1_老虎社区_美港股上老虎

免责声明：上述内容仅代表发帖人个人观点，不构成本平台的任何投资建议。

精彩评论

我们需要你的真知灼见来填补这片空白

发表看法

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"detailType":1,"isChannel":false,"data":{"magic":2,"id":869895916,"tweetId":"869895916","gmtCreate":1632271002235,"gmtModify":1632801619538,"author":{"id":3586254581176175,"idStr":"3586254581176175","authorId":3586254581176175,"authorIdStr":"3586254581176175","name":"chiaguan","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8fdcac0f133f5908b89db95162453f46","vip":1,"userType":1,"introduction":"","boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"fanSize":6,"starInvestorFlag":false},"themes":[],"images":[],"coverImages":[],"extraTitle":"","html":"<html><head></head><body><p>1</p></body></html>","htmlText":"<html><head></head><body><p>1</p></body></html>","text":"1","highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/869895916","repostId":2169630525,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2169630525","pubTimestamp":1632270851,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2169630525?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-09-22 08:34","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Facebook questioned by oversight board over celebrity rules","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2169630525","media":"The Straits Times","summary":"WASHINGTON (BLOOMBERG) - Facebook's de facto Supreme Court of content is calling on the social media","content":"<div>\n<p>WASHINGTON (BLOOMBERG) - Facebook's de facto Supreme Court of content is calling on the social media giant to release more information about how it moderates posts by famous people.\nThe Facebook ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"http://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/facebook-questioned-by-oversight-board-over-celebrity-rules\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"straits_highlight","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Facebook questioned by oversight board over celebrity rules</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFacebook questioned by oversight board over celebrity rules\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-09-22 08:34 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=http://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/facebook-questioned-by-oversight-board-over-celebrity-rules><strong>The Straits Times</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>WASHINGTON (BLOOMBERG) - Facebook's de facto Supreme Court of content is calling on the social media giant to release more information about how it moderates posts by famous people.\nThe Facebook ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"http://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/facebook-questioned-by-oversight-board-over-celebrity-rules\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"http://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/facebook-questioned-by-oversight-board-over-celebrity-rules","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2169630525","content_text":"WASHINGTON (BLOOMBERG) - Facebook's de facto Supreme Court of content is calling on the social media giant to release more information about how it moderates posts by famous people.\nThe Facebook Oversight Board said in a statement on Tuesday (Sept 22) that it has asked Facebook to provide more clarity about a program designed to protect high-profile figures from having their posts mistakenly taken down.\nThe review by the Oversight Board follows a Wall Street Journal report revealing details about a system Facebook built to exempt high-profile users in politics, popular culture and journalism from enforcement action over posts that break their rules.\nThe program, known as \"cross check\", was designed to avoid public relations backlash over famous people who mistaken have their posts taken down, the newspaper reported.\nWhile Facebook told the oversight board the program affects only a \"small number of decisions\", it actually included at least 5.8 million users in 2020, according to the newspaper.\n\"In light of recent developments, we are looking into the degree to which Facebook has been fully forthcoming in its responses in relation to cross-check, including the practice of whitelisting,\" the board wrote.\nUsers who are \"whitelisted\" don't face enforcement actions, the newspaper reported.\n\"These disclosures have drawn renewed attention to the seemingly inconsistent way that the company makes decisions, and why greater transparency and independent oversight of Facebook matter so much for users,\" the board said.\nThe board said it expects to receive a briefing from Facebook in the coming days and will issue a public analysis next month.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":166,"commentLimit":10,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"symbols":[],"verified":2,"subType":0,"readableState":1,"langContent":"EN","currentLanguage":"EN","warmUpFlag":false,"orderFlag":false,"shareable":true,"causeOfNotShareable":"","featuresForAnalytics":[],"commentAndTweetFlag":false,"andRepostAutoSelectedFlag":false,"upFlag":false,"length":1,"xxTargetLangEnum":"ORIG"},"commentList":[],"isCommentEnd":true,"isTiger":false,"isWeiXinMini":false,"url":"/m/post/869895916"}