Jo5tarz
2021-08-06
Not thanks to black widow?
[捂脸]
Did Disney Accidentally Save AMC Entertainment?
免责声明:上述内容仅代表发帖人个人观点,不构成本平台的任何投资建议。
分享至
微信
复制链接
精彩评论
我们需要你的真知灼见来填补这片空白
打开APP,发表看法
APP内打开
发表看法
3
5
{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"detailType":1,"isChannel":false,"data":{"magic":2,"id":893037197,"tweetId":"893037197","gmtCreate":1628220120319,"gmtModify":1631892564441,"author":{"id":3566111551860327,"authorId":3566111551860327,"authorIdStr":"3566111551860327","name":"Jo5tarz","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8cdaa131f223c2f17b3669bce62cc05e","vip":1,"userType":1,"introduction":"","boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"fanSize":125,"starInvestorFlag":false},"themes":[],"images":[],"coverImages":[],"extraTitle":"","html":"<html><head></head><body><p>Not thanks to black widow?<span>[捂脸] </span></p></body></html>","htmlText":"<html><head></head><body><p>Not thanks to black widow?<span>[捂脸] </span></p></body></html>","text":"Not thanks to black widow?[捂脸]","highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/893037197","repostId":2157343073,"repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2157343073","pubTimestamp":1628219356,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2157343073?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-06 11:09","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Did Disney Accidentally Save AMC Entertainment?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2157343073","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Maybe boasting about how much it made streaming \"Black Widow\" wasn't such a good idea after all.","content":"<p><b>Walt Disney</b> (NYSE:DIS) may have thought crowing about its $60 million from the debut of <i>Black Widow</i> on Disney+ would show how smart its simultaneous film releases to theaters and its streaming service was.</p>\n<p>Instead, the boast indicated to star Scarlett Johansson just how much money she was losing from the practice, and now she's suing Disney for breach of contract. It's also emboldened other movie stars to consider suing the studio, which could lead to day-and-date releases being dramatically scaled back or even eliminated.</p>\n<p>If that happens, Disney may have just accidentally saved <b>AMC Entertainment Holdings</b> (NYSE:AMC) from financial ruin.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0b77a3ed53dba08876600e0224e1dcd4\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p>\n<h2>Back to the future</h2>\n<p>Movie studios distributing films simultaneously to theaters and streaming services is a body blow to theater operators. Disney isn't the only <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> doing it; Paramount, Universal, Warner Bros., and others are adding movies to their streaming channels on the same day they're showing in theaters.</p>\n<p>Theaters have long faced declining attendance and day-and-date releases offer an additional incentive for moviegoers to avoid the cinema. While AMC was brought to its knees by the pandemic and was only rescued from bankruptcy by being elevated as a meme stock, which let it raise enough money to keep going, the advent of simultaneous film releases makes its future dark.</p>\n<p>But Johansson's lawsuit, and others that may follow -- <i>Cruella</i> star Emma Stone is also reportedly considering suing the studio for the simultaneous release of her film -- could have studios rethinking the practice. In so doing, they could just preserve the theater industry's window of exclusivity, ensuring AMC, <b>Cinemark Holdings</b>, and Regal theaters survive.</p>\n<p>Because theaters make most of their money from extended movie runs, reopening the window will bolster their profits. AMC CEO Adam Aron says most of a film's box office is made in the first three weeks of its run, but other chains argue they make greater profits from extended runs because of high-margin concession stand sales.</p>\n<p>The window of exclusivity that had once been as long as six months was virtually shut closed during the pandemic as studios needed to recoup their investment in the films they had already shot. Even after theaters began reopening, studios continued releasing them to streaming services.</p>\n<h2>A case of projection</h2>\n<p>According to Johansson's lawsuit, \"Disney intentionally induced Marvel's breach of the agreement, without justification, in order to prevent Ms. Johansson from realizing the full benefit of her bargain with Marvel.\"</p>\n<p>Like most actors, Johansson earns a salary for her acting, and then earns additional money from the box office receipts a film generates. It's often why actors go on extended promotional tours for a movie, and Johansson was very active in marketing <i>Black Widow</i>.</p>\n<p>The movie earned $80 million in its box office debut and has since generated over $167 million in domestic receipts and $176 million worldwide.</p>\n<p>Yet Disney separately benefited from her efforts, reaping tens of millions of dollars in streaming receipts that it did not have to share with the actor. It was ironic that Disney tried shaming Johansson for filing the lawsuit by calling her \"callous\" for ignoring the \"horrific and prolonged global effects of the COVID-19 pandemic,\" considering the extra profits the studio earned off Johansson's promotions.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://g.foolcdn.com/image/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fg.foolcdn.com%2Feditorial%2Fimages%2F636499%2Fmovie-theater-getty.jpeg&w=700&op=resize\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p>\n<h2>Zeroing in on the bottom line</h2>\n<p>Only films with blockbuster potential are worthy of a premium when released to streaming, and studios don't generate nearly as much money on their simultaneous release because multiple people can view a single stream. They lose the revenue that comes from multiple ticket purchases at the theater.</p>\n<p>And that is what can help theaters stay afloat. The entertainment venues will sell more tickets, which still accounts for 60% to 70% of their revenue, but generate more concession stand sales, which account for the bulk of their profit margins. </p>\n<p>AMC's food and beverage sales represented 31% of total revenue in 2019, but only 5% of its operating costs. They totaled 35% of revenue for Cinemark, but only 7% of its operating expenses.</p>\n<p>The problem for theaters is streaming is here to stay and will continue to gnaw away at attendance over time. In the meantime, Disney may have just given AMC Entertainment the time it needs to come up with a solution to confront this secular decline.</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Did Disney Accidentally Save AMC Entertainment?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nDid Disney Accidentally Save AMC Entertainment?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-08-06 11:09 GMT+8 <a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/08/05/did-disney-accidentally-save-amc-entertainment/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Walt Disney (NYSE:DIS) may have thought crowing about its $60 million from the debut of Black Widow on Disney+ would show how smart its simultaneous film releases to theaters and its streaming service...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/08/05/did-disney-accidentally-save-amc-entertainment/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"DIS":"迪士尼","AMC":"AMC院线"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/08/05/did-disney-accidentally-save-amc-entertainment/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2157343073","content_text":"Walt Disney (NYSE:DIS) may have thought crowing about its $60 million from the debut of Black Widow on Disney+ would show how smart its simultaneous film releases to theaters and its streaming service was.\nInstead, the boast indicated to star Scarlett Johansson just how much money she was losing from the practice, and now she's suing Disney for breach of contract. It's also emboldened other movie stars to consider suing the studio, which could lead to day-and-date releases being dramatically scaled back or even eliminated.\nIf that happens, Disney may have just accidentally saved AMC Entertainment Holdings (NYSE:AMC) from financial ruin.\nImage source: Getty Images.\nBack to the future\nMovie studios distributing films simultaneously to theaters and streaming services is a body blow to theater operators. Disney isn't the only one doing it; Paramount, Universal, Warner Bros., and others are adding movies to their streaming channels on the same day they're showing in theaters.\nTheaters have long faced declining attendance and day-and-date releases offer an additional incentive for moviegoers to avoid the cinema. While AMC was brought to its knees by the pandemic and was only rescued from bankruptcy by being elevated as a meme stock, which let it raise enough money to keep going, the advent of simultaneous film releases makes its future dark.\nBut Johansson's lawsuit, and others that may follow -- Cruella star Emma Stone is also reportedly considering suing the studio for the simultaneous release of her film -- could have studios rethinking the practice. In so doing, they could just preserve the theater industry's window of exclusivity, ensuring AMC, Cinemark Holdings, and Regal theaters survive.\nBecause theaters make most of their money from extended movie runs, reopening the window will bolster their profits. AMC CEO Adam Aron says most of a film's box office is made in the first three weeks of its run, but other chains argue they make greater profits from extended runs because of high-margin concession stand sales.\nThe window of exclusivity that had once been as long as six months was virtually shut closed during the pandemic as studios needed to recoup their investment in the films they had already shot. Even after theaters began reopening, studios continued releasing them to streaming services.\nA case of projection\nAccording to Johansson's lawsuit, \"Disney intentionally induced Marvel's breach of the agreement, without justification, in order to prevent Ms. Johansson from realizing the full benefit of her bargain with Marvel.\"\nLike most actors, Johansson earns a salary for her acting, and then earns additional money from the box office receipts a film generates. It's often why actors go on extended promotional tours for a movie, and Johansson was very active in marketing Black Widow.\nThe movie earned $80 million in its box office debut and has since generated over $167 million in domestic receipts and $176 million worldwide.\nYet Disney separately benefited from her efforts, reaping tens of millions of dollars in streaming receipts that it did not have to share with the actor. It was ironic that Disney tried shaming Johansson for filing the lawsuit by calling her \"callous\" for ignoring the \"horrific and prolonged global effects of the COVID-19 pandemic,\" considering the extra profits the studio earned off Johansson's promotions.\nImage source: Getty Images.\nZeroing in on the bottom line\nOnly films with blockbuster potential are worthy of a premium when released to streaming, and studios don't generate nearly as much money on their simultaneous release because multiple people can view a single stream. They lose the revenue that comes from multiple ticket purchases at the theater.\nAnd that is what can help theaters stay afloat. The entertainment venues will sell more tickets, which still accounts for 60% to 70% of their revenue, but generate more concession stand sales, which account for the bulk of their profit margins. \nAMC's food and beverage sales represented 31% of total revenue in 2019, but only 5% of its operating costs. They totaled 35% of revenue for Cinemark, but only 7% of its operating expenses.\nThe problem for theaters is streaming is here to stay and will continue to gnaw away at attendance over time. In the meantime, Disney may have just given AMC Entertainment the time it needs to come up with a solution to confront this secular decline.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":89,"commentLimit":10,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"symbols":[],"verified":2,"subType":0,"readableState":1,"langContent":"CN","currentLanguage":"CN","warmUpFlag":false,"orderFlag":false,"shareable":true,"causeOfNotShareable":"","featuresForAnalytics":[],"commentAndTweetFlag":false,"upFlag":false,"length":28,"xxTargetLangEnum":"ZH_CN"},"commentList":[],"isCommentEnd":true,"isTiger":false,"isWeiXinMini":false,"url":"/m/post/893037197"}
精彩评论