Kuxn
2021-03-25
Nice!!!
Massachusetts court reverses order requiring Facebook to disclose app records in privacy probe
免责声明：上述内容仅代表发帖人个人观点，不构成本平台的任何投资建议。
分享至
微信
复制链接
精彩评论
我们需要你的真知灼见来填补这片空白
打开APP，发表看法
APP内打开
发表看法
3
{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"detailType":1,"isChannel":false,"data":{"magic":2,"id":351421803,"tweetId":"351421803","gmtCreate":1616628244402,"gmtModify":1634524887798,"author":{"id":3576021125565845,"idStr":"3576021125565845","authorId":3576021125565845,"authorIdStr":"3576021125565845","name":"Kuxn","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/735264c1e1b135b6b4b9925b858173c7","vip":1,"userType":1,"introduction":"","boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"fanSize":4,"starInvestorFlag":false},"themes":[],"images":[],"coverImages":[],"extraTitle":"","html":"<html><head></head><body><p>Nice!!!</p></body></html>","htmlText":"<html><head></head><body><p>Nice!!!</p></body></html>","text":"Nice!!!","highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/351421803","repostId":2121641194,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2121641194","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1616598626,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2121641194?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-24 23:10","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Massachusetts court reverses order requiring Facebook to disclose app records in privacy probe","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2121641194","media":"Reuters","summary":"BOSTON, March 24 (Reuters) - The top court in Massachusetts on Wednesday reversed an order requiring","content":"<p>BOSTON, March 24 (Reuters) - The top court in Massachusetts on Wednesday reversed an order requiring <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FB\">Facebook</a> Inc to turn over to state Attorney General Maura Healey records identifying apps the company suspected had misused customer data, but the justices signaled she ultimately may obtain some materials.</p>\n<p>The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court overturned a judge's January 2020 order directing Facebook to disclose the records to Healey, a Democrat, as she investigates the social media company's privacy practices in the wake of the Cambridge Analytica scandal.</p>\n<p>Those records stemmed from an internal investigation that Facebook launched in 2018 after revelations that the political consulting firm Cambridge Analytica had improperly gained access to data from as many as 87 million of the social media network's users. Cambridge Analytica provided the data to help Republican former U.S. President Donald Trump's 2016 election campaign.</p>\n<p>According to court papers, Facebook's internal investigation led it to suspend 69,000 apps, mostly because their developers did not cooperate with the investigation. About 10,000 were identified as having potentially misused user info.</p>\n<p>Justice Scott Kafker, writing for the 5-0 court, said that Facebook had demonstrated that the information qualified as attorney \"work product\" potentially protected from disclosure.</p>\n<p>But Kafker wrote that Healey had demonstrated a substantial need for the materials to investigate potential data misuse and that further lower-court proceedings would likely determine that a \"significant amount of information\" can be disclosed.</p>\n<p>Representatives for Healey and Facebook did not immediately respond to requests for comment.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Massachusetts court reverses order requiring Facebook to disclose app records in privacy probe</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nMassachusetts court reverses order requiring Facebook to disclose app records in privacy probe\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-03-24 23:10</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>BOSTON, March 24 (Reuters) - The top court in Massachusetts on Wednesday reversed an order requiring <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FB\">Facebook</a> Inc to turn over to state Attorney General Maura Healey records identifying apps the company suspected had misused customer data, but the justices signaled she ultimately may obtain some materials.</p>\n<p>The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court overturned a judge's January 2020 order directing Facebook to disclose the records to Healey, a Democrat, as she investigates the social media company's privacy practices in the wake of the Cambridge Analytica scandal.</p>\n<p>Those records stemmed from an internal investigation that Facebook launched in 2018 after revelations that the political consulting firm Cambridge Analytica had improperly gained access to data from as many as 87 million of the social media network's users. Cambridge Analytica provided the data to help Republican former U.S. President Donald Trump's 2016 election campaign.</p>\n<p>According to court papers, Facebook's internal investigation led it to suspend 69,000 apps, mostly because their developers did not cooperate with the investigation. About 10,000 were identified as having potentially misused user info.</p>\n<p>Justice Scott Kafker, writing for the 5-0 court, said that Facebook had demonstrated that the information qualified as attorney \"work product\" potentially protected from disclosure.</p>\n<p>But Kafker wrote that Healey had demonstrated a substantial need for the materials to investigate potential data misuse and that further lower-court proceedings would likely determine that a \"significant amount of information\" can be disclosed.</p>\n<p>Representatives for Healey and Facebook did not immediately respond to requests for comment.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2121641194","content_text":"BOSTON, March 24 (Reuters) - The top court in Massachusetts on Wednesday reversed an order requiring Facebook Inc to turn over to state Attorney General Maura Healey records identifying apps the company suspected had misused customer data, but the justices signaled she ultimately may obtain some materials.\nThe Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court overturned a judge's January 2020 order directing Facebook to disclose the records to Healey, a Democrat, as she investigates the social media company's privacy practices in the wake of the Cambridge Analytica scandal.\nThose records stemmed from an internal investigation that Facebook launched in 2018 after revelations that the political consulting firm Cambridge Analytica had improperly gained access to data from as many as 87 million of the social media network's users. Cambridge Analytica provided the data to help Republican former U.S. President Donald Trump's 2016 election campaign.\nAccording to court papers, Facebook's internal investigation led it to suspend 69,000 apps, mostly because their developers did not cooperate with the investigation. About 10,000 were identified as having potentially misused user info.\nJustice Scott Kafker, writing for the 5-0 court, said that Facebook had demonstrated that the information qualified as attorney \"work product\" potentially protected from disclosure.\nBut Kafker wrote that Healey had demonstrated a substantial need for the materials to investigate potential data misuse and that further lower-court proceedings would likely determine that a \"significant amount of information\" can be disclosed.\nRepresentatives for Healey and Facebook did not immediately respond to requests for comment.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":172,"commentLimit":10,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"symbols":[],"verified":2,"subType":0,"readableState":1,"langContent":"EN","currentLanguage":"EN","warmUpFlag":false,"orderFlag":false,"shareable":true,"causeOfNotShareable":"","featuresForAnalytics":[],"commentAndTweetFlag":false,"andRepostAutoSelectedFlag":false,"upFlag":false,"length":7,"xxTargetLangEnum":"ORIG"},"commentList":[],"isCommentEnd":true,"isTiger":false,"isWeiXinMini":false,"url":"/m/post/351421803"}
精彩评论