whywhywhywhy
2021-12-17
[害羞]
Stocks’ reaction to latest inflation and jobs reports suggests that investors’ fears are overblown
免责声明：上述内容仅代表发帖人个人观点，不构成本平台的任何投资建议。
分享至
微信
复制链接
精彩评论
我们需要你的真知灼见来填补这片空白
打开APP，发表看法
APP内打开
发表看法
15
2
{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"detailType":1,"isChannel":false,"data":{"magic":2,"id":690791052,"tweetId":"690791052","gmtCreate":1639706684507,"gmtModify":1639707913933,"author":{"id":3580704334567935,"idStr":"3580704334567935","authorId":3580704334567935,"authorIdStr":"3580704334567935","name":"whywhywhywhy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/28195847b88a5c5115f0ab53d2eb35e7","vip":1,"userType":1,"introduction":"","boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"crmLevel":7,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"fanSize":51,"starInvestorFlag":false},"themes":[],"images":[],"coverImages":[],"extraTitle":"","html":"<html><head></head><body><p><span>[害羞] </span></p></body></html>","htmlText":"<html><head></head><body><p><span>[害羞] </span></p></body></html>","text":"[害羞]","highlighted":2,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":15,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/690791052","repostId":1189772579,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1189772579","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1639704109,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1189772579?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-17 09:21","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Stocks’ reaction to latest inflation and jobs reports suggests that investors’ fears are overblown","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1189772579","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"U.S. inflation surprises of 2022 and 2023 are more likely to be to the downside than the upside\nGett","content":"<p>U.S. inflation surprises of 2022 and 2023 are more likely to be to the downside than the upside</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8066e02530f188ac45f6252937991422\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"394\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Getty Images/iStockphoto</span></p>\n<p></p>\n<p>You’re almost certainly too worried about inflation. I acknowledge that my contrarian position on inflation is becoming increasingly solitary. Even U.S. Federal Reserve chairman Jerome Powell, who had been solidly in the “inflation is transitory” camp, threw in the towel at this week’s meeting of the Fed’s Open Market Committee — along with most other members of that Committee as well.</p>\n<p>I nevertheless am sticking with my contrarian position because of how Wall Street behaved on two recent occasions. The first came on Dec. 10, as the U.S. Labor Department reported that the Consumer Price Index inflation is running at a 6.8% annual rate, higher than what economists polled by MarketWatch had expected and the highest since July 1982. Yet almost immediately following the release of this inflation news, S&P 500 e-mini futures rose 0.5%.</p>\n<p>This move higher occurred on heavy trading volume, and it’s impossible to ascertain the motives and beliefs of the individual futures traders who bid up the S&P 500 futures on Dec. 10. But the suddenness of the price increase immediately after 8:30 a.m., and the absence of any other major news at that hour, points overwhelmingly to the inflation news being the catalyst for the market’s rise.</p>\n<p>This reaction was surprising, to say the least. The news media over the past six months has been obsessed with whether inflation’s spike is more than temporary, and with how persistent inflation would cause the Fed to tighten more aggressively. In contrast, Wall Street’s reaction to the inflation news suggests that it’s not that worried.</p>\n<p>The second occasion on which Wall Street indicated it’s not particularly concerned about inflation came in the wake of the <a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/coming-up-u-s-jobs-report-for-november-11638537320?mod=article_inline\" target=\"_blank\">Dec. 3 jobs report</a>, a week prior to the release of the latest inflation data. Even though the Labor Department reported that far fewer jobs were created in November than had been expected, stocks rose: over the 60 minutes following the Labor Department’s release, December S&P 500 futures added 0.5%.</p>\n<p>You easily could have imagined the market reacting differently. It seems plausible that a softer economy would prompt the Fed to pursue more inflationary policies. If Wall Street was as anxious about higher inflation as the news media would have you believe, this jobs report would have sent stocks into a tailspin.</p>\n<p>That it didn’t react that way suggests that the “market is less worried about long-term inflation,” Ravi Jagannathan, a finance professor at Northwestern University, told me in an email. That’s “good news.”</p>\n<p>I reached out to Professor Jagannathan because he co-authored a unique study many years ago on how to interpret the investment significance of the monthly jobs numbers. That study, entitled “The Stock Market’s Reaction to Unemployment News: Why Bad News Is Usually Good for Stocks,” was published in the <i>Journal of Finance</i> in 2005. His co-authors were John Boyd, a finance professor at the University of Minnesota, and Jian Hu of Moody’s Investors Service.</p>\n<p>Wall Street’s sanguine reaction to these early-December reports on inflation and jobs is echoed in the strikingly different inflation expectations of consumers, on the one hand, and professional forecasters on the other.</p>\n<p>According to the latest survey conducted by the University of Michigan, the median expected rise in the CPI over the next 12 months is 4.9%. In contrast, according to the latest Survey of Professional Forecasters conducted by the Philadelphia Federal Reserve, the median expectation for 2022 is that the CPI will rise 2.4% — less than half of what consumers are expecting. The professional forecasters’ expectation is in the same ballpark as a quantitative model created by the Cleveland Federal Reserve, which is projecting that the CPI over the next 12 months will rise by 2.62%.</p>\n<p>Moreover, the Cleveland model is expecting inflation to be lower in 2023. Their model currently is projecting a two-year CPI increase of 2.05% annualized. To get a two-year rate that low, when the first of the two years is experiencing 2.62% inflation, the CPI in 2023 would have to rise by around 1.5%.</p>\n<p>Yet another straw in the wind that inflation’s recent spike may be transitory is how the Cleveland model’s projection of 10-year inflation changed in the wake of the Dec. 10 inflation report. Believe it or not, it went down, however slightly, — to 1.75% from 1.76% annualized.</p>\n<p>The bottom line? The inflation surprises of 2022 and 2023 are more likely to be on the downside than on the upside. Plan accordingly.</p>\n<p></p>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Stocks’ reaction to latest inflation and jobs reports suggests that investors’ fears are overblown</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nStocks’ reaction to latest inflation and jobs reports suggests that investors’ fears are overblown\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-12-17 09:21 GMT+8 <a href=https://www.marketwatch.com/story/stocks-reaction-to-latest-inflation-and-jobs-reports-suggests-that-investors-fears-are-overblown-11639694633?mod=home-page><strong>MarketWatch</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>U.S. inflation surprises of 2022 and 2023 are more likely to be to the downside than the upside\nGetty Images/iStockphoto\n\nYou’re almost certainly too worried about inflation. I acknowledge that my ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/stocks-reaction-to-latest-inflation-and-jobs-reports-suggests-that-investors-fears-are-overblown-11639694633?mod=home-page\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/stocks-reaction-to-latest-inflation-and-jobs-reports-suggests-that-investors-fears-are-overblown-11639694633?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1189772579","content_text":"U.S. inflation surprises of 2022 and 2023 are more likely to be to the downside than the upside\nGetty Images/iStockphoto\n\nYou’re almost certainly too worried about inflation. I acknowledge that my contrarian position on inflation is becoming increasingly solitary. Even U.S. Federal Reserve chairman Jerome Powell, who had been solidly in the “inflation is transitory” camp, threw in the towel at this week’s meeting of the Fed’s Open Market Committee — along with most other members of that Committee as well.\nI nevertheless am sticking with my contrarian position because of how Wall Street behaved on two recent occasions. The first came on Dec. 10, as the U.S. Labor Department reported that the Consumer Price Index inflation is running at a 6.8% annual rate, higher than what economists polled by MarketWatch had expected and the highest since July 1982. Yet almost immediately following the release of this inflation news, S&P 500 e-mini futures rose 0.5%.\nThis move higher occurred on heavy trading volume, and it’s impossible to ascertain the motives and beliefs of the individual futures traders who bid up the S&P 500 futures on Dec. 10. But the suddenness of the price increase immediately after 8:30 a.m., and the absence of any other major news at that hour, points overwhelmingly to the inflation news being the catalyst for the market’s rise.\nThis reaction was surprising, to say the least. The news media over the past six months has been obsessed with whether inflation’s spike is more than temporary, and with how persistent inflation would cause the Fed to tighten more aggressively. In contrast, Wall Street’s reaction to the inflation news suggests that it’s not that worried.\nThe second occasion on which Wall Street indicated it’s not particularly concerned about inflation came in the wake of the Dec. 3 jobs report, a week prior to the release of the latest inflation data. Even though the Labor Department reported that far fewer jobs were created in November than had been expected, stocks rose: over the 60 minutes following the Labor Department’s release, December S&P 500 futures added 0.5%.\nYou easily could have imagined the market reacting differently. It seems plausible that a softer economy would prompt the Fed to pursue more inflationary policies. If Wall Street was as anxious about higher inflation as the news media would have you believe, this jobs report would have sent stocks into a tailspin.\nThat it didn’t react that way suggests that the “market is less worried about long-term inflation,” Ravi Jagannathan, a finance professor at Northwestern University, told me in an email. That’s “good news.”\nI reached out to Professor Jagannathan because he co-authored a unique study many years ago on how to interpret the investment significance of the monthly jobs numbers. That study, entitled “The Stock Market’s Reaction to Unemployment News: Why Bad News Is Usually Good for Stocks,” was published in the Journal of Finance in 2005. His co-authors were John Boyd, a finance professor at the University of Minnesota, and Jian Hu of Moody’s Investors Service.\nWall Street’s sanguine reaction to these early-December reports on inflation and jobs is echoed in the strikingly different inflation expectations of consumers, on the one hand, and professional forecasters on the other.\nAccording to the latest survey conducted by the University of Michigan, the median expected rise in the CPI over the next 12 months is 4.9%. In contrast, according to the latest Survey of Professional Forecasters conducted by the Philadelphia Federal Reserve, the median expectation for 2022 is that the CPI will rise 2.4% — less than half of what consumers are expecting. The professional forecasters’ expectation is in the same ballpark as a quantitative model created by the Cleveland Federal Reserve, which is projecting that the CPI over the next 12 months will rise by 2.62%.\nMoreover, the Cleveland model is expecting inflation to be lower in 2023. Their model currently is projecting a two-year CPI increase of 2.05% annualized. To get a two-year rate that low, when the first of the two years is experiencing 2.62% inflation, the CPI in 2023 would have to rise by around 1.5%.\nYet another straw in the wind that inflation’s recent spike may be transitory is how the Cleveland model’s projection of 10-year inflation changed in the wake of the Dec. 10 inflation report. Believe it or not, it went down, however slightly, — to 1.75% from 1.76% annualized.\nThe bottom line? The inflation surprises of 2022 and 2023 are more likely to be on the downside than on the upside. Plan accordingly.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":215,"commentLimit":10,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"symbols":[],"verified":2,"subType":0,"readableState":1,"langContent":"CN","currentLanguage":"CN","warmUpFlag":false,"orderFlag":false,"shareable":true,"causeOfNotShareable":"","featuresForAnalytics":[],"commentAndTweetFlag":false,"andRepostAutoSelectedFlag":false,"upFlag":false,"length":6,"xxTargetLangEnum":"ZH_CN"},"commentList":[],"isCommentEnd":true,"isTiger":false,"isWeiXinMini":false,"url":"/m/post/690791052"}
精彩评论