+关注
meganleeqy
暂无个人介绍
IP属地：海外
8
关注
0
粉丝
0
主题
0
勋章
主贴
热门
meganleeqy
2021-04-15
$LAC xxxxxxxxxxx
meganleeqy
2021-03-16
Like and comment
Value stocks are making a comeback. Don’t get left behind, these analysts say
meganleeqy
2021-03-15
Nice
4 Vanguard ETFs That Can Double Your $1,400 Stimulus Check
meganleeqy
2021-03-15
Yes
Breakout or breakdown? Why the Nasdaq’s two decade leadership cycle may withstand rising rates
去老虎APP查看更多动态
{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"3577605942117209","uuid":"3577605942117209","gmtCreate":1614511918204,"gmtModify":1614511918204,"name":"meganleeqy","pinyin":"meganleeqy","introduction":"","introductionEn":null,"signature":"","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":0,"headSize":8,"tweetSize":4,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":1,"name":"萌萌虎","nameTw":"萌萌虎","represent":"呱呱坠地","factor":"评论帖子3次或发布1条主帖（非转发）","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":null,"userBadges":[{"badgeId":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561-2","templateUuid":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561","name":"资深虎友","description":"加入老虎社区1000天","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0063fb68ea29c9ae6858c58630e182d5","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/96c699a93be4214d4b49aea6a5a5d1a4","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35b0e542a9ff77046ed69ef602bc105d","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2024.04.13","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37-1","templateUuid":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37","name":"博闻投资者","description":"累计交易超过10只正股","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.28","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a-1","templateUuid":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a","name":"实盘交易者","description":"完成一笔实盘交易","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":3,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":"海外","starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"post","tweets":[{"id":344521365,"gmtCreate":1618416812257,"gmtModify":1634293063248,"author":{"id":"3577605942117209","authorId":"3577605942117209","name":"meganleeqy","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577605942117209","authorIdStr":"3577605942117209"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"$LAC xxxxxxxxxxx","listText":"$LAC xxxxxxxxxxx","text":"$LAC xxxxxxxxxxx","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/211ce116a4096242e9d528d7e6d3383f","width":"1125","height":"2618"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/344521365","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":218,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":325394343,"gmtCreate":1615862644082,"gmtModify":1703494137338,"author":{"id":"3577605942117209","authorId":"3577605942117209","name":"meganleeqy","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577605942117209","authorIdStr":"3577605942117209"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like and comment ","listText":"Like and comment ","text":"Like and comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/325394343","repostId":"1143760301","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1143760301","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1615861990,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1143760301?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-16 10:33","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Value stocks are making a comeback. Don’t get left behind, these analysts say","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1143760301","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"Pure value has trailed the S&P 500 by 30 percentage points in the past 3 years.After a 14-year stret","content":"<blockquote>Pure value has trailed the S&P 500 by 30 percentage points in the past 3 years.</blockquote><p>After a 14-year stretch of outperformance for growth stocks compared to value, investors seem to finally be rewarding the left-behind names. That makes sense: value sectors tend to do better at the start of an economic cycle, after all. But there have been several value head fakes over the years, and growthier names grab more headlines.</p><p>Still, one analyst team says the rotation is for real— and there’s still upside left.</p><p>“Growth’s dominance relative to value peaked in the fall of 2020,” wrote Keith Lerner, chief market strategist, and Dylan Kase, investment analyst, at Truist Advisory Services.</p><p>“We still see more upside in value relative to growth over the next 12 months given value’s dramatic longer-term underperformance as well as the U.S. economy being on the cusp of the best growth in more than 35 years,” they added. “It would not be unusual to see value consolidate some of its recent outperformance, but we would stick with the value trend and use any short-term setbacks to add to the position.”</p><p>Value stocks have rallied in recent weeks, the analysts acknowledged, but according to one metric, there’s still room to run.</p><p>“Our work suggests that greater upside remains in the pure value style,” they write, which has more of an allocation to financials and energy.Pure value has trailed the S&P 500 by 30 percentage points over the past three years, and forward earnings look much more attractive than the broader market does.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9ddb33e8531412f0a26ac513dd0d610a\" tg-width=\"1260\" tg-height=\"657\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>“Catch up potential remains,” the analysts concluded, especially if the economic rebound is as strong as forecast.</p><p>On Monday, all major stock benchmarks were trading near flat, with a slight edge for the growth- and tech-oriented Nasdaq Composite index.</p>","source":"market_watch","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Value stocks are making a comeback. Don’t get left behind, these analysts say</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nValue stocks are making a comeback. Don’t get left behind, these analysts say\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-16 10:33 GMT+8 <a href=https://www.marketwatch.com/story/value-stocks-are-making-a-comeback-dont-get-left-behind-these-analysts-say-11615828690?mod=hp_LATEST&adobe_mc=MCMID%3D03250748340802259633376614514522268876%7CMCORGID%3DCB68E4BA55144CAA0A4C98A5%2540AdobeOrg%7CTS%3D1615861739><strong>MarketWatch</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Pure value has trailed the S&P 500 by 30 percentage points in the past 3 years.After a 14-year stretch of outperformance for growth stocks compared to value, investors seem to finally be rewarding the...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/value-stocks-are-making-a-comeback-dont-get-left-behind-these-analysts-say-11615828690?mod=hp_LATEST&adobe_mc=MCMID%3D03250748340802259633376614514522268876%7CMCORGID%3DCB68E4BA55144CAA0A4C98A5%2540AdobeOrg%7CTS%3D1615861739\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/value-stocks-are-making-a-comeback-dont-get-left-behind-these-analysts-say-11615828690?mod=hp_LATEST&adobe_mc=MCMID%3D03250748340802259633376614514522268876%7CMCORGID%3DCB68E4BA55144CAA0A4C98A5%2540AdobeOrg%7CTS%3D1615861739","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/599a65733b8245fcf7868668ef9ad712","article_id":"1143760301","content_text":"Pure value has trailed the S&P 500 by 30 percentage points in the past 3 years.After a 14-year stretch of outperformance for growth stocks compared to value, investors seem to finally be rewarding the left-behind names. That makes sense: value sectors tend to do better at the start of an economic cycle, after all. But there have been several value head fakes over the years, and growthier names grab more headlines.Still, one analyst team says the rotation is for real— and there’s still upside left.“Growth’s dominance relative to value peaked in the fall of 2020,” wrote Keith Lerner, chief market strategist, and Dylan Kase, investment analyst, at Truist Advisory Services.“We still see more upside in value relative to growth over the next 12 months given value’s dramatic longer-term underperformance as well as the U.S. economy being on the cusp of the best growth in more than 35 years,” they added. “It would not be unusual to see value consolidate some of its recent outperformance, but we would stick with the value trend and use any short-term setbacks to add to the position.”Value stocks have rallied in recent weeks, the analysts acknowledged, but according to one metric, there’s still room to run.“Our work suggests that greater upside remains in the pure value style,” they write, which has more of an allocation to financials and energy.Pure value has trailed the S&P 500 by 30 percentage points over the past three years, and forward earnings look much more attractive than the broader market does.“Catch up potential remains,” the analysts concluded, especially if the economic rebound is as strong as forecast.On Monday, all major stock benchmarks were trading near flat, with a slight edge for the growth- and tech-oriented Nasdaq Composite index.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":231,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":322625089,"gmtCreate":1615804582741,"gmtModify":1703493214421,"author":{"id":"3577605942117209","authorId":"3577605942117209","name":"meganleeqy","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577605942117209","authorIdStr":"3577605942117209"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nice","listText":"Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/322625089","repostId":"1192661500","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1192661500","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1615804156,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1192661500?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-15 18:29","market":"us","language":"en","title":"4 Vanguard ETFs That Can Double Your $1,400 Stimulus Check","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1192661500","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"If a $1,400 stimulus check is headed your way, investing that money in an exchange-traded fund (ETF)","content":"<p>If a $1,400 stimulus check is headed your way, investing that money in an exchange-traded fund (ETF) could pay off big time. Instead of buying a few different stocks, with anETFyou can invest in hundreds of companies. Vanguard ETFs are a smart pick because the fees are incredibly low.</p>\n<p>Of course, not everyone should invest their stimulus money. You should only do so if you have anemergency fund, you're current on bills, and you don't have high-interest debt. Also keep in mind that past performance doesn't guarantee future results. But if you can afford to invest and you want the potential to double your stimulus money, check out these four Vanguard ETFs.</p>\n<p><b>1. Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO)</b></p>\n<p>If you invest $1,400 in the<b>Vanguard S&P 500 ETF</b>(NYSEMKT:VOO)and leave it there for a long stretch, you're practically guaranteed to make money. The fund tracks the<b>S&P 500</b>index, which measures the performance of 500 of the largest companies in America. Buying an S&P 500 ETF makes you an automatic investor in those 500 companies, including<b>Apple</b>(NASDAQ:AAPL),<b>Amazon</b>(NASDAQ:AMZN),<b>Tesla</b>(NASDAQ:TSLA), and<b>Walt Disney Co.</b>(NYSE:DIS). If you'd invested money at any point in the S&P 500's history, never once would you have lost money had you kept it invested for 20 years.</p>\n<p>The VOO has an expense ratio of 0.03%. In other words, just 0.03% of your investment goes toward fees, which translates to $0.42 for a $1,400 investment. Had you invested $1,400 in the VOO in March 2016, you'd have just over $3,000 today.</p>\n<p><b>2. Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG)</b></p>\n<p>The<b>Vanguard Growth Fund ETF</b>(NYSEMKT:VUG)is a solid way to invest your stimulus check if you're OK with more risk in exchange for higher returns. It tracks an index called the<b>CRSP U.S. Large Cap Growth Index</b>, which is very similar to the S&P 500 screened to focus on 257 stocks identified asgrowth stocks. Essentially, you're investing in the faster-growing half of the S&P 500. With a 0.04% expense ratio, your fees would only eat up $0.56 of your stimulus check.</p>\n<p>Not surprisingly, the VUG is more heavily concentrated in the tech sector compared to S&P 500 funds. Tech stocks account for 47% of its holdings versus 27.8% for the VOO. A $1,400 investment in the VUG made five years ago would today be worth over $3,600. However, tech stocks that have soared in the past year have been cooling off recently. Temper your expectations if you're seeking huge returns immediately.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f236b494475214fb7e9a992442f31213\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"502\"><b>3. Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB)</b></p>\n<p>Investing insmall-cap stocks, typically defined as those with a market capitalization between $300 million and $2 billion, is another way to earn greater returns if you're comfortable with more risk. You have the potential to invest in a future giant while it's still small, but these often young companies have a higher risk of failing.</p>\n<p><b>Vanguard's Small-Cap ETF</b>(NYSEMKT:VB)allows you to invest in 1,426 stocks of smaller companies -- though many aren't exactly small caps, given that the median market cap is $5.9 billion. Its five largest holdings are fuel cell company<b>Plug Power Inc.</b>(NASDAQ:PLUG), solar power supplier<b>Enphase Energy</b>(NASDAQ:ENPH), cloud database<b>MongoDB</b>(NASDAQ:MDB), drug manufacturer<b>Catalent Inc.</b>(NYSE:CTLT), and software developer<b>Zendesk Inc.</b>(NYSE:ZEN).</p>\n<p>Had you invested $1,400 in the fund five years ago, you'd have more than $3,000 today. Its 0.05% expense ratio translates to fees of $0.70 on a $1,400 investment.</p>\n<p><b>4. Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO)</b></p>\n<p>You know how we said past performance isn't an indicator of future results? Well, had you invested $1,400 in the<b>Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF</b>(NYSEMKT:VWO)five years ago, you wouldn't have doubled your money. You'd have just over $2,500 today.</p>\n<p>The fund invests in more than 5,000 stocks across 23 developing nations, including China, Taiwan, India, Brazil, and South Africa. Its expense ratio is 0.1%, slightly higher than the other funds on this list -- but still just $1.40 of a $1,400 investment.</p>\n<p>Investing in emerging markets can be risky because there's often political instability and less regulation. But consider that about 85% of the world's population lives in emerging market countries. If you're taking a long-term focus, investing in an emerging markets fund like the VWO offers serious growth potential for your third stimulus check.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>4 Vanguard ETFs That Can Double Your $1,400 Stimulus Check</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n4 Vanguard ETFs That Can Double Your $1,400 Stimulus Check\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-15 18:29 GMT+8 <a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/15/4-vanguard-etfs-that-can-double-your-1400-stimulus/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>If a $1,400 stimulus check is headed your way, investing that money in an exchange-traded fund (ETF) could pay off big time. Instead of buying a few different stocks, with anETFyou can invest in ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/15/4-vanguard-etfs-that-can-double-your-1400-stimulus/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/15/4-vanguard-etfs-that-can-double-your-1400-stimulus/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1192661500","content_text":"If a $1,400 stimulus check is headed your way, investing that money in an exchange-traded fund (ETF) could pay off big time. Instead of buying a few different stocks, with anETFyou can invest in hundreds of companies. Vanguard ETFs are a smart pick because the fees are incredibly low.\nOf course, not everyone should invest their stimulus money. You should only do so if you have anemergency fund, you're current on bills, and you don't have high-interest debt. Also keep in mind that past performance doesn't guarantee future results. But if you can afford to invest and you want the potential to double your stimulus money, check out these four Vanguard ETFs.\n1. Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO)\nIf you invest $1,400 in theVanguard S&P 500 ETF(NYSEMKT:VOO)and leave it there for a long stretch, you're practically guaranteed to make money. The fund tracks theS&P 500index, which measures the performance of 500 of the largest companies in America. Buying an S&P 500 ETF makes you an automatic investor in those 500 companies, includingApple(NASDAQ:AAPL),Amazon(NASDAQ:AMZN),Tesla(NASDAQ:TSLA), andWalt Disney Co.(NYSE:DIS). If you'd invested money at any point in the S&P 500's history, never once would you have lost money had you kept it invested for 20 years.\nThe VOO has an expense ratio of 0.03%. In other words, just 0.03% of your investment goes toward fees, which translates to $0.42 for a $1,400 investment. Had you invested $1,400 in the VOO in March 2016, you'd have just over $3,000 today.\n2. Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG)\nTheVanguard Growth Fund ETF(NYSEMKT:VUG)is a solid way to invest your stimulus check if you're OK with more risk in exchange for higher returns. It tracks an index called theCRSP U.S. Large Cap Growth Index, which is very similar to the S&P 500 screened to focus on 257 stocks identified asgrowth stocks. Essentially, you're investing in the faster-growing half of the S&P 500. With a 0.04% expense ratio, your fees would only eat up $0.56 of your stimulus check.\nNot surprisingly, the VUG is more heavily concentrated in the tech sector compared to S&P 500 funds. Tech stocks account for 47% of its holdings versus 27.8% for the VOO. A $1,400 investment in the VUG made five years ago would today be worth over $3,600. However, tech stocks that have soared in the past year have been cooling off recently. Temper your expectations if you're seeking huge returns immediately.\n3. Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB)\nInvesting insmall-cap stocks, typically defined as those with a market capitalization between $300 million and $2 billion, is another way to earn greater returns if you're comfortable with more risk. You have the potential to invest in a future giant while it's still small, but these often young companies have a higher risk of failing.\nVanguard's Small-Cap ETF(NYSEMKT:VB)allows you to invest in 1,426 stocks of smaller companies -- though many aren't exactly small caps, given that the median market cap is $5.9 billion. Its five largest holdings are fuel cell companyPlug Power Inc.(NASDAQ:PLUG), solar power supplierEnphase Energy(NASDAQ:ENPH), cloud databaseMongoDB(NASDAQ:MDB), drug manufacturerCatalent Inc.(NYSE:CTLT), and software developerZendesk Inc.(NYSE:ZEN).\nHad you invested $1,400 in the fund five years ago, you'd have more than $3,000 today. Its 0.05% expense ratio translates to fees of $0.70 on a $1,400 investment.\n4. Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO)\nYou know how we said past performance isn't an indicator of future results? Well, had you invested $1,400 in theVanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF(NYSEMKT:VWO)five years ago, you wouldn't have doubled your money. You'd have just over $2,500 today.\nThe fund invests in more than 5,000 stocks across 23 developing nations, including China, Taiwan, India, Brazil, and South Africa. Its expense ratio is 0.1%, slightly higher than the other funds on this list -- but still just $1.40 of a $1,400 investment.\nInvesting in emerging markets can be risky because there's often political instability and less regulation. But consider that about 85% of the world's population lives in emerging market countries. If you're taking a long-term focus, investing in an emerging markets fund like the VWO offers serious growth potential for your third stimulus check.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":298,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":322622626,"gmtCreate":1615804552965,"gmtModify":1703493213556,"author":{"id":"3577605942117209","authorId":"3577605942117209","name":"meganleeqy","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577605942117209","authorIdStr":"3577605942117209"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Yes","listText":"Yes","text":"Yes","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/322622626","repostId":"1199092369","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1199092369","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1615766818,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1199092369?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-15 08:06","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Breakout or breakdown? Why the Nasdaq’s two decade leadership cycle may withstand rising rates","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1199092369","media":"cnbc","summary":"The Leuthold Group’s Jim Paulsen has a message for investors: Don’t give up on Big Tech.\nAccording t","content":"<div>\n<p>The Leuthold Group’s Jim Paulsen has a message for investors: Don’t give up on Big Tech.\nAccording to the firm’s chief investment strategist, Nasdaq volatility associated with rising Treasury Note ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/03/14/nasdaq-breakdown-fears-are-overblown-leutholds-jim-paulsen.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"cnbc_highlight","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Breakout or breakdown? Why the Nasdaq’s two decade leadership cycle may withstand rising rates</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBreakout or breakdown? Why the Nasdaq’s two decade leadership cycle may withstand rising rates\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-15 08:06 GMT+8 <a href=https://www.cnbc.com/2021/03/14/nasdaq-breakdown-fears-are-overblown-leutholds-jim-paulsen.html><strong>cnbc</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The Leuthold Group’s Jim Paulsen has a message for investors: Don’t give up on Big Tech.\nAccording to the firm’s chief investment strategist, Nasdaq volatility associated with rising Treasury Note ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/03/14/nasdaq-breakdown-fears-are-overblown-leutholds-jim-paulsen.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/03/14/nasdaq-breakdown-fears-are-overblown-leutholds-jim-paulsen.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/72bb72e1b84c09fca865c6dcb1bbcd16","article_id":"1199092369","content_text":"The Leuthold Group’s Jim Paulsen has a message for investors: Don’t give up on Big Tech.\nAccording to the firm’s chief investment strategist, Nasdaq volatility associated with rising Treasury Note yields may not be enough to permanently derail its two decade leadership cycle.\n“It’s quite a coincidence that that same peak we had three weeks ago in both the Nasdaq and S&P 500 technology index... to the overall S&P occurred also right on the same level as the dot-com top a little over 20 years ago,” Paulsen told CNBC’s “Trading Nation” on Friday. “That relative high has been enforced ever since.”\nIn a recent note to clients, Paulsen tackled whether growth plays, which include Big Tech, were “peaking out” or “breaking out.” He found support for both scenarios. But Paulsen believes it’s more likely the group will endure through higher rates.\n“It might have less to do with yields than it does with just facing a glass ceiling,” he added. “I’mnot totally convinced that we’re breaking down. We might just be hitting the ceiling, bouncing down for a minute and maybe going to take it out yet at some point here in the future.”\nPaulsen contends Big Tech and growth, which he classifies as “New-Era” stocks, will retain their attractiveness to investors.\n“If it does ultimately achieve a new relative-price high, might its leadership persevere and perhaps even strengthen? That is what happened the last two times the Nasdaq spent multiple years as an underperformer,” he wrote.\nDespite his optimism, Paulsen acknowledges it’s reasonable to expect a phase of underperformance, consolidation or even a temporary meltdown.\n“It’s important to realize that we’re just one year into this new economic expansion — probably both the expansion and the bull market are going to be a multi-year event in which tech will continue to play a fairly dominant role,” he said. “During the periods of time where cyclicality takes a hit and it’s going to in periods, I think tech is going to hold up your portfolio.”\nSo, Paulsen, who oversees about $1 billion in assets under management, isn’t bailing on Big Tech.\n“We’re underweighted tech, but not by a lot,” said Paulsen, who is overweight areas such as small caps, value and international stocks. “It’s likely to underperform over the next year as the economy really booms here, but I’m not totally sold that it will.”\nOn “Trading Nation” last September,Paulsen,a long-time market bull, recommended taking advantage of Wall Street pessimism while you still can. Since that appearance, the Nasdaq is up 20%, and he’s maintaining his enthusiasm.\n“It’s still going to be the leader of the future,” Paulsen said.\nThe Nasdaq dropped 0.6% to 13,319.87 on Friday as the benchmark 10-year Treasury Note yield hit 1.64%, its highest level in 13 months. But the tech heavy index, which is 6% off its all-time high, still ended the week up more than 3%.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":203,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":325394343,"gmtCreate":1615862644082,"gmtModify":1703494137338,"author":{"id":"3577605942117209","authorId":"3577605942117209","name":"meganleeqy","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577605942117209","authorIdStr":"3577605942117209"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like and comment ","listText":"Like and comment ","text":"Like and comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/325394343","repostId":"1143760301","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1143760301","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1615861990,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1143760301?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-16 10:33","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Value stocks are making a comeback. Don’t get left behind, these analysts say","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1143760301","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"Pure value has trailed the S&P 500 by 30 percentage points in the past 3 years.After a 14-year stret","content":"<blockquote>Pure value has trailed the S&P 500 by 30 percentage points in the past 3 years.</blockquote><p>After a 14-year stretch of outperformance for growth stocks compared to value, investors seem to finally be rewarding the left-behind names. That makes sense: value sectors tend to do better at the start of an economic cycle, after all. But there have been several value head fakes over the years, and growthier names grab more headlines.</p><p>Still, one analyst team says the rotation is for real— and there’s still upside left.</p><p>“Growth’s dominance relative to value peaked in the fall of 2020,” wrote Keith Lerner, chief market strategist, and Dylan Kase, investment analyst, at Truist Advisory Services.</p><p>“We still see more upside in value relative to growth over the next 12 months given value’s dramatic longer-term underperformance as well as the U.S. economy being on the cusp of the best growth in more than 35 years,” they added. “It would not be unusual to see value consolidate some of its recent outperformance, but we would stick with the value trend and use any short-term setbacks to add to the position.”</p><p>Value stocks have rallied in recent weeks, the analysts acknowledged, but according to one metric, there’s still room to run.</p><p>“Our work suggests that greater upside remains in the pure value style,” they write, which has more of an allocation to financials and energy.Pure value has trailed the S&P 500 by 30 percentage points over the past three years, and forward earnings look much more attractive than the broader market does.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9ddb33e8531412f0a26ac513dd0d610a\" tg-width=\"1260\" tg-height=\"657\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>“Catch up potential remains,” the analysts concluded, especially if the economic rebound is as strong as forecast.</p><p>On Monday, all major stock benchmarks were trading near flat, with a slight edge for the growth- and tech-oriented Nasdaq Composite index.</p>","source":"market_watch","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Value stocks are making a comeback. Don’t get left behind, these analysts say</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nValue stocks are making a comeback. Don’t get left behind, these analysts say\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-16 10:33 GMT+8 <a href=https://www.marketwatch.com/story/value-stocks-are-making-a-comeback-dont-get-left-behind-these-analysts-say-11615828690?mod=hp_LATEST&adobe_mc=MCMID%3D03250748340802259633376614514522268876%7CMCORGID%3DCB68E4BA55144CAA0A4C98A5%2540AdobeOrg%7CTS%3D1615861739><strong>MarketWatch</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Pure value has trailed the S&P 500 by 30 percentage points in the past 3 years.After a 14-year stretch of outperformance for growth stocks compared to value, investors seem to finally be rewarding the...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/value-stocks-are-making-a-comeback-dont-get-left-behind-these-analysts-say-11615828690?mod=hp_LATEST&adobe_mc=MCMID%3D03250748340802259633376614514522268876%7CMCORGID%3DCB68E4BA55144CAA0A4C98A5%2540AdobeOrg%7CTS%3D1615861739\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/value-stocks-are-making-a-comeback-dont-get-left-behind-these-analysts-say-11615828690?mod=hp_LATEST&adobe_mc=MCMID%3D03250748340802259633376614514522268876%7CMCORGID%3DCB68E4BA55144CAA0A4C98A5%2540AdobeOrg%7CTS%3D1615861739","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/599a65733b8245fcf7868668ef9ad712","article_id":"1143760301","content_text":"Pure value has trailed the S&P 500 by 30 percentage points in the past 3 years.After a 14-year stretch of outperformance for growth stocks compared to value, investors seem to finally be rewarding the left-behind names. That makes sense: value sectors tend to do better at the start of an economic cycle, after all. But there have been several value head fakes over the years, and growthier names grab more headlines.Still, one analyst team says the rotation is for real— and there’s still upside left.“Growth’s dominance relative to value peaked in the fall of 2020,” wrote Keith Lerner, chief market strategist, and Dylan Kase, investment analyst, at Truist Advisory Services.“We still see more upside in value relative to growth over the next 12 months given value’s dramatic longer-term underperformance as well as the U.S. economy being on the cusp of the best growth in more than 35 years,” they added. “It would not be unusual to see value consolidate some of its recent outperformance, but we would stick with the value trend and use any short-term setbacks to add to the position.”Value stocks have rallied in recent weeks, the analysts acknowledged, but according to one metric, there’s still room to run.“Our work suggests that greater upside remains in the pure value style,” they write, which has more of an allocation to financials and energy.Pure value has trailed the S&P 500 by 30 percentage points over the past three years, and forward earnings look much more attractive than the broader market does.“Catch up potential remains,” the analysts concluded, especially if the economic rebound is as strong as forecast.On Monday, all major stock benchmarks were trading near flat, with a slight edge for the growth- and tech-oriented Nasdaq Composite index.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":231,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":344521365,"gmtCreate":1618416812257,"gmtModify":1634293063248,"author":{"id":"3577605942117209","authorId":"3577605942117209","name":"meganleeqy","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577605942117209","authorIdStr":"3577605942117209"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"$LAC xxxxxxxxxxx","listText":"$LAC xxxxxxxxxxx","text":"$LAC xxxxxxxxxxx","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/211ce116a4096242e9d528d7e6d3383f","width":"1125","height":"2618"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/344521365","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":218,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":322625089,"gmtCreate":1615804582741,"gmtModify":1703493214421,"author":{"id":"3577605942117209","authorId":"3577605942117209","name":"meganleeqy","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577605942117209","authorIdStr":"3577605942117209"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nice","listText":"Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/322625089","repostId":"1192661500","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1192661500","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1615804156,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1192661500?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-15 18:29","market":"us","language":"en","title":"4 Vanguard ETFs That Can Double Your $1,400 Stimulus Check","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1192661500","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"If a $1,400 stimulus check is headed your way, investing that money in an exchange-traded fund (ETF)","content":"<p>If a $1,400 stimulus check is headed your way, investing that money in an exchange-traded fund (ETF) could pay off big time. Instead of buying a few different stocks, with anETFyou can invest in hundreds of companies. Vanguard ETFs are a smart pick because the fees are incredibly low.</p>\n<p>Of course, not everyone should invest their stimulus money. You should only do so if you have anemergency fund, you're current on bills, and you don't have high-interest debt. Also keep in mind that past performance doesn't guarantee future results. But if you can afford to invest and you want the potential to double your stimulus money, check out these four Vanguard ETFs.</p>\n<p><b>1. Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO)</b></p>\n<p>If you invest $1,400 in the<b>Vanguard S&P 500 ETF</b>(NYSEMKT:VOO)and leave it there for a long stretch, you're practically guaranteed to make money. The fund tracks the<b>S&P 500</b>index, which measures the performance of 500 of the largest companies in America. Buying an S&P 500 ETF makes you an automatic investor in those 500 companies, including<b>Apple</b>(NASDAQ:AAPL),<b>Amazon</b>(NASDAQ:AMZN),<b>Tesla</b>(NASDAQ:TSLA), and<b>Walt Disney Co.</b>(NYSE:DIS). If you'd invested money at any point in the S&P 500's history, never once would you have lost money had you kept it invested for 20 years.</p>\n<p>The VOO has an expense ratio of 0.03%. In other words, just 0.03% of your investment goes toward fees, which translates to $0.42 for a $1,400 investment. Had you invested $1,400 in the VOO in March 2016, you'd have just over $3,000 today.</p>\n<p><b>2. Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG)</b></p>\n<p>The<b>Vanguard Growth Fund ETF</b>(NYSEMKT:VUG)is a solid way to invest your stimulus check if you're OK with more risk in exchange for higher returns. It tracks an index called the<b>CRSP U.S. Large Cap Growth Index</b>, which is very similar to the S&P 500 screened to focus on 257 stocks identified asgrowth stocks. Essentially, you're investing in the faster-growing half of the S&P 500. With a 0.04% expense ratio, your fees would only eat up $0.56 of your stimulus check.</p>\n<p>Not surprisingly, the VUG is more heavily concentrated in the tech sector compared to S&P 500 funds. Tech stocks account for 47% of its holdings versus 27.8% for the VOO. A $1,400 investment in the VUG made five years ago would today be worth over $3,600. However, tech stocks that have soared in the past year have been cooling off recently. Temper your expectations if you're seeking huge returns immediately.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f236b494475214fb7e9a992442f31213\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"502\"><b>3. Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB)</b></p>\n<p>Investing insmall-cap stocks, typically defined as those with a market capitalization between $300 million and $2 billion, is another way to earn greater returns if you're comfortable with more risk. You have the potential to invest in a future giant while it's still small, but these often young companies have a higher risk of failing.</p>\n<p><b>Vanguard's Small-Cap ETF</b>(NYSEMKT:VB)allows you to invest in 1,426 stocks of smaller companies -- though many aren't exactly small caps, given that the median market cap is $5.9 billion. Its five largest holdings are fuel cell company<b>Plug Power Inc.</b>(NASDAQ:PLUG), solar power supplier<b>Enphase Energy</b>(NASDAQ:ENPH), cloud database<b>MongoDB</b>(NASDAQ:MDB), drug manufacturer<b>Catalent Inc.</b>(NYSE:CTLT), and software developer<b>Zendesk Inc.</b>(NYSE:ZEN).</p>\n<p>Had you invested $1,400 in the fund five years ago, you'd have more than $3,000 today. Its 0.05% expense ratio translates to fees of $0.70 on a $1,400 investment.</p>\n<p><b>4. Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO)</b></p>\n<p>You know how we said past performance isn't an indicator of future results? Well, had you invested $1,400 in the<b>Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF</b>(NYSEMKT:VWO)five years ago, you wouldn't have doubled your money. You'd have just over $2,500 today.</p>\n<p>The fund invests in more than 5,000 stocks across 23 developing nations, including China, Taiwan, India, Brazil, and South Africa. Its expense ratio is 0.1%, slightly higher than the other funds on this list -- but still just $1.40 of a $1,400 investment.</p>\n<p>Investing in emerging markets can be risky because there's often political instability and less regulation. But consider that about 85% of the world's population lives in emerging market countries. If you're taking a long-term focus, investing in an emerging markets fund like the VWO offers serious growth potential for your third stimulus check.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>4 Vanguard ETFs That Can Double Your $1,400 Stimulus Check</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n4 Vanguard ETFs That Can Double Your $1,400 Stimulus Check\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-15 18:29 GMT+8 <a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/15/4-vanguard-etfs-that-can-double-your-1400-stimulus/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>If a $1,400 stimulus check is headed your way, investing that money in an exchange-traded fund (ETF) could pay off big time. Instead of buying a few different stocks, with anETFyou can invest in ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/15/4-vanguard-etfs-that-can-double-your-1400-stimulus/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/15/4-vanguard-etfs-that-can-double-your-1400-stimulus/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1192661500","content_text":"If a $1,400 stimulus check is headed your way, investing that money in an exchange-traded fund (ETF) could pay off big time. Instead of buying a few different stocks, with anETFyou can invest in hundreds of companies. Vanguard ETFs are a smart pick because the fees are incredibly low.\nOf course, not everyone should invest their stimulus money. You should only do so if you have anemergency fund, you're current on bills, and you don't have high-interest debt. Also keep in mind that past performance doesn't guarantee future results. But if you can afford to invest and you want the potential to double your stimulus money, check out these four Vanguard ETFs.\n1. Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO)\nIf you invest $1,400 in theVanguard S&P 500 ETF(NYSEMKT:VOO)and leave it there for a long stretch, you're practically guaranteed to make money. The fund tracks theS&P 500index, which measures the performance of 500 of the largest companies in America. Buying an S&P 500 ETF makes you an automatic investor in those 500 companies, includingApple(NASDAQ:AAPL),Amazon(NASDAQ:AMZN),Tesla(NASDAQ:TSLA), andWalt Disney Co.(NYSE:DIS). If you'd invested money at any point in the S&P 500's history, never once would you have lost money had you kept it invested for 20 years.\nThe VOO has an expense ratio of 0.03%. In other words, just 0.03% of your investment goes toward fees, which translates to $0.42 for a $1,400 investment. Had you invested $1,400 in the VOO in March 2016, you'd have just over $3,000 today.\n2. Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG)\nTheVanguard Growth Fund ETF(NYSEMKT:VUG)is a solid way to invest your stimulus check if you're OK with more risk in exchange for higher returns. It tracks an index called theCRSP U.S. Large Cap Growth Index, which is very similar to the S&P 500 screened to focus on 257 stocks identified asgrowth stocks. Essentially, you're investing in the faster-growing half of the S&P 500. With a 0.04% expense ratio, your fees would only eat up $0.56 of your stimulus check.\nNot surprisingly, the VUG is more heavily concentrated in the tech sector compared to S&P 500 funds. Tech stocks account for 47% of its holdings versus 27.8% for the VOO. A $1,400 investment in the VUG made five years ago would today be worth over $3,600. However, tech stocks that have soared in the past year have been cooling off recently. Temper your expectations if you're seeking huge returns immediately.\n3. Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB)\nInvesting insmall-cap stocks, typically defined as those with a market capitalization between $300 million and $2 billion, is another way to earn greater returns if you're comfortable with more risk. You have the potential to invest in a future giant while it's still small, but these often young companies have a higher risk of failing.\nVanguard's Small-Cap ETF(NYSEMKT:VB)allows you to invest in 1,426 stocks of smaller companies -- though many aren't exactly small caps, given that the median market cap is $5.9 billion. Its five largest holdings are fuel cell companyPlug Power Inc.(NASDAQ:PLUG), solar power supplierEnphase Energy(NASDAQ:ENPH), cloud databaseMongoDB(NASDAQ:MDB), drug manufacturerCatalent Inc.(NYSE:CTLT), and software developerZendesk Inc.(NYSE:ZEN).\nHad you invested $1,400 in the fund five years ago, you'd have more than $3,000 today. Its 0.05% expense ratio translates to fees of $0.70 on a $1,400 investment.\n4. Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO)\nYou know how we said past performance isn't an indicator of future results? Well, had you invested $1,400 in theVanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF(NYSEMKT:VWO)five years ago, you wouldn't have doubled your money. You'd have just over $2,500 today.\nThe fund invests in more than 5,000 stocks across 23 developing nations, including China, Taiwan, India, Brazil, and South Africa. Its expense ratio is 0.1%, slightly higher than the other funds on this list -- but still just $1.40 of a $1,400 investment.\nInvesting in emerging markets can be risky because there's often political instability and less regulation. But consider that about 85% of the world's population lives in emerging market countries. If you're taking a long-term focus, investing in an emerging markets fund like the VWO offers serious growth potential for your third stimulus check.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":298,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":322622626,"gmtCreate":1615804552965,"gmtModify":1703493213556,"author":{"id":"3577605942117209","authorId":"3577605942117209","name":"meganleeqy","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577605942117209","authorIdStr":"3577605942117209"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Yes","listText":"Yes","text":"Yes","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/322622626","repostId":"1199092369","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1199092369","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1615766818,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1199092369?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-15 08:06","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Breakout or breakdown? Why the Nasdaq’s two decade leadership cycle may withstand rising rates","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1199092369","media":"cnbc","summary":"The Leuthold Group’s Jim Paulsen has a message for investors: Don’t give up on Big Tech.\nAccording t","content":"<div>\n<p>The Leuthold Group’s Jim Paulsen has a message for investors: Don’t give up on Big Tech.\nAccording to the firm’s chief investment strategist, Nasdaq volatility associated with rising Treasury Note ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/03/14/nasdaq-breakdown-fears-are-overblown-leutholds-jim-paulsen.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"cnbc_highlight","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Breakout or breakdown? Why the Nasdaq’s two decade leadership cycle may withstand rising rates</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBreakout or breakdown? Why the Nasdaq’s two decade leadership cycle may withstand rising rates\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-15 08:06 GMT+8 <a href=https://www.cnbc.com/2021/03/14/nasdaq-breakdown-fears-are-overblown-leutholds-jim-paulsen.html><strong>cnbc</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The Leuthold Group’s Jim Paulsen has a message for investors: Don’t give up on Big Tech.\nAccording to the firm’s chief investment strategist, Nasdaq volatility associated with rising Treasury Note ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/03/14/nasdaq-breakdown-fears-are-overblown-leutholds-jim-paulsen.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/03/14/nasdaq-breakdown-fears-are-overblown-leutholds-jim-paulsen.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/72bb72e1b84c09fca865c6dcb1bbcd16","article_id":"1199092369","content_text":"The Leuthold Group’s Jim Paulsen has a message for investors: Don’t give up on Big Tech.\nAccording to the firm’s chief investment strategist, Nasdaq volatility associated with rising Treasury Note yields may not be enough to permanently derail its two decade leadership cycle.\n“It’s quite a coincidence that that same peak we had three weeks ago in both the Nasdaq and S&P 500 technology index... to the overall S&P occurred also right on the same level as the dot-com top a little over 20 years ago,” Paulsen told CNBC’s “Trading Nation” on Friday. “That relative high has been enforced ever since.”\nIn a recent note to clients, Paulsen tackled whether growth plays, which include Big Tech, were “peaking out” or “breaking out.” He found support for both scenarios. But Paulsen believes it’s more likely the group will endure through higher rates.\n“It might have less to do with yields than it does with just facing a glass ceiling,” he added. “I’mnot totally convinced that we’re breaking down. We might just be hitting the ceiling, bouncing down for a minute and maybe going to take it out yet at some point here in the future.”\nPaulsen contends Big Tech and growth, which he classifies as “New-Era” stocks, will retain their attractiveness to investors.\n“If it does ultimately achieve a new relative-price high, might its leadership persevere and perhaps even strengthen? That is what happened the last two times the Nasdaq spent multiple years as an underperformer,” he wrote.\nDespite his optimism, Paulsen acknowledges it’s reasonable to expect a phase of underperformance, consolidation or even a temporary meltdown.\n“It’s important to realize that we’re just one year into this new economic expansion — probably both the expansion and the bull market are going to be a multi-year event in which tech will continue to play a fairly dominant role,” he said. “During the periods of time where cyclicality takes a hit and it’s going to in periods, I think tech is going to hold up your portfolio.”\nSo, Paulsen, who oversees about $1 billion in assets under management, isn’t bailing on Big Tech.\n“We’re underweighted tech, but not by a lot,” said Paulsen, who is overweight areas such as small caps, value and international stocks. “It’s likely to underperform over the next year as the economy really booms here, but I’m not totally sold that it will.”\nOn “Trading Nation” last September,Paulsen,a long-time market bull, recommended taking advantage of Wall Street pessimism while you still can. Since that appearance, the Nasdaq is up 20%, and he’s maintaining his enthusiasm.\n“It’s still going to be the leader of the future,” Paulsen said.\nThe Nasdaq dropped 0.6% to 13,319.87 on Friday as the benchmark 10-year Treasury Note yield hit 1.64%, its highest level in 13 months. But the tech heavy index, which is 6% off its all-time high, still ended the week up more than 3%.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":203,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}
