Ok_老虎社区_美港股上老虎

免责声明：上述内容仅代表发帖人个人观点，不构成本平台的任何投资建议。

精彩评论

我们需要你的真知灼见来填补这片空白

发表看法

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"detailType":1,"isChannel":false,"data":{"magic":2,"id":862747451,"tweetId":"862747451","gmtCreate":1632919914034,"gmtModify":1632919976573,"author":{"id":3569227954325701,"idStr":"3569227954325701","authorId":3569227954325701,"authorIdStr":"3569227954325701","name":"Seuna","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0bfb6c0f011a65d66aae3afb6132a82d","vip":1,"userType":1,"introduction":"","boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"fanSize":598,"starInvestorFlag":false},"themes":[],"images":[],"coverImages":[],"extraTitle":"","html":"<html><head></head><body><p>Ok</p></body></html>","htmlText":"<html><head></head><body><p>Ok</p></body></html>","text":"Ok","highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/862747451","repostId":2171989792,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2171989792","pubTimestamp":1632918933,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2171989792?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-09-29 20:35","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tech stocks were just stomped. Here's what to watch next, according to Goldman Sachs.","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2171989792","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"Tech stocks just got pounded as bad as the New York Times restaurant review of Eleven Madison Park. ","content":"<p>Tech stocks just got pounded as bad as the New York Times restaurant review of Eleven Madison Park. (Sample: the beet dish \"tastes like Lemon Pledge and smells like a burning joint.\") The 2.8% downturn for the Nasdaq Composite was the largest <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a>-day percentage drop in six months.</p>\n<p>The sharp rise in interest rates over the last two weeks appears to be the main culprit. According to Goldman Sachs, the 26 basis points rise in the 10-year Treasury yield since Sept. 14 represented a 1.4 standard deviation event, and the 20 basis point rise in the 10-year TIPS yield represents a 1.7 standard deviation event.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3e4ea8be326537971e62e8118dec0b81\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"656\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>\n<p>Since 1965, they note, stocks struggle when rates rise by two or more standard deviations. With the long-duration information technology and communication services sector now accounting for 40% of the S&amp;P 500 market cap, the index is even more sensitive to rate shocks.</p>\n<p>Another issue, say strategists led by Ryan Hammond, is that the backdrop for stocks isn't as favorable as when interest rates initially jumped at the beginning of the year. \"That move largely reflected the ongoing improvement in the economic growth outlook following the vaccine announcements in early November. Today, economic growth is decelerating, the FOMC [Federal Open Market Committee] is expected to announce the start of tapering at its November meeting, and our economists have downgraded China's economic growth forecasts,\" say the economists.</p>\n<p>So what to look at now? Focus on the speed of the rate moves more than the level. The 10-year yield would have to rise above 2.3% for relative valuations -- the difference between the earnings yield and the bond yield -- to rank above the long-term average.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a7e0148a36c4317619a03b61b44f9175\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"655\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>\n<p>The Goldman strategists also aren't as bullish toward short-duration value stocks as they were earlier in the year. \"We expect the magnitude of outperformance for short-duration value stocks will be more muted in today's environment than in the early 2021 experience, given the less favorable current economic backdrop of decelerating growth,\" they say. Maintain longer-term positions in high-quality secular growth stocks, they add.</p>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tech stocks were just stomped. Here's what to watch next, according to Goldman Sachs.</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTech stocks were just stomped. Here's what to watch next, according to Goldman Sachs.\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-09-29 20:35 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.marketwatch.com/story/tech-stocks-were-just-stomped-heres-what-to-watch-next-according-to-goldman-sachs-11632912648?mod=hp_LATEST&adobe_mc=MCMID%3D03250748340802259633376614514522268876%7CMCORGID%3DCB68E4BA55144CAA0A4C98A5%2540AdobeOrg%7CTS%3D1632918812><strong>MarketWatch</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Tech stocks just got pounded as bad as the New York Times restaurant review of Eleven Madison Park. (Sample: the beet dish \"tastes like Lemon Pledge and smells like a burning joint.\") The 2.8% ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/tech-stocks-were-just-stomped-heres-what-to-watch-next-according-to-goldman-sachs-11632912648?mod=hp_LATEST&adobe_mc=MCMID%3D03250748340802259633376614514522268876%7CMCORGID%3DCB68E4BA55144CAA0A4C98A5%2540AdobeOrg%7CTS%3D1632918812\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/tech-stocks-were-just-stomped-heres-what-to-watch-next-according-to-goldman-sachs-11632912648?mod=hp_LATEST&adobe_mc=MCMID%3D03250748340802259633376614514522268876%7CMCORGID%3DCB68E4BA55144CAA0A4C98A5%2540AdobeOrg%7CTS%3D1632918812","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2171989792","content_text":"Tech stocks just got pounded as bad as the New York Times restaurant review of Eleven Madison Park. (Sample: the beet dish \"tastes like Lemon Pledge and smells like a burning joint.\") The 2.8% downturn for the Nasdaq Composite was the largest one-day percentage drop in six months.\nThe sharp rise in interest rates over the last two weeks appears to be the main culprit. According to Goldman Sachs, the 26 basis points rise in the 10-year Treasury yield since Sept. 14 represented a 1.4 standard deviation event, and the 20 basis point rise in the 10-year TIPS yield represents a 1.7 standard deviation event.\n\nSince 1965, they note, stocks struggle when rates rise by two or more standard deviations. With the long-duration information technology and communication services sector now accounting for 40% of the S&P 500 market cap, the index is even more sensitive to rate shocks.\nAnother issue, say strategists led by Ryan Hammond, is that the backdrop for stocks isn't as favorable as when interest rates initially jumped at the beginning of the year. \"That move largely reflected the ongoing improvement in the economic growth outlook following the vaccine announcements in early November. Today, economic growth is decelerating, the FOMC [Federal Open Market Committee] is expected to announce the start of tapering at its November meeting, and our economists have downgraded China's economic growth forecasts,\" say the economists.\nSo what to look at now? Focus on the speed of the rate moves more than the level. The 10-year yield would have to rise above 2.3% for relative valuations -- the difference between the earnings yield and the bond yield -- to rank above the long-term average.\n\nThe Goldman strategists also aren't as bullish toward short-duration value stocks as they were earlier in the year. \"We expect the magnitude of outperformance for short-duration value stocks will be more muted in today's environment than in the early 2021 experience, given the less favorable current economic backdrop of decelerating growth,\" they say. Maintain longer-term positions in high-quality secular growth stocks, they add.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":555,"commentLimit":10,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"symbols":[],"verified":2,"subType":0,"readableState":1,"langContent":"CN","currentLanguage":"CN","warmUpFlag":false,"orderFlag":false,"shareable":true,"causeOfNotShareable":"","featuresForAnalytics":[],"commentAndTweetFlag":false,"andRepostAutoSelectedFlag":false,"upFlag":false,"length":2,"xxTargetLangEnum":"ZH_CN"},"commentList":[],"isCommentEnd":true,"isTiger":false,"isWeiXinMini":false,"url":"/m/post/862747451"}