137bd706
2021-12-11
Pls like
MacKenzie Scott reverses course after criticism, says she'll reveal who benefited from her latest round of billionaire philanthropy
免责声明：上述内容仅代表发帖人个人观点，不构成本平台的任何投资建议。
分享至
微信
复制链接
精彩评论
我们需要你的真知灼见来填补这片空白
打开APP，发表看法
APP内打开
发表看法
1
{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"detailType":1,"isChannel":false,"data":{"magic":2,"id":605216028,"tweetId":"605216028","gmtCreate":1639180303360,"gmtModify":1639180303642,"author":{"id":3584415246670106,"idStr":"3584415246670106","authorId":3584415246670106,"authorIdStr":"3584415246670106","name":"137bd706","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"userType":1,"introduction":"","boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"fanSize":26,"starInvestorFlag":false},"themes":[],"images":[],"coverImages":[],"extraTitle":"","html":"<html><head></head><body><p>Pls like</p></body></html>","htmlText":"<html><head></head><body><p>Pls like</p></body></html>","text":"Pls like","highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/605216028","repostId":2190736016,"repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2190736016","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1639175100,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2190736016?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-11 06:25","market":"us","language":"en","title":"MacKenzie Scott reverses course after criticism, says she'll reveal who benefited from her latest round of billionaire philanthropy","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2190736016","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"MW MacKenzie Scott reverses course after criticism, says she'll reveal who benefited from her latest","content":"<html><body><font class=\"NormalMinus1\" face=\"Arial\">\n<p>\nMW MacKenzie Scott reverses course after criticism, says she'll reveal who benefited from her latest round of billionaire philanthropy\n</p>\n<p>\n By Leslie Albrecht \n</p>\n<p>\n Scott, the former wife of Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, says she plans to build a website with a searchable database of grants \n</p>\n<p>\n After criticism about a lack of transparency, billionaire philanthropist MacKenzie Scott reversed course and said she'll share details about her latest round of gifts. \n</p>\n<p>\n In a Medium post Friday, Scott said she plans to release the information in the year to come, and to create a website with a searchable database of grants. Scott, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> of the world's wealthiest women, has announced more than $8.5 billion in grants to hundreds of nonprofits across the country since her 2019 divorce from Amazon <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">$(AMZN)$</a> founder Jeff Bezos. \n</p>\n<p>\n She released an update on her 2021 giving on Wednesday, but didn't reveal which groups received funding or how much money she had given out. Scott said she left \"dollar signs\" out of her update because she wanted media coverage to focus on the groups working on the causes she supports. She said she would let the groups that received her funding speak for themselves if they chose. \n</p>\n<p>\n Scott also called for a broader definition of philanthropy -- one that means more than just ultra-wealthy people doling out billions of dollars. \n</p>\n<p>\n The lack of detail in Scott's latest announcement provoked criticism from some philanthropy experts, who said that public scrutiny is one of the few checks against the power and influence of elite philanthropists. Others noted that charitable donations are typically tax-deductible, so all U.S. taxpayers have an interest in knowing where her money goes. \n</p>\n<p>\n \"She's undermining norms of transparency and accountability for a good cause, but plenty of other donors would be interested in doing a similar amount of undermining those norms without her noble intent,\" said Ben Soskis, a senior research associate at the Center on Nonprofits and Philanthropy at the Urban Institute, a Washington, D.C.-based think tank, after Scott declined to reveal details in her initial announcement. \n</p>\n<p>\n Soskis, who studies the history of philanthropy, praised Scott's subsequent update promising to share details. \n</p>\n<p>\n \"I hope this is an important moment in terms of establishing norms for the transparency commitments of living donors,\" Soskis said on <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWTR\">Twitter</a> (TWTR). \"We're at a moment where they could go in several directions, including toward real opacity. I hope @mackenziescott will help move them in the other direction.\" \n</p>\n<p>\n -Leslie Albrecht \n</p>\n<pre>\n \n</pre>\n<p>\n <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/END\">$(END)$</a> Dow Jones Newswires\n</p>\n<p>\n December 10, 2021 17:25 ET (22:25 GMT)\n</p>\n<p>\n Copyright (c) 2021 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.\n</p>\n</font></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>MacKenzie Scott reverses course after criticism, says she'll reveal who benefited from her latest round of billionaire philanthropy</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nMacKenzie Scott reverses course after criticism, says she'll reveal who benefited from her latest round of billionaire philanthropy\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-12-11 06:25</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><body><font class=\"NormalMinus1\" face=\"Arial\">\n<p>\nMW MacKenzie Scott reverses course after criticism, says she'll reveal who benefited from her latest round of billionaire philanthropy\n</p>\n<p>\n By Leslie Albrecht \n</p>\n<p>\n Scott, the former wife of Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, says she plans to build a website with a searchable database of grants \n</p>\n<p>\n After criticism about a lack of transparency, billionaire philanthropist MacKenzie Scott reversed course and said she'll share details about her latest round of gifts. \n</p>\n<p>\n In a Medium post Friday, Scott said she plans to release the information in the year to come, and to create a website with a searchable database of grants. Scott, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> of the world's wealthiest women, has announced more than $8.5 billion in grants to hundreds of nonprofits across the country since her 2019 divorce from Amazon <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">$(AMZN)$</a> founder Jeff Bezos. \n</p>\n<p>\n She released an update on her 2021 giving on Wednesday, but didn't reveal which groups received funding or how much money she had given out. Scott said she left \"dollar signs\" out of her update because she wanted media coverage to focus on the groups working on the causes she supports. She said she would let the groups that received her funding speak for themselves if they chose. \n</p>\n<p>\n Scott also called for a broader definition of philanthropy -- one that means more than just ultra-wealthy people doling out billions of dollars. \n</p>\n<p>\n The lack of detail in Scott's latest announcement provoked criticism from some philanthropy experts, who said that public scrutiny is one of the few checks against the power and influence of elite philanthropists. Others noted that charitable donations are typically tax-deductible, so all U.S. taxpayers have an interest in knowing where her money goes. \n</p>\n<p>\n \"She's undermining norms of transparency and accountability for a good cause, but plenty of other donors would be interested in doing a similar amount of undermining those norms without her noble intent,\" said Ben Soskis, a senior research associate at the Center on Nonprofits and Philanthropy at the Urban Institute, a Washington, D.C.-based think tank, after Scott declined to reveal details in her initial announcement. \n</p>\n<p>\n Soskis, who studies the history of philanthropy, praised Scott's subsequent update promising to share details. \n</p>\n<p>\n \"I hope this is an important moment in terms of establishing norms for the transparency commitments of living donors,\" Soskis said on <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWTR\">Twitter</a> (TWTR). \"We're at a moment where they could go in several directions, including toward real opacity. I hope @mackenziescott will help move them in the other direction.\" \n</p>\n<p>\n -Leslie Albrecht \n</p>\n<pre>\n \n</pre>\n<p>\n <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/END\">$(END)$</a> Dow Jones Newswires\n</p>\n<p>\n December 10, 2021 17:25 ET (22:25 GMT)\n</p>\n<p>\n Copyright (c) 2021 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.\n</p>\n</font></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4551":"寇图资本持仓","BK4561":"索罗斯持仓","QNETCN":"纳斯达克中美互联网老虎指数","BK4548":"巴美列捷福持仓","BK4516":"特朗普概念","BK4554":"元宇宙及AR概念","BK4532":"文艺复兴科技持仓","BK4507":"流媒体概念","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","TWTR":"Twitter","BK4566":"资本集团","AMZN":"亚马逊","BK4508":"社交媒体","BK4535":"淡马锡持仓","BK4524":"宅经济概念","BK4559":"巴菲特持仓","BK4538":"云计算","BK4077":"互动媒体与服务","BK4527":"明星科技股","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","BK4503":"景林资产持仓","BK4122":"互联网与直销零售"},"source_url":"http://dowjonesnews.com/newdjn/logon.aspx?AL=N","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2190736016","content_text":"MW MacKenzie Scott reverses course after criticism, says she'll reveal who benefited from her latest round of billionaire philanthropy\n\n\n By Leslie Albrecht \n\n\n Scott, the former wife of Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, says she plans to build a website with a searchable database of grants \n\n\n After criticism about a lack of transparency, billionaire philanthropist MacKenzie Scott reversed course and said she'll share details about her latest round of gifts. \n\n\n In a Medium post Friday, Scott said she plans to release the information in the year to come, and to create a website with a searchable database of grants. Scott, one of the world's wealthiest women, has announced more than $8.5 billion in grants to hundreds of nonprofits across the country since her 2019 divorce from Amazon $(AMZN)$ founder Jeff Bezos. \n\n\n She released an update on her 2021 giving on Wednesday, but didn't reveal which groups received funding or how much money she had given out. Scott said she left \"dollar signs\" out of her update because she wanted media coverage to focus on the groups working on the causes she supports. She said she would let the groups that received her funding speak for themselves if they chose. \n\n\n Scott also called for a broader definition of philanthropy -- one that means more than just ultra-wealthy people doling out billions of dollars. \n\n\n The lack of detail in Scott's latest announcement provoked criticism from some philanthropy experts, who said that public scrutiny is one of the few checks against the power and influence of elite philanthropists. Others noted that charitable donations are typically tax-deductible, so all U.S. taxpayers have an interest in knowing where her money goes. \n\n\n \"She's undermining norms of transparency and accountability for a good cause, but plenty of other donors would be interested in doing a similar amount of undermining those norms without her noble intent,\" said Ben Soskis, a senior research associate at the Center on Nonprofits and Philanthropy at the Urban Institute, a Washington, D.C.-based think tank, after Scott declined to reveal details in her initial announcement. \n\n\n Soskis, who studies the history of philanthropy, praised Scott's subsequent update promising to share details. \n\n\n \"I hope this is an important moment in terms of establishing norms for the transparency commitments of living donors,\" Soskis said on Twitter (TWTR). \"We're at a moment where they could go in several directions, including toward real opacity. I hope @mackenziescott will help move them in the other direction.\" \n\n\n -Leslie Albrecht \n\n\n \n\n\n$(END)$ Dow Jones Newswires\n\n\n December 10, 2021 17:25 ET (22:25 GMT)\n\n\n Copyright (c) 2021 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":327,"commentLimit":10,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"symbols":[],"verified":2,"subType":0,"readableState":1,"langContent":"CN","currentLanguage":"CN","warmUpFlag":false,"orderFlag":false,"shareable":true,"causeOfNotShareable":"","featuresForAnalytics":[],"commentAndTweetFlag":false,"andRepostAutoSelectedFlag":false,"upFlag":false,"length":7,"xxTargetLangEnum":"ZH_CN"},"commentList":[],"isCommentEnd":true,"isTiger":false,"isWeiXinMini":false,"url":"/m/post/605216028"}
精彩评论