+关注
CandiceTee
暂无个人介绍
IP属地:未知
8
关注
2
粉丝
0
主题
0
勋章
主贴
热门
CandiceTee
2021-11-30
$Exela Technologies, Inc.(XELA)$
有谁比我惨?给点推力[流泪] [流泪] [流泪]
CandiceTee
2021-08-03
nahbehhhhhhh[无语] [无语] [无语] [无语]
抱歉,原内容已删除
CandiceTee
2021-08-03
zzz[微笑]
抱歉,原内容已删除
去老虎APP查看更多动态
{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"userPageInfo":{"id":3580272056307583,"uuid":"3580272056307583","gmtCreate":1617182414800,"gmtModify":1619618709577,"name":"CandiceTee","pinyin":"candicetee","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/14ceedb2995dd31e0f3560f50a33ea72","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":2,"headSize":8,"tweetSize":5,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":1,"name":"萌萌虎","nameTw":"萌萌虎","represent":"呱呱坠地","factor":"评论帖子3次或发布1条主帖(非转发)","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":null,"userBadges":[{"badgeId":"228c86a078844d74991fff2b7ab2428d-3","templateUuid":"228c86a078844d74991fff2b7ab2428d","name":"投资合伙人虎","description":"证券账户累计交易金额达到100万美元","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fbeac6bb240db7da8b972e5183d050ba","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/436cdf80292b99f0a992e78750ac4e3a","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/506a259a7b456f037592c3b23c779599","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.07.14","exceedPercentage":"93.82%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101},{"badgeId":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561-1","templateUuid":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561","name":"出道虎友","description":"加入老虎社区500天","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0e4d0ca1da0456dc7894c946d44bf9ab","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0f2f65e8ce4cfaae8db2bea9b127f58b","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5948a31b6edf154422335b265235809","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.08.16","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969-2","templateUuid":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969","name":"宗师交易员","description":"证券或期货账户累计交易次数达到100次","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad22cfbe2d05aa393b18e9226e4b0307","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/36702e6ff3ffe46acafee66cc85273ca","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d52eb88fa385cf5abe2616ed63781765","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.28","exceedPercentage":"80.75%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37-1","templateUuid":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37","name":"博闻投资者","description":"累计交易超过10只正股","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a-1","templateUuid":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a","name":"实盘交易者","description":"完成一笔实盘交易","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":5,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":"未知","starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"post","tweets":[{"id":609018041,"gmtCreate":1638215847857,"gmtModify":1638215848027,"author":{"id":"3580272056307583","authorId":"3580272056307583","name":"CandiceTee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/14ceedb2995dd31e0f3560f50a33ea72","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/XELA\">$Exela Technologies, Inc.(XELA)$</a>有谁比我惨?给点推力[流泪] [流泪] [流泪] ","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/XELA\">$Exela Technologies, Inc.(XELA)$</a>有谁比我惨?给点推力[流泪] [流泪] [流泪] ","text":"$Exela Technologies, Inc.(XELA)$有谁比我惨?给点推力[流泪] [流泪] [流泪]","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b3b5ef51fc4d12a1c4b3291721dbe47e","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":16,"commentSize":5,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/609018041","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1908,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":804149091,"gmtCreate":1627947440713,"gmtModify":1633755093785,"author":{"id":"3580272056307583","authorId":"3580272056307583","name":"CandiceTee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/14ceedb2995dd31e0f3560f50a33ea72","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"nahbehhhhhhh[无语] [无语] [无语] [无语] ","listText":"nahbehhhhhhh[无语] [无语] [无语] [无语] ","text":"nahbehhhhhhh[无语] [无语] [无语] [无语]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/804149091","repostId":"2156117308","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":336,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":804152360,"gmtCreate":1627947251050,"gmtModify":1633755098727,"author":{"id":"3580272056307583","authorId":"3580272056307583","name":"CandiceTee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/14ceedb2995dd31e0f3560f50a33ea72","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"zzz[微笑] ","listText":"zzz[微笑] ","text":"zzz[微笑]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/804152360","repostId":"1190890686","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":417,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":609018041,"gmtCreate":1638215847857,"gmtModify":1638215848027,"author":{"id":"3580272056307583","authorId":"3580272056307583","name":"CandiceTee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/14ceedb2995dd31e0f3560f50a33ea72","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/XELA\">$Exela Technologies, Inc.(XELA)$</a>有谁比我惨?给点推力[流泪] [流泪] [流泪] ","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/XELA\">$Exela Technologies, Inc.(XELA)$</a>有谁比我惨?给点推力[流泪] [流泪] [流泪] ","text":"$Exela Technologies, Inc.(XELA)$有谁比我惨?给点推力[流泪] [流泪] [流泪]","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b3b5ef51fc4d12a1c4b3291721dbe47e","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":16,"commentSize":5,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/609018041","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1908,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":804149091,"gmtCreate":1627947440713,"gmtModify":1633755093785,"author":{"id":"3580272056307583","authorId":"3580272056307583","name":"CandiceTee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/14ceedb2995dd31e0f3560f50a33ea72","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"nahbehhhhhhh[无语] [无语] [无语] [无语] ","listText":"nahbehhhhhhh[无语] [无语] [无语] [无语] ","text":"nahbehhhhhhh[无语] [无语] [无语] [无语]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/804149091","repostId":"2156117308","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2156117308","pubTimestamp":1627943866,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2156117308?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-03 06:37","market":"us","language":"en","title":"EV Maker Li Auto Seeks $1.9 Billion in Hong Kong Listing","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2156117308","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"Chinese company is selling 100 million shares in listing\nLi Auto follows rival XPeng in selling shar","content":"<ul>\n <li>Chinese company is selling 100 million shares in listing</li>\n <li>Li Auto follows rival XPeng in selling shares in Hong Kong</li>\n</ul>\n<p>Electric vehicle maker Li Auto Inc. is looking to raise as much as HK$15 billion ($1.9 billion) in its Hong Kong listing.The Beijing-based firm is offering 100 million shares for as much as HK$150 each, according to a statement.</p>\n<p>The offering is being split into 10 million shares for Hong Kong retailers and the rest for international investors, whose shares could be priced higher, Li Auto said in the statement.</p>\n<p>Li Auto is following in the footsteps of larger rival XPeng Inc., which raised $1.8 billion in a dual primary listing in the city in June. U.S.-traded Chinese companies are pivoting to so-called homecoming listings in Hong Kong as a way to hedge against the risk of being delisted from American exchanges as well as broadening their investor base.</p>\n<p>Li Auto shares are down 2.9% since the beginning of July, giving the company a market value of about $30 billion. The shares fell about 2.5% in late trading Monday. XPeng is currently trading little changed from its offer price in Hong Kong.</p>\n<p>Like XPeng, Li Auto’s listing will be dual primary. The EV firms aren’t eligible for the waiver that some greater China-based companies use to seek a secondary listing, as they don’t have a track record of at least two years’ trading on another exchange.</p>\n<p>Li Auto raised $1.3 billion in its U.S. initial public offering a year ago. Its shares have risen 193% from its offer price as part of a global rally in EV stocks.</p>\n<p>The carmaker is still loss-making, recording a net loss of $54.9 million in the first three months of this year on revenues of $546 million, its prospectus shows.</p>\n<p>It plans to set the final price for the listing Aug. 6 and trading is slated to begin Aug. 12, according to a filing to Hong Kong stock exchange.</p>\n<p>Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and China International Capital Corp. are joint sponsors for Li Auto’s Hong Kong listing, while UBS Group AG is the financial adviser.</p>","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>EV Maker Li Auto Seeks $1.9 Billion in Hong Kong Listing</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nEV Maker Li Auto Seeks $1.9 Billion in Hong Kong Listing\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-08-03 06:37 GMT+8 <a href=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-08-02/ev-maker-li-auto-seeks-1-9-billion-in-hong-kong-listing><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Chinese company is selling 100 million shares in listing\nLi Auto follows rival XPeng in selling shares in Hong Kong\n\nElectric vehicle maker Li Auto Inc. is looking to raise as much as HK$15 billion ($...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-08-02/ev-maker-li-auto-seeks-1-9-billion-in-hong-kong-listing\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"LI":"理想汽车","XPEV":"小鹏汽车"},"source_url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-08-02/ev-maker-li-auto-seeks-1-9-billion-in-hong-kong-listing","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2156117308","content_text":"Chinese company is selling 100 million shares in listing\nLi Auto follows rival XPeng in selling shares in Hong Kong\n\nElectric vehicle maker Li Auto Inc. is looking to raise as much as HK$15 billion ($1.9 billion) in its Hong Kong listing.The Beijing-based firm is offering 100 million shares for as much as HK$150 each, according to a statement.\nThe offering is being split into 10 million shares for Hong Kong retailers and the rest for international investors, whose shares could be priced higher, Li Auto said in the statement.\nLi Auto is following in the footsteps of larger rival XPeng Inc., which raised $1.8 billion in a dual primary listing in the city in June. U.S.-traded Chinese companies are pivoting to so-called homecoming listings in Hong Kong as a way to hedge against the risk of being delisted from American exchanges as well as broadening their investor base.\nLi Auto shares are down 2.9% since the beginning of July, giving the company a market value of about $30 billion. The shares fell about 2.5% in late trading Monday. XPeng is currently trading little changed from its offer price in Hong Kong.\nLike XPeng, Li Auto’s listing will be dual primary. The EV firms aren’t eligible for the waiver that some greater China-based companies use to seek a secondary listing, as they don’t have a track record of at least two years’ trading on another exchange.\nLi Auto raised $1.3 billion in its U.S. initial public offering a year ago. Its shares have risen 193% from its offer price as part of a global rally in EV stocks.\nThe carmaker is still loss-making, recording a net loss of $54.9 million in the first three months of this year on revenues of $546 million, its prospectus shows.\nIt plans to set the final price for the listing Aug. 6 and trading is slated to begin Aug. 12, according to a filing to Hong Kong stock exchange.\nGoldman Sachs Group Inc. and China International Capital Corp. are joint sponsors for Li Auto’s Hong Kong listing, while UBS Group AG is the financial adviser.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":336,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":804152360,"gmtCreate":1627947251050,"gmtModify":1633755098727,"author":{"id":"3580272056307583","authorId":"3580272056307583","name":"CandiceTee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/14ceedb2995dd31e0f3560f50a33ea72","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"zzz[微笑] ","listText":"zzz[微笑] ","text":"zzz[微笑]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/804152360","repostId":"1190890686","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1190890686","pubTimestamp":1627910755,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1190890686?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-02 21:25","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Big Apple Takes Bite Out of Food Delivery","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1190890686","media":"The Wall Street Journal","summary":"New bills passed in New York City could curb some appeal of companies like Grubhub, DoorDash and Uber Eats.The New York City Council has long had a bone to pick with food delivery platform Grubhub.During the pandemic, that animus seems to extend to reach the sector more broadly as market share has leveled. Home to about 10% of the U.S. market, and a possible harbinger of local measures elsewhere, the city’s attitude matters a great deal.The conflict heated up last week. On Thursday, the council ","content":"<blockquote>\n New bills passed in New York City could curb some appeal of companies like Grubhub, DoorDash and Uber Eats.\n</blockquote>\n<p>The New York City Council has long had a bone to pick with food delivery platform Grubhub.During the pandemic, that animus seems to extend to reach the sector more broadly as market share has leveled. Home to about 10% of the U.S. market, and a possible harbinger of local measures elsewhere, the city’s attitude matters a great deal.</p>\n<p>The conflict heated up last week. On Thursday, the council said it passed five bills meant to shift some of the balance of power away from food delivery platforms toward “struggling mom and pop shops.” The bills include some straightforward legislation like providing a restaurants’ direct telephone number to eaters and prohibiting platforms from charging restaurants for phone orders that don’t result in transactions.</p>\n<p>But they also include more controversial and likely more consequential rules. One, if put into effect as anticipated, wouldextend temporary capsplaced on the commissions food-delivery platforms can charge restaurants at least until mid-February, 2022. Beyond what was decided last week, the city council says it is also scheduled to review a permanent commission cap bill this month.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b0376f43b736ee504664bb031aae5fdd\" tg-width=\"742\" tg-height=\"510\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">Long-term caps sound ominous for food delivery companies, but the true extent of their effects isn’t fully known. U.S. market leaderDoorDash,DASH-2.12%for example, has reported profits on the basis of adjusted earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization for the last four quarters—pretty much the entirety of the pandemic.</p>\n<p>At the same time, the company said in an April blog post that commission caps have caused a “tangible impact” to its business in terms of lessening demand as prices paid by customers have risen to recoup lost dollars.</p>\n<p>Food delivery companies don’t typically break out their economics by city, but a spokesperson for Uber Eats did say it had lost more than $60 million in New York City alone due to pandemic-related commission caps. For food delivery companies, consumers’ price sensitivity is likely to increase post-pandemic as they gain access to in-person dining andrely less on delivery.</p>\n<p>There are also other threats. The council also voted to require delivery services to share monthly eater information with restaurants if restaurants request it. While it remains unclear as to exactly what data this rule will cover, a summary of the bill suggests it could include eaters’ names, phone numbers, email addresses, home addresses and what is ordered.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/10e85c5617a7edb8cfa051b68e6b7240\" tg-width=\"727\" tg-height=\"508\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">That would arm restaurants with information they could use to determine where their orders are coming from, helping them to assess delivery platforms’ individual worth. It could also significantly lower switching costs between platforms and help enable restaurants to better access customers themselves.</p>\n<p>While a lot has been said of commission caps in food delivery, deciding who has access to eaters’ data is no less controversial. Food-delivery platforms have argued such a law would put eaters’ personal information at risk, noting consumers should be able to opt-in to data sharing rather than opt-out. Others have described third-party delivery as a “gatekeeper” of data with one source likening platforms to a “diner cartel” that is finally being busted.</p>\n<p>New York’s move is of particular importance to Grubhub since the city is its largest U.S. market. As of June, Bloomberg Second Measure data show Grubhub and DoorDash were tied with the market share lead in New York City with 35% a piece to Uber Eats’ 29%. Elsewhere, temporary caps have been put into place across many cities and suburbs nationwide. In June, San Francisco became the first city in the U.S. to pass a permanent fee cap.</p>\n<p>New York looms large for food delivery. If you can’t make it there, can you make it anywhere?</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Big Apple Takes Bite Out of Food Delivery</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBig Apple Takes Bite Out of Food Delivery\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-08-02 21:25 GMT+8 <a href=https://www.wsj.com/articles/big-apple-takes-bite-out-of-food-delivery-11627910300?mod=rss_markets_main><strong>The Wall Street Journal</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>New bills passed in New York City could curb some appeal of companies like Grubhub, DoorDash and Uber Eats.\n\nThe New York City Council has long had a bone to pick with food delivery platform Grubhub....</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.wsj.com/articles/big-apple-takes-bite-out-of-food-delivery-11627910300?mod=rss_markets_main\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.wsj.com/articles/big-apple-takes-bite-out-of-food-delivery-11627910300?mod=rss_markets_main","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1190890686","content_text":"New bills passed in New York City could curb some appeal of companies like Grubhub, DoorDash and Uber Eats.\n\nThe New York City Council has long had a bone to pick with food delivery platform Grubhub.During the pandemic, that animus seems to extend to reach the sector more broadly as market share has leveled. Home to about 10% of the U.S. market, and a possible harbinger of local measures elsewhere, the city’s attitude matters a great deal.\nThe conflict heated up last week. On Thursday, the council said it passed five bills meant to shift some of the balance of power away from food delivery platforms toward “struggling mom and pop shops.” The bills include some straightforward legislation like providing a restaurants’ direct telephone number to eaters and prohibiting platforms from charging restaurants for phone orders that don’t result in transactions.\nBut they also include more controversial and likely more consequential rules. One, if put into effect as anticipated, wouldextend temporary capsplaced on the commissions food-delivery platforms can charge restaurants at least until mid-February, 2022. Beyond what was decided last week, the city council says it is also scheduled to review a permanent commission cap bill this month.\nLong-term caps sound ominous for food delivery companies, but the true extent of their effects isn’t fully known. U.S. market leaderDoorDash,DASH-2.12%for example, has reported profits on the basis of adjusted earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization for the last four quarters—pretty much the entirety of the pandemic.\nAt the same time, the company said in an April blog post that commission caps have caused a “tangible impact” to its business in terms of lessening demand as prices paid by customers have risen to recoup lost dollars.\nFood delivery companies don’t typically break out their economics by city, but a spokesperson for Uber Eats did say it had lost more than $60 million in New York City alone due to pandemic-related commission caps. For food delivery companies, consumers’ price sensitivity is likely to increase post-pandemic as they gain access to in-person dining andrely less on delivery.\nThere are also other threats. The council also voted to require delivery services to share monthly eater information with restaurants if restaurants request it. While it remains unclear as to exactly what data this rule will cover, a summary of the bill suggests it could include eaters’ names, phone numbers, email addresses, home addresses and what is ordered.\nThat would arm restaurants with information they could use to determine where their orders are coming from, helping them to assess delivery platforms’ individual worth. It could also significantly lower switching costs between platforms and help enable restaurants to better access customers themselves.\nWhile a lot has been said of commission caps in food delivery, deciding who has access to eaters’ data is no less controversial. Food-delivery platforms have argued such a law would put eaters’ personal information at risk, noting consumers should be able to opt-in to data sharing rather than opt-out. Others have described third-party delivery as a “gatekeeper” of data with one source likening platforms to a “diner cartel” that is finally being busted.\nNew York’s move is of particular importance to Grubhub since the city is its largest U.S. market. As of June, Bloomberg Second Measure data show Grubhub and DoorDash were tied with the market share lead in New York City with 35% a piece to Uber Eats’ 29%. Elsewhere, temporary caps have been put into place across many cities and suburbs nationwide. In June, San Francisco became the first city in the U.S. to pass a permanent fee cap.\nNew York looms large for food delivery. If you can’t make it there, can you make it anywhere?","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":417,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}