RieslingHawk的个人主页 - 老虎社区

RieslingHawk

RieslingHawk

暂无个人介绍

IP属地：未知

8关注

4粉丝

1主题

0勋章

2021-12-17

Paying the taxes is just an excuse lol, First he is diluting your shareholding. Second, he is dumping at record rate because valuation is not justified long term. Third, his execrise price is $6.24, and you're paying $900 + per share. Elon laughing to the bank and would like to thank your contribution to his networth.

Musk has sold 75.66% of Tesla shares he promised to sell

2021-12-15

Market moving towards my Price Target of 4500 for SPX by end of this week? J Powell you da man !

Toplines Before US Market Open on Wednesday

2021-12-13

Market will tank this week, god bless

Vaccine stocks jumped in premarket trading,with Novavax rising over 5% and BioNTech SE rising more than 3%

2021-12-14

Dumb stocks with no earnings, only apes"invest" in junk like these

AMC, GME: What Investors Are Saying as the Top 2 Meme Stocks Tumble

2021-11-30

BEAR STRONKKKKK

Covid-19 Antibody Drugs Are Challenged by Omicron, Preliminary Testing Indicates

2021-11-22

Good

Biden taps Powell for second terms as Fed chair; Brainard to be vice chair

2021-12-14

Better sell before its too late

Lucid and Rivian Are Soaring Again. Which EV Stock Is The Better Buy?

2021-12-14

$Apple(AAPL)$ market crashing this week, I am selling it all, can always buy back atlower price!!

2021-12-06

TSLA to the moon? Pffft

How Elon Musk sold 10 million Tesla shares and increased his Tesla holdings

2021-12-04

Short On the 16th of Dec !!!

Adobe worth $26 billion less as DocuSign fears spark 'knee-jerk reaction' for stock

2021-12-22

Siao liao lo

Alibaba shares fell 3.45% in premarket trading

2021-12-14

Fake news hehe

Why Stocks' Next Rally Could Be Coming Soon

2021-12-06

Buy the dipIt dips deeper

Li Auto shares fell more than 14% in Hong Kong and XPeng fell nearly 9%.

2021-12-02

$SPY 20211203 457.5 PUT(SPY)$ Went to sleep down 50% poorer, but I woke up being up 475%....

2021-12-14

Stay away from the dip before your pocketdips

Apple closes in on $3 trillion market value

2021-12-11

Fed fund rates to 20% will see stock market plunging to hell, looking forward to that

The next recession: Here’s when the ‘everything bubble’ will burst

2021-12-02

In 2 week's time, we will see if Fed decidesto accelerate rate hikes, we will see morebloodshed. TP SPX 4150 by 17th Dec

U.S. Stocks’ Wall of Worry Rises Far Beyond the Omicron Variant

2021-12-02

Apple gonna weaken...

Apple stock slid more than 1% in premarket trading

2021-11-30

Hmmm

S&P 500 may end 'pretty flat' in 2022 amid previously 'unthinkable' negative real rates, says BofA strategist

2021-12-15

Good indication that market is crashingsoon

Mark Zuckerberg Sells Stock Every Day as Billionaires Cash Out

去老虎APP查看更多动态

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"userPageInfo":{"id":3578973717832794,"uuid":"3578973717832794","gmtCreate":1615879693777,"gmtModify":1624242709339,"name":"RieslingHawk","pinyin":"rieslinghawk","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a5390eacc9599c6447d4c42f983fcc76","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":4,"headSize":8,"tweetSize":49,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":2,"name":"无畏虎","nameTw":"無畏虎","represent":"初生牛犊","factor":"发布3条非转发主帖,1条获得他人回复或点赞","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":1,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":1,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":null,"userBadges":[{"badgeId":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561-1","templateUuid":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561","name":"出道虎友","description":"加入老虎社区500天","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0e4d0ca1da0456dc7894c946d44bf9ab","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0f2f65e8ce4cfaae8db2bea9b127f58b","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5948a31b6edf154422335b265235809","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.08.01","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969-3","templateUuid":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969","name":"传说交易员","description":"证券或期货账户累计交易次数达到300次","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/656db16598a0b8f21429e10d6c1cb033","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/03f10910d4dd9234f9b5702a3342193a","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0c767e35268feb729d50d3fa9a386c5a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.05.13","exceedPercentage":"93.56%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37-1","templateUuid":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37","name":"博闻投资者","description":"累计交易超过10只正股","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.01.14","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"228c86a078844d74991fff2b7ab2428d-3","templateUuid":"228c86a078844d74991fff2b7ab2428d","name":"投资合伙人虎","description":"证券账户累计交易金额达到100万美元","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fbeac6bb240db7da8b972e5183d050ba","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/436cdf80292b99f0a992e78750ac4e3a","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/506a259a7b456f037592c3b23c779599","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.01.13","exceedPercentage":"93.71%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101},{"badgeId":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a-1","templateUuid":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a","name":"实盘交易者","description":"完成一笔实盘交易","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":5,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":"未知","starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"hot","tweets":[{"id":691818338,"gmtCreate":1640164122731,"gmtModify":1640164122836,"author":{"id":"3578973717832794","authorId":"3578973717832794","name":"RieslingHawk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a5390eacc9599c6447d4c42f983fcc76","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Siao liao lo","listText":"Siao liao lo","text":"Siao liao lo","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/691818338","repostId":"1148919660","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1148919660","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1640163718,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1148919660?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-22 17:01","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Alibaba shares fell 3.45% in premarket trading","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1148919660","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Alibaba shares fell 3.45% in premarket trading.Chinese regulators have suspended an information-sharing partnership with Alibaba Cloud Computing, a subsidiary of e-commerce conglomerate Alibaba Group, over accusations it failed to promptly report and address a cybersecurity vulnerability, according to state-backed media reports.","content":"<p>Alibaba&nbsp;shares&nbsp;fell&nbsp;3.45%&nbsp;in&nbsp;premarket&nbsp;trading.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2aca7dde9ba9b99094907e05817f461b\" tg-width=\"735\" tg-height=\"593\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">Chinese regulators have suspended an information-sharing partnership with Alibaba Cloud Computing, a subsidiary of e-commerce conglomerate Alibaba Group, over accusations it failed to promptly report and address a cybersecurity vulnerability, according to state-backed media reports.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Alibaba shares fell 3.45% in premarket trading</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAlibaba shares fell 3.45% in premarket trading\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-12-22 17:01</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Alibaba&nbsp;shares&nbsp;fell&nbsp;3.45%&nbsp;in&nbsp;premarket&nbsp;trading.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2aca7dde9ba9b99094907e05817f461b\" tg-width=\"735\" tg-height=\"593\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">Chinese regulators have suspended an information-sharing partnership with Alibaba Cloud Computing, a subsidiary of e-commerce conglomerate Alibaba Group, over accusations it failed to promptly report and address a cybersecurity vulnerability, according to state-backed media reports.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"09988":"阿里巴巴-SW","BABA":"阿里巴巴"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1148919660","content_text":"Alibaba shares fell 3.45% in premarket trading.Chinese regulators have suspended an information-sharing partnership with Alibaba Cloud Computing, a subsidiary of e-commerce conglomerate Alibaba Group, over accusations it failed to promptly report and address a cybersecurity vulnerability, according to state-backed media reports.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":755,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":690732827,"gmtCreate":1639707459670,"gmtModify":1639708978911,"author":{"id":"3578973717832794","authorId":"3578973717832794","name":"RieslingHawk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a5390eacc9599c6447d4c42f983fcc76","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Paying the taxes is just an excuse lol, First he is diluting your shareholding. Second, he is dumping at record rate because valuation is not justified long term. Third, his execrise price is $6.24, and you're paying $900 + per share. Elon laughing to the bank and would like to thank your contribution to his networth.","listText":"Paying the taxes is just an excuse lol, First he is diluting your shareholding. Second, he is dumping at record rate because valuation is not justified long term. Third, his execrise price is $6.24, and you're paying $900 + per share. Elon laughing to the bank and would like to thank your contribution to his networth.","text":"Paying the taxes is just an excuse lol, First he is diluting your shareholding. Second, he is dumping at record rate because valuation is not justified long term. Third, his execrise price is $6.24, and you're paying $900 + per share. Elon laughing to the bank and would like to thank your contribution to his networth.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":12,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/690732827","repostId":"1143279118","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1143279118","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1639706631,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1143279118?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-17 10:03","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Musk has sold 75.66% of Tesla shares he promised to sell","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1143279118","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Tesla Inc Chief Executive Officer Elon Musk has sold nearly $14 billion worth of shares since early ","content":"<p>Tesla Inc&nbsp;Chief Executive Officer Elon Musk has sold nearly $14 billion worth of shares since early November when the world's richest person polled Twitter users about offloading 10% of his stake in the electric-car maker.</p>\n<p>The billionaire sold another 934,091 shares for $884.1 million on Thursday to pay for taxes on the exercise of stock options&nbsp;at a price of $6.24 to buy 2.2 million shares in Tesla, according to U.S. securities filings.</p>\n<p>Musk has sold about 12900512 Tesla shares since November 8, accounting for 75.66% of his previously committed shares.</p>\n<p>Here is a string of transactions he has done:</p>\n<table>\n <thead></thead>\n <tbody>\n  <tr>\n   <td>DATE</td>\n   <td>SHARES ACQUIRED</td>\n   <td>SHARES SOLD</td>\n   <td>GROSS PROCEEDS</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 8</td>\n   <td>2.2 mln</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 8</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>934,091</td>\n   <td>$1.10 bln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 9</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>3.1 mln</td>\n   <td>$3.35 bln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 10</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>500,000</td>\n   <td>$527.3 mln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 11</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>639,737</td>\n   <td>$687.3 mln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 12</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>1.2 mln</td>\n   <td>$1.24 bln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 15</td>\n   <td>2.1 mln</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 15</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>934,091</td>\n   <td>$930.7 mln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 16</td>\n   <td>2.1 mln</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 16</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>934,091</td>\n   <td>$973.4 mln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 23</td>\n   <td>2.2 mln</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>934,091</td>\n   <td>$1.05 bln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>DEC. 2</td>\n   <td>2.1 mln</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>934,091</td>\n   <td>$1.01 bln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Dec.9</td>\n   <td>2.2 mln</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>934,091</td>\n   <td>$963.2 mln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Dec.13</td>\n   <td>2.1 mln</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>934,091</td>\n   <td>$906.5 mln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Dec. 16</td>\n   <td>2.2 mln</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>934,091</td>\n   <td>$884.1 mln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Total</td>\n   <td>17.2 mln</td>\n   <td>12.9 mln</td>\n   <td>$13.62 bln</td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p>HOW DID MUSK SELL?</p>\n<p>Musk said on Nov. 6 he would sell 10% of his stake if Twitter users agreed. He owned a combination of about 244 million shares through his trust and stock options, bringing his stake in Tesla to about 23% as of June 30. It included 170 million shares held by his trust.</p>\n<p>The tweet was vague. Musk did not outline if he was intending to offload 10% of his shares he indirectly owned through the trust or if his stock options were also part of the deal.</p>\n<p>Tesla stock has dropped 25% since a peak on Nov. 4.</p>\n<p>With a $243 billion fortune, Musk is the world’s richest person, according to the&nbsp;Bloomberg Billionaires Index.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Musk has sold 75.66% of Tesla shares he promised to sell</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nMusk has sold 75.66% of Tesla shares he promised to sell\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-12-17 10:03</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Tesla Inc&nbsp;Chief Executive Officer Elon Musk has sold nearly $14 billion worth of shares since early November when the world's richest person polled Twitter users about offloading 10% of his stake in the electric-car maker.</p>\n<p>The billionaire sold another 934,091 shares for $884.1 million on Thursday to pay for taxes on the exercise of stock options&nbsp;at a price of $6.24 to buy 2.2 million shares in Tesla, according to U.S. securities filings.</p>\n<p>Musk has sold about 12900512 Tesla shares since November 8, accounting for 75.66% of his previously committed shares.</p>\n<p>Here is a string of transactions he has done:</p>\n<table>\n <thead></thead>\n <tbody>\n  <tr>\n   <td>DATE</td>\n   <td>SHARES ACQUIRED</td>\n   <td>SHARES SOLD</td>\n   <td>GROSS PROCEEDS</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 8</td>\n   <td>2.2 mln</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 8</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>934,091</td>\n   <td>$1.10 bln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 9</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>3.1 mln</td>\n   <td>$3.35 bln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 10</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>500,000</td>\n   <td>$527.3 mln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 11</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>639,737</td>\n   <td>$687.3 mln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 12</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>1.2 mln</td>\n   <td>$1.24 bln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 15</td>\n   <td>2.1 mln</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 15</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>934,091</td>\n   <td>$930.7 mln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 16</td>\n   <td>2.1 mln</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 16</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>934,091</td>\n   <td>$973.4 mln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 23</td>\n   <td>2.2 mln</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>934,091</td>\n   <td>$1.05 bln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>DEC. 2</td>\n   <td>2.1 mln</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>934,091</td>\n   <td>$1.01 bln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Dec.9</td>\n   <td>2.2 mln</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>934,091</td>\n   <td>$963.2 mln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Dec.13</td>\n   <td>2.1 mln</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>934,091</td>\n   <td>$906.5 mln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Dec. 16</td>\n   <td>2.2 mln</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>934,091</td>\n   <td>$884.1 mln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Total</td>\n   <td>17.2 mln</td>\n   <td>12.9 mln</td>\n   <td>$13.62 bln</td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p>HOW DID MUSK SELL?</p>\n<p>Musk said on Nov. 6 he would sell 10% of his stake if Twitter users agreed. He owned a combination of about 244 million shares through his trust and stock options, bringing his stake in Tesla to about 23% as of June 30. It included 170 million shares held by his trust.</p>\n<p>The tweet was vague. Musk did not outline if he was intending to offload 10% of his shares he indirectly owned through the trust or if his stock options were also part of the deal.</p>\n<p>Tesla stock has dropped 25% since a peak on Nov. 4.</p>\n<p>With a $243 billion fortune, Musk is the world’s richest person, according to the&nbsp;Bloomberg Billionaires Index.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1143279118","content_text":"Tesla Inc Chief Executive Officer Elon Musk has sold nearly $14 billion worth of shares since early November when the world's richest person polled Twitter users about offloading 10% of his stake in the electric-car maker.\nThe billionaire sold another 934,091 shares for $884.1 million on Thursday to pay for taxes on the exercise of stock options at a price of $6.24 to buy 2.2 million shares in Tesla, according to U.S. securities filings.\nMusk has sold about 12900512 Tesla shares since November 8, accounting for 75.66% of his previously committed shares.\nHere is a string of transactions he has done:\n\n\n\n\nDATE\nSHARES ACQUIRED\nSHARES SOLD\nGROSS PROCEEDS\n\n\nNOV. 8\n2.2 mln\n\n\n\n\nNOV. 8\n\n934,091\n$1.10 bln\n\n\nNOV. 9\n\n3.1 mln\n$3.35 bln\n\n\nNOV. 10\n\n500,000\n$527.3 mln\n\n\nNOV. 11\n\n639,737\n$687.3 mln\n\n\nNOV. 12\n\n1.2 mln\n$1.24 bln\n\n\nNOV. 15\n2.1 mln\n\n\n\n\nNOV. 15\n\n934,091\n$930.7 mln\n\n\nNOV. 16\n2.1 mln\n\n\n\n\nNOV. 16\n\n934,091\n$973.4 mln\n\n\nNOV. 23\n2.2 mln\n\n\n\n\n\n\n934,091\n$1.05 bln\n\n\nDEC. 2\n2.1 mln\n\n\n\n\n\n\n934,091\n$1.01 bln\n\n\nDec.9\n2.2 mln\n\n\n\n\n\n\n934,091\n$963.2 mln\n\n\nDec.13\n2.1 mln\n\n\n\n\n\n\n934,091\n$906.5 mln\n\n\nDec. 16\n2.2 mln\n\n\n\n\n\n\n934,091\n$884.1 mln\n\n\nTotal\n17.2 mln\n12.9 mln\n$13.62 bln\n\n\n\nHOW DID MUSK SELL?\nMusk said on Nov. 6 he would sell 10% of his stake if Twitter users agreed. He owned a combination of about 244 million shares through his trust and stock options, bringing his stake in Tesla to about 23% as of June 30. It included 170 million shares held by his trust.\nThe tweet was vague. Musk did not outline if he was intending to offload 10% of his shares he indirectly owned through the trust or if his stock options were also part of the deal.\nTesla stock has dropped 25% since a peak on Nov. 4.\nWith a $243 billion fortune, Musk is the world’s richest person, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":511,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":690731464,"gmtCreate":1639707304806,"gmtModify":1639709047483,"author":{"id":"3578973717832794","authorId":"3578973717832794","name":"RieslingHawk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a5390eacc9599c6447d4c42f983fcc76","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Buy the dip fools","listText":"Buy the dip fools","text":"Buy the dip fools","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/690731464","repostId":"1143279118","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1143279118","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1639706631,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1143279118?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-17 10:03","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Musk has sold 75.66% of Tesla shares he promised to sell","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1143279118","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Tesla Inc Chief Executive Officer Elon Musk has sold nearly $14 billion worth of shares since early ","content":"<p>Tesla Inc&nbsp;Chief Executive Officer Elon Musk has sold nearly $14 billion worth of shares since early November when the world's richest person polled Twitter users about offloading 10% of his stake in the electric-car maker.</p>\n<p>The billionaire sold another 934,091 shares for $884.1 million on Thursday to pay for taxes on the exercise of stock options&nbsp;at a price of $6.24 to buy 2.2 million shares in Tesla, according to U.S. securities filings.</p>\n<p>Musk has sold about 12900512 Tesla shares since November 8, accounting for 75.66% of his previously committed shares.</p>\n<p>Here is a string of transactions he has done:</p>\n<table>\n <thead></thead>\n <tbody>\n  <tr>\n   <td>DATE</td>\n   <td>SHARES ACQUIRED</td>\n   <td>SHARES SOLD</td>\n   <td>GROSS PROCEEDS</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 8</td>\n   <td>2.2 mln</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 8</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>934,091</td>\n   <td>$1.10 bln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 9</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>3.1 mln</td>\n   <td>$3.35 bln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 10</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>500,000</td>\n   <td>$527.3 mln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 11</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>639,737</td>\n   <td>$687.3 mln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 12</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>1.2 mln</td>\n   <td>$1.24 bln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 15</td>\n   <td>2.1 mln</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 15</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>934,091</td>\n   <td>$930.7 mln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 16</td>\n   <td>2.1 mln</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 16</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>934,091</td>\n   <td>$973.4 mln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 23</td>\n   <td>2.2 mln</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>934,091</td>\n   <td>$1.05 bln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>DEC. 2</td>\n   <td>2.1 mln</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>934,091</td>\n   <td>$1.01 bln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Dec.9</td>\n   <td>2.2 mln</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>934,091</td>\n   <td>$963.2 mln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Dec.13</td>\n   <td>2.1 mln</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>934,091</td>\n   <td>$906.5 mln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Dec. 16</td>\n   <td>2.2 mln</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>934,091</td>\n   <td>$884.1 mln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Total</td>\n   <td>17.2 mln</td>\n   <td>12.9 mln</td>\n   <td>$13.62 bln</td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p>HOW DID MUSK SELL?</p>\n<p>Musk said on Nov. 6 he would sell 10% of his stake if Twitter users agreed. He owned a combination of about 244 million shares through his trust and stock options, bringing his stake in Tesla to about 23% as of June 30. It included 170 million shares held by his trust.</p>\n<p>The tweet was vague. Musk did not outline if he was intending to offload 10% of his shares he indirectly owned through the trust or if his stock options were also part of the deal.</p>\n<p>Tesla stock has dropped 25% since a peak on Nov. 4.</p>\n<p>With a $243 billion fortune, Musk is the world’s richest person, according to the&nbsp;Bloomberg Billionaires Index.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Musk has sold 75.66% of Tesla shares he promised to sell</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nMusk has sold 75.66% of Tesla shares he promised to sell\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-12-17 10:03</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Tesla Inc&nbsp;Chief Executive Officer Elon Musk has sold nearly $14 billion worth of shares since early November when the world's richest person polled Twitter users about offloading 10% of his stake in the electric-car maker.</p>\n<p>The billionaire sold another 934,091 shares for $884.1 million on Thursday to pay for taxes on the exercise of stock options&nbsp;at a price of $6.24 to buy 2.2 million shares in Tesla, according to U.S. securities filings.</p>\n<p>Musk has sold about 12900512 Tesla shares since November 8, accounting for 75.66% of his previously committed shares.</p>\n<p>Here is a string of transactions he has done:</p>\n<table>\n <thead></thead>\n <tbody>\n  <tr>\n   <td>DATE</td>\n   <td>SHARES ACQUIRED</td>\n   <td>SHARES SOLD</td>\n   <td>GROSS PROCEEDS</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 8</td>\n   <td>2.2 mln</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 8</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>934,091</td>\n   <td>$1.10 bln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 9</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>3.1 mln</td>\n   <td>$3.35 bln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 10</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>500,000</td>\n   <td>$527.3 mln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 11</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>639,737</td>\n   <td>$687.3 mln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 12</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>1.2 mln</td>\n   <td>$1.24 bln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 15</td>\n   <td>2.1 mln</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 15</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>934,091</td>\n   <td>$930.7 mln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 16</td>\n   <td>2.1 mln</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 16</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>934,091</td>\n   <td>$973.4 mln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 23</td>\n   <td>2.2 mln</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>934,091</td>\n   <td>$1.05 bln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>DEC. 2</td>\n   <td>2.1 mln</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>934,091</td>\n   <td>$1.01 bln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Dec.9</td>\n   <td>2.2 mln</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>934,091</td>\n   <td>$963.2 mln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Dec.13</td>\n   <td>2.1 mln</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>934,091</td>\n   <td>$906.5 mln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Dec. 16</td>\n   <td>2.2 mln</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>934,091</td>\n   <td>$884.1 mln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Total</td>\n   <td>17.2 mln</td>\n   <td>12.9 mln</td>\n   <td>$13.62 bln</td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p>HOW DID MUSK SELL?</p>\n<p>Musk said on Nov. 6 he would sell 10% of his stake if Twitter users agreed. He owned a combination of about 244 million shares through his trust and stock options, bringing his stake in Tesla to about 23% as of June 30. It included 170 million shares held by his trust.</p>\n<p>The tweet was vague. Musk did not outline if he was intending to offload 10% of his shares he indirectly owned through the trust or if his stock options were also part of the deal.</p>\n<p>Tesla stock has dropped 25% since a peak on Nov. 4.</p>\n<p>With a $243 billion fortune, Musk is the world’s richest person, according to the&nbsp;Bloomberg Billionaires Index.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1143279118","content_text":"Tesla Inc Chief Executive Officer Elon Musk has sold nearly $14 billion worth of shares since early November when the world's richest person polled Twitter users about offloading 10% of his stake in the electric-car maker.\nThe billionaire sold another 934,091 shares for $884.1 million on Thursday to pay for taxes on the exercise of stock options at a price of $6.24 to buy 2.2 million shares in Tesla, according to U.S. securities filings.\nMusk has sold about 12900512 Tesla shares since November 8, accounting for 75.66% of his previously committed shares.\nHere is a string of transactions he has done:\n\n\n\n\nDATE\nSHARES ACQUIRED\nSHARES SOLD\nGROSS PROCEEDS\n\n\nNOV. 8\n2.2 mln\n\n\n\n\nNOV. 8\n\n934,091\n$1.10 bln\n\n\nNOV. 9\n\n3.1 mln\n$3.35 bln\n\n\nNOV. 10\n\n500,000\n$527.3 mln\n\n\nNOV. 11\n\n639,737\n$687.3 mln\n\n\nNOV. 12\n\n1.2 mln\n$1.24 bln\n\n\nNOV. 15\n2.1 mln\n\n\n\n\nNOV. 15\n\n934,091\n$930.7 mln\n\n\nNOV. 16\n2.1 mln\n\n\n\n\nNOV. 16\n\n934,091\n$973.4 mln\n\n\nNOV. 23\n2.2 mln\n\n\n\n\n\n\n934,091\n$1.05 bln\n\n\nDEC. 2\n2.1 mln\n\n\n\n\n\n\n934,091\n$1.01 bln\n\n\nDec.9\n2.2 mln\n\n\n\n\n\n\n934,091\n$963.2 mln\n\n\nDec.13\n2.1 mln\n\n\n\n\n\n\n934,091\n$906.5 mln\n\n\nDec. 16\n2.2 mln\n\n\n\n\n\n\n934,091\n$884.1 mln\n\n\nTotal\n17.2 mln\n12.9 mln\n$13.62 bln\n\n\n\nHOW DID MUSK SELL?\nMusk said on Nov. 6 he would sell 10% of his stake if Twitter users agreed. He owned a combination of about 244 million shares through his trust and stock options, bringing his stake in Tesla to about 23% as of June 30. It included 170 million shares held by his trust.\nThe tweet was vague. Musk did not outline if he was intending to offload 10% of his shares he indirectly owned through the trust or if his stock options were also part of the deal.\nTesla stock has dropped 25% since a peak on Nov. 4.\nWith a $243 billion fortune, Musk is the world’s richest person, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":790,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":690684237,"gmtCreate":1639664216886,"gmtModify":1639664217015,"author":{"id":"3578973717832794","authorId":"3578973717832794","name":"RieslingHawk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a5390eacc9599c6447d4c42f983fcc76","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"just another crazily hyped meme stocks&nbsp;","listText":"just another crazily hyped meme stocks&nbsp;","text":"just another crazily hyped meme stocks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/690684237","repostId":"1143795954","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1143795954","pubTimestamp":1639613655,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1143795954?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-16 08:14","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Palantir: A Value Trap","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1143795954","media":"seekingalpha","summary":"Summary\n\nPalantir is an overvalued government contractor.\nThe business has no intrinsic scale value.","content":"<p><b>Summary</b></p>\n<ul>\n <li>Palantir is an overvalued government contractor.</li>\n <li>The business has no intrinsic scale value.</li>\n <li>Palantir’s revenue growth, estimated at 40% this year, is still grossly overvalued.</li>\n</ul>\n<p></p>\n<p></p>\n<p>Palantir (NYSE:PLTR), a software company, has seen its share price fall significantly recently as investors exited high-growth, high-multiple stocks. At 24 times sales, I believe PLTR stock is still significantly overvalued, and investors should brace themselves for new lows.</p>\n<p></p>\n<p><b>A Government Consulting Business With Three Major Issues</b></p>\n<p>Someone needs to explain to me what all the fuss is about with the big data analytics company Palantir. Palantir is frequently lauded for its software capabilities, which provide customers with data intelligence insights that, ostensibly, improve managerial decision making, but I do not see Palantir as what everyone else does: a unique platform business cashing in on the big data market.</p>\n<p></p>\n<p>Palantir is best known for its various \"foundries.\" Palantir's foundries are data management and aggregation systems that assist institutions in efficiently centralizing and storing data. As businesses and government agencies collect more data, the complexities grow rapidly, necessitating the use of software solutions. Palantir is collaborating with businesses and governments to reduce complexity and make use of large data volumes for algorithmic predictions. Palantir has had some success with this type of business, if success is defined solely by sales growth. For example, Palantir's 3Q21 revenue increased by 36% YoY to $392 million. Palantir's main source of revenue, government revenues, increased by 34% YoY, while commercial revenues, which include all of Palantir's business activities outside of government, increased by 37% YoY.</p>\n<p></p>\n<p>Revenue growth, on the other hand, is not a concern for Palantir. Palantir's problems are much deeper, and there is clearly more than one issue here.</p>\n<p></p>\n<p>The first issue with Palantir is that, while the company's sales are increasing at a healthy clip, this is not translating into profits for shareholders. Palantir's revenue increased by 44% to $1.11 billion in the first three quarters of 2021. The sales forecast for 2021 calls for up to a 40% increase in sales. That's a good start, but what about profits?</p>\n<p></p>\n<p>Despite a 44% increase in revenue in 2021, Palantir's profit picture appears to be dire. The company lost $364 million in 2021 alone, and the year isn't even over yet. The total loss for the year could exceed $400 million. Not bad for a company that has been in operation for nearly 20 years and \"grows revenues at a 40% annual rate,\" right? Profits after nearly two decades of operation appear to be too high a bar for Palantir to clear.</p>\n<p></p>\n<p>The second major issue for Palantir, despite its big data allure, is its lack of scalability. Contrary to popular belief, Palantir is little more than a well-paid government consultant whose consulting business is not scalable in any way, shape, or form. Palantir also does not operate a \"platform business\" in the same way that Metaverse (NASDAQ:FB) or Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) do. For example, Metaverse collects customer data through a single platform, the Facebook platform. Netflix scales its moving streaming platform, which can add new customers at near-zero marginal costs. Palantir requires personnel to work with each individual client, coach them, and explain platform features. This is not a sustainable business model. It is a software-based consulting business model.</p>\n<p></p>\n<p>The third issue with Palantir, aside from its inability to operate profitably after two decades and its business model's lack of inherent scalability, is that profits made in Palantir's business are siphoned off by insiders who are compensated royally through stock packages at the expense of shareholders. Palantir has increased the number of shares by 12% in one year, and it now has more than 2 billion shares outstanding. As a result, business profits are primarily distributed to highly compensated insiders, rather than to the company's shareholders.</p>\n<p></p>\n<p><b>A Fantasy Valuation</b></p>\n<p>Let's be clear about what we're talking about. We are dealing with a company that is growing its sales by 30-40% per year, which means Palantir will have revenues in the $1.5 billion range by 2021. Give or take fifty million dollars. It is the same company that has a misunderstood \"platform business model,\" no profits after twenty years of operations, and prioritizes insider stock compensation over shareholder dilution in recent years. They are likely to see further dilution in the coming years.</p>\n<p></p>\n<p>Nonetheless, this company continues to trade at a sales multiple of twenty-four. This means that an investor pays 24 times the expected sales amount for the opportunity to invest in Palantir's loss-making \"big data prediction\" business. Palantir remains outrageously overvalued, despite a significant correction since November.</p>\n<p></p>\n<p></p>\n<p><b>My Conclusion</b></p>\n<p>I'd say the valuation is a joke or a calculation error if I didn't know any better. However, this does not appear to be the case. Apparently, a sizable portion of the investor population believes that Palantir, despite its lack of profits and excessive dilution, is worth 24 times sales. In normal circumstances, 24 times earnings would be excessive. Palantir's business has no scale, which calls into question the company's positioning as a growth stock. Palantir is expected to fall further as investors begin to exit high-multiple stocks. PLTR is nothing more than a value trap, nothing less.</p>","source":"lsy1638401102509","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Palantir: A Value Trap</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nPalantir: A Value Trap\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-12-16 08:14 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4475365-palantir-a-value-trap><strong>seekingalpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Summary\n\nPalantir is an overvalued government contractor.\nThe business has no intrinsic scale value.\nPalantir’s revenue growth, estimated at 40% this year, is still grossly overvalued.\n\n\n\nPalantir (...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4475365-palantir-a-value-trap\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"PLTR":"Palantir Technologies Inc."},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4475365-palantir-a-value-trap","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1143795954","content_text":"Summary\n\nPalantir is an overvalued government contractor.\nThe business has no intrinsic scale value.\nPalantir’s revenue growth, estimated at 40% this year, is still grossly overvalued.\n\n\n\nPalantir (NYSE:PLTR), a software company, has seen its share price fall significantly recently as investors exited high-growth, high-multiple stocks. At 24 times sales, I believe PLTR stock is still significantly overvalued, and investors should brace themselves for new lows.\n\nA Government Consulting Business With Three Major Issues\nSomeone needs to explain to me what all the fuss is about with the big data analytics company Palantir. Palantir is frequently lauded for its software capabilities, which provide customers with data intelligence insights that, ostensibly, improve managerial decision making, but I do not see Palantir as what everyone else does: a unique platform business cashing in on the big data market.\n\nPalantir is best known for its various \"foundries.\" Palantir's foundries are data management and aggregation systems that assist institutions in efficiently centralizing and storing data. As businesses and government agencies collect more data, the complexities grow rapidly, necessitating the use of software solutions. Palantir is collaborating with businesses and governments to reduce complexity and make use of large data volumes for algorithmic predictions. Palantir has had some success with this type of business, if success is defined solely by sales growth. For example, Palantir's 3Q21 revenue increased by 36% YoY to $392 million. Palantir's main source of revenue, government revenues, increased by 34% YoY, while commercial revenues, which include all of Palantir's business activities outside of government, increased by 37% YoY.\n\nRevenue growth, on the other hand, is not a concern for Palantir. Palantir's problems are much deeper, and there is clearly more than one issue here.\n\nThe first issue with Palantir is that, while the company's sales are increasing at a healthy clip, this is not translating into profits for shareholders. Palantir's revenue increased by 44% to $1.11 billion in the first three quarters of 2021. The sales forecast for 2021 calls for up to a 40% increase in sales. That's a good start, but what about profits?\n\nDespite a 44% increase in revenue in 2021, Palantir's profit picture appears to be dire. The company lost $364 million in 2021 alone, and the year isn't even over yet. The total loss for the year could exceed $400 million. Not bad for a company that has been in operation for nearly 20 years and \"grows revenues at a 40% annual rate,\" right? Profits after nearly two decades of operation appear to be too high a bar for Palantir to clear.\n\nThe second major issue for Palantir, despite its big data allure, is its lack of scalability. Contrary to popular belief, Palantir is little more than a well-paid government consultant whose consulting business is not scalable in any way, shape, or form. Palantir also does not operate a \"platform business\" in the same way that Metaverse (NASDAQ:FB) or Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) do. For example, Metaverse collects customer data through a single platform, the Facebook platform. Netflix scales its moving streaming platform, which can add new customers at near-zero marginal costs. Palantir requires personnel to work with each individual client, coach them, and explain platform features. This is not a sustainable business model. It is a software-based consulting business model.\n\nThe third issue with Palantir, aside from its inability to operate profitably after two decades and its business model's lack of inherent scalability, is that profits made in Palantir's business are siphoned off by insiders who are compensated royally through stock packages at the expense of shareholders. Palantir has increased the number of shares by 12% in one year, and it now has more than 2 billion shares outstanding. As a result, business profits are primarily distributed to highly compensated insiders, rather than to the company's shareholders.\n\nA Fantasy Valuation\nLet's be clear about what we're talking about. We are dealing with a company that is growing its sales by 30-40% per year, which means Palantir will have revenues in the $1.5 billion range by 2021. Give or take fifty million dollars. It is the same company that has a misunderstood \"platform business model,\" no profits after twenty years of operations, and prioritizes insider stock compensation over shareholder dilution in recent years. They are likely to see further dilution in the coming years.\n\nNonetheless, this company continues to trade at a sales multiple of twenty-four. This means that an investor pays 24 times the expected sales amount for the opportunity to invest in Palantir's loss-making \"big data prediction\" business. Palantir remains outrageously overvalued, despite a significant correction since November.\n\n\nMy Conclusion\nI'd say the valuation is a joke or a calculation error if I didn't know any better. However, this does not appear to be the case. Apparently, a sizable portion of the investor population believes that Palantir, despite its lack of profits and excessive dilution, is worth 24 times sales. In normal circumstances, 24 times earnings would be excessive. Palantir's business has no scale, which calls into question the company's positioning as a growth stock. Palantir is expected to fall further as investors begin to exit high-multiple stocks. PLTR is nothing more than a value trap, nothing less.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":671,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":690684142,"gmtCreate":1639664196302,"gmtModify":1639664196398,"author":{"id":"3578973717832794","authorId":"3578973717832794","name":"RieslingHawk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a5390eacc9599c6447d4c42f983fcc76","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"good analysis","listText":"good analysis","text":"good analysis","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/690684142","repostId":"1143795954","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1143795954","pubTimestamp":1639613655,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1143795954?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-16 08:14","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Palantir: A Value Trap","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1143795954","media":"seekingalpha","summary":"Summary\n\nPalantir is an overvalued government contractor.\nThe business has no intrinsic scale value.","content":"<p><b>Summary</b></p>\n<ul>\n <li>Palantir is an overvalued government contractor.</li>\n <li>The business has no intrinsic scale value.</li>\n <li>Palantir’s revenue growth, estimated at 40% this year, is still grossly overvalued.</li>\n</ul>\n<p></p>\n<p></p>\n<p>Palantir (NYSE:PLTR), a software company, has seen its share price fall significantly recently as investors exited high-growth, high-multiple stocks. At 24 times sales, I believe PLTR stock is still significantly overvalued, and investors should brace themselves for new lows.</p>\n<p></p>\n<p><b>A Government Consulting Business With Three Major Issues</b></p>\n<p>Someone needs to explain to me what all the fuss is about with the big data analytics company Palantir. Palantir is frequently lauded for its software capabilities, which provide customers with data intelligence insights that, ostensibly, improve managerial decision making, but I do not see Palantir as what everyone else does: a unique platform business cashing in on the big data market.</p>\n<p></p>\n<p>Palantir is best known for its various \"foundries.\" Palantir's foundries are data management and aggregation systems that assist institutions in efficiently centralizing and storing data. As businesses and government agencies collect more data, the complexities grow rapidly, necessitating the use of software solutions. Palantir is collaborating with businesses and governments to reduce complexity and make use of large data volumes for algorithmic predictions. Palantir has had some success with this type of business, if success is defined solely by sales growth. For example, Palantir's 3Q21 revenue increased by 36% YoY to $392 million. Palantir's main source of revenue, government revenues, increased by 34% YoY, while commercial revenues, which include all of Palantir's business activities outside of government, increased by 37% YoY.</p>\n<p></p>\n<p>Revenue growth, on the other hand, is not a concern for Palantir. Palantir's problems are much deeper, and there is clearly more than one issue here.</p>\n<p></p>\n<p>The first issue with Palantir is that, while the company's sales are increasing at a healthy clip, this is not translating into profits for shareholders. Palantir's revenue increased by 44% to $1.11 billion in the first three quarters of 2021. The sales forecast for 2021 calls for up to a 40% increase in sales. That's a good start, but what about profits?</p>\n<p></p>\n<p>Despite a 44% increase in revenue in 2021, Palantir's profit picture appears to be dire. The company lost $364 million in 2021 alone, and the year isn't even over yet. The total loss for the year could exceed $400 million. Not bad for a company that has been in operation for nearly 20 years and \"grows revenues at a 40% annual rate,\" right? Profits after nearly two decades of operation appear to be too high a bar for Palantir to clear.</p>\n<p></p>\n<p>The second major issue for Palantir, despite its big data allure, is its lack of scalability. Contrary to popular belief, Palantir is little more than a well-paid government consultant whose consulting business is not scalable in any way, shape, or form. Palantir also does not operate a \"platform business\" in the same way that Metaverse (NASDAQ:FB) or Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) do. For example, Metaverse collects customer data through a single platform, the Facebook platform. Netflix scales its moving streaming platform, which can add new customers at near-zero marginal costs. Palantir requires personnel to work with each individual client, coach them, and explain platform features. This is not a sustainable business model. It is a software-based consulting business model.</p>\n<p></p>\n<p>The third issue with Palantir, aside from its inability to operate profitably after two decades and its business model's lack of inherent scalability, is that profits made in Palantir's business are siphoned off by insiders who are compensated royally through stock packages at the expense of shareholders. Palantir has increased the number of shares by 12% in one year, and it now has more than 2 billion shares outstanding. As a result, business profits are primarily distributed to highly compensated insiders, rather than to the company's shareholders.</p>\n<p></p>\n<p><b>A Fantasy Valuation</b></p>\n<p>Let's be clear about what we're talking about. We are dealing with a company that is growing its sales by 30-40% per year, which means Palantir will have revenues in the $1.5 billion range by 2021. Give or take fifty million dollars. It is the same company that has a misunderstood \"platform business model,\" no profits after twenty years of operations, and prioritizes insider stock compensation over shareholder dilution in recent years. They are likely to see further dilution in the coming years.</p>\n<p></p>\n<p>Nonetheless, this company continues to trade at a sales multiple of twenty-four. This means that an investor pays 24 times the expected sales amount for the opportunity to invest in Palantir's loss-making \"big data prediction\" business. Palantir remains outrageously overvalued, despite a significant correction since November.</p>\n<p></p>\n<p></p>\n<p><b>My Conclusion</b></p>\n<p>I'd say the valuation is a joke or a calculation error if I didn't know any better. However, this does not appear to be the case. Apparently, a sizable portion of the investor population believes that Palantir, despite its lack of profits and excessive dilution, is worth 24 times sales. In normal circumstances, 24 times earnings would be excessive. Palantir's business has no scale, which calls into question the company's positioning as a growth stock. Palantir is expected to fall further as investors begin to exit high-multiple stocks. PLTR is nothing more than a value trap, nothing less.</p>","source":"lsy1638401102509","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Palantir: A Value Trap</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nPalantir: A Value Trap\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-12-16 08:14 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4475365-palantir-a-value-trap><strong>seekingalpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Summary\n\nPalantir is an overvalued government contractor.\nThe business has no intrinsic scale value.\nPalantir’s revenue growth, estimated at 40% this year, is still grossly overvalued.\n\n\n\nPalantir (...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4475365-palantir-a-value-trap\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"PLTR":"Palantir Technologies Inc."},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4475365-palantir-a-value-trap","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1143795954","content_text":"Summary\n\nPalantir is an overvalued government contractor.\nThe business has no intrinsic scale value.\nPalantir’s revenue growth, estimated at 40% this year, is still grossly overvalued.\n\n\n\nPalantir (NYSE:PLTR), a software company, has seen its share price fall significantly recently as investors exited high-growth, high-multiple stocks. At 24 times sales, I believe PLTR stock is still significantly overvalued, and investors should brace themselves for new lows.\n\nA Government Consulting Business With Three Major Issues\nSomeone needs to explain to me what all the fuss is about with the big data analytics company Palantir. Palantir is frequently lauded for its software capabilities, which provide customers with data intelligence insights that, ostensibly, improve managerial decision making, but I do not see Palantir as what everyone else does: a unique platform business cashing in on the big data market.\n\nPalantir is best known for its various \"foundries.\" Palantir's foundries are data management and aggregation systems that assist institutions in efficiently centralizing and storing data. As businesses and government agencies collect more data, the complexities grow rapidly, necessitating the use of software solutions. Palantir is collaborating with businesses and governments to reduce complexity and make use of large data volumes for algorithmic predictions. Palantir has had some success with this type of business, if success is defined solely by sales growth. For example, Palantir's 3Q21 revenue increased by 36% YoY to $392 million. Palantir's main source of revenue, government revenues, increased by 34% YoY, while commercial revenues, which include all of Palantir's business activities outside of government, increased by 37% YoY.\n\nRevenue growth, on the other hand, is not a concern for Palantir. Palantir's problems are much deeper, and there is clearly more than one issue here.\n\nThe first issue with Palantir is that, while the company's sales are increasing at a healthy clip, this is not translating into profits for shareholders. Palantir's revenue increased by 44% to $1.11 billion in the first three quarters of 2021. The sales forecast for 2021 calls for up to a 40% increase in sales. That's a good start, but what about profits?\n\nDespite a 44% increase in revenue in 2021, Palantir's profit picture appears to be dire. The company lost $364 million in 2021 alone, and the year isn't even over yet. The total loss for the year could exceed $400 million. Not bad for a company that has been in operation for nearly 20 years and \"grows revenues at a 40% annual rate,\" right? Profits after nearly two decades of operation appear to be too high a bar for Palantir to clear.\n\nThe second major issue for Palantir, despite its big data allure, is its lack of scalability. Contrary to popular belief, Palantir is little more than a well-paid government consultant whose consulting business is not scalable in any way, shape, or form. Palantir also does not operate a \"platform business\" in the same way that Metaverse (NASDAQ:FB) or Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) do. For example, Metaverse collects customer data through a single platform, the Facebook platform. Netflix scales its moving streaming platform, which can add new customers at near-zero marginal costs. Palantir requires personnel to work with each individual client, coach them, and explain platform features. This is not a sustainable business model. It is a software-based consulting business model.\n\nThe third issue with Palantir, aside from its inability to operate profitably after two decades and its business model's lack of inherent scalability, is that profits made in Palantir's business are siphoned off by insiders who are compensated royally through stock packages at the expense of shareholders. Palantir has increased the number of shares by 12% in one year, and it now has more than 2 billion shares outstanding. As a result, business profits are primarily distributed to highly compensated insiders, rather than to the company's shareholders.\n\nA Fantasy Valuation\nLet's be clear about what we're talking about. We are dealing with a company that is growing its sales by 30-40% per year, which means Palantir will have revenues in the $1.5 billion range by 2021. Give or take fifty million dollars. It is the same company that has a misunderstood \"platform business model,\" no profits after twenty years of operations, and prioritizes insider stock compensation over shareholder dilution in recent years. They are likely to see further dilution in the coming years.\n\nNonetheless, this company continues to trade at a sales multiple of twenty-four. This means that an investor pays 24 times the expected sales amount for the opportunity to invest in Palantir's loss-making \"big data prediction\" business. Palantir remains outrageously overvalued, despite a significant correction since November.\n\n\nMy Conclusion\nI'd say the valuation is a joke or a calculation error if I didn't know any better. However, this does not appear to be the case. Apparently, a sizable portion of the investor population believes that Palantir, despite its lack of profits and excessive dilution, is worth 24 times sales. In normal circumstances, 24 times earnings would be excessive. Palantir's business has no scale, which calls into question the company's positioning as a growth stock. Palantir is expected to fall further as investors begin to exit high-multiple stocks. PLTR is nothing more than a value trap, nothing less.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":918,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":607406769,"gmtCreate":1639574245246,"gmtModify":1639574245312,"author":{"id":"3578973717832794","authorId":"3578973717832794","name":"RieslingHawk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a5390eacc9599c6447d4c42f983fcc76","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Market moving towards my Price Target of 4500 for SPX by end of this week? J Powell you da man !","listText":"Market moving towards my Price Target of 4500 for SPX by end of this week? J Powell you da man !","text":"Market moving towards my Price Target of 4500 for SPX by end of this week? J Powell you da man !","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/607406769","repostId":"1144636661","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1144636661","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1639573288,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1144636661?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-15 21:01","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Toplines Before US Market Open on Wednesday","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1144636661","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"U.S. Stock futures traded flat Wednesday morning as investors looked ahead to the Federal Reserve's ","content":"<p>U.S.&nbsp;Stock futures traded flat Wednesday morning as investors&nbsp;looked ahead to the Federal Reserve's final monetary policy decision of 2021&nbsp;and weighed the central bank's potential response to persistent inflationary pressures.</p>\n<p>At 8:00 a.m. ET, Dow e-minis were up 16 points, or 0.05%, S&amp;P 500 e-minis were up 0.75 point, or 0.02%, and Nasdaq 100 e-minis were down 9.25 points, or 0.06%.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/34286b7e4b17094339c3a583ba0a4e13\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"379\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>\n<p>All eyes on Wednesday will be on the Federal Reserve's monetary policy statement and press conference by Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell. Many market participants expect these will set the stage for the Fed to speed the withdrawal of its crisis-era stimulus programs, with the firming economic recovery and soaring inflation suggesting the central bank has room for a more hawkish tilt to policy. </p>\n<p>Last week's Consumer Price Index showed the&nbsp;fastest surge in U.S. consumer prices since 1982&nbsp;on a year-over-year basis in November. And on Tuesday, the U.S. Producer Price Index jumped by the most on record at a 9.6% year-over-year increase for last month.</p>\n<p>Specifically, many investors anticipate the Fed will ramp up the rate of tapering of its asset-purchasing program, which took place at a rate of $120 billion per month in combined Treasuries and agency mortgage-backed securities from the start of the pandemic through November. Last month, the Fed began dialing back these purchases by $15 billion, and announced another $15 billion reduction for December.</p>\n<p><b>Stocks making the biggest moves premarket: </b></p>\n<p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TM\">Toyota</a> </b>– <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TM\">Toyota</a> gained 2.2% in premarket trading, after announcing it would produce a record 800,000 vehicles in January. Toyota is ramping up output to make up for prior production lost to parts shortages.</p>\n<p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/VIR\">Vir Biotechnology, Inc.</a></b> – <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/VIR\">Vir Biotechnology, Inc.</a> is rallying 4.3% in the premarket, putting it in position to rise for a fifth straight day. The drugmaker announced further data showing that its Covid-19 antibody therapy – developed in partnership with&nbsp;GlaxoSmithKline(GSK) – was effective against the omicron variant.</p>\n<p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LLY\">Eli Lilly and</a></b> – The drugmaker raised its 2022 profit and revenue forecast ahead of today’s meeting with the investment community, noting that it is on track to meet its goal of delivering 20 new treatments in the 10-year period through 2023. Lilly moved higher by 4.7% in the premarket.</p>\n<p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/RRD\">R.R.Donnelley</a></b> – <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/RRD\">R.R.Donnelley</a> agreed to be acquired by Chatham Asset Management – the printing company’s top shareholder – for about $897 million. Donnelley terminated an earlier buyout deal it reached with private equity firm Atlas Holdings after determining that Chatham’s bid was a “superior proposal.” The stock fell 2.8% in the premarket.</p>\n<p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DPZ\">Domino's Pizza</a></b> – Domino’s fell 2.1% in premarket trading after Barclays downgraded the stock to “underweight” from “equal weight.” Barclays said solid fundamentals and Covid headwinds in the industry as a whole helped Domino’s outperform during the pandemic, but noted that those headwinds for its competitors are now fading.</p>\n<p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/REGN\">Regeneron Pharmaceuticals</a></b> – Regeneron was downgraded to “market perform” from “outperform” at Bernstein, which cites the risk to Regeneron’s best-selling eye drug Eylea from the future release of biosimilars. Regeneron slid 1.8% in the premarket.</p>\n<p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SIX\">Six Flags Entertainment</a></b> – The theme park operator’s stock rose 2.2% in the premarket after Goldman Sachs upgraded it to “buy” from “neutral,” noting resilient ticket pricing as well as guidance from Six Flags that Goldman considers conservative.</p>\n<p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWNK\">Hostess Brands Inc</a></b> – The maker of Twinkies and other snack foods was rated “buy” in new coverage at Citi, which said Hostess is exiting the pandemic in a strong position with innovation driving market share gains. Hostess was up 1.1% in the premarket.</p>\n<p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/UPS\">United Parcel Service Inc</a></b> – UBS named the delivery service’s stock as a “top pick,” saying UPS should benefit from increased consumer spending and that it has a greater chance of margin expansion than its rivals. UPS rose 1.1% in premarket trading.</p>\n<p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CCMP\">Cabot Microelectronics</a></b> – The advanced materials supplier agreed to be acquired by rivalEntegris(ENTG) in a cash-and-stock deal. Based on Tuesday’s closing prices, the transaction is worth $197.53 per CMC share, compared with CMC’s Tuesday close of $145.97. Entegris fell 3% in the premarket.</p>\n<p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BLMN\">Bloomin</a></b> – The Outback Steakhouse parent surged 5.3% in premarket trading after Jefferies added the stock to its “franchise picks” list, saying the company was positioned to benefit from positive structural changes in the casual dining category.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Toplines Before US Market Open on Wednesday</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nToplines Before US Market Open on Wednesday\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-12-15 21:01</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>U.S.&nbsp;Stock futures traded flat Wednesday morning as investors&nbsp;looked ahead to the Federal Reserve's final monetary policy decision of 2021&nbsp;and weighed the central bank's potential response to persistent inflationary pressures.</p>\n<p>At 8:00 a.m. ET, Dow e-minis were up 16 points, or 0.05%, S&amp;P 500 e-minis were up 0.75 point, or 0.02%, and Nasdaq 100 e-minis were down 9.25 points, or 0.06%.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/34286b7e4b17094339c3a583ba0a4e13\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"379\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>\n<p>All eyes on Wednesday will be on the Federal Reserve's monetary policy statement and press conference by Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell. Many market participants expect these will set the stage for the Fed to speed the withdrawal of its crisis-era stimulus programs, with the firming economic recovery and soaring inflation suggesting the central bank has room for a more hawkish tilt to policy. </p>\n<p>Last week's Consumer Price Index showed the&nbsp;fastest surge in U.S. consumer prices since 1982&nbsp;on a year-over-year basis in November. And on Tuesday, the U.S. Producer Price Index jumped by the most on record at a 9.6% year-over-year increase for last month.</p>\n<p>Specifically, many investors anticipate the Fed will ramp up the rate of tapering of its asset-purchasing program, which took place at a rate of $120 billion per month in combined Treasuries and agency mortgage-backed securities from the start of the pandemic through November. Last month, the Fed began dialing back these purchases by $15 billion, and announced another $15 billion reduction for December.</p>\n<p><b>Stocks making the biggest moves premarket: </b></p>\n<p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TM\">Toyota</a> </b>– <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TM\">Toyota</a> gained 2.2% in premarket trading, after announcing it would produce a record 800,000 vehicles in January. Toyota is ramping up output to make up for prior production lost to parts shortages.</p>\n<p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/VIR\">Vir Biotechnology, Inc.</a></b> – <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/VIR\">Vir Biotechnology, Inc.</a> is rallying 4.3% in the premarket, putting it in position to rise for a fifth straight day. The drugmaker announced further data showing that its Covid-19 antibody therapy – developed in partnership with&nbsp;GlaxoSmithKline(GSK) – was effective against the omicron variant.</p>\n<p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LLY\">Eli Lilly and</a></b> – The drugmaker raised its 2022 profit and revenue forecast ahead of today’s meeting with the investment community, noting that it is on track to meet its goal of delivering 20 new treatments in the 10-year period through 2023. Lilly moved higher by 4.7% in the premarket.</p>\n<p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/RRD\">R.R.Donnelley</a></b> – <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/RRD\">R.R.Donnelley</a> agreed to be acquired by Chatham Asset Management – the printing company’s top shareholder – for about $897 million. Donnelley terminated an earlier buyout deal it reached with private equity firm Atlas Holdings after determining that Chatham’s bid was a “superior proposal.” The stock fell 2.8% in the premarket.</p>\n<p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DPZ\">Domino's Pizza</a></b> – Domino’s fell 2.1% in premarket trading after Barclays downgraded the stock to “underweight” from “equal weight.” Barclays said solid fundamentals and Covid headwinds in the industry as a whole helped Domino’s outperform during the pandemic, but noted that those headwinds for its competitors are now fading.</p>\n<p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/REGN\">Regeneron Pharmaceuticals</a></b> – Regeneron was downgraded to “market perform” from “outperform” at Bernstein, which cites the risk to Regeneron’s best-selling eye drug Eylea from the future release of biosimilars. Regeneron slid 1.8% in the premarket.</p>\n<p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SIX\">Six Flags Entertainment</a></b> – The theme park operator’s stock rose 2.2% in the premarket after Goldman Sachs upgraded it to “buy” from “neutral,” noting resilient ticket pricing as well as guidance from Six Flags that Goldman considers conservative.</p>\n<p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWNK\">Hostess Brands Inc</a></b> – The maker of Twinkies and other snack foods was rated “buy” in new coverage at Citi, which said Hostess is exiting the pandemic in a strong position with innovation driving market share gains. Hostess was up 1.1% in the premarket.</p>\n<p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/UPS\">United Parcel Service Inc</a></b> – UBS named the delivery service’s stock as a “top pick,” saying UPS should benefit from increased consumer spending and that it has a greater chance of margin expansion than its rivals. UPS rose 1.1% in premarket trading.</p>\n<p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CCMP\">Cabot Microelectronics</a></b> – The advanced materials supplier agreed to be acquired by rivalEntegris(ENTG) in a cash-and-stock deal. Based on Tuesday’s closing prices, the transaction is worth $197.53 per CMC share, compared with CMC’s Tuesday close of $145.97. Entegris fell 3% in the premarket.</p>\n<p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BLMN\">Bloomin</a></b> – The Outback Steakhouse parent surged 5.3% in premarket trading after Jefferies added the stock to its “franchise picks” list, saying the company was positioned to benefit from positive structural changes in the casual dining category.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1144636661","content_text":"U.S. Stock futures traded flat Wednesday morning as investors looked ahead to the Federal Reserve's final monetary policy decision of 2021 and weighed the central bank's potential response to persistent inflationary pressures.\nAt 8:00 a.m. ET, Dow e-minis were up 16 points, or 0.05%, S&P 500 e-minis were up 0.75 point, or 0.02%, and Nasdaq 100 e-minis were down 9.25 points, or 0.06%.\n\nAll eyes on Wednesday will be on the Federal Reserve's monetary policy statement and press conference by Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell. Many market participants expect these will set the stage for the Fed to speed the withdrawal of its crisis-era stimulus programs, with the firming economic recovery and soaring inflation suggesting the central bank has room for a more hawkish tilt to policy. \nLast week's Consumer Price Index showed the fastest surge in U.S. consumer prices since 1982 on a year-over-year basis in November. And on Tuesday, the U.S. Producer Price Index jumped by the most on record at a 9.6% year-over-year increase for last month.\nSpecifically, many investors anticipate the Fed will ramp up the rate of tapering of its asset-purchasing program, which took place at a rate of $120 billion per month in combined Treasuries and agency mortgage-backed securities from the start of the pandemic through November. Last month, the Fed began dialing back these purchases by $15 billion, and announced another $15 billion reduction for December.\nStocks making the biggest moves premarket: \nToyota – Toyota gained 2.2% in premarket trading, after announcing it would produce a record 800,000 vehicles in January. Toyota is ramping up output to make up for prior production lost to parts shortages.\nVir Biotechnology, Inc. – Vir Biotechnology, Inc. is rallying 4.3% in the premarket, putting it in position to rise for a fifth straight day. The drugmaker announced further data showing that its Covid-19 antibody therapy – developed in partnership with GlaxoSmithKline(GSK) – was effective against the omicron variant.\nEli Lilly and – The drugmaker raised its 2022 profit and revenue forecast ahead of today’s meeting with the investment community, noting that it is on track to meet its goal of delivering 20 new treatments in the 10-year period through 2023. Lilly moved higher by 4.7% in the premarket.\nR.R.Donnelley – R.R.Donnelley agreed to be acquired by Chatham Asset Management – the printing company’s top shareholder – for about $897 million. Donnelley terminated an earlier buyout deal it reached with private equity firm Atlas Holdings after determining that Chatham’s bid was a “superior proposal.” The stock fell 2.8% in the premarket.\nDomino's Pizza – Domino’s fell 2.1% in premarket trading after Barclays downgraded the stock to “underweight” from “equal weight.” Barclays said solid fundamentals and Covid headwinds in the industry as a whole helped Domino’s outperform during the pandemic, but noted that those headwinds for its competitors are now fading.\nRegeneron Pharmaceuticals – Regeneron was downgraded to “market perform” from “outperform” at Bernstein, which cites the risk to Regeneron’s best-selling eye drug Eylea from the future release of biosimilars. Regeneron slid 1.8% in the premarket.\nSix Flags Entertainment – The theme park operator’s stock rose 2.2% in the premarket after Goldman Sachs upgraded it to “buy” from “neutral,” noting resilient ticket pricing as well as guidance from Six Flags that Goldman considers conservative.\nHostess Brands Inc – The maker of Twinkies and other snack foods was rated “buy” in new coverage at Citi, which said Hostess is exiting the pandemic in a strong position with innovation driving market share gains. Hostess was up 1.1% in the premarket.\nUnited Parcel Service Inc – UBS named the delivery service’s stock as a “top pick,” saying UPS should benefit from increased consumer spending and that it has a greater chance of margin expansion than its rivals. UPS rose 1.1% in premarket trading.\nCabot Microelectronics – The advanced materials supplier agreed to be acquired by rivalEntegris(ENTG) in a cash-and-stock deal. Based on Tuesday’s closing prices, the transaction is worth $197.53 per CMC share, compared with CMC’s Tuesday close of $145.97. Entegris fell 3% in the premarket.\nBloomin – The Outback Steakhouse parent surged 5.3% in premarket trading after Jefferies added the stock to its “franchise picks” list, saying the company was positioned to benefit from positive structural changes in the casual dining category.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":932,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":607235383,"gmtCreate":1639543589758,"gmtModify":1639543589905,"author":{"id":"3578973717832794","authorId":"3578973717832794","name":"RieslingHawk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a5390eacc9599c6447d4c42f983fcc76","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good indication that market is crashingsoon","listText":"Good indication that market is crashingsoon","text":"Good indication that market is crashingsoon","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/607235383","repostId":"1150850336","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1150850336","pubTimestamp":1639535034,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1150850336?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-15 10:23","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Mark Zuckerberg Sells Stock Every Day as Billionaires Cash Out","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1150850336","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"Richest Americans have sold $42.9 billion of stock this year\nGoogle founders Brin, Page make their f","content":"<ul>\n <li>Richest Americans have sold $42.9 billion of stock this year</li>\n <li>Google founders Brin, Page make their first sales since 2017</li>\n</ul>\n<p>Mark Zuckerberg&nbsp;sold Meta Platforms Inc. stock almost every weekday of this year. The founders of Google began to unload shares in May, which is also when two of the three Airbnb Inc. co-founders started diversifying their stakes.</p>\n<p>The transactions are part of a surge of selling by the very richest Americans. They unloaded $42.9 billion in stock through the start of December, more than double the $20.2 billion they sold in all of 2020, according to an analysis of transactions by U.S. billionaires on the&nbsp;Bloomberg Billionaires Index, a daily ranking of the world’s richest 500 people.</p>\n<p>The super-wealthy often hold onto shares in the companies that made their fortunes, because realizing gains triggers a tax bill. But many rich Americans are deciding to unload shares now, while stock valuations are at records and before their taxes potentially rise at the start of 2022.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3385f88e66ccdd038a5c42b99934a33e\" tg-width=\"1000\" tg-height=\"666\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Mark Zuckerberg Photographer: Michael Nagle/Bloomberg</span></p>\n<p>“A lot of our clients are selling,” said Elizabeth Sevilla, a partner at Seiler LLP, an advisory firm based in the San Francisco Bay area. Founders and venture capitalists are deciding they want to diversify concentrated positions, or “they’re looking at the market and saying, ‘We’re at the top of the market.’”</p>\n<p>Plus, biting the tax bullet in 2021 may mean avoiding rate hikes in future years, she said.</p>\n<p>Several of the world’s richest people have been selling core holdings after years of hibernation, including&nbsp;Sergey Brin&nbsp;and&nbsp;Larry Page, the reclusive co-founders of Google. So far this year, Page has sold around $1.8 billion in stock of Google parent Alphabet Inc. and Brin around $1.7 billion. It was the first time either had sold shares since 2017.</p>\n<p><b>‘Unrealized Gains’</b></p>\n<p>Elon Musk, the world’s richest person, has&nbsp;unloaded&nbsp;about $12.7 billion in Tesla Inc. shares this year, the first time he’s sold stock since 2016. The selling streak was unleashed after the billionaire, who has a personal fortune of $253.6 billion, asked in a Twitter poll last month whether he should divest 10% of his shares in the electric-auto maker.</p>\n<p>“Much is made lately of unrealized gains being a means of tax avoidance,” he&nbsp;tweeted, promising to abide by the poll’s results.</p>\n<p>Michael Dell, founder and chief executive officer of Dell Technologies Inc., hadn’t sold shares of his company in at least two years, or since it returned to public markets in 2018. So far this year, he’s disposed of about $500 million.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d0db0fc47fb90ec02ecba7c32a2c9e68\" tg-width=\"955\" tg-height=\"499\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Source: Bloomberg data</span></p>\n<p>Whether avoiding taxes was their goal or not, selling in 2021 could help these billionaires save billions of dollars. Even as Musk framed his sales as tied to the outcome of a Twitter poll, some of the sale was pre-planned and displayed&nbsp;canny awareness&nbsp;of tax liabilities, both at the federal and state level.</p>\n<p>While Democrats have dropped several ideas to hike taxes on the top 0.1% to pay for President Joe Biden’s economic agenda, the bill that passed the House of Representatives last month included a millionaire’s surtax, a 5% levy on incomes over $10 million and an additional 3% tax on those above $25 million.</p>\n<p>The surtax, which is projected by the Joint Committee on Taxation to raise $228 billion over the next decade, applies to a broader definition of income, including capital gains, making it harder to avoid through deductions. It wouldn’t go into effect until 2022, however, giving the super-wealthy an opportunity to sell now and over the next couple weeks, saving as much as 8% on taxes.</p>\n<p><b>Easy Decision</b></p>\n<p>“It’s not an exodus from the market,” Seiler’s Sevilla said. Instead, planners are sitting down with wealthy tech clients and gauging the impact of the surtax and other tax proposals, then calculating how much investments would need to rise to justify holding onto them. “If they know they cannot exceed that, the decision is easy,” Sevilla said.</p>\n<p>The 167 Americans on the Bloomberg index are worth about $3.6 trillion, up 47% since the beginning of last year. Their wealth gains have been driven by a rapid run-up in stock valuations during that period, with the S&amp;P 500 Index up about 45% and the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite Index gaining 75%.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/721eba0c0fb13842fb62f4619cf02991\" tg-width=\"952\" tg-height=\"539\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>The top billionaires’ stock sales have soared faster than their wealth. In 2019, the richest Americans sold just $6.6 billion of stock, a similar amount as in previous years.</p>\n<p>The selling really picked up in 2020, as Democratic candidates were on the campaign trail proposing to raise rates on the rich. Advisers spent much of the year warning of higher taxes as early as 2021 if Democrats took over.</p>\n<p>Meanwhile, stock valuations were surging last year, particularly in tech stocks benefiting from trends unleashed by the pandemic.</p>\n<p>Nvidia Corp. co-founder and CEO&nbsp;Jensen Huang&nbsp;sold shares in the chipmaker in July 2020 as it was hitting new highs, his first sales in almost three years. The stock price has nearly tripled since then, and Huang’s sales have accelerated as well. He’s sold $426 million so far this year, on top of $168 million in 2020.</p>\n<p>Another factor driving sales is a wave of initial public offerings, which made it possible for founders of successful startups to diversify their fortunes for the first time.</p>\n<p>Two of Airbnb Inc.’s three cofounders --&nbsp;Joseph Gebbia&nbsp;and&nbsp;Nathan Blecharczyk&nbsp;-- have together sold more than $1 billion worth of stock since the vacation-rental company went public in December of last year. Another co-founder, CEO&nbsp;Brian Chesky, hasn’t sold any shares this year, according to filings.</p>\n<p>Even as U.S. billionaires sell more, their stock purchases are stagnant. Americans on the Bloomberg index bought $543 million of shares on the open market through Dec. 3, an increase from last year but less than half their purchases in 2018. The analysis doesn’t take into account other ways billionaires acquire shares, such as stock grants or option awards that are part of compensation packages.</p>\n<p><b>Personal Reasons</b></p>\n<p>The richest Americans could have a variety of personal reasons for selling now, including funding charitable endeavors.</p>\n<p>Jeff Bezos, the world’s second-richest person, has sold more than $9 billion in Amazon.com Inc. this year, money that he could use to deliver on recent grants and pledges to fight climate change through his Bezos Earth Fund.</p>\n<p>Zuckerberg is liquidating more Meta stock -- formerly known as Facebook -- than he has in years, largely to send to his Chan-Zuckerberg Initiative. He’s sold $4.5 billion this year, nearly eight times more than he sold in 2020. Six years ago he and his wife Priscilla Chan pledged to give 99% of their wealth to charity during their lifetimes.</p>\n<p>Jack Dorsey, the founder of Twitter Inc., has sold nearly $500 million in stock this year of another company he founded, Block Inc. Last year he announced a&nbsp;promise&nbsp;to donate a large stake in the company, formerly known as Square, to Covid-19 relief. (The billionaire has mostly not touched his Twitter shares, which comprises less than 10% of his $10.4 billion net worth, according to the Bloomberg index.)</p>","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Mark Zuckerberg Sells Stock Every Day as Billionaires Cash Out</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nMark Zuckerberg Sells Stock Every Day as Billionaires Cash Out\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-12-15 10:23 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-12-14/musk-bezos-lead-the-charge-of-u-s-billionaires-selling-shares><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Richest Americans have sold $42.9 billion of stock this year\nGoogle founders Brin, Page make their first sales since 2017\n\nMark Zuckerberg sold Meta Platforms Inc. stock almost every weekday of this ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-12-14/musk-bezos-lead-the-charge-of-u-s-billionaires-selling-shares\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"ABNB":"爱彼迎","TSLA":"特斯拉","TWTR":"Twitter","NVDA":"英伟达","GOOG":"谷歌","DELL":"戴尔","MSFT":"微软","GOOGL":"谷歌A","AMZN":"亚马逊"},"source_url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-12-14/musk-bezos-lead-the-charge-of-u-s-billionaires-selling-shares","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1150850336","content_text":"Richest Americans have sold $42.9 billion of stock this year\nGoogle founders Brin, Page make their first sales since 2017\n\nMark Zuckerberg sold Meta Platforms Inc. stock almost every weekday of this year. The founders of Google began to unload shares in May, which is also when two of the three Airbnb Inc. co-founders started diversifying their stakes.\nThe transactions are part of a surge of selling by the very richest Americans. They unloaded $42.9 billion in stock through the start of December, more than double the $20.2 billion they sold in all of 2020, according to an analysis of transactions by U.S. billionaires on the Bloomberg Billionaires Index, a daily ranking of the world’s richest 500 people.\nThe super-wealthy often hold onto shares in the companies that made their fortunes, because realizing gains triggers a tax bill. But many rich Americans are deciding to unload shares now, while stock valuations are at records and before their taxes potentially rise at the start of 2022.\nMark Zuckerberg Photographer: Michael Nagle/Bloomberg\n“A lot of our clients are selling,” said Elizabeth Sevilla, a partner at Seiler LLP, an advisory firm based in the San Francisco Bay area. Founders and venture capitalists are deciding they want to diversify concentrated positions, or “they’re looking at the market and saying, ‘We’re at the top of the market.’”\nPlus, biting the tax bullet in 2021 may mean avoiding rate hikes in future years, she said.\nSeveral of the world’s richest people have been selling core holdings after years of hibernation, including Sergey Brin and Larry Page, the reclusive co-founders of Google. So far this year, Page has sold around $1.8 billion in stock of Google parent Alphabet Inc. and Brin around $1.7 billion. It was the first time either had sold shares since 2017.\n‘Unrealized Gains’\nElon Musk, the world’s richest person, has unloaded about $12.7 billion in Tesla Inc. shares this year, the first time he’s sold stock since 2016. The selling streak was unleashed after the billionaire, who has a personal fortune of $253.6 billion, asked in a Twitter poll last month whether he should divest 10% of his shares in the electric-auto maker.\n“Much is made lately of unrealized gains being a means of tax avoidance,” he tweeted, promising to abide by the poll’s results.\nMichael Dell, founder and chief executive officer of Dell Technologies Inc., hadn’t sold shares of his company in at least two years, or since it returned to public markets in 2018. So far this year, he’s disposed of about $500 million.\nSource: Bloomberg data\nWhether avoiding taxes was their goal or not, selling in 2021 could help these billionaires save billions of dollars. Even as Musk framed his sales as tied to the outcome of a Twitter poll, some of the sale was pre-planned and displayed canny awareness of tax liabilities, both at the federal and state level.\nWhile Democrats have dropped several ideas to hike taxes on the top 0.1% to pay for President Joe Biden’s economic agenda, the bill that passed the House of Representatives last month included a millionaire’s surtax, a 5% levy on incomes over $10 million and an additional 3% tax on those above $25 million.\nThe surtax, which is projected by the Joint Committee on Taxation to raise $228 billion over the next decade, applies to a broader definition of income, including capital gains, making it harder to avoid through deductions. It wouldn’t go into effect until 2022, however, giving the super-wealthy an opportunity to sell now and over the next couple weeks, saving as much as 8% on taxes.\nEasy Decision\n“It’s not an exodus from the market,” Seiler’s Sevilla said. Instead, planners are sitting down with wealthy tech clients and gauging the impact of the surtax and other tax proposals, then calculating how much investments would need to rise to justify holding onto them. “If they know they cannot exceed that, the decision is easy,” Sevilla said.\nThe 167 Americans on the Bloomberg index are worth about $3.6 trillion, up 47% since the beginning of last year. Their wealth gains have been driven by a rapid run-up in stock valuations during that period, with the S&P 500 Index up about 45% and the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite Index gaining 75%.\n\nThe top billionaires’ stock sales have soared faster than their wealth. In 2019, the richest Americans sold just $6.6 billion of stock, a similar amount as in previous years.\nThe selling really picked up in 2020, as Democratic candidates were on the campaign trail proposing to raise rates on the rich. Advisers spent much of the year warning of higher taxes as early as 2021 if Democrats took over.\nMeanwhile, stock valuations were surging last year, particularly in tech stocks benefiting from trends unleashed by the pandemic.\nNvidia Corp. co-founder and CEO Jensen Huang sold shares in the chipmaker in July 2020 as it was hitting new highs, his first sales in almost three years. The stock price has nearly tripled since then, and Huang’s sales have accelerated as well. He’s sold $426 million so far this year, on top of $168 million in 2020.\nAnother factor driving sales is a wave of initial public offerings, which made it possible for founders of successful startups to diversify their fortunes for the first time.\nTwo of Airbnb Inc.’s three cofounders -- Joseph Gebbia and Nathan Blecharczyk -- have together sold more than $1 billion worth of stock since the vacation-rental company went public in December of last year. Another co-founder, CEO Brian Chesky, hasn’t sold any shares this year, according to filings.\nEven as U.S. billionaires sell more, their stock purchases are stagnant. Americans on the Bloomberg index bought $543 million of shares on the open market through Dec. 3, an increase from last year but less than half their purchases in 2018. The analysis doesn’t take into account other ways billionaires acquire shares, such as stock grants or option awards that are part of compensation packages.\nPersonal Reasons\nThe richest Americans could have a variety of personal reasons for selling now, including funding charitable endeavors.\nJeff Bezos, the world’s second-richest person, has sold more than $9 billion in Amazon.com Inc. this year, money that he could use to deliver on recent grants and pledges to fight climate change through his Bezos Earth Fund.\nZuckerberg is liquidating more Meta stock -- formerly known as Facebook -- than he has in years, largely to send to his Chan-Zuckerberg Initiative. He’s sold $4.5 billion this year, nearly eight times more than he sold in 2020. Six years ago he and his wife Priscilla Chan pledged to give 99% of their wealth to charity during their lifetimes.\nJack Dorsey, the founder of Twitter Inc., has sold nearly $500 million in stock this year of another company he founded, Block Inc. Last year he announced a promise to donate a large stake in the company, formerly known as Square, to Covid-19 relief. (The billionaire has mostly not touched his Twitter shares, which comprises less than 10% of his $10.4 billion net worth, according to the Bloomberg index.)","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1080,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":607300556,"gmtCreate":1639483167660,"gmtModify":1639483217996,"author":{"id":"3578973717832794","authorId":"3578973717832794","name":"RieslingHawk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a5390eacc9599c6447d4c42f983fcc76","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$</a> Elon Musk exercising TSLA stock options = buying shares at $6 per share and you are paying $966 to make him richer? Pffft please, don't be so stupid, stop contributing to his already mega wealthy net worth. And buy the dip? Seriously? Are you that dumb? Whenever this big wealthy **** exercises his stock options and sell it in the open market, he is basically diluting your shareholding in the company. Please realise this and stop being a dumbass!","listText":"<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$</a> Elon Musk exercising TSLA stock options = buying shares at $6 per share and you are paying $966 to make him richer? Pffft please, don't be so stupid, stop contributing to his already mega wealthy net worth. And buy the dip? Seriously? Are you that dumb? Whenever this big wealthy **** exercises his stock options and sell it in the open market, he is basically diluting your shareholding in the company. Please realise this and stop being a dumbass!","text":"$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$ Elon Musk exercising TSLA stock options = buying shares at $6 per share and you are paying $966 to make him richer? Pffft please, don't be so stupid, stop contributing to his already mega wealthy net worth. And buy the dip? Seriously? Are you that dumb? Whenever this big wealthy **** exercises his stock options and sell it in the open market, he is basically diluting your shareholding in the company. Please realise this and stop being a dumbass!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/607300556","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2122,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":607988932,"gmtCreate":1639474209420,"gmtModify":1639474209506,"author":{"id":"3578973717832794","authorId":"3578973717832794","name":"RieslingHawk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a5390eacc9599c6447d4c42f983fcc76","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Morgan Stanley seems the only rationalone in this crazy market&nbsp;","listText":"Morgan Stanley seems the only rationalone in this crazy market&nbsp;","text":"Morgan Stanley seems the only rationalone in this crazy market","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/607988932","repostId":"1108305514","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1108305514","pubTimestamp":1639468064,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1108305514?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-14 15:47","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Morgan Stanley Warns The Fed's Turbo Taper Will Trigger Market Chaos Over \"The Next 3-4 Months\"","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1108305514","media":"zerohedge","summary":"Until last week, the economic and market views of Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley couldn't be more ","content":"<p>Until last week, the economic and market views of Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley couldn't be more opposite: the former, delightfully optimistic, expects the US economy to grow on all cylinders in 2022 and despite the Fed's tightening - two months ago Goldman flipped its Fed views by pulling forward its first rate hike forecast by one year to July, and followed it up over the weekend&nbsp;by predicting that liftoff will begin in May&nbsp;with two more rate hikes to follow in 2022...</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/48bea9a6115e88e6a84296a31a94a5f6\" tg-width=\"643\" tg-height=\"423\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>\n<p>... said in its year-ahead market forecast last month that it&nbsp;expects the S&amp;P to hit 5,100 by the end of 2022&nbsp;even as the economy slows down modestly from its current feverish pace.</p>\n<p>Meanwhile, far less optimistic than their Goldman peers, Morgan Stanley's economists expected - until late last week - the Fed to stand pat without hiking even once in 2022. That changed over the weekend, however, when the bank&nbsp;admitted \"defeat\" and now expects two rate hikes&nbsp;in 2022, even as the bank's chief market economist Michael Wilson sees the S&amp;P closing 2022 at 4,400,some 5% below current&nbsp;levels.</p>\n<p>So while there has been some convergence on the economy and Fed front, a gaping divergence remains when it comes to what the two most influential US banks think the market will do, a schism which only became more acute in the past 24 hours, when on one hand Goldman predicted that a massive year-end Santa Rally is imminent (as we&nbsp;discussed last night), while Morgan Stanley doubled down on its bearish view this morning when in Michael Wilson's latest strategy outlook piece (available to&nbsp;professional subscribers), he warns that \"<b>the Fed's pivot to a more aggressive tapering schedule poses a larger risk for asset prices than most investors believe.</b>\"</p>\n<p>Confirming what we have been saying since 2010 when we first explained that it is not the stock but the flow that matters, and that tapering is tightening, Wilson echoes our decade-old conclusion and writes that \"<b>tapering is tightening for markets, if not the economy.\"</b>And due to the much greater than expected rise in inflation - now that even Powell has killed and buried \"team transitory\" - the Fed is pivoting to a more aggressive removal of monetary accommodation.</p>\n<p>Wilson believes this is warranted and supported by an administration that appears less focused on the stock market as a barometer of</p>\n<p>its success (actually since this administration has zero success to \"barometer\" besides flooding money into the economy and watching inflation skyrocket of course, it simply hasn't even considered the level of the S&amp;P; it will soon... after the crash).</p>\n<p>Furthermore, the Morgan Stanley strategist believes that tapering is different than in 2014 for 3 reasons:</p>\n<ol>\n <li>the Fed is exiting QE twice as fast this time,</li>\n <li>asset prices are much richer today and</li>\n <li>growth is decelerating rather than accelerating.</li>\n</ol>\n<p>And as we joked earlier (but not really) with the Fed tapering and soon hiking, the outcome will be a recession and a market crash...</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/67f779e8eac0b236a687016bfa896377\" tg-width=\"756\" tg-height=\"448\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>\n<p>... Wilson again agrees and says that such an adverse market reaction \"could be important for the economy, too, given how levered consumers are to stock prices today.\"</p>\n<p>Taking a more nuanced look at Morgan Stanley's forecast, Wilson explains that when he was writing his (decidedly bearish) year ahead outlook, he was faced with \"a wider than normal range of potential economic and policy outcomes.\" This higher \" uncertainty\" was one of the key inputs to the bank's conclusion that<b>valuations for US equity markets were likely to come down over the next 3-6 months,</b>and as further notes explains<i>\"in our discussions with hundreds of clients since publishing our outlook, the conversations have centered around how to handicap these various outcomes.\"</i>Wilson lists the three scenarios as follows:</p>\n<ul>\n <li><b>Goldilocks:</b><i>When we published on November 15, this was the prevailing view by most clients. In this outcome, supply picks up in 1Q to meet the excess demand companies are having a hard time fulfilling. Inflation falls back toward 2-3%, allowing the Fed to move gradually with its taper and hike maybe 1-2 times in 2022, a modest amount of tightening that most believe the economy and markets can handle. Under this scenario, earnings growth is solid (10-15%), interest rates stay well behaved and valuations remain elevated (20-21x Forward EPS). This yields 5-10% upside to the S&amp;P 500 over the next year or roughly 5000.</i><i><b>For us, this was the Bull case</b></i><i>outcome in our outlook with a 20% probability.</i></li>\n <li><b>Inflation remains hot and the Fed responds more aggressively:</b><i>Under this outcome, inflation proves to be stickier as supply chains and labor shortages remain difficult to fix in the short term. The Fed is forced to taper faster and even raise rates on a more aggressive path than investors expect.</i><i><b>This was our base case as it essentially lined up with our hotter but shorter cycle view we first wrote about back in March.</b></i><i>Under this outcome, interest rates continue to rise next year to 2-2.25% by year end. At the same time, operating leverage starts to fade as costs increase more in line with revenues, leaving limited margin upside. This leaves breadth narrow in the near term as valuations come down and P/Es finally normalize in line with the traditional mid cycle transition.</i><i><b>While there is some debate around how much P/Es need to fall, we believe 18x is the right number to use for year end 2022 and when combined with 10% revenue growth that gives us slight downside to the index from current prices, or 4400. We put a 60% probability on this outcome.</b></i></li>\n <li><b>Supply picks up just as demand fades</b>:<i>Under this outcome, supply does improve but it's too late to meet what has been an unsustainable level of demand and consumption for many goods. It's also too expensive for customers who have become more wary of high prices, which leads to discounting and a whiff of deflation for many areas of the goods economy. While services should fare better and keep the economy growing, goods producing companies suffer and make up a much larger part of the consumer discretionary part of the stock market. Under this scenario,</i><i><b>the Fed may decide to back off on their more aggressive tightening path.</b></i><i>Rates fall but not enough to offset the negative impact on margins and earnings which end up disappointing. This is essentially the \"Ice\" part of our narrative turning out be colder than expected. Equity risk premiums soar and multiples fall even more than under our base case.</i><i><b>This was our bear case with a 20% probability.</b></i></li>\n</ul>\n<p>Before we drill down into these, a quick detour to Wilson who says that since publishing his year-ahead forecast one month ago, he feels \"more confident about our base case being the most likely outcome. Inflation data continues to come in hotter and based on commentary from our analysts, companies seem to be having no problem passing it along to customers, keeping inflation sticky on the upside. While this will likely lead to another good quarter of earnings overall, we suspect there will be more casualties, too,<b>as execution risk is increasing leaving dispersion high and leadership inconsistent — two more conclusions in our outlook.</b>\" This means that stock picking, while difficult, will be a necessary condition to generate meaningful returns in 2022 as the market separates the winners and losers and index basically goes nowhere over the next 12 months.</p>\n<p>Meanwhile, and far more ominously, Wilson also warns that \"<b>the likelihood of our bear case is growing relative to our bull case. As it stands, we would say Bear case is now 30%, Base case is still 60% while goldilocks looks like a distance 3rd at just 10%.</b>\"</p>\n<p>In other words, the odds that the Fed will short circuit its tightening plans are rising.</p>\n<p>* * *</p>\n<p>With that in mind, let's focus some more on Wilson's core assumptions, at the top of which is that...</p>\n<p><b>The change in the Fed's reaction function is a big deal because Tapering is Tightening</b></p>\n<p>While Morgan Stanley's base case has always assumed the Fed would respond appropriately to the higher inflation, \"the pivot by Chair Powell at his recent Congressional testimony was more aggressive than what we expected, especially in light of the new Covid variant, which at the time was a known unknown.\" We discussed this&nbsp;over the weekend in depth. Here, Wilson concedes that with Omicron now looking like a lower risk to growth than 2 weeks ago,<b>this only raises the probability that the Fed will indeed taper its asset purchases much faster than the last tapering episode in 2014,</b>and Morgan Stanley \"economists point out that the Fed is now suggesting stable prices is important to achieving its primary goal of full employment which means inflation has taken center stage, until it's under control.\" In terms of speed, the bank's forecast is now for the Fed to end its asset purchase program by the end of March, the same as Goldman. However, if the Fed executes on that path, \"<b>it will leave a mark on asset prices in our view.</b>\"</p>\n<p>Wilson also thinks Jay Powell and the Fed will be under much less pressure from the White House versus the last time they tried to take the punch bowl away in late 2018. Part of this is due to the fact that inflation is a much bigger problem today than it was in 2018 and part of it is due to the observation that this White House is not as preoccupied with the stock market. Wilson's bottom line: \"<b>the Fed put still exists but the strike price is much lower now, in our view. If we had to guess, it's down 20% rather than down 10% unless credit markets or economic data really start to wobble.\"</b></p>\n<p>Here Wilson encounters the same challenge we have observed over the years, namely that most disagree with the conclusion<b>that tapering is tightening (</b>for markets, if not the economy). As evidence, those who still don't understand that only the Flow (and not the Stock) matters, point to the tapering in 2014 as an example of how markets traded well as the Fed let the air out of the balloon back then. On that score, Wilson has makes several points to argue \"it could be different this time.\"</p>\n<p><b>First, in 2014, it took the Fed 10 months to taper its QE program. This time they will do it in just 4 ½ months, or twice as fast.</b>While M2 has been decelerating this year on a global basis, it's still running almost 8% y/y (Exhibit 1). In the US, M2 growth is running 13% and explains a lot of why nominal GDP growth is also running about 13% in the fourth quarter.<b>After all, MV=PQ. If the Fed takes QE down to zero, its global M2 growth will slow severely and likely fall below 5% by the end of 1Q.</b>This looks a lot like 2014 and 2018, but at a faster pace. Wilson's guess is that growth will take a hit at a time when it's already decelerating and increase the odds of our bear case playing out.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d7b194d9260811b2e78dd6a302f3be64\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"287\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>\n<p><b>Second, US Equity markets are much richer today and therefore more vulnerable to a swift reduction of liquidity.</b>Specifically, the equity risk premium is 350bps today and was close to 500bps when they started the taper talk in 2013. P/Es were 14.5x versus 20x today. To be sure, rates were higher then but that is why multiples had room to rise from there as rates reflected the more hawkish Fed and inflation that was much lower then. As a result,<i>valuations were able to hold in and even increase during that tapering episode.</i></p>\n<p><b>Third, growth is decelerating now while in 2013-14 it was accelerating.</b>In addition to the PMI shown in the exhibit, earnings and economic growth were accelerating whereas both are likely to decelerate in 2021 and even outright decline for many companies, particularly in the first half of the year when the comparisons are most difficult. This, Wilson says, is what will really separate the winners from the losers&nbsp; and why he is so focused on earnings stability/achievability and valuation<i>\"because small beats will likely not be enough to drive stocks higher if they have a premium P/E.\"</i></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f880af3fb7e446f8e698778835968cdd\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"312\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>\n<p>Morgan Stanley's bottom line:<i><b>given that much of the market is expensive relative to history, rather than just a few sectors or names, it suggests to this tapering episode will be different than the last one and is likely to leave the overall market lower than where we are trading today by the end of the first quarter if the Fed goes through with an expedited tapering schedule.</b></i></p>\n<p>In short, Powell - who was wrong about inflation being transitory for the past year and only two weeks ago admitted he was dead wrong - is about to trigger a nightmare scenario for market, and will scramble to snuff inflation just as it has already peaked, and just as the global economy is sliding into a fast slowdown.</p>\n<p>* * *</p>\n<p>But wait, there's more because as Wilson also correctly observes,<b>asset markets have never been more important to consumer health.</b>That's right: a market crash here and we spiral right into a deep recession, perhaps even worse than the Global Financial Crisis.</p>\n<p>While Morgan Stanley's base case is that the economy should be able to handle the ending of QE and even some rate hikes next year,<b>the big risk has always been that if asset markets correct more significantly it could have a greater than normal effect on the economy too given how levered the consumer is to the stock market and other asset prices like housing and crypto currencies.</b>When just considering the stock market, it's easy to see that consumer net worth has increased dramatically as many key assets have risen inexorably over the past 18 months. And while this is a good thing for consumer demand if prices remain elevated, it also dramatically increases the odds that the inverse will be just as painful, and<b>tapering will quickly become tightening for the economy, too, if it leads to a significant asset price deflation.</b></p>\n<p>Here, Morgan Stanley thinks that<b>\"the risk of that is greatest over the next 3-4 months as the Fed exits QE on this faster time table.\"</b></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3cc412127eea207ffc76c8636ecdd375\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"168\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>\n<p>The market has, naturally, been ignoring these risks and one place where this is especially obvious is the collapse in market breadth. Since September, breadth has rarely been this weak relative to the Index level price</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0de5c40e0883d664f855f3522c275905\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"170\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>\n<p>As Wilson concludes, \"<b>the rolling correction that began last spring continues under the surface, making the index a very bad gauge of the overall health of the stock market, or the economy, in our view.\"</b>The good news here is that the average stock has already discounted a good chunk of the risks Morgan Stanley is forecasting \"even if the index has not.\"</p>\n<p>In this regard, the bank continues to stress that watching the S&amp;P 500 is a bad idea for measuring what the market is really telling us about the fundamentals. It also explains why it's been so difficult for many active managers to keep up with the benchmark. And while the average stock may begin to outperform as the index catches down, Wilson warns that&nbsp;<b>the absolute direction for most stocks will remain lower until the index has taken its turn on the de-rating process that began over 6 months ago.</b>It's also why Wilson remains overweight large cap defensive quality for now.</p>\n<p>One final point from the MS strategist: if there is one chart that depicts the risk off nature of the markets under the surface,<b>it's the MSCI large/mid cap quality index versus the Russell 2000 small cap index.</b></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1c190303d3ec030a5ff020ba604e0c85\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"302\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>\n<p>As Wilson concludes, \"making this very simple pivot in March as the rate of change on growth and policy peaked was the more important thing to do this year for performance... We continue to recommend this pair but with a more defensive bias on the quality side rather than growth due to valuation constraints as the Fed accelerates its taper this week.\"</p>","source":"lsy1583725640930","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Morgan Stanley Warns The Fed's Turbo Taper Will Trigger Market Chaos Over \"The Next 3-4 Months\"</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nMorgan Stanley Warns The Fed's Turbo Taper Will Trigger Market Chaos Over \"The Next 3-4 Months\"\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-12-14 15:47 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/morgan-stanley-warns-feds-taper-will-trigger-market-chaos-over-next-3-4-months><strong>zerohedge</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Until last week, the economic and market views of Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley couldn't be more opposite: the former, delightfully optimistic, expects the US economy to grow on all cylinders in ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/morgan-stanley-warns-feds-taper-will-trigger-market-chaos-over-next-3-4-months\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/morgan-stanley-warns-feds-taper-will-trigger-market-chaos-over-next-3-4-months","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1108305514","content_text":"Until last week, the economic and market views of Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley couldn't be more opposite: the former, delightfully optimistic, expects the US economy to grow on all cylinders in 2022 and despite the Fed's tightening - two months ago Goldman flipped its Fed views by pulling forward its first rate hike forecast by one year to July, and followed it up over the weekend by predicting that liftoff will begin in May with two more rate hikes to follow in 2022...\n\n... said in its year-ahead market forecast last month that it expects the S&P to hit 5,100 by the end of 2022 even as the economy slows down modestly from its current feverish pace.\nMeanwhile, far less optimistic than their Goldman peers, Morgan Stanley's economists expected - until late last week - the Fed to stand pat without hiking even once in 2022. That changed over the weekend, however, when the bank admitted \"defeat\" and now expects two rate hikes in 2022, even as the bank's chief market economist Michael Wilson sees the S&P closing 2022 at 4,400,some 5% below current levels.\nSo while there has been some convergence on the economy and Fed front, a gaping divergence remains when it comes to what the two most influential US banks think the market will do, a schism which only became more acute in the past 24 hours, when on one hand Goldman predicted that a massive year-end Santa Rally is imminent (as we discussed last night), while Morgan Stanley doubled down on its bearish view this morning when in Michael Wilson's latest strategy outlook piece (available to professional subscribers), he warns that \"the Fed's pivot to a more aggressive tapering schedule poses a larger risk for asset prices than most investors believe.\"\nConfirming what we have been saying since 2010 when we first explained that it is not the stock but the flow that matters, and that tapering is tightening, Wilson echoes our decade-old conclusion and writes that \"tapering is tightening for markets, if not the economy.\"And due to the much greater than expected rise in inflation - now that even Powell has killed and buried \"team transitory\" - the Fed is pivoting to a more aggressive removal of monetary accommodation.\nWilson believes this is warranted and supported by an administration that appears less focused on the stock market as a barometer of\nits success (actually since this administration has zero success to \"barometer\" besides flooding money into the economy and watching inflation skyrocket of course, it simply hasn't even considered the level of the S&P; it will soon... after the crash).\nFurthermore, the Morgan Stanley strategist believes that tapering is different than in 2014 for 3 reasons:\n\nthe Fed is exiting QE twice as fast this time,\nasset prices are much richer today and\ngrowth is decelerating rather than accelerating.\n\nAnd as we joked earlier (but not really) with the Fed tapering and soon hiking, the outcome will be a recession and a market crash...\n\n... Wilson again agrees and says that such an adverse market reaction \"could be important for the economy, too, given how levered consumers are to stock prices today.\"\nTaking a more nuanced look at Morgan Stanley's forecast, Wilson explains that when he was writing his (decidedly bearish) year ahead outlook, he was faced with \"a wider than normal range of potential economic and policy outcomes.\" This higher \" uncertainty\" was one of the key inputs to the bank's conclusion thatvaluations for US equity markets were likely to come down over the next 3-6 months,and as further notes explains\"in our discussions with hundreds of clients since publishing our outlook, the conversations have centered around how to handicap these various outcomes.\"Wilson lists the three scenarios as follows:\n\nGoldilocks:When we published on November 15, this was the prevailing view by most clients. In this outcome, supply picks up in 1Q to meet the excess demand companies are having a hard time fulfilling. Inflation falls back toward 2-3%, allowing the Fed to move gradually with its taper and hike maybe 1-2 times in 2022, a modest amount of tightening that most believe the economy and markets can handle. Under this scenario, earnings growth is solid (10-15%), interest rates stay well behaved and valuations remain elevated (20-21x Forward EPS). This yields 5-10% upside to the S&P 500 over the next year or roughly 5000.For us, this was the Bull caseoutcome in our outlook with a 20% probability.\nInflation remains hot and the Fed responds more aggressively:Under this outcome, inflation proves to be stickier as supply chains and labor shortages remain difficult to fix in the short term. The Fed is forced to taper faster and even raise rates on a more aggressive path than investors expect.This was our base case as it essentially lined up with our hotter but shorter cycle view we first wrote about back in March.Under this outcome, interest rates continue to rise next year to 2-2.25% by year end. At the same time, operating leverage starts to fade as costs increase more in line with revenues, leaving limited margin upside. This leaves breadth narrow in the near term as valuations come down and P/Es finally normalize in line with the traditional mid cycle transition.While there is some debate around how much P/Es need to fall, we believe 18x is the right number to use for year end 2022 and when combined with 10% revenue growth that gives us slight downside to the index from current prices, or 4400. We put a 60% probability on this outcome.\nSupply picks up just as demand fades:Under this outcome, supply does improve but it's too late to meet what has been an unsustainable level of demand and consumption for many goods. It's also too expensive for customers who have become more wary of high prices, which leads to discounting and a whiff of deflation for many areas of the goods economy. While services should fare better and keep the economy growing, goods producing companies suffer and make up a much larger part of the consumer discretionary part of the stock market. Under this scenario,the Fed may decide to back off on their more aggressive tightening path.Rates fall but not enough to offset the negative impact on margins and earnings which end up disappointing. This is essentially the \"Ice\" part of our narrative turning out be colder than expected. Equity risk premiums soar and multiples fall even more than under our base case.This was our bear case with a 20% probability.\n\nBefore we drill down into these, a quick detour to Wilson who says that since publishing his year-ahead forecast one month ago, he feels \"more confident about our base case being the most likely outcome. Inflation data continues to come in hotter and based on commentary from our analysts, companies seem to be having no problem passing it along to customers, keeping inflation sticky on the upside. While this will likely lead to another good quarter of earnings overall, we suspect there will be more casualties, too,as execution risk is increasing leaving dispersion high and leadership inconsistent — two more conclusions in our outlook.\" This means that stock picking, while difficult, will be a necessary condition to generate meaningful returns in 2022 as the market separates the winners and losers and index basically goes nowhere over the next 12 months.\nMeanwhile, and far more ominously, Wilson also warns that \"the likelihood of our bear case is growing relative to our bull case. As it stands, we would say Bear case is now 30%, Base case is still 60% while goldilocks looks like a distance 3rd at just 10%.\"\nIn other words, the odds that the Fed will short circuit its tightening plans are rising.\n* * *\nWith that in mind, let's focus some more on Wilson's core assumptions, at the top of which is that...\nThe change in the Fed's reaction function is a big deal because Tapering is Tightening\nWhile Morgan Stanley's base case has always assumed the Fed would respond appropriately to the higher inflation, \"the pivot by Chair Powell at his recent Congressional testimony was more aggressive than what we expected, especially in light of the new Covid variant, which at the time was a known unknown.\" We discussed this over the weekend in depth. Here, Wilson concedes that with Omicron now looking like a lower risk to growth than 2 weeks ago,this only raises the probability that the Fed will indeed taper its asset purchases much faster than the last tapering episode in 2014,and Morgan Stanley \"economists point out that the Fed is now suggesting stable prices is important to achieving its primary goal of full employment which means inflation has taken center stage, until it's under control.\" In terms of speed, the bank's forecast is now for the Fed to end its asset purchase program by the end of March, the same as Goldman. However, if the Fed executes on that path, \"it will leave a mark on asset prices in our view.\"\nWilson also thinks Jay Powell and the Fed will be under much less pressure from the White House versus the last time they tried to take the punch bowl away in late 2018. Part of this is due to the fact that inflation is a much bigger problem today than it was in 2018 and part of it is due to the observation that this White House is not as preoccupied with the stock market. Wilson's bottom line: \"the Fed put still exists but the strike price is much lower now, in our view. If we had to guess, it's down 20% rather than down 10% unless credit markets or economic data really start to wobble.\"\nHere Wilson encounters the same challenge we have observed over the years, namely that most disagree with the conclusionthat tapering is tightening (for markets, if not the economy). As evidence, those who still don't understand that only the Flow (and not the Stock) matters, point to the tapering in 2014 as an example of how markets traded well as the Fed let the air out of the balloon back then. On that score, Wilson has makes several points to argue \"it could be different this time.\"\nFirst, in 2014, it took the Fed 10 months to taper its QE program. This time they will do it in just 4 ½ months, or twice as fast.While M2 has been decelerating this year on a global basis, it's still running almost 8% y/y (Exhibit 1). In the US, M2 growth is running 13% and explains a lot of why nominal GDP growth is also running about 13% in the fourth quarter.After all, MV=PQ. If the Fed takes QE down to zero, its global M2 growth will slow severely and likely fall below 5% by the end of 1Q.This looks a lot like 2014 and 2018, but at a faster pace. Wilson's guess is that growth will take a hit at a time when it's already decelerating and increase the odds of our bear case playing out.\n\nSecond, US Equity markets are much richer today and therefore more vulnerable to a swift reduction of liquidity.Specifically, the equity risk premium is 350bps today and was close to 500bps when they started the taper talk in 2013. P/Es were 14.5x versus 20x today. To be sure, rates were higher then but that is why multiples had room to rise from there as rates reflected the more hawkish Fed and inflation that was much lower then. As a result,valuations were able to hold in and even increase during that tapering episode.\nThird, growth is decelerating now while in 2013-14 it was accelerating.In addition to the PMI shown in the exhibit, earnings and economic growth were accelerating whereas both are likely to decelerate in 2021 and even outright decline for many companies, particularly in the first half of the year when the comparisons are most difficult. This, Wilson says, is what will really separate the winners from the losers  and why he is so focused on earnings stability/achievability and valuation\"because small beats will likely not be enough to drive stocks higher if they have a premium P/E.\"\n\nMorgan Stanley's bottom line:given that much of the market is expensive relative to history, rather than just a few sectors or names, it suggests to this tapering episode will be different than the last one and is likely to leave the overall market lower than where we are trading today by the end of the first quarter if the Fed goes through with an expedited tapering schedule.\nIn short, Powell - who was wrong about inflation being transitory for the past year and only two weeks ago admitted he was dead wrong - is about to trigger a nightmare scenario for market, and will scramble to snuff inflation just as it has already peaked, and just as the global economy is sliding into a fast slowdown.\n* * *\nBut wait, there's more because as Wilson also correctly observes,asset markets have never been more important to consumer health.That's right: a market crash here and we spiral right into a deep recession, perhaps even worse than the Global Financial Crisis.\nWhile Morgan Stanley's base case is that the economy should be able to handle the ending of QE and even some rate hikes next year,the big risk has always been that if asset markets correct more significantly it could have a greater than normal effect on the economy too given how levered the consumer is to the stock market and other asset prices like housing and crypto currencies.When just considering the stock market, it's easy to see that consumer net worth has increased dramatically as many key assets have risen inexorably over the past 18 months. And while this is a good thing for consumer demand if prices remain elevated, it also dramatically increases the odds that the inverse will be just as painful, andtapering will quickly become tightening for the economy, too, if it leads to a significant asset price deflation.\nHere, Morgan Stanley thinks that\"the risk of that is greatest over the next 3-4 months as the Fed exits QE on this faster time table.\"\n\nThe market has, naturally, been ignoring these risks and one place where this is especially obvious is the collapse in market breadth. Since September, breadth has rarely been this weak relative to the Index level price\n\nAs Wilson concludes, \"the rolling correction that began last spring continues under the surface, making the index a very bad gauge of the overall health of the stock market, or the economy, in our view.\"The good news here is that the average stock has already discounted a good chunk of the risks Morgan Stanley is forecasting \"even if the index has not.\"\nIn this regard, the bank continues to stress that watching the S&P 500 is a bad idea for measuring what the market is really telling us about the fundamentals. It also explains why it's been so difficult for many active managers to keep up with the benchmark. And while the average stock may begin to outperform as the index catches down, Wilson warns that the absolute direction for most stocks will remain lower until the index has taken its turn on the de-rating process that began over 6 months ago.It's also why Wilson remains overweight large cap defensive quality for now.\nOne final point from the MS strategist: if there is one chart that depicts the risk off nature of the markets under the surface,it's the MSCI large/mid cap quality index versus the Russell 2000 small cap index.\n\nAs Wilson concludes, \"making this very simple pivot in March as the rate of change on growth and policy peaked was the more important thing to do this year for performance... We continue to recommend this pair but with a more defensive bias on the quality side rather than growth due to valuation constraints as the Fed accelerates its taper this week.\"","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":500,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":607981761,"gmtCreate":1639474169854,"gmtModify":1639474195134,"author":{"id":"3578973717832794","authorId":"3578973717832794","name":"RieslingHawk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a5390eacc9599c6447d4c42f983fcc76","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","listText":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","text":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/607981761","repostId":"1108305514","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1108305514","pubTimestamp":1639468064,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1108305514?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-14 15:47","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Morgan Stanley Warns The Fed's Turbo Taper Will Trigger Market Chaos Over \"The Next 3-4 Months\"","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1108305514","media":"zerohedge","summary":"Until last week, the economic and market views of Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley couldn't be more ","content":"<p>Until last week, the economic and market views of Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley couldn't be more opposite: the former, delightfully optimistic, expects the US economy to grow on all cylinders in 2022 and despite the Fed's tightening - two months ago Goldman flipped its Fed views by pulling forward its first rate hike forecast by one year to July, and followed it up over the weekend&nbsp;by predicting that liftoff will begin in May&nbsp;with two more rate hikes to follow in 2022...</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/48bea9a6115e88e6a84296a31a94a5f6\" tg-width=\"643\" tg-height=\"423\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>\n<p>... said in its year-ahead market forecast last month that it&nbsp;expects the S&amp;P to hit 5,100 by the end of 2022&nbsp;even as the economy slows down modestly from its current feverish pace.</p>\n<p>Meanwhile, far less optimistic than their Goldman peers, Morgan Stanley's economists expected - until late last week - the Fed to stand pat without hiking even once in 2022. That changed over the weekend, however, when the bank&nbsp;admitted \"defeat\" and now expects two rate hikes&nbsp;in 2022, even as the bank's chief market economist Michael Wilson sees the S&amp;P closing 2022 at 4,400,some 5% below current&nbsp;levels.</p>\n<p>So while there has been some convergence on the economy and Fed front, a gaping divergence remains when it comes to what the two most influential US banks think the market will do, a schism which only became more acute in the past 24 hours, when on one hand Goldman predicted that a massive year-end Santa Rally is imminent (as we&nbsp;discussed last night), while Morgan Stanley doubled down on its bearish view this morning when in Michael Wilson's latest strategy outlook piece (available to&nbsp;professional subscribers), he warns that \"<b>the Fed's pivot to a more aggressive tapering schedule poses a larger risk for asset prices than most investors believe.</b>\"</p>\n<p>Confirming what we have been saying since 2010 when we first explained that it is not the stock but the flow that matters, and that tapering is tightening, Wilson echoes our decade-old conclusion and writes that \"<b>tapering is tightening for markets, if not the economy.\"</b>And due to the much greater than expected rise in inflation - now that even Powell has killed and buried \"team transitory\" - the Fed is pivoting to a more aggressive removal of monetary accommodation.</p>\n<p>Wilson believes this is warranted and supported by an administration that appears less focused on the stock market as a barometer of</p>\n<p>its success (actually since this administration has zero success to \"barometer\" besides flooding money into the economy and watching inflation skyrocket of course, it simply hasn't even considered the level of the S&amp;P; it will soon... after the crash).</p>\n<p>Furthermore, the Morgan Stanley strategist believes that tapering is different than in 2014 for 3 reasons:</p>\n<ol>\n <li>the Fed is exiting QE twice as fast this time,</li>\n <li>asset prices are much richer today and</li>\n <li>growth is decelerating rather than accelerating.</li>\n</ol>\n<p>And as we joked earlier (but not really) with the Fed tapering and soon hiking, the outcome will be a recession and a market crash...</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/67f779e8eac0b236a687016bfa896377\" tg-width=\"756\" tg-height=\"448\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>\n<p>... Wilson again agrees and says that such an adverse market reaction \"could be important for the economy, too, given how levered consumers are to stock prices today.\"</p>\n<p>Taking a more nuanced look at Morgan Stanley's forecast, Wilson explains that when he was writing his (decidedly bearish) year ahead outlook, he was faced with \"a wider than normal range of potential economic and policy outcomes.\" This higher \" uncertainty\" was one of the key inputs to the bank's conclusion that<b>valuations for US equity markets were likely to come down over the next 3-6 months,</b>and as further notes explains<i>\"in our discussions with hundreds of clients since publishing our outlook, the conversations have centered around how to handicap these various outcomes.\"</i>Wilson lists the three scenarios as follows:</p>\n<ul>\n <li><b>Goldilocks:</b><i>When we published on November 15, this was the prevailing view by most clients. In this outcome, supply picks up in 1Q to meet the excess demand companies are having a hard time fulfilling. Inflation falls back toward 2-3%, allowing the Fed to move gradually with its taper and hike maybe 1-2 times in 2022, a modest amount of tightening that most believe the economy and markets can handle. Under this scenario, earnings growth is solid (10-15%), interest rates stay well behaved and valuations remain elevated (20-21x Forward EPS). This yields 5-10% upside to the S&amp;P 500 over the next year or roughly 5000.</i><i><b>For us, this was the Bull case</b></i><i>outcome in our outlook with a 20% probability.</i></li>\n <li><b>Inflation remains hot and the Fed responds more aggressively:</b><i>Under this outcome, inflation proves to be stickier as supply chains and labor shortages remain difficult to fix in the short term. The Fed is forced to taper faster and even raise rates on a more aggressive path than investors expect.</i><i><b>This was our base case as it essentially lined up with our hotter but shorter cycle view we first wrote about back in March.</b></i><i>Under this outcome, interest rates continue to rise next year to 2-2.25% by year end. At the same time, operating leverage starts to fade as costs increase more in line with revenues, leaving limited margin upside. This leaves breadth narrow in the near term as valuations come down and P/Es finally normalize in line with the traditional mid cycle transition.</i><i><b>While there is some debate around how much P/Es need to fall, we believe 18x is the right number to use for year end 2022 and when combined with 10% revenue growth that gives us slight downside to the index from current prices, or 4400. We put a 60% probability on this outcome.</b></i></li>\n <li><b>Supply picks up just as demand fades</b>:<i>Under this outcome, supply does improve but it's too late to meet what has been an unsustainable level of demand and consumption for many goods. It's also too expensive for customers who have become more wary of high prices, which leads to discounting and a whiff of deflation for many areas of the goods economy. While services should fare better and keep the economy growing, goods producing companies suffer and make up a much larger part of the consumer discretionary part of the stock market. Under this scenario,</i><i><b>the Fed may decide to back off on their more aggressive tightening path.</b></i><i>Rates fall but not enough to offset the negative impact on margins and earnings which end up disappointing. This is essentially the \"Ice\" part of our narrative turning out be colder than expected. Equity risk premiums soar and multiples fall even more than under our base case.</i><i><b>This was our bear case with a 20% probability.</b></i></li>\n</ul>\n<p>Before we drill down into these, a quick detour to Wilson who says that since publishing his year-ahead forecast one month ago, he feels \"more confident about our base case being the most likely outcome. Inflation data continues to come in hotter and based on commentary from our analysts, companies seem to be having no problem passing it along to customers, keeping inflation sticky on the upside. While this will likely lead to another good quarter of earnings overall, we suspect there will be more casualties, too,<b>as execution risk is increasing leaving dispersion high and leadership inconsistent — two more conclusions in our outlook.</b>\" This means that stock picking, while difficult, will be a necessary condition to generate meaningful returns in 2022 as the market separates the winners and losers and index basically goes nowhere over the next 12 months.</p>\n<p>Meanwhile, and far more ominously, Wilson also warns that \"<b>the likelihood of our bear case is growing relative to our bull case. As it stands, we would say Bear case is now 30%, Base case is still 60% while goldilocks looks like a distance 3rd at just 10%.</b>\"</p>\n<p>In other words, the odds that the Fed will short circuit its tightening plans are rising.</p>\n<p>* * *</p>\n<p>With that in mind, let's focus some more on Wilson's core assumptions, at the top of which is that...</p>\n<p><b>The change in the Fed's reaction function is a big deal because Tapering is Tightening</b></p>\n<p>While Morgan Stanley's base case has always assumed the Fed would respond appropriately to the higher inflation, \"the pivot by Chair Powell at his recent Congressional testimony was more aggressive than what we expected, especially in light of the new Covid variant, which at the time was a known unknown.\" We discussed this&nbsp;over the weekend in depth. Here, Wilson concedes that with Omicron now looking like a lower risk to growth than 2 weeks ago,<b>this only raises the probability that the Fed will indeed taper its asset purchases much faster than the last tapering episode in 2014,</b>and Morgan Stanley \"economists point out that the Fed is now suggesting stable prices is important to achieving its primary goal of full employment which means inflation has taken center stage, until it's under control.\" In terms of speed, the bank's forecast is now for the Fed to end its asset purchase program by the end of March, the same as Goldman. However, if the Fed executes on that path, \"<b>it will leave a mark on asset prices in our view.</b>\"</p>\n<p>Wilson also thinks Jay Powell and the Fed will be under much less pressure from the White House versus the last time they tried to take the punch bowl away in late 2018. Part of this is due to the fact that inflation is a much bigger problem today than it was in 2018 and part of it is due to the observation that this White House is not as preoccupied with the stock market. Wilson's bottom line: \"<b>the Fed put still exists but the strike price is much lower now, in our view. If we had to guess, it's down 20% rather than down 10% unless credit markets or economic data really start to wobble.\"</b></p>\n<p>Here Wilson encounters the same challenge we have observed over the years, namely that most disagree with the conclusion<b>that tapering is tightening (</b>for markets, if not the economy). As evidence, those who still don't understand that only the Flow (and not the Stock) matters, point to the tapering in 2014 as an example of how markets traded well as the Fed let the air out of the balloon back then. On that score, Wilson has makes several points to argue \"it could be different this time.\"</p>\n<p><b>First, in 2014, it took the Fed 10 months to taper its QE program. This time they will do it in just 4 ½ months, or twice as fast.</b>While M2 has been decelerating this year on a global basis, it's still running almost 8% y/y (Exhibit 1). In the US, M2 growth is running 13% and explains a lot of why nominal GDP growth is also running about 13% in the fourth quarter.<b>After all, MV=PQ. If the Fed takes QE down to zero, its global M2 growth will slow severely and likely fall below 5% by the end of 1Q.</b>This looks a lot like 2014 and 2018, but at a faster pace. Wilson's guess is that growth will take a hit at a time when it's already decelerating and increase the odds of our bear case playing out.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d7b194d9260811b2e78dd6a302f3be64\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"287\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>\n<p><b>Second, US Equity markets are much richer today and therefore more vulnerable to a swift reduction of liquidity.</b>Specifically, the equity risk premium is 350bps today and was close to 500bps when they started the taper talk in 2013. P/Es were 14.5x versus 20x today. To be sure, rates were higher then but that is why multiples had room to rise from there as rates reflected the more hawkish Fed and inflation that was much lower then. As a result,<i>valuations were able to hold in and even increase during that tapering episode.</i></p>\n<p><b>Third, growth is decelerating now while in 2013-14 it was accelerating.</b>In addition to the PMI shown in the exhibit, earnings and economic growth were accelerating whereas both are likely to decelerate in 2021 and even outright decline for many companies, particularly in the first half of the year when the comparisons are most difficult. This, Wilson says, is what will really separate the winners from the losers&nbsp; and why he is so focused on earnings stability/achievability and valuation<i>\"because small beats will likely not be enough to drive stocks higher if they have a premium P/E.\"</i></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f880af3fb7e446f8e698778835968cdd\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"312\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>\n<p>Morgan Stanley's bottom line:<i><b>given that much of the market is expensive relative to history, rather than just a few sectors or names, it suggests to this tapering episode will be different than the last one and is likely to leave the overall market lower than where we are trading today by the end of the first quarter if the Fed goes through with an expedited tapering schedule.</b></i></p>\n<p>In short, Powell - who was wrong about inflation being transitory for the past year and only two weeks ago admitted he was dead wrong - is about to trigger a nightmare scenario for market, and will scramble to snuff inflation just as it has already peaked, and just as the global economy is sliding into a fast slowdown.</p>\n<p>* * *</p>\n<p>But wait, there's more because as Wilson also correctly observes,<b>asset markets have never been more important to consumer health.</b>That's right: a market crash here and we spiral right into a deep recession, perhaps even worse than the Global Financial Crisis.</p>\n<p>While Morgan Stanley's base case is that the economy should be able to handle the ending of QE and even some rate hikes next year,<b>the big risk has always been that if asset markets correct more significantly it could have a greater than normal effect on the economy too given how levered the consumer is to the stock market and other asset prices like housing and crypto currencies.</b>When just considering the stock market, it's easy to see that consumer net worth has increased dramatically as many key assets have risen inexorably over the past 18 months. And while this is a good thing for consumer demand if prices remain elevated, it also dramatically increases the odds that the inverse will be just as painful, and<b>tapering will quickly become tightening for the economy, too, if it leads to a significant asset price deflation.</b></p>\n<p>Here, Morgan Stanley thinks that<b>\"the risk of that is greatest over the next 3-4 months as the Fed exits QE on this faster time table.\"</b></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3cc412127eea207ffc76c8636ecdd375\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"168\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>\n<p>The market has, naturally, been ignoring these risks and one place where this is especially obvious is the collapse in market breadth. Since September, breadth has rarely been this weak relative to the Index level price</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0de5c40e0883d664f855f3522c275905\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"170\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>\n<p>As Wilson concludes, \"<b>the rolling correction that began last spring continues under the surface, making the index a very bad gauge of the overall health of the stock market, or the economy, in our view.\"</b>The good news here is that the average stock has already discounted a good chunk of the risks Morgan Stanley is forecasting \"even if the index has not.\"</p>\n<p>In this regard, the bank continues to stress that watching the S&amp;P 500 is a bad idea for measuring what the market is really telling us about the fundamentals. It also explains why it's been so difficult for many active managers to keep up with the benchmark. And while the average stock may begin to outperform as the index catches down, Wilson warns that&nbsp;<b>the absolute direction for most stocks will remain lower until the index has taken its turn on the de-rating process that began over 6 months ago.</b>It's also why Wilson remains overweight large cap defensive quality for now.</p>\n<p>One final point from the MS strategist: if there is one chart that depicts the risk off nature of the markets under the surface,<b>it's the MSCI large/mid cap quality index versus the Russell 2000 small cap index.</b></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1c190303d3ec030a5ff020ba604e0c85\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"302\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>\n<p>As Wilson concludes, \"making this very simple pivot in March as the rate of change on growth and policy peaked was the more important thing to do this year for performance... We continue to recommend this pair but with a more defensive bias on the quality side rather than growth due to valuation constraints as the Fed accelerates its taper this week.\"</p>","source":"lsy1583725640930","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Morgan Stanley Warns The Fed's Turbo Taper Will Trigger Market Chaos Over \"The Next 3-4 Months\"</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nMorgan Stanley Warns The Fed's Turbo Taper Will Trigger Market Chaos Over \"The Next 3-4 Months\"\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-12-14 15:47 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/morgan-stanley-warns-feds-taper-will-trigger-market-chaos-over-next-3-4-months><strong>zerohedge</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Until last week, the economic and market views of Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley couldn't be more opposite: the former, delightfully optimistic, expects the US economy to grow on all cylinders in ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/morgan-stanley-warns-feds-taper-will-trigger-market-chaos-over-next-3-4-months\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/morgan-stanley-warns-feds-taper-will-trigger-market-chaos-over-next-3-4-months","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1108305514","content_text":"Until last week, the economic and market views of Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley couldn't be more opposite: the former, delightfully optimistic, expects the US economy to grow on all cylinders in 2022 and despite the Fed's tightening - two months ago Goldman flipped its Fed views by pulling forward its first rate hike forecast by one year to July, and followed it up over the weekend by predicting that liftoff will begin in May with two more rate hikes to follow in 2022...\n\n... said in its year-ahead market forecast last month that it expects the S&P to hit 5,100 by the end of 2022 even as the economy slows down modestly from its current feverish pace.\nMeanwhile, far less optimistic than their Goldman peers, Morgan Stanley's economists expected - until late last week - the Fed to stand pat without hiking even once in 2022. That changed over the weekend, however, when the bank admitted \"defeat\" and now expects two rate hikes in 2022, even as the bank's chief market economist Michael Wilson sees the S&P closing 2022 at 4,400,some 5% below current levels.\nSo while there has been some convergence on the economy and Fed front, a gaping divergence remains when it comes to what the two most influential US banks think the market will do, a schism which only became more acute in the past 24 hours, when on one hand Goldman predicted that a massive year-end Santa Rally is imminent (as we discussed last night), while Morgan Stanley doubled down on its bearish view this morning when in Michael Wilson's latest strategy outlook piece (available to professional subscribers), he warns that \"the Fed's pivot to a more aggressive tapering schedule poses a larger risk for asset prices than most investors believe.\"\nConfirming what we have been saying since 2010 when we first explained that it is not the stock but the flow that matters, and that tapering is tightening, Wilson echoes our decade-old conclusion and writes that \"tapering is tightening for markets, if not the economy.\"And due to the much greater than expected rise in inflation - now that even Powell has killed and buried \"team transitory\" - the Fed is pivoting to a more aggressive removal of monetary accommodation.\nWilson believes this is warranted and supported by an administration that appears less focused on the stock market as a barometer of\nits success (actually since this administration has zero success to \"barometer\" besides flooding money into the economy and watching inflation skyrocket of course, it simply hasn't even considered the level of the S&P; it will soon... after the crash).\nFurthermore, the Morgan Stanley strategist believes that tapering is different than in 2014 for 3 reasons:\n\nthe Fed is exiting QE twice as fast this time,\nasset prices are much richer today and\ngrowth is decelerating rather than accelerating.\n\nAnd as we joked earlier (but not really) with the Fed tapering and soon hiking, the outcome will be a recession and a market crash...\n\n... Wilson again agrees and says that such an adverse market reaction \"could be important for the economy, too, given how levered consumers are to stock prices today.\"\nTaking a more nuanced look at Morgan Stanley's forecast, Wilson explains that when he was writing his (decidedly bearish) year ahead outlook, he was faced with \"a wider than normal range of potential economic and policy outcomes.\" This higher \" uncertainty\" was one of the key inputs to the bank's conclusion thatvaluations for US equity markets were likely to come down over the next 3-6 months,and as further notes explains\"in our discussions with hundreds of clients since publishing our outlook, the conversations have centered around how to handicap these various outcomes.\"Wilson lists the three scenarios as follows:\n\nGoldilocks:When we published on November 15, this was the prevailing view by most clients. In this outcome, supply picks up in 1Q to meet the excess demand companies are having a hard time fulfilling. Inflation falls back toward 2-3%, allowing the Fed to move gradually with its taper and hike maybe 1-2 times in 2022, a modest amount of tightening that most believe the economy and markets can handle. Under this scenario, earnings growth is solid (10-15%), interest rates stay well behaved and valuations remain elevated (20-21x Forward EPS). This yields 5-10% upside to the S&P 500 over the next year or roughly 5000.For us, this was the Bull caseoutcome in our outlook with a 20% probability.\nInflation remains hot and the Fed responds more aggressively:Under this outcome, inflation proves to be stickier as supply chains and labor shortages remain difficult to fix in the short term. The Fed is forced to taper faster and even raise rates on a more aggressive path than investors expect.This was our base case as it essentially lined up with our hotter but shorter cycle view we first wrote about back in March.Under this outcome, interest rates continue to rise next year to 2-2.25% by year end. At the same time, operating leverage starts to fade as costs increase more in line with revenues, leaving limited margin upside. This leaves breadth narrow in the near term as valuations come down and P/Es finally normalize in line with the traditional mid cycle transition.While there is some debate around how much P/Es need to fall, we believe 18x is the right number to use for year end 2022 and when combined with 10% revenue growth that gives us slight downside to the index from current prices, or 4400. We put a 60% probability on this outcome.\nSupply picks up just as demand fades:Under this outcome, supply does improve but it's too late to meet what has been an unsustainable level of demand and consumption for many goods. It's also too expensive for customers who have become more wary of high prices, which leads to discounting and a whiff of deflation for many areas of the goods economy. While services should fare better and keep the economy growing, goods producing companies suffer and make up a much larger part of the consumer discretionary part of the stock market. Under this scenario,the Fed may decide to back off on their more aggressive tightening path.Rates fall but not enough to offset the negative impact on margins and earnings which end up disappointing. This is essentially the \"Ice\" part of our narrative turning out be colder than expected. Equity risk premiums soar and multiples fall even more than under our base case.This was our bear case with a 20% probability.\n\nBefore we drill down into these, a quick detour to Wilson who says that since publishing his year-ahead forecast one month ago, he feels \"more confident about our base case being the most likely outcome. Inflation data continues to come in hotter and based on commentary from our analysts, companies seem to be having no problem passing it along to customers, keeping inflation sticky on the upside. While this will likely lead to another good quarter of earnings overall, we suspect there will be more casualties, too,as execution risk is increasing leaving dispersion high and leadership inconsistent — two more conclusions in our outlook.\" This means that stock picking, while difficult, will be a necessary condition to generate meaningful returns in 2022 as the market separates the winners and losers and index basically goes nowhere over the next 12 months.\nMeanwhile, and far more ominously, Wilson also warns that \"the likelihood of our bear case is growing relative to our bull case. As it stands, we would say Bear case is now 30%, Base case is still 60% while goldilocks looks like a distance 3rd at just 10%.\"\nIn other words, the odds that the Fed will short circuit its tightening plans are rising.\n* * *\nWith that in mind, let's focus some more on Wilson's core assumptions, at the top of which is that...\nThe change in the Fed's reaction function is a big deal because Tapering is Tightening\nWhile Morgan Stanley's base case has always assumed the Fed would respond appropriately to the higher inflation, \"the pivot by Chair Powell at his recent Congressional testimony was more aggressive than what we expected, especially in light of the new Covid variant, which at the time was a known unknown.\" We discussed this over the weekend in depth. Here, Wilson concedes that with Omicron now looking like a lower risk to growth than 2 weeks ago,this only raises the probability that the Fed will indeed taper its asset purchases much faster than the last tapering episode in 2014,and Morgan Stanley \"economists point out that the Fed is now suggesting stable prices is important to achieving its primary goal of full employment which means inflation has taken center stage, until it's under control.\" In terms of speed, the bank's forecast is now for the Fed to end its asset purchase program by the end of March, the same as Goldman. However, if the Fed executes on that path, \"it will leave a mark on asset prices in our view.\"\nWilson also thinks Jay Powell and the Fed will be under much less pressure from the White House versus the last time they tried to take the punch bowl away in late 2018. Part of this is due to the fact that inflation is a much bigger problem today than it was in 2018 and part of it is due to the observation that this White House is not as preoccupied with the stock market. Wilson's bottom line: \"the Fed put still exists but the strike price is much lower now, in our view. If we had to guess, it's down 20% rather than down 10% unless credit markets or economic data really start to wobble.\"\nHere Wilson encounters the same challenge we have observed over the years, namely that most disagree with the conclusionthat tapering is tightening (for markets, if not the economy). As evidence, those who still don't understand that only the Flow (and not the Stock) matters, point to the tapering in 2014 as an example of how markets traded well as the Fed let the air out of the balloon back then. On that score, Wilson has makes several points to argue \"it could be different this time.\"\nFirst, in 2014, it took the Fed 10 months to taper its QE program. This time they will do it in just 4 ½ months, or twice as fast.While M2 has been decelerating this year on a global basis, it's still running almost 8% y/y (Exhibit 1). In the US, M2 growth is running 13% and explains a lot of why nominal GDP growth is also running about 13% in the fourth quarter.After all, MV=PQ. If the Fed takes QE down to zero, its global M2 growth will slow severely and likely fall below 5% by the end of 1Q.This looks a lot like 2014 and 2018, but at a faster pace. Wilson's guess is that growth will take a hit at a time when it's already decelerating and increase the odds of our bear case playing out.\n\nSecond, US Equity markets are much richer today and therefore more vulnerable to a swift reduction of liquidity.Specifically, the equity risk premium is 350bps today and was close to 500bps when they started the taper talk in 2013. P/Es were 14.5x versus 20x today. To be sure, rates were higher then but that is why multiples had room to rise from there as rates reflected the more hawkish Fed and inflation that was much lower then. As a result,valuations were able to hold in and even increase during that tapering episode.\nThird, growth is decelerating now while in 2013-14 it was accelerating.In addition to the PMI shown in the exhibit, earnings and economic growth were accelerating whereas both are likely to decelerate in 2021 and even outright decline for many companies, particularly in the first half of the year when the comparisons are most difficult. This, Wilson says, is what will really separate the winners from the losers  and why he is so focused on earnings stability/achievability and valuation\"because small beats will likely not be enough to drive stocks higher if they have a premium P/E.\"\n\nMorgan Stanley's bottom line:given that much of the market is expensive relative to history, rather than just a few sectors or names, it suggests to this tapering episode will be different than the last one and is likely to leave the overall market lower than where we are trading today by the end of the first quarter if the Fed goes through with an expedited tapering schedule.\nIn short, Powell - who was wrong about inflation being transitory for the past year and only two weeks ago admitted he was dead wrong - is about to trigger a nightmare scenario for market, and will scramble to snuff inflation just as it has already peaked, and just as the global economy is sliding into a fast slowdown.\n* * *\nBut wait, there's more because as Wilson also correctly observes,asset markets have never been more important to consumer health.That's right: a market crash here and we spiral right into a deep recession, perhaps even worse than the Global Financial Crisis.\nWhile Morgan Stanley's base case is that the economy should be able to handle the ending of QE and even some rate hikes next year,the big risk has always been that if asset markets correct more significantly it could have a greater than normal effect on the economy too given how levered the consumer is to the stock market and other asset prices like housing and crypto currencies.When just considering the stock market, it's easy to see that consumer net worth has increased dramatically as many key assets have risen inexorably over the past 18 months. And while this is a good thing for consumer demand if prices remain elevated, it also dramatically increases the odds that the inverse will be just as painful, andtapering will quickly become tightening for the economy, too, if it leads to a significant asset price deflation.\nHere, Morgan Stanley thinks that\"the risk of that is greatest over the next 3-4 months as the Fed exits QE on this faster time table.\"\n\nThe market has, naturally, been ignoring these risks and one place where this is especially obvious is the collapse in market breadth. Since September, breadth has rarely been this weak relative to the Index level price\n\nAs Wilson concludes, \"the rolling correction that began last spring continues under the surface, making the index a very bad gauge of the overall health of the stock market, or the economy, in our view.\"The good news here is that the average stock has already discounted a good chunk of the risks Morgan Stanley is forecasting \"even if the index has not.\"\nIn this regard, the bank continues to stress that watching the S&P 500 is a bad idea for measuring what the market is really telling us about the fundamentals. It also explains why it's been so difficult for many active managers to keep up with the benchmark. And while the average stock may begin to outperform as the index catches down, Wilson warns that the absolute direction for most stocks will remain lower until the index has taken its turn on the de-rating process that began over 6 months ago.It's also why Wilson remains overweight large cap defensive quality for now.\nOne final point from the MS strategist: if there is one chart that depicts the risk off nature of the markets under the surface,it's the MSCI large/mid cap quality index versus the Russell 2000 small cap index.\n\nAs Wilson concludes, \"making this very simple pivot in March as the rate of change on growth and policy peaked was the more important thing to do this year for performance... We continue to recommend this pair but with a more defensive bias on the quality side rather than growth due to valuation constraints as the Fed accelerates its taper this week.\"","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":950,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":607072113,"gmtCreate":1639466378782,"gmtModify":1639466544367,"author":{"id":"3578973717832794","authorId":"3578973717832794","name":"RieslingHawk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a5390eacc9599c6447d4c42f983fcc76","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Fake news hehe","listText":"Fake news hehe","text":"Fake news hehe","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/607072113","repostId":"1186687745","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1186687745","pubTimestamp":1639445704,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1186687745?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-14 09:35","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Stocks' Next Rally Could Be Coming Soon","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1186687745","media":"Barrons","summary":"Stocks appear to be almost through a difficult stretch brought on by news that the Federal Reserve i","content":"<p>Stocks appear to be almost through a difficult stretch brought on by news that the Federal Reserve is removing support from markets and the economy. History tells us that a sustained rally will likely begin soon.</p>\n<p>As of Dec. 1, the&nbsp;S&amp;P 500&nbsp;had fallen 4.1% from the record high it reached on Nov. 18, only to rebound 4.4% to a new closing high of 4712.02 on Friday. Monday, it&nbsp;slipped back, with a loss of 0.9%.</p>\n<p>The volatility centers on the Fed’s effort to fight inflation by moving away from the aggressive efforts to bolster growth it put in place as the pandemic ravaged the economy in 2020. Not only is the central bank already reducing its monthly bond purchases by tens of billions of dollars a month, but Chairman Jerome Powell recently indicated even more cuts are on the way. Within months, the Fed will be buying zero dollars in Treasury bonds, compared with $65 billion a month as recently as November.</p>\n<p>That could drag bond prices down, lifting their yields and making it more difficult for households and businesses to borrow money. Not only would that likely slow economic growth, but it also would mean less money will be flowing through financial markets, leaving less capital available to bid for stocks and other risky assets. And once the Fed has ended its bond-buying program, it will turn its attention to lifting short-term interest rates.</p>\n<p>But it is increasingly looking like the stock market has already factored in those moves. “The market began to discount eventual Fed tightening once supply chain effects became clearer this past spring, and as inflation compares began to accelerate,” Scott Chronert, global head of exchange-traded fund research at Citigroup, wrote in a research note Friday. “Selling the uncertainty ahead of a hawkish Fed change can often lead to buying on the alleviation of that uncertainty.”</p>\n<p>Buying activity will probably pick up within the next few months, given the market’s behavior in the past four cycles of interest-rate increases. Gains in the S&amp;P 500 from a year before an initial rate boost to six months afterward have averaged almost 15%, according to Credit Suisse data. From the same starting point to 12 months after an initial rate increase, the average gain is 18%.</p>\n<p>That doesn’t mean investors should blindly pour money into stocks: More volatility could be ahead. In the few months ahead of an initial rate increase, the market usually rises only minimally, according to Credit Suisse. Those few months are a time when investors tend to still be assessing the damage that tighter monetary policy could inflict on the economy.</p>\n<p>That’s especially true today. The bond market is already reflecting that the Fed could make a mistake, raising rates too many times, too quickly, abruptly choking off economic growth.</p>\n<p>The Fed isn’t used to trying to quell inflation. For the entire era since the 2008-2009 financial crisis era—and certainly during the pandemic-ravaged 2020—the Fed was trying to bring inflation higher by implementing loose monetary policy. Now, it is trying to keep inflation down, and investors are asking themselves whether it will damage economic demand in doing so.</p>\n<p>But one thing does seem like a solid bet. The rough waters in stocks are likely to be fairly temporary: The bull market can probably keep on chugging along—if the Fed doesn’t tighten policy too aggressively.</p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Stocks' Next Rally Could Be Coming Soon</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Stocks' Next Rally Could Be Coming Soon\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-12-14 09:35 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/stocks-rally-fed-tightening-taper-rate-hike-51639430005?mod=hp_LATEST><strong>Barrons</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Stocks appear to be almost through a difficult stretch brought on by news that the Federal Reserve is removing support from markets and the economy. History tells us that a sustained rally will likely...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/stocks-rally-fed-tightening-taper-rate-hike-51639430005?mod=hp_LATEST\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/stocks-rally-fed-tightening-taper-rate-hike-51639430005?mod=hp_LATEST","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1186687745","content_text":"Stocks appear to be almost through a difficult stretch brought on by news that the Federal Reserve is removing support from markets and the economy. History tells us that a sustained rally will likely begin soon.\nAs of Dec. 1, the S&P 500 had fallen 4.1% from the record high it reached on Nov. 18, only to rebound 4.4% to a new closing high of 4712.02 on Friday. Monday, it slipped back, with a loss of 0.9%.\nThe volatility centers on the Fed’s effort to fight inflation by moving away from the aggressive efforts to bolster growth it put in place as the pandemic ravaged the economy in 2020. Not only is the central bank already reducing its monthly bond purchases by tens of billions of dollars a month, but Chairman Jerome Powell recently indicated even more cuts are on the way. Within months, the Fed will be buying zero dollars in Treasury bonds, compared with $65 billion a month as recently as November.\nThat could drag bond prices down, lifting their yields and making it more difficult for households and businesses to borrow money. Not only would that likely slow economic growth, but it also would mean less money will be flowing through financial markets, leaving less capital available to bid for stocks and other risky assets. And once the Fed has ended its bond-buying program, it will turn its attention to lifting short-term interest rates.\nBut it is increasingly looking like the stock market has already factored in those moves. “The market began to discount eventual Fed tightening once supply chain effects became clearer this past spring, and as inflation compares began to accelerate,” Scott Chronert, global head of exchange-traded fund research at Citigroup, wrote in a research note Friday. “Selling the uncertainty ahead of a hawkish Fed change can often lead to buying on the alleviation of that uncertainty.”\nBuying activity will probably pick up within the next few months, given the market’s behavior in the past four cycles of interest-rate increases. Gains in the S&P 500 from a year before an initial rate boost to six months afterward have averaged almost 15%, according to Credit Suisse data. From the same starting point to 12 months after an initial rate increase, the average gain is 18%.\nThat doesn’t mean investors should blindly pour money into stocks: More volatility could be ahead. In the few months ahead of an initial rate increase, the market usually rises only minimally, according to Credit Suisse. Those few months are a time when investors tend to still be assessing the damage that tighter monetary policy could inflict on the economy.\nThat’s especially true today. The bond market is already reflecting that the Fed could make a mistake, raising rates too many times, too quickly, abruptly choking off economic growth.\nThe Fed isn’t used to trying to quell inflation. For the entire era since the 2008-2009 financial crisis era—and certainly during the pandemic-ravaged 2020—the Fed was trying to bring inflation higher by implementing loose monetary policy. Now, it is trying to keep inflation down, and investors are asking themselves whether it will damage economic demand in doing so.\nBut one thing does seem like a solid bet. The rough waters in stocks are likely to be fairly temporary: The bull market can probably keep on chugging along—if the Fed doesn’t tighten policy too aggressively.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":230,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":607029191,"gmtCreate":1639460787480,"gmtModify":1639461693379,"author":{"id":"3578973717832794","authorId":"3578973717832794","name":"RieslingHawk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a5390eacc9599c6447d4c42f983fcc76","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$</a> Elon Musk exercising all these options means your shareholding is diluted dumbass! He could get a share worth $966 (way overvalued) at his exercise price of $6, you guys are exactly like dumbass to Elon. Keep pumping up so he could be even richer than he already is.","listText":"<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$</a> Elon Musk exercising all these options means your shareholding is diluted dumbass! He could get a share worth $966 (way overvalued) at his exercise price of $6, you guys are exactly like dumbass to Elon. Keep pumping up so he could be even richer than he already is.","text":"$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$ Elon Musk exercising all these options means your shareholding is diluted dumbass! He could get a share worth $966 (way overvalued) at his exercise price of $6, you guys are exactly like dumbass to Elon. Keep pumping up so he could be even richer than he already is.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/607029191","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":338,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":604748347,"gmtCreate":1639449837974,"gmtModify":1639454908829,"author":{"id":"3578973717832794","authorId":"3578973717832794","name":"RieslingHawk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a5390eacc9599c6447d4c42f983fcc76","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Dumb stocks with no earnings, only apes\"invest\" in junk like these","listText":"Dumb stocks with no earnings, only apes\"invest\" in junk like these","text":"Dumb stocks with no earnings, only apes\"invest\" in junk like these","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/604748347","repostId":"1115346113","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1115346113","pubTimestamp":1639447080,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1115346113?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-14 09:58","market":"us","language":"en","title":"AMC, GME: What Investors Are Saying as the Top 2 Meme Stocks Tumble","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1115346113","media":"InvestorPlace","summary":"AMC Entertainment(NYSE:AMC) and GameStop(NYSE:GME) are taking a beating and traders of the meme stoc","content":"<p><b>AMC Entertainment</b>(NYSE:<b><u>AMC</u></b>) and&nbsp;<b>GameStop</b>(NYSE:<b><u>GME</u></b>) are taking a beating&nbsp;and traders of the meme stocks are reacting on social media.</p>\n<p>AMC stock is continuing to slip this week following&nbsp;news of insider selling&nbsp;from some of the company’s top executives last week. It’s also been a rough weekend&nbsp;as moviegoers aren’t returning to theaters as quickly as expected.</p>\n<p>Let’s dive into what traders on Reddit have to say about this below!</p>\n<p>Meme Stocks Reddit Talk: AMC</p>\n<blockquote>\n “I’m bullish on GME. Top expert hires, big growth, very solid investor base, genius chairman, tech pivot, highly intelligent in depth DD being done showing major bullish fundamentals. AMC….. Old dude selling his shares as fast as possible and the monkeys that are long on it can’t fucking read.” —Slut_Spoiler\n</blockquote>\n<blockquote>\n “The WSB Facebook group was so bullish on AMC. My goodness, what could have possibly happened?” —MarijuanaGrowGroup\n</blockquote>\n<blockquote>\n “i like to make fun of AMC gang but its def not done. even options market has premiums left to $30c, $40c etc. for next year. it’ll be volatile for quite awhile imo.” —freehouse_throwaway\n</blockquote>\n<p>Moving on to GME stock, shares have been&nbsp;slipping ever since its earnings report last week. That saw widening losses shock investors as the video game retailer continues to struggle. Not helping matters are&nbsp;shortages for consoles&nbsp;likely impacting its business.</p>\n<p>Let’s jump into what Reddit investors have to say about this below!</p>\n<p>Meme Stocks Reddit Chatter: GME</p>\n<blockquote>\n “GME I don’t understand! I just bought something there yesterday /s The experience was terrible and their return policies are bad.” —StopTooManyPeople\n</blockquote>\n<blockquote>\n “GME no question is going back to $40 but the trillion dollar question is does it keep sliding back to $10 or rocket back to $400?” —Sandvicheater\n</blockquote>\n<blockquote>\n “The most impressive thing about 2021 was GME managed so stay above $100 for a year even though nothing changed with the business” —kk7766\n</blockquote>\n<p>AMC stock is down 15.31% and GME stock is down 13.92% as of Monday afternoon.</p>","source":"lsy1606302653667","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>AMC, GME: What Investors Are Saying as the Top 2 Meme Stocks Tumble</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAMC, GME: What Investors Are Saying as the Top 2 Meme Stocks Tumble\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-12-14 09:58 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2021/12/amc-gme-what-investors-are-saying-as-the-top-2-meme-stocks-tumble-today/><strong>InvestorPlace</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>AMC Entertainment(NYSE:AMC) and GameStop(NYSE:GME) are taking a beating and traders of the meme stocks are reacting on social media.\nAMC stock is continuing to slip this week following news of insider...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2021/12/amc-gme-what-investors-are-saying-as-the-top-2-meme-stocks-tumble-today/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"GME":"游戏驿站","AMC":"AMC院线"},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2021/12/amc-gme-what-investors-are-saying-as-the-top-2-meme-stocks-tumble-today/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1115346113","content_text":"AMC Entertainment(NYSE:AMC) and GameStop(NYSE:GME) are taking a beating and traders of the meme stocks are reacting on social media.\nAMC stock is continuing to slip this week following news of insider selling from some of the company’s top executives last week. It’s also been a rough weekend as moviegoers aren’t returning to theaters as quickly as expected.\nLet’s dive into what traders on Reddit have to say about this below!\nMeme Stocks Reddit Talk: AMC\n\n “I’m bullish on GME. Top expert hires, big growth, very solid investor base, genius chairman, tech pivot, highly intelligent in depth DD being done showing major bullish fundamentals. AMC….. Old dude selling his shares as fast as possible and the monkeys that are long on it can’t fucking read.” —Slut_Spoiler\n\n\n “The WSB Facebook group was so bullish on AMC. My goodness, what could have possibly happened?” —MarijuanaGrowGroup\n\n\n “i like to make fun of AMC gang but its def not done. even options market has premiums left to $30c, $40c etc. for next year. it’ll be volatile for quite awhile imo.” —freehouse_throwaway\n\nMoving on to GME stock, shares have been slipping ever since its earnings report last week. That saw widening losses shock investors as the video game retailer continues to struggle. Not helping matters are shortages for consoles likely impacting its business.\nLet’s jump into what Reddit investors have to say about this below!\nMeme Stocks Reddit Chatter: GME\n\n “GME I don’t understand! I just bought something there yesterday /s The experience was terrible and their return policies are bad.” —StopTooManyPeople\n\n\n “GME no question is going back to $40 but the trillion dollar question is does it keep sliding back to $10 or rocket back to $400?” —Sandvicheater\n\n\n “The most impressive thing about 2021 was GME managed so stay above $100 for a year even though nothing changed with the business” —kk7766\n\nAMC stock is down 15.31% and GME stock is down 13.92% as of Monday afternoon.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":434,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":604743439,"gmtCreate":1639449726948,"gmtModify":1639451487457,"author":{"id":"3578973717832794","authorId":"3578973717832794","name":"RieslingHawk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a5390eacc9599c6447d4c42f983fcc76","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Stay away from the dip before your pocketdips","listText":"Stay away from the dip before your pocketdips","text":"Stay away from the dip before your pocketdips","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/604743439","repostId":"2191890219","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2191890219","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1639447890,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2191890219?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-14 10:11","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple closes in on $3 trillion market value","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2191890219","media":"Reuters","summary":"Dec 13 (Reuters) - Apple Inc's (AAPL.O) market value hovered just shy of the $3 trillion mark on Mon","content":"<p>Dec 13 (Reuters) - <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a> Inc's (AAPL.O) market value hovered just shy of the $3 trillion mark on Monday, following a stunning run over the past decade that has turned it into the world's most valuable company.</p>\n<p>The company’s shares fell just over 2% on Monday to close at $175.74, reversing earlier gains that saw them approach the $182.86 price needed to record a $3 trillion market value.</p>\n<p>Apple’s stock rose about 11% last week, extending its more than 30% year-to-date gain as investors remain confident that flush consumers will continue to pay top dollar for iPhones, MacBooks and services such as Apple TV and Apple Music.</p>\n<p>The iPhone maker's march from $2 trillion to near $3 trillion in market value took 16 months, as it led a group of megacap tech companies such as Google-parent <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOG\">Alphabet</a> Inc (GOOGL.O) and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">Amazon.com</a> Inc (AMZN.O) that benefited from people and businesses relying heavily on technology during the pandemic.</p>\n<p>By comparison, Apple's move from $1 trillion to $2 trillion took two years.</p>\n<p>\"It's now <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> of the more richly valued companies in the market, which shows the dominance of U.S. technology in the world and how confident investors are that it will remain in Apple’s hands,\" said Brian Frank, a portfolio manager at Frank Capital who sold his long-standing position in Apple in 2019 as the stock's valuation rose. \"It seems like the stock has priced in every possible good outcome.\"</p>\n<p>Among new revenue lines that investors expect are a possible Apple Car, alongside growth in service categories such as apps and TV that still remain well below the 65% of the company's revenues generated by sales of iPhones, said Daniel Morgan, senior portfolio manager at <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SNV\">Synovus</a> Trust Company.</p>\n<p>Eclipsing the $3 trillion milestone would add another feather in the cap for Chief Executive Tim Cook, who took over after Steve Jobs resigned in 2011, and oversaw the company's expansion into new products and markets.</p>\n<p>\"Tim Cook has done an amazing job over the past decade, taking Apple's share price up over 1,400%,\" OANDA analyst Edward Moya said.</p>\n<p>Apple shares have returned 22% per year since the 1990s, while the S&amp;P 500 (.SPX) has returned less than 9% annually in the same period.</p>\n<p>If Apple hits the $3 trillion milestone, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSFT\">Microsoft</a> Corp (MSFT.O) will be the only company in the $2 trillion club, while <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOGL\">Alphabet</a> (GOOGL.O), Amazon (AMZN.O) and Tesla Inc (TSLA.O) have crossed $1 trillion.</p>\n<p>Microsoft, which has a market value of roughly $2.6 trillion, was the world's most valuable company as recently as late October when Apple reported that supply chain constraints could weigh on its growth for the remainder of the year.</p>\n<p>Large technology stocks have rallied this year with investors tapping increasing demand for cloud-based products as companies shifted to a hybrid work model and consumers upgraded their devices. The <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NDAQ\">Nasdaq</a> 100 (.NDX), which is top-weighted by large companies such as Apple, is up nearly 26% this year, while the broader S&amp;P 500 index is up roughly 24%.</p>\n<p>The emergence of technologies such as 5G, augmented reality/virtual reality, and artificial intelligence may also help Apple and other cash-rich large technology stocks remain in favor with investors as the global economy puts the coronavirus pandemic behind it and supply chain pressures ease.</p>\n<p>\"I am in the camp that are experiencing another 'Super Cycle' with the iPhone12/iPhone 13 franchise,\" wrote Daniel Morgan, senior portfolio manager Synovus Trust Company, in a note. \"And that AAPL is lifting off to another string of quarters with strong revenue and profit growth.\"</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple closes in on $3 trillion market value</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple closes in on $3 trillion market value\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-12-14 10:11</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Dec 13 (Reuters) - <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a> Inc's (AAPL.O) market value hovered just shy of the $3 trillion mark on Monday, following a stunning run over the past decade that has turned it into the world's most valuable company.</p>\n<p>The company’s shares fell just over 2% on Monday to close at $175.74, reversing earlier gains that saw them approach the $182.86 price needed to record a $3 trillion market value.</p>\n<p>Apple’s stock rose about 11% last week, extending its more than 30% year-to-date gain as investors remain confident that flush consumers will continue to pay top dollar for iPhones, MacBooks and services such as Apple TV and Apple Music.</p>\n<p>The iPhone maker's march from $2 trillion to near $3 trillion in market value took 16 months, as it led a group of megacap tech companies such as Google-parent <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOG\">Alphabet</a> Inc (GOOGL.O) and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">Amazon.com</a> Inc (AMZN.O) that benefited from people and businesses relying heavily on technology during the pandemic.</p>\n<p>By comparison, Apple's move from $1 trillion to $2 trillion took two years.</p>\n<p>\"It's now <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> of the more richly valued companies in the market, which shows the dominance of U.S. technology in the world and how confident investors are that it will remain in Apple’s hands,\" said Brian Frank, a portfolio manager at Frank Capital who sold his long-standing position in Apple in 2019 as the stock's valuation rose. \"It seems like the stock has priced in every possible good outcome.\"</p>\n<p>Among new revenue lines that investors expect are a possible Apple Car, alongside growth in service categories such as apps and TV that still remain well below the 65% of the company's revenues generated by sales of iPhones, said Daniel Morgan, senior portfolio manager at <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SNV\">Synovus</a> Trust Company.</p>\n<p>Eclipsing the $3 trillion milestone would add another feather in the cap for Chief Executive Tim Cook, who took over after Steve Jobs resigned in 2011, and oversaw the company's expansion into new products and markets.</p>\n<p>\"Tim Cook has done an amazing job over the past decade, taking Apple's share price up over 1,400%,\" OANDA analyst Edward Moya said.</p>\n<p>Apple shares have returned 22% per year since the 1990s, while the S&amp;P 500 (.SPX) has returned less than 9% annually in the same period.</p>\n<p>If Apple hits the $3 trillion milestone, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSFT\">Microsoft</a> Corp (MSFT.O) will be the only company in the $2 trillion club, while <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOGL\">Alphabet</a> (GOOGL.O), Amazon (AMZN.O) and Tesla Inc (TSLA.O) have crossed $1 trillion.</p>\n<p>Microsoft, which has a market value of roughly $2.6 trillion, was the world's most valuable company as recently as late October when Apple reported that supply chain constraints could weigh on its growth for the remainder of the year.</p>\n<p>Large technology stocks have rallied this year with investors tapping increasing demand for cloud-based products as companies shifted to a hybrid work model and consumers upgraded their devices. The <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NDAQ\">Nasdaq</a> 100 (.NDX), which is top-weighted by large companies such as Apple, is up nearly 26% this year, while the broader S&amp;P 500 index is up roughly 24%.</p>\n<p>The emergence of technologies such as 5G, augmented reality/virtual reality, and artificial intelligence may also help Apple and other cash-rich large technology stocks remain in favor with investors as the global economy puts the coronavirus pandemic behind it and supply chain pressures ease.</p>\n<p>\"I am in the camp that are experiencing another 'Super Cycle' with the iPhone12/iPhone 13 franchise,\" wrote Daniel Morgan, senior portfolio manager Synovus Trust Company, in a note. \"And that AAPL is lifting off to another string of quarters with strong revenue and profit growth.\"</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4554":"元宇宙及AR概念","BK4532":"文艺复兴科技持仓","BK4515":"5G概念","BK4553":"喜马拉雅资本持仓","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4507":"流媒体概念","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","BK4525":"远程办公概念","BK4566":"资本集团","MSFT":"微软","BK4559":"巴菲特持仓","BK4527":"明星科技股","BK4538":"云计算","BK4501":"段永平概念","BK4077":"互动媒体与服务","GOOGL":"谷歌A","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","AMZN":"亚马逊","GOOG":"谷歌","BK4503":"景林资产持仓","BK4561":"索罗斯持仓","BK4505":"高瓴资本持仓","BK4548":"巴美列捷福持仓","AAPL":"苹果","BK4514":"搜索引擎","BK4170":"电脑硬件、储存设备及电脑周边"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2191890219","content_text":"Dec 13 (Reuters) - Apple Inc's (AAPL.O) market value hovered just shy of the $3 trillion mark on Monday, following a stunning run over the past decade that has turned it into the world's most valuable company.\nThe company’s shares fell just over 2% on Monday to close at $175.74, reversing earlier gains that saw them approach the $182.86 price needed to record a $3 trillion market value.\nApple’s stock rose about 11% last week, extending its more than 30% year-to-date gain as investors remain confident that flush consumers will continue to pay top dollar for iPhones, MacBooks and services such as Apple TV and Apple Music.\nThe iPhone maker's march from $2 trillion to near $3 trillion in market value took 16 months, as it led a group of megacap tech companies such as Google-parent Alphabet Inc (GOOGL.O) and Amazon.com Inc (AMZN.O) that benefited from people and businesses relying heavily on technology during the pandemic.\nBy comparison, Apple's move from $1 trillion to $2 trillion took two years.\n\"It's now one of the more richly valued companies in the market, which shows the dominance of U.S. technology in the world and how confident investors are that it will remain in Apple’s hands,\" said Brian Frank, a portfolio manager at Frank Capital who sold his long-standing position in Apple in 2019 as the stock's valuation rose. \"It seems like the stock has priced in every possible good outcome.\"\nAmong new revenue lines that investors expect are a possible Apple Car, alongside growth in service categories such as apps and TV that still remain well below the 65% of the company's revenues generated by sales of iPhones, said Daniel Morgan, senior portfolio manager at Synovus Trust Company.\nEclipsing the $3 trillion milestone would add another feather in the cap for Chief Executive Tim Cook, who took over after Steve Jobs resigned in 2011, and oversaw the company's expansion into new products and markets.\n\"Tim Cook has done an amazing job over the past decade, taking Apple's share price up over 1,400%,\" OANDA analyst Edward Moya said.\nApple shares have returned 22% per year since the 1990s, while the S&P 500 (.SPX) has returned less than 9% annually in the same period.\nIf Apple hits the $3 trillion milestone, Microsoft Corp (MSFT.O) will be the only company in the $2 trillion club, while Alphabet (GOOGL.O), Amazon (AMZN.O) and Tesla Inc (TSLA.O) have crossed $1 trillion.\nMicrosoft, which has a market value of roughly $2.6 trillion, was the world's most valuable company as recently as late October when Apple reported that supply chain constraints could weigh on its growth for the remainder of the year.\nLarge technology stocks have rallied this year with investors tapping increasing demand for cloud-based products as companies shifted to a hybrid work model and consumers upgraded their devices. The Nasdaq 100 (.NDX), which is top-weighted by large companies such as Apple, is up nearly 26% this year, while the broader S&P 500 index is up roughly 24%.\nThe emergence of technologies such as 5G, augmented reality/virtual reality, and artificial intelligence may also help Apple and other cash-rich large technology stocks remain in favor with investors as the global economy puts the coronavirus pandemic behind it and supply chain pressures ease.\n\"I am in the camp that are experiencing another 'Super Cycle' with the iPhone12/iPhone 13 franchise,\" wrote Daniel Morgan, senior portfolio manager Synovus Trust Company, in a note. \"And that AAPL is lifting off to another string of quarters with strong revenue and profit growth.\"","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":277,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":604781831,"gmtCreate":1639446410735,"gmtModify":1639446410735,"author":{"id":"3578973717832794","authorId":"3578973717832794","name":"RieslingHawk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a5390eacc9599c6447d4c42f983fcc76","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$</a> Buying PUTS Strike 500 expiring next year May","listText":"<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$</a> Buying PUTS Strike 500 expiring next year May","text":"$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$ Buying PUTS Strike 500 expiring next year May","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/604781831","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":200,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":604448442,"gmtCreate":1639441796488,"gmtModify":1639441796582,"author":{"id":"3578973717832794","authorId":"3578973717832794","name":"RieslingHawk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a5390eacc9599c6447d4c42f983fcc76","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Better sell before its too late","listText":"Better sell before its too late","text":"Better sell before its too late","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/604448442","repostId":"1198413271","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1198413271","pubTimestamp":1639438675,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1198413271?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-14 07:37","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Lucid and Rivian Are Soaring Again. Which EV Stock Is The Better Buy?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1198413271","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"These two EV growth stocks each got some good news over the weekend.\nShare prices of up-and-coming e","content":"<p>These two EV growth stocks each got some good news over the weekend.</p>\n<p>Share prices of up-and-coming electric vehicle (EV) players, Lucid Group ( LCID 3.96% ) and Rivian Automotive ( RIVN 3.70% ) are climbing higher. As with most unprofitable growth stocks, one day's gain could be the next day's loss as short-term volatility is par for the course.</p>\n<p></p>\n<p>While it's important not to get caught up with day-to-day price action, even long-term investors stand to benefit from monitoring major events so they can filter headlines and determine if a certain news item could have a material impact on the future of a business. Here's the latest on Lucid and Rivian and what it means.</p>\n<p></p>\n<p><b>What's driving Lucid higher</b></p>\n<p>Each year around the third Friday of December, the Nasdaq-100 index is reconstituted to reflect the 100 largest non-financial companies listed on its exchange. After market close on Dec. 10, Lucid, Airbnb, Fortinet, Palo Alto Networks, Zscaler, and Datadog were added to the index -- replacing CDW, Fox, Cerner, Check Point Software Technologies, Trip.com, and Incyte. The change will be effective on Dec. 20.</p>\n<p></p>\n<p>Lucid's inclusion into the Nasdaq 100 is somewhat of a formality. But it opens the door to more potential Lucid investors who may not directly buy its stock but will buy financial products that Lucid will become a part of.</p>\n<p></p>\n<p>Several exchange-traded funds (ETFs), namely the Invesco QQQ Trust ( QQQ -1.45% ), are meant to mirror the performance of the Nasdaq 100. Therefore, these funds are tasked with holding shares of the index's components, which now includes Lucid -- opening the door to a larger buyer pool. Aside from ETFs, there are other financial products like options, futures, and other funds tied to the Nasdaq-100. Similar to when stocks get added to the Dow Jones Industrial Average or the S&amp;P 500, being added to the Nasdaq 100 is a stamp of legitimacy from the financial markets.</p>\n<p></p>\n<p>In Lucid's case, the news is timely considering the company's woeful whirlwind of drama. Three major events just transpired: the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) subpoena of documents from Lucid on Dec. 3, a senior note offering, and CEO Peter Rawlinson selling some of his Lucid stock. These situations and broader market factors ultimately brought the share price of Lucid down over 20% last week. However, there are good reasons why the cumulative effect of these events, especially the $1.75 billion senior note offering, are a net positive for Lucid. Therefore, another reason why Lucid may be climbing higher again is that Mr. Market has had time to digest last week's events.</p>\n<p></p>\n<p><b>What's driving Rivian higher</b></p>\n<p>After an initial surge past a market cap of $150 billion, Rivian has cooled off as investors grapple with broader market volatility and EV valuations. But Rivian got a big boost on Sunday when MotorTrend, a reputable industry publication, named the Rivian R1T the 2022 MotorTrend Truck of the Year. The news comes after the Lucid Air was named the 2022 MotorTrend Car of the Year.</p>\n<p></p>\n<p>The truck was praised for its performance, range, style, utility, luxury, and a slew of other factors that led MotorTrend to call it \"the most remarkable pickup truck we've ever driven.\"</p>\n<p></p>\n<p>Unlike the highly competitive luxury sedan market, the electric truck market is more concentrated. With over 150,000 reservations, the Ford ( F -4.75% ) F-150 Lightning has received a lot of praise for its performance and starting price of just $40,000. Ford stock is the second-best performing U.S. automaker behind Lucid this year. It is making sizable investments into building out its EV manufacturing and battery production. However, Rivian isn't trying to go toe-to-toe with a legacy automaker like Ford. Rather, it's looking to carve out its own niche with outdoorsy and recreational folks interested in higher-priced electric trucks and SUVs.</p>\n<p></p>\n<p>Rivian has yet to begin mass deliveries of its vehicles. But its technology has sparked widespread attention from industry watchers and analysts. Last week, Morgan Stanley analyst Adam Jonas said that \"we see it [Rivian] as 'the one' that can challenge Tesla,\" praising the companies lead over the competition, impressive specs, partnership with Amazon, rich cash position, and strong management team.</p>\n<p></p>\n<p><b>The better buy now</b></p>\n<p>Given that Lucid and Rivian are young brands, positive reviews of their products are a sign they should be taken seriously. The main challenge for both companies is scaling production to meet customer demand and grow sales. Therefore, news that impacts either company's cash position is meaningful.</p>\n<p></p>\n<p>Lucid and Rivian are similar in that they both have negligible revenue, are years away from profitability, but have a ton of cash and exciting technology. Given Lucid's efficient battery pack, blending of executive luxury and a classic sports car, cost-saving decision not to build its own charging network, and its proven ability to deliver on its promises as a public company, Lucid is arguably the better buy now. However, investors could take a 50/50 split of Lucid and Rivian or invest in a basket of EV stocks to protect against an unforeseen catastrophic loss from any single company.</p>\n<p></p>\n<p><b>Should you invest $1,000 in Lucid Group, Inc. right now?</b></p>\n<p>Before you consider Lucid Group, Inc., you'll want to hear this.</p>\n<p></p>\n<p>Our award-winning analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy right now... and Lucid Group, Inc. wasn't one of them.</p>\n<p></p>\n<p>The online investing service they've run for nearly two decades, Motley Fool Stock Advisor, has beaten the stock market by over 4X.* And right now, they think there are 10 stocks that are better buys.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Lucid and Rivian Are Soaring Again. Which EV Stock Is The Better Buy?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nLucid and Rivian Are Soaring Again. Which EV Stock Is The Better Buy?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-12-14 07:37 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/12/13/lucid-and-rivian-are-soaring-again-which-ev-stock/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>These two EV growth stocks each got some good news over the weekend.\nShare prices of up-and-coming electric vehicle (EV) players, Lucid Group ( LCID 3.96% ) and Rivian Automotive ( RIVN 3.70% ) are ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/12/13/lucid-and-rivian-are-soaring-again-which-ev-stock/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"RIVN":"Rivian Automotive, Inc.","LCID":"Lucid Group Inc"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/12/13/lucid-and-rivian-are-soaring-again-which-ev-stock/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1198413271","content_text":"These two EV growth stocks each got some good news over the weekend.\nShare prices of up-and-coming electric vehicle (EV) players, Lucid Group ( LCID 3.96% ) and Rivian Automotive ( RIVN 3.70% ) are climbing higher. As with most unprofitable growth stocks, one day's gain could be the next day's loss as short-term volatility is par for the course.\n\nWhile it's important not to get caught up with day-to-day price action, even long-term investors stand to benefit from monitoring major events so they can filter headlines and determine if a certain news item could have a material impact on the future of a business. Here's the latest on Lucid and Rivian and what it means.\n\nWhat's driving Lucid higher\nEach year around the third Friday of December, the Nasdaq-100 index is reconstituted to reflect the 100 largest non-financial companies listed on its exchange. After market close on Dec. 10, Lucid, Airbnb, Fortinet, Palo Alto Networks, Zscaler, and Datadog were added to the index -- replacing CDW, Fox, Cerner, Check Point Software Technologies, Trip.com, and Incyte. The change will be effective on Dec. 20.\n\nLucid's inclusion into the Nasdaq 100 is somewhat of a formality. But it opens the door to more potential Lucid investors who may not directly buy its stock but will buy financial products that Lucid will become a part of.\n\nSeveral exchange-traded funds (ETFs), namely the Invesco QQQ Trust ( QQQ -1.45% ), are meant to mirror the performance of the Nasdaq 100. Therefore, these funds are tasked with holding shares of the index's components, which now includes Lucid -- opening the door to a larger buyer pool. Aside from ETFs, there are other financial products like options, futures, and other funds tied to the Nasdaq-100. Similar to when stocks get added to the Dow Jones Industrial Average or the S&P 500, being added to the Nasdaq 100 is a stamp of legitimacy from the financial markets.\n\nIn Lucid's case, the news is timely considering the company's woeful whirlwind of drama. Three major events just transpired: the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) subpoena of documents from Lucid on Dec. 3, a senior note offering, and CEO Peter Rawlinson selling some of his Lucid stock. These situations and broader market factors ultimately brought the share price of Lucid down over 20% last week. However, there are good reasons why the cumulative effect of these events, especially the $1.75 billion senior note offering, are a net positive for Lucid. Therefore, another reason why Lucid may be climbing higher again is that Mr. Market has had time to digest last week's events.\n\nWhat's driving Rivian higher\nAfter an initial surge past a market cap of $150 billion, Rivian has cooled off as investors grapple with broader market volatility and EV valuations. But Rivian got a big boost on Sunday when MotorTrend, a reputable industry publication, named the Rivian R1T the 2022 MotorTrend Truck of the Year. The news comes after the Lucid Air was named the 2022 MotorTrend Car of the Year.\n\nThe truck was praised for its performance, range, style, utility, luxury, and a slew of other factors that led MotorTrend to call it \"the most remarkable pickup truck we've ever driven.\"\n\nUnlike the highly competitive luxury sedan market, the electric truck market is more concentrated. With over 150,000 reservations, the Ford ( F -4.75% ) F-150 Lightning has received a lot of praise for its performance and starting price of just $40,000. Ford stock is the second-best performing U.S. automaker behind Lucid this year. It is making sizable investments into building out its EV manufacturing and battery production. However, Rivian isn't trying to go toe-to-toe with a legacy automaker like Ford. Rather, it's looking to carve out its own niche with outdoorsy and recreational folks interested in higher-priced electric trucks and SUVs.\n\nRivian has yet to begin mass deliveries of its vehicles. But its technology has sparked widespread attention from industry watchers and analysts. Last week, Morgan Stanley analyst Adam Jonas said that \"we see it [Rivian] as 'the one' that can challenge Tesla,\" praising the companies lead over the competition, impressive specs, partnership with Amazon, rich cash position, and strong management team.\n\nThe better buy now\nGiven that Lucid and Rivian are young brands, positive reviews of their products are a sign they should be taken seriously. The main challenge for both companies is scaling production to meet customer demand and grow sales. Therefore, news that impacts either company's cash position is meaningful.\n\nLucid and Rivian are similar in that they both have negligible revenue, are years away from profitability, but have a ton of cash and exciting technology. Given Lucid's efficient battery pack, blending of executive luxury and a classic sports car, cost-saving decision not to build its own charging network, and its proven ability to deliver on its promises as a public company, Lucid is arguably the better buy now. However, investors could take a 50/50 split of Lucid and Rivian or invest in a basket of EV stocks to protect against an unforeseen catastrophic loss from any single company.\n\nShould you invest $1,000 in Lucid Group, Inc. right now?\nBefore you consider Lucid Group, Inc., you'll want to hear this.\n\nOur award-winning analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy right now... and Lucid Group, Inc. wasn't one of them.\n\nThe online investing service they've run for nearly two decades, Motley Fool Stock Advisor, has beaten the stock market by over 4X.* And right now, they think there are 10 stocks that are better buys.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":227,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":604528454,"gmtCreate":1639416049087,"gmtModify":1639416049158,"author":{"id":"3578973717832794","authorId":"3578973717832794","name":"RieslingHawk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a5390eacc9599c6447d4c42f983fcc76","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ARKK\">$ARK Innovation ETF(ARKK)$</a> <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SPY\">$S&amp;amp;P500 ETF(SPY)$</a> S&amp;P 500 will end the week below 4,500!Sell before it's too late!!! Jerome Powell is going to accelerate rate hikes quicker than market expectations!!!!","listText":"<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ARKK\">$ARK Innovation ETF(ARKK)$</a> <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SPY\">$S&amp;amp;P500 ETF(SPY)$</a> S&amp;P 500 will end the week below 4,500!Sell before it's too late!!! Jerome Powell is going to accelerate rate hikes quicker than market expectations!!!!","text":"$ARK Innovation ETF(ARKK)$ $S&amp;P500 ETF(SPY)$ S&P 500 will end the week below 4,500!Sell before it's too late!!! Jerome Powell is going to accelerate rate hikes quicker than market expectations!!!!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/604528454","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":646,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":604587437,"gmtCreate":1639412498943,"gmtModify":1639412774397,"author":{"id":"3578973717832794","authorId":"3578973717832794","name":"RieslingHawk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a5390eacc9599c6447d4c42f983fcc76","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SPY\">$S&amp;P500 ETF(SPY)$</a>&nbsp;sell sell sell before it istoo late! Wednesday once Jerome Powell&nbsp;BECOMES A HAWK, IT WILL BE ALL TOO LATE","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SPY\">$S&amp;P500 ETF(SPY)$</a>&nbsp;sell sell sell before it istoo late! Wednesday once Jerome Powell&nbsp;BECOMES A HAWK, IT WILL BE ALL TOO LATE","text":"$S&P500 ETF(SPY)$ sell sell sell before it istoo late! Wednesday once Jerome Powell BECOMES A HAWK, IT WILL BE ALL TOO LATE","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/604587437","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":493,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":604588857,"gmtCreate":1639411779106,"gmtModify":1639412715903,"author":{"id":"3578973717832794","authorId":"3578973717832794","name":"RieslingHawk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a5390eacc9599c6447d4c42f983fcc76","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">$Apple(AAPL)$</a>&nbsp;market crashing this week, I am selling it all, can always buy back atlower price!!&nbsp;","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">$Apple(AAPL)$</a>&nbsp;market crashing this week, I am selling it all, can always buy back atlower price!!&nbsp;","text":"$Apple(AAPL)$ market crashing this week, I am selling it all, can always buy back atlower price!!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/604588857","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":401,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":604688607,"gmtCreate":1639387051617,"gmtModify":1639387222976,"author":{"id":"3578973717832794","authorId":"3578973717832794","name":"RieslingHawk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a5390eacc9599c6447d4c42f983fcc76","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Market tank after J Powell speaks on Wednesday&nbsp;","listText":"Market tank after J Powell speaks on Wednesday&nbsp;","text":"Market tank after J Powell speaks on Wednesday","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/604688607","repostId":"1169099899","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1169099899","pubTimestamp":1639367858,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1169099899?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-13 11:57","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Bull Run Enters Late Cycle","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1169099899","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"Summary\n\nThe short-term correction has probably not ended yet.\nMacroeconomic indicators signal furth","content":"<p><b>Summary</b></p>\n<ul>\n <li>The short-term correction has probably not ended yet.</li>\n <li>Macroeconomic indicators signal further upside for stocks despite short-term correction potential.</li>\n <li>The Fed could face tough challenges with its loose monetary stance sooner than many expect.</li>\n</ul>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35de74b68a683fda3b95d3fd873bc678\" tg-width=\"1536\" tg-height=\"1025\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>MundusImages/E+ via Getty Images</span></p>\n<p>The business cycle is maturing but has not ended yet. It is probably entering the late-cycle stage, according to Stouff capital's estimates. Their US Long-Term Macro Index gauge reached the 90% threshold, an early indicator for economic recessions. That's relevant because recessions had a perfect track record for bear markets in stocks. Every NBER recession in the past 170 involved a bear market in US stocks.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/631eab7d5b7d2c62994d942fc86cdcfc\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"511\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>(Source: Refinitiv, Stouff Capital)</span></p>\n<p>Nonetheless, entering the late stage of the business cycle does not imply that equities are in a bear market. On the contrary, equities developed positively during the late stage of the business cycle during the past century. The recession stage of the business cycle is the time window that investors want to avoid if they believe in statistical evidence. Other leading indicators, which have been reliable historically, do not signal an imminent recession yet. The labor market has been constructive until the last report. Moreover, the conference board Leading Economic Index (LEI) marked an all-time high on its latest reading. Historically, the labor market and the LEI reached their cycle peak several months ahead of the economy. Most often, both indices peaked even ahead of the US stock market before the US economy went into recession. Likewise, the yield curve is not flashing recessionary signals yet. Historically, it inverted shortly before a recession arrived and was also a leading indicator for cyclical stock market highs. That's neither the case today.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9fed5b5760550aa77356656aee41f1d0\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"379\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>(Source: Refinitiv, CEIC, Pictet Asset Management)</span></p>\n<p>However, equities corrected 5%-10% from their most recent highs into early December. The drop was not surprising because the market was running hot, as explained in our&nbsp;mid-November article&nbsp;here on Seeking Alpha. Sentiment and technical indicators signaled an imminent 5%-10% correction. Nonetheless, the correction is probably not finished short term. Some more weakness remains the base case during the next couple of weeks.</p>\n<p>Moreover, there is something peculiar about the current cycle. It is unfolding at an unprecedented speed. Therefore, the late-cycle stage may surprise many by not lasting as long as it usually does. Further, the current environment might prove extraordinarily challenging for central banks as inflation increases rapidly. The chart above shows that European purchasing prices are more than 20% higher versus last year. That's the steepest increase of the index since the '70s. The '70s were the latest period that recorded double-digit inflation after the breakup of the Bretton-Woods exchange-rate system. Inflation pressure is also mounting in the United States as well. Not only do goods become expensive due to supply shortages, but services also joined the party lately. The development is a problem for central banks as they have no effective tools against supply-side shortages. Consequently, we are unlikely to witness monetary easing short-term. That has been a headwind for equities in recent years. Yet again, that's not a hit-and-run event and we are not there yet. Historically, equities reached their cyclical high typically well after the initial rate hike.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bfdb33a6b0c068438eae297a0bd32d1d\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"390\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>(Source: Refinitiv, CEIC, Pictet Asset Management)</span></p>\n<p>Technicals support the macro evidence outlined above. Most of the major indices probably unfolded bearish Elliot waves from their November highs. The S&amp;P 500 counts best as an extending leading diagonal into the December 6th low. That's a signal that the short-term correction may not be over yet. The pattern will probably morph into a three-wave corrective leg towards 4250-4390 instead.</p>\n<p>All in all, there is potential for more damage short term. Technical evidence hints at another attack at the 4390 S/R before seeing the next sustainable leg up. Time will tell if it is the last leg up before the cycle ends. Some of the macro indicators discussed above will probably provide further hints before things turn sour. The bottom line is that the bull trend is most likely intact despite further short-term correction potential.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Bull Run Enters Late Cycle</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBull Run Enters Late Cycle\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-12-13 11:57 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4474830-bull-run-enters-late-cycle><strong>Seeking Alpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Summary\n\nThe short-term correction has probably not ended yet.\nMacroeconomic indicators signal further upside for stocks despite short-term correction potential.\nThe Fed could face tough challenges ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4474830-bull-run-enters-late-cycle\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4474830-bull-run-enters-late-cycle","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1169099899","content_text":"Summary\n\nThe short-term correction has probably not ended yet.\nMacroeconomic indicators signal further upside for stocks despite short-term correction potential.\nThe Fed could face tough challenges with its loose monetary stance sooner than many expect.\n\nMundusImages/E+ via Getty Images\nThe business cycle is maturing but has not ended yet. It is probably entering the late-cycle stage, according to Stouff capital's estimates. Their US Long-Term Macro Index gauge reached the 90% threshold, an early indicator for economic recessions. That's relevant because recessions had a perfect track record for bear markets in stocks. Every NBER recession in the past 170 involved a bear market in US stocks.\n(Source: Refinitiv, Stouff Capital)\nNonetheless, entering the late stage of the business cycle does not imply that equities are in a bear market. On the contrary, equities developed positively during the late stage of the business cycle during the past century. The recession stage of the business cycle is the time window that investors want to avoid if they believe in statistical evidence. Other leading indicators, which have been reliable historically, do not signal an imminent recession yet. The labor market has been constructive until the last report. Moreover, the conference board Leading Economic Index (LEI) marked an all-time high on its latest reading. Historically, the labor market and the LEI reached their cycle peak several months ahead of the economy. Most often, both indices peaked even ahead of the US stock market before the US economy went into recession. Likewise, the yield curve is not flashing recessionary signals yet. Historically, it inverted shortly before a recession arrived and was also a leading indicator for cyclical stock market highs. That's neither the case today.\n(Source: Refinitiv, CEIC, Pictet Asset Management)\nHowever, equities corrected 5%-10% from their most recent highs into early December. The drop was not surprising because the market was running hot, as explained in our mid-November article here on Seeking Alpha. Sentiment and technical indicators signaled an imminent 5%-10% correction. Nonetheless, the correction is probably not finished short term. Some more weakness remains the base case during the next couple of weeks.\nMoreover, there is something peculiar about the current cycle. It is unfolding at an unprecedented speed. Therefore, the late-cycle stage may surprise many by not lasting as long as it usually does. Further, the current environment might prove extraordinarily challenging for central banks as inflation increases rapidly. The chart above shows that European purchasing prices are more than 20% higher versus last year. That's the steepest increase of the index since the '70s. The '70s were the latest period that recorded double-digit inflation after the breakup of the Bretton-Woods exchange-rate system. Inflation pressure is also mounting in the United States as well. Not only do goods become expensive due to supply shortages, but services also joined the party lately. The development is a problem for central banks as they have no effective tools against supply-side shortages. Consequently, we are unlikely to witness monetary easing short-term. That has been a headwind for equities in recent years. Yet again, that's not a hit-and-run event and we are not there yet. Historically, equities reached their cyclical high typically well after the initial rate hike.\n(Source: Refinitiv, CEIC, Pictet Asset Management)\nTechnicals support the macro evidence outlined above. Most of the major indices probably unfolded bearish Elliot waves from their November highs. The S&P 500 counts best as an extending leading diagonal into the December 6th low. That's a signal that the short-term correction may not be over yet. The pattern will probably morph into a three-wave corrective leg towards 4250-4390 instead.\nAll in all, there is potential for more damage short term. Technical evidence hints at another attack at the 4390 S/R before seeing the next sustainable leg up. Time will tell if it is the last leg up before the cycle ends. Some of the macro indicators discussed above will probably provide further hints before things turn sour. The bottom line is that the bull trend is most likely intact despite further short-term correction potential.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":329,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":690732827,"gmtCreate":1639707459670,"gmtModify":1639708978911,"author":{"id":"3578973717832794","authorId":"3578973717832794","name":"RieslingHawk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a5390eacc9599c6447d4c42f983fcc76","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Paying the taxes is just an excuse lol, First he is diluting your shareholding. Second, he is dumping at record rate because valuation is not justified long term. Third, his execrise price is $6.24, and you're paying $900 + per share. Elon laughing to the bank and would like to thank your contribution to his networth.","listText":"Paying the taxes is just an excuse lol, First he is diluting your shareholding. Second, he is dumping at record rate because valuation is not justified long term. Third, his execrise price is $6.24, and you're paying $900 + per share. Elon laughing to the bank and would like to thank your contribution to his networth.","text":"Paying the taxes is just an excuse lol, First he is diluting your shareholding. Second, he is dumping at record rate because valuation is not justified long term. Third, his execrise price is $6.24, and you're paying $900 + per share. Elon laughing to the bank and would like to thank your contribution to his networth.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":12,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/690732827","repostId":"1143279118","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1143279118","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1639706631,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1143279118?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-17 10:03","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Musk has sold 75.66% of Tesla shares he promised to sell","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1143279118","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Tesla Inc Chief Executive Officer Elon Musk has sold nearly $14 billion worth of shares since early ","content":"<p>Tesla Inc&nbsp;Chief Executive Officer Elon Musk has sold nearly $14 billion worth of shares since early November when the world's richest person polled Twitter users about offloading 10% of his stake in the electric-car maker.</p>\n<p>The billionaire sold another 934,091 shares for $884.1 million on Thursday to pay for taxes on the exercise of stock options&nbsp;at a price of $6.24 to buy 2.2 million shares in Tesla, according to U.S. securities filings.</p>\n<p>Musk has sold about 12900512 Tesla shares since November 8, accounting for 75.66% of his previously committed shares.</p>\n<p>Here is a string of transactions he has done:</p>\n<table>\n <thead></thead>\n <tbody>\n  <tr>\n   <td>DATE</td>\n   <td>SHARES ACQUIRED</td>\n   <td>SHARES SOLD</td>\n   <td>GROSS PROCEEDS</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 8</td>\n   <td>2.2 mln</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 8</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>934,091</td>\n   <td>$1.10 bln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 9</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>3.1 mln</td>\n   <td>$3.35 bln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 10</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>500,000</td>\n   <td>$527.3 mln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 11</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>639,737</td>\n   <td>$687.3 mln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 12</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>1.2 mln</td>\n   <td>$1.24 bln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 15</td>\n   <td>2.1 mln</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 15</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>934,091</td>\n   <td>$930.7 mln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 16</td>\n   <td>2.1 mln</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 16</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>934,091</td>\n   <td>$973.4 mln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 23</td>\n   <td>2.2 mln</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>934,091</td>\n   <td>$1.05 bln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>DEC. 2</td>\n   <td>2.1 mln</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>934,091</td>\n   <td>$1.01 bln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Dec.9</td>\n   <td>2.2 mln</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>934,091</td>\n   <td>$963.2 mln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Dec.13</td>\n   <td>2.1 mln</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>934,091</td>\n   <td>$906.5 mln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Dec. 16</td>\n   <td>2.2 mln</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>934,091</td>\n   <td>$884.1 mln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Total</td>\n   <td>17.2 mln</td>\n   <td>12.9 mln</td>\n   <td>$13.62 bln</td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p>HOW DID MUSK SELL?</p>\n<p>Musk said on Nov. 6 he would sell 10% of his stake if Twitter users agreed. He owned a combination of about 244 million shares through his trust and stock options, bringing his stake in Tesla to about 23% as of June 30. It included 170 million shares held by his trust.</p>\n<p>The tweet was vague. Musk did not outline if he was intending to offload 10% of his shares he indirectly owned through the trust or if his stock options were also part of the deal.</p>\n<p>Tesla stock has dropped 25% since a peak on Nov. 4.</p>\n<p>With a $243 billion fortune, Musk is the world’s richest person, according to the&nbsp;Bloomberg Billionaires Index.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Musk has sold 75.66% of Tesla shares he promised to sell</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nMusk has sold 75.66% of Tesla shares he promised to sell\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-12-17 10:03</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Tesla Inc&nbsp;Chief Executive Officer Elon Musk has sold nearly $14 billion worth of shares since early November when the world's richest person polled Twitter users about offloading 10% of his stake in the electric-car maker.</p>\n<p>The billionaire sold another 934,091 shares for $884.1 million on Thursday to pay for taxes on the exercise of stock options&nbsp;at a price of $6.24 to buy 2.2 million shares in Tesla, according to U.S. securities filings.</p>\n<p>Musk has sold about 12900512 Tesla shares since November 8, accounting for 75.66% of his previously committed shares.</p>\n<p>Here is a string of transactions he has done:</p>\n<table>\n <thead></thead>\n <tbody>\n  <tr>\n   <td>DATE</td>\n   <td>SHARES ACQUIRED</td>\n   <td>SHARES SOLD</td>\n   <td>GROSS PROCEEDS</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 8</td>\n   <td>2.2 mln</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 8</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>934,091</td>\n   <td>$1.10 bln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 9</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>3.1 mln</td>\n   <td>$3.35 bln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 10</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>500,000</td>\n   <td>$527.3 mln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 11</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>639,737</td>\n   <td>$687.3 mln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 12</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>1.2 mln</td>\n   <td>$1.24 bln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 15</td>\n   <td>2.1 mln</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 15</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>934,091</td>\n   <td>$930.7 mln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 16</td>\n   <td>2.1 mln</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 16</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>934,091</td>\n   <td>$973.4 mln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 23</td>\n   <td>2.2 mln</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>934,091</td>\n   <td>$1.05 bln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>DEC. 2</td>\n   <td>2.1 mln</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>934,091</td>\n   <td>$1.01 bln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Dec.9</td>\n   <td>2.2 mln</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>934,091</td>\n   <td>$963.2 mln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Dec.13</td>\n   <td>2.1 mln</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>934,091</td>\n   <td>$906.5 mln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Dec. 16</td>\n   <td>2.2 mln</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>934,091</td>\n   <td>$884.1 mln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Total</td>\n   <td>17.2 mln</td>\n   <td>12.9 mln</td>\n   <td>$13.62 bln</td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p>HOW DID MUSK SELL?</p>\n<p>Musk said on Nov. 6 he would sell 10% of his stake if Twitter users agreed. He owned a combination of about 244 million shares through his trust and stock options, bringing his stake in Tesla to about 23% as of June 30. It included 170 million shares held by his trust.</p>\n<p>The tweet was vague. Musk did not outline if he was intending to offload 10% of his shares he indirectly owned through the trust or if his stock options were also part of the deal.</p>\n<p>Tesla stock has dropped 25% since a peak on Nov. 4.</p>\n<p>With a $243 billion fortune, Musk is the world’s richest person, according to the&nbsp;Bloomberg Billionaires Index.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1143279118","content_text":"Tesla Inc Chief Executive Officer Elon Musk has sold nearly $14 billion worth of shares since early November when the world's richest person polled Twitter users about offloading 10% of his stake in the electric-car maker.\nThe billionaire sold another 934,091 shares for $884.1 million on Thursday to pay for taxes on the exercise of stock options at a price of $6.24 to buy 2.2 million shares in Tesla, according to U.S. securities filings.\nMusk has sold about 12900512 Tesla shares since November 8, accounting for 75.66% of his previously committed shares.\nHere is a string of transactions he has done:\n\n\n\n\nDATE\nSHARES ACQUIRED\nSHARES SOLD\nGROSS PROCEEDS\n\n\nNOV. 8\n2.2 mln\n\n\n\n\nNOV. 8\n\n934,091\n$1.10 bln\n\n\nNOV. 9\n\n3.1 mln\n$3.35 bln\n\n\nNOV. 10\n\n500,000\n$527.3 mln\n\n\nNOV. 11\n\n639,737\n$687.3 mln\n\n\nNOV. 12\n\n1.2 mln\n$1.24 bln\n\n\nNOV. 15\n2.1 mln\n\n\n\n\nNOV. 15\n\n934,091\n$930.7 mln\n\n\nNOV. 16\n2.1 mln\n\n\n\n\nNOV. 16\n\n934,091\n$973.4 mln\n\n\nNOV. 23\n2.2 mln\n\n\n\n\n\n\n934,091\n$1.05 bln\n\n\nDEC. 2\n2.1 mln\n\n\n\n\n\n\n934,091\n$1.01 bln\n\n\nDec.9\n2.2 mln\n\n\n\n\n\n\n934,091\n$963.2 mln\n\n\nDec.13\n2.1 mln\n\n\n\n\n\n\n934,091\n$906.5 mln\n\n\nDec. 16\n2.2 mln\n\n\n\n\n\n\n934,091\n$884.1 mln\n\n\nTotal\n17.2 mln\n12.9 mln\n$13.62 bln\n\n\n\nHOW DID MUSK SELL?\nMusk said on Nov. 6 he would sell 10% of his stake if Twitter users agreed. He owned a combination of about 244 million shares through his trust and stock options, bringing his stake in Tesla to about 23% as of June 30. It included 170 million shares held by his trust.\nThe tweet was vague. Musk did not outline if he was intending to offload 10% of his shares he indirectly owned through the trust or if his stock options were also part of the deal.\nTesla stock has dropped 25% since a peak on Nov. 4.\nWith a $243 billion fortune, Musk is the world’s richest person, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":511,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":607406769,"gmtCreate":1639574245246,"gmtModify":1639574245312,"author":{"id":"3578973717832794","authorId":"3578973717832794","name":"RieslingHawk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a5390eacc9599c6447d4c42f983fcc76","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Market moving towards my Price Target of 4500 for SPX by end of this week? J Powell you da man !","listText":"Market moving towards my Price Target of 4500 for SPX by end of this week? J Powell you da man !","text":"Market moving towards my Price Target of 4500 for SPX by end of this week? J Powell you da man !","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/607406769","repostId":"1144636661","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1144636661","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1639573288,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1144636661?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-15 21:01","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Toplines Before US Market Open on Wednesday","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1144636661","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"U.S. Stock futures traded flat Wednesday morning as investors looked ahead to the Federal Reserve's ","content":"<p>U.S.&nbsp;Stock futures traded flat Wednesday morning as investors&nbsp;looked ahead to the Federal Reserve's final monetary policy decision of 2021&nbsp;and weighed the central bank's potential response to persistent inflationary pressures.</p>\n<p>At 8:00 a.m. ET, Dow e-minis were up 16 points, or 0.05%, S&amp;P 500 e-minis were up 0.75 point, or 0.02%, and Nasdaq 100 e-minis were down 9.25 points, or 0.06%.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/34286b7e4b17094339c3a583ba0a4e13\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"379\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>\n<p>All eyes on Wednesday will be on the Federal Reserve's monetary policy statement and press conference by Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell. Many market participants expect these will set the stage for the Fed to speed the withdrawal of its crisis-era stimulus programs, with the firming economic recovery and soaring inflation suggesting the central bank has room for a more hawkish tilt to policy. </p>\n<p>Last week's Consumer Price Index showed the&nbsp;fastest surge in U.S. consumer prices since 1982&nbsp;on a year-over-year basis in November. And on Tuesday, the U.S. Producer Price Index jumped by the most on record at a 9.6% year-over-year increase for last month.</p>\n<p>Specifically, many investors anticipate the Fed will ramp up the rate of tapering of its asset-purchasing program, which took place at a rate of $120 billion per month in combined Treasuries and agency mortgage-backed securities from the start of the pandemic through November. Last month, the Fed began dialing back these purchases by $15 billion, and announced another $15 billion reduction for December.</p>\n<p><b>Stocks making the biggest moves premarket: </b></p>\n<p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TM\">Toyota</a> </b>– <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TM\">Toyota</a> gained 2.2% in premarket trading, after announcing it would produce a record 800,000 vehicles in January. Toyota is ramping up output to make up for prior production lost to parts shortages.</p>\n<p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/VIR\">Vir Biotechnology, Inc.</a></b> – <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/VIR\">Vir Biotechnology, Inc.</a> is rallying 4.3% in the premarket, putting it in position to rise for a fifth straight day. The drugmaker announced further data showing that its Covid-19 antibody therapy – developed in partnership with&nbsp;GlaxoSmithKline(GSK) – was effective against the omicron variant.</p>\n<p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LLY\">Eli Lilly and</a></b> – The drugmaker raised its 2022 profit and revenue forecast ahead of today’s meeting with the investment community, noting that it is on track to meet its goal of delivering 20 new treatments in the 10-year period through 2023. Lilly moved higher by 4.7% in the premarket.</p>\n<p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/RRD\">R.R.Donnelley</a></b> – <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/RRD\">R.R.Donnelley</a> agreed to be acquired by Chatham Asset Management – the printing company’s top shareholder – for about $897 million. Donnelley terminated an earlier buyout deal it reached with private equity firm Atlas Holdings after determining that Chatham’s bid was a “superior proposal.” The stock fell 2.8% in the premarket.</p>\n<p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DPZ\">Domino's Pizza</a></b> – Domino’s fell 2.1% in premarket trading after Barclays downgraded the stock to “underweight” from “equal weight.” Barclays said solid fundamentals and Covid headwinds in the industry as a whole helped Domino’s outperform during the pandemic, but noted that those headwinds for its competitors are now fading.</p>\n<p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/REGN\">Regeneron Pharmaceuticals</a></b> – Regeneron was downgraded to “market perform” from “outperform” at Bernstein, which cites the risk to Regeneron’s best-selling eye drug Eylea from the future release of biosimilars. Regeneron slid 1.8% in the premarket.</p>\n<p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SIX\">Six Flags Entertainment</a></b> – The theme park operator’s stock rose 2.2% in the premarket after Goldman Sachs upgraded it to “buy” from “neutral,” noting resilient ticket pricing as well as guidance from Six Flags that Goldman considers conservative.</p>\n<p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWNK\">Hostess Brands Inc</a></b> – The maker of Twinkies and other snack foods was rated “buy” in new coverage at Citi, which said Hostess is exiting the pandemic in a strong position with innovation driving market share gains. Hostess was up 1.1% in the premarket.</p>\n<p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/UPS\">United Parcel Service Inc</a></b> – UBS named the delivery service’s stock as a “top pick,” saying UPS should benefit from increased consumer spending and that it has a greater chance of margin expansion than its rivals. UPS rose 1.1% in premarket trading.</p>\n<p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CCMP\">Cabot Microelectronics</a></b> – The advanced materials supplier agreed to be acquired by rivalEntegris(ENTG) in a cash-and-stock deal. Based on Tuesday’s closing prices, the transaction is worth $197.53 per CMC share, compared with CMC’s Tuesday close of $145.97. Entegris fell 3% in the premarket.</p>\n<p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BLMN\">Bloomin</a></b> – The Outback Steakhouse parent surged 5.3% in premarket trading after Jefferies added the stock to its “franchise picks” list, saying the company was positioned to benefit from positive structural changes in the casual dining category.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Toplines Before US Market Open on Wednesday</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nToplines Before US Market Open on Wednesday\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-12-15 21:01</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>U.S.&nbsp;Stock futures traded flat Wednesday morning as investors&nbsp;looked ahead to the Federal Reserve's final monetary policy decision of 2021&nbsp;and weighed the central bank's potential response to persistent inflationary pressures.</p>\n<p>At 8:00 a.m. ET, Dow e-minis were up 16 points, or 0.05%, S&amp;P 500 e-minis were up 0.75 point, or 0.02%, and Nasdaq 100 e-minis were down 9.25 points, or 0.06%.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/34286b7e4b17094339c3a583ba0a4e13\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"379\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>\n<p>All eyes on Wednesday will be on the Federal Reserve's monetary policy statement and press conference by Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell. Many market participants expect these will set the stage for the Fed to speed the withdrawal of its crisis-era stimulus programs, with the firming economic recovery and soaring inflation suggesting the central bank has room for a more hawkish tilt to policy. </p>\n<p>Last week's Consumer Price Index showed the&nbsp;fastest surge in U.S. consumer prices since 1982&nbsp;on a year-over-year basis in November. And on Tuesday, the U.S. Producer Price Index jumped by the most on record at a 9.6% year-over-year increase for last month.</p>\n<p>Specifically, many investors anticipate the Fed will ramp up the rate of tapering of its asset-purchasing program, which took place at a rate of $120 billion per month in combined Treasuries and agency mortgage-backed securities from the start of the pandemic through November. Last month, the Fed began dialing back these purchases by $15 billion, and announced another $15 billion reduction for December.</p>\n<p><b>Stocks making the biggest moves premarket: </b></p>\n<p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TM\">Toyota</a> </b>– <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TM\">Toyota</a> gained 2.2% in premarket trading, after announcing it would produce a record 800,000 vehicles in January. Toyota is ramping up output to make up for prior production lost to parts shortages.</p>\n<p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/VIR\">Vir Biotechnology, Inc.</a></b> – <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/VIR\">Vir Biotechnology, Inc.</a> is rallying 4.3% in the premarket, putting it in position to rise for a fifth straight day. The drugmaker announced further data showing that its Covid-19 antibody therapy – developed in partnership with&nbsp;GlaxoSmithKline(GSK) – was effective against the omicron variant.</p>\n<p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LLY\">Eli Lilly and</a></b> – The drugmaker raised its 2022 profit and revenue forecast ahead of today’s meeting with the investment community, noting that it is on track to meet its goal of delivering 20 new treatments in the 10-year period through 2023. Lilly moved higher by 4.7% in the premarket.</p>\n<p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/RRD\">R.R.Donnelley</a></b> – <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/RRD\">R.R.Donnelley</a> agreed to be acquired by Chatham Asset Management – the printing company’s top shareholder – for about $897 million. Donnelley terminated an earlier buyout deal it reached with private equity firm Atlas Holdings after determining that Chatham’s bid was a “superior proposal.” The stock fell 2.8% in the premarket.</p>\n<p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DPZ\">Domino's Pizza</a></b> – Domino’s fell 2.1% in premarket trading after Barclays downgraded the stock to “underweight” from “equal weight.” Barclays said solid fundamentals and Covid headwinds in the industry as a whole helped Domino’s outperform during the pandemic, but noted that those headwinds for its competitors are now fading.</p>\n<p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/REGN\">Regeneron Pharmaceuticals</a></b> – Regeneron was downgraded to “market perform” from “outperform” at Bernstein, which cites the risk to Regeneron’s best-selling eye drug Eylea from the future release of biosimilars. Regeneron slid 1.8% in the premarket.</p>\n<p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SIX\">Six Flags Entertainment</a></b> – The theme park operator’s stock rose 2.2% in the premarket after Goldman Sachs upgraded it to “buy” from “neutral,” noting resilient ticket pricing as well as guidance from Six Flags that Goldman considers conservative.</p>\n<p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWNK\">Hostess Brands Inc</a></b> – The maker of Twinkies and other snack foods was rated “buy” in new coverage at Citi, which said Hostess is exiting the pandemic in a strong position with innovation driving market share gains. Hostess was up 1.1% in the premarket.</p>\n<p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/UPS\">United Parcel Service Inc</a></b> – UBS named the delivery service’s stock as a “top pick,” saying UPS should benefit from increased consumer spending and that it has a greater chance of margin expansion than its rivals. UPS rose 1.1% in premarket trading.</p>\n<p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CCMP\">Cabot Microelectronics</a></b> – The advanced materials supplier agreed to be acquired by rivalEntegris(ENTG) in a cash-and-stock deal. Based on Tuesday’s closing prices, the transaction is worth $197.53 per CMC share, compared with CMC’s Tuesday close of $145.97. Entegris fell 3% in the premarket.</p>\n<p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BLMN\">Bloomin</a></b> – The Outback Steakhouse parent surged 5.3% in premarket trading after Jefferies added the stock to its “franchise picks” list, saying the company was positioned to benefit from positive structural changes in the casual dining category.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1144636661","content_text":"U.S. Stock futures traded flat Wednesday morning as investors looked ahead to the Federal Reserve's final monetary policy decision of 2021 and weighed the central bank's potential response to persistent inflationary pressures.\nAt 8:00 a.m. ET, Dow e-minis were up 16 points, or 0.05%, S&P 500 e-minis were up 0.75 point, or 0.02%, and Nasdaq 100 e-minis were down 9.25 points, or 0.06%.\n\nAll eyes on Wednesday will be on the Federal Reserve's monetary policy statement and press conference by Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell. Many market participants expect these will set the stage for the Fed to speed the withdrawal of its crisis-era stimulus programs, with the firming economic recovery and soaring inflation suggesting the central bank has room for a more hawkish tilt to policy. \nLast week's Consumer Price Index showed the fastest surge in U.S. consumer prices since 1982 on a year-over-year basis in November. And on Tuesday, the U.S. Producer Price Index jumped by the most on record at a 9.6% year-over-year increase for last month.\nSpecifically, many investors anticipate the Fed will ramp up the rate of tapering of its asset-purchasing program, which took place at a rate of $120 billion per month in combined Treasuries and agency mortgage-backed securities from the start of the pandemic through November. Last month, the Fed began dialing back these purchases by $15 billion, and announced another $15 billion reduction for December.\nStocks making the biggest moves premarket: \nToyota – Toyota gained 2.2% in premarket trading, after announcing it would produce a record 800,000 vehicles in January. Toyota is ramping up output to make up for prior production lost to parts shortages.\nVir Biotechnology, Inc. – Vir Biotechnology, Inc. is rallying 4.3% in the premarket, putting it in position to rise for a fifth straight day. The drugmaker announced further data showing that its Covid-19 antibody therapy – developed in partnership with GlaxoSmithKline(GSK) – was effective against the omicron variant.\nEli Lilly and – The drugmaker raised its 2022 profit and revenue forecast ahead of today’s meeting with the investment community, noting that it is on track to meet its goal of delivering 20 new treatments in the 10-year period through 2023. Lilly moved higher by 4.7% in the premarket.\nR.R.Donnelley – R.R.Donnelley agreed to be acquired by Chatham Asset Management – the printing company’s top shareholder – for about $897 million. Donnelley terminated an earlier buyout deal it reached with private equity firm Atlas Holdings after determining that Chatham’s bid was a “superior proposal.” The stock fell 2.8% in the premarket.\nDomino's Pizza – Domino’s fell 2.1% in premarket trading after Barclays downgraded the stock to “underweight” from “equal weight.” Barclays said solid fundamentals and Covid headwinds in the industry as a whole helped Domino’s outperform during the pandemic, but noted that those headwinds for its competitors are now fading.\nRegeneron Pharmaceuticals – Regeneron was downgraded to “market perform” from “outperform” at Bernstein, which cites the risk to Regeneron’s best-selling eye drug Eylea from the future release of biosimilars. Regeneron slid 1.8% in the premarket.\nSix Flags Entertainment – The theme park operator’s stock rose 2.2% in the premarket after Goldman Sachs upgraded it to “buy” from “neutral,” noting resilient ticket pricing as well as guidance from Six Flags that Goldman considers conservative.\nHostess Brands Inc – The maker of Twinkies and other snack foods was rated “buy” in new coverage at Citi, which said Hostess is exiting the pandemic in a strong position with innovation driving market share gains. Hostess was up 1.1% in the premarket.\nUnited Parcel Service Inc – UBS named the delivery service’s stock as a “top pick,” saying UPS should benefit from increased consumer spending and that it has a greater chance of margin expansion than its rivals. UPS rose 1.1% in premarket trading.\nCabot Microelectronics – The advanced materials supplier agreed to be acquired by rivalEntegris(ENTG) in a cash-and-stock deal. Based on Tuesday’s closing prices, the transaction is worth $197.53 per CMC share, compared with CMC’s Tuesday close of $145.97. Entegris fell 3% in the premarket.\nBloomin – The Outback Steakhouse parent surged 5.3% in premarket trading after Jefferies added the stock to its “franchise picks” list, saying the company was positioned to benefit from positive structural changes in the casual dining category.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":932,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":604681183,"gmtCreate":1639386906950,"gmtModify":1639386906950,"author":{"id":"3578973717832794","authorId":"3578973717832794","name":"RieslingHawk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a5390eacc9599c6447d4c42f983fcc76","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Market will tank this week, god bless&nbsp;","listText":"Market will tank this week, god bless&nbsp;","text":"Market will tank this week, god bless","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/604681183","repostId":"1177222740","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1177222740","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1639386759,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1177222740?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-13 17:12","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Vaccine stocks jumped in premarket trading,with Novavax rising over 5% and BioNTech SE rising more than 3%","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1177222740","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Vaccine stocks jumped in premarket trading,with Novavax rising over 5% and BioNTech SE rising more t","content":"<p>Vaccine&nbsp;stocks&nbsp;jumped&nbsp;in&nbsp;premarket&nbsp;trading,with&nbsp;Novavax&nbsp;rising&nbsp;over&nbsp;5%&nbsp;and&nbsp;BioNTech&nbsp;SE&nbsp;rising&nbsp;more&nbsp;than&nbsp;3%.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bdf47380f0d8775b43c9143423a79e00\" tg-width=\"770\" tg-height=\"560\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1b5e3fff3bd7076c87237eb4c56b1db0\" tg-width=\"771\" tg-height=\"562\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">Three doses of the Pfizer-BioNTechCOVID-19vaccine, BNT162b2 have been shown in a preliminary study to neutralize the Omicron variant.</p>\n<p>In a&nbsp;press release, Pfizer and BioNTech have announced that serum antibodies induced after three doses of their COVID-19 vaccine (BNT162b2) are able to neutralize the Omicron variant.</p>\n<p>The company’s laboratory study involved testing human sera obtained from the blood of individuals who had received two or three 30-µg doses of the BNT162B2 using a&nbsp;pseudovirus&nbsp;neutralization test, which was&nbsp;used to study the effect of antibodies to neutralize the capability of viruses to enter cells and thus prevent infection. The sera were collected from subjects 3 weeks after receiving the second dose or one month after receiving the third dose of their vaccine.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Vaccine stocks jumped in premarket trading,with Novavax rising over 5% and BioNTech SE rising more than 3%</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nVaccine stocks jumped in premarket trading,with Novavax rising over 5% and BioNTech SE rising more than 3%\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-12-13 17:12</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Vaccine&nbsp;stocks&nbsp;jumped&nbsp;in&nbsp;premarket&nbsp;trading,with&nbsp;Novavax&nbsp;rising&nbsp;over&nbsp;5%&nbsp;and&nbsp;BioNTech&nbsp;SE&nbsp;rising&nbsp;more&nbsp;than&nbsp;3%.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bdf47380f0d8775b43c9143423a79e00\" tg-width=\"770\" tg-height=\"560\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1b5e3fff3bd7076c87237eb4c56b1db0\" tg-width=\"771\" tg-height=\"562\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">Three doses of the Pfizer-BioNTechCOVID-19vaccine, BNT162b2 have been shown in a preliminary study to neutralize the Omicron variant.</p>\n<p>In a&nbsp;press release, Pfizer and BioNTech have announced that serum antibodies induced after three doses of their COVID-19 vaccine (BNT162b2) are able to neutralize the Omicron variant.</p>\n<p>The company’s laboratory study involved testing human sera obtained from the blood of individuals who had received two or three 30-µg doses of the BNT162B2 using a&nbsp;pseudovirus&nbsp;neutralization test, which was&nbsp;used to study the effect of antibodies to neutralize the capability of viruses to enter cells and thus prevent infection. The sera were collected from subjects 3 weeks after receiving the second dose or one month after receiving the third dose of their vaccine.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BNTX":"BioNTech SE","NVAX":"诺瓦瓦克斯医药"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1177222740","content_text":"Vaccine stocks jumped in premarket trading,with Novavax rising over 5% and BioNTech SE rising more than 3%.Three doses of the Pfizer-BioNTechCOVID-19vaccine, BNT162b2 have been shown in a preliminary study to neutralize the Omicron variant.\nIn a press release, Pfizer and BioNTech have announced that serum antibodies induced after three doses of their COVID-19 vaccine (BNT162b2) are able to neutralize the Omicron variant.\nThe company’s laboratory study involved testing human sera obtained from the blood of individuals who had received two or three 30-µg doses of the BNT162B2 using a pseudovirus neutralization test, which was used to study the effect of antibodies to neutralize the capability of viruses to enter cells and thus prevent infection. The sera were collected from subjects 3 weeks after receiving the second dose or one month after receiving the third dose of their vaccine.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":105,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":604748347,"gmtCreate":1639449837974,"gmtModify":1639454908829,"author":{"id":"3578973717832794","authorId":"3578973717832794","name":"RieslingHawk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a5390eacc9599c6447d4c42f983fcc76","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Dumb stocks with no earnings, only apes\"invest\" in junk like these","listText":"Dumb stocks with no earnings, only apes\"invest\" in junk like these","text":"Dumb stocks with no earnings, only apes\"invest\" in junk like these","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/604748347","repostId":"1115346113","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1115346113","pubTimestamp":1639447080,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1115346113?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-14 09:58","market":"us","language":"en","title":"AMC, GME: What Investors Are Saying as the Top 2 Meme Stocks Tumble","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1115346113","media":"InvestorPlace","summary":"AMC Entertainment(NYSE:AMC) and GameStop(NYSE:GME) are taking a beating and traders of the meme stoc","content":"<p><b>AMC Entertainment</b>(NYSE:<b><u>AMC</u></b>) and&nbsp;<b>GameStop</b>(NYSE:<b><u>GME</u></b>) are taking a beating&nbsp;and traders of the meme stocks are reacting on social media.</p>\n<p>AMC stock is continuing to slip this week following&nbsp;news of insider selling&nbsp;from some of the company’s top executives last week. It’s also been a rough weekend&nbsp;as moviegoers aren’t returning to theaters as quickly as expected.</p>\n<p>Let’s dive into what traders on Reddit have to say about this below!</p>\n<p>Meme Stocks Reddit Talk: AMC</p>\n<blockquote>\n “I’m bullish on GME. Top expert hires, big growth, very solid investor base, genius chairman, tech pivot, highly intelligent in depth DD being done showing major bullish fundamentals. AMC….. Old dude selling his shares as fast as possible and the monkeys that are long on it can’t fucking read.” —Slut_Spoiler\n</blockquote>\n<blockquote>\n “The WSB Facebook group was so bullish on AMC. My goodness, what could have possibly happened?” —MarijuanaGrowGroup\n</blockquote>\n<blockquote>\n “i like to make fun of AMC gang but its def not done. even options market has premiums left to $30c, $40c etc. for next year. it’ll be volatile for quite awhile imo.” —freehouse_throwaway\n</blockquote>\n<p>Moving on to GME stock, shares have been&nbsp;slipping ever since its earnings report last week. That saw widening losses shock investors as the video game retailer continues to struggle. Not helping matters are&nbsp;shortages for consoles&nbsp;likely impacting its business.</p>\n<p>Let’s jump into what Reddit investors have to say about this below!</p>\n<p>Meme Stocks Reddit Chatter: GME</p>\n<blockquote>\n “GME I don’t understand! I just bought something there yesterday /s The experience was terrible and their return policies are bad.” —StopTooManyPeople\n</blockquote>\n<blockquote>\n “GME no question is going back to $40 but the trillion dollar question is does it keep sliding back to $10 or rocket back to $400?” —Sandvicheater\n</blockquote>\n<blockquote>\n “The most impressive thing about 2021 was GME managed so stay above $100 for a year even though nothing changed with the business” —kk7766\n</blockquote>\n<p>AMC stock is down 15.31% and GME stock is down 13.92% as of Monday afternoon.</p>","source":"lsy1606302653667","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>AMC, GME: What Investors Are Saying as the Top 2 Meme Stocks Tumble</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAMC, GME: What Investors Are Saying as the Top 2 Meme Stocks Tumble\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-12-14 09:58 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2021/12/amc-gme-what-investors-are-saying-as-the-top-2-meme-stocks-tumble-today/><strong>InvestorPlace</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>AMC Entertainment(NYSE:AMC) and GameStop(NYSE:GME) are taking a beating and traders of the meme stocks are reacting on social media.\nAMC stock is continuing to slip this week following news of insider...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2021/12/amc-gme-what-investors-are-saying-as-the-top-2-meme-stocks-tumble-today/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"GME":"游戏驿站","AMC":"AMC院线"},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2021/12/amc-gme-what-investors-are-saying-as-the-top-2-meme-stocks-tumble-today/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1115346113","content_text":"AMC Entertainment(NYSE:AMC) and GameStop(NYSE:GME) are taking a beating and traders of the meme stocks are reacting on social media.\nAMC stock is continuing to slip this week following news of insider selling from some of the company’s top executives last week. It’s also been a rough weekend as moviegoers aren’t returning to theaters as quickly as expected.\nLet’s dive into what traders on Reddit have to say about this below!\nMeme Stocks Reddit Talk: AMC\n\n “I’m bullish on GME. Top expert hires, big growth, very solid investor base, genius chairman, tech pivot, highly intelligent in depth DD being done showing major bullish fundamentals. AMC….. Old dude selling his shares as fast as possible and the monkeys that are long on it can’t fucking read.” —Slut_Spoiler\n\n\n “The WSB Facebook group was so bullish on AMC. My goodness, what could have possibly happened?” —MarijuanaGrowGroup\n\n\n “i like to make fun of AMC gang but its def not done. even options market has premiums left to $30c, $40c etc. for next year. it’ll be volatile for quite awhile imo.” —freehouse_throwaway\n\nMoving on to GME stock, shares have been slipping ever since its earnings report last week. That saw widening losses shock investors as the video game retailer continues to struggle. Not helping matters are shortages for consoles likely impacting its business.\nLet’s jump into what Reddit investors have to say about this below!\nMeme Stocks Reddit Chatter: GME\n\n “GME I don’t understand! I just bought something there yesterday /s The experience was terrible and their return policies are bad.” —StopTooManyPeople\n\n\n “GME no question is going back to $40 but the trillion dollar question is does it keep sliding back to $10 or rocket back to $400?” —Sandvicheater\n\n\n “The most impressive thing about 2021 was GME managed so stay above $100 for a year even though nothing changed with the business” —kk7766\n\nAMC stock is down 15.31% and GME stock is down 13.92% as of Monday afternoon.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":434,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":609698823,"gmtCreate":1638275145699,"gmtModify":1638275145699,"author":{"id":"3578973717832794","authorId":"3578973717832794","name":"RieslingHawk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a5390eacc9599c6447d4c42f983fcc76","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"BEAR STRONKKKKK&nbsp;","listText":"BEAR STRONKKKKK&nbsp;","text":"BEAR STRONKKKKK","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/609698823","repostId":"1192203085","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1192203085","pubTimestamp":1638273550,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1192203085?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-30 19:59","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Covid-19 Antibody Drugs Are Challenged by Omicron, Preliminary Testing Indicates","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1192203085","media":"The Wall Street Journal","summary":"Regeneron said its antibody drug cocktail was found to lose effectiveness against the new variant\nA ","content":"<p>Regeneron said its antibody drug cocktail was found to lose effectiveness against the new variant</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ed6086131617e6933fe07f3e46cd5c26\" tg-width=\"1290\" tg-height=\"859\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>A monoclonal antibody treatment site in Pembroke Pines, Fla., earlier this year.</span></p>\n<p>Preliminary tests indicate the Covid-19 antibody drug cocktail from Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. loses effectiveness against Omicron, the company said Tuesday, a sign that some products in an important class of therapies might need modifying if the new strain becomes widespread.</p>\n<p>Separate testing of another authorized Covid-19 antibody drug cocktail, from&nbsp;Eli Lilly&amp; Co., indicates it also isn’t as effective against Omicron, outside scientists said. Lilly said it is testing the new variant against its antibody treatment and wouldn’t speculate on what the results will be.</p>\n<p>The findings are the early results of researchers’ race to assess the impact of the&nbsp;new Omicron variant&nbsp;on Covid-19 treatments that patients, doctors and hospitals have been relying on, as well as pills in development that have promised to keep people out of the hospital.</p>\n<p>Researchers say some antibody therapies are likely to be especially vulnerable to Omicron because it contains mutations to the spike protein that the Regeneron and Lilly drugs target, while other drugs should hold up well because they attack elements of the virus unchanged in the variant.</p>\n<p>Monoclonal antibodies are lab-made molecules derived from survivors of Covid-19 or mice engineered to have human immune systems. When given soon after infection, the drugs attach to the surface of the coronavirus and prevent it from replicating itself in new cells.</p>\n<p>They are the only drugs authorized to treat patients, before they require hospitalization, who are at high risk of developing severe cases.</p>\n<p>The drugs differ from vaccines, which train the immune system how to defend against the virus, including with the production of antibodies. Last year, former&nbsp;President Donald Trump credited Regeneron’s drug&nbsp;with his speedy recovery from Covid-19.</p>\n<p>Regeneron said it would be able to quantify the impact of the variant in coming weeks, after further testing is done.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6e7fac5c4630025e6c5ad28d2c3efbfa\" tg-width=\"1050\" tg-height=\"700\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Antiviral pills such as Pfizer’s Paxlovid appear to be unaffected by the variant.</span></p>\n<p>If final testing shows that its antibody drugs are less effective against Omicron, Regeneron has developed alternative antibodies that it can push into clinical testing and that it thinks will retain effectiveness against the variant, said George Yancopoulos, the company’s president and chief scientific officer.</p>\n<p>One of Regeneron’s alternative antibodies is already in clinical testing, which the company began in anticipation of new variants emerging over time.</p>\n<p>The Omicron variant was identified last week by scientists in South Africa, prompting drug researchers to scramble to see if the relatively small medicine chest of Covid-19 treatments would still work against the new strain if it ends up spreading widely.</p>\n<p>“What we have to admit is, in the course of the past six days, our urgency has increased,” Dr. Yancopoulos said in an interview. “What started out as a backup plan has now been made a lot more urgent.”</p>\n<p>Scientists at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle found that individual mutations from Omicron reduced or eliminated the ability of Regeneron’s and Lilly’s drugs to attach to the virus, said Allie Greaney, a Ph.D. candidate at the center and the University of Washington in Seattle.</p>\n<p>More comprehensive tests of the drugs against the entire variant are needed to fully understand the impact, she said. “I’m not certain what the exact magnitude of effect would be, but probably less effective,” said Ms. Greaney.</p>\n<p>Lilly is in the process of testing the new variant against its drug, a combination of&nbsp;two antibodies called bamlanivimab and etesevimab,said Nicole Kallewaard, a Lilly virologist and research adviser.</p>\n<p>She declined to comment on the results showing reduced effectiveness against individual Omicron mutations, because the results may differ when all of the mutations are combined.</p>\n<p>“I think that we need to wait for confirmation of the whole virus,” said Dr. Kallewaard. “Hopefully, the data will come in the next few weeks.”</p>\n<p>A rise in the prevalence of Omicron could present an opportunity for competitors who say their drugs don’t appear in preliminary testing to be affected by the variant, including&nbsp;Vir Biotechnology&nbsp;Inc.&nbsp;and GlaxoSmithKline PLC, whose drug&nbsp;sotrovimab was authorized for emergency use&nbsp;earlier this year.</p>\n<p>Fred Hutchinson researchers also said their initial testing indicated the Vir-GSK antibody drug retained its effectiveness.</p>\n<p>Adagio Therapeutics&nbsp;Inc.,a biotech with a Covid-19 antibody drug in clinical trials, said its antibody also appears to be unaffected by the new variant.</p>\n<p>Vir, Glaxo and Adagio said they are conducting further tests to confirm that their drugs aren’t affected by Omicron.</p>\n<p>Omicron poses a threat to lab-made antibody drugs as well as antibodies generated by vaccines, because the new variant has mutations on the spike protein part of the virus where antibodies are known to frequently attach themselves, scientists say.</p>\n<p>Vir and Adagio officials said the companies designed their antibodies with the aim of targeting spots on the virus that are common across different coronaviruses that remained stable even after numerous mutations over many years.</p>\n<p>“They bind to a region of the virus that through decades of evolution has not changed a lot,” Adagio Chief Executive Tillman Gerngross said in an interview. “Those conserved areas make the virus much more vulnerable” to antibodies.</p>\n<p>It will take at least two weeks to create a version of the full Omicron virus variant and test antibody drugs against it, company officials said. Still, scientists say they are concerned by what they know already about the variant’s ability to evade antibodies produced by vaccines, prior infection or from drug treatment.</p>\n<p>“Omicron hasn’t become the next Delta,” Vir Chief Scientific Officer Skip Virgin said in an interview. But “we think the extent of the mutations, the number of them, means that the world needs to take Omicron very seriously.”</p>\n<p>Antiviral drugs, including pills from&nbsp;Merck&amp; Co. and partner Ridgeback Biotherapeutics LP and from&nbsp;Pfizer&nbsp;Inc.&nbsp;that are being&nbsp;evaluated for authorization,appear to be unaffected by the variant because they target a different site on the virus, said Michel Nussenzweig, an immunologist at Rockefeller University.</p>\n<p>Doctors and patients have been looking forward to authorization of the pills, which in clinical trials have&nbsp;reduced the risk of hospitalization&nbsp;if taken early enough.</p>\n<p>“The targets of the pills appear to be under less pressure and may be OK, but this too needs to be tested,” said Dr. Nussenzweig.</p>\n<p>Pfizer and Merck said they expect their drugs to be effective against Omicron.</p>\n<p>Gilead SciencesInc.&nbsp;also said it expects&nbsp;Veklury, its antiviral drug&nbsp;used to treat hospitalized patients, to retain effectiveness against Omicron as it has against other variants of concern.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Covid-19 Antibody Drugs Are Challenged by Omicron, Preliminary Testing Indicates</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nCovid-19 Antibody Drugs Are Challenged by Omicron, Preliminary Testing Indicates\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-11-30 19:59 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.wsj.com/articles/covid-19-antibody-drugs-are-challenged-by-omicron-preliminary-testing-indicates-11638270003?mod=Searchresults_pos1&page=1><strong>The Wall Street Journal</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Regeneron said its antibody drug cocktail was found to lose effectiveness against the new variant\nA monoclonal antibody treatment site in Pembroke Pines, Fla., earlier this year.\nPreliminary tests ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.wsj.com/articles/covid-19-antibody-drugs-are-challenged-by-omicron-preliminary-testing-indicates-11638270003?mod=Searchresults_pos1&page=1\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"REGN":"再生元制药公司","LLY":"礼来"},"source_url":"https://www.wsj.com/articles/covid-19-antibody-drugs-are-challenged-by-omicron-preliminary-testing-indicates-11638270003?mod=Searchresults_pos1&page=1","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1192203085","content_text":"Regeneron said its antibody drug cocktail was found to lose effectiveness against the new variant\nA monoclonal antibody treatment site in Pembroke Pines, Fla., earlier this year.\nPreliminary tests indicate the Covid-19 antibody drug cocktail from Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. loses effectiveness against Omicron, the company said Tuesday, a sign that some products in an important class of therapies might need modifying if the new strain becomes widespread.\nSeparate testing of another authorized Covid-19 antibody drug cocktail, from Eli Lilly& Co., indicates it also isn’t as effective against Omicron, outside scientists said. Lilly said it is testing the new variant against its antibody treatment and wouldn’t speculate on what the results will be.\nThe findings are the early results of researchers’ race to assess the impact of the new Omicron variant on Covid-19 treatments that patients, doctors and hospitals have been relying on, as well as pills in development that have promised to keep people out of the hospital.\nResearchers say some antibody therapies are likely to be especially vulnerable to Omicron because it contains mutations to the spike protein that the Regeneron and Lilly drugs target, while other drugs should hold up well because they attack elements of the virus unchanged in the variant.\nMonoclonal antibodies are lab-made molecules derived from survivors of Covid-19 or mice engineered to have human immune systems. When given soon after infection, the drugs attach to the surface of the coronavirus and prevent it from replicating itself in new cells.\nThey are the only drugs authorized to treat patients, before they require hospitalization, who are at high risk of developing severe cases.\nThe drugs differ from vaccines, which train the immune system how to defend against the virus, including with the production of antibodies. Last year, former President Donald Trump credited Regeneron’s drug with his speedy recovery from Covid-19.\nRegeneron said it would be able to quantify the impact of the variant in coming weeks, after further testing is done.\nAntiviral pills such as Pfizer’s Paxlovid appear to be unaffected by the variant.\nIf final testing shows that its antibody drugs are less effective against Omicron, Regeneron has developed alternative antibodies that it can push into clinical testing and that it thinks will retain effectiveness against the variant, said George Yancopoulos, the company’s president and chief scientific officer.\nOne of Regeneron’s alternative antibodies is already in clinical testing, which the company began in anticipation of new variants emerging over time.\nThe Omicron variant was identified last week by scientists in South Africa, prompting drug researchers to scramble to see if the relatively small medicine chest of Covid-19 treatments would still work against the new strain if it ends up spreading widely.\n“What we have to admit is, in the course of the past six days, our urgency has increased,” Dr. Yancopoulos said in an interview. “What started out as a backup plan has now been made a lot more urgent.”\nScientists at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle found that individual mutations from Omicron reduced or eliminated the ability of Regeneron’s and Lilly’s drugs to attach to the virus, said Allie Greaney, a Ph.D. candidate at the center and the University of Washington in Seattle.\nMore comprehensive tests of the drugs against the entire variant are needed to fully understand the impact, she said. “I’m not certain what the exact magnitude of effect would be, but probably less effective,” said Ms. Greaney.\nLilly is in the process of testing the new variant against its drug, a combination of two antibodies called bamlanivimab and etesevimab,said Nicole Kallewaard, a Lilly virologist and research adviser.\nShe declined to comment on the results showing reduced effectiveness against individual Omicron mutations, because the results may differ when all of the mutations are combined.\n“I think that we need to wait for confirmation of the whole virus,” said Dr. Kallewaard. “Hopefully, the data will come in the next few weeks.”\nA rise in the prevalence of Omicron could present an opportunity for competitors who say their drugs don’t appear in preliminary testing to be affected by the variant, including Vir Biotechnology Inc. and GlaxoSmithKline PLC, whose drug sotrovimab was authorized for emergency use earlier this year.\nFred Hutchinson researchers also said their initial testing indicated the Vir-GSK antibody drug retained its effectiveness.\nAdagio Therapeutics Inc.,a biotech with a Covid-19 antibody drug in clinical trials, said its antibody also appears to be unaffected by the new variant.\nVir, Glaxo and Adagio said they are conducting further tests to confirm that their drugs aren’t affected by Omicron.\nOmicron poses a threat to lab-made antibody drugs as well as antibodies generated by vaccines, because the new variant has mutations on the spike protein part of the virus where antibodies are known to frequently attach themselves, scientists say.\nVir and Adagio officials said the companies designed their antibodies with the aim of targeting spots on the virus that are common across different coronaviruses that remained stable even after numerous mutations over many years.\n“They bind to a region of the virus that through decades of evolution has not changed a lot,” Adagio Chief Executive Tillman Gerngross said in an interview. “Those conserved areas make the virus much more vulnerable” to antibodies.\nIt will take at least two weeks to create a version of the full Omicron virus variant and test antibody drugs against it, company officials said. Still, scientists say they are concerned by what they know already about the variant’s ability to evade antibodies produced by vaccines, prior infection or from drug treatment.\n“Omicron hasn’t become the next Delta,” Vir Chief Scientific Officer Skip Virgin said in an interview. But “we think the extent of the mutations, the number of them, means that the world needs to take Omicron very seriously.”\nAntiviral drugs, including pills from Merck& Co. and partner Ridgeback Biotherapeutics LP and from Pfizer Inc. that are being evaluated for authorization,appear to be unaffected by the variant because they target a different site on the virus, said Michel Nussenzweig, an immunologist at Rockefeller University.\nDoctors and patients have been looking forward to authorization of the pills, which in clinical trials have reduced the risk of hospitalization if taken early enough.\n“The targets of the pills appear to be under less pressure and may be OK, but this too needs to be tested,” said Dr. Nussenzweig.\nPfizer and Merck said they expect their drugs to be effective against Omicron.\nGilead SciencesInc. also said it expects Veklury, its antiviral drug used to treat hospitalized patients, to retain effectiveness against Omicron as it has against other variants of concern.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":212,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":875020372,"gmtCreate":1637590174521,"gmtModify":1637590174521,"author":{"id":"3578973717832794","authorId":"3578973717832794","name":"RieslingHawk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a5390eacc9599c6447d4c42f983fcc76","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good&nbsp;","listText":"Good&nbsp;","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/875020372","repostId":"2185874498","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2185874498","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1637589600,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2185874498?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-22 22:00","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Biden taps Powell for second terms as Fed chair; Brainard to be vice chair","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2185874498","media":"Reuters","summary":"WASHINGTON, Nov 22 (Reuters) - Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell was nominated for a second four-y","content":"<p>WASHINGTON, Nov 22 (Reuters) - Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell was nominated for a second four-year term by President Joe Biden on Monday, extending a tenure that began somewhat by chance, survived blistering criticism from former President Donald Trump, and now positions the ex-investment banker to finish the most consequential revamp of monetary policy since the 1970s.</p>\n<p>Lael Brainard, the Federal Reserve board member who was the other top candidate for the job, will be vice chair, the White House said.</p>\n<p>“While there’s still more to be done, we’ve made remarkable progress over the last 10 months in getting Americans back to work and getting our economy moving again,\" Biden, a Democrat, said in comments emailed to reporters. \"That success is a testament to the economic agenda I’ve pursued and to the decisive action that the Federal Reserve has taken,\" he said.</p>\n<p>Powell, 68, will need to be confirmed by the Senate, currently controlled by Biden's Democratic party but closely divided. The decision to stick with Powell, a Republican and former private equity lawyer elevated to the Fed's top job by Trump, rejuvenates what in recent decades had been a bipartisan approach to filling the position, and several Republican senators have already endorsed the reappointment despite Powell's rocky relationship with Trump.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Biden taps Powell for second terms as Fed chair; Brainard to be vice chair</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBiden taps Powell for second terms as Fed chair; Brainard to be vice chair\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-11-22 22:00</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>WASHINGTON, Nov 22 (Reuters) - Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell was nominated for a second four-year term by President Joe Biden on Monday, extending a tenure that began somewhat by chance, survived blistering criticism from former President Donald Trump, and now positions the ex-investment banker to finish the most consequential revamp of monetary policy since the 1970s.</p>\n<p>Lael Brainard, the Federal Reserve board member who was the other top candidate for the job, will be vice chair, the White House said.</p>\n<p>“While there’s still more to be done, we’ve made remarkable progress over the last 10 months in getting Americans back to work and getting our economy moving again,\" Biden, a Democrat, said in comments emailed to reporters. \"That success is a testament to the economic agenda I’ve pursued and to the decisive action that the Federal Reserve has taken,\" he said.</p>\n<p>Powell, 68, will need to be confirmed by the Senate, currently controlled by Biden's Democratic party but closely divided. The decision to stick with Powell, a Republican and former private equity lawyer elevated to the Fed's top job by Trump, rejuvenates what in recent decades had been a bipartisan approach to filling the position, and several Republican senators have already endorsed the reappointment despite Powell's rocky relationship with Trump.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2185874498","content_text":"WASHINGTON, Nov 22 (Reuters) - Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell was nominated for a second four-year term by President Joe Biden on Monday, extending a tenure that began somewhat by chance, survived blistering criticism from former President Donald Trump, and now positions the ex-investment banker to finish the most consequential revamp of monetary policy since the 1970s.\nLael Brainard, the Federal Reserve board member who was the other top candidate for the job, will be vice chair, the White House said.\n“While there’s still more to be done, we’ve made remarkable progress over the last 10 months in getting Americans back to work and getting our economy moving again,\" Biden, a Democrat, said in comments emailed to reporters. \"That success is a testament to the economic agenda I’ve pursued and to the decisive action that the Federal Reserve has taken,\" he said.\nPowell, 68, will need to be confirmed by the Senate, currently controlled by Biden's Democratic party but closely divided. The decision to stick with Powell, a Republican and former private equity lawyer elevated to the Fed's top job by Trump, rejuvenates what in recent decades had been a bipartisan approach to filling the position, and several Republican senators have already endorsed the reappointment despite Powell's rocky relationship with Trump.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":39,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":604448442,"gmtCreate":1639441796488,"gmtModify":1639441796582,"author":{"id":"3578973717832794","authorId":"3578973717832794","name":"RieslingHawk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a5390eacc9599c6447d4c42f983fcc76","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Better sell before its too late","listText":"Better sell before its too late","text":"Better sell before its too late","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/604448442","repostId":"1198413271","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1198413271","pubTimestamp":1639438675,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1198413271?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-14 07:37","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Lucid and Rivian Are Soaring Again. Which EV Stock Is The Better Buy?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1198413271","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"These two EV growth stocks each got some good news over the weekend.\nShare prices of up-and-coming e","content":"<p>These two EV growth stocks each got some good news over the weekend.</p>\n<p>Share prices of up-and-coming electric vehicle (EV) players, Lucid Group ( LCID 3.96% ) and Rivian Automotive ( RIVN 3.70% ) are climbing higher. As with most unprofitable growth stocks, one day's gain could be the next day's loss as short-term volatility is par for the course.</p>\n<p></p>\n<p>While it's important not to get caught up with day-to-day price action, even long-term investors stand to benefit from monitoring major events so they can filter headlines and determine if a certain news item could have a material impact on the future of a business. Here's the latest on Lucid and Rivian and what it means.</p>\n<p></p>\n<p><b>What's driving Lucid higher</b></p>\n<p>Each year around the third Friday of December, the Nasdaq-100 index is reconstituted to reflect the 100 largest non-financial companies listed on its exchange. After market close on Dec. 10, Lucid, Airbnb, Fortinet, Palo Alto Networks, Zscaler, and Datadog were added to the index -- replacing CDW, Fox, Cerner, Check Point Software Technologies, Trip.com, and Incyte. The change will be effective on Dec. 20.</p>\n<p></p>\n<p>Lucid's inclusion into the Nasdaq 100 is somewhat of a formality. But it opens the door to more potential Lucid investors who may not directly buy its stock but will buy financial products that Lucid will become a part of.</p>\n<p></p>\n<p>Several exchange-traded funds (ETFs), namely the Invesco QQQ Trust ( QQQ -1.45% ), are meant to mirror the performance of the Nasdaq 100. Therefore, these funds are tasked with holding shares of the index's components, which now includes Lucid -- opening the door to a larger buyer pool. Aside from ETFs, there are other financial products like options, futures, and other funds tied to the Nasdaq-100. Similar to when stocks get added to the Dow Jones Industrial Average or the S&amp;P 500, being added to the Nasdaq 100 is a stamp of legitimacy from the financial markets.</p>\n<p></p>\n<p>In Lucid's case, the news is timely considering the company's woeful whirlwind of drama. Three major events just transpired: the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) subpoena of documents from Lucid on Dec. 3, a senior note offering, and CEO Peter Rawlinson selling some of his Lucid stock. These situations and broader market factors ultimately brought the share price of Lucid down over 20% last week. However, there are good reasons why the cumulative effect of these events, especially the $1.75 billion senior note offering, are a net positive for Lucid. Therefore, another reason why Lucid may be climbing higher again is that Mr. Market has had time to digest last week's events.</p>\n<p></p>\n<p><b>What's driving Rivian higher</b></p>\n<p>After an initial surge past a market cap of $150 billion, Rivian has cooled off as investors grapple with broader market volatility and EV valuations. But Rivian got a big boost on Sunday when MotorTrend, a reputable industry publication, named the Rivian R1T the 2022 MotorTrend Truck of the Year. The news comes after the Lucid Air was named the 2022 MotorTrend Car of the Year.</p>\n<p></p>\n<p>The truck was praised for its performance, range, style, utility, luxury, and a slew of other factors that led MotorTrend to call it \"the most remarkable pickup truck we've ever driven.\"</p>\n<p></p>\n<p>Unlike the highly competitive luxury sedan market, the electric truck market is more concentrated. With over 150,000 reservations, the Ford ( F -4.75% ) F-150 Lightning has received a lot of praise for its performance and starting price of just $40,000. Ford stock is the second-best performing U.S. automaker behind Lucid this year. It is making sizable investments into building out its EV manufacturing and battery production. However, Rivian isn't trying to go toe-to-toe with a legacy automaker like Ford. Rather, it's looking to carve out its own niche with outdoorsy and recreational folks interested in higher-priced electric trucks and SUVs.</p>\n<p></p>\n<p>Rivian has yet to begin mass deliveries of its vehicles. But its technology has sparked widespread attention from industry watchers and analysts. Last week, Morgan Stanley analyst Adam Jonas said that \"we see it [Rivian] as 'the one' that can challenge Tesla,\" praising the companies lead over the competition, impressive specs, partnership with Amazon, rich cash position, and strong management team.</p>\n<p></p>\n<p><b>The better buy now</b></p>\n<p>Given that Lucid and Rivian are young brands, positive reviews of their products are a sign they should be taken seriously. The main challenge for both companies is scaling production to meet customer demand and grow sales. Therefore, news that impacts either company's cash position is meaningful.</p>\n<p></p>\n<p>Lucid and Rivian are similar in that they both have negligible revenue, are years away from profitability, but have a ton of cash and exciting technology. Given Lucid's efficient battery pack, blending of executive luxury and a classic sports car, cost-saving decision not to build its own charging network, and its proven ability to deliver on its promises as a public company, Lucid is arguably the better buy now. However, investors could take a 50/50 split of Lucid and Rivian or invest in a basket of EV stocks to protect against an unforeseen catastrophic loss from any single company.</p>\n<p></p>\n<p><b>Should you invest $1,000 in Lucid Group, Inc. right now?</b></p>\n<p>Before you consider Lucid Group, Inc., you'll want to hear this.</p>\n<p></p>\n<p>Our award-winning analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy right now... and Lucid Group, Inc. wasn't one of them.</p>\n<p></p>\n<p>The online investing service they've run for nearly two decades, Motley Fool Stock Advisor, has beaten the stock market by over 4X.* And right now, they think there are 10 stocks that are better buys.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Lucid and Rivian Are Soaring Again. Which EV Stock Is The Better Buy?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nLucid and Rivian Are Soaring Again. Which EV Stock Is The Better Buy?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-12-14 07:37 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/12/13/lucid-and-rivian-are-soaring-again-which-ev-stock/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>These two EV growth stocks each got some good news over the weekend.\nShare prices of up-and-coming electric vehicle (EV) players, Lucid Group ( LCID 3.96% ) and Rivian Automotive ( RIVN 3.70% ) are ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/12/13/lucid-and-rivian-are-soaring-again-which-ev-stock/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"RIVN":"Rivian Automotive, Inc.","LCID":"Lucid Group Inc"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/12/13/lucid-and-rivian-are-soaring-again-which-ev-stock/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1198413271","content_text":"These two EV growth stocks each got some good news over the weekend.\nShare prices of up-and-coming electric vehicle (EV) players, Lucid Group ( LCID 3.96% ) and Rivian Automotive ( RIVN 3.70% ) are climbing higher. As with most unprofitable growth stocks, one day's gain could be the next day's loss as short-term volatility is par for the course.\n\nWhile it's important not to get caught up with day-to-day price action, even long-term investors stand to benefit from monitoring major events so they can filter headlines and determine if a certain news item could have a material impact on the future of a business. Here's the latest on Lucid and Rivian and what it means.\n\nWhat's driving Lucid higher\nEach year around the third Friday of December, the Nasdaq-100 index is reconstituted to reflect the 100 largest non-financial companies listed on its exchange. After market close on Dec. 10, Lucid, Airbnb, Fortinet, Palo Alto Networks, Zscaler, and Datadog were added to the index -- replacing CDW, Fox, Cerner, Check Point Software Technologies, Trip.com, and Incyte. The change will be effective on Dec. 20.\n\nLucid's inclusion into the Nasdaq 100 is somewhat of a formality. But it opens the door to more potential Lucid investors who may not directly buy its stock but will buy financial products that Lucid will become a part of.\n\nSeveral exchange-traded funds (ETFs), namely the Invesco QQQ Trust ( QQQ -1.45% ), are meant to mirror the performance of the Nasdaq 100. Therefore, these funds are tasked with holding shares of the index's components, which now includes Lucid -- opening the door to a larger buyer pool. Aside from ETFs, there are other financial products like options, futures, and other funds tied to the Nasdaq-100. Similar to when stocks get added to the Dow Jones Industrial Average or the S&P 500, being added to the Nasdaq 100 is a stamp of legitimacy from the financial markets.\n\nIn Lucid's case, the news is timely considering the company's woeful whirlwind of drama. Three major events just transpired: the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) subpoena of documents from Lucid on Dec. 3, a senior note offering, and CEO Peter Rawlinson selling some of his Lucid stock. These situations and broader market factors ultimately brought the share price of Lucid down over 20% last week. However, there are good reasons why the cumulative effect of these events, especially the $1.75 billion senior note offering, are a net positive for Lucid. Therefore, another reason why Lucid may be climbing higher again is that Mr. Market has had time to digest last week's events.\n\nWhat's driving Rivian higher\nAfter an initial surge past a market cap of $150 billion, Rivian has cooled off as investors grapple with broader market volatility and EV valuations. But Rivian got a big boost on Sunday when MotorTrend, a reputable industry publication, named the Rivian R1T the 2022 MotorTrend Truck of the Year. The news comes after the Lucid Air was named the 2022 MotorTrend Car of the Year.\n\nThe truck was praised for its performance, range, style, utility, luxury, and a slew of other factors that led MotorTrend to call it \"the most remarkable pickup truck we've ever driven.\"\n\nUnlike the highly competitive luxury sedan market, the electric truck market is more concentrated. With over 150,000 reservations, the Ford ( F -4.75% ) F-150 Lightning has received a lot of praise for its performance and starting price of just $40,000. Ford stock is the second-best performing U.S. automaker behind Lucid this year. It is making sizable investments into building out its EV manufacturing and battery production. However, Rivian isn't trying to go toe-to-toe with a legacy automaker like Ford. Rather, it's looking to carve out its own niche with outdoorsy and recreational folks interested in higher-priced electric trucks and SUVs.\n\nRivian has yet to begin mass deliveries of its vehicles. But its technology has sparked widespread attention from industry watchers and analysts. Last week, Morgan Stanley analyst Adam Jonas said that \"we see it [Rivian] as 'the one' that can challenge Tesla,\" praising the companies lead over the competition, impressive specs, partnership with Amazon, rich cash position, and strong management team.\n\nThe better buy now\nGiven that Lucid and Rivian are young brands, positive reviews of their products are a sign they should be taken seriously. The main challenge for both companies is scaling production to meet customer demand and grow sales. Therefore, news that impacts either company's cash position is meaningful.\n\nLucid and Rivian are similar in that they both have negligible revenue, are years away from profitability, but have a ton of cash and exciting technology. Given Lucid's efficient battery pack, blending of executive luxury and a classic sports car, cost-saving decision not to build its own charging network, and its proven ability to deliver on its promises as a public company, Lucid is arguably the better buy now. However, investors could take a 50/50 split of Lucid and Rivian or invest in a basket of EV stocks to protect against an unforeseen catastrophic loss from any single company.\n\nShould you invest $1,000 in Lucid Group, Inc. right now?\nBefore you consider Lucid Group, Inc., you'll want to hear this.\n\nOur award-winning analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy right now... and Lucid Group, Inc. wasn't one of them.\n\nThe online investing service they've run for nearly two decades, Motley Fool Stock Advisor, has beaten the stock market by over 4X.* And right now, they think there are 10 stocks that are better buys.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":227,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":604588857,"gmtCreate":1639411779106,"gmtModify":1639412715903,"author":{"id":"3578973717832794","authorId":"3578973717832794","name":"RieslingHawk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a5390eacc9599c6447d4c42f983fcc76","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">$Apple(AAPL)$</a>&nbsp;market crashing this week, I am selling it all, can always buy back atlower price!!&nbsp;","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">$Apple(AAPL)$</a>&nbsp;market crashing this week, I am selling it all, can always buy back atlower price!!&nbsp;","text":"$Apple(AAPL)$ market crashing this week, I am selling it all, can always buy back atlower price!!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/604588857","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":401,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":608573533,"gmtCreate":1638767161877,"gmtModify":1638767161877,"author":{"id":"3578973717832794","authorId":"3578973717832794","name":"RieslingHawk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a5390eacc9599c6447d4c42f983fcc76","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"TSLA to the moon? Pffft","listText":"TSLA to the moon? Pffft","text":"TSLA to the moon? Pffft","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/608573533","repostId":"1105188334","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1105188334","pubTimestamp":1638760294,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1105188334?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-06 11:11","market":"us","language":"en","title":"How Elon Musk sold 10 million Tesla shares and increased his Tesla holdings","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1105188334","media":"CNN Business","summary":"New York (CNN Business)Tesla CEO Elon Musk sold a massive stake in his company over the past several","content":"<p>New York (CNN Business)Tesla CEO Elon Musk sold a massive stake in his company over the past several weeks. And yet he owns 564,000 more shares than he did at the start of the selling spree.</p>\n<p>An analysis of his filings shows Musk is not backing away from his holdings in Tesla, despite his promise to follow a poll he sent to his Twitter followers, who called on him to sell 10% of his stake. So far he's sold 10.1 million shares — about 7 million shares short of the goal.</p>\n<p>That's because at the same time he is selling shares, he's also exercising options to buy additional stock. And he's doing so at a bargain exercise price of $6.24 a share, well below 1% of Tesla (TSLA)'s current share price. Since Musk's Twitter poll on November 6, he has exercised options to buy 10.7 million shares of Tesla. To be clear, he would have done so with or without the poll — the options were due to expire by August of 2022 if he didn't exercise them.</p>\n<p>And Tesla is poised to award Musk even more options, pending its upcoming financial results. His stake in the company is the reason Musk is the richest person on the planet.</p>\n<h4>Taxes, not Twitter, main reason for sales</h4>\n<p>Whenever he exercises options, he becomes subject to a large income-tax hit because he received those options as his primary form of compensation.</p>\n<p>He owes about $5 billion in federal income taxes on the new shares he has purchased since November 8. He also will probably owe some amount of state taxes. Musk sold off Tesla stock specifically to cover that tax hit, according to the filings.</p>\n<p>Musk also plans to exercise additional options that are set to expire next year. He still has 12.2 million of those soon-to-expire options that he has not yet exercised.</p>\n<p>If past practice is any indication, he'll sell about 5.3 million of those newly acquired shares to cover his tax bill. But that will still leave him with nearly 7 million more shares than he has today.</p>\n<p>Musk is keeping most of the shares he's acquiring, rather than selling them all, as other executives have been known to do when exercising options, including Robyn Denholm, the chair of Tesla's board.</p>\n<p>Once he's done with these soon-to-expire options, Musk will have 22.9 million fewer options than he had at the start of this process. But he'll still have 50.7 million other options that will allow him to buy that many additional shares, albeit at a higher exercise price than options he is now purchasing. He's not likely to exercise them soon, as virtually none of those options will expire until January of 2028.</p>\n<h4>More options on their way</h4>\n<p>The number of options Musk holds is likely to grow significantly in the coming year.</p>\n<p>Musk's pay package was designed to give him 12 different blocks of options once the company hits certain financial performance and market value targets. With the company now worth $1 trillion, the market value targets are all already accomplished, so it's a matter of revenue and profit targets being hit.</p>\n<p>Tesla has already accounted for three additional blocks of 8.4 million options each going to Musk soon, for a total of 25.3 new options, more than making up for the ones he is in the process of exercising. Company filings state that it is \"probable\" that the needed financial targets will be achieved soon.</p>\n<p>Analysts agree. Musk could qualify for one block of 8.4 million options with the fourth-quarter results, and two more with first quarter 2022 results, according to Wall Street's consensus forecasts. And if analysts' estimates are correct, he could get an additional 8.4 million options in the second or third quarter of 2022, and yet another blog early in 2023.</p>\n<h4>Additional stock sales</h4>\n<p>Musk sold a block of 5.4 million Tesla shares that he had previous held in trust over the course of three days shortly after the completed his Twitter poll.</p>\n<p>Most of the shares sold in those transactions were probably ones he has held since the company's 2010 initial public offering. So almost all of the $5.8 billion he received for those sales were probably judged to be long-term capital gains, taxed at a lower 20% rate, not the higher tax rate he'll pay on the exercise of the options.</p>\n<p>To hit the target of selling 10% of the Tesla shares he owned as of the date of the poll, he might need to sell about 2 million more shares to cover the tax bill for his additional 12 million options.</p>\n<p>But even if he does that, with even more options due to come his way, he's still likely to have a bigger stake in Tesla than when he began this process.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>How Elon Musk sold 10 million Tesla shares and increased his Tesla holdings</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHow Elon Musk sold 10 million Tesla shares and increased his Tesla holdings\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-12-06 11:11 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://edition.cnn.com/2021/12/05/investing/elon-musk-tesla-stock-sales/index.html><strong>CNN Business</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>New York (CNN Business)Tesla CEO Elon Musk sold a massive stake in his company over the past several weeks. And yet he owns 564,000 more shares than he did at the start of the selling spree.\nAn ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/12/05/investing/elon-musk-tesla-stock-sales/index.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/12/05/investing/elon-musk-tesla-stock-sales/index.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1105188334","content_text":"New York (CNN Business)Tesla CEO Elon Musk sold a massive stake in his company over the past several weeks. And yet he owns 564,000 more shares than he did at the start of the selling spree.\nAn analysis of his filings shows Musk is not backing away from his holdings in Tesla, despite his promise to follow a poll he sent to his Twitter followers, who called on him to sell 10% of his stake. So far he's sold 10.1 million shares — about 7 million shares short of the goal.\nThat's because at the same time he is selling shares, he's also exercising options to buy additional stock. And he's doing so at a bargain exercise price of $6.24 a share, well below 1% of Tesla (TSLA)'s current share price. Since Musk's Twitter poll on November 6, he has exercised options to buy 10.7 million shares of Tesla. To be clear, he would have done so with or without the poll — the options were due to expire by August of 2022 if he didn't exercise them.\nAnd Tesla is poised to award Musk even more options, pending its upcoming financial results. His stake in the company is the reason Musk is the richest person on the planet.\nTaxes, not Twitter, main reason for sales\nWhenever he exercises options, he becomes subject to a large income-tax hit because he received those options as his primary form of compensation.\nHe owes about $5 billion in federal income taxes on the new shares he has purchased since November 8. He also will probably owe some amount of state taxes. Musk sold off Tesla stock specifically to cover that tax hit, according to the filings.\nMusk also plans to exercise additional options that are set to expire next year. He still has 12.2 million of those soon-to-expire options that he has not yet exercised.\nIf past practice is any indication, he'll sell about 5.3 million of those newly acquired shares to cover his tax bill. But that will still leave him with nearly 7 million more shares than he has today.\nMusk is keeping most of the shares he's acquiring, rather than selling them all, as other executives have been known to do when exercising options, including Robyn Denholm, the chair of Tesla's board.\nOnce he's done with these soon-to-expire options, Musk will have 22.9 million fewer options than he had at the start of this process. But he'll still have 50.7 million other options that will allow him to buy that many additional shares, albeit at a higher exercise price than options he is now purchasing. He's not likely to exercise them soon, as virtually none of those options will expire until January of 2028.\nMore options on their way\nThe number of options Musk holds is likely to grow significantly in the coming year.\nMusk's pay package was designed to give him 12 different blocks of options once the company hits certain financial performance and market value targets. With the company now worth $1 trillion, the market value targets are all already accomplished, so it's a matter of revenue and profit targets being hit.\nTesla has already accounted for three additional blocks of 8.4 million options each going to Musk soon, for a total of 25.3 new options, more than making up for the ones he is in the process of exercising. Company filings state that it is \"probable\" that the needed financial targets will be achieved soon.\nAnalysts agree. Musk could qualify for one block of 8.4 million options with the fourth-quarter results, and two more with first quarter 2022 results, according to Wall Street's consensus forecasts. And if analysts' estimates are correct, he could get an additional 8.4 million options in the second or third quarter of 2022, and yet another blog early in 2023.\nAdditional stock sales\nMusk sold a block of 5.4 million Tesla shares that he had previous held in trust over the course of three days shortly after the completed his Twitter poll.\nMost of the shares sold in those transactions were probably ones he has held since the company's 2010 initial public offering. So almost all of the $5.8 billion he received for those sales were probably judged to be long-term capital gains, taxed at a lower 20% rate, not the higher tax rate he'll pay on the exercise of the options.\nTo hit the target of selling 10% of the Tesla shares he owned as of the date of the poll, he might need to sell about 2 million more shares to cover the tax bill for his additional 12 million options.\nBut even if he does that, with even more options due to come his way, he's still likely to have a bigger stake in Tesla than when he began this process.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":104,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":608319400,"gmtCreate":1638623418633,"gmtModify":1638623418633,"author":{"id":"3578973717832794","authorId":"3578973717832794","name":"RieslingHawk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a5390eacc9599c6447d4c42f983fcc76","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Short On the 16th of Dec !!!","listText":"Short On the 16th of Dec !!!","text":"Short On the 16th of Dec !!!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/608319400","repostId":"2188057871","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2188057871","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1638580800,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2188057871?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-04 09:20","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Adobe worth $26 billion less as DocuSign fears spark 'knee-jerk reaction' for stock","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2188057871","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"Adobe stock was the worst performer in S&P 500 Friday, after e-signature rival suggested pandemic bo","content":"<p>Adobe stock was the worst performer in S&amp;P 500 Friday, after e-signature rival suggested pandemic boom was slowing down</p>\n<p>Shares of Adobe Inc. sank to their worst performance in more than 20 months Friday, after DocuSign Inc. delivered what some saw as a the latest sign of a demand cool-down for work-from-home software.</p>\n<p>DocuSign <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DOCU\">$(DOCU)$</a> Chief Executive Dan Springer acknowledged Thursday that while his electronic-signature company saw \"accelerated growth\" for six quarters amid the pandemic, customers have gone back to \"more normalized buying patterns.\" As a result, DocuSign delivered a downbeat bookings outlook, sending its shares cratering more than 40%.</p>\n<p>Some of that investor fear seemed to transfer over to Adobe <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ADBE\">$(ADBE)$</a>, which also offers contract-management software and allows for the collection of e-signatures. Adobe's stock fell 8.2% Friday, its steepest single-day percentage drop since March 2020 and the worst performance on the day from an S&amp;P 500 stock. The move wiped away $26.3 billion in market capitalization, taking Adobe's valuation lower than $300 billion.</p>\n<p>The decline in Adobe shares struck Wedbush analyst Daniel Ives as a \"DOCU-related selloff,\" he told MarketWatch, as DocuSign's report served as a \"a barometer that the WFH tailwinds are now abating and could be a headwind for Adobe.\"</p>\n<p>\"The DOCU print was a shocker and this is a knee-jerk reaction,\" he said.</p>\n<p>Adobe is due to post its own quarterly results Dec. 16. The company highlighted its e-signature technology in its prior earnings report, as Chief Financial Officer John Murphy noted that \"third-quarter Document Cloud growth drivers included adoption of Sign in Acrobat driven by the increased need to collaborate in a hybrid work environment.\"</p>\n<p>While other at-home stocks took a hit on disappointing outlooks earlier in the course of the pandemic, DocuSign initially appeared more resilient. Its stock hit an all-time high in September and was up 165% since March 2020 as of Thursday's close. Now the company will need to \"show that it can generate, not just fulfill, demand on a regular basis,\" according to an Evercore analyst.</p>\n<p>Adobe has a more diversified business than DocuSign. While the company sells contract-related software, it has a variety of other offerings including subscriptions to creative programs like Photoshop. Adobe's Document Cloud accounted for about 13% of the company's overall revenue in its last-reported quarter.</p>\n<p>Shares of Adobe were up 86% since March 2020 as of Thursday's close.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Adobe worth $26 billion less as DocuSign fears spark 'knee-jerk reaction' for stock</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAdobe worth $26 billion less as DocuSign fears spark 'knee-jerk reaction' for stock\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-12-04 09:20</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Adobe stock was the worst performer in S&amp;P 500 Friday, after e-signature rival suggested pandemic boom was slowing down</p>\n<p>Shares of Adobe Inc. sank to their worst performance in more than 20 months Friday, after DocuSign Inc. delivered what some saw as a the latest sign of a demand cool-down for work-from-home software.</p>\n<p>DocuSign <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DOCU\">$(DOCU)$</a> Chief Executive Dan Springer acknowledged Thursday that while his electronic-signature company saw \"accelerated growth\" for six quarters amid the pandemic, customers have gone back to \"more normalized buying patterns.\" As a result, DocuSign delivered a downbeat bookings outlook, sending its shares cratering more than 40%.</p>\n<p>Some of that investor fear seemed to transfer over to Adobe <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ADBE\">$(ADBE)$</a>, which also offers contract-management software and allows for the collection of e-signatures. Adobe's stock fell 8.2% Friday, its steepest single-day percentage drop since March 2020 and the worst performance on the day from an S&amp;P 500 stock. The move wiped away $26.3 billion in market capitalization, taking Adobe's valuation lower than $300 billion.</p>\n<p>The decline in Adobe shares struck Wedbush analyst Daniel Ives as a \"DOCU-related selloff,\" he told MarketWatch, as DocuSign's report served as a \"a barometer that the WFH tailwinds are now abating and could be a headwind for Adobe.\"</p>\n<p>\"The DOCU print was a shocker and this is a knee-jerk reaction,\" he said.</p>\n<p>Adobe is due to post its own quarterly results Dec. 16. The company highlighted its e-signature technology in its prior earnings report, as Chief Financial Officer John Murphy noted that \"third-quarter Document Cloud growth drivers included adoption of Sign in Acrobat driven by the increased need to collaborate in a hybrid work environment.\"</p>\n<p>While other at-home stocks took a hit on disappointing outlooks earlier in the course of the pandemic, DocuSign initially appeared more resilient. Its stock hit an all-time high in September and was up 165% since March 2020 as of Thursday's close. Now the company will need to \"show that it can generate, not just fulfill, demand on a regular basis,\" according to an Evercore analyst.</p>\n<p>Adobe has a more diversified business than DocuSign. While the company sells contract-related software, it has a variety of other offerings including subscriptions to creative programs like Photoshop. Adobe's Document Cloud accounted for about 13% of the company's overall revenue in its last-reported quarter.</p>\n<p>Shares of Adobe were up 86% since March 2020 as of Thursday's close.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"ADBE":"Adobe","BK4528":"SaaS概念","BK4023":"应用软件","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","BK4566":"资本集团","BK4554":"元宇宙及AR概念","BK4567":"ESG概念","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4527":"明星科技股","DOCU":"Docusign"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2188057871","content_text":"Adobe stock was the worst performer in S&P 500 Friday, after e-signature rival suggested pandemic boom was slowing down\nShares of Adobe Inc. sank to their worst performance in more than 20 months Friday, after DocuSign Inc. delivered what some saw as a the latest sign of a demand cool-down for work-from-home software.\nDocuSign $(DOCU)$ Chief Executive Dan Springer acknowledged Thursday that while his electronic-signature company saw \"accelerated growth\" for six quarters amid the pandemic, customers have gone back to \"more normalized buying patterns.\" As a result, DocuSign delivered a downbeat bookings outlook, sending its shares cratering more than 40%.\nSome of that investor fear seemed to transfer over to Adobe $(ADBE)$, which also offers contract-management software and allows for the collection of e-signatures. Adobe's stock fell 8.2% Friday, its steepest single-day percentage drop since March 2020 and the worst performance on the day from an S&P 500 stock. The move wiped away $26.3 billion in market capitalization, taking Adobe's valuation lower than $300 billion.\nThe decline in Adobe shares struck Wedbush analyst Daniel Ives as a \"DOCU-related selloff,\" he told MarketWatch, as DocuSign's report served as a \"a barometer that the WFH tailwinds are now abating and could be a headwind for Adobe.\"\n\"The DOCU print was a shocker and this is a knee-jerk reaction,\" he said.\nAdobe is due to post its own quarterly results Dec. 16. The company highlighted its e-signature technology in its prior earnings report, as Chief Financial Officer John Murphy noted that \"third-quarter Document Cloud growth drivers included adoption of Sign in Acrobat driven by the increased need to collaborate in a hybrid work environment.\"\nWhile other at-home stocks took a hit on disappointing outlooks earlier in the course of the pandemic, DocuSign initially appeared more resilient. Its stock hit an all-time high in September and was up 165% since March 2020 as of Thursday's close. Now the company will need to \"show that it can generate, not just fulfill, demand on a regular basis,\" according to an Evercore analyst.\nAdobe has a more diversified business than DocuSign. While the company sells contract-related software, it has a variety of other offerings including subscriptions to creative programs like Photoshop. Adobe's Document Cloud accounted for about 13% of the company's overall revenue in its last-reported quarter.\nShares of Adobe were up 86% since March 2020 as of Thursday's close.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":92,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":691818338,"gmtCreate":1640164122731,"gmtModify":1640164122836,"author":{"id":"3578973717832794","authorId":"3578973717832794","name":"RieslingHawk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a5390eacc9599c6447d4c42f983fcc76","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Siao liao lo","listText":"Siao liao lo","text":"Siao liao lo","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/691818338","repostId":"1148919660","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1148919660","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1640163718,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1148919660?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-22 17:01","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Alibaba shares fell 3.45% in premarket trading","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1148919660","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Alibaba shares fell 3.45% in premarket trading.Chinese regulators have suspended an information-sharing partnership with Alibaba Cloud Computing, a subsidiary of e-commerce conglomerate Alibaba Group, over accusations it failed to promptly report and address a cybersecurity vulnerability, according to state-backed media reports.","content":"<p>Alibaba&nbsp;shares&nbsp;fell&nbsp;3.45%&nbsp;in&nbsp;premarket&nbsp;trading.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2aca7dde9ba9b99094907e05817f461b\" tg-width=\"735\" tg-height=\"593\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">Chinese regulators have suspended an information-sharing partnership with Alibaba Cloud Computing, a subsidiary of e-commerce conglomerate Alibaba Group, over accusations it failed to promptly report and address a cybersecurity vulnerability, according to state-backed media reports.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Alibaba shares fell 3.45% in premarket trading</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAlibaba shares fell 3.45% in premarket trading\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-12-22 17:01</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Alibaba&nbsp;shares&nbsp;fell&nbsp;3.45%&nbsp;in&nbsp;premarket&nbsp;trading.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2aca7dde9ba9b99094907e05817f461b\" tg-width=\"735\" tg-height=\"593\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">Chinese regulators have suspended an information-sharing partnership with Alibaba Cloud Computing, a subsidiary of e-commerce conglomerate Alibaba Group, over accusations it failed to promptly report and address a cybersecurity vulnerability, according to state-backed media reports.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"09988":"阿里巴巴-SW","BABA":"阿里巴巴"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1148919660","content_text":"Alibaba shares fell 3.45% in premarket trading.Chinese regulators have suspended an information-sharing partnership with Alibaba Cloud Computing, a subsidiary of e-commerce conglomerate Alibaba Group, over accusations it failed to promptly report and address a cybersecurity vulnerability, according to state-backed media reports.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":755,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":607072113,"gmtCreate":1639466378782,"gmtModify":1639466544367,"author":{"id":"3578973717832794","authorId":"3578973717832794","name":"RieslingHawk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a5390eacc9599c6447d4c42f983fcc76","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Fake news hehe","listText":"Fake news hehe","text":"Fake news hehe","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/607072113","repostId":"1186687745","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1186687745","pubTimestamp":1639445704,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1186687745?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-14 09:35","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Stocks' Next Rally Could Be Coming Soon","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1186687745","media":"Barrons","summary":"Stocks appear to be almost through a difficult stretch brought on by news that the Federal Reserve i","content":"<p>Stocks appear to be almost through a difficult stretch brought on by news that the Federal Reserve is removing support from markets and the economy. History tells us that a sustained rally will likely begin soon.</p>\n<p>As of Dec. 1, the&nbsp;S&amp;P 500&nbsp;had fallen 4.1% from the record high it reached on Nov. 18, only to rebound 4.4% to a new closing high of 4712.02 on Friday. Monday, it&nbsp;slipped back, with a loss of 0.9%.</p>\n<p>The volatility centers on the Fed’s effort to fight inflation by moving away from the aggressive efforts to bolster growth it put in place as the pandemic ravaged the economy in 2020. Not only is the central bank already reducing its monthly bond purchases by tens of billions of dollars a month, but Chairman Jerome Powell recently indicated even more cuts are on the way. Within months, the Fed will be buying zero dollars in Treasury bonds, compared with $65 billion a month as recently as November.</p>\n<p>That could drag bond prices down, lifting their yields and making it more difficult for households and businesses to borrow money. Not only would that likely slow economic growth, but it also would mean less money will be flowing through financial markets, leaving less capital available to bid for stocks and other risky assets. And once the Fed has ended its bond-buying program, it will turn its attention to lifting short-term interest rates.</p>\n<p>But it is increasingly looking like the stock market has already factored in those moves. “The market began to discount eventual Fed tightening once supply chain effects became clearer this past spring, and as inflation compares began to accelerate,” Scott Chronert, global head of exchange-traded fund research at Citigroup, wrote in a research note Friday. “Selling the uncertainty ahead of a hawkish Fed change can often lead to buying on the alleviation of that uncertainty.”</p>\n<p>Buying activity will probably pick up within the next few months, given the market’s behavior in the past four cycles of interest-rate increases. Gains in the S&amp;P 500 from a year before an initial rate boost to six months afterward have averaged almost 15%, according to Credit Suisse data. From the same starting point to 12 months after an initial rate increase, the average gain is 18%.</p>\n<p>That doesn’t mean investors should blindly pour money into stocks: More volatility could be ahead. In the few months ahead of an initial rate increase, the market usually rises only minimally, according to Credit Suisse. Those few months are a time when investors tend to still be assessing the damage that tighter monetary policy could inflict on the economy.</p>\n<p>That’s especially true today. The bond market is already reflecting that the Fed could make a mistake, raising rates too many times, too quickly, abruptly choking off economic growth.</p>\n<p>The Fed isn’t used to trying to quell inflation. For the entire era since the 2008-2009 financial crisis era—and certainly during the pandemic-ravaged 2020—the Fed was trying to bring inflation higher by implementing loose monetary policy. Now, it is trying to keep inflation down, and investors are asking themselves whether it will damage economic demand in doing so.</p>\n<p>But one thing does seem like a solid bet. The rough waters in stocks are likely to be fairly temporary: The bull market can probably keep on chugging along—if the Fed doesn’t tighten policy too aggressively.</p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Stocks' Next Rally Could Be Coming Soon</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Stocks' Next Rally Could Be Coming Soon\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-12-14 09:35 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/stocks-rally-fed-tightening-taper-rate-hike-51639430005?mod=hp_LATEST><strong>Barrons</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Stocks appear to be almost through a difficult stretch brought on by news that the Federal Reserve is removing support from markets and the economy. History tells us that a sustained rally will likely...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/stocks-rally-fed-tightening-taper-rate-hike-51639430005?mod=hp_LATEST\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/stocks-rally-fed-tightening-taper-rate-hike-51639430005?mod=hp_LATEST","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1186687745","content_text":"Stocks appear to be almost through a difficult stretch brought on by news that the Federal Reserve is removing support from markets and the economy. History tells us that a sustained rally will likely begin soon.\nAs of Dec. 1, the S&P 500 had fallen 4.1% from the record high it reached on Nov. 18, only to rebound 4.4% to a new closing high of 4712.02 on Friday. Monday, it slipped back, with a loss of 0.9%.\nThe volatility centers on the Fed’s effort to fight inflation by moving away from the aggressive efforts to bolster growth it put in place as the pandemic ravaged the economy in 2020. Not only is the central bank already reducing its monthly bond purchases by tens of billions of dollars a month, but Chairman Jerome Powell recently indicated even more cuts are on the way. Within months, the Fed will be buying zero dollars in Treasury bonds, compared with $65 billion a month as recently as November.\nThat could drag bond prices down, lifting their yields and making it more difficult for households and businesses to borrow money. Not only would that likely slow economic growth, but it also would mean less money will be flowing through financial markets, leaving less capital available to bid for stocks and other risky assets. And once the Fed has ended its bond-buying program, it will turn its attention to lifting short-term interest rates.\nBut it is increasingly looking like the stock market has already factored in those moves. “The market began to discount eventual Fed tightening once supply chain effects became clearer this past spring, and as inflation compares began to accelerate,” Scott Chronert, global head of exchange-traded fund research at Citigroup, wrote in a research note Friday. “Selling the uncertainty ahead of a hawkish Fed change can often lead to buying on the alleviation of that uncertainty.”\nBuying activity will probably pick up within the next few months, given the market’s behavior in the past four cycles of interest-rate increases. Gains in the S&P 500 from a year before an initial rate boost to six months afterward have averaged almost 15%, according to Credit Suisse data. From the same starting point to 12 months after an initial rate increase, the average gain is 18%.\nThat doesn’t mean investors should blindly pour money into stocks: More volatility could be ahead. In the few months ahead of an initial rate increase, the market usually rises only minimally, according to Credit Suisse. Those few months are a time when investors tend to still be assessing the damage that tighter monetary policy could inflict on the economy.\nThat’s especially true today. The bond market is already reflecting that the Fed could make a mistake, raising rates too many times, too quickly, abruptly choking off economic growth.\nThe Fed isn’t used to trying to quell inflation. For the entire era since the 2008-2009 financial crisis era—and certainly during the pandemic-ravaged 2020—the Fed was trying to bring inflation higher by implementing loose monetary policy. Now, it is trying to keep inflation down, and investors are asking themselves whether it will damage economic demand in doing so.\nBut one thing does seem like a solid bet. The rough waters in stocks are likely to be fairly temporary: The bull market can probably keep on chugging along—if the Fed doesn’t tighten policy too aggressively.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":230,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":608504553,"gmtCreate":1638755097337,"gmtModify":1638757598537,"author":{"id":"3578973717832794","authorId":"3578973717832794","name":"RieslingHawk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a5390eacc9599c6447d4c42f983fcc76","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Buy the dipIt dips deeper","listText":"Buy the dipIt dips deeper","text":"Buy the dipIt dips deeper","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/608504553","repostId":"1107533977","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1107533977","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1638754268,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1107533977?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-06 09:31","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Li Auto shares fell more than 14% in Hong Kong and XPeng fell nearly 9%.","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1107533977","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Li Auto shares fell more than 14% in Hong Kong and XPeng fell nearly 9%.","content":"<p>Li&nbsp;Auto&nbsp;shares&nbsp;fell&nbsp;more&nbsp;than&nbsp;14%&nbsp;in&nbsp;Hong&nbsp;Kong&nbsp;and&nbsp;XPeng&nbsp;fell&nbsp;nearly&nbsp;9%.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f4c63a9e3fe26341f23934616826c6a2\" tg-width=\"747\" tg-height=\"603\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/12cd5c05e050cc41f92f4263ac49921a\" tg-width=\"710\" tg-height=\"606\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Li Auto shares fell more than 14% in Hong Kong and XPeng fell nearly 9%.</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nLi Auto shares fell more than 14% in Hong Kong and XPeng fell nearly 9%.\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-12-06 09:31</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Li&nbsp;Auto&nbsp;shares&nbsp;fell&nbsp;more&nbsp;than&nbsp;14%&nbsp;in&nbsp;Hong&nbsp;Kong&nbsp;and&nbsp;XPeng&nbsp;fell&nbsp;nearly&nbsp;9%.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f4c63a9e3fe26341f23934616826c6a2\" tg-width=\"747\" tg-height=\"603\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/12cd5c05e050cc41f92f4263ac49921a\" tg-width=\"710\" tg-height=\"606\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"09868":"小鹏汽车-W","XPEV":"小鹏汽车","LI":"理想汽车","02015":"理想汽车-W"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1107533977","content_text":"Li Auto shares fell more than 14% in Hong Kong and XPeng fell nearly 9%.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":80,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":603825029,"gmtCreate":1638400647466,"gmtModify":1638400647549,"author":{"id":"3578973717832794","authorId":"3578973717832794","name":"RieslingHawk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a5390eacc9599c6447d4c42f983fcc76","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SPY\">$SPY 20211203 457.5 PUT(SPY)$</a>&nbsp;Went to sleep down 50% poorer, but I woke up being up 475%....&nbsp;","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SPY\">$SPY 20211203 457.5 PUT(SPY)$</a>&nbsp;Went to sleep down 50% poorer, but I woke up being up 475%....&nbsp;","text":"$SPY 20211203 457.5 PUT(SPY)$ Went to sleep down 50% poorer, but I woke up being up 475%....","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/46a64880951631a0370f7daa2bf6206f","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/603825029","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":83,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":604743439,"gmtCreate":1639449726948,"gmtModify":1639451487457,"author":{"id":"3578973717832794","authorId":"3578973717832794","name":"RieslingHawk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a5390eacc9599c6447d4c42f983fcc76","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Stay away from the dip before your pocketdips","listText":"Stay away from the dip before your pocketdips","text":"Stay away from the dip before your pocketdips","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/604743439","repostId":"2191890219","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2191890219","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1639447890,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2191890219?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-14 10:11","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple closes in on $3 trillion market value","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2191890219","media":"Reuters","summary":"Dec 13 (Reuters) - Apple Inc's (AAPL.O) market value hovered just shy of the $3 trillion mark on Mon","content":"<p>Dec 13 (Reuters) - <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a> Inc's (AAPL.O) market value hovered just shy of the $3 trillion mark on Monday, following a stunning run over the past decade that has turned it into the world's most valuable company.</p>\n<p>The company’s shares fell just over 2% on Monday to close at $175.74, reversing earlier gains that saw them approach the $182.86 price needed to record a $3 trillion market value.</p>\n<p>Apple’s stock rose about 11% last week, extending its more than 30% year-to-date gain as investors remain confident that flush consumers will continue to pay top dollar for iPhones, MacBooks and services such as Apple TV and Apple Music.</p>\n<p>The iPhone maker's march from $2 trillion to near $3 trillion in market value took 16 months, as it led a group of megacap tech companies such as Google-parent <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOG\">Alphabet</a> Inc (GOOGL.O) and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">Amazon.com</a> Inc (AMZN.O) that benefited from people and businesses relying heavily on technology during the pandemic.</p>\n<p>By comparison, Apple's move from $1 trillion to $2 trillion took two years.</p>\n<p>\"It's now <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> of the more richly valued companies in the market, which shows the dominance of U.S. technology in the world and how confident investors are that it will remain in Apple’s hands,\" said Brian Frank, a portfolio manager at Frank Capital who sold his long-standing position in Apple in 2019 as the stock's valuation rose. \"It seems like the stock has priced in every possible good outcome.\"</p>\n<p>Among new revenue lines that investors expect are a possible Apple Car, alongside growth in service categories such as apps and TV that still remain well below the 65% of the company's revenues generated by sales of iPhones, said Daniel Morgan, senior portfolio manager at <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SNV\">Synovus</a> Trust Company.</p>\n<p>Eclipsing the $3 trillion milestone would add another feather in the cap for Chief Executive Tim Cook, who took over after Steve Jobs resigned in 2011, and oversaw the company's expansion into new products and markets.</p>\n<p>\"Tim Cook has done an amazing job over the past decade, taking Apple's share price up over 1,400%,\" OANDA analyst Edward Moya said.</p>\n<p>Apple shares have returned 22% per year since the 1990s, while the S&amp;P 500 (.SPX) has returned less than 9% annually in the same period.</p>\n<p>If Apple hits the $3 trillion milestone, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSFT\">Microsoft</a> Corp (MSFT.O) will be the only company in the $2 trillion club, while <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOGL\">Alphabet</a> (GOOGL.O), Amazon (AMZN.O) and Tesla Inc (TSLA.O) have crossed $1 trillion.</p>\n<p>Microsoft, which has a market value of roughly $2.6 trillion, was the world's most valuable company as recently as late October when Apple reported that supply chain constraints could weigh on its growth for the remainder of the year.</p>\n<p>Large technology stocks have rallied this year with investors tapping increasing demand for cloud-based products as companies shifted to a hybrid work model and consumers upgraded their devices. The <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NDAQ\">Nasdaq</a> 100 (.NDX), which is top-weighted by large companies such as Apple, is up nearly 26% this year, while the broader S&amp;P 500 index is up roughly 24%.</p>\n<p>The emergence of technologies such as 5G, augmented reality/virtual reality, and artificial intelligence may also help Apple and other cash-rich large technology stocks remain in favor with investors as the global economy puts the coronavirus pandemic behind it and supply chain pressures ease.</p>\n<p>\"I am in the camp that are experiencing another 'Super Cycle' with the iPhone12/iPhone 13 franchise,\" wrote Daniel Morgan, senior portfolio manager Synovus Trust Company, in a note. \"And that AAPL is lifting off to another string of quarters with strong revenue and profit growth.\"</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple closes in on $3 trillion market value</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple closes in on $3 trillion market value\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-12-14 10:11</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Dec 13 (Reuters) - <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a> Inc's (AAPL.O) market value hovered just shy of the $3 trillion mark on Monday, following a stunning run over the past decade that has turned it into the world's most valuable company.</p>\n<p>The company’s shares fell just over 2% on Monday to close at $175.74, reversing earlier gains that saw them approach the $182.86 price needed to record a $3 trillion market value.</p>\n<p>Apple’s stock rose about 11% last week, extending its more than 30% year-to-date gain as investors remain confident that flush consumers will continue to pay top dollar for iPhones, MacBooks and services such as Apple TV and Apple Music.</p>\n<p>The iPhone maker's march from $2 trillion to near $3 trillion in market value took 16 months, as it led a group of megacap tech companies such as Google-parent <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOG\">Alphabet</a> Inc (GOOGL.O) and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">Amazon.com</a> Inc (AMZN.O) that benefited from people and businesses relying heavily on technology during the pandemic.</p>\n<p>By comparison, Apple's move from $1 trillion to $2 trillion took two years.</p>\n<p>\"It's now <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> of the more richly valued companies in the market, which shows the dominance of U.S. technology in the world and how confident investors are that it will remain in Apple’s hands,\" said Brian Frank, a portfolio manager at Frank Capital who sold his long-standing position in Apple in 2019 as the stock's valuation rose. \"It seems like the stock has priced in every possible good outcome.\"</p>\n<p>Among new revenue lines that investors expect are a possible Apple Car, alongside growth in service categories such as apps and TV that still remain well below the 65% of the company's revenues generated by sales of iPhones, said Daniel Morgan, senior portfolio manager at <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SNV\">Synovus</a> Trust Company.</p>\n<p>Eclipsing the $3 trillion milestone would add another feather in the cap for Chief Executive Tim Cook, who took over after Steve Jobs resigned in 2011, and oversaw the company's expansion into new products and markets.</p>\n<p>\"Tim Cook has done an amazing job over the past decade, taking Apple's share price up over 1,400%,\" OANDA analyst Edward Moya said.</p>\n<p>Apple shares have returned 22% per year since the 1990s, while the S&amp;P 500 (.SPX) has returned less than 9% annually in the same period.</p>\n<p>If Apple hits the $3 trillion milestone, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSFT\">Microsoft</a> Corp (MSFT.O) will be the only company in the $2 trillion club, while <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOGL\">Alphabet</a> (GOOGL.O), Amazon (AMZN.O) and Tesla Inc (TSLA.O) have crossed $1 trillion.</p>\n<p>Microsoft, which has a market value of roughly $2.6 trillion, was the world's most valuable company as recently as late October when Apple reported that supply chain constraints could weigh on its growth for the remainder of the year.</p>\n<p>Large technology stocks have rallied this year with investors tapping increasing demand for cloud-based products as companies shifted to a hybrid work model and consumers upgraded their devices. The <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NDAQ\">Nasdaq</a> 100 (.NDX), which is top-weighted by large companies such as Apple, is up nearly 26% this year, while the broader S&amp;P 500 index is up roughly 24%.</p>\n<p>The emergence of technologies such as 5G, augmented reality/virtual reality, and artificial intelligence may also help Apple and other cash-rich large technology stocks remain in favor with investors as the global economy puts the coronavirus pandemic behind it and supply chain pressures ease.</p>\n<p>\"I am in the camp that are experiencing another 'Super Cycle' with the iPhone12/iPhone 13 franchise,\" wrote Daniel Morgan, senior portfolio manager Synovus Trust Company, in a note. \"And that AAPL is lifting off to another string of quarters with strong revenue and profit growth.\"</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4554":"元宇宙及AR概念","BK4532":"文艺复兴科技持仓","BK4515":"5G概念","BK4553":"喜马拉雅资本持仓","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4507":"流媒体概念","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","BK4525":"远程办公概念","BK4566":"资本集团","MSFT":"微软","BK4559":"巴菲特持仓","BK4527":"明星科技股","BK4538":"云计算","BK4501":"段永平概念","BK4077":"互动媒体与服务","GOOGL":"谷歌A","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","AMZN":"亚马逊","GOOG":"谷歌","BK4503":"景林资产持仓","BK4561":"索罗斯持仓","BK4505":"高瓴资本持仓","BK4548":"巴美列捷福持仓","AAPL":"苹果","BK4514":"搜索引擎","BK4170":"电脑硬件、储存设备及电脑周边"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2191890219","content_text":"Dec 13 (Reuters) - Apple Inc's (AAPL.O) market value hovered just shy of the $3 trillion mark on Monday, following a stunning run over the past decade that has turned it into the world's most valuable company.\nThe company’s shares fell just over 2% on Monday to close at $175.74, reversing earlier gains that saw them approach the $182.86 price needed to record a $3 trillion market value.\nApple’s stock rose about 11% last week, extending its more than 30% year-to-date gain as investors remain confident that flush consumers will continue to pay top dollar for iPhones, MacBooks and services such as Apple TV and Apple Music.\nThe iPhone maker's march from $2 trillion to near $3 trillion in market value took 16 months, as it led a group of megacap tech companies such as Google-parent Alphabet Inc (GOOGL.O) and Amazon.com Inc (AMZN.O) that benefited from people and businesses relying heavily on technology during the pandemic.\nBy comparison, Apple's move from $1 trillion to $2 trillion took two years.\n\"It's now one of the more richly valued companies in the market, which shows the dominance of U.S. technology in the world and how confident investors are that it will remain in Apple’s hands,\" said Brian Frank, a portfolio manager at Frank Capital who sold his long-standing position in Apple in 2019 as the stock's valuation rose. \"It seems like the stock has priced in every possible good outcome.\"\nAmong new revenue lines that investors expect are a possible Apple Car, alongside growth in service categories such as apps and TV that still remain well below the 65% of the company's revenues generated by sales of iPhones, said Daniel Morgan, senior portfolio manager at Synovus Trust Company.\nEclipsing the $3 trillion milestone would add another feather in the cap for Chief Executive Tim Cook, who took over after Steve Jobs resigned in 2011, and oversaw the company's expansion into new products and markets.\n\"Tim Cook has done an amazing job over the past decade, taking Apple's share price up over 1,400%,\" OANDA analyst Edward Moya said.\nApple shares have returned 22% per year since the 1990s, while the S&P 500 (.SPX) has returned less than 9% annually in the same period.\nIf Apple hits the $3 trillion milestone, Microsoft Corp (MSFT.O) will be the only company in the $2 trillion club, while Alphabet (GOOGL.O), Amazon (AMZN.O) and Tesla Inc (TSLA.O) have crossed $1 trillion.\nMicrosoft, which has a market value of roughly $2.6 trillion, was the world's most valuable company as recently as late October when Apple reported that supply chain constraints could weigh on its growth for the remainder of the year.\nLarge technology stocks have rallied this year with investors tapping increasing demand for cloud-based products as companies shifted to a hybrid work model and consumers upgraded their devices. The Nasdaq 100 (.NDX), which is top-weighted by large companies such as Apple, is up nearly 26% this year, while the broader S&P 500 index is up roughly 24%.\nThe emergence of technologies such as 5G, augmented reality/virtual reality, and artificial intelligence may also help Apple and other cash-rich large technology stocks remain in favor with investors as the global economy puts the coronavirus pandemic behind it and supply chain pressures ease.\n\"I am in the camp that are experiencing another 'Super Cycle' with the iPhone12/iPhone 13 franchise,\" wrote Daniel Morgan, senior portfolio manager Synovus Trust Company, in a note. \"And that AAPL is lifting off to another string of quarters with strong revenue and profit growth.\"","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":277,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":605687763,"gmtCreate":1639152640951,"gmtModify":1639155879191,"author":{"id":"3578973717832794","authorId":"3578973717832794","name":"RieslingHawk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a5390eacc9599c6447d4c42f983fcc76","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Fed fund rates to 20% will see stock market plunging to hell, looking forward to that&nbsp;","listText":"Fed fund rates to 20% will see stock market plunging to hell, looking forward to that&nbsp;","text":"Fed fund rates to 20% will see stock market plunging to hell, looking forward to that","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/605687763","repostId":"1173696854","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1173696854","pubTimestamp":1639100666,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1173696854?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-10 09:44","market":"us","language":"en","title":"The next recession: Here’s when the ‘everything bubble’ will burst","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1173696854","media":"Fortune","summary":"In October 20XX. That’s not a typo. To reach the best guesstimate of when the next recession will be","content":"<p>In October 20XX. That’s not a typo. To reach the best guesstimate of when the next recession will begin, we need to understand how the Federal Reserve creates unsustainable booms and why the next bust may be just around the corner.</p>\n<p>A caveat is in order. As physicist Niels Bohr exclaimed, “Prediction is very difficult, especially if it’s about the future.” Nevertheless, I will weigh in fearlessly with my 10 cents. The Fed’s inflationary policies have increased my two cents fivefold. Maybe the next cryptocurrency is on the horizon: My 10 Cents.</p>\n<p>If a dog can have a crypto, why can’t a retired finance professor who&nbsp;warned the public&nbsp;that prices were about to accelerate due to the Fed’s inflationary policies in the spring of 1976 have one?</p>\n<p>Consumerprices rose5.7% in 1976, 6.5% in 1977, 7.6% in 1978, 11.3% in 1979 and 13.5% in 1980. Talk about being right on the money!</p>\n<p>As inflation was galloping throughout his presidency, then President Jimmy Carter appointed Paul Volcker, a former banker and U.S. Treasury official, in 1979 to halt the multiyear price spiral. Volcker succeeded spectacularly. Consumer prices rose 10.3% in 1981, revealing how inflation momentum can continue for a while before the Fed’s tight money policies slay the inflation dragon. In 1982, prices rose 6.1%, 3.2% in 1983, and (miracle of miracles) only 1.9% in 1986, a year before Volcker stepped down as Fed chairman and was replaced by Alan Greenspan.</p>\n<p>To accomplish what was considered at the time improbable due to high inflation expectations, the Volcker-led Fed&nbsp;raised the Fed Funds Rate–the rate banks borrow from each other for overnight loans–to 22% by December 1980. The cost of Volcker’s tight monetary policies necessary to halt the dollar’s slide was back-to-back recessions: a short downturn 1980 and then another one, 1981-1982. A case can be made that one long recession occurred that in effect lasted three years, from January 1980 to November 1982.</p>\n<p><b>Pinpointing the moment</b></p>\n<p>One of the best leading indicators of a cyclical downturn is the unemployment rate, which reached a cyclical bottom in May 1979 (5.6%) several months before the 1980 recession and didn’t peak until November 1982 (10.8%). The unemployment rate declined until the next upturn in layoffs began to accelerate in 1990.</p>\n<p>Currently,<b>the unemployment rate</b>&nbsp;has been declining from the lockdown peak of early 2020 and has reached levels that historically have signaled the beginning of the end of a cyclical boom. Lockdowns have undoubtedly distorted the unemployment rate, but the&nbsp;historical pattern&nbsp;reveals that when the unemployment rate nears three percent and then turns up, a recession will soon begin.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/746377b702eacfdfaa019222f8161b85\" tg-width=\"705\" tg-height=\"272\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>\n<p><b>The yield curve</b>&nbsp;is one of the most widely followed financial indicators that portend a recession usually within a year. The yield curve reveals the relationship between short-term and long-term interest rates. Typically, the yield curve is upward sloping, like today, when short-term rates are below long-term rates, reflecting a substantial amount of liquidity in the financial markets.</p>\n<p>When the Fed becomes concerned that the economy is “overheating,” it tends to raise the Fed Funds Rate to cool down price inflation, which occurred prior to the bursting of both the 2000 dotcom bubble and the 2007 housing bubble. The yield curve was&nbsp;virtually inverted&nbsp;at the end of 2019, suggesting that a recession would begin sometime in 2020. However, the lockdowns in response to COVID-19 caused an economic downturn in early 2020, not a typical cyclical recession.</p>\n<p>Now the economy is in another cyclical upswing because the Federal Reservein&nbsp;jected $4 trillion&nbsp;of liquidity to “simulate” the economy. At the most recent meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC), it was decided to reduce monthly purchases from $120 billion to $105 billion. In other words, the Fed will continue to have its foot on the monetary pedal even as the inflation rate recently topped 6% year over year. In the past accelerating inflation would set off alarm bells at the Fed to raise interest rates to dampen inflationary pressure and expectations. Currently, the thinking at the Fed is that price inflation is “transitory” and therefore monetary policy does not have to be tightened.</p>\n<p>My fearless forecast, therefore, is: Inflation accelerates in 2022. Then, the public outcry over skyrocketing prices and the media reports highlighting how prices are decimating the average family’s purchasing power may cause the Biden administration to impose wage-price controls as President Nixon did in 1971 to take the sting out of inflation before his 1972 reelection campaign. Biden could use an executive order if Congress doesn’t give him statutory authority to impose price controls.</p>\n<p>Without price controls, I expect the Fed to raise the Fed Funds Rate, sometime in 2022 and to continue tightening in 2023. Thus, the next recession could begin in the fall of 2023, but no later than a year later. If the recession does not begin on schedule, it only means it has been postponed, not eliminated.</p>","source":"lsy1612507957220","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>The next recession: Here’s when the ‘everything bubble’ will burst</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThe next recession: Here’s when the ‘everything bubble’ will burst\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-12-10 09:44 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/next-recession-everything-bubble-burst-120100109.html><strong>Fortune</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>In October 20XX. That’s not a typo. To reach the best guesstimate of when the next recession will begin, we need to understand how the Federal Reserve creates unsustainable booms and why the next bust...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/next-recession-everything-bubble-burst-120100109.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/next-recession-everything-bubble-burst-120100109.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1173696854","content_text":"In October 20XX. That’s not a typo. To reach the best guesstimate of when the next recession will begin, we need to understand how the Federal Reserve creates unsustainable booms and why the next bust may be just around the corner.\nA caveat is in order. As physicist Niels Bohr exclaimed, “Prediction is very difficult, especially if it’s about the future.” Nevertheless, I will weigh in fearlessly with my 10 cents. The Fed’s inflationary policies have increased my two cents fivefold. Maybe the next cryptocurrency is on the horizon: My 10 Cents.\nIf a dog can have a crypto, why can’t a retired finance professor who warned the public that prices were about to accelerate due to the Fed’s inflationary policies in the spring of 1976 have one?\nConsumerprices rose5.7% in 1976, 6.5% in 1977, 7.6% in 1978, 11.3% in 1979 and 13.5% in 1980. Talk about being right on the money!\nAs inflation was galloping throughout his presidency, then President Jimmy Carter appointed Paul Volcker, a former banker and U.S. Treasury official, in 1979 to halt the multiyear price spiral. Volcker succeeded spectacularly. Consumer prices rose 10.3% in 1981, revealing how inflation momentum can continue for a while before the Fed’s tight money policies slay the inflation dragon. In 1982, prices rose 6.1%, 3.2% in 1983, and (miracle of miracles) only 1.9% in 1986, a year before Volcker stepped down as Fed chairman and was replaced by Alan Greenspan.\nTo accomplish what was considered at the time improbable due to high inflation expectations, the Volcker-led Fed raised the Fed Funds Rate–the rate banks borrow from each other for overnight loans–to 22% by December 1980. The cost of Volcker’s tight monetary policies necessary to halt the dollar’s slide was back-to-back recessions: a short downturn 1980 and then another one, 1981-1982. A case can be made that one long recession occurred that in effect lasted three years, from January 1980 to November 1982.\nPinpointing the moment\nOne of the best leading indicators of a cyclical downturn is the unemployment rate, which reached a cyclical bottom in May 1979 (5.6%) several months before the 1980 recession and didn’t peak until November 1982 (10.8%). The unemployment rate declined until the next upturn in layoffs began to accelerate in 1990.\nCurrently,the unemployment rate has been declining from the lockdown peak of early 2020 and has reached levels that historically have signaled the beginning of the end of a cyclical boom. Lockdowns have undoubtedly distorted the unemployment rate, but the historical pattern reveals that when the unemployment rate nears three percent and then turns up, a recession will soon begin.\n\nThe yield curve is one of the most widely followed financial indicators that portend a recession usually within a year. The yield curve reveals the relationship between short-term and long-term interest rates. Typically, the yield curve is upward sloping, like today, when short-term rates are below long-term rates, reflecting a substantial amount of liquidity in the financial markets.\nWhen the Fed becomes concerned that the economy is “overheating,” it tends to raise the Fed Funds Rate to cool down price inflation, which occurred prior to the bursting of both the 2000 dotcom bubble and the 2007 housing bubble. The yield curve was virtually inverted at the end of 2019, suggesting that a recession would begin sometime in 2020. However, the lockdowns in response to COVID-19 caused an economic downturn in early 2020, not a typical cyclical recession.\nNow the economy is in another cyclical upswing because the Federal Reservein jected $4 trillion of liquidity to “simulate” the economy. At the most recent meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC), it was decided to reduce monthly purchases from $120 billion to $105 billion. In other words, the Fed will continue to have its foot on the monetary pedal even as the inflation rate recently topped 6% year over year. In the past accelerating inflation would set off alarm bells at the Fed to raise interest rates to dampen inflationary pressure and expectations. Currently, the thinking at the Fed is that price inflation is “transitory” and therefore monetary policy does not have to be tightened.\nMy fearless forecast, therefore, is: Inflation accelerates in 2022. Then, the public outcry over skyrocketing prices and the media reports highlighting how prices are decimating the average family’s purchasing power may cause the Biden administration to impose wage-price controls as President Nixon did in 1971 to take the sting out of inflation before his 1972 reelection campaign. Biden could use an executive order if Congress doesn’t give him statutory authority to impose price controls.\nWithout price controls, I expect the Fed to raise the Fed Funds Rate, sometime in 2022 and to continue tightening in 2023. Thus, the next recession could begin in the fall of 2023, but no later than a year later. If the recession does not begin on schedule, it only means it has been postponed, not eliminated.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":91,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":603760938,"gmtCreate":1638453743350,"gmtModify":1638455887599,"author":{"id":"3578973717832794","authorId":"3578973717832794","name":"RieslingHawk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a5390eacc9599c6447d4c42f983fcc76","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"In 2 week's time, we will see if Fed decidesto accelerate rate hikes, we will see morebloodshed. TP SPX 4150 by 17th Dec","listText":"In 2 week's time, we will see if Fed decidesto accelerate rate hikes, we will see morebloodshed. TP SPX 4150 by 17th Dec","text":"In 2 week's time, we will see if Fed decidesto accelerate rate hikes, we will see morebloodshed. TP SPX 4150 by 17th Dec","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/603760938","repostId":"1139890977","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1139890977","pubTimestamp":1638426308,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1139890977?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-02 14:25","market":"us","language":"en","title":"U.S. Stocks’ Wall of Worry Rises Far Beyond the Omicron Variant","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1139890977","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"Fed rate path, inflation, valuations may all be playing a role\nStock declines are much broader than ","content":"<ul>\n <li>Fed rate path, inflation, valuations may all be playing a role</li>\n <li>Stock declines are much broader than from delta pullback</li>\n</ul>\n<p>Investors are worrying about a lot more than just the omicron variant, if recent market moves are anything to go by.</p>\n<p>While the newly discovered virus strain has been one of the main catalysts for the recent slump in U.S. stocks, action under the surface points to concerns about the Federal Reserve, inflation, valuations, year-end volatility and perhaps even some some profit-taking after a solid year of gains.</p>\n<p>The selloff is the broadest since the worst pandemic fears last year, at least according to a&nbsp;gauget&nbsp;racking shares hitting 52-week lows relative to those at highs.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0ef9e660ce9da97a30717aa4eda6016f\" tg-width=\"1200\" tg-height=\"675\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>\n<p>“Both Covid headlines and the perception that the Fed will tighten in the face of a negative shock to the economy are weighing on equities,” said Peter Berezin of BCA Research.</p>\n<p><b>Delta Blues</b></p>\n<p>When the delta variant was emerging as a concern, investors rotated to stay-at-home and defensive growth stocks, and away from reopening shares.</p>\n<p>This time around, a wider swath of the market has suffered -- including technology names that should benefit from further restrictions such as&nbsp;Zoom Video Communications Inc.&nbsp;and&nbsp;Netflix Inc.</p>\n<p>The Nasdaq 100 Index -- which rose 14% during the ‘peak’ delta months of June, July and August -- has fallen 3% since Thanksgiving, when omicron first hit the attention of traders.</p>\n<p>The weakness is especially noticeable as bond yields are falling, a move which usually helps investors justify high-priced valuations for growth stocks though also a signal of concern over the outlook for the economy.</p>\n<p>“The problem is U.S. equity valuations, which have been priced for perfection and now confront a noticeably less-perfect world,” said Nicholas Colas, co-founder of DataTrek Research. “We won’t know much about the latest pandemic variant for a few weeks, and 10-year Treasuries are flashing yellow about future economic growth.”</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d3a39510347b6a47d23a40a72ddb9b9f\" tg-width=\"1200\" tg-height=\"675\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>\n<p>Investor concern over inflation is still prevalent, especially the worry it will force the Fed to jack up rates sooner-than-expected, putting the pandemic recovery under threat.</p>\n<p>Jerome Powell told Congress this week the Fed will consider ending its asset purchases earlier than planned, tapering the stimulus that has helped fuel this year’s record stock rally.</p>\n<p>“The real issue is the fear of liquidity coming out of the system, not so much the variant,” Alicia Levine, head of equities and capital markets advisory at BNY Mellon Wealth Management, said on Bloomberg Television. Liquidity “has really driven markets for the last 20 months and has made everybody a genius and everybody a winner. Now it’s going to get a little bit more complicated.”</p>\n<p><b>Seasonal Swings</b></p>\n<p>The sharp selloff has blindsided investors contemplating the chances of a year-end rally to cap a stellar 2021 for stocks. The S&amp;P 500 closed at an all-time high on Nov. 18, up almost 27% for the year. It has fallen about 4% since.</p>\n<p>The last month of the year traditionally sees investors dialing back risk and an increase in price swings as trading volumes dry up. Over the last decade, the Cboe Volatility Index has jumped by 12% on average in December.</p>\n<p>“Stock investors’ knee-jerk reaction may continue to be to take profits before the end of the year,” said Ed Yardeni, president of Yardeni Research. “The Santa Claus rally started early this year. The question is whether it is over already.”</p>","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>U.S. Stocks’ Wall of Worry Rises Far Beyond the Omicron Variant</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nU.S. Stocks’ Wall of Worry Rises Far Beyond the Omicron Variant\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-12-02 14:25 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-12-02/u-s-stocks-wall-of-worry-rises-far-beyond-the-omicron-variant><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Fed rate path, inflation, valuations may all be playing a role\nStock declines are much broader than from delta pullback\n\nInvestors are worrying about a lot more than just the omicron variant, if ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-12-02/u-s-stocks-wall-of-worry-rises-far-beyond-the-omicron-variant\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-12-02/u-s-stocks-wall-of-worry-rises-far-beyond-the-omicron-variant","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1139890977","content_text":"Fed rate path, inflation, valuations may all be playing a role\nStock declines are much broader than from delta pullback\n\nInvestors are worrying about a lot more than just the omicron variant, if recent market moves are anything to go by.\nWhile the newly discovered virus strain has been one of the main catalysts for the recent slump in U.S. stocks, action under the surface points to concerns about the Federal Reserve, inflation, valuations, year-end volatility and perhaps even some some profit-taking after a solid year of gains.\nThe selloff is the broadest since the worst pandemic fears last year, at least according to a gauget racking shares hitting 52-week lows relative to those at highs.\n\n“Both Covid headlines and the perception that the Fed will tighten in the face of a negative shock to the economy are weighing on equities,” said Peter Berezin of BCA Research.\nDelta Blues\nWhen the delta variant was emerging as a concern, investors rotated to stay-at-home and defensive growth stocks, and away from reopening shares.\nThis time around, a wider swath of the market has suffered -- including technology names that should benefit from further restrictions such as Zoom Video Communications Inc. and Netflix Inc.\nThe Nasdaq 100 Index -- which rose 14% during the ‘peak’ delta months of June, July and August -- has fallen 3% since Thanksgiving, when omicron first hit the attention of traders.\nThe weakness is especially noticeable as bond yields are falling, a move which usually helps investors justify high-priced valuations for growth stocks though also a signal of concern over the outlook for the economy.\n“The problem is U.S. equity valuations, which have been priced for perfection and now confront a noticeably less-perfect world,” said Nicholas Colas, co-founder of DataTrek Research. “We won’t know much about the latest pandemic variant for a few weeks, and 10-year Treasuries are flashing yellow about future economic growth.”\n\nInvestor concern over inflation is still prevalent, especially the worry it will force the Fed to jack up rates sooner-than-expected, putting the pandemic recovery under threat.\nJerome Powell told Congress this week the Fed will consider ending its asset purchases earlier than planned, tapering the stimulus that has helped fuel this year’s record stock rally.\n“The real issue is the fear of liquidity coming out of the system, not so much the variant,” Alicia Levine, head of equities and capital markets advisory at BNY Mellon Wealth Management, said on Bloomberg Television. Liquidity “has really driven markets for the last 20 months and has made everybody a genius and everybody a winner. Now it’s going to get a little bit more complicated.”\nSeasonal Swings\nThe sharp selloff has blindsided investors contemplating the chances of a year-end rally to cap a stellar 2021 for stocks. The S&P 500 closed at an all-time high on Nov. 18, up almost 27% for the year. It has fallen about 4% since.\nThe last month of the year traditionally sees investors dialing back risk and an increase in price swings as trading volumes dry up. Over the last decade, the Cboe Volatility Index has jumped by 12% on average in December.\n“Stock investors’ knee-jerk reaction may continue to be to take profits before the end of the year,” said Ed Yardeni, president of Yardeni Research. “The Santa Claus rally started early this year. The question is whether it is over already.”","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":42,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":603404605,"gmtCreate":1638436227189,"gmtModify":1638436227260,"author":{"id":"3578973717832794","authorId":"3578973717832794","name":"RieslingHawk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a5390eacc9599c6447d4c42f983fcc76","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Apple gonna weaken...&nbsp;","listText":"Apple gonna weaken...&nbsp;","text":"Apple gonna weaken...","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/603404605","repostId":"1184715609","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1184715609","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1638435754,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1184715609?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-02 17:02","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple stock slid more than 1% in premarket trading","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1184715609","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Apple stock slid more than 1% in premarket trading as the company told suppliers iPhone demand had s","content":"<p>Apple stock slid more&nbsp;than&nbsp;1% in premarket trading&nbsp;as&nbsp;the&nbsp;company&nbsp;told suppliers iPhone demand had slowed as holidays near.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4998e48aaef0f93a3524641e871e1368\" tg-width=\"853\" tg-height=\"618\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>\n<p>Apple Inc., suffering from a global supply crunch, is now confronting a different problem: slowing demand.</p>\n<p>The company has told its component suppliers that demand for the iPhone 13 lineup has weakened, people familiar with the matter said, signaling that some consumers have decided against trying to get the hard-to-find item.</p>\n<p>Already, Apple&nbsp;had cut&nbsp;its iPhone 13 production goal for this year by as many as 10 million units, down from a target of 90 million, because of a lack of parts, Bloomberg News reported. But the hope was to make up much of that shortfall next year -- when supply is expected to improve. The company is now informing its vendors that those orders may not materialize, according to the people, who asked not to be identified because the discussions are private.</p>\n<p>The company is still on track for a record holiday season, with analysts projecting a sales increase of 6% to $117.9 billion in the final three months of the calendar year. But it won’t be the blockbuster quarter that Apple -- and Wall Street -- had originally envisioned. Shortages and delivery delays have frustrated many consumers. And with inflation and the omicron variant bringing fresh concerns to pandemic-weary shoppers, they may forego some purchases.</p>\n<p>That could mean skipping the iPhone 13 altogether and waiting to upgrade next year, when its successor comes out. The current lineup, which starts at $799 for the standard model and $999 for the Pro, is considered a modest update from the iPhone 12, which had a whole new design. Bigger changes are expected for the 2022 model, giving some shoppers a reason to wait.</p>\n<p>Apple, based in Cupertino, California, declined to comment.</p>\n<p>Apple suppliers across Asia extended their declines after Bloomberg’s report. In South Korea,LG Innotek Co.&nbsp;slid 11%, while Hong Kong-listed AAC Technologies Holdings Inc. fell as much as 4.8% and Japan’s&nbsp;TDK Corp. dropped as much as 4.8%.</p>\n<p>The iPhone is Apple’s flagship product, accounting for about half of its $365.8 billion in revenue during the last fiscal year, and rolling out upgrades is a delicate dance. With the iPhone 13, Apple and wireless carriers unleashed aggressive rebate programs to spur purchases. In some cases, owners of an iPhone 12 or earlier models were able to buy an iPhone 13 at little to no cost. While discount programs are still available, some offer less dramatic savings than when new models first went on sale.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/473a40069576053da8e3b091905ed20d\" tg-width=\"959\" tg-height=\"419\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>During Apple’s last earnings call in October, Chief Executive Officer Tim Cook said that demand for new products was “very robust” -- fueled by interest in the latest iPhones, iPads and other devices -- and that the company was on track for a record holiday quarter. It had sales of $111.4 billion in the year-earlier period.</p>\n<p>He pointed to supply constraints as the company’s biggest challenge. Cook predicted that the struggle to get enough components, particularly chips, would cost Apple more than $6 billion in revenue during the holiday quarter.</p>\n<p>The constraints have hurt Apple partners as well. Sales for the company’s main chip supplier,Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., weakened recently, with October revenue falling 12% from the previous month to NT$134.5 billion ($4.8 billion).</p>\n<p>Last month, Apple’s main iPhone assembler,Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., predicted that its business willshrinkthis quarter from a year earlier -- caused by declines in consumer electronics and computing -- as it continues to suffer from the chip shortage. On Oct. 24,IQE Plc&nbsp;saw its shares fall 24% after it&nbsp;warned of&nbsp;softening smartphone demand, although the semiconductor company didn’t name any particular customer.</p>\n<p>And there’s now more strain on shoppers’ pocketbooks. U.S. consumer prices&nbsp;rose&nbsp;last month at the fastest annual pace since 1990. Surging&nbsp;costs&nbsp;for food, gas and housing are eroding purchasing power despite stronger wage growth.</p>\n<p>Meanwhile, the iPhone 13 isn’t as hard to get as it once was. Apple shoppers in the U.S. had been waiting about a month for the much-prized Pro model to be delivered. Now wait times are down to two weeks or less.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple stock slid more than 1% in premarket trading</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple stock slid more than 1% in premarket trading\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-12-02 17:02</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Apple stock slid more&nbsp;than&nbsp;1% in premarket trading&nbsp;as&nbsp;the&nbsp;company&nbsp;told suppliers iPhone demand had slowed as holidays near.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4998e48aaef0f93a3524641e871e1368\" tg-width=\"853\" tg-height=\"618\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>\n<p>Apple Inc., suffering from a global supply crunch, is now confronting a different problem: slowing demand.</p>\n<p>The company has told its component suppliers that demand for the iPhone 13 lineup has weakened, people familiar with the matter said, signaling that some consumers have decided against trying to get the hard-to-find item.</p>\n<p>Already, Apple&nbsp;had cut&nbsp;its iPhone 13 production goal for this year by as many as 10 million units, down from a target of 90 million, because of a lack of parts, Bloomberg News reported. But the hope was to make up much of that shortfall next year -- when supply is expected to improve. The company is now informing its vendors that those orders may not materialize, according to the people, who asked not to be identified because the discussions are private.</p>\n<p>The company is still on track for a record holiday season, with analysts projecting a sales increase of 6% to $117.9 billion in the final three months of the calendar year. But it won’t be the blockbuster quarter that Apple -- and Wall Street -- had originally envisioned. Shortages and delivery delays have frustrated many consumers. And with inflation and the omicron variant bringing fresh concerns to pandemic-weary shoppers, they may forego some purchases.</p>\n<p>That could mean skipping the iPhone 13 altogether and waiting to upgrade next year, when its successor comes out. The current lineup, which starts at $799 for the standard model and $999 for the Pro, is considered a modest update from the iPhone 12, which had a whole new design. Bigger changes are expected for the 2022 model, giving some shoppers a reason to wait.</p>\n<p>Apple, based in Cupertino, California, declined to comment.</p>\n<p>Apple suppliers across Asia extended their declines after Bloomberg’s report. In South Korea,LG Innotek Co.&nbsp;slid 11%, while Hong Kong-listed AAC Technologies Holdings Inc. fell as much as 4.8% and Japan’s&nbsp;TDK Corp. dropped as much as 4.8%.</p>\n<p>The iPhone is Apple’s flagship product, accounting for about half of its $365.8 billion in revenue during the last fiscal year, and rolling out upgrades is a delicate dance. With the iPhone 13, Apple and wireless carriers unleashed aggressive rebate programs to spur purchases. In some cases, owners of an iPhone 12 or earlier models were able to buy an iPhone 13 at little to no cost. While discount programs are still available, some offer less dramatic savings than when new models first went on sale.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/473a40069576053da8e3b091905ed20d\" tg-width=\"959\" tg-height=\"419\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>During Apple’s last earnings call in October, Chief Executive Officer Tim Cook said that demand for new products was “very robust” -- fueled by interest in the latest iPhones, iPads and other devices -- and that the company was on track for a record holiday quarter. It had sales of $111.4 billion in the year-earlier period.</p>\n<p>He pointed to supply constraints as the company’s biggest challenge. Cook predicted that the struggle to get enough components, particularly chips, would cost Apple more than $6 billion in revenue during the holiday quarter.</p>\n<p>The constraints have hurt Apple partners as well. Sales for the company’s main chip supplier,Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., weakened recently, with October revenue falling 12% from the previous month to NT$134.5 billion ($4.8 billion).</p>\n<p>Last month, Apple’s main iPhone assembler,Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., predicted that its business willshrinkthis quarter from a year earlier -- caused by declines in consumer electronics and computing -- as it continues to suffer from the chip shortage. On Oct. 24,IQE Plc&nbsp;saw its shares fall 24% after it&nbsp;warned of&nbsp;softening smartphone demand, although the semiconductor company didn’t name any particular customer.</p>\n<p>And there’s now more strain on shoppers’ pocketbooks. U.S. consumer prices&nbsp;rose&nbsp;last month at the fastest annual pace since 1990. Surging&nbsp;costs&nbsp;for food, gas and housing are eroding purchasing power despite stronger wage growth.</p>\n<p>Meanwhile, the iPhone 13 isn’t as hard to get as it once was. Apple shoppers in the U.S. had been waiting about a month for the much-prized Pro model to be delivered. Now wait times are down to two weeks or less.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1184715609","content_text":"Apple stock slid more than 1% in premarket trading as the company told suppliers iPhone demand had slowed as holidays near.\n\nApple Inc., suffering from a global supply crunch, is now confronting a different problem: slowing demand.\nThe company has told its component suppliers that demand for the iPhone 13 lineup has weakened, people familiar with the matter said, signaling that some consumers have decided against trying to get the hard-to-find item.\nAlready, Apple had cut its iPhone 13 production goal for this year by as many as 10 million units, down from a target of 90 million, because of a lack of parts, Bloomberg News reported. But the hope was to make up much of that shortfall next year -- when supply is expected to improve. The company is now informing its vendors that those orders may not materialize, according to the people, who asked not to be identified because the discussions are private.\nThe company is still on track for a record holiday season, with analysts projecting a sales increase of 6% to $117.9 billion in the final three months of the calendar year. But it won’t be the blockbuster quarter that Apple -- and Wall Street -- had originally envisioned. Shortages and delivery delays have frustrated many consumers. And with inflation and the omicron variant bringing fresh concerns to pandemic-weary shoppers, they may forego some purchases.\nThat could mean skipping the iPhone 13 altogether and waiting to upgrade next year, when its successor comes out. The current lineup, which starts at $799 for the standard model and $999 for the Pro, is considered a modest update from the iPhone 12, which had a whole new design. Bigger changes are expected for the 2022 model, giving some shoppers a reason to wait.\nApple, based in Cupertino, California, declined to comment.\nApple suppliers across Asia extended their declines after Bloomberg’s report. In South Korea,LG Innotek Co. slid 11%, while Hong Kong-listed AAC Technologies Holdings Inc. fell as much as 4.8% and Japan’s TDK Corp. dropped as much as 4.8%.\nThe iPhone is Apple’s flagship product, accounting for about half of its $365.8 billion in revenue during the last fiscal year, and rolling out upgrades is a delicate dance. With the iPhone 13, Apple and wireless carriers unleashed aggressive rebate programs to spur purchases. In some cases, owners of an iPhone 12 or earlier models were able to buy an iPhone 13 at little to no cost. While discount programs are still available, some offer less dramatic savings than when new models first went on sale.\n\nDuring Apple’s last earnings call in October, Chief Executive Officer Tim Cook said that demand for new products was “very robust” -- fueled by interest in the latest iPhones, iPads and other devices -- and that the company was on track for a record holiday quarter. It had sales of $111.4 billion in the year-earlier period.\nHe pointed to supply constraints as the company’s biggest challenge. Cook predicted that the struggle to get enough components, particularly chips, would cost Apple more than $6 billion in revenue during the holiday quarter.\nThe constraints have hurt Apple partners as well. Sales for the company’s main chip supplier,Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., weakened recently, with October revenue falling 12% from the previous month to NT$134.5 billion ($4.8 billion).\nLast month, Apple’s main iPhone assembler,Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., predicted that its business willshrinkthis quarter from a year earlier -- caused by declines in consumer electronics and computing -- as it continues to suffer from the chip shortage. On Oct. 24,IQE Plc saw its shares fall 24% after it warned of softening smartphone demand, although the semiconductor company didn’t name any particular customer.\nAnd there’s now more strain on shoppers’ pocketbooks. U.S. consumer prices rose last month at the fastest annual pace since 1990. Surging costs for food, gas and housing are eroding purchasing power despite stronger wage growth.\nMeanwhile, the iPhone 13 isn’t as hard to get as it once was. Apple shoppers in the U.S. had been waiting about a month for the much-prized Pro model to be delivered. Now wait times are down to two weeks or less.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":130,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":609363316,"gmtCreate":1638239823704,"gmtModify":1638239823704,"author":{"id":"3578973717832794","authorId":"3578973717832794","name":"RieslingHawk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a5390eacc9599c6447d4c42f983fcc76","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hmmm","listText":"Hmmm","text":"Hmmm","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/609363316","repostId":"2187301604","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2187301604","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1638239400,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2187301604?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-30 10:30","market":"us","language":"en","title":"S&P 500 may end 'pretty flat' in 2022 amid previously 'unthinkable' negative real rates, says BofA strategist","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2187301604","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"But 'the bubble today' is in bonds, not stocks, says a BofA strategist during a media briefing Monda","content":"<p>But 'the bubble today' is in bonds, not stocks, says a BofA strategist during a media briefing Monday</p>\n<p>The U.S. stock market, as measured by the S&amp;P 500 index, may struggle to rise next year amid similarities to the technology bubble of 2000, according to BofA Global Research.</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 500 will end 2022 at 4,600, BofA Global Research predicted in an equity and quant strategy note dated Nov. 23. That's down about 1% from the index's close of 4,655.27 Monday, as U.S. stocks partially rebounded from Friday's selloff that had been sparked by fears over the omicron variant of the coronavirus.</p>\n<p>That's a \"pretty flat market from here,\" Savita Subramanian, head of equity and quant strategy at BofA, said Monday during an online media briefing on the firm's U.S. economic and stock-market outlook for 2022. \"Unfortunately we see a lot of similarities between today and 2000 -- the tech bubble peak,\" she said, pointing to \"lofty expectations,\" Wall Street strategists increasing their stock allocations by almost 20 percentage points and \"lots of IPO activity.\"</p>\n<p>But \"the bubble today\" is in bonds, not stocks, said Subramanian, with investors expecting negative real interest rates despite that being previously \"unthinkable.\" Back in 2000, investors had accepted that the equity risk premium was negative, she said, calling that a \"prescient sign\" at the time that the market was overvalued with areas of \"bubble-like froth.\"</p>\n<p>\"You want to avoid stocks that behave like bonds or are hurt by rising interest rates,\" said Subramanian. \"We like small caps over large caps,\" she said, as well as \"value over growth.\"</p>\n<p>In Subramanian's view, the S&amp;P 500 has become \"a long duration bond,\" with investors paying for \"a lot of backend-loaded growth.\" The past decade has favored \"big growth stocks with lots of growth way out in the future as discount rates have fallen,\" she explained. But the BofA report shows the strategists are now expecting a higher discount rate as the Federal Reserve may begin hiking rates next year.</p>\n<p>The price of the S&amp;P 500, which measures the performance of U.S. large-cap stocks in the U.S., has risen about 24% this year through Monday, FactSet data shows.</p>\n<p>In 2022, \"we're looking for 13% dividend growth, with the \"action\" taking place in total return rather than price return for the S&amp;P 500, said Subramanian. \"Get ready for a total return world.\"</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>S&P 500 may end 'pretty flat' in 2022 amid previously 'unthinkable' negative real rates, says BofA strategist</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nS&P 500 may end 'pretty flat' in 2022 amid previously 'unthinkable' negative real rates, says BofA strategist\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-11-30 10:30</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>But 'the bubble today' is in bonds, not stocks, says a BofA strategist during a media briefing Monday</p>\n<p>The U.S. stock market, as measured by the S&amp;P 500 index, may struggle to rise next year amid similarities to the technology bubble of 2000, according to BofA Global Research.</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 500 will end 2022 at 4,600, BofA Global Research predicted in an equity and quant strategy note dated Nov. 23. That's down about 1% from the index's close of 4,655.27 Monday, as U.S. stocks partially rebounded from Friday's selloff that had been sparked by fears over the omicron variant of the coronavirus.</p>\n<p>That's a \"pretty flat market from here,\" Savita Subramanian, head of equity and quant strategy at BofA, said Monday during an online media briefing on the firm's U.S. economic and stock-market outlook for 2022. \"Unfortunately we see a lot of similarities between today and 2000 -- the tech bubble peak,\" she said, pointing to \"lofty expectations,\" Wall Street strategists increasing their stock allocations by almost 20 percentage points and \"lots of IPO activity.\"</p>\n<p>But \"the bubble today\" is in bonds, not stocks, said Subramanian, with investors expecting negative real interest rates despite that being previously \"unthinkable.\" Back in 2000, investors had accepted that the equity risk premium was negative, she said, calling that a \"prescient sign\" at the time that the market was overvalued with areas of \"bubble-like froth.\"</p>\n<p>\"You want to avoid stocks that behave like bonds or are hurt by rising interest rates,\" said Subramanian. \"We like small caps over large caps,\" she said, as well as \"value over growth.\"</p>\n<p>In Subramanian's view, the S&amp;P 500 has become \"a long duration bond,\" with investors paying for \"a lot of backend-loaded growth.\" The past decade has favored \"big growth stocks with lots of growth way out in the future as discount rates have fallen,\" she explained. But the BofA report shows the strategists are now expecting a higher discount rate as the Federal Reserve may begin hiking rates next year.</p>\n<p>The price of the S&amp;P 500, which measures the performance of U.S. large-cap stocks in the U.S., has risen about 24% this year through Monday, FactSet data shows.</p>\n<p>In 2022, \"we're looking for 13% dividend growth, with the \"action\" taking place in total return rather than price return for the S&amp;P 500, said Subramanian. \"Get ready for a total return world.\"</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"161125":"标普500","513500":"标普500ETF","SSO":"两倍做多标普500ETF","SPXU":"三倍做空标普500ETF","BK4559":"巴菲特持仓","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","SDS":"两倍做空标普500ETF","UPRO":"三倍做多标普500ETF","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","OEF":"标普100指数ETF-iShares","IVV":"标普500指数ETF","BK4504":"桥水持仓",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","OEX":"标普100","SH":"标普500反向ETF","SPY":"标普500ETF"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2187301604","content_text":"But 'the bubble today' is in bonds, not stocks, says a BofA strategist during a media briefing Monday\nThe U.S. stock market, as measured by the S&P 500 index, may struggle to rise next year amid similarities to the technology bubble of 2000, according to BofA Global Research.\nThe S&P 500 will end 2022 at 4,600, BofA Global Research predicted in an equity and quant strategy note dated Nov. 23. That's down about 1% from the index's close of 4,655.27 Monday, as U.S. stocks partially rebounded from Friday's selloff that had been sparked by fears over the omicron variant of the coronavirus.\nThat's a \"pretty flat market from here,\" Savita Subramanian, head of equity and quant strategy at BofA, said Monday during an online media briefing on the firm's U.S. economic and stock-market outlook for 2022. \"Unfortunately we see a lot of similarities between today and 2000 -- the tech bubble peak,\" she said, pointing to \"lofty expectations,\" Wall Street strategists increasing their stock allocations by almost 20 percentage points and \"lots of IPO activity.\"\nBut \"the bubble today\" is in bonds, not stocks, said Subramanian, with investors expecting negative real interest rates despite that being previously \"unthinkable.\" Back in 2000, investors had accepted that the equity risk premium was negative, she said, calling that a \"prescient sign\" at the time that the market was overvalued with areas of \"bubble-like froth.\"\n\"You want to avoid stocks that behave like bonds or are hurt by rising interest rates,\" said Subramanian. \"We like small caps over large caps,\" she said, as well as \"value over growth.\"\nIn Subramanian's view, the S&P 500 has become \"a long duration bond,\" with investors paying for \"a lot of backend-loaded growth.\" The past decade has favored \"big growth stocks with lots of growth way out in the future as discount rates have fallen,\" she explained. But the BofA report shows the strategists are now expecting a higher discount rate as the Federal Reserve may begin hiking rates next year.\nThe price of the S&P 500, which measures the performance of U.S. large-cap stocks in the U.S., has risen about 24% this year through Monday, FactSet data shows.\nIn 2022, \"we're looking for 13% dividend growth, with the \"action\" taking place in total return rather than price return for the S&P 500, said Subramanian. \"Get ready for a total return world.\"","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":44,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":607235383,"gmtCreate":1639543589758,"gmtModify":1639543589905,"author":{"id":"3578973717832794","authorId":"3578973717832794","name":"RieslingHawk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a5390eacc9599c6447d4c42f983fcc76","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good indication that market is crashingsoon","listText":"Good indication that market is crashingsoon","text":"Good indication that market is crashingsoon","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/607235383","repostId":"1150850336","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1150850336","pubTimestamp":1639535034,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1150850336?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-15 10:23","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Mark Zuckerberg Sells Stock Every Day as Billionaires Cash Out","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1150850336","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"Richest Americans have sold $42.9 billion of stock this year\nGoogle founders Brin, Page make their f","content":"<ul>\n <li>Richest Americans have sold $42.9 billion of stock this year</li>\n <li>Google founders Brin, Page make their first sales since 2017</li>\n</ul>\n<p>Mark Zuckerberg&nbsp;sold Meta Platforms Inc. stock almost every weekday of this year. The founders of Google began to unload shares in May, which is also when two of the three Airbnb Inc. co-founders started diversifying their stakes.</p>\n<p>The transactions are part of a surge of selling by the very richest Americans. They unloaded $42.9 billion in stock through the start of December, more than double the $20.2 billion they sold in all of 2020, according to an analysis of transactions by U.S. billionaires on the&nbsp;Bloomberg Billionaires Index, a daily ranking of the world’s richest 500 people.</p>\n<p>The super-wealthy often hold onto shares in the companies that made their fortunes, because realizing gains triggers a tax bill. But many rich Americans are deciding to unload shares now, while stock valuations are at records and before their taxes potentially rise at the start of 2022.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3385f88e66ccdd038a5c42b99934a33e\" tg-width=\"1000\" tg-height=\"666\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Mark Zuckerberg Photographer: Michael Nagle/Bloomberg</span></p>\n<p>“A lot of our clients are selling,” said Elizabeth Sevilla, a partner at Seiler LLP, an advisory firm based in the San Francisco Bay area. Founders and venture capitalists are deciding they want to diversify concentrated positions, or “they’re looking at the market and saying, ‘We’re at the top of the market.’”</p>\n<p>Plus, biting the tax bullet in 2021 may mean avoiding rate hikes in future years, she said.</p>\n<p>Several of the world’s richest people have been selling core holdings after years of hibernation, including&nbsp;Sergey Brin&nbsp;and&nbsp;Larry Page, the reclusive co-founders of Google. So far this year, Page has sold around $1.8 billion in stock of Google parent Alphabet Inc. and Brin around $1.7 billion. It was the first time either had sold shares since 2017.</p>\n<p><b>‘Unrealized Gains’</b></p>\n<p>Elon Musk, the world’s richest person, has&nbsp;unloaded&nbsp;about $12.7 billion in Tesla Inc. shares this year, the first time he’s sold stock since 2016. The selling streak was unleashed after the billionaire, who has a personal fortune of $253.6 billion, asked in a Twitter poll last month whether he should divest 10% of his shares in the electric-auto maker.</p>\n<p>“Much is made lately of unrealized gains being a means of tax avoidance,” he&nbsp;tweeted, promising to abide by the poll’s results.</p>\n<p>Michael Dell, founder and chief executive officer of Dell Technologies Inc., hadn’t sold shares of his company in at least two years, or since it returned to public markets in 2018. So far this year, he’s disposed of about $500 million.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d0db0fc47fb90ec02ecba7c32a2c9e68\" tg-width=\"955\" tg-height=\"499\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Source: Bloomberg data</span></p>\n<p>Whether avoiding taxes was their goal or not, selling in 2021 could help these billionaires save billions of dollars. Even as Musk framed his sales as tied to the outcome of a Twitter poll, some of the sale was pre-planned and displayed&nbsp;canny awareness&nbsp;of tax liabilities, both at the federal and state level.</p>\n<p>While Democrats have dropped several ideas to hike taxes on the top 0.1% to pay for President Joe Biden’s economic agenda, the bill that passed the House of Representatives last month included a millionaire’s surtax, a 5% levy on incomes over $10 million and an additional 3% tax on those above $25 million.</p>\n<p>The surtax, which is projected by the Joint Committee on Taxation to raise $228 billion over the next decade, applies to a broader definition of income, including capital gains, making it harder to avoid through deductions. It wouldn’t go into effect until 2022, however, giving the super-wealthy an opportunity to sell now and over the next couple weeks, saving as much as 8% on taxes.</p>\n<p><b>Easy Decision</b></p>\n<p>“It’s not an exodus from the market,” Seiler’s Sevilla said. Instead, planners are sitting down with wealthy tech clients and gauging the impact of the surtax and other tax proposals, then calculating how much investments would need to rise to justify holding onto them. “If they know they cannot exceed that, the decision is easy,” Sevilla said.</p>\n<p>The 167 Americans on the Bloomberg index are worth about $3.6 trillion, up 47% since the beginning of last year. Their wealth gains have been driven by a rapid run-up in stock valuations during that period, with the S&amp;P 500 Index up about 45% and the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite Index gaining 75%.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/721eba0c0fb13842fb62f4619cf02991\" tg-width=\"952\" tg-height=\"539\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>The top billionaires’ stock sales have soared faster than their wealth. In 2019, the richest Americans sold just $6.6 billion of stock, a similar amount as in previous years.</p>\n<p>The selling really picked up in 2020, as Democratic candidates were on the campaign trail proposing to raise rates on the rich. Advisers spent much of the year warning of higher taxes as early as 2021 if Democrats took over.</p>\n<p>Meanwhile, stock valuations were surging last year, particularly in tech stocks benefiting from trends unleashed by the pandemic.</p>\n<p>Nvidia Corp. co-founder and CEO&nbsp;Jensen Huang&nbsp;sold shares in the chipmaker in July 2020 as it was hitting new highs, his first sales in almost three years. The stock price has nearly tripled since then, and Huang’s sales have accelerated as well. He’s sold $426 million so far this year, on top of $168 million in 2020.</p>\n<p>Another factor driving sales is a wave of initial public offerings, which made it possible for founders of successful startups to diversify their fortunes for the first time.</p>\n<p>Two of Airbnb Inc.’s three cofounders --&nbsp;Joseph Gebbia&nbsp;and&nbsp;Nathan Blecharczyk&nbsp;-- have together sold more than $1 billion worth of stock since the vacation-rental company went public in December of last year. Another co-founder, CEO&nbsp;Brian Chesky, hasn’t sold any shares this year, according to filings.</p>\n<p>Even as U.S. billionaires sell more, their stock purchases are stagnant. Americans on the Bloomberg index bought $543 million of shares on the open market through Dec. 3, an increase from last year but less than half their purchases in 2018. The analysis doesn’t take into account other ways billionaires acquire shares, such as stock grants or option awards that are part of compensation packages.</p>\n<p><b>Personal Reasons</b></p>\n<p>The richest Americans could have a variety of personal reasons for selling now, including funding charitable endeavors.</p>\n<p>Jeff Bezos, the world’s second-richest person, has sold more than $9 billion in Amazon.com Inc. this year, money that he could use to deliver on recent grants and pledges to fight climate change through his Bezos Earth Fund.</p>\n<p>Zuckerberg is liquidating more Meta stock -- formerly known as Facebook -- than he has in years, largely to send to his Chan-Zuckerberg Initiative. He’s sold $4.5 billion this year, nearly eight times more than he sold in 2020. Six years ago he and his wife Priscilla Chan pledged to give 99% of their wealth to charity during their lifetimes.</p>\n<p>Jack Dorsey, the founder of Twitter Inc., has sold nearly $500 million in stock this year of another company he founded, Block Inc. Last year he announced a&nbsp;promise&nbsp;to donate a large stake in the company, formerly known as Square, to Covid-19 relief. (The billionaire has mostly not touched his Twitter shares, which comprises less than 10% of his $10.4 billion net worth, according to the Bloomberg index.)</p>","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Mark Zuckerberg Sells Stock Every Day as Billionaires Cash Out</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nMark Zuckerberg Sells Stock Every Day as Billionaires Cash Out\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-12-15 10:23 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-12-14/musk-bezos-lead-the-charge-of-u-s-billionaires-selling-shares><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Richest Americans have sold $42.9 billion of stock this year\nGoogle founders Brin, Page make their first sales since 2017\n\nMark Zuckerberg sold Meta Platforms Inc. stock almost every weekday of this ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-12-14/musk-bezos-lead-the-charge-of-u-s-billionaires-selling-shares\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"ABNB":"爱彼迎","TSLA":"特斯拉","TWTR":"Twitter","NVDA":"英伟达","GOOG":"谷歌","DELL":"戴尔","MSFT":"微软","GOOGL":"谷歌A","AMZN":"亚马逊"},"source_url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-12-14/musk-bezos-lead-the-charge-of-u-s-billionaires-selling-shares","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1150850336","content_text":"Richest Americans have sold $42.9 billion of stock this year\nGoogle founders Brin, Page make their first sales since 2017\n\nMark Zuckerberg sold Meta Platforms Inc. stock almost every weekday of this year. The founders of Google began to unload shares in May, which is also when two of the three Airbnb Inc. co-founders started diversifying their stakes.\nThe transactions are part of a surge of selling by the very richest Americans. They unloaded $42.9 billion in stock through the start of December, more than double the $20.2 billion they sold in all of 2020, according to an analysis of transactions by U.S. billionaires on the Bloomberg Billionaires Index, a daily ranking of the world’s richest 500 people.\nThe super-wealthy often hold onto shares in the companies that made their fortunes, because realizing gains triggers a tax bill. But many rich Americans are deciding to unload shares now, while stock valuations are at records and before their taxes potentially rise at the start of 2022.\nMark Zuckerberg Photographer: Michael Nagle/Bloomberg\n“A lot of our clients are selling,” said Elizabeth Sevilla, a partner at Seiler LLP, an advisory firm based in the San Francisco Bay area. Founders and venture capitalists are deciding they want to diversify concentrated positions, or “they’re looking at the market and saying, ‘We’re at the top of the market.’”\nPlus, biting the tax bullet in 2021 may mean avoiding rate hikes in future years, she said.\nSeveral of the world’s richest people have been selling core holdings after years of hibernation, including Sergey Brin and Larry Page, the reclusive co-founders of Google. So far this year, Page has sold around $1.8 billion in stock of Google parent Alphabet Inc. and Brin around $1.7 billion. It was the first time either had sold shares since 2017.\n‘Unrealized Gains’\nElon Musk, the world’s richest person, has unloaded about $12.7 billion in Tesla Inc. shares this year, the first time he’s sold stock since 2016. The selling streak was unleashed after the billionaire, who has a personal fortune of $253.6 billion, asked in a Twitter poll last month whether he should divest 10% of his shares in the electric-auto maker.\n“Much is made lately of unrealized gains being a means of tax avoidance,” he tweeted, promising to abide by the poll’s results.\nMichael Dell, founder and chief executive officer of Dell Technologies Inc., hadn’t sold shares of his company in at least two years, or since it returned to public markets in 2018. So far this year, he’s disposed of about $500 million.\nSource: Bloomberg data\nWhether avoiding taxes was their goal or not, selling in 2021 could help these billionaires save billions of dollars. Even as Musk framed his sales as tied to the outcome of a Twitter poll, some of the sale was pre-planned and displayed canny awareness of tax liabilities, both at the federal and state level.\nWhile Democrats have dropped several ideas to hike taxes on the top 0.1% to pay for President Joe Biden’s economic agenda, the bill that passed the House of Representatives last month included a millionaire’s surtax, a 5% levy on incomes over $10 million and an additional 3% tax on those above $25 million.\nThe surtax, which is projected by the Joint Committee on Taxation to raise $228 billion over the next decade, applies to a broader definition of income, including capital gains, making it harder to avoid through deductions. It wouldn’t go into effect until 2022, however, giving the super-wealthy an opportunity to sell now and over the next couple weeks, saving as much as 8% on taxes.\nEasy Decision\n“It’s not an exodus from the market,” Seiler’s Sevilla said. Instead, planners are sitting down with wealthy tech clients and gauging the impact of the surtax and other tax proposals, then calculating how much investments would need to rise to justify holding onto them. “If they know they cannot exceed that, the decision is easy,” Sevilla said.\nThe 167 Americans on the Bloomberg index are worth about $3.6 trillion, up 47% since the beginning of last year. Their wealth gains have been driven by a rapid run-up in stock valuations during that period, with the S&P 500 Index up about 45% and the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite Index gaining 75%.\n\nThe top billionaires’ stock sales have soared faster than their wealth. In 2019, the richest Americans sold just $6.6 billion of stock, a similar amount as in previous years.\nThe selling really picked up in 2020, as Democratic candidates were on the campaign trail proposing to raise rates on the rich. Advisers spent much of the year warning of higher taxes as early as 2021 if Democrats took over.\nMeanwhile, stock valuations were surging last year, particularly in tech stocks benefiting from trends unleashed by the pandemic.\nNvidia Corp. co-founder and CEO Jensen Huang sold shares in the chipmaker in July 2020 as it was hitting new highs, his first sales in almost three years. The stock price has nearly tripled since then, and Huang’s sales have accelerated as well. He’s sold $426 million so far this year, on top of $168 million in 2020.\nAnother factor driving sales is a wave of initial public offerings, which made it possible for founders of successful startups to diversify their fortunes for the first time.\nTwo of Airbnb Inc.’s three cofounders -- Joseph Gebbia and Nathan Blecharczyk -- have together sold more than $1 billion worth of stock since the vacation-rental company went public in December of last year. Another co-founder, CEO Brian Chesky, hasn’t sold any shares this year, according to filings.\nEven as U.S. billionaires sell more, their stock purchases are stagnant. Americans on the Bloomberg index bought $543 million of shares on the open market through Dec. 3, an increase from last year but less than half their purchases in 2018. The analysis doesn’t take into account other ways billionaires acquire shares, such as stock grants or option awards that are part of compensation packages.\nPersonal Reasons\nThe richest Americans could have a variety of personal reasons for selling now, including funding charitable endeavors.\nJeff Bezos, the world’s second-richest person, has sold more than $9 billion in Amazon.com Inc. this year, money that he could use to deliver on recent grants and pledges to fight climate change through his Bezos Earth Fund.\nZuckerberg is liquidating more Meta stock -- formerly known as Facebook -- than he has in years, largely to send to his Chan-Zuckerberg Initiative. He’s sold $4.5 billion this year, nearly eight times more than he sold in 2020. Six years ago he and his wife Priscilla Chan pledged to give 99% of their wealth to charity during their lifetimes.\nJack Dorsey, the founder of Twitter Inc., has sold nearly $500 million in stock this year of another company he founded, Block Inc. Last year he announced a promise to donate a large stake in the company, formerly known as Square, to Covid-19 relief. (The billionaire has mostly not touched his Twitter shares, which comprises less than 10% of his $10.4 billion net worth, according to the Bloomberg index.)","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1080,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}