds go after newly listed companies with growth potential. These companies are spread across sectors from transportation, pharma, digital payments, social media, cryptocurrency to blockchain technology.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":339,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":851187292,"gmtCreate":1634882054124,"gmtModify":1634882054231,"author":{"id":"3585881140356055","authorId":"3585881140356055","name":"Rsstiget","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Heng heng , going up","listText":"Heng heng , going up","text":"Heng heng , going up","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/851187292","repostId":"851186007","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":851186007,"gmtCreate":1634881376307,"gmtModify":1720268182121,"author":{"id":"3527667616426390","authorId":"3527667616426390","name":"社区小管家","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0afb2000fa4cb2e747dbc357b364235f","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"title":"10月22日老虎社区违规行为处罚公告","htmlText":"亲爱的虎友们，又到了每周五的通报时间了，祝大家周末愉快！ 老虎社区是为各位虎友提供市场信息、投资线索、分析研究、互动交流等有助于投资互动的服务，我们一直在为营造一个开放包容、尊重平等、友好和谐的社区氛围而努力。 但我们发现一些虎友存在不遵守社区规则，严重扰乱社区环境的行为，这些行为严重影响了其他虎友的日常体验。我们将以每日收集、每日查封等方式对违规的虎友进行处罚。小管家再次提醒广大虎友们友善发言，理性沟通，良好的社区环境需要大家共同来维护！ 相关释义： 敏感言论：社区鼓励大家理性讨论，但不要胡评妄议政策、体制等敏感内容，任何上升到国家政治层面的违规内容。一经发现，都会被小管家删除内容，并对违规虎友进行处罚。 股托水军：社区鼓励大家在各个股票标的下发表自己的看法，但是却有一些虎友以推介股票之名，行高位诱套之实，打着股票交易的名号带节奏，严重影响了其他虎友们的交易决策。对于这种恶劣行为，小管家绝不姑息，一经发现绝不手软。 广告水军：社区严禁任何形式的广告行为，包括但不限于添加微信或扫描二维码的方式引流荐股、推荐交易品种等。一经发现会被小管家从严、从重处罚。 言语辱骂：语言是把双刃剑，讨论交易心得，还请大家就事论事，不要用语言中伤他人，用语言羞辱、谩骂、攻击、骚扰、恐吓、威胁、诽谤等行为均不可取。一经发现，小管家会删除其内容，并对违规虎友进行处罚。 恶意灌水：社区禁止大家发布一连串没意义的文字、符号、字母、图片、表情等严重影响其他虎友获取信息，影响浏览体验的行为。一经发现，都会被小管家删除内容，并对违规虎友进行处罚。 现将一周的处罚名单进行公示（部分） 为了给虎友们提供更好的交流环境，我们欢迎大家对违规内容进行举报，常用的举报方式有以下两种： 方法一：违规内容举报 举报违规帖子，可以点击帖子右下角“...”，选择“举报按钮”；举报违规评论，长按评论，在弹出选项中找到“举报”键。","listText":"亲爱的虎友们，又到了每周五的通报时间了，祝大家周末愉快！ 老虎社区是为各位虎友提供市场信息、投资线索、分析研究、互动交流等有助于投资互动的服务，我们一直在为营造一个开放包容、尊重平等、友好和谐的社区氛围而努力。 但我们发现一些虎友存在不遵守社区规则，严重扰乱社区环境的行为，这些行为严重影响了其他虎友的日常体验。我们将以每日收集、每日查封等方式对违规的虎友进行处罚。小管家再次提醒广大虎友们友善发言，理性沟通，良好的社区环境需要大家共同来维护！ 相关释义： 敏感言论：社区鼓励大家理性讨论，但不要胡评妄议政策、体制等敏感内容，任何上升到国家政治层面的违规内容。一经发现，都会被小管家删除内容，并对违规虎友进行处罚。 股托水军：社区鼓励大家在各个股票标的下发表自己的看法，但是却有一些虎友以推介股票之名，行高位诱套之实，打着股票交易的名号带节奏，严重影响了其他虎友们的交易决策。对于这种恶劣行为，小管家绝不姑息，一经发现绝不手软。 广告水军：社区严禁任何形式的广告行为，包括但不限于添加微信或扫描二维码的方式引流荐股、推荐交易品种等。一经发现会被小管家从严、从重处罚。 言语辱骂：语言是把双刃剑，讨论交易心得，还请大家就事论事，不要用语言中伤他人，用语言羞辱、谩骂、攻击、骚扰、恐吓、威胁、诽谤等行为均不可取。一经发现，小管家会删除其内容，并对违规虎友进行处罚。 恶意灌水：社区禁止大家发布一连串没意义的文字、符号、字母、图片、表情等严重影响其他虎友获取信息，影响浏览体验的行为。一经发现，都会被小管家删除内容，并对违规虎友进行处罚。 现将一周的处罚名单进行公示（部分） 为了给虎友们提供更好的交流环境，我们欢迎大家对违规内容进行举报，常用的举报方式有以下两种： 方法一：违规内容举报 举报违规帖子，可以点击帖子右下角“...”，选择“举报按钮”；举报违规评论，长按评论，在弹出选项中找到“举报”键。","text":"亲爱的虎友们，又到了每周五的通报时间了，祝大家周末愉快！ 老虎社区是为各位虎友提供市场信息、投资线索、分析研究、互动交流等有助于投资互动的服务，我们一直在为营造一个开放包容、尊重平等、友好和谐的社区氛围而努力。 但我们发现一些虎友存在不遵守社区规则，严重扰乱社区环境的行为，这些行为严重影响了其他虎友的日常体验。我们将以每日收集、每日查封等方式对违规的虎友进行处罚。小管家再次提醒广大虎友们友善发言，理性沟通，良好的社区环境需要大家共同来维护！ 相关释义： 敏感言论：社区鼓励大家理性讨论，但不要胡评妄议政策、体制等敏感内容，任何上升到国家政治层面的违规内容。一经发现，都会被小管家删除内容，并对违规虎友进行处罚。 股托水军：社区鼓励大家在各个股票标的下发表自己的看法，但是却有一些虎友以推介股票之名，行高位诱套之实，打着股票交易的名号带节奏，严重影响了其他虎友们的交易决策。对于这种恶劣行为，小管家绝不姑息，一经发现绝不手软。 广告水军：社区严禁任何形式的广告行为，包括但不限于添加微信或扫描二维码的方式引流荐股、推荐交易品种等。一经发现会被小管家从严、从重处罚。 言语辱骂：语言是把双刃剑，讨论交易心得，还请大家就事论事，不要用语言中伤他人，用语言羞辱、谩骂、攻击、骚扰、恐吓、威胁、诽谤等行为均不可取。一经发现，小管家会删除其内容，并对违规虎友进行处罚。 恶意灌水：社区禁止大家发布一连串没意义的文字、符号、字母、图片、表情等严重影响其他虎友获取信息，影响浏览体验的行为。一经发现，都会被小管家删除内容，并对违规虎友进行处罚。 现将一周的处罚名单进行公示（部分） 为了给虎友们提供更好的交流环境，我们欢迎大家对违规内容进行举报，常用的举报方式有以下两种： 方法一：违规内容举报 举报违规帖子，可以点击帖子右下角“...”，选择“举报按钮”；举报违规评论，长按评论，在弹出选项中找到“举报”键。","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3da23b86e6428b04d0e7cf1ffd7c926b","width":"946","height":"833"},{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d483e955d4eabeb03642275a89521eda","width":"1280","height":"554"},{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/86b839b72758e43f7ed8cb09ee979b68","width":"429","height":"309"}],"top":1,"highlighted":2,"essential":1,"paper":2,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/851186007","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":3,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":378,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}