Excellent _老虎社区_美港股上老虎

2021-10-16

Excellent writing. You have spelled out the exact intentions of the management. Pull the wool over our eyes!

Naked Brand Has Become a SPAC Without the Risk Mitigation

免责声明：上述内容仅代表发帖人个人观点，不构成本平台的任何投资建议。

精彩评论

我们需要你的真知灼见来填补这片空白

发表看法

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"detailType":1,"isChannel":false,"data":{"magic":2,"id":824235632,"tweetId":"824235632","gmtCreate":1634313885348,"gmtModify":1634313885348,"author":{"id":3569809505691000,"idStr":"3569809505691000","authorId":3569809505691000,"authorIdStr":"3569809505691000","name":"breAkdaWn","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"userType":1,"introduction":"","boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"fanSize":34,"starInvestorFlag":false},"themes":[],"images":[],"coverImages":[],"extraTitle":"","html":"<html><head></head><body><p>Excellent writing. You have spelled out the exact intentions of the management. Pull the wool over our eyes!&nbsp;</p></body></html>","htmlText":"<html><head></head><body><p>Excellent writing. You have spelled out the exact intentions of the management. Pull the wool over our eyes!&nbsp;</p></body></html>","text":"Excellent writing. You have spelled out the exact intentions of the management. Pull the wool over our eyes!","highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/824235632","repostId":1140754934,"repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1140754934","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1634308406,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1140754934?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-15 22:33","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Naked Brand Has Become a SPAC Without the Risk Mitigation","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1140754934","media":"InvestorPlace","summary":"NAKD stock is a now binary gamble on the CEO's ESG pivot","content":"<p>Skivvies and clean tech. Has the market ever seen such an odd couple? So it is with&nbsp;<b>Naked Brand</b>(NASDAQ:<b><u>NAKD</u></b>). In the days following the announcement of news that the lingerie and swimwear retailer found a “disruptive opportunity in the clean technology sector,” investors had a “WTF?” moment that sent NAKD stock down almost 21%.</p>\n<p>Management’s announcement, sans important details, made the whole concept seemed ludicrous. Yet the analysis regarding the future implications for NAKD stock appeared largely measured.</p>\n<p>Take for instance<i>Barron’s</i>Sabrina Escobar. In discussing the sharp move of NAKD stock on the disclosure that Naked Brand CEO Justin Davis-Rice had found said “disruptive opportunity,” the only hint of an opinion was this line: “While the&nbsp;move into clean technology may be unexpected for a swimwear retailer, Davis-Rice said he had always been attracted to ESG [environmental, social, governance] opportunities.</p>\n<p>“May be unexpected?” This is the kind of understated plot twist that sees evangelical pastors use a hallowed name in vain, only to sheepishly apologize to passersby later. Out of all the news events that I anticipated concerning NAKD stock, I can safely say that this wasn’t one of them.</p>\n<p>Still, a method to the madness exists. Certainly, I wouldn’t recommend conservative investors piling into NAKD stock. However, from perusing social media forums, it appears that speculators are betting on a buy-the-rumor, sell-the-news scenario. That is, they’re positioning themselves now in Naked shares hoping for that next corporate disclosure that will skyrocket the stock.</p>\n<p>In that sense, I’ve got to give credit where it’s due. Honestly, under this play, I don’t think it matters what Naked announces. So long as it makes reasonable sense, there’s a chance that NAKD stock will jump. If it does, then these same bulls will probably dump it like there’s no tomorrow.</p>\n<p>NAKD Stock Now a Pure-Risk SPAC Trade</p>\n<p>So, I’ve got to take back some of my criticisms about NAKD stock. There’s a reason why so many speculators like it. I just don’t think it’s a particularly good one.</p>\n<p>In my opinion, with this obscure pivot to clean technologies and ESG, NAKD stock has become a sort of special purpose acquisition company. Like a pre-merger SPAC, you’re betting blind, hoping that its sponsor(s) will find a viable target enterprise. Indeed, Naked is very much like a SPAC since both entities are teasing the viability of a business combination without giving away critical details.</p>\n<p>But here’s the thing: if you had a choice, you might be better off with the SPAC than NAKD stock.</p>\n<p>Based on how pre-merger SPACs are structured, investors are trusting that sponsors will find an appropriate deal. But the difference between a SPAC and NAKD stock is that the former is not a purely blind trust. If a SPAC fails to find a merger target, investors can get their money back. Per the Securities and Exchange Commission:</p>\n<blockquote>\n [For SPAC shares purchased in the open market]you are only entitled to your\n <i>pro rata</i>share of the trust account and not the price at which you bought the SPAC shares on the market. For example, if a SPAC had an IPO at $10 per share, but you bought 100 SPAC shares on the open market at $12 per share, the shares you purchased are associated with a trust account balance of about $10 per share, so your share of the trust account would be worth about $1,000 (not the $1,200 you paid for your shares).\n</blockquote>\n<p>The opposite is also true, meaning that buying SPACs below the initial offering price basically facilitates risk-free yield. Plus, you can back out of a deal you don’t like.</p>\n<p>With SPACs, you have protection. With NAKD stock, you don’t.</p>\n<p><b>Be Careful in Your Approach</b></p>\n<p>I’m not here to dissuade anyone from buying NAKD stock. If you believe that there will be any army of people that will buy the ESG hype which you’ve already positioned yourself early in, then by all means, buy away.</p>\n<p>But as I just mentioned, the opposite is true. If Naked’s pivot to clean technologies and ESG turns out to be a dud, you’ll probably lose big. And the worst part is that you would have jumped out of the plane without a parachute.</p>","source":"lsy1606302653667","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Naked Brand Has Become a SPAC Without the Risk Mitigation</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nNaked Brand Has Become a SPAC Without the Risk Mitigation\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-10-15 22:33 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2021/10/nakd-stock-become-spac-without-risk-mitigation/><strong>InvestorPlace</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Skivvies and clean tech. Has the market ever seen such an odd couple? So it is with Naked Brand(NASDAQ:NAKD). In the days following the announcement of news that the lingerie and swimwear retailer ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2021/10/nakd-stock-become-spac-without-risk-mitigation/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2021/10/nakd-stock-become-spac-without-risk-mitigation/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1140754934","content_text":"Skivvies and clean tech. Has the market ever seen such an odd couple? So it is with Naked Brand(NASDAQ:NAKD). In the days following the announcement of news that the lingerie and swimwear retailer found a “disruptive opportunity in the clean technology sector,” investors had a “WTF?” moment that sent NAKD stock down almost 21%.\nManagement’s announcement, sans important details, made the whole concept seemed ludicrous. Yet the analysis regarding the future implications for NAKD stock appeared largely measured.\nTake for instanceBarron’sSabrina Escobar. In discussing the sharp move of NAKD stock on the disclosure that Naked Brand CEO Justin Davis-Rice had found said “disruptive opportunity,” the only hint of an opinion was this line: “While the move into clean technology may be unexpected for a swimwear retailer, Davis-Rice said he had always been attracted to ESG [environmental, social, governance] opportunities.\n“May be unexpected?” This is the kind of understated plot twist that sees evangelical pastors use a hallowed name in vain, only to sheepishly apologize to passersby later. Out of all the news events that I anticipated concerning NAKD stock, I can safely say that this wasn’t one of them.\nStill, a method to the madness exists. Certainly, I wouldn’t recommend conservative investors piling into NAKD stock. However, from perusing social media forums, it appears that speculators are betting on a buy-the-rumor, sell-the-news scenario. That is, they’re positioning themselves now in Naked shares hoping for that next corporate disclosure that will skyrocket the stock.\nIn that sense, I’ve got to give credit where it’s due. Honestly, under this play, I don’t think it matters what Naked announces. So long as it makes reasonable sense, there’s a chance that NAKD stock will jump. If it does, then these same bulls will probably dump it like there’s no tomorrow.\nNAKD Stock Now a Pure-Risk SPAC Trade\nSo, I’ve got to take back some of my criticisms about NAKD stock. There’s a reason why so many speculators like it. I just don’t think it’s a particularly good one.\nIn my opinion, with this obscure pivot to clean technologies and ESG, NAKD stock has become a sort of special purpose acquisition company. Like a pre-merger SPAC, you’re betting blind, hoping that its sponsor(s) will find a viable target enterprise. Indeed, Naked is very much like a SPAC since both entities are teasing the viability of a business combination without giving away critical details.\nBut here’s the thing: if you had a choice, you might be better off with the SPAC than NAKD stock.\nBased on how pre-merger SPACs are structured, investors are trusting that sponsors will find an appropriate deal. But the difference between a SPAC and NAKD stock is that the former is not a purely blind trust. If a SPAC fails to find a merger target, investors can get their money back. Per the Securities and Exchange Commission:\n\n [For SPAC shares purchased in the open market]you are only entitled to your\n pro ratashare of the trust account and not the price at which you bought the SPAC shares on the market. For example, if a SPAC had an IPO at $10 per share, but you bought 100 SPAC shares on the open market at $12 per share, the shares you purchased are associated with a trust account balance of about $10 per share, so your share of the trust account would be worth about $1,000 (not the $1,200 you paid for your shares).\n\nThe opposite is also true, meaning that buying SPACs below the initial offering price basically facilitates risk-free yield. Plus, you can back out of a deal you don’t like.\nWith SPACs, you have protection. With NAKD stock, you don’t.\nBe Careful in Your Approach\nI’m not here to dissuade anyone from buying NAKD stock. If you believe that there will be any army of people that will buy the ESG hype which you’ve already positioned yourself early in, then by all means, buy away.\nBut as I just mentioned, the opposite is true. If Naked’s pivot to clean technologies and ESG turns out to be a dud, you’ll probably lose big. And the worst part is that you would have jumped out of the plane without a parachute.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":687,"commentLimit":10,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"symbols":[],"verified":2,"subType":0,"readableState":1,"langContent":"CN","currentLanguage":"CN","warmUpFlag":false,"orderFlag":false,"shareable":true,"causeOfNotShareable":"","featuresForAnalytics":[],"commentAndTweetFlag":false,"andRepostAutoSelectedFlag":false,"upFlag":false,"length":91,"xxTargetLangEnum":"ZH_CN"},"commentList":[],"isCommentEnd":true,"isTiger":false,"isWeiXinMini":false,"url":"/m/post/824235632"}