jazinfinity
2021-09-08
Bonds for the lose?
85% Of High Yield Bonds Have A Negative Real Yield
免责声明：上述内容仅代表发帖人个人观点，不构成本平台的任何投资建议。
分享至
微信
复制链接
精彩评论
我们需要你的真知灼见来填补这片空白
打开APP，发表看法
APP内打开
发表看法
1
5
{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"detailType":1,"isChannel":false,"data":{"magic":2,"id":889952483,"tweetId":"889952483","gmtCreate":1631106268742,"gmtModify":1631890675162,"author":{"id":3577229603264633,"idStr":"3577229603264633","authorId":3577229603264633,"authorIdStr":"3577229603264633","name":"jazinfinity","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1208221a570d94e334b2d76cd0baf1d6","vip":1,"userType":1,"introduction":"","boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"fanSize":20,"starInvestorFlag":false},"themes":[],"images":[],"coverImages":[],"extraTitle":"","html":"<html><head></head><body><p>Bonds for the lose?</p></body></html>","htmlText":"<html><head></head><body><p>Bonds for the lose?</p></body></html>","text":"Bonds for the lose?","highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/889952483","repostId":1189790306,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1189790306","pubTimestamp":1631105439,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1189790306?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-09-08 20:50","market":"us","language":"en","title":"85% Of High Yield Bonds Have A Negative Real Yield","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1189790306","media":"zerohedge","summary":"Ahead of the publication of his periodic long-term study which is coming out next week, Deutsche Ban","content":"<p>Ahead of the publication of his periodic long-term study which is coming out next week, Deutsche Bank's Jim Reid has shared some advance highlights including one remarkable chart.</p>\n<p>Using 25 years of data for the US high yield market, Reid finds that the annual real return over the last quarter of a century has been 4.48% p.a. (6.75% p.a. nominal). Well, not any more: the index currently sports a nominal yield of just 3.87% and with headline CPI at 5.4%, Reid says that we are seeing a<b>negative gap of -1.53% between the two - around 6% below the long run excess real return.</b>\"<i>This pretty much ensures that historical returns are absolutely no template for the future\",</i>according to the DB strategist.</p>\n<p>Reid then shares the following chart showing that a \"stunning\" 85% of the US HY market has a yield below the current rate of inflation. While that proportion has been elevated for a few months now ever since the advent of the Fed's covid response policy,<b>it had never been above 10%, and rarely been much above zero. In fact, at the end of last year it was less than 4%.</b></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/61416447137d46a482b957c808bb1adf\" tg-width=\"734\" tg-height=\"419\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>\n<p>While many expect CPI to start descending over the coming months, \"it will likely stay elevated for many quarters to come\" according to Reid, jeopardizing the Fed's \"transitory\" narrative. Yet even at 3%, CPI would still be above 35% of the US HY market by yield.</p>\n<p>As Reid concludes, \"Financial repression has indeed stretched a long way down the credit curve and you have to take more and more risk to beat inflation these days. Indeed the current yield on US single-Bs is 4.3% and on CCCs 7.1%.\"</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>85% Of High Yield Bonds Have A Negative Real Yield</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n85% Of High Yield Bonds Have A Negative Real Yield\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-09-08 20:50 GMT+8 <a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/85-high-yield-bonds-have-negative-real-yield><strong>zerohedge</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Ahead of the publication of his periodic long-term study which is coming out next week, Deutsche Bank's Jim Reid has shared some advance highlights including one remarkable chart.\nUsing 25 years of ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/85-high-yield-bonds-have-negative-real-yield\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯","SPY":"标普500ETF",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/85-high-yield-bonds-have-negative-real-yield","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1189790306","content_text":"Ahead of the publication of his periodic long-term study which is coming out next week, Deutsche Bank's Jim Reid has shared some advance highlights including one remarkable chart.\nUsing 25 years of data for the US high yield market, Reid finds that the annual real return over the last quarter of a century has been 4.48% p.a. (6.75% p.a. nominal). Well, not any more: the index currently sports a nominal yield of just 3.87% and with headline CPI at 5.4%, Reid says that we are seeing anegative gap of -1.53% between the two - around 6% below the long run excess real return.\"This pretty much ensures that historical returns are absolutely no template for the future\",according to the DB strategist.\nReid then shares the following chart showing that a \"stunning\" 85% of the US HY market has a yield below the current rate of inflation. While that proportion has been elevated for a few months now ever since the advent of the Fed's covid response policy,it had never been above 10%, and rarely been much above zero. In fact, at the end of last year it was less than 4%.\n\nWhile many expect CPI to start descending over the coming months, \"it will likely stay elevated for many quarters to come\" according to Reid, jeopardizing the Fed's \"transitory\" narrative. Yet even at 3%, CPI would still be above 35% of the US HY market by yield.\nAs Reid concludes, \"Financial repression has indeed stretched a long way down the credit curve and you have to take more and more risk to beat inflation these days. Indeed the current yield on US single-Bs is 4.3% and on CCCs 7.1%.\"","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":98,"commentLimit":10,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"symbols":[],"verified":2,"subType":0,"readableState":1,"langContent":"EN","currentLanguage":"EN","warmUpFlag":false,"orderFlag":false,"shareable":true,"causeOfNotShareable":"","featuresForAnalytics":[],"commentAndTweetFlag":false,"andRepostAutoSelectedFlag":false,"upFlag":false,"length":16,"xxTargetLangEnum":"ORIG"},"commentList":[],"isCommentEnd":true,"isTiger":false,"isWeiXinMini":false,"url":"/m/post/889952483"}
精彩评论