Nebhol的个人主页 - 老虎社区

Nebhol

Nebhol

暂无个人介绍

IP属地：未知

593关注

38粉丝

0主题

0勋章

2021-11-07

Like comment

US to Opec+: ‘This isn’t the end’ of effort to ease oil prices

2021-10-11

Like comment

Big banks kick off Q3 earnings season, CPI inflation data: What to know this week

2021-09-27

Like comment

Debt ceiling debates in Congress, consumer confidence: What to know this week

2021-10-22

Like comment

Snap points to possibility of Apple causing the long-feared ‘ad-mageddon’

2021-07-18

Like and comment please

The story behind the savvy ‘Mystery Broker’ and where he sees the market going now

2021-06-11

Like and comment

China Youran Dairy raises $643 mln in Hong Kong IPO - sources

2021-07-31

Like comment

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-05-31

$Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. V(IPOE)$Changing ticker soon?

2021-11-24

Like comment

Mild Upside Expected For Singapore Stock Market

2021-10-23

Like comment

Tech Stocks Stumbled While the Dow Hit a New High

2021-08-24

Like comment

Wall St gains, Nasdaq notches record closing high on full vaccine approval

2021-07-21

Like comment

Wall Street bounces back on renewed economic optimism

2021-03-26

Buy the dip

Congress is fed up with Big Tech. Now what?

2021-12-17

Like

Nasdaq ends sharply lower as investors dump growth stocks

2021-12-10

Like comment

Software Firm HashiCorp rises 1% on its first day of trading

2021-11-27

Like comment

Why Tesla Stock Tumbled Today

2021-10-13

Buy?

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-10-07

Like comment.

Amazon’s Streaming Platform, Twitch, Suffers Security Breach. What Investors Need to Know.

2021-09-08

Like comment

S&P 500 ends down, Big Tech lifts Nasdaq to record

2021-07-21

Like comment

Netflix details video game push as it forecasts weak growth

去老虎APP查看更多动态

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"3567411499210880","uuid":"3567411499210880","gmtCreate":1604317476058,"gmtModify":1612527343681,"name":"Nebhol","pinyin":"nebhol","introduction":"","introductionEn":null,"signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b0bfc2a45b91e41a283614268857b3a5","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":38,"headSize":593,"tweetSize":736,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":3,"name":"书生虎","nameTw":"書生虎","represent":"努力向上","factor":"发布10条非转发主帖,其中5条获得他人回复或点赞","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":null,"userBadges":[{"badgeId":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561-1","templateUuid":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561","name":"出道虎友","description":"加入老虎社区500天","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0e4d0ca1da0456dc7894c946d44bf9ab","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0f2f65e8ce4cfaae8db2bea9b127f58b","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5948a31b6edf154422335b265235809","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.03.18","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37-1","templateUuid":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37","name":"博闻投资者","description":"累计交易超过10只正股","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a-1","templateUuid":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a","name":"实盘交易者","description":"完成一笔实盘交易","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969-1","templateUuid":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969","name":"精英交易员","description":"证券或期货账户累计交易次数达到30次","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ab0f87127c854ce3191a752d57b46edc","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c9835ce48b8c8743566d344ac7a7ba8c","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76754b53ce7a90019f132c1d2fbc698f","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":"60.47%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":4,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":"未知","starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"hot","tweets":[{"id":693475906,"gmtCreate":1640072030304,"gmtModify":1640072030764,"author":{"id":"3567411499210880","authorId":"3567411499210880","name":"Nebhol","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b0bfc2a45b91e41a283614268857b3a5","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3567411499210880","authorIdStr":"3567411499210880"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Why?&nbsp;","listText":"Why?&nbsp;","text":"Why?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/693475906","repostId":"1117226796","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1117226796","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1640057164,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1117226796?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-21 11:26","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Palantir: 3 Reasons Against It And Why It's Still A Buy","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1117226796","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"Summary\n\nPalantir Technologies is a battleground stock. Listening to the bears' arguments is a good ","content":"<p><b>Summary</b></p>\n<ul>\n <li>Palantir Technologies is a battleground stock. Listening to the bears' arguments is a good idea for bulls.</li>\n <li>PLTR dilutes its shareholders, but that is not necessarily a huge problem.</li>\n <li>Despite some interest rate headwinds, PLTR seems like a good investment to me, thanks to a strong moat and great growth outlook.</li>\n</ul>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7230cdd890b86f9941b99b1503d04049\" tg-width=\"1536\" tg-height=\"1044\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>spxChrome/E+ via Getty Images</span></p>\n<p><b>Article Thesis</b></p>\n<p>Palantir Technologies (PLTR) is an embattled growth stock, and in recent weeks, bears have been winning as shares continued to decline. There are, indeed some important bear arguments, such as dilution, reliance on government contracts, and rising interest rates. I do, however, still believe that Palantir Technologies is an attractive long-term investment, due to the act that its technology could lead to massive growth for many years to come.</p>\n<p><b>3 Issues Brought Up By Bears</b></p>\n<p>Palantir is a growth stock that brings out highly convinced bulls as well as highly convinced bears. Generally, I am in the bullish camp here, but taking a look at the bear arguments can be a good idea as well. Three of the most common arguments against Palantir are the following ones:</p>\n<p><b>1. Shareholder Dilution</b></p>\n<p>Growth on a company-wide basis is important, but growth on a per-share basis is even more important. There are many examples that show that changes in a company's share count can create or destroy a lot of shareholder value. Apple (AAPL), for example, has seen its net income grow by roughly 190% over the last decade:</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2b5263c8346cfbbb898f1d1ac9a5bead\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"433\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Data by YCharts</span></p>\n<p>Thanks to a declining share count, its earnings per share rose by a much more attractive 350%, however -- buybacks created a lot of shareholder value. There are also examples where a rising share count destroyed a lot of shareholder value, e.g. at Citigroup (C):</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fc39008812f5e2d0082dedc95b025c68\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"433\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Data by YCharts</span></p>\n<p>Massive share issuance during the Great Recession has resulted in a 75% earnings per share decline since 2007, even though net profits were up over the same time frame. Looking at the changes in a company's share count thus makes sense, as those changes can have a large impact in the long run. At Palantir, we see that the share count has been rising considerably since the company went public. During the most recent quarter, Palantir's share count looked like this:</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/917ca4d7a390ced61d7c92d528f84fc1\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"539\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Source: Palantir Press Release</span></p>\n<p>Compared to the second quarter, Palantir's average share count was&nbsp;1.895 billion, which makes for a 3.5% quarterly increase, which pencils out to an annual growth rate in the mid-teens. That is, of course, not negligible at all, and bears to have an argument when they state that shareholders get diluted at a meaningful pace. On the other hand, Palantir's business growth rate is way higher than 3% per quarter, as the company has guided for ~40% revenue growth this year, and since Palantir should also deliver outsized business growth in the coming years. Even if Palantir's share count were to climb by 10%-15% a year going forward, revenue per share would still climb by 25%+ a year thanks to the fact that PLTR is growing rapidly. I also believe that dilution will, over the years, decline. Not only has this been the case at many other growth companies, e.g. Amazon (AMZN), Alphabet (GOOG), or Meta (FB), but it is also logical from an option rewards perspective. Option rewards are especially generous when a company is not yet publicly traded and when its future is still more uncertain, but as a company matures, employees get more comfortable as risks for the company decline, and they do not demand large option packages any longer. Last but not least, Palantir also generates strong free cash flows that should allow the company to do share buybacks in the future, which should help improve the dilution rate as well.</p>\n<p><b>2. Reliance on government contracts</b></p>\n<p>In a recent bearish&nbsp;article, fellow Seeking Alpha contributor On The Pulse argued that Palantir was overvalued and that its reliance on government contracts was an issue. Palantir Technologies is, indeed, reliant on government contracts to a large degree today, but I do not believe that this is a major issue. First, Palantir has diversified away from government contracts in the recent past, thanks to massive growth in its commercial business:</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/de23409915ee3811691b986a42ece899\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"308\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Source: Palantir Technologies presentation</span></p>\n<p>In fact, Palantir's commercial business has been growing much faster than its government business in the recent past, which shows that commercial customers from all kinds of industries apparently see a lot of value in Palantir's technology -- otherwise, they wouldn't be buying at a rapid pace. With</p>\n<p>With the commercial business growth rate outpacing the government business growth rate, Palantir will, over the years, become a company that is less and less dependent on government contracts, and that will ultimately turn into a B2B-focused software/technology player. Even if Palantir were to remain a government-focused company forever, which seems unlikely based on the current growth rates of the individual business units, that would not necessarily be an issue. Working for the government means that there is very little counterparty risk and that existing relations can easily be used to get future contracts. Last but not least, with government budgets rising relatively steadily, good government connections allow for considerable growth opportunities -- especially in the defense tech/security tech space Palantir is active in, as there is a huge need for further investments in this space.</p>\n<p>The claim that a government focus leads to lacking scalability is also false, I believe. Per Palantir's most recent quarterly report (linked above), its operating expenses rose by $9 million between Q3 2020 and Q3 2021 -- whereas revenues rose by $103 million in the same time frame. This backs out changes in share-based compensation. If one were to include those SBC expenses, Palantir's expenses actually<i>declined</i>year-over-year while the company managed to grow its revenue by close to 40%. The claim that Palantir will not generate any scale advantages over the years thus seems to be unfounded, I believe. Instead, the data suggest that Palantir will be able to grow its margins considerably -- the company was able to grow its adjusted gross profit by a massive $90 million while growing its adjusted operating expenses by just $9 million -- making for excellent operating leverage.</p>\n<p><b>3. Exposure to rising rates</b></p>\n<p>Massive inflation will force the Fed to raise rates in 2022 and beyond, and that could be an issue for growth stocks. Companies that are not profitable today, or that have the vast majority of their profits in the distant future, are more exposed to a rising discount rate compared to companies that have low or no growth and that generate a large amount of all future profits in the near term. This could result in outperformance of value stocks versus growth stocks in the coming years, I believe. Palantir, which is not profitable yet, naturally belongs in the \"growth\" bucket that could see an above-average impact from rising interest rates. There is no real counter-argument here, I believe -- it is indeed true that the impact of rising rates on Palantir, all else equal, will be larger compared to a value stock like AbbVie (ABBV), for example.</p>\n<p>This being an incremental negative for Palantir doesn't mean that shares have to be avoided under any circumstances, however. Indeed, even despite some potential headwinds from rising rates, Palantir could still be an attractive investment if other arguments have a larger weight -- I believe this to be true, as I see PLTR's massive growth potential and huge moat outweighing some near-term headwinds from rising rates.</p>\n<p><b>Why Palantir Is Still Attractive</b></p>\n<p>Bears bring up a range of arguments against Palantir, and as shown above, those can have merit. I believe that they might be overblown in some cases, but taking a look at the bear's arguments doesn't hurt -- in fact, it seems like a good idea to look at both sides in order to make a more informed decision. Dilution is indeed an issue, although I do not believe that this will be too much of a headwind, since PLTR's business growth easily outpaces dilution and since dilution, overall, should slow down over the years. Government reliance will wane over the years due to an above-average commercial business growth rate, and in general, doing business with the government is not a bad thing anyway. The claim that PLTR lacks scalability seems to be false, from what I see in PLTR's data.</p>\n<p>Palantir is, despite these arguments, attractive, I believe: The company is growing rapidly, has decades-long growth potential in both its government business as well as on the commercial side, and Palantir seems to have a very wide moat. This combination could turn Palantir into one of the largest and most important companies eventually -- although investors shouldn't expect this to happen in the very near term. Instead, I believe that there is a good chance that Palantir will grow at a considerable rate throughout the 2020s and beyond, as our world becomes ever more data-hungry -- both governments, as well as enterprises, will try to get the most value out of all of this data, and Palantir, with its tailored solutions, will be there to offer that value to its customers. With new tools such as the recently-showcased&nbsp;Foundry&nbsp;for crypto, Palantir is at the forefront of all kinds of emerging technologies. Thanks to the fact that Palantir has access to top talent -- the result of SBC and of an&nbsp;excellent working environment-- I believe that there is a good chance that Palantir will be able to be highly competitive in all kinds of future markets in the Big Data/AI space that may not even exist yet.</p>\n<p><b>Takeaway</b></p>\n<p>In general, I am not much of a growth investor -- instead, I primarily focus on attractively priced stocks with strong cash flows, oftentimes those that pay dividends. Palantir, however, is somewhat of an outlier in my portfolio -- it's a growth stock, it is not really profitable yet, and most of its potential is years away. Due to the highly attractive combination of a massive market opportunity, excellent talent, and a wide moat, Palantir still seems like an attractive long-term investment to me. This isn't a stock that will make investors rich quickly, but I believe that there is a very good chance that Palantir will turn into a very dominant, important company over the next 10+ years. At 19x next year's revenue, PLTR is not cheap, but when we expect that the company will grow at a strong rate for many years, that also doesn't seem outlandish to me at all. It makes sense to listen to the bears' arguments, but I believe that the pros outweigh the cons here.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Palantir: 3 Reasons Against It And Why It's Still A Buy</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nPalantir: 3 Reasons Against It And Why It's Still A Buy\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-12-21 11:26 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4475960-palantir-3-reasons-against-it-and-why-its-still-a-buy><strong>Seeking Alpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Summary\n\nPalantir Technologies is a battleground stock. Listening to the bears' arguments is a good idea for bulls.\nPLTR dilutes its shareholders, but that is not necessarily a huge problem.\nDespite ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4475960-palantir-3-reasons-against-it-and-why-its-still-a-buy\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"PLTR":"Palantir Technologies Inc."},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4475960-palantir-3-reasons-against-it-and-why-its-still-a-buy","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1117226796","content_text":"Summary\n\nPalantir Technologies is a battleground stock. Listening to the bears' arguments is a good idea for bulls.\nPLTR dilutes its shareholders, but that is not necessarily a huge problem.\nDespite some interest rate headwinds, PLTR seems like a good investment to me, thanks to a strong moat and great growth outlook.\n\nspxChrome/E+ via Getty Images\nArticle Thesis\nPalantir Technologies (PLTR) is an embattled growth stock, and in recent weeks, bears have been winning as shares continued to decline. There are, indeed some important bear arguments, such as dilution, reliance on government contracts, and rising interest rates. I do, however, still believe that Palantir Technologies is an attractive long-term investment, due to the act that its technology could lead to massive growth for many years to come.\n3 Issues Brought Up By Bears\nPalantir is a growth stock that brings out highly convinced bulls as well as highly convinced bears. Generally, I am in the bullish camp here, but taking a look at the bear arguments can be a good idea as well. Three of the most common arguments against Palantir are the following ones:\n1. Shareholder Dilution\nGrowth on a company-wide basis is important, but growth on a per-share basis is even more important. There are many examples that show that changes in a company's share count can create or destroy a lot of shareholder value. Apple (AAPL), for example, has seen its net income grow by roughly 190% over the last decade:\nData by YCharts\nThanks to a declining share count, its earnings per share rose by a much more attractive 350%, however -- buybacks created a lot of shareholder value. There are also examples where a rising share count destroyed a lot of shareholder value, e.g. at Citigroup (C):\nData by YCharts\nMassive share issuance during the Great Recession has resulted in a 75% earnings per share decline since 2007, even though net profits were up over the same time frame. Looking at the changes in a company's share count thus makes sense, as those changes can have a large impact in the long run. At Palantir, we see that the share count has been rising considerably since the company went public. During the most recent quarter, Palantir's share count looked like this:\nSource: Palantir Press Release\nCompared to the second quarter, Palantir's average share count was 1.895 billion, which makes for a 3.5% quarterly increase, which pencils out to an annual growth rate in the mid-teens. That is, of course, not negligible at all, and bears to have an argument when they state that shareholders get diluted at a meaningful pace. On the other hand, Palantir's business growth rate is way higher than 3% per quarter, as the company has guided for ~40% revenue growth this year, and since Palantir should also deliver outsized business growth in the coming years. Even if Palantir's share count were to climb by 10%-15% a year going forward, revenue per share would still climb by 25%+ a year thanks to the fact that PLTR is growing rapidly. I also believe that dilution will, over the years, decline. Not only has this been the case at many other growth companies, e.g. Amazon (AMZN), Alphabet (GOOG), or Meta (FB), but it is also logical from an option rewards perspective. Option rewards are especially generous when a company is not yet publicly traded and when its future is still more uncertain, but as a company matures, employees get more comfortable as risks for the company decline, and they do not demand large option packages any longer. Last but not least, Palantir also generates strong free cash flows that should allow the company to do share buybacks in the future, which should help improve the dilution rate as well.\n2. Reliance on government contracts\nIn a recent bearish article, fellow Seeking Alpha contributor On The Pulse argued that Palantir was overvalued and that its reliance on government contracts was an issue. Palantir Technologies is, indeed, reliant on government contracts to a large degree today, but I do not believe that this is a major issue. First, Palantir has diversified away from government contracts in the recent past, thanks to massive growth in its commercial business:\nSource: Palantir Technologies presentation\nIn fact, Palantir's commercial business has been growing much faster than its government business in the recent past, which shows that commercial customers from all kinds of industries apparently see a lot of value in Palantir's technology -- otherwise, they wouldn't be buying at a rapid pace. With\nWith the commercial business growth rate outpacing the government business growth rate, Palantir will, over the years, become a company that is less and less dependent on government contracts, and that will ultimately turn into a B2B-focused software/technology player. Even if Palantir were to remain a government-focused company forever, which seems unlikely based on the current growth rates of the individual business units, that would not necessarily be an issue. Working for the government means that there is very little counterparty risk and that existing relations can easily be used to get future contracts. Last but not least, with government budgets rising relatively steadily, good government connections allow for considerable growth opportunities -- especially in the defense tech/security tech space Palantir is active in, as there is a huge need for further investments in this space.\nThe claim that a government focus leads to lacking scalability is also false, I believe. Per Palantir's most recent quarterly report (linked above), its operating expenses rose by $9 million between Q3 2020 and Q3 2021 -- whereas revenues rose by $103 million in the same time frame. This backs out changes in share-based compensation. If one were to include those SBC expenses, Palantir's expenses actuallydeclinedyear-over-year while the company managed to grow its revenue by close to 40%. The claim that Palantir will not generate any scale advantages over the years thus seems to be unfounded, I believe. Instead, the data suggest that Palantir will be able to grow its margins considerably -- the company was able to grow its adjusted gross profit by a massive $90 million while growing its adjusted operating expenses by just $9 million -- making for excellent operating leverage.\n3. Exposure to rising rates\nMassive inflation will force the Fed to raise rates in 2022 and beyond, and that could be an issue for growth stocks. Companies that are not profitable today, or that have the vast majority of their profits in the distant future, are more exposed to a rising discount rate compared to companies that have low or no growth and that generate a large amount of all future profits in the near term. This could result in outperformance of value stocks versus growth stocks in the coming years, I believe. Palantir, which is not profitable yet, naturally belongs in the \"growth\" bucket that could see an above-average impact from rising interest rates. There is no real counter-argument here, I believe -- it is indeed true that the impact of rising rates on Palantir, all else equal, will be larger compared to a value stock like AbbVie (ABBV), for example.\nThis being an incremental negative for Palantir doesn't mean that shares have to be avoided under any circumstances, however. Indeed, even despite some potential headwinds from rising rates, Palantir could still be an attractive investment if other arguments have a larger weight -- I believe this to be true, as I see PLTR's massive growth potential and huge moat outweighing some near-term headwinds from rising rates.\nWhy Palantir Is Still Attractive\nBears bring up a range of arguments against Palantir, and as shown above, those can have merit. I believe that they might be overblown in some cases, but taking a look at the bear's arguments doesn't hurt -- in fact, it seems like a good idea to look at both sides in order to make a more informed decision. Dilution is indeed an issue, although I do not believe that this will be too much of a headwind, since PLTR's business growth easily outpaces dilution and since dilution, overall, should slow down over the years. Government reliance will wane over the years due to an above-average commercial business growth rate, and in general, doing business with the government is not a bad thing anyway. The claim that PLTR lacks scalability seems to be false, from what I see in PLTR's data.\nPalantir is, despite these arguments, attractive, I believe: The company is growing rapidly, has decades-long growth potential in both its government business as well as on the commercial side, and Palantir seems to have a very wide moat. This combination could turn Palantir into one of the largest and most important companies eventually -- although investors shouldn't expect this to happen in the very near term. Instead, I believe that there is a good chance that Palantir will grow at a considerable rate throughout the 2020s and beyond, as our world becomes ever more data-hungry -- both governments, as well as enterprises, will try to get the most value out of all of this data, and Palantir, with its tailored solutions, will be there to offer that value to its customers. With new tools such as the recently-showcased Foundry for crypto, Palantir is at the forefront of all kinds of emerging technologies. Thanks to the fact that Palantir has access to top talent -- the result of SBC and of an excellent working environment-- I believe that there is a good chance that Palantir will be able to be highly competitive in all kinds of future markets in the Big Data/AI space that may not even exist yet.\nTakeaway\nIn general, I am not much of a growth investor -- instead, I primarily focus on attractively priced stocks with strong cash flows, oftentimes those that pay dividends. Palantir, however, is somewhat of an outlier in my portfolio -- it's a growth stock, it is not really profitable yet, and most of its potential is years away. Due to the highly attractive combination of a massive market opportunity, excellent talent, and a wide moat, Palantir still seems like an attractive long-term investment to me. This isn't a stock that will make investors rich quickly, but I believe that there is a very good chance that Palantir will turn into a very dominant, important company over the next 10+ years. At 19x next year's revenue, PLTR is not cheap, but when we expect that the company will grow at a strong rate for many years, that also doesn't seem outlandish to me at all. It makes sense to listen to the bears' arguments, but I believe that the pros outweigh the cons here.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":549,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":693990184,"gmtCreate":1639957646294,"gmtModify":1639957646775,"author":{"id":"3567411499210880","authorId":"3567411499210880","name":"Nebhol","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b0bfc2a45b91e41a283614268857b3a5","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3567411499210880","authorIdStr":"3567411499210880"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/693990184","repostId":"1130472386","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1130472386","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1639957070,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1130472386?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-20 07:37","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Manchin delivers potential fatal blow to Biden's $1.75 trillion spending bill","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1130472386","media":"Reuters","summary":"WASHINGTON, Dec 19 (Reuters) - U.S. Senator Joe Manchin, a moderate Democrat who is key to President","content":"<p>WASHINGTON, Dec 19 (Reuters) - U.S. Senator Joe Manchin, a moderate Democrat who is key to President Joe Biden's hopes of passing a $1.75 trillion domestic investment bill, said on Sunday he would not support the package, drawing a sharp rebuke from the White House.</p>\n<p>Manchin appeared to deal a fatal blow to Biden's signature domestic policy bill, which is known as Build Back Better and aims to expand the social safety net and tackle climate change.</p>\n<p>\"I cannot vote to continue with this piece of legislation,\" Manchin said during an interview with the \"Fox News Sunday\" program, citing concerns&nbsp;about inflation. \"I just can't. I have tried everything humanly possible.\"</p>\n<p>He then released a statement accusing his party of pushing for an increase in the debt load that would \"drastically hinder\" the United States' ability to respond to the coronavirus pandemic and geopolitical threats.</p>\n<p>\"My Democratic colleagues in Washington are determined to dramatically reshape our society in a way that leaves our country even more vulnerable to the threats we face,\" Manchin said in a statement.</p>\n<p>The White House responded angrily, accusing him of breaking his promise to find common ground and get the bill passed.</p>\n<p>White House press secretary Jen Psaki said Manchin's comments \"represent a sudden and inexplicable reversal in his position.\" Biden's administration would find a way to move forward with the legislation in 2022, she said.</p>\n<p>Many Democrats feel passage of the bill is essential to the party's chances of maintaining control of Congress in next year's elections.</p>\n<p>The White House had hoped to keep negotiations cordial and private to avoid alienating Manchin, who represents West Virginia, a state that Biden lost to former President Donald Trump by almost 40 percentage points in the 2020 election.</p>\n<p>But many top Biden allies believe Manchin is damaging the Democratic president's political future, and Psaki's public rebuke of the senator suggested a new phase in Biden's push for legislation he regards as essential to his legacy.</p>\n<p>Manchin's comments also drew outrage from liberal Democrats.</p>\n<p>\"Let's be clear: Manchin’s excuse is bullshit,\" U.S. Representative Ilhan Omar, a Democrat from Minnesota, said on Twitter.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/25bdee0fca31c7b5c80f20c87eb55439\" tg-width=\"960\" tg-height=\"640\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>U.S. Senator Joe Manchin (D-WV) arrives at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, U.S., September 27, 2021. REUTERS/Elizabeth Frantz</span></p>\n<p>Senator Bernie Sanders, who helped shape the bill, called for a vote to be held on the package of measures anyway.</p>\n<p>The bill would raise taxes on the wealthy and corporations to pay for a host of programs to thwart climate change, boost healthcare subsidies and provide free childcare.</p>\n<p>Biden has argued that lowering such costs is critical at a time of rising inflation and as the economy recovers from the fallout of the coronavirus pandemic. Republicans say the proposed legislation would&nbsp;increase the federal deficit, fuel inflation and hurt the economy.</p>\n<p><b>UPHILL STRUGGLE</b></p>\n<p>Manchin's support is crucial in a chamber where the Democrats have the slimmest margin of control and Republicans are united in their opposition to the bill.</p>\n<p>Even if Manchin were somehow convinced to back the bill, the White House would still have to win over Senator Kyrsten Sinema, another moderate Democrat who has not committed to supporting it.</p>\n<p>Though talks with Manchin had been going poorly, Biden's aides had expressed confidence in recent days that they would eventually secure a deal.</p>\n<p>Sanders, a democratic socialist who is aligned with Democrats in the Senate, told CNN on Sunday that he thinks there should still be a vote on the proposed legislation, despite Manchin's opposition.</p>\n<p>\"If he doesn't have the courage to do the right thing for the working families of West Virginia and America, let him vote no in front of the whole world,\" Sanders told CNN.</p>\n<p>Biden last month signed into law a $1 trillion infrastructure bill designed to create jobs by dispersing money to state and local governments to fix crumbling bridges and roads and by expanding broadband internet access.</p>\n<p>Liberal Democrats in Congress had pushed for the coupling of the Build Back Better legislation with the infrastructure bill in the hope of ensuring the passage of the former.</p>\n<p>U.S. House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi, a Democrat, led an effort in September to decouple the two bills.</p>\n<p>\"This is exactly what we warned would happen if we separated Build Back Better from infrastructure,\" Omar said on Twitter.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Manchin delivers potential fatal blow to Biden's $1.75 trillion spending bill</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nManchin delivers potential fatal blow to Biden's $1.75 trillion spending bill\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-12-20 07:37</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>WASHINGTON, Dec 19 (Reuters) - U.S. Senator Joe Manchin, a moderate Democrat who is key to President Joe Biden's hopes of passing a $1.75 trillion domestic investment bill, said on Sunday he would not support the package, drawing a sharp rebuke from the White House.</p>\n<p>Manchin appeared to deal a fatal blow to Biden's signature domestic policy bill, which is known as Build Back Better and aims to expand the social safety net and tackle climate change.</p>\n<p>\"I cannot vote to continue with this piece of legislation,\" Manchin said during an interview with the \"Fox News Sunday\" program, citing concerns&nbsp;about inflation. \"I just can't. I have tried everything humanly possible.\"</p>\n<p>He then released a statement accusing his party of pushing for an increase in the debt load that would \"drastically hinder\" the United States' ability to respond to the coronavirus pandemic and geopolitical threats.</p>\n<p>\"My Democratic colleagues in Washington are determined to dramatically reshape our society in a way that leaves our country even more vulnerable to the threats we face,\" Manchin said in a statement.</p>\n<p>The White House responded angrily, accusing him of breaking his promise to find common ground and get the bill passed.</p>\n<p>White House press secretary Jen Psaki said Manchin's comments \"represent a sudden and inexplicable reversal in his position.\" Biden's administration would find a way to move forward with the legislation in 2022, she said.</p>\n<p>Many Democrats feel passage of the bill is essential to the party's chances of maintaining control of Congress in next year's elections.</p>\n<p>The White House had hoped to keep negotiations cordial and private to avoid alienating Manchin, who represents West Virginia, a state that Biden lost to former President Donald Trump by almost 40 percentage points in the 2020 election.</p>\n<p>But many top Biden allies believe Manchin is damaging the Democratic president's political future, and Psaki's public rebuke of the senator suggested a new phase in Biden's push for legislation he regards as essential to his legacy.</p>\n<p>Manchin's comments also drew outrage from liberal Democrats.</p>\n<p>\"Let's be clear: Manchin’s excuse is bullshit,\" U.S. Representative Ilhan Omar, a Democrat from Minnesota, said on Twitter.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/25bdee0fca31c7b5c80f20c87eb55439\" tg-width=\"960\" tg-height=\"640\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>U.S. Senator Joe Manchin (D-WV) arrives at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, U.S., September 27, 2021. REUTERS/Elizabeth Frantz</span></p>\n<p>Senator Bernie Sanders, who helped shape the bill, called for a vote to be held on the package of measures anyway.</p>\n<p>The bill would raise taxes on the wealthy and corporations to pay for a host of programs to thwart climate change, boost healthcare subsidies and provide free childcare.</p>\n<p>Biden has argued that lowering such costs is critical at a time of rising inflation and as the economy recovers from the fallout of the coronavirus pandemic. Republicans say the proposed legislation would&nbsp;increase the federal deficit, fuel inflation and hurt the economy.</p>\n<p><b>UPHILL STRUGGLE</b></p>\n<p>Manchin's support is crucial in a chamber where the Democrats have the slimmest margin of control and Republicans are united in their opposition to the bill.</p>\n<p>Even if Manchin were somehow convinced to back the bill, the White House would still have to win over Senator Kyrsten Sinema, another moderate Democrat who has not committed to supporting it.</p>\n<p>Though talks with Manchin had been going poorly, Biden's aides had expressed confidence in recent days that they would eventually secure a deal.</p>\n<p>Sanders, a democratic socialist who is aligned with Democrats in the Senate, told CNN on Sunday that he thinks there should still be a vote on the proposed legislation, despite Manchin's opposition.</p>\n<p>\"If he doesn't have the courage to do the right thing for the working families of West Virginia and America, let him vote no in front of the whole world,\" Sanders told CNN.</p>\n<p>Biden last month signed into law a $1 trillion infrastructure bill designed to create jobs by dispersing money to state and local governments to fix crumbling bridges and roads and by expanding broadband internet access.</p>\n<p>Liberal Democrats in Congress had pushed for the coupling of the Build Back Better legislation with the infrastructure bill in the hope of ensuring the passage of the former.</p>\n<p>U.S. House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi, a Democrat, led an effort in September to decouple the two bills.</p>\n<p>\"This is exactly what we warned would happen if we separated Build Back Better from infrastructure,\" Omar said on Twitter.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1130472386","content_text":"WASHINGTON, Dec 19 (Reuters) - U.S. Senator Joe Manchin, a moderate Democrat who is key to President Joe Biden's hopes of passing a $1.75 trillion domestic investment bill, said on Sunday he would not support the package, drawing a sharp rebuke from the White House.\nManchin appeared to deal a fatal blow to Biden's signature domestic policy bill, which is known as Build Back Better and aims to expand the social safety net and tackle climate change.\n\"I cannot vote to continue with this piece of legislation,\" Manchin said during an interview with the \"Fox News Sunday\" program, citing concerns about inflation. \"I just can't. I have tried everything humanly possible.\"\nHe then released a statement accusing his party of pushing for an increase in the debt load that would \"drastically hinder\" the United States' ability to respond to the coronavirus pandemic and geopolitical threats.\n\"My Democratic colleagues in Washington are determined to dramatically reshape our society in a way that leaves our country even more vulnerable to the threats we face,\" Manchin said in a statement.\nThe White House responded angrily, accusing him of breaking his promise to find common ground and get the bill passed.\nWhite House press secretary Jen Psaki said Manchin's comments \"represent a sudden and inexplicable reversal in his position.\" Biden's administration would find a way to move forward with the legislation in 2022, she said.\nMany Democrats feel passage of the bill is essential to the party's chances of maintaining control of Congress in next year's elections.\nThe White House had hoped to keep negotiations cordial and private to avoid alienating Manchin, who represents West Virginia, a state that Biden lost to former President Donald Trump by almost 40 percentage points in the 2020 election.\nBut many top Biden allies believe Manchin is damaging the Democratic president's political future, and Psaki's public rebuke of the senator suggested a new phase in Biden's push for legislation he regards as essential to his legacy.\nManchin's comments also drew outrage from liberal Democrats.\n\"Let's be clear: Manchin’s excuse is bullshit,\" U.S. Representative Ilhan Omar, a Democrat from Minnesota, said on Twitter.\nU.S. Senator Joe Manchin (D-WV) arrives at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, U.S., September 27, 2021. REUTERS/Elizabeth Frantz\nSenator Bernie Sanders, who helped shape the bill, called for a vote to be held on the package of measures anyway.\nThe bill would raise taxes on the wealthy and corporations to pay for a host of programs to thwart climate change, boost healthcare subsidies and provide free childcare.\nBiden has argued that lowering such costs is critical at a time of rising inflation and as the economy recovers from the fallout of the coronavirus pandemic. Republicans say the proposed legislation would increase the federal deficit, fuel inflation and hurt the economy.\nUPHILL STRUGGLE\nManchin's support is crucial in a chamber where the Democrats have the slimmest margin of control and Republicans are united in their opposition to the bill.\nEven if Manchin were somehow convinced to back the bill, the White House would still have to win over Senator Kyrsten Sinema, another moderate Democrat who has not committed to supporting it.\nThough talks with Manchin had been going poorly, Biden's aides had expressed confidence in recent days that they would eventually secure a deal.\nSanders, a democratic socialist who is aligned with Democrats in the Senate, told CNN on Sunday that he thinks there should still be a vote on the proposed legislation, despite Manchin's opposition.\n\"If he doesn't have the courage to do the right thing for the working families of West Virginia and America, let him vote no in front of the whole world,\" Sanders told CNN.\nBiden last month signed into law a $1 trillion infrastructure bill designed to create jobs by dispersing money to state and local governments to fix crumbling bridges and roads and by expanding broadband internet access.\nLiberal Democrats in Congress had pushed for the coupling of the Build Back Better legislation with the infrastructure bill in the hope of ensuring the passage of the former.\nU.S. House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi, a Democrat, led an effort in September to decouple the two bills.\n\"This is exactly what we warned would happen if we separated Build Back Better from infrastructure,\" Omar said on Twitter.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":833,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":699714195,"gmtCreate":1639894703611,"gmtModify":1639894704027,"author":{"id":"3567411499210880","authorId":"3567411499210880","name":"Nebhol","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b0bfc2a45b91e41a283614268857b3a5","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3567411499210880","authorIdStr":"3567411499210880"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like&nbsp;","listText":"Like&nbsp;","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/699714195","repostId":"2192903795","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2192903795","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1639880431,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2192903795?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-19 10:20","market":"us","language":"en","title":"5 Growth Stocks to Buy Now for 2022","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2192903795","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Can these five stock picks boost your 2022 gains?","content":"<p>Today, I provide five growth stocks that I think will perform well in 2022 and beyond. These stock picks cover enormous secular growth trends that should flourish over the long term.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVDA\"><b>Nvidia</b> </a> is the first stock on the list. It's easy to see why some investors would shy away from Nvidia at these levels. The stock price has delivered over 67,000% returns since going public in 1999. A $10,000 investment would be worth approximately $6.7 million today. But the company is firing on all cylinders, and when you look under the hood, you will find that its future looks very bright, which can arguably justify the premium share price. Nvidia has its hands in nearly every secular tailwind imaginable:</p>\n<ul>\n <li>Data centers</li>\n <li>Cloud computing</li>\n <li>Cybersecurity&nbsp;</li>\n <li>Space exploration</li>\n <li>Video gaming</li>\n <li>Online gambling</li>\n <li>Augmented reality (AR)</li>\n <li>Virtual reality (VR)</li>\n <li>Mixed reality (MR)</li>\n <li>Autonomous driving</li>\n <li>Electric vehicles</li>\n <li>Genomics</li>\n <li>Esports</li>\n <li>5G</li>\n <li>E-commerce</li>\n <li>Cryptocurrency</li>\n <li>Artificial intelligence (AI)</li>\n <li>Metaverse</li>\n <li>Big data</li>\n</ul>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\"><b>Tesla</b> </a> has made a historic run over the past couple of years, but with Elon Musk at the helm, the future still looks very bright. The company continues to grow rapidly while improving net profit margins and cash flows. The EV super cycle is just getting started, and Tesla is poised to be top dog. Not only is Tesla a top autonomous and electric vehicle manufacturer, it is, in my opinion, also the best artificial intelligence company in the world.&nbsp;</p>\n<p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SNOW\">Snowflake</a></b> offers what it calls a \"data warehouse-as-a-service\" (DaaS), a cloud-based data storage and analytics solution. Think \"big data.\" Interestingly, Snowflake is not a SaaS company since its revenue is over 90% consumption based. Snowflake reduces cost and improves agility. Its data platform is unique in that it is not built on an existing big data platform. In addition to big data and analytics, I believe Snowflake is positioned well to create a unique digital advertising moat, which I discuss in detail here.&nbsp;I have been a fan of this stock since pre-IPO, and I have high conviction long term.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/U\"><b>Unity Software</b>&nbsp;</a>&nbsp;is best known for gaming. It provides tools and software to assist developers in game creation and marketing. In 2019, over 50% of the top 1,000 mobile games were created using Unity. Unity has players in 195 countries, so it's literally a global company. Unity powers billon-dollar mobile games like <i>Pokémon Go</i> and <i>Angry Birds</i>.&nbsp;</p>\n<p>But augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) are why I personally own the stock. Think metaverse! However, Unity is actually quite diverse in terms of its offerings and industry segments. Here are some other areas Unity works in outside of gaming:</p>\n<ul>\n <li>Automotive, transportation, and manufacturing</li>\n <li>Film, animation, and cinematics</li>\n <li>Architecture, engineering, and construction</li>\n <li>Government and aerospace</li>\n <li>Gambling</li>\n</ul>\n<p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PATH\">UiPath</a></b> (NYSE:PATH) is a global software company focused on robotic process automation, also called RPA. The company's software enables organizations to automate data entry and repetitive tasks. RPA technology makes it simple for businesses to build, deploy, and manage bots. These software robots emulate human actions and provide many benefits. Examples include:</p>\n<ul>\n <li>Increased production times</li>\n <li>Reduction of costs</li>\n <li>Increased employee creativity and innovation</li>\n <li>Improved efficiency</li>\n <li>Increased employee happiness and retention</li>\n <li>Improved process quality</li>\n <li>Higher employee productivity</li>\n <li>Improved customer service</li>\n</ul>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>5 Growth Stocks to Buy Now for 2022</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n5 Growth Stocks to Buy Now for 2022\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-12-19 10:20 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/12/18/5-growth-stocks-to-buy-now-for-2022/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Today, I provide five growth stocks that I think will perform well in 2022 and beyond. These stock picks cover enormous secular growth trends that should flourish over the long term.\nNvidia  is the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/12/18/5-growth-stocks-to-buy-now-for-2022/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4543":"AI","BK4559":"巴菲特持仓","BK4527":"明星科技股","BK4116":"互联网服务与基础架构","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","BK4141":"半导体产品","TSLA":"特斯拉","BK4503":"景林资产持仓","BK4551":"寇图资本持仓","BK4561":"索罗斯持仓","BK4097":"系统软件","BK4505":"高瓴资本持仓","NVDA":"英伟达","BK4549":"软银资本持仓","BK4099":"汽车制造商","BK4548":"巴美列捷福持仓","SNOW":"Snowflake","U":"Unity Software Inc.","PATH":"UiPath","BK4529":"IDC概念","BK4213":"石油与天然气的勘探与生产","BK4539":"次新股","BK4528":"SaaS概念","BK4023":"应用软件","BK4554":"元宇宙及AR概念","BK4532":"文艺复兴科技持仓","BK4567":"ESG概念","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4555":"新能源车","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","VR":"GLOBAL X METAVERSE ETF","BK4535":"淡马锡持仓"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/12/18/5-growth-stocks-to-buy-now-for-2022/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2192903795","content_text":"Today, I provide five growth stocks that I think will perform well in 2022 and beyond. These stock picks cover enormous secular growth trends that should flourish over the long term.\nNvidia  is the first stock on the list. It's easy to see why some investors would shy away from Nvidia at these levels. The stock price has delivered over 67,000% returns since going public in 1999. A $10,000 investment would be worth approximately $6.7 million today. But the company is firing on all cylinders, and when you look under the hood, you will find that its future looks very bright, which can arguably justify the premium share price. Nvidia has its hands in nearly every secular tailwind imaginable:\n\nData centers\nCloud computing\nCybersecurity \nSpace exploration\nVideo gaming\nOnline gambling\nAugmented reality (AR)\nVirtual reality (VR)\nMixed reality (MR)\nAutonomous driving\nElectric vehicles\nGenomics\nEsports\n5G\nE-commerce\nCryptocurrency\nArtificial intelligence (AI)\nMetaverse\nBig data\n\nTesla  has made a historic run over the past couple of years, but with Elon Musk at the helm, the future still looks very bright. The company continues to grow rapidly while improving net profit margins and cash flows. The EV super cycle is just getting started, and Tesla is poised to be top dog. Not only is Tesla a top autonomous and electric vehicle manufacturer, it is, in my opinion, also the best artificial intelligence company in the world. \nSnowflake offers what it calls a \"data warehouse-as-a-service\" (DaaS), a cloud-based data storage and analytics solution. Think \"big data.\" Interestingly, Snowflake is not a SaaS company since its revenue is over 90% consumption based. Snowflake reduces cost and improves agility. Its data platform is unique in that it is not built on an existing big data platform. In addition to big data and analytics, I believe Snowflake is positioned well to create a unique digital advertising moat, which I discuss in detail here. I have been a fan of this stock since pre-IPO, and I have high conviction long term.\nUnity Software  is best known for gaming. It provides tools and software to assist developers in game creation and marketing. In 2019, over 50% of the top 1,000 mobile games were created using Unity. Unity has players in 195 countries, so it's literally a global company. Unity powers billon-dollar mobile games like Pokémon Go and Angry Birds. \nBut augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) are why I personally own the stock. Think metaverse! However, Unity is actually quite diverse in terms of its offerings and industry segments. Here are some other areas Unity works in outside of gaming:\n\nAutomotive, transportation, and manufacturing\nFilm, animation, and cinematics\nArchitecture, engineering, and construction\nGovernment and aerospace\nGambling\n\nUiPath (NYSE:PATH) is a global software company focused on robotic process automation, also called RPA. The company's software enables organizations to automate data entry and repetitive tasks. RPA technology makes it simple for businesses to build, deploy, and manage bots. These software robots emulate human actions and provide many benefits. Examples include:\n\nIncreased production times\nReduction of costs\nIncreased employee creativity and innovation\nImproved efficiency\nIncreased employee happiness and retention\nImproved process quality\nHigher employee productivity\nImproved customer service","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":851,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":699227930,"gmtCreate":1639818110439,"gmtModify":1639818110924,"author":{"id":"3567411499210880","authorId":"3567411499210880","name":"Nebhol","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b0bfc2a45b91e41a283614268857b3a5","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3567411499210880","authorIdStr":"3567411499210880"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like&nbsp;","listText":"Like&nbsp;","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/699227930","repostId":"2192754259","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2192754259","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1639811460,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2192754259?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-18 15:11","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Got $5,000? These 3 Growth Stocks Are Trading Near Their 52-Week Lows","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2192754259","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Three names you know are trading within 10% of their 52-week lows. They deserve better.","content":"<p>The major market indexes may be near their recent all-time highs, but your portfolio might have missed the memo. There are a lot of stocks struggling outside of the bellwethers that are heavily weighted in the market gauges, and we're not just talking about small and obscure names.</p>\n<p><b>Disney</b>&nbsp;(NYSE:DIS),<b> <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWTR\">Twitter</a></b>&nbsp;(NYSE:TWTR), and <b>Toast </b>(NYSE:TOST) are all trading within 10% of their 52-week lows. They are market leaders, but investors just aren't feeling the love for the entertainment powerhouse, the social media kingmaker, and the toast of the town in restaurant tech. Let's see why these are three promising ideas for the next $5,000 you want to invest in the market.</p>\n<h4><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DIS\">Disney</a></h4>\n<p>Disney's theme parks call themselves the happiest or merriest places on Earth, but shareholders aren't feeling the same way these days. The media maven's stock is less than 5% away from the 52-week low it hit earlier this month.</p>\n<p>It's pretty surprising to see Disney as a market laggard this year. It's the dominant theme park operator and film studio on the planet, making it a clear beneficiary of the reopening of the economy in 2021. Unfortunately for shareholders, things are never as easy as they seem. Disney+ subscriber growth has slowed recently, and that's problematic since the platform for premium streaming video was the major reason for Disney climbing in 2020.</p>\n<p>Disney near 52-week lows is still a sobering development. The theme parks continue to draw. The top movies this year are largely Disney's handiwork. Even its cruise lines are finally sailing again. The weight of the world may be on beleaguered CEO Bob Chapek's shoulders, but it's a small world after all.</p>\n<p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWTR\">Twitter</a></b></p>\n<p>Another shocking name skirting fresh lows is Twitter. The company behind the short-form social platform is in a funk, and even the initial 10% pop that the stock experienced after its CEO stepped down late last month proved fleeting. As of Thursday's close, Twitter is also now just 5% above the fresh low it hit two weeks ago.</p>\n<p>The platform is working. Its daily active users have grown 13% over the past year to 211 million. Ad revenue is growing even faster, and that 41% surge is a testament to both Twitter's engagement and its ability to milk more money out of every user. New leadership should help it continue to evolve, and the recent rollout of premium features for those willing to pay a little to improve the experience should get Twitter moving in the right direction again before long.</p>\n<h4><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TOST\">Toast</a></h4>\n<p>Running a restaurant has changed dramatically just in the past couple of years, and Toast is the no-brainer cloud-based platform that keeps eateries on top of all of the trending revenue streams. It's a one-stop shop for restaurant needs. On the consumer-facing end, it helps process mobile ordering for take-out, manage incoming sales from third-party delivery services, and naturally serve as the point-of-sale for in-restaurant dining. It also helps run customer loyalty programs to keep regulars coming back.</p>\n<p>Toast does even more on the enterprise end, tackling everything from payroll to inventory management. With chains and independent concepts emerging smarter out of the pandemic than they were before, the company simplifies the necessary functions of an eatery in the new normal.</p>\n<p>Despite stellar growth -- revenue has soared 105% through the first nine months of this year -- the recent IPO hit an all-time low on Wednesday. It may be causing indigestion for investors who chased the new stock when it popped to double today's price by early November, but right now it feels more like a dinner bell.</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Got $5,000? These 3 Growth Stocks Are Trading Near Their 52-Week Lows</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGot $5,000? These 3 Growth Stocks Are Trading Near Their 52-Week Lows\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-12-18 15:11 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/12/17/got-5000-these-3-growth-stocks-are-trading-near-th/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The major market indexes may be near their recent all-time highs, but your portfolio might have missed the memo. There are a lot of stocks struggling outside of the bellwethers that are heavily ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/12/17/got-5000-these-3-growth-stocks-are-trading-near-th/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4516":"特朗普概念","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","QNETCN":"纳斯达克中美互联网老虎指数","BK4106":"数据处理与外包服务","BK4554":"元宇宙及AR概念","BK4532":"文艺复兴科技持仓","TWTR":"Twitter","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","TOST":"Toast, Inc.","BK4508":"社交媒体","BK4077":"互动媒体与服务","BK4551":"寇图资本持仓","BK4108":"电影和娱乐","BK4524":"宅经济概念","BK4507":"流媒体概念","BK4561":"索罗斯持仓","DIS":"迪士尼"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/12/17/got-5000-these-3-growth-stocks-are-trading-near-th/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2192754259","content_text":"The major market indexes may be near their recent all-time highs, but your portfolio might have missed the memo. There are a lot of stocks struggling outside of the bellwethers that are heavily weighted in the market gauges, and we're not just talking about small and obscure names.\nDisney (NYSE:DIS), Twitter (NYSE:TWTR), and Toast (NYSE:TOST) are all trading within 10% of their 52-week lows. They are market leaders, but investors just aren't feeling the love for the entertainment powerhouse, the social media kingmaker, and the toast of the town in restaurant tech. Let's see why these are three promising ideas for the next $5,000 you want to invest in the market.\nDisney\nDisney's theme parks call themselves the happiest or merriest places on Earth, but shareholders aren't feeling the same way these days. The media maven's stock is less than 5% away from the 52-week low it hit earlier this month.\nIt's pretty surprising to see Disney as a market laggard this year. It's the dominant theme park operator and film studio on the planet, making it a clear beneficiary of the reopening of the economy in 2021. Unfortunately for shareholders, things are never as easy as they seem. Disney+ subscriber growth has slowed recently, and that's problematic since the platform for premium streaming video was the major reason for Disney climbing in 2020.\nDisney near 52-week lows is still a sobering development. The theme parks continue to draw. The top movies this year are largely Disney's handiwork. Even its cruise lines are finally sailing again. The weight of the world may be on beleaguered CEO Bob Chapek's shoulders, but it's a small world after all.\nTwitter\nAnother shocking name skirting fresh lows is Twitter. The company behind the short-form social platform is in a funk, and even the initial 10% pop that the stock experienced after its CEO stepped down late last month proved fleeting. As of Thursday's close, Twitter is also now just 5% above the fresh low it hit two weeks ago.\nThe platform is working. Its daily active users have grown 13% over the past year to 211 million. Ad revenue is growing even faster, and that 41% surge is a testament to both Twitter's engagement and its ability to milk more money out of every user. New leadership should help it continue to evolve, and the recent rollout of premium features for those willing to pay a little to improve the experience should get Twitter moving in the right direction again before long.\nToast\nRunning a restaurant has changed dramatically just in the past couple of years, and Toast is the no-brainer cloud-based platform that keeps eateries on top of all of the trending revenue streams. It's a one-stop shop for restaurant needs. On the consumer-facing end, it helps process mobile ordering for take-out, manage incoming sales from third-party delivery services, and naturally serve as the point-of-sale for in-restaurant dining. It also helps run customer loyalty programs to keep regulars coming back.\nToast does even more on the enterprise end, tackling everything from payroll to inventory management. With chains and independent concepts emerging smarter out of the pandemic than they were before, the company simplifies the necessary functions of an eatery in the new normal.\nDespite stellar growth -- revenue has soared 105% through the first nine months of this year -- the recent IPO hit an all-time low on Wednesday. It may be causing indigestion for investors who chased the new stock when it popped to double today's price by early November, but right now it feels more like a dinner bell.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":655,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":690763967,"gmtCreate":1639709792526,"gmtModify":1639709793007,"author":{"id":"3567411499210880","authorId":"3567411499210880","name":"Nebhol","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b0bfc2a45b91e41a283614268857b3a5","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3567411499210880","authorIdStr":"3567411499210880"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/690763967","repostId":"2192920942","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2192920942","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1639694745,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2192920942?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-17 06:45","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Nasdaq ends sharply lower as investors dump growth stocks","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2192920942","media":"Reuters","summary":"* Fed to end bond purchases, signals rate hikes in 2022\n* Tech is worst among 11 S&P 500 sector inde","content":"<p>* Fed to end bond purchases, signals rate hikes in 2022</p>\n<p>* Tech is worst among 11 S&amp;P 500 sector indexes, financials rally</p>\n<p>* Lennar slips after missing quarterly profit</p>\n<p>* Indexes: Dow -0.08%, S&amp;P 500 -0.87%, Nasdaq -2.47%</p>\n<p>Dec 16 (Reuters) - The Nasdaq ended sharply lower on Thursday as the Federal Reserve's announcement of a faster end to its pandemic-era stimulus pushed investors away from Big Tech and toward more economically sensitive sectors.</p>\n<p>Nvidia,Apple,Microsoft, Amazon&nbsp;and Tesla&nbsp;tumbled between 2.6% and 6.8%, hitting the Nasdaq&nbsp;and the S&amp;P 500, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average declined marginally.</p>\n<p>Most of those heavyweight growth stocks have outperformed the broader market in 2021, with Nvidia up more than 100% year to date.</p>\n<p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average&nbsp;fell 0.08% to end at 35,897.64, while the S&amp;P 500&nbsp;lost 0.87% to 4,668.67.</p>\n<p>The Nasdaq Composite&nbsp;dropped 2.47% to 15,180.44.</p>\n<p>The U.S. central bank said on Wednesday it would end its bond purchases in March and signaled three quarter-percentage-point interest rate hikes by the end of 2022.</p>\n<p>That pleased investors who have increasingly worried about an inflation spike related to the coronavirus pandemic. But on Thursday it contributed to the sell-off in growth stocks.</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 500 value index&nbsp;climbed 0.7%, while the growth index fell 2.1%, reflecting investors' views that high-growth stocks tend to underperform when interest rates rise. The value index includes stocks seen as more likely to do well during an economic recovery.</p>\n<p>\"You're seeing money come out of growth, as it should. If we are going into an environment where interest rates are going up, growth stocks are going to be less attractive\" said Dennis Dick, a trader at Bright Trading LLC.</p>\n<p>\"There's a lot of uncertainty as we go into 2022... We're going to have a more hawkish Fed that is going to pull away the punch bowl,\" he said.</p>\n<p>Among the 11 major S&amp;P 500 sector indexes, technology&nbsp;slumped 2.9%, while financials&nbsp;rallied 1.2%. Eight of the sectors gained, even as the overall index fell.</p>\n<p>\"The Fed gave the market what it wanted, and today I think investors are turning again to pandemic uncertainty, and they're also cautious going into the end of the year,\" said Lindsey Bell, chief investment strategist at Ally Invest, in Charlotte, North Carolina.</p>\n<p>Recent readings on surging producer and consumer prices, as well as the fast-spreading Omicron variant of the coronavirus, have fueled anxiety. The S&amp;P 500, nonetheless, remains up about 25% in 2021 and it is trading near record highs.</p>\n<p>The CBOE Volatility index, often considered Wall Street's fear gauge, slipped to a three-week low.</p>\n<p>Data showed the number of Americans filing new claims for unemployment benefits increased moderately last week, remaining at levels consistent with tightening labor market conditions.</p>\n<p>Separately, a survey showed production at U.S. factories increased to the highest level in nearly three years in November.</p>\n<p>Lennar Corp&nbsp;fell 4.1% after the homebuilder missed analysts' estimates for quarterly profit as pandemic-led supply chain issues pushed lumber costs higher and delayed house deliveries.</p>\n<p>Declining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 1.03-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.93-to-1 ratio favored decliners.</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 500 posted 69 new 52-week highs and 3 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 43 new highs and 184 new lows.</p>\n<p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 11.6 billion shares, in line with the average over the last 20 trading days.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Nasdaq ends sharply lower as investors dump growth stocks</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nNasdaq ends sharply lower as investors dump growth stocks\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-12-17 06:45</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>* Fed to end bond purchases, signals rate hikes in 2022</p>\n<p>* Tech is worst among 11 S&amp;P 500 sector indexes, financials rally</p>\n<p>* Lennar slips after missing quarterly profit</p>\n<p>* Indexes: Dow -0.08%, S&amp;P 500 -0.87%, Nasdaq -2.47%</p>\n<p>Dec 16 (Reuters) - The Nasdaq ended sharply lower on Thursday as the Federal Reserve's announcement of a faster end to its pandemic-era stimulus pushed investors away from Big Tech and toward more economically sensitive sectors.</p>\n<p>Nvidia,Apple,Microsoft, Amazon&nbsp;and Tesla&nbsp;tumbled between 2.6% and 6.8%, hitting the Nasdaq&nbsp;and the S&amp;P 500, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average declined marginally.</p>\n<p>Most of those heavyweight growth stocks have outperformed the broader market in 2021, with Nvidia up more than 100% year to date.</p>\n<p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average&nbsp;fell 0.08% to end at 35,897.64, while the S&amp;P 500&nbsp;lost 0.87% to 4,668.67.</p>\n<p>The Nasdaq Composite&nbsp;dropped 2.47% to 15,180.44.</p>\n<p>The U.S. central bank said on Wednesday it would end its bond purchases in March and signaled three quarter-percentage-point interest rate hikes by the end of 2022.</p>\n<p>That pleased investors who have increasingly worried about an inflation spike related to the coronavirus pandemic. But on Thursday it contributed to the sell-off in growth stocks.</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 500 value index&nbsp;climbed 0.7%, while the growth index fell 2.1%, reflecting investors' views that high-growth stocks tend to underperform when interest rates rise. The value index includes stocks seen as more likely to do well during an economic recovery.</p>\n<p>\"You're seeing money come out of growth, as it should. If we are going into an environment where interest rates are going up, growth stocks are going to be less attractive\" said Dennis Dick, a trader at Bright Trading LLC.</p>\n<p>\"There's a lot of uncertainty as we go into 2022... We're going to have a more hawkish Fed that is going to pull away the punch bowl,\" he said.</p>\n<p>Among the 11 major S&amp;P 500 sector indexes, technology&nbsp;slumped 2.9%, while financials&nbsp;rallied 1.2%. Eight of the sectors gained, even as the overall index fell.</p>\n<p>\"The Fed gave the market what it wanted, and today I think investors are turning again to pandemic uncertainty, and they're also cautious going into the end of the year,\" said Lindsey Bell, chief investment strategist at Ally Invest, in Charlotte, North Carolina.</p>\n<p>Recent readings on surging producer and consumer prices, as well as the fast-spreading Omicron variant of the coronavirus, have fueled anxiety. The S&amp;P 500, nonetheless, remains up about 25% in 2021 and it is trading near record highs.</p>\n<p>The CBOE Volatility index, often considered Wall Street's fear gauge, slipped to a three-week low.</p>\n<p>Data showed the number of Americans filing new claims for unemployment benefits increased moderately last week, remaining at levels consistent with tightening labor market conditions.</p>\n<p>Separately, a survey showed production at U.S. factories increased to the highest level in nearly three years in November.</p>\n<p>Lennar Corp&nbsp;fell 4.1% after the homebuilder missed analysts' estimates for quarterly profit as pandemic-led supply chain issues pushed lumber costs higher and delayed house deliveries.</p>\n<p>Declining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 1.03-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.93-to-1 ratio favored decliners.</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 500 posted 69 new 52-week highs and 3 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 43 new highs and 184 new lows.</p>\n<p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 11.6 billion shares, in line with the average over the last 20 trading days.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"161125":"标普500","513500":"标普500ETF","UPRO":"三倍做多标普500ETF","BK4561":"索罗斯持仓","BK4505":"高瓴资本持仓","OEX":"标普100","BK4504":"桥水持仓",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","BK4549":"软银资本持仓","BK4099":"汽车制造商","SH":"标普500反向ETF","BK4088":"住宅建筑","IVV":"标普500指数ETF","BK4548":"巴美列捷福持仓","SSO":"两倍做多标普500ETF","SDS":"两倍做空标普500ETF","OEF":"标普100指数ETF-iShares","SPXU":"三倍做空标普500ETF","SDOW":"道指三倍做空ETF-ProShares","BK4554":"元宇宙及AR概念","BK4515":"5G概念","SQQQ":"纳指三倍做空ETF","BK4553":"喜马拉雅资本持仓","DXD":"道指两倍做空ETF","BK4567":"ESG概念","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","PSQ":"纳指反向ETF","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","TSLA":"特斯拉","DDM":"道指两倍做多ETF","AMZN":"亚马逊","BK4524":"宅经济概念","LEN":"莱纳建筑公司","NVDA":"英伟达","BK4538":"云计算","BK4527":"明星科技股","BK4559":"巴菲特持仓","BK4501":"段永平概念","TQQQ":"纳指三倍做多ETF","BK4543":"AI","QQQ":"纳指100ETF",".DJI":"道琼斯","BK4503":"景林资产持仓",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","DOG":"道指反向ETF","BK4551":"寇图资本持仓","UDOW":"道指三倍做多ETF-ProShares"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2192920942","content_text":"* Fed to end bond purchases, signals rate hikes in 2022\n* Tech is worst among 11 S&P 500 sector indexes, financials rally\n* Lennar slips after missing quarterly profit\n* Indexes: Dow -0.08%, S&P 500 -0.87%, Nasdaq -2.47%\nDec 16 (Reuters) - The Nasdaq ended sharply lower on Thursday as the Federal Reserve's announcement of a faster end to its pandemic-era stimulus pushed investors away from Big Tech and toward more economically sensitive sectors.\nNvidia,Apple,Microsoft, Amazon and Tesla tumbled between 2.6% and 6.8%, hitting the Nasdaq and the S&P 500, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average declined marginally.\nMost of those heavyweight growth stocks have outperformed the broader market in 2021, with Nvidia up more than 100% year to date.\nThe Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 0.08% to end at 35,897.64, while the S&P 500 lost 0.87% to 4,668.67.\nThe Nasdaq Composite dropped 2.47% to 15,180.44.\nThe U.S. central bank said on Wednesday it would end its bond purchases in March and signaled three quarter-percentage-point interest rate hikes by the end of 2022.\nThat pleased investors who have increasingly worried about an inflation spike related to the coronavirus pandemic. But on Thursday it contributed to the sell-off in growth stocks.\nThe S&P 500 value index climbed 0.7%, while the growth index fell 2.1%, reflecting investors' views that high-growth stocks tend to underperform when interest rates rise. The value index includes stocks seen as more likely to do well during an economic recovery.\n\"You're seeing money come out of growth, as it should. If we are going into an environment where interest rates are going up, growth stocks are going to be less attractive\" said Dennis Dick, a trader at Bright Trading LLC.\n\"There's a lot of uncertainty as we go into 2022... We're going to have a more hawkish Fed that is going to pull away the punch bowl,\" he said.\nAmong the 11 major S&P 500 sector indexes, technology slumped 2.9%, while financials rallied 1.2%. Eight of the sectors gained, even as the overall index fell.\n\"The Fed gave the market what it wanted, and today I think investors are turning again to pandemic uncertainty, and they're also cautious going into the end of the year,\" said Lindsey Bell, chief investment strategist at Ally Invest, in Charlotte, North Carolina.\nRecent readings on surging producer and consumer prices, as well as the fast-spreading Omicron variant of the coronavirus, have fueled anxiety. The S&P 500, nonetheless, remains up about 25% in 2021 and it is trading near record highs.\nThe CBOE Volatility index, often considered Wall Street's fear gauge, slipped to a three-week low.\nData showed the number of Americans filing new claims for unemployment benefits increased moderately last week, remaining at levels consistent with tightening labor market conditions.\nSeparately, a survey showed production at U.S. factories increased to the highest level in nearly three years in November.\nLennar Corp fell 4.1% after the homebuilder missed analysts' estimates for quarterly profit as pandemic-led supply chain issues pushed lumber costs higher and delayed house deliveries.\nDeclining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 1.03-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.93-to-1 ratio favored decliners.\nThe S&P 500 posted 69 new 52-week highs and 3 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 43 new highs and 184 new lows.\nVolume on U.S. exchanges was 11.6 billion shares, in line with the average over the last 20 trading days.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1024,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":690070747,"gmtCreate":1639617398131,"gmtModify":1639617398534,"author":{"id":"3567411499210880","authorId":"3567411499210880","name":"Nebhol","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b0bfc2a45b91e41a283614268857b3a5","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3567411499210880","authorIdStr":"3567411499210880"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"At last?&nbsp;","listText":"At last?&nbsp;","text":"At last?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/690070747","repostId":"2191994940","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2191994940","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1639608624,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2191994940?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-16 06:50","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Wall St ends higher; Fed to end bond purchases in March","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2191994940","media":"Reuters","summary":"Fed says it will end bond purchases in March\nTech and healthcare the strongest sectors\nIndexes: Dow ","content":"<ul>\n <li>Fed says it will end bond purchases in March</li>\n <li>Tech and healthcare the strongest sectors</li>\n <li>Indexes: Dow +1.08%, S&amp;P 500 +1.63%, Nasdaq +2.15%</li>\n</ul>\n<p>Dec 15 (Reuters) - Wall Street ended sharply higher on Wednesday after the Federal Reserve said it would end its pandemic-era bond purchases in March as it exits from policies enacted at the start of the health crisis.</p>\n<p>Following its two-day policy meeting, the Fed signaled its inflation target has been met, and its announcement on ending the bond purchases paved the way for three quarter-percentage-point interest rate increases by the end of 2022.</p>\n<p>All three main U.S. stock indexes reversed earlier losses and climbed into positive territory. Wall Street extended those gains as Fed Chair Jerome Powell during his news conference struck an&nbsp;upbeat tone&nbsp;about the U.S. economic recovery and expressed willingness to raise interest rates as necessary to control inflation.</p>\n<p>\"What the markets are saying is, because the Fed is increasing their taper, maybe they feel inflation is under control,\" said Tom Martin, senior portfolio manager at Globalt Investments in Atlanta. \"They did what was expected. It’s going to add to the credibility for the Fed and that will be - on balance - neutral to positive for the markets.\"</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 500's sharp rise on Wednesday erased almost all of its losses from earlier this week and left it just short of its record-high close on Friday.</p>\n<p>For the session, the Dow Jones Industrial Average&nbsp;rose 1.08% to end at 35,927.43 points, while the S&amp;P 500&nbsp;gained 1.63% to 4,709.85.</p>\n<p>The Nasdaq Composite&nbsp;climbed 2.15% to 15,565.58.</p>\n<p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 12.2 billion shares, strong compared with the 11.6 billion average over the last 20 trading days.</p>\n<p>Inflation and higher interest rates have become a major concern on Wall Street in recent months. Data on Tuesday showed producer prices increased more than expected in the 12 months through November, clocking their largest gain since 2010. Last week's consumer prices data showed the biggest gain in almost four decades.</p>\n<p>\"You had hedge funds positioned for the worst, in the terms of the worst for equities, coming in to the Fed statement,\" said Michael James, managing director of equity trading at Wedbush Securities in Los Angeles. \"Today, I think, is a function of sell the expectation and buy the news.\"</p>\n<p>Among the 11 S&amp;P 500 sector indexes, technology&nbsp;jumped 2.7% and healthcare&nbsp;rallied 2.1%.</p>\n<p>Apple Inc&nbsp;climbed 2.85% and Nvidia Corp&nbsp;rallied 7.49%, with both lifting the S&amp;P 500 more than any other stocks.</p>\n<p>The Philadelphia Semiconductor index&nbsp;jumped 3.7%.</p>\n<p>Albemarle Corp&nbsp;ended 1.67% lower after Goldman Sachs downgraded the lithium producer to \"sell\" from \"neutral.\"</p>\n<p>Advancing issues outnumbered declining ones on the NYSE by a 1.85-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.70-to-1 ratio favored advancers.</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 500 posted 40 new 52-week highs and 10 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 38 new highs and 545 new lows.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Wall St ends higher; Fed to end bond purchases in March</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWall St ends higher; Fed to end bond purchases in March\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-12-16 06:50</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<ul>\n <li>Fed says it will end bond purchases in March</li>\n <li>Tech and healthcare the strongest sectors</li>\n <li>Indexes: Dow +1.08%, S&amp;P 500 +1.63%, Nasdaq +2.15%</li>\n</ul>\n<p>Dec 15 (Reuters) - Wall Street ended sharply higher on Wednesday after the Federal Reserve said it would end its pandemic-era bond purchases in March as it exits from policies enacted at the start of the health crisis.</p>\n<p>Following its two-day policy meeting, the Fed signaled its inflation target has been met, and its announcement on ending the bond purchases paved the way for three quarter-percentage-point interest rate increases by the end of 2022.</p>\n<p>All three main U.S. stock indexes reversed earlier losses and climbed into positive territory. Wall Street extended those gains as Fed Chair Jerome Powell during his news conference struck an&nbsp;upbeat tone&nbsp;about the U.S. economic recovery and expressed willingness to raise interest rates as necessary to control inflation.</p>\n<p>\"What the markets are saying is, because the Fed is increasing their taper, maybe they feel inflation is under control,\" said Tom Martin, senior portfolio manager at Globalt Investments in Atlanta. \"They did what was expected. It’s going to add to the credibility for the Fed and that will be - on balance - neutral to positive for the markets.\"</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 500's sharp rise on Wednesday erased almost all of its losses from earlier this week and left it just short of its record-high close on Friday.</p>\n<p>For the session, the Dow Jones Industrial Average&nbsp;rose 1.08% to end at 35,927.43 points, while the S&amp;P 500&nbsp;gained 1.63% to 4,709.85.</p>\n<p>The Nasdaq Composite&nbsp;climbed 2.15% to 15,565.58.</p>\n<p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 12.2 billion shares, strong compared with the 11.6 billion average over the last 20 trading days.</p>\n<p>Inflation and higher interest rates have become a major concern on Wall Street in recent months. Data on Tuesday showed producer prices increased more than expected in the 12 months through November, clocking their largest gain since 2010. Last week's consumer prices data showed the biggest gain in almost four decades.</p>\n<p>\"You had hedge funds positioned for the worst, in the terms of the worst for equities, coming in to the Fed statement,\" said Michael James, managing director of equity trading at Wedbush Securities in Los Angeles. \"Today, I think, is a function of sell the expectation and buy the news.\"</p>\n<p>Among the 11 S&amp;P 500 sector indexes, technology&nbsp;jumped 2.7% and healthcare&nbsp;rallied 2.1%.</p>\n<p>Apple Inc&nbsp;climbed 2.85% and Nvidia Corp&nbsp;rallied 7.49%, with both lifting the S&amp;P 500 more than any other stocks.</p>\n<p>The Philadelphia Semiconductor index&nbsp;jumped 3.7%.</p>\n<p>Albemarle Corp&nbsp;ended 1.67% lower after Goldman Sachs downgraded the lithium producer to \"sell\" from \"neutral.\"</p>\n<p>Advancing issues outnumbered declining ones on the NYSE by a 1.85-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.70-to-1 ratio favored advancers.</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 500 posted 40 new 52-week highs and 10 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 38 new highs and 545 new lows.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","NVDA":"英伟达","AAPL":"苹果","ALB":"美国雅保",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2191994940","content_text":"Fed says it will end bond purchases in March\nTech and healthcare the strongest sectors\nIndexes: Dow +1.08%, S&P 500 +1.63%, Nasdaq +2.15%\n\nDec 15 (Reuters) - Wall Street ended sharply higher on Wednesday after the Federal Reserve said it would end its pandemic-era bond purchases in March as it exits from policies enacted at the start of the health crisis.\nFollowing its two-day policy meeting, the Fed signaled its inflation target has been met, and its announcement on ending the bond purchases paved the way for three quarter-percentage-point interest rate increases by the end of 2022.\nAll three main U.S. stock indexes reversed earlier losses and climbed into positive territory. Wall Street extended those gains as Fed Chair Jerome Powell during his news conference struck an upbeat tone about the U.S. economic recovery and expressed willingness to raise interest rates as necessary to control inflation.\n\"What the markets are saying is, because the Fed is increasing their taper, maybe they feel inflation is under control,\" said Tom Martin, senior portfolio manager at Globalt Investments in Atlanta. \"They did what was expected. It’s going to add to the credibility for the Fed and that will be - on balance - neutral to positive for the markets.\"\nThe S&P 500's sharp rise on Wednesday erased almost all of its losses from earlier this week and left it just short of its record-high close on Friday.\nFor the session, the Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 1.08% to end at 35,927.43 points, while the S&P 500 gained 1.63% to 4,709.85.\nThe Nasdaq Composite climbed 2.15% to 15,565.58.\nVolume on U.S. exchanges was 12.2 billion shares, strong compared with the 11.6 billion average over the last 20 trading days.\nInflation and higher interest rates have become a major concern on Wall Street in recent months. Data on Tuesday showed producer prices increased more than expected in the 12 months through November, clocking their largest gain since 2010. Last week's consumer prices data showed the biggest gain in almost four decades.\n\"You had hedge funds positioned for the worst, in the terms of the worst for equities, coming in to the Fed statement,\" said Michael James, managing director of equity trading at Wedbush Securities in Los Angeles. \"Today, I think, is a function of sell the expectation and buy the news.\"\nAmong the 11 S&P 500 sector indexes, technology jumped 2.7% and healthcare rallied 2.1%.\nApple Inc climbed 2.85% and Nvidia Corp rallied 7.49%, with both lifting the S&P 500 more than any other stocks.\nThe Philadelphia Semiconductor index jumped 3.7%.\nAlbemarle Corp ended 1.67% lower after Goldman Sachs downgraded the lithium producer to \"sell\" from \"neutral.\"\nAdvancing issues outnumbered declining ones on the NYSE by a 1.85-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.70-to-1 ratio favored advancers.\nThe S&P 500 posted 40 new 52-week highs and 10 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 38 new highs and 545 new lows.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":789,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":607845889,"gmtCreate":1639528414137,"gmtModify":1639528414535,"author":{"id":"3567411499210880","authorId":"3567411499210880","name":"Nebhol","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b0bfc2a45b91e41a283614268857b3a5","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3567411499210880","authorIdStr":"3567411499210880"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like&nbsp;","listText":"Like&nbsp;","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/607845889","repostId":"1101216534","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1101216534","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1639525158,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1101216534?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-15 07:39","market":"us","language":"en","title":"PayPal Holdings: Buying This Dip Will Make You Pay Pal","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1101216534","media":"seekingalpha","summary":"Summary\n\nPayPal Holdings has demonstrated weak returns on invested capital in 2021 relative to their","content":"<p><b>Summary</b></p>\n<ul>\n <li>PayPal Holdings has demonstrated weak returns on invested capital in 2021 relative to their peers.</li>\n <li>The company is currently trading at 53 times its GAAP forward earnings making shares egregiously over-priced.</li>\n <li>I believe that PayPal's FCF calculation is not a fair representation with transaction and credit losses being added to the company's cashflow.</li>\n <li>Advancement in financial technology will begin to reduce the benefit of PayPal's value proposition.</li>\n</ul>\n<p></p>\n<p></p>\n<p><b>Investment Thesis</b></p>\n<p>PayPal Holdings (PYPL), the household online payment firm with around 416 million active merchant accounts is currently gaining investors attention after sliding 30% over the last 6 months. The stock is extremely popular amongst American investors as approximately 245 hedge funds have it in their top 10 holdings. That being said, despite the large institutions and Wall Street's optimism around the stock, I fail to see what the majority of analysts see in PayPal. To begin with, despite the company's stock sliding 30% over the last 6 months, PayPal is still trading at a GAAP forward Price-to-earnings multiple of 53. Secondly, the company has had poor performance when looking at their return on invested capital. Thirdly, PayPal's FCF calculations in my opinion are inaccurate to the actual volume of cash the company is bringing in. Lastly, PayPal's business model appears to be fizzling out as India's FinTech expansion has shown that a transaction middleman is becoming increasingly redundant.</p>\n<p></p>\n<p><b>PayPal's Underperformance</b></p>\n<p>In order for me to come to the conclusion that PayPal has under-performed this year, I had compared the returns on invested capital of PayPal versus peers Visa Inc (NYSE:V) and Mastercard Inc (NYSE:MA). The return on invested capital is a key metric measuring how well management is at deploying their capital profitably. The following are the three companies current ROIC.</p>\n<p></p>\n<p>PYPL return on invested capital</p>\n<p>Data by YCharts</p>\n<p>One of the main reasons why Visa and Mastercard has and will continue to outperform PayPal in returns on invested capital is because their business models are much less risky. Visa and Mastercard are just payment processors who pass on any additional risks to retailers and banks, whereas PayPal has to endure the risk of a merchant either defaulting or not making a payment. That additional risk PayPal is forced to endure leads to transaction and credit losses which hurts their profitability. This ultimately gives PayPal's competitors a competitive advantage when looking through the lens of an investor.</p>\n<p></p>\n<p><b>Transaction And Credit Losses</b></p>\n<p>From my perspective, the method in which is used to calculate PayPal's cashflows comes with some misrepresentations. The big problem with PayPal's FCF calculation is that they are able to add back all of their transaction and credit losses back onto their cashflow statement. This made up around 30% of PayPal's operating cashflow in 2020.</p>\n<p></p>\n<p>As you can see, these transaction and credit losses have been making up a solid chunk of PayPal's annual free cashflow. These transaction and credit losses are simple to explain. PayPal provides loans to individuals with bad credit, and should they write off those bad loans (which they're in fact doing a lot of), the losses are added back on PayPal's cashflow statement. I am of the opinion that investors should be aware of the risks involved in this and be vigilant when accounting it in your analysis. PayPal even acknowledges the risk of these bad loans in their 10-k form.</p>\n<p></p>\n<p>For this reason, the large amount of transaction and credit losses being added back onto PayPal's cashflow statement represent additional risk and also leads me to believe that their cashflow calculation is slightly misrepresented.</p>\n<p></p>\n<p><b>Valuation</b></p>\n<p>In order to compute the intrinsic value of PayPal stock, I will provide a discount cashflow model. The following is a forecast of some key data points needed to compute the calculation (all figures in millions USD).</p>\n<p></p>\n<p>For this calculation, I will be subtracting PayPal's transaction and credit losses as I've earlier stated that they overstate the company's cashflow. Additionally, I used 3 year moving averages to forecast D&amp;A and CapEx costs. Lastly, I chose a discount rate of 8% and a perpetual growth rate of 3%. The following is my discount cashflow model.</p>\n<p>My final consensus after computing my DCF model is that PayPal's intrinsic value is 77% lower than where shares are currently trading. This makes PayPal shares egregiously overvalued. Furthermore, looking deeper at PayPal's valuation using a comparable cost analysis, you can once again see by comparing the company's EV/EBITDA ratio to Visa and Mastercard, how overpriced PayPal shares are currently when compared to its peers.</p>\n<p></p>\n<p>I thought it would be important to add that PayPal's 1 year EPS growth rate is only about 4%, which compared to peers Visa and Mastercard is worse. Additionally, despite PayPal having a higher EV/EBITDA than both Mastercard and Visa, the company's YoY quarterly EPS growth has been lower and has shown a massive slowdown. Moreover, I don't expect PayPal's growth to pick up in the future as the industry moves away from their value proposition. The following is a chart representing quarterly YoY growth of the three companies.</p>\n<p></p>\n<p>As you can see, PayPal's EV-to-EBITDA is higher, despite lower EPS growth then their two largest rivals. To conclude on PayPal's valuation, PayPal has the price of a growth stock however, the company's growth rate and growth catalyst closer resembles a retirement value stock. This further amplifies my conviction that in my opinion PayPal shares are overvalued.</p>\n<p></p>\n<p><b>FinTech Evolution Is Leaving PayPal Behind</b></p>\n<p>When PayPal originally released its initial concept and value proposition, it took the world by storm as their business model was nothing others had seen before. That being said, the greatest risk PayPal faces in the future is that its clock may be ticking as banks and other new FinTech solutions change the market to where we just have bank-to-bank transactions, leaving less need for a middleman such as PayPal. You're already beginning to see this in countries such as China and now India. India specifically is set to have bank-to-bank digital payments increase rapidly over the next couple of years. The following is the forecasted dollar amount of digital payments in India in trillions of rupees.</p>\n<p></p>\n<p>Between China and India's adoption of FinTech and digital payments, the countries are setting the stage as to where the payment market will be headed in the next couple of years. Unfortunately for PayPal, that seems to be a world without a middleman between a merchant and a bank. Mastercard and Visa don't carry this risk because both companies just process payments, leaving them to be much better alternative investments.</p>\n<p></p>\n<p></p>\n<p><b>Why I Could Be Wrong And Final Thoughts</b></p>\n<p>To conclude my bearish PayPal thesis, I would like to say that if PayPal is able to pull together a couple of decent quarters, then in the short-term I could be wrong about the stock price as Wall Street's fondness for the company could push the valuation a little bit higher. That being said, I have to say that longer-term this is definitely a position I would want to avoid. PayPal's FCF calculations in my opinion are questionable, the company is currently egregiously overpriced with little growth, and its business model could begin to be fazed out down the line. For these reasons, I believe that PayPal is poised to fall by an additional 30-40% over the next 1-2 years. As much as investors want to talk about the past performance for this company, past performance does not equate to future performance. Therefore, I have to say that if you decide to purchase some PayPal shares, I think you will certainly pay pal.</p>","source":"lsy1638401102509","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>PayPal Holdings: Buying This Dip Will Make You Pay Pal</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nPayPal Holdings: Buying This Dip Will Make You Pay Pal\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-12-15 07:39 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4475141-paypal-holdings-buying-dip-unattractive><strong>seekingalpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Summary\n\nPayPal Holdings has demonstrated weak returns on invested capital in 2021 relative to their peers.\nThe company is currently trading at 53 times its GAAP forward earnings making shares ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4475141-paypal-holdings-buying-dip-unattractive\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"PYPL":"PayPal"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4475141-paypal-holdings-buying-dip-unattractive","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1101216534","content_text":"Summary\n\nPayPal Holdings has demonstrated weak returns on invested capital in 2021 relative to their peers.\nThe company is currently trading at 53 times its GAAP forward earnings making shares egregiously over-priced.\nI believe that PayPal's FCF calculation is not a fair representation with transaction and credit losses being added to the company's cashflow.\nAdvancement in financial technology will begin to reduce the benefit of PayPal's value proposition.\n\n\n\nInvestment Thesis\nPayPal Holdings (PYPL), the household online payment firm with around 416 million active merchant accounts is currently gaining investors attention after sliding 30% over the last 6 months. The stock is extremely popular amongst American investors as approximately 245 hedge funds have it in their top 10 holdings. That being said, despite the large institutions and Wall Street's optimism around the stock, I fail to see what the majority of analysts see in PayPal. To begin with, despite the company's stock sliding 30% over the last 6 months, PayPal is still trading at a GAAP forward Price-to-earnings multiple of 53. Secondly, the company has had poor performance when looking at their return on invested capital. Thirdly, PayPal's FCF calculations in my opinion are inaccurate to the actual volume of cash the company is bringing in. Lastly, PayPal's business model appears to be fizzling out as India's FinTech expansion has shown that a transaction middleman is becoming increasingly redundant.\n\nPayPal's Underperformance\nIn order for me to come to the conclusion that PayPal has under-performed this year, I had compared the returns on invested capital of PayPal versus peers Visa Inc (NYSE:V) and Mastercard Inc (NYSE:MA). The return on invested capital is a key metric measuring how well management is at deploying their capital profitably. The following are the three companies current ROIC.\n\nPYPL return on invested capital\nData by YCharts\nOne of the main reasons why Visa and Mastercard has and will continue to outperform PayPal in returns on invested capital is because their business models are much less risky. Visa and Mastercard are just payment processors who pass on any additional risks to retailers and banks, whereas PayPal has to endure the risk of a merchant either defaulting or not making a payment. That additional risk PayPal is forced to endure leads to transaction and credit losses which hurts their profitability. This ultimately gives PayPal's competitors a competitive advantage when looking through the lens of an investor.\n\nTransaction And Credit Losses\nFrom my perspective, the method in which is used to calculate PayPal's cashflows comes with some misrepresentations. The big problem with PayPal's FCF calculation is that they are able to add back all of their transaction and credit losses back onto their cashflow statement. This made up around 30% of PayPal's operating cashflow in 2020.\n\nAs you can see, these transaction and credit losses have been making up a solid chunk of PayPal's annual free cashflow. These transaction and credit losses are simple to explain. PayPal provides loans to individuals with bad credit, and should they write off those bad loans (which they're in fact doing a lot of), the losses are added back on PayPal's cashflow statement. I am of the opinion that investors should be aware of the risks involved in this and be vigilant when accounting it in your analysis. PayPal even acknowledges the risk of these bad loans in their 10-k form.\n\nFor this reason, the large amount of transaction and credit losses being added back onto PayPal's cashflow statement represent additional risk and also leads me to believe that their cashflow calculation is slightly misrepresented.\n\nValuation\nIn order to compute the intrinsic value of PayPal stock, I will provide a discount cashflow model. The following is a forecast of some key data points needed to compute the calculation (all figures in millions USD).\n\nFor this calculation, I will be subtracting PayPal's transaction and credit losses as I've earlier stated that they overstate the company's cashflow. Additionally, I used 3 year moving averages to forecast D&A and CapEx costs. Lastly, I chose a discount rate of 8% and a perpetual growth rate of 3%. The following is my discount cashflow model.\nMy final consensus after computing my DCF model is that PayPal's intrinsic value is 77% lower than where shares are currently trading. This makes PayPal shares egregiously overvalued. Furthermore, looking deeper at PayPal's valuation using a comparable cost analysis, you can once again see by comparing the company's EV/EBITDA ratio to Visa and Mastercard, how overpriced PayPal shares are currently when compared to its peers.\n\nI thought it would be important to add that PayPal's 1 year EPS growth rate is only about 4%, which compared to peers Visa and Mastercard is worse. Additionally, despite PayPal having a higher EV/EBITDA than both Mastercard and Visa, the company's YoY quarterly EPS growth has been lower and has shown a massive slowdown. Moreover, I don't expect PayPal's growth to pick up in the future as the industry moves away from their value proposition. The following is a chart representing quarterly YoY growth of the three companies.\n\nAs you can see, PayPal's EV-to-EBITDA is higher, despite lower EPS growth then their two largest rivals. To conclude on PayPal's valuation, PayPal has the price of a growth stock however, the company's growth rate and growth catalyst closer resembles a retirement value stock. This further amplifies my conviction that in my opinion PayPal shares are overvalued.\n\nFinTech Evolution Is Leaving PayPal Behind\nWhen PayPal originally released its initial concept and value proposition, it took the world by storm as their business model was nothing others had seen before. That being said, the greatest risk PayPal faces in the future is that its clock may be ticking as banks and other new FinTech solutions change the market to where we just have bank-to-bank transactions, leaving less need for a middleman such as PayPal. You're already beginning to see this in countries such as China and now India. India specifically is set to have bank-to-bank digital payments increase rapidly over the next couple of years. The following is the forecasted dollar amount of digital payments in India in trillions of rupees.\n\nBetween China and India's adoption of FinTech and digital payments, the countries are setting the stage as to where the payment market will be headed in the next couple of years. Unfortunately for PayPal, that seems to be a world without a middleman between a merchant and a bank. Mastercard and Visa don't carry this risk because both companies just process payments, leaving them to be much better alternative investments.\n\n\nWhy I Could Be Wrong And Final Thoughts\nTo conclude my bearish PayPal thesis, I would like to say that if PayPal is able to pull together a couple of decent quarters, then in the short-term I could be wrong about the stock price as Wall Street's fondness for the company could push the valuation a little bit higher. That being said, I have to say that longer-term this is definitely a position I would want to avoid. PayPal's FCF calculations in my opinion are questionable, the company is currently egregiously overpriced with little growth, and its business model could begin to be fazed out down the line. For these reasons, I believe that PayPal is poised to fall by an additional 30-40% over the next 1-2 years. As much as investors want to talk about the past performance for this company, past performance does not equate to future performance. Therefore, I have to say that if you decide to purchase some PayPal shares, I think you will certainly pay pal.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":714,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":604769101,"gmtCreate":1639446971624,"gmtModify":1639447031165,"author":{"id":"3567411499210880","authorId":"3567411499210880","name":"Nebhol","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b0bfc2a45b91e41a283614268857b3a5","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3567411499210880","authorIdStr":"3567411499210880"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"He’s bought more than he sold it seems…","listText":"He’s bought more than he sold it seems…","text":"He’s bought more than he sold it seems…","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/604769101","repostId":"1144236332","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1144236332","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1639445127,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1144236332?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-14 09:25","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Musk has sold 70.18% of Tesla shares promised to bear","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1144236332","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Tesla Inc Chief Executive Officer Elon Musk has sold nearly $13 billion worth of shares since early ","content":"<p>Tesla Inc&nbsp;Chief Executive Officer Elon Musk has sold nearly $13 billion worth of shares since early November when the world's richest person polled Twitter users about offloading 10% of his stake in the electric-car maker.</p>\n<p>The billionaire sold another 934,091 shares of the electric vehicle maker worth $906.5 million, U.S. securities filings showed on Monday.</p>\n<p>He also exercised stock options to buy 2.13 million shares of Tesla, according to the filings.</p>\n<p>Musk has sold about 11966421 Tesla shares since November 8, accounting for 70.18% of its previously committed shares.</p>\n<p>Here is a string of transactions he has done:</p>\n<table>\n <tbody>\n  <tr>\n   <td>DATE</td>\n   <td>SHARES ACQUIRED</td>\n   <td>SHARES SOLD</td>\n   <td>GROSS PROCEEDS</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 8</td>\n   <td>2.2 mln</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 8</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>934,091</td>\n   <td>$1.10 bln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 9</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>3.1 mln</td>\n   <td>$3.35 bln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 10</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>500,000</td>\n   <td>$527.3 mln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 11</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>639,737</td>\n   <td>$687.3 mln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 12</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>1.2 mln</td>\n   <td>$1.24 bln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 15</td>\n   <td>2.1 mln</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 15</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>934,091</td>\n   <td>$930.7 mln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 16</td>\n   <td>2.1 mln</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 16</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>934,091</td>\n   <td>$973.4 mln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 23</td>\n   <td>2.15 mln</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>934,091</td>\n   <td>$1.05 bln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>DEC. 2</td>\n   <td>2.1 mln</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>934,091</td>\n   <td>$1.01 bln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Dec.9</td>\n   <td>2.17 mln</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>934,091</td>\n   <td>$963.2 mln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Dec.13</td>\n   <td>2.13 mln</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>934,091</td>\n   <td>$906.5 mln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Total</td>\n   <td>14.96 mln</td>\n   <td>11.97 mln</td>\n   <td>$12.74 bln</td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p>HOW DID MUSK SELL?</p>\n<p>Musk said on Nov. 6 he would sell 10% of his stake if Twitter users agreed. He owned a combination of about 244 million shares through his trust and stock options, bringing his stake in Tesla to about 23% as of June 30. It included 170 million shares held by his trust.</p>\n<p>The tweet was vague. Musk did not outline if he was intending to offload 10% of his shares he indirectly owned through the trust or if his stock options were also part of the deal.</p>\n<p>Tesla’s stock has lost 21% since a peak in November as Musk has trimmed his stake. He’s still added almost $98 billion to his fortune this year, taking it to $253.6 billion, according to the&nbsp;Bloomberg Billionaires Index.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Musk has sold 70.18% of Tesla shares promised to bear</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nMusk has sold 70.18% of Tesla shares promised to bear\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-12-14 09:25</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Tesla Inc&nbsp;Chief Executive Officer Elon Musk has sold nearly $13 billion worth of shares since early November when the world's richest person polled Twitter users about offloading 10% of his stake in the electric-car maker.</p>\n<p>The billionaire sold another 934,091 shares of the electric vehicle maker worth $906.5 million, U.S. securities filings showed on Monday.</p>\n<p>He also exercised stock options to buy 2.13 million shares of Tesla, according to the filings.</p>\n<p>Musk has sold about 11966421 Tesla shares since November 8, accounting for 70.18% of its previously committed shares.</p>\n<p>Here is a string of transactions he has done:</p>\n<table>\n <tbody>\n  <tr>\n   <td>DATE</td>\n   <td>SHARES ACQUIRED</td>\n   <td>SHARES SOLD</td>\n   <td>GROSS PROCEEDS</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 8</td>\n   <td>2.2 mln</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 8</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>934,091</td>\n   <td>$1.10 bln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 9</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>3.1 mln</td>\n   <td>$3.35 bln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 10</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>500,000</td>\n   <td>$527.3 mln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 11</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>639,737</td>\n   <td>$687.3 mln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 12</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>1.2 mln</td>\n   <td>$1.24 bln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 15</td>\n   <td>2.1 mln</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 15</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>934,091</td>\n   <td>$930.7 mln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 16</td>\n   <td>2.1 mln</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 16</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>934,091</td>\n   <td>$973.4 mln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV. 23</td>\n   <td>2.15 mln</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>934,091</td>\n   <td>$1.05 bln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>DEC. 2</td>\n   <td>2.1 mln</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>934,091</td>\n   <td>$1.01 bln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Dec.9</td>\n   <td>2.17 mln</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>934,091</td>\n   <td>$963.2 mln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Dec.13</td>\n   <td>2.13 mln</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>934,091</td>\n   <td>$906.5 mln</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Total</td>\n   <td>14.96 mln</td>\n   <td>11.97 mln</td>\n   <td>$12.74 bln</td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p>HOW DID MUSK SELL?</p>\n<p>Musk said on Nov. 6 he would sell 10% of his stake if Twitter users agreed. He owned a combination of about 244 million shares through his trust and stock options, bringing his stake in Tesla to about 23% as of June 30. It included 170 million shares held by his trust.</p>\n<p>The tweet was vague. Musk did not outline if he was intending to offload 10% of his shares he indirectly owned through the trust or if his stock options were also part of the deal.</p>\n<p>Tesla’s stock has lost 21% since a peak in November as Musk has trimmed his stake. He’s still added almost $98 billion to his fortune this year, taking it to $253.6 billion, according to the&nbsp;Bloomberg Billionaires Index.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1144236332","content_text":"Tesla Inc Chief Executive Officer Elon Musk has sold nearly $13 billion worth of shares since early November when the world's richest person polled Twitter users about offloading 10% of his stake in the electric-car maker.\nThe billionaire sold another 934,091 shares of the electric vehicle maker worth $906.5 million, U.S. securities filings showed on Monday.\nHe also exercised stock options to buy 2.13 million shares of Tesla, according to the filings.\nMusk has sold about 11966421 Tesla shares since November 8, accounting for 70.18% of its previously committed shares.\nHere is a string of transactions he has done:\n\n\n\nDATE\nSHARES ACQUIRED\nSHARES SOLD\nGROSS PROCEEDS\n\n\nNOV. 8\n2.2 mln\n\n\n\n\nNOV. 8\n\n934,091\n$1.10 bln\n\n\nNOV. 9\n\n3.1 mln\n$3.35 bln\n\n\nNOV. 10\n\n500,000\n$527.3 mln\n\n\nNOV. 11\n\n639,737\n$687.3 mln\n\n\nNOV. 12\n\n1.2 mln\n$1.24 bln\n\n\nNOV. 15\n2.1 mln\n\n\n\n\nNOV. 15\n\n934,091\n$930.7 mln\n\n\nNOV. 16\n2.1 mln\n\n\n\n\nNOV. 16\n\n934,091\n$973.4 mln\n\n\nNOV. 23\n2.15 mln\n\n\n\n\n\n\n934,091\n$1.05 bln\n\n\nDEC. 2\n2.1 mln\n\n\n\n\n\n\n934,091\n$1.01 bln\n\n\nDec.9\n2.17 mln\n\n\n\n\n\n\n934,091\n$963.2 mln\n\n\nDec.13\n2.13 mln\n\n\n\n\n\n\n934,091\n$906.5 mln\n\n\nTotal\n14.96 mln\n11.97 mln\n$12.74 bln\n\n\n\nHOW DID MUSK SELL?\nMusk said on Nov. 6 he would sell 10% of his stake if Twitter users agreed. He owned a combination of about 244 million shares through his trust and stock options, bringing his stake in Tesla to about 23% as of June 30. It included 170 million shares held by his trust.\nThe tweet was vague. Musk did not outline if he was intending to offload 10% of his shares he indirectly owned through the trust or if his stock options were also part of the deal.\nTesla’s stock has lost 21% since a peak in November as Musk has trimmed his stake. He’s still added almost $98 billion to his fortune this year, taking it to $253.6 billion, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1213,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":604760589,"gmtCreate":1639446923897,"gmtModify":1639447003181,"author":{"id":"3567411499210880","authorId":"3567411499210880","name":"Nebhol","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b0bfc2a45b91e41a283614268857b3a5","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3567411499210880","authorIdStr":"3567411499210880"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Buy?&nbsp;","listText":"Buy?&nbsp;","text":"Buy?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/604760589","repostId":"2191984334","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2191984334","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1639435732,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2191984334?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-14 06:48","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Wall Street ends down; investors eye Omicron and Fed meeting","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2191984334","media":"Reuters","summary":"* Pfizer to buy Arena Pharma, shares of both companies rise\n* Meme stocks GameStop, AMC slump to mul","content":"<p>* Pfizer to buy Arena Pharma, shares of both companies rise</p>\n<p>*&nbsp;Meme stocks GameStop, AMC slump to multi-month lows</p>\n<p>* Consumer discretionary, energy lead declines</p>\n<p>Dec 13 (Reuters) - Wall Street ended lower on Monday, with shares of Carnival Corp and several airlines tumbling as investors worried about the Omicron coronavirus variant ahead of a Federal Reserve meeting later this week.</p>\n<p>Travel-related stocks fell, with the fast-spreading variant accounting for around 40% of COVID-19 infections in London and at least one death in the United Kingdom.</p>\n<p>Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings, Carnival Corp&nbsp;and Royal Caribbean Cruises&nbsp;all slumped more than 4%, while the S&amp;P 1500 airlines index&nbsp;shed about 3%.</p>\n<p>\"It's transportation, restaurants, all the things that if it got bad enough that we started putting new restrictions on people, it would not be good for them,\" said Tom Martin, senior portfolio manager at Globalt Investments in Atlanta. \"They have all been bid over the past several months by the idea that we were going to get back to business as usual.\"</p>\n<p>Most of the 11 major S&amp;P 500 sector indexes fell, with only defensive sectors, including consumer staples, utilities&nbsp;and real estate&nbsp;gaining.</p>\n<p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average&nbsp;fell 0.89% to end at 35,650.95 points, while the S&amp;P 500&nbsp;lost 0.91% to 4,668.97.</p>\n<p>The Nasdaq Composite&nbsp;dropped 1.39% to 15,413.28.</p>\n<p>Following Monday's dip, the S&amp;P 500 remains up about 24% year to date.</p>\n<p>Apple Inc&nbsp;dipped 2.1%, even after J.P. Morgan raised its price target on the iPhone maker to the highest on Wall Street. The company is close to becoming the first in the world to hit $3 trillion in market value.</p>\n<p>Investors expect an increasingly hawkish tone out of the Federal Reserve's two-day meeting that wraps up on Wednesday. The U.S. central bank is expected to signal a faster wind-down of asset purchases, which could also usher closer a start to interest rate hikes.</p>\n<p>\"Everyone is focused on the Fed this week and what guidance we get in terms of bond purchases and interest rates. There's an expectation that there will be an acceleration of tapering, and there's a little anxiety leading up to that,\" said Ryan Jacob, chief portfolio manager at Jacob Internet Fund.</p>\n<p>A Reuters poll of economists sees the central bank hiking interest rates from near zero to 0.25%-0.50% in the third quarter of next year, followed by another in the fourth quarter.</p>\n<p>Positive updates about vaccines and antibody cocktails to combat the new COVID-19 variant, along with a recent reading on inflation that was in line with consensus, pushed the S&amp;P 500&nbsp;index to a record closing high on Friday.</p>\n<p>Pfizer Inc&nbsp;rose 4.6% after it agreed to acquire Arena Pharmaceuticals&nbsp;in a $6.7 billion all-cash deal. Arena's shares surged 80%.</p>\n<p>Shares of Gamestop&nbsp;and AMC Entertainment&nbsp;tumbled to multi-month lows on Monday as some investors appeared to sour on the names that had produced eye-watering gains earlier in the year.</p>\n<p>Video game retailer GameStop tumbled 13.9% at $136.88, briefly touching its lowest level since April, while movie theater operator AMC slumped 15.3% to $23.24, a level last seen in May.</p>\n<p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 10.4 billion shares, compared with the 11.4 billion average over the last 20 trading days.</p>\n<p>Declining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 2.30-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 2.53-to-1 ratio favored decliners.</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 500 posted 52 new 52-week highs and 4 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 33 new highs and 302 new lows.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Wall Street ends down; investors eye Omicron and Fed meeting</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWall Street ends down; investors eye Omicron and Fed meeting\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-12-14 06:48</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>* Pfizer to buy Arena Pharma, shares of both companies rise</p>\n<p>*&nbsp;Meme stocks GameStop, AMC slump to multi-month lows</p>\n<p>* Consumer discretionary, energy lead declines</p>\n<p>Dec 13 (Reuters) - Wall Street ended lower on Monday, with shares of Carnival Corp and several airlines tumbling as investors worried about the Omicron coronavirus variant ahead of a Federal Reserve meeting later this week.</p>\n<p>Travel-related stocks fell, with the fast-spreading variant accounting for around 40% of COVID-19 infections in London and at least one death in the United Kingdom.</p>\n<p>Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings, Carnival Corp&nbsp;and Royal Caribbean Cruises&nbsp;all slumped more than 4%, while the S&amp;P 1500 airlines index&nbsp;shed about 3%.</p>\n<p>\"It's transportation, restaurants, all the things that if it got bad enough that we started putting new restrictions on people, it would not be good for them,\" said Tom Martin, senior portfolio manager at Globalt Investments in Atlanta. \"They have all been bid over the past several months by the idea that we were going to get back to business as usual.\"</p>\n<p>Most of the 11 major S&amp;P 500 sector indexes fell, with only defensive sectors, including consumer staples, utilities&nbsp;and real estate&nbsp;gaining.</p>\n<p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average&nbsp;fell 0.89% to end at 35,650.95 points, while the S&amp;P 500&nbsp;lost 0.91% to 4,668.97.</p>\n<p>The Nasdaq Composite&nbsp;dropped 1.39% to 15,413.28.</p>\n<p>Following Monday's dip, the S&amp;P 500 remains up about 24% year to date.</p>\n<p>Apple Inc&nbsp;dipped 2.1%, even after J.P. Morgan raised its price target on the iPhone maker to the highest on Wall Street. The company is close to becoming the first in the world to hit $3 trillion in market value.</p>\n<p>Investors expect an increasingly hawkish tone out of the Federal Reserve's two-day meeting that wraps up on Wednesday. The U.S. central bank is expected to signal a faster wind-down of asset purchases, which could also usher closer a start to interest rate hikes.</p>\n<p>\"Everyone is focused on the Fed this week and what guidance we get in terms of bond purchases and interest rates. There's an expectation that there will be an acceleration of tapering, and there's a little anxiety leading up to that,\" said Ryan Jacob, chief portfolio manager at Jacob Internet Fund.</p>\n<p>A Reuters poll of economists sees the central bank hiking interest rates from near zero to 0.25%-0.50% in the third quarter of next year, followed by another in the fourth quarter.</p>\n<p>Positive updates about vaccines and antibody cocktails to combat the new COVID-19 variant, along with a recent reading on inflation that was in line with consensus, pushed the S&amp;P 500&nbsp;index to a record closing high on Friday.</p>\n<p>Pfizer Inc&nbsp;rose 4.6% after it agreed to acquire Arena Pharmaceuticals&nbsp;in a $6.7 billion all-cash deal. Arena's shares surged 80%.</p>\n<p>Shares of Gamestop&nbsp;and AMC Entertainment&nbsp;tumbled to multi-month lows on Monday as some investors appeared to sour on the names that had produced eye-watering gains earlier in the year.</p>\n<p>Video game retailer GameStop tumbled 13.9% at $136.88, briefly touching its lowest level since April, while movie theater operator AMC slumped 15.3% to $23.24, a level last seen in May.</p>\n<p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 10.4 billion shares, compared with the 11.4 billion average over the last 20 trading days.</p>\n<p>Declining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 2.30-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 2.53-to-1 ratio favored decliners.</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 500 posted 52 new 52-week highs and 4 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 33 new highs and 302 new lows.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"DDM":"道指两倍做多ETF","BK4007":"制药","BK4566":"资本集团","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","DOG":"道指反向ETF","BK4568":"美国抗疫概念","RCL":"皇家加勒比邮轮","BK4517":"邮轮概念","SQQQ":"纳指三倍做空ETF","QLD":"纳指两倍做多ETF","CCL":"嘉年华邮轮","ARNA":"阿里那","PSQ":"纳指反向ETF","SDOW":"道指三倍做空ETF-ProShares","BK4142":"酒店、度假村与豪华游轮","TQQQ":"纳指三倍做多ETF","PFE":"辉瑞","DXD":"道指两倍做空ETF","QQQ":"纳指100ETF","DJX":"1/100道琼斯","UDOW":"道指三倍做多ETF-ProShares","NCLH":"挪威邮轮","BK4139":"生物科技","QID":"纳指两倍做空ETF"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2191984334","content_text":"* Pfizer to buy Arena Pharma, shares of both companies rise\n* Meme stocks GameStop, AMC slump to multi-month lows\n* Consumer discretionary, energy lead declines\nDec 13 (Reuters) - Wall Street ended lower on Monday, with shares of Carnival Corp and several airlines tumbling as investors worried about the Omicron coronavirus variant ahead of a Federal Reserve meeting later this week.\nTravel-related stocks fell, with the fast-spreading variant accounting for around 40% of COVID-19 infections in London and at least one death in the United Kingdom.\nNorwegian Cruise Line Holdings, Carnival Corp and Royal Caribbean Cruises all slumped more than 4%, while the S&P 1500 airlines index shed about 3%.\n\"It's transportation, restaurants, all the things that if it got bad enough that we started putting new restrictions on people, it would not be good for them,\" said Tom Martin, senior portfolio manager at Globalt Investments in Atlanta. \"They have all been bid over the past several months by the idea that we were going to get back to business as usual.\"\nMost of the 11 major S&P 500 sector indexes fell, with only defensive sectors, including consumer staples, utilities and real estate gaining.\nThe Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 0.89% to end at 35,650.95 points, while the S&P 500 lost 0.91% to 4,668.97.\nThe Nasdaq Composite dropped 1.39% to 15,413.28.\nFollowing Monday's dip, the S&P 500 remains up about 24% year to date.\nApple Inc dipped 2.1%, even after J.P. Morgan raised its price target on the iPhone maker to the highest on Wall Street. The company is close to becoming the first in the world to hit $3 trillion in market value.\nInvestors expect an increasingly hawkish tone out of the Federal Reserve's two-day meeting that wraps up on Wednesday. The U.S. central bank is expected to signal a faster wind-down of asset purchases, which could also usher closer a start to interest rate hikes.\n\"Everyone is focused on the Fed this week and what guidance we get in terms of bond purchases and interest rates. There's an expectation that there will be an acceleration of tapering, and there's a little anxiety leading up to that,\" said Ryan Jacob, chief portfolio manager at Jacob Internet Fund.\nA Reuters poll of economists sees the central bank hiking interest rates from near zero to 0.25%-0.50% in the third quarter of next year, followed by another in the fourth quarter.\nPositive updates about vaccines and antibody cocktails to combat the new COVID-19 variant, along with a recent reading on inflation that was in line with consensus, pushed the S&P 500 index to a record closing high on Friday.\nPfizer Inc rose 4.6% after it agreed to acquire Arena Pharmaceuticals in a $6.7 billion all-cash deal. Arena's shares surged 80%.\nShares of Gamestop and AMC Entertainment tumbled to multi-month lows on Monday as some investors appeared to sour on the names that had produced eye-watering gains earlier in the year.\nVideo game retailer GameStop tumbled 13.9% at $136.88, briefly touching its lowest level since April, while movie theater operator AMC slumped 15.3% to $23.24, a level last seen in May.\nVolume on U.S. exchanges was 10.4 billion shares, compared with the 11.4 billion average over the last 20 trading days.\nDeclining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 2.30-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 2.53-to-1 ratio favored decliners.\nThe S&P 500 posted 52 new 52-week highs and 4 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 33 new highs and 302 new lows.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":771,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":604329535,"gmtCreate":1639352472115,"gmtModify":1639352472560,"author":{"id":"3567411499210880","authorId":"3567411499210880","name":"Nebhol","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b0bfc2a45b91e41a283614268857b3a5","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3567411499210880","authorIdStr":"3567411499210880"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/604329535","repostId":"1171271872","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1171271872","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1639348466,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1171271872?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-13 06:34","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Rivian,Adobe,FedEx,Lennar,Campbell Soup,and Other Stocks to Watch This Week","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1171271872","media":"Barrons","summary":"The main event for investors this week will be the Federal Reserve’s rate-setting committee’s last meeting of 2021. Recent commentary from officials has leaned more hawkish, setting up a potential announcement of plans to accelerate monthly asset purchase tapering.The Federal Open Market Committee’s two-day meeting takes place on Tuesday and Wednesday.Earnings reports this week are few, but will include Campbell Soup on Tuesday;Lennar,Accenture,FedEx,Rivian Automotive, and Adobe on Thursday; and","content":"<p>The main event for investors this week will be the Federal Reserve’s rate-setting committee’s&nbsp;last meeting of 2021. Recent commentary from officials has leaned more hawkish, setting up a potential announcement of plans to accelerate monthly asset purchase tapering.</p>\n<p>The Federal Open Market Committee’s two-day meeting takes place on Tuesday and Wednesday.</p>\n<p>Earnings reports this week are few, but will include&nbsp;Campbell Soup&nbsp;on Tuesday;Lennar,Accenture,FedEx,Rivian&nbsp;Automotive, and&nbsp;Adobe&nbsp;on Thursday; and&nbsp;Darden Restaurants&nbsp;on Friday.</p>\n<p>Economic data coming out this week includes the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ producer price index for November on Tuesday. Economists expect a 0.55% month-over-month rise for the headline index and a 0.4% gain for the core PPI. Those would both roughly match October’s pace of producer inflation.</p>\n<p>Other data releases include the National Federation of Independent Businesses’ sentiment&nbsp;index on Tuesday, November retail-sales spending from the Census Bureau on Wednesday, and the November housing starts on Thursday.</p>\n<p><b>Monday 12/13</b></p>\n<p>J.Jill&nbsp;and&nbsp;PHX Minerals&nbsp;host earnings conference calls.</p>\n<p><b>Tuesday 12/14</b></p>\n<p>Campbell Soup, Barnes Group, and&nbsp;Avaya Holdings&nbsp;host investor days.</p>\n<p><b>The Bureau of Labor</b>&nbsp;Statistics releases the producer price index for November. Consensus estimate is for a 0.55% month-over-month rise, and for the core PPI, which excludes food and energy, to gain 0.4%. This compares with increases of 0.6% and 0.4%, respectively, in October.</p>\n<p><b>The National Federation</b>&nbsp;of Independent Businesses reports its index, which surveys about 5,000 small-business owners across the country, for November. Expectations call for a reading of 98.3, compared with 98.2 in October.</p>\n<p><b>Wednesday 12/15</b></p>\n<p><b>The Federal Open Market Committee</b> concludes its two-day meeting, when policy makers will discuss accelerating the timetable for tapering monthly securities purchases.</p>\n<p><b>The BLS reports</b> export and import price data for November. Expectations are for a 0.5% month-over-month rise in export prices, while import prices are seen increasing 0.5%. This compares with gains of 1.5% and 1.2%, respectively, in October.</p>\n<p><b>The National Association</b> of Home Builders releases its NAHB/Wells Fargo Housing Market Index for December. Consensus estimate is for an 84 reading, compared with an 83 reading in November. The index peaked at 90 late last year, and home builders remain bullish on the housing market.</p>\n<p><b>The Census Bureau</b> reports on retail-sales spending for November. Expectations are for a seasonally adjusted 0.7% month-over-month increase in retail sales, compared with a 1.7% rise in October. Excluding autos, spending is seen rising 0.8%, compared with 1.7% in the previous period.</p>\n<p><b>Thursday 12/16</b></p>\n<p>Heico,Lennar, Accenture, FedEx, Jabil, Adobe, Rivian Automotive, and Nordson are among companies hosting earnings conference calls.</p>\n<p><b>The Census Bureau</b>releases its New Residential Construction report for November. The seasonally adjusted annual rate of housing starts is expected to be 1.563 million units, compared with 1.52 million in October. A housing start is counted when excavation begins on a home. Permits issued for new-home construction are expected to be 1.655 million, compared with 1.653 million in October.</p>\n<p><b>The Bank of England</b> announces its interest-rate decision and publishes the minutes of the meeting.</p>\n<p><b>The Federal Reserve</b> releases industrial production data for November. Economists are looking for a 0.6% rise, after a 1.6% increase in October. Capacity utilization is expected at 76.8, roughly in line with October’s 76.4%.</p>\n<p><b>Friday 12/17</b></p>\n<p>Steelcase,Darden Restaurants, and&nbsp;Quanex Building Products&nbsp;host earnings conference calls.</p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Rivian,Adobe,FedEx,Lennar,Campbell Soup,and Other Stocks to Watch This Week</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nRivian,Adobe,FedEx,Lennar,Campbell Soup,and Other Stocks to Watch This Week\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-12-13 06:34 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/stocks-to-watch-this-week-fedex-rivian-lennar-campbell-adobe-51639330550?mod=hp_LEAD_3><strong>Barrons</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The main event for investors this week will be the Federal Reserve’s rate-setting committee’s last meeting of 2021. Recent commentary from officials has leaned more hawkish, setting up a potential ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/stocks-to-watch-this-week-fedex-rivian-lennar-campbell-adobe-51639330550?mod=hp_LEAD_3\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"LEN":"莱纳建筑公司","ADBE":"Adobe","JILL":"J.Jill Inc.",".DJI":"道琼斯","ACN":"埃森哲","RIVN":"Rivian Automotive, Inc.","CPB":"金宝汤",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","FDX":"联邦快递","DRI":"达登饭店","PHX":"潘汉德尔油气","SCS":"Steelcase Inc.","HEI":"海科航空",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/stocks-to-watch-this-week-fedex-rivian-lennar-campbell-adobe-51639330550?mod=hp_LEAD_3","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1171271872","content_text":"The main event for investors this week will be the Federal Reserve’s rate-setting committee’s last meeting of 2021. Recent commentary from officials has leaned more hawkish, setting up a potential announcement of plans to accelerate monthly asset purchase tapering.\nThe Federal Open Market Committee’s two-day meeting takes place on Tuesday and Wednesday.\nEarnings reports this week are few, but will include Campbell Soup on Tuesday;Lennar,Accenture,FedEx,Rivian Automotive, and Adobe on Thursday; and Darden Restaurants on Friday.\nEconomic data coming out this week includes the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ producer price index for November on Tuesday. Economists expect a 0.55% month-over-month rise for the headline index and a 0.4% gain for the core PPI. Those would both roughly match October’s pace of producer inflation.\nOther data releases include the National Federation of Independent Businesses’ sentiment index on Tuesday, November retail-sales spending from the Census Bureau on Wednesday, and the November housing starts on Thursday.\nMonday 12/13\nJ.Jill and PHX Minerals host earnings conference calls.\nTuesday 12/14\nCampbell Soup, Barnes Group, and Avaya Holdings host investor days.\nThe Bureau of Labor Statistics releases the producer price index for November. Consensus estimate is for a 0.55% month-over-month rise, and for the core PPI, which excludes food and energy, to gain 0.4%. This compares with increases of 0.6% and 0.4%, respectively, in October.\nThe National Federation of Independent Businesses reports its index, which surveys about 5,000 small-business owners across the country, for November. Expectations call for a reading of 98.3, compared with 98.2 in October.\nWednesday 12/15\nThe Federal Open Market Committee concludes its two-day meeting, when policy makers will discuss accelerating the timetable for tapering monthly securities purchases.\nThe BLS reports export and import price data for November. Expectations are for a 0.5% month-over-month rise in export prices, while import prices are seen increasing 0.5%. This compares with gains of 1.5% and 1.2%, respectively, in October.\nThe National Association of Home Builders releases its NAHB/Wells Fargo Housing Market Index for December. Consensus estimate is for an 84 reading, compared with an 83 reading in November. The index peaked at 90 late last year, and home builders remain bullish on the housing market.\nThe Census Bureau reports on retail-sales spending for November. Expectations are for a seasonally adjusted 0.7% month-over-month increase in retail sales, compared with a 1.7% rise in October. Excluding autos, spending is seen rising 0.8%, compared with 1.7% in the previous period.\nThursday 12/16\nHeico,Lennar, Accenture, FedEx, Jabil, Adobe, Rivian Automotive, and Nordson are among companies hosting earnings conference calls.\nThe Census Bureaureleases its New Residential Construction report for November. The seasonally adjusted annual rate of housing starts is expected to be 1.563 million units, compared with 1.52 million in October. A housing start is counted when excavation begins on a home. Permits issued for new-home construction are expected to be 1.655 million, compared with 1.653 million in October.\nThe Bank of England announces its interest-rate decision and publishes the minutes of the meeting.\nThe Federal Reserve releases industrial production data for November. Economists are looking for a 0.6% rise, after a 1.6% increase in October. Capacity utilization is expected at 76.8, roughly in line with October’s 76.4%.\nFriday 12/17\nSteelcase,Darden Restaurants, and Quanex Building Products host earnings conference calls.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":662,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":604055456,"gmtCreate":1639288137175,"gmtModify":1639288137567,"author":{"id":"3567411499210880","authorId":"3567411499210880","name":"Nebhol","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b0bfc2a45b91e41a283614268857b3a5","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3567411499210880","authorIdStr":"3567411499210880"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/604055456","repostId":"2190671014","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2190671014","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1639258200,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2190671014?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-12 05:30","market":"hk","language":"en","title":"Intel shows research for packing more computing power into chips beyond 2025","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2190671014","media":"Reuters","summary":"Dec 11 (Reuters) - Research teams at Intel Corp on Saturday unveiled work that the company believes ","content":"<p>Dec 11 (Reuters) - Research teams at Intel Corp on Saturday unveiled work that the company believes will help it keep speeding up and shrinking computing chips over the next ten years, with several technologies aimed at stacking parts of chips on top of each other.</p>\n<p>Intel's Research Components Group introduced the work in papers at an international conference being held in San Francisco. The Silicon Valley company is working to regain a lead in making the smallest, fastest chips that it has lost in recent years to rivals like Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co and Samsung Electronics Co Ltd .</p>\n<p>While Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger has laid out commercial plans&nbsp;aimed at regaining that lead by 2025, the research work unveiled Saturday gives a look into how Intel plans to compete beyond 2025.</p>\n<p>One of the ways Intel is packing more computing power into chips by stacking up \"tiles\" or \"chiplets\" in three dimensions rather than making chips all as <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> two-dimension piece. Intel showed work Saturday that could allow for 10 times as many connections between stacked tiles, meaning that more complex tiles can be stacked on top of one another.</p>\n<p>But perhaps the biggest advance showed Saturday was a research paper demonstrating a way to stack transistors - tiny switches that form the most basic building bocks of chips by representing the 1s and 0s of digital logic - on top of one another.</p>\n<p>Intel believes the technology will yield a 30% to 50% increase in the number of transistors it can pack into a given area on a chip. Raising the number of transistors is the main reason chips have consistently gotten faster over the past 50 years.</p>\n<p>\"By stacking the devices directly on top of each other, we're clearly saving area,\" Paul Fischer, director and senior principal engineer of Intel's Components Research Group told Reuters in an interview. \"We're reducing interconnect lengths and really saving energy, making this not only more cost efficient, but also better performing.\"</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Intel shows research for packing more computing power into chips beyond 2025</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIntel shows research for packing more computing power into chips beyond 2025\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-12-12 05:30</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Dec 11 (Reuters) - Research teams at Intel Corp on Saturday unveiled work that the company believes will help it keep speeding up and shrinking computing chips over the next ten years, with several technologies aimed at stacking parts of chips on top of each other.</p>\n<p>Intel's Research Components Group introduced the work in papers at an international conference being held in San Francisco. The Silicon Valley company is working to regain a lead in making the smallest, fastest chips that it has lost in recent years to rivals like Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co and Samsung Electronics Co Ltd .</p>\n<p>While Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger has laid out commercial plans&nbsp;aimed at regaining that lead by 2025, the research work unveiled Saturday gives a look into how Intel plans to compete beyond 2025.</p>\n<p>One of the ways Intel is packing more computing power into chips by stacking up \"tiles\" or \"chiplets\" in three dimensions rather than making chips all as <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> two-dimension piece. Intel showed work Saturday that could allow for 10 times as many connections between stacked tiles, meaning that more complex tiles can be stacked on top of one another.</p>\n<p>But perhaps the biggest advance showed Saturday was a research paper demonstrating a way to stack transistors - tiny switches that form the most basic building bocks of chips by representing the 1s and 0s of digital logic - on top of one another.</p>\n<p>Intel believes the technology will yield a 30% to 50% increase in the number of transistors it can pack into a given area on a chip. Raising the number of transistors is the main reason chips have consistently gotten faster over the past 50 years.</p>\n<p>\"By stacking the devices directly on top of each other, we're clearly saving area,\" Paul Fischer, director and senior principal engineer of Intel's Components Research Group told Reuters in an interview. \"We're reducing interconnect lengths and really saving energy, making this not only more cost efficient, but also better performing.\"</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4527":"明星科技股","BK4529":"IDC概念","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","BK4512":"苹果概念","INTC":"英特尔","BK4141":"半导体产品","BK4515":"5G概念","BK4554":"元宇宙及AR概念","BK4535":"淡马锡持仓"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2190671014","content_text":"Dec 11 (Reuters) - Research teams at Intel Corp on Saturday unveiled work that the company believes will help it keep speeding up and shrinking computing chips over the next ten years, with several technologies aimed at stacking parts of chips on top of each other.\nIntel's Research Components Group introduced the work in papers at an international conference being held in San Francisco. The Silicon Valley company is working to regain a lead in making the smallest, fastest chips that it has lost in recent years to rivals like Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co and Samsung Electronics Co Ltd .\nWhile Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger has laid out commercial plans aimed at regaining that lead by 2025, the research work unveiled Saturday gives a look into how Intel plans to compete beyond 2025.\nOne of the ways Intel is packing more computing power into chips by stacking up \"tiles\" or \"chiplets\" in three dimensions rather than making chips all as one two-dimension piece. Intel showed work Saturday that could allow for 10 times as many connections between stacked tiles, meaning that more complex tiles can be stacked on top of one another.\nBut perhaps the biggest advance showed Saturday was a research paper demonstrating a way to stack transistors - tiny switches that form the most basic building bocks of chips by representing the 1s and 0s of digital logic - on top of one another.\nIntel believes the technology will yield a 30% to 50% increase in the number of transistors it can pack into a given area on a chip. Raising the number of transistors is the main reason chips have consistently gotten faster over the past 50 years.\n\"By stacking the devices directly on top of each other, we're clearly saving area,\" Paul Fischer, director and senior principal engineer of Intel's Components Research Group told Reuters in an interview. \"We're reducing interconnect lengths and really saving energy, making this not only more cost efficient, but also better performing.\"","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":302,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":604055686,"gmtCreate":1639288056809,"gmtModify":1639288057284,"author":{"id":"3567411499210880","authorId":"3567411499210880","name":"Nebhol","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b0bfc2a45b91e41a283614268857b3a5","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3567411499210880","authorIdStr":"3567411499210880"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like&nbsp;","listText":"Like&nbsp;","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/604055686","repostId":"1103250344","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1103250344","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1639280672,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1103250344?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-12 11:44","market":"hk","language":"en","title":"US IPO Week Ahead: IoT solutions, wine, and satellites in a 3 IPO week","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1103250344","media":"renaissancecap...","summary":"The IPO market is expected to stay relatively quiet in the week ahead with three IPOs scheduled to r","content":"<p>The IPO market is expected to stay relatively quiet in the week ahead with three IPOs scheduled to raise $789 million.</p>\n<p>IoT solutions developer<b>Samsara</b>(IOT) plans to raise $753 million at an $11.6 billion market cap. This \"internet-of-things\" company provides a cloud-based platform that connects the assets of businesses with physical operations, enhancing operational efficiency and asset and employee productivity. Fast growing but highly unprofitable, Samsara saw double-digit growth for customers with $100k+ ARR in the 9mo FY22.</p>\n<p>Wine brand<b>Fresh Vine Wine</b>(VINE) plans to raise $21 million at a $116 million market cap. This celebrity-founded company produces low carb, low calorie premium wines. Growing but highly unprofitable, Fresh Vine sells its wines through wholesale, retail, and DTC channels, and is able to conduct wholesale distribution in all 50 states and Puerto Rico.</p>\n<p>Micro-cap satellite developer<b>Sidus Space</b>(SIDU) plans to raise $15 million at an $81 million market cap. This company provides commercial satellite services such as design, manufacture, launch, and data collection. &nbsp;Sidus Space has generated space-related manufacturing revenues to date, but is highly unprofitable with negative gross margin in the 9mo21.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ead80e54642569e2b7b368c8d50dc265\" tg-width=\"1409\" tg-height=\"457\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>","source":"lsy1619493174116","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>US IPO Week Ahead: IoT solutions, wine, and satellites in a 3 IPO week</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nUS IPO Week Ahead: IoT solutions, wine, and satellites in a 3 IPO week\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-12-12 11:44 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.renaissancecapital.com/IPO-Center/News/89474/US-IPO-Week-Ahead-IoT-solutions-wine-and-satellites-in-a-3-IPO-week><strong>renaissancecap...</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The IPO market is expected to stay relatively quiet in the week ahead with three IPOs scheduled to raise $789 million.\nIoT solutions developerSamsara(IOT) plans to raise $753 million at an $11.6 ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.renaissancecapital.com/IPO-Center/News/89474/US-IPO-Week-Ahead-IoT-solutions-wine-and-satellites-in-a-3-IPO-week\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","IOT":"Samsara, Inc.",".DJI":"道琼斯","SIDU":"Sidus Space Inc.",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","VINE":"Fresh Vine Wine, Inc"},"source_url":"https://www.renaissancecapital.com/IPO-Center/News/89474/US-IPO-Week-Ahead-IoT-solutions-wine-and-satellites-in-a-3-IPO-week","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1103250344","content_text":"The IPO market is expected to stay relatively quiet in the week ahead with three IPOs scheduled to raise $789 million.\nIoT solutions developerSamsara(IOT) plans to raise $753 million at an $11.6 billion market cap. This \"internet-of-things\" company provides a cloud-based platform that connects the assets of businesses with physical operations, enhancing operational efficiency and asset and employee productivity. Fast growing but highly unprofitable, Samsara saw double-digit growth for customers with $100k+ ARR in the 9mo FY22.\nWine brandFresh Vine Wine(VINE) plans to raise $21 million at a $116 million market cap. This celebrity-founded company produces low carb, low calorie premium wines. Growing but highly unprofitable, Fresh Vine sells its wines through wholesale, retail, and DTC channels, and is able to conduct wholesale distribution in all 50 states and Puerto Rico.\nMicro-cap satellite developerSidus Space(SIDU) plans to raise $15 million at an $81 million market cap. This company provides commercial satellite services such as design, manufacture, launch, and data collection.  Sidus Space has generated space-related manufacturing revenues to date, but is highly unprofitable with negative gross margin in the 9mo21.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":313,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":605427132,"gmtCreate":1639226956637,"gmtModify":1639226957081,"author":{"id":"3567411499210880","authorId":"3567411499210880","name":"Nebhol","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b0bfc2a45b91e41a283614268857b3a5","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3567411499210880","authorIdStr":"3567411499210880"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/605427132","repostId":"2190484675","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2190484675","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1639186463,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2190484675?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-11 09:34","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Ford expects to triple electric Mustang output by 2023","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2190484675","media":"Reuters","summary":"Dec 10 (Reuters) - Ford Motor Co expects to triple the output of its all-electric Mustang Mach-E SUV","content":"<p>Dec 10 (Reuters) - Ford Motor Co expects to triple the output of its all-electric Mustang Mach-E SUV to over 200,000 units per year by 2023 for North America and Europe, its Chief Executive Officer Jim Farley said in a tweet on Friday.</p>\n<p>\"It's hard to produce Mustang Mach-Es fast enough to meet the incredible demand, but we are sure going to try.\" Farley added</p>\n<p>In a hot electrical vehicle market, Ford is pitting itself against the likes of century-old rival General Motors Co and European carmaker Stellantis , while chasing Volkswagen and global EV leader Tesla Inc .</p>\n<p>Last week, a top Ford executive said that the company was aiming for annual EV production capacity of nearly 600,000 within the next two years, which would also include its Lightning pickup and E-Transit van.</p>\n<p>Lisa Drake, the chief operating officer of Ford North America, said that the company's optimism stemmed from increasing demand for its F-150 Lightning pickup, with retail reservations approaching 200,000.</p>\n<p>Automotive News reported earlier on Friday that Ford was postponing the production of electric versions of the Explorer and Lincoln Aviator crossovers by about <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> and a half years to increase manufacturing of its Mustang Mach-E SUVs.</p>\n<p>Ford told its suppliers that production of these new EVs is now scheduled to start in December 2024, according to the report.</p>\n<p>Ford did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the Automotive News report.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Ford expects to triple electric Mustang output by 2023</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFord expects to triple electric Mustang output by 2023\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-12-11 09:34</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Dec 10 (Reuters) - Ford Motor Co expects to triple the output of its all-electric Mustang Mach-E SUV to over 200,000 units per year by 2023 for North America and Europe, its Chief Executive Officer Jim Farley said in a tweet on Friday.</p>\n<p>\"It's hard to produce Mustang Mach-Es fast enough to meet the incredible demand, but we are sure going to try.\" Farley added</p>\n<p>In a hot electrical vehicle market, Ford is pitting itself against the likes of century-old rival General Motors Co and European carmaker Stellantis , while chasing Volkswagen and global EV leader Tesla Inc .</p>\n<p>Last week, a top Ford executive said that the company was aiming for annual EV production capacity of nearly 600,000 within the next two years, which would also include its Lightning pickup and E-Transit van.</p>\n<p>Lisa Drake, the chief operating officer of Ford North America, said that the company's optimism stemmed from increasing demand for its F-150 Lightning pickup, with retail reservations approaching 200,000.</p>\n<p>Automotive News reported earlier on Friday that Ford was postponing the production of electric versions of the Explorer and Lincoln Aviator crossovers by about <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> and a half years to increase manufacturing of its Mustang Mach-E SUVs.</p>\n<p>Ford told its suppliers that production of these new EVs is now scheduled to start in December 2024, according to the report.</p>\n<p>Ford did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the Automotive News report.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉","GM":"通用汽车","F":"福特汽车","BK4555":"新能源车","BK4099":"汽车制造商"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2190484675","content_text":"Dec 10 (Reuters) - Ford Motor Co expects to triple the output of its all-electric Mustang Mach-E SUV to over 200,000 units per year by 2023 for North America and Europe, its Chief Executive Officer Jim Farley said in a tweet on Friday.\n\"It's hard to produce Mustang Mach-Es fast enough to meet the incredible demand, but we are sure going to try.\" Farley added\nIn a hot electrical vehicle market, Ford is pitting itself against the likes of century-old rival General Motors Co and European carmaker Stellantis , while chasing Volkswagen and global EV leader Tesla Inc .\nLast week, a top Ford executive said that the company was aiming for annual EV production capacity of nearly 600,000 within the next two years, which would also include its Lightning pickup and E-Transit van.\nLisa Drake, the chief operating officer of Ford North America, said that the company's optimism stemmed from increasing demand for its F-150 Lightning pickup, with retail reservations approaching 200,000.\nAutomotive News reported earlier on Friday that Ford was postponing the production of electric versions of the Explorer and Lincoln Aviator crossovers by about one and a half years to increase manufacturing of its Mustang Mach-E SUVs.\nFord told its suppliers that production of these new EVs is now scheduled to start in December 2024, according to the report.\nFord did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the Automotive News report.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":276,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":605002861,"gmtCreate":1639089946382,"gmtModify":1639089946753,"author":{"id":"3567411499210880","authorId":"3567411499210880","name":"Nebhol","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b0bfc2a45b91e41a283614268857b3a5","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3567411499210880","authorIdStr":"3567411499210880"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like comment&nbsp;","listText":"Like comment&nbsp;","text":"Like comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/605002861","repostId":"1145466242","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1145466242","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1639069232,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1145466242?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-10 01:00","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Software Firm HashiCorp rises 1% on its first day of trading","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1145466242","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Software Firm HashiCorp rises 1% on its first day of trading.\n\nHashiCorp Inc. is set to go public Th","content":"<p>Software Firm HashiCorp rises 1% on its first day of trading.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2334817c232db42995b11840a3560bbb\" tg-width=\"1831\" tg-height=\"913\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>\n<p>HashiCorp Inc.&nbsp;is set to go public Thursday, after the California-based cloud adoption software company's initial public offering priced overnight well above the expected range. The company raised $1.22 billion as it sold 15.3 million shares in the IPO, which priced at $80 a share, above the expected range of between $68 and $72 a share. The pricing valued the company at about $14.31 billion. The stock is expected to begin trading on the Nasdaq some time after the open under the ticker symbol \"HCP.\"</p>\n<p>HashiCorp was founded in 2012 by Mitchell Hashimoto and Armon Dadgar, who met at the University of Washington in Seattle. HashiCorp raised $175 million in a series E financing round last year at a valuation of $5.1 billion, according to a statement.</p>\n<p>The company’s software helps businesses run a mix of public and private cloud systems, as well as older applications. It has partnerships with cloud platforms including Amazon.com Inc.’s AWS and Alphabet Inc.’s Google Cloud, its website shows.</p>\n<p>Hashimoto and Dadgar emphasize their commitment to their “open-source philosophy” in a letter to investors included in the company’s prospectus.</p>\n<p>“The cloud market is already an enormous market that is upending every industry and reshaping the modern tech stack,” they said. “Yet, cloud adoption is still early, and most organizations are only beginning their digital transformation.”</p>\n<p>HashiCorp posted a net loss of $62 million on revenue of $224 million for the nine months ended Oct. 31, its filings show. That compares with a net loss of $77 million on revenue of $150 million for the same period a year earlier.</p>\n<p>Investors in HashiCorp include affiliates of Mayfield, GGV Capital, and Redpoint Omega, according to the filings.</p>\n<p>The offering is being led by Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and JPMorgan Chase &amp; Co.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Software Firm HashiCorp rises 1% on its first day of trading</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSoftware Firm HashiCorp rises 1% on its first day of trading\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-12-10 01:00</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Software Firm HashiCorp rises 1% on its first day of trading.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2334817c232db42995b11840a3560bbb\" tg-width=\"1831\" tg-height=\"913\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>\n<p>HashiCorp Inc.&nbsp;is set to go public Thursday, after the California-based cloud adoption software company's initial public offering priced overnight well above the expected range. The company raised $1.22 billion as it sold 15.3 million shares in the IPO, which priced at $80 a share, above the expected range of between $68 and $72 a share. The pricing valued the company at about $14.31 billion. The stock is expected to begin trading on the Nasdaq some time after the open under the ticker symbol \"HCP.\"</p>\n<p>HashiCorp was founded in 2012 by Mitchell Hashimoto and Armon Dadgar, who met at the University of Washington in Seattle. HashiCorp raised $175 million in a series E financing round last year at a valuation of $5.1 billion, according to a statement.</p>\n<p>The company’s software helps businesses run a mix of public and private cloud systems, as well as older applications. It has partnerships with cloud platforms including Amazon.com Inc.’s AWS and Alphabet Inc.’s Google Cloud, its website shows.</p>\n<p>Hashimoto and Dadgar emphasize their commitment to their “open-source philosophy” in a letter to investors included in the company’s prospectus.</p>\n<p>“The cloud market is already an enormous market that is upending every industry and reshaping the modern tech stack,” they said. “Yet, cloud adoption is still early, and most organizations are only beginning their digital transformation.”</p>\n<p>HashiCorp posted a net loss of $62 million on revenue of $224 million for the nine months ended Oct. 31, its filings show. That compares with a net loss of $77 million on revenue of $150 million for the same period a year earlier.</p>\n<p>Investors in HashiCorp include affiliates of Mayfield, GGV Capital, and Redpoint Omega, according to the filings.</p>\n<p>The offering is being led by Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and JPMorgan Chase &amp; Co.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"HCP":"HashiCorp, Inc."},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1145466242","content_text":"Software Firm HashiCorp rises 1% on its first day of trading.\n\nHashiCorp Inc. is set to go public Thursday, after the California-based cloud adoption software company's initial public offering priced overnight well above the expected range. The company raised $1.22 billion as it sold 15.3 million shares in the IPO, which priced at $80 a share, above the expected range of between $68 and $72 a share. The pricing valued the company at about $14.31 billion. The stock is expected to begin trading on the Nasdaq some time after the open under the ticker symbol \"HCP.\"\nHashiCorp was founded in 2012 by Mitchell Hashimoto and Armon Dadgar, who met at the University of Washington in Seattle. HashiCorp raised $175 million in a series E financing round last year at a valuation of $5.1 billion, according to a statement.\nThe company’s software helps businesses run a mix of public and private cloud systems, as well as older applications. It has partnerships with cloud platforms including Amazon.com Inc.’s AWS and Alphabet Inc.’s Google Cloud, its website shows.\nHashimoto and Dadgar emphasize their commitment to their “open-source philosophy” in a letter to investors included in the company’s prospectus.\n“The cloud market is already an enormous market that is upending every industry and reshaping the modern tech stack,” they said. “Yet, cloud adoption is still early, and most organizations are only beginning their digital transformation.”\nHashiCorp posted a net loss of $62 million on revenue of $224 million for the nine months ended Oct. 31, its filings show. That compares with a net loss of $77 million on revenue of $150 million for the same period a year earlier.\nInvestors in HashiCorp include affiliates of Mayfield, GGV Capital, and Redpoint Omega, according to the filings.\nThe offering is being led by Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and JPMorgan Chase & Co.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":370,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":602825424,"gmtCreate":1639008642670,"gmtModify":1639008643082,"author":{"id":"3567411499210880","authorId":"3567411499210880","name":"Nebhol","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b0bfc2a45b91e41a283614268857b3a5","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3567411499210880","authorIdStr":"3567411499210880"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/602825424","repostId":"2190693745","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2190693745","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1639006935,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2190693745?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-09 07:42","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Streamline Health Reports Fiscal Third Quarter 2021 Financial Results","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2190693745","media":"GlobeNewswire","summary":"Revenues of $5.5 Million; 214% SaaS Revenue Growth; $(4.3) Million Net Loss; $(0.3) Million Adjusted","content":"<p><i>Revenues of&nbsp;$5.5</i> <i>Million;&nbsp;214% SaaS Revenue Growth; $(4.3) Million Net Loss;</i> <i>$(0.3) Million</i> <i>Adjusted EBITDA</i></p>\n<p><b>Atlanta, GA, Dec. 08, 2021 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/STRM\">Streamline Health Solutions</a>, Inc.</b> (“Streamline” or the “Company”) (Nasdaq: STRM), provider of the eValuator™ Revenue Integrity Program to help healthcare providers proactively address revenue leakage and improve financial performance, today announced financial results for the third quarter of fiscal year 2021, which ended October 31, 2021.</p>\n<p><b>Fiscal Third Quarter 2021 Financial Results</b></p>\n<p><i>The following financial results have been prepared in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). Fiscal third quarter 2021 financial results represent the consolidation of the Company with Avelead, which was acquired by Streamline during the reporting period. Fiscal third quarter 2020</i> <i>financial results do not reflect results from Avelead’s operations.</i></p>\n<p>Streamline acquired Avelead on August 16, 2021, and the results of Avelead’s operations are included from that date to the end of the fiscal quarter, October 31, 2021.</p>\n<p>Total revenues for the third quarter of fiscal 2021 were $5.5 million, a 109% increase from $2.6 million during the third quarter of fiscal 2020. The increase in revenue was the result of higher revenue from SaaS and professional services as a result of the Avelead acquisition. For the first nine months of fiscal 2021, total revenue was $11.3 million, a 35% increase compared to $8.4 million during the first nine months of fiscal 2020. Recurring revenue comprised 71% and 75% of total revenue for the three- and nine-month periods ended October 31, 2021, respectively, as compared to 75% and 74% for the comparable prior year periods.</p>\n<p>The Company is focused on the growth of its SaaS solutions. During the third quarter of 2021, SaaS revenue grew $1.9 million or 214% compared to the third quarter of 2020 and $2.7 million or 103% during the nine months ended October 31, 2021, compared to the first nine months of 2020.</p>\n<p>Net loss for the third quarter of fiscal 2021 was $(4.3) million as compared to a net loss of $(1.1) million during the third quarter of fiscal 2020. Net loss from continuing operations during the quarter was impacted by approximately $1.9 million of non-routine costs and $0.5 million of other, non-operating expenses. The majority of the non-routine costs and non-operating costs are transaction costs associated with the acquisition of Avelead. The Company’s net loss in the third quarter of 2021 was also impacted by operating cost and amortization cost from the Avelead acquisition.</p>\n<p>Net loss for the nine months ended October 31, 2021 was $(6.5) million, as compared to net income of $1.5 million for the same period of 2020. Net loss for the first nine months of 2021 included $0.4 million of income from discontinued operations, as compared to $4.7 million of income from a gain on sale and discontinued operations during the same period of 2020. Income from discontinued operations was offset by a $(6.9) million loss from continuing operations in the first nine months of 2021 compared to a loss from continuing operations of $(3.2) million during the same period of 2020. For the nine months ended October 31, 2021, the Company reported $2.7 million in non-routine costs and a $2.3 million gain from forgiveness of its PPP loan and approximately $0.5 million in other expenses.</p>\n<p>Adjusted EBITDA for the third quarter of fiscal 2021 was a loss of $(0.3) million, compared to an adjusted EBITDA loss of $(0.7) million in the third quarter of fiscal 2020. Adjusted EBITDA for the nine months ended October 31, 2021 was a loss of $(1.7) million as compared to an adjusted EBITDA loss of $(1.7) million during the comparable year-ago period.</p>\n<p><b>Fiscal Third Quarter 2021 Financial Results (Pro Forma)</b></p>\n<p><i>The following financial results are pro forma and have not been prepared in accordance with GAAP. Both fiscal third quarter 2021 and 2020 financial results represent the consolidation of the Company with Avelead as if Avelead’s operations were fully recognized during both comparable periods.</i></p>\n<p>Pro forma, unaudited, consolidated revenue for the third quarter of fiscal 2021 was approximately $6.1 million, an increase of 17% compared to approximately $5.2 million during the third quarter of fiscal 2020. SaaS revenue comprised approximately $3.1 million of this total, up 81% from approximately $1.7 million during the third quarter of fiscal 2020. The pro forma consolidated revenue for the three months ended October 31, 2021 and 2020 include $0.6 million and $2.6 million of revenue from Avelead’s pre-acquisition operations, respectively.</p>\n<p>Pro forma, unaudited, consolidated revenue for the first nine months of fiscal 2021 was approximately $16.6 million, an increase of 18% compared to approximately $14.1 million during the first nine months of fiscal 2020. SaaS revenue comprised approximately $8.6 million of this total, up 115% from approximately $4.0 million during the first nine months of fiscal 2020. The pro forma consolidated revenue for the nine months ended October 31, 2021 and 2020 include $5.3 million and $5.7 million of revenue from Avelead’s pre-acquisition operations, respectively.</p>\n<p><b>Management Commentary</b></p>\n<p>“With the completion of our acquisition of Avelead during the period, we have taken major steps forward to drive more diversified, recurring revenue streams and better position our Company for long term growth,” stated Tee Green, President and Chief Executive Officer, Streamline Health. “Our combined technologies offer a more holistic approach to ensuring hospitals are able to collect 100% of the revenue that they have earned.”</p>\n<p>“In the wake of the ongoing pandemic and with new variants still having an impact on healthcare providers, many operators are still experiencing significant disruptions, including suspending elective procedures, which has understandably delayed certain sales cycles. Despite these challenges we continue to grow our sales pipeline, both in terms of average contract values, and number of prospects, which we expect to translate into new sales in a more normalized environment. During the period we also completed the transformation of our eValuator sales team, which we believe will enable us to generate increased interest and acceptance of our technologies on a national footprint. The hospital revenue cycle continues to increase in complexity, and we see this challenge as a great opportunity to make the middle of the revenue cycle more accurate, timely, and efficient.”</p>\n<p><b>Highlights from the third quarter ended October 31, 2021, included:</b></p>\n<ul>\n <li>Total bookings (total contract value) for the third quarter of fiscal 2021 were $2.1 million;</li>\n <li>Revenue for the third quarter of fiscal 2021 was $5.5 million;</li>\n <li>Pro forma third quarter revenue, assuming the acquisition of Avelead was completed July 31, 2021, totaled approximately $6.1 million;</li>\n <li>SaaS revenue grew 116% sequentially and 214% over the prior year period;</li>\n <li>Adjusted EBITDA for the third quarter of fiscal 2021 was a loss of $(0.3) million;</li>\n <li>Completed acquisition of Avelead, a recognized leader in providing solutions and services to improve Revenue Integrity for healthcare providers nationwide.</li>\n</ul>\n<p><b>Conference Call</b></p>\n<p>The Company will conduct a conference call on Thursday, December 9, 2021 at 9:00 AM ET to review results and provide a corporate update. Interested parties can access the call by joining the live webcast: click here to register. You can also join by phone by dialing 877-407-8291.</p>\n<p>A replay of the conference call will be available from Thursday, December 9, 2021 at 12:00 PM ET to Thursday, December 16, 2021 at 12:00 PM ET by dialing 877-660-6853 or 201-612-7415 with conference ID 13724715. An online replay of the presentation will also be available for six months following the presentation in the Investor Relations section of the Streamline website, www.streamlinehealth.net.</p>\n<p><b>About Streamline Health</b></p>\n<p>Streamline Health Solutions, Inc. (NASDAQ: STRM) is a leader in pre-bill revenue integrity solutions for healthcare providers. Our eValuator™ Revenue Integrity Program includes integrated solutions, technology-enabled services and analytics that drive compliant revenue and improve financial performance across the enterprise. We share a common calling and commitment to advance the quality of life and the quality of healthcare - for society, our clients, the communities they serve, and the individual patient. For more information, please visit our website at www.streamlinehealth.net.</p>\n<p><b>Non-GAAP Financial Measures</b></p>\n<p>Streamline reports its financial results in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (\"GAAP\"). Streamline's management also evaluates and makes operating decisions using various other measures. One such measure is adjusted EBITDA, which is a non-GAAP financial measure. Streamline's management believes that this measure provides useful supplemental information regarding the performance of Streamline's business operations.</p>\n<p>Streamline defines \"adjusted EBITDA\" as net earnings (loss) plus interest expense, tax expense, depreciation and amortization expense of tangible and intangible assets, stock-based compensation expense, significant non-recurring operating expenses, and transactional related expenses including: gains and losses on debt and equity conversions, associate severances and related restructuring expenses, associate inducements, and professional and advisory fees. A table illustrating this measure is included in this press release.</p>\n<p><b><i>Safe Harbor statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995</i></b></p>\n<p>Statements made by Streamline Health Solutions, Inc. that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements that are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in the forward-looking statements included herein. Forward-looking statements contained in this press release include, without limitation, statements regarding the Company’s growth prospects, estimates of backlog, industry trends and market growth, results of investments in sales and marketing, adjusted EBITDA, success of future products and related expectations and assumptions. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the timing of contract negotiations and execution of contracts and the related timing of the revenue recognition related thereto, the potential cancellation of existing contracts or clients not completing projects included in the backlog, the impact of competitive solutions and pricing, solution demand and market acceptance, new solution development and enhancement of current solutions, key strategic alliances with vendors and channel partners that resell the Company’s solutions, the ability of the Company to control costs, the effects of cost-containment measures implemented by the Company, availability of solutions from third party vendors, the healthcare regulatory environment, potential changes in legislation, regulation and government funding affecting the healthcare industry, healthcare information systems budgets, availability of healthcare information systems trained personnel for implementation of new systems, as well as maintenance of legacy systems, fluctuations in operating results, effects of critical accounting policies and judgments, changes in accounting policies or procedures as may be required by the Financial Accounting Standards Board or other similar entities, changes in economic, business and market conditions impacting the healthcare industry generally and the markets in which the Company operates and nationally, the Company’s ability to maintain compliance with the terms of its credit facilities, and other risks detailed from time to time in the Streamline Health Solutions, Inc. filings with the U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which reflect management’s analysis only as of the date hereof. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly release the results of any revision to these forward-looking statements, which may be made to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events, except as required by law.</p>\n<table>\n <tbody>\n  <tr>\n   <td></td>\n   <td><b>&nbsp;</b></td>\n   <td colspan=\"6\"><b>Three Months Ended</b></td>\n   <td><b>&nbsp;</b></td>\n   <td><b>&nbsp;</b></td>\n   <td colspan=\"6\"><b>Nine Months Ended</b></td>\n   <td><b>&nbsp;</b></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td></td>\n   <td><b>&nbsp;</b></td>\n   <td colspan=\"6\"><b>October 31</b></td>\n   <td><b>&nbsp;</b></td>\n   <td><b>&nbsp;</b></td>\n   <td colspan=\"6\"><b>October 31</b></td>\n   <td><b>&nbsp;</b></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td></td>\n   <td><b>&nbsp;</b></td>\n   <td colspan=\"2\"><b>2021</b></td>\n   <td><b>&nbsp;</b></td>\n   <td><b>&nbsp;</b></td>\n   <td colspan=\"2\"><b>2020</b></td>\n   <td><b>&nbsp;</b></td>\n   <td><b>&nbsp;</b></td>\n   <td colspan=\"2\"><b>2021</b></td>\n   <td><b>&nbsp;</b></td>\n   <td><b>&nbsp;</b></td>\n   <td colspan=\"2\"><b>2020</b></td>\n   <td><b>&nbsp;</b></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><b>Revenues:</b></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td colspan=\"2\"></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td colspan=\"2\"></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td colspan=\"2\"></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td colspan=\"2\"></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Software Licenses</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>$</td>\n   <td>150,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>$</td>\n   <td>19,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>$</td>\n   <td>285,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>$</td>\n   <td>234,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Professional Services</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>944,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>161,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>1,052,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>473,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Audit Services</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>513,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>491,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>1,460,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>1,498,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Maintenance and Support</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>1,082,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>1,070,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>3,226,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>3,556,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Software as a Service</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>2,825,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>900,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>5,310,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>2,611,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Total revenues</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>5,514,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>2,641,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>11,333,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>8,372,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><b>Operating expenses:</b></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Cost of software licenses</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>133,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>183,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>412,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>385,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Cost of professional services</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>936,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>268,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>1,411,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>779,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Cost of audit services</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>409,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>425,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>1,174,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>1,158,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Cost of maintenance and support</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>57,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>160,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>223,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>528,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Cost of software as a service</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>1,088,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>443,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>2,276,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>1,250,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Selling, general and administrative expense</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>3,439,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>2,283,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>8,507,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>6,859,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Research and development</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>1,339,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>753,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>3,280,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>1,946,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Non-routine costs</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>1,933,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>-</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>2,710,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>-</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Loss on exit from membership agreement</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>-</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>-</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>-</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>105,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Total operating expenses</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>9,334,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>4,515,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>19,993,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>13,010,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Operating loss</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>(3,820,000</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>(1,874,000</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>(8,660,000</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>(4,638,000</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Other (income) expense:</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Interest income (expense)</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>(85,000</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>(12,000</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>(107,000</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>(39,000</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Loss on Extinguishment of Debt</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>(43,000</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>-</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>(43,000</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>-</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Other</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>(427,000</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>14,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>(421,000</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>(68,000</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>PPP Loan Forgiveness</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>-</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>-</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>2,327,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>-</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Loss from continuing operations before income taxes</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>(4,375,000</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>(1,872,000</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>(6,904,000</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>(4,745,000</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Income tax benefit (expense)</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>(4,000</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>803,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>(9,000</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>1,536,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Loss from continuing operations</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>$</td>\n   <td>(4,379,000</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>$</td>\n   <td>(1,069,000</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>$</td>\n   <td>(6,913,000</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>$</td>\n   <td>(3,209,000</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Income from discontinued operations:</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Gain on sale of discontinued operations</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>-</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>-</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>-</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>6,013,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Income from discontinued operations</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>69,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>64,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>401,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>305,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Income tax expense</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>-</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>(50,000</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>-</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>(1,626,000</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Income from discontinued operations</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>69,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>14,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>401,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>4,692,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Net (loss) income</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>$</td>\n   <td>(4,310,000</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>$</td>\n   <td>(1,055,000</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>$</td>\n   <td>(6,512,000</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>$</td>\n   <td>1,483,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Basic Earnings per Share:</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Continuing operations</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>$</td>\n   <td>(0.10</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>$</td>\n   <td>(0.04</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>$</td>\n   <td>(0.17</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>$</td>\n   <td>(0.11</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Discontinued operations</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>-</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>-</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>0.01</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>0.16</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Net (loss) income</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>$</td>\n   <td>(0.10</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>$</td>\n   <td>(0.04</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>$</td>\n   <td>(0.16</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>$</td>\n   <td>0.05</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Weighted average number of common shares - basic</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>45,709,952</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>30,286,197</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>41,498,873</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>30,026,890</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Diluted Earnings per Share:</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Continuing operations</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>$</td>\n   <td>(0.10</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>$</td>\n   <td>(0.04</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>$</td>\n   <td>(0.17</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>$</td>\n   <td>(0.11</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Discontinued operations</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>-</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>-</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>0.01</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>0.15</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Net (loss) income</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>$</td>\n   <td>(0.10</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>$</td>\n   <td>(0.04</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>$</td>\n   <td>(0.16</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>$</td>\n   <td>0.04</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Weighted average number of common shares – diluted</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>46,063,803</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>30,892,526</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>41,995,266</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>30,450,572</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p><b>STREAMLINE HEALTH SOLUTIONS, INC.</b></p>\n<p><b>CONSOLIDATED AND CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS</b></p>\n<p><b>(Unaudited)</b></p>\n<table>\n <tbody>\n  <tr>\n   <td colspan=\"9\"><b><i>Assets</i></b></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td></td>\n   <td><b>&nbsp;</b></td>\n   <td colspan=\"2\"><b>October 31,</b></td>\n   <td><b>&nbsp;</b></td>\n   <td><b>&nbsp;</b></td>\n   <td colspan=\"2\"><b>January 31,</b></td>\n   <td><b>&nbsp;</b></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td></td>\n   <td><b>&nbsp;</b></td>\n   <td colspan=\"2\"><b>2021</b></td>\n   <td><b>&nbsp;</b></td>\n   <td><b>&nbsp;</b></td>\n   <td colspan=\"2\"><b>2021</b></td>\n   <td><b>&nbsp;</b></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Current assets:</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Cash and cash equivalents</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>$</td>\n   <td>10,409,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>$</td>\n   <td>2,409,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Accounts receivable, net</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>3,287,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>2,929,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Contract receivables</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>581,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>174,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Assets Held in Escrow</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>-</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>800,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Prepaid and other current assets</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>876,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>416,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Current assets of discontinued operations</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>-</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>587,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Total current assets</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>15,153,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>7,315,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Non-current assets:</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Property and equipment, net</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>116,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>104,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Right of use asset</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>262,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>391,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Capitalized software development costs, net</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>5,563,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>5,945,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Intangible assets, net</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>17,323,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>624,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Goodwill</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>23,089,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>10,712,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Other</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>908,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>873,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Long-term assets of discontinued operations</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>-</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>13,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Total non-current assets</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>47,261,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>18,662,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>$</td>\n   <td>62,414,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>$</td>\n   <td>25,977,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><b><i>Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity</i></b></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Current liabilities:</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Accounts payable</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>$</td>\n   <td>689,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>$</td>\n   <td>272,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Accrued expenses</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>2,024,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>908,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Current portion of term loan</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>125,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>1,534,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Deferred revenues</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>4,395,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>3,862,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Current portion of lease obligation</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>202,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>198,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Current liabilities of discontinued operations</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>-</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>595,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Total current liabilities</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>7,435,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>7,369,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Non-current liabilities:</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Term loan, net of current portion and</td>\n   <td>deferred financing costs</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>9,759,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>767,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Deferred revenues, less current portion</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>156,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>130,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Lease obligations, less current portion</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>82,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>222,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Acquisition Earnout Liability</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>11,101,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>-</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Other Non-Current Liabilities</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>280,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>-</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Total non-current liabilities</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>21,378,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>1,119,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Total liabilities</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>28,813,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>8,488,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Stockholders’ equity</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>33,601,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>17,489,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>$</td>\n   <td>62,414,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>$</td>\n   <td>25,977,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p><b>STREAMLINE HEALTH SOLUTIONS, INC.</b></p>\n<p><b>CONSOLIDATED AND CONDENSED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS</b></p>\n<p><b>(Unaudited)</b></p>\n<table>\n <tbody>\n  <tr>\n   <td></td>\n   <td><b>&nbsp;</b></td>\n   <td colspan=\"6\"><b>Nine Months Ended</b></td>\n   <td><b>&nbsp;</b></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td></td>\n   <td><b>&nbsp;</b></td>\n   <td colspan=\"6\"><b>October 31,</b></td>\n   <td><b>&nbsp;</b></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td></td>\n   <td><b>&nbsp;</b></td>\n   <td colspan=\"2\"><b>2021</b></td>\n   <td><b>&nbsp;</b></td>\n   <td><b>&nbsp;</b></td>\n   <td colspan=\"2\"><b>2020</b></td>\n   <td><b>&nbsp;</b></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Cash flows from continuing operating activities:</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Loss from continuing operations</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>$</td>\n   <td>(6,913,000</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>$</td>\n   <td>(3,209,000</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Depreciation</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>53,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>35,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Amortization of capitalized software development costs</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>1,430,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>1,128,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Amortization of intangible assets</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>721,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>370,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Amortization of other deferred costs</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>369,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>242,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Valuation adjustments</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>417,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>31,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Provision for income taxes</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>-</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>(1,536,000</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Loss on early extinguishment of debt</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>43,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>-</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Loss on exit of membership agreement</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>-</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>105,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Share-based compensation expense</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>1,659,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>1,004,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Expense (Benefit) for accounts receivable allowance</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>14,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>(15,000</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Forgiveness of PPP Loan</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>(2,327,000</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>-</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Changes in assets and liabilities:</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Accounts and contract receivables</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>666,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>1,151,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Other assets</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>(551,000</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>(514,000</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Accounts payable</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>(72,000</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>(489,000</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Accrued expenses and other liabilities</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>774,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>(386,000</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Deferred revenues</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>(305,000</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>(1,600,000</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Net cash used in operating activities</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>(4,022,000</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>(3,683,000</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Net cash from operating activities - discontinued operations</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>406,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>(2,319,000</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Cash flows used in investing activities:</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Cash paid for Avelead</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>(12,354,000</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>-</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Proceeds from sale of ECM assets</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>800,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>11,288,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Capitalization of software development costs</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>(1,048,000</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>(1,495,000</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Purchases of property and equipment</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>(18,000</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>(42,000</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>(12,620,000</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>9,751,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Cash flows from financing activities:</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Proceeds from issuance of common stock</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>16,100,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>-</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Payments for costs directly attributable to the issuance of common stock</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>(1,313,000</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>-</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Repayment of bank term loan</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>-</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>(4,000,000</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Proceeds from term loan payable</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>10,000,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>2,301,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Payments related to settlement of employee shared based awards</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>(380,000</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>(168,000</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Payment for deferred financing costs</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>(168,000</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>-</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Payment of Royalty Liability</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>-</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>(500,000</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Other</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>(3,000</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>-</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>24,236,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>(2,367,000</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>8,000,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>1,382,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>2,409,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>1,649,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Cash and cash equivalents at end of year</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>$</td>\n   <td>10,409,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>$</td>\n   <td>3,031,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p><b>STREAMLINE HEALTH SOLUTIONS, INC.</b></p>\n<p><b>New Bookings</b></p>\n<p><b>(Unaudited)</b></p>\n<table>\n <tbody>\n  <tr>\n   <td><b>Total Contract Value Amounts</b></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td colspan=\"2\"></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td colspan=\"2\"></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td></td>\n   <td><b>&nbsp;</b></td>\n   <td colspan=\"6\"><b>October 31, 2021</b></td>\n   <td><b>&nbsp;</b></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td></td>\n   <td><b>&nbsp;</b></td>\n   <td colspan=\"2\"><b>Three Months Ended</b></td>\n   <td><b>&nbsp;</b></td>\n   <td><b>&nbsp;</b></td>\n   <td colspan=\"2\"><b>Nine Months Ended</b></td>\n   <td><b>&nbsp;</b></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Systems Sales</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>$</td>\n   <td>142,900</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>$</td>\n   <td>277,900</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Professional Services *</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>661,080</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>1,010,030</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Audit Services</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>227,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>634,800</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Maintenance and Support</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>308,300</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>443,300</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Software as a Service *</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>750,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>3,930,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Q3 2021 Bookings</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>$</td>\n   <td>2,089,280</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>$</td>\n   <td>6,296,030</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Q3 2020 Bookings</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>$</td>\n   <td>1,424,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>$</td>\n   <td>5,574,000</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p><i>* Bookings are presented on a total contract value basis, and include Avelead from the acquisition date,&nbsp;August 16, 2021.</i></p>\n<p><b>STREAMLINE HEALTH SOLUTIONS, INC.</b></p>\n<p><b>Reconciliation of Loss from Continuing Operations to non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA</b></p>\n<p><b>(in thousands)</b></p>\n<p><b>(Unaudited)</b></p>\n<table>\n <tbody>\n  <tr>\n   <td></td>\n   <td><b>&nbsp;</b></td>\n   <td colspan=\"6\"><b>Three Months Ended October 31,</b></td>\n   <td><b>&nbsp;</b></td>\n   <td><b>&nbsp;</b></td>\n   <td colspan=\"6\"><b>Nine Months Ended October 31,</b></td>\n   <td><b>&nbsp;</b></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td></td>\n   <td><b>&nbsp;</b></td>\n   <td colspan=\"2\"><b>2021</b></td>\n   <td><b>&nbsp;</b></td>\n   <td><b>&nbsp;</b></td>\n   <td colspan=\"2\"><b>2020</b></td>\n   <td><b>&nbsp;</b></td>\n   <td><b>&nbsp;</b></td>\n   <td colspan=\"2\"><b>2021</b></td>\n   <td><b>&nbsp;</b></td>\n   <td><b>&nbsp;</b></td>\n   <td colspan=\"2\"><b>2020</b></td>\n   <td><b>&nbsp;</b></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Loss from continuing operations</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>$</td>\n   <td>(4,379</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>$</td>\n   <td>(1,069</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>$</td>\n   <td>(6,913</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>$</td>\n   <td>(3,209</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Interest expense</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>85</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>12</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>107</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>39</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Income tax (benefit) expense</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>4</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>(803</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>9</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>(1,536</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Depreciation</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>16</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>4</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>53</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>35</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Amortization of capitalized software development costs</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>446</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>477</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>1,430</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>1,128</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Amortization of intangible assets</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>490</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>123</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>721</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>370</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Amortization of other costs</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>110</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>89</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>338</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>242</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>EBITDA</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>(3,228</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>(1,167</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>(4,255</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>(2,931</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Share-based compensation expense</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>537</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>442</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>1,659</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>1,054</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Non-cash valuation adjustments</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>417</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>-</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>417</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>31</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Loss on exit of operating lease</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>-</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>-</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>-</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>105</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Other non-recurring operating expenses</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>1,933</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>-</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>2,710</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>-</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Forgiveness of PPP Loan and accrued interest</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>-</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>-</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>(2,327</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>-</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Other non-recurring operating expenses</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>-</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>-</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>16</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>-</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Loss on early extinguishment of debt</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>43</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>-</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>43</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>-</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Adjusted EBITDA</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>$</td>\n   <td>(298</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>$</td>\n   <td>(725</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>$</td>\n   <td>(1,737</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>$</td>\n   <td>(1,741</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><b>Adjusted EBITDA per diluted share:</b></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Net loss per common share – diluted</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>$</td>\n   <td>(0.10</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>$</td>\n   <td>(0.04</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>$</td>\n   <td>(0.17</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>$</td>\n   <td>(0.11</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Adjusted EBITDA per adjusted diluted share (1)</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>$</td>\n   <td>(0.01</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>$</td>\n   <td>(0.02</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>$</td>\n   <td>(0.04</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>$</td>\n   <td>(0.06</td>\n   <td>)</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Diluted weighted average shares (2)</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>45,709,952</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>30,286,197</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>41,498,873</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>30,026,890</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Includable incremental shares — Adjusted EBITDA (3)</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>353,851</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>606,329</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>496,393</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>423,682</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Adjusted diluted shares</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>46,063,803</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>30,892,526</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>41,995,266</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>30,450,572</td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p>(1) Adjusted EBITDA per adjusted diluted share for the Company’s common stock is computed using the treasury stock method.</p>\n<p>(2) Diluted EPS for the Company’s common stock was computed using the treasury stock method.</p>\n<p>(3) The number of incremental shares that would be dilutive under an assumption that the Company is profitable during the reported period, which is only applicable for a period in which the Company reports a GAAP net loss. If a GAAP profit is earned in the reported periods, no additional incremental shares are assumed.</p>","source":"yahoofinance","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Streamline Health Reports Fiscal Third Quarter 2021 Financial Results</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nStreamline Health Reports Fiscal Third Quarter 2021 Financial Results\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-12-09 07:42 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/streamline-health-reports-fiscal-third-211500576.html><strong>GlobeNewswire</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Revenues of $5.5 Million; 214% SaaS Revenue Growth; $(4.3) Million Net Loss; $(0.3) Million Adjusted EBITDA\nAtlanta, GA, Dec. 08, 2021 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Streamline Health Solutions, Inc. (“...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/streamline-health-reports-fiscal-third-211500576.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"STRM":"Streamline Health Solutions","BK4167":"医疗保健技术"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/streamline-health-reports-fiscal-third-211500576.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5f26f4a48f9cb3e29be4d71d3ba8c038","article_id":"2190693745","content_text":"Revenues of $5.5 Million; 214% SaaS Revenue Growth; $(4.3) Million Net Loss; $(0.3) Million Adjusted EBITDA\nAtlanta, GA, Dec. 08, 2021 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Streamline Health Solutions, Inc. (“Streamline” or the “Company”) (Nasdaq: STRM), provider of the eValuator™ Revenue Integrity Program to help healthcare providers proactively address revenue leakage and improve financial performance, today announced financial results for the third quarter of fiscal year 2021, which ended October 31, 2021.\nFiscal Third Quarter 2021 Financial Results\nThe following financial results have been prepared in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). Fiscal third quarter 2021 financial results represent the consolidation of the Company with Avelead, which was acquired by Streamline during the reporting period. Fiscal third quarter 2020 financial results do not reflect results from Avelead’s operations.\nStreamline acquired Avelead on August 16, 2021, and the results of Avelead’s operations are included from that date to the end of the fiscal quarter, October 31, 2021.\nTotal revenues for the third quarter of fiscal 2021 were $5.5 million, a 109% increase from $2.6 million during the third quarter of fiscal 2020. The increase in revenue was the result of higher revenue from SaaS and professional services as a result of the Avelead acquisition. For the first nine months of fiscal 2021, total revenue was $11.3 million, a 35% increase compared to $8.4 million during the first nine months of fiscal 2020. Recurring revenue comprised 71% and 75% of total revenue for the three- and nine-month periods ended October 31, 2021, respectively, as compared to 75% and 74% for the comparable prior year periods.\nThe Company is focused on the growth of its SaaS solutions. During the third quarter of 2021, SaaS revenue grew $1.9 million or 214% compared to the third quarter of 2020 and $2.7 million or 103% during the nine months ended October 31, 2021, compared to the first nine months of 2020.\nNet loss for the third quarter of fiscal 2021 was $(4.3) million as compared to a net loss of $(1.1) million during the third quarter of fiscal 2020. Net loss from continuing operations during the quarter was impacted by approximately $1.9 million of non-routine costs and $0.5 million of other, non-operating expenses. The majority of the non-routine costs and non-operating costs are transaction costs associated with the acquisition of Avelead. The Company’s net loss in the third quarter of 2021 was also impacted by operating cost and amortization cost from the Avelead acquisition.\nNet loss for the nine months ended October 31, 2021 was $(6.5) million, as compared to net income of $1.5 million for the same period of 2020. Net loss for the first nine months of 2021 included $0.4 million of income from discontinued operations, as compared to $4.7 million of income from a gain on sale and discontinued operations during the same period of 2020. Income from discontinued operations was offset by a $(6.9) million loss from continuing operations in the first nine months of 2021 compared to a loss from continuing operations of $(3.2) million during the same period of 2020. For the nine months ended October 31, 2021, the Company reported $2.7 million in non-routine costs and a $2.3 million gain from forgiveness of its PPP loan and approximately $0.5 million in other expenses.\nAdjusted EBITDA for the third quarter of fiscal 2021 was a loss of $(0.3) million, compared to an adjusted EBITDA loss of $(0.7) million in the third quarter of fiscal 2020. Adjusted EBITDA for the nine months ended October 31, 2021 was a loss of $(1.7) million as compared to an adjusted EBITDA loss of $(1.7) million during the comparable year-ago period.\nFiscal Third Quarter 2021 Financial Results (Pro Forma)\nThe following financial results are pro forma and have not been prepared in accordance with GAAP. Both fiscal third quarter 2021 and 2020 financial results represent the consolidation of the Company with Avelead as if Avelead’s operations were fully recognized during both comparable periods.\nPro forma, unaudited, consolidated revenue for the third quarter of fiscal 2021 was approximately $6.1 million, an increase of 17% compared to approximately $5.2 million during the third quarter of fiscal 2020. SaaS revenue comprised approximately $3.1 million of this total, up 81% from approximately $1.7 million during the third quarter of fiscal 2020. The pro forma consolidated revenue for the three months ended October 31, 2021 and 2020 include $0.6 million and $2.6 million of revenue from Avelead’s pre-acquisition operations, respectively.\nPro forma, unaudited, consolidated revenue for the first nine months of fiscal 2021 was approximately $16.6 million, an increase of 18% compared to approximately $14.1 million during the first nine months of fiscal 2020. SaaS revenue comprised approximately $8.6 million of this total, up 115% from approximately $4.0 million during the first nine months of fiscal 2020. The pro forma consolidated revenue for the nine months ended October 31, 2021 and 2020 include $5.3 million and $5.7 million of revenue from Avelead’s pre-acquisition operations, respectively.\nManagement Commentary\n“With the completion of our acquisition of Avelead during the period, we have taken major steps forward to drive more diversified, recurring revenue streams and better position our Company for long term growth,” stated Tee Green, President and Chief Executive Officer, Streamline Health. “Our combined technologies offer a more holistic approach to ensuring hospitals are able to collect 100% of the revenue that they have earned.”\n“In the wake of the ongoing pandemic and with new variants still having an impact on healthcare providers, many operators are still experiencing significant disruptions, including suspending elective procedures, which has understandably delayed certain sales cycles. Despite these challenges we continue to grow our sales pipeline, both in terms of average contract values, and number of prospects, which we expect to translate into new sales in a more normalized environment. During the period we also completed the transformation of our eValuator sales team, which we believe will enable us to generate increased interest and acceptance of our technologies on a national footprint. The hospital revenue cycle continues to increase in complexity, and we see this challenge as a great opportunity to make the middle of the revenue cycle more accurate, timely, and efficient.”\nHighlights from the third quarter ended October 31, 2021, included:\n\nTotal bookings (total contract value) for the third quarter of fiscal 2021 were $2.1 million;\nRevenue for the third quarter of fiscal 2021 was $5.5 million;\nPro forma third quarter revenue, assuming the acquisition of Avelead was completed July 31, 2021, totaled approximately $6.1 million;\nSaaS revenue grew 116% sequentially and 214% over the prior year period;\nAdjusted EBITDA for the third quarter of fiscal 2021 was a loss of $(0.3) million;\nCompleted acquisition of Avelead, a recognized leader in providing solutions and services to improve Revenue Integrity for healthcare providers nationwide.\n\nConference Call\nThe Company will conduct a conference call on Thursday, December 9, 2021 at 9:00 AM ET to review results and provide a corporate update. Interested parties can access the call by joining the live webcast: click here to register. You can also join by phone by dialing 877-407-8291.\nA replay of the conference call will be available from Thursday, December 9, 2021 at 12:00 PM ET to Thursday, December 16, 2021 at 12:00 PM ET by dialing 877-660-6853 or 201-612-7415 with conference ID 13724715. An online replay of the presentation will also be available for six months following the presentation in the Investor Relations section of the Streamline website, www.streamlinehealth.net.\nAbout Streamline Health\nStreamline Health Solutions, Inc. (NASDAQ: STRM) is a leader in pre-bill revenue integrity solutions for healthcare providers. Our eValuator™ Revenue Integrity Program includes integrated solutions, technology-enabled services and analytics that drive compliant revenue and improve financial performance across the enterprise. We share a common calling and commitment to advance the quality of life and the quality of healthcare - for society, our clients, the communities they serve, and the individual patient. For more information, please visit our website at www.streamlinehealth.net.\nNon-GAAP Financial Measures\nStreamline reports its financial results in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (\"GAAP\"). Streamline's management also evaluates and makes operating decisions using various other measures. One such measure is adjusted EBITDA, which is a non-GAAP financial measure. Streamline's management believes that this measure provides useful supplemental information regarding the performance of Streamline's business operations.\nStreamline defines \"adjusted EBITDA\" as net earnings (loss) plus interest expense, tax expense, depreciation and amortization expense of tangible and intangible assets, stock-based compensation expense, significant non-recurring operating expenses, and transactional related expenses including: gains and losses on debt and equity conversions, associate severances and related restructuring expenses, associate inducements, and professional and advisory fees. A table illustrating this measure is included in this press release.\nSafe Harbor statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995\nStatements made by Streamline Health Solutions, Inc. that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements that are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in the forward-looking statements included herein. Forward-looking statements contained in this press release include, without limitation, statements regarding the Company’s growth prospects, estimates of backlog, industry trends and market growth, results of investments in sales and marketing, adjusted EBITDA, success of future products and related expectations and assumptions. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the timing of contract negotiations and execution of contracts and the related timing of the revenue recognition related thereto, the potential cancellation of existing contracts or clients not completing projects included in the backlog, the impact of competitive solutions and pricing, solution demand and market acceptance, new solution development and enhancement of current solutions, key strategic alliances with vendors and channel partners that resell the Company’s solutions, the ability of the Company to control costs, the effects of cost-containment measures implemented by the Company, availability of solutions from third party vendors, the healthcare regulatory environment, potential changes in legislation, regulation and government funding affecting the healthcare industry, healthcare information systems budgets, availability of healthcare information systems trained personnel for implementation of new systems, as well as maintenance of legacy systems, fluctuations in operating results, effects of critical accounting policies and judgments, changes in accounting policies or procedures as may be required by the Financial Accounting Standards Board or other similar entities, changes in economic, business and market conditions impacting the healthcare industry generally and the markets in which the Company operates and nationally, the Company’s ability to maintain compliance with the terms of its credit facilities, and other risks detailed from time to time in the Streamline Health Solutions, Inc. filings with the U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which reflect management’s analysis only as of the date hereof. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly release the results of any revision to these forward-looking statements, which may be made to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events, except as required by law.\n\n\n\n\n \nThree Months Ended\n \n \nNine Months Ended\n \n\n\n\n \nOctober 31\n \n \nOctober 31\n \n\n\n\n \n2021\n \n \n2020\n \n \n2021\n \n \n2020\n \n\n\nRevenues:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nSoftware Licenses\n\n$\n150,000\n\n\n$\n19,000\n\n\n$\n285,000\n\n\n$\n234,000\n\n\n\nProfessional Services\n\n\n944,000\n\n\n\n161,000\n\n\n\n1,052,000\n\n\n\n473,000\n\n\n\nAudit Services\n\n\n513,000\n\n\n\n491,000\n\n\n\n1,460,000\n\n\n\n1,498,000\n\n\n\nMaintenance and Support\n\n\n1,082,000\n\n\n\n1,070,000\n\n\n\n3,226,000\n\n\n\n3,556,000\n\n\n\nSoftware as a Service\n\n\n2,825,000\n\n\n\n900,000\n\n\n\n5,310,000\n\n\n\n2,611,000\n\n\n\nTotal revenues\n\n\n5,514,000\n\n\n\n2,641,000\n\n\n\n11,333,000\n\n\n\n8,372,000\n\n\n\nOperating expenses:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nCost of software licenses\n\n\n133,000\n\n\n\n183,000\n\n\n\n412,000\n\n\n\n385,000\n\n\n\nCost of professional services\n\n\n936,000\n\n\n\n268,000\n\n\n\n1,411,000\n\n\n\n779,000\n\n\n\nCost of audit services\n\n\n409,000\n\n\n\n425,000\n\n\n\n1,174,000\n\n\n\n1,158,000\n\n\n\nCost of maintenance and support\n\n\n57,000\n\n\n\n160,000\n\n\n\n223,000\n\n\n\n528,000\n\n\n\nCost of software as a service\n\n\n1,088,000\n\n\n\n443,000\n\n\n\n2,276,000\n\n\n\n1,250,000\n\n\n\nSelling, general and administrative expense\n\n\n3,439,000\n\n\n\n2,283,000\n\n\n\n8,507,000\n\n\n\n6,859,000\n\n\n\nResearch and development\n\n\n1,339,000\n\n\n\n753,000\n\n\n\n3,280,000\n\n\n\n1,946,000\n\n\n\nNon-routine costs\n\n\n1,933,000\n\n\n\n-\n\n\n\n2,710,000\n\n\n\n-\n\n\n\nLoss on exit from membership agreement\n\n\n-\n\n\n\n-\n\n\n\n-\n\n\n\n105,000\n\n\n\nTotal operating expenses\n\n\n9,334,000\n\n\n\n4,515,000\n\n\n\n19,993,000\n\n\n\n13,010,000\n\n\n\nOperating loss\n\n\n(3,820,000\n)\n\n\n(1,874,000\n)\n\n\n(8,660,000\n)\n\n\n(4,638,000\n)\n\n\nOther (income) expense:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nInterest income (expense)\n\n\n(85,000\n)\n\n\n(12,000\n)\n\n\n(107,000\n)\n\n\n(39,000\n)\n\n\nLoss on Extinguishment of Debt\n\n\n(43,000\n)\n\n\n-\n\n\n\n(43,000\n)\n\n\n-\n\n\n\nOther\n\n\n(427,000\n)\n\n\n14,000\n\n\n\n(421,000\n)\n\n\n(68,000\n)\n\n\nPPP Loan Forgiveness\n\n\n-\n\n\n\n-\n\n\n\n2,327,000\n\n\n\n-\n\n\n\nLoss from continuing operations before income taxes\n\n\n(4,375,000\n)\n\n\n(1,872,000\n)\n\n\n(6,904,000\n)\n\n\n(4,745,000\n)\n\n\nIncome tax benefit (expense)\n\n\n(4,000\n)\n\n\n803,000\n\n\n\n(9,000\n)\n\n\n1,536,000\n\n\n\nLoss from continuing operations\n\n$\n(4,379,000\n)\n\n$\n(1,069,000\n)\n\n$\n(6,913,000\n)\n\n$\n(3,209,000\n)\n\n\nIncome from discontinued operations:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nGain on sale of discontinued operations\n\n\n-\n\n\n\n-\n\n\n\n-\n\n\n\n6,013,000\n\n\n\nIncome from discontinued operations\n\n\n69,000\n\n\n\n64,000\n\n\n\n401,000\n\n\n\n305,000\n\n\n\nIncome tax expense\n\n\n-\n\n\n\n(50,000\n)\n\n\n-\n\n\n\n(1,626,000\n)\n\n\nIncome from discontinued operations\n\n\n69,000\n\n\n\n14,000\n\n\n\n401,000\n\n\n\n4,692,000\n\n\n\nNet (loss) income\n\n$\n(4,310,000\n)\n\n$\n(1,055,000\n)\n\n$\n(6,512,000\n)\n\n$\n1,483,000\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nBasic Earnings per Share:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nContinuing operations\n\n$\n(0.10\n)\n\n$\n(0.04\n)\n\n$\n(0.17\n)\n\n$\n(0.11\n)\n\n\nDiscontinued operations\n\n\n-\n\n\n\n-\n\n\n\n0.01\n\n\n\n0.16\n\n\n\nNet (loss) income\n\n$\n(0.10\n)\n\n$\n(0.04\n)\n\n$\n(0.16\n)\n\n$\n0.05\n\n\n\nWeighted average number of common shares - basic\n\n\n45,709,952\n\n\n\n30,286,197\n\n\n\n41,498,873\n\n\n\n30,026,890\n\n\n\nDiluted Earnings per Share:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nContinuing operations\n\n$\n(0.10\n)\n\n$\n(0.04\n)\n\n$\n(0.17\n)\n\n$\n(0.11\n)\n\n\nDiscontinued operations\n\n\n-\n\n\n\n-\n\n\n\n0.01\n\n\n\n0.15\n\n\n\nNet (loss) income\n\n$\n(0.10\n)\n\n$\n(0.04\n)\n\n$\n(0.16\n)\n\n$\n0.04\n\n\n\nWeighted average number of common shares – diluted\n\n\n46,063,803\n\n\n\n30,892,526\n\n\n\n41,995,266\n\n\n\n30,450,572\n\n\n\n\nSTREAMLINE HEALTH SOLUTIONS, INC.\nCONSOLIDATED AND CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS\n(Unaudited)\n\n\n\nAssets\n\n\n\n \nOctober 31,\n \n \nJanuary 31,\n \n\n\n\n \n2021\n \n \n2021\n \n\n\nCurrent assets:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nCash and cash equivalents\n\n$\n10,409,000\n\n\n$\n2,409,000\n\n\n\nAccounts receivable, net\n\n\n3,287,000\n\n\n\n2,929,000\n\n\n\nContract receivables\n\n\n581,000\n\n\n\n174,000\n\n\n\nAssets Held in Escrow\n\n\n-\n\n\n\n800,000\n\n\n\nPrepaid and other current assets\n\n\n876,000\n\n\n\n416,000\n\n\n\nCurrent assets of discontinued operations\n\n\n-\n\n\n\n587,000\n\n\n\nTotal current assets\n\n\n15,153,000\n\n\n\n7,315,000\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nNon-current assets:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nProperty and equipment, net\n\n\n116,000\n\n\n\n104,000\n\n\n\nRight of use asset\n\n\n262,000\n\n\n\n391,000\n\n\n\nCapitalized software development costs, net\n\n\n5,563,000\n\n\n\n5,945,000\n\n\n\nIntangible assets, net\n\n\n17,323,000\n\n\n\n624,000\n\n\n\nGoodwill\n\n\n23,089,000\n\n\n\n10,712,000\n\n\n\nOther\n\n\n908,000\n\n\n\n873,000\n\n\n\nLong-term assets of discontinued operations\n\n\n-\n\n\n\n13,000\n\n\n\nTotal non-current assets\n\n\n47,261,000\n\n\n\n18,662,000\n\n\n\n\n\n$\n62,414,000\n\n\n$\n25,977,000\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nLiabilities and Stockholders’ Equity\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nCurrent liabilities:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nAccounts payable\n\n$\n689,000\n\n\n$\n272,000\n\n\n\nAccrued expenses\n\n\n2,024,000\n\n\n\n908,000\n\n\n\nCurrent portion of term loan\n\n\n125,000\n\n\n\n1,534,000\n\n\n\nDeferred revenues\n\n\n4,395,000\n\n\n\n3,862,000\n\n\n\nCurrent portion of lease obligation\n\n\n202,000\n\n\n\n198,000\n\n\n\nCurrent liabilities of discontinued operations\n\n\n-\n\n\n\n595,000\n\n\n\nTotal current liabilities\n\n\n7,435,000\n\n\n\n7,369,000\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nNon-current liabilities:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nTerm loan, net of current portion and\ndeferred financing costs\n\n\n9,759,000\n\n\n\n767,000\n\n\n\nDeferred revenues, less current portion\n\n\n156,000\n\n\n\n130,000\n\n\n\nLease obligations, less current portion\n\n\n82,000\n\n\n\n222,000\n\n\n\nAcquisition Earnout Liability\n\n\n11,101,000\n\n\n\n-\n\n\n\nOther Non-Current Liabilities\n\n\n280,000\n\n\n\n-\n\n\n\nTotal non-current liabilities\n\n\n21,378,000\n\n\n\n1,119,000\n\n\n\nTotal liabilities\n\n\n28,813,000\n\n\n\n8,488,000\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nStockholders’ equity\n\n\n33,601,000\n\n\n\n17,489,000\n\n\n\n\n\n$\n62,414,000\n\n\n$\n25,977,000\n\n\n\n\nSTREAMLINE HEALTH SOLUTIONS, INC.\nCONSOLIDATED AND CONDENSED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS\n(Unaudited)\n\n\n\n\n \nNine Months Ended\n \n\n\n\n \nOctober 31,\n \n\n\n\n \n2021\n \n \n2020\n \n\n\nCash flows from continuing operating activities:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nLoss from continuing operations\n\n$\n(6,913,000\n)\n\n$\n(3,209,000\n)\n\n\nDepreciation\n\n\n53,000\n\n\n\n35,000\n\n\n\nAmortization of capitalized software development costs\n\n\n1,430,000\n\n\n\n1,128,000\n\n\n\nAmortization of intangible assets\n\n\n721,000\n\n\n\n370,000\n\n\n\nAmortization of other deferred costs\n\n\n369,000\n\n\n\n242,000\n\n\n\nValuation adjustments\n\n\n417,000\n\n\n\n31,000\n\n\n\nProvision for income taxes\n\n\n-\n\n\n\n(1,536,000\n)\n\n\nLoss on early extinguishment of debt\n\n\n43,000\n\n\n\n-\n\n\n\nLoss on exit of membership agreement\n\n\n-\n\n\n\n105,000\n\n\n\nShare-based compensation expense\n\n\n1,659,000\n\n\n\n1,004,000\n\n\n\nExpense (Benefit) for accounts receivable allowance\n\n\n14,000\n\n\n\n(15,000\n)\n\n\nForgiveness of PPP Loan\n\n\n(2,327,000\n)\n\n\n-\n\n\n\nChanges in assets and liabilities:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nAccounts and contract receivables\n\n\n666,000\n\n\n\n1,151,000\n\n\n\nOther assets\n\n\n(551,000\n)\n\n\n(514,000\n)\n\n\nAccounts payable\n\n\n(72,000\n)\n\n\n(489,000\n)\n\n\nAccrued expenses and other liabilities\n\n\n774,000\n\n\n\n(386,000\n)\n\n\nDeferred revenues\n\n\n(305,000\n)\n\n\n(1,600,000\n)\n\n\nNet cash used in operating activities\n\n\n(4,022,000\n)\n\n\n(3,683,000\n)\n\n\nNet cash from operating activities - discontinued operations\n\n\n406,000\n\n\n\n(2,319,000\n)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nCash flows used in investing activities:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nCash paid for Avelead\n\n\n(12,354,000\n)\n\n\n-\n\n\n\nProceeds from sale of ECM assets\n\n\n800,000\n\n\n\n11,288,000\n\n\n\nCapitalization of software development costs\n\n\n(1,048,000\n)\n\n\n(1,495,000\n)\n\n\nPurchases of property and equipment\n\n\n(18,000\n)\n\n\n(42,000\n)\n\n\nNet cash (used in) provided by investing activities\n\n\n(12,620,000\n)\n\n\n9,751,000\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nCash flows from financing activities:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nProceeds from issuance of common stock\n\n\n16,100,000\n\n\n\n-\n\n\n\nPayments for costs directly attributable to the issuance of common stock\n\n\n(1,313,000\n)\n\n\n-\n\n\n\nRepayment of bank term loan\n\n\n-\n\n\n\n(4,000,000\n)\n\n\nProceeds from term loan payable\n\n\n10,000,000\n\n\n\n2,301,000\n\n\n\nPayments related to settlement of employee shared based awards\n\n\n(380,000\n)\n\n\n(168,000\n)\n\n\nPayment for deferred financing costs\n\n\n(168,000\n)\n\n\n-\n\n\n\nPayment of Royalty Liability\n\n\n-\n\n\n\n(500,000\n)\n\n\nOther\n\n\n(3,000\n)\n\n\n-\n\n\n\nNet cash provided by (used in) financing activities\n\n\n24,236,000\n\n\n\n(2,367,000\n)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nNet decrease in cash and cash equivalents\n\n\n8,000,000\n\n\n\n1,382,000\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nCash and cash equivalents at beginning of year\n\n\n2,409,000\n\n\n\n1,649,000\n\n\n\nCash and cash equivalents at end of year\n\n$\n10,409,000\n\n\n$\n3,031,000\n\n\n\n\nSTREAMLINE HEALTH SOLUTIONS, INC.\nNew Bookings\n(Unaudited)\n\n\n\nTotal Contract Value Amounts\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \nOctober 31, 2021\n \n\n\n\n \nThree Months Ended\n \n \nNine Months Ended\n \n\n\nSystems Sales\n\n$\n142,900\n\n\n$\n277,900\n\n\n\nProfessional Services *\n\n\n661,080\n\n\n\n1,010,030\n\n\n\nAudit Services\n\n\n227,000\n\n\n\n634,800\n\n\n\nMaintenance and Support\n\n\n308,300\n\n\n\n443,300\n\n\n\nSoftware as a Service *\n\n\n750,000\n\n\n\n3,930,000\n\n\n\nQ3 2021 Bookings\n\n$\n2,089,280\n\n\n$\n6,296,030\n\n\n\nQ3 2020 Bookings\n\n$\n1,424,000\n\n\n$\n5,574,000\n\n\n\n\n* Bookings are presented on a total contract value basis, and include Avelead from the acquisition date, August 16, 2021.\nSTREAMLINE HEALTH SOLUTIONS, INC.\nReconciliation of Loss from Continuing Operations to non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA\n(in thousands)\n(Unaudited)\n\n\n\n\n \nThree Months Ended October 31,\n \n \nNine Months Ended October 31,\n \n\n\n\n \n2021\n \n \n2020\n \n \n2021\n \n \n2020\n \n\n\nLoss from continuing operations\n\n$\n(4,379\n)\n\n$\n(1,069\n)\n\n$\n(6,913\n)\n\n$\n(3,209\n)\n\n\nInterest expense\n\n\n85\n\n\n\n12\n\n\n\n107\n\n\n\n39\n\n\n\nIncome tax (benefit) expense\n\n\n4\n\n\n\n(803\n)\n\n\n9\n\n\n\n(1,536\n)\n\n\nDepreciation\n\n\n16\n\n\n\n4\n\n\n\n53\n\n\n\n35\n\n\n\nAmortization of capitalized software development costs\n\n\n446\n\n\n\n477\n\n\n\n1,430\n\n\n\n1,128\n\n\n\nAmortization of intangible assets\n\n\n490\n\n\n\n123\n\n\n\n721\n\n\n\n370\n\n\n\nAmortization of other costs\n\n\n110\n\n\n\n89\n\n\n\n338\n\n\n\n242\n\n\n\nEBITDA\n\n\n(3,228\n)\n\n\n(1,167\n)\n\n\n(4,255\n)\n\n\n(2,931\n)\n\n\nShare-based compensation expense\n\n\n537\n\n\n\n442\n\n\n\n1,659\n\n\n\n1,054\n\n\n\nNon-cash valuation adjustments\n\n\n417\n\n\n\n-\n\n\n\n417\n\n\n\n31\n\n\n\nLoss on exit of operating lease\n\n\n-\n\n\n\n-\n\n\n\n-\n\n\n\n105\n\n\n\nOther non-recurring operating expenses\n\n\n1,933\n\n\n\n-\n\n\n\n2,710\n\n\n\n-\n\n\n\nForgiveness of PPP Loan and accrued interest\n\n\n-\n\n\n\n-\n\n\n\n(2,327\n)\n\n\n-\n\n\n\nOther non-recurring operating expenses\n\n\n-\n\n\n\n-\n\n\n\n16\n\n\n\n-\n\n\n\nLoss on early extinguishment of debt\n\n\n43\n\n\n\n-\n\n\n\n43\n\n\n\n-\n\n\n\nAdjusted EBITDA\n\n$\n(298\n)\n\n$\n(725\n)\n\n$\n(1,737\n)\n\n$\n(1,741\n)\n\n\nAdjusted EBITDA per diluted share:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nNet loss per common share – diluted\n\n$\n(0.10\n)\n\n$\n(0.04\n)\n\n$\n(0.17\n)\n\n$\n(0.11\n)\n\n\nAdjusted EBITDA per adjusted diluted share (1)\n\n$\n(0.01\n)\n\n$\n(0.02\n)\n\n$\n(0.04\n)\n\n$\n(0.06\n)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nDiluted weighted average shares (2)\n\n\n45,709,952\n\n\n\n30,286,197\n\n\n\n41,498,873\n\n\n\n30,026,890\n\n\n\nIncludable incremental shares — Adjusted EBITDA (3)\n\n\n353,851\n\n\n\n606,329\n\n\n\n496,393\n\n\n\n423,682\n\n\n\nAdjusted diluted shares\n\n\n46,063,803\n\n\n\n30,892,526\n\n\n\n41,995,266\n\n\n\n30,450,572\n\n\n\n\n(1) Adjusted EBITDA per adjusted diluted share for the Company’s common stock is computed using the treasury stock method.\n(2) Diluted EPS for the Company’s common stock was computed using the treasury stock method.\n(3) The number of incremental shares that would be dilutive under an assumption that the Company is profitable during the reported period, which is only applicable for a period in which the Company reports a GAAP net loss. If a GAAP profit is earned in the reported periods, no additional incremental shares are assumed.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":465,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":606705364,"gmtCreate":1638925296333,"gmtModify":1638925296742,"author":{"id":"3567411499210880","authorId":"3567411499210880","name":"Nebhol","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b0bfc2a45b91e41a283614268857b3a5","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3567411499210880","authorIdStr":"3567411499210880"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like&nbsp;","listText":"Like&nbsp;","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/606705364","repostId":"2189659812","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2189659812","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1638923767,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2189659812?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-08 08:36","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Pfizer, ex-employee reach accord over Covid-19 vaccine secrets","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2189659812","media":"The Straits Times","summary":"NEW YORK (REUTERS) - Pfizer has reached a truce with a former longtime employee whom it sued two wee","content":"<div>\n<p>NEW YORK (REUTERS) - Pfizer has reached a truce with a former longtime employee whom it sued two weeks ago for allegedly stealing confidential documents related to its Covid-19 vaccine and other drugs...</p>\n\n<a href=\"http://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/pfizer-ex-employee-reach-accord-over-covid-19-vaccine-secrets\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"straits_highlight","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Pfizer, ex-employee reach accord over Covid-19 vaccine secrets</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nPfizer, ex-employee reach accord over Covid-19 vaccine secrets\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-12-08 08:36 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=http://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/pfizer-ex-employee-reach-accord-over-covid-19-vaccine-secrets><strong>The Straits Times</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>NEW YORK (REUTERS) - Pfizer has reached a truce with a former longtime employee whom it sued two weeks ago for allegedly stealing confidential documents related to its Covid-19 vaccine and other drugs...</p>\n\n<a href=\"http://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/pfizer-ex-employee-reach-accord-over-covid-19-vaccine-secrets\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","BK4007":"制药","BK4568":"美国抗疫概念","PFE":"辉瑞","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓"},"source_url":"http://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/pfizer-ex-employee-reach-accord-over-covid-19-vaccine-secrets","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2189659812","content_text":"NEW YORK (REUTERS) - Pfizer has reached a truce with a former longtime employee whom it sued two weeks ago for allegedly stealing confidential documents related to its Covid-19 vaccine and other drugs.\nUnder an agreement filed on Monday (Dec 6), Li Chunxiao, a former associate director of statistics and 15-year Pfizer veteran, will let Pfizer's lawyers review her computers and online accounts for the drugmaker's confidential information.\nPfizer is expected to complete that review by Dec 29, when Ms Li must also submit a sworn declaration that she no longer possesses its confidential information or trade secrets.\nThe drugmaker's lawsuit in San Diego federal court could end in early January if the conditions are met.\nMr Adam Cashman, a lawyer for Ms Li, declined to comment on Tuesday.\nPfizer, based in New York, had sued Ms Li on Nov 23, saying she had uploaded more than 12,000 files without permission from her company-issued laptop as she was preparing to join another company.\nIt said the files included a \"playbook\" discussing the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine, Pfizer's relationship with its German vaccine partner and presentations related to cancer antibodies.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":377,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":606387268,"gmtCreate":1638835405762,"gmtModify":1638835406139,"author":{"id":"3567411499210880","authorId":"3567411499210880","name":"Nebhol","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b0bfc2a45b91e41a283614268857b3a5","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3567411499210880","authorIdStr":"3567411499210880"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Cool","listText":"Cool","text":"Cool","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/606387268","repostId":"2189850790","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2189850790","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1638833577,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2189850790?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-07 07:32","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Microsoft is Yahoo Finance’s Company of the Year 2021","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2189850790","media":"Yahoo Finance","summary":"Microsoft (MSFT) has had a stunning year. After nearly 50 years in business, the tech giant crashed ","content":"<p>Microsoft (MSFT) has had a stunning year. After nearly 50 years in business, the tech giant crashed through the $2 trillion market capitalization mark in June, joining an exclusive club that includes Apple and, for a brief moment, Google parent Alphabet. As of Dec. 6, Microsoft was worth a staggering $2.4 trillion.</p>\n<p>Over the last 52 weeks, Microsoft’s stock price has skyrocketed 45%, easily outpacing the broader S&amp;P 500, which rose 21%, not to mention rivals Apple (AAPL) and Amazon (AMZN), which saw their stock prices increase by 23% and 5.5%, respectively.</p>\n<p>The company’s financial reports were just as impressive as its market cap. Over the last 12 months, the software giant has reported a whopping $176 billion in revenue — a nearly 20% year-over-year increase.</p>\n<p>But Microsoft has always been a cash cow. It operates in the high-margin software sector.</p>\n<p>What’s truly impressive is that, under CEO Satya Nadella, the 46-year-old company is branching out and thriving in new businesses including cloud computing, connectivity apps like Teams, and social apps like LinkedIn.</p>\n<p>Equally remarkable is that Microsoft has flourished while avoiding the public backlash or antitrust scrutiny its Big Tech peers like Amazon, Facebook (FB), and Apple have faced. It’s for those reasons and more that Yahoo Finance has named Microsoft its Company of the Year for 2021.</p>\n<h2><b>Microsoft reinvented itself by cannibalizing itself</b></h2>\n<p>Bill Gates and Paul Allen founded Microsoft in 1975, creating what would go on to become the world’s most widely used operating system. Gates remained CEO for decades until he stepped aside in 2000 and Steve Ballmer took the reins. The duo saw Microsoft through a number of major product releases and challenges, the most significant of which was Microsoft’s antitrust battle with the Justice Department that ran until 2002.</p>\n<p>And while Microsoft is a reborn tech giant in 2021, the distraction caused by its antitrust fight and a series of miscues meant it spent years fighting for relevance among its Big Tech peers.</p>\n<p>Microsoft failed to penetrate the smartphone market, despite spending more than $7 billion to buy Nokia. While LinkedIn has performed well, Microsoft’s social media capabilities are still dwarfed by Facebook And when was the last time you tried to Bing your own name rather than Google (GOOG, GOOGL) it?</p>\n<p>But in 2010, the company launched Azure, a version of Windows powered by the cloud, and it hasn’t looked back. It’s now <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> of the world’s largest cloud providers, offering the latest cloud services and coming in second in market share only to Amazon’s Amazon Web Services.</p>\n<p>Those efforts, however, required Microsoft to reinvent itself. Rather than peddling individual pieces of software, it began selling subscriptions that generate recurring revenue. While the individual sales provide more short-term revenue, subscriptions bring in more cash overall.</p>\n<p>Its Office products, for instance, are now primarily available as cloud-based products for both commercial and consumer applications. And in fiscal Q1 2022, that meant revenue growth of 18% and 10% for the commercial and consumer businesses, respectively.</p>\n<p>“For so long, [Microsoft] resisted cloud computing and opening up their software and running it on other devices because they thought it would cannibalize Windows, because that was their profit machine,” University of Pennsylvania Wharton School senior fellow Scott Snyder told Yahoo Finance.</p>\n<p>“Everybody at that time saw cloud as this nascent business,” said Snyder, author of “Goliath’s Revenge: How Established Companies Turn the Tables on Digital Disruptors.”</p>\n<p>But Nadella — who helped nurture Microsoft’s cloud business before becoming the company’s third CEO in 2014 — saw the opportunity. And it’s the cloud that pushed Microsoft over the $2 trillion mark in 2021, according to analysts.</p>\n<p>“But then you start to add in these other things they're bringing in whether it's LinkedIn, whether it's other types of platforms that can allow people to start to build on Microsoft Solutions. They're really set up well to help enterprises for digital transformation for a long time,” Snyder added.</p>\n<p>While Microsoft had roughly 20% of global cloud market share in 2020 behind Amazon’s 41%, the software company is slowly gaining on the Everything Store.</p>\n<p>Microsoft’s cloud business has been particularly unstoppable in the past year. Over the last four quarters, the segment has exploded with year over year increases of 34% in Q2, 23% in Q3, 30% in Q4, and 36% in fiscal Q1 2022.</p>\n<p>“I think investors under appreciated the story even going into 2021, thinking there wasn't that much gasoline left in the growth tank,” Wedbush analyst Dan Ives told Yahoo Finance.</p>\n<p>“Instead, it's actually accelerated, because it's a perfect storm of demand. It's with more enterprises moving to the cloud. You've seen Azure gain share versus the likes of Amazon, and AWS. And the stock has now started to get rerated on being a cloud company, rather than the traditional Microsoft. It's no longer your grandfather's Microsoft,” Ives added.</p>\n<h2><b>Even more room for growth</b></h2>\n<p>Microsoft’s cloud growth doesn’t show any signs of stopping either. The company now offers cloud-based versions of IT infrastructure, web hosting services, and Office, as well as on-premises versions of its server software.</p>\n<p>According to Ives, only 30% of Microsoft’s enterprise install base has shifted to the cloud, leaving an enormous growth opportunity ahead.</p>\n<p>“In our opinion, it's not a matter of if, it's when this company hits a $3 trillion market cap,” he said.</p>\n<p>It’s certainly on its way there, adding $500 billion to its value in just five months. And the company is continuing to make all of the right moves, explained Michael Cusumano, deputy dean at MIT’s Sloan School of Management.</p>\n<p>“They're growing again, because usage of the cloud has been growing,” Cusumano said. “They’re in some very powerful positions.”</p>\n<h2><b>Microsoft continues to look to the future</b></h2>\n<p>While Nadella and company could kick back and rake in the cash by selling its cloud offerings to its existing install base of customers, Microsoft is continuing to innovate. In April, the company purchased AI pioneer Nuance Communications for $19.7 billion, a move that will benefit everything from Microsoft’s healthcare efforts to its customer engagement offerings.</p>\n<p>The company is also diving into the nascent metaverse space through its Mesh Teams software. The idea is to have colleagues located around the world participate in virtual meetings using everything from AR and VR headsets to their laptops, creating a sense of presence and making it feel like everyone is in the same room.</p>\n<p>At the same time, Microsoft is digging deeper into its gaming business with its Xbox Game Pass cloud gaming, a platform powered by Microsoft’s own cloud servers. The service not only marks Microsoft as a leader in the shift to cloud gaming, but it also ensures younger users recognize the Microsoft nameplate. It doesn’t hurt that it also provides potential cloud customers with proof that Microsoft’s cloud servers are robust enough for even the most demanding applications.</p>\n<p>And thanks to its more open nature — you can find Microsoft products on most any operating system — it’s gained plenty of goodwill across the tech industry.</p>\n<p>Of course, there’s no guarantee that Microsoft’s current trajectory will hold. After all, plenty of rivals hope to knock it from its pedestal — whether that includes Amazon’s AWS, Slack, Google’s Workspace, Sony’s PlayStation, or SalesForce.</p>\n<p>For now, however, the once under-the-radar software company is among the most innovative companies on the planet.</p>","source":"yahoofinance","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Microsoft is Yahoo Finance’s Company of the Year 2021</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nMicrosoft is Yahoo Finance’s Company of the Year 2021\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-12-07 07:32 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/microsoft-yahoo-finance-company-of-the-year-2021-143057560.html><strong>Yahoo Finance</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Microsoft (MSFT) has had a stunning year. After nearly 50 years in business, the tech giant crashed through the $2 trillion market capitalization mark in June, joining an exclusive club that includes ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/microsoft-yahoo-finance-company-of-the-year-2021-143057560.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMZN":"亚马逊","BK4504":"桥水持仓","MSFT":"微软","BK4548":"巴美列捷福持仓","BK4528":"SaaS概念","BK4516":"特朗普概念","BK4554":"元宇宙及AR概念","BK4532":"文艺复兴科技持仓","GOOG":"谷歌","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4567":"ESG概念","AAPL":"苹果","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","GOOGL":"谷歌A","BK4525":"远程办公概念","BK4566":"资本集团","BK4535":"淡马锡持仓","BK4538":"云计算","BK4527":"明星科技股","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","BK4503":"景林资产持仓","BK4097":"系统软件"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/microsoft-yahoo-finance-company-of-the-year-2021-143057560.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5f26f4a48f9cb3e29be4d71d3ba8c038","article_id":"2189850790","content_text":"Microsoft (MSFT) has had a stunning year. After nearly 50 years in business, the tech giant crashed through the $2 trillion market capitalization mark in June, joining an exclusive club that includes Apple and, for a brief moment, Google parent Alphabet. As of Dec. 6, Microsoft was worth a staggering $2.4 trillion.\nOver the last 52 weeks, Microsoft’s stock price has skyrocketed 45%, easily outpacing the broader S&P 500, which rose 21%, not to mention rivals Apple (AAPL) and Amazon (AMZN), which saw their stock prices increase by 23% and 5.5%, respectively.\nThe company’s financial reports were just as impressive as its market cap. Over the last 12 months, the software giant has reported a whopping $176 billion in revenue — a nearly 20% year-over-year increase.\nBut Microsoft has always been a cash cow. It operates in the high-margin software sector.\nWhat’s truly impressive is that, under CEO Satya Nadella, the 46-year-old company is branching out and thriving in new businesses including cloud computing, connectivity apps like Teams, and social apps like LinkedIn.\nEqually remarkable is that Microsoft has flourished while avoiding the public backlash or antitrust scrutiny its Big Tech peers like Amazon, Facebook (FB), and Apple have faced. It’s for those reasons and more that Yahoo Finance has named Microsoft its Company of the Year for 2021.\nMicrosoft reinvented itself by cannibalizing itself\nBill Gates and Paul Allen founded Microsoft in 1975, creating what would go on to become the world’s most widely used operating system. Gates remained CEO for decades until he stepped aside in 2000 and Steve Ballmer took the reins. The duo saw Microsoft through a number of major product releases and challenges, the most significant of which was Microsoft’s antitrust battle with the Justice Department that ran until 2002.\nAnd while Microsoft is a reborn tech giant in 2021, the distraction caused by its antitrust fight and a series of miscues meant it spent years fighting for relevance among its Big Tech peers.\nMicrosoft failed to penetrate the smartphone market, despite spending more than $7 billion to buy Nokia. While LinkedIn has performed well, Microsoft’s social media capabilities are still dwarfed by Facebook And when was the last time you tried to Bing your own name rather than Google (GOOG, GOOGL) it?\nBut in 2010, the company launched Azure, a version of Windows powered by the cloud, and it hasn’t looked back. It’s now one of the world’s largest cloud providers, offering the latest cloud services and coming in second in market share only to Amazon’s Amazon Web Services.\nThose efforts, however, required Microsoft to reinvent itself. Rather than peddling individual pieces of software, it began selling subscriptions that generate recurring revenue. While the individual sales provide more short-term revenue, subscriptions bring in more cash overall.\nIts Office products, for instance, are now primarily available as cloud-based products for both commercial and consumer applications. And in fiscal Q1 2022, that meant revenue growth of 18% and 10% for the commercial and consumer businesses, respectively.\n“For so long, [Microsoft] resisted cloud computing and opening up their software and running it on other devices because they thought it would cannibalize Windows, because that was their profit machine,” University of Pennsylvania Wharton School senior fellow Scott Snyder told Yahoo Finance.\n“Everybody at that time saw cloud as this nascent business,” said Snyder, author of “Goliath’s Revenge: How Established Companies Turn the Tables on Digital Disruptors.”\nBut Nadella — who helped nurture Microsoft’s cloud business before becoming the company’s third CEO in 2014 — saw the opportunity. And it’s the cloud that pushed Microsoft over the $2 trillion mark in 2021, according to analysts.\n“But then you start to add in these other things they're bringing in whether it's LinkedIn, whether it's other types of platforms that can allow people to start to build on Microsoft Solutions. They're really set up well to help enterprises for digital transformation for a long time,” Snyder added.\nWhile Microsoft had roughly 20% of global cloud market share in 2020 behind Amazon’s 41%, the software company is slowly gaining on the Everything Store.\nMicrosoft’s cloud business has been particularly unstoppable in the past year. Over the last four quarters, the segment has exploded with year over year increases of 34% in Q2, 23% in Q3, 30% in Q4, and 36% in fiscal Q1 2022.\n“I think investors under appreciated the story even going into 2021, thinking there wasn't that much gasoline left in the growth tank,” Wedbush analyst Dan Ives told Yahoo Finance.\n“Instead, it's actually accelerated, because it's a perfect storm of demand. It's with more enterprises moving to the cloud. You've seen Azure gain share versus the likes of Amazon, and AWS. And the stock has now started to get rerated on being a cloud company, rather than the traditional Microsoft. It's no longer your grandfather's Microsoft,” Ives added.\nEven more room for growth\nMicrosoft’s cloud growth doesn’t show any signs of stopping either. The company now offers cloud-based versions of IT infrastructure, web hosting services, and Office, as well as on-premises versions of its server software.\nAccording to Ives, only 30% of Microsoft’s enterprise install base has shifted to the cloud, leaving an enormous growth opportunity ahead.\n“In our opinion, it's not a matter of if, it's when this company hits a $3 trillion market cap,” he said.\nIt’s certainly on its way there, adding $500 billion to its value in just five months. And the company is continuing to make all of the right moves, explained Michael Cusumano, deputy dean at MIT’s Sloan School of Management.\n“They're growing again, because usage of the cloud has been growing,” Cusumano said. “They’re in some very powerful positions.”\nMicrosoft continues to look to the future\nWhile Nadella and company could kick back and rake in the cash by selling its cloud offerings to its existing install base of customers, Microsoft is continuing to innovate. In April, the company purchased AI pioneer Nuance Communications for $19.7 billion, a move that will benefit everything from Microsoft’s healthcare efforts to its customer engagement offerings.\nThe company is also diving into the nascent metaverse space through its Mesh Teams software. The idea is to have colleagues located around the world participate in virtual meetings using everything from AR and VR headsets to their laptops, creating a sense of presence and making it feel like everyone is in the same room.\nAt the same time, Microsoft is digging deeper into its gaming business with its Xbox Game Pass cloud gaming, a platform powered by Microsoft’s own cloud servers. The service not only marks Microsoft as a leader in the shift to cloud gaming, but it also ensures younger users recognize the Microsoft nameplate. It doesn’t hurt that it also provides potential cloud customers with proof that Microsoft’s cloud servers are robust enough for even the most demanding applications.\nAnd thanks to its more open nature — you can find Microsoft products on most any operating system — it’s gained plenty of goodwill across the tech industry.\nOf course, there’s no guarantee that Microsoft’s current trajectory will hold. After all, plenty of rivals hope to knock it from its pedestal — whether that includes Amazon’s AWS, Slack, Google’s Workspace, Sony’s PlayStation, or SalesForce.\nFor now, however, the once under-the-radar software company is among the most innovative companies on the planet.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":157,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":608219480,"gmtCreate":1638747632049,"gmtModify":1638747632238,"author":{"id":"3567411499210880","authorId":"3567411499210880","name":"Nebhol","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b0bfc2a45b91e41a283614268857b3a5","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3567411499210880","authorIdStr":"3567411499210880"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like comment&nbsp;","listText":"Like comment&nbsp;","text":"Like comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/608219480","repostId":"2189957413","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2189957413","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1638746998,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2189957413?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-06 07:29","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Disney's 'Encanto' Leads Another Quiet Weekend at Box Office","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2189957413","media":"Reuters","summary":"LOS ANGELES, Dec 5 (Variety.com) - Without any new releases to pose a threat, Disney's animated musi","content":"<p>LOS ANGELES, Dec 5 (Variety.com) - Without any new releases to pose a threat, Disney's animated musical fable \"Encanto\" has again notched the No. 1 spot on domestic box office charts.</p>\n<p>In its second weekend of release, \"Encanto\" has collected $12.38 million from 3,980 venues in the U.S. and Canada. That marks a 54% drop from its debut and pushes the film's two-week total to $57.6 million domestically.</p>\n<p>A decline of roughly 50% between its first and second weekend is in line with Disney's recent Thanksgiving releases, such as 2016's \"Moana\" (down 50%), 2017's \"Coco\" (down only 45%) 2018's \"Ralph Breaks the Internet\" (down 54%) and 2019's \"Frozen II\" (down 59%). Prior Disney animated features were able to conjure stronger starts at the domestic box office, however, those films weren't playing in theaters during a pandemic. By COVID-19 standards, \"Encanto\" is faring well at the box office. The family-friendly adventure, which boasts songs by \"Hamilton\" creator Lin-Manuel Miranda, will land on Disney Plus after playing exclusively in theaters for 30 days.</p>\n<p>Other than \"Encanto\" and its fellow holdover titles, like MGM's starry crime drama \"House of Gucci\" and Sony's \"Ghostbusters: Afterlife\" reboot, it's all quiet on the box office front. That is, until Steven Spielberg's marvelously received \"West Side Story\" adaptation lands in theaters on Dec. 10 and Tom Holland's comic book adventure \"Spider-Man: No Way Home\" hits the big screen on Dec. 17.</p>\n<p>Although big-budget films have started to return to cinemas and COVID-19 vaccines have been approved for younger children, movie theater attendance has remained on the lighter side. Still, Hollywood studios and film exhibitors have been optimistic that Spielberg's latest, Spidey's finale and Neo's return in \"The Matrix: Resurrections\" on Dec. 22 will be a potent enough combination to boost ticket sales in December.</p>\n<p>Until then, theater operators will be serving up leftovers. The domestic box office chart's standings are near identical to last weekend's results, with \"Ghostbusters: Afterlife\" in second place, \"House of Gucci\" at No. 3 and Marvel's comic book epic \"Eternals\" in fifth place.</p>\n<p>Fourth place was won by Fathom Events' \"Christmas With the Chosen: The Messengers.\" The release is a holiday special of the religious streaming series \"The Chosen\" and recounts the birth and life of Jesus Christ. \"The Messengers\" is projected to earn $4 million over the three-day weekend. Fathom Events sold $1.5 million in pre-sales during its first 12 hours of availability, prompting an expansion to a 10-night run across 1,700 theaters, the largest in the history of the specialty distributor.</p>\n<p>\"Afterlife,\" in its third weekend of release, collected $10.35 million from 4,059 North American theaters. In a notable pandemic-era milestone, the film is set to surpass $100 million domestically on Sunday. \"Afterlife,\" which is available only in theaters, will have generated an impressive $101 million to date once the weekend ends.</p>\n<p>Elsewhere, Lady Gaga continues to prop up the movie theater business. Her latest film \"House of Gucci\" added $6.77 million from 3,477 locations in the U.S. and Canada. After debuting to $21 million over the extended Thanksgiving holiday weekend, \"House of Gucci\" has boosted its domestic tally to $33.6 million, which isn't a bad result at a time when most adult dramas during the pandemic have struggled to reach $10 million in total. But decent box office receipts by COVID-19 standards may not be enough to ensure \"House of Gucci\" becomes profitable. Since it cost $75 million to produce and many millions more to advertise, \"House of Gucci\" will need international audiences to turn out in force to get the movie out of the red.</p>\n<p>After five weeks in theaters, \"Eternals\" brought in $3.8 million from 3,230 cinemas this weekend. The comic book adaptation -- starring Gemma Chan, Richard Madden, Kumail Nanjiani, Salma Hayek and Angelina Jolie -- has amassed $156 million at the domestic box office -- an impressive number, albeit <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> that's a little beneath Marvel's usual sky-high performances.</p>\n<p>Also notable is Warner Bros. and Legendary's \"Dune,\" which returned to IMAX screens this weekend for a final dance with premium formats at the tail end of its theatrical run. The Denis Villeneuve-helmed sci-fi epic experienced a measly drop of 16% from the Thanksgiving holiday.</p>\n<p>Over in the world of independent releases, MGM and United Artists Releasing's \"Licorice Pizza\" continued to draw audiences in its limited four-location engagement. The latest from Paul Thomas Anderson grossed $223,000 in its second weekend, marking a slight dip of 35% from its debut last week. The film landed pandemic-best numbers for per-theater average in its opening.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Disney's 'Encanto' Leads Another Quiet Weekend at Box Office</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nDisney's 'Encanto' Leads Another Quiet Weekend at Box Office\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-12-06 07:29</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>LOS ANGELES, Dec 5 (Variety.com) - Without any new releases to pose a threat, Disney's animated musical fable \"Encanto\" has again notched the No. 1 spot on domestic box office charts.</p>\n<p>In its second weekend of release, \"Encanto\" has collected $12.38 million from 3,980 venues in the U.S. and Canada. That marks a 54% drop from its debut and pushes the film's two-week total to $57.6 million domestically.</p>\n<p>A decline of roughly 50% between its first and second weekend is in line with Disney's recent Thanksgiving releases, such as 2016's \"Moana\" (down 50%), 2017's \"Coco\" (down only 45%) 2018's \"Ralph Breaks the Internet\" (down 54%) and 2019's \"Frozen II\" (down 59%). Prior Disney animated features were able to conjure stronger starts at the domestic box office, however, those films weren't playing in theaters during a pandemic. By COVID-19 standards, \"Encanto\" is faring well at the box office. The family-friendly adventure, which boasts songs by \"Hamilton\" creator Lin-Manuel Miranda, will land on Disney Plus after playing exclusively in theaters for 30 days.</p>\n<p>Other than \"Encanto\" and its fellow holdover titles, like MGM's starry crime drama \"House of Gucci\" and Sony's \"Ghostbusters: Afterlife\" reboot, it's all quiet on the box office front. That is, until Steven Spielberg's marvelously received \"West Side Story\" adaptation lands in theaters on Dec. 10 and Tom Holland's comic book adventure \"Spider-Man: No Way Home\" hits the big screen on Dec. 17.</p>\n<p>Although big-budget films have started to return to cinemas and COVID-19 vaccines have been approved for younger children, movie theater attendance has remained on the lighter side. Still, Hollywood studios and film exhibitors have been optimistic that Spielberg's latest, Spidey's finale and Neo's return in \"The Matrix: Resurrections\" on Dec. 22 will be a potent enough combination to boost ticket sales in December.</p>\n<p>Until then, theater operators will be serving up leftovers. The domestic box office chart's standings are near identical to last weekend's results, with \"Ghostbusters: Afterlife\" in second place, \"House of Gucci\" at No. 3 and Marvel's comic book epic \"Eternals\" in fifth place.</p>\n<p>Fourth place was won by Fathom Events' \"Christmas With the Chosen: The Messengers.\" The release is a holiday special of the religious streaming series \"The Chosen\" and recounts the birth and life of Jesus Christ. \"The Messengers\" is projected to earn $4 million over the three-day weekend. Fathom Events sold $1.5 million in pre-sales during its first 12 hours of availability, prompting an expansion to a 10-night run across 1,700 theaters, the largest in the history of the specialty distributor.</p>\n<p>\"Afterlife,\" in its third weekend of release, collected $10.35 million from 4,059 North American theaters. In a notable pandemic-era milestone, the film is set to surpass $100 million domestically on Sunday. \"Afterlife,\" which is available only in theaters, will have generated an impressive $101 million to date once the weekend ends.</p>\n<p>Elsewhere, Lady Gaga continues to prop up the movie theater business. Her latest film \"House of Gucci\" added $6.77 million from 3,477 locations in the U.S. and Canada. After debuting to $21 million over the extended Thanksgiving holiday weekend, \"House of Gucci\" has boosted its domestic tally to $33.6 million, which isn't a bad result at a time when most adult dramas during the pandemic have struggled to reach $10 million in total. But decent box office receipts by COVID-19 standards may not be enough to ensure \"House of Gucci\" becomes profitable. Since it cost $75 million to produce and many millions more to advertise, \"House of Gucci\" will need international audiences to turn out in force to get the movie out of the red.</p>\n<p>After five weeks in theaters, \"Eternals\" brought in $3.8 million from 3,230 cinemas this weekend. The comic book adaptation -- starring Gemma Chan, Richard Madden, Kumail Nanjiani, Salma Hayek and Angelina Jolie -- has amassed $156 million at the domestic box office -- an impressive number, albeit <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> that's a little beneath Marvel's usual sky-high performances.</p>\n<p>Also notable is Warner Bros. and Legendary's \"Dune,\" which returned to IMAX screens this weekend for a final dance with premium formats at the tail end of its theatrical run. The Denis Villeneuve-helmed sci-fi epic experienced a measly drop of 16% from the Thanksgiving holiday.</p>\n<p>Over in the world of independent releases, MGM and United Artists Releasing's \"Licorice Pizza\" continued to draw audiences in its limited four-location engagement. The latest from Paul Thomas Anderson grossed $223,000 in its second weekend, marking a slight dip of 35% from its debut last week. The film landed pandemic-best numbers for per-theater average in its opening.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"DIS":"迪士尼"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2189957413","content_text":"LOS ANGELES, Dec 5 (Variety.com) - Without any new releases to pose a threat, Disney's animated musical fable \"Encanto\" has again notched the No. 1 spot on domestic box office charts.\nIn its second weekend of release, \"Encanto\" has collected $12.38 million from 3,980 venues in the U.S. and Canada. That marks a 54% drop from its debut and pushes the film's two-week total to $57.6 million domestically.\nA decline of roughly 50% between its first and second weekend is in line with Disney's recent Thanksgiving releases, such as 2016's \"Moana\" (down 50%), 2017's \"Coco\" (down only 45%) 2018's \"Ralph Breaks the Internet\" (down 54%) and 2019's \"Frozen II\" (down 59%). Prior Disney animated features were able to conjure stronger starts at the domestic box office, however, those films weren't playing in theaters during a pandemic. By COVID-19 standards, \"Encanto\" is faring well at the box office. The family-friendly adventure, which boasts songs by \"Hamilton\" creator Lin-Manuel Miranda, will land on Disney Plus after playing exclusively in theaters for 30 days.\nOther than \"Encanto\" and its fellow holdover titles, like MGM's starry crime drama \"House of Gucci\" and Sony's \"Ghostbusters: Afterlife\" reboot, it's all quiet on the box office front. That is, until Steven Spielberg's marvelously received \"West Side Story\" adaptation lands in theaters on Dec. 10 and Tom Holland's comic book adventure \"Spider-Man: No Way Home\" hits the big screen on Dec. 17.\nAlthough big-budget films have started to return to cinemas and COVID-19 vaccines have been approved for younger children, movie theater attendance has remained on the lighter side. Still, Hollywood studios and film exhibitors have been optimistic that Spielberg's latest, Spidey's finale and Neo's return in \"The Matrix: Resurrections\" on Dec. 22 will be a potent enough combination to boost ticket sales in December.\nUntil then, theater operators will be serving up leftovers. The domestic box office chart's standings are near identical to last weekend's results, with \"Ghostbusters: Afterlife\" in second place, \"House of Gucci\" at No. 3 and Marvel's comic book epic \"Eternals\" in fifth place.\nFourth place was won by Fathom Events' \"Christmas With the Chosen: The Messengers.\" The release is a holiday special of the religious streaming series \"The Chosen\" and recounts the birth and life of Jesus Christ. \"The Messengers\" is projected to earn $4 million over the three-day weekend. Fathom Events sold $1.5 million in pre-sales during its first 12 hours of availability, prompting an expansion to a 10-night run across 1,700 theaters, the largest in the history of the specialty distributor.\n\"Afterlife,\" in its third weekend of release, collected $10.35 million from 4,059 North American theaters. In a notable pandemic-era milestone, the film is set to surpass $100 million domestically on Sunday. \"Afterlife,\" which is available only in theaters, will have generated an impressive $101 million to date once the weekend ends.\nElsewhere, Lady Gaga continues to prop up the movie theater business. Her latest film \"House of Gucci\" added $6.77 million from 3,477 locations in the U.S. and Canada. After debuting to $21 million over the extended Thanksgiving holiday weekend, \"House of Gucci\" has boosted its domestic tally to $33.6 million, which isn't a bad result at a time when most adult dramas during the pandemic have struggled to reach $10 million in total. But decent box office receipts by COVID-19 standards may not be enough to ensure \"House of Gucci\" becomes profitable. Since it cost $75 million to produce and many millions more to advertise, \"House of Gucci\" will need international audiences to turn out in force to get the movie out of the red.\nAfter five weeks in theaters, \"Eternals\" brought in $3.8 million from 3,230 cinemas this weekend. The comic book adaptation -- starring Gemma Chan, Richard Madden, Kumail Nanjiani, Salma Hayek and Angelina Jolie -- has amassed $156 million at the domestic box office -- an impressive number, albeit one that's a little beneath Marvel's usual sky-high performances.\nAlso notable is Warner Bros. and Legendary's \"Dune,\" which returned to IMAX screens this weekend for a final dance with premium formats at the tail end of its theatrical run. The Denis Villeneuve-helmed sci-fi epic experienced a measly drop of 16% from the Thanksgiving holiday.\nOver in the world of independent releases, MGM and United Artists Releasing's \"Licorice Pizza\" continued to draw audiences in its limited four-location engagement. The latest from Paul Thomas Anderson grossed $223,000 in its second weekend, marking a slight dip of 35% from its debut last week. The film landed pandemic-best numbers for per-theater average in its opening.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":480,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":608855012,"gmtCreate":1638689516598,"gmtModify":1638689516833,"author":{"id":"3567411499210880","authorId":"3567411499210880","name":"Nebhol","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b0bfc2a45b91e41a283614268857b3a5","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3567411499210880","authorIdStr":"3567411499210880"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/608855012","repostId":"1195177271","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":297,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":608903819,"gmtCreate":1638588667292,"gmtModify":1638588667480,"author":{"id":"3567411499210880","authorId":"3567411499210880","name":"Nebhol","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b0bfc2a45b91e41a283614268857b3a5","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3567411499210880","authorIdStr":"3567411499210880"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Just buy the dip","listText":"Just buy the dip","text":"Just buy the dip","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/608903819","repostId":"2188057871","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2188057871","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1638580800,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2188057871?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-04 09:20","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Adobe worth $26 billion less as DocuSign fears spark 'knee-jerk reaction' for stock","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2188057871","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"Adobe stock was the worst performer in S&P 500 Friday, after e-signature rival suggested pandemic bo","content":"<p>Adobe stock was the worst performer in S&amp;P 500 Friday, after e-signature rival suggested pandemic boom was slowing down</p>\n<p>Shares of Adobe Inc. sank to their worst performance in more than 20 months Friday, after DocuSign Inc. delivered what some saw as a the latest sign of a demand cool-down for work-from-home software.</p>\n<p>DocuSign <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DOCU\">$(DOCU)$</a> Chief Executive Dan Springer acknowledged Thursday that while his electronic-signature company saw \"accelerated growth\" for six quarters amid the pandemic, customers have gone back to \"more normalized buying patterns.\" As a result, DocuSign delivered a downbeat bookings outlook, sending its shares cratering more than 40%.</p>\n<p>Some of that investor fear seemed to transfer over to Adobe <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ADBE\">$(ADBE)$</a>, which also offers contract-management software and allows for the collection of e-signatures. Adobe's stock fell 8.2% Friday, its steepest single-day percentage drop since March 2020 and the worst performance on the day from an S&amp;P 500 stock. The move wiped away $26.3 billion in market capitalization, taking Adobe's valuation lower than $300 billion.</p>\n<p>The decline in Adobe shares struck Wedbush analyst Daniel Ives as a \"DOCU-related selloff,\" he told MarketWatch, as DocuSign's report served as a \"a barometer that the WFH tailwinds are now abating and could be a headwind for Adobe.\"</p>\n<p>\"The DOCU print was a shocker and this is a knee-jerk reaction,\" he said.</p>\n<p>Adobe is due to post its own quarterly results Dec. 16. The company highlighted its e-signature technology in its prior earnings report, as Chief Financial Officer John Murphy noted that \"third-quarter Document Cloud growth drivers included adoption of Sign in Acrobat driven by the increased need to collaborate in a hybrid work environment.\"</p>\n<p>While other at-home stocks took a hit on disappointing outlooks earlier in the course of the pandemic, DocuSign initially appeared more resilient. Its stock hit an all-time high in September and was up 165% since March 2020 as of Thursday's close. Now the company will need to \"show that it can generate, not just fulfill, demand on a regular basis,\" according to an Evercore analyst.</p>\n<p>Adobe has a more diversified business than DocuSign. While the company sells contract-related software, it has a variety of other offerings including subscriptions to creative programs like Photoshop. Adobe's Document Cloud accounted for about 13% of the company's overall revenue in its last-reported quarter.</p>\n<p>Shares of Adobe were up 86% since March 2020 as of Thursday's close.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Adobe worth $26 billion less as DocuSign fears spark 'knee-jerk reaction' for stock</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAdobe worth $26 billion less as DocuSign fears spark 'knee-jerk reaction' for stock\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-12-04 09:20</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Adobe stock was the worst performer in S&amp;P 500 Friday, after e-signature rival suggested pandemic boom was slowing down</p>\n<p>Shares of Adobe Inc. sank to their worst performance in more than 20 months Friday, after DocuSign Inc. delivered what some saw as a the latest sign of a demand cool-down for work-from-home software.</p>\n<p>DocuSign <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DOCU\">$(DOCU)$</a> Chief Executive Dan Springer acknowledged Thursday that while his electronic-signature company saw \"accelerated growth\" for six quarters amid the pandemic, customers have gone back to \"more normalized buying patterns.\" As a result, DocuSign delivered a downbeat bookings outlook, sending its shares cratering more than 40%.</p>\n<p>Some of that investor fear seemed to transfer over to Adobe <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ADBE\">$(ADBE)$</a>, which also offers contract-management software and allows for the collection of e-signatures. Adobe's stock fell 8.2% Friday, its steepest single-day percentage drop since March 2020 and the worst performance on the day from an S&amp;P 500 stock. The move wiped away $26.3 billion in market capitalization, taking Adobe's valuation lower than $300 billion.</p>\n<p>The decline in Adobe shares struck Wedbush analyst Daniel Ives as a \"DOCU-related selloff,\" he told MarketWatch, as DocuSign's report served as a \"a barometer that the WFH tailwinds are now abating and could be a headwind for Adobe.\"</p>\n<p>\"The DOCU print was a shocker and this is a knee-jerk reaction,\" he said.</p>\n<p>Adobe is due to post its own quarterly results Dec. 16. The company highlighted its e-signature technology in its prior earnings report, as Chief Financial Officer John Murphy noted that \"third-quarter Document Cloud growth drivers included adoption of Sign in Acrobat driven by the increased need to collaborate in a hybrid work environment.\"</p>\n<p>While other at-home stocks took a hit on disappointing outlooks earlier in the course of the pandemic, DocuSign initially appeared more resilient. Its stock hit an all-time high in September and was up 165% since March 2020 as of Thursday's close. Now the company will need to \"show that it can generate, not just fulfill, demand on a regular basis,\" according to an Evercore analyst.</p>\n<p>Adobe has a more diversified business than DocuSign. While the company sells contract-related software, it has a variety of other offerings including subscriptions to creative programs like Photoshop. Adobe's Document Cloud accounted for about 13% of the company's overall revenue in its last-reported quarter.</p>\n<p>Shares of Adobe were up 86% since March 2020 as of Thursday's close.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4023":"应用软件","DOCU":"Docusign","BK4566":"资本集团","BK4554":"元宇宙及AR概念","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4527":"明星科技股","BK4567":"ESG概念","ADBE":"Adobe","BK4528":"SaaS概念"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2188057871","content_text":"Adobe stock was the worst performer in S&P 500 Friday, after e-signature rival suggested pandemic boom was slowing down\nShares of Adobe Inc. sank to their worst performance in more than 20 months Friday, after DocuSign Inc. delivered what some saw as a the latest sign of a demand cool-down for work-from-home software.\nDocuSign $(DOCU)$ Chief Executive Dan Springer acknowledged Thursday that while his electronic-signature company saw \"accelerated growth\" for six quarters amid the pandemic, customers have gone back to \"more normalized buying patterns.\" As a result, DocuSign delivered a downbeat bookings outlook, sending its shares cratering more than 40%.\nSome of that investor fear seemed to transfer over to Adobe $(ADBE)$, which also offers contract-management software and allows for the collection of e-signatures. Adobe's stock fell 8.2% Friday, its steepest single-day percentage drop since March 2020 and the worst performance on the day from an S&P 500 stock. The move wiped away $26.3 billion in market capitalization, taking Adobe's valuation lower than $300 billion.\nThe decline in Adobe shares struck Wedbush analyst Daniel Ives as a \"DOCU-related selloff,\" he told MarketWatch, as DocuSign's report served as a \"a barometer that the WFH tailwinds are now abating and could be a headwind for Adobe.\"\n\"The DOCU print was a shocker and this is a knee-jerk reaction,\" he said.\nAdobe is due to post its own quarterly results Dec. 16. The company highlighted its e-signature technology in its prior earnings report, as Chief Financial Officer John Murphy noted that \"third-quarter Document Cloud growth drivers included adoption of Sign in Acrobat driven by the increased need to collaborate in a hybrid work environment.\"\nWhile other at-home stocks took a hit on disappointing outlooks earlier in the course of the pandemic, DocuSign initially appeared more resilient. Its stock hit an all-time high in September and was up 165% since March 2020 as of Thursday's close. Now the company will need to \"show that it can generate, not just fulfill, demand on a regular basis,\" according to an Evercore analyst.\nAdobe has a more diversified business than DocuSign. While the company sells contract-related software, it has a variety of other offerings including subscriptions to creative programs like Photoshop. Adobe's Document Cloud accounted for about 13% of the company's overall revenue in its last-reported quarter.\nShares of Adobe were up 86% since March 2020 as of Thursday's close.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":250,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":845951556,"gmtCreate":1636269702518,"gmtModify":1636269703127,"author":{"id":"3567411499210880","authorId":"3567411499210880","name":"Nebhol","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b0bfc2a45b91e41a283614268857b3a5","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3567411499210880","authorIdStr":"3567411499210880"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like comment&nbsp;","listText":"Like comment&nbsp;","text":"Like comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":12,"commentSize":4,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/845951556","repostId":"2181409167","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2181409167","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1636262820,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2181409167?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-07 13:27","market":"fut","language":"en","title":"US to Opec+: ‘This isn’t the end’ of effort to ease oil prices","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2181409167","media":"BusinessDay","summary":"Biden wants the cartel to pump more oil to bring down prices and keep the post-Covid economic recovery on course","content":"<div>\n<p>The US warned this week that Opec+ is at risk of impairing the world’s economic recovery by failing to put more oil into the global market, signalling that its efforts to ease high crude prices aren’t...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.businesslive.co.za/bt/business-and-economy/2021-11-07-us-to-opec-this-isnt-the-end-of-effort-to-ease-oil-prices/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"businessday_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>US to Opec+: ‘This isn’t the end’ of effort to ease oil prices</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nUS to Opec+: ‘This isn’t the end’ of effort to ease oil prices\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-11-07 13:27 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.businesslive.co.za/bt/business-and-economy/2021-11-07-us-to-opec-this-isnt-the-end-of-effort-to-ease-oil-prices/><strong>BusinessDay</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The US warned this week that Opec+ is at risk of impairing the world’s economic recovery by failing to put more oil into the global market, signalling that its efforts to ease high crude prices aren’t...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.businesslive.co.za/bt/business-and-economy/2021-11-07-us-to-opec-this-isnt-the-end-of-effort-to-ease-oil-prices/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.businesslive.co.za/bt/business-and-economy/2021-11-07-us-to-opec-this-isnt-the-end-of-effort-to-ease-oil-prices/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2181409167","content_text":"The US warned this week that Opec+ is at risk of impairing the world’s economic recovery by failing to put more oil into the global market, signalling that its efforts to ease high crude prices aren’t over.Hours after Saudi Arabia and its allies in Opec+ — the 14 members of the Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries plus 10 non-members, including Russia — approved a 400,000 barrel-a-day output hike for December, the White House reiterated that it will consider “the full range of tools” to protect the economy.Other major consumers also say the Opec+ decision, at a meeting of the cartel this week, is not enough to sustain the post-Covid economic recovery, with the US asking for as much as double that amount. “They have the capacity and the power now to act and make sure this critical moment of global recovery is not impaired,” White House spokesperson Karine Jean-Pierre said.The US operates in “a competitive free market system”, she said, and Opec+ “is what impacts global oil prices, which is what has an effect on gas [petrol] prices at home”.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":58,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":828553753,"gmtCreate":1633927187698,"gmtModify":1633927187850,"author":{"id":"3567411499210880","authorId":"3567411499210880","name":"Nebhol","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b0bfc2a45b91e41a283614268857b3a5","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3567411499210880","authorIdStr":"3567411499210880"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like comment&nbsp;","listText":"Like comment&nbsp;","text":"Like comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":4,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/828553753","repostId":"2174971913","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2174971913","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1633907096,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2174971913?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-11 07:04","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Big banks kick off Q3 earnings season, CPI inflation data: What to know this week","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2174971913","media":"Yahoo Finance","summary":"Third-quarter earnings season ramps up in earnest this week with a packed schedule of major financia","content":"<p>Third-quarter earnings season ramps up in earnest this week with a packed schedule of major financial companies poised to report results. Key economic data will include the U.S. consumer price index for September, in the latest print on the state of inflation in the U.S. economy.</p>\n<p>Investors have been anxiously awaiting the start of the latest earnings season and bracing for a deceleration in corporate profit growth after a strong second quarter.</p>\n<p>S&amp;P 500 earnings are expected to grow by 27.6% in aggregate for the third quarter, slowing sharply from the second quarter's nearly 90% growth rate, according to data from FactSet. Still, last quarter's results had been aided by easy comparisons to the pandemic-depressed profit levels of mid-2020. And at nearly 30%, the expected earnings growth rate for the third quarter would still be the third-fastest pace for the index since 2010.</p>\n<p>Traders are especially looking to see that supply-side challenges and rising input and labor costs weighed heavily on corporate profits for the latest quarter. Nearly two dozen S&amp;P 500 companies — including major names like FedEx (FDX) and Nike (NKE) — have already reported third-quarter results, giving hints about the magnitude of the margin pressure being exerted by supply-side challenges.</p>\n<p>\"Supply chain disruptions and costs have been cited by the highest number companies in the index to date as a factor that either had a negative impact on earnings or revenues in Q3, or is expected to have a negative impact on earnings or revenues in future quarters,\" FactSet's John Butters wrote in a note on Friday. Of the 21 S&amp;P 500 component companies that have reported results so far, 15 of them have discussed negative impacts from these factors, Butters added.</p>\n<p>\"After supply chain disruptions, labor shortages and costs (14), COVID costs and impacts (11), and transportation and freight costs (11) have been discussed by the highest number of S&amp;P 500 companies,\" he added.</p>\n<p>For many companies, the specter of eventual interest rate hikes from the Federal Reserve and the present inflationary environment has presented a slew of concerns over higher input and borrowing costs. But for the Big Banks, a higher interest-rate environment generally translates into stronger profits in their key lending businesses, allowing them to command higher rates on loans.</p>\n<p>The major U.S. banks including JPMorgan Chase (JPM), Bank of America (BAC), Goldman Sachs (GS) and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSTLW\">Morgan Stanley</a> (MS) are each set to report quarterly results this week. Heading into these results, many analysts have said they expect to see net interest margins expand alongside the creep higher in benchmark interest rates this year. And as the economic recovery chugs along, banks may further release loan loss reserves they set aside to protect against potential defaults and nonpayments over the course of the pandemic.</p>\n<p>\"We expect 3Q21 EPS [earnings per share] results to be stronger on a year-over-year basis as loan loss reserves continue to be released albeit at a lower level than 1Q/2Q21 and the group posts positive revenue growth,\" RBC Capital Markets analyst Gerard Cassidy wrote in a note last week.</p>\n<p>\"Key themes that we expect to see in the results include: (1) more signs of net interest margin (NIM) stabilization; (2) growth in the consumer loan, residential mortgage and commercial real estate mortgage portfolios; and (3) positive outlook guidance on credit, loan growth (especially commercial &amp; industrial loans,) and NIM,\" he added. \"Lastly, commentary on core operating expenses should be listened to carefully to see if the banks are starting to feel non-incentive compensation wage pressure.\"</p>\n<p>According to Matt O'Connor, Deutsche Bank managing director of U.S. banks equity research, banks still have considerable room for loan growth with the economic recovery under way. Total industry loans are still 1% below pre-pandemic levels from the fourth quarter of 2019, he said, and are down by an even more significant mid-single-digits percentage when excluding loans made via the COVID-era Paycheck Protection Program.</p>\n<p>“We remain positive on bank stocks given a likely multi-year positive backdrop for credit, interest rates and loan growth,” O'Connor wrote in a note. “It’s hard to be too negative on the banks given a generally favorable macroeconomic outlook among most (despite some slower activity more recently) and the prospect for higher rates and faster loan growth, though was we’ve noted before the timing/magnitude of this remains unclear.”</p>\n<p>For the year-to-date, the financials sector remains the second-best performer in the S&amp;P 500 after the energy sector, climbing more than 30% so far in 2021.</p>\n<h2>Consumer price index</h2>\n<p>One of the most closely watched economic reports this week will be the Bureau of Labor Statistics' Consumer Price Index, due for release on Wednesday.</p>\n<p>The report is expected to show consumer prices rose at roughly the same month-on-month and annual rate in September as in August, reinforcing the persistent inflationary pressures present even as the economic recovery rolls on.</p>\n<p>Consensus economists are looking for the consumer price index to jump by 0.3% in September over the previous month and by 5.3% over the prior year.</p>\n<p>At least some of that increase will likely come as a result of jumping energy prices, with crude oil and natural gas prices spiking amid elevated demand and tight supply over the past month. However, even excluding more volatile food and energy prices, the CPI likely still rose at a 4.0% annual pace.</p>\n<p>The so-called core measure of CPI has moderated from June's 4.5% annual clip, or the fastest rate since 1991, but has still held markedly higher compared to pre-pandemic standards. Some of the categories mostly closely associated with the economic reopening have seen prices pull back after initial surges in the spring and early summer — but not by enough to bring down the overall level of CPI.</p>\n<p>“The key takeaway from the upcoming consumer price index will be how broadly across categories we are seeing price increases,\" Greg McBride, chief financial analyst for Bankrate, said in an email on Friday. \"While used car prices, airfares, and lodging have all pulled back a bit, underscoring the idea that higher inflation might indeed be transitory, increases in others like shelter costs might just be heating up.”</p>\n<p>Other areas of the economy have also begun to show persistently heightened levels of inflation, with U.S. crude oil futures skyrocketing to their highest level since 2014 last week and commodity prices across the board moving higher. And last week's September jobs report also reflected a number of inflationary pressures in the labor market, with average hourly wages accelerating to the fastest year-over-year pace since February, and rise in the workweek taking place alongside a drop in labor force participation.</p>\n<p>\"We expect reopening effects to continue to fade, but the risk from supply constraints is likely to be longer-lasting than previously expected,\" High Frequency Economics' Rubeela Farooqi wrote in a note. \"That should provide ongoing support to goods prices, even as services inflation continues to revert to more typical trends on a normalization of activity.\"</p>\n<h2>Economic calendar</h2>\n<ul>\n <li><p><b>Monday:</b> <i>No notable reports scheduled for release </i></p></li>\n <li><p><b>Tuesday: </b>NFIB Small Business Optimism, September (99.5 expected, 100.1 during prior month); JOLTS Job Openings, August (10.938 million expected, 10.934 million during prior month)</p></li>\n <li><p><b>Wednesday: </b>MBA Mortgage Applications, week ended Oct. 8 (-6.9% during prior week); Consumer price index, month-over-month, September (0.3% expected, 0.3% during prior month); CPI excluding food and energy, month-over-month, September (0.2% expected, 0.1% during prior month); CPI year-over-year, September (5.3% expected, 5.3% during prior month); CPI excluding food and energy, year-over-year, September (4.0% expected, 4.0% during prior month); Real Average Hourly earnings, year-over-year, September (-1.1% during prior month); Real Average Weekly earnings, year-over-year, September (-1.4% during prior month); FOMC meeting minutes</p></li>\n <li><p><b>Thursday: </b>Initial jobless claims, week ended Oct. 9 (325,000 expected, 326,000 during prior week); Continuing claims, week ended Oct. 2 (2.696 million expected, 2.714 million during prior week); Producer price index, month-over-month, September (0.6% expected, 0.7% during prior month); PPI excluding food and energy, month-over-month, September (0.5% expected, 0.6% during prior month); PPI, year-over-year, September (8.7% expected, 8.3% during prior month); PPI excluding food and energy, year-over-year. September (7.1% expected, 6.7% during prior month)</p></li>\n <li><p><b>Friday: </b>Empire Manufacturing, October (25.0 expected, 34.3 during prior month); Retail sales, month-over-month, September (-0.2% expected, 0.7% during prior month); Retail sales excluding autos and gas, month-over-month, September (0.6% expected, 1.8% during prior month); Import price index, month-over-month, September (0.6% expected, -0.3% during prior month); University of Michigan sentiment, October preliminary (73.5 expected, 72.8 during prior month)</p></li>\n</ul>\n<h2>Earnings calendar</h2>\n<ul>\n <li><p><b>Monday: </b><i>No notable reports scheduled for release</i></p></li>\n <li><p><b>Tuesday: </b><i>No notable reports scheduled for release</i></p></li>\n <li><p><b>Wednesday: </b>JPMorgan Chase (JPM), BlackRock (BLK), First Republic Bank (FRC), Delta Air Lines (DAL) before market open</p></li>\n <li><p><b>Thursday: </b>Bank of America (BAC), Domino's Pizza (DPZ), <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WBA\">Walgreens Boots Alliance</a> (WBA), The Progressive Corp. (PGR), UnitedHealth Group (UNH), US Bancorp (USB), Wells Fargo (WFC), Morgan Stanley (MS), Citigroup (C) before market open; Alcoa (AA) after market close</p></li>\n <li><p><b>Friday: </b>PNC Financial Services (PNC), <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TFC\">Truist Financial Corp</a>. (TFC), Coinbase Global (COIN), The Charles Schwab Corp. (SCHW), Goldman Sachs (GS) before market open</p></li>\n</ul>","source":"yahoofinance","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Big banks kick off Q3 earnings season, CPI inflation data: What to know this week</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBig banks kick off Q3 earnings season, CPI inflation data: What to know this week\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-10-11 07:04 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/big-banks-kick-off-q-3-earnings-season-cpi-inflation-data-what-to-know-this-week-170456712.html><strong>Yahoo Finance</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Third-quarter earnings season ramps up in earnest this week with a packed schedule of major financial companies poised to report results. Key economic data will include the U.S. consumer price index ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/big-banks-kick-off-q-3-earnings-season-cpi-inflation-data-what-to-know-this-week-170456712.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"C":"花旗","BAC":"美国银行","SPY.AU":"SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust","GS":"高盛","JPM":"摩根大通","WFC":"富国银行","MS":"摩根士丹利"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/big-banks-kick-off-q-3-earnings-season-cpi-inflation-data-what-to-know-this-week-170456712.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5f26f4a48f9cb3e29be4d71d3ba8c038","article_id":"2174971913","content_text":"Third-quarter earnings season ramps up in earnest this week with a packed schedule of major financial companies poised to report results. Key economic data will include the U.S. consumer price index for September, in the latest print on the state of inflation in the U.S. economy.\nInvestors have been anxiously awaiting the start of the latest earnings season and bracing for a deceleration in corporate profit growth after a strong second quarter.\nS&P 500 earnings are expected to grow by 27.6% in aggregate for the third quarter, slowing sharply from the second quarter's nearly 90% growth rate, according to data from FactSet. Still, last quarter's results had been aided by easy comparisons to the pandemic-depressed profit levels of mid-2020. And at nearly 30%, the expected earnings growth rate for the third quarter would still be the third-fastest pace for the index since 2010.\nTraders are especially looking to see that supply-side challenges and rising input and labor costs weighed heavily on corporate profits for the latest quarter. Nearly two dozen S&P 500 companies — including major names like FedEx (FDX) and Nike (NKE) — have already reported third-quarter results, giving hints about the magnitude of the margin pressure being exerted by supply-side challenges.\n\"Supply chain disruptions and costs have been cited by the highest number companies in the index to date as a factor that either had a negative impact on earnings or revenues in Q3, or is expected to have a negative impact on earnings or revenues in future quarters,\" FactSet's John Butters wrote in a note on Friday. Of the 21 S&P 500 component companies that have reported results so far, 15 of them have discussed negative impacts from these factors, Butters added.\n\"After supply chain disruptions, labor shortages and costs (14), COVID costs and impacts (11), and transportation and freight costs (11) have been discussed by the highest number of S&P 500 companies,\" he added.\nFor many companies, the specter of eventual interest rate hikes from the Federal Reserve and the present inflationary environment has presented a slew of concerns over higher input and borrowing costs. But for the Big Banks, a higher interest-rate environment generally translates into stronger profits in their key lending businesses, allowing them to command higher rates on loans.\nThe major U.S. banks including JPMorgan Chase (JPM), Bank of America (BAC), Goldman Sachs (GS) and Morgan Stanley (MS) are each set to report quarterly results this week. Heading into these results, many analysts have said they expect to see net interest margins expand alongside the creep higher in benchmark interest rates this year. And as the economic recovery chugs along, banks may further release loan loss reserves they set aside to protect against potential defaults and nonpayments over the course of the pandemic.\n\"We expect 3Q21 EPS [earnings per share] results to be stronger on a year-over-year basis as loan loss reserves continue to be released albeit at a lower level than 1Q/2Q21 and the group posts positive revenue growth,\" RBC Capital Markets analyst Gerard Cassidy wrote in a note last week.\n\"Key themes that we expect to see in the results include: (1) more signs of net interest margin (NIM) stabilization; (2) growth in the consumer loan, residential mortgage and commercial real estate mortgage portfolios; and (3) positive outlook guidance on credit, loan growth (especially commercial & industrial loans,) and NIM,\" he added. \"Lastly, commentary on core operating expenses should be listened to carefully to see if the banks are starting to feel non-incentive compensation wage pressure.\"\nAccording to Matt O'Connor, Deutsche Bank managing director of U.S. banks equity research, banks still have considerable room for loan growth with the economic recovery under way. Total industry loans are still 1% below pre-pandemic levels from the fourth quarter of 2019, he said, and are down by an even more significant mid-single-digits percentage when excluding loans made via the COVID-era Paycheck Protection Program.\n“We remain positive on bank stocks given a likely multi-year positive backdrop for credit, interest rates and loan growth,” O'Connor wrote in a note. “It’s hard to be too negative on the banks given a generally favorable macroeconomic outlook among most (despite some slower activity more recently) and the prospect for higher rates and faster loan growth, though was we’ve noted before the timing/magnitude of this remains unclear.”\nFor the year-to-date, the financials sector remains the second-best performer in the S&P 500 after the energy sector, climbing more than 30% so far in 2021.\nConsumer price index\nOne of the most closely watched economic reports this week will be the Bureau of Labor Statistics' Consumer Price Index, due for release on Wednesday.\nThe report is expected to show consumer prices rose at roughly the same month-on-month and annual rate in September as in August, reinforcing the persistent inflationary pressures present even as the economic recovery rolls on.\nConsensus economists are looking for the consumer price index to jump by 0.3% in September over the previous month and by 5.3% over the prior year.\nAt least some of that increase will likely come as a result of jumping energy prices, with crude oil and natural gas prices spiking amid elevated demand and tight supply over the past month. However, even excluding more volatile food and energy prices, the CPI likely still rose at a 4.0% annual pace.\nThe so-called core measure of CPI has moderated from June's 4.5% annual clip, or the fastest rate since 1991, but has still held markedly higher compared to pre-pandemic standards. Some of the categories mostly closely associated with the economic reopening have seen prices pull back after initial surges in the spring and early summer — but not by enough to bring down the overall level of CPI.\n“The key takeaway from the upcoming consumer price index will be how broadly across categories we are seeing price increases,\" Greg McBride, chief financial analyst for Bankrate, said in an email on Friday. \"While used car prices, airfares, and lodging have all pulled back a bit, underscoring the idea that higher inflation might indeed be transitory, increases in others like shelter costs might just be heating up.”\nOther areas of the economy have also begun to show persistently heightened levels of inflation, with U.S. crude oil futures skyrocketing to their highest level since 2014 last week and commodity prices across the board moving higher. And last week's September jobs report also reflected a number of inflationary pressures in the labor market, with average hourly wages accelerating to the fastest year-over-year pace since February, and rise in the workweek taking place alongside a drop in labor force participation.\n\"We expect reopening effects to continue to fade, but the risk from supply constraints is likely to be longer-lasting than previously expected,\" High Frequency Economics' Rubeela Farooqi wrote in a note. \"That should provide ongoing support to goods prices, even as services inflation continues to revert to more typical trends on a normalization of activity.\"\nEconomic calendar\n\nMonday: No notable reports scheduled for release \nTuesday: NFIB Small Business Optimism, September (99.5 expected, 100.1 during prior month); JOLTS Job Openings, August (10.938 million expected, 10.934 million during prior month)\nWednesday: MBA Mortgage Applications, week ended Oct. 8 (-6.9% during prior week); Consumer price index, month-over-month, September (0.3% expected, 0.3% during prior month); CPI excluding food and energy, month-over-month, September (0.2% expected, 0.1% during prior month); CPI year-over-year, September (5.3% expected, 5.3% during prior month); CPI excluding food and energy, year-over-year, September (4.0% expected, 4.0% during prior month); Real Average Hourly earnings, year-over-year, September (-1.1% during prior month); Real Average Weekly earnings, year-over-year, September (-1.4% during prior month); FOMC meeting minutes\nThursday: Initial jobless claims, week ended Oct. 9 (325,000 expected, 326,000 during prior week); Continuing claims, week ended Oct. 2 (2.696 million expected, 2.714 million during prior week); Producer price index, month-over-month, September (0.6% expected, 0.7% during prior month); PPI excluding food and energy, month-over-month, September (0.5% expected, 0.6% during prior month); PPI, year-over-year, September (8.7% expected, 8.3% during prior month); PPI excluding food and energy, year-over-year. September (7.1% expected, 6.7% during prior month)\nFriday: Empire Manufacturing, October (25.0 expected, 34.3 during prior month); Retail sales, month-over-month, September (-0.2% expected, 0.7% during prior month); Retail sales excluding autos and gas, month-over-month, September (0.6% expected, 1.8% during prior month); Import price index, month-over-month, September (0.6% expected, -0.3% during prior month); University of Michigan sentiment, October preliminary (73.5 expected, 72.8 during prior month)\n\nEarnings calendar\n\nMonday: No notable reports scheduled for release\nTuesday: No notable reports scheduled for release\nWednesday: JPMorgan Chase (JPM), BlackRock (BLK), First Republic Bank (FRC), Delta Air Lines (DAL) before market open\nThursday: Bank of America (BAC), Domino's Pizza (DPZ), Walgreens Boots Alliance (WBA), The Progressive Corp. (PGR), UnitedHealth Group (UNH), US Bancorp (USB), Wells Fargo (WFC), Morgan Stanley (MS), Citigroup (C) before market open; Alcoa (AA) after market close\nFriday: PNC Financial Services (PNC), Truist Financial Corp. (TFC), Coinbase Global (COIN), The Charles Schwab Corp. (SCHW), Goldman Sachs (GS) before market open","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":155,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":866011522,"gmtCreate":1632711195666,"gmtModify":1632798375250,"author":{"id":"3567411499210880","authorId":"3567411499210880","name":"Nebhol","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b0bfc2a45b91e41a283614268857b3a5","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3567411499210880","authorIdStr":"3567411499210880"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like comment&nbsp;","listText":"Like comment&nbsp;","text":"Like comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":10,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/866011522","repostId":"2170488786","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2170488786","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1632685409,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2170488786?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-09-27 03:43","market":"other","language":"en","title":"Debt ceiling debates in Congress, consumer confidence: What to know this week","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2170488786","media":"Yahoo Finance","summary":"Investors this week are set to closely monitor developments in Washington, D.C., as lawmakers race t","content":"<p>Investors this week are set to closely monitor developments in Washington, D.C., as lawmakers race to pass legislation to avoid a government shutdown by the end of the month and debate raising the debt ceiling. Elsewhere, economic data on consumer confidence is also due for release.</p>\n<p>The Senate is expected to vote Monday on a procedural motion over the legislation passed by the House of Representatives last week. That bill included a plan to temporarily fund the government through early December, and came alongside a measure to raise the government debt ceiling through December 2022.</p>\n<p>The latter point has been an area of contention for Senate Republicans, who are only narrowly outnumbered by Democratic lawmakers in both chambers and who have threatened to block the bill in its current form.</p>\n<p>Senate Republicans including Minority Leader Mitch McConnell have suggested that Democratic lawmakers should use the budget reconciliation process to raise the debt ceiling without Republican support. McConnell has, however, supported a short-term government funding bill that excludes a debt ceiling suspension.</p>\n<p>\"If they [the Democrats] want to tax, borrow and spend historic sums of money without our input, they’ll have to raise the debt limit without our help. This is the reality,” McConnell said on the Senate floor last week.</p>\n<p>Democratic lawmakers, for their part, have called for the move to raise the debt limit be bipartisan to prevent the government from defaulting on its obligations. The Treasury Department has warned that the U.S. could default on its debts as soon as October in absence of congressional action.</p>\n<p>\"The U.S. has always paid its bills on time, but the overwhelming consensus among economists and Treasury officials of both parties is that failing to raise the debt limit would produce widespread economic catastrophe,\" Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen wrote in an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal last week.</p>\n<p>Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell also warned of the consequences of a failure to raise the debt ceiling during his post-FOMC meeting press conference last week.</p>\n<p>\"It's just very important that the debt ceiling be raised in a timely fashion so that the United States can pay its bills when and as they come due. That's a critically important thing,\" he said. \"The failure to do that is something that could result in severe reactions, severe damage to the economy and to the financial markets ... no <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> should assume that the Fed or anyone else can protect the markets or the economy in the event of a failure.\"</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6a59b9c059b09d9267c8298e0b837\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">A dead Elm tree is removed on the West Front of the Capitol in Washington, Friday, Sept. 10, 2021. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)ASSOCIATED PRESS</p>\n<p>Amid the standoff, the Office of Management and Budget began warning federal agencies last week to prepare for a potential government shutdown. The reminder served as a standard warning one week out from Congress's deadline to reach an agreement to at least temporarily continue funding the government.</p>\n<p>Though leaders of both political parties have agreed that a continuing resolution to avoid the shutdown at the end of the month is needed, the ongoing tension over raising the debt limit has served as a potential roadblock in this effort.</p>\n<p>\"We still expect Congress to avert a partial government shutdown at the start of October. Republicans won’t vote for the current continuing resolution being touted by the Democratic leadership, which also includes a new debt ceiling suspension,\" wrote Paul Ashworth, chief North America economist for Capital Economics, in a note Friday. \"But we expect a Plan B to emerge next week with the latter stripped out, which Republicans will support.\"</p>\n<p>\"The bigger issue is that there doesn’t appear to be an easy path to raising the debt ceiling by mid-October, which is when estimates suggest the Treasury’s will exhaust the 'extraordinary measures it is currently using to keep the lights on,\" he added.</p>\n<p>Investors have also grown jittery as the debates wore on, with stocks posting their worst day since May last week amid a confluence of concerns that also included debt concerns with China Evergrande.</p>\n<p>Many strategists, however, have suggested market participants need not be overly concerned about the impacts of a potential government shutdown.</p>\n<p>\"Historically, we've seen that government shutdowns tend to be short-lived,\" Jordan Jackson, JPMorgan Asset Management global market strategist, told Yahoo Finance Live on Friday. \"We also know that for those non-essential federal employees, they do get furlough pay as well.\"</p>\n<p>\"If it lasts more than 30 days, it's certainly going to have a bigger impact on the economy. But generally speaking, these shutdowns tend to be short-lived and markets — while they may correct in the short-term — they do sort of continue to grind higher,\" he added. \"I think it's certainly a risk in terms of a short-term mini correction there. But again, with all the liquidity out there, I think any sort of blip in the markets will be short-lived.\"</p>\n<p>Historical equity performance during and immediately following a government shutdown has also tended to point to a muted market impact.</p>\n<p>\"In the 14 government shutdowns since 1980, the S&amp;P 500 generated median returns of -0.1% on the dates of budget authority expiration, 0.1% during the shutdown periods, and 0.3% on the dates of resolution,\" David Kostin, Goldman Sachs chief equity strategist, wrote in a note published on Sept. 21.</p>\n<p>\"One notable exception was the most recent federal shutdown in December 2018, when the S&amp;P 500 fell 2% on the spending authority expiration date,\" he added. \"However, this decline was likely driven primarily by investor concerns about Fed tightening.\"</p>\n<p>Kostin also noted that the typical government shutdown since 1980 has only lasted three days before ultimately being resolved. More recent shutdowns have lasted several times longer, however, with the duration of the four most recent federal shutdowns averaging 18 days, Kostin said.</p>\n<h3>Consumer confidence</h3>\n<p>On the economic data front, one of the most closely watched new pieces of data will be on consumer confidence.</p>\n<p>The Conference Board is set to release its September consumer confidence index Tuesday morning. Economists expect the index to tick up only slightly compared to August, with consumers' views on the coronavirus and rising prices stabilizing near the lowest level since February.</p>\n<p>Specifically, consensus economists are looking for the index to rise to 115.0 in September after dropping to 113.8 in August. During the last monthly report, consumers' assessments of current business and labor market conditions both eased, and expectations for the next six months out also deteriorated.</p>\n<p>\"Consumer confidence fell to a six-month low in August, due to concerns around the Delta variant and inflation,\" wrote Bank of America economist Michelle Meyer in a note on Friday. \"We think these concerns largely remained in September.\"</p>\n<p>At the time, Lynn Franco, senior director of economic indicators at the Conference Board, said it was still \"too soon to conclude\" whether decline in consumer confidence would \"result in consumers significantly curtailing their spending in the months ahead.\"</p>\n<p>The latest spending data has also been equivocal. The Commerce Department's latest report showed retail sales rose 0.7% in August after declining in July. However, the categories posting the biggest declines were areas like e-commerce shops and grocery stores, suggesting consumer behavior was shifting back toward stay-in-place trends and away from in-person events like restaurant dining amid the latest wave of the coronavirus.</p>\n<h3>Economic calendar</h3>\n<ul>\n <li><p><b>Monday: </b>Durable goods orders, August preliminary (0.6% expected, -0.1% in July); Durable goods excluding transportation, August preliminary (0.5% expected, 0.8% in July); Non-defense capital goods orders excluding aircraft, August preliminary (0.3% expected, 0.1% in July); Non-defense capital goods orders excluding aircraft, August preliminary (0.9% in July); Dallas Fed Manufacturing Activity Index, September (11.0 expected, 9.0 in July)</p></li>\n <li><p><b>Tuesday: </b>Advance goods trade balance, August (-$87.0 billion expected, -$86.4 billion in July); Wholesale inventories, month-over-month, August preliminary (0.6% in July); Retail inventories, month-over-month, August (0.4% in July); FHFA House Price Index, month-over-month, July (1.5% expected, 1.6% in July); S&amp;P <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CLGX\">CoreLogic</a> Case-Shiller 20-City Composite Index, month-over-month, July (1.62% expected, 1.77% in June); S&amp;P CoreLogic Case-Shiller 20-City Composite Index, month-over-month, July (20.1% expected, 19.08% in June); Conference Board Consumer Confidence Index, September (114.2 expected, 113.8 in August); Richmond Fed Manufacturing Index, September (9 in August)</p></li>\n <li><p><b>Wednesday: </b>MBA Mortgage Applications, week ended September 24 (4.9% during prior month); Pending home sales, month-over-month, August (1.0% expected, -1.8% in July)</p></li>\n <li><p><b>Thursday: </b>Initial jobless claims, week ended September 25 (320,000 expected, 351,000 during prior week); Continuing claims, week ended September 18 (2.845 million during prior week); GDP annualized, quarter-over-quarter, second-quarter third estimate (6.7% expected, 6.6% in prior estimate); Personal consumption, second-quarter third estimate (11.9% in prior estimate); Core personal consumption expenditures, second quarter third estimate (6.1% in prior estimate); MNI Chicago PMI, September (65.0 expected, 66.8 in August)</p></li>\n <li><p><b>Friday: </b>Personal income, August (0.2% expected, 1.1% in July); Personal spending, August (0.7% expected, 0.3% in July); Personal consumption expenditures core deflator, month-over-over, August (0.2% expected, 0.3% in July); Personal consumption expenditures core deflator, year-over-year, August (3.6% expected, 3.6% in July); <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MRKT\">Markit</a> manufacturing PMI, September final (60.5 in prior estimate); Construction spending, month-over-month, August (0.3% expected, 0.3% in July); University of Michigan sentiment, September final (71.0 expected, 71.0 in prior print); ISM Manufacturing, September (59.5 expected, 59.9 in August)</p></li>\n</ul>\n<h3>Earnings calendar</h3>\n<ul>\n <li><p><b>Monday: </b>Aurora Cannabis (ACB) after market close</p></li>\n <li><p><b>Tuesday: </b>Micron Technology (MU) after market close.</p></li>\n <li><p><b>Wednesday: </b><i>No notable reports scheduled for release</i></p></li>\n <li><p><b>Thursday: </b>CarMax (KMX), Bed Bath &amp; Beyond (BBBY) before market open; Jefferies (JEF) after market close</p></li>\n <li><p><b>Friday: </b><i>No notable reports scheduled for releas</i></p></li>\n</ul>","source":"yahoofinance_au","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Debt ceiling debates in Congress, consumer confidence: What to know this week</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nDebt ceiling debates in Congress, consumer confidence: What to know this week\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-09-27 03:43 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/debt-ceiling-debates-in-congress-consumer-confidence-what-to-know-this-week-194329712.html><strong>Yahoo Finance</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Investors this week are set to closely monitor developments in Washington, D.C., as lawmakers race to pass legislation to avoid a government shutdown by the end of the month and debate raising the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/debt-ceiling-debates-in-congress-consumer-confidence-what-to-know-this-week-194329712.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e7e749e88d2580d292ffc6ae18d03b65","relate_stocks":{"SPY.AU":"SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/debt-ceiling-debates-in-congress-consumer-confidence-what-to-know-this-week-194329712.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2170488786","content_text":"Investors this week are set to closely monitor developments in Washington, D.C., as lawmakers race to pass legislation to avoid a government shutdown by the end of the month and debate raising the debt ceiling. Elsewhere, economic data on consumer confidence is also due for release.\nThe Senate is expected to vote Monday on a procedural motion over the legislation passed by the House of Representatives last week. That bill included a plan to temporarily fund the government through early December, and came alongside a measure to raise the government debt ceiling through December 2022.\nThe latter point has been an area of contention for Senate Republicans, who are only narrowly outnumbered by Democratic lawmakers in both chambers and who have threatened to block the bill in its current form.\nSenate Republicans including Minority Leader Mitch McConnell have suggested that Democratic lawmakers should use the budget reconciliation process to raise the debt ceiling without Republican support. McConnell has, however, supported a short-term government funding bill that excludes a debt ceiling suspension.\n\"If they [the Democrats] want to tax, borrow and spend historic sums of money without our input, they’ll have to raise the debt limit without our help. This is the reality,” McConnell said on the Senate floor last week.\nDemocratic lawmakers, for their part, have called for the move to raise the debt limit be bipartisan to prevent the government from defaulting on its obligations. The Treasury Department has warned that the U.S. could default on its debts as soon as October in absence of congressional action.\n\"The U.S. has always paid its bills on time, but the overwhelming consensus among economists and Treasury officials of both parties is that failing to raise the debt limit would produce widespread economic catastrophe,\" Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen wrote in an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal last week.\nFederal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell also warned of the consequences of a failure to raise the debt ceiling during his post-FOMC meeting press conference last week.\n\"It's just very important that the debt ceiling be raised in a timely fashion so that the United States can pay its bills when and as they come due. That's a critically important thing,\" he said. \"The failure to do that is something that could result in severe reactions, severe damage to the economy and to the financial markets ... no one should assume that the Fed or anyone else can protect the markets or the economy in the event of a failure.\"\nA dead Elm tree is removed on the West Front of the Capitol in Washington, Friday, Sept. 10, 2021. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)ASSOCIATED PRESS\nAmid the standoff, the Office of Management and Budget began warning federal agencies last week to prepare for a potential government shutdown. The reminder served as a standard warning one week out from Congress's deadline to reach an agreement to at least temporarily continue funding the government.\nThough leaders of both political parties have agreed that a continuing resolution to avoid the shutdown at the end of the month is needed, the ongoing tension over raising the debt limit has served as a potential roadblock in this effort.\n\"We still expect Congress to avert a partial government shutdown at the start of October. Republicans won’t vote for the current continuing resolution being touted by the Democratic leadership, which also includes a new debt ceiling suspension,\" wrote Paul Ashworth, chief North America economist for Capital Economics, in a note Friday. \"But we expect a Plan B to emerge next week with the latter stripped out, which Republicans will support.\"\n\"The bigger issue is that there doesn’t appear to be an easy path to raising the debt ceiling by mid-October, which is when estimates suggest the Treasury’s will exhaust the 'extraordinary measures it is currently using to keep the lights on,\" he added.\nInvestors have also grown jittery as the debates wore on, with stocks posting their worst day since May last week amid a confluence of concerns that also included debt concerns with China Evergrande.\nMany strategists, however, have suggested market participants need not be overly concerned about the impacts of a potential government shutdown.\n\"Historically, we've seen that government shutdowns tend to be short-lived,\" Jordan Jackson, JPMorgan Asset Management global market strategist, told Yahoo Finance Live on Friday. \"We also know that for those non-essential federal employees, they do get furlough pay as well.\"\n\"If it lasts more than 30 days, it's certainly going to have a bigger impact on the economy. But generally speaking, these shutdowns tend to be short-lived and markets — while they may correct in the short-term — they do sort of continue to grind higher,\" he added. \"I think it's certainly a risk in terms of a short-term mini correction there. But again, with all the liquidity out there, I think any sort of blip in the markets will be short-lived.\"\nHistorical equity performance during and immediately following a government shutdown has also tended to point to a muted market impact.\n\"In the 14 government shutdowns since 1980, the S&P 500 generated median returns of -0.1% on the dates of budget authority expiration, 0.1% during the shutdown periods, and 0.3% on the dates of resolution,\" David Kostin, Goldman Sachs chief equity strategist, wrote in a note published on Sept. 21.\n\"One notable exception was the most recent federal shutdown in December 2018, when the S&P 500 fell 2% on the spending authority expiration date,\" he added. \"However, this decline was likely driven primarily by investor concerns about Fed tightening.\"\nKostin also noted that the typical government shutdown since 1980 has only lasted three days before ultimately being resolved. More recent shutdowns have lasted several times longer, however, with the duration of the four most recent federal shutdowns averaging 18 days, Kostin said.\nConsumer confidence\nOn the economic data front, one of the most closely watched new pieces of data will be on consumer confidence.\nThe Conference Board is set to release its September consumer confidence index Tuesday morning. Economists expect the index to tick up only slightly compared to August, with consumers' views on the coronavirus and rising prices stabilizing near the lowest level since February.\nSpecifically, consensus economists are looking for the index to rise to 115.0 in September after dropping to 113.8 in August. During the last monthly report, consumers' assessments of current business and labor market conditions both eased, and expectations for the next six months out also deteriorated.\n\"Consumer confidence fell to a six-month low in August, due to concerns around the Delta variant and inflation,\" wrote Bank of America economist Michelle Meyer in a note on Friday. \"We think these concerns largely remained in September.\"\nAt the time, Lynn Franco, senior director of economic indicators at the Conference Board, said it was still \"too soon to conclude\" whether decline in consumer confidence would \"result in consumers significantly curtailing their spending in the months ahead.\"\nThe latest spending data has also been equivocal. The Commerce Department's latest report showed retail sales rose 0.7% in August after declining in July. However, the categories posting the biggest declines were areas like e-commerce shops and grocery stores, suggesting consumer behavior was shifting back toward stay-in-place trends and away from in-person events like restaurant dining amid the latest wave of the coronavirus.\nEconomic calendar\n\nMonday: Durable goods orders, August preliminary (0.6% expected, -0.1% in July); Durable goods excluding transportation, August preliminary (0.5% expected, 0.8% in July); Non-defense capital goods orders excluding aircraft, August preliminary (0.3% expected, 0.1% in July); Non-defense capital goods orders excluding aircraft, August preliminary (0.9% in July); Dallas Fed Manufacturing Activity Index, September (11.0 expected, 9.0 in July)\nTuesday: Advance goods trade balance, August (-$87.0 billion expected, -$86.4 billion in July); Wholesale inventories, month-over-month, August preliminary (0.6% in July); Retail inventories, month-over-month, August (0.4% in July); FHFA House Price Index, month-over-month, July (1.5% expected, 1.6% in July); S&P CoreLogic Case-Shiller 20-City Composite Index, month-over-month, July (1.62% expected, 1.77% in June); S&P CoreLogic Case-Shiller 20-City Composite Index, month-over-month, July (20.1% expected, 19.08% in June); Conference Board Consumer Confidence Index, September (114.2 expected, 113.8 in August); Richmond Fed Manufacturing Index, September (9 in August)\nWednesday: MBA Mortgage Applications, week ended September 24 (4.9% during prior month); Pending home sales, month-over-month, August (1.0% expected, -1.8% in July)\nThursday: Initial jobless claims, week ended September 25 (320,000 expected, 351,000 during prior week); Continuing claims, week ended September 18 (2.845 million during prior week); GDP annualized, quarter-over-quarter, second-quarter third estimate (6.7% expected, 6.6% in prior estimate); Personal consumption, second-quarter third estimate (11.9% in prior estimate); Core personal consumption expenditures, second quarter third estimate (6.1% in prior estimate); MNI Chicago PMI, September (65.0 expected, 66.8 in August)\nFriday: Personal income, August (0.2% expected, 1.1% in July); Personal spending, August (0.7% expected, 0.3% in July); Personal consumption expenditures core deflator, month-over-over, August (0.2% expected, 0.3% in July); Personal consumption expenditures core deflator, year-over-year, August (3.6% expected, 3.6% in July); Markit manufacturing PMI, September final (60.5 in prior estimate); Construction spending, month-over-month, August (0.3% expected, 0.3% in July); University of Michigan sentiment, September final (71.0 expected, 71.0 in prior print); ISM Manufacturing, September (59.5 expected, 59.9 in August)\n\nEarnings calendar\n\nMonday: Aurora Cannabis (ACB) after market close\nTuesday: Micron Technology (MU) after market close.\nWednesday: No notable reports scheduled for release\nThursday: CarMax (KMX), Bed Bath & Beyond (BBBY) before market open; Jefferies (JEF) after market close\nFriday: No notable reports scheduled for releas","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":118,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":851191415,"gmtCreate":1634877332566,"gmtModify":1634877332783,"author":{"id":"3567411499210880","authorId":"3567411499210880","name":"Nebhol","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b0bfc2a45b91e41a283614268857b3a5","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3567411499210880","authorIdStr":"3567411499210880"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like comment&nbsp;","listText":"Like comment&nbsp;","text":"Like comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":4,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/851191415","repostId":"1184152939","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1184152939","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1634867326,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1184152939?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-22 09:48","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Snap points to possibility of Apple causing the long-feared ‘ad-mageddon’","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1184152939","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"Snap Inc. sounded the alarm Thursday for the long-feared internet advertising meltdown that could be coming in the normally busy fourth quarter.Long-feared because ever since Apple Inc. announced upcoming privacy changes to the iPhone, many companies with internet advertising businesses have been warning about its impact potential looming over their results.Apple updated its mobile operating system in April to give users the option of not sharing their data or having it tracked, making it more d","content":"<p>Snap Inc. sounded the alarm Thursday for the long-feared internet advertising meltdown that could be coming in the normally busy fourth quarter.</p>\n<p>Long-feared because ever since Apple Inc.&nbsp;announced upcoming privacy changes to the iPhone, many companies with internet advertising businesses have been warning about its impact potential looming over their results.</p>\n<p>Apple updated its mobile operating system in April to give users the option of not sharing their data or having it tracked, making it more difficult for software developers to track users across their apps, and for advertisers to target their ads.</p>\n<p>Based on comments by Snap&nbsp;on Thursday, the results are not pretty. The young social-media company, known for its Snapchat app, blamed the changes Apple made to iOS as a big factor in its $3 million third-quarter revenue shortfall. In addition, Snap executives forecast that fourth-quarter revenue would grow at a rate of only about 19% to 20%, down from third-quarter growth of 57%.</p>\n<p>Shares of Snap plunged more than 20% in after-hours trading, taking some of the biggest names in tech with it — Facebook Inc.,Alphabet Inc.,Twitter Inc.&nbsp;and Pinterest Inc.&nbsp;all saw their shares fall after the Snap news.</p>\n<p>Facebook, for example, has been warning about the effects of Apple’s changes for more than a year, most recently in September, but investors have yet to see much change to Facebook’s very profitable business model, even amid all the other controversies at the social-media giant.</p>\n<p>Last December, Facebook even launched a full-on PR assault on Apple, with full-page ads in three national newspapers, proclaiming that Apple’s then-upcoming changes would hurt the ability of small businesses to offer targeted advertising to consumers, and app developers’ ability to offer free content.</p>\n<p>But Snap co-founder and Chief Executive Evan Spiegel — who has previously avoided aiming any specific attacks at Apple regarding the change — said Thursday that the privacy changes have proved more problematic than expected, specifically mentioning that Apple even changed the tools that advertisers have to measure results of their ads.</p>\n<p>“I think what we really underestimated were the tooling changes,” said Spiegel. “Advertisers have essentially for a long time now used a set of really sophisticated tools to measure and optimize their campaigns, so that allows them to test out a bunch of different creative and see what’s performing.”</p>\n<p>With Apple’s changes, he said, those tools “were essentially rendered blind.”</p>\n<p>Still, Spiegel reined in his criticism of Apple, adding that these privacy changes were “important to the long-term health of the ecosystem” and something that “we fully support.”</p>\n<p>In addition to Apple’s huge changes, the global supply chain and staffing problems are affecting the number of ads that companies are starting to run in the all-important holiday season.</p>\n<p>“[Advertisers] don’t necessarily want to accelerate the field of products that they are going to have a hard time getting into the hands of customers, and that is somewhat broad,” Snap Chief Business Officer Jeremi Gorman told analysts on Thursday’s post-earnings conference call.</p>\n<p>But Snap executives added, in response to an analyst’s question, that the Apple changes were having the biggest impact and would affect the broader advertising ecosystem, as some companies have been warning about but not yet quantifying.</p>\n<p>“So what you’re seeing when we go into Q4 is a full-quarter impact of those issues, on Q4, and you know the reason that we’re mentioning, you know, iOS 15, is that that’s going to continue to disrupt the advertising ecosystem,” said Derek Anderson, Snap’s chief financial officer.</p>\n<p>Facebook, Google parent Alphabet and Twitter all report earnings next week, and investors will be able to gauge how widespread those issues are from their results, guidance and comments on company conference calls. If the outlook for the fourth quarter from any of those companies is as dismal as Snap’s, investors are likely to see a huge downdraft in internet ad companies. On Thursday, many investors were trying to get ahead of future bad news, which could even potentially impact the reported mega-merger talks between PayPal Holdings Inc.&nbsp;and Pinterest.</p>\n<p>If Snap’s warning does prove to be applicable to its rivals, the next few weeks could spell an “ad-mageddon” for internet stocks and social-media companies.</p>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Snap points to possibility of Apple causing the long-feared ‘ad-mageddon’ </title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSnap points to possibility of Apple causing the long-feared ‘ad-mageddon’ \n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-10-22 09:48 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.marketwatch.com/story/snap-points-to-possibility-of-apple-causing-the-long-feared-ad-mageddon-11634865299?mod=home-page><strong>MarketWatch</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Snap Inc. sounded the alarm Thursday for the long-feared internet advertising meltdown that could be coming in the normally busy fourth quarter.\nLong-feared because ever since Apple Inc. announced ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/snap-points-to-possibility-of-apple-causing-the-long-feared-ad-mageddon-11634865299?mod=home-page\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SNAP":"Snap Inc","GOOGL":"谷歌A","PINS":"Pinterest, Inc.","GOOG":"谷歌","TWTR":"Twitter","AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/snap-points-to-possibility-of-apple-causing-the-long-feared-ad-mageddon-11634865299?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1184152939","content_text":"Snap Inc. sounded the alarm Thursday for the long-feared internet advertising meltdown that could be coming in the normally busy fourth quarter.\nLong-feared because ever since Apple Inc. announced upcoming privacy changes to the iPhone, many companies with internet advertising businesses have been warning about its impact potential looming over their results.\nApple updated its mobile operating system in April to give users the option of not sharing their data or having it tracked, making it more difficult for software developers to track users across their apps, and for advertisers to target their ads.\nBased on comments by Snap on Thursday, the results are not pretty. The young social-media company, known for its Snapchat app, blamed the changes Apple made to iOS as a big factor in its $3 million third-quarter revenue shortfall. In addition, Snap executives forecast that fourth-quarter revenue would grow at a rate of only about 19% to 20%, down from third-quarter growth of 57%.\nShares of Snap plunged more than 20% in after-hours trading, taking some of the biggest names in tech with it — Facebook Inc.,Alphabet Inc.,Twitter Inc. and Pinterest Inc. all saw their shares fall after the Snap news.\nFacebook, for example, has been warning about the effects of Apple’s changes for more than a year, most recently in September, but investors have yet to see much change to Facebook’s very profitable business model, even amid all the other controversies at the social-media giant.\nLast December, Facebook even launched a full-on PR assault on Apple, with full-page ads in three national newspapers, proclaiming that Apple’s then-upcoming changes would hurt the ability of small businesses to offer targeted advertising to consumers, and app developers’ ability to offer free content.\nBut Snap co-founder and Chief Executive Evan Spiegel — who has previously avoided aiming any specific attacks at Apple regarding the change — said Thursday that the privacy changes have proved more problematic than expected, specifically mentioning that Apple even changed the tools that advertisers have to measure results of their ads.\n“I think what we really underestimated were the tooling changes,” said Spiegel. “Advertisers have essentially for a long time now used a set of really sophisticated tools to measure and optimize their campaigns, so that allows them to test out a bunch of different creative and see what’s performing.”\nWith Apple’s changes, he said, those tools “were essentially rendered blind.”\nStill, Spiegel reined in his criticism of Apple, adding that these privacy changes were “important to the long-term health of the ecosystem” and something that “we fully support.”\nIn addition to Apple’s huge changes, the global supply chain and staffing problems are affecting the number of ads that companies are starting to run in the all-important holiday season.\n“[Advertisers] don’t necessarily want to accelerate the field of products that they are going to have a hard time getting into the hands of customers, and that is somewhat broad,” Snap Chief Business Officer Jeremi Gorman told analysts on Thursday’s post-earnings conference call.\nBut Snap executives added, in response to an analyst’s question, that the Apple changes were having the biggest impact and would affect the broader advertising ecosystem, as some companies have been warning about but not yet quantifying.\n“So what you’re seeing when we go into Q4 is a full-quarter impact of those issues, on Q4, and you know the reason that we’re mentioning, you know, iOS 15, is that that’s going to continue to disrupt the advertising ecosystem,” said Derek Anderson, Snap’s chief financial officer.\nFacebook, Google parent Alphabet and Twitter all report earnings next week, and investors will be able to gauge how widespread those issues are from their results, guidance and comments on company conference calls. If the outlook for the fourth quarter from any of those companies is as dismal as Snap’s, investors are likely to see a huge downdraft in internet ad companies. On Thursday, many investors were trying to get ahead of future bad news, which could even potentially impact the reported mega-merger talks between PayPal Holdings Inc. and Pinterest.\nIf Snap’s warning does prove to be applicable to its rivals, the next few weeks could spell an “ad-mageddon” for internet stocks and social-media companies.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":40,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":179766768,"gmtCreate":1626578348854,"gmtModify":1633925726266,"author":{"id":"3567411499210880","authorId":"3567411499210880","name":"Nebhol","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b0bfc2a45b91e41a283614268857b3a5","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3567411499210880","authorIdStr":"3567411499210880"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like and comment please","listText":"Like and comment please","text":"Like and comment please","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":4,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/179766768","repostId":"1123523681","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1123523681","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1626569903,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1123523681?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-18 08:58","market":"us","language":"en","title":"The story behind the savvy ‘Mystery Broker’ and where he sees the market going now","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1123523681","media":"CNBC","summary":"“So, there’s this guy who emails me his market outlook every so often.”\nThat’s howmy Barron’s column","content":"<div>\n<p>“So, there’s this guy who emails me his market outlook every so often.”\nThat’s howmy Barron’s column started one week nearly a dozen years ago, introducing the canny and clear-thinking financial ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/07/17/the-story-behind-the-savvy-mystery-broker-and-where-he-sees-the-market-going-now.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"cnbc_highlight","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>The story behind the savvy ‘Mystery Broker’ and where he sees the market going now</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThe story behind the savvy ‘Mystery Broker’ and where he sees the market going now\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-18 08:58 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.cnbc.com/2021/07/17/the-story-behind-the-savvy-mystery-broker-and-where-he-sees-the-market-going-now.html><strong>CNBC</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>“So, there’s this guy who emails me his market outlook every so often.”\nThat’s howmy Barron’s column started one week nearly a dozen years ago, introducing the canny and clear-thinking financial ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/07/17/the-story-behind-the-savvy-mystery-broker-and-where-he-sees-the-market-going-now.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/07/17/the-story-behind-the-savvy-mystery-broker-and-where-he-sees-the-market-going-now.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/72bb72e1b84c09fca865c6dcb1bbcd16","article_id":"1123523681","content_text":"“So, there’s this guy who emails me his market outlook every so often.”\nThat’s howmy Barron’s column started one week nearly a dozen years ago, introducing the canny and clear-thinking financial advisor who has come to be known in print and on Twitter as the Mystery Broker, whose market color and investment calls I share on the irregular frequency with which he sends them.\nHis predictions don’t always prove prescient, but he has been more right than wrong, with a particularly impressive record of bold calls around market bottoms and ahead of corrections.\nAs noted in that first writeup in Barron’s in December 2009: “This particular guy is unique in at least two respects. He has no interest in having his name placed in print or pixels. And he is the one commentator I’m aware of who both turned aggressively bearish virtually at the all-time market peak in 2007, then in April began insisting that the March market lows would not be challenged, and that a new cyclical bull market had a long way to run.”\nThis broker’s dispatch to me in April 2009 — just weeks after the ultimate low of a wrenching 18-month bear market and terrifying global credit crisis — was a 12-page single-spaced argument that the financial crisis was over.  This was far from the consensus at the time. A November 2007 piece had called for a brutal bear market, a month after the S&P 500 hit a peak it wouldn’t revisit until 2013 and before most investors even had a bear market on their radar.\nThe intention of airing his views was not to create some gimmick or generate cheap intrigue, but simply to offer the well-grounded thoughts of professional free of institutional constraints or the need to sell investment products.\nBut it did capture readers’ attention and imagination, to the point that requests for updates of the Mystery Broker’s market take come constantly. I continue it strictly because so many readers and viewers have followed his work for years and like to keep up\nAnd, yes, the whole exercise drives some people nuts, whether they think it’s irresponsible (which makes no sense, he gets no benefit and doesn’t hype small stocks that could move in his favor) or insist it’s a fictional alter ego (untrue).\nMystery Broker’s approach\nHe became a broker in the mid-’80s. While there’s long been a guessing game about MB’s identity, he is not someone who’s name anyone would know, he doesn’t otherwise comment publicly on investments.\nAs noted back in 2009: “He doesn’t claim any magic formulas or proprietary systems. His approach is eclectic and inclusive, ranging among economic, technical, historical, valuation and sentiment inputs.” He’ll cite Marty Zweig, Ned Davis and the Value Line Appreciation Potential indicators – fairly old-school inspirations – but doesn’t seem rigidly attached to any one model or style.\nI almost never solicit Mystery Broker’s take, preferring he check in only when it strikes him, often when he changes his market stance or is moved to reiterate his conviction in a prior call. Aside from the broad market commentary, he’ll sometimes make the case for or against individual stocks. He loved wells Fargo to start 2021, as well as GE, for instance.\nMystery Broker sometimes goes deep on a controversial emerging biotech name, the sort of thing I tend not to pass along. He was put off by CNBC’s heavy coverage of the “meme stocks” early this year and let me know it. He and I both have strong views on baseball, which we exchange via email. We’ve never met.\nHow he navigated the pandemic\nIn the past few months, Mystery Broker has been cautious on stocks and has missed a bit of upside. Specifically, he went to a sell (which tends to mean raising cash for clients and himself and hedging equity holdings with index puts) at the close on April 16, with the S&P 500 at 4185. The index went sideways for two months, then lifted to last week’s record up almost 5% from where he called for a correction.\nStill, he’s playing with a lot of house money, having been deftly bullish into the teeth of the March 2020 Covid crash. (He was negative on the market from January last year, though not because he expected either a pandemic or a crash).\nThe individual calls are viewable at the #MysteryBroker hashtag on Twitter, but to cite a few examples: He thought the March 4, 2020, low in the S&P 500 near 2900 would hold; it absolutely didn’t, plunging to about 2200 by the 23rd. But on March 26 he said the bottom was in, and within a month the S&P had recovered back to 2900.\nThen, this in mid-April 2020: He would normally look for a retest of the major low, but not then: ”“Because for the first time in stock market history the consensus is for a retest, a normal retest is not likely to happen.”\nThis was right, as was his preference for riskier cyclical stocks and his update June of last year: “We are in a new bull market...every correction should be bought...every time S&P 500 falls below its 50-day moving average is an extraordinary buying opportunity.”\nS&P 500 with 50-day moving averageFactSet\nAfter that and before predicting a correction three months ago that has yet to occur, he pegged the peak in FAANMG days before they topped last Sept. 1; said in late December the market had “entered the last hurrah for growth and speculative stocks” that would pressure the  overall market but not necessarily drive across-the-board losses; and predicted bitcoin would peak coincident with the Coinbase listing (it did). Not perfect, but not bad.\nHis current outlook\nHis is not a system, but a weight-of-the-evidence approach pursued with an open mind and a feel for market cadences earned over more than three decades of economic cycles.\nFollowing up onhis latest update this week, I asked for a broader take on historical echoes and longer-term probabilities. Mystery Broker offers this:\n“I think the current recovery is most similar to the recovery in 2003-04.  A big transition from hyper-growth to value.  Also, valuations are already high after only one year of stock market and economic growth similar to 2003-4, although more extreme now. ” He expects “muted returns for the rest of decade similar to the low returns of the first decade of the 2000s.  See leadership from industrials, healthcare and to some degree financials.”\n“Don’t expect technology to be a big outperformer and semiconductors will be a disappointment especially equipment semis that have benefitted from a few big trends over the last few years. Value, foreign stocks (expect dollar to fall over the next few years) and equal-weighted indices will outperform.  Inflation and interest rates will slowly rise which is different from the last decade.\n“The big surprise will be how old industries adapt to new technology and fight off some of the hot new entries.  There will be a lot of rebounds similar to how the New York Times came back from the dead last decade.”\nI also asked if he’s interested in being identified. The answer: not now, but maybe soon.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":74,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":181100594,"gmtCreate":1623376465918,"gmtModify":1634034015441,"author":{"id":"3567411499210880","authorId":"3567411499210880","name":"Nebhol","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b0bfc2a45b91e41a283614268857b3a5","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3567411499210880","authorIdStr":"3567411499210880"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like and comment&nbsp;","listText":"Like and comment&nbsp;","text":"Like and comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":5,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/181100594","repostId":"2142382275","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2142382275","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1623375737,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2142382275?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-06-11 09:42","market":"hk","language":"en","title":"China Youran Dairy raises $643 mln in Hong Kong IPO - sources","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2142382275","media":"Reuters","summary":"HONG KONG, June 11 (Reuters) - China Youran Dairy Group raised $643 million in its Hong Kong initial","content":"<p>HONG KONG, June 11 (Reuters) - China Youran Dairy Group&nbsp;raised $643 million in its Hong Kong initial public offering <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/IPO.UK\">$(IPO.UK)$</a> by pricing its shares at the bottom of an indicated price range at HK$6.98 each, according to two sources with direct knowledge of the matter.</p>\n<p>China Youran did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The sources could not be named as the information was not yet public.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>China Youran Dairy raises $643 mln in Hong Kong IPO - sources</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nChina Youran Dairy raises $643 mln in Hong Kong IPO - sources\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-06-11 09:42</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>HONG KONG, June 11 (Reuters) - China Youran Dairy Group&nbsp;raised $643 million in its Hong Kong initial public offering <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/IPO.UK\">$(IPO.UK)$</a> by pricing its shares at the bottom of an indicated price range at HK$6.98 each, according to two sources with direct knowledge of the matter.</p>\n<p>China Youran did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The sources could not be named as the information was not yet public.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"09858":"优然牧业"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2142382275","content_text":"HONG KONG, June 11 (Reuters) - China Youran Dairy Group raised $643 million in its Hong Kong initial public offering $(IPO.UK)$ by pricing its shares at the bottom of an indicated price range at HK$6.98 each, according to two sources with direct knowledge of the matter.\nChina Youran did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The sources could not be named as the information was not yet public.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":127,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":802052843,"gmtCreate":1627701351282,"gmtModify":1633756963694,"author":{"id":"3567411499210880","authorId":"3567411499210880","name":"Nebhol","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b0bfc2a45b91e41a283614268857b3a5","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3567411499210880","authorIdStr":"3567411499210880"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like comment&nbsp;","listText":"Like comment&nbsp;","text":"Like comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/802052843","repostId":"1106964638","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":88,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":110065749,"gmtCreate":1622417829181,"gmtModify":1631884836183,"author":{"id":"3567411499210880","authorId":"3567411499210880","name":"Nebhol","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b0bfc2a45b91e41a283614268857b3a5","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3567411499210880","authorIdStr":"3567411499210880"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/IPOE\">$Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. V(IPOE)$</a>Changing ticker soon?&nbsp;","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/IPOE\">$Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. V(IPOE)$</a>Changing ticker soon?&nbsp;","text":"$Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. V(IPOE)$Changing ticker soon?","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6285ba3cd4c482fd918507a3e4d71bbd","width":"828","height":"1434"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":4,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/110065749","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":633,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":874053688,"gmtCreate":1637714196049,"gmtModify":1637714196280,"author":{"id":"3567411499210880","authorId":"3567411499210880","name":"Nebhol","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b0bfc2a45b91e41a283614268857b3a5","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3567411499210880","authorIdStr":"3567411499210880"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like comment&nbsp;","listText":"Like comment&nbsp;","text":"Like comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":4,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/874053688","repostId":"1176597039","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1176597039","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1637713100,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1176597039?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-24 08:18","market":"sg","language":"en","title":"Mild Upside Expected For Singapore Stock Market","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1176597039","media":"RTTNews","summary":"The Singapore stock market has alternated between positive and negative finishes through the last fo","content":"<p>The Singapore stock market has alternated between positive and negative finishes through the last four trading days since the end of the two-day slide in which it had fallen almost 10 points or 0.3 percent. The Straits Times Index now sits just above the 3,225-point plateau and it may tick higher again on Wednesday.</p>\n<p>The global forecast for the Asian&nbsp;markets&nbsp;is mixed, with support from oil and financial stocks likely to be undercut by weakness from technology shares. The European markets were down and the U.S. bourses were mixed and the Asian markets figure to follow the latter lead.</p>\n<p>The STI finished modestly lower on Tuesday following losses from the financial shares and mixed performances from the properties and industrials.</p>\n<p>For the day, the index shed 9.55 points or 0.30 percent to finish at 3,227.53 after trading between 3,226.76 and 3,237.32. Volume was 1.88 billion shares worth 987 million Singapore dollars. There were 262 decliners and 191 gainers.</p>\n<p>Among the actives, CapitaLand Integrated Commercial Trust jumped 1.83 percent, while City Developments plunged 1.67 percent, Comfort DelGro skidded 1.32 percent, Dairy Farm International tumbled 1.25 percent, DBS Group dropped 0.43 percent, Genting Singapore declined 0.60 percent, Keppel Corp surrendered 0.93 percent, Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation shed 0.42 percent, SATS fell 0.24 percent, SembCorp Industries plummeted 1.95 percent, Singapore Airlines sank 0.57 percent, Singapore Exchange dipped 0.21 percent, Singapore Technologies Engineering retreated 0.51 percent, SingTel and United Overseas Bank both lost 0.40 percent, Thai Beverage tanked 1.39 percent, Wilmar International rose 0.23 percent, Yangzijiang Shipbuilding climbed 1.56 percent and Mapletree Commercial Trust, Mapletree Logistics Trust, Ascendas REIT and Singapore Press Holdings were unchanged.</p>\n<p>The lead from Wall Street remains inconsistent as the Dow and S&amp;P spent Tuesday bouncing back and forth across the unchanged line before ending higher. The NASDAQ spent most of the session in the red and finished that way.</p>\n<p>The Dow jumped 194.55 points or 0.55 percent to finish at 35,813.80, while the NASDAQ slipped 79.62 points or 0.50 percent to close at 15,775.14 and the S&amp;P 500 rose 7.76 points or 0.17 percent to end at 4,690.70.</p>\n<p>The tech-heavy NASDAQ pulled back further off the record intraday high set in early trading on Monday, as a continued increase in treasury yields weighed on high-growth tech stocks.</p>\n<p>Yields have moved notably higher since President Joe Biden announced his intention to nominate Jerome Powell for a second term as Fed Chair. With the upward move, the yield on the benchmark ten-year note ended at its highest closing level in a month.</p>\n<p>On the other hand, the Dow benefited from strong gains by financial giants Goldman Sachs (GS) and JPMorgan Chase (JPM).</p>\n<p>Crude oil futures settled sharply higher on Tuesday, rebounding strongly from earlier losses over the outlook for energy demand due to rising&nbsp;coronavirus&nbsp;cases in Europe, and plans by the U.S. to release oil from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. West Texas Intermediate Crude oil futures for January still ended higher by $1.75 or 2.3 percent at $78.50 a barrel.</p>\n<p>Closer to home, Singapore will release final Q3 figures for gross domestic product later this morning; in the previous three months, GDP was down 1.8 percent on quarter and up 14.7 percent on year.</p>","source":"lsy1626938412129","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Mild Upside Expected For Singapore Stock Market</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nMild Upside Expected For Singapore Stock Market\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-11-24 08:18 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.rttnews.com/3244509/mild-upside-expected-for-singapore-stock-market.aspx?type=acom><strong>RTTNews</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The Singapore stock market has alternated between positive and negative finishes through the last four trading days since the end of the two-day slide in which it had fallen almost 10 points or 0.3 ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.rttnews.com/3244509/mild-upside-expected-for-singapore-stock-market.aspx?type=acom\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"STI.SI":"富时新加坡海峡指数"},"source_url":"https://www.rttnews.com/3244509/mild-upside-expected-for-singapore-stock-market.aspx?type=acom","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1176597039","content_text":"The Singapore stock market has alternated between positive and negative finishes through the last four trading days since the end of the two-day slide in which it had fallen almost 10 points or 0.3 percent. The Straits Times Index now sits just above the 3,225-point plateau and it may tick higher again on Wednesday.\nThe global forecast for the Asian markets is mixed, with support from oil and financial stocks likely to be undercut by weakness from technology shares. The European markets were down and the U.S. bourses were mixed and the Asian markets figure to follow the latter lead.\nThe STI finished modestly lower on Tuesday following losses from the financial shares and mixed performances from the properties and industrials.\nFor the day, the index shed 9.55 points or 0.30 percent to finish at 3,227.53 after trading between 3,226.76 and 3,237.32. Volume was 1.88 billion shares worth 987 million Singapore dollars. There were 262 decliners and 191 gainers.\nAmong the actives, CapitaLand Integrated Commercial Trust jumped 1.83 percent, while City Developments plunged 1.67 percent, Comfort DelGro skidded 1.32 percent, Dairy Farm International tumbled 1.25 percent, DBS Group dropped 0.43 percent, Genting Singapore declined 0.60 percent, Keppel Corp surrendered 0.93 percent, Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation shed 0.42 percent, SATS fell 0.24 percent, SembCorp Industries plummeted 1.95 percent, Singapore Airlines sank 0.57 percent, Singapore Exchange dipped 0.21 percent, Singapore Technologies Engineering retreated 0.51 percent, SingTel and United Overseas Bank both lost 0.40 percent, Thai Beverage tanked 1.39 percent, Wilmar International rose 0.23 percent, Yangzijiang Shipbuilding climbed 1.56 percent and Mapletree Commercial Trust, Mapletree Logistics Trust, Ascendas REIT and Singapore Press Holdings were unchanged.\nThe lead from Wall Street remains inconsistent as the Dow and S&P spent Tuesday bouncing back and forth across the unchanged line before ending higher. The NASDAQ spent most of the session in the red and finished that way.\nThe Dow jumped 194.55 points or 0.55 percent to finish at 35,813.80, while the NASDAQ slipped 79.62 points or 0.50 percent to close at 15,775.14 and the S&P 500 rose 7.76 points or 0.17 percent to end at 4,690.70.\nThe tech-heavy NASDAQ pulled back further off the record intraday high set in early trading on Monday, as a continued increase in treasury yields weighed on high-growth tech stocks.\nYields have moved notably higher since President Joe Biden announced his intention to nominate Jerome Powell for a second term as Fed Chair. With the upward move, the yield on the benchmark ten-year note ended at its highest closing level in a month.\nOn the other hand, the Dow benefited from strong gains by financial giants Goldman Sachs (GS) and JPMorgan Chase (JPM).\nCrude oil futures settled sharply higher on Tuesday, rebounding strongly from earlier losses over the outlook for energy demand due to rising coronavirus cases in Europe, and plans by the U.S. to release oil from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. West Texas Intermediate Crude oil futures for January still ended higher by $1.75 or 2.3 percent at $78.50 a barrel.\nCloser to home, Singapore will release final Q3 figures for gross domestic product later this morning; in the previous three months, GDP was down 1.8 percent on quarter and up 14.7 percent on year.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":65,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":851767541,"gmtCreate":1634946768716,"gmtModify":1634946769333,"author":{"id":"3567411499210880","authorId":"3567411499210880","name":"Nebhol","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b0bfc2a45b91e41a283614268857b3a5","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3567411499210880","authorIdStr":"3567411499210880"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like comment&nbsp;","listText":"Like comment&nbsp;","text":"Like comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/851767541","repostId":"1172683205","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1172683205","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1634944622,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1172683205?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-23 07:17","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tech Stocks Stumbled While the Dow Hit a New High","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1172683205","media":"Barrons","summary":"The Dow Jones Industrial Average closed at a new record Friday, while tech stocks came under pressur","content":"<p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average&nbsp;closed at a new record Friday, while tech stocks came under pressure as&nbsp;Snap‘s Apple issues partly spurred a selloff in social-media stocks.</p>\n<p>The Dow gained 74 points, or 0.2%, closing at 35,677.02 points and surpassing its record close of 35,625.4 points hit Aug. 16. Meanwhile, the S&amp;P 500 fell 0.1% and the&nbsp;Nasdaq Composite&nbsp;tumbled 0.8%.</p>\n<p>Big Tech stocks were hit hard, as seen by the tech-heavy Nasdaq. Over a quarter of the S&amp;P 500’s total market capitalization is from technology companies, so when their shares decline, they usually bring the S&amp;P 500 down with them, too.</p>\n<p>Snap&nbsp;shares slid 26.6% as its revenue for the third quarter was slightly below estimates. Snap said&nbsp;Apple‘s (AAPL) privacy changes damaged advertising sales. The company also warned that brands’ supply chain constraints—which limit the ability to meet sales goals—are prompting them to reduce ad spend. That hurt&nbsp;Facebook&nbsp;and&nbsp;Alphabet&nbsp;stocks, which fell 5.1% and 3%, respectively.</p>\n<p>The stock market wasn’t having as rough a day as the major indexes would suggest. While tech stocks dropped, other sectors rose; about 63% of the S&amp;P 500’s stocks were in the green, according to FactSet.</p>\n<p>Earnings season thus far has largely propelled stocks higher. The aggregate earnings per share result from S&amp;P 500 companies—excluding financials—has beaten analyst estimates by about 10%, according to Credit Suisse. Just a few weeks ago, profits were beating by only about 4%.</p>\n<p>“A return to a focus on earnings would once again favor stock picking over buying Indexes,” writes Louis Navellier, founder of Navellier &amp; Associates.</p>\n<p>Another positive—certainly helping to lift economically-sensitive stocks—was strong economic data. The Markit Services Purchasing Managers Index showed a reading of 58.2 for October, beating estimates of 55.5. Any reading above 50 indicates that activity increased. The Markit Manufacturing PMI read 59.2, just below the expected 60.5.</p>\n<p>While the PMI results showed that companies are paying higher costs for materials, they’re also raising prices. Ultimately, “demand is clearly strong,” writes Andrew Hollenhorst, Citigroup economist.</p>\n<p>Markets continue to monitor one key negative factor—ongoing inflation. Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell implied at a virtual conference Friday that he is becoming slightly more&nbsp;concerned that high inflation is here to stay.</p>\n<p><b>Here are 5 stocks on the move Friday</b>:</p>\n<p>Intel&nbsp;was down 11.7% after the chip maker missed sales expectations when it posted earnings late Thursday, putting down a decline in its PC business to broader component shortages.</p>\n<p>Mattel&nbsp;rose 0.6% after reporting better-than-expected earnings.</p>\n<p>Cleveland-Cliffs&nbsp;gained 12.7% after its earnings beat estimates and the company offered optimistic guidance on steel pricing.</p>\n<p>Zoom Video Communications&nbsp;advanced 1% after getting upgraded to Overweight from Neutral at JPMorgan.</p>\n<p>Beyond Meat&nbsp;tumbled 11.8% after forecasting third-quarter sales of $106 million, compared with its prior forecast of $120 million to $140 million.</p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tech Stocks Stumbled While the Dow Hit a New High</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTech Stocks Stumbled While the Dow Hit a New High\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-10-23 07:17 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/stock-market-today-51634891875?mod=hp_LEAD_1><strong>Barrons</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average closed at a new record Friday, while tech stocks came under pressure as Snap‘s Apple issues partly spurred a selloff in social-media stocks.\nThe Dow gained 74 points, ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/stock-market-today-51634891875?mod=hp_LEAD_1\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BYND":"Beyond Meat, Inc.","INTC":"英特尔",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","ZM":"Zoom","AAPL":"苹果","MAT":"美国美泰公司","CLF":"克利夫兰克里夫","GOOGL":"谷歌A","SNAP":"Snap Inc",".DJI":"道琼斯","GOOG":"谷歌",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/stock-market-today-51634891875?mod=hp_LEAD_1","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1172683205","content_text":"The Dow Jones Industrial Average closed at a new record Friday, while tech stocks came under pressure as Snap‘s Apple issues partly spurred a selloff in social-media stocks.\nThe Dow gained 74 points, or 0.2%, closing at 35,677.02 points and surpassing its record close of 35,625.4 points hit Aug. 16. Meanwhile, the S&P 500 fell 0.1% and the Nasdaq Composite tumbled 0.8%.\nBig Tech stocks were hit hard, as seen by the tech-heavy Nasdaq. Over a quarter of the S&P 500’s total market capitalization is from technology companies, so when their shares decline, they usually bring the S&P 500 down with them, too.\nSnap shares slid 26.6% as its revenue for the third quarter was slightly below estimates. Snap said Apple‘s (AAPL) privacy changes damaged advertising sales. The company also warned that brands’ supply chain constraints—which limit the ability to meet sales goals—are prompting them to reduce ad spend. That hurt Facebook and Alphabet stocks, which fell 5.1% and 3%, respectively.\nThe stock market wasn’t having as rough a day as the major indexes would suggest. While tech stocks dropped, other sectors rose; about 63% of the S&P 500’s stocks were in the green, according to FactSet.\nEarnings season thus far has largely propelled stocks higher. The aggregate earnings per share result from S&P 500 companies—excluding financials—has beaten analyst estimates by about 10%, according to Credit Suisse. Just a few weeks ago, profits were beating by only about 4%.\n“A return to a focus on earnings would once again favor stock picking over buying Indexes,” writes Louis Navellier, founder of Navellier & Associates.\nAnother positive—certainly helping to lift economically-sensitive stocks—was strong economic data. The Markit Services Purchasing Managers Index showed a reading of 58.2 for October, beating estimates of 55.5. Any reading above 50 indicates that activity increased. The Markit Manufacturing PMI read 59.2, just below the expected 60.5.\nWhile the PMI results showed that companies are paying higher costs for materials, they’re also raising prices. Ultimately, “demand is clearly strong,” writes Andrew Hollenhorst, Citigroup economist.\nMarkets continue to monitor one key negative factor—ongoing inflation. Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell implied at a virtual conference Friday that he is becoming slightly more concerned that high inflation is here to stay.\nHere are 5 stocks on the move Friday:\nIntel was down 11.7% after the chip maker missed sales expectations when it posted earnings late Thursday, putting down a decline in its PC business to broader component shortages.\nMattel rose 0.6% after reporting better-than-expected earnings.\nCleveland-Cliffs gained 12.7% after its earnings beat estimates and the company offered optimistic guidance on steel pricing.\nZoom Video Communications advanced 1% after getting upgraded to Overweight from Neutral at JPMorgan.\nBeyond Meat tumbled 11.8% after forecasting third-quarter sales of $106 million, compared with its prior forecast of $120 million to $140 million.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":43,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":834080856,"gmtCreate":1629762444975,"gmtModify":1633682695352,"author":{"id":"3567411499210880","authorId":"3567411499210880","name":"Nebhol","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b0bfc2a45b91e41a283614268857b3a5","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3567411499210880","authorIdStr":"3567411499210880"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like comment","listText":"Like comment","text":"Like comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/834080856","repostId":"2161777891","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2161777891","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1629750559,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2161777891?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-24 04:29","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Wall St gains, Nasdaq notches record closing high on full vaccine approval","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2161777891","media":"Reuters","summary":"NEW YORK, Aug 23 (Reuters) - Wall Street rallied on Monday, and the Nasdaq reached an all-time closi","content":"<p>NEW YORK, Aug 23 (Reuters) - Wall Street rallied on Monday, and the Nasdaq reached an all-time closing high as sentiment was boosted by full FDA approval of a COVID-19 vaccine and market participants looked ahead to the Jackson Hole Symposium expected to convene later this week.</p>\n<p>All three major U.S. stock indexes ended the session sharply higher, with the S&amp;P 500 in the session's final minutes just failing to hold what would have been a record-high close.</p>\n<p>Surging crude prices, driven by expected demand growth, putting energy shares&nbsp;out front.</p>\n<p>\"This has been the script all along,\" said Peter Cardillo, chief market economist at Spartan Capital Securities in New York. \"We make new highs, pull back, and then we’re off to the races again.\"</p>\n<p>\"That tells me the fundamentals are in place,\" Cardillo added. \"There’s worries out there, but it’s hard to keep this market down.\"</p>\n<p>The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted full approval to the COVID-19 vaccine developed by Pfizer Inc&nbsp;and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BNTX\">BioNTech SE</a>&nbsp;in a move that could accelerate inoculations in the United States.</p>\n<p>\"Full approval means that there’s most likely going to be more mandates, more companies will mandate that you have to get the vaccine in order to get back to the office,\" Cardillo said. \"I don’t think this will get all the doubters vaccinated but this news today will probably drive (the vaccinated rate) closer to 75%.\"</p>\n<p>Pfizer and U.S.-listed shares of BioNTech advanced 2.5% and 9.6%, respectively.</p>\n<p>Rival Moderna Inc&nbsp;gained 7.5%.</p>\n<p>Spiking COVID-19 infections caused by the highly contagious Delta variant have fueled concerns over a protracted recovery from the global health crisis.</p>\n<p>For an interactive graphic on worldwide vaccine deployment and access, click here</p>\n<p>Data released on Monday painted a \"Goldilocks\" portrait of an economic recovery headed in the right direction, but not enough to warrant a change in the Federal Reserve's dovish monetary policy, which helped feed investor risk appetite.</p>\n<p>Market participants look to the Jackson Hole Symposium, due to convene in Wyoming later this week. The comments of Fed Chairman Jerome Powell will be closely parsed for clues regarding the central bank's policy-tightening timeline.</p>\n<p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average&nbsp;rose 215.63 points, or 0.61%, to 35,335.71, the S&amp;P 500&nbsp;gained 37.86 points, or 0.85%, to 4,479.53 and the Nasdaq Composite&nbsp;added 227.99 points, or 1.55%, to 14,942.65.</p>\n<p>Of the 11 major sectors in the S&amp;P 500, seven ended the session green, with energy enjoying its best day in nearly two months.</p>\n<p>Exxon Mobil Corp&nbsp;and Chevron Corp&nbsp;gained 4.1% and 2.6%, respectively.</p>\n<p>U.S.-listed shares of Trillium Therapeutics Inc&nbsp;soared 188.8% after Pfizer agreed to buy the cancer drug developer in a $2.26 billion deal.</p>\n<p>General Motors Co fell 1.3% following its announcement that it would take a $1 billion hit to expand the recall of its Chevrolet Bolt electric vehicles.</p>\n<p>Advancing issues outnumbered declining ones on the NYSE by a 2.46-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 2.81-to-1 ratio favored advancers.</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 500 posted 57 new 52-week highs and 1 new low; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 108 new highs and 54 new lows.</p>\n<p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 8.63 billion shares, compared with the 9.15 billion average over the last 20 trading days.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Wall St gains, Nasdaq notches record closing high on full vaccine approval</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWall St gains, Nasdaq notches record closing high on full vaccine approval\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-08-24 04:29</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>NEW YORK, Aug 23 (Reuters) - Wall Street rallied on Monday, and the Nasdaq reached an all-time closing high as sentiment was boosted by full FDA approval of a COVID-19 vaccine and market participants looked ahead to the Jackson Hole Symposium expected to convene later this week.</p>\n<p>All three major U.S. stock indexes ended the session sharply higher, with the S&amp;P 500 in the session's final minutes just failing to hold what would have been a record-high close.</p>\n<p>Surging crude prices, driven by expected demand growth, putting energy shares&nbsp;out front.</p>\n<p>\"This has been the script all along,\" said Peter Cardillo, chief market economist at Spartan Capital Securities in New York. \"We make new highs, pull back, and then we’re off to the races again.\"</p>\n<p>\"That tells me the fundamentals are in place,\" Cardillo added. \"There’s worries out there, but it’s hard to keep this market down.\"</p>\n<p>The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted full approval to the COVID-19 vaccine developed by Pfizer Inc&nbsp;and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BNTX\">BioNTech SE</a>&nbsp;in a move that could accelerate inoculations in the United States.</p>\n<p>\"Full approval means that there’s most likely going to be more mandates, more companies will mandate that you have to get the vaccine in order to get back to the office,\" Cardillo said. \"I don’t think this will get all the doubters vaccinated but this news today will probably drive (the vaccinated rate) closer to 75%.\"</p>\n<p>Pfizer and U.S.-listed shares of BioNTech advanced 2.5% and 9.6%, respectively.</p>\n<p>Rival Moderna Inc&nbsp;gained 7.5%.</p>\n<p>Spiking COVID-19 infections caused by the highly contagious Delta variant have fueled concerns over a protracted recovery from the global health crisis.</p>\n<p>For an interactive graphic on worldwide vaccine deployment and access, click here</p>\n<p>Data released on Monday painted a \"Goldilocks\" portrait of an economic recovery headed in the right direction, but not enough to warrant a change in the Federal Reserve's dovish monetary policy, which helped feed investor risk appetite.</p>\n<p>Market participants look to the Jackson Hole Symposium, due to convene in Wyoming later this week. The comments of Fed Chairman Jerome Powell will be closely parsed for clues regarding the central bank's policy-tightening timeline.</p>\n<p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average&nbsp;rose 215.63 points, or 0.61%, to 35,335.71, the S&amp;P 500&nbsp;gained 37.86 points, or 0.85%, to 4,479.53 and the Nasdaq Composite&nbsp;added 227.99 points, or 1.55%, to 14,942.65.</p>\n<p>Of the 11 major sectors in the S&amp;P 500, seven ended the session green, with energy enjoying its best day in nearly two months.</p>\n<p>Exxon Mobil Corp&nbsp;and Chevron Corp&nbsp;gained 4.1% and 2.6%, respectively.</p>\n<p>U.S.-listed shares of Trillium Therapeutics Inc&nbsp;soared 188.8% after Pfizer agreed to buy the cancer drug developer in a $2.26 billion deal.</p>\n<p>General Motors Co fell 1.3% following its announcement that it would take a $1 billion hit to expand the recall of its Chevrolet Bolt electric vehicles.</p>\n<p>Advancing issues outnumbered declining ones on the NYSE by a 2.46-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 2.81-to-1 ratio favored advancers.</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 500 posted 57 new 52-week highs and 1 new low; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 108 new highs and 54 new lows.</p>\n<p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 8.63 billion shares, compared with the 9.15 billion average over the last 20 trading days.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","PFE":"辉瑞",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2161777891","content_text":"NEW YORK, Aug 23 (Reuters) - Wall Street rallied on Monday, and the Nasdaq reached an all-time closing high as sentiment was boosted by full FDA approval of a COVID-19 vaccine and market participants looked ahead to the Jackson Hole Symposium expected to convene later this week.\nAll three major U.S. stock indexes ended the session sharply higher, with the S&P 500 in the session's final minutes just failing to hold what would have been a record-high close.\nSurging crude prices, driven by expected demand growth, putting energy shares out front.\n\"This has been the script all along,\" said Peter Cardillo, chief market economist at Spartan Capital Securities in New York. \"We make new highs, pull back, and then we’re off to the races again.\"\n\"That tells me the fundamentals are in place,\" Cardillo added. \"There’s worries out there, but it’s hard to keep this market down.\"\nThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted full approval to the COVID-19 vaccine developed by Pfizer Inc and BioNTech SE in a move that could accelerate inoculations in the United States.\n\"Full approval means that there’s most likely going to be more mandates, more companies will mandate that you have to get the vaccine in order to get back to the office,\" Cardillo said. \"I don’t think this will get all the doubters vaccinated but this news today will probably drive (the vaccinated rate) closer to 75%.\"\nPfizer and U.S.-listed shares of BioNTech advanced 2.5% and 9.6%, respectively.\nRival Moderna Inc gained 7.5%.\nSpiking COVID-19 infections caused by the highly contagious Delta variant have fueled concerns over a protracted recovery from the global health crisis.\nFor an interactive graphic on worldwide vaccine deployment and access, click here\nData released on Monday painted a \"Goldilocks\" portrait of an economic recovery headed in the right direction, but not enough to warrant a change in the Federal Reserve's dovish monetary policy, which helped feed investor risk appetite.\nMarket participants look to the Jackson Hole Symposium, due to convene in Wyoming later this week. The comments of Fed Chairman Jerome Powell will be closely parsed for clues regarding the central bank's policy-tightening timeline.\nThe Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 215.63 points, or 0.61%, to 35,335.71, the S&P 500 gained 37.86 points, or 0.85%, to 4,479.53 and the Nasdaq Composite added 227.99 points, or 1.55%, to 14,942.65.\nOf the 11 major sectors in the S&P 500, seven ended the session green, with energy enjoying its best day in nearly two months.\nExxon Mobil Corp and Chevron Corp gained 4.1% and 2.6%, respectively.\nU.S.-listed shares of Trillium Therapeutics Inc soared 188.8% after Pfizer agreed to buy the cancer drug developer in a $2.26 billion deal.\nGeneral Motors Co fell 1.3% following its announcement that it would take a $1 billion hit to expand the recall of its Chevrolet Bolt electric vehicles.\nAdvancing issues outnumbered declining ones on the NYSE by a 2.46-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 2.81-to-1 ratio favored advancers.\nThe S&P 500 posted 57 new 52-week highs and 1 new low; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 108 new highs and 54 new lows.\nVolume on U.S. exchanges was 8.63 billion shares, compared with the 9.15 billion average over the last 20 trading days.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":76,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":178218885,"gmtCreate":1626823316347,"gmtModify":1633770769460,"author":{"id":"3567411499210880","authorId":"3567411499210880","name":"Nebhol","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b0bfc2a45b91e41a283614268857b3a5","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3567411499210880","authorIdStr":"3567411499210880"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like comment&nbsp;","listText":"Like comment&nbsp;","text":"Like comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/178218885","repostId":"2153924256","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2153924256","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1626812915,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2153924256?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-21 04:28","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Wall Street bounces back on renewed economic optimism","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2153924256","media":"Reuters","summary":"NEW YORK, July 20 (Reuters) - Wall Street ended sharply higher on Tuesday, rebounding from a multi-d","content":"<p>NEW YORK, July 20 (Reuters) - Wall Street ended sharply higher on Tuesday, rebounding from a multi-day losing streak as a string of upbeat earnings reports and revived economic optimism fueled a risk-on rally.</p>\n<p>All three major U.S. stock indexes gained more than 1% with the blue-chip Dow, on the heels of its worst day in nine months, leading the charge.</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P notched its first advance in four days as well as registering its strongest day since March. The Nasdaq posted its first gain in six sessions.</p>\n<p>\"It’s a buy-the-dip mentality coming into the market,\" said Chuck Carlson, chief executive officer at Horizon Investment Services in Hammond, Indiana.</p>\n<p>Economically sensitive small caps&nbsp;and transports&nbsp;outperformed the broader market.</p>\n<p>Benchmark U.S. Treasury yields bounced back from five-month lows, in the wake of their biggest single-session decline since February in the prior session . This helped boost rate-vulnerable banks by 2.6%.</p>\n<p>\"The economically sensitive stocks are up today,\" Carlson added. \"When the 10-year (Treasury yield) goes down in a short period of time, that typically doesn’t happen with an economy that’s supposed to be growing. Firming in the 10-year (yield) indicates that perhaps the economy isn’t going to be falling off a cliff.\"</p>\n<p>Mounting concerns over the highly contagious Delta variant of COVID-19, now responsible for the majority of new infections, have sparked sell-offs in recent sessions as worldwide vaccination efforts gather momentum.</p>\n<p>\"Things like the Delta variant can certainly impact in the margins,\" Carlson said. \"It doesn’t take a whole lot of fear in some investors to create what we saw yesterday.\"</p>\n<p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 549.95 points, or 1.62%, to 34,511.99, the S&amp;P 500 gained 64.57 points, or 1.52%, to 4,323.06 and the Nasdaq Composite added 223.89 points, or 1.57%, to 14,498.88.</p>\n<p>Of the 11 major sectors in the S&amp;P 500, all but consumer staples closed green. Industrials fared best, rising 2.7%.</p>\n<p>Second-quarter reporting season has hit full-stride, with 56 of the companies in the S&amp;P 500 having posted results. Of those, 91% have beaten consensus, according to Refinitiv.</p>\n<p>Analysts now see annual S&amp;P earnings growth of 72.9% for the April-June period, a significant improvement over the 54% growth seen at the beginning of the quarter.</p>\n<p>Halliburton Co&nbsp;rose 3.7% after a bounce-back in crude prices boosted oilfield services demand, leading the company to post its second consecutive quarterly profit.</p>\n<p>Peloton Interactive Inc&nbsp;advanced 6.7% after announcing it would provide UnitedHealth Group's fully insured members free access to its live and on-demand fitness classes.</p>\n<p>Moderna's&nbsp;stock dropped 2% in a volatile session on Tuesday, with the COVID-19 vaccine maker the most heavily traded company on Wall Street ahead of its debut in the S&amp;P 500 on Wednesday.</p>\n<p>Netflix Inc&nbsp;shares dipped more than 3% in after- hours trading after its forecast missed estimates.</p>\n<p>Shares of Chipotle Mexican Grill gained over 2% post-market after its earnings and revenue beat consensus.</p>\n<p>Advancing issues outnumbered declining ones on the NYSE by a 4.44-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 3.59-to-1 ratio favored advancers.</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 500 posted 41 new 52-week highs and no new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 45 new highs and 76 new lows.</p>\n<p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 10.62 billion shares, compared with the 10.19 billion average over the last 20 trading days.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Wall Street bounces back on renewed economic optimism</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWall Street bounces back on renewed economic optimism\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-07-21 04:28</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>NEW YORK, July 20 (Reuters) - Wall Street ended sharply higher on Tuesday, rebounding from a multi-day losing streak as a string of upbeat earnings reports and revived economic optimism fueled a risk-on rally.</p>\n<p>All three major U.S. stock indexes gained more than 1% with the blue-chip Dow, on the heels of its worst day in nine months, leading the charge.</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P notched its first advance in four days as well as registering its strongest day since March. The Nasdaq posted its first gain in six sessions.</p>\n<p>\"It’s a buy-the-dip mentality coming into the market,\" said Chuck Carlson, chief executive officer at Horizon Investment Services in Hammond, Indiana.</p>\n<p>Economically sensitive small caps&nbsp;and transports&nbsp;outperformed the broader market.</p>\n<p>Benchmark U.S. Treasury yields bounced back from five-month lows, in the wake of their biggest single-session decline since February in the prior session . This helped boost rate-vulnerable banks by 2.6%.</p>\n<p>\"The economically sensitive stocks are up today,\" Carlson added. \"When the 10-year (Treasury yield) goes down in a short period of time, that typically doesn’t happen with an economy that’s supposed to be growing. Firming in the 10-year (yield) indicates that perhaps the economy isn’t going to be falling off a cliff.\"</p>\n<p>Mounting concerns over the highly contagious Delta variant of COVID-19, now responsible for the majority of new infections, have sparked sell-offs in recent sessions as worldwide vaccination efforts gather momentum.</p>\n<p>\"Things like the Delta variant can certainly impact in the margins,\" Carlson said. \"It doesn’t take a whole lot of fear in some investors to create what we saw yesterday.\"</p>\n<p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 549.95 points, or 1.62%, to 34,511.99, the S&amp;P 500 gained 64.57 points, or 1.52%, to 4,323.06 and the Nasdaq Composite added 223.89 points, or 1.57%, to 14,498.88.</p>\n<p>Of the 11 major sectors in the S&amp;P 500, all but consumer staples closed green. Industrials fared best, rising 2.7%.</p>\n<p>Second-quarter reporting season has hit full-stride, with 56 of the companies in the S&amp;P 500 having posted results. Of those, 91% have beaten consensus, according to Refinitiv.</p>\n<p>Analysts now see annual S&amp;P earnings growth of 72.9% for the April-June period, a significant improvement over the 54% growth seen at the beginning of the quarter.</p>\n<p>Halliburton Co&nbsp;rose 3.7% after a bounce-back in crude prices boosted oilfield services demand, leading the company to post its second consecutive quarterly profit.</p>\n<p>Peloton Interactive Inc&nbsp;advanced 6.7% after announcing it would provide UnitedHealth Group's fully insured members free access to its live and on-demand fitness classes.</p>\n<p>Moderna's&nbsp;stock dropped 2% in a volatile session on Tuesday, with the COVID-19 vaccine maker the most heavily traded company on Wall Street ahead of its debut in the S&amp;P 500 on Wednesday.</p>\n<p>Netflix Inc&nbsp;shares dipped more than 3% in after- hours trading after its forecast missed estimates.</p>\n<p>Shares of Chipotle Mexican Grill gained over 2% post-market after its earnings and revenue beat consensus.</p>\n<p>Advancing issues outnumbered declining ones on the NYSE by a 4.44-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 3.59-to-1 ratio favored advancers.</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 500 posted 41 new 52-week highs and no new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 45 new highs and 76 new lows.</p>\n<p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 10.62 billion shares, compared with the 10.19 billion average over the last 20 trading days.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"161125":"标普500","513500":"标普500ETF","DJX":"1/100道琼斯","SDS":"两倍做空标普500ETF","TQQQ":"纳指三倍做多ETF","QQQ":"纳指100ETF","DOG":"道指反向ETF","DDM":"道指两倍做多ETF","UDOW":"道指三倍做多ETF-ProShares","UPRO":"三倍做多标普500ETF","NFLX":"奈飞","QID":"纳指两倍做空ETF","SH":"标普500反向ETF","IVV":"标普500指数ETF","SSO":"两倍做多标普500ETF","OEF":"标普100指数ETF-iShares","SPXU":"三倍做空标普500ETF","OEX":"标普100","SQQQ":"纳指三倍做空ETF","QLD":"纳指两倍做多ETF","DXD":"道指两倍做空ETF","QNETCN":"纳斯达克中美互联网老虎指数","PSQ":"纳指反向ETF","MRNA":"Moderna, Inc.","SDOW":"道指三倍做空ETF-ProShares"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2153924256","content_text":"NEW YORK, July 20 (Reuters) - Wall Street ended sharply higher on Tuesday, rebounding from a multi-day losing streak as a string of upbeat earnings reports and revived economic optimism fueled a risk-on rally.\nAll three major U.S. stock indexes gained more than 1% with the blue-chip Dow, on the heels of its worst day in nine months, leading the charge.\nThe S&P notched its first advance in four days as well as registering its strongest day since March. The Nasdaq posted its first gain in six sessions.\n\"It’s a buy-the-dip mentality coming into the market,\" said Chuck Carlson, chief executive officer at Horizon Investment Services in Hammond, Indiana.\nEconomically sensitive small caps and transports outperformed the broader market.\nBenchmark U.S. Treasury yields bounced back from five-month lows, in the wake of their biggest single-session decline since February in the prior session . This helped boost rate-vulnerable banks by 2.6%.\n\"The economically sensitive stocks are up today,\" Carlson added. \"When the 10-year (Treasury yield) goes down in a short period of time, that typically doesn’t happen with an economy that’s supposed to be growing. Firming in the 10-year (yield) indicates that perhaps the economy isn’t going to be falling off a cliff.\"\nMounting concerns over the highly contagious Delta variant of COVID-19, now responsible for the majority of new infections, have sparked sell-offs in recent sessions as worldwide vaccination efforts gather momentum.\n\"Things like the Delta variant can certainly impact in the margins,\" Carlson said. \"It doesn’t take a whole lot of fear in some investors to create what we saw yesterday.\"\nThe Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 549.95 points, or 1.62%, to 34,511.99, the S&P 500 gained 64.57 points, or 1.52%, to 4,323.06 and the Nasdaq Composite added 223.89 points, or 1.57%, to 14,498.88.\nOf the 11 major sectors in the S&P 500, all but consumer staples closed green. Industrials fared best, rising 2.7%.\nSecond-quarter reporting season has hit full-stride, with 56 of the companies in the S&P 500 having posted results. Of those, 91% have beaten consensus, according to Refinitiv.\nAnalysts now see annual S&P earnings growth of 72.9% for the April-June period, a significant improvement over the 54% growth seen at the beginning of the quarter.\nHalliburton Co rose 3.7% after a bounce-back in crude prices boosted oilfield services demand, leading the company to post its second consecutive quarterly profit.\nPeloton Interactive Inc advanced 6.7% after announcing it would provide UnitedHealth Group's fully insured members free access to its live and on-demand fitness classes.\nModerna's stock dropped 2% in a volatile session on Tuesday, with the COVID-19 vaccine maker the most heavily traded company on Wall Street ahead of its debut in the S&P 500 on Wednesday.\nNetflix Inc shares dipped more than 3% in after- hours trading after its forecast missed estimates.\nShares of Chipotle Mexican Grill gained over 2% post-market after its earnings and revenue beat consensus.\nAdvancing issues outnumbered declining ones on the NYSE by a 4.44-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 3.59-to-1 ratio favored advancers.\nThe S&P 500 posted 41 new 52-week highs and no new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 45 new highs and 76 new lows.\nVolume on U.S. exchanges was 10.62 billion shares, compared with the 10.19 billion average over the last 20 trading days.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":48,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":356951430,"gmtCreate":1616750869920,"gmtModify":1634524199785,"author":{"id":"3567411499210880","authorId":"3567411499210880","name":"Nebhol","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b0bfc2a45b91e41a283614268857b3a5","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3567411499210880","authorIdStr":"3567411499210880"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Buy the dip","listText":"Buy the dip","text":"Buy the dip","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/356951430","repostId":"1149036179","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1149036179","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1616750434,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1149036179?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-26 17:20","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Congress is fed up with Big Tech. Now what?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1149036179","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"Based on Thursday’s hearing on Capitol Hill, the gloves are off and Big Tech’s party could be ending","content":"<p>Based on Thursday’s hearing on Capitol Hill, the gloves are off and Big Tech’s party could be ending</p>\n<p>The insurrection at the U.S. Capitol in January appears to have been the last straw for Congress, which is poised to step in to try and put the brakes on Big Tech and its inability to stop misinformation and hate speech on its platforms.</p>\n<p>In a nearly six-hour virtual hearing of the House Energy and Commerce Committee on Thursday, many lawmakers exhibited little or no patience with the chief executives&nbsp;of Alphabet Inc.,Facebook Inc.&nbsp;and Twitter Inc.&nbsp;and the attempts by the companies to self-regulate.</p>\n<p>Trump supporters stormed the Capitol complex on Jan. 6 as the 2020 election results were being ratified, falsely claiming the election was rigged, leaving five people dead. The terrifying incident was referred to or mentioned by several committee members, who blamed social-media companies as venues where the insurrectionists made their plans.</p>\n<p>“The attack started and was nourished on your platforms,” said Rep. Frank Pallone, D-N.J., the committee’s chairman, adding that the companies have in the past just “shrugged off billion-dollar fines.”</p>\n<p>“Your business model itself has become the problem,” he said.</p>\n<p>How this committee and other legislative bodies in Congress plan to attack the business models of the social-media giants and Google’s YouTube is another question, one that was not really answered Thursday. But there were references to at least two pieces of legislation in progress.</p>\n<p>One is the “Protecting Americans from Dangerous Algorithms Act, ” which was reintroduced this week and seeks to narrowly amend Section 230 of the Internet Communications Act of 1996, which gives companies immunity from liability for comments or actions made on their platforms. The revised bill, co-authored by Rep. Anna Eshoo, D-Calif., and Rep. Tom Malinowski, D-N.J., seeks to hold large social-media platforms liable “if their algorithms amplify misinformation that leads to offline violence.”</p>\n<p>And Rep. Jan Schakowsky, D-Ill., said she will introduce the “Online Consumer Protection Act” to hold tech companies more accountable and weaken their liability shield, because “the witnesses here today have demonstrated time and time again that self-regulation has not worked. They must be held accountable.”</p>\n<p>Many of the committee members tried, often in vain, to get simple yes or no answers from Facebook’s Mark Zuckerbug, Twitter’s Jack Dorsey and Alphabet’s Sundar Pichai on a variety of questions about potential reform, and what the companies have done since their last rounds of grilling. Some of the most interesting and apt comparisons, though, was comparing social media to Big Tobacco, which is now viewed as having created addictive products in cigarettes, through nicotine.</p>\n<p>“Big Tech is handing our children a lit cigarette and they become hooked for life,” said Rep. Doris Matsui, D-Calif., who pointedly asked each executive if they agreed that they made money from an addictive habit of its users on social media. All three said no to that question.</p>\n<p>It’s still not clear, though, if the current proposed legislation — or any other new bills in the works — will successfully wend their way through both the House and the Senate.</p>\n<p>One thing was clear, though — Congress has had enough from Big Tech. How that shakes out over the next year is anyone’s guess, whether it’s through bills that seek to limit Section 230 or ongoing antitrust investigations. But the message from Washington on Thursday was clear: The gloves are off.</p>","source":"market_watch","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Congress is fed up with Big Tech. Now what?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nCongress is fed up with Big Tech. Now what?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-26 17:20 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.marketwatch.com/story/congress-is-fed-up-with-big-tech-now-what-11616724180?mod=home-page><strong>MarketWatch</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Based on Thursday’s hearing on Capitol Hill, the gloves are off and Big Tech’s party could be ending\nThe insurrection at the U.S. Capitol in January appears to have been the last straw for Congress, ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/congress-is-fed-up-with-big-tech-now-what-11616724180?mod=home-page\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TWTR":"Twitter","GOOGL":"谷歌A","GOOG":"谷歌","AAPL":"苹果","MSFT":"微软"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/congress-is-fed-up-with-big-tech-now-what-11616724180?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/599a65733b8245fcf7868668ef9ad712","article_id":"1149036179","content_text":"Based on Thursday’s hearing on Capitol Hill, the gloves are off and Big Tech’s party could be ending\nThe insurrection at the U.S. Capitol in January appears to have been the last straw for Congress, which is poised to step in to try and put the brakes on Big Tech and its inability to stop misinformation and hate speech on its platforms.\nIn a nearly six-hour virtual hearing of the House Energy and Commerce Committee on Thursday, many lawmakers exhibited little or no patience with the chief executives of Alphabet Inc.,Facebook Inc. and Twitter Inc. and the attempts by the companies to self-regulate.\nTrump supporters stormed the Capitol complex on Jan. 6 as the 2020 election results were being ratified, falsely claiming the election was rigged, leaving five people dead. The terrifying incident was referred to or mentioned by several committee members, who blamed social-media companies as venues where the insurrectionists made their plans.\n“The attack started and was nourished on your platforms,” said Rep. Frank Pallone, D-N.J., the committee’s chairman, adding that the companies have in the past just “shrugged off billion-dollar fines.”\n“Your business model itself has become the problem,” he said.\nHow this committee and other legislative bodies in Congress plan to attack the business models of the social-media giants and Google’s YouTube is another question, one that was not really answered Thursday. But there were references to at least two pieces of legislation in progress.\nOne is the “Protecting Americans from Dangerous Algorithms Act, ” which was reintroduced this week and seeks to narrowly amend Section 230 of the Internet Communications Act of 1996, which gives companies immunity from liability for comments or actions made on their platforms. The revised bill, co-authored by Rep. Anna Eshoo, D-Calif., and Rep. Tom Malinowski, D-N.J., seeks to hold large social-media platforms liable “if their algorithms amplify misinformation that leads to offline violence.”\nAnd Rep. Jan Schakowsky, D-Ill., said she will introduce the “Online Consumer Protection Act” to hold tech companies more accountable and weaken their liability shield, because “the witnesses here today have demonstrated time and time again that self-regulation has not worked. They must be held accountable.”\nMany of the committee members tried, often in vain, to get simple yes or no answers from Facebook’s Mark Zuckerbug, Twitter’s Jack Dorsey and Alphabet’s Sundar Pichai on a variety of questions about potential reform, and what the companies have done since their last rounds of grilling. Some of the most interesting and apt comparisons, though, was comparing social media to Big Tobacco, which is now viewed as having created addictive products in cigarettes, through nicotine.\n“Big Tech is handing our children a lit cigarette and they become hooked for life,” said Rep. Doris Matsui, D-Calif., who pointedly asked each executive if they agreed that they made money from an addictive habit of its users on social media. All three said no to that question.\nIt’s still not clear, though, if the current proposed legislation — or any other new bills in the works — will successfully wend their way through both the House and the Senate.\nOne thing was clear, though — Congress has had enough from Big Tech. How that shakes out over the next year is anyone’s guess, whether it’s through bills that seek to limit Section 230 or ongoing antitrust investigations. But the message from Washington on Thursday was clear: The gloves are off.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":118,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":690763967,"gmtCreate":1639709792526,"gmtModify":1639709793007,"author":{"id":"3567411499210880","authorId":"3567411499210880","name":"Nebhol","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b0bfc2a45b91e41a283614268857b3a5","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3567411499210880","authorIdStr":"3567411499210880"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/690763967","repostId":"2192920942","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2192920942","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1639694745,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2192920942?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-17 06:45","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Nasdaq ends sharply lower as investors dump growth stocks","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2192920942","media":"Reuters","summary":"* Fed to end bond purchases, signals rate hikes in 2022\n* Tech is worst among 11 S&P 500 sector inde","content":"<p>* Fed to end bond purchases, signals rate hikes in 2022</p>\n<p>* Tech is worst among 11 S&amp;P 500 sector indexes, financials rally</p>\n<p>* Lennar slips after missing quarterly profit</p>\n<p>* Indexes: Dow -0.08%, S&amp;P 500 -0.87%, Nasdaq -2.47%</p>\n<p>Dec 16 (Reuters) - The Nasdaq ended sharply lower on Thursday as the Federal Reserve's announcement of a faster end to its pandemic-era stimulus pushed investors away from Big Tech and toward more economically sensitive sectors.</p>\n<p>Nvidia,Apple,Microsoft, Amazon&nbsp;and Tesla&nbsp;tumbled between 2.6% and 6.8%, hitting the Nasdaq&nbsp;and the S&amp;P 500, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average declined marginally.</p>\n<p>Most of those heavyweight growth stocks have outperformed the broader market in 2021, with Nvidia up more than 100% year to date.</p>\n<p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average&nbsp;fell 0.08% to end at 35,897.64, while the S&amp;P 500&nbsp;lost 0.87% to 4,668.67.</p>\n<p>The Nasdaq Composite&nbsp;dropped 2.47% to 15,180.44.</p>\n<p>The U.S. central bank said on Wednesday it would end its bond purchases in March and signaled three quarter-percentage-point interest rate hikes by the end of 2022.</p>\n<p>That pleased investors who have increasingly worried about an inflation spike related to the coronavirus pandemic. But on Thursday it contributed to the sell-off in growth stocks.</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 500 value index&nbsp;climbed 0.7%, while the growth index fell 2.1%, reflecting investors' views that high-growth stocks tend to underperform when interest rates rise. The value index includes stocks seen as more likely to do well during an economic recovery.</p>\n<p>\"You're seeing money come out of growth, as it should. If we are going into an environment where interest rates are going up, growth stocks are going to be less attractive\" said Dennis Dick, a trader at Bright Trading LLC.</p>\n<p>\"There's a lot of uncertainty as we go into 2022... We're going to have a more hawkish Fed that is going to pull away the punch bowl,\" he said.</p>\n<p>Among the 11 major S&amp;P 500 sector indexes, technology&nbsp;slumped 2.9%, while financials&nbsp;rallied 1.2%. Eight of the sectors gained, even as the overall index fell.</p>\n<p>\"The Fed gave the market what it wanted, and today I think investors are turning again to pandemic uncertainty, and they're also cautious going into the end of the year,\" said Lindsey Bell, chief investment strategist at Ally Invest, in Charlotte, North Carolina.</p>\n<p>Recent readings on surging producer and consumer prices, as well as the fast-spreading Omicron variant of the coronavirus, have fueled anxiety. The S&amp;P 500, nonetheless, remains up about 25% in 2021 and it is trading near record highs.</p>\n<p>The CBOE Volatility index, often considered Wall Street's fear gauge, slipped to a three-week low.</p>\n<p>Data showed the number of Americans filing new claims for unemployment benefits increased moderately last week, remaining at levels consistent with tightening labor market conditions.</p>\n<p>Separately, a survey showed production at U.S. factories increased to the highest level in nearly three years in November.</p>\n<p>Lennar Corp&nbsp;fell 4.1% after the homebuilder missed analysts' estimates for quarterly profit as pandemic-led supply chain issues pushed lumber costs higher and delayed house deliveries.</p>\n<p>Declining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 1.03-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.93-to-1 ratio favored decliners.</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 500 posted 69 new 52-week highs and 3 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 43 new highs and 184 new lows.</p>\n<p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 11.6 billion shares, in line with the average over the last 20 trading days.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Nasdaq ends sharply lower as investors dump growth stocks</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nNasdaq ends sharply lower as investors dump growth stocks\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-12-17 06:45</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>* Fed to end bond purchases, signals rate hikes in 2022</p>\n<p>* Tech is worst among 11 S&amp;P 500 sector indexes, financials rally</p>\n<p>* Lennar slips after missing quarterly profit</p>\n<p>* Indexes: Dow -0.08%, S&amp;P 500 -0.87%, Nasdaq -2.47%</p>\n<p>Dec 16 (Reuters) - The Nasdaq ended sharply lower on Thursday as the Federal Reserve's announcement of a faster end to its pandemic-era stimulus pushed investors away from Big Tech and toward more economically sensitive sectors.</p>\n<p>Nvidia,Apple,Microsoft, Amazon&nbsp;and Tesla&nbsp;tumbled between 2.6% and 6.8%, hitting the Nasdaq&nbsp;and the S&amp;P 500, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average declined marginally.</p>\n<p>Most of those heavyweight growth stocks have outperformed the broader market in 2021, with Nvidia up more than 100% year to date.</p>\n<p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average&nbsp;fell 0.08% to end at 35,897.64, while the S&amp;P 500&nbsp;lost 0.87% to 4,668.67.</p>\n<p>The Nasdaq Composite&nbsp;dropped 2.47% to 15,180.44.</p>\n<p>The U.S. central bank said on Wednesday it would end its bond purchases in March and signaled three quarter-percentage-point interest rate hikes by the end of 2022.</p>\n<p>That pleased investors who have increasingly worried about an inflation spike related to the coronavirus pandemic. But on Thursday it contributed to the sell-off in growth stocks.</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 500 value index&nbsp;climbed 0.7%, while the growth index fell 2.1%, reflecting investors' views that high-growth stocks tend to underperform when interest rates rise. The value index includes stocks seen as more likely to do well during an economic recovery.</p>\n<p>\"You're seeing money come out of growth, as it should. If we are going into an environment where interest rates are going up, growth stocks are going to be less attractive\" said Dennis Dick, a trader at Bright Trading LLC.</p>\n<p>\"There's a lot of uncertainty as we go into 2022... We're going to have a more hawkish Fed that is going to pull away the punch bowl,\" he said.</p>\n<p>Among the 11 major S&amp;P 500 sector indexes, technology&nbsp;slumped 2.9%, while financials&nbsp;rallied 1.2%. Eight of the sectors gained, even as the overall index fell.</p>\n<p>\"The Fed gave the market what it wanted, and today I think investors are turning again to pandemic uncertainty, and they're also cautious going into the end of the year,\" said Lindsey Bell, chief investment strategist at Ally Invest, in Charlotte, North Carolina.</p>\n<p>Recent readings on surging producer and consumer prices, as well as the fast-spreading Omicron variant of the coronavirus, have fueled anxiety. The S&amp;P 500, nonetheless, remains up about 25% in 2021 and it is trading near record highs.</p>\n<p>The CBOE Volatility index, often considered Wall Street's fear gauge, slipped to a three-week low.</p>\n<p>Data showed the number of Americans filing new claims for unemployment benefits increased moderately last week, remaining at levels consistent with tightening labor market conditions.</p>\n<p>Separately, a survey showed production at U.S. factories increased to the highest level in nearly three years in November.</p>\n<p>Lennar Corp&nbsp;fell 4.1% after the homebuilder missed analysts' estimates for quarterly profit as pandemic-led supply chain issues pushed lumber costs higher and delayed house deliveries.</p>\n<p>Declining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 1.03-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.93-to-1 ratio favored decliners.</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 500 posted 69 new 52-week highs and 3 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 43 new highs and 184 new lows.</p>\n<p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 11.6 billion shares, in line with the average over the last 20 trading days.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"161125":"标普500","513500":"标普500ETF","UPRO":"三倍做多标普500ETF","BK4561":"索罗斯持仓","BK4505":"高瓴资本持仓","OEX":"标普100","BK4504":"桥水持仓",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","BK4549":"软银资本持仓","BK4099":"汽车制造商","SH":"标普500反向ETF","BK4088":"住宅建筑","IVV":"标普500指数ETF","BK4548":"巴美列捷福持仓","SSO":"两倍做多标普500ETF","SDS":"两倍做空标普500ETF","OEF":"标普100指数ETF-iShares","SPXU":"三倍做空标普500ETF","SDOW":"道指三倍做空ETF-ProShares","BK4554":"元宇宙及AR概念","BK4515":"5G概念","SQQQ":"纳指三倍做空ETF","BK4553":"喜马拉雅资本持仓","DXD":"道指两倍做空ETF","BK4567":"ESG概念","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","PSQ":"纳指反向ETF","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","TSLA":"特斯拉","DDM":"道指两倍做多ETF","AMZN":"亚马逊","BK4524":"宅经济概念","LEN":"莱纳建筑公司","NVDA":"英伟达","BK4538":"云计算","BK4527":"明星科技股","BK4559":"巴菲特持仓","BK4501":"段永平概念","TQQQ":"纳指三倍做多ETF","BK4543":"AI","QQQ":"纳指100ETF",".DJI":"道琼斯","BK4503":"景林资产持仓",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","DOG":"道指反向ETF","BK4551":"寇图资本持仓","UDOW":"道指三倍做多ETF-ProShares"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2192920942","content_text":"* Fed to end bond purchases, signals rate hikes in 2022\n* Tech is worst among 11 S&P 500 sector indexes, financials rally\n* Lennar slips after missing quarterly profit\n* Indexes: Dow -0.08%, S&P 500 -0.87%, Nasdaq -2.47%\nDec 16 (Reuters) - The Nasdaq ended sharply lower on Thursday as the Federal Reserve's announcement of a faster end to its pandemic-era stimulus pushed investors away from Big Tech and toward more economically sensitive sectors.\nNvidia,Apple,Microsoft, Amazon and Tesla tumbled between 2.6% and 6.8%, hitting the Nasdaq and the S&P 500, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average declined marginally.\nMost of those heavyweight growth stocks have outperformed the broader market in 2021, with Nvidia up more than 100% year to date.\nThe Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 0.08% to end at 35,897.64, while the S&P 500 lost 0.87% to 4,668.67.\nThe Nasdaq Composite dropped 2.47% to 15,180.44.\nThe U.S. central bank said on Wednesday it would end its bond purchases in March and signaled three quarter-percentage-point interest rate hikes by the end of 2022.\nThat pleased investors who have increasingly worried about an inflation spike related to the coronavirus pandemic. But on Thursday it contributed to the sell-off in growth stocks.\nThe S&P 500 value index climbed 0.7%, while the growth index fell 2.1%, reflecting investors' views that high-growth stocks tend to underperform when interest rates rise. The value index includes stocks seen as more likely to do well during an economic recovery.\n\"You're seeing money come out of growth, as it should. If we are going into an environment where interest rates are going up, growth stocks are going to be less attractive\" said Dennis Dick, a trader at Bright Trading LLC.\n\"There's a lot of uncertainty as we go into 2022... We're going to have a more hawkish Fed that is going to pull away the punch bowl,\" he said.\nAmong the 11 major S&P 500 sector indexes, technology slumped 2.9%, while financials rallied 1.2%. Eight of the sectors gained, even as the overall index fell.\n\"The Fed gave the market what it wanted, and today I think investors are turning again to pandemic uncertainty, and they're also cautious going into the end of the year,\" said Lindsey Bell, chief investment strategist at Ally Invest, in Charlotte, North Carolina.\nRecent readings on surging producer and consumer prices, as well as the fast-spreading Omicron variant of the coronavirus, have fueled anxiety. The S&P 500, nonetheless, remains up about 25% in 2021 and it is trading near record highs.\nThe CBOE Volatility index, often considered Wall Street's fear gauge, slipped to a three-week low.\nData showed the number of Americans filing new claims for unemployment benefits increased moderately last week, remaining at levels consistent with tightening labor market conditions.\nSeparately, a survey showed production at U.S. factories increased to the highest level in nearly three years in November.\nLennar Corp fell 4.1% after the homebuilder missed analysts' estimates for quarterly profit as pandemic-led supply chain issues pushed lumber costs higher and delayed house deliveries.\nDeclining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 1.03-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.93-to-1 ratio favored decliners.\nThe S&P 500 posted 69 new 52-week highs and 3 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 43 new highs and 184 new lows.\nVolume on U.S. exchanges was 11.6 billion shares, in line with the average over the last 20 trading days.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1024,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":605002861,"gmtCreate":1639089946382,"gmtModify":1639089946753,"author":{"id":"3567411499210880","authorId":"3567411499210880","name":"Nebhol","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b0bfc2a45b91e41a283614268857b3a5","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3567411499210880","authorIdStr":"3567411499210880"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like comment&nbsp;","listText":"Like comment&nbsp;","text":"Like comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/605002861","repostId":"1145466242","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1145466242","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1639069232,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1145466242?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-10 01:00","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Software Firm HashiCorp rises 1% on its first day of trading","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1145466242","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Software Firm HashiCorp rises 1% on its first day of trading.\n\nHashiCorp Inc. is set to go public Th","content":"<p>Software Firm HashiCorp rises 1% on its first day of trading.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2334817c232db42995b11840a3560bbb\" tg-width=\"1831\" tg-height=\"913\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>\n<p>HashiCorp Inc.&nbsp;is set to go public Thursday, after the California-based cloud adoption software company's initial public offering priced overnight well above the expected range. The company raised $1.22 billion as it sold 15.3 million shares in the IPO, which priced at $80 a share, above the expected range of between $68 and $72 a share. The pricing valued the company at about $14.31 billion. The stock is expected to begin trading on the Nasdaq some time after the open under the ticker symbol \"HCP.\"</p>\n<p>HashiCorp was founded in 2012 by Mitchell Hashimoto and Armon Dadgar, who met at the University of Washington in Seattle. HashiCorp raised $175 million in a series E financing round last year at a valuation of $5.1 billion, according to a statement.</p>\n<p>The company’s software helps businesses run a mix of public and private cloud systems, as well as older applications. It has partnerships with cloud platforms including Amazon.com Inc.’s AWS and Alphabet Inc.’s Google Cloud, its website shows.</p>\n<p>Hashimoto and Dadgar emphasize their commitment to their “open-source philosophy” in a letter to investors included in the company’s prospectus.</p>\n<p>“The cloud market is already an enormous market that is upending every industry and reshaping the modern tech stack,” they said. “Yet, cloud adoption is still early, and most organizations are only beginning their digital transformation.”</p>\n<p>HashiCorp posted a net loss of $62 million on revenue of $224 million for the nine months ended Oct. 31, its filings show. That compares with a net loss of $77 million on revenue of $150 million for the same period a year earlier.</p>\n<p>Investors in HashiCorp include affiliates of Mayfield, GGV Capital, and Redpoint Omega, according to the filings.</p>\n<p>The offering is being led by Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and JPMorgan Chase &amp; Co.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Software Firm HashiCorp rises 1% on its first day of trading</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSoftware Firm HashiCorp rises 1% on its first day of trading\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-12-10 01:00</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Software Firm HashiCorp rises 1% on its first day of trading.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2334817c232db42995b11840a3560bbb\" tg-width=\"1831\" tg-height=\"913\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>\n<p>HashiCorp Inc.&nbsp;is set to go public Thursday, after the California-based cloud adoption software company's initial public offering priced overnight well above the expected range. The company raised $1.22 billion as it sold 15.3 million shares in the IPO, which priced at $80 a share, above the expected range of between $68 and $72 a share. The pricing valued the company at about $14.31 billion. The stock is expected to begin trading on the Nasdaq some time after the open under the ticker symbol \"HCP.\"</p>\n<p>HashiCorp was founded in 2012 by Mitchell Hashimoto and Armon Dadgar, who met at the University of Washington in Seattle. HashiCorp raised $175 million in a series E financing round last year at a valuation of $5.1 billion, according to a statement.</p>\n<p>The company’s software helps businesses run a mix of public and private cloud systems, as well as older applications. It has partnerships with cloud platforms including Amazon.com Inc.’s AWS and Alphabet Inc.’s Google Cloud, its website shows.</p>\n<p>Hashimoto and Dadgar emphasize their commitment to their “open-source philosophy” in a letter to investors included in the company’s prospectus.</p>\n<p>“The cloud market is already an enormous market that is upending every industry and reshaping the modern tech stack,” they said. “Yet, cloud adoption is still early, and most organizations are only beginning their digital transformation.”</p>\n<p>HashiCorp posted a net loss of $62 million on revenue of $224 million for the nine months ended Oct. 31, its filings show. That compares with a net loss of $77 million on revenue of $150 million for the same period a year earlier.</p>\n<p>Investors in HashiCorp include affiliates of Mayfield, GGV Capital, and Redpoint Omega, according to the filings.</p>\n<p>The offering is being led by Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and JPMorgan Chase &amp; Co.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"HCP":"HashiCorp, Inc."},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1145466242","content_text":"Software Firm HashiCorp rises 1% on its first day of trading.\n\nHashiCorp Inc. is set to go public Thursday, after the California-based cloud adoption software company's initial public offering priced overnight well above the expected range. The company raised $1.22 billion as it sold 15.3 million shares in the IPO, which priced at $80 a share, above the expected range of between $68 and $72 a share. The pricing valued the company at about $14.31 billion. The stock is expected to begin trading on the Nasdaq some time after the open under the ticker symbol \"HCP.\"\nHashiCorp was founded in 2012 by Mitchell Hashimoto and Armon Dadgar, who met at the University of Washington in Seattle. HashiCorp raised $175 million in a series E financing round last year at a valuation of $5.1 billion, according to a statement.\nThe company’s software helps businesses run a mix of public and private cloud systems, as well as older applications. It has partnerships with cloud platforms including Amazon.com Inc.’s AWS and Alphabet Inc.’s Google Cloud, its website shows.\nHashimoto and Dadgar emphasize their commitment to their “open-source philosophy” in a letter to investors included in the company’s prospectus.\n“The cloud market is already an enormous market that is upending every industry and reshaping the modern tech stack,” they said. “Yet, cloud adoption is still early, and most organizations are only beginning their digital transformation.”\nHashiCorp posted a net loss of $62 million on revenue of $224 million for the nine months ended Oct. 31, its filings show. That compares with a net loss of $77 million on revenue of $150 million for the same period a year earlier.\nInvestors in HashiCorp include affiliates of Mayfield, GGV Capital, and Redpoint Omega, according to the filings.\nThe offering is being led by Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and JPMorgan Chase & Co.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":370,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":877489361,"gmtCreate":1637972122833,"gmtModify":1637972123031,"author":{"id":"3567411499210880","authorId":"3567411499210880","name":"Nebhol","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b0bfc2a45b91e41a283614268857b3a5","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3567411499210880","authorIdStr":"3567411499210880"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like comment&nbsp;","listText":"Like comment&nbsp;","text":"Like comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/877489361","repostId":"1100657085","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1100657085","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1637971854,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1100657085?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-27 08:10","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Tesla Stock Tumbled Today","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1100657085","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"What happened\nGood news for Tesla(NASDAQ:TSLA)investors! Demand forelectric vehiclesin China is appa","content":"<p>What happened</p>\n<p>Good news for&nbsp;<b>Tesla</b>(NASDAQ:TSLA)investors! Demand forelectric vehiclesin China is apparently so strong that Tesla has decided to invest $188 million to expand production capacity at its Shanghai factory. It's so high that Tesla is putting 4,000 more people on the payroll at the site, as Reuters reported Friday morning.</p>\n<p>So why was Tesla stock trading down by 2% as of 11:37 a.m. ET Friday?</p>\n<p>So what</p>\n<p>On the one hand, this sure sounds like upbeat news. Tesla initially wanted its Shanghai factory to produce 500,000 cars per year -- and it already has the capacity to manufacture 450,000 Model 3 sedans and Model Y crossovers annually. This decision speaks to CEO Elon Musk's confidence that even 500,000 vehicles a year soon won't be enough to meet the demand for Teslas in China and the European markets that its Chinese facility also supplies.</p>\n<p>And yet Europe may also be part of Tesla's problem. As Reuters also reported Friday, the automaker just withdrew its application for state support for the construction of a planned battery plant near Berlin, Germany. Tesla had previously asked the Federal Ministry of Economics and the Brandenburg Ministry of Economics for some $1.3 billion in subsidies for the plant. But citing his belief that \"all subsidies should be eliminated\" from the electric car industry, Musk says he's now willing to forego that state support -- and hopes that governments will also eliminate \"massive subsidies for oil and gas.\"</p>\n<p>Now what</p>\n<p>Thus we're left with a sort of \"bad news, good news\" situation in Germany. On the one hand, Tesla is giving up $1.3 billion that would have essentially dropped straight to its bottom line as the German government picked up part of the tab for the automaker's capital expenditures.</p>\n<p>On the other hand, though, Tesla is making it clear that doesn't really need these subsidies anymore. Over the past 12 months, it has generated free cash flow of $2.6 billion, and&nbsp;GAAP(generally accepted accounting principles) profits of $3.5 billion. By forgoing this subsidy, Tesla gains a bit of moral authority as it urges governments to not subsidize rivals such as&nbsp;<b>Rivian</b>,<b>Lucid</b>, and other EV companies that have not yet reached profitability (and to halt subsidies tooil companies, too).</p>\n<p>For the moment, investors seem to be focusing on the negative aspects of the news. Longer term, though, I suspect that Tesla's decision to give up this subsidy will prove a clever move that will only make the companya stronger competitor.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Tesla Stock Tumbled Today</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Tesla Stock Tumbled Today\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-11-27 08:10 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/26/why-tesla-stock-tumbled-today/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>What happened\nGood news for Tesla(NASDAQ:TSLA)investors! Demand forelectric vehiclesin China is apparently so strong that Tesla has decided to invest $188 million to expand production capacity at its ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/26/why-tesla-stock-tumbled-today/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/26/why-tesla-stock-tumbled-today/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1100657085","content_text":"What happened\nGood news for Tesla(NASDAQ:TSLA)investors! Demand forelectric vehiclesin China is apparently so strong that Tesla has decided to invest $188 million to expand production capacity at its Shanghai factory. It's so high that Tesla is putting 4,000 more people on the payroll at the site, as Reuters reported Friday morning.\nSo why was Tesla stock trading down by 2% as of 11:37 a.m. ET Friday?\nSo what\nOn the one hand, this sure sounds like upbeat news. Tesla initially wanted its Shanghai factory to produce 500,000 cars per year -- and it already has the capacity to manufacture 450,000 Model 3 sedans and Model Y crossovers annually. This decision speaks to CEO Elon Musk's confidence that even 500,000 vehicles a year soon won't be enough to meet the demand for Teslas in China and the European markets that its Chinese facility also supplies.\nAnd yet Europe may also be part of Tesla's problem. As Reuters also reported Friday, the automaker just withdrew its application for state support for the construction of a planned battery plant near Berlin, Germany. Tesla had previously asked the Federal Ministry of Economics and the Brandenburg Ministry of Economics for some $1.3 billion in subsidies for the plant. But citing his belief that \"all subsidies should be eliminated\" from the electric car industry, Musk says he's now willing to forego that state support -- and hopes that governments will also eliminate \"massive subsidies for oil and gas.\"\nNow what\nThus we're left with a sort of \"bad news, good news\" situation in Germany. On the one hand, Tesla is giving up $1.3 billion that would have essentially dropped straight to its bottom line as the German government picked up part of the tab for the automaker's capital expenditures.\nOn the other hand, though, Tesla is making it clear that doesn't really need these subsidies anymore. Over the past 12 months, it has generated free cash flow of $2.6 billion, and GAAP(generally accepted accounting principles) profits of $3.5 billion. By forgoing this subsidy, Tesla gains a bit of moral authority as it urges governments to not subsidize rivals such as Rivian,Lucid, and other EV companies that have not yet reached profitability (and to halt subsidies tooil companies, too).\nFor the moment, investors seem to be focusing on the negative aspects of the news. Longer term, though, I suspect that Tesla's decision to give up this subsidy will prove a clever move that will only make the companya stronger competitor.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":49,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":822927386,"gmtCreate":1634086703761,"gmtModify":1634086704359,"author":{"id":"3567411499210880","authorId":"3567411499210880","name":"Nebhol","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b0bfc2a45b91e41a283614268857b3a5","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3567411499210880","authorIdStr":"3567411499210880"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Buy?&nbsp;","listText":"Buy?&nbsp;","text":"Buy?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/822927386","repostId":"2175273130","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":260,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":823304262,"gmtCreate":1633578245167,"gmtModify":1633578245717,"author":{"id":"3567411499210880","authorId":"3567411499210880","name":"Nebhol","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b0bfc2a45b91e41a283614268857b3a5","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3567411499210880","authorIdStr":"3567411499210880"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like comment.","listText":"Like comment.","text":"Like comment.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/823304262","repostId":"1195286161","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1195286161","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1633577491,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1195286161?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-07 11:31","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Amazon’s Streaming Platform, Twitch, Suffers Security Breach. What Investors Need to Know.","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1195286161","media":"Barrons","summary":"Amazon.com’s live-streaming platform Twitch suffered a security breach on Wednesday. An anonymous us","content":"<p>Amazon.com’s live-streaming platform Twitch suffered a security breach on Wednesday. An anonymous user on 4Chan posted a trove of files which allegedly included the website’s source code, user earnings figures, and even scraps about unannounced projects.</p>\n<p>The official Twitch account on Twitter&nbsp;confirmed a breach occurred. The company said it it was working to understand the extent and would provide an update when additional information was available. A Twitch representative declined to comment beyond the post.</p>\n<p>“It’s a testament to the ingenuity of hackers,” Wedbush analyst Michael Pachter told <i>Barron’s</i>. “If they can breach Twitch, they can breach anything.”</p>\n<p>The leak didn’t seem to hamper Amazon.com stock (ticker: AMZN). Shares rose 1.3% to $3,262.01, while the S&amp;P 500 index closed 0.4% higher on Wednesday.</p>\n<p>News site Video Games Chronicle reported on contents of the post earlier Wednesday. Since then, some users on Twitter and media outlets have said that the creator payout data matched their own records.</p>\n<p>Jarno&nbsp;Niemela, principal researcher at information technology security firm&nbsp;F-Secure,told <i>Barron’s</i> that users should change their passwords and enable two-factor authentication, if that wasn’t already the case. They should also rethink what non-public information they provide to sites like Twitch. He also notes that with the site’s source code reportedly out in the open, it could potentially make finding security vulnerabilities easier to find in the future.</p>\n<p>“Having something open makes finding vulnerabilities a lot easier,” Niemela said. “And when we combine this with the media attention Twitch is getting, it is extremely likely that any kind of vulnerability is going to be found. It’s going to be found by multiple people, and it’s very likely that those [vulnerabilities] are going to be abused.”</p>\n<p>Mario Stefanidis, vice president of research at Roundhill Investments, told <i>Barron’s</i> that Amazon will likely face pressure from its streamers, as well as from regulators regarding its handling of user data. Roundhill sponsors thematic exchange-traded funds, including ones aimed at providing exposure to esports and the evolution of interactive digital worlds known as the metaverse.</p>\n<p>Aside from privacy concerns, Stefanidis notes the breach has reportedly uncovered an unannounced digital game storefront codenamed Vapor—akin to Valve’s Steam—and a meta-verse-like virtual reality project nicknamed Vapeworld. If those projects are indeed in the works, they would suggest an aggressive expansion for Amazon into two hotly contested spaces, leveraging its Twitch platform.</p>\n<p>“Based on the leaks, Vapor would be fully tied in with Twitch and have some sort of integration with popular titles streamed on the site, though Amazon’s exact plans are uncertain,” Stefanidis added. “If Amazon is still working on [Vapeworld], it would also put it in competition with games that have features of the metaverse like <i>Fortnite</i> and <i>Minecraft.</i>“</p>\n<p>Fortnite is owned by the closely held Epic Games, but Minecraft is a&nbsp;Microsoft&nbsp;(MSFT) property.Roblox&nbsp;(RBLX), another company that’s betting on the rise of interactive online worlds, is also publicly traded.</p>\n<p>Pachter, of Wedbush, has been anticipating a Steam competitor from Amazon for years. Though Epic Games and&nbsp;Electronic Arts&nbsp;(EA) have launched similar services, the closely-held Valve has managed to stave off rivals thus far. An Amazon upstart could also have implications for meme-favorite&nbsp;GameStop&nbsp;stock (GME), since the company is focused on a digital transformation.</p>\n<p>“There is no reason not to compete with Steam, particularly if Amazon can offer gamers the ability to play without special equipment,” Pachter added, referring to its cloud-streaming service Luna.</p>\n<p>Raymond James analyst Adam Tindle guesses that either the breach was conducted by a large group, or by an extremely senior insider, given the reported scope.”Further, we believe that this breach was only possible due to either a critical misconfiguration or an extremely complex hacking organization capable of bypassing all security tools in place,” he wrote. “In any case, the breach is equal parts impressive and confusing.”</p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Amazon’s Streaming Platform, Twitch, Suffers Security Breach. What Investors Need to Know.</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAmazon’s Streaming Platform, Twitch, Suffers Security Breach. What Investors Need to Know.\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-10-07 11:31 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/amazon-twitch-security-breach-51633556097?mod=RTA><strong>Barrons</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Amazon.com’s live-streaming platform Twitch suffered a security breach on Wednesday. An anonymous user on 4Chan posted a trove of files which allegedly included the website’s source code, user ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/amazon-twitch-security-breach-51633556097?mod=RTA\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMZN":"亚马逊"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/amazon-twitch-security-breach-51633556097?mod=RTA","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1195286161","content_text":"Amazon.com’s live-streaming platform Twitch suffered a security breach on Wednesday. An anonymous user on 4Chan posted a trove of files which allegedly included the website’s source code, user earnings figures, and even scraps about unannounced projects.\nThe official Twitch account on Twitter confirmed a breach occurred. The company said it it was working to understand the extent and would provide an update when additional information was available. A Twitch representative declined to comment beyond the post.\n“It’s a testament to the ingenuity of hackers,” Wedbush analyst Michael Pachter told Barron’s. “If they can breach Twitch, they can breach anything.”\nThe leak didn’t seem to hamper Amazon.com stock (ticker: AMZN). Shares rose 1.3% to $3,262.01, while the S&P 500 index closed 0.4% higher on Wednesday.\nNews site Video Games Chronicle reported on contents of the post earlier Wednesday. Since then, some users on Twitter and media outlets have said that the creator payout data matched their own records.\nJarno Niemela, principal researcher at information technology security firm F-Secure,told Barron’s that users should change their passwords and enable two-factor authentication, if that wasn’t already the case. They should also rethink what non-public information they provide to sites like Twitch. He also notes that with the site’s source code reportedly out in the open, it could potentially make finding security vulnerabilities easier to find in the future.\n“Having something open makes finding vulnerabilities a lot easier,” Niemela said. “And when we combine this with the media attention Twitch is getting, it is extremely likely that any kind of vulnerability is going to be found. It’s going to be found by multiple people, and it’s very likely that those [vulnerabilities] are going to be abused.”\nMario Stefanidis, vice president of research at Roundhill Investments, told Barron’s that Amazon will likely face pressure from its streamers, as well as from regulators regarding its handling of user data. Roundhill sponsors thematic exchange-traded funds, including ones aimed at providing exposure to esports and the evolution of interactive digital worlds known as the metaverse.\nAside from privacy concerns, Stefanidis notes the breach has reportedly uncovered an unannounced digital game storefront codenamed Vapor—akin to Valve’s Steam—and a meta-verse-like virtual reality project nicknamed Vapeworld. If those projects are indeed in the works, they would suggest an aggressive expansion for Amazon into two hotly contested spaces, leveraging its Twitch platform.\n“Based on the leaks, Vapor would be fully tied in with Twitch and have some sort of integration with popular titles streamed on the site, though Amazon’s exact plans are uncertain,” Stefanidis added. “If Amazon is still working on [Vapeworld], it would also put it in competition with games that have features of the metaverse like Fortnite and Minecraft.“\nFortnite is owned by the closely held Epic Games, but Minecraft is a Microsoft (MSFT) property.Roblox (RBLX), another company that’s betting on the rise of interactive online worlds, is also publicly traded.\nPachter, of Wedbush, has been anticipating a Steam competitor from Amazon for years. Though Epic Games and Electronic Arts (EA) have launched similar services, the closely-held Valve has managed to stave off rivals thus far. An Amazon upstart could also have implications for meme-favorite GameStop stock (GME), since the company is focused on a digital transformation.\n“There is no reason not to compete with Steam, particularly if Amazon can offer gamers the ability to play without special equipment,” Pachter added, referring to its cloud-streaming service Luna.\nRaymond James analyst Adam Tindle guesses that either the breach was conducted by a large group, or by an extremely senior insider, given the reported scope.”Further, we believe that this breach was only possible due to either a critical misconfiguration or an extremely complex hacking organization capable of bypassing all security tools in place,” he wrote. “In any case, the breach is equal parts impressive and confusing.”","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":132,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":880672056,"gmtCreate":1631057923675,"gmtModify":1632884967748,"author":{"id":"3567411499210880","authorId":"3567411499210880","name":"Nebhol","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b0bfc2a45b91e41a283614268857b3a5","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3567411499210880","authorIdStr":"3567411499210880"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like comment&nbsp;","listText":"Like comment&nbsp;","text":"Like comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":10,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/880672056","repostId":"2165350503","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2165350503","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1631055124,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2165350503?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-09-08 06:52","market":"us","language":"en","title":"S&P 500 ends down, Big Tech lifts Nasdaq to record","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2165350503","media":"Reuters","summary":"* Indexes end: S&P 500 -0.34%, Nasdaq +0.07%, Dow -0.76%. The S&P 500 closed lower on Tuesday while the Nasdaq edged up to a record high, as investors balanced worries about the slowing pace of economic recovery with expectations that the Federal Reserve will maintain its accommodative monetary policy.Amgen Inc fell 2.2% and Merck & Co lost 1.7% after $Morgan Stanley$ cut its rating on the stocks to \"equal-weight\" from \"overweight.\". The Nasdaq was supported by Big Tech stocks that have fueled W","content":"<p>* Drugmakers Amgen, Merck dip after rating cuts</p>\n<p>* Apple and Netflix hit record highs</p>\n<p>* Boeing drops after Ryanair ends jet order talks</p>\n<p>* Indexes end: S&amp;P 500 -0.34%, Nasdaq +0.07%, Dow -0.76%</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 500 closed lower on Tuesday while the Nasdaq edged up to a record high, as investors balanced worries about the slowing pace of economic recovery with expectations that the Federal Reserve will maintain its accommodative monetary policy.</p>\n<p>Amgen Inc fell 2.2% and Merck &amp; Co lost 1.7% after <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSTLW\">Morgan Stanley</a> cut its rating on the stocks to \"equal-weight\" from \"overweight.\"</p>\n<p>The Nasdaq was supported by Big Tech stocks that have fueled Wall Street's gains in recent years. Apple rose 1.6% and Netflix added 2.7%, both hitting record highs.</p>\n<p>\"You could call it a gravitation toward Big Tech. As people feel a bit uncertain about how COVID will play out, you don’t have your reopening worries with those companies,\" said Tom Martin, senior portfolio manager at Globalt Investments in Atlanta.</p>\n<p>Much of the rest of Wall Street fell. Eight of the eleven sub-indexes traded lower, with economy-sensitive sectors like industrials down 1.8% and utilities dipping 1.4%. The real estate index lost 1.1%.</p>\n<p>Tepid August payrolls data on Friday last week raised concerns that the economic recovery was slowing down.</p>\n<p>On Tuesday, Morgan Stanley cut its rating on U.S. stocks to underweight, pointing to risks related to economic growth, policy and legislation, and warning it expects the next two months to be \"bumpy.\"</p>\n<p>Accommodative central bank policies and reopening optimism have pushed the S&amp;P 500 and Nasdaq to record highs over the past few weeks, but concerns are growing about rising coronavirus infections due to the Delta variant and its impact on the economic recovery.</p>\n<p>Analysts on average expect S&amp;P 500 companies to increase their earnings per share by 30% in the September quarter, following a 96% surge in the second quarter, according to I/B/E/S data from Refinitiv.</p>\n<p>Unofficially, the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 0.76% to end at 35,100 points, while the S&amp;P 500 lost 0.34% to 4,520.03.</p>\n<p>The Nasdaq Composite climbed 0.07% to 15,374.33.</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 500 remains up about 20% year to date, and the Nasdaq is up about 19%.</p>\n<p>Boeing Co dropped 1.8% after Ireland's Ryanair&nbsp;said it had ended talks with the planemaker over a purchase of 737 MAX 10 jets worth tens of billions of dollars due to differences over price.</p>\n<p>Match Group Inc jumped over 7% after the S&amp;P Dow Jones Indices said on Friday the Tinder parent will join the benchmark index.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CXP\">Columbia Property Trust Inc</a> surged 15% after Pacific Investment Management Company said it would buy the company for $2.2 billion.</p>\n<p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 9.2 billion shares, compared with the 9.0 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.</p>\n<p>Declining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 2.27-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.65-to-1 ratio favored decliners.</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 500 posted 19 new 52-week highs and 1 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 120 new highs and 24 new lows.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>S&P 500 ends down, Big Tech lifts Nasdaq to record</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nS&P 500 ends down, Big Tech lifts Nasdaq to record\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-09-08 06:52</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>* Drugmakers Amgen, Merck dip after rating cuts</p>\n<p>* Apple and Netflix hit record highs</p>\n<p>* Boeing drops after Ryanair ends jet order talks</p>\n<p>* Indexes end: S&amp;P 500 -0.34%, Nasdaq +0.07%, Dow -0.76%</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 500 closed lower on Tuesday while the Nasdaq edged up to a record high, as investors balanced worries about the slowing pace of economic recovery with expectations that the Federal Reserve will maintain its accommodative monetary policy.</p>\n<p>Amgen Inc fell 2.2% and Merck &amp; Co lost 1.7% after <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSTLW\">Morgan Stanley</a> cut its rating on the stocks to \"equal-weight\" from \"overweight.\"</p>\n<p>The Nasdaq was supported by Big Tech stocks that have fueled Wall Street's gains in recent years. Apple rose 1.6% and Netflix added 2.7%, both hitting record highs.</p>\n<p>\"You could call it a gravitation toward Big Tech. As people feel a bit uncertain about how COVID will play out, you don’t have your reopening worries with those companies,\" said Tom Martin, senior portfolio manager at Globalt Investments in Atlanta.</p>\n<p>Much of the rest of Wall Street fell. Eight of the eleven sub-indexes traded lower, with economy-sensitive sectors like industrials down 1.8% and utilities dipping 1.4%. The real estate index lost 1.1%.</p>\n<p>Tepid August payrolls data on Friday last week raised concerns that the economic recovery was slowing down.</p>\n<p>On Tuesday, Morgan Stanley cut its rating on U.S. stocks to underweight, pointing to risks related to economic growth, policy and legislation, and warning it expects the next two months to be \"bumpy.\"</p>\n<p>Accommodative central bank policies and reopening optimism have pushed the S&amp;P 500 and Nasdaq to record highs over the past few weeks, but concerns are growing about rising coronavirus infections due to the Delta variant and its impact on the economic recovery.</p>\n<p>Analysts on average expect S&amp;P 500 companies to increase their earnings per share by 30% in the September quarter, following a 96% surge in the second quarter, according to I/B/E/S data from Refinitiv.</p>\n<p>Unofficially, the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 0.76% to end at 35,100 points, while the S&amp;P 500 lost 0.34% to 4,520.03.</p>\n<p>The Nasdaq Composite climbed 0.07% to 15,374.33.</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 500 remains up about 20% year to date, and the Nasdaq is up about 19%.</p>\n<p>Boeing Co dropped 1.8% after Ireland's Ryanair&nbsp;said it had ended talks with the planemaker over a purchase of 737 MAX 10 jets worth tens of billions of dollars due to differences over price.</p>\n<p>Match Group Inc jumped over 7% after the S&amp;P Dow Jones Indices said on Friday the Tinder parent will join the benchmark index.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CXP\">Columbia Property Trust Inc</a> surged 15% after Pacific Investment Management Company said it would buy the company for $2.2 billion.</p>\n<p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 9.2 billion shares, compared with the 9.0 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.</p>\n<p>Declining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 2.27-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.65-to-1 ratio favored decliners.</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 500 posted 19 new 52-week highs and 1 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 120 new highs and 24 new lows.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"161125":"标普500","513500":"标普500ETF","MTCH":"Match Group, Inc.","SPY":"标普500ETF","AAPL":"苹果","AMGN":"安进",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","SDS":"两倍做空标普500ETF",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","OEX":"标普100","CXP":"Columbia Property Trust Inc","MRK":"默沙东","UPRO":"三倍做多标普500ETF","SH":"标普500反向ETF","NFLX":"奈飞","BA":"波音","IVV":"标普500指数ETF","SSO":"两倍做多标普500ETF","SPXU":"三倍做空标普500ETF","OEF":"标普100指数ETF-iShares"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2165350503","content_text":"* Drugmakers Amgen, Merck dip after rating cuts\n* Apple and Netflix hit record highs\n* Boeing drops after Ryanair ends jet order talks\n* Indexes end: S&P 500 -0.34%, Nasdaq +0.07%, Dow -0.76%\nThe S&P 500 closed lower on Tuesday while the Nasdaq edged up to a record high, as investors balanced worries about the slowing pace of economic recovery with expectations that the Federal Reserve will maintain its accommodative monetary policy.\nAmgen Inc fell 2.2% and Merck & Co lost 1.7% after Morgan Stanley cut its rating on the stocks to \"equal-weight\" from \"overweight.\"\nThe Nasdaq was supported by Big Tech stocks that have fueled Wall Street's gains in recent years. Apple rose 1.6% and Netflix added 2.7%, both hitting record highs.\n\"You could call it a gravitation toward Big Tech. As people feel a bit uncertain about how COVID will play out, you don’t have your reopening worries with those companies,\" said Tom Martin, senior portfolio manager at Globalt Investments in Atlanta.\nMuch of the rest of Wall Street fell. Eight of the eleven sub-indexes traded lower, with economy-sensitive sectors like industrials down 1.8% and utilities dipping 1.4%. The real estate index lost 1.1%.\nTepid August payrolls data on Friday last week raised concerns that the economic recovery was slowing down.\nOn Tuesday, Morgan Stanley cut its rating on U.S. stocks to underweight, pointing to risks related to economic growth, policy and legislation, and warning it expects the next two months to be \"bumpy.\"\nAccommodative central bank policies and reopening optimism have pushed the S&P 500 and Nasdaq to record highs over the past few weeks, but concerns are growing about rising coronavirus infections due to the Delta variant and its impact on the economic recovery.\nAnalysts on average expect S&P 500 companies to increase their earnings per share by 30% in the September quarter, following a 96% surge in the second quarter, according to I/B/E/S data from Refinitiv.\nUnofficially, the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 0.76% to end at 35,100 points, while the S&P 500 lost 0.34% to 4,520.03.\nThe Nasdaq Composite climbed 0.07% to 15,374.33.\nThe S&P 500 remains up about 20% year to date, and the Nasdaq is up about 19%.\nBoeing Co dropped 1.8% after Ireland's Ryanair said it had ended talks with the planemaker over a purchase of 737 MAX 10 jets worth tens of billions of dollars due to differences over price.\nMatch Group Inc jumped over 7% after the S&P Dow Jones Indices said on Friday the Tinder parent will join the benchmark index.\nColumbia Property Trust Inc surged 15% after Pacific Investment Management Company said it would buy the company for $2.2 billion.\nVolume on U.S. exchanges was 9.2 billion shares, compared with the 9.0 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.\nDeclining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 2.27-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.65-to-1 ratio favored decliners.\nThe S&P 500 posted 19 new 52-week highs and 1 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 120 new highs and 24 new lows.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":92,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":178212977,"gmtCreate":1626823365699,"gmtModify":1633770768151,"author":{"id":"3567411499210880","authorId":"3567411499210880","name":"Nebhol","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b0bfc2a45b91e41a283614268857b3a5","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3567411499210880","authorIdStr":"3567411499210880"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like comment","listText":"Like comment","text":"Like comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/178212977","repostId":"1102026643","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1102026643","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1626822943,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1102026643?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-21 07:15","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Netflix details video game push as it forecasts weak growth","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1102026643","media":"Reuters","summary":"(Reuters) -Netflix Inc said it would make a deeper dive into video games as the movie and TV streami","content":"<p>(Reuters) -Netflix Inc said it would make a deeper dive into video games as the movie and TV streaming service projected weak subscriber growth amid growing competition and the lifting of pandemic restrictions that had kept people at home.</p>\n<p>The company’s shares&nbsp;once&nbsp;fell&nbsp;6%&nbsp;and&nbsp;finally hovered about even at $531.10 in after-hours trading on Tuesday.</p>\n<p>Earnings for April through June came in at $2.97 per share, below the average forecast of $3.16, according to analysts surveyed by Refinitiv.</p>\n<p>Netflix is weathering a sharp slowdown in new customers after a boom in 2020 fueled by stay-at-home orders to curb the COVID-19 pandemic. In the United States and Canada, Netflix reported a decline of about 430,000 subscribers in the second quarter.</p>\n<p>The streaming video pioneer said it was in the early stages of expanding its video game offerings, which would be available to subscribers at no extra charge. The company will initially focus primarily on mobile games.</p>\n<p>“We view gaming as another new content category for us, similar to our expansion into original films, animation and unscripted TV,” the company said in its quarterly letter to shareholders.</p>\n<p>Netflix has dabbled in video games with a few titles linked to hits including “Stranger Things” and “The Dark Crystal: Age of Resistance.”</p>\n<p>Some analysts have said the company that dominates streaming video needs to find new ways to jump-start subscriptions after years of rapid expansion. According to eMarketer, Netflix’s share of U.S. revenue from subscription streaming video will shrink to 30.8% by the end of 2021, from nearly 50% in 2018.</p>\n<p>“Netflix delivered another underwhelming quarter as competition in the streaming space heats up,” said Investing.com senior analyst Jesse Cohen. “The absence of any new looming growth catalysts has been one of the main reasons for Netflix’s relatively mild performance this year.”</p>\n<p>The company projected it would add 3.5 million customers from July through September. Wall Street had expected a forecast of 5.5 million.</p>\n<p>For the just-ended quarter, Netflix added 1.54 million customers, beating analyst projections of 1.04 million. Total subscribers numbered 209 million at the end of June.</p>\n<p>A year ago, Netflix picked up 10.1 million subscribers in the second quarter.</p>\n<p>This year, Netflix felt the impact of COVID-19 on TV production, which left the company with a small menu of new titles. At the same time, Walt Disney Co’s Disney+, AT&amp;T Inc’s HBO Max and other services attracted customers, and summer blockbusters returned to movie theaters.</p>\n<p>The easing of pandemic safety measures also lured people out of their homes and away from their televisions.</p>\n<p>Netflix promises a heavier lineup in the second half of 2021, including new seasons of “You,” “Money Heist” and “The Witcher.”</p>\n<p>If its subscriber forecast pans out, Netflix will have added more than 54 million subscribers over the past two years, a pace consistent with its annual additions before the COVID-19 pandemic, the company said.</p>\n<p>It also noted that streaming television still accounts for a small portion of overall viewing time and that its service is less mature outside the United States.</p>\n<p>“We are confident that we have a long runway for growth,” Netflix said in its investor letter.</p>\n<p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Netflix details video game push as it forecasts weak growth</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nNetflix details video game push as it forecasts weak growth\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-21 07:15 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.reuters.com/article/netflix-results/update-4-netflix-details-video-game-push-as-it-forecasts-weak-growth-idUSL1N2OW2GQ><strong>Reuters</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(Reuters) -Netflix Inc said it would make a deeper dive into video games as the movie and TV streaming service projected weak subscriber growth amid growing competition and the lifting of pandemic ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.reuters.com/article/netflix-results/update-4-netflix-details-video-game-push-as-it-forecasts-weak-growth-idUSL1N2OW2GQ\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NFLX":"奈飞"},"source_url":"https://www.reuters.com/article/netflix-results/update-4-netflix-details-video-game-push-as-it-forecasts-weak-growth-idUSL1N2OW2GQ","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1102026643","content_text":"(Reuters) -Netflix Inc said it would make a deeper dive into video games as the movie and TV streaming service projected weak subscriber growth amid growing competition and the lifting of pandemic restrictions that had kept people at home.\nThe company’s shares once fell 6% and finally hovered about even at $531.10 in after-hours trading on Tuesday.\nEarnings for April through June came in at $2.97 per share, below the average forecast of $3.16, according to analysts surveyed by Refinitiv.\nNetflix is weathering a sharp slowdown in new customers after a boom in 2020 fueled by stay-at-home orders to curb the COVID-19 pandemic. In the United States and Canada, Netflix reported a decline of about 430,000 subscribers in the second quarter.\nThe streaming video pioneer said it was in the early stages of expanding its video game offerings, which would be available to subscribers at no extra charge. The company will initially focus primarily on mobile games.\n“We view gaming as another new content category for us, similar to our expansion into original films, animation and unscripted TV,” the company said in its quarterly letter to shareholders.\nNetflix has dabbled in video games with a few titles linked to hits including “Stranger Things” and “The Dark Crystal: Age of Resistance.”\nSome analysts have said the company that dominates streaming video needs to find new ways to jump-start subscriptions after years of rapid expansion. According to eMarketer, Netflix’s share of U.S. revenue from subscription streaming video will shrink to 30.8% by the end of 2021, from nearly 50% in 2018.\n“Netflix delivered another underwhelming quarter as competition in the streaming space heats up,” said Investing.com senior analyst Jesse Cohen. “The absence of any new looming growth catalysts has been one of the main reasons for Netflix’s relatively mild performance this year.”\nThe company projected it would add 3.5 million customers from July through September. Wall Street had expected a forecast of 5.5 million.\nFor the just-ended quarter, Netflix added 1.54 million customers, beating analyst projections of 1.04 million. Total subscribers numbered 209 million at the end of June.\nA year ago, Netflix picked up 10.1 million subscribers in the second quarter.\nThis year, Netflix felt the impact of COVID-19 on TV production, which left the company with a small menu of new titles. At the same time, Walt Disney Co’s Disney+, AT&T Inc’s HBO Max and other services attracted customers, and summer blockbusters returned to movie theaters.\nThe easing of pandemic safety measures also lured people out of their homes and away from their televisions.\nNetflix promises a heavier lineup in the second half of 2021, including new seasons of “You,” “Money Heist” and “The Witcher.”\nIf its subscriber forecast pans out, Netflix will have added more than 54 million subscribers over the past two years, a pace consistent with its annual additions before the COVID-19 pandemic, the company said.\nIt also noted that streaming television still accounts for a small portion of overall viewing time and that its service is less mature outside the United States.\n“We are confident that we have a long runway for growth,” Netflix said in its investor letter.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":5,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}