[微笑] [微笑]_老虎社区_美港股上老虎

Xiaomaomi
2021-03-19

[微笑] [微笑]

New Boeing 787 inspections signal tougher FAA oversight

A U.S. Federal Aviation Administration decision to bring in-house final checks on four Boeing Co 787

New Boeing 787 inspections signal tougher FAA oversight

免责声明：上述内容仅代表发帖人个人观点，不构成本平台的任何投资建议。

推荐
最新

暂无评论

热议股票

关于我们·老虎社区守则·老虎社区账号管理规范·老虎社区服务协议·老虎社区隐私政策

公司名称：北京至简风宜信息技术有限公司

违法和不良信息投诉：010-5681-3562（工作时间9:30-18:30）

邮箱：service@laohu8.com

营业执照：91110105MA01A4U55R

ICP备：京ICP备18016422号

网安备：京公网安备11010502036490

关注我们

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"data":{"magic":2,"id":327451715,"tweetId":"327451715","gmtCreate":1616119129537,"gmtModify":1634527136911,"author":{"id":3574397541060708,"authorId":3574397541060708,"authorIdStr":"3574397541060708","name":"Xiaomaomi","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/006c591e7fa7b238bc02caf1ee9cdeec","vip":1,"userType":1,"introduction":"","boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"fanSize":2,"starInvestorFlag":false},"themes":[],"images":[],"coverImages":[],"extraTitle":"","html":"<html><head></head><body>[微笑]&nbsp;[微笑]&nbsp; </body></html>","htmlText":"<html><head></head><body>[微笑]&nbsp;[微笑]&nbsp; </body></html>","text":"[微笑] [微笑]","highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/327451715","repostId":1110132130,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1110132130","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1616118554,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1110132130?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-19 09:49","market":"us","language":"en","title":"New Boeing 787 inspections signal tougher FAA oversight","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1110132130","media":"Reuters","summary":"A U.S. Federal Aviation Administration decision to bring in-house final checks on four Boeing Co 787","content":"A U.S. Federal Aviation Administration decision to bring in-house final checks on four Boeing Co 787 jets is the latest signal of the agency’s tougher scrutiny of the embattled U.S. airplane manufacturer.\nThe FAA said late Wednesday it was taking “a number of corrective actions” to address multiple production issues on the advanced carbon-composite twin-aisle aircraft. These include structural integrity flaws and potential safety hazards, it said in an email to Reuters.\n“One of the actions is retaining the authority to issue (Airworthiness Certificates) for four specific aircraft,” it said. “We can extend the AC retention to other aircraft if we see the need.”\nThe FAA told Boeing of its decision in a January letter reviewed by Reuters.\nThe move comes as the planemaker has faced tougher scrutiny in the wake of two crashes involving its 737 MAX jet that killed 346 people, triggering a 20-month safety ban that U.S. regulators lifted last November.\nA September U.S. House report into the two crashes faulted “grossly insufficient oversight by the FAA.”\n“With all the accusations of an overly-close relationship between (the FAA) and Boeing, they’re eager to emphasize that they’re deploying more resources for inspections, exercising more authority, and scrutinizing work more closely,” said Richard Aboulafia, an analyst with Teal Group.\n“We’ll likely see more actions like this.”\nFAA Administrator Steve Dickson said last month the agency was holding Boeing accountable and added he “reiterated to Boeing’s leadership time and again that the company must prioritize safety and regulatory compliance, and that the FAA will always put safety first in all its decisions.”\nFor most aircraft deliveries, Boeing employees officially designated to act on behalf of the FAA conduct final airworthiness checks before a jet is handed over to an airline.\nBut over the past several years FAA inspectors themselves have taken over that work on a small number of aircraft as part of its oversight.\nThe FAA said its latest decision not to outsource the four new checks on the 787s was different from those more routine checks.\n“If the FAA is increasing oversight, that says they have been exposed to things that should not have happened,” said Peter Lemme, a former Boeing engineer and consultant.\n“Boeing is at one strike for sure and maybe two strikes down. If they find something now, it would be infinitely worse.”\nBoeing said Thursday it was “encouraged by the progress our team is making on returning to delivery activities for the 787 program. We have engaged the FAA throughout this effort.”\nLast month, the planemaker agreed to pay $6.6 million to the FAA as part of a settlement over quality and safety-oversight lapses going back years.\nThe fine stemmed from a 2015 FAA settlement from Boeing, including a $12 million fine, to resolve multiple pending and potential enforcement cases.\nBoeing is also working through forensic inspections and painstaking repairs to fix defects embedded in more than 80 parked 787s that have halted deliveries for months.\nThe inspections and retrofits could take up to a month per plane and are likely to cost hundreds of millions - if not billions - of dollars, although the final bill depends on how many planes in service and undelivered have issues, an industry source said.\nBoeing remains on course to resume deliveries of a number of 787s this month, a second source said.\nIn January, Boeing took a $6.5 billion charge on its forthcoming 777X mini-jumbo, as the cost of tighter regulation and sagging long-haul demand hit its next flagship development.","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>New Boeing 787 inspections signal tougher FAA oversight</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nNew Boeing 787 inspections signal tougher FAA oversight\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\nReuters \n2021-03-19 09:49\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\nA U.S. Federal Aviation Administration decision to bring in-house final checks on four Boeing Co 787 jets is the latest signal of the agency’s tougher scrutiny of the embattled U.S. airplane manufacturer.\nThe FAA said late Wednesday it was taking “a number of corrective actions” to address multiple production issues on the advanced carbon-composite twin-aisle aircraft. These include structural integrity flaws and potential safety hazards, it said in an email to Reuters.\n“One of the actions is retaining the authority to issue (Airworthiness Certificates) for four specific aircraft,” it said. “We can extend the AC retention to other aircraft if we see the need.”\nThe FAA told Boeing of its decision in a January letter reviewed by Reuters.\nThe move comes as the planemaker has faced tougher scrutiny in the wake of two crashes involving its 737 MAX jet that killed 346 people, triggering a 20-month safety ban that U.S. regulators lifted last November.\nA September U.S. House report into the two crashes faulted “grossly insufficient oversight by the FAA.”\n“With all the accusations of an overly-close relationship between (the FAA) and Boeing, they’re eager to emphasize that they’re deploying more resources for inspections, exercising more authority, and scrutinizing work more closely,” said Richard Aboulafia, an analyst with Teal Group.\n“We’ll likely see more actions like this.”\nFAA Administrator Steve Dickson said last month the agency was holding Boeing accountable and added he “reiterated to Boeing’s leadership time and again that the company must prioritize safety and regulatory compliance, and that the FAA will always put safety first in all its decisions.”\nFor most aircraft deliveries, Boeing employees officially designated to act on behalf of the FAA conduct final airworthiness checks before a jet is handed over to an airline.\nBut over the past several years FAA inspectors themselves have taken over that work on a small number of aircraft as part of its oversight.\nThe FAA said its latest decision not to outsource the four new checks on the 787s was different from those more routine checks.\n“If the FAA is increasing oversight, that says they have been exposed to things that should not have happened,” said Peter Lemme, a former Boeing engineer and consultant.\n“Boeing is at one strike for sure and maybe two strikes down. If they find something now, it would be infinitely worse.”\nBoeing said Thursday it was “encouraged by the progress our team is making on returning to delivery activities for the 787 program. We have engaged the FAA throughout this effort.”\nLast month, the planemaker agreed to pay $6.6 million to the FAA as part of a settlement over quality and safety-oversight lapses going back years.\nThe fine stemmed from a 2015 FAA settlement from Boeing, including a $12 million fine, to resolve multiple pending and potential enforcement cases.\nBoeing is also working through forensic inspections and painstaking repairs to fix defects embedded in more than 80 parked 787s that have halted deliveries for months.\nThe inspections and retrofits could take up to a month per plane and are likely to cost hundreds of millions - if not billions - of dollars, although the final bill depends on how many planes in service and undelivered have issues, an industry source said.\nBoeing remains on course to resume deliveries of a number of 787s this month, a second source said.\nIn January, Boeing took a $6.5 billion charge on its forthcoming 777X mini-jumbo, as the cost of tighter regulation and sagging long-haul demand hit its next flagship development.\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BA":"波音"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1110132130","content_text":"A U.S. Federal Aviation Administration decision to bring in-house final checks on four Boeing Co 787 jets is the latest signal of the agency’s tougher scrutiny of the embattled U.S. airplane manufacturer.\nThe FAA said late Wednesday it was taking “a number of corrective actions” to address multiple production issues on the advanced carbon-composite twin-aisle aircraft. These include structural integrity flaws and potential safety hazards, it said in an email to Reuters.\n“One of the actions is retaining the authority to issue (Airworthiness Certificates) for four specific aircraft,” it said. “We can extend the AC retention to other aircraft if we see the need.”\nThe FAA told Boeing of its decision in a January letter reviewed by Reuters.\nThe move comes as the planemaker has faced tougher scrutiny in the wake of two crashes involving its 737 MAX jet that killed 346 people, triggering a 20-month safety ban that U.S. regulators lifted last November.\nA September U.S. House report into the two crashes faulted “grossly insufficient oversight by the FAA.”\n“With all the accusations of an overly-close relationship between (the FAA) and Boeing, they’re eager to emphasize that they’re deploying more resources for inspections, exercising more authority, and scrutinizing work more closely,” said Richard Aboulafia, an analyst with Teal Group.\n“We’ll likely see more actions like this.”\nFAA Administrator Steve Dickson said last month the agency was holding Boeing accountable and added he “reiterated to Boeing’s leadership time and again that the company must prioritize safety and regulatory compliance, and that the FAA will always put safety first in all its decisions.”\nFor most aircraft deliveries, Boeing employees officially designated to act on behalf of the FAA conduct final airworthiness checks before a jet is handed over to an airline.\nBut over the past several years FAA inspectors themselves have taken over that work on a small number of aircraft as part of its oversight.\nThe FAA said its latest decision not to outsource the four new checks on the 787s was different from those more routine checks.\n“If the FAA is increasing oversight, that says they have been exposed to things that should not have happened,” said Peter Lemme, a former Boeing engineer and consultant.\n“Boeing is at one strike for sure and maybe two strikes down. If they find something now, it would be infinitely worse.”\nBoeing said Thursday it was “encouraged by the progress our team is making on returning to delivery activities for the 787 program. We have engaged the FAA throughout this effort.”\nLast month, the planemaker agreed to pay $6.6 million to the FAA as part of a settlement over quality and safety-oversight lapses going back years.\nThe fine stemmed from a 2015 FAA settlement from Boeing, including a $12 million fine, to resolve multiple pending and potential enforcement cases.\nBoeing is also working through forensic inspections and painstaking repairs to fix defects embedded in more than 80 parked 787s that have halted deliveries for months.\nThe inspections and retrofits could take up to a month per plane and are likely to cost hundreds of millions - if not billions - of dollars, although the final bill depends on how many planes in service and undelivered have issues, an industry source said.\nBoeing remains on course to resume deliveries of a number of 787s this month, a second source said.\nIn January, Boeing took a $6.5 billion charge on its forthcoming 777X mini-jumbo, as the cost of tighter regulation and sagging long-haul demand hit its next flagship development.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":468,"commentLimit":10,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"symbols":[],"verified":2,"subType":0,"readableState":1,"langContent":"CN","currentLanguage":"CN","warmUpFlag":false,"orderFlag":false,"shareable":true,"causeOfNotShareable":"","featuresForAnalytics":[],"commentAndTweetFlag":false,"upFlag":false,"length":12,"xxTargetLangEnum":"ZH_CN"},"commentList":[],"hasMoreComment":false,"orderType":2}