FuelCell Energy Is the Wrong Stock to Buy for the Biden Bill_老虎社区_美港股上老虎

FuelCell Energy Is the Wrong Stock to Buy for the Biden Bill

InvestorPlace2021-11-26

The current narrative surrounding FuelCell Energy(NASDAQ:FCEL) stock revolves around a few central ideas. One, the idea that it will rise from President Joseph Biden’s infrastructure bill and the ...

网页链接

免责声明：本文观点仅代表作者个人观点，不构成本平台的投资建议，本平台不对文章信息准确性、完整性和及时性做出任何保证，亦不对因使用或信赖文章信息引发的任何损失承担责任。

Eatmi
·2021-11-26
Wow, I agree with your say.
回复
2
举报
Eatmi
·2021-11-26
Learning
回复
1
举报
Eatmi
·2021-11-26
Let learn how to invest in business
回复
1
举报
AnaiAnai
·2021-11-26
no positive earning. no hope
回复
1
举报
sfleong1
·2021-11-26
Like n comment
回复
2
举报
收起
- Katewong:
  Ok
  2021-11-26
  回复
  举报
TooYoung
·2021-11-26
Like
回复
2
举报
Dazza7
·2021-11-26
Really depends on individuals appetite on investments. Looking at the run run, it could be the one to buy
回复
1
举报
收起
- HOTBE:
  Totally agree
  2021-11-26
  回复
  举报
ASMH
·2021-11-26
Like
回复
1
举报
收起
- ASMH:
  Ok ay
  2021-11-27
  回复
  举报
- TooYoung:
  done
  2021-11-26
  回复
  举报
nicholastsj
·2021-11-26
like
回复
4
举报
收起
- iuhnaij:
  like
  2021-11-26
  回复
  举报
HappyTum
·2021-11-26
Like
回复
3
举报
收起
- nicholastsj:
  like
  2021-11-26
  回复
  举报

热议股票

7x24

全部

关于我们·老虎社区守则·老虎社区账号管理规范·老虎社区服务协议·老虎社区隐私政策

公司名称：北京至简风宜信息技术有限公司

违法和不良信息投诉：010-5681-3562（工作时间9:30-18:30）

邮箱：service@laohu8.com

营业执照：91110105MA01A4U55R

ICP备：京ICP备18016422号

网安备：京公网安备11010502036490

关注我们

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"data":{"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1143613429?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","thumbnail":"","is_english":true,"pubTime":"2021-11-26 07:35","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","id":"1143613429","market":"us","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"FuelCell Energy Is the Wrong Stock to Buy for the Biden Bill","media":"InvestorPlace","content":"<div>\n<p>The current narrative surrounding FuelCell Energy(NASDAQ:FCEL) stock revolves around a few central ideas.\nOne, the idea that it will rise from President Joseph Biden’s infrastructure bill and the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2021/11/fcel-stock-fuelcell-energy-is-the-wrong-stock-for-the-biden-bill/\">网页链接</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"lsy1606302653667","html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>FuelCell Energy Is the Wrong Stock to Buy for the Biden Bill</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFuelCell Energy Is the Wrong Stock to Buy for the Biden Bill\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-11-26 07:35 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2021/11/fcel-stock-fuelcell-energy-is-the-wrong-stock-for-the-biden-bill/><strong>InvestorPlace</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The current narrative surrounding FuelCell Energy(NASDAQ:FCEL) stock revolves around a few central ideas.\nOne, the idea that it will rise from President Joseph Biden’s infrastructure bill and the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2021/11/fcel-stock-fuelcell-energy-is-the-wrong-stock-for-the-biden-bill/\">网页链接</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":"FCEL","symbol_name":"燃料电池能源","start_time":0,"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2021/11/fcel-stock-fuelcell-energy-is-the-wrong-stock-for-the-biden-bill/","article_id":"1143613429","we_media_id":null,"thumbnails":[],"rights":null,"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1143613429","pubTimestamp":1637883352,"sourceInfo":{"source_id":"lsy1606302653667","name":"InvestorPlace"},"weMediaInfo":null,"summary":"FCEL stock isn't the seize the opportunity play it is being billed as","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"investorplace.com","property":[],"viewcount":null,"language":"en","relate_stocks":{"FCEL":"燃料电池能源"},"translate_title":"燃料电池能源能源是拜登法案购买的错误股票","themeId":null,"isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":null,"symbols_score_info":{"FCEL":0.9},"content_text":"The current narrative surrounding FuelCell Energy(NASDAQ:FCEL) stock revolves around a few central ideas.\nOne, the idea that it will rise from President Joseph Biden’s infrastructure bill and the money to be directed toward clean energy. And two, that FCEL stock is a buy-the-dip opportunity.\nLet’s start there first.\nOpportunity?\nEarly in 2021, clean energy was much more attractive than it currently is. Back then, investors drove the price of FCEL stock up above $27. By April, it had fallen below $10 — it’s still there.\nThat has led some investors to characterize FCEL stock as a diamond in the rough or a buy-the-dip opportunity.\nThat might be fine if the analysts covering the stock had a higher opinion of it, but they don’t. Their consensus is that FCEL shares should trade at $7.38 — and there are 10 of those analysts.\nRemember, their job is to meticulously study the valuation of a given sector and the firms within it. So, when 10 of them come to a collective conclusion that FCEL stock should trade at $7.38, it should at least pique investors’ interest.\nIn short, that strongly suggests that FuelCell Energy could move even lower and it also suggests that early 2021 prices were wildly exaggerated.The counter to that assertion is that FuelCell Energy will instead rise because Biden has signed his infrastructure bill. The bull thesis is that FCEL stock in particular will receive some sort of second wind.\nBiden’s Bill\nThat bill includes funding for clean energy. The implication then is that FCEL stock ought to rise since its fuel cell platforms should find more buyers as a result of the bill’s passage\nIndeed, FuelCell Energy CEO Jason Few’s description of his firm’s investment in that future energy landscape makes sense:\n“We have increased our investment in innovation and are making progress towards the availability of our Advanced Technologies solutions, including distributed hydrogen, long duration energy storage, and hydrogen production via our solid oxide platform. These offerings will complement our commercially available carbonate fuel cell platforms that provide a scalable solution to deliver against the increasing requirements of clean, distributed power and hydrogen generation to strengthen and supplement the grid power and enable the hydrogen economy. The global energy transition continues to accelerate, and we believe FuelCell Energy is positioned to answer these opportunities with our patented portfolio of platform solutions.”\nSo theoretically, the company should be in a prime position to take advantage of the billions earmarked for related projects, and perhaps it will — but it certainly cannot predict the future. However, the issue I foresee is that the inflow of capital likely won’t reach FuelCell Energy.\nNot Strong Financially\nThe deeper you dig into the company, the more likely you are to realize it isn’t a great firm.\n When the company last released earnings figures, it showed weakness.Total revenues were essentially flat, having increased from $53.872 million to $55.65 million year over year.\nIn the 2020 period, the firm managed to eke out a $320k net gain. However, that turned into a $7.274 million loss for the nine months which ended July 31, 2021.\nSo, the obvious question becomes why should that capital flow go towards FuelCell Energy as opposed to any number of other similar projects?\nI don’t have another suggestion in its place, instead I’m simply asking a rhetorical question. Moreover,  that’s how investors must think when bills get passed which are slated to lift entire sectors higher.\nWhat to Do\nI can see why investors are eagerly searching to find the right stocks that are bound to rise on Biden’s infrastructure bill. But I can’t see how investors can conclude FCEL stock is among the best choices in that search.","kind":null,"is_publish_news":true,"is_publish_highlight":true,"is_publish_live":null,"is_publish_wemedia":null,"editions":null,"column":"","sentiment":"0","news_tag":"","news_rank":0,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":1},"commentList":[{"id":877396168,"gmtCreate":1637885630386,"gmtModify":1637885630496,"author":{"id":"3586650352963687","authorId":"3586650352963687","name":"Eatmi","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c87cf272101a80f24fca3ccaf2ff53e5","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Wow, I agree with your say.&nbsp;","listText":"Wow, I agree with your say.&nbsp;","text":"Wow, I agree with your say.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/877396168","repostId":1143613429,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1143613429","pubTimestamp":1637883352,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1143613429?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-26 07:35","market":"us","language":"en","title":"FuelCell Energy Is the Wrong Stock to Buy for the Biden Bill","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1143613429","media":"InvestorPlace","summary":"FCEL stock isn't the seize the opportunity play it is being billed as","content":"<p>The current narrative surrounding&nbsp;<b>FuelCell Energy</b>(NASDAQ:<b><u>FCEL</u></b>) stock revolves around a few central ideas.</p>\n<p>One, the idea that it will rise from President Joseph Biden’s infrastructure bill and the money to be directed toward clean energy. And two, that FCEL stock is a buy-the-dip opportunity.</p>\n<p>Let’s start there first.</p>\n<p><b>Opportunity?</b></p>\n<p>Early in 2021, clean energy was much more attractive than it currently is. Back then, investors drove the price of FCEL stock up above $27. By April, it had fallen below $10 — it’s still there.</p>\n<p>That has led some investors to characterize FCEL stock as a diamond in the rough or a buy-the-dip opportunity.</p>\n<p>That might be fine if the&nbsp;analysts covering the stock&nbsp;had a higher opinion of it, but they don’t. Their consensus is that FCEL shares should trade at $7.38 — and there are 10 of those analysts.</p>\n<p>Remember, their job is to meticulously study the valuation of a given sector and the firms within it. So, when 10 of them come to a collective conclusion that FCEL stock should trade at $7.38, it should at least pique investors’ interest.</p>\n<p>In short, that strongly suggests that FuelCell Energy could move even lower and it also suggests that early 2021 prices were wildly exaggerated.The counter to that assertion is that FuelCell Energy will instead rise because Biden has signed his infrastructure bill. The bull thesis is that FCEL stock in particular will receive some sort of second wind.</p>\n<p><b>Biden’s Bill</b></p>\n<p>That bill includes funding for clean energy. The implication then is that FCEL stock ought to rise since its fuel cell platforms should find more buyers as a result of the bill’s passage</p>\n<p>Indeed, FuelCell Energy CEO Jason Few’s&nbsp;description of his firm’s investment&nbsp;in that future energy landscape makes sense:</p>\n<p>“We have increased our investment in innovation and are making progress towards the availability of our Advanced Technologies solutions, including distributed hydrogen, long duration energy storage, and hydrogen production via our solid oxide platform. These offerings will complement our commercially available carbonate fuel cell platforms that provide a scalable solution to deliver against the increasing requirements of clean, distributed power and hydrogen generation to strengthen and supplement the grid power and enable the hydrogen economy. The global energy transition continues to accelerate, and we believe FuelCell Energy is positioned to answer these opportunities with our patented portfolio of platform solutions.”</p>\n<p>So theoretically, the company should be in a prime position to take advantage of the billions earmarked for related projects, and perhaps it will — but it certainly cannot predict the future. However, the issue I foresee is that the inflow of capital likely won’t reach FuelCell Energy.</p>\n<p><b>Not Strong Financially</b></p>\n<p>The deeper you dig into the company, the more likely you are to realize it isn’t a great firm.</p>\n<p>&nbsp;When the company last released earnings figures, it showed weakness.Total revenues were essentially flat, having increased from&nbsp;$53.872 million to $55.65 million&nbsp;year over year.</p>\n<p>In the 2020 period, the firm managed to eke out a $320k net gain. However, that turned into a $7.274 million loss for the nine months which ended July 31, 2021.</p>\n<p>So, the obvious question becomes why should that capital flow go towards FuelCell Energy as opposed to any number of other similar projects?</p>\n<p>I don’t have another suggestion in its place, instead I’m simply asking a rhetorical question. Moreover,&nbsp; that’s how investors must think when bills get passed which are slated to lift entire sectors higher.</p>\n<p><b>What to Do</b></p>\n<p>I can see why investors are eagerly searching to find the right stocks that are bound to rise on Biden’s infrastructure bill. But I can’t see how investors can conclude FCEL stock is among the best choices in that search.</p>","source":"lsy1606302653667","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>FuelCell Energy Is the Wrong Stock to Buy for the Biden Bill</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFuelCell Energy Is the Wrong Stock to Buy for the Biden Bill\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-11-26 07:35 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2021/11/fcel-stock-fuelcell-energy-is-the-wrong-stock-for-the-biden-bill/><strong>InvestorPlace</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The current narrative surrounding FuelCell Energy(NASDAQ:FCEL) stock revolves around a few central ideas.\nOne, the idea that it will rise from President Joseph Biden’s infrastructure bill and the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2021/11/fcel-stock-fuelcell-energy-is-the-wrong-stock-for-the-biden-bill/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"FCEL":"燃料电池能源"},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2021/11/fcel-stock-fuelcell-energy-is-the-wrong-stock-for-the-biden-bill/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1143613429","content_text":"The current narrative surrounding FuelCell Energy(NASDAQ:FCEL) stock revolves around a few central ideas.\nOne, the idea that it will rise from President Joseph Biden’s infrastructure bill and the money to be directed toward clean energy. And two, that FCEL stock is a buy-the-dip opportunity.\nLet’s start there first.\nOpportunity?\nEarly in 2021, clean energy was much more attractive than it currently is. Back then, investors drove the price of FCEL stock up above $27. By April, it had fallen below $10 — it’s still there.\nThat has led some investors to characterize FCEL stock as a diamond in the rough or a buy-the-dip opportunity.\nThat might be fine if the analysts covering the stock had a higher opinion of it, but they don’t. Their consensus is that FCEL shares should trade at $7.38 — and there are 10 of those analysts.\nRemember, their job is to meticulously study the valuation of a given sector and the firms within it. So, when 10 of them come to a collective conclusion that FCEL stock should trade at $7.38, it should at least pique investors’ interest.\nIn short, that strongly suggests that FuelCell Energy could move even lower and it also suggests that early 2021 prices were wildly exaggerated.The counter to that assertion is that FuelCell Energy will instead rise because Biden has signed his infrastructure bill. The bull thesis is that FCEL stock in particular will receive some sort of second wind.\nBiden’s Bill\nThat bill includes funding for clean energy. The implication then is that FCEL stock ought to rise since its fuel cell platforms should find more buyers as a result of the bill’s passage\nIndeed, FuelCell Energy CEO Jason Few’s description of his firm’s investment in that future energy landscape makes sense:\n“We have increased our investment in innovation and are making progress towards the availability of our Advanced Technologies solutions, including distributed hydrogen, long duration energy storage, and hydrogen production via our solid oxide platform. These offerings will complement our commercially available carbonate fuel cell platforms that provide a scalable solution to deliver against the increasing requirements of clean, distributed power and hydrogen generation to strengthen and supplement the grid power and enable the hydrogen economy. The global energy transition continues to accelerate, and we believe FuelCell Energy is positioned to answer these opportunities with our patented portfolio of platform solutions.”\nSo theoretically, the company should be in a prime position to take advantage of the billions earmarked for related projects, and perhaps it will — but it certainly cannot predict the future. However, the issue I foresee is that the inflow of capital likely won’t reach FuelCell Energy.\nNot Strong Financially\nThe deeper you dig into the company, the more likely you are to realize it isn’t a great firm.\n When the company last released earnings figures, it showed weakness.Total revenues were essentially flat, having increased from $53.872 million to $55.65 million year over year.\nIn the 2020 period, the firm managed to eke out a $320k net gain. However, that turned into a $7.274 million loss for the nine months which ended July 31, 2021.\nSo, the obvious question becomes why should that capital flow go towards FuelCell Energy as opposed to any number of other similar projects?\nI don’t have another suggestion in its place, instead I’m simply asking a rhetorical question. Moreover,  that’s how investors must think when bills get passed which are slated to lift entire sectors higher.\nWhat to Do\nI can see why investors are eagerly searching to find the right stocks that are bound to rise on Biden’s infrastructure bill. But I can’t see how investors can conclude FCEL stock is among the best choices in that search.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"CN"},{"id":877391908,"gmtCreate":1637885467157,"gmtModify":1637885467157,"author":{"id":"3586650352963687","authorId":"3586650352963687","name":"Eatmi","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c87cf272101a80f24fca3ccaf2ff53e5","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Learning&nbsp;","listText":"Learning&nbsp;","text":"Learning","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/877391908","repostId":1143613429,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1143613429","pubTimestamp":1637883352,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1143613429?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-26 07:35","market":"us","language":"en","title":"FuelCell Energy Is the Wrong Stock to Buy for the Biden Bill","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1143613429","media":"InvestorPlace","summary":"FCEL stock isn't the seize the opportunity play it is being billed as","content":"<p>The current narrative surrounding&nbsp;<b>FuelCell Energy</b>(NASDAQ:<b><u>FCEL</u></b>) stock revolves around a few central ideas.</p>\n<p>One, the idea that it will rise from President Joseph Biden’s infrastructure bill and the money to be directed toward clean energy. And two, that FCEL stock is a buy-the-dip opportunity.</p>\n<p>Let’s start there first.</p>\n<p><b>Opportunity?</b></p>\n<p>Early in 2021, clean energy was much more attractive than it currently is. Back then, investors drove the price of FCEL stock up above $27. By April, it had fallen below $10 — it’s still there.</p>\n<p>That has led some investors to characterize FCEL stock as a diamond in the rough or a buy-the-dip opportunity.</p>\n<p>That might be fine if the&nbsp;analysts covering the stock&nbsp;had a higher opinion of it, but they don’t. Their consensus is that FCEL shares should trade at $7.38 — and there are 10 of those analysts.</p>\n<p>Remember, their job is to meticulously study the valuation of a given sector and the firms within it. So, when 10 of them come to a collective conclusion that FCEL stock should trade at $7.38, it should at least pique investors’ interest.</p>\n<p>In short, that strongly suggests that FuelCell Energy could move even lower and it also suggests that early 2021 prices were wildly exaggerated.The counter to that assertion is that FuelCell Energy will instead rise because Biden has signed his infrastructure bill. The bull thesis is that FCEL stock in particular will receive some sort of second wind.</p>\n<p><b>Biden’s Bill</b></p>\n<p>That bill includes funding for clean energy. The implication then is that FCEL stock ought to rise since its fuel cell platforms should find more buyers as a result of the bill’s passage</p>\n<p>Indeed, FuelCell Energy CEO Jason Few’s&nbsp;description of his firm’s investment&nbsp;in that future energy landscape makes sense:</p>\n<p>“We have increased our investment in innovation and are making progress towards the availability of our Advanced Technologies solutions, including distributed hydrogen, long duration energy storage, and hydrogen production via our solid oxide platform. These offerings will complement our commercially available carbonate fuel cell platforms that provide a scalable solution to deliver against the increasing requirements of clean, distributed power and hydrogen generation to strengthen and supplement the grid power and enable the hydrogen economy. The global energy transition continues to accelerate, and we believe FuelCell Energy is positioned to answer these opportunities with our patented portfolio of platform solutions.”</p>\n<p>So theoretically, the company should be in a prime position to take advantage of the billions earmarked for related projects, and perhaps it will — but it certainly cannot predict the future. However, the issue I foresee is that the inflow of capital likely won’t reach FuelCell Energy.</p>\n<p><b>Not Strong Financially</b></p>\n<p>The deeper you dig into the company, the more likely you are to realize it isn’t a great firm.</p>\n<p>&nbsp;When the company last released earnings figures, it showed weakness.Total revenues were essentially flat, having increased from&nbsp;$53.872 million to $55.65 million&nbsp;year over year.</p>\n<p>In the 2020 period, the firm managed to eke out a $320k net gain. However, that turned into a $7.274 million loss for the nine months which ended July 31, 2021.</p>\n<p>So, the obvious question becomes why should that capital flow go towards FuelCell Energy as opposed to any number of other similar projects?</p>\n<p>I don’t have another suggestion in its place, instead I’m simply asking a rhetorical question. Moreover,&nbsp; that’s how investors must think when bills get passed which are slated to lift entire sectors higher.</p>\n<p><b>What to Do</b></p>\n<p>I can see why investors are eagerly searching to find the right stocks that are bound to rise on Biden’s infrastructure bill. But I can’t see how investors can conclude FCEL stock is among the best choices in that search.</p>","source":"lsy1606302653667","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>FuelCell Energy Is the Wrong Stock to Buy for the Biden Bill</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFuelCell Energy Is the Wrong Stock to Buy for the Biden Bill\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-11-26 07:35 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2021/11/fcel-stock-fuelcell-energy-is-the-wrong-stock-for-the-biden-bill/><strong>InvestorPlace</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The current narrative surrounding FuelCell Energy(NASDAQ:FCEL) stock revolves around a few central ideas.\nOne, the idea that it will rise from President Joseph Biden’s infrastructure bill and the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2021/11/fcel-stock-fuelcell-energy-is-the-wrong-stock-for-the-biden-bill/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"FCEL":"燃料电池能源"},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2021/11/fcel-stock-fuelcell-energy-is-the-wrong-stock-for-the-biden-bill/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1143613429","content_text":"The current narrative surrounding FuelCell Energy(NASDAQ:FCEL) stock revolves around a few central ideas.\nOne, the idea that it will rise from President Joseph Biden’s infrastructure bill and the money to be directed toward clean energy. And two, that FCEL stock is a buy-the-dip opportunity.\nLet’s start there first.\nOpportunity?\nEarly in 2021, clean energy was much more attractive than it currently is. Back then, investors drove the price of FCEL stock up above $27. By April, it had fallen below $10 — it’s still there.\nThat has led some investors to characterize FCEL stock as a diamond in the rough or a buy-the-dip opportunity.\nThat might be fine if the analysts covering the stock had a higher opinion of it, but they don’t. Their consensus is that FCEL shares should trade at $7.38 — and there are 10 of those analysts.\nRemember, their job is to meticulously study the valuation of a given sector and the firms within it. So, when 10 of them come to a collective conclusion that FCEL stock should trade at $7.38, it should at least pique investors’ interest.\nIn short, that strongly suggests that FuelCell Energy could move even lower and it also suggests that early 2021 prices were wildly exaggerated.The counter to that assertion is that FuelCell Energy will instead rise because Biden has signed his infrastructure bill. The bull thesis is that FCEL stock in particular will receive some sort of second wind.\nBiden’s Bill\nThat bill includes funding for clean energy. The implication then is that FCEL stock ought to rise since its fuel cell platforms should find more buyers as a result of the bill’s passage\nIndeed, FuelCell Energy CEO Jason Few’s description of his firm’s investment in that future energy landscape makes sense:\n“We have increased our investment in innovation and are making progress towards the availability of our Advanced Technologies solutions, including distributed hydrogen, long duration energy storage, and hydrogen production via our solid oxide platform. These offerings will complement our commercially available carbonate fuel cell platforms that provide a scalable solution to deliver against the increasing requirements of clean, distributed power and hydrogen generation to strengthen and supplement the grid power and enable the hydrogen economy. The global energy transition continues to accelerate, and we believe FuelCell Energy is positioned to answer these opportunities with our patented portfolio of platform solutions.”\nSo theoretically, the company should be in a prime position to take advantage of the billions earmarked for related projects, and perhaps it will — but it certainly cannot predict the future. However, the issue I foresee is that the inflow of capital likely won’t reach FuelCell Energy.\nNot Strong Financially\nThe deeper you dig into the company, the more likely you are to realize it isn’t a great firm.\n When the company last released earnings figures, it showed weakness.Total revenues were essentially flat, having increased from $53.872 million to $55.65 million year over year.\nIn the 2020 period, the firm managed to eke out a $320k net gain. However, that turned into a $7.274 million loss for the nine months which ended July 31, 2021.\nSo, the obvious question becomes why should that capital flow go towards FuelCell Energy as opposed to any number of other similar projects?\nI don’t have another suggestion in its place, instead I’m simply asking a rhetorical question. Moreover,  that’s how investors must think when bills get passed which are slated to lift entire sectors higher.\nWhat to Do\nI can see why investors are eagerly searching to find the right stocks that are bound to rise on Biden’s infrastructure bill. But I can’t see how investors can conclude FCEL stock is among the best choices in that search.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"CN"},{"id":877393988,"gmtCreate":1637885381986,"gmtModify":1637885381986,"author":{"id":"3586650352963687","authorId":"3586650352963687","name":"Eatmi","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c87cf272101a80f24fca3ccaf2ff53e5","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Let learn how to invest in business&nbsp;","listText":"Let learn how to invest in business&nbsp;","text":"Let learn how to invest in business","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/877393988","repostId":1143613429,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1143613429","pubTimestamp":1637883352,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1143613429?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-26 07:35","market":"us","language":"en","title":"FuelCell Energy Is the Wrong Stock to Buy for the Biden Bill","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1143613429","media":"InvestorPlace","summary":"FCEL stock isn't the seize the opportunity play it is being billed as","content":"<p>The current narrative surrounding&nbsp;<b>FuelCell Energy</b>(NASDAQ:<b><u>FCEL</u></b>) stock revolves around a few central ideas.</p>\n<p>One, the idea that it will rise from President Joseph Biden’s infrastructure bill and the money to be directed toward clean energy. And two, that FCEL stock is a buy-the-dip opportunity.</p>\n<p>Let’s start there first.</p>\n<p><b>Opportunity?</b></p>\n<p>Early in 2021, clean energy was much more attractive than it currently is. Back then, investors drove the price of FCEL stock up above $27. By April, it had fallen below $10 — it’s still there.</p>\n<p>That has led some investors to characterize FCEL stock as a diamond in the rough or a buy-the-dip opportunity.</p>\n<p>That might be fine if the&nbsp;analysts covering the stock&nbsp;had a higher opinion of it, but they don’t. Their consensus is that FCEL shares should trade at $7.38 — and there are 10 of those analysts.</p>\n<p>Remember, their job is to meticulously study the valuation of a given sector and the firms within it. So, when 10 of them come to a collective conclusion that FCEL stock should trade at $7.38, it should at least pique investors’ interest.</p>\n<p>In short, that strongly suggests that FuelCell Energy could move even lower and it also suggests that early 2021 prices were wildly exaggerated.The counter to that assertion is that FuelCell Energy will instead rise because Biden has signed his infrastructure bill. The bull thesis is that FCEL stock in particular will receive some sort of second wind.</p>\n<p><b>Biden’s Bill</b></p>\n<p>That bill includes funding for clean energy. The implication then is that FCEL stock ought to rise since its fuel cell platforms should find more buyers as a result of the bill’s passage</p>\n<p>Indeed, FuelCell Energy CEO Jason Few’s&nbsp;description of his firm’s investment&nbsp;in that future energy landscape makes sense:</p>\n<p>“We have increased our investment in innovation and are making progress towards the availability of our Advanced Technologies solutions, including distributed hydrogen, long duration energy storage, and hydrogen production via our solid oxide platform. These offerings will complement our commercially available carbonate fuel cell platforms that provide a scalable solution to deliver against the increasing requirements of clean, distributed power and hydrogen generation to strengthen and supplement the grid power and enable the hydrogen economy. The global energy transition continues to accelerate, and we believe FuelCell Energy is positioned to answer these opportunities with our patented portfolio of platform solutions.”</p>\n<p>So theoretically, the company should be in a prime position to take advantage of the billions earmarked for related projects, and perhaps it will — but it certainly cannot predict the future. However, the issue I foresee is that the inflow of capital likely won’t reach FuelCell Energy.</p>\n<p><b>Not Strong Financially</b></p>\n<p>The deeper you dig into the company, the more likely you are to realize it isn’t a great firm.</p>\n<p>&nbsp;When the company last released earnings figures, it showed weakness.Total revenues were essentially flat, having increased from&nbsp;$53.872 million to $55.65 million&nbsp;year over year.</p>\n<p>In the 2020 period, the firm managed to eke out a $320k net gain. However, that turned into a $7.274 million loss for the nine months which ended July 31, 2021.</p>\n<p>So, the obvious question becomes why should that capital flow go towards FuelCell Energy as opposed to any number of other similar projects?</p>\n<p>I don’t have another suggestion in its place, instead I’m simply asking a rhetorical question. Moreover,&nbsp; that’s how investors must think when bills get passed which are slated to lift entire sectors higher.</p>\n<p><b>What to Do</b></p>\n<p>I can see why investors are eagerly searching to find the right stocks that are bound to rise on Biden’s infrastructure bill. But I can’t see how investors can conclude FCEL stock is among the best choices in that search.</p>","source":"lsy1606302653667","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>FuelCell Energy Is the Wrong Stock to Buy for the Biden Bill</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFuelCell Energy Is the Wrong Stock to Buy for the Biden Bill\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-11-26 07:35 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2021/11/fcel-stock-fuelcell-energy-is-the-wrong-stock-for-the-biden-bill/><strong>InvestorPlace</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The current narrative surrounding FuelCell Energy(NASDAQ:FCEL) stock revolves around a few central ideas.\nOne, the idea that it will rise from President Joseph Biden’s infrastructure bill and the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2021/11/fcel-stock-fuelcell-energy-is-the-wrong-stock-for-the-biden-bill/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"FCEL":"燃料电池能源"},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2021/11/fcel-stock-fuelcell-energy-is-the-wrong-stock-for-the-biden-bill/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1143613429","content_text":"The current narrative surrounding FuelCell Energy(NASDAQ:FCEL) stock revolves around a few central ideas.\nOne, the idea that it will rise from President Joseph Biden’s infrastructure bill and the money to be directed toward clean energy. And two, that FCEL stock is a buy-the-dip opportunity.\nLet’s start there first.\nOpportunity?\nEarly in 2021, clean energy was much more attractive than it currently is. Back then, investors drove the price of FCEL stock up above $27. By April, it had fallen below $10 — it’s still there.\nThat has led some investors to characterize FCEL stock as a diamond in the rough or a buy-the-dip opportunity.\nThat might be fine if the analysts covering the stock had a higher opinion of it, but they don’t. Their consensus is that FCEL shares should trade at $7.38 — and there are 10 of those analysts.\nRemember, their job is to meticulously study the valuation of a given sector and the firms within it. So, when 10 of them come to a collective conclusion that FCEL stock should trade at $7.38, it should at least pique investors’ interest.\nIn short, that strongly suggests that FuelCell Energy could move even lower and it also suggests that early 2021 prices were wildly exaggerated.The counter to that assertion is that FuelCell Energy will instead rise because Biden has signed his infrastructure bill. The bull thesis is that FCEL stock in particular will receive some sort of second wind.\nBiden’s Bill\nThat bill includes funding for clean energy. The implication then is that FCEL stock ought to rise since its fuel cell platforms should find more buyers as a result of the bill’s passage\nIndeed, FuelCell Energy CEO Jason Few’s description of his firm’s investment in that future energy landscape makes sense:\n“We have increased our investment in innovation and are making progress towards the availability of our Advanced Technologies solutions, including distributed hydrogen, long duration energy storage, and hydrogen production via our solid oxide platform. These offerings will complement our commercially available carbonate fuel cell platforms that provide a scalable solution to deliver against the increasing requirements of clean, distributed power and hydrogen generation to strengthen and supplement the grid power and enable the hydrogen economy. The global energy transition continues to accelerate, and we believe FuelCell Energy is positioned to answer these opportunities with our patented portfolio of platform solutions.”\nSo theoretically, the company should be in a prime position to take advantage of the billions earmarked for related projects, and perhaps it will — but it certainly cannot predict the future. However, the issue I foresee is that the inflow of capital likely won’t reach FuelCell Energy.\nNot Strong Financially\nThe deeper you dig into the company, the more likely you are to realize it isn’t a great firm.\n When the company last released earnings figures, it showed weakness.Total revenues were essentially flat, having increased from $53.872 million to $55.65 million year over year.\nIn the 2020 period, the firm managed to eke out a $320k net gain. However, that turned into a $7.274 million loss for the nine months which ended July 31, 2021.\nSo, the obvious question becomes why should that capital flow go towards FuelCell Energy as opposed to any number of other similar projects?\nI don’t have another suggestion in its place, instead I’m simply asking a rhetorical question. Moreover,  that’s how investors must think when bills get passed which are slated to lift entire sectors higher.\nWhat to Do\nI can see why investors are eagerly searching to find the right stocks that are bound to rise on Biden’s infrastructure bill. But I can’t see how investors can conclude FCEL stock is among the best choices in that search.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"CN"},{"id":877972036,"gmtCreate":1637884211042,"gmtModify":1637884211156,"author":{"id":"3583884958321017","authorId":"3583884958321017","name":"AnaiAnai","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8b0d0d8e20a4082ac0bc6a98756546ec","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"no positive earning. no hope","listText":"no positive earning. no hope","text":"no positive earning. no hope","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/877972036","repostId":1143613429,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1143613429","pubTimestamp":1637883352,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1143613429?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-26 07:35","market":"us","language":"en","title":"FuelCell Energy Is the Wrong Stock to Buy for the Biden Bill","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1143613429","media":"InvestorPlace","summary":"FCEL stock isn't the seize the opportunity play it is being billed as","content":"<p>The current narrative surrounding&nbsp;<b>FuelCell Energy</b>(NASDAQ:<b><u>FCEL</u></b>) stock revolves around a few central ideas.</p>\n<p>One, the idea that it will rise from President Joseph Biden’s infrastructure bill and the money to be directed toward clean energy. And two, that FCEL stock is a buy-the-dip opportunity.</p>\n<p>Let’s start there first.</p>\n<p><b>Opportunity?</b></p>\n<p>Early in 2021, clean energy was much more attractive than it currently is. Back then, investors drove the price of FCEL stock up above $27. By April, it had fallen below $10 — it’s still there.</p>\n<p>That has led some investors to characterize FCEL stock as a diamond in the rough or a buy-the-dip opportunity.</p>\n<p>That might be fine if the&nbsp;analysts covering the stock&nbsp;had a higher opinion of it, but they don’t. Their consensus is that FCEL shares should trade at $7.38 — and there are 10 of those analysts.</p>\n<p>Remember, their job is to meticulously study the valuation of a given sector and the firms within it. So, when 10 of them come to a collective conclusion that FCEL stock should trade at $7.38, it should at least pique investors’ interest.</p>\n<p>In short, that strongly suggests that FuelCell Energy could move even lower and it also suggests that early 2021 prices were wildly exaggerated.The counter to that assertion is that FuelCell Energy will instead rise because Biden has signed his infrastructure bill. The bull thesis is that FCEL stock in particular will receive some sort of second wind.</p>\n<p><b>Biden’s Bill</b></p>\n<p>That bill includes funding for clean energy. The implication then is that FCEL stock ought to rise since its fuel cell platforms should find more buyers as a result of the bill’s passage</p>\n<p>Indeed, FuelCell Energy CEO Jason Few’s&nbsp;description of his firm’s investment&nbsp;in that future energy landscape makes sense:</p>\n<p>“We have increased our investment in innovation and are making progress towards the availability of our Advanced Technologies solutions, including distributed hydrogen, long duration energy storage, and hydrogen production via our solid oxide platform. These offerings will complement our commercially available carbonate fuel cell platforms that provide a scalable solution to deliver against the increasing requirements of clean, distributed power and hydrogen generation to strengthen and supplement the grid power and enable the hydrogen economy. The global energy transition continues to accelerate, and we believe FuelCell Energy is positioned to answer these opportunities with our patented portfolio of platform solutions.”</p>\n<p>So theoretically, the company should be in a prime position to take advantage of the billions earmarked for related projects, and perhaps it will — but it certainly cannot predict the future. However, the issue I foresee is that the inflow of capital likely won’t reach FuelCell Energy.</p>\n<p><b>Not Strong Financially</b></p>\n<p>The deeper you dig into the company, the more likely you are to realize it isn’t a great firm.</p>\n<p>&nbsp;When the company last released earnings figures, it showed weakness.Total revenues were essentially flat, having increased from&nbsp;$53.872 million to $55.65 million&nbsp;year over year.</p>\n<p>In the 2020 period, the firm managed to eke out a $320k net gain. However, that turned into a $7.274 million loss for the nine months which ended July 31, 2021.</p>\n<p>So, the obvious question becomes why should that capital flow go towards FuelCell Energy as opposed to any number of other similar projects?</p>\n<p>I don’t have another suggestion in its place, instead I’m simply asking a rhetorical question. Moreover,&nbsp; that’s how investors must think when bills get passed which are slated to lift entire sectors higher.</p>\n<p><b>What to Do</b></p>\n<p>I can see why investors are eagerly searching to find the right stocks that are bound to rise on Biden’s infrastructure bill. But I can’t see how investors can conclude FCEL stock is among the best choices in that search.</p>","source":"lsy1606302653667","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>FuelCell Energy Is the Wrong Stock to Buy for the Biden Bill</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFuelCell Energy Is the Wrong Stock to Buy for the Biden Bill\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-11-26 07:35 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2021/11/fcel-stock-fuelcell-energy-is-the-wrong-stock-for-the-biden-bill/><strong>InvestorPlace</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The current narrative surrounding FuelCell Energy(NASDAQ:FCEL) stock revolves around a few central ideas.\nOne, the idea that it will rise from President Joseph Biden’s infrastructure bill and the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2021/11/fcel-stock-fuelcell-energy-is-the-wrong-stock-for-the-biden-bill/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"FCEL":"燃料电池能源"},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2021/11/fcel-stock-fuelcell-energy-is-the-wrong-stock-for-the-biden-bill/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1143613429","content_text":"The current narrative surrounding FuelCell Energy(NASDAQ:FCEL) stock revolves around a few central ideas.\nOne, the idea that it will rise from President Joseph Biden’s infrastructure bill and the money to be directed toward clean energy. And two, that FCEL stock is a buy-the-dip opportunity.\nLet’s start there first.\nOpportunity?\nEarly in 2021, clean energy was much more attractive than it currently is. Back then, investors drove the price of FCEL stock up above $27. By April, it had fallen below $10 — it’s still there.\nThat has led some investors to characterize FCEL stock as a diamond in the rough or a buy-the-dip opportunity.\nThat might be fine if the analysts covering the stock had a higher opinion of it, but they don’t. Their consensus is that FCEL shares should trade at $7.38 — and there are 10 of those analysts.\nRemember, their job is to meticulously study the valuation of a given sector and the firms within it. So, when 10 of them come to a collective conclusion that FCEL stock should trade at $7.38, it should at least pique investors’ interest.\nIn short, that strongly suggests that FuelCell Energy could move even lower and it also suggests that early 2021 prices were wildly exaggerated.The counter to that assertion is that FuelCell Energy will instead rise because Biden has signed his infrastructure bill. The bull thesis is that FCEL stock in particular will receive some sort of second wind.\nBiden’s Bill\nThat bill includes funding for clean energy. The implication then is that FCEL stock ought to rise since its fuel cell platforms should find more buyers as a result of the bill’s passage\nIndeed, FuelCell Energy CEO Jason Few’s description of his firm’s investment in that future energy landscape makes sense:\n“We have increased our investment in innovation and are making progress towards the availability of our Advanced Technologies solutions, including distributed hydrogen, long duration energy storage, and hydrogen production via our solid oxide platform. These offerings will complement our commercially available carbonate fuel cell platforms that provide a scalable solution to deliver against the increasing requirements of clean, distributed power and hydrogen generation to strengthen and supplement the grid power and enable the hydrogen economy. The global energy transition continues to accelerate, and we believe FuelCell Energy is positioned to answer these opportunities with our patented portfolio of platform solutions.”\nSo theoretically, the company should be in a prime position to take advantage of the billions earmarked for related projects, and perhaps it will — but it certainly cannot predict the future. However, the issue I foresee is that the inflow of capital likely won’t reach FuelCell Energy.\nNot Strong Financially\nThe deeper you dig into the company, the more likely you are to realize it isn’t a great firm.\n When the company last released earnings figures, it showed weakness.Total revenues were essentially flat, having increased from $53.872 million to $55.65 million year over year.\nIn the 2020 period, the firm managed to eke out a $320k net gain. However, that turned into a $7.274 million loss for the nine months which ended July 31, 2021.\nSo, the obvious question becomes why should that capital flow go towards FuelCell Energy as opposed to any number of other similar projects?\nI don’t have another suggestion in its place, instead I’m simply asking a rhetorical question. Moreover,  that’s how investors must think when bills get passed which are slated to lift entire sectors higher.\nWhat to Do\nI can see why investors are eagerly searching to find the right stocks that are bound to rise on Biden’s infrastructure bill. But I can’t see how investors can conclude FCEL stock is among the best choices in that search.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"CN"},{"id":877971849,"gmtCreate":1637883946899,"gmtModify":1637883947200,"author":{"id":"3583570345500843","authorId":"3583570345500843","name":"sfleong1","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2ec42f3f2b911279950a45a9140bc358","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Like n comment","listText":"Like n comment","text":"Like n comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/877971849","repostId":1143613429,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1143613429","pubTimestamp":1637883352,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1143613429?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-26 07:35","market":"us","language":"en","title":"FuelCell Energy Is the Wrong Stock to Buy for the Biden Bill","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1143613429","media":"InvestorPlace","summary":"FCEL stock isn't the seize the opportunity play it is being billed as","content":"<p>The current narrative surrounding&nbsp;<b>FuelCell Energy</b>(NASDAQ:<b><u>FCEL</u></b>) stock revolves around a few central ideas.</p>\n<p>One, the idea that it will rise from President Joseph Biden’s infrastructure bill and the money to be directed toward clean energy. And two, that FCEL stock is a buy-the-dip opportunity.</p>\n<p>Let’s start there first.</p>\n<p><b>Opportunity?</b></p>\n<p>Early in 2021, clean energy was much more attractive than it currently is. Back then, investors drove the price of FCEL stock up above $27. By April, it had fallen below $10 — it’s still there.</p>\n<p>That has led some investors to characterize FCEL stock as a diamond in the rough or a buy-the-dip opportunity.</p>\n<p>That might be fine if the&nbsp;analysts covering the stock&nbsp;had a higher opinion of it, but they don’t. Their consensus is that FCEL shares should trade at $7.38 — and there are 10 of those analysts.</p>\n<p>Remember, their job is to meticulously study the valuation of a given sector and the firms within it. So, when 10 of them come to a collective conclusion that FCEL stock should trade at $7.38, it should at least pique investors’ interest.</p>\n<p>In short, that strongly suggests that FuelCell Energy could move even lower and it also suggests that early 2021 prices were wildly exaggerated.The counter to that assertion is that FuelCell Energy will instead rise because Biden has signed his infrastructure bill. The bull thesis is that FCEL stock in particular will receive some sort of second wind.</p>\n<p><b>Biden’s Bill</b></p>\n<p>That bill includes funding for clean energy. The implication then is that FCEL stock ought to rise since its fuel cell platforms should find more buyers as a result of the bill’s passage</p>\n<p>Indeed, FuelCell Energy CEO Jason Few’s&nbsp;description of his firm’s investment&nbsp;in that future energy landscape makes sense:</p>\n<p>“We have increased our investment in innovation and are making progress towards the availability of our Advanced Technologies solutions, including distributed hydrogen, long duration energy storage, and hydrogen production via our solid oxide platform. These offerings will complement our commercially available carbonate fuel cell platforms that provide a scalable solution to deliver against the increasing requirements of clean, distributed power and hydrogen generation to strengthen and supplement the grid power and enable the hydrogen economy. The global energy transition continues to accelerate, and we believe FuelCell Energy is positioned to answer these opportunities with our patented portfolio of platform solutions.”</p>\n<p>So theoretically, the company should be in a prime position to take advantage of the billions earmarked for related projects, and perhaps it will — but it certainly cannot predict the future. However, the issue I foresee is that the inflow of capital likely won’t reach FuelCell Energy.</p>\n<p><b>Not Strong Financially</b></p>\n<p>The deeper you dig into the company, the more likely you are to realize it isn’t a great firm.</p>\n<p>&nbsp;When the company last released earnings figures, it showed weakness.Total revenues were essentially flat, having increased from&nbsp;$53.872 million to $55.65 million&nbsp;year over year.</p>\n<p>In the 2020 period, the firm managed to eke out a $320k net gain. However, that turned into a $7.274 million loss for the nine months which ended July 31, 2021.</p>\n<p>So, the obvious question becomes why should that capital flow go towards FuelCell Energy as opposed to any number of other similar projects?</p>\n<p>I don’t have another suggestion in its place, instead I’m simply asking a rhetorical question. Moreover,&nbsp; that’s how investors must think when bills get passed which are slated to lift entire sectors higher.</p>\n<p><b>What to Do</b></p>\n<p>I can see why investors are eagerly searching to find the right stocks that are bound to rise on Biden’s infrastructure bill. But I can’t see how investors can conclude FCEL stock is among the best choices in that search.</p>","source":"lsy1606302653667","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>FuelCell Energy Is the Wrong Stock to Buy for the Biden Bill</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFuelCell Energy Is the Wrong Stock to Buy for the Biden Bill\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-11-26 07:35 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2021/11/fcel-stock-fuelcell-energy-is-the-wrong-stock-for-the-biden-bill/><strong>InvestorPlace</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The current narrative surrounding FuelCell Energy(NASDAQ:FCEL) stock revolves around a few central ideas.\nOne, the idea that it will rise from President Joseph Biden’s infrastructure bill and the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2021/11/fcel-stock-fuelcell-energy-is-the-wrong-stock-for-the-biden-bill/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"FCEL":"燃料电池能源"},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2021/11/fcel-stock-fuelcell-energy-is-the-wrong-stock-for-the-biden-bill/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1143613429","content_text":"The current narrative surrounding FuelCell Energy(NASDAQ:FCEL) stock revolves around a few central ideas.\nOne, the idea that it will rise from President Joseph Biden’s infrastructure bill and the money to be directed toward clean energy. And two, that FCEL stock is a buy-the-dip opportunity.\nLet’s start there first.\nOpportunity?\nEarly in 2021, clean energy was much more attractive than it currently is. Back then, investors drove the price of FCEL stock up above $27. By April, it had fallen below $10 — it’s still there.\nThat has led some investors to characterize FCEL stock as a diamond in the rough or a buy-the-dip opportunity.\nThat might be fine if the analysts covering the stock had a higher opinion of it, but they don’t. Their consensus is that FCEL shares should trade at $7.38 — and there are 10 of those analysts.\nRemember, their job is to meticulously study the valuation of a given sector and the firms within it. So, when 10 of them come to a collective conclusion that FCEL stock should trade at $7.38, it should at least pique investors’ interest.\nIn short, that strongly suggests that FuelCell Energy could move even lower and it also suggests that early 2021 prices were wildly exaggerated.The counter to that assertion is that FuelCell Energy will instead rise because Biden has signed his infrastructure bill. The bull thesis is that FCEL stock in particular will receive some sort of second wind.\nBiden’s Bill\nThat bill includes funding for clean energy. The implication then is that FCEL stock ought to rise since its fuel cell platforms should find more buyers as a result of the bill’s passage\nIndeed, FuelCell Energy CEO Jason Few’s description of his firm’s investment in that future energy landscape makes sense:\n“We have increased our investment in innovation and are making progress towards the availability of our Advanced Technologies solutions, including distributed hydrogen, long duration energy storage, and hydrogen production via our solid oxide platform. These offerings will complement our commercially available carbonate fuel cell platforms that provide a scalable solution to deliver against the increasing requirements of clean, distributed power and hydrogen generation to strengthen and supplement the grid power and enable the hydrogen economy. The global energy transition continues to accelerate, and we believe FuelCell Energy is positioned to answer these opportunities with our patented portfolio of platform solutions.”\nSo theoretically, the company should be in a prime position to take advantage of the billions earmarked for related projects, and perhaps it will — but it certainly cannot predict the future. However, the issue I foresee is that the inflow of capital likely won’t reach FuelCell Energy.\nNot Strong Financially\nThe deeper you dig into the company, the more likely you are to realize it isn’t a great firm.\n When the company last released earnings figures, it showed weakness.Total revenues were essentially flat, having increased from $53.872 million to $55.65 million year over year.\nIn the 2020 period, the firm managed to eke out a $320k net gain. However, that turned into a $7.274 million loss for the nine months which ended July 31, 2021.\nSo, the obvious question becomes why should that capital flow go towards FuelCell Energy as opposed to any number of other similar projects?\nI don’t have another suggestion in its place, instead I’m simply asking a rhetorical question. Moreover,  that’s how investors must think when bills get passed which are slated to lift entire sectors higher.\nWhat to Do\nI can see why investors are eagerly searching to find the right stocks that are bound to rise on Biden’s infrastructure bill. But I can’t see how investors can conclude FCEL stock is among the best choices in that search.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6725674,"gmtCreate":1637884179712,"gmtModify":1637884179766,"authorId":3578890350762955,"author":{"id":3578890350762955,"authorId":3578890350762955,"name":"Katewong","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/62030146b6696c54415225b5f032c136","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":877971849,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Ok","text":"Ok","html":"Ok"}],"langContent":"CN"},{"id":877973700,"gmtCreate":1637883913521,"gmtModify":1637883913739,"author":{"id":"3570267505142951","authorId":"3570267505142951","name":"TooYoung","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/910a137e5328138f3ccac23ab2276279","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/877973700","repostId":1143613429,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1143613429","pubTimestamp":1637883352,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1143613429?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-26 07:35","market":"us","language":"en","title":"FuelCell Energy Is the Wrong Stock to Buy for the Biden Bill","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1143613429","media":"InvestorPlace","summary":"FCEL stock isn't the seize the opportunity play it is being billed as","content":"<p>The current narrative surrounding&nbsp;<b>FuelCell Energy</b>(NASDAQ:<b><u>FCEL</u></b>) stock revolves around a few central ideas.</p>\n<p>One, the idea that it will rise from President Joseph Biden’s infrastructure bill and the money to be directed toward clean energy. And two, that FCEL stock is a buy-the-dip opportunity.</p>\n<p>Let’s start there first.</p>\n<p><b>Opportunity?</b></p>\n<p>Early in 2021, clean energy was much more attractive than it currently is. Back then, investors drove the price of FCEL stock up above $27. By April, it had fallen below $10 — it’s still there.</p>\n<p>That has led some investors to characterize FCEL stock as a diamond in the rough or a buy-the-dip opportunity.</p>\n<p>That might be fine if the&nbsp;analysts covering the stock&nbsp;had a higher opinion of it, but they don’t. Their consensus is that FCEL shares should trade at $7.38 — and there are 10 of those analysts.</p>\n<p>Remember, their job is to meticulously study the valuation of a given sector and the firms within it. So, when 10 of them come to a collective conclusion that FCEL stock should trade at $7.38, it should at least pique investors’ interest.</p>\n<p>In short, that strongly suggests that FuelCell Energy could move even lower and it also suggests that early 2021 prices were wildly exaggerated.The counter to that assertion is that FuelCell Energy will instead rise because Biden has signed his infrastructure bill. The bull thesis is that FCEL stock in particular will receive some sort of second wind.</p>\n<p><b>Biden’s Bill</b></p>\n<p>That bill includes funding for clean energy. The implication then is that FCEL stock ought to rise since its fuel cell platforms should find more buyers as a result of the bill’s passage</p>\n<p>Indeed, FuelCell Energy CEO Jason Few’s&nbsp;description of his firm’s investment&nbsp;in that future energy landscape makes sense:</p>\n<p>“We have increased our investment in innovation and are making progress towards the availability of our Advanced Technologies solutions, including distributed hydrogen, long duration energy storage, and hydrogen production via our solid oxide platform. These offerings will complement our commercially available carbonate fuel cell platforms that provide a scalable solution to deliver against the increasing requirements of clean, distributed power and hydrogen generation to strengthen and supplement the grid power and enable the hydrogen economy. The global energy transition continues to accelerate, and we believe FuelCell Energy is positioned to answer these opportunities with our patented portfolio of platform solutions.”</p>\n<p>So theoretically, the company should be in a prime position to take advantage of the billions earmarked for related projects, and perhaps it will — but it certainly cannot predict the future. However, the issue I foresee is that the inflow of capital likely won’t reach FuelCell Energy.</p>\n<p><b>Not Strong Financially</b></p>\n<p>The deeper you dig into the company, the more likely you are to realize it isn’t a great firm.</p>\n<p>&nbsp;When the company last released earnings figures, it showed weakness.Total revenues were essentially flat, having increased from&nbsp;$53.872 million to $55.65 million&nbsp;year over year.</p>\n<p>In the 2020 period, the firm managed to eke out a $320k net gain. However, that turned into a $7.274 million loss for the nine months which ended July 31, 2021.</p>\n<p>So, the obvious question becomes why should that capital flow go towards FuelCell Energy as opposed to any number of other similar projects?</p>\n<p>I don’t have another suggestion in its place, instead I’m simply asking a rhetorical question. Moreover,&nbsp; that’s how investors must think when bills get passed which are slated to lift entire sectors higher.</p>\n<p><b>What to Do</b></p>\n<p>I can see why investors are eagerly searching to find the right stocks that are bound to rise on Biden’s infrastructure bill. But I can’t see how investors can conclude FCEL stock is among the best choices in that search.</p>","source":"lsy1606302653667","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>FuelCell Energy Is the Wrong Stock to Buy for the Biden Bill</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFuelCell Energy Is the Wrong Stock to Buy for the Biden Bill\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-11-26 07:35 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2021/11/fcel-stock-fuelcell-energy-is-the-wrong-stock-for-the-biden-bill/><strong>InvestorPlace</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The current narrative surrounding FuelCell Energy(NASDAQ:FCEL) stock revolves around a few central ideas.\nOne, the idea that it will rise from President Joseph Biden’s infrastructure bill and the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2021/11/fcel-stock-fuelcell-energy-is-the-wrong-stock-for-the-biden-bill/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"FCEL":"燃料电池能源"},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2021/11/fcel-stock-fuelcell-energy-is-the-wrong-stock-for-the-biden-bill/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1143613429","content_text":"The current narrative surrounding FuelCell Energy(NASDAQ:FCEL) stock revolves around a few central ideas.\nOne, the idea that it will rise from President Joseph Biden’s infrastructure bill and the money to be directed toward clean energy. And two, that FCEL stock is a buy-the-dip opportunity.\nLet’s start there first.\nOpportunity?\nEarly in 2021, clean energy was much more attractive than it currently is. Back then, investors drove the price of FCEL stock up above $27. By April, it had fallen below $10 — it’s still there.\nThat has led some investors to characterize FCEL stock as a diamond in the rough or a buy-the-dip opportunity.\nThat might be fine if the analysts covering the stock had a higher opinion of it, but they don’t. Their consensus is that FCEL shares should trade at $7.38 — and there are 10 of those analysts.\nRemember, their job is to meticulously study the valuation of a given sector and the firms within it. So, when 10 of them come to a collective conclusion that FCEL stock should trade at $7.38, it should at least pique investors’ interest.\nIn short, that strongly suggests that FuelCell Energy could move even lower and it also suggests that early 2021 prices were wildly exaggerated.The counter to that assertion is that FuelCell Energy will instead rise because Biden has signed his infrastructure bill. The bull thesis is that FCEL stock in particular will receive some sort of second wind.\nBiden’s Bill\nThat bill includes funding for clean energy. The implication then is that FCEL stock ought to rise since its fuel cell platforms should find more buyers as a result of the bill’s passage\nIndeed, FuelCell Energy CEO Jason Few’s description of his firm’s investment in that future energy landscape makes sense:\n“We have increased our investment in innovation and are making progress towards the availability of our Advanced Technologies solutions, including distributed hydrogen, long duration energy storage, and hydrogen production via our solid oxide platform. These offerings will complement our commercially available carbonate fuel cell platforms that provide a scalable solution to deliver against the increasing requirements of clean, distributed power and hydrogen generation to strengthen and supplement the grid power and enable the hydrogen economy. The global energy transition continues to accelerate, and we believe FuelCell Energy is positioned to answer these opportunities with our patented portfolio of platform solutions.”\nSo theoretically, the company should be in a prime position to take advantage of the billions earmarked for related projects, and perhaps it will — but it certainly cannot predict the future. However, the issue I foresee is that the inflow of capital likely won’t reach FuelCell Energy.\nNot Strong Financially\nThe deeper you dig into the company, the more likely you are to realize it isn’t a great firm.\n When the company last released earnings figures, it showed weakness.Total revenues were essentially flat, having increased from $53.872 million to $55.65 million year over year.\nIn the 2020 period, the firm managed to eke out a $320k net gain. However, that turned into a $7.274 million loss for the nine months which ended July 31, 2021.\nSo, the obvious question becomes why should that capital flow go towards FuelCell Energy as opposed to any number of other similar projects?\nI don’t have another suggestion in its place, instead I’m simply asking a rhetorical question. Moreover,  that’s how investors must think when bills get passed which are slated to lift entire sectors higher.\nWhat to Do\nI can see why investors are eagerly searching to find the right stocks that are bound to rise on Biden’s infrastructure bill. But I can’t see how investors can conclude FCEL stock is among the best choices in that search.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"CN"},{"id":877973640,"gmtCreate":1637883853193,"gmtModify":1637883853193,"author":{"id":"4100090743979700","authorId":"4100090743979700","name":"Dazza7","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a615a2ef617ef5afc23600a34f17f629","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Really depends on individuals appetite on investments. Looking at the run run, it could be the one to buy","listText":"Really depends on individuals appetite on investments. Looking at the run run, it could be the one to buy","text":"Really depends on individuals appetite on investments. Looking at the run run, it could be the one to buy","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/877973640","repostId":1143613429,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1143613429","pubTimestamp":1637883352,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1143613429?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-26 07:35","market":"us","language":"en","title":"FuelCell Energy Is the Wrong Stock to Buy for the Biden Bill","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1143613429","media":"InvestorPlace","summary":"FCEL stock isn't the seize the opportunity play it is being billed as","content":"<p>The current narrative surrounding&nbsp;<b>FuelCell Energy</b>(NASDAQ:<b><u>FCEL</u></b>) stock revolves around a few central ideas.</p>\n<p>One, the idea that it will rise from President Joseph Biden’s infrastructure bill and the money to be directed toward clean energy. And two, that FCEL stock is a buy-the-dip opportunity.</p>\n<p>Let’s start there first.</p>\n<p><b>Opportunity?</b></p>\n<p>Early in 2021, clean energy was much more attractive than it currently is. Back then, investors drove the price of FCEL stock up above $27. By April, it had fallen below $10 — it’s still there.</p>\n<p>That has led some investors to characterize FCEL stock as a diamond in the rough or a buy-the-dip opportunity.</p>\n<p>That might be fine if the&nbsp;analysts covering the stock&nbsp;had a higher opinion of it, but they don’t. Their consensus is that FCEL shares should trade at $7.38 — and there are 10 of those analysts.</p>\n<p>Remember, their job is to meticulously study the valuation of a given sector and the firms within it. So, when 10 of them come to a collective conclusion that FCEL stock should trade at $7.38, it should at least pique investors’ interest.</p>\n<p>In short, that strongly suggests that FuelCell Energy could move even lower and it also suggests that early 2021 prices were wildly exaggerated.The counter to that assertion is that FuelCell Energy will instead rise because Biden has signed his infrastructure bill. The bull thesis is that FCEL stock in particular will receive some sort of second wind.</p>\n<p><b>Biden’s Bill</b></p>\n<p>That bill includes funding for clean energy. The implication then is that FCEL stock ought to rise since its fuel cell platforms should find more buyers as a result of the bill’s passage</p>\n<p>Indeed, FuelCell Energy CEO Jason Few’s&nbsp;description of his firm’s investment&nbsp;in that future energy landscape makes sense:</p>\n<p>“We have increased our investment in innovation and are making progress towards the availability of our Advanced Technologies solutions, including distributed hydrogen, long duration energy storage, and hydrogen production via our solid oxide platform. These offerings will complement our commercially available carbonate fuel cell platforms that provide a scalable solution to deliver against the increasing requirements of clean, distributed power and hydrogen generation to strengthen and supplement the grid power and enable the hydrogen economy. The global energy transition continues to accelerate, and we believe FuelCell Energy is positioned to answer these opportunities with our patented portfolio of platform solutions.”</p>\n<p>So theoretically, the company should be in a prime position to take advantage of the billions earmarked for related projects, and perhaps it will — but it certainly cannot predict the future. However, the issue I foresee is that the inflow of capital likely won’t reach FuelCell Energy.</p>\n<p><b>Not Strong Financially</b></p>\n<p>The deeper you dig into the company, the more likely you are to realize it isn’t a great firm.</p>\n<p>&nbsp;When the company last released earnings figures, it showed weakness.Total revenues were essentially flat, having increased from&nbsp;$53.872 million to $55.65 million&nbsp;year over year.</p>\n<p>In the 2020 period, the firm managed to eke out a $320k net gain. However, that turned into a $7.274 million loss for the nine months which ended July 31, 2021.</p>\n<p>So, the obvious question becomes why should that capital flow go towards FuelCell Energy as opposed to any number of other similar projects?</p>\n<p>I don’t have another suggestion in its place, instead I’m simply asking a rhetorical question. Moreover,&nbsp; that’s how investors must think when bills get passed which are slated to lift entire sectors higher.</p>\n<p><b>What to Do</b></p>\n<p>I can see why investors are eagerly searching to find the right stocks that are bound to rise on Biden’s infrastructure bill. But I can’t see how investors can conclude FCEL stock is among the best choices in that search.</p>","source":"lsy1606302653667","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>FuelCell Energy Is the Wrong Stock to Buy for the Biden Bill</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFuelCell Energy Is the Wrong Stock to Buy for the Biden Bill\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-11-26 07:35 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2021/11/fcel-stock-fuelcell-energy-is-the-wrong-stock-for-the-biden-bill/><strong>InvestorPlace</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The current narrative surrounding FuelCell Energy(NASDAQ:FCEL) stock revolves around a few central ideas.\nOne, the idea that it will rise from President Joseph Biden’s infrastructure bill and the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2021/11/fcel-stock-fuelcell-energy-is-the-wrong-stock-for-the-biden-bill/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"FCEL":"燃料电池能源"},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2021/11/fcel-stock-fuelcell-energy-is-the-wrong-stock-for-the-biden-bill/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1143613429","content_text":"The current narrative surrounding FuelCell Energy(NASDAQ:FCEL) stock revolves around a few central ideas.\nOne, the idea that it will rise from President Joseph Biden’s infrastructure bill and the money to be directed toward clean energy. And two, that FCEL stock is a buy-the-dip opportunity.\nLet’s start there first.\nOpportunity?\nEarly in 2021, clean energy was much more attractive than it currently is. Back then, investors drove the price of FCEL stock up above $27. By April, it had fallen below $10 — it’s still there.\nThat has led some investors to characterize FCEL stock as a diamond in the rough or a buy-the-dip opportunity.\nThat might be fine if the analysts covering the stock had a higher opinion of it, but they don’t. Their consensus is that FCEL shares should trade at $7.38 — and there are 10 of those analysts.\nRemember, their job is to meticulously study the valuation of a given sector and the firms within it. So, when 10 of them come to a collective conclusion that FCEL stock should trade at $7.38, it should at least pique investors’ interest.\nIn short, that strongly suggests that FuelCell Energy could move even lower and it also suggests that early 2021 prices were wildly exaggerated.The counter to that assertion is that FuelCell Energy will instead rise because Biden has signed his infrastructure bill. The bull thesis is that FCEL stock in particular will receive some sort of second wind.\nBiden’s Bill\nThat bill includes funding for clean energy. The implication then is that FCEL stock ought to rise since its fuel cell platforms should find more buyers as a result of the bill’s passage\nIndeed, FuelCell Energy CEO Jason Few’s description of his firm’s investment in that future energy landscape makes sense:\n“We have increased our investment in innovation and are making progress towards the availability of our Advanced Technologies solutions, including distributed hydrogen, long duration energy storage, and hydrogen production via our solid oxide platform. These offerings will complement our commercially available carbonate fuel cell platforms that provide a scalable solution to deliver against the increasing requirements of clean, distributed power and hydrogen generation to strengthen and supplement the grid power and enable the hydrogen economy. The global energy transition continues to accelerate, and we believe FuelCell Energy is positioned to answer these opportunities with our patented portfolio of platform solutions.”\nSo theoretically, the company should be in a prime position to take advantage of the billions earmarked for related projects, and perhaps it will — but it certainly cannot predict the future. However, the issue I foresee is that the inflow of capital likely won’t reach FuelCell Energy.\nNot Strong Financially\nThe deeper you dig into the company, the more likely you are to realize it isn’t a great firm.\n When the company last released earnings figures, it showed weakness.Total revenues were essentially flat, having increased from $53.872 million to $55.65 million year over year.\nIn the 2020 period, the firm managed to eke out a $320k net gain. However, that turned into a $7.274 million loss for the nine months which ended July 31, 2021.\nSo, the obvious question becomes why should that capital flow go towards FuelCell Energy as opposed to any number of other similar projects?\nI don’t have another suggestion in its place, instead I’m simply asking a rhetorical question. Moreover,  that’s how investors must think when bills get passed which are slated to lift entire sectors higher.\nWhat to Do\nI can see why investors are eagerly searching to find the right stocks that are bound to rise on Biden’s infrastructure bill. But I can’t see how investors can conclude FCEL stock is among the best choices in that search.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6725603,"gmtCreate":1637883945137,"gmtModify":1637883945237,"authorId":3576325295778787,"author":{"id":3576325295778787,"authorId":3576325295778787,"name":"HOTBE","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4f535d0d25c5b9833a0f75cd652fbbcd","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":877973640,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Totally agree","text":"Totally agree","html":"Totally agree"}],"langContent":"CN"},{"id":877979388,"gmtCreate":1637883745297,"gmtModify":1637883745466,"author":{"id":"3586939439858903","authorId":"3586939439858903","name":"ASMH","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c8c22c3127769d9bb7b4e8d291d98433","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Like&nbsp;","listText":"Like&nbsp;","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/877979388","repostId":1143613429,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1143613429","pubTimestamp":1637883352,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1143613429?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-26 07:35","market":"us","language":"en","title":"FuelCell Energy Is the Wrong Stock to Buy for the Biden Bill","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1143613429","media":"InvestorPlace","summary":"FCEL stock isn't the seize the opportunity play it is being billed as","content":"<p>The current narrative surrounding&nbsp;<b>FuelCell Energy</b>(NASDAQ:<b><u>FCEL</u></b>) stock revolves around a few central ideas.</p>\n<p>One, the idea that it will rise from President Joseph Biden’s infrastructure bill and the money to be directed toward clean energy. And two, that FCEL stock is a buy-the-dip opportunity.</p>\n<p>Let’s start there first.</p>\n<p><b>Opportunity?</b></p>\n<p>Early in 2021, clean energy was much more attractive than it currently is. Back then, investors drove the price of FCEL stock up above $27. By April, it had fallen below $10 — it’s still there.</p>\n<p>That has led some investors to characterize FCEL stock as a diamond in the rough or a buy-the-dip opportunity.</p>\n<p>That might be fine if the&nbsp;analysts covering the stock&nbsp;had a higher opinion of it, but they don’t. Their consensus is that FCEL shares should trade at $7.38 — and there are 10 of those analysts.</p>\n<p>Remember, their job is to meticulously study the valuation of a given sector and the firms within it. So, when 10 of them come to a collective conclusion that FCEL stock should trade at $7.38, it should at least pique investors’ interest.</p>\n<p>In short, that strongly suggests that FuelCell Energy could move even lower and it also suggests that early 2021 prices were wildly exaggerated.The counter to that assertion is that FuelCell Energy will instead rise because Biden has signed his infrastructure bill. The bull thesis is that FCEL stock in particular will receive some sort of second wind.</p>\n<p><b>Biden’s Bill</b></p>\n<p>That bill includes funding for clean energy. The implication then is that FCEL stock ought to rise since its fuel cell platforms should find more buyers as a result of the bill’s passage</p>\n<p>Indeed, FuelCell Energy CEO Jason Few’s&nbsp;description of his firm’s investment&nbsp;in that future energy landscape makes sense:</p>\n<p>“We have increased our investment in innovation and are making progress towards the availability of our Advanced Technologies solutions, including distributed hydrogen, long duration energy storage, and hydrogen production via our solid oxide platform. These offerings will complement our commercially available carbonate fuel cell platforms that provide a scalable solution to deliver against the increasing requirements of clean, distributed power and hydrogen generation to strengthen and supplement the grid power and enable the hydrogen economy. The global energy transition continues to accelerate, and we believe FuelCell Energy is positioned to answer these opportunities with our patented portfolio of platform solutions.”</p>\n<p>So theoretically, the company should be in a prime position to take advantage of the billions earmarked for related projects, and perhaps it will — but it certainly cannot predict the future. However, the issue I foresee is that the inflow of capital likely won’t reach FuelCell Energy.</p>\n<p><b>Not Strong Financially</b></p>\n<p>The deeper you dig into the company, the more likely you are to realize it isn’t a great firm.</p>\n<p>&nbsp;When the company last released earnings figures, it showed weakness.Total revenues were essentially flat, having increased from&nbsp;$53.872 million to $55.65 million&nbsp;year over year.</p>\n<p>In the 2020 period, the firm managed to eke out a $320k net gain. However, that turned into a $7.274 million loss for the nine months which ended July 31, 2021.</p>\n<p>So, the obvious question becomes why should that capital flow go towards FuelCell Energy as opposed to any number of other similar projects?</p>\n<p>I don’t have another suggestion in its place, instead I’m simply asking a rhetorical question. Moreover,&nbsp; that’s how investors must think when bills get passed which are slated to lift entire sectors higher.</p>\n<p><b>What to Do</b></p>\n<p>I can see why investors are eagerly searching to find the right stocks that are bound to rise on Biden’s infrastructure bill. But I can’t see how investors can conclude FCEL stock is among the best choices in that search.</p>","source":"lsy1606302653667","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>FuelCell Energy Is the Wrong Stock to Buy for the Biden Bill</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFuelCell Energy Is the Wrong Stock to Buy for the Biden Bill\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-11-26 07:35 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2021/11/fcel-stock-fuelcell-energy-is-the-wrong-stock-for-the-biden-bill/><strong>InvestorPlace</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The current narrative surrounding FuelCell Energy(NASDAQ:FCEL) stock revolves around a few central ideas.\nOne, the idea that it will rise from President Joseph Biden’s infrastructure bill and the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2021/11/fcel-stock-fuelcell-energy-is-the-wrong-stock-for-the-biden-bill/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"FCEL":"燃料电池能源"},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2021/11/fcel-stock-fuelcell-energy-is-the-wrong-stock-for-the-biden-bill/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1143613429","content_text":"The current narrative surrounding FuelCell Energy(NASDAQ:FCEL) stock revolves around a few central ideas.\nOne, the idea that it will rise from President Joseph Biden’s infrastructure bill and the money to be directed toward clean energy. And two, that FCEL stock is a buy-the-dip opportunity.\nLet’s start there first.\nOpportunity?\nEarly in 2021, clean energy was much more attractive than it currently is. Back then, investors drove the price of FCEL stock up above $27. By April, it had fallen below $10 — it’s still there.\nThat has led some investors to characterize FCEL stock as a diamond in the rough or a buy-the-dip opportunity.\nThat might be fine if the analysts covering the stock had a higher opinion of it, but they don’t. Their consensus is that FCEL shares should trade at $7.38 — and there are 10 of those analysts.\nRemember, their job is to meticulously study the valuation of a given sector and the firms within it. So, when 10 of them come to a collective conclusion that FCEL stock should trade at $7.38, it should at least pique investors’ interest.\nIn short, that strongly suggests that FuelCell Energy could move even lower and it also suggests that early 2021 prices were wildly exaggerated.The counter to that assertion is that FuelCell Energy will instead rise because Biden has signed his infrastructure bill. The bull thesis is that FCEL stock in particular will receive some sort of second wind.\nBiden’s Bill\nThat bill includes funding for clean energy. The implication then is that FCEL stock ought to rise since its fuel cell platforms should find more buyers as a result of the bill’s passage\nIndeed, FuelCell Energy CEO Jason Few’s description of his firm’s investment in that future energy landscape makes sense:\n“We have increased our investment in innovation and are making progress towards the availability of our Advanced Technologies solutions, including distributed hydrogen, long duration energy storage, and hydrogen production via our solid oxide platform. These offerings will complement our commercially available carbonate fuel cell platforms that provide a scalable solution to deliver against the increasing requirements of clean, distributed power and hydrogen generation to strengthen and supplement the grid power and enable the hydrogen economy. The global energy transition continues to accelerate, and we believe FuelCell Energy is positioned to answer these opportunities with our patented portfolio of platform solutions.”\nSo theoretically, the company should be in a prime position to take advantage of the billions earmarked for related projects, and perhaps it will — but it certainly cannot predict the future. However, the issue I foresee is that the inflow of capital likely won’t reach FuelCell Energy.\nNot Strong Financially\nThe deeper you dig into the company, the more likely you are to realize it isn’t a great firm.\n When the company last released earnings figures, it showed weakness.Total revenues were essentially flat, having increased from $53.872 million to $55.65 million year over year.\nIn the 2020 period, the firm managed to eke out a $320k net gain. However, that turned into a $7.274 million loss for the nine months which ended July 31, 2021.\nSo, the obvious question becomes why should that capital flow go towards FuelCell Energy as opposed to any number of other similar projects?\nI don’t have another suggestion in its place, instead I’m simply asking a rhetorical question. Moreover,  that’s how investors must think when bills get passed which are slated to lift entire sectors higher.\nWhat to Do\nI can see why investors are eagerly searching to find the right stocks that are bound to rise on Biden’s infrastructure bill. But I can’t see how investors can conclude FCEL stock is among the best choices in that search.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6739183,"gmtCreate":1637969936602,"gmtModify":1637969936631,"authorId":3586939439858903,"author":{"id":3586939439858903,"authorId":3586939439858903,"name":"ASMH","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c8c22c3127769d9bb7b4e8d291d98433","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":877979388,"type":1,"supId":6725600,"prevId":0,"content":"Ok ay","text":"Ok ay","html":"Ok ay"},{"id":6725600,"gmtCreate":1637883925880,"gmtModify":1637883925910,"authorId":3570267505142951,"author":{"id":3570267505142951,"authorId":3570267505142951,"name":"TooYoung","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/910a137e5328138f3ccac23ab2276279","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":877979388,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"<u>done</u>","text":"<u>done</u>","html":"<u>done</u>"}],"langContent":"CN"},{"id":877944332,"gmtCreate":1637883525373,"gmtModify":1637883525558,"author":{"id":"3574929829220175","authorId":"3574929829220175","name":"nicholastsj","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d43d1a543e192369160adfc42ef5e783","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"like","listText":"like","text":"like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/877944332","repostId":1143613429,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1143613429","pubTimestamp":1637883352,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1143613429?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-26 07:35","market":"us","language":"en","title":"FuelCell Energy Is the Wrong Stock to Buy for the Biden Bill","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1143613429","media":"InvestorPlace","summary":"FCEL stock isn't the seize the opportunity play it is being billed as","content":"<p>The current narrative surrounding&nbsp;<b>FuelCell Energy</b>(NASDAQ:<b><u>FCEL</u></b>) stock revolves around a few central ideas.</p>\n<p>One, the idea that it will rise from President Joseph Biden’s infrastructure bill and the money to be directed toward clean energy. And two, that FCEL stock is a buy-the-dip opportunity.</p>\n<p>Let’s start there first.</p>\n<p><b>Opportunity?</b></p>\n<p>Early in 2021, clean energy was much more attractive than it currently is. Back then, investors drove the price of FCEL stock up above $27. By April, it had fallen below $10 — it’s still there.</p>\n<p>That has led some investors to characterize FCEL stock as a diamond in the rough or a buy-the-dip opportunity.</p>\n<p>That might be fine if the&nbsp;analysts covering the stock&nbsp;had a higher opinion of it, but they don’t. Their consensus is that FCEL shares should trade at $7.38 — and there are 10 of those analysts.</p>\n<p>Remember, their job is to meticulously study the valuation of a given sector and the firms within it. So, when 10 of them come to a collective conclusion that FCEL stock should trade at $7.38, it should at least pique investors’ interest.</p>\n<p>In short, that strongly suggests that FuelCell Energy could move even lower and it also suggests that early 2021 prices were wildly exaggerated.The counter to that assertion is that FuelCell Energy will instead rise because Biden has signed his infrastructure bill. The bull thesis is that FCEL stock in particular will receive some sort of second wind.</p>\n<p><b>Biden’s Bill</b></p>\n<p>That bill includes funding for clean energy. The implication then is that FCEL stock ought to rise since its fuel cell platforms should find more buyers as a result of the bill’s passage</p>\n<p>Indeed, FuelCell Energy CEO Jason Few’s&nbsp;description of his firm’s investment&nbsp;in that future energy landscape makes sense:</p>\n<p>“We have increased our investment in innovation and are making progress towards the availability of our Advanced Technologies solutions, including distributed hydrogen, long duration energy storage, and hydrogen production via our solid oxide platform. These offerings will complement our commercially available carbonate fuel cell platforms that provide a scalable solution to deliver against the increasing requirements of clean, distributed power and hydrogen generation to strengthen and supplement the grid power and enable the hydrogen economy. The global energy transition continues to accelerate, and we believe FuelCell Energy is positioned to answer these opportunities with our patented portfolio of platform solutions.”</p>\n<p>So theoretically, the company should be in a prime position to take advantage of the billions earmarked for related projects, and perhaps it will — but it certainly cannot predict the future. However, the issue I foresee is that the inflow of capital likely won’t reach FuelCell Energy.</p>\n<p><b>Not Strong Financially</b></p>\n<p>The deeper you dig into the company, the more likely you are to realize it isn’t a great firm.</p>\n<p>&nbsp;When the company last released earnings figures, it showed weakness.Total revenues were essentially flat, having increased from&nbsp;$53.872 million to $55.65 million&nbsp;year over year.</p>\n<p>In the 2020 period, the firm managed to eke out a $320k net gain. However, that turned into a $7.274 million loss for the nine months which ended July 31, 2021.</p>\n<p>So, the obvious question becomes why should that capital flow go towards FuelCell Energy as opposed to any number of other similar projects?</p>\n<p>I don’t have another suggestion in its place, instead I’m simply asking a rhetorical question. Moreover,&nbsp; that’s how investors must think when bills get passed which are slated to lift entire sectors higher.</p>\n<p><b>What to Do</b></p>\n<p>I can see why investors are eagerly searching to find the right stocks that are bound to rise on Biden’s infrastructure bill. But I can’t see how investors can conclude FCEL stock is among the best choices in that search.</p>","source":"lsy1606302653667","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>FuelCell Energy Is the Wrong Stock to Buy for the Biden Bill</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFuelCell Energy Is the Wrong Stock to Buy for the Biden Bill\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-11-26 07:35 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2021/11/fcel-stock-fuelcell-energy-is-the-wrong-stock-for-the-biden-bill/><strong>InvestorPlace</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The current narrative surrounding FuelCell Energy(NASDAQ:FCEL) stock revolves around a few central ideas.\nOne, the idea that it will rise from President Joseph Biden’s infrastructure bill and the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2021/11/fcel-stock-fuelcell-energy-is-the-wrong-stock-for-the-biden-bill/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"FCEL":"燃料电池能源"},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2021/11/fcel-stock-fuelcell-energy-is-the-wrong-stock-for-the-biden-bill/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1143613429","content_text":"The current narrative surrounding FuelCell Energy(NASDAQ:FCEL) stock revolves around a few central ideas.\nOne, the idea that it will rise from President Joseph Biden’s infrastructure bill and the money to be directed toward clean energy. And two, that FCEL stock is a buy-the-dip opportunity.\nLet’s start there first.\nOpportunity?\nEarly in 2021, clean energy was much more attractive than it currently is. Back then, investors drove the price of FCEL stock up above $27. By April, it had fallen below $10 — it’s still there.\nThat has led some investors to characterize FCEL stock as a diamond in the rough or a buy-the-dip opportunity.\nThat might be fine if the analysts covering the stock had a higher opinion of it, but they don’t. Their consensus is that FCEL shares should trade at $7.38 — and there are 10 of those analysts.\nRemember, their job is to meticulously study the valuation of a given sector and the firms within it. So, when 10 of them come to a collective conclusion that FCEL stock should trade at $7.38, it should at least pique investors’ interest.\nIn short, that strongly suggests that FuelCell Energy could move even lower and it also suggests that early 2021 prices were wildly exaggerated.The counter to that assertion is that FuelCell Energy will instead rise because Biden has signed his infrastructure bill. The bull thesis is that FCEL stock in particular will receive some sort of second wind.\nBiden’s Bill\nThat bill includes funding for clean energy. The implication then is that FCEL stock ought to rise since its fuel cell platforms should find more buyers as a result of the bill’s passage\nIndeed, FuelCell Energy CEO Jason Few’s description of his firm’s investment in that future energy landscape makes sense:\n“We have increased our investment in innovation and are making progress towards the availability of our Advanced Technologies solutions, including distributed hydrogen, long duration energy storage, and hydrogen production via our solid oxide platform. These offerings will complement our commercially available carbonate fuel cell platforms that provide a scalable solution to deliver against the increasing requirements of clean, distributed power and hydrogen generation to strengthen and supplement the grid power and enable the hydrogen economy. The global energy transition continues to accelerate, and we believe FuelCell Energy is positioned to answer these opportunities with our patented portfolio of platform solutions.”\nSo theoretically, the company should be in a prime position to take advantage of the billions earmarked for related projects, and perhaps it will — but it certainly cannot predict the future. However, the issue I foresee is that the inflow of capital likely won’t reach FuelCell Energy.\nNot Strong Financially\nThe deeper you dig into the company, the more likely you are to realize it isn’t a great firm.\n When the company last released earnings figures, it showed weakness.Total revenues were essentially flat, having increased from $53.872 million to $55.65 million year over year.\nIn the 2020 period, the firm managed to eke out a $320k net gain. However, that turned into a $7.274 million loss for the nine months which ended July 31, 2021.\nSo, the obvious question becomes why should that capital flow go towards FuelCell Energy as opposed to any number of other similar projects?\nI don’t have another suggestion in its place, instead I’m simply asking a rhetorical question. Moreover,  that’s how investors must think when bills get passed which are slated to lift entire sectors higher.\nWhat to Do\nI can see why investors are eagerly searching to find the right stocks that are bound to rise on Biden’s infrastructure bill. But I can’t see how investors can conclude FCEL stock is among the best choices in that search.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6725516,"gmtCreate":1637883576587,"gmtModify":1637883576618,"authorId":3569246821403636,"author":{"id":3569246821403636,"authorId":3569246821403636,"name":"iuhnaij","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f75a9eb10b1516329dea134dea1d9a7a","vip":1,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":877944332,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"like","text":"like","html":"like"}],"langContent":"CN"},{"id":877945735,"gmtCreate":1637883465619,"gmtModify":1637883465761,"author":{"id":"3584083942205926","authorId":"3584083942205926","name":"HappyTum","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e17e8fe0f76bab142b7afa480ad9e85b","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/877945735","repostId":1143613429,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1143613429","pubTimestamp":1637883352,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1143613429?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-26 07:35","market":"us","language":"en","title":"FuelCell Energy Is the Wrong Stock to Buy for the Biden Bill","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1143613429","media":"InvestorPlace","summary":"FCEL stock isn't the seize the opportunity play it is being billed as","content":"<p>The current narrative surrounding&nbsp;<b>FuelCell Energy</b>(NASDAQ:<b><u>FCEL</u></b>) stock revolves around a few central ideas.</p>\n<p>One, the idea that it will rise from President Joseph Biden’s infrastructure bill and the money to be directed toward clean energy. And two, that FCEL stock is a buy-the-dip opportunity.</p>\n<p>Let’s start there first.</p>\n<p><b>Opportunity?</b></p>\n<p>Early in 2021, clean energy was much more attractive than it currently is. Back then, investors drove the price of FCEL stock up above $27. By April, it had fallen below $10 — it’s still there.</p>\n<p>That has led some investors to characterize FCEL stock as a diamond in the rough or a buy-the-dip opportunity.</p>\n<p>That might be fine if the&nbsp;analysts covering the stock&nbsp;had a higher opinion of it, but they don’t. Their consensus is that FCEL shares should trade at $7.38 — and there are 10 of those analysts.</p>\n<p>Remember, their job is to meticulously study the valuation of a given sector and the firms within it. So, when 10 of them come to a collective conclusion that FCEL stock should trade at $7.38, it should at least pique investors’ interest.</p>\n<p>In short, that strongly suggests that FuelCell Energy could move even lower and it also suggests that early 2021 prices were wildly exaggerated.The counter to that assertion is that FuelCell Energy will instead rise because Biden has signed his infrastructure bill. The bull thesis is that FCEL stock in particular will receive some sort of second wind.</p>\n<p><b>Biden’s Bill</b></p>\n<p>That bill includes funding for clean energy. The implication then is that FCEL stock ought to rise since its fuel cell platforms should find more buyers as a result of the bill’s passage</p>\n<p>Indeed, FuelCell Energy CEO Jason Few’s&nbsp;description of his firm’s investment&nbsp;in that future energy landscape makes sense:</p>\n<p>“We have increased our investment in innovation and are making progress towards the availability of our Advanced Technologies solutions, including distributed hydrogen, long duration energy storage, and hydrogen production via our solid oxide platform. These offerings will complement our commercially available carbonate fuel cell platforms that provide a scalable solution to deliver against the increasing requirements of clean, distributed power and hydrogen generation to strengthen and supplement the grid power and enable the hydrogen economy. The global energy transition continues to accelerate, and we believe FuelCell Energy is positioned to answer these opportunities with our patented portfolio of platform solutions.”</p>\n<p>So theoretically, the company should be in a prime position to take advantage of the billions earmarked for related projects, and perhaps it will — but it certainly cannot predict the future. However, the issue I foresee is that the inflow of capital likely won’t reach FuelCell Energy.</p>\n<p><b>Not Strong Financially</b></p>\n<p>The deeper you dig into the company, the more likely you are to realize it isn’t a great firm.</p>\n<p>&nbsp;When the company last released earnings figures, it showed weakness.Total revenues were essentially flat, having increased from&nbsp;$53.872 million to $55.65 million&nbsp;year over year.</p>\n<p>In the 2020 period, the firm managed to eke out a $320k net gain. However, that turned into a $7.274 million loss for the nine months which ended July 31, 2021.</p>\n<p>So, the obvious question becomes why should that capital flow go towards FuelCell Energy as opposed to any number of other similar projects?</p>\n<p>I don’t have another suggestion in its place, instead I’m simply asking a rhetorical question. Moreover,&nbsp; that’s how investors must think when bills get passed which are slated to lift entire sectors higher.</p>\n<p><b>What to Do</b></p>\n<p>I can see why investors are eagerly searching to find the right stocks that are bound to rise on Biden’s infrastructure bill. But I can’t see how investors can conclude FCEL stock is among the best choices in that search.</p>","source":"lsy1606302653667","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>FuelCell Energy Is the Wrong Stock to Buy for the Biden Bill</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFuelCell Energy Is the Wrong Stock to Buy for the Biden Bill\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-11-26 07:35 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2021/11/fcel-stock-fuelcell-energy-is-the-wrong-stock-for-the-biden-bill/><strong>InvestorPlace</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The current narrative surrounding FuelCell Energy(NASDAQ:FCEL) stock revolves around a few central ideas.\nOne, the idea that it will rise from President Joseph Biden’s infrastructure bill and the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2021/11/fcel-stock-fuelcell-energy-is-the-wrong-stock-for-the-biden-bill/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"FCEL":"燃料电池能源"},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2021/11/fcel-stock-fuelcell-energy-is-the-wrong-stock-for-the-biden-bill/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1143613429","content_text":"The current narrative surrounding FuelCell Energy(NASDAQ:FCEL) stock revolves around a few central ideas.\nOne, the idea that it will rise from President Joseph Biden’s infrastructure bill and the money to be directed toward clean energy. And two, that FCEL stock is a buy-the-dip opportunity.\nLet’s start there first.\nOpportunity?\nEarly in 2021, clean energy was much more attractive than it currently is. Back then, investors drove the price of FCEL stock up above $27. By April, it had fallen below $10 — it’s still there.\nThat has led some investors to characterize FCEL stock as a diamond in the rough or a buy-the-dip opportunity.\nThat might be fine if the analysts covering the stock had a higher opinion of it, but they don’t. Their consensus is that FCEL shares should trade at $7.38 — and there are 10 of those analysts.\nRemember, their job is to meticulously study the valuation of a given sector and the firms within it. So, when 10 of them come to a collective conclusion that FCEL stock should trade at $7.38, it should at least pique investors’ interest.\nIn short, that strongly suggests that FuelCell Energy could move even lower and it also suggests that early 2021 prices were wildly exaggerated.The counter to that assertion is that FuelCell Energy will instead rise because Biden has signed his infrastructure bill. The bull thesis is that FCEL stock in particular will receive some sort of second wind.\nBiden’s Bill\nThat bill includes funding for clean energy. The implication then is that FCEL stock ought to rise since its fuel cell platforms should find more buyers as a result of the bill’s passage\nIndeed, FuelCell Energy CEO Jason Few’s description of his firm’s investment in that future energy landscape makes sense:\n“We have increased our investment in innovation and are making progress towards the availability of our Advanced Technologies solutions, including distributed hydrogen, long duration energy storage, and hydrogen production via our solid oxide platform. These offerings will complement our commercially available carbonate fuel cell platforms that provide a scalable solution to deliver against the increasing requirements of clean, distributed power and hydrogen generation to strengthen and supplement the grid power and enable the hydrogen economy. The global energy transition continues to accelerate, and we believe FuelCell Energy is positioned to answer these opportunities with our patented portfolio of platform solutions.”\nSo theoretically, the company should be in a prime position to take advantage of the billions earmarked for related projects, and perhaps it will — but it certainly cannot predict the future. However, the issue I foresee is that the inflow of capital likely won’t reach FuelCell Energy.\nNot Strong Financially\nThe deeper you dig into the company, the more likely you are to realize it isn’t a great firm.\n When the company last released earnings figures, it showed weakness.Total revenues were essentially flat, having increased from $53.872 million to $55.65 million year over year.\nIn the 2020 period, the firm managed to eke out a $320k net gain. However, that turned into a $7.274 million loss for the nine months which ended July 31, 2021.\nSo, the obvious question becomes why should that capital flow go towards FuelCell Energy as opposed to any number of other similar projects?\nI don’t have another suggestion in its place, instead I’m simply asking a rhetorical question. Moreover,  that’s how investors must think when bills get passed which are slated to lift entire sectors higher.\nWhat to Do\nI can see why investors are eagerly searching to find the right stocks that are bound to rise on Biden’s infrastructure bill. But I can’t see how investors can conclude FCEL stock is among the best choices in that search.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6725500,"gmtCreate":1637883529642,"gmtModify":1637883529675,"authorId":3574929829220175,"author":{"id":3574929829220175,"authorId":3574929829220175,"name":"nicholastsj","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d43d1a543e192369160adfc42ef5e783","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":877945735,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"like","text":"like","html":"like"}],"langContent":"CN"}],"hasMoreComments":true,"newsSizeData":{"likeSize":81,"commentSize":10,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false}}