chowtimeee的个人主页 - 老虎社区

chowtimeee

暂无个人介绍

IP属地：未知

6关注

2粉丝

0主题

0勋章

2021-11-01

Like

Apple Disappointed -- and Quickly Rebounded. Here's Why.

2021-09-07

I'm humbles whenever I read about buffett and munger's investment decisions. Their strategy is worth us all emulating

Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway has scored a $2 billion gain on BYD stock this year

2021-08-24

Building up for more hype

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-08-23

Clean energy

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-08-23

Clean energy

Big Oil Looks To Woo Investors Back With Massive Dividends

去老虎APP查看更多动态

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"4091437618269770","uuid":"4091437618269770","gmtCreate":1628334553792,"gmtModify":1628334553792,"name":"chowtimeee","pinyin":"chowtimeee","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":2,"headSize":6,"tweetSize":5,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":1,"name":"萌萌虎","nameTw":"萌萌虎","represent":"呱呱坠地","factor":"评论帖子3次或发布1条主帖（非转发）","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":1,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":null,"userBadges":[{"badgeId":"228c86a078844d74991fff2b7ab2428d-3","templateUuid":"228c86a078844d74991fff2b7ab2428d","name":"投资合伙人虎","description":"证券账户累计交易金额达到100万美元","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fbeac6bb240db7da8b972e5183d050ba","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/436cdf80292b99f0a992e78750ac4e3a","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/506a259a7b456f037592c3b23c779599","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2024.11.28","exceedPercentage":"93.50%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101},{"badgeId":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969-2","templateUuid":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969","name":"宗师交易员","description":"证券或期货账户累计交易次数达到100次","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad22cfbe2d05aa393b18e9226e4b0307","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/36702e6ff3ffe46acafee66cc85273ca","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d52eb88fa385cf5abe2616ed63781765","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.12.08","exceedPercentage":"80.78%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37-1","templateUuid":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37","name":"博闻投资者","description":"累计交易超过10只正股","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.07.08","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a-1","templateUuid":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a","name":"实盘交易者","description":"完成一笔实盘交易","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":4,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":"未知","starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"post","tweets":[{"id":843008075,"gmtCreate":1635780178398,"gmtModify":1635780225796,"author":{"id":"4091437618269770","authorId":"4091437618269770","name":"chowtimeee","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4091437618269770","authorIdStr":"4091437618269770"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/843008075","repostId":"1175678891","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1175678891","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1635779942,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1175678891?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-01 23:19","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Disappointed -- and Quickly Rebounded. Here's Why.","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1175678891","media":"TheStreet","summary":"Apple disappointed on fiscal Q3 earnings day, but the stock’s selloff did not last long. Here is the","content":"<p>Apple disappointed on fiscal Q3 earnings day, but the stock’s selloff did not last long. Here is the most likely reason why AAPL shares rebounded as early as Friday.</p>\n<p>On October 28,Apple delivered fiscal Q4 results&nbsp;that lagged consensus for the first time in years. Despite revenue growth of 29% that most companies would find very solid, Apple stocksold off in after-hours action, losing as much as $125 billion in market cap right before the earnings call.</p>\n<p>Yet, by the end of day Friday, AAPL had erased the bulk of its short-lived losses. The Apple Maven thinks that the intraday recovery was driven primarily by analysts publishing reports that sounded much less bearish than the revenue miss may have implied at first.</p>\n<p>Below, we review some of the main takeaways from Wall Street experts on Apple’s earnings.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b3facec59ae76a6c28f4c5847600b4de\" tg-width=\"1240\" tg-height=\"886\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Figure 1: Apple store in New York, NY.</span></p>\n<p><b>Wall Street seemed comfortable</b></p>\n<p>TipRanks&nbsp;reported&nbsp;on 13 analysts that published earnings reviews on Apple. Among these, none changed the rating on AAPL stock, which remains a “moderate buy”: about three-fourths still recommend buying the shares.</p>\n<p>The traditionally optimistic analyst from Wedbush, Dan Ives, did notseereasons to worry about Apple and its business. He called the Cupertino company’s supply chain issues “painful noise in the near term” and remained confident that strong demand for Apple’s products and services should convert to delayed sales in 2022.</p>\n<p>Morgan Stanley’s Katy Huberty is another vocal bull that I like to track for her insightful opinions and analysis. She&nbsp;lowered&nbsp;her price target on AAPL stock by a meager $2 to $164, while still pointing at around 10% gain potential from here.</p>\n<p>According to the analyst, “supply constraints will dominate the headlines post Apple's September quarter earnings report”, which could put a damper on valuations and share price for a moment. But she made two other comments that sounded much more upbeat: (1) guidance commentary implies that fiscal Q1 revenue should be in line with consensus, and (2) the more important stories are impressive growth in services and Greater China segments.</p>\n<p>Even the much less bullish analysts did notseemtoo worried about Apple. Bernstein’s Tony Sacconaghi has a neutral rating on the stock and sees downside risk of over 10%. Still, the expert seemed to nod at solid fiscal Q1 guided growth of 6% to 9% and higher-than-expected gross margin, despite the challenges.</p>\n<p><b>Apple Maven’s take</b></p>\n<p>Investors had become accustomed to seeing Apple deliver impressive earnings beats in the past few years, even more so during the COVID-19 crisis. For this reason, the most recent revenue miss must have felt like a dip in ice-cold water.</p>\n<p>But under the hood, Apple’s recent performance has remained impressive. Despite all the supply chain issues, revenues still climbed 29%, albeit over easy 2020 comps. Gross margin increased substantially, and operating expenses remained under check. If not for some drag from below-the-line items that investors care little about, Apple would have delivered another EPS beat.</p>\n<p>I still find it hard to justify bearishness towards Apple, considering how well the company’s management team has been executing lately. It looks like the market has agreed with me, even if it took it a few hours on Friday to make up its mind.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Disappointed -- and Quickly Rebounded. Here's Why.</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Disappointed -- and Quickly Rebounded. Here's Why.\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-11-01 23:19 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.thestreet.com/apple/stock/this-is-why-apple-stock-rebounded-after-earnings><strong>TheStreet</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Apple disappointed on fiscal Q3 earnings day, but the stock’s selloff did not last long. Here is the most likely reason why AAPL shares rebounded as early as Friday.\nOn October 28,Apple delivered ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.thestreet.com/apple/stock/this-is-why-apple-stock-rebounded-after-earnings\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://www.thestreet.com/apple/stock/this-is-why-apple-stock-rebounded-after-earnings","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1175678891","content_text":"Apple disappointed on fiscal Q3 earnings day, but the stock’s selloff did not last long. Here is the most likely reason why AAPL shares rebounded as early as Friday.\nOn October 28,Apple delivered fiscal Q4 results that lagged consensus for the first time in years. Despite revenue growth of 29% that most companies would find very solid, Apple stocksold off in after-hours action, losing as much as $125 billion in market cap right before the earnings call.\nYet, by the end of day Friday, AAPL had erased the bulk of its short-lived losses. The Apple Maven thinks that the intraday recovery was driven primarily by analysts publishing reports that sounded much less bearish than the revenue miss may have implied at first.\nBelow, we review some of the main takeaways from Wall Street experts on Apple’s earnings.\nFigure 1: Apple store in New York, NY.\nWall Street seemed comfortable\nTipRanks reported on 13 analysts that published earnings reviews on Apple. Among these, none changed the rating on AAPL stock, which remains a “moderate buy”: about three-fourths still recommend buying the shares.\nThe traditionally optimistic analyst from Wedbush, Dan Ives, did notseereasons to worry about Apple and its business. He called the Cupertino company’s supply chain issues “painful noise in the near term” and remained confident that strong demand for Apple’s products and services should convert to delayed sales in 2022.\nMorgan Stanley’s Katy Huberty is another vocal bull that I like to track for her insightful opinions and analysis. She lowered her price target on AAPL stock by a meager $2 to $164, while still pointing at around 10% gain potential from here.\nAccording to the analyst, “supply constraints will dominate the headlines post Apple's September quarter earnings report”, which could put a damper on valuations and share price for a moment. But she made two other comments that sounded much more upbeat: (1) guidance commentary implies that fiscal Q1 revenue should be in line with consensus, and (2) the more important stories are impressive growth in services and Greater China segments.\nEven the much less bullish analysts did notseemtoo worried about Apple. Bernstein’s Tony Sacconaghi has a neutral rating on the stock and sees downside risk of over 10%. Still, the expert seemed to nod at solid fiscal Q1 guided growth of 6% to 9% and higher-than-expected gross margin, despite the challenges.\nApple Maven’s take\nInvestors had become accustomed to seeing Apple deliver impressive earnings beats in the past few years, even more so during the COVID-19 crisis. For this reason, the most recent revenue miss must have felt like a dip in ice-cold water.\nBut under the hood, Apple’s recent performance has remained impressive. Despite all the supply chain issues, revenues still climbed 29%, albeit over easy 2020 comps. Gross margin increased substantially, and operating expenses remained under check. If not for some drag from below-the-line items that investors care little about, Apple would have delivered another EPS beat.\nI still find it hard to justify bearishness towards Apple, considering how well the company’s management team has been executing lately. It looks like the market has agreed with me, even if it took it a few hours on Friday to make up its mind.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":655,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":817416600,"gmtCreate":1630980025600,"gmtModify":1632904808493,"author":{"id":"4091437618269770","authorId":"4091437618269770","name":"chowtimeee","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4091437618269770","authorIdStr":"4091437618269770"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"I'm humbles whenever I read about buffett and munger's investment decisions. Their strategy is worth us all emulating","listText":"I'm humbles whenever I read about buffett and munger's investment decisions. Their strategy is worth us all emulating","text":"I'm humbles whenever I read about buffett and munger's investment decisions. Their strategy is worth us all emulating","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/817416600","repostId":"1154766595","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1154766595","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1630978701,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1154766595?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-09-07 09:38","market":"hk","language":"en","title":"Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway has scored a $2 billion gain on BYD stock this year","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1154766595","media":"Business  insider","summary":"Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway has made a $2 billion gain on BYD this year.\nBerkshire spent $23","content":"<ul>\n <li>Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway has made a $2 billion gain on BYD this year.</li>\n <li>Berkshire spent $232 million in 2008 for a stake in the automaker worth nearly $8 billion today.</li>\n <li>The Chinese group's sales of electric and hybrid vehicles rose by over 300% year-on-year in August.</li>\n</ul>\n<p>Warren Buffett's&nbsp;Berkshire Hathaway&nbsp;has racked up a $2 billion gain onBYDstock this year, boosting the value of its bet on the Chinese electric-vehicle company to almost $8 billion - a 3,400% gain on its investment in under 13 years.</p>\n<p>The famed investor's company spent $232 million to buy 225 million shares of BYD in 2008. Its stake was worth $5.9 billion at the end of last year, Berkshire's&nbsp;latest annual report shows. Yet BYD's stock price has surged by about 23% since then, lifting the value of Berkshire's roughly 8% stake to $7.9 billion.</p>\n<p>BYD's Hong Kong-listed shares climbed 8% on Monday alone after the automaker revealed its sales of passenger vehicles more than quadrupled year-on-year to 60,500 units in August. It sold a total of 261,000 passenger vehicles in the first eight months of this year - more than triple the 85,000 it sold in the same period of 2020.</p>\n<p>The robust sales growth reflected a 125% rise in sales of fully electric vehicles to 149,000 units in the first eight months of this year, along with a 485% increase in sales of plug-in hybrids to 112,000 units. In contrast, BYD's sales of gas-powered vehicles dropped 22% to 106,000 units during that period.</p>\n<p>Buffett's business partner and Berkshire's vice-chairman, Charlie Munger, has&nbsp;repeatedly sung BYD's praises&nbsp;since he first brought the company to Buffett's attention. For example, he described BYD's founder and CEO, Wang Chuanfu, as a mixture of inventor Thomas Edison and former GE boss Jack Welch in a&nbsp;Fortune interview&nbsp;in 2009.</p>\n<p>Munger has been right about BYD's prospects so far. The company has grown its revenue by nearly six-fold to the equivalent of $24 billion since Berkshire invested, and more than tripled its net income to around $1 billion.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway has scored a $2 billion gain on BYD stock this year</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWarren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway has scored a $2 billion gain on BYD stock this year\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-09-07 09:38 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/warren-buffett-berkshire-hathaway-byd-stock-electric-vehicles-batteries-transportation-2021-9><strong>Business  insider</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway has made a $2 billion gain on BYD this year.\nBerkshire spent $232 million in 2008 for a stake in the automaker worth nearly $8 billion today.\nThe Chinese group's ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/warren-buffett-berkshire-hathaway-byd-stock-electric-vehicles-batteries-transportation-2021-9\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"002594":"比亚迪","01211":"比亚迪股份","BRK.B":"伯克希尔B","BRK.A":"伯克希尔"},"source_url":"https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/warren-buffett-berkshire-hathaway-byd-stock-electric-vehicles-batteries-transportation-2021-9","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1154766595","content_text":"Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway has made a $2 billion gain on BYD this year.\nBerkshire spent $232 million in 2008 for a stake in the automaker worth nearly $8 billion today.\nThe Chinese group's sales of electric and hybrid vehicles rose by over 300% year-on-year in August.\n\nWarren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway has racked up a $2 billion gain onBYDstock this year, boosting the value of its bet on the Chinese electric-vehicle company to almost $8 billion - a 3,400% gain on its investment in under 13 years.\nThe famed investor's company spent $232 million to buy 225 million shares of BYD in 2008. Its stake was worth $5.9 billion at the end of last year, Berkshire's latest annual report shows. Yet BYD's stock price has surged by about 23% since then, lifting the value of Berkshire's roughly 8% stake to $7.9 billion.\nBYD's Hong Kong-listed shares climbed 8% on Monday alone after the automaker revealed its sales of passenger vehicles more than quadrupled year-on-year to 60,500 units in August. It sold a total of 261,000 passenger vehicles in the first eight months of this year - more than triple the 85,000 it sold in the same period of 2020.\nThe robust sales growth reflected a 125% rise in sales of fully electric vehicles to 149,000 units in the first eight months of this year, along with a 485% increase in sales of plug-in hybrids to 112,000 units. In contrast, BYD's sales of gas-powered vehicles dropped 22% to 106,000 units during that period.\nBuffett's business partner and Berkshire's vice-chairman, Charlie Munger, has repeatedly sung BYD's praises since he first brought the company to Buffett's attention. For example, he described BYD's founder and CEO, Wang Chuanfu, as a mixture of inventor Thomas Edison and former GE boss Jack Welch in a Fortune interview in 2009.\nMunger has been right about BYD's prospects so far. The company has grown its revenue by nearly six-fold to the equivalent of $24 billion since Berkshire invested, and more than tripled its net income to around $1 billion.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":265,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":834994611,"gmtCreate":1629765591833,"gmtModify":1633682630720,"author":{"id":"4091437618269770","authorId":"4091437618269770","name":"chowtimeee","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4091437618269770","authorIdStr":"4091437618269770"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Building up for more hype","listText":"Building up for more hype","text":"Building up for more hype","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/834994611","repostId":"1172929887","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":407,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":832754968,"gmtCreate":1629679280554,"gmtModify":1633683352083,"author":{"id":"4091437618269770","authorId":"4091437618269770","name":"chowtimeee","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4091437618269770","authorIdStr":"4091437618269770"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Clean energy","listText":"Clean energy","text":"Clean energy","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/832754968","repostId":"2161740148","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":377,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":832756639,"gmtCreate":1629679203421,"gmtModify":1633683353988,"author":{"id":"4091437618269770","authorId":"4091437618269770","name":"chowtimeee","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4091437618269770","authorIdStr":"4091437618269770"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Clean energy","listText":"Clean energy","text":"Clean energy","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/832756639","repostId":"2161740148","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2161740148","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1629678180,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2161740148?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-23 08:23","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Big Oil Looks To Woo Investors Back With Massive Dividends","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2161740148","media":"Oilprice.com","summary":"Big Oil is coming off yet another blockbuster season, posting the second consecutive quarter of stel","content":"<p>Big Oil is coming off yet another blockbuster season, posting the second consecutive quarter of stellar top-and-bottom line growth. According to the latest FactSet data, the energy sector's Q2 2021 revenue growth rate of 24.9% came in way higher than Wall Street's estimate of 19.4% while the sector reported earnings of $15.9 billion compared to a loss of -$10.6 billion in Q2 2020 marked the biggest Y/Y improvement of any of the <b>S&amp;P 500</b>'s 11 market sectors.</p>\n<p>Interestingly, the Big Oil duo of <b>ExxonMobil </b>(NYSE:XOM) and <b>Chevron Corp</b>. (NYSE:CVX) were largely to thank for the outstanding performance, with the two combining for $13.9 billion of the $26.8 billion year-over-year increase in earnings for the sector.</p>\n<p>Not surprisingly, the majority of the oil and gas majors have been using their cash bonanza to reward shareholders with higher dividends and buybacks.</p>\n<p>Chevron, <b>Marathon Oil </b>(NYSE:MRO), <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/EQNR\">Equinor ASA</a></b> (NYSE:EQNR), and <b>Royal Dutch </b>Shell (NYSE:RDS.A) have announced dividend hikes during their latest earnings call while <b>ConocoPhillips</b> (NYSE:COP) and <b>BP Plc</b> (NYSE:BP) have reinstated share buybacks after bumper earnings.</p>\n<p>But contrary to Wall Street's expectations, Big Oil's cash bounty, including fat dividends, has mostly failed to impress investors, a rather surprising development in a market starved of yields.</p>\n<p>There's a method to the madness, though.</p>\n<p>Kathy Hipple, finance professor at Bard College in New York, has told CNBC that Big Oil's bid to lure back investors with cash rewards is unlikely to work on long-term investors.</p>\n<p><b>Dividend traps</b></p>\n<p>Companies in all sectors normally use dividends and share buybacks to make their shares more attractive to investors.</p>\n<p>For most companies, dividend payments act as a token reward to shareholders for their investment. However, oil companies are particularly adept at dishing out these token rewards, and Big Oil sports some of the most impressive yields in the business.</p>\n<p>ExxonMobil currently sports a 6.60% dividend yield (Fwd); Chevron yields 5.68%, BP 5.56%, Shell 5.01%, while <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MPLX\">MPLX LP</a> </b>(NYSE:MPLX) checks in with 10.01% fwd yield.</p>\n<p>Meanwhile, share buybacks are designed to boost a company's earnings, which eventually reflects in its share price.</p>\n<p>However, Hipple says that whereas a 10% yield can act as a powerful magnet for the average income investor, savvy, long-term investors are not falling for it because they view oil and gas companies as dividend traps with a sell-by date that is moving closer by the day.</p>\n<p><i>\"Once institutional investors determine that demand has peaked--which likely has already happened--they will abandon the sector permanently. Many already have, based on the stock performance of the sector over the past several years</i>.\"</p>\n<p><b>Stranded assets</b></p>\n<p>Hipple said that savvy long-term investors will continue to shy away from oil and gas majors \"unless and until\" they fully acknowledge the climate crisis due to the very real risk of stranded assets.</p>\n<p>\"<i>These investors understand that the oil majors are still investing tens of billions in unnecessary oil and gas infrastructure, ignoring the IEA findings that no additional infrastructure is possible to meet a 1.5 [degrees Celsius] scenario. These investments are likely to become stranded assets, and investors don't want to be left holding the bag.\"</i></p>\n<p>She certainly has a valid point here.</p>\n<p>Last week, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change delivered its starkest warning yet about the deepening climate emergency, saying a key temperature limit of 1.5 degrees Celsius could be broken in just over a decade in the absence of immediate, rapid, and large-scale reductions in greenhouse gas emissions.</p>\n<p>U.N. Secretary-General, António Guterres, has described the report's findings as a \"code red for humanity,\" saying they \"<i>must sound a death knell</i>\" for fossil fuels.</p>\n<p>True, U.S. Shale companies are exercising a lot more capital discipline than they have in the past. Shale drillers have a history of matching their capital spending to the strength of oil and gas prices; However, Big Oil is ditching the old playbook this time around. Rystad Energy says that whereas hydrocarbon sales, cash from operations and EBITDA for tight oil producers are all likely to test new record highs if WTI averages at least $60 per barrel this year, capital expenditure will only see muted growth as many producers remain committed to maintaining operational discipline.</p>\n<p>However, the lion's share of these investments is still flowing towards developing new oil and gas assets, with a minuscule fraction going towards sustainable energy.</p>\n<p>Hipple is hardly alone in her dim view of legacy oil and gas companies.</p>\n<p>\"<i>We frankly just don't think these are very good businesses. With the oil companies, we still just don't think they represent good long-term businesses. They don't generate consistent returns on capital or cash flow, albeit at the moment they look to be in a pretty good place,</i>\" David Moss, head of European equities at BMO Global Asset Management, has told CNBC.</p>\n<p>Moss, in particular, faults European energy majors which are currently generating \"very strong\" cash flows amid a sustained rebound in oil prices but many are choosing to keep a tight lid on spending rather than invest in sustainable energy.</p>\n<p>It appears that Wall Street is now doing a 180 and increasingly turning bearish on oil and gas.</p>\n<p>In a recent report, Standard Chartered says Wall Street is plain wrong in its expectations of high oil prices because \"...<i>a significant amount of money has already entered the market in the Wall Street-generated belief (mistaken according to our analysis) that the balances are much tighter and justify USD 80-100/bbl.\"</i></p>","source":"yahoofinance","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Big Oil Looks To Woo Investors Back With Massive Dividends</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBig Oil Looks To Woo Investors Back With Massive Dividends\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-08-23 08:23 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/big-oil-looks-woo-investors-230000275.html><strong>Oilprice.com</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Big Oil is coming off yet another blockbuster season, posting the second consecutive quarter of stellar top-and-bottom line growth. According to the latest FactSet data, the energy sector's Q2 2021 ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/big-oil-looks-woo-investors-230000275.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"RDS.A":"荷兰皇家壳牌石油A类股","BP":"英国石油","MRO":"马拉松石油","XOM":"埃克森美孚","COP":"康菲石油","CVX":"雪佛龙","EQNR":"Equinor ASA"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/big-oil-looks-woo-investors-230000275.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5f26f4a48f9cb3e29be4d71d3ba8c038","article_id":"2161740148","content_text":"Big Oil is coming off yet another blockbuster season, posting the second consecutive quarter of stellar top-and-bottom line growth. According to the latest FactSet data, the energy sector's Q2 2021 revenue growth rate of 24.9% came in way higher than Wall Street's estimate of 19.4% while the sector reported earnings of $15.9 billion compared to a loss of -$10.6 billion in Q2 2020 marked the biggest Y/Y improvement of any of the S&P 500's 11 market sectors.\nInterestingly, the Big Oil duo of ExxonMobil (NYSE:XOM) and Chevron Corp. (NYSE:CVX) were largely to thank for the outstanding performance, with the two combining for $13.9 billion of the $26.8 billion year-over-year increase in earnings for the sector.\nNot surprisingly, the majority of the oil and gas majors have been using their cash bonanza to reward shareholders with higher dividends and buybacks.\nChevron, Marathon Oil (NYSE:MRO), Equinor ASA (NYSE:EQNR), and Royal Dutch Shell (NYSE:RDS.A) have announced dividend hikes during their latest earnings call while ConocoPhillips (NYSE:COP) and BP Plc (NYSE:BP) have reinstated share buybacks after bumper earnings.\nBut contrary to Wall Street's expectations, Big Oil's cash bounty, including fat dividends, has mostly failed to impress investors, a rather surprising development in a market starved of yields.\nThere's a method to the madness, though.\nKathy Hipple, finance professor at Bard College in New York, has told CNBC that Big Oil's bid to lure back investors with cash rewards is unlikely to work on long-term investors.\nDividend traps\nCompanies in all sectors normally use dividends and share buybacks to make their shares more attractive to investors.\nFor most companies, dividend payments act as a token reward to shareholders for their investment. However, oil companies are particularly adept at dishing out these token rewards, and Big Oil sports some of the most impressive yields in the business.\nExxonMobil currently sports a 6.60% dividend yield (Fwd); Chevron yields 5.68%, BP 5.56%, Shell 5.01%, while MPLX LP (NYSE:MPLX) checks in with 10.01% fwd yield.\nMeanwhile, share buybacks are designed to boost a company's earnings, which eventually reflects in its share price.\nHowever, Hipple says that whereas a 10% yield can act as a powerful magnet for the average income investor, savvy, long-term investors are not falling for it because they view oil and gas companies as dividend traps with a sell-by date that is moving closer by the day.\n\"Once institutional investors determine that demand has peaked--which likely has already happened--they will abandon the sector permanently. Many already have, based on the stock performance of the sector over the past several years.\"\nStranded assets\nHipple said that savvy long-term investors will continue to shy away from oil and gas majors \"unless and until\" they fully acknowledge the climate crisis due to the very real risk of stranded assets.\n\"These investors understand that the oil majors are still investing tens of billions in unnecessary oil and gas infrastructure, ignoring the IEA findings that no additional infrastructure is possible to meet a 1.5 [degrees Celsius] scenario. These investments are likely to become stranded assets, and investors don't want to be left holding the bag.\"\nShe certainly has a valid point here.\nLast week, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change delivered its starkest warning yet about the deepening climate emergency, saying a key temperature limit of 1.5 degrees Celsius could be broken in just over a decade in the absence of immediate, rapid, and large-scale reductions in greenhouse gas emissions.\nU.N. Secretary-General, António Guterres, has described the report's findings as a \"code red for humanity,\" saying they \"must sound a death knell\" for fossil fuels.\nTrue, U.S. Shale companies are exercising a lot more capital discipline than they have in the past. Shale drillers have a history of matching their capital spending to the strength of oil and gas prices; However, Big Oil is ditching the old playbook this time around. Rystad Energy says that whereas hydrocarbon sales, cash from operations and EBITDA for tight oil producers are all likely to test new record highs if WTI averages at least $60 per barrel this year, capital expenditure will only see muted growth as many producers remain committed to maintaining operational discipline.\nHowever, the lion's share of these investments is still flowing towards developing new oil and gas assets, with a minuscule fraction going towards sustainable energy.\nHipple is hardly alone in her dim view of legacy oil and gas companies.\n\"We frankly just don't think these are very good businesses. With the oil companies, we still just don't think they represent good long-term businesses. They don't generate consistent returns on capital or cash flow, albeit at the moment they look to be in a pretty good place,\" David Moss, head of European equities at BMO Global Asset Management, has told CNBC.\nMoss, in particular, faults European energy majors which are currently generating \"very strong\" cash flows amid a sustained rebound in oil prices but many are choosing to keep a tight lid on spending rather than invest in sustainable energy.\nIt appears that Wall Street is now doing a 180 and increasingly turning bearish on oil and gas.\nIn a recent report, Standard Chartered says Wall Street is plain wrong in its expectations of high oil prices because \"...a significant amount of money has already entered the market in the Wall Street-generated belief (mistaken according to our analysis) that the balances are much tighter and justify USD 80-100/bbl.\"","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":228,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":843008075,"gmtCreate":1635780178398,"gmtModify":1635780225796,"author":{"id":"4091437618269770","authorId":"4091437618269770","name":"chowtimeee","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4091437618269770","authorIdStr":"4091437618269770"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/843008075","repostId":"1175678891","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1175678891","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1635779942,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1175678891?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-01 23:19","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Disappointed -- and Quickly Rebounded. Here's Why.","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1175678891","media":"TheStreet","summary":"Apple disappointed on fiscal Q3 earnings day, but the stock’s selloff did not last long. Here is the","content":"<p>Apple disappointed on fiscal Q3 earnings day, but the stock’s selloff did not last long. Here is the most likely reason why AAPL shares rebounded as early as Friday.</p>\n<p>On October 28,Apple delivered fiscal Q4 results&nbsp;that lagged consensus for the first time in years. Despite revenue growth of 29% that most companies would find very solid, Apple stocksold off in after-hours action, losing as much as $125 billion in market cap right before the earnings call.</p>\n<p>Yet, by the end of day Friday, AAPL had erased the bulk of its short-lived losses. The Apple Maven thinks that the intraday recovery was driven primarily by analysts publishing reports that sounded much less bearish than the revenue miss may have implied at first.</p>\n<p>Below, we review some of the main takeaways from Wall Street experts on Apple’s earnings.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b3facec59ae76a6c28f4c5847600b4de\" tg-width=\"1240\" tg-height=\"886\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Figure 1: Apple store in New York, NY.</span></p>\n<p><b>Wall Street seemed comfortable</b></p>\n<p>TipRanks&nbsp;reported&nbsp;on 13 analysts that published earnings reviews on Apple. Among these, none changed the rating on AAPL stock, which remains a “moderate buy”: about three-fourths still recommend buying the shares.</p>\n<p>The traditionally optimistic analyst from Wedbush, Dan Ives, did notseereasons to worry about Apple and its business. He called the Cupertino company’s supply chain issues “painful noise in the near term” and remained confident that strong demand for Apple’s products and services should convert to delayed sales in 2022.</p>\n<p>Morgan Stanley’s Katy Huberty is another vocal bull that I like to track for her insightful opinions and analysis. She&nbsp;lowered&nbsp;her price target on AAPL stock by a meager $2 to $164, while still pointing at around 10% gain potential from here.</p>\n<p>According to the analyst, “supply constraints will dominate the headlines post Apple's September quarter earnings report”, which could put a damper on valuations and share price for a moment. But she made two other comments that sounded much more upbeat: (1) guidance commentary implies that fiscal Q1 revenue should be in line with consensus, and (2) the more important stories are impressive growth in services and Greater China segments.</p>\n<p>Even the much less bullish analysts did notseemtoo worried about Apple. Bernstein’s Tony Sacconaghi has a neutral rating on the stock and sees downside risk of over 10%. Still, the expert seemed to nod at solid fiscal Q1 guided growth of 6% to 9% and higher-than-expected gross margin, despite the challenges.</p>\n<p><b>Apple Maven’s take</b></p>\n<p>Investors had become accustomed to seeing Apple deliver impressive earnings beats in the past few years, even more so during the COVID-19 crisis. For this reason, the most recent revenue miss must have felt like a dip in ice-cold water.</p>\n<p>But under the hood, Apple’s recent performance has remained impressive. Despite all the supply chain issues, revenues still climbed 29%, albeit over easy 2020 comps. Gross margin increased substantially, and operating expenses remained under check. If not for some drag from below-the-line items that investors care little about, Apple would have delivered another EPS beat.</p>\n<p>I still find it hard to justify bearishness towards Apple, considering how well the company’s management team has been executing lately. It looks like the market has agreed with me, even if it took it a few hours on Friday to make up its mind.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Disappointed -- and Quickly Rebounded. Here's Why.</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Disappointed -- and Quickly Rebounded. Here's Why.\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-11-01 23:19 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.thestreet.com/apple/stock/this-is-why-apple-stock-rebounded-after-earnings><strong>TheStreet</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Apple disappointed on fiscal Q3 earnings day, but the stock’s selloff did not last long. Here is the most likely reason why AAPL shares rebounded as early as Friday.\nOn October 28,Apple delivered ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.thestreet.com/apple/stock/this-is-why-apple-stock-rebounded-after-earnings\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://www.thestreet.com/apple/stock/this-is-why-apple-stock-rebounded-after-earnings","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1175678891","content_text":"Apple disappointed on fiscal Q3 earnings day, but the stock’s selloff did not last long. Here is the most likely reason why AAPL shares rebounded as early as Friday.\nOn October 28,Apple delivered fiscal Q4 results that lagged consensus for the first time in years. Despite revenue growth of 29% that most companies would find very solid, Apple stocksold off in after-hours action, losing as much as $125 billion in market cap right before the earnings call.\nYet, by the end of day Friday, AAPL had erased the bulk of its short-lived losses. The Apple Maven thinks that the intraday recovery was driven primarily by analysts publishing reports that sounded much less bearish than the revenue miss may have implied at first.\nBelow, we review some of the main takeaways from Wall Street experts on Apple’s earnings.\nFigure 1: Apple store in New York, NY.\nWall Street seemed comfortable\nTipRanks reported on 13 analysts that published earnings reviews on Apple. Among these, none changed the rating on AAPL stock, which remains a “moderate buy”: about three-fourths still recommend buying the shares.\nThe traditionally optimistic analyst from Wedbush, Dan Ives, did notseereasons to worry about Apple and its business. He called the Cupertino company’s supply chain issues “painful noise in the near term” and remained confident that strong demand for Apple’s products and services should convert to delayed sales in 2022.\nMorgan Stanley’s Katy Huberty is another vocal bull that I like to track for her insightful opinions and analysis. She lowered her price target on AAPL stock by a meager $2 to $164, while still pointing at around 10% gain potential from here.\nAccording to the analyst, “supply constraints will dominate the headlines post Apple's September quarter earnings report”, which could put a damper on valuations and share price for a moment. But she made two other comments that sounded much more upbeat: (1) guidance commentary implies that fiscal Q1 revenue should be in line with consensus, and (2) the more important stories are impressive growth in services and Greater China segments.\nEven the much less bullish analysts did notseemtoo worried about Apple. Bernstein’s Tony Sacconaghi has a neutral rating on the stock and sees downside risk of over 10%. Still, the expert seemed to nod at solid fiscal Q1 guided growth of 6% to 9% and higher-than-expected gross margin, despite the challenges.\nApple Maven’s take\nInvestors had become accustomed to seeing Apple deliver impressive earnings beats in the past few years, even more so during the COVID-19 crisis. For this reason, the most recent revenue miss must have felt like a dip in ice-cold water.\nBut under the hood, Apple’s recent performance has remained impressive. Despite all the supply chain issues, revenues still climbed 29%, albeit over easy 2020 comps. Gross margin increased substantially, and operating expenses remained under check. If not for some drag from below-the-line items that investors care little about, Apple would have delivered another EPS beat.\nI still find it hard to justify bearishness towards Apple, considering how well the company’s management team has been executing lately. It looks like the market has agreed with me, even if it took it a few hours on Friday to make up its mind.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":655,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":817416600,"gmtCreate":1630980025600,"gmtModify":1632904808493,"author":{"id":"4091437618269770","authorId":"4091437618269770","name":"chowtimeee","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4091437618269770","authorIdStr":"4091437618269770"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"I'm humbles whenever I read about buffett and munger's investment decisions. Their strategy is worth us all emulating","listText":"I'm humbles whenever I read about buffett and munger's investment decisions. Their strategy is worth us all emulating","text":"I'm humbles whenever I read about buffett and munger's investment decisions. Their strategy is worth us all emulating","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/817416600","repostId":"1154766595","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1154766595","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1630978701,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1154766595?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-09-07 09:38","market":"hk","language":"en","title":"Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway has scored a $2 billion gain on BYD stock this year","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1154766595","media":"Business  insider","summary":"Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway has made a $2 billion gain on BYD this year.\nBerkshire spent $23","content":"<ul>\n <li>Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway has made a $2 billion gain on BYD this year.</li>\n <li>Berkshire spent $232 million in 2008 for a stake in the automaker worth nearly $8 billion today.</li>\n <li>The Chinese group's sales of electric and hybrid vehicles rose by over 300% year-on-year in August.</li>\n</ul>\n<p>Warren Buffett's&nbsp;Berkshire Hathaway&nbsp;has racked up a $2 billion gain onBYDstock this year, boosting the value of its bet on the Chinese electric-vehicle company to almost $8 billion - a 3,400% gain on its investment in under 13 years.</p>\n<p>The famed investor's company spent $232 million to buy 225 million shares of BYD in 2008. Its stake was worth $5.9 billion at the end of last year, Berkshire's&nbsp;latest annual report shows. Yet BYD's stock price has surged by about 23% since then, lifting the value of Berkshire's roughly 8% stake to $7.9 billion.</p>\n<p>BYD's Hong Kong-listed shares climbed 8% on Monday alone after the automaker revealed its sales of passenger vehicles more than quadrupled year-on-year to 60,500 units in August. It sold a total of 261,000 passenger vehicles in the first eight months of this year - more than triple the 85,000 it sold in the same period of 2020.</p>\n<p>The robust sales growth reflected a 125% rise in sales of fully electric vehicles to 149,000 units in the first eight months of this year, along with a 485% increase in sales of plug-in hybrids to 112,000 units. In contrast, BYD's sales of gas-powered vehicles dropped 22% to 106,000 units during that period.</p>\n<p>Buffett's business partner and Berkshire's vice-chairman, Charlie Munger, has&nbsp;repeatedly sung BYD's praises&nbsp;since he first brought the company to Buffett's attention. For example, he described BYD's founder and CEO, Wang Chuanfu, as a mixture of inventor Thomas Edison and former GE boss Jack Welch in a&nbsp;Fortune interview&nbsp;in 2009.</p>\n<p>Munger has been right about BYD's prospects so far. The company has grown its revenue by nearly six-fold to the equivalent of $24 billion since Berkshire invested, and more than tripled its net income to around $1 billion.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway has scored a $2 billion gain on BYD stock this year</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWarren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway has scored a $2 billion gain on BYD stock this year\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-09-07 09:38 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/warren-buffett-berkshire-hathaway-byd-stock-electric-vehicles-batteries-transportation-2021-9><strong>Business  insider</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway has made a $2 billion gain on BYD this year.\nBerkshire spent $232 million in 2008 for a stake in the automaker worth nearly $8 billion today.\nThe Chinese group's ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/warren-buffett-berkshire-hathaway-byd-stock-electric-vehicles-batteries-transportation-2021-9\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"002594":"比亚迪","01211":"比亚迪股份","BRK.B":"伯克希尔B","BRK.A":"伯克希尔"},"source_url":"https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/warren-buffett-berkshire-hathaway-byd-stock-electric-vehicles-batteries-transportation-2021-9","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1154766595","content_text":"Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway has made a $2 billion gain on BYD this year.\nBerkshire spent $232 million in 2008 for a stake in the automaker worth nearly $8 billion today.\nThe Chinese group's sales of electric and hybrid vehicles rose by over 300% year-on-year in August.\n\nWarren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway has racked up a $2 billion gain onBYDstock this year, boosting the value of its bet on the Chinese electric-vehicle company to almost $8 billion - a 3,400% gain on its investment in under 13 years.\nThe famed investor's company spent $232 million to buy 225 million shares of BYD in 2008. Its stake was worth $5.9 billion at the end of last year, Berkshire's latest annual report shows. Yet BYD's stock price has surged by about 23% since then, lifting the value of Berkshire's roughly 8% stake to $7.9 billion.\nBYD's Hong Kong-listed shares climbed 8% on Monday alone after the automaker revealed its sales of passenger vehicles more than quadrupled year-on-year to 60,500 units in August. It sold a total of 261,000 passenger vehicles in the first eight months of this year - more than triple the 85,000 it sold in the same period of 2020.\nThe robust sales growth reflected a 125% rise in sales of fully electric vehicles to 149,000 units in the first eight months of this year, along with a 485% increase in sales of plug-in hybrids to 112,000 units. In contrast, BYD's sales of gas-powered vehicles dropped 22% to 106,000 units during that period.\nBuffett's business partner and Berkshire's vice-chairman, Charlie Munger, has repeatedly sung BYD's praises since he first brought the company to Buffett's attention. For example, he described BYD's founder and CEO, Wang Chuanfu, as a mixture of inventor Thomas Edison and former GE boss Jack Welch in a Fortune interview in 2009.\nMunger has been right about BYD's prospects so far. The company has grown its revenue by nearly six-fold to the equivalent of $24 billion since Berkshire invested, and more than tripled its net income to around $1 billion.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":265,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":834994611,"gmtCreate":1629765591833,"gmtModify":1633682630720,"author":{"id":"4091437618269770","authorId":"4091437618269770","name":"chowtimeee","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4091437618269770","authorIdStr":"4091437618269770"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Building up for more hype","listText":"Building up for more hype","text":"Building up for more hype","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/834994611","repostId":"1172929887","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":407,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":832754968,"gmtCreate":1629679280554,"gmtModify":1633683352083,"author":{"id":"4091437618269770","authorId":"4091437618269770","name":"chowtimeee","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4091437618269770","authorIdStr":"4091437618269770"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Clean energy","listText":"Clean energy","text":"Clean energy","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/832754968","repostId":"2161740148","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":377,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":832756639,"gmtCreate":1629679203421,"gmtModify":1633683353988,"author":{"id":"4091437618269770","authorId":"4091437618269770","name":"chowtimeee","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4091437618269770","authorIdStr":"4091437618269770"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Clean energy","listText":"Clean energy","text":"Clean energy","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/832756639","repostId":"2161740148","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":228,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}