Srav
2021-12-06
Oh no! ๐๐๐๐
Tesla seeks court approval of win in engineer's defamation case
ๅ ่ดฃๅฃฐๆ๏ผไธ่ฟฐๅ ๅฎนไป ไปฃ่กจๅๅธไบบไธชไบบ่ง็น๏ผไธๆๆๆฌๅนณๅฐ็ไปปไฝๆ่ตๅปบ่ฎฎใ
ๅไบซ่ณ
ๅพฎไฟก
ๅคๅถ้พๆฅ
็ฒพๅฝฉ่ฏ่ฎบ
ๆไปฌ้่ฆไฝ ็็็ฅ็ผ่งๆฅๅกซ่กฅ่ฟ็็ฉบ็ฝ
ๆๅผAPP๏ผๅ่กจ็ๆณ
APPๅ ๆๅผ
ๅ่กจ็ๆณ
4
{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"detailType":1,"isChannel":false,"data":{"magic":2,"id":608786861,"tweetId":"608786861","gmtCreate":1638790801595,"gmtModify":1638791492058,"author":{"id":4088072696934800,"idStr":"4088072696934800","authorId":4088072696934800,"authorIdStr":"4088072696934800","name":"Srav","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/836224b9548dab0408e50eb68087968a","vip":1,"userType":1,"introduction":"","boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"fanSize":6,"starInvestorFlag":false},"themes":[],"images":[],"coverImages":[],"extraTitle":"","html":"<html><head></head><body><p>Oh no! ๐๐๐๐</p></body></html>","htmlText":"<html><head></head><body><p>Oh no! ๐๐๐๐</p></body></html>","text":"Oh no! ๐๐๐๐","highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/608786861","repostId":2188243825,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2188243825","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1638789106,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2188243825?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-06 19:11","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tesla seeks court approval of win in engineer's defamation case","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2188243825","media":"Reuters","summary":"Dec 3 (Reuters) - Tesla Incย has asked a U.S. court to affirm an arbitrator's recent decision dismiss","content":"<p>Dec 3 (Reuters) - Tesla Inc has asked a U.S. court to affirm an arbitrator's recent decision dismissing a former engineer's claims that the automaker fired and defamed her for raising concerns about defective floormats and contracting practices.</p>\n<p>In a petition filed in San Francisco federal court on Thursday, Tesla said an arbitrator in a Nov. 3 decision found Cristina Balan's claims that the company falsely accused her of criminal conduct in response to a 2017 Huffington Post article about her firing were untimely.</p>\n<p>In March, a California-based appeals court ruled that Balan was required to arbitrate the defamation claims because they were directly related to her employment with Tesla.</p>\n<p>The company on Thursday asked the court to confirm the arbitrator's decision, which opens the door for Balan to challenge it.</p>\n<p>Balan said in an email on Friday that she would seek to vacate the arbitration award \"due to fraud, corruption, bias ... and manifest disregard for the law.\"</p>\n<p>In a 2019 lawsuit, Balan said she was fired shortly after sending an email to Tesla Chief Executive Elon Musk claiming contracts were being awarded based on friendships regardless of price or quality.</p>\n<p>Balan had also raised concerns about floormats in Tesla's Model S curling up under the pedals.</p>\n<p>In a statement provided to the Huffington Post about Balan's case, Tesla claimed she was fired for using company time to work on a personal project and illegally recording conversations with colleagues.</p>\n<p>Tesla had lauded Balan's work prior to her firing, including crediting her with perfecting a design for a battery pack, according to court filings.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tesla seeks court approval of win in engineer's defamation case</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTesla seeks court approval of win in engineer's defamation case\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-12-06 19:11</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Dec 3 (Reuters) - Tesla Inc has asked a U.S. court to affirm an arbitrator's recent decision dismissing a former engineer's claims that the automaker fired and defamed her for raising concerns about defective floormats and contracting practices.</p>\n<p>In a petition filed in San Francisco federal court on Thursday, Tesla said an arbitrator in a Nov. 3 decision found Cristina Balan's claims that the company falsely accused her of criminal conduct in response to a 2017 Huffington Post article about her firing were untimely.</p>\n<p>In March, a California-based appeals court ruled that Balan was required to arbitrate the defamation claims because they were directly related to her employment with Tesla.</p>\n<p>The company on Thursday asked the court to confirm the arbitrator's decision, which opens the door for Balan to challenge it.</p>\n<p>Balan said in an email on Friday that she would seek to vacate the arbitration award \"due to fraud, corruption, bias ... and manifest disregard for the law.\"</p>\n<p>In a 2019 lawsuit, Balan said she was fired shortly after sending an email to Tesla Chief Executive Elon Musk claiming contracts were being awarded based on friendships regardless of price or quality.</p>\n<p>Balan had also raised concerns about floormats in Tesla's Model S curling up under the pedals.</p>\n<p>In a statement provided to the Huffington Post about Balan's case, Tesla claimed she was fired for using company time to work on a personal project and illegally recording conversations with colleagues.</p>\n<p>Tesla had lauded Balan's work prior to her firing, including crediting her with perfecting a design for a battery pack, according to court filings.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4551":"ๅฏๅพ่ตๆฌๆไป","BK4548":"ๅทด็พๅๆท็ฆๆไป","BK4534":"็ๅฃซไฟก่ดทๆไป","TSLA":"็นๆฏๆ","BK4527":"ๆๆ็งๆ่ก","BK4550":"็บขๆ่ตๆฌๆไป","BK4555":"ๆฐ่ฝๆบ่ฝฆ","BK4533":"AQR่ตๆฌ็ฎก็(ๅ จ็็ฌฌไบๅคงๅฏนๅฒๅบ้)","BK4099":"ๆฑฝ่ฝฆๅถ้ ๅ"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2188243825","content_text":"Dec 3 (Reuters) - Tesla Incย has asked a U.S. court to affirm an arbitrator's recent decision dismissing a former engineer's claims that the automaker fired and defamed her for raising concerns about defective floormats and contracting practices.\nIn a petition filed in San Francisco federal court on Thursday, Tesla said an arbitrator in a Nov. 3 decision found Cristina Balan's claims that the company falsely accused her of criminal conduct in response to a 2017 Huffington Post article about her firing were untimely.\nIn March, a California-based appeals court ruled that Balan was required to arbitrate the defamation claims because they were directly related to her employment with Tesla.\nThe company on Thursday asked the court to confirm the arbitrator's decision, which opens the door for Balan to challenge it.\nBalan said in an email on Friday that she would seek to vacate the arbitration award \"due to fraud, corruption, bias ... and manifest disregard for the law.\"\nIn a 2019 lawsuit, Balan said she was fired shortly after sending an email to Tesla Chief Executive Elon Musk claiming contracts were being awarded based on friendships regardless of price or quality.\nBalan had also raised concerns about floormats in Tesla's Model S curling up under the pedals.\nIn a statement provided to the Huffington Post about Balan's case, Tesla claimed she was fired for using company time to work on a personal project and illegally recording conversations with colleagues.\nTesla had lauded Balan's work prior to her firing, including crediting her with perfecting a design for a battery pack, according to court filings.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":950,"commentLimit":10,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"symbols":[],"verified":2,"subType":0,"readableState":1,"langContent":"CN","currentLanguage":"CN","warmUpFlag":false,"orderFlag":false,"shareable":true,"causeOfNotShareable":"","featuresForAnalytics":[],"commentAndTweetFlag":false,"andRepostAutoSelectedFlag":false,"upFlag":false,"length":13,"xxTargetLangEnum":"ZH_CN"},"commentList":[],"isCommentEnd":true,"isTiger":false,"isWeiXinMini":false,"url":"/m/post/608786861"}
็ฒพๅฝฉ่ฏ่ฎบ