Ok_老虎社区_美港股上老虎

JinDuaHuat
2021-09-14

Apple Must Decide How Badly It Wants 30% Fee After Court Ruling

Judge questioned, but didn’t lower iPhone maker’s commission Maximizing revenue means logistical cha

Apple Must Decide How Badly It Wants 30% Fee After Court Ruling

免责声明：上述内容仅代表发帖人个人观点，不构成本平台的任何投资建议。

推荐
最新

暂无评论

热议股票

关于我们·老虎社区守则·老虎社区账号管理规范·老虎社区服务协议·老虎社区隐私政策

公司名称：北京至简风宜信息技术有限公司

违法和不良信息投诉：010-5681-3562（工作时间9:30-18:30）

邮箱：service@laohu8.com

营业执照：91110105MA01A4U55R

ICP备：京ICP备18016422号

网安备：京公网安备11010502036490

关注我们

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"data":{"magic":2,"id":886450244,"tweetId":"886450244","gmtCreate":1631619275888,"gmtModify":1631890220644,"author":{"id":3582069586264576,"authorId":3582069586264576,"authorIdStr":"3582069586264576","name":"JinDuaHuat","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"userType":1,"introduction":"","boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"fanSize":1,"starInvestorFlag":false},"themes":[],"images":[],"coverImages":[],"extraTitle":"","html":"<html><head></head><body><p>Ok</p></body></html>","htmlText":"<html><head></head><body><p>Ok</p></body></html>","text":"Ok","highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/886450244","repostId":1165648531,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1165648531","pubTimestamp":1631612659,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1165648531?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-09-14 17:44","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Must Decide How Badly It Wants 30% Fee After Court Ruling","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1165648531","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"Judge questioned, but didn’t lower iPhone maker’s commission\nMaximizing revenue means logistical cha","content":"<ul>\n <li>Judge questioned, but didn’t lower iPhone maker’s commission</li>\n <li>Maximizing revenue means logistical challenges, political risk</li>\n</ul>\n<p>Apple Inc.&nbsp;could tell mobile app developers that it still intends to collect a commission of up to 30% despite last week’s&nbsp;court ruling&nbsp;ordering the iPhone maker to let users make payments on the web and questioning whether its much-criticized fee is justified.</p>\n<p>The judge’s 185-page decision following a May trial in a lawsuit by&nbsp;Epic Games Inc.&nbsp;left enough wiggle room for Apple to try to keep its App Store revenue stream largely intact, lawyers and analysts say, but doing so risks logistical hurdles and political blowback.</p>\n<p>While U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers said Apple can no longer ban developers from using “buttons, external links or other calls to action that direct customers to purchasing methods” other than Apple’s payment system, she stopped short of ordering the company to lower its commission.</p>\n<p>The order didn’t say developers who steer consumers away from Apple’s system are entitled to keep all the revenue for themselves from in-app subscriptions and other digital items. Instead, the judge wrote, “Apple could still charge a commission on developers. It would simply be more difficult for Apple to collect that commission.”</p>\n<p>“Apple has the legal right to do business with anyone they want,” said Paul Gallant, managing director at Cowen &amp; Co. “So Apple could change the terms of the App Store and say to developers, regardless of where you collect your revenue, you owe us 30%, and if developers refuse to pay it, Apple would be free to de-platform them.”</p>\n<p>Gonzalez Rogers&nbsp;wrote&nbsp;that Apple hasn’t shown that its 30% rate levied on larger-scale developers is “justified.” She didn’t ask Apple to change it, however, and found that Epic’s collection of revenue outside of Apple’s in-app-purchase system for the popular game Fortnite violated their contract and must be paid back at the 30% rate.</p>\n<p>On Monday, Epic Games Chief Executive Officer Tim Sweeneysaidhis company has paid Apple $6 million for commissions it circumvented in Fortnite last year.</p>\n<p>But beyond the court fight, it’s unclear how Apple would collect revenue from its large group of developers if they were to use their own web-based payment systems.</p>\n<p>Apple Chief Executive Officer Tim Cook alluded to that challenge when he testified at the trial.</p>\n<p>“We would have to come up with another system to invoice developers, which I think would be a mess,” he said. Asked by the judge directly if developers would still need to pay Apple if they collected payments from consumers outside of the iPhone maker’s in-app-purchase system, Cook said: “Yes, of course.”</p>\n<p>It would be an extraordinarily complex undertaking. Such a system would need to track how much money a developer is actually generating from consumers and retroactively collect a portion of it.</p>\n<p>Amid all the pressure Apple faces globally from lawmakers and regulators to loosen its grip on app distribution, an aggressive effort to recoup revenue from web-based purchase risks stirring an uproar.</p>\n<p>“The more likely path is for Apple to think seriously about reducing its commissions,” Cowen’s Gallant said. “I think the pending legislation in the U.S. and Europe and Friday’s court ruling increase the prospects for Apple to make a move on commissions.”</p>\n<p>Cook testified that the 30% fee covers developer tools, distribution and customer service in addition to payment processing. Continuing to charge such a high rate for developers that don’t use all those services might be perceived as unfair.</p>\n<p>Prior to Friday’s ruling, Apple had already agreed,starting next year, to let “reader” apps -- which include video, music, news, books and other media -- to point users away from its store to complete transactions on the web. Having made that concession, Apple might find it harder to continue to collect commissions from other developers.</p>\n<p>The silver lining for Apple is that some developers may decide it’s not worth the effort to leave Apple’s existing payment system in light of the benefits it offers including simplicity, refund processing, and security.</p>","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Must Decide How Badly It Wants 30% Fee After Court Ruling</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Must Decide How Badly It Wants 30% Fee After Court Ruling\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-09-14 17:44 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-09-14/apple-must-decide-how-badly-it-wants-30-fee-after-court-ruling?srnd=markets-vp><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Judge questioned, but didn’t lower iPhone maker’s commission\nMaximizing revenue means logistical challenges, political risk\n\nApple Inc. could tell mobile app developers that it still intends to ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-09-14/apple-must-decide-how-badly-it-wants-30-fee-after-court-ruling?srnd=markets-vp\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-09-14/apple-must-decide-how-badly-it-wants-30-fee-after-court-ruling?srnd=markets-vp","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1165648531","content_text":"Judge questioned, but didn’t lower iPhone maker’s commission\nMaximizing revenue means logistical challenges, political risk\n\nApple Inc. could tell mobile app developers that it still intends to collect a commission of up to 30% despite last week’s court ruling ordering the iPhone maker to let users make payments on the web and questioning whether its much-criticized fee is justified.\nThe judge’s 185-page decision following a May trial in a lawsuit by Epic Games Inc. left enough wiggle room for Apple to try to keep its App Store revenue stream largely intact, lawyers and analysts say, but doing so risks logistical hurdles and political blowback.\nWhile U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers said Apple can no longer ban developers from using “buttons, external links or other calls to action that direct customers to purchasing methods” other than Apple’s payment system, she stopped short of ordering the company to lower its commission.\nThe order didn’t say developers who steer consumers away from Apple’s system are entitled to keep all the revenue for themselves from in-app subscriptions and other digital items. Instead, the judge wrote, “Apple could still charge a commission on developers. It would simply be more difficult for Apple to collect that commission.”\n“Apple has the legal right to do business with anyone they want,” said Paul Gallant, managing director at Cowen & Co. “So Apple could change the terms of the App Store and say to developers, regardless of where you collect your revenue, you owe us 30%, and if developers refuse to pay it, Apple would be free to de-platform them.”\nGonzalez Rogers wrote that Apple hasn’t shown that its 30% rate levied on larger-scale developers is “justified.” She didn’t ask Apple to change it, however, and found that Epic’s collection of revenue outside of Apple’s in-app-purchase system for the popular game Fortnite violated their contract and must be paid back at the 30% rate.\nOn Monday, Epic Games Chief Executive Officer Tim Sweeneysaidhis company has paid Apple $6 million for commissions it circumvented in Fortnite last year.\nBut beyond the court fight, it’s unclear how Apple would collect revenue from its large group of developers if they were to use their own web-based payment systems.\nApple Chief Executive Officer Tim Cook alluded to that challenge when he testified at the trial.\n“We would have to come up with another system to invoice developers, which I think would be a mess,” he said. Asked by the judge directly if developers would still need to pay Apple if they collected payments from consumers outside of the iPhone maker’s in-app-purchase system, Cook said: “Yes, of course.”\nIt would be an extraordinarily complex undertaking. Such a system would need to track how much money a developer is actually generating from consumers and retroactively collect a portion of it.\nAmid all the pressure Apple faces globally from lawmakers and regulators to loosen its grip on app distribution, an aggressive effort to recoup revenue from web-based purchase risks stirring an uproar.\n“The more likely path is for Apple to think seriously about reducing its commissions,” Cowen’s Gallant said. “I think the pending legislation in the U.S. and Europe and Friday’s court ruling increase the prospects for Apple to make a move on commissions.”\nCook testified that the 30% fee covers developer tools, distribution and customer service in addition to payment processing. Continuing to charge such a high rate for developers that don’t use all those services might be perceived as unfair.\nPrior to Friday’s ruling, Apple had already agreed,starting next year, to let “reader” apps -- which include video, music, news, books and other media -- to point users away from its store to complete transactions on the web. Having made that concession, Apple might find it harder to continue to collect commissions from other developers.\nThe silver lining for Apple is that some developers may decide it’s not worth the effort to leave Apple’s existing payment system in light of the benefits it offers including simplicity, refund processing, and security.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":52,"commentLimit":10,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"symbols":[],"verified":2,"subType":0,"readableState":1,"langContent":"EN","currentLanguage":"EN","warmUpFlag":false,"orderFlag":false,"shareable":true,"causeOfNotShareable":"","featuresForAnalytics":[],"commentAndTweetFlag":false,"upFlag":false,"length":2,"xxTargetLangEnum":"ORIG"},"commentList":[],"hasMoreComment":false,"orderType":2}