Donn的个人主页 - 老虎社区

Donn

Donn

暂无个人介绍

IP属地：未知

35关注

2粉丝

0主题

0勋章

2021-01-31

CROOKS!

Robinhood Raises $1 Billion in Dash for Cash After Trader Revolt

2021-01-23

Good read

6 Dividend Funds for Long-Term Investors

2021-01-24

Waiting for the dip?

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-01-23

Hmm

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-05-29

$MARIJUANA CO OF AMER INC(MCOA)$Any idea why can’t I buy MCOA shares? I tried buying and they said I can only close..

2021-02-02

Wow

Amazon, Alphabet and Salesforce are all investing in a $28 billion company that crunches big data

2021-02-01

Let’s go!!

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-01-30

Crooks

Robinhood Raises $1 Billion in Dash for Cash After Trader Revolt

2021-01-29

Time to buy?

Apple Smashes Q1 Earnings Forecast on Surging China Sales

2021-01-28

High risk. Must be strong to hold haha

Is the trading in GameStop and AMC a major risk? Analysts weigh in

2021-01-27

Missed it :(

Apple Stock Could Surge 62% to $225, According to This Analyst

2021-01-26

Hopefully

Tesla earnings: Can sales growth match stock’s rise?

2021-01-25

Hmm. It’ll recover.

抱歉，原内容已删除

去老虎APP查看更多动态

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"3570617809207113","uuid":"3570617809207113","gmtCreate":1607524265136,"gmtModify":1611375038481,"name":"Donn","pinyin":"donn","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ba1b57c564d3f11854c26a2bf9847d97","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":2,"headSize":35,"tweetSize":13,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":1,"name":"萌萌虎","nameTw":"萌萌虎","represent":"呱呱坠地","factor":"评论帖子3次或发布1条主帖（非转发）","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":null,"userBadges":[{"badgeId":"228c86a078844d74991fff2b7ab2428d-1","templateUuid":"228c86a078844d74991fff2b7ab2428d","name":"投资经理虎","description":"证券账户累计交易金额达到10万美元","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c8dfc27c1ee0e25db1c93e9d0b641101","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f43908c142f8a33c78f5bdf0e2897488","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/82165ff19cb8a786e8919f92acee5213","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.07.14","exceedPercentage":"60.14%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101},{"badgeId":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561-1","templateUuid":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561","name":"出道虎友","description":"加入老虎社区500天","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0e4d0ca1da0456dc7894c946d44bf9ab","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0f2f65e8ce4cfaae8db2bea9b127f58b","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5948a31b6edf154422335b265235809","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.04.30","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37-1","templateUuid":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37","name":"博闻投资者","description":"累计交易超过10只正股","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a-1","templateUuid":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a","name":"实盘交易者","description":"完成一笔实盘交易","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969-2","templateUuid":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969","name":"宗师交易员","description":"证券或期货账户累计交易次数达到100次","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad22cfbe2d05aa393b18e9226e4b0307","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/36702e6ff3ffe46acafee66cc85273ca","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d52eb88fa385cf5abe2616ed63781765","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":"80.77%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":5,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":"未知","starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"hot","tweets":[{"id":134603725,"gmtCreate":1622218490967,"gmtModify":1631887051295,"author":{"id":"3570617809207113","authorId":"3570617809207113","name":"Donn","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ba1b57c564d3f11854c26a2bf9847d97","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570617809207113","authorIdStr":"3570617809207113"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MCOA\">$MARIJUANA CO OF AMER INC(MCOA)$</a>Any idea why can’t I buy MCOA shares? I tried buying and they said I can only close..","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MCOA\">$MARIJUANA CO OF AMER INC(MCOA)$</a>Any idea why can’t I buy MCOA shares? I tried buying and they said I can only close..","text":"$MARIJUANA CO OF AMER INC(MCOA)$Any idea why can’t I buy MCOA shares? I tried buying and they said I can only close..","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/134603725","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":341,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":315698849,"gmtCreate":1612239133981,"gmtModify":1703759165272,"author":{"id":"3570617809207113","authorId":"3570617809207113","name":"Donn","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ba1b57c564d3f11854c26a2bf9847d97","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570617809207113","authorIdStr":"3570617809207113"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wow","listText":"Wow","text":"Wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/315698849","repostId":"1155510692","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1155510692","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1612233643,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1155510692?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-02-02 10:40","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Amazon, Alphabet and Salesforce are all investing in a $28 billion company that crunches big data","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1155510692","media":"cnbc","summary":"Databricks, a start-up whose software helps companies quickly process large sets of data and get it ","content":"<div>\n<p>Databricks, a start-up whose software helps companies quickly process large sets of data and get it ready for analysis, said Monday it has raised $1 billion in fresh cash, including from a few ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/02/01/amazon-alphabet-salesforce-back-databricks-at-28-billion-valuation.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"cnbc_highlight","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Amazon, Alphabet and Salesforce are all investing in a $28 billion company that crunches big data</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAmazon, Alphabet and Salesforce are all investing in a $28 billion company that crunches big data\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-02-02 10:40 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.cnbc.com/2021/02/01/amazon-alphabet-salesforce-back-databricks-at-28-billion-valuation.html><strong>cnbc</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Databricks, a start-up whose software helps companies quickly process large sets of data and get it ready for analysis, said Monday it has raised $1 billion in fresh cash, including from a few ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/02/01/amazon-alphabet-salesforce-back-databricks-at-28-billion-valuation.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMZN":"亚马逊"},"source_url":"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/02/01/amazon-alphabet-salesforce-back-databricks-at-28-billion-valuation.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/72bb72e1b84c09fca865c6dcb1bbcd16","article_id":"1155510692","content_text":"Databricks, a start-up whose software helps companies quickly process large sets of data and get it ready for analysis, said Monday it has raised $1 billion in fresh cash, including from a few prominent corporate investors.\nAmazonWeb Services,Alphabet’sCapitalG venture arm andSalesforceVentures all joined in, according to a statement.Microsoft, which invested in Databricksearlier, is also participating in the new round, thestatement said.\nThe transaction, which values Databricks at $28 billion, shows the top three U.S. cloud providers recognize that the company represents an opportunity similar toSnowflake, another firm with cloud software that helps companies manage data.\nDatabricks rose to prominence because it helped companies implement a version of Apache Spark, an alternative to the Hadoop technology for storing lots of different kinds of data in massive quantities. It can help clean up data for exploration in data visualization software such as Salesforce-owned Tableau. The Databricks software gives companies a simple way to run this sort of software, without having to worry about configuring and updating it. Databricks is alsoincreasingly helping organizationsdeploy artificial intelligence models.\n“We’re 100 percent cloud-native,” Databricks CEO Ali Ghodsi told CNBC in a 2019 interview. That same principle applies to Snowflake, which Salesforce had also invested in and has demonstratedstrong revenue growthfollowing its initial public offering last year.\nAmazon, the largest cloud provider, did not put money into Snowflake before it went public. Now it’s investing in Databricks at a later stage than it has historically done.\nNominations are open for the 2021CNBC Disruptor 50, a list of private start-ups using breakthrough technology to become the next generation of great public companies.Submitby Friday, Feb. 12, at 3 pm EST.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":568,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":312649831,"gmtCreate":1612144990223,"gmtModify":1703757908601,"author":{"id":"3570617809207113","authorId":"3570617809207113","name":"Donn","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ba1b57c564d3f11854c26a2bf9847d97","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570617809207113","authorIdStr":"3570617809207113"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Let’s go!!","listText":"Let’s go!!","text":"Let’s go!!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/312649831","repostId":"1195425718","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":429,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":312161918,"gmtCreate":1612068028834,"gmtModify":1703757610134,"author":{"id":"3570617809207113","authorId":"3570617809207113","name":"Donn","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ba1b57c564d3f11854c26a2bf9847d97","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570617809207113","authorIdStr":"3570617809207113"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"CROOKS!","listText":"CROOKS!","text":"CROOKS!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/312161918","repostId":"1137182252","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1137182252","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1611909009,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1137182252?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-01-29 16:30","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Robinhood Raises $1 Billion in Dash for Cash After Trader Revolt","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1137182252","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"New York markets had just fired up, and the investing world was tuning in for Thursday’s episode of ","content":"<p>New York markets had just fired up, and the investing world was tuning in for Thursday’s episode of the continuing drama: Legions ofRobinhood Marketsinvestors versus hedge-fund Goliaths.</p><p>But within minutes, a shock wave invisible to the outside world rattled the mechanics of Wall Street -- sending Robinhood rushing for more than $1 billion of additional cash. The stock market’s central clearing hub had demanded large sums of collateral from brokerages including Robinhood that for weeks had facilitated spectacular jumps in shares such as GameStop Corp.</p><p>The Silicon Valley venture with the wildly popular no-fee trading app came to a crossroads. It reined in the risk to itself by banning certain trades and unwinding client bets -- igniting an outcry from customers and even U.S. political leaders. By that night, word was emerging that Robinhood had raised more than $1 billion from existing investors anddrawn hundreds of millions morefrom bank credit lines to weather the storm.</p><p>“Look, it is not negotiable for us to comply with our financial requirements and our clearinghouse deposits,” Robinhood Chief Executive Officer Vlad Tenev said in defending his firm’s decisions on Thursday in a Bloomberg Television interview. “We have to do that.”</p><p>The capital injection is “a strong sign of confidence from investors that will help us continue to further serve our customers,” a Robinhood spokesperson later said in an emailed statement. The money will allow the firm to “continue to invest in record growth.”</p><p>When the history of this month’s stock mania is written, it may be a story of how retail traders set out from Reddit message boards to challenge Wall Street’s status quo -- and ended up battering their beloved brokerage too.</p><p>For weeks, Robinhood, with a mission “to democratize finance for all,” has been their trading platform of choice as they inflictedbillions of dollars of losseson hedge funds by sending stocks that those firms had shorted into the stratosphere -- a sort-of populist crusade into the staid world of finance.</p><p>Robinhood’s trading restrictions made virtually nobody happy Thursday, except perhaps the hedge funds. In a surreal scene, political archenemies Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Ted Cruz found common ground in lashing the firm’s decisions. Conspiracy theories erupted online.</p><p>The question is whether such critics will dig into the industry’s inner workings, where pressure mounted on Robinhood and other firms to limit certain trades. That would put a rare spotlight on arcane parts of the market designed to prevent catastrophe, such as theDepository Trust &amp; Clearing Corp.</p><p>Not ‘Nefarious’What's moving marketsStart your day with the 5 Things newsletter.EmailBloomberg may send me offers and promotions.Sign UpBy submitting my information, I agree to thePrivacy Policyand&nbsp;Terms of Service.</p><p>One key consideration for brokers, particularly around high-flying and volatile stocks like GameStop, is in the money they must put up with the DTCC while waiting a few days for stock transactions to settle. Those outlays, which behave like margin in a brokerage account, can create a cash crunch on volatile days, say when GameStop falls from $483 to $112 like it did at one point during Thursday’s session.</p><p>“It’s not really Robinhood doing nefarious stuff,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Larry Tabb. “It’s the DTCC saying ‘This stuff is just too risky. We don’t trust that these guys have the cash to be able to withstand settling these things two days from now, because in two days, who knows what the price could be, it could be zero.’”</p><p>The trouble on Thursday began around 10 a.m., when after days of turbulence, the DTCC demanded significantly more collateral from member brokers, according to two people familiar with the matter.</p><p>A spokesman for the DTCC wouldn’t specify how much it required from specific firms but said that by the end of the day industrywide collateral requirements jumped to $33.5 billion, up from $26 billion.</p><p>‘Rare Circumstances’</p><p>Brokerage executives rushed to figure out how to come up with the funds. Robinhood’s reaction drew the most public attention, but the firm wasn’t alone in limiting trading of stocks such as GameStop and AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc.</p><p>In fact,Charles Schwab Corp.’s TD Ameritrade curbed transactions in both of those companies on Wednesday.Interactive Brokers Group Inc.andMorgan Stanley’s E*Trade took similar action Thursday.</p><p>Thomas Peterffy, the billionaire chairman of Greenwich, Connecticut-based Interactive Brokers, told Bloomberg TV the restrictions were prompted by concerns “about the integrity of the marketplace and the system.”</p><p>E*Trade stressed that its measures were a highly unusual. “We take actions like this seriously, and only initiate them in rare circumstances,” said spokesman Thayer Fox, adding that he expected normal trading to resume Friday.</p><p>Robinhood said after markets closed that it plans to allow “limited buys” to resume in affected securities. It also tried to assuage customer concerns with an email that evening: “This was a temporary decision made to best continue serving you, and was not an easy one to make.”</p><p>Credit Lines</p><p>The firm has tapped at least several hundred million dollars from its bank credit lines, a person with knowledge of the situation said. The company’s lenders includeJPMorgan Chase &amp; Co.andGoldman Sachs Group Inc., according todatacompiled by Bloomberg. Representatives for Robinhood and those banks declined to comment.</p><p>Robinhood’s capital remains “strong,” CEO Tenev told Bloomberg TV, underscoring that the restrictions helped protect both the brokerage and its clients.</p><p>One question is whether frustrated customers will forgive what some see as a betrayal in their campaign against Wall Street’s financial elite.</p><p>Douglas Bray, a software developer from Connecticut who’s been using Robinhood for about five years, said he plans to withdraw about $100,000 after the trading restrictions.</p><p>“I’m disappointed I could not keep my money in GME like any institutional investor could,” said Bray, 32, referring to GameStop’s ticker. “Hedge funds are on the brink of a massive short squeeze and appear to be calling in all the cavalry. So brokers are now ‘protecting’ customers as a facade so that they can appease their institutional backers. The entire community is outraged.”</p>","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Robinhood Raises $1 Billion in Dash for Cash After Trader Revolt</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nRobinhood Raises $1 Billion in Dash for Cash After Trader Revolt\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-01-29 16:30 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-01-29/for-robinhood-a-dash-for-cash-after-traders-took-on-wall-street?srnd=premium-asia><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>New York markets had just fired up, and the investing world was tuning in for Thursday’s episode of the continuing drama: Legions ofRobinhood Marketsinvestors versus hedge-fund Goliaths.But within ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-01-29/for-robinhood-a-dash-for-cash-after-traders-took-on-wall-street?srnd=premium-asia\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-01-29/for-robinhood-a-dash-for-cash-after-traders-took-on-wall-street?srnd=premium-asia","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1137182252","content_text":"New York markets had just fired up, and the investing world was tuning in for Thursday’s episode of the continuing drama: Legions ofRobinhood Marketsinvestors versus hedge-fund Goliaths.But within minutes, a shock wave invisible to the outside world rattled the mechanics of Wall Street -- sending Robinhood rushing for more than $1 billion of additional cash. The stock market’s central clearing hub had demanded large sums of collateral from brokerages including Robinhood that for weeks had facilitated spectacular jumps in shares such as GameStop Corp.The Silicon Valley venture with the wildly popular no-fee trading app came to a crossroads. It reined in the risk to itself by banning certain trades and unwinding client bets -- igniting an outcry from customers and even U.S. political leaders. By that night, word was emerging that Robinhood had raised more than $1 billion from existing investors anddrawn hundreds of millions morefrom bank credit lines to weather the storm.“Look, it is not negotiable for us to comply with our financial requirements and our clearinghouse deposits,” Robinhood Chief Executive Officer Vlad Tenev said in defending his firm’s decisions on Thursday in a Bloomberg Television interview. “We have to do that.”The capital injection is “a strong sign of confidence from investors that will help us continue to further serve our customers,” a Robinhood spokesperson later said in an emailed statement. The money will allow the firm to “continue to invest in record growth.”When the history of this month’s stock mania is written, it may be a story of how retail traders set out from Reddit message boards to challenge Wall Street’s status quo -- and ended up battering their beloved brokerage too.For weeks, Robinhood, with a mission “to democratize finance for all,” has been their trading platform of choice as they inflictedbillions of dollars of losseson hedge funds by sending stocks that those firms had shorted into the stratosphere -- a sort-of populist crusade into the staid world of finance.Robinhood’s trading restrictions made virtually nobody happy Thursday, except perhaps the hedge funds. In a surreal scene, political archenemies Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Ted Cruz found common ground in lashing the firm’s decisions. Conspiracy theories erupted online.The question is whether such critics will dig into the industry’s inner workings, where pressure mounted on Robinhood and other firms to limit certain trades. That would put a rare spotlight on arcane parts of the market designed to prevent catastrophe, such as theDepository Trust & Clearing Corp.Not ‘Nefarious’What's moving marketsStart your day with the 5 Things newsletter.EmailBloomberg may send me offers and promotions.Sign UpBy submitting my information, I agree to thePrivacy Policyand Terms of Service.One key consideration for brokers, particularly around high-flying and volatile stocks like GameStop, is in the money they must put up with the DTCC while waiting a few days for stock transactions to settle. Those outlays, which behave like margin in a brokerage account, can create a cash crunch on volatile days, say when GameStop falls from $483 to $112 like it did at one point during Thursday’s session.“It’s not really Robinhood doing nefarious stuff,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Larry Tabb. “It’s the DTCC saying ‘This stuff is just too risky. We don’t trust that these guys have the cash to be able to withstand settling these things two days from now, because in two days, who knows what the price could be, it could be zero.’”The trouble on Thursday began around 10 a.m., when after days of turbulence, the DTCC demanded significantly more collateral from member brokers, according to two people familiar with the matter.A spokesman for the DTCC wouldn’t specify how much it required from specific firms but said that by the end of the day industrywide collateral requirements jumped to $33.5 billion, up from $26 billion.‘Rare Circumstances’Brokerage executives rushed to figure out how to come up with the funds. Robinhood’s reaction drew the most public attention, but the firm wasn’t alone in limiting trading of stocks such as GameStop and AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc.In fact,Charles Schwab Corp.’s TD Ameritrade curbed transactions in both of those companies on Wednesday.Interactive Brokers Group Inc.andMorgan Stanley’s E*Trade took similar action Thursday.Thomas Peterffy, the billionaire chairman of Greenwich, Connecticut-based Interactive Brokers, told Bloomberg TV the restrictions were prompted by concerns “about the integrity of the marketplace and the system.”E*Trade stressed that its measures were a highly unusual. “We take actions like this seriously, and only initiate them in rare circumstances,” said spokesman Thayer Fox, adding that he expected normal trading to resume Friday.Robinhood said after markets closed that it plans to allow “limited buys” to resume in affected securities. It also tried to assuage customer concerns with an email that evening: “This was a temporary decision made to best continue serving you, and was not an easy one to make.”Credit LinesThe firm has tapped at least several hundred million dollars from its bank credit lines, a person with knowledge of the situation said. The company’s lenders includeJPMorgan Chase & Co.andGoldman Sachs Group Inc., according todatacompiled by Bloomberg. Representatives for Robinhood and those banks declined to comment.Robinhood’s capital remains “strong,” CEO Tenev told Bloomberg TV, underscoring that the restrictions helped protect both the brokerage and its clients.One question is whether frustrated customers will forgive what some see as a betrayal in their campaign against Wall Street’s financial elite.Douglas Bray, a software developer from Connecticut who’s been using Robinhood for about five years, said he plans to withdraw about $100,000 after the trading restrictions.“I’m disappointed I could not keep my money in GME like any institutional investor could,” said Bray, 32, referring to GameStop’s ticker. “Hedge funds are on the brink of a massive short squeeze and appear to be calling in all the cavalry. So brokers are now ‘protecting’ customers as a facade so that they can appease their institutional backers. The entire community is outraged.”","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":347,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":312041459,"gmtCreate":1611979739871,"gmtModify":1703757263830,"author":{"id":"3570617809207113","authorId":"3570617809207113","name":"Donn","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ba1b57c564d3f11854c26a2bf9847d97","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570617809207113","authorIdStr":"3570617809207113"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Crooks","listText":"Crooks","text":"Crooks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/312041459","repostId":"1137182252","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1137182252","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1611909009,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1137182252?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-01-29 16:30","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Robinhood Raises $1 Billion in Dash for Cash After Trader Revolt","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1137182252","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"New York markets had just fired up, and the investing world was tuning in for Thursday’s episode of ","content":"<p>New York markets had just fired up, and the investing world was tuning in for Thursday’s episode of the continuing drama: Legions ofRobinhood Marketsinvestors versus hedge-fund Goliaths.</p><p>But within minutes, a shock wave invisible to the outside world rattled the mechanics of Wall Street -- sending Robinhood rushing for more than $1 billion of additional cash. The stock market’s central clearing hub had demanded large sums of collateral from brokerages including Robinhood that for weeks had facilitated spectacular jumps in shares such as GameStop Corp.</p><p>The Silicon Valley venture with the wildly popular no-fee trading app came to a crossroads. It reined in the risk to itself by banning certain trades and unwinding client bets -- igniting an outcry from customers and even U.S. political leaders. By that night, word was emerging that Robinhood had raised more than $1 billion from existing investors anddrawn hundreds of millions morefrom bank credit lines to weather the storm.</p><p>“Look, it is not negotiable for us to comply with our financial requirements and our clearinghouse deposits,” Robinhood Chief Executive Officer Vlad Tenev said in defending his firm’s decisions on Thursday in a Bloomberg Television interview. “We have to do that.”</p><p>The capital injection is “a strong sign of confidence from investors that will help us continue to further serve our customers,” a Robinhood spokesperson later said in an emailed statement. The money will allow the firm to “continue to invest in record growth.”</p><p>When the history of this month’s stock mania is written, it may be a story of how retail traders set out from Reddit message boards to challenge Wall Street’s status quo -- and ended up battering their beloved brokerage too.</p><p>For weeks, Robinhood, with a mission “to democratize finance for all,” has been their trading platform of choice as they inflictedbillions of dollars of losseson hedge funds by sending stocks that those firms had shorted into the stratosphere -- a sort-of populist crusade into the staid world of finance.</p><p>Robinhood’s trading restrictions made virtually nobody happy Thursday, except perhaps the hedge funds. In a surreal scene, political archenemies Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Ted Cruz found common ground in lashing the firm’s decisions. Conspiracy theories erupted online.</p><p>The question is whether such critics will dig into the industry’s inner workings, where pressure mounted on Robinhood and other firms to limit certain trades. That would put a rare spotlight on arcane parts of the market designed to prevent catastrophe, such as theDepository Trust &amp; Clearing Corp.</p><p>Not ‘Nefarious’What's moving marketsStart your day with the 5 Things newsletter.EmailBloomberg may send me offers and promotions.Sign UpBy submitting my information, I agree to thePrivacy Policyand&nbsp;Terms of Service.</p><p>One key consideration for brokers, particularly around high-flying and volatile stocks like GameStop, is in the money they must put up with the DTCC while waiting a few days for stock transactions to settle. Those outlays, which behave like margin in a brokerage account, can create a cash crunch on volatile days, say when GameStop falls from $483 to $112 like it did at one point during Thursday’s session.</p><p>“It’s not really Robinhood doing nefarious stuff,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Larry Tabb. “It’s the DTCC saying ‘This stuff is just too risky. We don’t trust that these guys have the cash to be able to withstand settling these things two days from now, because in two days, who knows what the price could be, it could be zero.’”</p><p>The trouble on Thursday began around 10 a.m., when after days of turbulence, the DTCC demanded significantly more collateral from member brokers, according to two people familiar with the matter.</p><p>A spokesman for the DTCC wouldn’t specify how much it required from specific firms but said that by the end of the day industrywide collateral requirements jumped to $33.5 billion, up from $26 billion.</p><p>‘Rare Circumstances’</p><p>Brokerage executives rushed to figure out how to come up with the funds. Robinhood’s reaction drew the most public attention, but the firm wasn’t alone in limiting trading of stocks such as GameStop and AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc.</p><p>In fact,Charles Schwab Corp.’s TD Ameritrade curbed transactions in both of those companies on Wednesday.Interactive Brokers Group Inc.andMorgan Stanley’s E*Trade took similar action Thursday.</p><p>Thomas Peterffy, the billionaire chairman of Greenwich, Connecticut-based Interactive Brokers, told Bloomberg TV the restrictions were prompted by concerns “about the integrity of the marketplace and the system.”</p><p>E*Trade stressed that its measures were a highly unusual. “We take actions like this seriously, and only initiate them in rare circumstances,” said spokesman Thayer Fox, adding that he expected normal trading to resume Friday.</p><p>Robinhood said after markets closed that it plans to allow “limited buys” to resume in affected securities. It also tried to assuage customer concerns with an email that evening: “This was a temporary decision made to best continue serving you, and was not an easy one to make.”</p><p>Credit Lines</p><p>The firm has tapped at least several hundred million dollars from its bank credit lines, a person with knowledge of the situation said. The company’s lenders includeJPMorgan Chase &amp; Co.andGoldman Sachs Group Inc., according todatacompiled by Bloomberg. Representatives for Robinhood and those banks declined to comment.</p><p>Robinhood’s capital remains “strong,” CEO Tenev told Bloomberg TV, underscoring that the restrictions helped protect both the brokerage and its clients.</p><p>One question is whether frustrated customers will forgive what some see as a betrayal in their campaign against Wall Street’s financial elite.</p><p>Douglas Bray, a software developer from Connecticut who’s been using Robinhood for about five years, said he plans to withdraw about $100,000 after the trading restrictions.</p><p>“I’m disappointed I could not keep my money in GME like any institutional investor could,” said Bray, 32, referring to GameStop’s ticker. “Hedge funds are on the brink of a massive short squeeze and appear to be calling in all the cavalry. So brokers are now ‘protecting’ customers as a facade so that they can appease their institutional backers. The entire community is outraged.”</p>","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Robinhood Raises $1 Billion in Dash for Cash After Trader Revolt</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nRobinhood Raises $1 Billion in Dash for Cash After Trader Revolt\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-01-29 16:30 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-01-29/for-robinhood-a-dash-for-cash-after-traders-took-on-wall-street?srnd=premium-asia><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>New York markets had just fired up, and the investing world was tuning in for Thursday’s episode of the continuing drama: Legions ofRobinhood Marketsinvestors versus hedge-fund Goliaths.But within ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-01-29/for-robinhood-a-dash-for-cash-after-traders-took-on-wall-street?srnd=premium-asia\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-01-29/for-robinhood-a-dash-for-cash-after-traders-took-on-wall-street?srnd=premium-asia","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1137182252","content_text":"New York markets had just fired up, and the investing world was tuning in for Thursday’s episode of the continuing drama: Legions ofRobinhood Marketsinvestors versus hedge-fund Goliaths.But within minutes, a shock wave invisible to the outside world rattled the mechanics of Wall Street -- sending Robinhood rushing for more than $1 billion of additional cash. The stock market’s central clearing hub had demanded large sums of collateral from brokerages including Robinhood that for weeks had facilitated spectacular jumps in shares such as GameStop Corp.The Silicon Valley venture with the wildly popular no-fee trading app came to a crossroads. It reined in the risk to itself by banning certain trades and unwinding client bets -- igniting an outcry from customers and even U.S. political leaders. By that night, word was emerging that Robinhood had raised more than $1 billion from existing investors anddrawn hundreds of millions morefrom bank credit lines to weather the storm.“Look, it is not negotiable for us to comply with our financial requirements and our clearinghouse deposits,” Robinhood Chief Executive Officer Vlad Tenev said in defending his firm’s decisions on Thursday in a Bloomberg Television interview. “We have to do that.”The capital injection is “a strong sign of confidence from investors that will help us continue to further serve our customers,” a Robinhood spokesperson later said in an emailed statement. The money will allow the firm to “continue to invest in record growth.”When the history of this month’s stock mania is written, it may be a story of how retail traders set out from Reddit message boards to challenge Wall Street’s status quo -- and ended up battering their beloved brokerage too.For weeks, Robinhood, with a mission “to democratize finance for all,” has been their trading platform of choice as they inflictedbillions of dollars of losseson hedge funds by sending stocks that those firms had shorted into the stratosphere -- a sort-of populist crusade into the staid world of finance.Robinhood’s trading restrictions made virtually nobody happy Thursday, except perhaps the hedge funds. In a surreal scene, political archenemies Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Ted Cruz found common ground in lashing the firm’s decisions. Conspiracy theories erupted online.The question is whether such critics will dig into the industry’s inner workings, where pressure mounted on Robinhood and other firms to limit certain trades. That would put a rare spotlight on arcane parts of the market designed to prevent catastrophe, such as theDepository Trust & Clearing Corp.Not ‘Nefarious’What's moving marketsStart your day with the 5 Things newsletter.EmailBloomberg may send me offers and promotions.Sign UpBy submitting my information, I agree to thePrivacy Policyand Terms of Service.One key consideration for brokers, particularly around high-flying and volatile stocks like GameStop, is in the money they must put up with the DTCC while waiting a few days for stock transactions to settle. Those outlays, which behave like margin in a brokerage account, can create a cash crunch on volatile days, say when GameStop falls from $483 to $112 like it did at one point during Thursday’s session.“It’s not really Robinhood doing nefarious stuff,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Larry Tabb. “It’s the DTCC saying ‘This stuff is just too risky. We don’t trust that these guys have the cash to be able to withstand settling these things two days from now, because in two days, who knows what the price could be, it could be zero.’”The trouble on Thursday began around 10 a.m., when after days of turbulence, the DTCC demanded significantly more collateral from member brokers, according to two people familiar with the matter.A spokesman for the DTCC wouldn’t specify how much it required from specific firms but said that by the end of the day industrywide collateral requirements jumped to $33.5 billion, up from $26 billion.‘Rare Circumstances’Brokerage executives rushed to figure out how to come up with the funds. Robinhood’s reaction drew the most public attention, but the firm wasn’t alone in limiting trading of stocks such as GameStop and AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc.In fact,Charles Schwab Corp.’s TD Ameritrade curbed transactions in both of those companies on Wednesday.Interactive Brokers Group Inc.andMorgan Stanley’s E*Trade took similar action Thursday.Thomas Peterffy, the billionaire chairman of Greenwich, Connecticut-based Interactive Brokers, told Bloomberg TV the restrictions were prompted by concerns “about the integrity of the marketplace and the system.”E*Trade stressed that its measures were a highly unusual. “We take actions like this seriously, and only initiate them in rare circumstances,” said spokesman Thayer Fox, adding that he expected normal trading to resume Friday.Robinhood said after markets closed that it plans to allow “limited buys” to resume in affected securities. It also tried to assuage customer concerns with an email that evening: “This was a temporary decision made to best continue serving you, and was not an easy one to make.”Credit LinesThe firm has tapped at least several hundred million dollars from its bank credit lines, a person with knowledge of the situation said. The company’s lenders includeJPMorgan Chase & Co.andGoldman Sachs Group Inc., according todatacompiled by Bloomberg. Representatives for Robinhood and those banks declined to comment.Robinhood’s capital remains “strong,” CEO Tenev told Bloomberg TV, underscoring that the restrictions helped protect both the brokerage and its clients.One question is whether frustrated customers will forgive what some see as a betrayal in their campaign against Wall Street’s financial elite.Douglas Bray, a software developer from Connecticut who’s been using Robinhood for about five years, said he plans to withdraw about $100,000 after the trading restrictions.“I’m disappointed I could not keep my money in GME like any institutional investor could,” said Bray, 32, referring to GameStop’s ticker. “Hedge funds are on the brink of a massive short squeeze and appear to be calling in all the cavalry. So brokers are now ‘protecting’ customers as a facade so that they can appease their institutional backers. The entire community is outraged.”","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":234,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":318423488,"gmtCreate":1611885464544,"gmtModify":1703755634032,"author":{"id":"3570617809207113","authorId":"3570617809207113","name":"Donn","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ba1b57c564d3f11854c26a2bf9847d97","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570617809207113","authorIdStr":"3570617809207113"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Time to buy?","listText":"Time to buy?","text":"Time to buy?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/318423488","repostId":"1181346723","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1181346723","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1611820093,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1181346723?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-01-28 15:48","market":"sg","language":"en","title":"Apple Smashes Q1 Earnings Forecast on Surging China Sales","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1181346723","media":"The street","summary":"Apple saw a 57% surge in China sales over the December quarter, helping drive a record top line and much stronger-than-expected first quarter earnings.Apple Inc.  -Get Report posted stronger-than-expected first quarter earnings Wednesday, and its first print of revenues over $100 million, thanks in part to surging China sales and demand for its new iPhone 12.Greater China revenues surged 57% to $21.3 billion, Apple said, helping iPhone revenues rise 17% to an all-time high of $65.5 billion, than","content":"<p>Apple saw a 57% surge in China sales over the December quarter, helping drive a record top line and much stronger-than-expected first quarter earnings.</p><p>Apple Inc.&nbsp;(<b>AAPL</b>) -Get Report&nbsp;posted stronger-than-expected first quarter earnings Wednesday, and its first print of revenues over $100 million, thanks in part to surging China sales and demand for its new iPhone 12.</p><p>Apple said profits for the three months ending in December, the tech giant's fiscal first quarter, were pegged at $1.68 per share, up 34.4% from the same period last year and well ahead of the Street consensus forecast of $1.41. Group revenues, Apple said, rose 21% from last year to a record $111.44 billion, again topping analysts' estimates of a $103.3 billion tally.</p><p>Greater China revenues surged 57% to $21.3 billion, Apple said, helping iPhone revenues rise 17% to an all-time high of $65.5 billion, thanks in part to the launch of its new iPhone 12 suite of smartphones late last year amid COVID-related disruptions to its global brick-and-mortar network of stores. Services revenue rose 24.2% to $15.8 billion, Apple said, with more than 620 million subscribers across all of its platforms.</p><p>Looking into the three months ending in March, Apple said its sees revenue growing on an year-on-year basis, but declined to provide detailed guidance for either sales or bottom line earnings. Gross margins, Apple said, will likely be flat on a quarter-to-quarter basis.</p><p>“This quarter for Apple wouldn’t have been possible without the tireless and innovative work of every Apple team member worldwide,” said CEO Tim Cook. “We’re gratified by the enthusiastic customer response to the unmatched line of cutting-edge products that we delivered across a historic holiday season.\"</p><p>Apple shares were marked 2% lower in after hours trading immediately following the earnings release to indicate a Thursday opening bell price of $139.30 each, a move that would trim the stock's six-month gain to around 49%.</p><p>Mac sales, Apple said, rose 21.2% to $8.68 billion, while sales from its wearables, home and accessories division jumped 30% to $13 billion, \"driven by holiday demand for the latest Apple watch,\" Cook said. iPad sales were up an astonishing 41% to $8.44 billion.</p><p>“Our December quarter business performance was fueled by double-digit growth in each product category, which drove all-time revenue records in each of our geographic segments and an all-time high for our installed base of active devices,” said CFO Luca Maestri. “These results helped us generate record operating cash flow of $38.8 billion. We also returned over $30 billion to shareholders during the quarter as we maintain our target of reaching a net cash neutral position over time.</p><p>Cook said the gains helped lift its total installed base of devices past 1.65 billion, with more than 1 billion iPhones active and outstanding and records in each of its project categories.</p>","source":"lsy1610613172068","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Smashes Q1 Earnings Forecast on Surging China Sales</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Smashes Q1 Earnings Forecast on Surging China Sales\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-01-28 15:48 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.thestreet.com/investing/apple-smashes-q1-earnings-forecast-on-surging-china-sales><strong>The street</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Apple saw a 57% surge in China sales over the December quarter, helping drive a record top line and much stronger-than-expected first quarter earnings.Apple Inc. (AAPL) -Get Report posted stronger-...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.thestreet.com/investing/apple-smashes-q1-earnings-forecast-on-surging-china-sales\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.thestreet.com/investing/apple-smashes-q1-earnings-forecast-on-surging-china-sales","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1181346723","content_text":"Apple saw a 57% surge in China sales over the December quarter, helping drive a record top line and much stronger-than-expected first quarter earnings.Apple Inc. (AAPL) -Get Report posted stronger-than-expected first quarter earnings Wednesday, and its first print of revenues over $100 million, thanks in part to surging China sales and demand for its new iPhone 12.Apple said profits for the three months ending in December, the tech giant's fiscal first quarter, were pegged at $1.68 per share, up 34.4% from the same period last year and well ahead of the Street consensus forecast of $1.41. Group revenues, Apple said, rose 21% from last year to a record $111.44 billion, again topping analysts' estimates of a $103.3 billion tally.Greater China revenues surged 57% to $21.3 billion, Apple said, helping iPhone revenues rise 17% to an all-time high of $65.5 billion, thanks in part to the launch of its new iPhone 12 suite of smartphones late last year amid COVID-related disruptions to its global brick-and-mortar network of stores. Services revenue rose 24.2% to $15.8 billion, Apple said, with more than 620 million subscribers across all of its platforms.Looking into the three months ending in March, Apple said its sees revenue growing on an year-on-year basis, but declined to provide detailed guidance for either sales or bottom line earnings. Gross margins, Apple said, will likely be flat on a quarter-to-quarter basis.“This quarter for Apple wouldn’t have been possible without the tireless and innovative work of every Apple team member worldwide,” said CEO Tim Cook. “We’re gratified by the enthusiastic customer response to the unmatched line of cutting-edge products that we delivered across a historic holiday season.\"Apple shares were marked 2% lower in after hours trading immediately following the earnings release to indicate a Thursday opening bell price of $139.30 each, a move that would trim the stock's six-month gain to around 49%.Mac sales, Apple said, rose 21.2% to $8.68 billion, while sales from its wearables, home and accessories division jumped 30% to $13 billion, \"driven by holiday demand for the latest Apple watch,\" Cook said. iPad sales were up an astonishing 41% to $8.44 billion.“Our December quarter business performance was fueled by double-digit growth in each product category, which drove all-time revenue records in each of our geographic segments and an all-time high for our installed base of active devices,” said CFO Luca Maestri. “These results helped us generate record operating cash flow of $38.8 billion. We also returned over $30 billion to shareholders during the quarter as we maintain our target of reaching a net cash neutral position over time.Cook said the gains helped lift its total installed base of devices past 1.65 billion, with more than 1 billion iPhones active and outstanding and records in each of its project categories.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":390,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":311259220,"gmtCreate":1611803034260,"gmtModify":1703754047298,"author":{"id":"3570617809207113","authorId":"3570617809207113","name":"Donn","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ba1b57c564d3f11854c26a2bf9847d97","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570617809207113","authorIdStr":"3570617809207113"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"High risk. Must be strong to hold haha","listText":"High risk. Must be strong to hold haha","text":"High risk. Must be strong to hold haha","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/311259220","repostId":"2106258590","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2106258590","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1611795900,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2106258590?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-01-28 09:05","market":"sg","language":"en","title":"Is the trading in GameStop and AMC a major risk? Analysts weigh in","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2106258590","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"Here's what major figures on Wall Street are saying about the spike in prices of heavily shorted sto","content":"<p>Here's what major figures on Wall Street are saying about the spike in prices of heavily shorted stocks amid targeted trading by mob of online investors</p><p>A mania is under way on Wall Street that is being heralded by some as a revolution of individual investors against pros, but there are concerns that the recent flurry of activity -- powered by traders using forums on platforms such as Reddit and Discord --  signals a top to the market, or, even worse, a systemic risk to the delicate foundation of markets where valuations are already considered inflated.</p><p>The surge in prices of companies like videogame retailer GameStop Corp. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GME\">$(GME)$</a> and movie-theater chain AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMC\">$(AMC)$</a>  are partly due to the fact that more than 100% of the shares available for trading, known as the \"the float,\" had been borrowed by short sellers to bet against the stocks.  The Wall Street Journal described the recent moves as a war that has broken out between professionals losing billions  \"and the individual investors jeering at them on social media.\"</p><p>The stratospheric ride has GameStop shares up more than 1,700% in January alone, as social-media traders on Reddit  with long positions bandy together to knock around Wall Street firms. Shares of AMC surged 301% on Wednesday, bringing its return in the first 17 trading days of 2021 to an eye-popping 840%.</p><p>At least <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a> hedge fund, Melvin Capital, closed out its short position  in GameStop on Tuesday afternoon and suffered major losses, its manager told CNBC in an interview.</p><p>Here's what some Wall Street types are saying about the recent moves and the risk of its spilling over into the broader market:</p><p>-- \"The price action is completely divorced from fundamentals. It's a relatively small universe of retail investors that are pushing around a relatively small universe of stocks so at the end of the day, this Reddit army they don't have the wherewithal to sustain these big losses...It's not going to be the institutions [left holding the bag]...it's the kids on my basketball team asking me about how options work,\" Jason Katz, a UBS managing director and star portfolio manager, told Fox Business during a Wednesday interview .</p><p>--  \"The marketplace should be a place where risk is taken, but not reckless risk and not a situation that undermines the system, and that's what we're looking at here,\" Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth William Galvin told CNBC on Wednesday .</p><p>-- Of the overall market, Michael Wilson, chief U.S. equity strategist at <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSTLW\">Morgan Stanley</a>, described in a late Wednesday interview the recent market action as possibly a health development in a CNBC interview .</p><p>\"A lot of these heavily shorted stocks running up...and that always leads to some degrossing. Look, this is a health development, in my view. We're still very bullish about the economy this year and we're very constructive on equities going into 2021. But let's be honest, we've had a heck of a move and we've discounted a lot of good news and so a good consolidation is exactly what we need,\" Wilson said.</p><p>--  \"A short squeeze in a security named GameStop forced several hedge funds to liquidate other securities to cover their losses. GameStop was up 125% today alone. Also, the action in GameStop caused other investors to back away from they thought was a crazy and irrational market,\" wrote independent market analyst Stephen Todd, in a research note.</p><p>-- \"The Reddit army should prepare for stricter rules and regulation shortly, which should kill the idea that what happened with GameStop will happen with others,\" wrote Edward Moya, senior market analyst at Oanda.</p><p>Indeed, already a number of retail brokerages have imposed restrictions on investing  in a number of popular stocks like GameStop and AMC.</p><p>The action in those names helped to weigh on market sentiment, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average  and the S&amp;P 500 index&nbsp;suffering their worst <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a>-day declines since late October, according to FactSet data .</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Is the trading in GameStop and AMC a major risk? Analysts weigh in</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIs the trading in GameStop and AMC a major risk? Analysts weigh in\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-01-28 09:05</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Here's what major figures on Wall Street are saying about the spike in prices of heavily shorted stocks amid targeted trading by mob of online investors</p><p>A mania is under way on Wall Street that is being heralded by some as a revolution of individual investors against pros, but there are concerns that the recent flurry of activity -- powered by traders using forums on platforms such as Reddit and Discord --  signals a top to the market, or, even worse, a systemic risk to the delicate foundation of markets where valuations are already considered inflated.</p><p>The surge in prices of companies like videogame retailer GameStop Corp. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GME\">$(GME)$</a> and movie-theater chain AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMC\">$(AMC)$</a>  are partly due to the fact that more than 100% of the shares available for trading, known as the \"the float,\" had been borrowed by short sellers to bet against the stocks.  The Wall Street Journal described the recent moves as a war that has broken out between professionals losing billions  \"and the individual investors jeering at them on social media.\"</p><p>The stratospheric ride has GameStop shares up more than 1,700% in January alone, as social-media traders on Reddit  with long positions bandy together to knock around Wall Street firms. Shares of AMC surged 301% on Wednesday, bringing its return in the first 17 trading days of 2021 to an eye-popping 840%.</p><p>At least <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a> hedge fund, Melvin Capital, closed out its short position  in GameStop on Tuesday afternoon and suffered major losses, its manager told CNBC in an interview.</p><p>Here's what some Wall Street types are saying about the recent moves and the risk of its spilling over into the broader market:</p><p>-- \"The price action is completely divorced from fundamentals. It's a relatively small universe of retail investors that are pushing around a relatively small universe of stocks so at the end of the day, this Reddit army they don't have the wherewithal to sustain these big losses...It's not going to be the institutions [left holding the bag]...it's the kids on my basketball team asking me about how options work,\" Jason Katz, a UBS managing director and star portfolio manager, told Fox Business during a Wednesday interview .</p><p>--  \"The marketplace should be a place where risk is taken, but not reckless risk and not a situation that undermines the system, and that's what we're looking at here,\" Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth William Galvin told CNBC on Wednesday .</p><p>-- Of the overall market, Michael Wilson, chief U.S. equity strategist at <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSTLW\">Morgan Stanley</a>, described in a late Wednesday interview the recent market action as possibly a health development in a CNBC interview .</p><p>\"A lot of these heavily shorted stocks running up...and that always leads to some degrossing. Look, this is a health development, in my view. We're still very bullish about the economy this year and we're very constructive on equities going into 2021. But let's be honest, we've had a heck of a move and we've discounted a lot of good news and so a good consolidation is exactly what we need,\" Wilson said.</p><p>--  \"A short squeeze in a security named GameStop forced several hedge funds to liquidate other securities to cover their losses. GameStop was up 125% today alone. Also, the action in GameStop caused other investors to back away from they thought was a crazy and irrational market,\" wrote independent market analyst Stephen Todd, in a research note.</p><p>-- \"The Reddit army should prepare for stricter rules and regulation shortly, which should kill the idea that what happened with GameStop will happen with others,\" wrote Edward Moya, senior market analyst at Oanda.</p><p>Indeed, already a number of retail brokerages have imposed restrictions on investing  in a number of popular stocks like GameStop and AMC.</p><p>The action in those names helped to weigh on market sentiment, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average  and the S&amp;P 500 index&nbsp;suffering their worst <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a>-day declines since late October, according to FactSet data .</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"GME":"游戏驿站","AMC":"AMC院线"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2106258590","content_text":"Here's what major figures on Wall Street are saying about the spike in prices of heavily shorted stocks amid targeted trading by mob of online investorsA mania is under way on Wall Street that is being heralded by some as a revolution of individual investors against pros, but there are concerns that the recent flurry of activity -- powered by traders using forums on platforms such as Reddit and Discord --  signals a top to the market, or, even worse, a systemic risk to the delicate foundation of markets where valuations are already considered inflated.The surge in prices of companies like videogame retailer GameStop Corp. $(GME)$ and movie-theater chain AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc. $(AMC)$  are partly due to the fact that more than 100% of the shares available for trading, known as the \"the float,\" had been borrowed by short sellers to bet against the stocks.  The Wall Street Journal described the recent moves as a war that has broken out between professionals losing billions  \"and the individual investors jeering at them on social media.\"The stratospheric ride has GameStop shares up more than 1,700% in January alone, as social-media traders on Reddit  with long positions bandy together to knock around Wall Street firms. Shares of AMC surged 301% on Wednesday, bringing its return in the first 17 trading days of 2021 to an eye-popping 840%.At least one hedge fund, Melvin Capital, closed out its short position  in GameStop on Tuesday afternoon and suffered major losses, its manager told CNBC in an interview.Here's what some Wall Street types are saying about the recent moves and the risk of its spilling over into the broader market:-- \"The price action is completely divorced from fundamentals. It's a relatively small universe of retail investors that are pushing around a relatively small universe of stocks so at the end of the day, this Reddit army they don't have the wherewithal to sustain these big losses...It's not going to be the institutions [left holding the bag]...it's the kids on my basketball team asking me about how options work,\" Jason Katz, a UBS managing director and star portfolio manager, told Fox Business during a Wednesday interview .--  \"The marketplace should be a place where risk is taken, but not reckless risk and not a situation that undermines the system, and that's what we're looking at here,\" Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth William Galvin told CNBC on Wednesday .-- Of the overall market, Michael Wilson, chief U.S. equity strategist at Morgan Stanley, described in a late Wednesday interview the recent market action as possibly a health development in a CNBC interview .\"A lot of these heavily shorted stocks running up...and that always leads to some degrossing. Look, this is a health development, in my view. We're still very bullish about the economy this year and we're very constructive on equities going into 2021. But let's be honest, we've had a heck of a move and we've discounted a lot of good news and so a good consolidation is exactly what we need,\" Wilson said.--  \"A short squeeze in a security named GameStop forced several hedge funds to liquidate other securities to cover their losses. GameStop was up 125% today alone. Also, the action in GameStop caused other investors to back away from they thought was a crazy and irrational market,\" wrote independent market analyst Stephen Todd, in a research note.-- \"The Reddit army should prepare for stricter rules and regulation shortly, which should kill the idea that what happened with GameStop will happen with others,\" wrote Edward Moya, senior market analyst at Oanda.Indeed, already a number of retail brokerages have imposed restrictions on investing  in a number of popular stocks like GameStop and AMC.The action in those names helped to weigh on market sentiment, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average  and the S&P 500 index suffering their worst one-day declines since late October, according to FactSet data .","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":266,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":313670523,"gmtCreate":1611714666762,"gmtModify":1703752568184,"author":{"id":"3570617809207113","authorId":"3570617809207113","name":"Donn","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ba1b57c564d3f11854c26a2bf9847d97","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570617809207113","authorIdStr":"3570617809207113"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Missed it :(","listText":"Missed it :(","text":"Missed it :(","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/313670523","repostId":"1141309013","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1141309013","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1611655201,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1141309013?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-01-26 18:00","market":"sg","language":"en","title":"Apple Stock Could Surge 62% to $225, According to This Analyst","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1141309013","media":"nasdaq","summary":"Shares ofApple(NASDAQ: AAPL)have already climbed 79% over the past year, but will surge to new all-t","content":"<p>Shares of<b>Apple</b>(NASDAQ: AAPL)have already climbed 79% over the past year, but will surge to new all-time highs in 2021.</p><p>That's according to Wedbush analyst Daniel Ives. Today, Ives raised his price target on Apple's stock to $175 from $160, but also laid out a bull case for why the stock could climb to as high as $225. His new base target represents potential gains for investors of roughly 26% over the stock's closing price of about $139 on Friday. It's his compelling argument for the bull case, however, that should have investors more excited.</p><p>Ives cited the potential for \"eye-popping\" iPhone sales, saying that checks of Apple's supply chain in Asia showed strong demand for the device. The analyst now believes Apple could have sold as many as 90 million iPhones during the December quarter, roughly 35% over the analyst's already robust forecast. Ives sees this upward trend continuing over the March and June quarters.</p><p>\"We believe based on the current trajectory and in a bull case Cupertino has potential to sell north of 240 million units (~250 million could be in the cards -- an eye-popping figure)\" Ives wrote in a note to clients, \"which would easily eclipse the previous Apple record of 231 million units sold in [fiscal year 2015].\"</p><p>Will Apple stock hit $225?</p><p>There have long been prognostications of a supercycle for the iPhone maker. It has an installed base of more than 1.4 billion active devices, with the iPhone accounting for an estimated 950 million of those.</p><p>The current thinking suggests that as many as 350 million iPhone buyers could upgrade their device this year. To put that number in context, Apple sold roughly 185 million iPhones in 2019. Given the demand for a 5G-enabled iPhone, and the number of devices due for an upgrade, it's certainly possible Apple could sell 89% more iPhones in 2021 -- but that's certainly a high bar.</p>","source":"lsy1603171495471","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Stock Could Surge 62% to $225, According to This Analyst</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Stock Could Surge 62% to $225, According to This Analyst\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-01-26 18:00 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/apple-stock-could-surge-62-to-%24225-according-to-this-analyst-2021-01-25><strong>nasdaq</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Shares ofApple(NASDAQ: AAPL)have already climbed 79% over the past year, but will surge to new all-time highs in 2021.That's according to Wedbush analyst Daniel Ives. Today, Ives raised his price ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/apple-stock-could-surge-62-to-%24225-according-to-this-analyst-2021-01-25\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/apple-stock-could-surge-62-to-%24225-according-to-this-analyst-2021-01-25","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1141309013","content_text":"Shares ofApple(NASDAQ: AAPL)have already climbed 79% over the past year, but will surge to new all-time highs in 2021.That's according to Wedbush analyst Daniel Ives. Today, Ives raised his price target on Apple's stock to $175 from $160, but also laid out a bull case for why the stock could climb to as high as $225. His new base target represents potential gains for investors of roughly 26% over the stock's closing price of about $139 on Friday. It's his compelling argument for the bull case, however, that should have investors more excited.Ives cited the potential for \"eye-popping\" iPhone sales, saying that checks of Apple's supply chain in Asia showed strong demand for the device. The analyst now believes Apple could have sold as many as 90 million iPhones during the December quarter, roughly 35% over the analyst's already robust forecast. Ives sees this upward trend continuing over the March and June quarters.\"We believe based on the current trajectory and in a bull case Cupertino has potential to sell north of 240 million units (~250 million could be in the cards -- an eye-popping figure)\" Ives wrote in a note to clients, \"which would easily eclipse the previous Apple record of 231 million units sold in [fiscal year 2015].\"Will Apple stock hit $225?There have long been prognostications of a supercycle for the iPhone maker. It has an installed base of more than 1.4 billion active devices, with the iPhone accounting for an estimated 950 million of those.The current thinking suggests that as many as 350 million iPhone buyers could upgrade their device this year. To put that number in context, Apple sold roughly 185 million iPhones in 2019. Given the demand for a 5G-enabled iPhone, and the number of devices due for an upgrade, it's certainly possible Apple could sell 89% more iPhones in 2021 -- but that's certainly a high bar.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":234,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":319764911,"gmtCreate":1611625061333,"gmtModify":1703751689970,"author":{"id":"3570617809207113","authorId":"3570617809207113","name":"Donn","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ba1b57c564d3f11854c26a2bf9847d97","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570617809207113","authorIdStr":"3570617809207113"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hopefully","listText":"Hopefully","text":"Hopefully","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/319764911","repostId":"1111408338","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1111408338","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1611573530,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1111408338?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-01-25 19:18","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tesla earnings: Can sales growth match stock’s rise?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1111408338","media":"Market Wacth","summary":"Tesla Inc. is expected to report fourth-quarter results after the bell on Wednesday, with all eyes on the Silicon Valley electric-car maker’s sales goals for 2021.On a call in October to discussTesla’s third-quarter earnings,one analyst estimated 2021 sales between 840,000 to 1 million vehicles, and Chief Executive Elon Musk responded that it likely would be “in that vicinity,” and that the analyst was “not far off.”Chief Financial Officer Zach Kirkhorn then added that TeslaTSLA,+0.20%would prov","content":"<p>Tesla Inc. is expected to report fourth-quarter results after the bell on Wednesday, with all eyes on the Silicon Valley electric-car maker’s sales goals for 2021.</p><p>On a call in October to discussTesla’s third-quarter earnings,one analyst estimated 2021 sales between 840,000 to 1 million vehicles, and Chief Executive Elon Musk responded that it likely would be “in that vicinity,” and that the analyst was “not far off.”</p><p>Chief Financial Officer Zach Kirkhorn then added that TeslaTSLA,+0.20%would provide official 2021 guidance when it reports fourth-quarter results, seemingly preventing Musk from saying more.</p><p>All through last year, despite factory closures and other pandemic-related snags, Tesla kept its 2020 sales guidance intact, and the company ended the year a hair’s breath from it, earning praise from Wall Street.</p><p>Tesla earlier this month said it hadproduced more than half a million vehicles and delivered 499,550 in 2020.Deliveries are a proxy for Tesla sales. Before the start of the pandemic, the company set a goal of delivering more than 500,000 vehicles in the year.</p><p>Wall Street analysts expect a deliveries guidance to come in around 825,000 and 875,000 vehicles.</p><p>Here’s what else to expect:</p><p><b>Earnings:</b>Consensus from 37 Wall Street analysts polled by FactSet calls for GAAP earnings of 65 cents a share, which would compare with GAAP earnings of 12 cents a share in the fourth quarter of 2019.</p><p>The analysts expect an adjusted profit of $1.04 a share, which would compare with an adjusted profit of 43 cents a share a year ago. A fourth-quarter profit would be Tesla’s sixth straight quarterly GAAP and adjusted earnings.</p><p>Estimize, a crowdsourcing platform that gathers estimates from Wall Street analysts as well as buy-side analysts, fund managers, company executives, academics and others, is expecting an adjusted profit of $1.02 a share.</p><p><b>Revenue:</b>The analysts surveyed by FactSet expect sales of $10.53 billion for Tesla, up from $7.38 billion a year ago. Estimize sees revenue of $10.61 billion for the company.</p><p><b>Stock movement:</b>Tesla stock greeted 2021 just about the same way it ended 2020: Scoring closing and intraday records highs. Earlier this month, the stock went on its longest-everwinning run.</p><p>Tesla shares are up 635% in the past 12 months, compared with gains around 16% for the S&amp;P 500 indexSPX,-0.30%in the same period.</p><p><b>What else to expect:</b>Full-year results will provide the clearest yet picture of the coronavirus pandemic impact on the company.</p><p>Besides an official 2021 sales guidance, Wall Street is looking for more commentary on the Model Y, the newest addition to the Tesla lineup, and on upcoming models, such as the Cybertruck and a cheaper vehicle that has been only hinted at and that has been dubbed the “Model 2.”</p><p>Analysts at JPMorgan said Friday they remained “highly cautious” on Tesla due to its stock valuation, but they raised their price target on the stock to $125 from $105, the lowest among FactSet-surveyed analysts.</p><p>“While still suggestive of large downside, we do not regard our price target as ungenerous as it actually values Tesla as the world’s second largest automaker by market capitalization, behind Toyota and ahead of Volkswagen despite these automakers each currently selling on the order of magnitude of 20x as many vehicles annually as Tesla,” the JPMorgan analysts, led by Ryan Brinkman, said in their note.</p><p>RBC analysts, led by Joseph Spak, said in a recent note they expect Tesla to reiterate its recently raised capex 2021 outlook, which calls for between $4.5 billion and $6 billion.</p><p>Tesla historically has issued guidance for free cash flow and GAAP net income, the RBC analysts said, but could hold off on it beyond calling for “significant” on-year improvement.</p><p>Deutsche Bank analysts said they expect a “solid” quarter for Tesla, raising their delivery forecast to 825,000 vehicles from 800,000, “given</p><p>continued strong sales of Model 3 and fast ramp-up of (made-in-China) Model Y.”</p><p>The Deutsche Bank analysts, led by Emmanuel Rosner, also raised their price target on Tesla shares to $890 from 705 to $890, based on expectations of higher sales and profits through 2021 and the next few years.</p><p>On average, Tesla analysts polled by FactSet have a price target of $525 on Tesla, with 12 out of the 37 with a buy rating on the stock, 15 rating it a hold, and the remaining 10 rating it a sell. The $525 average represents a 37% downside from Friday prices.</p>","source":"lsy1604288433698","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tesla earnings: Can sales growth match stock’s rise?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTesla earnings: Can sales growth match stock’s rise?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-01-25 19:18 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.marketwatch.com/story/get-ready-for-apples-first-100-billion-quarter-in-history-11611347355?mod=home-page><strong>Market Wacth</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Tesla Inc. is expected to report fourth-quarter results after the bell on Wednesday, with all eyes on the Silicon Valley electric-car maker’s sales goals for 2021.On a call in October to discussTesla’...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/get-ready-for-apples-first-100-billion-quarter-in-history-11611347355?mod=home-page\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fab3e6da33eab070d39ea5ddbb760010","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/get-ready-for-apples-first-100-billion-quarter-in-history-11611347355?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1111408338","content_text":"Tesla Inc. is expected to report fourth-quarter results after the bell on Wednesday, with all eyes on the Silicon Valley electric-car maker’s sales goals for 2021.On a call in October to discussTesla’s third-quarter earnings,one analyst estimated 2021 sales between 840,000 to 1 million vehicles, and Chief Executive Elon Musk responded that it likely would be “in that vicinity,” and that the analyst was “not far off.”Chief Financial Officer Zach Kirkhorn then added that TeslaTSLA,+0.20%would provide official 2021 guidance when it reports fourth-quarter results, seemingly preventing Musk from saying more.All through last year, despite factory closures and other pandemic-related snags, Tesla kept its 2020 sales guidance intact, and the company ended the year a hair’s breath from it, earning praise from Wall Street.Tesla earlier this month said it hadproduced more than half a million vehicles and delivered 499,550 in 2020.Deliveries are a proxy for Tesla sales. Before the start of the pandemic, the company set a goal of delivering more than 500,000 vehicles in the year.Wall Street analysts expect a deliveries guidance to come in around 825,000 and 875,000 vehicles.Here’s what else to expect:Earnings:Consensus from 37 Wall Street analysts polled by FactSet calls for GAAP earnings of 65 cents a share, which would compare with GAAP earnings of 12 cents a share in the fourth quarter of 2019.The analysts expect an adjusted profit of $1.04 a share, which would compare with an adjusted profit of 43 cents a share a year ago. A fourth-quarter profit would be Tesla’s sixth straight quarterly GAAP and adjusted earnings.Estimize, a crowdsourcing platform that gathers estimates from Wall Street analysts as well as buy-side analysts, fund managers, company executives, academics and others, is expecting an adjusted profit of $1.02 a share.Revenue:The analysts surveyed by FactSet expect sales of $10.53 billion for Tesla, up from $7.38 billion a year ago. Estimize sees revenue of $10.61 billion for the company.Stock movement:Tesla stock greeted 2021 just about the same way it ended 2020: Scoring closing and intraday records highs. Earlier this month, the stock went on its longest-everwinning run.Tesla shares are up 635% in the past 12 months, compared with gains around 16% for the S&P 500 indexSPX,-0.30%in the same period.What else to expect:Full-year results will provide the clearest yet picture of the coronavirus pandemic impact on the company.Besides an official 2021 sales guidance, Wall Street is looking for more commentary on the Model Y, the newest addition to the Tesla lineup, and on upcoming models, such as the Cybertruck and a cheaper vehicle that has been only hinted at and that has been dubbed the “Model 2.”Analysts at JPMorgan said Friday they remained “highly cautious” on Tesla due to its stock valuation, but they raised their price target on the stock to $125 from $105, the lowest among FactSet-surveyed analysts.“While still suggestive of large downside, we do not regard our price target as ungenerous as it actually values Tesla as the world’s second largest automaker by market capitalization, behind Toyota and ahead of Volkswagen despite these automakers each currently selling on the order of magnitude of 20x as many vehicles annually as Tesla,” the JPMorgan analysts, led by Ryan Brinkman, said in their note.RBC analysts, led by Joseph Spak, said in a recent note they expect Tesla to reiterate its recently raised capex 2021 outlook, which calls for between $4.5 billion and $6 billion.Tesla historically has issued guidance for free cash flow and GAAP net income, the RBC analysts said, but could hold off on it beyond calling for “significant” on-year improvement.Deutsche Bank analysts said they expect a “solid” quarter for Tesla, raising their delivery forecast to 825,000 vehicles from 800,000, “givencontinued strong sales of Model 3 and fast ramp-up of (made-in-China) Model Y.”The Deutsche Bank analysts, led by Emmanuel Rosner, also raised their price target on Tesla shares to $890 from 705 to $890, based on expectations of higher sales and profits through 2021 and the next few years.On average, Tesla analysts polled by FactSet have a price target of $525 on Tesla, with 12 out of the 37 with a buy rating on the stock, 15 rating it a hold, and the remaining 10 rating it a sell. The $525 average represents a 37% downside from Friday prices.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":362,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":319361445,"gmtCreate":1611538880187,"gmtModify":1703750707130,"author":{"id":"3570617809207113","authorId":"3570617809207113","name":"Donn","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ba1b57c564d3f11854c26a2bf9847d97","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570617809207113","authorIdStr":"3570617809207113"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hmm. It’ll recover.","listText":"Hmm. It’ll recover.","text":"Hmm. It’ll recover.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/319361445","repostId":"2105659234","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":625,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":319912892,"gmtCreate":1611470604316,"gmtModify":1703750547718,"author":{"id":"3570617809207113","authorId":"3570617809207113","name":"Donn","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ba1b57c564d3f11854c26a2bf9847d97","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570617809207113","authorIdStr":"3570617809207113"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Waiting for the dip?","listText":"Waiting for the dip?","text":"Waiting for the dip?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/319912892","repostId":"2105593894","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":186,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":310786786,"gmtCreate":1611373439645,"gmtModify":1703750278496,"author":{"id":"3570617809207113","authorId":"3570617809207113","name":"Donn","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ba1b57c564d3f11854c26a2bf9847d97","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570617809207113","authorIdStr":"3570617809207113"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hmm","listText":"Hmm","text":"Hmm","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/310786786","repostId":"2105466589","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":253,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":310786236,"gmtCreate":1611373410025,"gmtModify":1703750278150,"author":{"id":"3570617809207113","authorId":"3570617809207113","name":"Donn","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ba1b57c564d3f11854c26a2bf9847d97","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570617809207113","authorIdStr":"3570617809207113"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good read","listText":"Good read","text":"Good read","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/310786236","repostId":"1186615938","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1186615938","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1611304246,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1186615938?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-01-22 16:30","market":"us","language":"en","title":"6 Dividend Funds for Long-Term Investors","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1186615938","media":"Barrons","summary":"Although dividend stocks lagged behind flashier tech stocks during the pandemic last year, their “lo","content":"<p>Although dividend stocks lagged behind flashier tech stocks during the pandemic last year, their “long-term investment case remains solid.”</p>\n<p>So concludes Amy Arnott, a portfolio strategist atMorningstar,in a recent note. A lot of the mutual funds that specialize in these stocks “really suffered from not having as much tech exposure” as other funds did, Arnott tells<i>Barron’s</i>. These equity income funds, Arnott adds, also took a hit owing to the manydividend cuts and suspensionslast year as companies tried to preserve cash.</p>\n<p>From Feb. 19 of last year, when the market peaked at what was then a record high, through March 23, the average stock dividend fund had a return of minus 36.6%, versus minus 33.5% for the S&amp;P 500, according to Morningstar. The MSCI USA High Dividend Yield Index notched a slightly better result, with a gross return of minus 32.6% over that stretch.</p>\n<p>Looking at the full year, theTechnology Select Sector SPDR Fund(ticker: XLK), a proxy for large technology companies, returned 43.6% in 2020, well above theS&amp;P 500’s18.4% result or theS&amp;P 500 Dividend Aristocrats’ 8.7% return.</p>\n<p>Beaten but Not BrokenDespite recent underperformance, the long-term case for dividend funds</p>\n<table>\n <thead>\n  <tr>\n   <th>Fund or Index / Ticker</th>\n   <th>1-Year Return</th>\n   <th>Dividend Yield</th>\n   <th>AUM (bil)</th>\n   <th>Net Expense Ratio</th>\n  </tr>\n </thead>\n <tbody>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Columbia Dividend Income / GSFTX</td>\n   <td>9.2%</td>\n   <td>1.7%</td>\n   <td>$28.9</td>\n   <td>0.69%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Franklin Equity Income / FISEX</td>\n   <td>6.2</td>\n   <td>2.2</td>\n   <td>2.8</td>\n   <td>0.86</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>JPMorgan Equity Income / OIEIX</td>\n   <td>4.8</td>\n   <td>2.3</td>\n   <td>37.5</td>\n   <td>0.98</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth / PRDGX</td>\n   <td>12.3</td>\n   <td>1.1</td>\n   <td>18</td>\n   <td>0.63</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Vanguard Dividend Growth / VDIGX</td>\n   <td>8.5</td>\n   <td>1.8</td>\n   <td>47.4</td>\n   <td>0.27</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Vanguard Dividend Appreciation / VIG</td>\n   <td>13.0</td>\n   <td>1.9</td>\n   <td>53.2</td>\n   <td>0.06</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>S&amp;P 500</td>\n   <td>16.7</td>\n   <td>1.5</td>\n   <td>NA</td>\n   <td>NA</td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p>Note: Returns as of Jan. 15. NA=Not applicable</p>\n<p>Sources: Morningstar; Bloomberg; company reports</p>\n<p>However, Arnott argues that dividend stocks have acquitted themselves better during various other challenging periods—performance levels they may well return to in future rough patches. Over the 41 five-year rolling periods from 1976 through 2020, dividend stocks outpaced the broader market in 25 of those spans. But as with so much else during the pandemic, 2020 was an aberration for dividend stocks.</p>\n<p>“They’ve typically fared best during periods of slow economic growth and sluggish market returns, such as the early part of the [2000s] and in the 1980s, when stagflation dragged down market returns,” Arnott observed in her Jan. 11 note.</p>\n<p>In contrast, dividend stocks trailed the broader market through much of the 1990s when the tech-stock bubble inflated. They “tend to fare worst during more ebullient times, such as 1995-99 and the generally strong period from 2016 through 2020,” she wrote.</p>\n<p>Arnott also looked at the trailing 20-year returns and volatility, as measured by standard deviation, for dividend stocks. The MSCI USA High Dividend Yield Index had a 20-year annual return of 7.89%, versus 7.49% for the S&amp;P 500. That dividend index also was less volatile over that period, with a standard deviation of 13.23, nearly two percentage points better than the broader market’s 15.08.</p>\n<p>“Stocks with above-average dividends have generally held up relatively well in previous market downturns,” Arnott wrote, pointing to the fourth quarter of 1987, the early 2000s, and the fourth quarter of 2018 as examples.</p>\n<p>To supplement Arnott’s observations,<i>Barron’s</i>looked at some of the equity income funds we have written about in recent years. None of these funds have outperformed the S&amp;P 500 over the past 12 months.</p>\n<p>Nearly all of them, however, have finished in the top half of the Morningstar category when measured by three- and five-year returns—and many have strong performance over even longer periods as well.</p>\n<p>The T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund (PRDGX), which tries togenerate income and capital appreciation, has a one-year return of 12.3%, ranking second among the funds included in the accompanying table.</p>\n<p>As of Dec. 31, the portfolio’s top sector weighting was technology at 22.2%, followed by health care at 16.5%, and financials at 12.8%. Its top two holdings wereMicrosoft(MSFT), which yields 1%, andApple(AAPL), which yields 0.6%. Neither stock has a big yield. But Microsoft has returned about 36% over the past year, dividends included, and Apple has gained about 67%.</p>\n<p>TheColumbia Dividend Income Fund(GSFTX) has a one-year return of 9.2%. A fourth-quarter tailwind forthe fundwas an overweight position in bank stocks such asBank of America(BAC), which yields 2.2%, andJPMorgan Chase(JPM), 2.7%.</p>\n<p>“The segment benefited from the quarter’s rotation into value,” according to the fund managers’ commentary on the company’s website, adding that bank stocks helped as well.</p>\n<p>The&nbsp;JPMorgan Equity Income Fund(OIEIX) had a tougher time of it, with a return of 4.8% over the past 12 months, placing it in the middle of the pack among its peers.</p>\n<p>Under longtime lead managerClare Hart, the portfolio has placed in the top half of its Morningstar peer group over the past three and five years and in the top 10% over the past 10 and 15 years. “Underperformance was predominantly a function of what we don’t own rather than what we do,” according to an assessment of the fund’s fourth-quarter performance by Hart and one of her colleagues, Jamie Steinhardt.</p>\n<p>The managers also pointed out thatBest Buy(BBY) andHome Depot(HD) “gave back some of their gains [despite] both companies reporting double-digit earnings growth.”</p>\n<p>The fund did benefit from financial holdings such as Bank of America.</p>\n<p>Actively managed funds aren’t the only option for investors. There are various ETFs, which typically hew to an index and don’t have a manager actively buying and selling stocks.</p>\n<p>TheVanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF(VIG) has a one-year return of 13%, tops among the funds included in the table, helped by an ultralow expense ratio of 0.06%.</p>\n<p>The fund, which tries to track the Nasdaq US Dividend Achievers Select Index, recently held 212 stocks with a median market capitalization of about $158 billion, giving it a large-cap bent.</p>\n<p>As of Dec. 31, its biggest sector weighting was consumer discretionary at 22.8%, followed by industrials at 20.8%, and health care at 14.9%. Technology clocked in at 12.5%—showing that a dividend stock fund doesn’t have to have a big tech overweighting to perform well right now.</p>\n<p>“The bottom line is that every down market is different, and dividend-oriented stocks won’t excel in every one,” Arnott wrote in her note’s conclusion. “Overall, though, they tend to hold up a bit better than average during times of market turbulence and have generated attractive risk-adjusted returns over longer periods.”</p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>6 Dividend Funds for Long-Term Investors</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n6 Dividend Funds for Long-Term Investors\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-01-22 16:30 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/6-dividend-funds-for-long-term-investors-51611244802?mod=hp_LEADSUPP_2><strong>Barrons</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Although dividend stocks lagged behind flashier tech stocks during the pandemic last year, their “long-term investment case remains solid.”\nSo concludes Amy Arnott, a portfolio strategist ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/6-dividend-funds-for-long-term-investors-51611244802?mod=hp_LEADSUPP_2\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/6-dividend-funds-for-long-term-investors-51611244802?mod=hp_LEADSUPP_2","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1186615938","content_text":"Although dividend stocks lagged behind flashier tech stocks during the pandemic last year, their “long-term investment case remains solid.”\nSo concludes Amy Arnott, a portfolio strategist atMorningstar,in a recent note. A lot of the mutual funds that specialize in these stocks “really suffered from not having as much tech exposure” as other funds did, Arnott tellsBarron’s. These equity income funds, Arnott adds, also took a hit owing to the manydividend cuts and suspensionslast year as companies tried to preserve cash.\nFrom Feb. 19 of last year, when the market peaked at what was then a record high, through March 23, the average stock dividend fund had a return of minus 36.6%, versus minus 33.5% for the S&P 500, according to Morningstar. The MSCI USA High Dividend Yield Index notched a slightly better result, with a gross return of minus 32.6% over that stretch.\nLooking at the full year, theTechnology Select Sector SPDR Fund(ticker: XLK), a proxy for large technology companies, returned 43.6% in 2020, well above theS&P 500’s18.4% result or theS&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats’ 8.7% return.\nBeaten but Not BrokenDespite recent underperformance, the long-term case for dividend funds\n\n\n\nFund or Index / Ticker\n1-Year Return\nDividend Yield\nAUM (bil)\nNet Expense Ratio\n\n\n\n\nColumbia Dividend Income / GSFTX\n9.2%\n1.7%\n$28.9\n0.69%\n\n\nFranklin Equity Income / FISEX\n6.2\n2.2\n2.8\n0.86\n\n\nJPMorgan Equity Income / OIEIX\n4.8\n2.3\n37.5\n0.98\n\n\nT. Rowe Price Dividend Growth / PRDGX\n12.3\n1.1\n18\n0.63\n\n\nVanguard Dividend Growth / VDIGX\n8.5\n1.8\n47.4\n0.27\n\n\nVanguard Dividend Appreciation / VIG\n13.0\n1.9\n53.2\n0.06\n\n\nS&P 500\n16.7\n1.5\nNA\nNA\n\n\n\nNote: Returns as of Jan. 15. NA=Not applicable\nSources: Morningstar; Bloomberg; company reports\nHowever, Arnott argues that dividend stocks have acquitted themselves better during various other challenging periods—performance levels they may well return to in future rough patches. Over the 41 five-year rolling periods from 1976 through 2020, dividend stocks outpaced the broader market in 25 of those spans. But as with so much else during the pandemic, 2020 was an aberration for dividend stocks.\n“They’ve typically fared best during periods of slow economic growth and sluggish market returns, such as the early part of the [2000s] and in the 1980s, when stagflation dragged down market returns,” Arnott observed in her Jan. 11 note.\nIn contrast, dividend stocks trailed the broader market through much of the 1990s when the tech-stock bubble inflated. They “tend to fare worst during more ebullient times, such as 1995-99 and the generally strong period from 2016 through 2020,” she wrote.\nArnott also looked at the trailing 20-year returns and volatility, as measured by standard deviation, for dividend stocks. The MSCI USA High Dividend Yield Index had a 20-year annual return of 7.89%, versus 7.49% for the S&P 500. That dividend index also was less volatile over that period, with a standard deviation of 13.23, nearly two percentage points better than the broader market’s 15.08.\n“Stocks with above-average dividends have generally held up relatively well in previous market downturns,” Arnott wrote, pointing to the fourth quarter of 1987, the early 2000s, and the fourth quarter of 2018 as examples.\nTo supplement Arnott’s observations,Barron’slooked at some of the equity income funds we have written about in recent years. None of these funds have outperformed the S&P 500 over the past 12 months.\nNearly all of them, however, have finished in the top half of the Morningstar category when measured by three- and five-year returns—and many have strong performance over even longer periods as well.\nThe T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund (PRDGX), which tries togenerate income and capital appreciation, has a one-year return of 12.3%, ranking second among the funds included in the accompanying table.\nAs of Dec. 31, the portfolio’s top sector weighting was technology at 22.2%, followed by health care at 16.5%, and financials at 12.8%. Its top two holdings wereMicrosoft(MSFT), which yields 1%, andApple(AAPL), which yields 0.6%. Neither stock has a big yield. But Microsoft has returned about 36% over the past year, dividends included, and Apple has gained about 67%.\nTheColumbia Dividend Income Fund(GSFTX) has a one-year return of 9.2%. A fourth-quarter tailwind forthe fundwas an overweight position in bank stocks such asBank of America(BAC), which yields 2.2%, andJPMorgan Chase(JPM), 2.7%.\n“The segment benefited from the quarter’s rotation into value,” according to the fund managers’ commentary on the company’s website, adding that bank stocks helped as well.\nThe JPMorgan Equity Income Fund(OIEIX) had a tougher time of it, with a return of 4.8% over the past 12 months, placing it in the middle of the pack among its peers.\nUnder longtime lead managerClare Hart, the portfolio has placed in the top half of its Morningstar peer group over the past three and five years and in the top 10% over the past 10 and 15 years. “Underperformance was predominantly a function of what we don’t own rather than what we do,” according to an assessment of the fund’s fourth-quarter performance by Hart and one of her colleagues, Jamie Steinhardt.\nThe managers also pointed out thatBest Buy(BBY) andHome Depot(HD) “gave back some of their gains [despite] both companies reporting double-digit earnings growth.”\nThe fund did benefit from financial holdings such as Bank of America.\nActively managed funds aren’t the only option for investors. There are various ETFs, which typically hew to an index and don’t have a manager actively buying and selling stocks.\nTheVanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF(VIG) has a one-year return of 13%, tops among the funds included in the table, helped by an ultralow expense ratio of 0.06%.\nThe fund, which tries to track the Nasdaq US Dividend Achievers Select Index, recently held 212 stocks with a median market capitalization of about $158 billion, giving it a large-cap bent.\nAs of Dec. 31, its biggest sector weighting was consumer discretionary at 22.8%, followed by industrials at 20.8%, and health care at 14.9%. Technology clocked in at 12.5%—showing that a dividend stock fund doesn’t have to have a big tech overweighting to perform well right now.\n“The bottom line is that every down market is different, and dividend-oriented stocks won’t excel in every one,” Arnott wrote in her note’s conclusion. “Overall, though, they tend to hold up a bit better than average during times of market turbulence and have generated attractive risk-adjusted returns over longer periods.”","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":387,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":312161918,"gmtCreate":1612068028834,"gmtModify":1703757610134,"author":{"id":"3570617809207113","authorId":"3570617809207113","name":"Donn","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ba1b57c564d3f11854c26a2bf9847d97","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570617809207113","authorIdStr":"3570617809207113"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"CROOKS!","listText":"CROOKS!","text":"CROOKS!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/312161918","repostId":"1137182252","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1137182252","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1611909009,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1137182252?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-01-29 16:30","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Robinhood Raises $1 Billion in Dash for Cash After Trader Revolt","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1137182252","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"New York markets had just fired up, and the investing world was tuning in for Thursday’s episode of ","content":"<p>New York markets had just fired up, and the investing world was tuning in for Thursday’s episode of the continuing drama: Legions ofRobinhood Marketsinvestors versus hedge-fund Goliaths.</p><p>But within minutes, a shock wave invisible to the outside world rattled the mechanics of Wall Street -- sending Robinhood rushing for more than $1 billion of additional cash. The stock market’s central clearing hub had demanded large sums of collateral from brokerages including Robinhood that for weeks had facilitated spectacular jumps in shares such as GameStop Corp.</p><p>The Silicon Valley venture with the wildly popular no-fee trading app came to a crossroads. It reined in the risk to itself by banning certain trades and unwinding client bets -- igniting an outcry from customers and even U.S. political leaders. By that night, word was emerging that Robinhood had raised more than $1 billion from existing investors anddrawn hundreds of millions morefrom bank credit lines to weather the storm.</p><p>“Look, it is not negotiable for us to comply with our financial requirements and our clearinghouse deposits,” Robinhood Chief Executive Officer Vlad Tenev said in defending his firm’s decisions on Thursday in a Bloomberg Television interview. “We have to do that.”</p><p>The capital injection is “a strong sign of confidence from investors that will help us continue to further serve our customers,” a Robinhood spokesperson later said in an emailed statement. The money will allow the firm to “continue to invest in record growth.”</p><p>When the history of this month’s stock mania is written, it may be a story of how retail traders set out from Reddit message boards to challenge Wall Street’s status quo -- and ended up battering their beloved brokerage too.</p><p>For weeks, Robinhood, with a mission “to democratize finance for all,” has been their trading platform of choice as they inflictedbillions of dollars of losseson hedge funds by sending stocks that those firms had shorted into the stratosphere -- a sort-of populist crusade into the staid world of finance.</p><p>Robinhood’s trading restrictions made virtually nobody happy Thursday, except perhaps the hedge funds. In a surreal scene, political archenemies Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Ted Cruz found common ground in lashing the firm’s decisions. Conspiracy theories erupted online.</p><p>The question is whether such critics will dig into the industry’s inner workings, where pressure mounted on Robinhood and other firms to limit certain trades. That would put a rare spotlight on arcane parts of the market designed to prevent catastrophe, such as theDepository Trust &amp; Clearing Corp.</p><p>Not ‘Nefarious’What's moving marketsStart your day with the 5 Things newsletter.EmailBloomberg may send me offers and promotions.Sign UpBy submitting my information, I agree to thePrivacy Policyand&nbsp;Terms of Service.</p><p>One key consideration for brokers, particularly around high-flying and volatile stocks like GameStop, is in the money they must put up with the DTCC while waiting a few days for stock transactions to settle. Those outlays, which behave like margin in a brokerage account, can create a cash crunch on volatile days, say when GameStop falls from $483 to $112 like it did at one point during Thursday’s session.</p><p>“It’s not really Robinhood doing nefarious stuff,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Larry Tabb. “It’s the DTCC saying ‘This stuff is just too risky. We don’t trust that these guys have the cash to be able to withstand settling these things two days from now, because in two days, who knows what the price could be, it could be zero.’”</p><p>The trouble on Thursday began around 10 a.m., when after days of turbulence, the DTCC demanded significantly more collateral from member brokers, according to two people familiar with the matter.</p><p>A spokesman for the DTCC wouldn’t specify how much it required from specific firms but said that by the end of the day industrywide collateral requirements jumped to $33.5 billion, up from $26 billion.</p><p>‘Rare Circumstances’</p><p>Brokerage executives rushed to figure out how to come up with the funds. Robinhood’s reaction drew the most public attention, but the firm wasn’t alone in limiting trading of stocks such as GameStop and AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc.</p><p>In fact,Charles Schwab Corp.’s TD Ameritrade curbed transactions in both of those companies on Wednesday.Interactive Brokers Group Inc.andMorgan Stanley’s E*Trade took similar action Thursday.</p><p>Thomas Peterffy, the billionaire chairman of Greenwich, Connecticut-based Interactive Brokers, told Bloomberg TV the restrictions were prompted by concerns “about the integrity of the marketplace and the system.”</p><p>E*Trade stressed that its measures were a highly unusual. “We take actions like this seriously, and only initiate them in rare circumstances,” said spokesman Thayer Fox, adding that he expected normal trading to resume Friday.</p><p>Robinhood said after markets closed that it plans to allow “limited buys” to resume in affected securities. It also tried to assuage customer concerns with an email that evening: “This was a temporary decision made to best continue serving you, and was not an easy one to make.”</p><p>Credit Lines</p><p>The firm has tapped at least several hundred million dollars from its bank credit lines, a person with knowledge of the situation said. The company’s lenders includeJPMorgan Chase &amp; Co.andGoldman Sachs Group Inc., according todatacompiled by Bloomberg. Representatives for Robinhood and those banks declined to comment.</p><p>Robinhood’s capital remains “strong,” CEO Tenev told Bloomberg TV, underscoring that the restrictions helped protect both the brokerage and its clients.</p><p>One question is whether frustrated customers will forgive what some see as a betrayal in their campaign against Wall Street’s financial elite.</p><p>Douglas Bray, a software developer from Connecticut who’s been using Robinhood for about five years, said he plans to withdraw about $100,000 after the trading restrictions.</p><p>“I’m disappointed I could not keep my money in GME like any institutional investor could,” said Bray, 32, referring to GameStop’s ticker. “Hedge funds are on the brink of a massive short squeeze and appear to be calling in all the cavalry. So brokers are now ‘protecting’ customers as a facade so that they can appease their institutional backers. The entire community is outraged.”</p>","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Robinhood Raises $1 Billion in Dash for Cash After Trader Revolt</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nRobinhood Raises $1 Billion in Dash for Cash After Trader Revolt\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-01-29 16:30 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-01-29/for-robinhood-a-dash-for-cash-after-traders-took-on-wall-street?srnd=premium-asia><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>New York markets had just fired up, and the investing world was tuning in for Thursday’s episode of the continuing drama: Legions ofRobinhood Marketsinvestors versus hedge-fund Goliaths.But within ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-01-29/for-robinhood-a-dash-for-cash-after-traders-took-on-wall-street?srnd=premium-asia\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-01-29/for-robinhood-a-dash-for-cash-after-traders-took-on-wall-street?srnd=premium-asia","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1137182252","content_text":"New York markets had just fired up, and the investing world was tuning in for Thursday’s episode of the continuing drama: Legions ofRobinhood Marketsinvestors versus hedge-fund Goliaths.But within minutes, a shock wave invisible to the outside world rattled the mechanics of Wall Street -- sending Robinhood rushing for more than $1 billion of additional cash. The stock market’s central clearing hub had demanded large sums of collateral from brokerages including Robinhood that for weeks had facilitated spectacular jumps in shares such as GameStop Corp.The Silicon Valley venture with the wildly popular no-fee trading app came to a crossroads. It reined in the risk to itself by banning certain trades and unwinding client bets -- igniting an outcry from customers and even U.S. political leaders. By that night, word was emerging that Robinhood had raised more than $1 billion from existing investors anddrawn hundreds of millions morefrom bank credit lines to weather the storm.“Look, it is not negotiable for us to comply with our financial requirements and our clearinghouse deposits,” Robinhood Chief Executive Officer Vlad Tenev said in defending his firm’s decisions on Thursday in a Bloomberg Television interview. “We have to do that.”The capital injection is “a strong sign of confidence from investors that will help us continue to further serve our customers,” a Robinhood spokesperson later said in an emailed statement. The money will allow the firm to “continue to invest in record growth.”When the history of this month’s stock mania is written, it may be a story of how retail traders set out from Reddit message boards to challenge Wall Street’s status quo -- and ended up battering their beloved brokerage too.For weeks, Robinhood, with a mission “to democratize finance for all,” has been their trading platform of choice as they inflictedbillions of dollars of losseson hedge funds by sending stocks that those firms had shorted into the stratosphere -- a sort-of populist crusade into the staid world of finance.Robinhood’s trading restrictions made virtually nobody happy Thursday, except perhaps the hedge funds. In a surreal scene, political archenemies Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Ted Cruz found common ground in lashing the firm’s decisions. Conspiracy theories erupted online.The question is whether such critics will dig into the industry’s inner workings, where pressure mounted on Robinhood and other firms to limit certain trades. That would put a rare spotlight on arcane parts of the market designed to prevent catastrophe, such as theDepository Trust & Clearing Corp.Not ‘Nefarious’What's moving marketsStart your day with the 5 Things newsletter.EmailBloomberg may send me offers and promotions.Sign UpBy submitting my information, I agree to thePrivacy Policyand Terms of Service.One key consideration for brokers, particularly around high-flying and volatile stocks like GameStop, is in the money they must put up with the DTCC while waiting a few days for stock transactions to settle. Those outlays, which behave like margin in a brokerage account, can create a cash crunch on volatile days, say when GameStop falls from $483 to $112 like it did at one point during Thursday’s session.“It’s not really Robinhood doing nefarious stuff,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Larry Tabb. “It’s the DTCC saying ‘This stuff is just too risky. We don’t trust that these guys have the cash to be able to withstand settling these things two days from now, because in two days, who knows what the price could be, it could be zero.’”The trouble on Thursday began around 10 a.m., when after days of turbulence, the DTCC demanded significantly more collateral from member brokers, according to two people familiar with the matter.A spokesman for the DTCC wouldn’t specify how much it required from specific firms but said that by the end of the day industrywide collateral requirements jumped to $33.5 billion, up from $26 billion.‘Rare Circumstances’Brokerage executives rushed to figure out how to come up with the funds. Robinhood’s reaction drew the most public attention, but the firm wasn’t alone in limiting trading of stocks such as GameStop and AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc.In fact,Charles Schwab Corp.’s TD Ameritrade curbed transactions in both of those companies on Wednesday.Interactive Brokers Group Inc.andMorgan Stanley’s E*Trade took similar action Thursday.Thomas Peterffy, the billionaire chairman of Greenwich, Connecticut-based Interactive Brokers, told Bloomberg TV the restrictions were prompted by concerns “about the integrity of the marketplace and the system.”E*Trade stressed that its measures were a highly unusual. “We take actions like this seriously, and only initiate them in rare circumstances,” said spokesman Thayer Fox, adding that he expected normal trading to resume Friday.Robinhood said after markets closed that it plans to allow “limited buys” to resume in affected securities. It also tried to assuage customer concerns with an email that evening: “This was a temporary decision made to best continue serving you, and was not an easy one to make.”Credit LinesThe firm has tapped at least several hundred million dollars from its bank credit lines, a person with knowledge of the situation said. The company’s lenders includeJPMorgan Chase & Co.andGoldman Sachs Group Inc., according todatacompiled by Bloomberg. Representatives for Robinhood and those banks declined to comment.Robinhood’s capital remains “strong,” CEO Tenev told Bloomberg TV, underscoring that the restrictions helped protect both the brokerage and its clients.One question is whether frustrated customers will forgive what some see as a betrayal in their campaign against Wall Street’s financial elite.Douglas Bray, a software developer from Connecticut who’s been using Robinhood for about five years, said he plans to withdraw about $100,000 after the trading restrictions.“I’m disappointed I could not keep my money in GME like any institutional investor could,” said Bray, 32, referring to GameStop’s ticker. “Hedge funds are on the brink of a massive short squeeze and appear to be calling in all the cavalry. So brokers are now ‘protecting’ customers as a facade so that they can appease their institutional backers. The entire community is outraged.”","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":347,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":310786236,"gmtCreate":1611373410025,"gmtModify":1703750278150,"author":{"id":"3570617809207113","authorId":"3570617809207113","name":"Donn","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ba1b57c564d3f11854c26a2bf9847d97","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570617809207113","authorIdStr":"3570617809207113"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good read","listText":"Good read","text":"Good read","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/310786236","repostId":"1186615938","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1186615938","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1611304246,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1186615938?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-01-22 16:30","market":"us","language":"en","title":"6 Dividend Funds for Long-Term Investors","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1186615938","media":"Barrons","summary":"Although dividend stocks lagged behind flashier tech stocks during the pandemic last year, their “lo","content":"<p>Although dividend stocks lagged behind flashier tech stocks during the pandemic last year, their “long-term investment case remains solid.”</p>\n<p>So concludes Amy Arnott, a portfolio strategist atMorningstar,in a recent note. A lot of the mutual funds that specialize in these stocks “really suffered from not having as much tech exposure” as other funds did, Arnott tells<i>Barron’s</i>. These equity income funds, Arnott adds, also took a hit owing to the manydividend cuts and suspensionslast year as companies tried to preserve cash.</p>\n<p>From Feb. 19 of last year, when the market peaked at what was then a record high, through March 23, the average stock dividend fund had a return of minus 36.6%, versus minus 33.5% for the S&amp;P 500, according to Morningstar. The MSCI USA High Dividend Yield Index notched a slightly better result, with a gross return of minus 32.6% over that stretch.</p>\n<p>Looking at the full year, theTechnology Select Sector SPDR Fund(ticker: XLK), a proxy for large technology companies, returned 43.6% in 2020, well above theS&amp;P 500’s18.4% result or theS&amp;P 500 Dividend Aristocrats’ 8.7% return.</p>\n<p>Beaten but Not BrokenDespite recent underperformance, the long-term case for dividend funds</p>\n<table>\n <thead>\n  <tr>\n   <th>Fund or Index / Ticker</th>\n   <th>1-Year Return</th>\n   <th>Dividend Yield</th>\n   <th>AUM (bil)</th>\n   <th>Net Expense Ratio</th>\n  </tr>\n </thead>\n <tbody>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Columbia Dividend Income / GSFTX</td>\n   <td>9.2%</td>\n   <td>1.7%</td>\n   <td>$28.9</td>\n   <td>0.69%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Franklin Equity Income / FISEX</td>\n   <td>6.2</td>\n   <td>2.2</td>\n   <td>2.8</td>\n   <td>0.86</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>JPMorgan Equity Income / OIEIX</td>\n   <td>4.8</td>\n   <td>2.3</td>\n   <td>37.5</td>\n   <td>0.98</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth / PRDGX</td>\n   <td>12.3</td>\n   <td>1.1</td>\n   <td>18</td>\n   <td>0.63</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Vanguard Dividend Growth / VDIGX</td>\n   <td>8.5</td>\n   <td>1.8</td>\n   <td>47.4</td>\n   <td>0.27</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Vanguard Dividend Appreciation / VIG</td>\n   <td>13.0</td>\n   <td>1.9</td>\n   <td>53.2</td>\n   <td>0.06</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>S&amp;P 500</td>\n   <td>16.7</td>\n   <td>1.5</td>\n   <td>NA</td>\n   <td>NA</td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p>Note: Returns as of Jan. 15. NA=Not applicable</p>\n<p>Sources: Morningstar; Bloomberg; company reports</p>\n<p>However, Arnott argues that dividend stocks have acquitted themselves better during various other challenging periods—performance levels they may well return to in future rough patches. Over the 41 five-year rolling periods from 1976 through 2020, dividend stocks outpaced the broader market in 25 of those spans. But as with so much else during the pandemic, 2020 was an aberration for dividend stocks.</p>\n<p>“They’ve typically fared best during periods of slow economic growth and sluggish market returns, such as the early part of the [2000s] and in the 1980s, when stagflation dragged down market returns,” Arnott observed in her Jan. 11 note.</p>\n<p>In contrast, dividend stocks trailed the broader market through much of the 1990s when the tech-stock bubble inflated. They “tend to fare worst during more ebullient times, such as 1995-99 and the generally strong period from 2016 through 2020,” she wrote.</p>\n<p>Arnott also looked at the trailing 20-year returns and volatility, as measured by standard deviation, for dividend stocks. The MSCI USA High Dividend Yield Index had a 20-year annual return of 7.89%, versus 7.49% for the S&amp;P 500. That dividend index also was less volatile over that period, with a standard deviation of 13.23, nearly two percentage points better than the broader market’s 15.08.</p>\n<p>“Stocks with above-average dividends have generally held up relatively well in previous market downturns,” Arnott wrote, pointing to the fourth quarter of 1987, the early 2000s, and the fourth quarter of 2018 as examples.</p>\n<p>To supplement Arnott’s observations,<i>Barron’s</i>looked at some of the equity income funds we have written about in recent years. None of these funds have outperformed the S&amp;P 500 over the past 12 months.</p>\n<p>Nearly all of them, however, have finished in the top half of the Morningstar category when measured by three- and five-year returns—and many have strong performance over even longer periods as well.</p>\n<p>The T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund (PRDGX), which tries togenerate income and capital appreciation, has a one-year return of 12.3%, ranking second among the funds included in the accompanying table.</p>\n<p>As of Dec. 31, the portfolio’s top sector weighting was technology at 22.2%, followed by health care at 16.5%, and financials at 12.8%. Its top two holdings wereMicrosoft(MSFT), which yields 1%, andApple(AAPL), which yields 0.6%. Neither stock has a big yield. But Microsoft has returned about 36% over the past year, dividends included, and Apple has gained about 67%.</p>\n<p>TheColumbia Dividend Income Fund(GSFTX) has a one-year return of 9.2%. A fourth-quarter tailwind forthe fundwas an overweight position in bank stocks such asBank of America(BAC), which yields 2.2%, andJPMorgan Chase(JPM), 2.7%.</p>\n<p>“The segment benefited from the quarter’s rotation into value,” according to the fund managers’ commentary on the company’s website, adding that bank stocks helped as well.</p>\n<p>The&nbsp;JPMorgan Equity Income Fund(OIEIX) had a tougher time of it, with a return of 4.8% over the past 12 months, placing it in the middle of the pack among its peers.</p>\n<p>Under longtime lead managerClare Hart, the portfolio has placed in the top half of its Morningstar peer group over the past three and five years and in the top 10% over the past 10 and 15 years. “Underperformance was predominantly a function of what we don’t own rather than what we do,” according to an assessment of the fund’s fourth-quarter performance by Hart and one of her colleagues, Jamie Steinhardt.</p>\n<p>The managers also pointed out thatBest Buy(BBY) andHome Depot(HD) “gave back some of their gains [despite] both companies reporting double-digit earnings growth.”</p>\n<p>The fund did benefit from financial holdings such as Bank of America.</p>\n<p>Actively managed funds aren’t the only option for investors. There are various ETFs, which typically hew to an index and don’t have a manager actively buying and selling stocks.</p>\n<p>TheVanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF(VIG) has a one-year return of 13%, tops among the funds included in the table, helped by an ultralow expense ratio of 0.06%.</p>\n<p>The fund, which tries to track the Nasdaq US Dividend Achievers Select Index, recently held 212 stocks with a median market capitalization of about $158 billion, giving it a large-cap bent.</p>\n<p>As of Dec. 31, its biggest sector weighting was consumer discretionary at 22.8%, followed by industrials at 20.8%, and health care at 14.9%. Technology clocked in at 12.5%—showing that a dividend stock fund doesn’t have to have a big tech overweighting to perform well right now.</p>\n<p>“The bottom line is that every down market is different, and dividend-oriented stocks won’t excel in every one,” Arnott wrote in her note’s conclusion. “Overall, though, they tend to hold up a bit better than average during times of market turbulence and have generated attractive risk-adjusted returns over longer periods.”</p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>6 Dividend Funds for Long-Term Investors</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n6 Dividend Funds for Long-Term Investors\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-01-22 16:30 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/6-dividend-funds-for-long-term-investors-51611244802?mod=hp_LEADSUPP_2><strong>Barrons</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Although dividend stocks lagged behind flashier tech stocks during the pandemic last year, their “long-term investment case remains solid.”\nSo concludes Amy Arnott, a portfolio strategist ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/6-dividend-funds-for-long-term-investors-51611244802?mod=hp_LEADSUPP_2\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/6-dividend-funds-for-long-term-investors-51611244802?mod=hp_LEADSUPP_2","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1186615938","content_text":"Although dividend stocks lagged behind flashier tech stocks during the pandemic last year, their “long-term investment case remains solid.”\nSo concludes Amy Arnott, a portfolio strategist atMorningstar,in a recent note. A lot of the mutual funds that specialize in these stocks “really suffered from not having as much tech exposure” as other funds did, Arnott tellsBarron’s. These equity income funds, Arnott adds, also took a hit owing to the manydividend cuts and suspensionslast year as companies tried to preserve cash.\nFrom Feb. 19 of last year, when the market peaked at what was then a record high, through March 23, the average stock dividend fund had a return of minus 36.6%, versus minus 33.5% for the S&P 500, according to Morningstar. The MSCI USA High Dividend Yield Index notched a slightly better result, with a gross return of minus 32.6% over that stretch.\nLooking at the full year, theTechnology Select Sector SPDR Fund(ticker: XLK), a proxy for large technology companies, returned 43.6% in 2020, well above theS&P 500’s18.4% result or theS&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats’ 8.7% return.\nBeaten but Not BrokenDespite recent underperformance, the long-term case for dividend funds\n\n\n\nFund or Index / Ticker\n1-Year Return\nDividend Yield\nAUM (bil)\nNet Expense Ratio\n\n\n\n\nColumbia Dividend Income / GSFTX\n9.2%\n1.7%\n$28.9\n0.69%\n\n\nFranklin Equity Income / FISEX\n6.2\n2.2\n2.8\n0.86\n\n\nJPMorgan Equity Income / OIEIX\n4.8\n2.3\n37.5\n0.98\n\n\nT. Rowe Price Dividend Growth / PRDGX\n12.3\n1.1\n18\n0.63\n\n\nVanguard Dividend Growth / VDIGX\n8.5\n1.8\n47.4\n0.27\n\n\nVanguard Dividend Appreciation / VIG\n13.0\n1.9\n53.2\n0.06\n\n\nS&P 500\n16.7\n1.5\nNA\nNA\n\n\n\nNote: Returns as of Jan. 15. NA=Not applicable\nSources: Morningstar; Bloomberg; company reports\nHowever, Arnott argues that dividend stocks have acquitted themselves better during various other challenging periods—performance levels they may well return to in future rough patches. Over the 41 five-year rolling periods from 1976 through 2020, dividend stocks outpaced the broader market in 25 of those spans. But as with so much else during the pandemic, 2020 was an aberration for dividend stocks.\n“They’ve typically fared best during periods of slow economic growth and sluggish market returns, such as the early part of the [2000s] and in the 1980s, when stagflation dragged down market returns,” Arnott observed in her Jan. 11 note.\nIn contrast, dividend stocks trailed the broader market through much of the 1990s when the tech-stock bubble inflated. They “tend to fare worst during more ebullient times, such as 1995-99 and the generally strong period from 2016 through 2020,” she wrote.\nArnott also looked at the trailing 20-year returns and volatility, as measured by standard deviation, for dividend stocks. The MSCI USA High Dividend Yield Index had a 20-year annual return of 7.89%, versus 7.49% for the S&P 500. That dividend index also was less volatile over that period, with a standard deviation of 13.23, nearly two percentage points better than the broader market’s 15.08.\n“Stocks with above-average dividends have generally held up relatively well in previous market downturns,” Arnott wrote, pointing to the fourth quarter of 1987, the early 2000s, and the fourth quarter of 2018 as examples.\nTo supplement Arnott’s observations,Barron’slooked at some of the equity income funds we have written about in recent years. None of these funds have outperformed the S&P 500 over the past 12 months.\nNearly all of them, however, have finished in the top half of the Morningstar category when measured by three- and five-year returns—and many have strong performance over even longer periods as well.\nThe T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund (PRDGX), which tries togenerate income and capital appreciation, has a one-year return of 12.3%, ranking second among the funds included in the accompanying table.\nAs of Dec. 31, the portfolio’s top sector weighting was technology at 22.2%, followed by health care at 16.5%, and financials at 12.8%. Its top two holdings wereMicrosoft(MSFT), which yields 1%, andApple(AAPL), which yields 0.6%. Neither stock has a big yield. But Microsoft has returned about 36% over the past year, dividends included, and Apple has gained about 67%.\nTheColumbia Dividend Income Fund(GSFTX) has a one-year return of 9.2%. A fourth-quarter tailwind forthe fundwas an overweight position in bank stocks such asBank of America(BAC), which yields 2.2%, andJPMorgan Chase(JPM), 2.7%.\n“The segment benefited from the quarter’s rotation into value,” according to the fund managers’ commentary on the company’s website, adding that bank stocks helped as well.\nThe JPMorgan Equity Income Fund(OIEIX) had a tougher time of it, with a return of 4.8% over the past 12 months, placing it in the middle of the pack among its peers.\nUnder longtime lead managerClare Hart, the portfolio has placed in the top half of its Morningstar peer group over the past three and five years and in the top 10% over the past 10 and 15 years. “Underperformance was predominantly a function of what we don’t own rather than what we do,” according to an assessment of the fund’s fourth-quarter performance by Hart and one of her colleagues, Jamie Steinhardt.\nThe managers also pointed out thatBest Buy(BBY) andHome Depot(HD) “gave back some of their gains [despite] both companies reporting double-digit earnings growth.”\nThe fund did benefit from financial holdings such as Bank of America.\nActively managed funds aren’t the only option for investors. There are various ETFs, which typically hew to an index and don’t have a manager actively buying and selling stocks.\nTheVanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF(VIG) has a one-year return of 13%, tops among the funds included in the table, helped by an ultralow expense ratio of 0.06%.\nThe fund, which tries to track the Nasdaq US Dividend Achievers Select Index, recently held 212 stocks with a median market capitalization of about $158 billion, giving it a large-cap bent.\nAs of Dec. 31, its biggest sector weighting was consumer discretionary at 22.8%, followed by industrials at 20.8%, and health care at 14.9%. Technology clocked in at 12.5%—showing that a dividend stock fund doesn’t have to have a big tech overweighting to perform well right now.\n“The bottom line is that every down market is different, and dividend-oriented stocks won’t excel in every one,” Arnott wrote in her note’s conclusion. “Overall, though, they tend to hold up a bit better than average during times of market turbulence and have generated attractive risk-adjusted returns over longer periods.”","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":387,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":319912892,"gmtCreate":1611470604316,"gmtModify":1703750547718,"author":{"id":"3570617809207113","authorId":"3570617809207113","name":"Donn","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ba1b57c564d3f11854c26a2bf9847d97","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570617809207113","authorIdStr":"3570617809207113"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Waiting for the dip?","listText":"Waiting for the dip?","text":"Waiting for the dip?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/319912892","repostId":"2105593894","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":186,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":310786786,"gmtCreate":1611373439645,"gmtModify":1703750278496,"author":{"id":"3570617809207113","authorId":"3570617809207113","name":"Donn","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ba1b57c564d3f11854c26a2bf9847d97","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570617809207113","authorIdStr":"3570617809207113"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hmm","listText":"Hmm","text":"Hmm","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/310786786","repostId":"2105466589","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":253,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":134603725,"gmtCreate":1622218490967,"gmtModify":1631887051295,"author":{"id":"3570617809207113","authorId":"3570617809207113","name":"Donn","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ba1b57c564d3f11854c26a2bf9847d97","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570617809207113","authorIdStr":"3570617809207113"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MCOA\">$MARIJUANA CO OF AMER INC(MCOA)$</a>Any idea why can’t I buy MCOA shares? I tried buying and they said I can only close..","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MCOA\">$MARIJUANA CO OF AMER INC(MCOA)$</a>Any idea why can’t I buy MCOA shares? I tried buying and they said I can only close..","text":"$MARIJUANA CO OF AMER INC(MCOA)$Any idea why can’t I buy MCOA shares? I tried buying and they said I can only close..","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/134603725","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":341,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":315698849,"gmtCreate":1612239133981,"gmtModify":1703759165272,"author":{"id":"3570617809207113","authorId":"3570617809207113","name":"Donn","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ba1b57c564d3f11854c26a2bf9847d97","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570617809207113","authorIdStr":"3570617809207113"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wow","listText":"Wow","text":"Wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/315698849","repostId":"1155510692","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1155510692","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1612233643,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1155510692?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-02-02 10:40","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Amazon, Alphabet and Salesforce are all investing in a $28 billion company that crunches big data","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1155510692","media":"cnbc","summary":"Databricks, a start-up whose software helps companies quickly process large sets of data and get it ","content":"<div>\n<p>Databricks, a start-up whose software helps companies quickly process large sets of data and get it ready for analysis, said Monday it has raised $1 billion in fresh cash, including from a few ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/02/01/amazon-alphabet-salesforce-back-databricks-at-28-billion-valuation.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"cnbc_highlight","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Amazon, Alphabet and Salesforce are all investing in a $28 billion company that crunches big data</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAmazon, Alphabet and Salesforce are all investing in a $28 billion company that crunches big data\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-02-02 10:40 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.cnbc.com/2021/02/01/amazon-alphabet-salesforce-back-databricks-at-28-billion-valuation.html><strong>cnbc</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Databricks, a start-up whose software helps companies quickly process large sets of data and get it ready for analysis, said Monday it has raised $1 billion in fresh cash, including from a few ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/02/01/amazon-alphabet-salesforce-back-databricks-at-28-billion-valuation.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMZN":"亚马逊"},"source_url":"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/02/01/amazon-alphabet-salesforce-back-databricks-at-28-billion-valuation.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/72bb72e1b84c09fca865c6dcb1bbcd16","article_id":"1155510692","content_text":"Databricks, a start-up whose software helps companies quickly process large sets of data and get it ready for analysis, said Monday it has raised $1 billion in fresh cash, including from a few prominent corporate investors.\nAmazonWeb Services,Alphabet’sCapitalG venture arm andSalesforceVentures all joined in, according to a statement.Microsoft, which invested in Databricksearlier, is also participating in the new round, thestatement said.\nThe transaction, which values Databricks at $28 billion, shows the top three U.S. cloud providers recognize that the company represents an opportunity similar toSnowflake, another firm with cloud software that helps companies manage data.\nDatabricks rose to prominence because it helped companies implement a version of Apache Spark, an alternative to the Hadoop technology for storing lots of different kinds of data in massive quantities. It can help clean up data for exploration in data visualization software such as Salesforce-owned Tableau. The Databricks software gives companies a simple way to run this sort of software, without having to worry about configuring and updating it. Databricks is alsoincreasingly helping organizationsdeploy artificial intelligence models.\n“We’re 100 percent cloud-native,” Databricks CEO Ali Ghodsi told CNBC in a 2019 interview. That same principle applies to Snowflake, which Salesforce had also invested in and has demonstratedstrong revenue growthfollowing its initial public offering last year.\nAmazon, the largest cloud provider, did not put money into Snowflake before it went public. Now it’s investing in Databricks at a later stage than it has historically done.\nNominations are open for the 2021CNBC Disruptor 50, a list of private start-ups using breakthrough technology to become the next generation of great public companies.Submitby Friday, Feb. 12, at 3 pm EST.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":568,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":312649831,"gmtCreate":1612144990223,"gmtModify":1703757908601,"author":{"id":"3570617809207113","authorId":"3570617809207113","name":"Donn","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ba1b57c564d3f11854c26a2bf9847d97","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570617809207113","authorIdStr":"3570617809207113"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Let’s go!!","listText":"Let’s go!!","text":"Let’s go!!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/312649831","repostId":"1195425718","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":429,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":312041459,"gmtCreate":1611979739871,"gmtModify":1703757263830,"author":{"id":"3570617809207113","authorId":"3570617809207113","name":"Donn","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ba1b57c564d3f11854c26a2bf9847d97","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570617809207113","authorIdStr":"3570617809207113"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Crooks","listText":"Crooks","text":"Crooks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/312041459","repostId":"1137182252","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1137182252","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1611909009,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1137182252?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-01-29 16:30","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Robinhood Raises $1 Billion in Dash for Cash After Trader Revolt","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1137182252","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"New York markets had just fired up, and the investing world was tuning in for Thursday’s episode of ","content":"<p>New York markets had just fired up, and the investing world was tuning in for Thursday’s episode of the continuing drama: Legions ofRobinhood Marketsinvestors versus hedge-fund Goliaths.</p><p>But within minutes, a shock wave invisible to the outside world rattled the mechanics of Wall Street -- sending Robinhood rushing for more than $1 billion of additional cash. The stock market’s central clearing hub had demanded large sums of collateral from brokerages including Robinhood that for weeks had facilitated spectacular jumps in shares such as GameStop Corp.</p><p>The Silicon Valley venture with the wildly popular no-fee trading app came to a crossroads. It reined in the risk to itself by banning certain trades and unwinding client bets -- igniting an outcry from customers and even U.S. political leaders. By that night, word was emerging that Robinhood had raised more than $1 billion from existing investors anddrawn hundreds of millions morefrom bank credit lines to weather the storm.</p><p>“Look, it is not negotiable for us to comply with our financial requirements and our clearinghouse deposits,” Robinhood Chief Executive Officer Vlad Tenev said in defending his firm’s decisions on Thursday in a Bloomberg Television interview. “We have to do that.”</p><p>The capital injection is “a strong sign of confidence from investors that will help us continue to further serve our customers,” a Robinhood spokesperson later said in an emailed statement. The money will allow the firm to “continue to invest in record growth.”</p><p>When the history of this month’s stock mania is written, it may be a story of how retail traders set out from Reddit message boards to challenge Wall Street’s status quo -- and ended up battering their beloved brokerage too.</p><p>For weeks, Robinhood, with a mission “to democratize finance for all,” has been their trading platform of choice as they inflictedbillions of dollars of losseson hedge funds by sending stocks that those firms had shorted into the stratosphere -- a sort-of populist crusade into the staid world of finance.</p><p>Robinhood’s trading restrictions made virtually nobody happy Thursday, except perhaps the hedge funds. In a surreal scene, political archenemies Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Ted Cruz found common ground in lashing the firm’s decisions. Conspiracy theories erupted online.</p><p>The question is whether such critics will dig into the industry’s inner workings, where pressure mounted on Robinhood and other firms to limit certain trades. That would put a rare spotlight on arcane parts of the market designed to prevent catastrophe, such as theDepository Trust &amp; Clearing Corp.</p><p>Not ‘Nefarious’What's moving marketsStart your day with the 5 Things newsletter.EmailBloomberg may send me offers and promotions.Sign UpBy submitting my information, I agree to thePrivacy Policyand&nbsp;Terms of Service.</p><p>One key consideration for brokers, particularly around high-flying and volatile stocks like GameStop, is in the money they must put up with the DTCC while waiting a few days for stock transactions to settle. Those outlays, which behave like margin in a brokerage account, can create a cash crunch on volatile days, say when GameStop falls from $483 to $112 like it did at one point during Thursday’s session.</p><p>“It’s not really Robinhood doing nefarious stuff,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Larry Tabb. “It’s the DTCC saying ‘This stuff is just too risky. We don’t trust that these guys have the cash to be able to withstand settling these things two days from now, because in two days, who knows what the price could be, it could be zero.’”</p><p>The trouble on Thursday began around 10 a.m., when after days of turbulence, the DTCC demanded significantly more collateral from member brokers, according to two people familiar with the matter.</p><p>A spokesman for the DTCC wouldn’t specify how much it required from specific firms but said that by the end of the day industrywide collateral requirements jumped to $33.5 billion, up from $26 billion.</p><p>‘Rare Circumstances’</p><p>Brokerage executives rushed to figure out how to come up with the funds. Robinhood’s reaction drew the most public attention, but the firm wasn’t alone in limiting trading of stocks such as GameStop and AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc.</p><p>In fact,Charles Schwab Corp.’s TD Ameritrade curbed transactions in both of those companies on Wednesday.Interactive Brokers Group Inc.andMorgan Stanley’s E*Trade took similar action Thursday.</p><p>Thomas Peterffy, the billionaire chairman of Greenwich, Connecticut-based Interactive Brokers, told Bloomberg TV the restrictions were prompted by concerns “about the integrity of the marketplace and the system.”</p><p>E*Trade stressed that its measures were a highly unusual. “We take actions like this seriously, and only initiate them in rare circumstances,” said spokesman Thayer Fox, adding that he expected normal trading to resume Friday.</p><p>Robinhood said after markets closed that it plans to allow “limited buys” to resume in affected securities. It also tried to assuage customer concerns with an email that evening: “This was a temporary decision made to best continue serving you, and was not an easy one to make.”</p><p>Credit Lines</p><p>The firm has tapped at least several hundred million dollars from its bank credit lines, a person with knowledge of the situation said. The company’s lenders includeJPMorgan Chase &amp; Co.andGoldman Sachs Group Inc., according todatacompiled by Bloomberg. Representatives for Robinhood and those banks declined to comment.</p><p>Robinhood’s capital remains “strong,” CEO Tenev told Bloomberg TV, underscoring that the restrictions helped protect both the brokerage and its clients.</p><p>One question is whether frustrated customers will forgive what some see as a betrayal in their campaign against Wall Street’s financial elite.</p><p>Douglas Bray, a software developer from Connecticut who’s been using Robinhood for about five years, said he plans to withdraw about $100,000 after the trading restrictions.</p><p>“I’m disappointed I could not keep my money in GME like any institutional investor could,” said Bray, 32, referring to GameStop’s ticker. “Hedge funds are on the brink of a massive short squeeze and appear to be calling in all the cavalry. So brokers are now ‘protecting’ customers as a facade so that they can appease their institutional backers. The entire community is outraged.”</p>","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Robinhood Raises $1 Billion in Dash for Cash After Trader Revolt</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nRobinhood Raises $1 Billion in Dash for Cash After Trader Revolt\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-01-29 16:30 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-01-29/for-robinhood-a-dash-for-cash-after-traders-took-on-wall-street?srnd=premium-asia><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>New York markets had just fired up, and the investing world was tuning in for Thursday’s episode of the continuing drama: Legions ofRobinhood Marketsinvestors versus hedge-fund Goliaths.But within ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-01-29/for-robinhood-a-dash-for-cash-after-traders-took-on-wall-street?srnd=premium-asia\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-01-29/for-robinhood-a-dash-for-cash-after-traders-took-on-wall-street?srnd=premium-asia","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1137182252","content_text":"New York markets had just fired up, and the investing world was tuning in for Thursday’s episode of the continuing drama: Legions ofRobinhood Marketsinvestors versus hedge-fund Goliaths.But within minutes, a shock wave invisible to the outside world rattled the mechanics of Wall Street -- sending Robinhood rushing for more than $1 billion of additional cash. The stock market’s central clearing hub had demanded large sums of collateral from brokerages including Robinhood that for weeks had facilitated spectacular jumps in shares such as GameStop Corp.The Silicon Valley venture with the wildly popular no-fee trading app came to a crossroads. It reined in the risk to itself by banning certain trades and unwinding client bets -- igniting an outcry from customers and even U.S. political leaders. By that night, word was emerging that Robinhood had raised more than $1 billion from existing investors anddrawn hundreds of millions morefrom bank credit lines to weather the storm.“Look, it is not negotiable for us to comply with our financial requirements and our clearinghouse deposits,” Robinhood Chief Executive Officer Vlad Tenev said in defending his firm’s decisions on Thursday in a Bloomberg Television interview. “We have to do that.”The capital injection is “a strong sign of confidence from investors that will help us continue to further serve our customers,” a Robinhood spokesperson later said in an emailed statement. The money will allow the firm to “continue to invest in record growth.”When the history of this month’s stock mania is written, it may be a story of how retail traders set out from Reddit message boards to challenge Wall Street’s status quo -- and ended up battering their beloved brokerage too.For weeks, Robinhood, with a mission “to democratize finance for all,” has been their trading platform of choice as they inflictedbillions of dollars of losseson hedge funds by sending stocks that those firms had shorted into the stratosphere -- a sort-of populist crusade into the staid world of finance.Robinhood’s trading restrictions made virtually nobody happy Thursday, except perhaps the hedge funds. In a surreal scene, political archenemies Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Ted Cruz found common ground in lashing the firm’s decisions. Conspiracy theories erupted online.The question is whether such critics will dig into the industry’s inner workings, where pressure mounted on Robinhood and other firms to limit certain trades. That would put a rare spotlight on arcane parts of the market designed to prevent catastrophe, such as theDepository Trust & Clearing Corp.Not ‘Nefarious’What's moving marketsStart your day with the 5 Things newsletter.EmailBloomberg may send me offers and promotions.Sign UpBy submitting my information, I agree to thePrivacy Policyand Terms of Service.One key consideration for brokers, particularly around high-flying and volatile stocks like GameStop, is in the money they must put up with the DTCC while waiting a few days for stock transactions to settle. Those outlays, which behave like margin in a brokerage account, can create a cash crunch on volatile days, say when GameStop falls from $483 to $112 like it did at one point during Thursday’s session.“It’s not really Robinhood doing nefarious stuff,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Larry Tabb. “It’s the DTCC saying ‘This stuff is just too risky. We don’t trust that these guys have the cash to be able to withstand settling these things two days from now, because in two days, who knows what the price could be, it could be zero.’”The trouble on Thursday began around 10 a.m., when after days of turbulence, the DTCC demanded significantly more collateral from member brokers, according to two people familiar with the matter.A spokesman for the DTCC wouldn’t specify how much it required from specific firms but said that by the end of the day industrywide collateral requirements jumped to $33.5 billion, up from $26 billion.‘Rare Circumstances’Brokerage executives rushed to figure out how to come up with the funds. Robinhood’s reaction drew the most public attention, but the firm wasn’t alone in limiting trading of stocks such as GameStop and AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc.In fact,Charles Schwab Corp.’s TD Ameritrade curbed transactions in both of those companies on Wednesday.Interactive Brokers Group Inc.andMorgan Stanley’s E*Trade took similar action Thursday.Thomas Peterffy, the billionaire chairman of Greenwich, Connecticut-based Interactive Brokers, told Bloomberg TV the restrictions were prompted by concerns “about the integrity of the marketplace and the system.”E*Trade stressed that its measures were a highly unusual. “We take actions like this seriously, and only initiate them in rare circumstances,” said spokesman Thayer Fox, adding that he expected normal trading to resume Friday.Robinhood said after markets closed that it plans to allow “limited buys” to resume in affected securities. It also tried to assuage customer concerns with an email that evening: “This was a temporary decision made to best continue serving you, and was not an easy one to make.”Credit LinesThe firm has tapped at least several hundred million dollars from its bank credit lines, a person with knowledge of the situation said. The company’s lenders includeJPMorgan Chase & Co.andGoldman Sachs Group Inc., according todatacompiled by Bloomberg. Representatives for Robinhood and those banks declined to comment.Robinhood’s capital remains “strong,” CEO Tenev told Bloomberg TV, underscoring that the restrictions helped protect both the brokerage and its clients.One question is whether frustrated customers will forgive what some see as a betrayal in their campaign against Wall Street’s financial elite.Douglas Bray, a software developer from Connecticut who’s been using Robinhood for about five years, said he plans to withdraw about $100,000 after the trading restrictions.“I’m disappointed I could not keep my money in GME like any institutional investor could,” said Bray, 32, referring to GameStop’s ticker. “Hedge funds are on the brink of a massive short squeeze and appear to be calling in all the cavalry. So brokers are now ‘protecting’ customers as a facade so that they can appease their institutional backers. The entire community is outraged.”","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":234,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":318423488,"gmtCreate":1611885464544,"gmtModify":1703755634032,"author":{"id":"3570617809207113","authorId":"3570617809207113","name":"Donn","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ba1b57c564d3f11854c26a2bf9847d97","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570617809207113","authorIdStr":"3570617809207113"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Time to buy?","listText":"Time to buy?","text":"Time to buy?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/318423488","repostId":"1181346723","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1181346723","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1611820093,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1181346723?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-01-28 15:48","market":"sg","language":"en","title":"Apple Smashes Q1 Earnings Forecast on Surging China Sales","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1181346723","media":"The street","summary":"Apple saw a 57% surge in China sales over the December quarter, helping drive a record top line and much stronger-than-expected first quarter earnings.Apple Inc.  -Get Report posted stronger-than-expected first quarter earnings Wednesday, and its first print of revenues over $100 million, thanks in part to surging China sales and demand for its new iPhone 12.Greater China revenues surged 57% to $21.3 billion, Apple said, helping iPhone revenues rise 17% to an all-time high of $65.5 billion, than","content":"<p>Apple saw a 57% surge in China sales over the December quarter, helping drive a record top line and much stronger-than-expected first quarter earnings.</p><p>Apple Inc.&nbsp;(<b>AAPL</b>) -Get Report&nbsp;posted stronger-than-expected first quarter earnings Wednesday, and its first print of revenues over $100 million, thanks in part to surging China sales and demand for its new iPhone 12.</p><p>Apple said profits for the three months ending in December, the tech giant's fiscal first quarter, were pegged at $1.68 per share, up 34.4% from the same period last year and well ahead of the Street consensus forecast of $1.41. Group revenues, Apple said, rose 21% from last year to a record $111.44 billion, again topping analysts' estimates of a $103.3 billion tally.</p><p>Greater China revenues surged 57% to $21.3 billion, Apple said, helping iPhone revenues rise 17% to an all-time high of $65.5 billion, thanks in part to the launch of its new iPhone 12 suite of smartphones late last year amid COVID-related disruptions to its global brick-and-mortar network of stores. Services revenue rose 24.2% to $15.8 billion, Apple said, with more than 620 million subscribers across all of its platforms.</p><p>Looking into the three months ending in March, Apple said its sees revenue growing on an year-on-year basis, but declined to provide detailed guidance for either sales or bottom line earnings. Gross margins, Apple said, will likely be flat on a quarter-to-quarter basis.</p><p>“This quarter for Apple wouldn’t have been possible without the tireless and innovative work of every Apple team member worldwide,” said CEO Tim Cook. “We’re gratified by the enthusiastic customer response to the unmatched line of cutting-edge products that we delivered across a historic holiday season.\"</p><p>Apple shares were marked 2% lower in after hours trading immediately following the earnings release to indicate a Thursday opening bell price of $139.30 each, a move that would trim the stock's six-month gain to around 49%.</p><p>Mac sales, Apple said, rose 21.2% to $8.68 billion, while sales from its wearables, home and accessories division jumped 30% to $13 billion, \"driven by holiday demand for the latest Apple watch,\" Cook said. iPad sales were up an astonishing 41% to $8.44 billion.</p><p>“Our December quarter business performance was fueled by double-digit growth in each product category, which drove all-time revenue records in each of our geographic segments and an all-time high for our installed base of active devices,” said CFO Luca Maestri. “These results helped us generate record operating cash flow of $38.8 billion. We also returned over $30 billion to shareholders during the quarter as we maintain our target of reaching a net cash neutral position over time.</p><p>Cook said the gains helped lift its total installed base of devices past 1.65 billion, with more than 1 billion iPhones active and outstanding and records in each of its project categories.</p>","source":"lsy1610613172068","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Smashes Q1 Earnings Forecast on Surging China Sales</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Smashes Q1 Earnings Forecast on Surging China Sales\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-01-28 15:48 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.thestreet.com/investing/apple-smashes-q1-earnings-forecast-on-surging-china-sales><strong>The street</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Apple saw a 57% surge in China sales over the December quarter, helping drive a record top line and much stronger-than-expected first quarter earnings.Apple Inc. (AAPL) -Get Report posted stronger-...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.thestreet.com/investing/apple-smashes-q1-earnings-forecast-on-surging-china-sales\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.thestreet.com/investing/apple-smashes-q1-earnings-forecast-on-surging-china-sales","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1181346723","content_text":"Apple saw a 57% surge in China sales over the December quarter, helping drive a record top line and much stronger-than-expected first quarter earnings.Apple Inc. (AAPL) -Get Report posted stronger-than-expected first quarter earnings Wednesday, and its first print of revenues over $100 million, thanks in part to surging China sales and demand for its new iPhone 12.Apple said profits for the three months ending in December, the tech giant's fiscal first quarter, were pegged at $1.68 per share, up 34.4% from the same period last year and well ahead of the Street consensus forecast of $1.41. Group revenues, Apple said, rose 21% from last year to a record $111.44 billion, again topping analysts' estimates of a $103.3 billion tally.Greater China revenues surged 57% to $21.3 billion, Apple said, helping iPhone revenues rise 17% to an all-time high of $65.5 billion, thanks in part to the launch of its new iPhone 12 suite of smartphones late last year amid COVID-related disruptions to its global brick-and-mortar network of stores. Services revenue rose 24.2% to $15.8 billion, Apple said, with more than 620 million subscribers across all of its platforms.Looking into the three months ending in March, Apple said its sees revenue growing on an year-on-year basis, but declined to provide detailed guidance for either sales or bottom line earnings. Gross margins, Apple said, will likely be flat on a quarter-to-quarter basis.“This quarter for Apple wouldn’t have been possible without the tireless and innovative work of every Apple team member worldwide,” said CEO Tim Cook. “We’re gratified by the enthusiastic customer response to the unmatched line of cutting-edge products that we delivered across a historic holiday season.\"Apple shares were marked 2% lower in after hours trading immediately following the earnings release to indicate a Thursday opening bell price of $139.30 each, a move that would trim the stock's six-month gain to around 49%.Mac sales, Apple said, rose 21.2% to $8.68 billion, while sales from its wearables, home and accessories division jumped 30% to $13 billion, \"driven by holiday demand for the latest Apple watch,\" Cook said. iPad sales were up an astonishing 41% to $8.44 billion.“Our December quarter business performance was fueled by double-digit growth in each product category, which drove all-time revenue records in each of our geographic segments and an all-time high for our installed base of active devices,” said CFO Luca Maestri. “These results helped us generate record operating cash flow of $38.8 billion. We also returned over $30 billion to shareholders during the quarter as we maintain our target of reaching a net cash neutral position over time.Cook said the gains helped lift its total installed base of devices past 1.65 billion, with more than 1 billion iPhones active and outstanding and records in each of its project categories.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":390,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":311259220,"gmtCreate":1611803034260,"gmtModify":1703754047298,"author":{"id":"3570617809207113","authorId":"3570617809207113","name":"Donn","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ba1b57c564d3f11854c26a2bf9847d97","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570617809207113","authorIdStr":"3570617809207113"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"High risk. Must be strong to hold haha","listText":"High risk. Must be strong to hold haha","text":"High risk. Must be strong to hold haha","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/311259220","repostId":"2106258590","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2106258590","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1611795900,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2106258590?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-01-28 09:05","market":"sg","language":"en","title":"Is the trading in GameStop and AMC a major risk? Analysts weigh in","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2106258590","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"Here's what major figures on Wall Street are saying about the spike in prices of heavily shorted sto","content":"<p>Here's what major figures on Wall Street are saying about the spike in prices of heavily shorted stocks amid targeted trading by mob of online investors</p><p>A mania is under way on Wall Street that is being heralded by some as a revolution of individual investors against pros, but there are concerns that the recent flurry of activity -- powered by traders using forums on platforms such as Reddit and Discord --  signals a top to the market, or, even worse, a systemic risk to the delicate foundation of markets where valuations are already considered inflated.</p><p>The surge in prices of companies like videogame retailer GameStop Corp. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GME\">$(GME)$</a> and movie-theater chain AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMC\">$(AMC)$</a>  are partly due to the fact that more than 100% of the shares available for trading, known as the \"the float,\" had been borrowed by short sellers to bet against the stocks.  The Wall Street Journal described the recent moves as a war that has broken out between professionals losing billions  \"and the individual investors jeering at them on social media.\"</p><p>The stratospheric ride has GameStop shares up more than 1,700% in January alone, as social-media traders on Reddit  with long positions bandy together to knock around Wall Street firms. Shares of AMC surged 301% on Wednesday, bringing its return in the first 17 trading days of 2021 to an eye-popping 840%.</p><p>At least <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a> hedge fund, Melvin Capital, closed out its short position  in GameStop on Tuesday afternoon and suffered major losses, its manager told CNBC in an interview.</p><p>Here's what some Wall Street types are saying about the recent moves and the risk of its spilling over into the broader market:</p><p>-- \"The price action is completely divorced from fundamentals. It's a relatively small universe of retail investors that are pushing around a relatively small universe of stocks so at the end of the day, this Reddit army they don't have the wherewithal to sustain these big losses...It's not going to be the institutions [left holding the bag]...it's the kids on my basketball team asking me about how options work,\" Jason Katz, a UBS managing director and star portfolio manager, told Fox Business during a Wednesday interview .</p><p>--  \"The marketplace should be a place where risk is taken, but not reckless risk and not a situation that undermines the system, and that's what we're looking at here,\" Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth William Galvin told CNBC on Wednesday .</p><p>-- Of the overall market, Michael Wilson, chief U.S. equity strategist at <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSTLW\">Morgan Stanley</a>, described in a late Wednesday interview the recent market action as possibly a health development in a CNBC interview .</p><p>\"A lot of these heavily shorted stocks running up...and that always leads to some degrossing. Look, this is a health development, in my view. We're still very bullish about the economy this year and we're very constructive on equities going into 2021. But let's be honest, we've had a heck of a move and we've discounted a lot of good news and so a good consolidation is exactly what we need,\" Wilson said.</p><p>--  \"A short squeeze in a security named GameStop forced several hedge funds to liquidate other securities to cover their losses. GameStop was up 125% today alone. Also, the action in GameStop caused other investors to back away from they thought was a crazy and irrational market,\" wrote independent market analyst Stephen Todd, in a research note.</p><p>-- \"The Reddit army should prepare for stricter rules and regulation shortly, which should kill the idea that what happened with GameStop will happen with others,\" wrote Edward Moya, senior market analyst at Oanda.</p><p>Indeed, already a number of retail brokerages have imposed restrictions on investing  in a number of popular stocks like GameStop and AMC.</p><p>The action in those names helped to weigh on market sentiment, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average  and the S&amp;P 500 index&nbsp;suffering their worst <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a>-day declines since late October, according to FactSet data .</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Is the trading in GameStop and AMC a major risk? Analysts weigh in</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIs the trading in GameStop and AMC a major risk? Analysts weigh in\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-01-28 09:05</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Here's what major figures on Wall Street are saying about the spike in prices of heavily shorted stocks amid targeted trading by mob of online investors</p><p>A mania is under way on Wall Street that is being heralded by some as a revolution of individual investors against pros, but there are concerns that the recent flurry of activity -- powered by traders using forums on platforms such as Reddit and Discord --  signals a top to the market, or, even worse, a systemic risk to the delicate foundation of markets where valuations are already considered inflated.</p><p>The surge in prices of companies like videogame retailer GameStop Corp. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GME\">$(GME)$</a> and movie-theater chain AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMC\">$(AMC)$</a>  are partly due to the fact that more than 100% of the shares available for trading, known as the \"the float,\" had been borrowed by short sellers to bet against the stocks.  The Wall Street Journal described the recent moves as a war that has broken out between professionals losing billions  \"and the individual investors jeering at them on social media.\"</p><p>The stratospheric ride has GameStop shares up more than 1,700% in January alone, as social-media traders on Reddit  with long positions bandy together to knock around Wall Street firms. Shares of AMC surged 301% on Wednesday, bringing its return in the first 17 trading days of 2021 to an eye-popping 840%.</p><p>At least <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a> hedge fund, Melvin Capital, closed out its short position  in GameStop on Tuesday afternoon and suffered major losses, its manager told CNBC in an interview.</p><p>Here's what some Wall Street types are saying about the recent moves and the risk of its spilling over into the broader market:</p><p>-- \"The price action is completely divorced from fundamentals. It's a relatively small universe of retail investors that are pushing around a relatively small universe of stocks so at the end of the day, this Reddit army they don't have the wherewithal to sustain these big losses...It's not going to be the institutions [left holding the bag]...it's the kids on my basketball team asking me about how options work,\" Jason Katz, a UBS managing director and star portfolio manager, told Fox Business during a Wednesday interview .</p><p>--  \"The marketplace should be a place where risk is taken, but not reckless risk and not a situation that undermines the system, and that's what we're looking at here,\" Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth William Galvin told CNBC on Wednesday .</p><p>-- Of the overall market, Michael Wilson, chief U.S. equity strategist at <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSTLW\">Morgan Stanley</a>, described in a late Wednesday interview the recent market action as possibly a health development in a CNBC interview .</p><p>\"A lot of these heavily shorted stocks running up...and that always leads to some degrossing. Look, this is a health development, in my view. We're still very bullish about the economy this year and we're very constructive on equities going into 2021. But let's be honest, we've had a heck of a move and we've discounted a lot of good news and so a good consolidation is exactly what we need,\" Wilson said.</p><p>--  \"A short squeeze in a security named GameStop forced several hedge funds to liquidate other securities to cover their losses. GameStop was up 125% today alone. Also, the action in GameStop caused other investors to back away from they thought was a crazy and irrational market,\" wrote independent market analyst Stephen Todd, in a research note.</p><p>-- \"The Reddit army should prepare for stricter rules and regulation shortly, which should kill the idea that what happened with GameStop will happen with others,\" wrote Edward Moya, senior market analyst at Oanda.</p><p>Indeed, already a number of retail brokerages have imposed restrictions on investing  in a number of popular stocks like GameStop and AMC.</p><p>The action in those names helped to weigh on market sentiment, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average  and the S&amp;P 500 index&nbsp;suffering their worst <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a>-day declines since late October, according to FactSet data .</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"GME":"游戏驿站","AMC":"AMC院线"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2106258590","content_text":"Here's what major figures on Wall Street are saying about the spike in prices of heavily shorted stocks amid targeted trading by mob of online investorsA mania is under way on Wall Street that is being heralded by some as a revolution of individual investors against pros, but there are concerns that the recent flurry of activity -- powered by traders using forums on platforms such as Reddit and Discord --  signals a top to the market, or, even worse, a systemic risk to the delicate foundation of markets where valuations are already considered inflated.The surge in prices of companies like videogame retailer GameStop Corp. $(GME)$ and movie-theater chain AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc. $(AMC)$  are partly due to the fact that more than 100% of the shares available for trading, known as the \"the float,\" had been borrowed by short sellers to bet against the stocks.  The Wall Street Journal described the recent moves as a war that has broken out between professionals losing billions  \"and the individual investors jeering at them on social media.\"The stratospheric ride has GameStop shares up more than 1,700% in January alone, as social-media traders on Reddit  with long positions bandy together to knock around Wall Street firms. Shares of AMC surged 301% on Wednesday, bringing its return in the first 17 trading days of 2021 to an eye-popping 840%.At least one hedge fund, Melvin Capital, closed out its short position  in GameStop on Tuesday afternoon and suffered major losses, its manager told CNBC in an interview.Here's what some Wall Street types are saying about the recent moves and the risk of its spilling over into the broader market:-- \"The price action is completely divorced from fundamentals. It's a relatively small universe of retail investors that are pushing around a relatively small universe of stocks so at the end of the day, this Reddit army they don't have the wherewithal to sustain these big losses...It's not going to be the institutions [left holding the bag]...it's the kids on my basketball team asking me about how options work,\" Jason Katz, a UBS managing director and star portfolio manager, told Fox Business during a Wednesday interview .--  \"The marketplace should be a place where risk is taken, but not reckless risk and not a situation that undermines the system, and that's what we're looking at here,\" Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth William Galvin told CNBC on Wednesday .-- Of the overall market, Michael Wilson, chief U.S. equity strategist at Morgan Stanley, described in a late Wednesday interview the recent market action as possibly a health development in a CNBC interview .\"A lot of these heavily shorted stocks running up...and that always leads to some degrossing. Look, this is a health development, in my view. We're still very bullish about the economy this year and we're very constructive on equities going into 2021. But let's be honest, we've had a heck of a move and we've discounted a lot of good news and so a good consolidation is exactly what we need,\" Wilson said.--  \"A short squeeze in a security named GameStop forced several hedge funds to liquidate other securities to cover their losses. GameStop was up 125% today alone. Also, the action in GameStop caused other investors to back away from they thought was a crazy and irrational market,\" wrote independent market analyst Stephen Todd, in a research note.-- \"The Reddit army should prepare for stricter rules and regulation shortly, which should kill the idea that what happened with GameStop will happen with others,\" wrote Edward Moya, senior market analyst at Oanda.Indeed, already a number of retail brokerages have imposed restrictions on investing  in a number of popular stocks like GameStop and AMC.The action in those names helped to weigh on market sentiment, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average  and the S&P 500 index suffering their worst one-day declines since late October, according to FactSet data .","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":266,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":313670523,"gmtCreate":1611714666762,"gmtModify":1703752568184,"author":{"id":"3570617809207113","authorId":"3570617809207113","name":"Donn","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ba1b57c564d3f11854c26a2bf9847d97","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570617809207113","authorIdStr":"3570617809207113"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Missed it :(","listText":"Missed it :(","text":"Missed it :(","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/313670523","repostId":"1141309013","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1141309013","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1611655201,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1141309013?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-01-26 18:00","market":"sg","language":"en","title":"Apple Stock Could Surge 62% to $225, According to This Analyst","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1141309013","media":"nasdaq","summary":"Shares ofApple(NASDAQ: AAPL)have already climbed 79% over the past year, but will surge to new all-t","content":"<p>Shares of<b>Apple</b>(NASDAQ: AAPL)have already climbed 79% over the past year, but will surge to new all-time highs in 2021.</p><p>That's according to Wedbush analyst Daniel Ives. Today, Ives raised his price target on Apple's stock to $175 from $160, but also laid out a bull case for why the stock could climb to as high as $225. His new base target represents potential gains for investors of roughly 26% over the stock's closing price of about $139 on Friday. It's his compelling argument for the bull case, however, that should have investors more excited.</p><p>Ives cited the potential for \"eye-popping\" iPhone sales, saying that checks of Apple's supply chain in Asia showed strong demand for the device. The analyst now believes Apple could have sold as many as 90 million iPhones during the December quarter, roughly 35% over the analyst's already robust forecast. Ives sees this upward trend continuing over the March and June quarters.</p><p>\"We believe based on the current trajectory and in a bull case Cupertino has potential to sell north of 240 million units (~250 million could be in the cards -- an eye-popping figure)\" Ives wrote in a note to clients, \"which would easily eclipse the previous Apple record of 231 million units sold in [fiscal year 2015].\"</p><p>Will Apple stock hit $225?</p><p>There have long been prognostications of a supercycle for the iPhone maker. It has an installed base of more than 1.4 billion active devices, with the iPhone accounting for an estimated 950 million of those.</p><p>The current thinking suggests that as many as 350 million iPhone buyers could upgrade their device this year. To put that number in context, Apple sold roughly 185 million iPhones in 2019. Given the demand for a 5G-enabled iPhone, and the number of devices due for an upgrade, it's certainly possible Apple could sell 89% more iPhones in 2021 -- but that's certainly a high bar.</p>","source":"lsy1603171495471","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Stock Could Surge 62% to $225, According to This Analyst</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Stock Could Surge 62% to $225, According to This Analyst\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-01-26 18:00 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/apple-stock-could-surge-62-to-%24225-according-to-this-analyst-2021-01-25><strong>nasdaq</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Shares ofApple(NASDAQ: AAPL)have already climbed 79% over the past year, but will surge to new all-time highs in 2021.That's according to Wedbush analyst Daniel Ives. Today, Ives raised his price ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/apple-stock-could-surge-62-to-%24225-according-to-this-analyst-2021-01-25\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/apple-stock-could-surge-62-to-%24225-according-to-this-analyst-2021-01-25","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1141309013","content_text":"Shares ofApple(NASDAQ: AAPL)have already climbed 79% over the past year, but will surge to new all-time highs in 2021.That's according to Wedbush analyst Daniel Ives. Today, Ives raised his price target on Apple's stock to $175 from $160, but also laid out a bull case for why the stock could climb to as high as $225. His new base target represents potential gains for investors of roughly 26% over the stock's closing price of about $139 on Friday. It's his compelling argument for the bull case, however, that should have investors more excited.Ives cited the potential for \"eye-popping\" iPhone sales, saying that checks of Apple's supply chain in Asia showed strong demand for the device. The analyst now believes Apple could have sold as many as 90 million iPhones during the December quarter, roughly 35% over the analyst's already robust forecast. Ives sees this upward trend continuing over the March and June quarters.\"We believe based on the current trajectory and in a bull case Cupertino has potential to sell north of 240 million units (~250 million could be in the cards -- an eye-popping figure)\" Ives wrote in a note to clients, \"which would easily eclipse the previous Apple record of 231 million units sold in [fiscal year 2015].\"Will Apple stock hit $225?There have long been prognostications of a supercycle for the iPhone maker. It has an installed base of more than 1.4 billion active devices, with the iPhone accounting for an estimated 950 million of those.The current thinking suggests that as many as 350 million iPhone buyers could upgrade their device this year. To put that number in context, Apple sold roughly 185 million iPhones in 2019. Given the demand for a 5G-enabled iPhone, and the number of devices due for an upgrade, it's certainly possible Apple could sell 89% more iPhones in 2021 -- but that's certainly a high bar.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":234,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":319764911,"gmtCreate":1611625061333,"gmtModify":1703751689970,"author":{"id":"3570617809207113","authorId":"3570617809207113","name":"Donn","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ba1b57c564d3f11854c26a2bf9847d97","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570617809207113","authorIdStr":"3570617809207113"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hopefully","listText":"Hopefully","text":"Hopefully","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/319764911","repostId":"1111408338","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1111408338","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1611573530,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1111408338?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-01-25 19:18","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tesla earnings: Can sales growth match stock’s rise?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1111408338","media":"Market Wacth","summary":"Tesla Inc. is expected to report fourth-quarter results after the bell on Wednesday, with all eyes on the Silicon Valley electric-car maker’s sales goals for 2021.On a call in October to discussTesla’s third-quarter earnings,one analyst estimated 2021 sales between 840,000 to 1 million vehicles, and Chief Executive Elon Musk responded that it likely would be “in that vicinity,” and that the analyst was “not far off.”Chief Financial Officer Zach Kirkhorn then added that TeslaTSLA,+0.20%would prov","content":"<p>Tesla Inc. is expected to report fourth-quarter results after the bell on Wednesday, with all eyes on the Silicon Valley electric-car maker’s sales goals for 2021.</p><p>On a call in October to discussTesla’s third-quarter earnings,one analyst estimated 2021 sales between 840,000 to 1 million vehicles, and Chief Executive Elon Musk responded that it likely would be “in that vicinity,” and that the analyst was “not far off.”</p><p>Chief Financial Officer Zach Kirkhorn then added that TeslaTSLA,+0.20%would provide official 2021 guidance when it reports fourth-quarter results, seemingly preventing Musk from saying more.</p><p>All through last year, despite factory closures and other pandemic-related snags, Tesla kept its 2020 sales guidance intact, and the company ended the year a hair’s breath from it, earning praise from Wall Street.</p><p>Tesla earlier this month said it hadproduced more than half a million vehicles and delivered 499,550 in 2020.Deliveries are a proxy for Tesla sales. Before the start of the pandemic, the company set a goal of delivering more than 500,000 vehicles in the year.</p><p>Wall Street analysts expect a deliveries guidance to come in around 825,000 and 875,000 vehicles.</p><p>Here’s what else to expect:</p><p><b>Earnings:</b>Consensus from 37 Wall Street analysts polled by FactSet calls for GAAP earnings of 65 cents a share, which would compare with GAAP earnings of 12 cents a share in the fourth quarter of 2019.</p><p>The analysts expect an adjusted profit of $1.04 a share, which would compare with an adjusted profit of 43 cents a share a year ago. A fourth-quarter profit would be Tesla’s sixth straight quarterly GAAP and adjusted earnings.</p><p>Estimize, a crowdsourcing platform that gathers estimates from Wall Street analysts as well as buy-side analysts, fund managers, company executives, academics and others, is expecting an adjusted profit of $1.02 a share.</p><p><b>Revenue:</b>The analysts surveyed by FactSet expect sales of $10.53 billion for Tesla, up from $7.38 billion a year ago. Estimize sees revenue of $10.61 billion for the company.</p><p><b>Stock movement:</b>Tesla stock greeted 2021 just about the same way it ended 2020: Scoring closing and intraday records highs. Earlier this month, the stock went on its longest-everwinning run.</p><p>Tesla shares are up 635% in the past 12 months, compared with gains around 16% for the S&amp;P 500 indexSPX,-0.30%in the same period.</p><p><b>What else to expect:</b>Full-year results will provide the clearest yet picture of the coronavirus pandemic impact on the company.</p><p>Besides an official 2021 sales guidance, Wall Street is looking for more commentary on the Model Y, the newest addition to the Tesla lineup, and on upcoming models, such as the Cybertruck and a cheaper vehicle that has been only hinted at and that has been dubbed the “Model 2.”</p><p>Analysts at JPMorgan said Friday they remained “highly cautious” on Tesla due to its stock valuation, but they raised their price target on the stock to $125 from $105, the lowest among FactSet-surveyed analysts.</p><p>“While still suggestive of large downside, we do not regard our price target as ungenerous as it actually values Tesla as the world’s second largest automaker by market capitalization, behind Toyota and ahead of Volkswagen despite these automakers each currently selling on the order of magnitude of 20x as many vehicles annually as Tesla,” the JPMorgan analysts, led by Ryan Brinkman, said in their note.</p><p>RBC analysts, led by Joseph Spak, said in a recent note they expect Tesla to reiterate its recently raised capex 2021 outlook, which calls for between $4.5 billion and $6 billion.</p><p>Tesla historically has issued guidance for free cash flow and GAAP net income, the RBC analysts said, but could hold off on it beyond calling for “significant” on-year improvement.</p><p>Deutsche Bank analysts said they expect a “solid” quarter for Tesla, raising their delivery forecast to 825,000 vehicles from 800,000, “given</p><p>continued strong sales of Model 3 and fast ramp-up of (made-in-China) Model Y.”</p><p>The Deutsche Bank analysts, led by Emmanuel Rosner, also raised their price target on Tesla shares to $890 from 705 to $890, based on expectations of higher sales and profits through 2021 and the next few years.</p><p>On average, Tesla analysts polled by FactSet have a price target of $525 on Tesla, with 12 out of the 37 with a buy rating on the stock, 15 rating it a hold, and the remaining 10 rating it a sell. The $525 average represents a 37% downside from Friday prices.</p>","source":"lsy1604288433698","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tesla earnings: Can sales growth match stock’s rise?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTesla earnings: Can sales growth match stock’s rise?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-01-25 19:18 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.marketwatch.com/story/get-ready-for-apples-first-100-billion-quarter-in-history-11611347355?mod=home-page><strong>Market Wacth</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Tesla Inc. is expected to report fourth-quarter results after the bell on Wednesday, with all eyes on the Silicon Valley electric-car maker’s sales goals for 2021.On a call in October to discussTesla’...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/get-ready-for-apples-first-100-billion-quarter-in-history-11611347355?mod=home-page\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fab3e6da33eab070d39ea5ddbb760010","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/get-ready-for-apples-first-100-billion-quarter-in-history-11611347355?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1111408338","content_text":"Tesla Inc. is expected to report fourth-quarter results after the bell on Wednesday, with all eyes on the Silicon Valley electric-car maker’s sales goals for 2021.On a call in October to discussTesla’s third-quarter earnings,one analyst estimated 2021 sales between 840,000 to 1 million vehicles, and Chief Executive Elon Musk responded that it likely would be “in that vicinity,” and that the analyst was “not far off.”Chief Financial Officer Zach Kirkhorn then added that TeslaTSLA,+0.20%would provide official 2021 guidance when it reports fourth-quarter results, seemingly preventing Musk from saying more.All through last year, despite factory closures and other pandemic-related snags, Tesla kept its 2020 sales guidance intact, and the company ended the year a hair’s breath from it, earning praise from Wall Street.Tesla earlier this month said it hadproduced more than half a million vehicles and delivered 499,550 in 2020.Deliveries are a proxy for Tesla sales. Before the start of the pandemic, the company set a goal of delivering more than 500,000 vehicles in the year.Wall Street analysts expect a deliveries guidance to come in around 825,000 and 875,000 vehicles.Here’s what else to expect:Earnings:Consensus from 37 Wall Street analysts polled by FactSet calls for GAAP earnings of 65 cents a share, which would compare with GAAP earnings of 12 cents a share in the fourth quarter of 2019.The analysts expect an adjusted profit of $1.04 a share, which would compare with an adjusted profit of 43 cents a share a year ago. A fourth-quarter profit would be Tesla’s sixth straight quarterly GAAP and adjusted earnings.Estimize, a crowdsourcing platform that gathers estimates from Wall Street analysts as well as buy-side analysts, fund managers, company executives, academics and others, is expecting an adjusted profit of $1.02 a share.Revenue:The analysts surveyed by FactSet expect sales of $10.53 billion for Tesla, up from $7.38 billion a year ago. Estimize sees revenue of $10.61 billion for the company.Stock movement:Tesla stock greeted 2021 just about the same way it ended 2020: Scoring closing and intraday records highs. Earlier this month, the stock went on its longest-everwinning run.Tesla shares are up 635% in the past 12 months, compared with gains around 16% for the S&P 500 indexSPX,-0.30%in the same period.What else to expect:Full-year results will provide the clearest yet picture of the coronavirus pandemic impact on the company.Besides an official 2021 sales guidance, Wall Street is looking for more commentary on the Model Y, the newest addition to the Tesla lineup, and on upcoming models, such as the Cybertruck and a cheaper vehicle that has been only hinted at and that has been dubbed the “Model 2.”Analysts at JPMorgan said Friday they remained “highly cautious” on Tesla due to its stock valuation, but they raised their price target on the stock to $125 from $105, the lowest among FactSet-surveyed analysts.“While still suggestive of large downside, we do not regard our price target as ungenerous as it actually values Tesla as the world’s second largest automaker by market capitalization, behind Toyota and ahead of Volkswagen despite these automakers each currently selling on the order of magnitude of 20x as many vehicles annually as Tesla,” the JPMorgan analysts, led by Ryan Brinkman, said in their note.RBC analysts, led by Joseph Spak, said in a recent note they expect Tesla to reiterate its recently raised capex 2021 outlook, which calls for between $4.5 billion and $6 billion.Tesla historically has issued guidance for free cash flow and GAAP net income, the RBC analysts said, but could hold off on it beyond calling for “significant” on-year improvement.Deutsche Bank analysts said they expect a “solid” quarter for Tesla, raising their delivery forecast to 825,000 vehicles from 800,000, “givencontinued strong sales of Model 3 and fast ramp-up of (made-in-China) Model Y.”The Deutsche Bank analysts, led by Emmanuel Rosner, also raised their price target on Tesla shares to $890 from 705 to $890, based on expectations of higher sales and profits through 2021 and the next few years.On average, Tesla analysts polled by FactSet have a price target of $525 on Tesla, with 12 out of the 37 with a buy rating on the stock, 15 rating it a hold, and the remaining 10 rating it a sell. The $525 average represents a 37% downside from Friday prices.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":362,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":319361445,"gmtCreate":1611538880187,"gmtModify":1703750707130,"author":{"id":"3570617809207113","authorId":"3570617809207113","name":"Donn","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ba1b57c564d3f11854c26a2bf9847d97","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570617809207113","authorIdStr":"3570617809207113"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hmm. It’ll recover.","listText":"Hmm. It’ll recover.","text":"Hmm. It’ll recover.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/319361445","repostId":"2105659234","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":625,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}