Good_老虎社区_美港股上老虎

2021-08-05

Good

Coursera fell 3% after soaring 21% yesterday

免责声明：上述内容仅代表发帖人个人观点，不构成本平台的任何投资建议。

精彩评论

我们需要你的真知灼见来填补这片空白

发表看法

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"detailType":1,"isChannel":false,"data":{"magic":2,"id":899804377,"tweetId":"899804377","gmtCreate":1628172047899,"gmtModify":1633752952153,"author":{"id":3581501341719005,"idStr":"3581501341719005","authorId":3581501341719005,"authorIdStr":"3581501341719005","name":"KYBoo","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/43072e3bdf1be8a6c0fb9e0d7c8a0558","vip":1,"userType":1,"introduction":"","boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"fanSize":7,"starInvestorFlag":false},"themes":[],"images":[],"coverImages":[],"extraTitle":"","html":"<html><head></head><body><p>Good</p></body></html>","htmlText":"<html><head></head><body><p>Good</p></body></html>","text":"Good","highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/899804377","repostId":1132594719,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1132594719","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1628171470,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1132594719?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-05 21:51","market":"other","language":"en","title":"Coursera fell 3% after soaring 21% yesterday","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1132594719","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"(Aug 5) Coursera fell 3% after soaring 21% yesterday. \nthe company have reported Q2 2021 financial r","content":"<p>(Aug 5)&nbsp;Coursera fell 3% after soaring 21% yesterday.&nbsp;</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b4c30f620d3324d65c0c18c0207d5830\" tg-width=\"1129\" tg-height=\"653\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">the company have&nbsp;reported Q2 2021 financial results that look \"mixed\" in the extreme&nbsp;yesterday&nbsp;.</p>\n<p>On the one hand, Coursera blew away analyst targets for Q2 revenue, producing $102.1 million where Wall Street had expected only $91.5 million. On the other hand, though, Coursera appears to have missed analyst predictions on profit entirely. According to a writeup fromTheFly.comthis morning, instead of the predicted $0.11-per-share loss, Coursera lost $0.38 per share.</p>\n<p>Wait, what? Coursera lost three times as much money as it was \"supposed\" to, and its stock is going up? At first glance, it certainly does look that way. So let me unravel the mystery for you.</p>\n<p>When analysts make earnings estimates, they most often refer not to earnings calculated according to generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) but rather topro formaearnings. And this fact can create some confusion among investors around earnings time as to whether a company \"beat\" or \"missed\" earnings.</p>\n<p>So in the case of Coursera, analysts forecast that the company would lose $0.11 per share<i>pro forma.</i>But the earnings number TheFly and other financial outlets refer to -- the $0.38-per-share loss -- was the company's<i>GAAP</i>loss. If you back out all the one-time charges (or what analysts consider one-time charges) from Coursera's results, though, the company's<i>pro forma</i>loss for the quarter was only $0.05 per share.</p>\n<p>Or in other words, comparing apples to apples, this was not an earnings \"miss,\" but an earnings \"beat.\"</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Coursera fell 3% after soaring 21% yesterday</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nCoursera fell 3% after soaring 21% yesterday\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-08-05 21:51</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>(Aug 5)&nbsp;Coursera fell 3% after soaring 21% yesterday.&nbsp;</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b4c30f620d3324d65c0c18c0207d5830\" tg-width=\"1129\" tg-height=\"653\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">the company have&nbsp;reported Q2 2021 financial results that look \"mixed\" in the extreme&nbsp;yesterday&nbsp;.</p>\n<p>On the one hand, Coursera blew away analyst targets for Q2 revenue, producing $102.1 million where Wall Street had expected only $91.5 million. On the other hand, though, Coursera appears to have missed analyst predictions on profit entirely. According to a writeup fromTheFly.comthis morning, instead of the predicted $0.11-per-share loss, Coursera lost $0.38 per share.</p>\n<p>Wait, what? Coursera lost three times as much money as it was \"supposed\" to, and its stock is going up? At first glance, it certainly does look that way. So let me unravel the mystery for you.</p>\n<p>When analysts make earnings estimates, they most often refer not to earnings calculated according to generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) but rather topro formaearnings. And this fact can create some confusion among investors around earnings time as to whether a company \"beat\" or \"missed\" earnings.</p>\n<p>So in the case of Coursera, analysts forecast that the company would lose $0.11 per share<i>pro forma.</i>But the earnings number TheFly and other financial outlets refer to -- the $0.38-per-share loss -- was the company's<i>GAAP</i>loss. If you back out all the one-time charges (or what analysts consider one-time charges) from Coursera's results, though, the company's<i>pro forma</i>loss for the quarter was only $0.05 per share.</p>\n<p>Or in other words, comparing apples to apples, this was not an earnings \"miss,\" but an earnings \"beat.\"</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"COUR":"Coursera, Inc."},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1132594719","content_text":"(Aug 5) Coursera fell 3% after soaring 21% yesterday. \nthe company have reported Q2 2021 financial results that look \"mixed\" in the extreme yesterday .\nOn the one hand, Coursera blew away analyst targets for Q2 revenue, producing $102.1 million where Wall Street had expected only $91.5 million. On the other hand, though, Coursera appears to have missed analyst predictions on profit entirely. According to a writeup fromTheFly.comthis morning, instead of the predicted $0.11-per-share loss, Coursera lost $0.38 per share.\nWait, what? Coursera lost three times as much money as it was \"supposed\" to, and its stock is going up? At first glance, it certainly does look that way. So let me unravel the mystery for you.\nWhen analysts make earnings estimates, they most often refer not to earnings calculated according to generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) but rather topro formaearnings. And this fact can create some confusion among investors around earnings time as to whether a company \"beat\" or \"missed\" earnings.\nSo in the case of Coursera, analysts forecast that the company would lose $0.11 per sharepro forma.But the earnings number TheFly and other financial outlets refer to -- the $0.38-per-share loss -- was the company'sGAAPloss. If you back out all the one-time charges (or what analysts consider one-time charges) from Coursera's results, though, the company'spro formaloss for the quarter was only $0.05 per share.\nOr in other words, comparing apples to apples, this was not an earnings \"miss,\" but an earnings \"beat.\"","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":121,"commentLimit":10,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"symbols":[],"verified":2,"subType":0,"readableState":1,"langContent":"EN","currentLanguage":"EN","warmUpFlag":false,"orderFlag":false,"shareable":true,"causeOfNotShareable":"","featuresForAnalytics":[],"commentAndTweetFlag":false,"andRepostAutoSelectedFlag":false,"upFlag":false,"length":4,"xxTargetLangEnum":"ORIG"},"commentList":[],"isCommentEnd":true,"isTiger":false,"isWeiXinMini":false,"url":"/m/post/899804377"}