Bull_Lion
2021-12-09
Time to sell out of Goldman. It’s the same bloody bank embroiled in the 1MDB scandal
Goldman Sachs must again face crisis-era securities fraud class action
免责声明：上述内容仅代表发帖人个人观点，不构成本平台的任何投资建议。
分享至
微信
复制链接
精彩评论
我们需要你的真知灼见来填补这片空白
打开APP，发表看法
APP内打开
发表看法
{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"detailType":1,"isChannel":false,"data":{"magic":2,"id":602636740,"tweetId":"602636740","gmtCreate":1639012987848,"gmtModify":1639015375095,"author":{"id":3573540190522229,"idStr":"3573540190522229","authorId":3573540190522229,"authorIdStr":"3573540190522229","name":"Bull_Lion","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/97c7d011186160cd333508e7d9191f74","vip":1,"userType":1,"introduction":"","boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"crmLevel":7,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"fanSize":80,"starInvestorFlag":false},"themes":[],"images":[],"coverImages":[],"extraTitle":"","html":"<html><head></head><body><p>Time to sell out of Goldman. It’s the same bloody bank embroiled in the 1MDB scandal </p></body></html>","htmlText":"<html><head></head><body><p>Time to sell out of Goldman. It’s the same bloody bank embroiled in the 1MDB scandal </p></body></html>","text":"Time to sell out of Goldman. It’s the same bloody bank embroiled in the 1MDB scandal","highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/602636740","repostId":2190621696,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2190621696","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1639007400,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2190621696?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-09 07:50","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Goldman Sachs must again face crisis-era securities fraud class action","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2190621696","media":"Reuters","summary":"NEW YORK, Dec 8 (Reuters) - Goldman Sachs Group Inc must again face a class action by shareholders w","content":"<p>NEW YORK, Dec 8 (Reuters) - Goldman Sachs Group Inc must again face a class action by shareholders who said they lost $13 billion because the Wall Street bank hid conflicts of interest when creating risky subprime securities before the 2008 financial crisis, a judge ruled on Wednesday.</p>\n<p>U.S. District Judge Paul Crotty in <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MHC.AU\">Manhattan</a> rejected Goldman's claim that its general statements about its business, including that client interests \"always come first\" and \"integrity and honesty are at the heart of our business,\" were too generic to mislead investors and affect its stock price.</p>\n<p>Shareholders accused Goldman of concealing its packaging and selling of collateralized debt obligations it wanted to fail so favored clients like hedge fund billionaire John Paulson could secretly bet against them. They said Goldman's stock price fell as the truth became known.</p>\n<p>Goldman declined to comment. Darren Robbins, a lawyer for shareholders including the Arkansas Teacher Retirement System, said they were ready to move the 11-year-old case to trial.</p>\n<p>The case had gone to the U.S. Supreme Court, which in June said lower courts could use expert testimony and \"a good dose of common sense\" in deciding whether generic statements affected stock prices.</p>\n<p>Applying that decision, Crotty said even Goldman's more generic statements could reinforce misconceptions about its practices, and that Goldman offered no evidence its stock price would have \"held fast\" had it disclosed its conflicts.</p>\n<p>Noting Goldman's claim that dozens of blue-chip companies make similar statements, Crotty said he was \"hard pressed\" to understand why such statements would achieve \"such ubiquity\" if they had no effect on stock prices.</p>\n<p>The judge said Goldman did not show it more likely than not that its alleged misstatements \"had no price impact whatsoever.\"</p>\n<p>In 1988, the Supreme Court said investors could rely on a presumption that all public information about a company was reflected in its stock price.</p>\n<p>Goldman reached a $550 million settlement in 2010 resolving U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission charges it concealed Paulson's role in creating the Abacus 2007-AC1 CDO, and that he made $1 billion betting against it.</p>\n<p>The case is In re Goldman Sachs Group Inc Securities Litigation, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 10-03461.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Goldman Sachs must again face crisis-era securities fraud class action</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGoldman Sachs must again face crisis-era securities fraud class action\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-12-09 07:50</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>NEW YORK, Dec 8 (Reuters) - Goldman Sachs Group Inc must again face a class action by shareholders who said they lost $13 billion because the Wall Street bank hid conflicts of interest when creating risky subprime securities before the 2008 financial crisis, a judge ruled on Wednesday.</p>\n<p>U.S. District Judge Paul Crotty in <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MHC.AU\">Manhattan</a> rejected Goldman's claim that its general statements about its business, including that client interests \"always come first\" and \"integrity and honesty are at the heart of our business,\" were too generic to mislead investors and affect its stock price.</p>\n<p>Shareholders accused Goldman of concealing its packaging and selling of collateralized debt obligations it wanted to fail so favored clients like hedge fund billionaire John Paulson could secretly bet against them. They said Goldman's stock price fell as the truth became known.</p>\n<p>Goldman declined to comment. Darren Robbins, a lawyer for shareholders including the Arkansas Teacher Retirement System, said they were ready to move the 11-year-old case to trial.</p>\n<p>The case had gone to the U.S. Supreme Court, which in June said lower courts could use expert testimony and \"a good dose of common sense\" in deciding whether generic statements affected stock prices.</p>\n<p>Applying that decision, Crotty said even Goldman's more generic statements could reinforce misconceptions about its practices, and that Goldman offered no evidence its stock price would have \"held fast\" had it disclosed its conflicts.</p>\n<p>Noting Goldman's claim that dozens of blue-chip companies make similar statements, Crotty said he was \"hard pressed\" to understand why such statements would achieve \"such ubiquity\" if they had no effect on stock prices.</p>\n<p>The judge said Goldman did not show it more likely than not that its alleged misstatements \"had no price impact whatsoever.\"</p>\n<p>In 1988, the Supreme Court said investors could rely on a presumption that all public information about a company was reflected in its stock price.</p>\n<p>Goldman reached a $550 million settlement in 2010 resolving U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission charges it concealed Paulson's role in creating the Abacus 2007-AC1 CDO, and that he made $1 billion betting against it.</p>\n<p>The case is In re Goldman Sachs Group Inc Securities Litigation, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 10-03461.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4504":"桥水持仓","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","BK4127":"投资银行业与经纪业","BK4552":"Archegos爆仓风波概念","GS":"高盛"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2190621696","content_text":"NEW YORK, Dec 8 (Reuters) - Goldman Sachs Group Inc must again face a class action by shareholders who said they lost $13 billion because the Wall Street bank hid conflicts of interest when creating risky subprime securities before the 2008 financial crisis, a judge ruled on Wednesday.\nU.S. District Judge Paul Crotty in Manhattan rejected Goldman's claim that its general statements about its business, including that client interests \"always come first\" and \"integrity and honesty are at the heart of our business,\" were too generic to mislead investors and affect its stock price.\nShareholders accused Goldman of concealing its packaging and selling of collateralized debt obligations it wanted to fail so favored clients like hedge fund billionaire John Paulson could secretly bet against them. They said Goldman's stock price fell as the truth became known.\nGoldman declined to comment. Darren Robbins, a lawyer for shareholders including the Arkansas Teacher Retirement System, said they were ready to move the 11-year-old case to trial.\nThe case had gone to the U.S. Supreme Court, which in June said lower courts could use expert testimony and \"a good dose of common sense\" in deciding whether generic statements affected stock prices.\nApplying that decision, Crotty said even Goldman's more generic statements could reinforce misconceptions about its practices, and that Goldman offered no evidence its stock price would have \"held fast\" had it disclosed its conflicts.\nNoting Goldman's claim that dozens of blue-chip companies make similar statements, Crotty said he was \"hard pressed\" to understand why such statements would achieve \"such ubiquity\" if they had no effect on stock prices.\nThe judge said Goldman did not show it more likely than not that its alleged misstatements \"had no price impact whatsoever.\"\nIn 1988, the Supreme Court said investors could rely on a presumption that all public information about a company was reflected in its stock price.\nGoldman reached a $550 million settlement in 2010 resolving U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission charges it concealed Paulson's role in creating the Abacus 2007-AC1 CDO, and that he made $1 billion betting against it.\nThe case is In re Goldman Sachs Group Inc Securities Litigation, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 10-03461.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":291,"commentLimit":10,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"symbols":[],"verified":2,"subType":0,"readableState":1,"langContent":"CN","currentLanguage":"CN","warmUpFlag":false,"orderFlag":false,"shareable":true,"causeOfNotShareable":"","featuresForAnalytics":[],"commentAndTweetFlag":false,"andRepostAutoSelectedFlag":false,"upFlag":false,"length":69,"xxTargetLangEnum":"ZH_CN"},"commentList":[],"isCommentEnd":true,"isTiger":false,"isWeiXinMini":false,"url":"/m/post/602636740"}
精彩评论