轨道
12-05
裁定如果没有被推翻,就意味着法官和原告律师在管理特拉华州的公司,而不是股东这一公司的合法拥有者。
特斯拉回应马斯克薪酬方案再次被否:法院裁定错误 将上诉
免责声明:上述内容仅代表发帖人个人观点,不构成本平台的任何投资建议。
分享至
微信
复制链接
精彩评论
我们需要你的真知灼见来填补这片空白
打开APP,发表看法
APP内打开
发表看法
{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"detailType":1,"isChannel":false,"data":{"magic":2,"id":378012315480456,"tweetId":"378012315480456","gmtCreate":1733330887973,"gmtModify":1733333134589,"author":{"id":3447286363889070,"idStr":"3447286363889070","authorId":3447286363889070,"authorIdStr":"3447286363889070","name":"轨道","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5152e80d2e974dcae594ece0c46148ca","vip":1,"userType":1,"introduction":"","boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"fanSize":1,"starInvestorFlag":false},"themes":[],"images":[],"coverImages":[],"html":"<html><head></head><body><p>裁定如果没有被推翻,就意味着法官和原告律师在管理特拉华州的公司,而不是股东这一公司的合法拥有者。</p></body></html>","htmlText":"<html><head></head><body><p>裁定如果没有被推翻,就意味着法官和原告律师在管理特拉华州的公司,而不是股东这一公司的合法拥有者。</p></body></html>","text":"裁定如果没有被推翻,就意味着法官和原告律师在管理特拉华州的公司,而不是股东这一公司的合法拥有者。","highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/378012315480456","repostId":2488154394,"repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2488154394","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1733302231,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2488154394?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2024-12-04 16:50","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"特斯拉回应马斯克薪酬方案再次被否:法院裁定错误 将上诉","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2488154394","media":"TechWeb","summary":"特斯拉方面在社交媒体上还表示,法院的裁定是错误的,他们将上诉,并表示裁定如果没有被推翻,就意味着法官和原告律师在管理特拉华州的公司,而不是股东这一公司的合法拥有者。特斯拉方面提出上诉,也就意味着他的薪酬案将进入特拉华州最高法院,围绕此案的法律纷争可能会持续数月甚至数年,在最终裁决之前,马斯克的薪酬方案在法律上都将处于悬而未决的状态。","content":"<html><body><article><p>【TechWeb】12月4日消息,据外媒报道,当地时间周一,年初裁定<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">特斯拉</a>取消给予马斯克天价薪酬方案的美国特拉华州法官凯瑟琳•麦考密克(Kathaleen St. J. McCormick),驳回了马斯克和特斯拉董事会代理律师提交的取消年初裁定的请求,维持原裁定,在股东大会上以压倒性优势再次通过的马斯克薪酬方案,就此再次搁浅。</p><p>而从外媒最新的报道来看,在麦考密克做出裁定之后,特斯拉方面也给出了回应。</p><p>外媒的报道显示,麦考密克驳回马斯克和特斯拉董事会代理律师提交的取消年初裁定请求之后不久,特斯拉就在官方社交媒体上表示,特拉华州的一名法官否决了绝大多数特斯拉股东的意见,股东曾两次投票决定给马斯克支付他值得的薪酬。</p><p>特斯拉方面在社交媒体上还表示,法院的裁定是错误的,他们将上诉,并表示裁定如果没有被推翻,就意味着法官和原告律师在管理特拉华州的公司,而不是股东这一公司的合法拥有者。</p><p>对于麦考密克的裁定,马斯克是认为应当遵循股东的投票决定,他已在社交媒体上表示股东应该控制公司的投票权,而不是法官。</p><p>特斯拉方面提出上诉,也就意味着他的薪酬案将进入特拉华州最高法院,围绕此案的法律纷争可能会持续数月甚至数年,在最终裁决之前,马斯克的薪酬方案在法律上都将处于悬而未决的状态。(海蓝)</p></article></body></html>","source":"tencent","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>特斯拉回应马斯克薪酬方案再次被否:法院裁定错误 将上诉</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n特斯拉回应马斯克薪酬方案再次被否:法院裁定错误 将上诉\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2024-12-04 16:50 北京时间 <a href=http://gu.qq.com/resources/shy/news/detail-v2/index.html#/?id=nesSN20241204165032abf51447&s=b><strong>TechWeb</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>【TechWeb】12月4日消息,据外媒报道,当地时间周一,年初裁定特斯拉取消给予马斯克天价薪酬方案的美国特拉华州法官凯瑟琳•麦考密克(Kathaleen St. J. McCormick),驳回了马斯克和特斯拉董事会代理律师提交的取消年初裁定的请求,维持原裁定,在股东大会上以压倒性优势再次通过的马斯克薪酬方案,就此再次搁浅。而从外媒最新的报道来看,在麦考密克做出裁定之后,特斯拉方面也给出了回应。...</p>\n\n<a href=\"http://gu.qq.com/resources/shy/news/detail-v2/index.html#/?id=nesSN20241204165032abf51447&s=b\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"LU0234570918.USD":"高盛全球核心股票组合Acc Close","LU2357305700.SGD":"Allianz Global Artificial Intelligence ET H2-SGD","SG9999015952.SGD":"LIONGLOBAL DISRUPTIVE INNOVATION \"I\" (SGD) ACC","LU1839511570.USD":"WELLS FARGO GLOBAL FACTOR ENHANCED EQUITY \"I\" (USD) ACC","LU1861559042.SGD":"日兴方舟颠覆性创新基金B SGD","BK4585":"ETF&股票定投概念","LU1435385759.SGD":"Natixis Loomis Sayles US Growth Equity RA SGD-H","LU0823411888.USD":"法巴消费创新基金 Cap","LU0053666078.USD":"摩根大通基金-美国股票A(离岸)美元","LU2213496289.HKD":"ALLIANZ INCOME AND GROWTH \"AT\" (HKD) ACC","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4555":"新能源车","TSLA":"特斯拉","LU0082616367.USD":"摩根大通美国科技A(dist)","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","LU0056508442.USD":"贝莱德世界科技基金A2","LU0719512351.SGD":"JPMorgan Funds - US Technology A (acc) SGD","IE00B1XK9C88.USD":"PINEBRIDGE US LARGE CAP RESEARCH ENHANCED \"A\" (USD) ACC","IE00BJLML261.HKD":"HSBC GLOBAL EQUITY INDEX \"HCH\" (HKD) ACC","LU1914381329.SGD":"Allianz Best Styles Global Equity Cl ET Acc H2-SGD","LU2249611893.SGD":"BNP PARIBAS ENERGY TRANSITION \"CRH\" (SGD) ACC","BK4527":"明星科技股","LU0234572021.USD":"高盛美国核心股票组合Acc","LU0820562030.AUD":"ALLIANZ INCOME AND GROWTH \"AMH2\" (AUDHDG) H2 INC","LU2063271972.USD":"富兰克林创新领域基金","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","SG9999015986.USD":"LIONGLOBAL DISRUPTIVE INNOVATION \"I\" (USD) ACC","BK4574":"无人驾驶","LU1145028129.USD":"ALLIANZ INCOME AND GROWTH \"AQ\" (USD) INC","LU0097036916.USD":"贝莱德美国增长A2 USD","LU0689472784.USD":"安联收益及增长基金Cl AM AT Acc","SG9999015978.USD":"利安颠覆性创新基金A","LU2023250330.USD":"ALLIANZ INCOME AND GROWTH \"AMG\" (USD) INC","LU2326559502.SGD":"Natixis Loomis Sayles US Growth Equity P/A SGD-H","LU2087621335.USD":"ALLSPRING GLOBAL FACTOR ENHANCED EQUITY \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU1852331112.SGD":"Blackrock World Technology Fund A2 SGD-H","LU1720051017.SGD":"Allianz Global Artificial Intelligence AT Acc H2-SGD","BK4581":"高盛持仓","LU0198837287.USD":"UBS (LUX) EQUITY SICAV - USA GROWTH \"P\" (USD) ACC","LU1861215975.USD":"贝莱德新一代科技基金 A2","LU0316494557.USD":"FRANKLIN GLOBAL FUNDAMENTAL STRATEGIES \"A\" ACC","TSLL":"Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X Shares","LU1548497426.USD":"安联环球人工智能AT Acc","BK4511":"特斯拉概念","BK4099":"汽车制造商","LU0820561818.USD":"安联收益及增长平衡基金Cl AM DIS","LU2602419157.SGD":"HSBC ISLAMIC GLOBAL EQUITY INDEX \"AC\" (SGD) ACC","LU2756315318.SGD":"ALLIANZ INCOME AND GROWTH \"AMG\" (SGDHDG) INC A","LU0348723411.USD":"ALLIANZ GLOBAL HI-TECH GROWTH \"A\" (USD) INC","BK4516":"特朗普概念"},"source_url":"http://gu.qq.com/resources/shy/news/detail-v2/index.html#/?id=nesSN20241204165032abf51447&s=b","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/9a95c1376e76363c1401fee7d3717173","article_id":"2488154394","content_text":"【TechWeb】12月4日消息,据外媒报道,当地时间周一,年初裁定特斯拉取消给予马斯克天价薪酬方案的美国特拉华州法官凯瑟琳•麦考密克(Kathaleen St. J. McCormick),驳回了马斯克和特斯拉董事会代理律师提交的取消年初裁定的请求,维持原裁定,在股东大会上以压倒性优势再次通过的马斯克薪酬方案,就此再次搁浅。而从外媒最新的报道来看,在麦考密克做出裁定之后,特斯拉方面也给出了回应。外媒的报道显示,麦考密克驳回马斯克和特斯拉董事会代理律师提交的取消年初裁定请求之后不久,特斯拉就在官方社交媒体上表示,特拉华州的一名法官否决了绝大多数特斯拉股东的意见,股东曾两次投票决定给马斯克支付他值得的薪酬。特斯拉方面在社交媒体上还表示,法院的裁定是错误的,他们将上诉,并表示裁定如果没有被推翻,就意味着法官和原告律师在管理特拉华州的公司,而不是股东这一公司的合法拥有者。对于麦考密克的裁定,马斯克是认为应当遵循股东的投票决定,他已在社交媒体上表示股东应该控制公司的投票权,而不是法官。特斯拉方面提出上诉,也就意味着他的薪酬案将进入特拉华州最高法院,围绕此案的法律纷争可能会持续数月甚至数年,在最终裁决之前,马斯克的薪酬方案在法律上都将处于悬而未决的状态。(海蓝)","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":136,"commentLimit":10,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"symbols":[],"verified":2,"subType":0,"readableState":1,"langContent":"CN","currentLanguage":"CN","warmUpFlag":false,"orderFlag":false,"shareable":true,"causeOfNotShareable":"","featuresForAnalytics":[],"commentAndTweetFlag":false,"andRepostAutoSelectedFlag":false,"upFlag":false,"length":93,"xxTargetLangEnum":"ZH_CN"},"commentList":[],"isCommentEnd":true,"isTiger":false,"isWeiXinMini":false,"url":"/m/post/378012315480456"}
精彩评论