+关注
foreverhappy
暂无个人介绍
IP属地：北京
24
关注
0
粉丝
3
主题
0
勋章
主贴
热门
foreverhappy
2021-04-28
呵呵
女记者遭遇理想员工“下流话”侮辱，澎湃：哪来的“恨媒”戾气？
去老虎APP查看更多动态
{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"userPageInfo":{"id":3520295925638180,"uuid":"3520295925638180","gmtCreate":1557201903973,"gmtModify":1557201903973,"name":"foreverhappy","pinyin":"foreverhappy","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ca6dfa72e26a0e48d715b9540d2e0f29","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":0,"headSize":24,"tweetSize":1,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":0,"name":"","nameTw":"","represent":"","factor":"","iconColor":"","bgColor":""},"themeCounts":3,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":null,"userBadges":[{"badgeId":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561-3","templateUuid":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561","name":"偶像虎友","description":"加入老虎社区1500天","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8b40ae7da5bf081a1c84df14bf9e6367","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f160eceddd7c284a8e1136557615cfad","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/11792805c468334a9b31c39f95a41c6a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.06.15","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"228c86a078844d74991fff2b7ab2428d-2","templateUuid":"228c86a078844d74991fff2b7ab2428d","name":"投资总监虎","description":"证券账户累计交易金额达到30万美元","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9d20b23f1b6335407f882bc5c2ad12c0","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ada3b4533518ace8404a3f6dd192bd29","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/177f283ba21d1c077054dac07f88f3bd","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.28","exceedPercentage":"80.27%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101},{"badgeId":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a-1","templateUuid":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a","name":"实盘交易者","description":"完成一笔实盘交易","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969-2","templateUuid":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969","name":"宗师交易员","description":"证券或期货账户累计交易次数达到100次","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad22cfbe2d05aa393b18e9226e4b0307","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/36702e6ff3ffe46acafee66cc85273ca","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d52eb88fa385cf5abe2616ed63781765","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":"80.24%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":4,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":"北京","starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"post","tweets":[{"id":100586843,"gmtCreate":1619621544082,"gmtModify":1619621544082,"author":{"id":"3520295925638180","authorId":"3520295925638180","name":"foreverhappy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ca6dfa72e26a0e48d715b9540d2e0f29","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"呵呵","listText":"呵呵","text":"呵呵","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/100586843","repostId":"2130037553","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2130037553","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"为财经记者、投资者服务！","home_visible":1,"media_name":"深蓝财经","id":"10","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7ed3098ca9794eae9907fbd1b71a744b"},"pubTimestamp":1619605560,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2130037553?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-04-28 18:26","market":"sh","language":"zh","title":"女记者遭遇理想员工“下流话”侮辱，澎湃：哪来的“恨媒”戾气？","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2130037553","media":"深蓝财经","summary":"微博中，李想表示此微博将会在12点后删除。对此次事件，澎湃新闻首席评论员沈彬发表评论称，李想的行文貌似客观、客气，但还是藏了“沙子”，直接把女记者的一句询问说成“打听保密信息”。值得警惕的是，如今舆论场里蔓延的“恨媒”情绪，以羞辱、恶搞、“硬杠”媒体为能事。","content":"<html><body><div>\n<p><span><strong><span><strong><span><span><strong arial=\"\" border-box=\"\" break-word=\"\" gb=\"\" helvetica=\"\" neue=\"\" rgb=\"\" sans=\"\" sans-serif=\"\" sc=\"\" ui=\"\" yahei=\"\"><span border-box=\"\" break-word=\"\" microsoft=\"\" yahei=\"\"><strong arial=\"\" border-box=\"\" break-word=\"\" gb=\"\" helvetica=\"\" neue=\"\" sans=\"\" sans-serif=\"\" sc=\"\" ui=\"\" yahei=\"\"><span><strong><span><strong><strong><span><strong><span><img arial=\"\" border-box=\"\" break-word=\"\" gb=\"\" helvetica=\"\" neue=\"\" sans=\"\" sans-serif=\"\" sc=\"\" src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a75af9940f934e94b8805d12d71f5494\" ui=\"\" visible=\"\" yahei=\"\"/></span></strong></span></strong></strong></span></strong></span></strong></span></strong></span></span></strong></span></strong></span></p><p><span><strong><span>本文综合自：中新经纬APP、澎湃新闻</span></strong></span></p><p><span>4月27日晚，<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LI\">理想汽车</a>CEO李想发布一则长<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WB\">微博</a>向网友发文并征集答案，称有女记者向某企业男性工程师打探公司内部消息，遭到男工程师用不恰当且带有侮辱女性的语言拒绝，最终，该男性工程师被公司解雇，并向女记者当面道歉。</span></p><p><img auto=\"\" src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f6ff9eb80af14203988bc251e2f61add\"/></p><p><span>但该女记者和所在媒体又增加了新要求，还要求该企业在公开媒体上以企业身份向该媒体的女记者道歉。</span></p><p><span>李想向网友提出两点疑问：</span></p><blockquote><p><span><em><strong><span>1.从法律专业和道德伦理层面，企业是否有责任针对上述发生的问题公开对女记者道歉？</span></strong></em></span></p><p><span><em><strong><span>2.企业是否有责任对被辱骂或者被侮辱的当事人承担公开道歉的责任。</span></strong></em></span></p></blockquote><p><span>而李想微博所讲的故事，居然和近日网络流传的一张聊天记录惊人的符合。李想微博故事中的B企业或许就是理想汽车本身。</span></p><p><img auto=\"\" src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b3c36885b24f4e42bd4ca7b5767a0e6c\"/></p><p><span>微博中，李想表示此微博将会在12点后删除。深蓝财经28日查阅李想微博，发现已无法找到相关内容。</span></p><p><span><strong><span>企业该为员工行为买单吗？ 网友观点不一</span></strong></span></p><p><span>员工在本职工作范围之外，在公共场合或社交网络辱骂或者侮辱了别人，企业除了可以尽到解雇该员工的责任外，是否有责任对被辱骂或者被侮辱的当事人承担公开道歉的责任？</span></p><p><span>对此，网友纷纷表达了自己的观点。</span></p><p><img auto=\"\" src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1a0ed50025d44ae28f6fb94ed6d672fe\"/></p><p><span>网友纷纷评论称：“很简单的道理就是，如果员工在企业有足够影响力，能对公司形象产生影响，那么企业就不得不为其的个人行为买单”“记者职业需要，工程师情商太低”“理想的入职培训也有不足”“不愿意回答可以拉黑，侮辱人就很差劲”“任何场合侮辱别人都应该道歉”。</span></p><p><img auto=\"\" src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/aea43330cb15404fa9a1db35208bae92\"/></p><p><span>也有网友评论称“看了两人对话内容，男员工被开除不过分。公司层面负有管理之责，全体员工对媒体该不该说话，由谁说，应该有基本的普及和培训。理想公司出代表私底下道歉其实就够了，但是公开道歉最好是当事人，毕竟企业不承担主责”“企业没必要替出事员工道歉，但是企业内部可以对所有员工培训如何处理这种情况。”</span></p><p><span><strong><span>澎湃新闻评论：哪来的“恨媒”戾气？</span></strong></span></p><p><span>对此次事件，澎湃新闻首席评论员沈彬发表评论称，李想的行文貌似客观、客气，但还是藏了“沙子”，直接把女记者的一句询问说成“打听保密信息”。其实，企业的“保密信息”和国家秘密的范围、性质完全不一样，前者是由企业自主决定的，而不是法律规定的。</span></p><p><span>我国《反不正当竞争法》等法律明确规定，商业秘密，是指不为公众所知悉、能为权利人带来经济利益，并经权利人采取保密措施的技术信息和经营信息。可见，“采取保密措施”是构成商业秘密的要件，但是外部人不问，怎么可能未卜先知地知道企业有没有“采取保密措施”？媒体记者再正常不过的询问，却被污名化成了“刺探保密信息”。</span></p><p><span>记者探究真相、报道新闻事实，是履行法定的职责，这是光荣使命，也是铁肩担当。《新闻记者证管理办法》也明确规定：“各级人民政府及其职能部门、工作人员应为合法的新闻采访活动提供必要的便利和保障。”“任何组织或者个人不得干扰、阻挠新闻机构及其新闻记者合法的采访活动。”</span></p><p><span>值得警惕的是，如今舆论场里蔓延的“恨媒”情绪，以羞辱、恶搞、“硬杠”媒体为能事。特别是社交媒体崛起之后，话语权事实上下沉了，草根言论自带反建制的冲动，首当其冲地表现为“恨媒”，特别是恨机构性媒体。</span></p><p><span>如今“恨媒”表现已经从“不告诉你”升级到“不许你问”。这种“不许你问”的戾气，会导致媒体报道权的收缩，最终反噬社会成员的知情权。不尊重媒体的社会，就不可能知晓真相。就这次事件来说，保守商业秘密的培训，是员工进职培训的一部分，知道哪些可以说，哪些不能说，也是员工的职责。但是，“不说”不代表可以羞辱记者，“不想说”不代表可以将记者履职说成“刺探机密”。哪怕不是记者询问的，就是普通人多问了一句，张口就是黄腔，侮辱他人，也是道德不合格的人。</span></p><hr arial=\"\" border-box=\"\" break-word=\"\" gb=\"\" helvetica=\"\" neue=\"\" rgb=\"\" rgba=\"\" sans=\"\" sans-serif=\"\" sc=\"\" scale=\"\" solid=\"\" ui=\"\" yahei=\"\"/><p><span arial=\"\" microsoft=\"\" rgb=\"\" sans-serif=\"\" yahei=\"\">欢迎关注深蓝财经视频号</span></p><p arial=\"\" border-box=\"\" break-word=\"\" gb=\"\" helvetica=\"\" neue=\"\" sans=\"\" sans-serif=\"\" sc=\"\" ui=\"\" yahei=\"\"><span><strong>· END ·</strong></span></p><p><span><span><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f64adefc7dc949629f361a1d429195cf\"/></span></span></p><p><span><span><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0b5694bcfc8a4e9c85f292c299876f8a\"/></span></span></p><p><span><span><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8b486077c5b448edb6c6455935cebca7\"/></span></span></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/022a02d8b80d4279b4a22dcdc553baff\"/></p>\n</div></body></html>","source":"weixin_highlight","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>女记者遭遇理想员工“下流话”侮辱，澎湃：哪来的“恨媒”戾气？</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n女记者遭遇理想员工“下流话”侮辱，澎湃：哪来的“恨媒”戾气？\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/10\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/7ed3098ca9794eae9907fbd1b71a744b);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">深蓝财经 </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-04-28 18:26</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><body><div>\n<p><span><strong><span><strong><span><span><strong arial=\"\" border-box=\"\" break-word=\"\" gb=\"\" helvetica=\"\" neue=\"\" rgb=\"\" sans=\"\" sans-serif=\"\" sc=\"\" ui=\"\" yahei=\"\"><span border-box=\"\" break-word=\"\" microsoft=\"\" yahei=\"\"><strong arial=\"\" border-box=\"\" break-word=\"\" gb=\"\" helvetica=\"\" neue=\"\" sans=\"\" sans-serif=\"\" sc=\"\" ui=\"\" yahei=\"\"><span><strong><span><strong><strong><span><strong><span><img arial=\"\" border-box=\"\" break-word=\"\" gb=\"\" helvetica=\"\" neue=\"\" sans=\"\" sans-serif=\"\" sc=\"\" src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a75af9940f934e94b8805d12d71f5494\" ui=\"\" visible=\"\" yahei=\"\"/></span></strong></span></strong></strong></span></strong></span></strong></span></strong></span></span></strong></span></strong></span></p><p><span><strong><span>本文综合自：中新经纬APP、澎湃新闻</span></strong></span></p><p><span>4月27日晚，<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LI\">理想汽车</a>CEO李想发布一则长<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WB\">微博</a>向网友发文并征集答案，称有女记者向某企业男性工程师打探公司内部消息，遭到男工程师用不恰当且带有侮辱女性的语言拒绝，最终，该男性工程师被公司解雇，并向女记者当面道歉。</span></p><p><img auto=\"\" src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f6ff9eb80af14203988bc251e2f61add\"/></p><p><span>但该女记者和所在媒体又增加了新要求，还要求该企业在公开媒体上以企业身份向该媒体的女记者道歉。</span></p><p><span>李想向网友提出两点疑问：</span></p><blockquote><p><span><em><strong><span>1.从法律专业和道德伦理层面，企业是否有责任针对上述发生的问题公开对女记者道歉？</span></strong></em></span></p><p><span><em><strong><span>2.企业是否有责任对被辱骂或者被侮辱的当事人承担公开道歉的责任。</span></strong></em></span></p></blockquote><p><span>而李想微博所讲的故事，居然和近日网络流传的一张聊天记录惊人的符合。李想微博故事中的B企业或许就是理想汽车本身。</span></p><p><img auto=\"\" src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b3c36885b24f4e42bd4ca7b5767a0e6c\"/></p><p><span>微博中，李想表示此微博将会在12点后删除。深蓝财经28日查阅李想微博，发现已无法找到相关内容。</span></p><p><span><strong><span>企业该为员工行为买单吗？ 网友观点不一</span></strong></span></p><p><span>员工在本职工作范围之外，在公共场合或社交网络辱骂或者侮辱了别人，企业除了可以尽到解雇该员工的责任外，是否有责任对被辱骂或者被侮辱的当事人承担公开道歉的责任？</span></p><p><span>对此，网友纷纷表达了自己的观点。</span></p><p><img auto=\"\" src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1a0ed50025d44ae28f6fb94ed6d672fe\"/></p><p><span>网友纷纷评论称：“很简单的道理就是，如果员工在企业有足够影响力，能对公司形象产生影响，那么企业就不得不为其的个人行为买单”“记者职业需要，工程师情商太低”“理想的入职培训也有不足”“不愿意回答可以拉黑，侮辱人就很差劲”“任何场合侮辱别人都应该道歉”。</span></p><p><img auto=\"\" src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/aea43330cb15404fa9a1db35208bae92\"/></p><p><span>也有网友评论称“看了两人对话内容，男员工被开除不过分。公司层面负有管理之责，全体员工对媒体该不该说话，由谁说，应该有基本的普及和培训。理想公司出代表私底下道歉其实就够了，但是公开道歉最好是当事人，毕竟企业不承担主责”“企业没必要替出事员工道歉，但是企业内部可以对所有员工培训如何处理这种情况。”</span></p><p><span><strong><span>澎湃新闻评论：哪来的“恨媒”戾气？</span></strong></span></p><p><span>对此次事件，澎湃新闻首席评论员沈彬发表评论称，李想的行文貌似客观、客气，但还是藏了“沙子”，直接把女记者的一句询问说成“打听保密信息”。其实，企业的“保密信息”和国家秘密的范围、性质完全不一样，前者是由企业自主决定的，而不是法律规定的。</span></p><p><span>我国《反不正当竞争法》等法律明确规定，商业秘密，是指不为公众所知悉、能为权利人带来经济利益，并经权利人采取保密措施的技术信息和经营信息。可见，“采取保密措施”是构成商业秘密的要件，但是外部人不问，怎么可能未卜先知地知道企业有没有“采取保密措施”？媒体记者再正常不过的询问，却被污名化成了“刺探保密信息”。</span></p><p><span>记者探究真相、报道新闻事实，是履行法定的职责，这是光荣使命，也是铁肩担当。《新闻记者证管理办法》也明确规定：“各级人民政府及其职能部门、工作人员应为合法的新闻采访活动提供必要的便利和保障。”“任何组织或者个人不得干扰、阻挠新闻机构及其新闻记者合法的采访活动。”</span></p><p><span>值得警惕的是，如今舆论场里蔓延的“恨媒”情绪，以羞辱、恶搞、“硬杠”媒体为能事。特别是社交媒体崛起之后，话语权事实上下沉了，草根言论自带反建制的冲动，首当其冲地表现为“恨媒”，特别是恨机构性媒体。</span></p><p><span>如今“恨媒”表现已经从“不告诉你”升级到“不许你问”。这种“不许你问”的戾气，会导致媒体报道权的收缩，最终反噬社会成员的知情权。不尊重媒体的社会，就不可能知晓真相。就这次事件来说，保守商业秘密的培训，是员工进职培训的一部分，知道哪些可以说，哪些不能说，也是员工的职责。但是，“不说”不代表可以羞辱记者，“不想说”不代表可以将记者履职说成“刺探机密”。哪怕不是记者询问的，就是普通人多问了一句，张口就是黄腔，侮辱他人，也是道德不合格的人。</span></p><hr arial=\"\" border-box=\"\" break-word=\"\" gb=\"\" helvetica=\"\" neue=\"\" rgb=\"\" rgba=\"\" sans=\"\" sans-serif=\"\" sc=\"\" scale=\"\" solid=\"\" ui=\"\" yahei=\"\"/><p><span arial=\"\" microsoft=\"\" rgb=\"\" sans-serif=\"\" yahei=\"\">欢迎关注深蓝财经视频号</span></p><p arial=\"\" border-box=\"\" break-word=\"\" gb=\"\" helvetica=\"\" neue=\"\" sans=\"\" sans-serif=\"\" sc=\"\" ui=\"\" yahei=\"\"><span><strong>· END ·</strong></span></p><p><span><span><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f64adefc7dc949629f361a1d429195cf\"/></span></span></p><p><span><span><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0b5694bcfc8a4e9c85f292c299876f8a\"/></span></span></p><p><span><span><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8b486077c5b448edb6c6455935cebca7\"/></span></span></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/022a02d8b80d4279b4a22dcdc553baff\"/></p>\n</div></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cdebdfe62273ac806dc3a657b1ca6182","relate_stocks":{"LI":"理想汽车"},"source_url":"http://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?__biz=MzU1Njc1NjA2NA==&mid=2247521325&idx=2&sn=d61a7f0bda98e1e7de153722e61dafc5&chksm=fbc2e922ccb56034b3e546b71bbc092c4ae41117d77e181c37d59e7e52a83785d84b7c77dc98&scene=0#rd","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/ecd74548980bc5b366aa8f4b37ed0bd5","article_id":"2130037553","content_text":"本文综合自：中新经纬APP、澎湃新闻4月27日晚，理想汽车CEO李想发布一则长微博向网友发文并征集答案，称有女记者向某企业男性工程师打探公司内部消息，遭到男工程师用不恰当且带有侮辱女性的语言拒绝，最终，该男性工程师被公司解雇，并向女记者当面道歉。但该女记者和所在媒体又增加了新要求，还要求该企业在公开媒体上以企业身份向该媒体的女记者道歉。李想向网友提出两点疑问：1.从法律专业和道德伦理层面，企业是否有责任针对上述发生的问题公开对女记者道歉？2.企业是否有责任对被辱骂或者被侮辱的当事人承担公开道歉的责任。而李想微博所讲的故事，居然和近日网络流传的一张聊天记录惊人的符合。李想微博故事中的B企业或许就是理想汽车本身。微博中，李想表示此微博将会在12点后删除。深蓝财经28日查阅李想微博，发现已无法找到相关内容。企业该为员工行为买单吗？ 网友观点不一员工在本职工作范围之外，在公共场合或社交网络辱骂或者侮辱了别人，企业除了可以尽到解雇该员工的责任外，是否有责任对被辱骂或者被侮辱的当事人承担公开道歉的责任？对此，网友纷纷表达了自己的观点。网友纷纷评论称：“很简单的道理就是，如果员工在企业有足够影响力，能对公司形象产生影响，那么企业就不得不为其的个人行为买单”“记者职业需要，工程师情商太低”“理想的入职培训也有不足”“不愿意回答可以拉黑，侮辱人就很差劲”“任何场合侮辱别人都应该道歉”。也有网友评论称“看了两人对话内容，男员工被开除不过分。公司层面负有管理之责，全体员工对媒体该不该说话，由谁说，应该有基本的普及和培训。理想公司出代表私底下道歉其实就够了，但是公开道歉最好是当事人，毕竟企业不承担主责”“企业没必要替出事员工道歉，但是企业内部可以对所有员工培训如何处理这种情况。”澎湃新闻评论：哪来的“恨媒”戾气？对此次事件，澎湃新闻首席评论员沈彬发表评论称，李想的行文貌似客观、客气，但还是藏了“沙子”，直接把女记者的一句询问说成“打听保密信息”。其实，企业的“保密信息”和国家秘密的范围、性质完全不一样，前者是由企业自主决定的，而不是法律规定的。我国《反不正当竞争法》等法律明确规定，商业秘密，是指不为公众所知悉、能为权利人带来经济利益，并经权利人采取保密措施的技术信息和经营信息。可见，“采取保密措施”是构成商业秘密的要件，但是外部人不问，怎么可能未卜先知地知道企业有没有“采取保密措施”？媒体记者再正常不过的询问，却被污名化成了“刺探保密信息”。记者探究真相、报道新闻事实，是履行法定的职责，这是光荣使命，也是铁肩担当。《新闻记者证管理办法》也明确规定：“各级人民政府及其职能部门、工作人员应为合法的新闻采访活动提供必要的便利和保障。”“任何组织或者个人不得干扰、阻挠新闻机构及其新闻记者合法的采访活动。”值得警惕的是，如今舆论场里蔓延的“恨媒”情绪，以羞辱、恶搞、“硬杠”媒体为能事。特别是社交媒体崛起之后，话语权事实上下沉了，草根言论自带反建制的冲动，首当其冲地表现为“恨媒”，特别是恨机构性媒体。如今“恨媒”表现已经从“不告诉你”升级到“不许你问”。这种“不许你问”的戾气，会导致媒体报道权的收缩，最终反噬社会成员的知情权。不尊重媒体的社会，就不可能知晓真相。就这次事件来说，保守商业秘密的培训，是员工进职培训的一部分，知道哪些可以说，哪些不能说，也是员工的职责。但是，“不说”不代表可以羞辱记者，“不想说”不代表可以将记者履职说成“刺探机密”。哪怕不是记者询问的，就是普通人多问了一句，张口就是黄腔，侮辱他人，也是道德不合格的人。欢迎关注深蓝财经视频号· END ·","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":430,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":100586843,"gmtCreate":1619621544082,"gmtModify":1619621544082,"author":{"id":"3520295925638180","authorId":"3520295925638180","name":"foreverhappy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ca6dfa72e26a0e48d715b9540d2e0f29","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"呵呵","listText":"呵呵","text":"呵呵","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/100586843","repostId":"2130037553","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":430,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}
