Overvalued_老虎社区_美港股上老虎

2021-04-12

Overvalued

Coinbase: Highly Overvalued At $100 Billion Valuation

免责声明：上述内容仅代表发帖人个人观点，不构成本平台的任何投资建议。

精彩评论

我们需要你的真知灼见来填补这片空白

发表看法

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"detailType":1,"isChannel":false,"data":{"magic":2,"id":342822178,"tweetId":"342822178","gmtCreate":1618201047494,"gmtModify":1634294460537,"author":{"id":3555058611399231,"idStr":"3555058611399231","authorId":3555058611399231,"authorIdStr":"3555058611399231","name":"Judyz","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/06f165a585f4b3970fa74619c099266d","vip":1,"userType":1,"introduction":"","boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"fanSize":4,"starInvestorFlag":false},"themes":[],"images":[],"coverImages":[],"extraTitle":"","html":"<html><head></head><body>Overvalued&nbsp;</body></html>","htmlText":"<html><head></head><body>Overvalued&nbsp;</body></html>","text":"Overvalued","highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/342822178","repostId":1158838491,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1158838491","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1618197869,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1158838491?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-04-12 11:24","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Coinbase: Highly Overvalued At $100 Billion Valuation","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1158838491","media":"seekingalpha","summary":"Summary\n\nOur valuation analysis suggests a range of $31.9 billion to $47.9 billion in market cap for","content":"Summary\n<ul>\n <li>Our valuation analysis suggests a range of $31.9 billion to $47.9 billion in market cap for Coinbase.</li>\n <li>Our base case valuation of Coinbase is $39.9 billion, which is nearly 60% lower than the purported private market value of $100 billion that Coinbase received recently.</li>\n <li>Overall, at an implied market cap value of $100 billion for Coinbase, we think that there is much larger potential downside risk than upside appreciation.</li>\n <li>Coinbase is highly exposed to other competitors coming out with more cut-throat lower fees for trading cryptos in the future.</li>\n</ul>\nComparable Companies Valuation Analysis\nOur valuation analysis suggests a range of $31.9 billion to $47.9 billion in market cap for Coinbase (COIN). Our base case valuation of Coinbase is $39.9 billion, which is nearly 5x the value the company received in October 2018 ($8 billion) in private funding transaction. However, our base case value of $39.9 billion is nearly 60% lower than the purported recent private market value of$100 billionthat Coinbase received recently.\nBecause of the lack of the directly comparable cryptocurrency focused exchanges, we compare Coinbase against some of the biggest exchanges (mostly stock markets) globally including Intercontinental Exchange (ICE), Nasdaq Exchange (NDAQ), and Euronext(OTCPK:EUXTF).\nOur base case valuation is based on 31.2x the company's sales of $1.3 billion in 2020. This P/S multiple is based on 5x the average P/S multiple of its peers including Intercontinental Exchange, Nasdaq Exchange, and Euronext. The peers are trading at an average P/S multiple of 6.2x in 2020. Our reasoning of applying a 5x higher P/S multiple on Coinbase versus its peers is because Coinbase's sales growth in 2020 was 5x higher (139.4% YoY) than the average sales growth rate of its peers (27.9% YoY).\nNonetheless, applying a 31.2x P/S multiple on Coinbase's 2020 sales may even be generous as Coinbase's business model which mainly involves Bitcoin and Ethereum which are exposed to higher volatility, uncertainties, and regulatory risks as compared to ICE, Nasdaq, and Euronext.\nIn addition, the combined market caps of ICE, Nasdaq Exchange, and Euronext are $94 billion which is less than the recent private market valuation of nearly $100 billion for Coinbase. We find it hard to digest how Coinbase could be valued higher than the combined market caps of these three largest exchanges in the world, especially because Coinbase is highly exposed to other competitors coming out with more cut-throat lower fees for trading cryptos in the future.\nOverall, at an implied market cap value of $100 billion for Coinbase, we think that there is much larger potential downside risk than upside appreciation. As such, we think that the prudent investor should avoid this direct listing of Coinbase if indeed it is priced at nearly $100 billion. Despite the numerous positive factors (such as surging sales growth and turn to profitability), it is difficult to argue for a valuation of nearly $100 billion for Coinbase, which would represent a whopping 78x P/S multiple (using 2020 sales).\nEven the company has pointed out in its prospectus that Bitcoin has experienced four major cycles since its launch (the fourth cycle is still ongoing). We would argue that for the prudent investors, there is no rush to buy Coinbase while Bitcoin price is near at its all time highs. The prudent investor should wait until there is a major correction in the Bitcoin price to see how the Coinbase's financials are able to withstand such correction.\nIn addition, we would argue that as the Bitcoin and crypto trading become more mainstream, the trading fees for the cryptos will go down much more significantly, which is likely to negatively impact Coinbase.\n<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f562704ffd69c639772c9c98cc042380\" tg-width=\"908\" tg-height=\"716\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a2e1760c521642a9d826b93822bbf76c\" tg-width=\"904\" tg-height=\"684\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a700a76614a166cfed8a2e712e411461\" tg-width=\"910\" tg-height=\"448\">\nCoinbase Income Statement Analysis\nCoinbase generated sales of $1.3 billion in 2020 (up 139.4% YoY). It also had an operating profit of $409 million in 2020, from an operating loss of $45.8 million in 2019. Coinbase generates nearly all of its revenues from commissions and fees. Transaction revenue represented over 96% of its net revenue in 2020. The company's revenues are highly impacted by the changing crypto prices. Therefore, we would argue that the company's sales and profit growth in 2020 is highly impacted by the surging crypto prices and in the evident of a major downturn in crypto prices, the company's results are bound to deteriorate significantly.\nSince late 2018, the company has launched a range of subscription products and services such as Store, Stake, and Borrow &amp; Lend in order to diversify its revenue stream and reduce its reliance on transaction fees. However, they currently remain a minor portion of the company's revenues.\nThe improvement in the operating margins was due to the surging sales growth and a decline in total operating expenses as a percentage of sales which declined from 108.6% in 2019 to 68% in 2020. Among the major operating expenses, the biggest improvements have come from the transaction expense, technology &amp; development, and general &amp; admin expenses. The transaction expense as a percentage of sales declined from 15.4% in 2019 to 10.6% in 2020. The general &amp; admin expenses as a percentage of sales also declined significantly from 43.5% in 2019 to 21.9% in 2020.\nAlthough the company has done a good job in increasing sales and profits in 2020, they were driven at a period when crypto prices rallied strongly. The company faces a major risk of significant decline in sales and profit growth if the crypto prices decline materially.\n<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4006dd1b7826bc8bfb5c54c3fc337f8f\" tg-width=\"605\" tg-height=\"771\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0d1881ca71359bc62ac668414f9704c2\" tg-width=\"602\" tg-height=\"601\">\n<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bac8f93693e1189b4c33d586a33d9777\" tg-width=\"777\" tg-height=\"489\">Source: Author, from Company data\n<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/19577c539f8268f0f59b6ad94c271862\" tg-width=\"836\" tg-height=\"495\">Source: Author, from Company data\n<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/71df7a8d3a9ec9edf1345ad24af29fe4\" tg-width=\"869\" tg-height=\"499\">Source: Author, from Company data\nCoinbase (Key Business Metrics and Financial Measures)\nThe key business metrics for the company include items including verified users, monthly transacting users, assets on platform, and trading volume. These figures show sharply increasing growth rates and are provided for the last two years. We would argue that the company is subject to big declines in these key business metrics' growth rates if there are sharp declines in crypto prices in the next several years.\nVerified users- The company had 43 million verified users at the end of 2020, up 34.4% YoY.\nMonthly transacting users (MTU)- The company defines MTU as a retail user who transacts in one or more products on its platform at least once during the rolling 28-day period ending on the date of measurement. MTUs increased from 1 million in 2019 to 2.8 million in 2020, up 180% YoY.\nAssets on platform- Assets on platform are highly impacted by the changing crypto prices. From December 31, 2017 to December 31, 2018, Bitcoin and Ethereum prices declined 74% and 82%, respectively. During the same period, the company's assets on platform decreased by 73%.\nThe total market capitalization of crypto assets surged from less than $500 million at the end of 2012 to $782 billion at the end of 2020, representing a CAGR of over 150% during this period. At the end of 2020, Bitcoin, Ethereum, and other crypto assets represented 70%, 13%, and 13% of the company's assets on platform, respectively. Assets on platform surged from $16.9 billion at the end of 2019 to $90.3 billion at the end of 2020, up 432% YoY.\nTrading volume- Trading volume on the Coinbase exchange increased from $79.9 billion in 2019 to $193.1 billion in 2020, up 141.7% YoY.\n<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/477168e292f8066052c361be979611a3\" tg-width=\"906\" tg-height=\"631\">\nBitcoin Price Trend- There have been four major crypto asset price cycles since 2010, with each cycle lasting about two to four years. In the three price cycles prior to the current one, crypto prices have subsequently declined from each peak and settled at a trough higher than the prior peak.\nCrypto Market Capitalization vs. S&amp;P 500- Prior to the start of the COVID-19 pandemic in 1Q 2019, there was not a really visible correlation between the S&amp;P 500 and the crypto market capitalization. However, in the past year, there certainly has been a positive correlation between them. This presents a key risk factor for Coinbase since if there is a major downturn in the S&amp;P 500, it could also drag along the crypto markets as well.\nCoinbase's market share in the crypto market capitalization increased from 4.5% in 2018 to 8.3% in 2019, and 11.1% in 2020. The company has done a really good job of taking away market share from its competitors.\nCompetition\nThe company faces competition from a wide range of competitors including both big and small companies. For retail users, it competes with firms such as Square(NYSE:SQ)and Robinhood (RBNHD). PayPal(NASDAQ:PYPL)also recently introduced crypto products and services. Binance, which is mostly focused on the crypto market, is also a major competitor. Other major competitors include Gemini, Bitstamp, and Kraken.\nThe top five crypto exchanges include Binance, Coinbase Pro, Huobi Global, Kraken, and Bitfinex. Among the top 10 cryptocurrency exchanges, globally, two of them are based in Korea including Bithumb and Coinone.\nComparisons of Coinbase, Kraken, and Binance\nThe comparisons of Coinbase, Kraken, and Binance suggest that while Coinbase is able to enjoy some higher pricing advantages than these other two leading players, this may be because many customers still are willing to pay higher prices for the quality of service and lack of security breaches. In our view, the competitors are likely to catch up to Coinbase in terms of these two factors as well as provide lower pricing for trading cryptos in the coming years which is likely to result in a more difficult competitive environment for Coinbase.\nCoinbase and Kraken are two of the leading crypto exchanges based in the United States. UnlikeCoinbase, Kraken charges flat fees on crypto purchases. The standard deposit fee for Kraken is $5. By offering flat fees, Kraken is trying to grab more institutional customers. Coinbase's service has a percentage based fee (of purchasing cryptos) that starts at 1.49% for bank transfers and the fees increase to 3.99% if debit or credit cards are used. Looking at the fees structures, it would appear that many institutional investors could be interested in the flat fees offered by Kraken but many retail investors that invest only small sums of money in cryptos may be more interested in Coinbase.\nOne of the major&nbsp;differences&nbsp;between Coinbase and Kraken is the digital wallets. Coinbase has completely separate services for the wallets and its crypto exchange (unlike Kraken), which provides a clear separation between the funds the customers would like to hold and the ones they would like to trade. However, at times, the transferring of funds between the exchange and the wallets remains a bit inconvenient. Overall, it appears that Coinbase has an easier user experience, especially among the new users in the crypto market. However, Kraken may be more convenient for more experienced institutional investors.\nThe trading fees for Kraken start at 0.16% for maker orders and 0.26% for taker orders. These fees are reduced as the customers' 30 days trading volume increases. At the lowest levels, Kraken customers can place free maker trades and 0.10% taker trades if they have a 30-day volume greater than$10 million.\nThe trading fees for Coinbase start at 0.5% for both taker and maker, which is much more expensive as compared to other leading exchanges. The trading fees for Coinbase decline as the customers increase their 30 day trading volume. Trading under $10,000 over a 30 day period means the customer will incur 0.5% trading fees. Once the customer reaches $1 billion or more, these fees are reduced to 0.04% for taker and 0.00% for maker. Overall, for most investors, Kraken would provide lower trading fees as compared to Coinbase.\nBinance also has a tiered trading fee structure and it has one of the most competitive trading fees structures in the market. For Binance, at the lowest volume levels, fees are 0.1% for both makers and takers and at the highest trade volume levels, the fees come down to 0.02% and 0.04% for makers and takers, respectively. In addition, the users can further reduce their trading fees by as much as 25% if they pay fees in Binance's native BNB token.\nWhy use Coinbase if it has higher fees than Binance and Kraken?Despite Coinbase having higher fees than Binance and Kraken, it appears that millions of people have flocked to using Coinbase mainly due to its better performance on 1) ease of use, 2) security, and 3) customer service. Many customers are willing to pay a bit extra on the trading fees that Coinbase charges due to is relative better performance on its strengths, especially the fact that Coinbase is often cited as the most user friendly.\nAlso, there have been several cases of hackers stealing cryptos from other smaller exchanges as well as from competitors such asKrakenin the past several years. Coinbase has successfully thwarted off attempts by the hackers to steal money from its accounts. Many customers of Coinbase believe that it is one of the safest cryptocurrency exchanges in the market.\n<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2c247135cbe917a7b75aa3679d4d6998\" tg-width=\"906\" tg-height=\"486\">\nConclusion\nWe believe that the prudent investor would avoid the Coinbase direct listing if indeed the pricing is completed at a market cap of nearly $100 billion. Our base case valuation is $39.9 billion, which is nearly 60% discount to the recent private market valuation of about $100 billion.\nAt a valuation of nearly $100 billion, this would be more than the market caps of the three of the world's largest stock market/commodity exchanges including the Intercontinental Exchange, Nasdaq Exchange, and the Euronext which combined have $94 billion in market cap. We find it hard to understand how Coinbase could be valued higher than the combined market caps of these three largest exchanges in the world, especially because Coinbase is highly exposed to other competitors coming out with more cut-throat lower fees for trading cryptos in the future.","source":"seekingalpha","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Coinbase: Highly Overvalued At $100 Billion Valuation</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nCoinbase: Highly Overvalued At $100 Billion Valuation\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-04-12 11:24 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4417132-coinbase-highly-overvalued-100-billion-valuation>seekingalpha</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nSummary\n\nOur valuation analysis suggests a range of $31.9 billion to $47.9 billion in market cap for Coinbase.\nOur base case valuation of Coinbase is $39.9 billion, which is nearly 60% lower than the ...\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4417132-coinbase-highly-overvalued-100-billion-valuation\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"COIN":"Coinbase Global, Inc."},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4417132-coinbase-highly-overvalued-100-billion-valuation","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5a36db9d73b4222bc376d24ccc48c8a4","article_id":"1158838491","content_text":"Summary\n\nOur valuation analysis suggests a range of $31.9 billion to $47.9 billion in market cap for Coinbase.\nOur base case valuation of Coinbase is $39.9 billion, which is nearly 60% lower than the purported private market value of $100 billion that Coinbase received recently.\nOverall, at an implied market cap value of $100 billion for Coinbase, we think that there is much larger potential downside risk than upside appreciation.\nCoinbase is highly exposed to other competitors coming out with more cut-throat lower fees for trading cryptos in the future.\n\nComparable Companies Valuation Analysis\nOur valuation analysis suggests a range of $31.9 billion to $47.9 billion in market cap for Coinbase (COIN). Our base case valuation of Coinbase is $39.9 billion, which is nearly 5x the value the company received in October 2018 ($8 billion) in private funding transaction. However, our base case value of $39.9 billion is nearly 60% lower than the purported recent private market value of$100 billionthat Coinbase received recently.\nBecause of the lack of the directly comparable cryptocurrency focused exchanges, we compare Coinbase against some of the biggest exchanges (mostly stock markets) globally including Intercontinental Exchange (ICE), Nasdaq Exchange (NDAQ), and Euronext(OTCPK:EUXTF).\nOur base case valuation is based on 31.2x the company's sales of $1.3 billion in 2020. This P/S multiple is based on 5x the average P/S multiple of its peers including Intercontinental Exchange, Nasdaq Exchange, and Euronext. The peers are trading at an average P/S multiple of 6.2x in 2020. Our reasoning of applying a 5x higher P/S multiple on Coinbase versus its peers is because Coinbase's sales growth in 2020 was 5x higher (139.4% YoY) than the average sales growth rate of its peers (27.9% YoY).\nNonetheless, applying a 31.2x P/S multiple on Coinbase's 2020 sales may even be generous as Coinbase's business model which mainly involves Bitcoin and Ethereum which are exposed to higher volatility, uncertainties, and regulatory risks as compared to ICE, Nasdaq, and Euronext.\nIn addition, the combined market caps of ICE, Nasdaq Exchange, and Euronext are $94 billion which is less than the recent private market valuation of nearly $100 billion for Coinbase. We find it hard to digest how Coinbase could be valued higher than the combined market caps of these three largest exchanges in the world, especially because Coinbase is highly exposed to other competitors coming out with more cut-throat lower fees for trading cryptos in the future.\nOverall, at an implied market cap value of $100 billion for Coinbase, we think that there is much larger potential downside risk than upside appreciation. As such, we think that the prudent investor should avoid this direct listing of Coinbase if indeed it is priced at nearly $100 billion. Despite the numerous positive factors (such as surging sales growth and turn to profitability), it is difficult to argue for a valuation of nearly $100 billion for Coinbase, which would represent a whopping 78x P/S multiple (using 2020 sales).\nEven the company has pointed out in its prospectus that Bitcoin has experienced four major cycles since its launch (the fourth cycle is still ongoing). We would argue that for the prudent investors, there is no rush to buy Coinbase while Bitcoin price is near at its all time highs. The prudent investor should wait until there is a major correction in the Bitcoin price to see how the Coinbase's financials are able to withstand such correction.\nIn addition, we would argue that as the Bitcoin and crypto trading become more mainstream, the trading fees for the cryptos will go down much more significantly, which is likely to negatively impact Coinbase.\n\nCoinbase Income Statement Analysis\nCoinbase generated sales of $1.3 billion in 2020 (up 139.4% YoY). It also had an operating profit of $409 million in 2020, from an operating loss of $45.8 million in 2019. Coinbase generates nearly all of its revenues from commissions and fees. Transaction revenue represented over 96% of its net revenue in 2020. The company's revenues are highly impacted by the changing crypto prices. Therefore, we would argue that the company's sales and profit growth in 2020 is highly impacted by the surging crypto prices and in the evident of a major downturn in crypto prices, the company's results are bound to deteriorate significantly.\nSince late 2018, the company has launched a range of subscription products and services such as Store, Stake, and Borrow & Lend in order to diversify its revenue stream and reduce its reliance on transaction fees. However, they currently remain a minor portion of the company's revenues.\nThe improvement in the operating margins was due to the surging sales growth and a decline in total operating expenses as a percentage of sales which declined from 108.6% in 2019 to 68% in 2020. Among the major operating expenses, the biggest improvements have come from the transaction expense, technology & development, and general & admin expenses. The transaction expense as a percentage of sales declined from 15.4% in 2019 to 10.6% in 2020. The general & admin expenses as a percentage of sales also declined significantly from 43.5% in 2019 to 21.9% in 2020.\nAlthough the company has done a good job in increasing sales and profits in 2020, they were driven at a period when crypto prices rallied strongly. The company faces a major risk of significant decline in sales and profit growth if the crypto prices decline materially.\n\nSource: Author, from Company data\nSource: Author, from Company data\nSource: Author, from Company data\nCoinbase (Key Business Metrics and Financial Measures)\nThe key business metrics for the company include items including verified users, monthly transacting users, assets on platform, and trading volume. These figures show sharply increasing growth rates and are provided for the last two years. We would argue that the company is subject to big declines in these key business metrics' growth rates if there are sharp declines in crypto prices in the next several years.\nVerified users- The company had 43 million verified users at the end of 2020, up 34.4% YoY.\nMonthly transacting users (MTU)- The company defines MTU as a retail user who transacts in one or more products on its platform at least once during the rolling 28-day period ending on the date of measurement. MTUs increased from 1 million in 2019 to 2.8 million in 2020, up 180% YoY.\nAssets on platform- Assets on platform are highly impacted by the changing crypto prices. From December 31, 2017 to December 31, 2018, Bitcoin and Ethereum prices declined 74% and 82%, respectively. During the same period, the company's assets on platform decreased by 73%.\nThe total market capitalization of crypto assets surged from less than $500 million at the end of 2012 to $782 billion at the end of 2020, representing a CAGR of over 150% during this period. At the end of 2020, Bitcoin, Ethereum, and other crypto assets represented 70%, 13%, and 13% of the company's assets on platform, respectively. Assets on platform surged from $16.9 billion at the end of 2019 to $90.3 billion at the end of 2020, up 432% YoY.\nTrading volume- Trading volume on the Coinbase exchange increased from $79.9 billion in 2019 to $193.1 billion in 2020, up 141.7% YoY.\n\nBitcoin Price Trend- There have been four major crypto asset price cycles since 2010, with each cycle lasting about two to four years. In the three price cycles prior to the current one, crypto prices have subsequently declined from each peak and settled at a trough higher than the prior peak.\nCrypto Market Capitalization vs. S&P 500- Prior to the start of the COVID-19 pandemic in 1Q 2019, there was not a really visible correlation between the S&P 500 and the crypto market capitalization. However, in the past year, there certainly has been a positive correlation between them. This presents a key risk factor for Coinbase since if there is a major downturn in the S&P 500, it could also drag along the crypto markets as well.\nCoinbase's market share in the crypto market capitalization increased from 4.5% in 2018 to 8.3% in 2019, and 11.1% in 2020. The company has done a really good job of taking away market share from its competitors.\nCompetition\nThe company faces competition from a wide range of competitors including both big and small companies. For retail users, it competes with firms such as Square(NYSE:SQ)and Robinhood (RBNHD). PayPal(NASDAQ:PYPL)also recently introduced crypto products and services. Binance, which is mostly focused on the crypto market, is also a major competitor. Other major competitors include Gemini, Bitstamp, and Kraken.\nThe top five crypto exchanges include Binance, Coinbase Pro, Huobi Global, Kraken, and Bitfinex. Among the top 10 cryptocurrency exchanges, globally, two of them are based in Korea including Bithumb and Coinone.\nComparisons of Coinbase, Kraken, and Binance\nThe comparisons of Coinbase, Kraken, and Binance suggest that while Coinbase is able to enjoy some higher pricing advantages than these other two leading players, this may be because many customers still are willing to pay higher prices for the quality of service and lack of security breaches. In our view, the competitors are likely to catch up to Coinbase in terms of these two factors as well as provide lower pricing for trading cryptos in the coming years which is likely to result in a more difficult competitive environment for Coinbase.\nCoinbase and Kraken are two of the leading crypto exchanges based in the United States. UnlikeCoinbase, Kraken charges flat fees on crypto purchases. The standard deposit fee for Kraken is $5. By offering flat fees, Kraken is trying to grab more institutional customers. Coinbase's service has a percentage based fee (of purchasing cryptos) that starts at 1.49% for bank transfers and the fees increase to 3.99% if debit or credit cards are used. Looking at the fees structures, it would appear that many institutional investors could be interested in the flat fees offered by Kraken but many retail investors that invest only small sums of money in cryptos may be more interested in Coinbase.\nOne of the major differences between Coinbase and Kraken is the digital wallets. Coinbase has completely separate services for the wallets and its crypto exchange (unlike Kraken), which provides a clear separation between the funds the customers would like to hold and the ones they would like to trade. However, at times, the transferring of funds between the exchange and the wallets remains a bit inconvenient. Overall, it appears that Coinbase has an easier user experience, especially among the new users in the crypto market. However, Kraken may be more convenient for more experienced institutional investors.\nThe trading fees for Kraken start at 0.16% for maker orders and 0.26% for taker orders. These fees are reduced as the customers' 30 days trading volume increases. At the lowest levels, Kraken customers can place free maker trades and 0.10% taker trades if they have a 30-day volume greater than$10 million.\nThe trading fees for Coinbase start at 0.5% for both taker and maker, which is much more expensive as compared to other leading exchanges. The trading fees for Coinbase decline as the customers increase their 30 day trading volume. Trading under $10,000 over a 30 day period means the customer will incur 0.5% trading fees. Once the customer reaches $1 billion or more, these fees are reduced to 0.04% for taker and 0.00% for maker. Overall, for most investors, Kraken would provide lower trading fees as compared to Coinbase.\nBinance also has a tiered trading fee structure and it has one of the most competitive trading fees structures in the market. For Binance, at the lowest volume levels, fees are 0.1% for both makers and takers and at the highest trade volume levels, the fees come down to 0.02% and 0.04% for makers and takers, respectively. In addition, the users can further reduce their trading fees by as much as 25% if they pay fees in Binance's native BNB token.\nWhy use Coinbase if it has higher fees than Binance and Kraken?Despite Coinbase having higher fees than Binance and Kraken, it appears that millions of people have flocked to using Coinbase mainly due to its better performance on 1) ease of use, 2) security, and 3) customer service. Many customers are willing to pay a bit extra on the trading fees that Coinbase charges due to is relative better performance on its strengths, especially the fact that Coinbase is often cited as the most user friendly.\nAlso, there have been several cases of hackers stealing cryptos from other smaller exchanges as well as from competitors such asKrakenin the past several years. Coinbase has successfully thwarted off attempts by the hackers to steal money from its accounts. Many customers of Coinbase believe that it is one of the safest cryptocurrency exchanges in the market.\n\nConclusion\nWe believe that the prudent investor would avoid the Coinbase direct listing if indeed the pricing is completed at a market cap of nearly $100 billion. Our base case valuation is $39.9 billion, which is nearly 60% discount to the recent private market valuation of about $100 billion.\nAt a valuation of nearly $100 billion, this would be more than the market caps of the three of the world's largest stock market/commodity exchanges including the Intercontinental Exchange, Nasdaq Exchange, and the Euronext which combined have $94 billion in market cap. We find it hard to understand how Coinbase could be valued higher than the combined market caps of these three largest exchanges in the world, especially because Coinbase is highly exposed to other competitors coming out with more cut-throat lower fees for trading cryptos in the future.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":426,"commentLimit":10,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"symbols":[],"verified":2,"subType":0,"readableState":1,"langContent":"EN","currentLanguage":"EN","warmUpFlag":false,"orderFlag":false,"shareable":true,"causeOfNotShareable":"","featuresForAnalytics":[],"commentAndTweetFlag":false,"andRepostAutoSelectedFlag":false,"upFlag":false,"length":10,"xxTargetLangEnum":"ORIG"},"commentList":[],"isCommentEnd":true,"isTiger":false,"isWeiXinMini":false,"url":"/m/post/342822178"}