Bluefaerie的个人主页 - 老虎社区

Bluefaerie

Bluefaerie

暂无个人介绍

IP属地：未知

48关注

2粉丝

0主题

0勋章

2021-09-08

$Novavax(NVAX)$🤩

2021-08-02

Nice

Airline shares, Carnival stocks were mostly higher

2021-07-29

Great ariticle, would you like to share it?

@趋势队长:周三Moc大资金卖出排行榜，beke,vips,tal,nok,luv上榜

2021-07-29

Nice

@小虎综合资讯:【异动】港股科技股短线拉升，京东、网易涨超11%

2021-07-29

Nice

@小虎综合资讯:【异动】港股科技股短线拉升，京东、网易涨超11%

2021-07-27

please like 😻

How the 10-year Treasury rate and S&P 500 performed when the Fed tapered in 2013

2021-07-23

Is this overvaluation?

Wall Street ekes out gains, led by tech, growth stocks

2021-07-22

Informative

Users Say Their Nvidia Graphics Cards Are Getting Bricked By Amazon MMO Game

2021-07-21

Woah

Disney is chipping away at Netflix’s dominance

2021-07-18

Woww

The story behind the savvy ‘Mystery Broker’ and where he sees the market going now

2021-07-17

Up up up

Apple Stock: Next Stop, $175?

2021-07-16

Keep everyone well informed

Nasdaq ends lower as investors sell Big Tech

2021-07-16

Nice

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-07-16

Nice

'Boring '20s'? - a decade of zero real rates :Mike Dolan

2021-07-16

Nice

'Boring '20s'? - a decade of zero real rates :Mike Dolan

去老虎APP查看更多动态

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"4089440680592730","uuid":"4089440680592730","gmtCreate":1626414698742,"gmtModify":1626415822105,"name":"Bluefaerie","pinyin":"bluefaerie","introduction":"","introductionEn":null,"signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3a14cce34aa8b490facc68d4c62d3704","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":2,"headSize":48,"tweetSize":15,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":1,"name":"萌萌虎","nameTw":"萌萌虎","represent":"呱呱坠地","factor":"评论帖子3次或发布1条主帖（非转发）","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":null,"userBadges":[{"badgeId":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561-1","templateUuid":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561","name":"出道虎友","description":"加入老虎社区500天","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0e4d0ca1da0456dc7894c946d44bf9ab","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0f2f65e8ce4cfaae8db2bea9b127f58b","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5948a31b6edf154422335b265235809","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.12.13","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a-1","templateUuid":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a","name":"实盘交易者","description":"完成一笔实盘交易","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":2,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":"未知","starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"post","tweets":[{"id":880889944,"gmtCreate":1631031200488,"gmtModify":1631884988642,"author":{"id":"4089440680592730","authorId":"4089440680592730","name":"Bluefaerie","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3a14cce34aa8b490facc68d4c62d3704","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4089440680592730","idStr":"4089440680592730"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVAX\">$Novavax(NVAX)$</a>🤩","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVAX\">$Novavax(NVAX)$</a>🤩","text":"$Novavax(NVAX)$🤩","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1c13baa1ab8e4c26ab3f602d69624511","width":"1170","height":"2026"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/880889944","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":113,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":804022606,"gmtCreate":1627913067805,"gmtModify":1633755338612,"author":{"id":"4089440680592730","authorId":"4089440680592730","name":"Bluefaerie","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3a14cce34aa8b490facc68d4c62d3704","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4089440680592730","idStr":"4089440680592730"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nice","listText":"Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":9,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/804022606","repostId":"1169778745","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1169778745","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1627911880,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1169778745?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-02 21:44","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Airline shares, Carnival stocks were mostly higher","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1169778745","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"(August 2) Shares of Carnival Corp. were up 2.52% in early trading. Major banks including Morgan Sta","content":"<p>(August 2)&nbsp;Shares of Carnival Corp. were up 2.52% in early trading. Major banks including Morgan Stanley and Bank of America were higher. Airline shares were mostly higher.</p>\n<p>“We believe the reopening and recovery trend is on track and continue to see upside for equities,” wrote Mark Haefele, chief investment officer of global wealth management at UBS. “We expect the S&amp;P 500 to climb to around 4,650 by June next year, versus 4,395 at present. But we see the greatest upside for cyclical parts of the market, including energy, financials, and Japanese stocks.”</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9d1f8013a64fda7879ad10c4e7559aec\" tg-width=\"313\" tg-height=\"363\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Airline shares, Carnival stocks were mostly higher</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAirline shares, Carnival stocks were mostly higher\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-08-02 21:44</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>(August 2)&nbsp;Shares of Carnival Corp. were up 2.52% in early trading. Major banks including Morgan Stanley and Bank of America were higher. Airline shares were mostly higher.</p>\n<p>“We believe the reopening and recovery trend is on track and continue to see upside for equities,” wrote Mark Haefele, chief investment officer of global wealth management at UBS. “We expect the S&amp;P 500 to climb to around 4,650 by June next year, versus 4,395 at present. But we see the greatest upside for cyclical parts of the market, including energy, financials, and Japanese stocks.”</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9d1f8013a64fda7879ad10c4e7559aec\" tg-width=\"313\" tg-height=\"363\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1169778745","content_text":"(August 2) Shares of Carnival Corp. were up 2.52% in early trading. Major banks including Morgan Stanley and Bank of America were higher. Airline shares were mostly higher.\n“We believe the reopening and recovery trend is on track and continue to see upside for equities,” wrote Mark Haefele, chief investment officer of global wealth management at UBS. “We expect the S&P 500 to climb to around 4,650 by June next year, versus 4,395 at present. But we see the greatest upside for cyclical parts of the market, including energy, financials, and Japanese stocks.”","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":246,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":801436491,"gmtCreate":1627527025513,"gmtModify":1633764097299,"author":{"id":"4089440680592730","authorId":"4089440680592730","name":"Bluefaerie","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3a14cce34aa8b490facc68d4c62d3704","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4089440680592730","idStr":"4089440680592730"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","listText":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","text":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/801436491","repostId":"801495474","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":801495474,"gmtCreate":1627526557198,"gmtModify":1627526557198,"author":{"id":"3521339628608760","authorId":"3521339628608760","name":"趋势队长","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a126f572eafb02336cabf7f7a75e6712","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3521339628608760","idStr":"3521339628608760"},"themes":[],"title":"周三Moc大资金卖出排行榜，beke,vips,tal,nok,luv上榜","htmlText":"美股的很多基金（包括共同基金、对冲基金、养老金等）只能在尾盘以收盘价进行交易，英文叫Market-On-Close Stock Order Imbalances，简称moc，这些交易基本都是在尾盘15分钟内进行交易。<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BEKE\">$贝壳(BEKE)$</a>&nbsp;<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/VIPS\">$唯品会(VIPS)$</a>&nbsp;<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TAL\">$好未来(TAL)$</a>&nbsp;<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NOK\">$诺基亚(NOK)$</a>&nbsp;<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LUV\">$西南航空(LUV)$</a>&nbsp;每日股票机会更新、实时买卖通知和实仓分享，请订阅<a href=\"https://www.laohu8.com/m/space?userId=3521339628608760\" target=\"_blank\">我的空间站</a>","listText":"美股的很多基金（包括共同基金、对冲基金、养老金等）只能在尾盘以收盘价进行交易，英文叫Market-On-Close Stock Order Imbalances，简称moc，这些交易基本都是在尾盘15分钟内进行交易。<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BEKE\">$贝壳(BEKE)$</a>&nbsp;<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/VIPS\">$唯品会(VIPS)$</a>&nbsp;<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TAL\">$好未来(TAL)$</a>&nbsp;<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NOK\">$诺基亚(NOK)$</a>&nbsp;<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LUV\">$西南航空(LUV)$</a>&nbsp;每日股票机会更新、实时买卖通知和实仓分享，请订阅<a href=\"https://www.laohu8.com/m/space?userId=3521339628608760\" target=\"_blank\">我的空间站</a>","text":"美股的很多基金（包括共同基金、对冲基金、养老金等）只能在尾盘以收盘价进行交易，英文叫Market-On-Close Stock Order Imbalances，简称moc，这些交易基本都是在尾盘15分钟内进行交易。$贝壳(BEKE)$ $唯品会(VIPS)$ $好未来(TAL)$ $诺基亚(NOK)$ $西南航空(LUV)$ 每日股票机会更新、实时买卖通知和实仓分享，请订阅我的空间站","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/29f3e19f2c9c51ae1fd6ffee92f834a4","width":"688","height":"273"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":2,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/801495474","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":2,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":211,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":801436361,"gmtCreate":1627527014053,"gmtModify":1633764097664,"author":{"id":"4089440680592730","authorId":"4089440680592730","name":"Bluefaerie","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3a14cce34aa8b490facc68d4c62d3704","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4089440680592730","idStr":"4089440680592730"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nice","listText":"Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/801436361","repostId":"801494120","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":801494120,"gmtCreate":1627526591556,"gmtModify":1627526591556,"author":{"id":"3527667586584720","authorId":"3527667586584720","name":"小虎综合资讯","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3527667586584720","idStr":"3527667586584720"},"themes":[],"title":"【异动】港股科技股短线拉升，京东、网易涨超11%","htmlText":"7月29日，港股科技股短线拉升，京东、网易涨超11%，腾讯控股涨超7%，阿里巴巴涨超5%。","listText":"7月29日，港股科技股短线拉升，京东、网易涨超11%，腾讯控股涨超7%，阿里巴巴涨超5%。","text":"7月29日，港股科技股短线拉升，京东、网易涨超11%，腾讯控股涨超7%，阿里巴巴涨超5%。","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/117faf34f66b8007ef46d320d8928345","width":"-1","height":"-1"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":2,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/801494120","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":240,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":801438598,"gmtCreate":1627526992014,"gmtModify":1633764098109,"author":{"id":"4089440680592730","authorId":"4089440680592730","name":"Bluefaerie","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3a14cce34aa8b490facc68d4c62d3704","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4089440680592730","idStr":"4089440680592730"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"&nbsp;Nice","listText":"&nbsp;Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/801438598","repostId":"801494120","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":801494120,"gmtCreate":1627526591556,"gmtModify":1627526591556,"author":{"id":"3527667586584720","authorId":"3527667586584720","name":"小虎综合资讯","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3527667586584720","idStr":"3527667586584720"},"themes":[],"title":"【异动】港股科技股短线拉升，京东、网易涨超11%","htmlText":"7月29日，港股科技股短线拉升，京东、网易涨超11%，腾讯控股涨超7%，阿里巴巴涨超5%。","listText":"7月29日，港股科技股短线拉升，京东、网易涨超11%，腾讯控股涨超7%，阿里巴巴涨超5%。","text":"7月29日，港股科技股短线拉升，京东、网易涨超11%，腾讯控股涨超7%，阿里巴巴涨超5%。","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/117faf34f66b8007ef46d320d8928345","width":"-1","height":"-1"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":2,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/801494120","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":271,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":809280026,"gmtCreate":1627372814965,"gmtModify":1633765635406,"author":{"id":"4089440680592730","authorId":"4089440680592730","name":"Bluefaerie","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3a14cce34aa8b490facc68d4c62d3704","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4089440680592730","idStr":"4089440680592730"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"please like 😻","listText":"please like 😻","text":"please like 😻","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/809280026","repostId":"2154875967","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2154875967","pubTimestamp":1627372266,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2154875967?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-27 15:51","market":"us","language":"en","title":"How the 10-year Treasury rate and S&P 500 performed when the Fed tapered in 2013","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2154875967","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"In the wake of the Great Recession, it took about five years for the U.S. central bank to start slow","content":"<p>In the wake of the Great Recession, it took about five years for the U.S. central bank to start slowing down its controversial large-scale bond-buying program, ultimately making 2013 the year of the \"taper tantrum .\"</p>\n<p>Federal Reserve officials have said they'd rather avoid a repeat of that episode, when it comes to eventually scaling back its $120 billion-a-month, pandemic-era asset-purchase program.</p>\n<p>And while it felt like the U.S. stock and bond markets both freaked out in 2013, a review of the S&amp;P 500's performance in that tumultuous year shows it turned out pretty well for equity investors who stayed the course.</p>\n<p>Following a roughly 6% pullback post-Fed taper announcement, the S&amp;P 500 finished the year higher by about 30%, according to the Wells Fargo Investment Institute.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b5888ee701d08887e5b8d11bca7d6e30\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"376\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>S&amp;P 500 rose 30% in 2013. WELLS FARGO INVESTMENT INSTITUTE</span></p>\n<p>At the same time, the 10-year Treasury yield nearly doubled in six months from a low of almost 1.5% to roughly 3.1% by that December, leading to higher borrowing costs that rippled through the U.S. economy, from commercial real-estate owners to U.S. corporations <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LQD\">$(LQD)$</a>.</p>\n<p>\"Higher inflation, rising long-term interest rates, and a less dovish Fed could potentially cause the market to pause,\" Chris Haverland, Wells Fargo Institute's global equity strategist wrote, in a Monday note.</p>\n<p>\"However, equities have historically performed well through these events, even if there was some initial selling pressure.\"</p>\n<p>Haverland thinks the Fed may announce plans to reduce its asset purchases later this year, which could lift longer-duration Treasury rates, including the 10-year, from its current 1.3% range. He also prefers to stick to his wheelhouse in equities over bonds.</p>\n<p>\"If the market corrects, we would view it as an opportunity to fill our equity positions that may be below strategic or tactical targets,\" he said.</p>\n<p>During the pandemic, the Fed has been buying about $80 billion of Treasurys each month and $40 billion of agency mortgage-backed securities (MBS), while increasing its balance sheet to about $8.2 trillion .</p>\n<p>Some Fed officials have been debating buying, as a first step to withdrawing some support, particularly since the U.S. housing market has been red-hot during the COVID crisis, albeit with recent signs of cooling.</p>\n<p>The Federal Reserve kicks off a two-day policy meeting on Tuesday, with a statement due Wednesday at 2 p.m. Eastern, followed by Fed Chairman Jerome Powell's press conference.</p>\n<p>U.S. stocks drifted higher into record territory on Monday, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average , S&amp;P 500 and Nasdaq Composite Index claiming new closing highs.</p>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>How the 10-year Treasury rate and S&P 500 performed when the Fed tapered in 2013</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHow the 10-year Treasury rate and S&P 500 performed when the Fed tapered in 2013\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-27 15:51 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.marketwatch.com/story/how-the-10-year-treasury-rate-and-s-p-500-performed-when-the-fed-tapered-in-2013-11627344095?mod=home-page><strong>MarketWatch</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>In the wake of the Great Recession, it took about five years for the U.S. central bank to start slowing down its controversial large-scale bond-buying program, ultimately making 2013 the year of the \"...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/how-the-10-year-treasury-rate-and-s-p-500-performed-when-the-fed-tapered-in-2013-11627344095?mod=home-page\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"161125":"标普500","513500":"标普500ETF","OEX":"标普100",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","LQD":"债券指数ETF-iShares iBoxx投资级公司债","IVV":"标普500指数ETF","SDS":"两倍做空标普500ETF","SSO":"两倍做多标普500ETF","MBB":"美国按揭抵押债券ETF-iShares","SPY":"标普500ETF",".DJI":"道琼斯","UPRO":"三倍做多标普500ETF","SH":"标普500反向ETF","SPXU":"三倍做空标普500ETF","OEF":"标普100指数ETF-iShares"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/how-the-10-year-treasury-rate-and-s-p-500-performed-when-the-fed-tapered-in-2013-11627344095?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2154875967","content_text":"In the wake of the Great Recession, it took about five years for the U.S. central bank to start slowing down its controversial large-scale bond-buying program, ultimately making 2013 the year of the \"taper tantrum .\"\nFederal Reserve officials have said they'd rather avoid a repeat of that episode, when it comes to eventually scaling back its $120 billion-a-month, pandemic-era asset-purchase program.\nAnd while it felt like the U.S. stock and bond markets both freaked out in 2013, a review of the S&P 500's performance in that tumultuous year shows it turned out pretty well for equity investors who stayed the course.\nFollowing a roughly 6% pullback post-Fed taper announcement, the S&P 500 finished the year higher by about 30%, according to the Wells Fargo Investment Institute.\nS&P 500 rose 30% in 2013. WELLS FARGO INVESTMENT INSTITUTE\nAt the same time, the 10-year Treasury yield nearly doubled in six months from a low of almost 1.5% to roughly 3.1% by that December, leading to higher borrowing costs that rippled through the U.S. economy, from commercial real-estate owners to U.S. corporations $(LQD)$.\n\"Higher inflation, rising long-term interest rates, and a less dovish Fed could potentially cause the market to pause,\" Chris Haverland, Wells Fargo Institute's global equity strategist wrote, in a Monday note.\n\"However, equities have historically performed well through these events, even if there was some initial selling pressure.\"\nHaverland thinks the Fed may announce plans to reduce its asset purchases later this year, which could lift longer-duration Treasury rates, including the 10-year, from its current 1.3% range. He also prefers to stick to his wheelhouse in equities over bonds.\n\"If the market corrects, we would view it as an opportunity to fill our equity positions that may be below strategic or tactical targets,\" he said.\nDuring the pandemic, the Fed has been buying about $80 billion of Treasurys each month and $40 billion of agency mortgage-backed securities (MBS), while increasing its balance sheet to about $8.2 trillion .\nSome Fed officials have been debating buying, as a first step to withdrawing some support, particularly since the U.S. housing market has been red-hot during the COVID crisis, albeit with recent signs of cooling.\nThe Federal Reserve kicks off a two-day policy meeting on Tuesday, with a statement due Wednesday at 2 p.m. Eastern, followed by Fed Chairman Jerome Powell's press conference.\nU.S. stocks drifted higher into record territory on Monday, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average , S&P 500 and Nasdaq Composite Index claiming new closing highs.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":319,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":175203397,"gmtCreate":1627031584319,"gmtModify":1633768620283,"author":{"id":"4089440680592730","authorId":"4089440680592730","name":"Bluefaerie","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3a14cce34aa8b490facc68d4c62d3704","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4089440680592730","idStr":"4089440680592730"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Is this overvaluation?","listText":"Is this overvaluation?","text":"Is this overvaluation?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/175203397","repostId":"1164478982","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1164478982","pubTimestamp":1626995319,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1164478982?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-23 07:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Wall Street ekes out gains, led by tech, growth stocks","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1164478982","media":"Reuters","summary":"NEW YORK  - Big tech helped Wall Street inch up to a higher close on Thursday, modestly building on a two-day rally as lackluster economic data and mixed corporate earnings prompted a pivot back to growth stocks.A pull-back in economically sensitive cyclicals kept the S&P 500’s and the blue-chip Dow’s gains muted, while small-caps underperformed their larger rivals.“The market is flip-flopping between the view that economic growth has almost peaked so you need to buy stocks that manufacture thei","content":"<p>NEW YORK (Reuters) - Big tech helped Wall Street inch up to a higher close on Thursday, modestly building on a two-day rally as lackluster economic data and mixed corporate earnings prompted a pivot back to growth stocks.</p>\n<p>A pull-back in economically sensitive cyclicals kept the S&amp;P 500’s and the blue-chip Dow’s gains muted, while small-caps underperformed their larger rivals.</p>\n<p>But megacap tech and tech-adjacent stocks, such as Microsoft Corp, Amazon.com, Apple Inc, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FB\">Facebook</a> Inc and Alphabet Inc, rose ahead of their quarterly results next week, putting the Nasdaq out front.</p>\n<p>All three major U.S. stock indexes ended the session within 1% of their record closing highs.</p>\n<p>Growth stocks, which outperformed throughout the health crisis, were back in favor, gaining 0.8%, while the value index slipped by 0.5%.</p>\n<p>“The market is flip-flopping between the view that economic growth has almost peaked so you need to buy stocks that manufacture their own growth like tech names, versus the view that economic growth will continue and you want to own cyclicals and value names,” said David Carter, chief investment officer at Lenox Wealth Advisors in New York.</p>\n<p>The number of U.S. workers filing first-time applications for unemployment benefits spiked unexpectedly to 419,000 last week, a two-month high, according to the Labor Department.</p>\n<p>Market participants are closely watching labor market indicators for hints as to when the Federal Reserve, expected to convene next week for its two-day monetary policy meeting, will begin discussions about hiking key interest rates from near zero.</p>\n<p>“The jobless data today didn’t have a meaningful impact on markets or the economic outlook,” Carter added. “It’s now all about how much longer the Fed will tolerate low rates. The Fed seems to be favoring its full employment mandate more than its price stability mandate.”</p>\n<p>“Accordingly, the upcoming Fed meeting could be impactful,” Carter said.</p>\n<p>Benchmark Treasury yields eased after the bid at the largest-ever TIPS auction touched a record low, pressuring rate sensitive banks.</p>\n<p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 25.35 points, or 0.07%, to 34,823.35, the S&amp;P 500 gained 8.79 points, or 0.20%, to 4,367.48 and the Nasdaq Composite added 52.64 points, or 0.36%, to 14,684.60.</p>\n<p>Of the 11 major sectors of the S&amp;P 500, tech was shining brightest, gaining 0.7%. Energy stocks suffered the largest percentage drop.</p>\n<p>The second-quarter reporting season barreled ahead at full-throttle, with 104 of the companies in the S&amp;P 500 having reported. Of those, 88% have beaten consensus estimates, according to Refinitiv.</p>\n<p>Drugmaker Biogen Inc gained 1.1% after hiking its full-year revenue guidance, while Domino’s Pizza Inc surged 14.6% to an all-time high on the heels of its quarterly report.</p>\n<p>Southwest Airlines Co posted a bigger-than-expected quarterly loss, sending its stock down 3.5%, and American Airlines Group Inc dipped 1.1% even after reporting a quarterly profit.</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 1500 Airlines index ended the session off 1.7%.</p>\n<p>Shares of Texas Instruments Inc slid 5.3% after its current-quarter revenue forecast cast concerns as to whether the company will be able to meet spiking demand in the face of a global semiconductor shortage.</p>\n<p>The Philadelphia SE Semiconductor index ended the session down 0.9%.</p>\n<p>Chipmaker Intel Corp slipped more than 1% in extended trading after the chipmaker posted results and raised its annual revenue forecast.</p>\n<p>Declining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 1.82-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.90-to-1 ratio favored decliners.</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 500 posted 39 new 52-week highs and no new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 70 new highs and 54 new lows.</p>\n<p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 8.25 billion shares, compared with the 10.12 billion average over the last 20 trading days.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Wall Street ekes out gains, led by tech, growth stocks</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWall Street ekes out gains, led by tech, growth stocks\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-23 07:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.reuters.com/article/usa-stocks/us-stocks-wall-street-ekes-out-gains-led-by-tech-growth-stocks-idUSL1N2OY2HH><strong>Reuters</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>NEW YORK (Reuters) - Big tech helped Wall Street inch up to a higher close on Thursday, modestly building on a two-day rally as lackluster economic data and mixed corporate earnings prompted a pivot ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.reuters.com/article/usa-stocks/us-stocks-wall-street-ekes-out-gains-led-by-tech-growth-stocks-idUSL1N2OY2HH\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"https://www.reuters.com/article/usa-stocks/us-stocks-wall-street-ekes-out-gains-led-by-tech-growth-stocks-idUSL1N2OY2HH","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1164478982","content_text":"NEW YORK (Reuters) - Big tech helped Wall Street inch up to a higher close on Thursday, modestly building on a two-day rally as lackluster economic data and mixed corporate earnings prompted a pivot back to growth stocks.\nA pull-back in economically sensitive cyclicals kept the S&P 500’s and the blue-chip Dow’s gains muted, while small-caps underperformed their larger rivals.\nBut megacap tech and tech-adjacent stocks, such as Microsoft Corp, Amazon.com, Apple Inc, Facebook Inc and Alphabet Inc, rose ahead of their quarterly results next week, putting the Nasdaq out front.\nAll three major U.S. stock indexes ended the session within 1% of their record closing highs.\nGrowth stocks, which outperformed throughout the health crisis, were back in favor, gaining 0.8%, while the value index slipped by 0.5%.\n“The market is flip-flopping between the view that economic growth has almost peaked so you need to buy stocks that manufacture their own growth like tech names, versus the view that economic growth will continue and you want to own cyclicals and value names,” said David Carter, chief investment officer at Lenox Wealth Advisors in New York.\nThe number of U.S. workers filing first-time applications for unemployment benefits spiked unexpectedly to 419,000 last week, a two-month high, according to the Labor Department.\nMarket participants are closely watching labor market indicators for hints as to when the Federal Reserve, expected to convene next week for its two-day monetary policy meeting, will begin discussions about hiking key interest rates from near zero.\n“The jobless data today didn’t have a meaningful impact on markets or the economic outlook,” Carter added. “It’s now all about how much longer the Fed will tolerate low rates. The Fed seems to be favoring its full employment mandate more than its price stability mandate.”\n“Accordingly, the upcoming Fed meeting could be impactful,” Carter said.\nBenchmark Treasury yields eased after the bid at the largest-ever TIPS auction touched a record low, pressuring rate sensitive banks.\nThe Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 25.35 points, or 0.07%, to 34,823.35, the S&P 500 gained 8.79 points, or 0.20%, to 4,367.48 and the Nasdaq Composite added 52.64 points, or 0.36%, to 14,684.60.\nOf the 11 major sectors of the S&P 500, tech was shining brightest, gaining 0.7%. Energy stocks suffered the largest percentage drop.\nThe second-quarter reporting season barreled ahead at full-throttle, with 104 of the companies in the S&P 500 having reported. Of those, 88% have beaten consensus estimates, according to Refinitiv.\nDrugmaker Biogen Inc gained 1.1% after hiking its full-year revenue guidance, while Domino’s Pizza Inc surged 14.6% to an all-time high on the heels of its quarterly report.\nSouthwest Airlines Co posted a bigger-than-expected quarterly loss, sending its stock down 3.5%, and American Airlines Group Inc dipped 1.1% even after reporting a quarterly profit.\nThe S&P 1500 Airlines index ended the session off 1.7%.\nShares of Texas Instruments Inc slid 5.3% after its current-quarter revenue forecast cast concerns as to whether the company will be able to meet spiking demand in the face of a global semiconductor shortage.\nThe Philadelphia SE Semiconductor index ended the session down 0.9%.\nChipmaker Intel Corp slipped more than 1% in extended trading after the chipmaker posted results and raised its annual revenue forecast.\nDeclining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 1.82-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.90-to-1 ratio favored decliners.\nThe S&P 500 posted 39 new 52-week highs and no new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 70 new highs and 54 new lows.\nVolume on U.S. exchanges was 8.25 billion shares, compared with the 10.12 billion average over the last 20 trading days.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":338,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":172355742,"gmtCreate":1626939810486,"gmtModify":1633769552303,"author":{"id":"4089440680592730","authorId":"4089440680592730","name":"Bluefaerie","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3a14cce34aa8b490facc68d4c62d3704","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4089440680592730","idStr":"4089440680592730"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Informative","listText":"Informative","text":"Informative","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/172355742","repostId":"1199772945","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1199772945","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1626939541,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1199772945?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-22 15:39","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Users Say Their Nvidia Graphics Cards Are Getting Bricked By Amazon MMO Game","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1199772945","media":"Benzinga","summary":"Amazon.com, Inc’s AMZN massively multiplayer online game, or MMO — “New World” — said Wednesday it w","content":"<p><b>Amazon.com, Inc’s</b>&nbsp;AMZN&nbsp;massively multiplayer online game, or MMO —&nbsp;“New World” — said&nbsp;Wednesday it will release a patch for its&nbsp;closed beta to reassure players after hardware failure reports emerged.</p>\n<p><b>What Happened:</b>&nbsp;New Worldannouncedvia<b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWTR\">Twitter</a> Inc’s</b>TWTR 0.01%platform that “New World makes standard DirectX calls as provided by the Windows API.”</p>\n<p>“We have seen no indication of widespread issues with 3090s, either in the beta or during our many months of alpha testing.”</p>\n<p>Amazon’s New World said that, while hundreds of thousands of people played the game’s beta and millions of total hours were played,&nbsp;they received a few reports of hardware failures from players using “high-performance graphics cards.”</p>\n<p>Some players had reported that their&nbsp;<b>Nvidia Corporation</b>&nbsp;NVDA&nbsp;manufactured RTX 3090 graphics cards were bricked after they played New World, the Vergereported.</p>\n<p>Many of the cards were said to have been manufactured by EVGA, the Verge reported citing the New World subreddit.</p>\n<p><b>Why It Matters:</b>&nbsp;New World is set to launch on August 31. The closed beta began July 20 and will continue until August 2.</p>\n<p>Amazon issued a statement that acknowledged that they have two customer service reports on 3090 failures, the Verge reported.</p>\n<p>“We do provide user select-able (sic) settings to reduce graphics, which correspondingly reduces GPU load, if the player desires,” as per the statement.</p>\n<p>The RTX 3090 was released as apart of the GeForce RTX 30 seriesin September 2020. At the time its top-end model was priced at $1,499 and base model at $499.</p>\n<p>Analternative applicationfor the 3090 graphics card is&nbsp;<b>Ethereum</b>(CRYPTO: ETH) mining as the 24GB variant can mine that cryptocurrency at up to 120 Mh/S.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Users Say Their Nvidia Graphics Cards Are Getting Bricked By Amazon MMO Game</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nUsers Say Their Nvidia Graphics Cards Are Getting Bricked By Amazon MMO Game\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-07-22 15:39</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><b>Amazon.com, Inc’s</b>&nbsp;AMZN&nbsp;massively multiplayer online game, or MMO —&nbsp;“New World” — said&nbsp;Wednesday it will release a patch for its&nbsp;closed beta to reassure players after hardware failure reports emerged.</p>\n<p><b>What Happened:</b>&nbsp;New Worldannouncedvia<b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWTR\">Twitter</a> Inc’s</b>TWTR 0.01%platform that “New World makes standard DirectX calls as provided by the Windows API.”</p>\n<p>“We have seen no indication of widespread issues with 3090s, either in the beta or during our many months of alpha testing.”</p>\n<p>Amazon’s New World said that, while hundreds of thousands of people played the game’s beta and millions of total hours were played,&nbsp;they received a few reports of hardware failures from players using “high-performance graphics cards.”</p>\n<p>Some players had reported that their&nbsp;<b>Nvidia Corporation</b>&nbsp;NVDA&nbsp;manufactured RTX 3090 graphics cards were bricked after they played New World, the Vergereported.</p>\n<p>Many of the cards were said to have been manufactured by EVGA, the Verge reported citing the New World subreddit.</p>\n<p><b>Why It Matters:</b>&nbsp;New World is set to launch on August 31. The closed beta began July 20 and will continue until August 2.</p>\n<p>Amazon issued a statement that acknowledged that they have two customer service reports on 3090 failures, the Verge reported.</p>\n<p>“We do provide user select-able (sic) settings to reduce graphics, which correspondingly reduces GPU load, if the player desires,” as per the statement.</p>\n<p>The RTX 3090 was released as apart of the GeForce RTX 30 seriesin September 2020. At the time its top-end model was priced at $1,499 and base model at $499.</p>\n<p>Analternative applicationfor the 3090 graphics card is&nbsp;<b>Ethereum</b>(CRYPTO: ETH) mining as the 24GB variant can mine that cryptocurrency at up to 120 Mh/S.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"09086":"华夏纳指-U","03086":"华夏纳指","NVDA":"英伟达","QNETCN":"纳斯达克中美互联网老虎指数","AMZN":"亚马逊"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1199772945","content_text":"Amazon.com, Inc’s AMZN massively multiplayer online game, or MMO — “New World” — said Wednesday it will release a patch for its closed beta to reassure players after hardware failure reports emerged.\nWhat Happened: New WorldannouncedviaTwitter Inc’sTWTR 0.01%platform that “New World makes standard DirectX calls as provided by the Windows API.”\n“We have seen no indication of widespread issues with 3090s, either in the beta or during our many months of alpha testing.”\nAmazon’s New World said that, while hundreds of thousands of people played the game’s beta and millions of total hours were played, they received a few reports of hardware failures from players using “high-performance graphics cards.”\nSome players had reported that their Nvidia Corporation NVDA manufactured RTX 3090 graphics cards were bricked after they played New World, the Vergereported.\nMany of the cards were said to have been manufactured by EVGA, the Verge reported citing the New World subreddit.\nWhy It Matters: New World is set to launch on August 31. The closed beta began July 20 and will continue until August 2.\nAmazon issued a statement that acknowledged that they have two customer service reports on 3090 failures, the Verge reported.\n“We do provide user select-able (sic) settings to reduce graphics, which correspondingly reduces GPU load, if the player desires,” as per the statement.\nThe RTX 3090 was released as apart of the GeForce RTX 30 seriesin September 2020. At the time its top-end model was priced at $1,499 and base model at $499.\nAnalternative applicationfor the 3090 graphics card is Ethereum(CRYPTO: ETH) mining as the 24GB variant can mine that cryptocurrency at up to 120 Mh/S.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":347,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":178721111,"gmtCreate":1626839165933,"gmtModify":1633770503149,"author":{"id":"4089440680592730","authorId":"4089440680592730","name":"Bluefaerie","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3a14cce34aa8b490facc68d4c62d3704","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4089440680592730","idStr":"4089440680592730"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Woah","listText":"Woah","text":"Woah","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/178721111","repostId":"1196827638","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1196827638","pubTimestamp":1626837882,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1196827638?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-21 11:24","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Disney is chipping away at Netflix’s dominance","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1196827638","media":"The New York Times","summary":"The cracks are showing in Netflix’s worldwide dominance.\nNetflix, Inc. is still king of streaming vi","content":"<p>The cracks are showing in Netflix’s worldwide dominance.</p>\n<p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NFLX\">Netflix, Inc.</a></b> is still king of streaming video, but audiences are slowly shifting toward new rivals, namely the <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DIS\">Walt Disney</a></b> Company’s Disney+, according to research from&nbsp;Parrot Analytics.</p>\n<p>Netflix’s share of worldwide demand interest — a&nbsp;measure&nbsp;of the popularity of its shows created by Parrot and a key barometer of how many new subscribers a streaming service is likely to attract — fell below 50 percent for the first time in the second quarter of the year.</p>\n<p>The company’s “lack of new hit original programming and the increased competition from other streamers is going to ultimately have a negative impact on subscriber growth and retention,” Parrot said in a news release.</p>\n<p>Netflix relies on creating as many different shows and films for as many different audiences as possible, and the pandemic upset that formula, forcing the shutdown of productions around the world.</p>\n<p>The company will announce its second quarter financial results Tuesday afternoon and has already told investors not to expect too much. It set a surprisingly low bar for the quarter when it told Wall Street that itanticipatedadding <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> million new subscribers, a meager uptick to its current total of 207 million customers. (It’s worth noting that lower expectations are easier to beat, and beating expectations by even a hair can boost a company’s stock.)</p>\n<p>Disney+ more than doubled its share of demand interest in the second quarter compared with a year ago, and <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">Amazon.com</a></b> Prime Video, <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a> </b>TV+ and HBO Max are also gaining, according to Parrot.</p>\n<p>Even as newer entrants have chipped away at Netflix’s long-held grip, Reed Hastings, Netflix’s co-chief executive, has dismissed the competition as pretenders to the Netflix throne. In April, after Mr. Hastings was asked by investors why the company had missed its expectations for adding new customers in the first quarter, he said, “Of course we’re wondering, ‘Well, wait a second, are we sure it’s not competition?’”</p>\n<p>“We really looked through all the data, looking at different regions where new competitors are launched, are not launched,” he continued. “And we just can’t see any difference in our relative growth in those regions, which is what gives us confidence.”</p>\n<p>“We’ve been competing with Amazon Prime for 13 years, with Hulu for 14 years,” he added. “It’s always been very competitive with linear TV, too. So there’s no real change that we can detect in the competitive environment. It’s always been high and remains high.”</p>\n<p>In other words:&nbsp;<i>If Disney+ is hurting us, we haven’t seen it.</i></p>\n<p>The argument that Netflix has been competing with regular television and other streamers for a long time overlooks the fact that new rivals like Disney+ and AppleTV+ are much cheaper than Netflix (and subscription television). And although those services produce far fewer originals than Netflix, they appear to be getting more bang for their buck.</p>\n<p>In the second quarter, Disney+ got a big boost of demand interest from “The Falcon and the Winter Soldier,” a series based on the Marvel Cinematic Universe, which has thoroughly dominated the box office in recent years. “Loki,” another Marvel spinoff, also helped, according to Parrot.</p>\n<p>Amazon Prime Video got a boost in the period with the launch of “Invincible,” an animated superhero series for adults. And AppleTV+ attracted new customers with a trio of originals: “Mosquito Coast,” a drama based on the 1981 novel; “For All Mankind,” a sci-fi series, and “Mythic Quest,” a comedy series that takes place in a game developer studio.</p>\n<p>Speaking of, Netflix said this month that it planned to jump into video games. It has hired a gaming executive, Mike Verdu, formerly of Electronic Arts and <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FB\">Facebook</a></b>, to oversee its development of new games. It’s a potentially significant move for the company, which hasn’t strayed far from its formula of television series and films.</p>","source":"lsy1608616134662","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Disney is chipping away at Netflix’s dominance</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nDisney is chipping away at Netflix’s dominance\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-21 11:24 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.nytimes.com/live/2021/07/20/business/economy-stock-market-news><strong>The New York Times</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The cracks are showing in Netflix’s worldwide dominance.\nNetflix, Inc. is still king of streaming video, but audiences are slowly shifting toward new rivals, namely the Walt Disney Company’s Disney+, ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.nytimes.com/live/2021/07/20/business/economy-stock-market-news\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NFLX":"奈飞","AAPL":"苹果","AMZN":"亚马逊","DIS":"迪士尼"},"source_url":"https://www.nytimes.com/live/2021/07/20/business/economy-stock-market-news","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1196827638","content_text":"The cracks are showing in Netflix’s worldwide dominance.\nNetflix, Inc. is still king of streaming video, but audiences are slowly shifting toward new rivals, namely the Walt Disney Company’s Disney+, according to research from Parrot Analytics.\nNetflix’s share of worldwide demand interest — a measure of the popularity of its shows created by Parrot and a key barometer of how many new subscribers a streaming service is likely to attract — fell below 50 percent for the first time in the second quarter of the year.\nThe company’s “lack of new hit original programming and the increased competition from other streamers is going to ultimately have a negative impact on subscriber growth and retention,” Parrot said in a news release.\nNetflix relies on creating as many different shows and films for as many different audiences as possible, and the pandemic upset that formula, forcing the shutdown of productions around the world.\nThe company will announce its second quarter financial results Tuesday afternoon and has already told investors not to expect too much. It set a surprisingly low bar for the quarter when it told Wall Street that itanticipatedadding one million new subscribers, a meager uptick to its current total of 207 million customers. (It’s worth noting that lower expectations are easier to beat, and beating expectations by even a hair can boost a company’s stock.)\nDisney+ more than doubled its share of demand interest in the second quarter compared with a year ago, and Amazon.com Prime Video, Apple TV+ and HBO Max are also gaining, according to Parrot.\nEven as newer entrants have chipped away at Netflix’s long-held grip, Reed Hastings, Netflix’s co-chief executive, has dismissed the competition as pretenders to the Netflix throne. In April, after Mr. Hastings was asked by investors why the company had missed its expectations for adding new customers in the first quarter, he said, “Of course we’re wondering, ‘Well, wait a second, are we sure it’s not competition?’”\n“We really looked through all the data, looking at different regions where new competitors are launched, are not launched,” he continued. “And we just can’t see any difference in our relative growth in those regions, which is what gives us confidence.”\n“We’ve been competing with Amazon Prime for 13 years, with Hulu for 14 years,” he added. “It’s always been very competitive with linear TV, too. So there’s no real change that we can detect in the competitive environment. It’s always been high and remains high.”\nIn other words: If Disney+ is hurting us, we haven’t seen it.\nThe argument that Netflix has been competing with regular television and other streamers for a long time overlooks the fact that new rivals like Disney+ and AppleTV+ are much cheaper than Netflix (and subscription television). And although those services produce far fewer originals than Netflix, they appear to be getting more bang for their buck.\nIn the second quarter, Disney+ got a big boost of demand interest from “The Falcon and the Winter Soldier,” a series based on the Marvel Cinematic Universe, which has thoroughly dominated the box office in recent years. “Loki,” another Marvel spinoff, also helped, according to Parrot.\nAmazon Prime Video got a boost in the period with the launch of “Invincible,” an animated superhero series for adults. And AppleTV+ attracted new customers with a trio of originals: “Mosquito Coast,” a drama based on the 1981 novel; “For All Mankind,” a sci-fi series, and “Mythic Quest,” a comedy series that takes place in a game developer studio.\nSpeaking of, Netflix said this month that it planned to jump into video games. It has hired a gaming executive, Mike Verdu, formerly of Electronic Arts and Facebook, to oversee its development of new games. It’s a potentially significant move for the company, which hasn’t strayed far from its formula of television series and films.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":415,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":179442466,"gmtCreate":1626573901755,"gmtModify":1633925791273,"author":{"id":"4089440680592730","authorId":"4089440680592730","name":"Bluefaerie","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3a14cce34aa8b490facc68d4c62d3704","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4089440680592730","idStr":"4089440680592730"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Woww","listText":"Woww","text":"Woww","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/179442466","repostId":"1123523681","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1123523681","pubTimestamp":1626569903,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1123523681?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-18 08:58","market":"us","language":"en","title":"The story behind the savvy ‘Mystery Broker’ and where he sees the market going now","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1123523681","media":"CNBC","summary":"“So, there’s this guy who emails me his market outlook every so often.”\nThat’s howmy Barron’s column","content":"<div>\n<p>“So, there’s this guy who emails me his market outlook every so often.”\nThat’s howmy Barron’s column started one week nearly a dozen years ago, introducing the canny and clear-thinking financial ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/07/17/the-story-behind-the-savvy-mystery-broker-and-where-he-sees-the-market-going-now.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"cnbc_highlight","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>The story behind the savvy ‘Mystery Broker’ and where he sees the market going now</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThe story behind the savvy ‘Mystery Broker’ and where he sees the market going now\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-18 08:58 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.cnbc.com/2021/07/17/the-story-behind-the-savvy-mystery-broker-and-where-he-sees-the-market-going-now.html><strong>CNBC</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>“So, there’s this guy who emails me his market outlook every so often.”\nThat’s howmy Barron’s column started one week nearly a dozen years ago, introducing the canny and clear-thinking financial ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/07/17/the-story-behind-the-savvy-mystery-broker-and-where-he-sees-the-market-going-now.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/07/17/the-story-behind-the-savvy-mystery-broker-and-where-he-sees-the-market-going-now.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/72bb72e1b84c09fca865c6dcb1bbcd16","article_id":"1123523681","content_text":"“So, there’s this guy who emails me his market outlook every so often.”\nThat’s howmy Barron’s column started one week nearly a dozen years ago, introducing the canny and clear-thinking financial advisor who has come to be known in print and on Twitter as the Mystery Broker, whose market color and investment calls I share on the irregular frequency with which he sends them.\nHis predictions don’t always prove prescient, but he has been more right than wrong, with a particularly impressive record of bold calls around market bottoms and ahead of corrections.\nAs noted in that first writeup in Barron’s in December 2009: “This particular guy is unique in at least two respects. He has no interest in having his name placed in print or pixels. And he is the one commentator I’m aware of who both turned aggressively bearish virtually at the all-time market peak in 2007, then in April began insisting that the March market lows would not be challenged, and that a new cyclical bull market had a long way to run.”\nThis broker’s dispatch to me in April 2009 — just weeks after the ultimate low of a wrenching 18-month bear market and terrifying global credit crisis — was a 12-page single-spaced argument that the financial crisis was over.  This was far from the consensus at the time. A November 2007 piece had called for a brutal bear market, a month after the S&P 500 hit a peak it wouldn’t revisit until 2013 and before most investors even had a bear market on their radar.\nThe intention of airing his views was not to create some gimmick or generate cheap intrigue, but simply to offer the well-grounded thoughts of professional free of institutional constraints or the need to sell investment products.\nBut it did capture readers’ attention and imagination, to the point that requests for updates of the Mystery Broker’s market take come constantly. I continue it strictly because so many readers and viewers have followed his work for years and like to keep up\nAnd, yes, the whole exercise drives some people nuts, whether they think it’s irresponsible (which makes no sense, he gets no benefit and doesn’t hype small stocks that could move in his favor) or insist it’s a fictional alter ego (untrue).\nMystery Broker’s approach\nHe became a broker in the mid-’80s. While there’s long been a guessing game about MB’s identity, he is not someone who’s name anyone would know, he doesn’t otherwise comment publicly on investments.\nAs noted back in 2009: “He doesn’t claim any magic formulas or proprietary systems. His approach is eclectic and inclusive, ranging among economic, technical, historical, valuation and sentiment inputs.” He’ll cite Marty Zweig, Ned Davis and the Value Line Appreciation Potential indicators – fairly old-school inspirations – but doesn’t seem rigidly attached to any one model or style.\nI almost never solicit Mystery Broker’s take, preferring he check in only when it strikes him, often when he changes his market stance or is moved to reiterate his conviction in a prior call. Aside from the broad market commentary, he’ll sometimes make the case for or against individual stocks. He loved wells Fargo to start 2021, as well as GE, for instance.\nMystery Broker sometimes goes deep on a controversial emerging biotech name, the sort of thing I tend not to pass along. He was put off by CNBC’s heavy coverage of the “meme stocks” early this year and let me know it. He and I both have strong views on baseball, which we exchange via email. We’ve never met.\nHow he navigated the pandemic\nIn the past few months, Mystery Broker has been cautious on stocks and has missed a bit of upside. Specifically, he went to a sell (which tends to mean raising cash for clients and himself and hedging equity holdings with index puts) at the close on April 16, with the S&P 500 at 4185. The index went sideways for two months, then lifted to last week’s record up almost 5% from where he called for a correction.\nStill, he’s playing with a lot of house money, having been deftly bullish into the teeth of the March 2020 Covid crash. (He was negative on the market from January last year, though not because he expected either a pandemic or a crash).\nThe individual calls are viewable at the #MysteryBroker hashtag on Twitter, but to cite a few examples: He thought the March 4, 2020, low in the S&P 500 near 2900 would hold; it absolutely didn’t, plunging to about 2200 by the 23rd. But on March 26 he said the bottom was in, and within a month the S&P had recovered back to 2900.\nThen, this in mid-April 2020: He would normally look for a retest of the major low, but not then: ”“Because for the first time in stock market history the consensus is for a retest, a normal retest is not likely to happen.”\nThis was right, as was his preference for riskier cyclical stocks and his update June of last year: “We are in a new bull market...every correction should be bought...every time S&P 500 falls below its 50-day moving average is an extraordinary buying opportunity.”\nS&P 500 with 50-day moving averageFactSet\nAfter that and before predicting a correction three months ago that has yet to occur, he pegged the peak in FAANMG days before they topped last Sept. 1; said in late December the market had “entered the last hurrah for growth and speculative stocks” that would pressure the  overall market but not necessarily drive across-the-board losses; and predicted bitcoin would peak coincident with the Coinbase listing (it did). Not perfect, but not bad.\nHis current outlook\nHis is not a system, but a weight-of-the-evidence approach pursued with an open mind and a feel for market cadences earned over more than three decades of economic cycles.\nFollowing up onhis latest update this week, I asked for a broader take on historical echoes and longer-term probabilities. Mystery Broker offers this:\n“I think the current recovery is most similar to the recovery in 2003-04.  A big transition from hyper-growth to value.  Also, valuations are already high after only one year of stock market and economic growth similar to 2003-4, although more extreme now. ” He expects “muted returns for the rest of decade similar to the low returns of the first decade of the 2000s.  See leadership from industrials, healthcare and to some degree financials.”\n“Don’t expect technology to be a big outperformer and semiconductors will be a disappointment especially equipment semis that have benefitted from a few big trends over the last few years. Value, foreign stocks (expect dollar to fall over the next few years) and equal-weighted indices will outperform.  Inflation and interest rates will slowly rise which is different from the last decade.\n“The big surprise will be how old industries adapt to new technology and fight off some of the hot new entries.  There will be a lot of rebounds similar to how the New York Times came back from the dead last decade.”\nI also asked if he’s interested in being identified. The answer: not now, but maybe soon.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":249,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":179197522,"gmtCreate":1626491429566,"gmtModify":1633926275674,"author":{"id":"4089440680592730","authorId":"4089440680592730","name":"Bluefaerie","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3a14cce34aa8b490facc68d4c62d3704","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4089440680592730","idStr":"4089440680592730"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Up up up","listText":"Up up up","text":"Up up up","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/179197522","repostId":"2152168594","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2152168594","pubTimestamp":1626488760,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2152168594?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-17 10:26","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Stock: Next Stop, $175?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2152168594","media":"TipRanks","summary":"So, Apple  is having a bad year, you say?With shares hitting an all-time high this week and the gap in performance narrowing over the past month, that conversation can now be put to rest.The uptick has coincided with reports Apple has boosted the production rate of its iPhones, instructing manufacturers to build 90 million iPhones this year, a 20% increase on the 75 million units it produced last year.The renewed optimism in all things Apple is not surprising to J.P. Morgan’s Samik Chatterjee. T","content":"<div>\n<p>So, Apple (AAPL) is having a bad year, you say? Not long ago, the talk on Wall Street was all about the tech giant’s uncharacteristically underperforming stock, especially when compared to some of the...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-stock-next-stop-175-135700668.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"yahoofinance","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Stock: Next Stop, $175?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Stock: Next Stop, $175?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-17 10:26 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-stock-next-stop-175-135700668.html><strong>TipRanks</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>So, Apple (AAPL) is having a bad year, you say? Not long ago, the talk on Wall Street was all about the tech giant’s uncharacteristically underperforming stock, especially when compared to some of the...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-stock-next-stop-175-135700668.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"09086":"华夏纳指-U","AAPL":"苹果","03086":"华夏纳指"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-stock-next-stop-175-135700668.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5f26f4a48f9cb3e29be4d71d3ba8c038","article_id":"2152168594","content_text":"So, Apple (AAPL) is having a bad year, you say? Not long ago, the talk on Wall Street was all about the tech giant’s uncharacteristically underperforming stock, especially when compared to some of the other mega-caps’ displays in 2021.\nWith shares hitting an all-time high this week and the gap in performance narrowing over the past month, that conversation can now be put to rest.\nThe uptick has coincided with reports Apple has boosted the production rate of its iPhones, instructing manufacturers to build 90 million iPhones this year, a 20% increase on the 75 million units it produced last year.\nThe renewed optimism in all things Apple is not surprising to J.P. Morgan’s Samik Chatterjee. The analyst recently told investors Apple is well set up to outperform in 2H21. In fact, the growing confidence means Chatterjee has added Apple to the firm’s Analyst Focus List as “a Growth idea.”\n“The recent momentum led by better market share, drives us to also estimate higher sustainable volumes in future quarters, leading us to see a path to Apple outperforming investor expectations over a longer time horizon rather than just the upcoming earnings print,” the 5-star analyst said, confirming Apple is also a Top Pick.\nTo reflect the increase in build rates, Chatterjee has “modestly” increased iPhone volume expectations, but of more importance to the analyst is the “path to upside” for the shares in the medium-term.\nThis is because of the potential for better iPhone 12 sales but also due to what Chatterjee considers are low expectations from the iPhone 13’s fall launch, which could create “another leg to the upside opportunity.”\nIt’s a potent mix which is given additional allure with the launch of the iPhone SE3 next year and means Apple can “not only pleasantly surprise with a more robust iPhone 13 cycle, but also has the opportunity to drive material upside to consensus expectations for FY22.”\nTo this end, Chatterjee rates Apple shares an Overweight (i.e. Buy), while slightly lifting the price target from $170 to $175. The revised figure implying shares will add 19.5% from current levels.\nSo, that’s J.P. Morgan’s view, what does the rest of the Street have in mind for Apple? Based on 20 Buys, 5 Holds and 2 Sells, the stock currently has a Moderate Buy consensus rating. The forecast is for shares to appreciate by 8% over the coming months, given the average price target clocks in at $158.62.\nTo find good ideas for tech stocks trading at attractive valuations, visit TipRanks’ Best Stocks to Buy, a newly launched tool that unites all of TipRanks’ equity insights.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":234,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":170140289,"gmtCreate":1626415184641,"gmtModify":1633926940765,"author":{"id":"4089440680592730","authorId":"4089440680592730","name":"Bluefaerie","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3a14cce34aa8b490facc68d4c62d3704","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4089440680592730","idStr":"4089440680592730"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Keep everyone well informed","listText":"Keep everyone well informed","text":"Keep everyone well informed","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/170140289","repostId":"2151573133","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2151573133","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1626379249,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2151573133?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-16 04:00","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Nasdaq ends lower as investors sell Big Tech","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2151573133","media":"Reuters","summary":"July 15  - The Nasdaq ended lower on Thursday, pulled down by Apple, Amazon and other Big Tech companies as a fall in weekly jobless claims data fed investor concerns about a recent inflation spike.Amazon, Apple, Tesla and $Facebook$all fell. Nvidia tumbled around 4%.The S&P 500 technology sector index ended a four-day winning streak. Earlier this week, investors' favor for heavyweight growth stocks pushed the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq to record highs.The S&P 500 energy sector index fell more than ","content":"<ul>\n <li>U.S. weekly jobless claims fall to 16-month low</li>\n <li>Tech sector ends four-day winning streak</li>\n</ul>\n<p>July 15 (Reuters) - The Nasdaq ended lower on Thursday, pulled down by Apple, Amazon and other Big Tech companies as a fall in weekly jobless claims data fed investor concerns about a recent inflation spike.</p>\n<p>Amazon, Apple,&nbsp;Tesla and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FB\">Facebook</a>all fell. Nvidia&nbsp;tumbled around 4%.</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 500 technology sector index ended a four-day winning streak. Earlier this week, investors' favor for heavyweight growth stocks pushed the S&amp;P 500 and the Nasdaq to record highs.</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 500 energy sector index fell more than 1% and tracked a drop in crude prices on expectations of more supply after a compromise agreement between leading OPEC producers.</p>\n<p>Fresh data showed the number of Americans filing new claims for unemployment benefits fell last week to a 16-month low, while worker shortages and bottlenecks in the supply chain have frustrated efforts by businesses to ramp up production to meet strong demand for goods and services.</p>\n<p>Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell told lawmakers he anticipated the shortages and high inflation would abate. Yet many investors still worry that more sustained inflation could lead to a sooner-than-expected tightening of monetary policy.</p>\n<p>\"People are very nervous and concerned about inflation, tax rates and the (2022 midterm) election. Those three things are very much on people's minds,\" said 6 Meridian Chief Investment Officer Andrew Mies, describing recent phone calls with his firm's clients.</p>\n<p>Unofficially, the Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 54.52 points, or 0.16%, to 34,987.75, the S&amp;P 500 lost 14.29 points, or 0.33%, to 4,360.01 and the Nasdaq Composite&nbsp;dropped 101.82 points, or 0.7%, to 14,543.13.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSTLW\">Morgan Stanley</a> dipped as much as 1.2% after it beat expectations for quarterly profit, getting a boost from record investment banking activity even as the trading bonanza that supported results in recent quarters slowed down.</p>\n<p>Second-quarter reporting season kicked off this week, with the four largest U.S. lenders - Wells Fargo &amp; Co , $Bank of America Corp(BAC-N)$ , $Citigroup Inc(C-N)$ and JPMorgan Chase &amp; Co - posting a combined $33 billion in profits, but also highlighting the industry's sensitivity to low interest rates.</p>\n<p>Blackstone said late on Wednesday it would pay $2.2 billion for 9.9% stake in American International Group's life and retirement business. AIG and Blackstone both rallied.</p>\n<p>Johnson &amp; Johnson dipped after it voluntarily recalled five aerosol sunscreen products in the United States after detecting a cancer-causing chemical in some samples.</p>\n<p>(Reporting by Noel Randewich; Additional reporting by Devik Jain and Shreyashi Sanyal in Bengaluru; Editing by Maju Samuel)</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Nasdaq ends lower as investors sell Big Tech</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nNasdaq ends lower as investors sell Big Tech\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-07-16 04:00</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<ul>\n <li>U.S. weekly jobless claims fall to 16-month low</li>\n <li>Tech sector ends four-day winning streak</li>\n</ul>\n<p>July 15 (Reuters) - The Nasdaq ended lower on Thursday, pulled down by Apple, Amazon and other Big Tech companies as a fall in weekly jobless claims data fed investor concerns about a recent inflation spike.</p>\n<p>Amazon, Apple,&nbsp;Tesla and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FB\">Facebook</a>all fell. Nvidia&nbsp;tumbled around 4%.</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 500 technology sector index ended a four-day winning streak. Earlier this week, investors' favor for heavyweight growth stocks pushed the S&amp;P 500 and the Nasdaq to record highs.</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 500 energy sector index fell more than 1% and tracked a drop in crude prices on expectations of more supply after a compromise agreement between leading OPEC producers.</p>\n<p>Fresh data showed the number of Americans filing new claims for unemployment benefits fell last week to a 16-month low, while worker shortages and bottlenecks in the supply chain have frustrated efforts by businesses to ramp up production to meet strong demand for goods and services.</p>\n<p>Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell told lawmakers he anticipated the shortages and high inflation would abate. Yet many investors still worry that more sustained inflation could lead to a sooner-than-expected tightening of monetary policy.</p>\n<p>\"People are very nervous and concerned about inflation, tax rates and the (2022 midterm) election. Those three things are very much on people's minds,\" said 6 Meridian Chief Investment Officer Andrew Mies, describing recent phone calls with his firm's clients.</p>\n<p>Unofficially, the Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 54.52 points, or 0.16%, to 34,987.75, the S&amp;P 500 lost 14.29 points, or 0.33%, to 4,360.01 and the Nasdaq Composite&nbsp;dropped 101.82 points, or 0.7%, to 14,543.13.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSTLW\">Morgan Stanley</a> dipped as much as 1.2% after it beat expectations for quarterly profit, getting a boost from record investment banking activity even as the trading bonanza that supported results in recent quarters slowed down.</p>\n<p>Second-quarter reporting season kicked off this week, with the four largest U.S. lenders - Wells Fargo &amp; Co , $Bank of America Corp(BAC-N)$ , $Citigroup Inc(C-N)$ and JPMorgan Chase &amp; Co - posting a combined $33 billion in profits, but also highlighting the industry's sensitivity to low interest rates.</p>\n<p>Blackstone said late on Wednesday it would pay $2.2 billion for 9.9% stake in American International Group's life and retirement business. AIG and Blackstone both rallied.</p>\n<p>Johnson &amp; Johnson dipped after it voluntarily recalled five aerosol sunscreen products in the United States after detecting a cancer-causing chemical in some samples.</p>\n<p>(Reporting by Noel Randewich; Additional reporting by Devik Jain and Shreyashi Sanyal in Bengaluru; Editing by Maju Samuel)</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"161125":"标普500","513500":"标普500ETF","BX":"黑石","AAPL":"苹果","WFC":"富国银行","SPXU":"三倍做空标普500ETF","SQQQ":"纳指三倍做空ETF","QLD":"纳指两倍做多ETF","DXD":"道指两倍做空ETF","PSQ":"纳指反向ETF","TSLA":"特斯拉","SDOW":"道指三倍做空ETF-ProShares","03086":"华夏纳指","09086":"华夏纳指-U","DDM":"道指两倍做多ETF","BAC":"美国银行","SDS":"两倍做空标普500ETF","NVDA":"英伟达","JPM":"摩根大通","TQQQ":"纳指三倍做多ETF","C":"花旗",".DJI":"道琼斯","AMZN":"亚马逊","QQQ":"纳指100ETF","AIG":"美国国际集团","JNJ":"强生",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","MS":"摩根士丹利","DOG":"道指反向ETF",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","OEX":"标普100","UDOW":"道指三倍做多ETF-ProShares","UPRO":"三倍做多标普500ETF","QNETCN":"纳斯达克中美互联网老虎指数","QID":"纳指两倍做空ETF","SH":"标普500反向ETF","OEF":"标普100指数ETF-iShares","IVV":"标普500指数ETF","SSO":"两倍做多标普500ETF","DJX":"1/100道琼斯"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2151573133","content_text":"U.S. weekly jobless claims fall to 16-month low\nTech sector ends four-day winning streak\n\nJuly 15 (Reuters) - The Nasdaq ended lower on Thursday, pulled down by Apple, Amazon and other Big Tech companies as a fall in weekly jobless claims data fed investor concerns about a recent inflation spike.\nAmazon, Apple, Tesla and Facebookall fell. Nvidia tumbled around 4%.\nThe S&P 500 technology sector index ended a four-day winning streak. Earlier this week, investors' favor for heavyweight growth stocks pushed the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq to record highs.\nThe S&P 500 energy sector index fell more than 1% and tracked a drop in crude prices on expectations of more supply after a compromise agreement between leading OPEC producers.\nFresh data showed the number of Americans filing new claims for unemployment benefits fell last week to a 16-month low, while worker shortages and bottlenecks in the supply chain have frustrated efforts by businesses to ramp up production to meet strong demand for goods and services.\nFederal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell told lawmakers he anticipated the shortages and high inflation would abate. Yet many investors still worry that more sustained inflation could lead to a sooner-than-expected tightening of monetary policy.\n\"People are very nervous and concerned about inflation, tax rates and the (2022 midterm) election. Those three things are very much on people's minds,\" said 6 Meridian Chief Investment Officer Andrew Mies, describing recent phone calls with his firm's clients.\nUnofficially, the Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 54.52 points, or 0.16%, to 34,987.75, the S&P 500 lost 14.29 points, or 0.33%, to 4,360.01 and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 101.82 points, or 0.7%, to 14,543.13.\nMorgan Stanley dipped as much as 1.2% after it beat expectations for quarterly profit, getting a boost from record investment banking activity even as the trading bonanza that supported results in recent quarters slowed down.\nSecond-quarter reporting season kicked off this week, with the four largest U.S. lenders - Wells Fargo & Co , $Bank of America Corp(BAC-N)$ , $Citigroup Inc(C-N)$ and JPMorgan Chase & Co - posting a combined $33 billion in profits, but also highlighting the industry's sensitivity to low interest rates.\nBlackstone said late on Wednesday it would pay $2.2 billion for 9.9% stake in American International Group's life and retirement business. AIG and Blackstone both rallied.\nJohnson & Johnson dipped after it voluntarily recalled five aerosol sunscreen products in the United States after detecting a cancer-causing chemical in some samples.\n(Reporting by Noel Randewich; Additional reporting by Devik Jain and Shreyashi Sanyal in Bengaluru; Editing by Maju Samuel)","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":349,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":170140914,"gmtCreate":1626415145838,"gmtModify":1633926941381,"author":{"id":"4089440680592730","authorId":"4089440680592730","name":"Bluefaerie","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3a14cce34aa8b490facc68d4c62d3704","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4089440680592730","idStr":"4089440680592730"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nice","listText":"Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/170140914","repostId":"1129144056","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":186,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":170152692,"gmtCreate":1626414870016,"gmtModify":1633926943486,"author":{"id":"4089440680592730","authorId":"4089440680592730","name":"Bluefaerie","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3a14cce34aa8b490facc68d4c62d3704","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4089440680592730","idStr":"4089440680592730"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nice","listText":"Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/170152692","repostId":"1124361019","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1124361019","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1626413039,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1124361019?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-16 13:23","market":"us","language":"en","title":"'Boring '20s'? - a decade of zero real rates :Mike Dolan","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1124361019","media":"Reuters","summary":"(The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.)\nLONDON, July 16 (Reu","content":"<p>(The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.)</p>\n<p>LONDON, July 16 (Reuters) - The U.S. government can once again borrow at a deeply negative ‘real’ rate of minus 1.0% for 10 years - and some economists insist there’s a powerful historical case for expecting that rate to stay near zero or below for the rest of the decade.</p>\n<p>It’s been fashionable in markets of late to think of another “Roaring ‘20s” emerging over the next decade. Pandemic-driven megatrends, fractious politics, gigantic government debt piles and the return of inflation could all conspire to electrify or unnerve markets over the years ahead - or so the story goes.</p>\n<p>But after a restive first quarter of 2021, global bond markets - still under the spell of heavy central bank buying - appear to be pricing in a very different scenario ahead.</p>\n<p>Even after this week’s June readout of the highest annual gain in U.S. core consumer prices in 30 years - an inflation rate of some 4.5% excluding food and energy prices - the yield on the Treasury’s 10-year inflation-protected bond skidded back below -1.0% for the first time in five months.</p>\n<p>Aside from that brief moment in February, these rates have never been lower - at least not in the history of these securities. And all equivalent rates in the G4 major economies are also below zero, with Germany and Britain even lower than those in the United States.</p>\n<p>Investors pore over everything from ‘peak inflation’ to ‘peak growth’ and even ‘peak stimulus’ for clues as to why bond yields continue to defy forecasts and why they have taken the surge in inflation and government debt levels in their stride.</p>\n<p>U.S. government debt will top 125% of gross domestic product this year and next - its highest since World War Two - and up almost 20 percentage points since before the pandemic. Debt/GDP in G4 economies overall has risen by a similar amount to 125%.</p>\n<p>While many put the seeming nonchalance down to persistent central bank intervention or technical quirks, some also point out to the risk of a weakening ‘fiscal impulse’ over the next two years that mathematically drags on growth rates.</p>\n<p>Manulife Investment Management economist Frances Donald thinks this should be seen as a “fiscal cliff” and the drop in U.S. spending - viewed as a share of resulting falling budget deficit - marks the steepest such cliff since the 1940s.</p>\n<p><b>HIGH PRESSURE</b></p>\n<p>However, G7 leaders pledged last month not to make the mistakes of the last crisis by reducing government spending too soon and reverting to fiscal austerity too early.</p>\n<p>The White House and congressional Democrats at least seem intent on keeping that “high pressure economy” until all sections of society take part. Leading Democrats this week agreed to table another $3.5 trillion investment plan on top of the proposed $600 billion of infrastructure spending already in the pipeline.</p>\n<p>And yet the bond market barely flickered at the prospect.</p>\n<p>Is this just the Federal Reserve’s hand? Is Fed buying really so dominant and can it remain so for years?</p>\n<p>Fed chief Jerome Powell was this week pointedly reluctant to give Congress any hard timeline for a reduction in bond buying and continued to characterize inflation spikes as mostly temporary base effects and bottlenecks from pandemic lockdowns.</p>\n<p>But if the Fed is right about inflation over time and the pursuit of a high pressure economy is now G7 consensus due to equality and climate priorities, history shows bond yields could be down here for a long time to come yet.</p>\n<p>Morgan Stanley economists published a study this week looking at 100 years of data on how countries managed debt blowouts - defined as periods when debt/GDP ratios jumped 20 percentage points in five years.</p>\n<p>They concluded that countries which managed to rein in those debt levels over the subsequent decade had kept looser monetary and fiscal policies longer than those who failed to stop their debt rising. Low debt servicing costs - absent an inflation problem - and growth were shown to be the best ways to keep debts sustainable.</p>\n<p>Studying all outcomes, they reckoned the most successful strategy was to keep real interest rates two percentage points below real GDP growth rates for 10 years and ‘grow out’ of the debt rather than slashing spending. Fiscal consolidation, by contrast, had played a lesser role in the reversal of public debt build-ups over the century, it said.</p>\n<p>On that basis the investment bank saw U.S. real rates held between -0.5% and +0.5% for the next decade - about 2 points below their expected real GDP growth rate.</p>\n<p>While flatlining, that’s still higher than today’s rate - although it assumes some modest Fed tightening at some point.</p>\n<p>And of course, the lower the growth rate, the lower the real rate needs to be to rein in debt loads. Morgan Stanley said that if adverse demographics and productivity depressed real GDP growth more than it thought then real rates as low as today’s may have to be sustained to stop debts rising.</p>\n<p>But it also said most episodes of successful debt reduction had generally been accompanied by only moderate but sustained inflation - a median of 2.9% for those successful in cutting debts. Contrary to popular perceptions, hyperinflation ensued only in a very small number of episodes.</p>\n<p>“Our analysis shows that the real rate environment has been key in determining the path of public debt substantially more so than actual fiscal spending.”</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>'Boring '20s'? - a decade of zero real rates :Mike Dolan</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n'Boring '20s'? - a decade of zero real rates :Mike Dolan\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-07-16 13:23</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>(The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.)</p>\n<p>LONDON, July 16 (Reuters) - The U.S. government can once again borrow at a deeply negative ‘real’ rate of minus 1.0% for 10 years - and some economists insist there’s a powerful historical case for expecting that rate to stay near zero or below for the rest of the decade.</p>\n<p>It’s been fashionable in markets of late to think of another “Roaring ‘20s” emerging over the next decade. Pandemic-driven megatrends, fractious politics, gigantic government debt piles and the return of inflation could all conspire to electrify or unnerve markets over the years ahead - or so the story goes.</p>\n<p>But after a restive first quarter of 2021, global bond markets - still under the spell of heavy central bank buying - appear to be pricing in a very different scenario ahead.</p>\n<p>Even after this week’s June readout of the highest annual gain in U.S. core consumer prices in 30 years - an inflation rate of some 4.5% excluding food and energy prices - the yield on the Treasury’s 10-year inflation-protected bond skidded back below -1.0% for the first time in five months.</p>\n<p>Aside from that brief moment in February, these rates have never been lower - at least not in the history of these securities. And all equivalent rates in the G4 major economies are also below zero, with Germany and Britain even lower than those in the United States.</p>\n<p>Investors pore over everything from ‘peak inflation’ to ‘peak growth’ and even ‘peak stimulus’ for clues as to why bond yields continue to defy forecasts and why they have taken the surge in inflation and government debt levels in their stride.</p>\n<p>U.S. government debt will top 125% of gross domestic product this year and next - its highest since World War Two - and up almost 20 percentage points since before the pandemic. Debt/GDP in G4 economies overall has risen by a similar amount to 125%.</p>\n<p>While many put the seeming nonchalance down to persistent central bank intervention or technical quirks, some also point out to the risk of a weakening ‘fiscal impulse’ over the next two years that mathematically drags on growth rates.</p>\n<p>Manulife Investment Management economist Frances Donald thinks this should be seen as a “fiscal cliff” and the drop in U.S. spending - viewed as a share of resulting falling budget deficit - marks the steepest such cliff since the 1940s.</p>\n<p><b>HIGH PRESSURE</b></p>\n<p>However, G7 leaders pledged last month not to make the mistakes of the last crisis by reducing government spending too soon and reverting to fiscal austerity too early.</p>\n<p>The White House and congressional Democrats at least seem intent on keeping that “high pressure economy” until all sections of society take part. Leading Democrats this week agreed to table another $3.5 trillion investment plan on top of the proposed $600 billion of infrastructure spending already in the pipeline.</p>\n<p>And yet the bond market barely flickered at the prospect.</p>\n<p>Is this just the Federal Reserve’s hand? Is Fed buying really so dominant and can it remain so for years?</p>\n<p>Fed chief Jerome Powell was this week pointedly reluctant to give Congress any hard timeline for a reduction in bond buying and continued to characterize inflation spikes as mostly temporary base effects and bottlenecks from pandemic lockdowns.</p>\n<p>But if the Fed is right about inflation over time and the pursuit of a high pressure economy is now G7 consensus due to equality and climate priorities, history shows bond yields could be down here for a long time to come yet.</p>\n<p>Morgan Stanley economists published a study this week looking at 100 years of data on how countries managed debt blowouts - defined as periods when debt/GDP ratios jumped 20 percentage points in five years.</p>\n<p>They concluded that countries which managed to rein in those debt levels over the subsequent decade had kept looser monetary and fiscal policies longer than those who failed to stop their debt rising. Low debt servicing costs - absent an inflation problem - and growth were shown to be the best ways to keep debts sustainable.</p>\n<p>Studying all outcomes, they reckoned the most successful strategy was to keep real interest rates two percentage points below real GDP growth rates for 10 years and ‘grow out’ of the debt rather than slashing spending. Fiscal consolidation, by contrast, had played a lesser role in the reversal of public debt build-ups over the century, it said.</p>\n<p>On that basis the investment bank saw U.S. real rates held between -0.5% and +0.5% for the next decade - about 2 points below their expected real GDP growth rate.</p>\n<p>While flatlining, that’s still higher than today’s rate - although it assumes some modest Fed tightening at some point.</p>\n<p>And of course, the lower the growth rate, the lower the real rate needs to be to rein in debt loads. Morgan Stanley said that if adverse demographics and productivity depressed real GDP growth more than it thought then real rates as low as today’s may have to be sustained to stop debts rising.</p>\n<p>But it also said most episodes of successful debt reduction had generally been accompanied by only moderate but sustained inflation - a median of 2.9% for those successful in cutting debts. Contrary to popular perceptions, hyperinflation ensued only in a very small number of episodes.</p>\n<p>“Our analysis shows that the real rate environment has been key in determining the path of public debt substantially more so than actual fiscal spending.”</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","SPY":"标普500ETF",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1124361019","content_text":"(The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.)\nLONDON, July 16 (Reuters) - The U.S. government can once again borrow at a deeply negative ‘real’ rate of minus 1.0% for 10 years - and some economists insist there’s a powerful historical case for expecting that rate to stay near zero or below for the rest of the decade.\nIt’s been fashionable in markets of late to think of another “Roaring ‘20s” emerging over the next decade. Pandemic-driven megatrends, fractious politics, gigantic government debt piles and the return of inflation could all conspire to electrify or unnerve markets over the years ahead - or so the story goes.\nBut after a restive first quarter of 2021, global bond markets - still under the spell of heavy central bank buying - appear to be pricing in a very different scenario ahead.\nEven after this week’s June readout of the highest annual gain in U.S. core consumer prices in 30 years - an inflation rate of some 4.5% excluding food and energy prices - the yield on the Treasury’s 10-year inflation-protected bond skidded back below -1.0% for the first time in five months.\nAside from that brief moment in February, these rates have never been lower - at least not in the history of these securities. And all equivalent rates in the G4 major economies are also below zero, with Germany and Britain even lower than those in the United States.\nInvestors pore over everything from ‘peak inflation’ to ‘peak growth’ and even ‘peak stimulus’ for clues as to why bond yields continue to defy forecasts and why they have taken the surge in inflation and government debt levels in their stride.\nU.S. government debt will top 125% of gross domestic product this year and next - its highest since World War Two - and up almost 20 percentage points since before the pandemic. Debt/GDP in G4 economies overall has risen by a similar amount to 125%.\nWhile many put the seeming nonchalance down to persistent central bank intervention or technical quirks, some also point out to the risk of a weakening ‘fiscal impulse’ over the next two years that mathematically drags on growth rates.\nManulife Investment Management economist Frances Donald thinks this should be seen as a “fiscal cliff” and the drop in U.S. spending - viewed as a share of resulting falling budget deficit - marks the steepest such cliff since the 1940s.\nHIGH PRESSURE\nHowever, G7 leaders pledged last month not to make the mistakes of the last crisis by reducing government spending too soon and reverting to fiscal austerity too early.\nThe White House and congressional Democrats at least seem intent on keeping that “high pressure economy” until all sections of society take part. Leading Democrats this week agreed to table another $3.5 trillion investment plan on top of the proposed $600 billion of infrastructure spending already in the pipeline.\nAnd yet the bond market barely flickered at the prospect.\nIs this just the Federal Reserve’s hand? Is Fed buying really so dominant and can it remain so for years?\nFed chief Jerome Powell was this week pointedly reluctant to give Congress any hard timeline for a reduction in bond buying and continued to characterize inflation spikes as mostly temporary base effects and bottlenecks from pandemic lockdowns.\nBut if the Fed is right about inflation over time and the pursuit of a high pressure economy is now G7 consensus due to equality and climate priorities, history shows bond yields could be down here for a long time to come yet.\nMorgan Stanley economists published a study this week looking at 100 years of data on how countries managed debt blowouts - defined as periods when debt/GDP ratios jumped 20 percentage points in five years.\nThey concluded that countries which managed to rein in those debt levels over the subsequent decade had kept looser monetary and fiscal policies longer than those who failed to stop their debt rising. Low debt servicing costs - absent an inflation problem - and growth were shown to be the best ways to keep debts sustainable.\nStudying all outcomes, they reckoned the most successful strategy was to keep real interest rates two percentage points below real GDP growth rates for 10 years and ‘grow out’ of the debt rather than slashing spending. Fiscal consolidation, by contrast, had played a lesser role in the reversal of public debt build-ups over the century, it said.\nOn that basis the investment bank saw U.S. real rates held between -0.5% and +0.5% for the next decade - about 2 points below their expected real GDP growth rate.\nWhile flatlining, that’s still higher than today’s rate - although it assumes some modest Fed tightening at some point.\nAnd of course, the lower the growth rate, the lower the real rate needs to be to rein in debt loads. Morgan Stanley said that if adverse demographics and productivity depressed real GDP growth more than it thought then real rates as low as today’s may have to be sustained to stop debts rising.\nBut it also said most episodes of successful debt reduction had generally been accompanied by only moderate but sustained inflation - a median of 2.9% for those successful in cutting debts. Contrary to popular perceptions, hyperinflation ensued only in a very small number of episodes.\n“Our analysis shows that the real rate environment has been key in determining the path of public debt substantially more so than actual fiscal spending.”","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":170,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":170156545,"gmtCreate":1626414819987,"gmtModify":1633926944079,"author":{"id":"4089440680592730","authorId":"4089440680592730","name":"Bluefaerie","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3a14cce34aa8b490facc68d4c62d3704","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4089440680592730","idStr":"4089440680592730"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nice","listText":"Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/170156545","repostId":"1124361019","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1124361019","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1626413039,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1124361019?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-16 13:23","market":"us","language":"en","title":"'Boring '20s'? - a decade of zero real rates :Mike Dolan","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1124361019","media":"Reuters","summary":"(The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.)\nLONDON, July 16 (Reu","content":"<p>(The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.)</p>\n<p>LONDON, July 16 (Reuters) - The U.S. government can once again borrow at a deeply negative ‘real’ rate of minus 1.0% for 10 years - and some economists insist there’s a powerful historical case for expecting that rate to stay near zero or below for the rest of the decade.</p>\n<p>It’s been fashionable in markets of late to think of another “Roaring ‘20s” emerging over the next decade. Pandemic-driven megatrends, fractious politics, gigantic government debt piles and the return of inflation could all conspire to electrify or unnerve markets over the years ahead - or so the story goes.</p>\n<p>But after a restive first quarter of 2021, global bond markets - still under the spell of heavy central bank buying - appear to be pricing in a very different scenario ahead.</p>\n<p>Even after this week’s June readout of the highest annual gain in U.S. core consumer prices in 30 years - an inflation rate of some 4.5% excluding food and energy prices - the yield on the Treasury’s 10-year inflation-protected bond skidded back below -1.0% for the first time in five months.</p>\n<p>Aside from that brief moment in February, these rates have never been lower - at least not in the history of these securities. And all equivalent rates in the G4 major economies are also below zero, with Germany and Britain even lower than those in the United States.</p>\n<p>Investors pore over everything from ‘peak inflation’ to ‘peak growth’ and even ‘peak stimulus’ for clues as to why bond yields continue to defy forecasts and why they have taken the surge in inflation and government debt levels in their stride.</p>\n<p>U.S. government debt will top 125% of gross domestic product this year and next - its highest since World War Two - and up almost 20 percentage points since before the pandemic. Debt/GDP in G4 economies overall has risen by a similar amount to 125%.</p>\n<p>While many put the seeming nonchalance down to persistent central bank intervention or technical quirks, some also point out to the risk of a weakening ‘fiscal impulse’ over the next two years that mathematically drags on growth rates.</p>\n<p>Manulife Investment Management economist Frances Donald thinks this should be seen as a “fiscal cliff” and the drop in U.S. spending - viewed as a share of resulting falling budget deficit - marks the steepest such cliff since the 1940s.</p>\n<p><b>HIGH PRESSURE</b></p>\n<p>However, G7 leaders pledged last month not to make the mistakes of the last crisis by reducing government spending too soon and reverting to fiscal austerity too early.</p>\n<p>The White House and congressional Democrats at least seem intent on keeping that “high pressure economy” until all sections of society take part. Leading Democrats this week agreed to table another $3.5 trillion investment plan on top of the proposed $600 billion of infrastructure spending already in the pipeline.</p>\n<p>And yet the bond market barely flickered at the prospect.</p>\n<p>Is this just the Federal Reserve’s hand? Is Fed buying really so dominant and can it remain so for years?</p>\n<p>Fed chief Jerome Powell was this week pointedly reluctant to give Congress any hard timeline for a reduction in bond buying and continued to characterize inflation spikes as mostly temporary base effects and bottlenecks from pandemic lockdowns.</p>\n<p>But if the Fed is right about inflation over time and the pursuit of a high pressure economy is now G7 consensus due to equality and climate priorities, history shows bond yields could be down here for a long time to come yet.</p>\n<p>Morgan Stanley economists published a study this week looking at 100 years of data on how countries managed debt blowouts - defined as periods when debt/GDP ratios jumped 20 percentage points in five years.</p>\n<p>They concluded that countries which managed to rein in those debt levels over the subsequent decade had kept looser monetary and fiscal policies longer than those who failed to stop their debt rising. Low debt servicing costs - absent an inflation problem - and growth were shown to be the best ways to keep debts sustainable.</p>\n<p>Studying all outcomes, they reckoned the most successful strategy was to keep real interest rates two percentage points below real GDP growth rates for 10 years and ‘grow out’ of the debt rather than slashing spending. Fiscal consolidation, by contrast, had played a lesser role in the reversal of public debt build-ups over the century, it said.</p>\n<p>On that basis the investment bank saw U.S. real rates held between -0.5% and +0.5% for the next decade - about 2 points below their expected real GDP growth rate.</p>\n<p>While flatlining, that’s still higher than today’s rate - although it assumes some modest Fed tightening at some point.</p>\n<p>And of course, the lower the growth rate, the lower the real rate needs to be to rein in debt loads. Morgan Stanley said that if adverse demographics and productivity depressed real GDP growth more than it thought then real rates as low as today’s may have to be sustained to stop debts rising.</p>\n<p>But it also said most episodes of successful debt reduction had generally been accompanied by only moderate but sustained inflation - a median of 2.9% for those successful in cutting debts. Contrary to popular perceptions, hyperinflation ensued only in a very small number of episodes.</p>\n<p>“Our analysis shows that the real rate environment has been key in determining the path of public debt substantially more so than actual fiscal spending.”</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>'Boring '20s'? - a decade of zero real rates :Mike Dolan</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n'Boring '20s'? - a decade of zero real rates :Mike Dolan\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-07-16 13:23</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>(The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.)</p>\n<p>LONDON, July 16 (Reuters) - The U.S. government can once again borrow at a deeply negative ‘real’ rate of minus 1.0% for 10 years - and some economists insist there’s a powerful historical case for expecting that rate to stay near zero or below for the rest of the decade.</p>\n<p>It’s been fashionable in markets of late to think of another “Roaring ‘20s” emerging over the next decade. Pandemic-driven megatrends, fractious politics, gigantic government debt piles and the return of inflation could all conspire to electrify or unnerve markets over the years ahead - or so the story goes.</p>\n<p>But after a restive first quarter of 2021, global bond markets - still under the spell of heavy central bank buying - appear to be pricing in a very different scenario ahead.</p>\n<p>Even after this week’s June readout of the highest annual gain in U.S. core consumer prices in 30 years - an inflation rate of some 4.5% excluding food and energy prices - the yield on the Treasury’s 10-year inflation-protected bond skidded back below -1.0% for the first time in five months.</p>\n<p>Aside from that brief moment in February, these rates have never been lower - at least not in the history of these securities. And all equivalent rates in the G4 major economies are also below zero, with Germany and Britain even lower than those in the United States.</p>\n<p>Investors pore over everything from ‘peak inflation’ to ‘peak growth’ and even ‘peak stimulus’ for clues as to why bond yields continue to defy forecasts and why they have taken the surge in inflation and government debt levels in their stride.</p>\n<p>U.S. government debt will top 125% of gross domestic product this year and next - its highest since World War Two - and up almost 20 percentage points since before the pandemic. Debt/GDP in G4 economies overall has risen by a similar amount to 125%.</p>\n<p>While many put the seeming nonchalance down to persistent central bank intervention or technical quirks, some also point out to the risk of a weakening ‘fiscal impulse’ over the next two years that mathematically drags on growth rates.</p>\n<p>Manulife Investment Management economist Frances Donald thinks this should be seen as a “fiscal cliff” and the drop in U.S. spending - viewed as a share of resulting falling budget deficit - marks the steepest such cliff since the 1940s.</p>\n<p><b>HIGH PRESSURE</b></p>\n<p>However, G7 leaders pledged last month not to make the mistakes of the last crisis by reducing government spending too soon and reverting to fiscal austerity too early.</p>\n<p>The White House and congressional Democrats at least seem intent on keeping that “high pressure economy” until all sections of society take part. Leading Democrats this week agreed to table another $3.5 trillion investment plan on top of the proposed $600 billion of infrastructure spending already in the pipeline.</p>\n<p>And yet the bond market barely flickered at the prospect.</p>\n<p>Is this just the Federal Reserve’s hand? Is Fed buying really so dominant and can it remain so for years?</p>\n<p>Fed chief Jerome Powell was this week pointedly reluctant to give Congress any hard timeline for a reduction in bond buying and continued to characterize inflation spikes as mostly temporary base effects and bottlenecks from pandemic lockdowns.</p>\n<p>But if the Fed is right about inflation over time and the pursuit of a high pressure economy is now G7 consensus due to equality and climate priorities, history shows bond yields could be down here for a long time to come yet.</p>\n<p>Morgan Stanley economists published a study this week looking at 100 years of data on how countries managed debt blowouts - defined as periods when debt/GDP ratios jumped 20 percentage points in five years.</p>\n<p>They concluded that countries which managed to rein in those debt levels over the subsequent decade had kept looser monetary and fiscal policies longer than those who failed to stop their debt rising. Low debt servicing costs - absent an inflation problem - and growth were shown to be the best ways to keep debts sustainable.</p>\n<p>Studying all outcomes, they reckoned the most successful strategy was to keep real interest rates two percentage points below real GDP growth rates for 10 years and ‘grow out’ of the debt rather than slashing spending. Fiscal consolidation, by contrast, had played a lesser role in the reversal of public debt build-ups over the century, it said.</p>\n<p>On that basis the investment bank saw U.S. real rates held between -0.5% and +0.5% for the next decade - about 2 points below their expected real GDP growth rate.</p>\n<p>While flatlining, that’s still higher than today’s rate - although it assumes some modest Fed tightening at some point.</p>\n<p>And of course, the lower the growth rate, the lower the real rate needs to be to rein in debt loads. Morgan Stanley said that if adverse demographics and productivity depressed real GDP growth more than it thought then real rates as low as today’s may have to be sustained to stop debts rising.</p>\n<p>But it also said most episodes of successful debt reduction had generally been accompanied by only moderate but sustained inflation - a median of 2.9% for those successful in cutting debts. Contrary to popular perceptions, hyperinflation ensued only in a very small number of episodes.</p>\n<p>“Our analysis shows that the real rate environment has been key in determining the path of public debt substantially more so than actual fiscal spending.”</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","SPY":"标普500ETF",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1124361019","content_text":"(The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.)\nLONDON, July 16 (Reuters) - The U.S. government can once again borrow at a deeply negative ‘real’ rate of minus 1.0% for 10 years - and some economists insist there’s a powerful historical case for expecting that rate to stay near zero or below for the rest of the decade.\nIt’s been fashionable in markets of late to think of another “Roaring ‘20s” emerging over the next decade. Pandemic-driven megatrends, fractious politics, gigantic government debt piles and the return of inflation could all conspire to electrify or unnerve markets over the years ahead - or so the story goes.\nBut after a restive first quarter of 2021, global bond markets - still under the spell of heavy central bank buying - appear to be pricing in a very different scenario ahead.\nEven after this week’s June readout of the highest annual gain in U.S. core consumer prices in 30 years - an inflation rate of some 4.5% excluding food and energy prices - the yield on the Treasury’s 10-year inflation-protected bond skidded back below -1.0% for the first time in five months.\nAside from that brief moment in February, these rates have never been lower - at least not in the history of these securities. And all equivalent rates in the G4 major economies are also below zero, with Germany and Britain even lower than those in the United States.\nInvestors pore over everything from ‘peak inflation’ to ‘peak growth’ and even ‘peak stimulus’ for clues as to why bond yields continue to defy forecasts and why they have taken the surge in inflation and government debt levels in their stride.\nU.S. government debt will top 125% of gross domestic product this year and next - its highest since World War Two - and up almost 20 percentage points since before the pandemic. Debt/GDP in G4 economies overall has risen by a similar amount to 125%.\nWhile many put the seeming nonchalance down to persistent central bank intervention or technical quirks, some also point out to the risk of a weakening ‘fiscal impulse’ over the next two years that mathematically drags on growth rates.\nManulife Investment Management economist Frances Donald thinks this should be seen as a “fiscal cliff” and the drop in U.S. spending - viewed as a share of resulting falling budget deficit - marks the steepest such cliff since the 1940s.\nHIGH PRESSURE\nHowever, G7 leaders pledged last month not to make the mistakes of the last crisis by reducing government spending too soon and reverting to fiscal austerity too early.\nThe White House and congressional Democrats at least seem intent on keeping that “high pressure economy” until all sections of society take part. Leading Democrats this week agreed to table another $3.5 trillion investment plan on top of the proposed $600 billion of infrastructure spending already in the pipeline.\nAnd yet the bond market barely flickered at the prospect.\nIs this just the Federal Reserve’s hand? Is Fed buying really so dominant and can it remain so for years?\nFed chief Jerome Powell was this week pointedly reluctant to give Congress any hard timeline for a reduction in bond buying and continued to characterize inflation spikes as mostly temporary base effects and bottlenecks from pandemic lockdowns.\nBut if the Fed is right about inflation over time and the pursuit of a high pressure economy is now G7 consensus due to equality and climate priorities, history shows bond yields could be down here for a long time to come yet.\nMorgan Stanley economists published a study this week looking at 100 years of data on how countries managed debt blowouts - defined as periods when debt/GDP ratios jumped 20 percentage points in five years.\nThey concluded that countries which managed to rein in those debt levels over the subsequent decade had kept looser monetary and fiscal policies longer than those who failed to stop their debt rising. Low debt servicing costs - absent an inflation problem - and growth were shown to be the best ways to keep debts sustainable.\nStudying all outcomes, they reckoned the most successful strategy was to keep real interest rates two percentage points below real GDP growth rates for 10 years and ‘grow out’ of the debt rather than slashing spending. Fiscal consolidation, by contrast, had played a lesser role in the reversal of public debt build-ups over the century, it said.\nOn that basis the investment bank saw U.S. real rates held between -0.5% and +0.5% for the next decade - about 2 points below their expected real GDP growth rate.\nWhile flatlining, that’s still higher than today’s rate - although it assumes some modest Fed tightening at some point.\nAnd of course, the lower the growth rate, the lower the real rate needs to be to rein in debt loads. Morgan Stanley said that if adverse demographics and productivity depressed real GDP growth more than it thought then real rates as low as today’s may have to be sustained to stop debts rising.\nBut it also said most episodes of successful debt reduction had generally been accompanied by only moderate but sustained inflation - a median of 2.9% for those successful in cutting debts. Contrary to popular perceptions, hyperinflation ensued only in a very small number of episodes.\n“Our analysis shows that the real rate environment has been key in determining the path of public debt substantially more so than actual fiscal spending.”","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":180,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":804022606,"gmtCreate":1627913067805,"gmtModify":1633755338612,"author":{"id":"4089440680592730","authorId":"4089440680592730","name":"Bluefaerie","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3a14cce34aa8b490facc68d4c62d3704","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4089440680592730","authorIdStr":"4089440680592730"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nice","listText":"Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":9,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/804022606","repostId":"1169778745","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1169778745","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1627911880,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1169778745?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-02 21:44","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Airline shares, Carnival stocks were mostly higher","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1169778745","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"(August 2) Shares of Carnival Corp. were up 2.52% in early trading. Major banks including Morgan Sta","content":"<p>(August 2)&nbsp;Shares of Carnival Corp. were up 2.52% in early trading. Major banks including Morgan Stanley and Bank of America were higher. Airline shares were mostly higher.</p>\n<p>“We believe the reopening and recovery trend is on track and continue to see upside for equities,” wrote Mark Haefele, chief investment officer of global wealth management at UBS. “We expect the S&amp;P 500 to climb to around 4,650 by June next year, versus 4,395 at present. But we see the greatest upside for cyclical parts of the market, including energy, financials, and Japanese stocks.”</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9d1f8013a64fda7879ad10c4e7559aec\" tg-width=\"313\" tg-height=\"363\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Airline shares, Carnival stocks were mostly higher</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAirline shares, Carnival stocks were mostly higher\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-08-02 21:44</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>(August 2)&nbsp;Shares of Carnival Corp. were up 2.52% in early trading. Major banks including Morgan Stanley and Bank of America were higher. Airline shares were mostly higher.</p>\n<p>“We believe the reopening and recovery trend is on track and continue to see upside for equities,” wrote Mark Haefele, chief investment officer of global wealth management at UBS. “We expect the S&amp;P 500 to climb to around 4,650 by June next year, versus 4,395 at present. But we see the greatest upside for cyclical parts of the market, including energy, financials, and Japanese stocks.”</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9d1f8013a64fda7879ad10c4e7559aec\" tg-width=\"313\" tg-height=\"363\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1169778745","content_text":"(August 2) Shares of Carnival Corp. were up 2.52% in early trading. Major banks including Morgan Stanley and Bank of America were higher. Airline shares were mostly higher.\n“We believe the reopening and recovery trend is on track and continue to see upside for equities,” wrote Mark Haefele, chief investment officer of global wealth management at UBS. “We expect the S&P 500 to climb to around 4,650 by June next year, versus 4,395 at present. But we see the greatest upside for cyclical parts of the market, including energy, financials, and Japanese stocks.”","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":246,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":172355742,"gmtCreate":1626939810486,"gmtModify":1633769552303,"author":{"id":"4089440680592730","authorId":"4089440680592730","name":"Bluefaerie","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3a14cce34aa8b490facc68d4c62d3704","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4089440680592730","authorIdStr":"4089440680592730"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Informative","listText":"Informative","text":"Informative","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/172355742","repostId":"1199772945","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1199772945","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1626939541,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1199772945?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-22 15:39","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Users Say Their Nvidia Graphics Cards Are Getting Bricked By Amazon MMO Game","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1199772945","media":"Benzinga","summary":"Amazon.com, Inc’s AMZN massively multiplayer online game, or MMO — “New World” — said Wednesday it w","content":"<p><b>Amazon.com, Inc’s</b>&nbsp;AMZN&nbsp;massively multiplayer online game, or MMO —&nbsp;“New World” — said&nbsp;Wednesday it will release a patch for its&nbsp;closed beta to reassure players after hardware failure reports emerged.</p>\n<p><b>What Happened:</b>&nbsp;New Worldannouncedvia<b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWTR\">Twitter</a> Inc’s</b>TWTR 0.01%platform that “New World makes standard DirectX calls as provided by the Windows API.”</p>\n<p>“We have seen no indication of widespread issues with 3090s, either in the beta or during our many months of alpha testing.”</p>\n<p>Amazon’s New World said that, while hundreds of thousands of people played the game’s beta and millions of total hours were played,&nbsp;they received a few reports of hardware failures from players using “high-performance graphics cards.”</p>\n<p>Some players had reported that their&nbsp;<b>Nvidia Corporation</b>&nbsp;NVDA&nbsp;manufactured RTX 3090 graphics cards were bricked after they played New World, the Vergereported.</p>\n<p>Many of the cards were said to have been manufactured by EVGA, the Verge reported citing the New World subreddit.</p>\n<p><b>Why It Matters:</b>&nbsp;New World is set to launch on August 31. The closed beta began July 20 and will continue until August 2.</p>\n<p>Amazon issued a statement that acknowledged that they have two customer service reports on 3090 failures, the Verge reported.</p>\n<p>“We do provide user select-able (sic) settings to reduce graphics, which correspondingly reduces GPU load, if the player desires,” as per the statement.</p>\n<p>The RTX 3090 was released as apart of the GeForce RTX 30 seriesin September 2020. At the time its top-end model was priced at $1,499 and base model at $499.</p>\n<p>Analternative applicationfor the 3090 graphics card is&nbsp;<b>Ethereum</b>(CRYPTO: ETH) mining as the 24GB variant can mine that cryptocurrency at up to 120 Mh/S.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Users Say Their Nvidia Graphics Cards Are Getting Bricked By Amazon MMO Game</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nUsers Say Their Nvidia Graphics Cards Are Getting Bricked By Amazon MMO Game\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-07-22 15:39</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><b>Amazon.com, Inc’s</b>&nbsp;AMZN&nbsp;massively multiplayer online game, or MMO —&nbsp;“New World” — said&nbsp;Wednesday it will release a patch for its&nbsp;closed beta to reassure players after hardware failure reports emerged.</p>\n<p><b>What Happened:</b>&nbsp;New Worldannouncedvia<b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWTR\">Twitter</a> Inc’s</b>TWTR 0.01%platform that “New World makes standard DirectX calls as provided by the Windows API.”</p>\n<p>“We have seen no indication of widespread issues with 3090s, either in the beta or during our many months of alpha testing.”</p>\n<p>Amazon’s New World said that, while hundreds of thousands of people played the game’s beta and millions of total hours were played,&nbsp;they received a few reports of hardware failures from players using “high-performance graphics cards.”</p>\n<p>Some players had reported that their&nbsp;<b>Nvidia Corporation</b>&nbsp;NVDA&nbsp;manufactured RTX 3090 graphics cards were bricked after they played New World, the Vergereported.</p>\n<p>Many of the cards were said to have been manufactured by EVGA, the Verge reported citing the New World subreddit.</p>\n<p><b>Why It Matters:</b>&nbsp;New World is set to launch on August 31. The closed beta began July 20 and will continue until August 2.</p>\n<p>Amazon issued a statement that acknowledged that they have two customer service reports on 3090 failures, the Verge reported.</p>\n<p>“We do provide user select-able (sic) settings to reduce graphics, which correspondingly reduces GPU load, if the player desires,” as per the statement.</p>\n<p>The RTX 3090 was released as apart of the GeForce RTX 30 seriesin September 2020. At the time its top-end model was priced at $1,499 and base model at $499.</p>\n<p>Analternative applicationfor the 3090 graphics card is&nbsp;<b>Ethereum</b>(CRYPTO: ETH) mining as the 24GB variant can mine that cryptocurrency at up to 120 Mh/S.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"09086":"华夏纳指-U","03086":"华夏纳指","NVDA":"英伟达","QNETCN":"纳斯达克中美互联网老虎指数","AMZN":"亚马逊"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1199772945","content_text":"Amazon.com, Inc’s AMZN massively multiplayer online game, or MMO — “New World” — said Wednesday it will release a patch for its closed beta to reassure players after hardware failure reports emerged.\nWhat Happened: New WorldannouncedviaTwitter Inc’sTWTR 0.01%platform that “New World makes standard DirectX calls as provided by the Windows API.”\n“We have seen no indication of widespread issues with 3090s, either in the beta or during our many months of alpha testing.”\nAmazon’s New World said that, while hundreds of thousands of people played the game’s beta and millions of total hours were played, they received a few reports of hardware failures from players using “high-performance graphics cards.”\nSome players had reported that their Nvidia Corporation NVDA manufactured RTX 3090 graphics cards were bricked after they played New World, the Vergereported.\nMany of the cards were said to have been manufactured by EVGA, the Verge reported citing the New World subreddit.\nWhy It Matters: New World is set to launch on August 31. The closed beta began July 20 and will continue until August 2.\nAmazon issued a statement that acknowledged that they have two customer service reports on 3090 failures, the Verge reported.\n“We do provide user select-able (sic) settings to reduce graphics, which correspondingly reduces GPU load, if the player desires,” as per the statement.\nThe RTX 3090 was released as apart of the GeForce RTX 30 seriesin September 2020. At the time its top-end model was priced at $1,499 and base model at $499.\nAnalternative applicationfor the 3090 graphics card is Ethereum(CRYPTO: ETH) mining as the 24GB variant can mine that cryptocurrency at up to 120 Mh/S.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":347,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":178721111,"gmtCreate":1626839165933,"gmtModify":1633770503149,"author":{"id":"4089440680592730","authorId":"4089440680592730","name":"Bluefaerie","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3a14cce34aa8b490facc68d4c62d3704","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4089440680592730","authorIdStr":"4089440680592730"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Woah","listText":"Woah","text":"Woah","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/178721111","repostId":"1196827638","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1196827638","pubTimestamp":1626837882,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1196827638?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-21 11:24","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Disney is chipping away at Netflix’s dominance","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1196827638","media":"The New York Times","summary":"The cracks are showing in Netflix’s worldwide dominance.\nNetflix, Inc. is still king of streaming vi","content":"<p>The cracks are showing in Netflix’s worldwide dominance.</p>\n<p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NFLX\">Netflix, Inc.</a></b> is still king of streaming video, but audiences are slowly shifting toward new rivals, namely the <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DIS\">Walt Disney</a></b> Company’s Disney+, according to research from&nbsp;Parrot Analytics.</p>\n<p>Netflix’s share of worldwide demand interest — a&nbsp;measure&nbsp;of the popularity of its shows created by Parrot and a key barometer of how many new subscribers a streaming service is likely to attract — fell below 50 percent for the first time in the second quarter of the year.</p>\n<p>The company’s “lack of new hit original programming and the increased competition from other streamers is going to ultimately have a negative impact on subscriber growth and retention,” Parrot said in a news release.</p>\n<p>Netflix relies on creating as many different shows and films for as many different audiences as possible, and the pandemic upset that formula, forcing the shutdown of productions around the world.</p>\n<p>The company will announce its second quarter financial results Tuesday afternoon and has already told investors not to expect too much. It set a surprisingly low bar for the quarter when it told Wall Street that itanticipatedadding <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> million new subscribers, a meager uptick to its current total of 207 million customers. (It’s worth noting that lower expectations are easier to beat, and beating expectations by even a hair can boost a company’s stock.)</p>\n<p>Disney+ more than doubled its share of demand interest in the second quarter compared with a year ago, and <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">Amazon.com</a></b> Prime Video, <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a> </b>TV+ and HBO Max are also gaining, according to Parrot.</p>\n<p>Even as newer entrants have chipped away at Netflix’s long-held grip, Reed Hastings, Netflix’s co-chief executive, has dismissed the competition as pretenders to the Netflix throne. In April, after Mr. Hastings was asked by investors why the company had missed its expectations for adding new customers in the first quarter, he said, “Of course we’re wondering, ‘Well, wait a second, are we sure it’s not competition?’”</p>\n<p>“We really looked through all the data, looking at different regions where new competitors are launched, are not launched,” he continued. “And we just can’t see any difference in our relative growth in those regions, which is what gives us confidence.”</p>\n<p>“We’ve been competing with Amazon Prime for 13 years, with Hulu for 14 years,” he added. “It’s always been very competitive with linear TV, too. So there’s no real change that we can detect in the competitive environment. It’s always been high and remains high.”</p>\n<p>In other words:&nbsp;<i>If Disney+ is hurting us, we haven’t seen it.</i></p>\n<p>The argument that Netflix has been competing with regular television and other streamers for a long time overlooks the fact that new rivals like Disney+ and AppleTV+ are much cheaper than Netflix (and subscription television). And although those services produce far fewer originals than Netflix, they appear to be getting more bang for their buck.</p>\n<p>In the second quarter, Disney+ got a big boost of demand interest from “The Falcon and the Winter Soldier,” a series based on the Marvel Cinematic Universe, which has thoroughly dominated the box office in recent years. “Loki,” another Marvel spinoff, also helped, according to Parrot.</p>\n<p>Amazon Prime Video got a boost in the period with the launch of “Invincible,” an animated superhero series for adults. And AppleTV+ attracted new customers with a trio of originals: “Mosquito Coast,” a drama based on the 1981 novel; “For All Mankind,” a sci-fi series, and “Mythic Quest,” a comedy series that takes place in a game developer studio.</p>\n<p>Speaking of, Netflix said this month that it planned to jump into video games. It has hired a gaming executive, Mike Verdu, formerly of Electronic Arts and <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FB\">Facebook</a></b>, to oversee its development of new games. It’s a potentially significant move for the company, which hasn’t strayed far from its formula of television series and films.</p>","source":"lsy1608616134662","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Disney is chipping away at Netflix’s dominance</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nDisney is chipping away at Netflix’s dominance\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-21 11:24 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.nytimes.com/live/2021/07/20/business/economy-stock-market-news><strong>The New York Times</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The cracks are showing in Netflix’s worldwide dominance.\nNetflix, Inc. is still king of streaming video, but audiences are slowly shifting toward new rivals, namely the Walt Disney Company’s Disney+, ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.nytimes.com/live/2021/07/20/business/economy-stock-market-news\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NFLX":"奈飞","AAPL":"苹果","AMZN":"亚马逊","DIS":"迪士尼"},"source_url":"https://www.nytimes.com/live/2021/07/20/business/economy-stock-market-news","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1196827638","content_text":"The cracks are showing in Netflix’s worldwide dominance.\nNetflix, Inc. is still king of streaming video, but audiences are slowly shifting toward new rivals, namely the Walt Disney Company’s Disney+, according to research from Parrot Analytics.\nNetflix’s share of worldwide demand interest — a measure of the popularity of its shows created by Parrot and a key barometer of how many new subscribers a streaming service is likely to attract — fell below 50 percent for the first time in the second quarter of the year.\nThe company’s “lack of new hit original programming and the increased competition from other streamers is going to ultimately have a negative impact on subscriber growth and retention,” Parrot said in a news release.\nNetflix relies on creating as many different shows and films for as many different audiences as possible, and the pandemic upset that formula, forcing the shutdown of productions around the world.\nThe company will announce its second quarter financial results Tuesday afternoon and has already told investors not to expect too much. It set a surprisingly low bar for the quarter when it told Wall Street that itanticipatedadding one million new subscribers, a meager uptick to its current total of 207 million customers. (It’s worth noting that lower expectations are easier to beat, and beating expectations by even a hair can boost a company’s stock.)\nDisney+ more than doubled its share of demand interest in the second quarter compared with a year ago, and Amazon.com Prime Video, Apple TV+ and HBO Max are also gaining, according to Parrot.\nEven as newer entrants have chipped away at Netflix’s long-held grip, Reed Hastings, Netflix’s co-chief executive, has dismissed the competition as pretenders to the Netflix throne. In April, after Mr. Hastings was asked by investors why the company had missed its expectations for adding new customers in the first quarter, he said, “Of course we’re wondering, ‘Well, wait a second, are we sure it’s not competition?’”\n“We really looked through all the data, looking at different regions where new competitors are launched, are not launched,” he continued. “And we just can’t see any difference in our relative growth in those regions, which is what gives us confidence.”\n“We’ve been competing with Amazon Prime for 13 years, with Hulu for 14 years,” he added. “It’s always been very competitive with linear TV, too. So there’s no real change that we can detect in the competitive environment. It’s always been high and remains high.”\nIn other words: If Disney+ is hurting us, we haven’t seen it.\nThe argument that Netflix has been competing with regular television and other streamers for a long time overlooks the fact that new rivals like Disney+ and AppleTV+ are much cheaper than Netflix (and subscription television). And although those services produce far fewer originals than Netflix, they appear to be getting more bang for their buck.\nIn the second quarter, Disney+ got a big boost of demand interest from “The Falcon and the Winter Soldier,” a series based on the Marvel Cinematic Universe, which has thoroughly dominated the box office in recent years. “Loki,” another Marvel spinoff, also helped, according to Parrot.\nAmazon Prime Video got a boost in the period with the launch of “Invincible,” an animated superhero series for adults. And AppleTV+ attracted new customers with a trio of originals: “Mosquito Coast,” a drama based on the 1981 novel; “For All Mankind,” a sci-fi series, and “Mythic Quest,” a comedy series that takes place in a game developer studio.\nSpeaking of, Netflix said this month that it planned to jump into video games. It has hired a gaming executive, Mike Verdu, formerly of Electronic Arts and Facebook, to oversee its development of new games. It’s a potentially significant move for the company, which hasn’t strayed far from its formula of television series and films.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":415,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":175203397,"gmtCreate":1627031584319,"gmtModify":1633768620283,"author":{"id":"4089440680592730","authorId":"4089440680592730","name":"Bluefaerie","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3a14cce34aa8b490facc68d4c62d3704","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4089440680592730","authorIdStr":"4089440680592730"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Is this overvaluation?","listText":"Is this overvaluation?","text":"Is this overvaluation?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/175203397","repostId":"1164478982","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1164478982","pubTimestamp":1626995319,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1164478982?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-23 07:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Wall Street ekes out gains, led by tech, growth stocks","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1164478982","media":"Reuters","summary":"NEW YORK  - Big tech helped Wall Street inch up to a higher close on Thursday, modestly building on a two-day rally as lackluster economic data and mixed corporate earnings prompted a pivot back to growth stocks.A pull-back in economically sensitive cyclicals kept the S&P 500’s and the blue-chip Dow’s gains muted, while small-caps underperformed their larger rivals.“The market is flip-flopping between the view that economic growth has almost peaked so you need to buy stocks that manufacture thei","content":"<p>NEW YORK (Reuters) - Big tech helped Wall Street inch up to a higher close on Thursday, modestly building on a two-day rally as lackluster economic data and mixed corporate earnings prompted a pivot back to growth stocks.</p>\n<p>A pull-back in economically sensitive cyclicals kept the S&amp;P 500’s and the blue-chip Dow’s gains muted, while small-caps underperformed their larger rivals.</p>\n<p>But megacap tech and tech-adjacent stocks, such as Microsoft Corp, Amazon.com, Apple Inc, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FB\">Facebook</a> Inc and Alphabet Inc, rose ahead of their quarterly results next week, putting the Nasdaq out front.</p>\n<p>All three major U.S. stock indexes ended the session within 1% of their record closing highs.</p>\n<p>Growth stocks, which outperformed throughout the health crisis, were back in favor, gaining 0.8%, while the value index slipped by 0.5%.</p>\n<p>“The market is flip-flopping between the view that economic growth has almost peaked so you need to buy stocks that manufacture their own growth like tech names, versus the view that economic growth will continue and you want to own cyclicals and value names,” said David Carter, chief investment officer at Lenox Wealth Advisors in New York.</p>\n<p>The number of U.S. workers filing first-time applications for unemployment benefits spiked unexpectedly to 419,000 last week, a two-month high, according to the Labor Department.</p>\n<p>Market participants are closely watching labor market indicators for hints as to when the Federal Reserve, expected to convene next week for its two-day monetary policy meeting, will begin discussions about hiking key interest rates from near zero.</p>\n<p>“The jobless data today didn’t have a meaningful impact on markets or the economic outlook,” Carter added. “It’s now all about how much longer the Fed will tolerate low rates. The Fed seems to be favoring its full employment mandate more than its price stability mandate.”</p>\n<p>“Accordingly, the upcoming Fed meeting could be impactful,” Carter said.</p>\n<p>Benchmark Treasury yields eased after the bid at the largest-ever TIPS auction touched a record low, pressuring rate sensitive banks.</p>\n<p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 25.35 points, or 0.07%, to 34,823.35, the S&amp;P 500 gained 8.79 points, or 0.20%, to 4,367.48 and the Nasdaq Composite added 52.64 points, or 0.36%, to 14,684.60.</p>\n<p>Of the 11 major sectors of the S&amp;P 500, tech was shining brightest, gaining 0.7%. Energy stocks suffered the largest percentage drop.</p>\n<p>The second-quarter reporting season barreled ahead at full-throttle, with 104 of the companies in the S&amp;P 500 having reported. Of those, 88% have beaten consensus estimates, according to Refinitiv.</p>\n<p>Drugmaker Biogen Inc gained 1.1% after hiking its full-year revenue guidance, while Domino’s Pizza Inc surged 14.6% to an all-time high on the heels of its quarterly report.</p>\n<p>Southwest Airlines Co posted a bigger-than-expected quarterly loss, sending its stock down 3.5%, and American Airlines Group Inc dipped 1.1% even after reporting a quarterly profit.</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 1500 Airlines index ended the session off 1.7%.</p>\n<p>Shares of Texas Instruments Inc slid 5.3% after its current-quarter revenue forecast cast concerns as to whether the company will be able to meet spiking demand in the face of a global semiconductor shortage.</p>\n<p>The Philadelphia SE Semiconductor index ended the session down 0.9%.</p>\n<p>Chipmaker Intel Corp slipped more than 1% in extended trading after the chipmaker posted results and raised its annual revenue forecast.</p>\n<p>Declining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 1.82-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.90-to-1 ratio favored decliners.</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 500 posted 39 new 52-week highs and no new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 70 new highs and 54 new lows.</p>\n<p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 8.25 billion shares, compared with the 10.12 billion average over the last 20 trading days.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Wall Street ekes out gains, led by tech, growth stocks</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWall Street ekes out gains, led by tech, growth stocks\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-23 07:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.reuters.com/article/usa-stocks/us-stocks-wall-street-ekes-out-gains-led-by-tech-growth-stocks-idUSL1N2OY2HH><strong>Reuters</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>NEW YORK (Reuters) - Big tech helped Wall Street inch up to a higher close on Thursday, modestly building on a two-day rally as lackluster economic data and mixed corporate earnings prompted a pivot ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.reuters.com/article/usa-stocks/us-stocks-wall-street-ekes-out-gains-led-by-tech-growth-stocks-idUSL1N2OY2HH\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"https://www.reuters.com/article/usa-stocks/us-stocks-wall-street-ekes-out-gains-led-by-tech-growth-stocks-idUSL1N2OY2HH","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1164478982","content_text":"NEW YORK (Reuters) - Big tech helped Wall Street inch up to a higher close on Thursday, modestly building on a two-day rally as lackluster economic data and mixed corporate earnings prompted a pivot back to growth stocks.\nA pull-back in economically sensitive cyclicals kept the S&P 500’s and the blue-chip Dow’s gains muted, while small-caps underperformed their larger rivals.\nBut megacap tech and tech-adjacent stocks, such as Microsoft Corp, Amazon.com, Apple Inc, Facebook Inc and Alphabet Inc, rose ahead of their quarterly results next week, putting the Nasdaq out front.\nAll three major U.S. stock indexes ended the session within 1% of their record closing highs.\nGrowth stocks, which outperformed throughout the health crisis, were back in favor, gaining 0.8%, while the value index slipped by 0.5%.\n“The market is flip-flopping between the view that economic growth has almost peaked so you need to buy stocks that manufacture their own growth like tech names, versus the view that economic growth will continue and you want to own cyclicals and value names,” said David Carter, chief investment officer at Lenox Wealth Advisors in New York.\nThe number of U.S. workers filing first-time applications for unemployment benefits spiked unexpectedly to 419,000 last week, a two-month high, according to the Labor Department.\nMarket participants are closely watching labor market indicators for hints as to when the Federal Reserve, expected to convene next week for its two-day monetary policy meeting, will begin discussions about hiking key interest rates from near zero.\n“The jobless data today didn’t have a meaningful impact on markets or the economic outlook,” Carter added. “It’s now all about how much longer the Fed will tolerate low rates. The Fed seems to be favoring its full employment mandate more than its price stability mandate.”\n“Accordingly, the upcoming Fed meeting could be impactful,” Carter said.\nBenchmark Treasury yields eased after the bid at the largest-ever TIPS auction touched a record low, pressuring rate sensitive banks.\nThe Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 25.35 points, or 0.07%, to 34,823.35, the S&P 500 gained 8.79 points, or 0.20%, to 4,367.48 and the Nasdaq Composite added 52.64 points, or 0.36%, to 14,684.60.\nOf the 11 major sectors of the S&P 500, tech was shining brightest, gaining 0.7%. Energy stocks suffered the largest percentage drop.\nThe second-quarter reporting season barreled ahead at full-throttle, with 104 of the companies in the S&P 500 having reported. Of those, 88% have beaten consensus estimates, according to Refinitiv.\nDrugmaker Biogen Inc gained 1.1% after hiking its full-year revenue guidance, while Domino’s Pizza Inc surged 14.6% to an all-time high on the heels of its quarterly report.\nSouthwest Airlines Co posted a bigger-than-expected quarterly loss, sending its stock down 3.5%, and American Airlines Group Inc dipped 1.1% even after reporting a quarterly profit.\nThe S&P 1500 Airlines index ended the session off 1.7%.\nShares of Texas Instruments Inc slid 5.3% after its current-quarter revenue forecast cast concerns as to whether the company will be able to meet spiking demand in the face of a global semiconductor shortage.\nThe Philadelphia SE Semiconductor index ended the session down 0.9%.\nChipmaker Intel Corp slipped more than 1% in extended trading after the chipmaker posted results and raised its annual revenue forecast.\nDeclining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 1.82-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.90-to-1 ratio favored decliners.\nThe S&P 500 posted 39 new 52-week highs and no new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 70 new highs and 54 new lows.\nVolume on U.S. exchanges was 8.25 billion shares, compared with the 10.12 billion average over the last 20 trading days.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":338,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":809280026,"gmtCreate":1627372814965,"gmtModify":1633765635406,"author":{"id":"4089440680592730","authorId":"4089440680592730","name":"Bluefaerie","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3a14cce34aa8b490facc68d4c62d3704","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4089440680592730","authorIdStr":"4089440680592730"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"please like 😻","listText":"please like 😻","text":"please like 😻","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/809280026","repostId":"2154875967","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2154875967","pubTimestamp":1627372266,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2154875967?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-27 15:51","market":"us","language":"en","title":"How the 10-year Treasury rate and S&P 500 performed when the Fed tapered in 2013","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2154875967","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"In the wake of the Great Recession, it took about five years for the U.S. central bank to start slow","content":"<p>In the wake of the Great Recession, it took about five years for the U.S. central bank to start slowing down its controversial large-scale bond-buying program, ultimately making 2013 the year of the \"taper tantrum .\"</p>\n<p>Federal Reserve officials have said they'd rather avoid a repeat of that episode, when it comes to eventually scaling back its $120 billion-a-month, pandemic-era asset-purchase program.</p>\n<p>And while it felt like the U.S. stock and bond markets both freaked out in 2013, a review of the S&amp;P 500's performance in that tumultuous year shows it turned out pretty well for equity investors who stayed the course.</p>\n<p>Following a roughly 6% pullback post-Fed taper announcement, the S&amp;P 500 finished the year higher by about 30%, according to the Wells Fargo Investment Institute.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b5888ee701d08887e5b8d11bca7d6e30\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"376\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>S&amp;P 500 rose 30% in 2013. WELLS FARGO INVESTMENT INSTITUTE</span></p>\n<p>At the same time, the 10-year Treasury yield nearly doubled in six months from a low of almost 1.5% to roughly 3.1% by that December, leading to higher borrowing costs that rippled through the U.S. economy, from commercial real-estate owners to U.S. corporations <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LQD\">$(LQD)$</a>.</p>\n<p>\"Higher inflation, rising long-term interest rates, and a less dovish Fed could potentially cause the market to pause,\" Chris Haverland, Wells Fargo Institute's global equity strategist wrote, in a Monday note.</p>\n<p>\"However, equities have historically performed well through these events, even if there was some initial selling pressure.\"</p>\n<p>Haverland thinks the Fed may announce plans to reduce its asset purchases later this year, which could lift longer-duration Treasury rates, including the 10-year, from its current 1.3% range. He also prefers to stick to his wheelhouse in equities over bonds.</p>\n<p>\"If the market corrects, we would view it as an opportunity to fill our equity positions that may be below strategic or tactical targets,\" he said.</p>\n<p>During the pandemic, the Fed has been buying about $80 billion of Treasurys each month and $40 billion of agency mortgage-backed securities (MBS), while increasing its balance sheet to about $8.2 trillion .</p>\n<p>Some Fed officials have been debating buying, as a first step to withdrawing some support, particularly since the U.S. housing market has been red-hot during the COVID crisis, albeit with recent signs of cooling.</p>\n<p>The Federal Reserve kicks off a two-day policy meeting on Tuesday, with a statement due Wednesday at 2 p.m. Eastern, followed by Fed Chairman Jerome Powell's press conference.</p>\n<p>U.S. stocks drifted higher into record territory on Monday, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average , S&amp;P 500 and Nasdaq Composite Index claiming new closing highs.</p>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>How the 10-year Treasury rate and S&P 500 performed when the Fed tapered in 2013</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHow the 10-year Treasury rate and S&P 500 performed when the Fed tapered in 2013\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-27 15:51 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.marketwatch.com/story/how-the-10-year-treasury-rate-and-s-p-500-performed-when-the-fed-tapered-in-2013-11627344095?mod=home-page><strong>MarketWatch</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>In the wake of the Great Recession, it took about five years for the U.S. central bank to start slowing down its controversial large-scale bond-buying program, ultimately making 2013 the year of the \"...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/how-the-10-year-treasury-rate-and-s-p-500-performed-when-the-fed-tapered-in-2013-11627344095?mod=home-page\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"161125":"标普500","513500":"标普500ETF","OEX":"标普100",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","LQD":"债券指数ETF-iShares iBoxx投资级公司债","IVV":"标普500指数ETF","SDS":"两倍做空标普500ETF","SSO":"两倍做多标普500ETF","MBB":"美国按揭抵押债券ETF-iShares","SPY":"标普500ETF",".DJI":"道琼斯","UPRO":"三倍做多标普500ETF","SH":"标普500反向ETF","SPXU":"三倍做空标普500ETF","OEF":"标普100指数ETF-iShares"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/how-the-10-year-treasury-rate-and-s-p-500-performed-when-the-fed-tapered-in-2013-11627344095?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2154875967","content_text":"In the wake of the Great Recession, it took about five years for the U.S. central bank to start slowing down its controversial large-scale bond-buying program, ultimately making 2013 the year of the \"taper tantrum .\"\nFederal Reserve officials have said they'd rather avoid a repeat of that episode, when it comes to eventually scaling back its $120 billion-a-month, pandemic-era asset-purchase program.\nAnd while it felt like the U.S. stock and bond markets both freaked out in 2013, a review of the S&P 500's performance in that tumultuous year shows it turned out pretty well for equity investors who stayed the course.\nFollowing a roughly 6% pullback post-Fed taper announcement, the S&P 500 finished the year higher by about 30%, according to the Wells Fargo Investment Institute.\nS&P 500 rose 30% in 2013. WELLS FARGO INVESTMENT INSTITUTE\nAt the same time, the 10-year Treasury yield nearly doubled in six months from a low of almost 1.5% to roughly 3.1% by that December, leading to higher borrowing costs that rippled through the U.S. economy, from commercial real-estate owners to U.S. corporations $(LQD)$.\n\"Higher inflation, rising long-term interest rates, and a less dovish Fed could potentially cause the market to pause,\" Chris Haverland, Wells Fargo Institute's global equity strategist wrote, in a Monday note.\n\"However, equities have historically performed well through these events, even if there was some initial selling pressure.\"\nHaverland thinks the Fed may announce plans to reduce its asset purchases later this year, which could lift longer-duration Treasury rates, including the 10-year, from its current 1.3% range. He also prefers to stick to his wheelhouse in equities over bonds.\n\"If the market corrects, we would view it as an opportunity to fill our equity positions that may be below strategic or tactical targets,\" he said.\nDuring the pandemic, the Fed has been buying about $80 billion of Treasurys each month and $40 billion of agency mortgage-backed securities (MBS), while increasing its balance sheet to about $8.2 trillion .\nSome Fed officials have been debating buying, as a first step to withdrawing some support, particularly since the U.S. housing market has been red-hot during the COVID crisis, albeit with recent signs of cooling.\nThe Federal Reserve kicks off a two-day policy meeting on Tuesday, with a statement due Wednesday at 2 p.m. Eastern, followed by Fed Chairman Jerome Powell's press conference.\nU.S. stocks drifted higher into record territory on Monday, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average , S&P 500 and Nasdaq Composite Index claiming new closing highs.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":319,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":170140914,"gmtCreate":1626415145838,"gmtModify":1633926941381,"author":{"id":"4089440680592730","authorId":"4089440680592730","name":"Bluefaerie","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3a14cce34aa8b490facc68d4c62d3704","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4089440680592730","authorIdStr":"4089440680592730"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nice","listText":"Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/170140914","repostId":"1129144056","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":186,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":170152692,"gmtCreate":1626414870016,"gmtModify":1633926943486,"author":{"id":"4089440680592730","authorId":"4089440680592730","name":"Bluefaerie","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3a14cce34aa8b490facc68d4c62d3704","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4089440680592730","authorIdStr":"4089440680592730"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nice","listText":"Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/170152692","repostId":"1124361019","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1124361019","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1626413039,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1124361019?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-16 13:23","market":"us","language":"en","title":"'Boring '20s'? - a decade of zero real rates :Mike Dolan","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1124361019","media":"Reuters","summary":"(The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.)\nLONDON, July 16 (Reu","content":"<p>(The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.)</p>\n<p>LONDON, July 16 (Reuters) - The U.S. government can once again borrow at a deeply negative ‘real’ rate of minus 1.0% for 10 years - and some economists insist there’s a powerful historical case for expecting that rate to stay near zero or below for the rest of the decade.</p>\n<p>It’s been fashionable in markets of late to think of another “Roaring ‘20s” emerging over the next decade. Pandemic-driven megatrends, fractious politics, gigantic government debt piles and the return of inflation could all conspire to electrify or unnerve markets over the years ahead - or so the story goes.</p>\n<p>But after a restive first quarter of 2021, global bond markets - still under the spell of heavy central bank buying - appear to be pricing in a very different scenario ahead.</p>\n<p>Even after this week’s June readout of the highest annual gain in U.S. core consumer prices in 30 years - an inflation rate of some 4.5% excluding food and energy prices - the yield on the Treasury’s 10-year inflation-protected bond skidded back below -1.0% for the first time in five months.</p>\n<p>Aside from that brief moment in February, these rates have never been lower - at least not in the history of these securities. And all equivalent rates in the G4 major economies are also below zero, with Germany and Britain even lower than those in the United States.</p>\n<p>Investors pore over everything from ‘peak inflation’ to ‘peak growth’ and even ‘peak stimulus’ for clues as to why bond yields continue to defy forecasts and why they have taken the surge in inflation and government debt levels in their stride.</p>\n<p>U.S. government debt will top 125% of gross domestic product this year and next - its highest since World War Two - and up almost 20 percentage points since before the pandemic. Debt/GDP in G4 economies overall has risen by a similar amount to 125%.</p>\n<p>While many put the seeming nonchalance down to persistent central bank intervention or technical quirks, some also point out to the risk of a weakening ‘fiscal impulse’ over the next two years that mathematically drags on growth rates.</p>\n<p>Manulife Investment Management economist Frances Donald thinks this should be seen as a “fiscal cliff” and the drop in U.S. spending - viewed as a share of resulting falling budget deficit - marks the steepest such cliff since the 1940s.</p>\n<p><b>HIGH PRESSURE</b></p>\n<p>However, G7 leaders pledged last month not to make the mistakes of the last crisis by reducing government spending too soon and reverting to fiscal austerity too early.</p>\n<p>The White House and congressional Democrats at least seem intent on keeping that “high pressure economy” until all sections of society take part. Leading Democrats this week agreed to table another $3.5 trillion investment plan on top of the proposed $600 billion of infrastructure spending already in the pipeline.</p>\n<p>And yet the bond market barely flickered at the prospect.</p>\n<p>Is this just the Federal Reserve’s hand? Is Fed buying really so dominant and can it remain so for years?</p>\n<p>Fed chief Jerome Powell was this week pointedly reluctant to give Congress any hard timeline for a reduction in bond buying and continued to characterize inflation spikes as mostly temporary base effects and bottlenecks from pandemic lockdowns.</p>\n<p>But if the Fed is right about inflation over time and the pursuit of a high pressure economy is now G7 consensus due to equality and climate priorities, history shows bond yields could be down here for a long time to come yet.</p>\n<p>Morgan Stanley economists published a study this week looking at 100 years of data on how countries managed debt blowouts - defined as periods when debt/GDP ratios jumped 20 percentage points in five years.</p>\n<p>They concluded that countries which managed to rein in those debt levels over the subsequent decade had kept looser monetary and fiscal policies longer than those who failed to stop their debt rising. Low debt servicing costs - absent an inflation problem - and growth were shown to be the best ways to keep debts sustainable.</p>\n<p>Studying all outcomes, they reckoned the most successful strategy was to keep real interest rates two percentage points below real GDP growth rates for 10 years and ‘grow out’ of the debt rather than slashing spending. Fiscal consolidation, by contrast, had played a lesser role in the reversal of public debt build-ups over the century, it said.</p>\n<p>On that basis the investment bank saw U.S. real rates held between -0.5% and +0.5% for the next decade - about 2 points below their expected real GDP growth rate.</p>\n<p>While flatlining, that’s still higher than today’s rate - although it assumes some modest Fed tightening at some point.</p>\n<p>And of course, the lower the growth rate, the lower the real rate needs to be to rein in debt loads. Morgan Stanley said that if adverse demographics and productivity depressed real GDP growth more than it thought then real rates as low as today’s may have to be sustained to stop debts rising.</p>\n<p>But it also said most episodes of successful debt reduction had generally been accompanied by only moderate but sustained inflation - a median of 2.9% for those successful in cutting debts. Contrary to popular perceptions, hyperinflation ensued only in a very small number of episodes.</p>\n<p>“Our analysis shows that the real rate environment has been key in determining the path of public debt substantially more so than actual fiscal spending.”</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>'Boring '20s'? - a decade of zero real rates :Mike Dolan</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n'Boring '20s'? - a decade of zero real rates :Mike Dolan\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-07-16 13:23</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>(The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.)</p>\n<p>LONDON, July 16 (Reuters) - The U.S. government can once again borrow at a deeply negative ‘real’ rate of minus 1.0% for 10 years - and some economists insist there’s a powerful historical case for expecting that rate to stay near zero or below for the rest of the decade.</p>\n<p>It’s been fashionable in markets of late to think of another “Roaring ‘20s” emerging over the next decade. Pandemic-driven megatrends, fractious politics, gigantic government debt piles and the return of inflation could all conspire to electrify or unnerve markets over the years ahead - or so the story goes.</p>\n<p>But after a restive first quarter of 2021, global bond markets - still under the spell of heavy central bank buying - appear to be pricing in a very different scenario ahead.</p>\n<p>Even after this week’s June readout of the highest annual gain in U.S. core consumer prices in 30 years - an inflation rate of some 4.5% excluding food and energy prices - the yield on the Treasury’s 10-year inflation-protected bond skidded back below -1.0% for the first time in five months.</p>\n<p>Aside from that brief moment in February, these rates have never been lower - at least not in the history of these securities. And all equivalent rates in the G4 major economies are also below zero, with Germany and Britain even lower than those in the United States.</p>\n<p>Investors pore over everything from ‘peak inflation’ to ‘peak growth’ and even ‘peak stimulus’ for clues as to why bond yields continue to defy forecasts and why they have taken the surge in inflation and government debt levels in their stride.</p>\n<p>U.S. government debt will top 125% of gross domestic product this year and next - its highest since World War Two - and up almost 20 percentage points since before the pandemic. Debt/GDP in G4 economies overall has risen by a similar amount to 125%.</p>\n<p>While many put the seeming nonchalance down to persistent central bank intervention or technical quirks, some also point out to the risk of a weakening ‘fiscal impulse’ over the next two years that mathematically drags on growth rates.</p>\n<p>Manulife Investment Management economist Frances Donald thinks this should be seen as a “fiscal cliff” and the drop in U.S. spending - viewed as a share of resulting falling budget deficit - marks the steepest such cliff since the 1940s.</p>\n<p><b>HIGH PRESSURE</b></p>\n<p>However, G7 leaders pledged last month not to make the mistakes of the last crisis by reducing government spending too soon and reverting to fiscal austerity too early.</p>\n<p>The White House and congressional Democrats at least seem intent on keeping that “high pressure economy” until all sections of society take part. Leading Democrats this week agreed to table another $3.5 trillion investment plan on top of the proposed $600 billion of infrastructure spending already in the pipeline.</p>\n<p>And yet the bond market barely flickered at the prospect.</p>\n<p>Is this just the Federal Reserve’s hand? Is Fed buying really so dominant and can it remain so for years?</p>\n<p>Fed chief Jerome Powell was this week pointedly reluctant to give Congress any hard timeline for a reduction in bond buying and continued to characterize inflation spikes as mostly temporary base effects and bottlenecks from pandemic lockdowns.</p>\n<p>But if the Fed is right about inflation over time and the pursuit of a high pressure economy is now G7 consensus due to equality and climate priorities, history shows bond yields could be down here for a long time to come yet.</p>\n<p>Morgan Stanley economists published a study this week looking at 100 years of data on how countries managed debt blowouts - defined as periods when debt/GDP ratios jumped 20 percentage points in five years.</p>\n<p>They concluded that countries which managed to rein in those debt levels over the subsequent decade had kept looser monetary and fiscal policies longer than those who failed to stop their debt rising. Low debt servicing costs - absent an inflation problem - and growth were shown to be the best ways to keep debts sustainable.</p>\n<p>Studying all outcomes, they reckoned the most successful strategy was to keep real interest rates two percentage points below real GDP growth rates for 10 years and ‘grow out’ of the debt rather than slashing spending. Fiscal consolidation, by contrast, had played a lesser role in the reversal of public debt build-ups over the century, it said.</p>\n<p>On that basis the investment bank saw U.S. real rates held between -0.5% and +0.5% for the next decade - about 2 points below their expected real GDP growth rate.</p>\n<p>While flatlining, that’s still higher than today’s rate - although it assumes some modest Fed tightening at some point.</p>\n<p>And of course, the lower the growth rate, the lower the real rate needs to be to rein in debt loads. Morgan Stanley said that if adverse demographics and productivity depressed real GDP growth more than it thought then real rates as low as today’s may have to be sustained to stop debts rising.</p>\n<p>But it also said most episodes of successful debt reduction had generally been accompanied by only moderate but sustained inflation - a median of 2.9% for those successful in cutting debts. Contrary to popular perceptions, hyperinflation ensued only in a very small number of episodes.</p>\n<p>“Our analysis shows that the real rate environment has been key in determining the path of public debt substantially more so than actual fiscal spending.”</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","SPY":"标普500ETF",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1124361019","content_text":"(The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.)\nLONDON, July 16 (Reuters) - The U.S. government can once again borrow at a deeply negative ‘real’ rate of minus 1.0% for 10 years - and some economists insist there’s a powerful historical case for expecting that rate to stay near zero or below for the rest of the decade.\nIt’s been fashionable in markets of late to think of another “Roaring ‘20s” emerging over the next decade. Pandemic-driven megatrends, fractious politics, gigantic government debt piles and the return of inflation could all conspire to electrify or unnerve markets over the years ahead - or so the story goes.\nBut after a restive first quarter of 2021, global bond markets - still under the spell of heavy central bank buying - appear to be pricing in a very different scenario ahead.\nEven after this week’s June readout of the highest annual gain in U.S. core consumer prices in 30 years - an inflation rate of some 4.5% excluding food and energy prices - the yield on the Treasury’s 10-year inflation-protected bond skidded back below -1.0% for the first time in five months.\nAside from that brief moment in February, these rates have never been lower - at least not in the history of these securities. And all equivalent rates in the G4 major economies are also below zero, with Germany and Britain even lower than those in the United States.\nInvestors pore over everything from ‘peak inflation’ to ‘peak growth’ and even ‘peak stimulus’ for clues as to why bond yields continue to defy forecasts and why they have taken the surge in inflation and government debt levels in their stride.\nU.S. government debt will top 125% of gross domestic product this year and next - its highest since World War Two - and up almost 20 percentage points since before the pandemic. Debt/GDP in G4 economies overall has risen by a similar amount to 125%.\nWhile many put the seeming nonchalance down to persistent central bank intervention or technical quirks, some also point out to the risk of a weakening ‘fiscal impulse’ over the next two years that mathematically drags on growth rates.\nManulife Investment Management economist Frances Donald thinks this should be seen as a “fiscal cliff” and the drop in U.S. spending - viewed as a share of resulting falling budget deficit - marks the steepest such cliff since the 1940s.\nHIGH PRESSURE\nHowever, G7 leaders pledged last month not to make the mistakes of the last crisis by reducing government spending too soon and reverting to fiscal austerity too early.\nThe White House and congressional Democrats at least seem intent on keeping that “high pressure economy” until all sections of society take part. Leading Democrats this week agreed to table another $3.5 trillion investment plan on top of the proposed $600 billion of infrastructure spending already in the pipeline.\nAnd yet the bond market barely flickered at the prospect.\nIs this just the Federal Reserve’s hand? Is Fed buying really so dominant and can it remain so for years?\nFed chief Jerome Powell was this week pointedly reluctant to give Congress any hard timeline for a reduction in bond buying and continued to characterize inflation spikes as mostly temporary base effects and bottlenecks from pandemic lockdowns.\nBut if the Fed is right about inflation over time and the pursuit of a high pressure economy is now G7 consensus due to equality and climate priorities, history shows bond yields could be down here for a long time to come yet.\nMorgan Stanley economists published a study this week looking at 100 years of data on how countries managed debt blowouts - defined as periods when debt/GDP ratios jumped 20 percentage points in five years.\nThey concluded that countries which managed to rein in those debt levels over the subsequent decade had kept looser monetary and fiscal policies longer than those who failed to stop their debt rising. Low debt servicing costs - absent an inflation problem - and growth were shown to be the best ways to keep debts sustainable.\nStudying all outcomes, they reckoned the most successful strategy was to keep real interest rates two percentage points below real GDP growth rates for 10 years and ‘grow out’ of the debt rather than slashing spending. Fiscal consolidation, by contrast, had played a lesser role in the reversal of public debt build-ups over the century, it said.\nOn that basis the investment bank saw U.S. real rates held between -0.5% and +0.5% for the next decade - about 2 points below their expected real GDP growth rate.\nWhile flatlining, that’s still higher than today’s rate - although it assumes some modest Fed tightening at some point.\nAnd of course, the lower the growth rate, the lower the real rate needs to be to rein in debt loads. Morgan Stanley said that if adverse demographics and productivity depressed real GDP growth more than it thought then real rates as low as today’s may have to be sustained to stop debts rising.\nBut it also said most episodes of successful debt reduction had generally been accompanied by only moderate but sustained inflation - a median of 2.9% for those successful in cutting debts. Contrary to popular perceptions, hyperinflation ensued only in a very small number of episodes.\n“Our analysis shows that the real rate environment has been key in determining the path of public debt substantially more so than actual fiscal spending.”","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":170,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":170156545,"gmtCreate":1626414819987,"gmtModify":1633926944079,"author":{"id":"4089440680592730","authorId":"4089440680592730","name":"Bluefaerie","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3a14cce34aa8b490facc68d4c62d3704","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4089440680592730","authorIdStr":"4089440680592730"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nice","listText":"Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/170156545","repostId":"1124361019","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1124361019","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1626413039,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1124361019?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-16 13:23","market":"us","language":"en","title":"'Boring '20s'? - a decade of zero real rates :Mike Dolan","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1124361019","media":"Reuters","summary":"(The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.)\nLONDON, July 16 (Reu","content":"<p>(The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.)</p>\n<p>LONDON, July 16 (Reuters) - The U.S. government can once again borrow at a deeply negative ‘real’ rate of minus 1.0% for 10 years - and some economists insist there’s a powerful historical case for expecting that rate to stay near zero or below for the rest of the decade.</p>\n<p>It’s been fashionable in markets of late to think of another “Roaring ‘20s” emerging over the next decade. Pandemic-driven megatrends, fractious politics, gigantic government debt piles and the return of inflation could all conspire to electrify or unnerve markets over the years ahead - or so the story goes.</p>\n<p>But after a restive first quarter of 2021, global bond markets - still under the spell of heavy central bank buying - appear to be pricing in a very different scenario ahead.</p>\n<p>Even after this week’s June readout of the highest annual gain in U.S. core consumer prices in 30 years - an inflation rate of some 4.5% excluding food and energy prices - the yield on the Treasury’s 10-year inflation-protected bond skidded back below -1.0% for the first time in five months.</p>\n<p>Aside from that brief moment in February, these rates have never been lower - at least not in the history of these securities. And all equivalent rates in the G4 major economies are also below zero, with Germany and Britain even lower than those in the United States.</p>\n<p>Investors pore over everything from ‘peak inflation’ to ‘peak growth’ and even ‘peak stimulus’ for clues as to why bond yields continue to defy forecasts and why they have taken the surge in inflation and government debt levels in their stride.</p>\n<p>U.S. government debt will top 125% of gross domestic product this year and next - its highest since World War Two - and up almost 20 percentage points since before the pandemic. Debt/GDP in G4 economies overall has risen by a similar amount to 125%.</p>\n<p>While many put the seeming nonchalance down to persistent central bank intervention or technical quirks, some also point out to the risk of a weakening ‘fiscal impulse’ over the next two years that mathematically drags on growth rates.</p>\n<p>Manulife Investment Management economist Frances Donald thinks this should be seen as a “fiscal cliff” and the drop in U.S. spending - viewed as a share of resulting falling budget deficit - marks the steepest such cliff since the 1940s.</p>\n<p><b>HIGH PRESSURE</b></p>\n<p>However, G7 leaders pledged last month not to make the mistakes of the last crisis by reducing government spending too soon and reverting to fiscal austerity too early.</p>\n<p>The White House and congressional Democrats at least seem intent on keeping that “high pressure economy” until all sections of society take part. Leading Democrats this week agreed to table another $3.5 trillion investment plan on top of the proposed $600 billion of infrastructure spending already in the pipeline.</p>\n<p>And yet the bond market barely flickered at the prospect.</p>\n<p>Is this just the Federal Reserve’s hand? Is Fed buying really so dominant and can it remain so for years?</p>\n<p>Fed chief Jerome Powell was this week pointedly reluctant to give Congress any hard timeline for a reduction in bond buying and continued to characterize inflation spikes as mostly temporary base effects and bottlenecks from pandemic lockdowns.</p>\n<p>But if the Fed is right about inflation over time and the pursuit of a high pressure economy is now G7 consensus due to equality and climate priorities, history shows bond yields could be down here for a long time to come yet.</p>\n<p>Morgan Stanley economists published a study this week looking at 100 years of data on how countries managed debt blowouts - defined as periods when debt/GDP ratios jumped 20 percentage points in five years.</p>\n<p>They concluded that countries which managed to rein in those debt levels over the subsequent decade had kept looser monetary and fiscal policies longer than those who failed to stop their debt rising. Low debt servicing costs - absent an inflation problem - and growth were shown to be the best ways to keep debts sustainable.</p>\n<p>Studying all outcomes, they reckoned the most successful strategy was to keep real interest rates two percentage points below real GDP growth rates for 10 years and ‘grow out’ of the debt rather than slashing spending. Fiscal consolidation, by contrast, had played a lesser role in the reversal of public debt build-ups over the century, it said.</p>\n<p>On that basis the investment bank saw U.S. real rates held between -0.5% and +0.5% for the next decade - about 2 points below their expected real GDP growth rate.</p>\n<p>While flatlining, that’s still higher than today’s rate - although it assumes some modest Fed tightening at some point.</p>\n<p>And of course, the lower the growth rate, the lower the real rate needs to be to rein in debt loads. Morgan Stanley said that if adverse demographics and productivity depressed real GDP growth more than it thought then real rates as low as today’s may have to be sustained to stop debts rising.</p>\n<p>But it also said most episodes of successful debt reduction had generally been accompanied by only moderate but sustained inflation - a median of 2.9% for those successful in cutting debts. Contrary to popular perceptions, hyperinflation ensued only in a very small number of episodes.</p>\n<p>“Our analysis shows that the real rate environment has been key in determining the path of public debt substantially more so than actual fiscal spending.”</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>'Boring '20s'? - a decade of zero real rates :Mike Dolan</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n'Boring '20s'? - a decade of zero real rates :Mike Dolan\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-07-16 13:23</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>(The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.)</p>\n<p>LONDON, July 16 (Reuters) - The U.S. government can once again borrow at a deeply negative ‘real’ rate of minus 1.0% for 10 years - and some economists insist there’s a powerful historical case for expecting that rate to stay near zero or below for the rest of the decade.</p>\n<p>It’s been fashionable in markets of late to think of another “Roaring ‘20s” emerging over the next decade. Pandemic-driven megatrends, fractious politics, gigantic government debt piles and the return of inflation could all conspire to electrify or unnerve markets over the years ahead - or so the story goes.</p>\n<p>But after a restive first quarter of 2021, global bond markets - still under the spell of heavy central bank buying - appear to be pricing in a very different scenario ahead.</p>\n<p>Even after this week’s June readout of the highest annual gain in U.S. core consumer prices in 30 years - an inflation rate of some 4.5% excluding food and energy prices - the yield on the Treasury’s 10-year inflation-protected bond skidded back below -1.0% for the first time in five months.</p>\n<p>Aside from that brief moment in February, these rates have never been lower - at least not in the history of these securities. And all equivalent rates in the G4 major economies are also below zero, with Germany and Britain even lower than those in the United States.</p>\n<p>Investors pore over everything from ‘peak inflation’ to ‘peak growth’ and even ‘peak stimulus’ for clues as to why bond yields continue to defy forecasts and why they have taken the surge in inflation and government debt levels in their stride.</p>\n<p>U.S. government debt will top 125% of gross domestic product this year and next - its highest since World War Two - and up almost 20 percentage points since before the pandemic. Debt/GDP in G4 economies overall has risen by a similar amount to 125%.</p>\n<p>While many put the seeming nonchalance down to persistent central bank intervention or technical quirks, some also point out to the risk of a weakening ‘fiscal impulse’ over the next two years that mathematically drags on growth rates.</p>\n<p>Manulife Investment Management economist Frances Donald thinks this should be seen as a “fiscal cliff” and the drop in U.S. spending - viewed as a share of resulting falling budget deficit - marks the steepest such cliff since the 1940s.</p>\n<p><b>HIGH PRESSURE</b></p>\n<p>However, G7 leaders pledged last month not to make the mistakes of the last crisis by reducing government spending too soon and reverting to fiscal austerity too early.</p>\n<p>The White House and congressional Democrats at least seem intent on keeping that “high pressure economy” until all sections of society take part. Leading Democrats this week agreed to table another $3.5 trillion investment plan on top of the proposed $600 billion of infrastructure spending already in the pipeline.</p>\n<p>And yet the bond market barely flickered at the prospect.</p>\n<p>Is this just the Federal Reserve’s hand? Is Fed buying really so dominant and can it remain so for years?</p>\n<p>Fed chief Jerome Powell was this week pointedly reluctant to give Congress any hard timeline for a reduction in bond buying and continued to characterize inflation spikes as mostly temporary base effects and bottlenecks from pandemic lockdowns.</p>\n<p>But if the Fed is right about inflation over time and the pursuit of a high pressure economy is now G7 consensus due to equality and climate priorities, history shows bond yields could be down here for a long time to come yet.</p>\n<p>Morgan Stanley economists published a study this week looking at 100 years of data on how countries managed debt blowouts - defined as periods when debt/GDP ratios jumped 20 percentage points in five years.</p>\n<p>They concluded that countries which managed to rein in those debt levels over the subsequent decade had kept looser monetary and fiscal policies longer than those who failed to stop their debt rising. Low debt servicing costs - absent an inflation problem - and growth were shown to be the best ways to keep debts sustainable.</p>\n<p>Studying all outcomes, they reckoned the most successful strategy was to keep real interest rates two percentage points below real GDP growth rates for 10 years and ‘grow out’ of the debt rather than slashing spending. Fiscal consolidation, by contrast, had played a lesser role in the reversal of public debt build-ups over the century, it said.</p>\n<p>On that basis the investment bank saw U.S. real rates held between -0.5% and +0.5% for the next decade - about 2 points below their expected real GDP growth rate.</p>\n<p>While flatlining, that’s still higher than today’s rate - although it assumes some modest Fed tightening at some point.</p>\n<p>And of course, the lower the growth rate, the lower the real rate needs to be to rein in debt loads. Morgan Stanley said that if adverse demographics and productivity depressed real GDP growth more than it thought then real rates as low as today’s may have to be sustained to stop debts rising.</p>\n<p>But it also said most episodes of successful debt reduction had generally been accompanied by only moderate but sustained inflation - a median of 2.9% for those successful in cutting debts. Contrary to popular perceptions, hyperinflation ensued only in a very small number of episodes.</p>\n<p>“Our analysis shows that the real rate environment has been key in determining the path of public debt substantially more so than actual fiscal spending.”</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","SPY":"标普500ETF",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1124361019","content_text":"(The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.)\nLONDON, July 16 (Reuters) - The U.S. government can once again borrow at a deeply negative ‘real’ rate of minus 1.0% for 10 years - and some economists insist there’s a powerful historical case for expecting that rate to stay near zero or below for the rest of the decade.\nIt’s been fashionable in markets of late to think of another “Roaring ‘20s” emerging over the next decade. Pandemic-driven megatrends, fractious politics, gigantic government debt piles and the return of inflation could all conspire to electrify or unnerve markets over the years ahead - or so the story goes.\nBut after a restive first quarter of 2021, global bond markets - still under the spell of heavy central bank buying - appear to be pricing in a very different scenario ahead.\nEven after this week’s June readout of the highest annual gain in U.S. core consumer prices in 30 years - an inflation rate of some 4.5% excluding food and energy prices - the yield on the Treasury’s 10-year inflation-protected bond skidded back below -1.0% for the first time in five months.\nAside from that brief moment in February, these rates have never been lower - at least not in the history of these securities. And all equivalent rates in the G4 major economies are also below zero, with Germany and Britain even lower than those in the United States.\nInvestors pore over everything from ‘peak inflation’ to ‘peak growth’ and even ‘peak stimulus’ for clues as to why bond yields continue to defy forecasts and why they have taken the surge in inflation and government debt levels in their stride.\nU.S. government debt will top 125% of gross domestic product this year and next - its highest since World War Two - and up almost 20 percentage points since before the pandemic. Debt/GDP in G4 economies overall has risen by a similar amount to 125%.\nWhile many put the seeming nonchalance down to persistent central bank intervention or technical quirks, some also point out to the risk of a weakening ‘fiscal impulse’ over the next two years that mathematically drags on growth rates.\nManulife Investment Management economist Frances Donald thinks this should be seen as a “fiscal cliff” and the drop in U.S. spending - viewed as a share of resulting falling budget deficit - marks the steepest such cliff since the 1940s.\nHIGH PRESSURE\nHowever, G7 leaders pledged last month not to make the mistakes of the last crisis by reducing government spending too soon and reverting to fiscal austerity too early.\nThe White House and congressional Democrats at least seem intent on keeping that “high pressure economy” until all sections of society take part. Leading Democrats this week agreed to table another $3.5 trillion investment plan on top of the proposed $600 billion of infrastructure spending already in the pipeline.\nAnd yet the bond market barely flickered at the prospect.\nIs this just the Federal Reserve’s hand? Is Fed buying really so dominant and can it remain so for years?\nFed chief Jerome Powell was this week pointedly reluctant to give Congress any hard timeline for a reduction in bond buying and continued to characterize inflation spikes as mostly temporary base effects and bottlenecks from pandemic lockdowns.\nBut if the Fed is right about inflation over time and the pursuit of a high pressure economy is now G7 consensus due to equality and climate priorities, history shows bond yields could be down here for a long time to come yet.\nMorgan Stanley economists published a study this week looking at 100 years of data on how countries managed debt blowouts - defined as periods when debt/GDP ratios jumped 20 percentage points in five years.\nThey concluded that countries which managed to rein in those debt levels over the subsequent decade had kept looser monetary and fiscal policies longer than those who failed to stop their debt rising. Low debt servicing costs - absent an inflation problem - and growth were shown to be the best ways to keep debts sustainable.\nStudying all outcomes, they reckoned the most successful strategy was to keep real interest rates two percentage points below real GDP growth rates for 10 years and ‘grow out’ of the debt rather than slashing spending. Fiscal consolidation, by contrast, had played a lesser role in the reversal of public debt build-ups over the century, it said.\nOn that basis the investment bank saw U.S. real rates held between -0.5% and +0.5% for the next decade - about 2 points below their expected real GDP growth rate.\nWhile flatlining, that’s still higher than today’s rate - although it assumes some modest Fed tightening at some point.\nAnd of course, the lower the growth rate, the lower the real rate needs to be to rein in debt loads. Morgan Stanley said that if adverse demographics and productivity depressed real GDP growth more than it thought then real rates as low as today’s may have to be sustained to stop debts rising.\nBut it also said most episodes of successful debt reduction had generally been accompanied by only moderate but sustained inflation - a median of 2.9% for those successful in cutting debts. Contrary to popular perceptions, hyperinflation ensued only in a very small number of episodes.\n“Our analysis shows that the real rate environment has been key in determining the path of public debt substantially more so than actual fiscal spending.”","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":180,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":179442466,"gmtCreate":1626573901755,"gmtModify":1633925791273,"author":{"id":"4089440680592730","authorId":"4089440680592730","name":"Bluefaerie","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3a14cce34aa8b490facc68d4c62d3704","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4089440680592730","authorIdStr":"4089440680592730"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Woww","listText":"Woww","text":"Woww","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/179442466","repostId":"1123523681","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":249,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":880889944,"gmtCreate":1631031200488,"gmtModify":1631884988642,"author":{"id":"4089440680592730","authorId":"4089440680592730","name":"Bluefaerie","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3a14cce34aa8b490facc68d4c62d3704","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4089440680592730","authorIdStr":"4089440680592730"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVAX\">$Novavax(NVAX)$</a>🤩","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVAX\">$Novavax(NVAX)$</a>🤩","text":"$Novavax(NVAX)$🤩","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1c13baa1ab8e4c26ab3f602d69624511","width":"1170","height":"2026"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/880889944","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":113,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":801436491,"gmtCreate":1627527025513,"gmtModify":1633764097299,"author":{"id":"4089440680592730","authorId":"4089440680592730","name":"Bluefaerie","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3a14cce34aa8b490facc68d4c62d3704","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4089440680592730","authorIdStr":"4089440680592730"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","listText":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","text":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/801436491","repostId":"801495474","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":801495474,"gmtCreate":1627526557198,"gmtModify":1627526557198,"author":{"id":"3521339628608760","authorId":"3521339628608760","name":"趋势队长","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a126f572eafb02336cabf7f7a75e6712","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3521339628608760","authorIdStr":"3521339628608760"},"themes":[],"title":"周三Moc大资金卖出排行榜，beke,vips,tal,nok,luv上榜","htmlText":"美股的很多基金（包括共同基金、对冲基金、养老金等）只能在尾盘以收盘价进行交易，英文叫Market-On-Close Stock Order Imbalances，简称moc，这些交易基本都是在尾盘15分钟内进行交易。<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BEKE\">$贝壳(BEKE)$</a>&nbsp;<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/VIPS\">$唯品会(VIPS)$</a>&nbsp;<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TAL\">$好未来(TAL)$</a>&nbsp;<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NOK\">$诺基亚(NOK)$</a>&nbsp;<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LUV\">$西南航空(LUV)$</a>&nbsp;每日股票机会更新、实时买卖通知和实仓分享，请订阅<a href=\"https://www.laohu8.com/m/space?userId=3521339628608760\" target=\"_blank\">我的空间站</a>","listText":"美股的很多基金（包括共同基金、对冲基金、养老金等）只能在尾盘以收盘价进行交易，英文叫Market-On-Close Stock Order Imbalances，简称moc，这些交易基本都是在尾盘15分钟内进行交易。<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BEKE\">$贝壳(BEKE)$</a>&nbsp;<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/VIPS\">$唯品会(VIPS)$</a>&nbsp;<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TAL\">$好未来(TAL)$</a>&nbsp;<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NOK\">$诺基亚(NOK)$</a>&nbsp;<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LUV\">$西南航空(LUV)$</a>&nbsp;每日股票机会更新、实时买卖通知和实仓分享，请订阅<a href=\"https://www.laohu8.com/m/space?userId=3521339628608760\" target=\"_blank\">我的空间站</a>","text":"美股的很多基金（包括共同基金、对冲基金、养老金等）只能在尾盘以收盘价进行交易，英文叫Market-On-Close Stock Order Imbalances，简称moc，这些交易基本都是在尾盘15分钟内进行交易。$贝壳(BEKE)$ $唯品会(VIPS)$ $好未来(TAL)$ $诺基亚(NOK)$ $西南航空(LUV)$ 每日股票机会更新、实时买卖通知和实仓分享，请订阅我的空间站","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/29f3e19f2c9c51ae1fd6ffee92f834a4","width":"688","height":"273"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":2,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/801495474","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":2,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":211,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":801436361,"gmtCreate":1627527014053,"gmtModify":1633764097664,"author":{"id":"4089440680592730","authorId":"4089440680592730","name":"Bluefaerie","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3a14cce34aa8b490facc68d4c62d3704","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4089440680592730","authorIdStr":"4089440680592730"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nice","listText":"Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/801436361","repostId":"801494120","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":801494120,"gmtCreate":1627526591556,"gmtModify":1627526591556,"author":{"id":"3527667586584720","authorId":"3527667586584720","name":"小虎综合资讯","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3527667586584720","authorIdStr":"3527667586584720"},"themes":[],"title":"【异动】港股科技股短线拉升，京东、网易涨超11%","htmlText":"7月29日，港股科技股短线拉升，京东、网易涨超11%，腾讯控股涨超7%，阿里巴巴涨超5%。","listText":"7月29日，港股科技股短线拉升，京东、网易涨超11%，腾讯控股涨超7%，阿里巴巴涨超5%。","text":"7月29日，港股科技股短线拉升，京东、网易涨超11%，腾讯控股涨超7%，阿里巴巴涨超5%。","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/117faf34f66b8007ef46d320d8928345","width":"-1","height":"-1"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":2,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/801494120","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":240,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":801438598,"gmtCreate":1627526992014,"gmtModify":1633764098109,"author":{"id":"4089440680592730","authorId":"4089440680592730","name":"Bluefaerie","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3a14cce34aa8b490facc68d4c62d3704","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4089440680592730","authorIdStr":"4089440680592730"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"&nbsp;Nice","listText":"&nbsp;Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/801438598","repostId":"801494120","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":801494120,"gmtCreate":1627526591556,"gmtModify":1627526591556,"author":{"id":"3527667586584720","authorId":"3527667586584720","name":"小虎综合资讯","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3527667586584720","authorIdStr":"3527667586584720"},"themes":[],"title":"【异动】港股科技股短线拉升，京东、网易涨超11%","htmlText":"7月29日，港股科技股短线拉升，京东、网易涨超11%，腾讯控股涨超7%，阿里巴巴涨超5%。","listText":"7月29日，港股科技股短线拉升，京东、网易涨超11%，腾讯控股涨超7%，阿里巴巴涨超5%。","text":"7月29日，港股科技股短线拉升，京东、网易涨超11%，腾讯控股涨超7%，阿里巴巴涨超5%。","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/117faf34f66b8007ef46d320d8928345","width":"-1","height":"-1"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":2,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/801494120","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":271,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":179197522,"gmtCreate":1626491429566,"gmtModify":1633926275674,"author":{"id":"4089440680592730","authorId":"4089440680592730","name":"Bluefaerie","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3a14cce34aa8b490facc68d4c62d3704","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4089440680592730","authorIdStr":"4089440680592730"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Up up up","listText":"Up up up","text":"Up up up","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/179197522","repostId":"2152168594","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2152168594","pubTimestamp":1626488760,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2152168594?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-17 10:26","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Stock: Next Stop, $175?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2152168594","media":"TipRanks","summary":"So, Apple  is having a bad year, you say?With shares hitting an all-time high this week and the gap in performance narrowing over the past month, that conversation can now be put to rest.The uptick has coincided with reports Apple has boosted the production rate of its iPhones, instructing manufacturers to build 90 million iPhones this year, a 20% increase on the 75 million units it produced last year.The renewed optimism in all things Apple is not surprising to J.P. Morgan’s Samik Chatterjee. T","content":"<div>\n<p>So, Apple (AAPL) is having a bad year, you say? Not long ago, the talk on Wall Street was all about the tech giant’s uncharacteristically underperforming stock, especially when compared to some of the...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-stock-next-stop-175-135700668.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"yahoofinance","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Stock: Next Stop, $175?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Stock: Next Stop, $175?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-17 10:26 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-stock-next-stop-175-135700668.html><strong>TipRanks</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>So, Apple (AAPL) is having a bad year, you say? Not long ago, the talk on Wall Street was all about the tech giant’s uncharacteristically underperforming stock, especially when compared to some of the...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-stock-next-stop-175-135700668.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"09086":"华夏纳指-U","AAPL":"苹果","03086":"华夏纳指"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-stock-next-stop-175-135700668.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5f26f4a48f9cb3e29be4d71d3ba8c038","article_id":"2152168594","content_text":"So, Apple (AAPL) is having a bad year, you say? Not long ago, the talk on Wall Street was all about the tech giant’s uncharacteristically underperforming stock, especially when compared to some of the other mega-caps’ displays in 2021.\nWith shares hitting an all-time high this week and the gap in performance narrowing over the past month, that conversation can now be put to rest.\nThe uptick has coincided with reports Apple has boosted the production rate of its iPhones, instructing manufacturers to build 90 million iPhones this year, a 20% increase on the 75 million units it produced last year.\nThe renewed optimism in all things Apple is not surprising to J.P. Morgan’s Samik Chatterjee. The analyst recently told investors Apple is well set up to outperform in 2H21. In fact, the growing confidence means Chatterjee has added Apple to the firm’s Analyst Focus List as “a Growth idea.”\n“The recent momentum led by better market share, drives us to also estimate higher sustainable volumes in future quarters, leading us to see a path to Apple outperforming investor expectations over a longer time horizon rather than just the upcoming earnings print,” the 5-star analyst said, confirming Apple is also a Top Pick.\nTo reflect the increase in build rates, Chatterjee has “modestly” increased iPhone volume expectations, but of more importance to the analyst is the “path to upside” for the shares in the medium-term.\nThis is because of the potential for better iPhone 12 sales but also due to what Chatterjee considers are low expectations from the iPhone 13’s fall launch, which could create “another leg to the upside opportunity.”\nIt’s a potent mix which is given additional allure with the launch of the iPhone SE3 next year and means Apple can “not only pleasantly surprise with a more robust iPhone 13 cycle, but also has the opportunity to drive material upside to consensus expectations for FY22.”\nTo this end, Chatterjee rates Apple shares an Overweight (i.e. Buy), while slightly lifting the price target from $170 to $175. The revised figure implying shares will add 19.5% from current levels.\nSo, that’s J.P. Morgan’s view, what does the rest of the Street have in mind for Apple? Based on 20 Buys, 5 Holds and 2 Sells, the stock currently has a Moderate Buy consensus rating. The forecast is for shares to appreciate by 8% over the coming months, given the average price target clocks in at $158.62.\nTo find good ideas for tech stocks trading at attractive valuations, visit TipRanks’ Best Stocks to Buy, a newly launched tool that unites all of TipRanks’ equity insights.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":234,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":170140289,"gmtCreate":1626415184641,"gmtModify":1633926940765,"author":{"id":"4089440680592730","authorId":"4089440680592730","name":"Bluefaerie","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3a14cce34aa8b490facc68d4c62d3704","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4089440680592730","authorIdStr":"4089440680592730"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Keep everyone well informed","listText":"Keep everyone well informed","text":"Keep everyone well informed","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/170140289","repostId":"2151573133","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2151573133","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1626379249,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2151573133?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-16 04:00","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Nasdaq ends lower as investors sell Big Tech","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2151573133","media":"Reuters","summary":"July 15  - The Nasdaq ended lower on Thursday, pulled down by Apple, Amazon and other Big Tech companies as a fall in weekly jobless claims data fed investor concerns about a recent inflation spike.Amazon, Apple, Tesla and $Facebook$all fell. Nvidia tumbled around 4%.The S&P 500 technology sector index ended a four-day winning streak. Earlier this week, investors' favor for heavyweight growth stocks pushed the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq to record highs.The S&P 500 energy sector index fell more than ","content":"<ul>\n <li>U.S. weekly jobless claims fall to 16-month low</li>\n <li>Tech sector ends four-day winning streak</li>\n</ul>\n<p>July 15 (Reuters) - The Nasdaq ended lower on Thursday, pulled down by Apple, Amazon and other Big Tech companies as a fall in weekly jobless claims data fed investor concerns about a recent inflation spike.</p>\n<p>Amazon, Apple,&nbsp;Tesla and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FB\">Facebook</a>all fell. Nvidia&nbsp;tumbled around 4%.</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 500 technology sector index ended a four-day winning streak. Earlier this week, investors' favor for heavyweight growth stocks pushed the S&amp;P 500 and the Nasdaq to record highs.</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 500 energy sector index fell more than 1% and tracked a drop in crude prices on expectations of more supply after a compromise agreement between leading OPEC producers.</p>\n<p>Fresh data showed the number of Americans filing new claims for unemployment benefits fell last week to a 16-month low, while worker shortages and bottlenecks in the supply chain have frustrated efforts by businesses to ramp up production to meet strong demand for goods and services.</p>\n<p>Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell told lawmakers he anticipated the shortages and high inflation would abate. Yet many investors still worry that more sustained inflation could lead to a sooner-than-expected tightening of monetary policy.</p>\n<p>\"People are very nervous and concerned about inflation, tax rates and the (2022 midterm) election. Those three things are very much on people's minds,\" said 6 Meridian Chief Investment Officer Andrew Mies, describing recent phone calls with his firm's clients.</p>\n<p>Unofficially, the Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 54.52 points, or 0.16%, to 34,987.75, the S&amp;P 500 lost 14.29 points, or 0.33%, to 4,360.01 and the Nasdaq Composite&nbsp;dropped 101.82 points, or 0.7%, to 14,543.13.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSTLW\">Morgan Stanley</a> dipped as much as 1.2% after it beat expectations for quarterly profit, getting a boost from record investment banking activity even as the trading bonanza that supported results in recent quarters slowed down.</p>\n<p>Second-quarter reporting season kicked off this week, with the four largest U.S. lenders - Wells Fargo &amp; Co , $Bank of America Corp(BAC-N)$ , $Citigroup Inc(C-N)$ and JPMorgan Chase &amp; Co - posting a combined $33 billion in profits, but also highlighting the industry's sensitivity to low interest rates.</p>\n<p>Blackstone said late on Wednesday it would pay $2.2 billion for 9.9% stake in American International Group's life and retirement business. AIG and Blackstone both rallied.</p>\n<p>Johnson &amp; Johnson dipped after it voluntarily recalled five aerosol sunscreen products in the United States after detecting a cancer-causing chemical in some samples.</p>\n<p>(Reporting by Noel Randewich; Additional reporting by Devik Jain and Shreyashi Sanyal in Bengaluru; Editing by Maju Samuel)</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Nasdaq ends lower as investors sell Big Tech</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nNasdaq ends lower as investors sell Big Tech\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-07-16 04:00</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<ul>\n <li>U.S. weekly jobless claims fall to 16-month low</li>\n <li>Tech sector ends four-day winning streak</li>\n</ul>\n<p>July 15 (Reuters) - The Nasdaq ended lower on Thursday, pulled down by Apple, Amazon and other Big Tech companies as a fall in weekly jobless claims data fed investor concerns about a recent inflation spike.</p>\n<p>Amazon, Apple,&nbsp;Tesla and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FB\">Facebook</a>all fell. Nvidia&nbsp;tumbled around 4%.</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 500 technology sector index ended a four-day winning streak. Earlier this week, investors' favor for heavyweight growth stocks pushed the S&amp;P 500 and the Nasdaq to record highs.</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 500 energy sector index fell more than 1% and tracked a drop in crude prices on expectations of more supply after a compromise agreement between leading OPEC producers.</p>\n<p>Fresh data showed the number of Americans filing new claims for unemployment benefits fell last week to a 16-month low, while worker shortages and bottlenecks in the supply chain have frustrated efforts by businesses to ramp up production to meet strong demand for goods and services.</p>\n<p>Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell told lawmakers he anticipated the shortages and high inflation would abate. Yet many investors still worry that more sustained inflation could lead to a sooner-than-expected tightening of monetary policy.</p>\n<p>\"People are very nervous and concerned about inflation, tax rates and the (2022 midterm) election. Those three things are very much on people's minds,\" said 6 Meridian Chief Investment Officer Andrew Mies, describing recent phone calls with his firm's clients.</p>\n<p>Unofficially, the Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 54.52 points, or 0.16%, to 34,987.75, the S&amp;P 500 lost 14.29 points, or 0.33%, to 4,360.01 and the Nasdaq Composite&nbsp;dropped 101.82 points, or 0.7%, to 14,543.13.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSTLW\">Morgan Stanley</a> dipped as much as 1.2% after it beat expectations for quarterly profit, getting a boost from record investment banking activity even as the trading bonanza that supported results in recent quarters slowed down.</p>\n<p>Second-quarter reporting season kicked off this week, with the four largest U.S. lenders - Wells Fargo &amp; Co , $Bank of America Corp(BAC-N)$ , $Citigroup Inc(C-N)$ and JPMorgan Chase &amp; Co - posting a combined $33 billion in profits, but also highlighting the industry's sensitivity to low interest rates.</p>\n<p>Blackstone said late on Wednesday it would pay $2.2 billion for 9.9% stake in American International Group's life and retirement business. AIG and Blackstone both rallied.</p>\n<p>Johnson &amp; Johnson dipped after it voluntarily recalled five aerosol sunscreen products in the United States after detecting a cancer-causing chemical in some samples.</p>\n<p>(Reporting by Noel Randewich; Additional reporting by Devik Jain and Shreyashi Sanyal in Bengaluru; Editing by Maju Samuel)</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"161125":"标普500","513500":"标普500ETF","BX":"黑石","AAPL":"苹果","WFC":"富国银行","SPXU":"三倍做空标普500ETF","SQQQ":"纳指三倍做空ETF","QLD":"纳指两倍做多ETF","DXD":"道指两倍做空ETF","PSQ":"纳指反向ETF","TSLA":"特斯拉","SDOW":"道指三倍做空ETF-ProShares","03086":"华夏纳指","09086":"华夏纳指-U","DDM":"道指两倍做多ETF","BAC":"美国银行","SDS":"两倍做空标普500ETF","NVDA":"英伟达","JPM":"摩根大通","TQQQ":"纳指三倍做多ETF","C":"花旗",".DJI":"道琼斯","AMZN":"亚马逊","QQQ":"纳指100ETF","AIG":"美国国际集团","JNJ":"强生",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","MS":"摩根士丹利","DOG":"道指反向ETF",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","OEX":"标普100","UDOW":"道指三倍做多ETF-ProShares","UPRO":"三倍做多标普500ETF","QNETCN":"纳斯达克中美互联网老虎指数","QID":"纳指两倍做空ETF","SH":"标普500反向ETF","OEF":"标普100指数ETF-iShares","IVV":"标普500指数ETF","SSO":"两倍做多标普500ETF","DJX":"1/100道琼斯"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2151573133","content_text":"U.S. weekly jobless claims fall to 16-month low\nTech sector ends four-day winning streak\n\nJuly 15 (Reuters) - The Nasdaq ended lower on Thursday, pulled down by Apple, Amazon and other Big Tech companies as a fall in weekly jobless claims data fed investor concerns about a recent inflation spike.\nAmazon, Apple, Tesla and Facebookall fell. Nvidia tumbled around 4%.\nThe S&P 500 technology sector index ended a four-day winning streak. Earlier this week, investors' favor for heavyweight growth stocks pushed the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq to record highs.\nThe S&P 500 energy sector index fell more than 1% and tracked a drop in crude prices on expectations of more supply after a compromise agreement between leading OPEC producers.\nFresh data showed the number of Americans filing new claims for unemployment benefits fell last week to a 16-month low, while worker shortages and bottlenecks in the supply chain have frustrated efforts by businesses to ramp up production to meet strong demand for goods and services.\nFederal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell told lawmakers he anticipated the shortages and high inflation would abate. Yet many investors still worry that more sustained inflation could lead to a sooner-than-expected tightening of monetary policy.\n\"People are very nervous and concerned about inflation, tax rates and the (2022 midterm) election. Those three things are very much on people's minds,\" said 6 Meridian Chief Investment Officer Andrew Mies, describing recent phone calls with his firm's clients.\nUnofficially, the Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 54.52 points, or 0.16%, to 34,987.75, the S&P 500 lost 14.29 points, or 0.33%, to 4,360.01 and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 101.82 points, or 0.7%, to 14,543.13.\nMorgan Stanley dipped as much as 1.2% after it beat expectations for quarterly profit, getting a boost from record investment banking activity even as the trading bonanza that supported results in recent quarters slowed down.\nSecond-quarter reporting season kicked off this week, with the four largest U.S. lenders - Wells Fargo & Co , $Bank of America Corp(BAC-N)$ , $Citigroup Inc(C-N)$ and JPMorgan Chase & Co - posting a combined $33 billion in profits, but also highlighting the industry's sensitivity to low interest rates.\nBlackstone said late on Wednesday it would pay $2.2 billion for 9.9% stake in American International Group's life and retirement business. AIG and Blackstone both rallied.\nJohnson & Johnson dipped after it voluntarily recalled five aerosol sunscreen products in the United States after detecting a cancer-causing chemical in some samples.\n(Reporting by Noel Randewich; Additional reporting by Devik Jain and Shreyashi Sanyal in Bengaluru; Editing by Maju Samuel)","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":349,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}