+关注
T1213121
暂无个人介绍
IP属地：未知
159
关注
3
粉丝
0
主题
0
勋章
主贴
热门
T1213121
2021-06-14
Alibaba
抱歉，原内容已删除
T1213121
2021-02-06
“China’s Starbucks”
抱歉，原内容已删除
T1213121
2021-02-05
Nice
These S&P 500 stocks have had the biggest increases in ‘buy’ ratings so far this year
T1213121
2021-02-04
Xpeng
抱歉，原内容已删除
T1213121
2021-02-04
BABA
Ant and Chinese Banks Are Reining In Joint Loans to Consumers
去老虎APP查看更多动态
{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"3574854488928895","uuid":"3574854488928895","gmtCreate":1611761023221,"gmtModify":1611761023221,"name":"T1213121","pinyin":"t1213121","introduction":"","introductionEn":null,"signature":"","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":3,"headSize":159,"tweetSize":5,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":0,"name":"","nameTw":"","represent":"","factor":"","iconColor":"","bgColor":""},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":null,"userBadges":[{"badgeId":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561-1","templateUuid":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561","name":"出道虎友","description":"加入老虎社区500天","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0e4d0ca1da0456dc7894c946d44bf9ab","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0f2f65e8ce4cfaae8db2bea9b127f58b","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5948a31b6edf154422335b265235809","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.06.16","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37-1","templateUuid":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37","name":"博闻投资者","description":"累计交易超过10只正股","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a-1","templateUuid":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a","name":"实盘交易者","description":"完成一笔实盘交易","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969-1","templateUuid":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969","name":"精英交易员","description":"证券或期货账户累计交易次数达到30次","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ab0f87127c854ce3191a752d57b46edc","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c9835ce48b8c8743566d344ac7a7ba8c","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76754b53ce7a90019f132c1d2fbc698f","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":"60.91%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":4,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":"未知","starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"post","tweets":[{"id":185388539,"gmtCreate":1623633480021,"gmtModify":1631887318104,"author":{"id":"3574854488928895","authorId":"3574854488928895","name":"T1213121","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574854488928895","authorIdStr":"3574854488928895"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Alibaba","listText":"Alibaba","text":"Alibaba","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/185388539","repostId":"2143857817","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":376,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":380450289,"gmtCreate":1612577833241,"gmtModify":1703763792631,"author":{"id":"3574854488928895","authorId":"3574854488928895","name":"T1213121","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574854488928895","authorIdStr":"3574854488928895"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"“China’s Starbucks”","listText":"“China’s Starbucks”","text":"“China’s Starbucks”","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/380450289","repostId":"2109722637","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":137,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":317717349,"gmtCreate":1612485636681,"gmtModify":1703762508557,"author":{"id":"3574854488928895","authorId":"3574854488928895","name":"T1213121","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574854488928895","authorIdStr":"3574854488928895"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nice","listText":"Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/317717349","repostId":"1140015602","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1140015602","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1612406760,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1140015602?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-02-04 10:46","market":"us","language":"en","title":"These S&P 500 stocks have had the biggest increases in ‘buy’ ratings so far this year","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1140015602","media":"marketwatch","summary":"Traders in the stock market can take advantage of special situations to exploit sentiment and moment","content":"<p>Traders in the stock market can take advantage of special situations to exploit sentiment and momentum and make quick profits — if they are quick enough or lucky enough. But over the long haul, investors have profited by holding shares of companies that increase sales, earnings and cash flow. And the resulting increases in analysts’ ratings can help lift stock prices.</p>\n<p>Below is a list of stocks among the S&P 500SPX,+0.10%that have had the biggest increases in “buy” or equivalent ratings this year among analysts polled by FactSet. An upgrade may mean a stock has fallen enough so that an analyst believes it has become a compelling value. Or it may mean that something has changed for the better in the company’s business or industry. Or it could be a combination these and other factors.</p>\n<p>A focus on the positive side of the ratings action makes sense. Analysts working for brokerage firms — those that provide recommendations to investor clients — are separated from the firms’ business groups that generate fees by providing various services to some of the same companies the analysts cover. But there is still a far greater tendency for these so-called sell-side analysts to assign “buy” or equivalent “overweight” ratings than “sell” or equivalent “underweight” ratings.</p>\n<p>Among the S&P 500, 270 companies have majority “buy” or equivalent ratings among analysts polled by FactSet, but only two (American Airlines Group Inc.AAL,+6.09%and Lumen Technologies Inc.LUMN,+2.44%) have majority “sell” or equivalent ratings.</p>\n<p>An increase in the number of “buy” ratings doesn’t necessarily mean all the new “buys” resulted from upgrades. The number of analysts covering any one company often changes. An analyst might initiate coverage with a “buy” rating. Brokerage firms often add or drop coverage of companies or even entire industries because of staff changes or reallocation of resources.</p>\n<p>Biggest increases in ‘buy’ ratings</p>\n<p>Here’s a list of 22 companies among the S&P 500 that now have at least three more “buy” ratings than they did at the end of 2020:</p>\n<table>\n <thead>\n <tr>\n <th>COMPANY</th>\n <th>TICKER</th>\n <th>CHANGE IN NUMBER OF BUY RATINGS</th>\n <th>BUY RATINGS - NOW</th>\n <th>BUY RATINGS - DEC. 31</th>\n <th>% BUY RATINGS</th>\n <th>TOTAL RATINGS - NOW</th>\n <th>TOTAL RATINGS - DEC. 31</th>\n <th>CHANGE IN TOTAL RATINGS</th>\n </tr>\n </thead>\n <tbody>\n <tr>\n <td>CONOCOPHILLIPS</td>\n <td>COP</td>\n <td>5</td>\n <td>27</td>\n <td>22</td>\n <td>96%</td>\n <td>28</td>\n <td>24</td>\n <td>4</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>Chevron Corp.</td>\n <td>CVX</td>\n <td>5</td>\n <td>19</td>\n <td>14</td>\n <td>68%</td>\n <td>28</td>\n <td>25</td>\n <td>3</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>Intel Corp.</td>\n <td>INTC</td>\n <td>5</td>\n <td>15</td>\n <td>10</td>\n <td>38%</td>\n <td>40</td>\n <td>38</td>\n <td>2</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>PayPal Holdings Inc.</td>\n <td>PYPL</td>\n <td>4</td>\n <td>39</td>\n <td>35</td>\n <td>81%</td>\n <td>48</td>\n <td>45</td>\n <td>3</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>WestRock Co.</td>\n <td>WRK</td>\n <td>4</td>\n <td>12</td>\n <td>8</td>\n <td>71%</td>\n <td>17</td>\n <td>13</td>\n <td>4</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>Wells Fargo & Co.</td>\n <td>WFC</td>\n <td>4</td>\n <td>17</td>\n <td>13</td>\n <td>63%</td>\n <td>27</td>\n <td>27</td>\n <td>0</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>CenterPoint Energy Inc.</td>\n <td>CNP</td>\n <td>4</td>\n <td>11</td>\n <td>7</td>\n <td>61%</td>\n <td>18</td>\n <td>17</td>\n <td>1</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>Pioneer Natural Resources Co.</td>\n <td>PXD</td>\n <td>3</td>\n <td>32</td>\n <td>29</td>\n <td>94%</td>\n <td>34</td>\n <td>31</td>\n <td>3</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>Activision Blizzard Inc.</td>\n <td>ATVI</td>\n <td>3</td>\n <td>28</td>\n <td>25</td>\n <td>82%</td>\n <td>34</td>\n <td>31</td>\n <td>3</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.</td>\n <td>REGN</td>\n <td>3</td>\n <td>18</td>\n <td>15</td>\n <td>67%</td>\n <td>27</td>\n <td>26</td>\n <td>1</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>Dominion Energy Inc.</td>\n <td>D</td>\n <td>3</td>\n <td>11</td>\n <td>8</td>\n <td>65%</td>\n <td>17</td>\n <td>17</td>\n <td>0</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>PPG Industries Inc.</td>\n <td>PPG</td>\n <td>3</td>\n <td>17</td>\n <td>14</td>\n <td>63%</td>\n <td>27</td>\n <td>27</td>\n <td>0</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>Electronic Arts Inc.</td>\n <td>EA</td>\n <td>3</td>\n <td>20</td>\n <td>17</td>\n <td>63%</td>\n <td>32</td>\n <td>28</td>\n <td>4</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>NOV Inc.</td>\n <td>NOV</td>\n <td>3</td>\n <td>14</td>\n <td>11</td>\n <td>58%</td>\n <td>24</td>\n <td>25</td>\n <td>-1</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>Corning Inc</td>\n <td>GLW</td>\n <td>3</td>\n <td>8</td>\n <td>5</td>\n <td>57%</td>\n <td>14</td>\n <td>13</td>\n <td>1</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc.</td>\n <td>CMG</td>\n <td>3</td>\n <td>19</td>\n <td>16</td>\n <td>54%</td>\n <td>35</td>\n <td>33</td>\n <td>2</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>Emerson Electric Co.</td>\n <td>EMR</td>\n <td>3</td>\n <td>13</td>\n <td>10</td>\n <td>54%</td>\n <td>24</td>\n <td>25</td>\n <td>-1</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>Expedia Group Inc.</td>\n <td>EXPE</td>\n <td>3</td>\n <td>14</td>\n <td>11</td>\n <td>45%</td>\n <td>31</td>\n <td>32</td>\n <td>-1</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>Marathon Oil Corp.</td>\n <td>MRO</td>\n <td>3</td>\n <td>13</td>\n <td>10</td>\n <td>45%</td>\n <td>29</td>\n <td>30</td>\n <td>-1</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>Exxon Mobil Corp.</td>\n <td>XOM</td>\n <td>3</td>\n <td>10</td>\n <td>7</td>\n <td>36%</td>\n <td>28</td>\n <td>26</td>\n <td>2</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>Equity Residential</td>\n <td>EQR</td>\n <td>3</td>\n <td>6</td>\n <td>3</td>\n <td>27%</td>\n <td>22</td>\n <td>21</td>\n <td>1</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>Illinois Tool Works Inc.</td>\n <td>ITW</td>\n <td>3</td>\n <td>5</td>\n <td>2</td>\n <td>23%</td>\n <td>22</td>\n <td>22</td>\n <td>0</td>\n </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p>FactSet</p>\n<p>The table is sorted in two ways — first by the increase in the number of “buy” ratings, but then by the current percentage of “buy” ratings. You will need to scroll the table to see all the data.</p>\n<p>So ConocoPhillipsCOP,+5.47%tops the list because it has five more “buy” ratings than it did on Dec. 31 and because 96% of analysts polled by FactSet currently rate the shares a “buy.”</p>\n<p>The second company on the list, Chevron Corp.CVX,+2.18%,has also had its number of “buy” ratings increase by five, but 68% of the analysts rate the stock a “buy.”</p>\n<p>Third on the list is Intel Corp.INTC,-0.55%,also with five additional “buy” ratings but with only 38% of analysts having a positive rating on the shares.</p>\n<p>Highest percentage ‘buy’ ratings</p>\n<p>Here’s a list of 21 S&P 500 companies with the highest percentage of “buy” ratings among analysts polled by FactSet:</p>\n<table>\n <thead>\n <tr>\n <th>COMPANY</th>\n <th>TICKER</th>\n <th>% BUY RATINGS</th>\n <th>CHANGE IN NUMBER OF BUY RATINGS</th>\n <th>BUY RATINGS - NOW</th>\n <th>BUY RATINGS - DEC. 31</th>\n <th>TOTAL RATINGS - NOW</th>\n <th>TOTAL RATINGS - DEC. 31</th>\n </tr>\n </thead>\n <tbody>\n <tr>\n <td>ASSURANT INC.</td>\n <td>AIZ</td>\n <td>100%</td>\n <td>0</td>\n <td>5</td>\n <td>5</td>\n <td>5</td>\n <td>5</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>Teledyne Technologies Inc.</td>\n <td>TDY</td>\n <td>100%</td>\n <td>0</td>\n <td>5</td>\n <td>5</td>\n <td>5</td>\n <td>6</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>ConocoPhillips</td>\n <td>COP</td>\n <td>96%</td>\n <td>5</td>\n <td>27</td>\n <td>22</td>\n <td>28</td>\n <td>24</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>Amazon.com Inc.</td>\n <td>AMZN</td>\n <td>96%</td>\n <td>0</td>\n <td>46</td>\n <td>46</td>\n <td>48</td>\n <td>49</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>Phillips 66</td>\n <td>PSX</td>\n <td>95%</td>\n <td>1</td>\n <td>21</td>\n <td>20</td>\n <td>22</td>\n <td>20</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>Pioneer Natural Resources Co.</td>\n <td>PXD</td>\n <td>94%</td>\n <td>3</td>\n <td>32</td>\n <td>29</td>\n <td>34</td>\n <td>31</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>Alexandria Real Estate Equities Inc.</td>\n <td>ARE</td>\n <td>92%</td>\n <td>1</td>\n <td>11</td>\n <td>10</td>\n <td>12</td>\n <td>12</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>Teleflex Inc.</td>\n <td>TFX</td>\n <td>92%</td>\n <td>0</td>\n <td>11</td>\n <td>11</td>\n <td>12</td>\n <td>12</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>Diamondback Energy Inc.</td>\n <td>FANG</td>\n <td>91%</td>\n <td>2</td>\n <td>30</td>\n <td>28</td>\n <td>33</td>\n <td>31</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>Alphabet Inc. Class A</td>\n <td>GOOGL</td>\n <td>91%</td>\n <td>1</td>\n <td>39</td>\n <td>38</td>\n <td>43</td>\n <td>43</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>Microsoft Corp.</td>\n <td>MSFT</td>\n <td>91%</td>\n <td>1</td>\n <td>31</td>\n <td>30</td>\n <td>34</td>\n <td>32</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>T-Mobile US Inc.</td>\n <td>TMUS</td>\n <td>90%</td>\n <td>1</td>\n <td>26</td>\n <td>25</td>\n <td>29</td>\n <td>28</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>Howmet Aerospace Inc.</td>\n <td>HWM</td>\n <td>90%</td>\n <td>0</td>\n <td>9</td>\n <td>9</td>\n <td>10</td>\n <td>11</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>Fiserv Inc.</td>\n <td>FISV</td>\n <td>89%</td>\n <td>2</td>\n <td>33</td>\n <td>31</td>\n <td>37</td>\n <td>35</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>General Motors Co.</td>\n <td>GM</td>\n <td>89%</td>\n <td>1</td>\n <td>16</td>\n <td>15</td>\n <td>18</td>\n <td>17</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>Laboratory Corp. of America Holdings</td>\n <td>LH</td>\n <td>89%</td>\n <td>1</td>\n <td>17</td>\n <td>16</td>\n <td>19</td>\n <td>19</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>ServiceNow Inc.</td>\n <td>NOW</td>\n <td>88%</td>\n <td>2</td>\n <td>29</td>\n <td>27</td>\n <td>33</td>\n <td>32</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>Nike Inc. Class B</td>\n <td>NKE</td>\n <td>88%</td>\n <td>0</td>\n <td>28</td>\n <td>28</td>\n <td>32</td>\n <td>33</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>Etsy Inc.</td>\n <td>ETSY</td>\n <td>88%</td>\n <td>-1</td>\n <td>14</td>\n <td>15</td>\n <td>16</td>\n <td>17</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.</td>\n <td>J</td>\n <td>88%</td>\n <td>-1</td>\n <td>15</td>\n <td>16</td>\n <td>17</td>\n <td>17</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>Cigna Corp.</td>\n <td>CI</td>\n <td>88%</td>\n <td>-2</td>\n <td>21</td>\n <td>23</td>\n <td>24</td>\n <td>26</td>\n </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p>FactSet</p>\n<p>The bottom two, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.J,+0.51%and Cigna Corp.CI,+0.74%are tied at 88%.</p>\n<p>The first two companies, Assurant Inc.AIZ,-0.19%and Teledyne Technologies Inc.TDY,-1.37%,haven’t gained any “buy” ratings since the end of 2020, however, Teledyne has one fewer total ratings, which is why it is now 100% buy-rated according to FactSet’s data.</p>\n<p>There are six companies involved with oil production or distribution on the first list and four on the second, showing analysts’ growing confidence in the oil price recovery.</p>\n<p>Amazon.com Inc.AMZN,-2.00%is fourth on the second list, with 96% “buy” ratings. The internet retail pioneer’s founder, Jeff Bezos, announced on Feb. 2 that he wouldstep down as CEOduring the third quarter, while remaining executive chair. Here’s a look athow well Amazon’s stock has performedsince it went public in May 1997.</p>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>These S&P 500 stocks have had the biggest increases in ‘buy’ ratings so far this year</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThese S&P 500 stocks have had the biggest increases in ‘buy’ ratings so far this year\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-02-04 10:46 GMT+8 <a href=https://www.marketwatch.com/story/these-s-p-500-stocks-have-had-the-biggest-increases-in-buy-ratings-so-far-this-year-11612367383?mod=home-page><strong>marketwatch</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Traders in the stock market can take advantage of special situations to exploit sentiment and momentum and make quick profits — if they are quick enough or lucky enough. But over the long haul, ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/these-s-p-500-stocks-have-had-the-biggest-increases-in-buy-ratings-so-far-this-year-11612367383?mod=home-page\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/these-s-p-500-stocks-have-had-the-biggest-increases-in-buy-ratings-so-far-this-year-11612367383?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1140015602","content_text":"Traders in the stock market can take advantage of special situations to exploit sentiment and momentum and make quick profits — if they are quick enough or lucky enough. But over the long haul, investors have profited by holding shares of companies that increase sales, earnings and cash flow. And the resulting increases in analysts’ ratings can help lift stock prices.\nBelow is a list of stocks among the S&P 500SPX,+0.10%that have had the biggest increases in “buy” or equivalent ratings this year among analysts polled by FactSet. An upgrade may mean a stock has fallen enough so that an analyst believes it has become a compelling value. Or it may mean that something has changed for the better in the company’s business or industry. Or it could be a combination these and other factors.\nA focus on the positive side of the ratings action makes sense. Analysts working for brokerage firms — those that provide recommendations to investor clients — are separated from the firms’ business groups that generate fees by providing various services to some of the same companies the analysts cover. But there is still a far greater tendency for these so-called sell-side analysts to assign “buy” or equivalent “overweight” ratings than “sell” or equivalent “underweight” ratings.\nAmong the S&P 500, 270 companies have majority “buy” or equivalent ratings among analysts polled by FactSet, but only two (American Airlines Group Inc.AAL,+6.09%and Lumen Technologies Inc.LUMN,+2.44%) have majority “sell” or equivalent ratings.\nAn increase in the number of “buy” ratings doesn’t necessarily mean all the new “buys” resulted from upgrades. The number of analysts covering any one company often changes. An analyst might initiate coverage with a “buy” rating. Brokerage firms often add or drop coverage of companies or even entire industries because of staff changes or reallocation of resources.\nBiggest increases in ‘buy’ ratings\nHere’s a list of 22 companies among the S&P 500 that now have at least three more “buy” ratings than they did at the end of 2020:\n\n\n\nCOMPANY\nTICKER\nCHANGE IN NUMBER OF BUY RATINGS\nBUY RATINGS - NOW\nBUY RATINGS - DEC. 31\n% BUY RATINGS\nTOTAL RATINGS - NOW\nTOTAL RATINGS - DEC. 31\nCHANGE IN TOTAL RATINGS\n\n\n\n\nCONOCOPHILLIPS\nCOP\n5\n27\n22\n96%\n28\n24\n4\n\n\nChevron Corp.\nCVX\n5\n19\n14\n68%\n28\n25\n3\n\n\nIntel Corp.\nINTC\n5\n15\n10\n38%\n40\n38\n2\n\n\nPayPal Holdings Inc.\nPYPL\n4\n39\n35\n81%\n48\n45\n3\n\n\nWestRock Co.\nWRK\n4\n12\n8\n71%\n17\n13\n4\n\n\nWells Fargo & Co.\nWFC\n4\n17\n13\n63%\n27\n27\n0\n\n\nCenterPoint Energy Inc.\nCNP\n4\n11\n7\n61%\n18\n17\n1\n\n\nPioneer Natural Resources Co.\nPXD\n3\n32\n29\n94%\n34\n31\n3\n\n\nActivision Blizzard Inc.\nATVI\n3\n28\n25\n82%\n34\n31\n3\n\n\nRegeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.\nREGN\n3\n18\n15\n67%\n27\n26\n1\n\n\nDominion Energy Inc.\nD\n3\n11\n8\n65%\n17\n17\n0\n\n\nPPG Industries Inc.\nPPG\n3\n17\n14\n63%\n27\n27\n0\n\n\nElectronic Arts Inc.\nEA\n3\n20\n17\n63%\n32\n28\n4\n\n\nNOV Inc.\nNOV\n3\n14\n11\n58%\n24\n25\n-1\n\n\nCorning Inc\nGLW\n3\n8\n5\n57%\n14\n13\n1\n\n\nChipotle Mexican Grill Inc.\nCMG\n3\n19\n16\n54%\n35\n33\n2\n\n\nEmerson Electric Co.\nEMR\n3\n13\n10\n54%\n24\n25\n-1\n\n\nExpedia Group Inc.\nEXPE\n3\n14\n11\n45%\n31\n32\n-1\n\n\nMarathon Oil Corp.\nMRO\n3\n13\n10\n45%\n29\n30\n-1\n\n\nExxon Mobil Corp.\nXOM\n3\n10\n7\n36%\n28\n26\n2\n\n\nEquity Residential\nEQR\n3\n6\n3\n27%\n22\n21\n1\n\n\nIllinois Tool Works Inc.\nITW\n3\n5\n2\n23%\n22\n22\n0\n\n\n\nFactSet\nThe table is sorted in two ways — first by the increase in the number of “buy” ratings, but then by the current percentage of “buy” ratings. You will need to scroll the table to see all the data.\nSo ConocoPhillipsCOP,+5.47%tops the list because it has five more “buy” ratings than it did on Dec. 31 and because 96% of analysts polled by FactSet currently rate the shares a “buy.”\nThe second company on the list, Chevron Corp.CVX,+2.18%,has also had its number of “buy” ratings increase by five, but 68% of the analysts rate the stock a “buy.”\nThird on the list is Intel Corp.INTC,-0.55%,also with five additional “buy” ratings but with only 38% of analysts having a positive rating on the shares.\nHighest percentage ‘buy’ ratings\nHere’s a list of 21 S&P 500 companies with the highest percentage of “buy” ratings among analysts polled by FactSet:\n\n\n\nCOMPANY\nTICKER\n% BUY RATINGS\nCHANGE IN NUMBER OF BUY RATINGS\nBUY RATINGS - NOW\nBUY RATINGS - DEC. 31\nTOTAL RATINGS - NOW\nTOTAL RATINGS - DEC. 31\n\n\n\n\nASSURANT INC.\nAIZ\n100%\n0\n5\n5\n5\n5\n\n\nTeledyne Technologies Inc.\nTDY\n100%\n0\n5\n5\n5\n6\n\n\nConocoPhillips\nCOP\n96%\n5\n27\n22\n28\n24\n\n\nAmazon.com Inc.\nAMZN\n96%\n0\n46\n46\n48\n49\n\n\nPhillips 66\nPSX\n95%\n1\n21\n20\n22\n20\n\n\nPioneer Natural Resources Co.\nPXD\n94%\n3\n32\n29\n34\n31\n\n\nAlexandria Real Estate Equities Inc.\nARE\n92%\n1\n11\n10\n12\n12\n\n\nTeleflex Inc.\nTFX\n92%\n0\n11\n11\n12\n12\n\n\nDiamondback Energy Inc.\nFANG\n91%\n2\n30\n28\n33\n31\n\n\nAlphabet Inc. Class A\nGOOGL\n91%\n1\n39\n38\n43\n43\n\n\nMicrosoft Corp.\nMSFT\n91%\n1\n31\n30\n34\n32\n\n\nT-Mobile US Inc.\nTMUS\n90%\n1\n26\n25\n29\n28\n\n\nHowmet Aerospace Inc.\nHWM\n90%\n0\n9\n9\n10\n11\n\n\nFiserv Inc.\nFISV\n89%\n2\n33\n31\n37\n35\n\n\nGeneral Motors Co.\nGM\n89%\n1\n16\n15\n18\n17\n\n\nLaboratory Corp. of America Holdings\nLH\n89%\n1\n17\n16\n19\n19\n\n\nServiceNow Inc.\nNOW\n88%\n2\n29\n27\n33\n32\n\n\nNike Inc. Class B\nNKE\n88%\n0\n28\n28\n32\n33\n\n\nEtsy Inc.\nETSY\n88%\n-1\n14\n15\n16\n17\n\n\nJacobs Engineering Group Inc.\nJ\n88%\n-1\n15\n16\n17\n17\n\n\nCigna Corp.\nCI\n88%\n-2\n21\n23\n24\n26\n\n\n\nFactSet\nThe bottom two, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.J,+0.51%and Cigna Corp.CI,+0.74%are tied at 88%.\nThe first two companies, Assurant Inc.AIZ,-0.19%and Teledyne Technologies Inc.TDY,-1.37%,haven’t gained any “buy” ratings since the end of 2020, however, Teledyne has one fewer total ratings, which is why it is now 100% buy-rated according to FactSet’s data.\nThere are six companies involved with oil production or distribution on the first list and four on the second, showing analysts’ growing confidence in the oil price recovery.\nAmazon.com Inc.AMZN,-2.00%is fourth on the second list, with 96% “buy” ratings. The internet retail pioneer’s founder, Jeff Bezos, announced on Feb. 2 that he wouldstep down as CEOduring the third quarter, while remaining executive chair. Here’s a look athow well Amazon’s stock has performedsince it went public in May 1997.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":164,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":317338964,"gmtCreate":1612415497458,"gmtModify":1703761520831,"author":{"id":"3574854488928895","authorId":"3574854488928895","name":"T1213121","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574854488928895","authorIdStr":"3574854488928895"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Xpeng","listText":"Xpeng","text":"Xpeng","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/317338964","repostId":"1198883855","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":284,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":317331552,"gmtCreate":1612415451876,"gmtModify":1703761520155,"author":{"id":"3574854488928895","authorId":"3574854488928895","name":"T1213121","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574854488928895","authorIdStr":"3574854488928895"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"BABA","listText":"BABA","text":"BABA","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/317331552","repostId":"2108791116","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2108791116","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1612407835,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2108791116?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-02-04 11:03","market":"sh","language":"en","title":"Ant and Chinese Banks Are Reining In Joint Loans to Consumers","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2108791116","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"(Bloomberg) -- Ant Group Co. and at least a dozen banks are paring back their years-long cooperation","content":"<p>(Bloomberg) -- Ant Group Co. and at least a dozen banks are paring back their years-long cooperation on consumer lending platforms that fuel the spending of at least 500 million people across China.</p>\n<p>Regulators have signaled their intention to curb online loans in recent months, prompting banks and Ant itself to discuss lending caps, people familiar with the matter said, asking not to be identified discussing a private information.</p>\n<p>Banks in Zhejiang province have been instructed to cut their exposure to Ant via joint loans on the firm’s Jiebei and Huabei platforms, the people said. Some lenders in Shanghai have set a timetable for a gradual reduction in joint offerings, while at least <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a> in Shandong has completely suspended ties with the firm, the people said.</p>\n<p>The moves have taken place in parallel with Ant’s discussions with Chinese authorities on a restructuring plan. Bloomberg reported on Wednesday that Ant has agreed to become a financial holding company, making it subject to capital requirements similar to those for banks.</p>\n<p>Consumer credit has been crucial in driving growth at Ant’s digital finance business, which contributed 63% of the firm’s revenue in the first half of 2020 before the authorities unleashed a barrage of rules to curb the country’s booming financial technology industry. Regulators also want to prevent any <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> firm from becoming too dominant.</p>\n<p>The regulators upended a $35 billion initial public offering by Ant Group in November, stunning investors from Shanghai to New York. In a conference call with investors on Tuesday, Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. Chief Executive Officer Daniel Zhang said there is “substantial uncertainty” with Ant’s business and it is difficult to assess the impact of the new regulations. Alibaba owns a third of Ant and both were founded by billionaire Jack Ma.</p>\n<p>Ant declined to comment. The China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission didn’t immediately respond to a request seeking comment.</p>\n<p>Among the hardest-hitting for Ant was the proposal to impose additional capital requirements on microlenders and demand that fintech platforms put up at least 30% of the funding for loans that are jointly offered with banks. Before the proposal, only about 2% of the more than 1.7 trillion yuan ($263 billion) in loans remained on Ant’s balance sheet, with the bulk of funding coming from its about 100 bank partners.</p>\n<p>Ant needs to inject at least 70 billion yuan of new capital just for its credit-lending business to comply with the regulation, according to a November estimate by Francis Chan, a senior analyst at Bloomberg Intelligence in Hong Kong.</p>\n<p>Liang Tao, vice chairman of the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, said last month recent measures weren’t aimed at any specific company and have been well received by some in the industry. Some of the firms have a “relatively positive attitude” toward the new requirements and have achieved “initial effects” in their “rectification” efforts, he said.</p>\n<p>Banks and insurers should continue to cooperate normally with internet platforms in compliance with laws and regulations and some lenders that have pulled back should correct their behavior, Liang said, without elaborating.</p>\n<p>Still, local banking regulators in provinces including Zhejiang and Hunan are urging banks that have relied heavily on Ant for client referrals and lending growth to cut back, said the people.</p>\n<p>“While the restructuring would bring Ant a step closer to relaunching its IPO, all its units face more restrictions on capital, leverage and product pricing, risking growth,” said Chan, who estimated Ant’s valuation may have fallen to below $108 billion from a $280 billion pre-money valuation ahead of its failed IPO.</p>\n<p></p>","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Ant and Chinese Banks Are Reining In Joint Loans to Consumers</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAnt and Chinese Banks Are Reining In Joint Loans to Consumers\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-02-04 11:03 GMT+8 <a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/ant-chinese-banks-reining-joint-010651856.html><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(Bloomberg) -- Ant Group Co. and at least a dozen banks are paring back their years-long cooperation on consumer lending platforms that fuel the spending of at least 500 million people across China.\n...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/ant-chinese-banks-reining-joint-010651856.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1684aaaa06891b8d2dd04a9941acb502","relate_stocks":{"BABA":"阿里巴巴","09988":"阿里巴巴-W"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/ant-chinese-banks-reining-joint-010651856.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2108791116","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- Ant Group Co. and at least a dozen banks are paring back their years-long cooperation on consumer lending platforms that fuel the spending of at least 500 million people across China.\nRegulators have signaled their intention to curb online loans in recent months, prompting banks and Ant itself to discuss lending caps, people familiar with the matter said, asking not to be identified discussing a private information.\nBanks in Zhejiang province have been instructed to cut their exposure to Ant via joint loans on the firm’s Jiebei and Huabei platforms, the people said. Some lenders in Shanghai have set a timetable for a gradual reduction in joint offerings, while at least one in Shandong has completely suspended ties with the firm, the people said.\nThe moves have taken place in parallel with Ant’s discussions with Chinese authorities on a restructuring plan. Bloomberg reported on Wednesday that Ant has agreed to become a financial holding company, making it subject to capital requirements similar to those for banks.\nConsumer credit has been crucial in driving growth at Ant’s digital finance business, which contributed 63% of the firm’s revenue in the first half of 2020 before the authorities unleashed a barrage of rules to curb the country’s booming financial technology industry. Regulators also want to prevent any one firm from becoming too dominant.\nThe regulators upended a $35 billion initial public offering by Ant Group in November, stunning investors from Shanghai to New York. In a conference call with investors on Tuesday, Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. Chief Executive Officer Daniel Zhang said there is “substantial uncertainty” with Ant’s business and it is difficult to assess the impact of the new regulations. Alibaba owns a third of Ant and both were founded by billionaire Jack Ma.\nAnt declined to comment. The China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission didn’t immediately respond to a request seeking comment.\nAmong the hardest-hitting for Ant was the proposal to impose additional capital requirements on microlenders and demand that fintech platforms put up at least 30% of the funding for loans that are jointly offered with banks. Before the proposal, only about 2% of the more than 1.7 trillion yuan ($263 billion) in loans remained on Ant’s balance sheet, with the bulk of funding coming from its about 100 bank partners.\nAnt needs to inject at least 70 billion yuan of new capital just for its credit-lending business to comply with the regulation, according to a November estimate by Francis Chan, a senior analyst at Bloomberg Intelligence in Hong Kong.\nLiang Tao, vice chairman of the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, said last month recent measures weren’t aimed at any specific company and have been well received by some in the industry. Some of the firms have a “relatively positive attitude” toward the new requirements and have achieved “initial effects” in their “rectification” efforts, he said.\nBanks and insurers should continue to cooperate normally with internet platforms in compliance with laws and regulations and some lenders that have pulled back should correct their behavior, Liang said, without elaborating.\nStill, local banking regulators in provinces including Zhejiang and Hunan are urging banks that have relied heavily on Ant for client referrals and lending growth to cut back, said the people.\n“While the restructuring would bring Ant a step closer to relaunching its IPO, all its units face more restrictions on capital, leverage and product pricing, risking growth,” said Chan, who estimated Ant’s valuation may have fallen to below $108 billion from a $280 billion pre-money valuation ahead of its failed IPO.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":201,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":185388539,"gmtCreate":1623633480021,"gmtModify":1631887318104,"author":{"id":"3574854488928895","authorId":"3574854488928895","name":"T1213121","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574854488928895","authorIdStr":"3574854488928895"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Alibaba","listText":"Alibaba","text":"Alibaba","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/185388539","repostId":"2143857817","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":376,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":380450289,"gmtCreate":1612577833241,"gmtModify":1703763792631,"author":{"id":"3574854488928895","authorId":"3574854488928895","name":"T1213121","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574854488928895","authorIdStr":"3574854488928895"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"“China’s Starbucks”","listText":"“China’s Starbucks”","text":"“China’s Starbucks”","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/380450289","repostId":"2109722637","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":137,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":317338964,"gmtCreate":1612415497458,"gmtModify":1703761520831,"author":{"id":"3574854488928895","authorId":"3574854488928895","name":"T1213121","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574854488928895","authorIdStr":"3574854488928895"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Xpeng","listText":"Xpeng","text":"Xpeng","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/317338964","repostId":"1198883855","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1198883855","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1612407577,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1198883855?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-02-04 10:59","market":"us","language":"en","title":"What are the challenges facing Biden's electric vehicle program?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1198883855","media":"marketwatch","summary":"President Biden may be winning points with environmentalists, renewable-energy champions and U.S. allies abroad for his serious approach to slowing global warming, but his electric-vehicle plan has some practical challenges when applied across all 50 states.Transportation isthe largest source of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions, which is why electric-vehicle adoption is a cornerstone of President Joe Biden’s ambitious climate-change plan.Biden may be winning points with some consumers, environmenta","content":"<p>President Biden may be winning points with environmentalists, renewable-energy champions and U.S. allies abroad for his serious approach to slowing global warming, but his electric-vehicle plan has some practical challenges when applied across all 50 states.</p><p>Transportation isthe largest source of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions, which is why electric-vehicle adoption is a cornerstone of President Joe Biden’s ambitious climate-change plan.</p><p>Biden may be winning points with some consumers, environmentalists, renewable-energy champions and allies abroad for his serious approach to slowing emissions, but his electric-vehicle initiative has some practical implementation challenges: states have varying barriers to entry.</p><p>Biden via executive order has said he will replace the U.S. government’s fleet of roughly 650,000 vehicles with electric models and encourage a broader national shift to electric cars, including installing 500,000 new electric vehicle charging stations across the country.</p><p>But states and cities have their own hot-and-cold political climate toward EVs and, for instance, some areas have sharply raised registration fees on EVs as an offset for lost tax revenue tied to gasoline purchases.</p><p>EVs tend to have lower lifetime ownership costs because of low fueling and maintenance expenses. But the higher initial purchase cost and lack of access to vehicle charging remain barriers for many households and fleet owners.</p><p>“Charging is the big challenge right now,” said Joe Wiesenfelder, executive editor at Cars.com. “People will want to charge at home, overnight, then unplug and drive. At-home charging doesn’t work in every home without modification. And once on the road and needing a charge, even fast-charging batteries aren’t as fast as the five minutes consumers are used to spending at a gas station.”</p><p>Still, well aware of the burgeoning policy and regulatory trend, several states, led by California, are taking comprehensive steps to help enable more residents and businesses to use and charge EVs. Other states notably have done less to reduce barriers to entry, according to the American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, in what it suggests is a first-of-its-kind report ranking states.</p><p>States that rate high in this particular report are mitigating obstacles by offering purchase incentives to buy EVs (on top of federal tax credits, which are up to $7,500 for select manufacturers, excluding TeslaTSLA,-2.07%,where credits have been phased out), adding more charging options and setting lower electric rates at preferred car-charging times.</p><p>California is the only state to set deadlines for electrifying transit buses, heavy trucks and commercial vehicles. The state is also one of the few to offer assistance for lower-income drivers replacing older, high-polluting cars with zero- or near-zero-emissions vehicles, and it plans to deploy chargers in economically distressed areas and communities with a history of environmental injustice.</p><p>California scored 91 out of 100 possible points. Other top finishers include New York; Washington, D.C.; Maryland; Massachusetts; Washington State; Vermont; Colorado; Oregon and New Jersey.</p><p>Twenty states earned 15 points or fewer.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fda572f679aec2a40d1fa93f5d4312dd\" tg-width=\"620\" tg-height=\"509\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">Evaluation in the American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy scorecard focuses on the states that have demonstrated some level of progress on transportation electrification. Unranked states achieved no more than 15% of the total available points.</p><p>According to the state rankings, the most common state actions to electrify transportation include planning for more EVs and EV charging options (23 states); incentives such as rebates, tax credits and grants to buy large electric pickups and delivery trucks (27 states); using federal funds to buy electric transit buses (48 states); utility programs that offer lower electric rates at preferred times for EV (Level 2) charging (36 states) and utility funding to spur EV and EV charging adoption in low-income areas and environmental justice communities (15 states).</p><p>Cars.com’s Wiesenfelder said the pursuit of more EVs on the road has historically been a “pull not a push,” meaning consumers aren’t yet in front and plans are subsidy-reliant.</p><p>Cars.com said that despite the positive momentum expected in the EV category this year, hybrids and EV searches made up less than 1% of total searches on its site in 2020, signaling a long road ahead for mainstream adoption.</p><p>Under Biden’sproposed aim for net-zero U.S. emissionsby no later than 2050, the EV share of passenger vehicle sales would have to hit at least 25% by 2026, with electric-car sales reaching 4 million per year, Bloomberg NEF analysts, led by Aleksandra O’Donovan, said inreportlate last year.</p><p>Undeniably market forces are changing, especially with tech companies such as AppleAAPLrumored to enter the market, and automakers like HyundaiKR:005380, FordFand GMGMannouncing plans to significantly invest and expand their EV platforms. GM last week saidit aspires to offer only electric vehicles in 15 yearson its way to become a carbon-neutral company by 2040.</p><p>How fast local governments and individuals make the upgrades remain a challenge to the federal agenda.</p><p>“The leading states are embracing this transition, but many more are just starting, even as the automakers are preparing a burst of new electric models,” said Bryan Howard, state policy director at the American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy.</p>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title> What are the challenges facing Biden's electric vehicle program?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n What are the challenges facing Biden's electric vehicle program?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-02-04 10:59 GMT+8 <a href=https://www.marketwatch.com/story/the-big-challenge-to-bidens-electric-vehicle-pledge-every-state-is-different-11612389231?mod=home-page><strong>marketwatch</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>President Biden may be winning points with environmentalists, renewable-energy champions and U.S. allies abroad for his serious approach to slowing global warming, but his electric-vehicle plan has ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/the-big-challenge-to-bidens-electric-vehicle-pledge-every-state-is-different-11612389231?mod=home-page\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/11fb5ef0b1cb032e12ea701b85e5650d","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/the-big-challenge-to-bidens-electric-vehicle-pledge-every-state-is-different-11612389231?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1198883855","content_text":"President Biden may be winning points with environmentalists, renewable-energy champions and U.S. allies abroad for his serious approach to slowing global warming, but his electric-vehicle plan has some practical challenges when applied across all 50 states.Transportation isthe largest source of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions, which is why electric-vehicle adoption is a cornerstone of President Joe Biden’s ambitious climate-change plan.Biden may be winning points with some consumers, environmentalists, renewable-energy champions and allies abroad for his serious approach to slowing emissions, but his electric-vehicle initiative has some practical implementation challenges: states have varying barriers to entry.Biden via executive order has said he will replace the U.S. government’s fleet of roughly 650,000 vehicles with electric models and encourage a broader national shift to electric cars, including installing 500,000 new electric vehicle charging stations across the country.But states and cities have their own hot-and-cold political climate toward EVs and, for instance, some areas have sharply raised registration fees on EVs as an offset for lost tax revenue tied to gasoline purchases.EVs tend to have lower lifetime ownership costs because of low fueling and maintenance expenses. But the higher initial purchase cost and lack of access to vehicle charging remain barriers for many households and fleet owners.“Charging is the big challenge right now,” said Joe Wiesenfelder, executive editor at Cars.com. “People will want to charge at home, overnight, then unplug and drive. At-home charging doesn’t work in every home without modification. And once on the road and needing a charge, even fast-charging batteries aren’t as fast as the five minutes consumers are used to spending at a gas station.”Still, well aware of the burgeoning policy and regulatory trend, several states, led by California, are taking comprehensive steps to help enable more residents and businesses to use and charge EVs. Other states notably have done less to reduce barriers to entry, according to the American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, in what it suggests is a first-of-its-kind report ranking states.States that rate high in this particular report are mitigating obstacles by offering purchase incentives to buy EVs (on top of federal tax credits, which are up to $7,500 for select manufacturers, excluding TeslaTSLA,-2.07%,where credits have been phased out), adding more charging options and setting lower electric rates at preferred car-charging times.California is the only state to set deadlines for electrifying transit buses, heavy trucks and commercial vehicles. The state is also one of the few to offer assistance for lower-income drivers replacing older, high-polluting cars with zero- or near-zero-emissions vehicles, and it plans to deploy chargers in economically distressed areas and communities with a history of environmental injustice.California scored 91 out of 100 possible points. Other top finishers include New York; Washington, D.C.; Maryland; Massachusetts; Washington State; Vermont; Colorado; Oregon and New Jersey.Twenty states earned 15 points or fewer.Evaluation in the American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy scorecard focuses on the states that have demonstrated some level of progress on transportation electrification. Unranked states achieved no more than 15% of the total available points.According to the state rankings, the most common state actions to electrify transportation include planning for more EVs and EV charging options (23 states); incentives such as rebates, tax credits and grants to buy large electric pickups and delivery trucks (27 states); using federal funds to buy electric transit buses (48 states); utility programs that offer lower electric rates at preferred times for EV (Level 2) charging (36 states) and utility funding to spur EV and EV charging adoption in low-income areas and environmental justice communities (15 states).Cars.com’s Wiesenfelder said the pursuit of more EVs on the road has historically been a “pull not a push,” meaning consumers aren’t yet in front and plans are subsidy-reliant.Cars.com said that despite the positive momentum expected in the EV category this year, hybrids and EV searches made up less than 1% of total searches on its site in 2020, signaling a long road ahead for mainstream adoption.Under Biden’sproposed aim for net-zero U.S. emissionsby no later than 2050, the EV share of passenger vehicle sales would have to hit at least 25% by 2026, with electric-car sales reaching 4 million per year, Bloomberg NEF analysts, led by Aleksandra O’Donovan, said inreportlate last year.Undeniably market forces are changing, especially with tech companies such as AppleAAPLrumored to enter the market, and automakers like HyundaiKR:005380, FordFand GMGMannouncing plans to significantly invest and expand their EV platforms. GM last week saidit aspires to offer only electric vehicles in 15 yearson its way to become a carbon-neutral company by 2040.How fast local governments and individuals make the upgrades remain a challenge to the federal agenda.“The leading states are embracing this transition, but many more are just starting, even as the automakers are preparing a burst of new electric models,” said Bryan Howard, state policy director at the American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":284,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":317331552,"gmtCreate":1612415451876,"gmtModify":1703761520155,"author":{"id":"3574854488928895","authorId":"3574854488928895","name":"T1213121","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574854488928895","authorIdStr":"3574854488928895"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"BABA","listText":"BABA","text":"BABA","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/317331552","repostId":"2108791116","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":201,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":317717349,"gmtCreate":1612485636681,"gmtModify":1703762508557,"author":{"id":"3574854488928895","authorId":"3574854488928895","name":"T1213121","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574854488928895","authorIdStr":"3574854488928895"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nice","listText":"Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/317717349","repostId":"1140015602","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1140015602","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1612406760,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1140015602?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-02-04 10:46","market":"us","language":"en","title":"These S&P 500 stocks have had the biggest increases in ‘buy’ ratings so far this year","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1140015602","media":"marketwatch","summary":"Traders in the stock market can take advantage of special situations to exploit sentiment and moment","content":"<p>Traders in the stock market can take advantage of special situations to exploit sentiment and momentum and make quick profits — if they are quick enough or lucky enough. But over the long haul, investors have profited by holding shares of companies that increase sales, earnings and cash flow. And the resulting increases in analysts’ ratings can help lift stock prices.</p>\n<p>Below is a list of stocks among the S&P 500SPX,+0.10%that have had the biggest increases in “buy” or equivalent ratings this year among analysts polled by FactSet. An upgrade may mean a stock has fallen enough so that an analyst believes it has become a compelling value. Or it may mean that something has changed for the better in the company’s business or industry. Or it could be a combination these and other factors.</p>\n<p>A focus on the positive side of the ratings action makes sense. Analysts working for brokerage firms — those that provide recommendations to investor clients — are separated from the firms’ business groups that generate fees by providing various services to some of the same companies the analysts cover. But there is still a far greater tendency for these so-called sell-side analysts to assign “buy” or equivalent “overweight” ratings than “sell” or equivalent “underweight” ratings.</p>\n<p>Among the S&P 500, 270 companies have majority “buy” or equivalent ratings among analysts polled by FactSet, but only two (American Airlines Group Inc.AAL,+6.09%and Lumen Technologies Inc.LUMN,+2.44%) have majority “sell” or equivalent ratings.</p>\n<p>An increase in the number of “buy” ratings doesn’t necessarily mean all the new “buys” resulted from upgrades. The number of analysts covering any one company often changes. An analyst might initiate coverage with a “buy” rating. Brokerage firms often add or drop coverage of companies or even entire industries because of staff changes or reallocation of resources.</p>\n<p>Biggest increases in ‘buy’ ratings</p>\n<p>Here’s a list of 22 companies among the S&P 500 that now have at least three more “buy” ratings than they did at the end of 2020:</p>\n<table>\n <thead>\n <tr>\n <th>COMPANY</th>\n <th>TICKER</th>\n <th>CHANGE IN NUMBER OF BUY RATINGS</th>\n <th>BUY RATINGS - NOW</th>\n <th>BUY RATINGS - DEC. 31</th>\n <th>% BUY RATINGS</th>\n <th>TOTAL RATINGS - NOW</th>\n <th>TOTAL RATINGS - DEC. 31</th>\n <th>CHANGE IN TOTAL RATINGS</th>\n </tr>\n </thead>\n <tbody>\n <tr>\n <td>CONOCOPHILLIPS</td>\n <td>COP</td>\n <td>5</td>\n <td>27</td>\n <td>22</td>\n <td>96%</td>\n <td>28</td>\n <td>24</td>\n <td>4</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>Chevron Corp.</td>\n <td>CVX</td>\n <td>5</td>\n <td>19</td>\n <td>14</td>\n <td>68%</td>\n <td>28</td>\n <td>25</td>\n <td>3</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>Intel Corp.</td>\n <td>INTC</td>\n <td>5</td>\n <td>15</td>\n <td>10</td>\n <td>38%</td>\n <td>40</td>\n <td>38</td>\n <td>2</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>PayPal Holdings Inc.</td>\n <td>PYPL</td>\n <td>4</td>\n <td>39</td>\n <td>35</td>\n <td>81%</td>\n <td>48</td>\n <td>45</td>\n <td>3</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>WestRock Co.</td>\n <td>WRK</td>\n <td>4</td>\n <td>12</td>\n <td>8</td>\n <td>71%</td>\n <td>17</td>\n <td>13</td>\n <td>4</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>Wells Fargo & Co.</td>\n <td>WFC</td>\n <td>4</td>\n <td>17</td>\n <td>13</td>\n <td>63%</td>\n <td>27</td>\n <td>27</td>\n <td>0</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>CenterPoint Energy Inc.</td>\n <td>CNP</td>\n <td>4</td>\n <td>11</td>\n <td>7</td>\n <td>61%</td>\n <td>18</td>\n <td>17</td>\n <td>1</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>Pioneer Natural Resources Co.</td>\n <td>PXD</td>\n <td>3</td>\n <td>32</td>\n <td>29</td>\n <td>94%</td>\n <td>34</td>\n <td>31</td>\n <td>3</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>Activision Blizzard Inc.</td>\n <td>ATVI</td>\n <td>3</td>\n <td>28</td>\n <td>25</td>\n <td>82%</td>\n <td>34</td>\n <td>31</td>\n <td>3</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.</td>\n <td>REGN</td>\n <td>3</td>\n <td>18</td>\n <td>15</td>\n <td>67%</td>\n <td>27</td>\n <td>26</td>\n <td>1</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>Dominion Energy Inc.</td>\n <td>D</td>\n <td>3</td>\n <td>11</td>\n <td>8</td>\n <td>65%</td>\n <td>17</td>\n <td>17</td>\n <td>0</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>PPG Industries Inc.</td>\n <td>PPG</td>\n <td>3</td>\n <td>17</td>\n <td>14</td>\n <td>63%</td>\n <td>27</td>\n <td>27</td>\n <td>0</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>Electronic Arts Inc.</td>\n <td>EA</td>\n <td>3</td>\n <td>20</td>\n <td>17</td>\n <td>63%</td>\n <td>32</td>\n <td>28</td>\n <td>4</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>NOV Inc.</td>\n <td>NOV</td>\n <td>3</td>\n <td>14</td>\n <td>11</td>\n <td>58%</td>\n <td>24</td>\n <td>25</td>\n <td>-1</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>Corning Inc</td>\n <td>GLW</td>\n <td>3</td>\n <td>8</td>\n <td>5</td>\n <td>57%</td>\n <td>14</td>\n <td>13</td>\n <td>1</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc.</td>\n <td>CMG</td>\n <td>3</td>\n <td>19</td>\n <td>16</td>\n <td>54%</td>\n <td>35</td>\n <td>33</td>\n <td>2</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>Emerson Electric Co.</td>\n <td>EMR</td>\n <td>3</td>\n <td>13</td>\n <td>10</td>\n <td>54%</td>\n <td>24</td>\n <td>25</td>\n <td>-1</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>Expedia Group Inc.</td>\n <td>EXPE</td>\n <td>3</td>\n <td>14</td>\n <td>11</td>\n <td>45%</td>\n <td>31</td>\n <td>32</td>\n <td>-1</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>Marathon Oil Corp.</td>\n <td>MRO</td>\n <td>3</td>\n <td>13</td>\n <td>10</td>\n <td>45%</td>\n <td>29</td>\n <td>30</td>\n <td>-1</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>Exxon Mobil Corp.</td>\n <td>XOM</td>\n <td>3</td>\n <td>10</td>\n <td>7</td>\n <td>36%</td>\n <td>28</td>\n <td>26</td>\n <td>2</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>Equity Residential</td>\n <td>EQR</td>\n <td>3</td>\n <td>6</td>\n <td>3</td>\n <td>27%</td>\n <td>22</td>\n <td>21</td>\n <td>1</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>Illinois Tool Works Inc.</td>\n <td>ITW</td>\n <td>3</td>\n <td>5</td>\n <td>2</td>\n <td>23%</td>\n <td>22</td>\n <td>22</td>\n <td>0</td>\n </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p>FactSet</p>\n<p>The table is sorted in two ways — first by the increase in the number of “buy” ratings, but then by the current percentage of “buy” ratings. You will need to scroll the table to see all the data.</p>\n<p>So ConocoPhillipsCOP,+5.47%tops the list because it has five more “buy” ratings than it did on Dec. 31 and because 96% of analysts polled by FactSet currently rate the shares a “buy.”</p>\n<p>The second company on the list, Chevron Corp.CVX,+2.18%,has also had its number of “buy” ratings increase by five, but 68% of the analysts rate the stock a “buy.”</p>\n<p>Third on the list is Intel Corp.INTC,-0.55%,also with five additional “buy” ratings but with only 38% of analysts having a positive rating on the shares.</p>\n<p>Highest percentage ‘buy’ ratings</p>\n<p>Here’s a list of 21 S&P 500 companies with the highest percentage of “buy” ratings among analysts polled by FactSet:</p>\n<table>\n <thead>\n <tr>\n <th>COMPANY</th>\n <th>TICKER</th>\n <th>% BUY RATINGS</th>\n <th>CHANGE IN NUMBER OF BUY RATINGS</th>\n <th>BUY RATINGS - NOW</th>\n <th>BUY RATINGS - DEC. 31</th>\n <th>TOTAL RATINGS - NOW</th>\n <th>TOTAL RATINGS - DEC. 31</th>\n </tr>\n </thead>\n <tbody>\n <tr>\n <td>ASSURANT INC.</td>\n <td>AIZ</td>\n <td>100%</td>\n <td>0</td>\n <td>5</td>\n <td>5</td>\n <td>5</td>\n <td>5</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>Teledyne Technologies Inc.</td>\n <td>TDY</td>\n <td>100%</td>\n <td>0</td>\n <td>5</td>\n <td>5</td>\n <td>5</td>\n <td>6</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>ConocoPhillips</td>\n <td>COP</td>\n <td>96%</td>\n <td>5</td>\n <td>27</td>\n <td>22</td>\n <td>28</td>\n <td>24</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>Amazon.com Inc.</td>\n <td>AMZN</td>\n <td>96%</td>\n <td>0</td>\n <td>46</td>\n <td>46</td>\n <td>48</td>\n <td>49</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>Phillips 66</td>\n <td>PSX</td>\n <td>95%</td>\n <td>1</td>\n <td>21</td>\n <td>20</td>\n <td>22</td>\n <td>20</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>Pioneer Natural Resources Co.</td>\n <td>PXD</td>\n <td>94%</td>\n <td>3</td>\n <td>32</td>\n <td>29</td>\n <td>34</td>\n <td>31</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>Alexandria Real Estate Equities Inc.</td>\n <td>ARE</td>\n <td>92%</td>\n <td>1</td>\n <td>11</td>\n <td>10</td>\n <td>12</td>\n <td>12</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>Teleflex Inc.</td>\n <td>TFX</td>\n <td>92%</td>\n <td>0</td>\n <td>11</td>\n <td>11</td>\n <td>12</td>\n <td>12</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>Diamondback Energy Inc.</td>\n <td>FANG</td>\n <td>91%</td>\n <td>2</td>\n <td>30</td>\n <td>28</td>\n <td>33</td>\n <td>31</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>Alphabet Inc. Class A</td>\n <td>GOOGL</td>\n <td>91%</td>\n <td>1</td>\n <td>39</td>\n <td>38</td>\n <td>43</td>\n <td>43</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>Microsoft Corp.</td>\n <td>MSFT</td>\n <td>91%</td>\n <td>1</td>\n <td>31</td>\n <td>30</td>\n <td>34</td>\n <td>32</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>T-Mobile US Inc.</td>\n <td>TMUS</td>\n <td>90%</td>\n <td>1</td>\n <td>26</td>\n <td>25</td>\n <td>29</td>\n <td>28</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>Howmet Aerospace Inc.</td>\n <td>HWM</td>\n <td>90%</td>\n <td>0</td>\n <td>9</td>\n <td>9</td>\n <td>10</td>\n <td>11</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>Fiserv Inc.</td>\n <td>FISV</td>\n <td>89%</td>\n <td>2</td>\n <td>33</td>\n <td>31</td>\n <td>37</td>\n <td>35</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>General Motors Co.</td>\n <td>GM</td>\n <td>89%</td>\n <td>1</td>\n <td>16</td>\n <td>15</td>\n <td>18</td>\n <td>17</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>Laboratory Corp. of America Holdings</td>\n <td>LH</td>\n <td>89%</td>\n <td>1</td>\n <td>17</td>\n <td>16</td>\n <td>19</td>\n <td>19</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>ServiceNow Inc.</td>\n <td>NOW</td>\n <td>88%</td>\n <td>2</td>\n <td>29</td>\n <td>27</td>\n <td>33</td>\n <td>32</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>Nike Inc. Class B</td>\n <td>NKE</td>\n <td>88%</td>\n <td>0</td>\n <td>28</td>\n <td>28</td>\n <td>32</td>\n <td>33</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>Etsy Inc.</td>\n <td>ETSY</td>\n <td>88%</td>\n <td>-1</td>\n <td>14</td>\n <td>15</td>\n <td>16</td>\n <td>17</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.</td>\n <td>J</td>\n <td>88%</td>\n <td>-1</td>\n <td>15</td>\n <td>16</td>\n <td>17</td>\n <td>17</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>Cigna Corp.</td>\n <td>CI</td>\n <td>88%</td>\n <td>-2</td>\n <td>21</td>\n <td>23</td>\n <td>24</td>\n <td>26</td>\n </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p>FactSet</p>\n<p>The bottom two, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.J,+0.51%and Cigna Corp.CI,+0.74%are tied at 88%.</p>\n<p>The first two companies, Assurant Inc.AIZ,-0.19%and Teledyne Technologies Inc.TDY,-1.37%,haven’t gained any “buy” ratings since the end of 2020, however, Teledyne has one fewer total ratings, which is why it is now 100% buy-rated according to FactSet’s data.</p>\n<p>There are six companies involved with oil production or distribution on the first list and four on the second, showing analysts’ growing confidence in the oil price recovery.</p>\n<p>Amazon.com Inc.AMZN,-2.00%is fourth on the second list, with 96% “buy” ratings. The internet retail pioneer’s founder, Jeff Bezos, announced on Feb. 2 that he wouldstep down as CEOduring the third quarter, while remaining executive chair. Here’s a look athow well Amazon’s stock has performedsince it went public in May 1997.</p>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>These S&P 500 stocks have had the biggest increases in ‘buy’ ratings so far this year</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThese S&P 500 stocks have had the biggest increases in ‘buy’ ratings so far this year\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-02-04 10:46 GMT+8 <a href=https://www.marketwatch.com/story/these-s-p-500-stocks-have-had-the-biggest-increases-in-buy-ratings-so-far-this-year-11612367383?mod=home-page><strong>marketwatch</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Traders in the stock market can take advantage of special situations to exploit sentiment and momentum and make quick profits — if they are quick enough or lucky enough. But over the long haul, ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/these-s-p-500-stocks-have-had-the-biggest-increases-in-buy-ratings-so-far-this-year-11612367383?mod=home-page\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/these-s-p-500-stocks-have-had-the-biggest-increases-in-buy-ratings-so-far-this-year-11612367383?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1140015602","content_text":"Traders in the stock market can take advantage of special situations to exploit sentiment and momentum and make quick profits — if they are quick enough or lucky enough. But over the long haul, investors have profited by holding shares of companies that increase sales, earnings and cash flow. And the resulting increases in analysts’ ratings can help lift stock prices.\nBelow is a list of stocks among the S&P 500SPX,+0.10%that have had the biggest increases in “buy” or equivalent ratings this year among analysts polled by FactSet. An upgrade may mean a stock has fallen enough so that an analyst believes it has become a compelling value. Or it may mean that something has changed for the better in the company’s business or industry. Or it could be a combination these and other factors.\nA focus on the positive side of the ratings action makes sense. Analysts working for brokerage firms — those that provide recommendations to investor clients — are separated from the firms’ business groups that generate fees by providing various services to some of the same companies the analysts cover. But there is still a far greater tendency for these so-called sell-side analysts to assign “buy” or equivalent “overweight” ratings than “sell” or equivalent “underweight” ratings.\nAmong the S&P 500, 270 companies have majority “buy” or equivalent ratings among analysts polled by FactSet, but only two (American Airlines Group Inc.AAL,+6.09%and Lumen Technologies Inc.LUMN,+2.44%) have majority “sell” or equivalent ratings.\nAn increase in the number of “buy” ratings doesn’t necessarily mean all the new “buys” resulted from upgrades. The number of analysts covering any one company often changes. An analyst might initiate coverage with a “buy” rating. Brokerage firms often add or drop coverage of companies or even entire industries because of staff changes or reallocation of resources.\nBiggest increases in ‘buy’ ratings\nHere’s a list of 22 companies among the S&P 500 that now have at least three more “buy” ratings than they did at the end of 2020:\n\n\n\nCOMPANY\nTICKER\nCHANGE IN NUMBER OF BUY RATINGS\nBUY RATINGS - NOW\nBUY RATINGS - DEC. 31\n% BUY RATINGS\nTOTAL RATINGS - NOW\nTOTAL RATINGS - DEC. 31\nCHANGE IN TOTAL RATINGS\n\n\n\n\nCONOCOPHILLIPS\nCOP\n5\n27\n22\n96%\n28\n24\n4\n\n\nChevron Corp.\nCVX\n5\n19\n14\n68%\n28\n25\n3\n\n\nIntel Corp.\nINTC\n5\n15\n10\n38%\n40\n38\n2\n\n\nPayPal Holdings Inc.\nPYPL\n4\n39\n35\n81%\n48\n45\n3\n\n\nWestRock Co.\nWRK\n4\n12\n8\n71%\n17\n13\n4\n\n\nWells Fargo & Co.\nWFC\n4\n17\n13\n63%\n27\n27\n0\n\n\nCenterPoint Energy Inc.\nCNP\n4\n11\n7\n61%\n18\n17\n1\n\n\nPioneer Natural Resources Co.\nPXD\n3\n32\n29\n94%\n34\n31\n3\n\n\nActivision Blizzard Inc.\nATVI\n3\n28\n25\n82%\n34\n31\n3\n\n\nRegeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.\nREGN\n3\n18\n15\n67%\n27\n26\n1\n\n\nDominion Energy Inc.\nD\n3\n11\n8\n65%\n17\n17\n0\n\n\nPPG Industries Inc.\nPPG\n3\n17\n14\n63%\n27\n27\n0\n\n\nElectronic Arts Inc.\nEA\n3\n20\n17\n63%\n32\n28\n4\n\n\nNOV Inc.\nNOV\n3\n14\n11\n58%\n24\n25\n-1\n\n\nCorning Inc\nGLW\n3\n8\n5\n57%\n14\n13\n1\n\n\nChipotle Mexican Grill Inc.\nCMG\n3\n19\n16\n54%\n35\n33\n2\n\n\nEmerson Electric Co.\nEMR\n3\n13\n10\n54%\n24\n25\n-1\n\n\nExpedia Group Inc.\nEXPE\n3\n14\n11\n45%\n31\n32\n-1\n\n\nMarathon Oil Corp.\nMRO\n3\n13\n10\n45%\n29\n30\n-1\n\n\nExxon Mobil Corp.\nXOM\n3\n10\n7\n36%\n28\n26\n2\n\n\nEquity Residential\nEQR\n3\n6\n3\n27%\n22\n21\n1\n\n\nIllinois Tool Works Inc.\nITW\n3\n5\n2\n23%\n22\n22\n0\n\n\n\nFactSet\nThe table is sorted in two ways — first by the increase in the number of “buy” ratings, but then by the current percentage of “buy” ratings. You will need to scroll the table to see all the data.\nSo ConocoPhillipsCOP,+5.47%tops the list because it has five more “buy” ratings than it did on Dec. 31 and because 96% of analysts polled by FactSet currently rate the shares a “buy.”\nThe second company on the list, Chevron Corp.CVX,+2.18%,has also had its number of “buy” ratings increase by five, but 68% of the analysts rate the stock a “buy.”\nThird on the list is Intel Corp.INTC,-0.55%,also with five additional “buy” ratings but with only 38% of analysts having a positive rating on the shares.\nHighest percentage ‘buy’ ratings\nHere’s a list of 21 S&P 500 companies with the highest percentage of “buy” ratings among analysts polled by FactSet:\n\n\n\nCOMPANY\nTICKER\n% BUY RATINGS\nCHANGE IN NUMBER OF BUY RATINGS\nBUY RATINGS - NOW\nBUY RATINGS - DEC. 31\nTOTAL RATINGS - NOW\nTOTAL RATINGS - DEC. 31\n\n\n\n\nASSURANT INC.\nAIZ\n100%\n0\n5\n5\n5\n5\n\n\nTeledyne Technologies Inc.\nTDY\n100%\n0\n5\n5\n5\n6\n\n\nConocoPhillips\nCOP\n96%\n5\n27\n22\n28\n24\n\n\nAmazon.com Inc.\nAMZN\n96%\n0\n46\n46\n48\n49\n\n\nPhillips 66\nPSX\n95%\n1\n21\n20\n22\n20\n\n\nPioneer Natural Resources Co.\nPXD\n94%\n3\n32\n29\n34\n31\n\n\nAlexandria Real Estate Equities Inc.\nARE\n92%\n1\n11\n10\n12\n12\n\n\nTeleflex Inc.\nTFX\n92%\n0\n11\n11\n12\n12\n\n\nDiamondback Energy Inc.\nFANG\n91%\n2\n30\n28\n33\n31\n\n\nAlphabet Inc. Class A\nGOOGL\n91%\n1\n39\n38\n43\n43\n\n\nMicrosoft Corp.\nMSFT\n91%\n1\n31\n30\n34\n32\n\n\nT-Mobile US Inc.\nTMUS\n90%\n1\n26\n25\n29\n28\n\n\nHowmet Aerospace Inc.\nHWM\n90%\n0\n9\n9\n10\n11\n\n\nFiserv Inc.\nFISV\n89%\n2\n33\n31\n37\n35\n\n\nGeneral Motors Co.\nGM\n89%\n1\n16\n15\n18\n17\n\n\nLaboratory Corp. of America Holdings\nLH\n89%\n1\n17\n16\n19\n19\n\n\nServiceNow Inc.\nNOW\n88%\n2\n29\n27\n33\n32\n\n\nNike Inc. Class B\nNKE\n88%\n0\n28\n28\n32\n33\n\n\nEtsy Inc.\nETSY\n88%\n-1\n14\n15\n16\n17\n\n\nJacobs Engineering Group Inc.\nJ\n88%\n-1\n15\n16\n17\n17\n\n\nCigna Corp.\nCI\n88%\n-2\n21\n23\n24\n26\n\n\n\nFactSet\nThe bottom two, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.J,+0.51%and Cigna Corp.CI,+0.74%are tied at 88%.\nThe first two companies, Assurant Inc.AIZ,-0.19%and Teledyne Technologies Inc.TDY,-1.37%,haven’t gained any “buy” ratings since the end of 2020, however, Teledyne has one fewer total ratings, which is why it is now 100% buy-rated according to FactSet’s data.\nThere are six companies involved with oil production or distribution on the first list and four on the second, showing analysts’ growing confidence in the oil price recovery.\nAmazon.com Inc.AMZN,-2.00%is fourth on the second list, with 96% “buy” ratings. The internet retail pioneer’s founder, Jeff Bezos, announced on Feb. 2 that he wouldstep down as CEOduring the third quarter, while remaining executive chair. Here’s a look athow well Amazon’s stock has performedsince it went public in May 1997.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":164,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}
