McWes
2021-07-13
Like and comment pls
Apple's win in Blix case comes weeks before Epic decision
免责声明：上述内容仅代表发帖人个人观点，不构成本平台的任何投资建议。
分享至
微信
复制链接
精彩评论
我们需要你的真知灼见来填补这片空白
打开APP，发表看法
APP内打开
发表看法
1
1
{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"detailType":1,"isChannel":false,"data":{"magic":2,"id":142386138,"tweetId":"142386138","gmtCreate":1626132698124,"gmtModify":1631891476210,"author":{"id":3575537958076350,"idStr":"3575537958076350","authorId":3575537958076350,"authorIdStr":"3575537958076350","name":"McWes","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d5e2759867585d32f8e2f72ef14a0a59","vip":1,"userType":1,"introduction":"","boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"fanSize":2,"starInvestorFlag":false},"themes":[],"images":[],"coverImages":[],"extraTitle":"","html":"<html><head></head><body><p>Like and comment pls</p></body></html>","htmlText":"<html><head></head><body><p>Like and comment pls</p></body></html>","text":"Like and comment pls","highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/142386138","repostId":2151537170,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2151537170","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1626123360,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2151537170?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-13 04:56","market":"hk","language":"en","title":"Apple's win in Blix case comes weeks before Epic decision","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2151537170","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"Apple Inc.'s win in federal court against a developer's antitrust claims against the App Store has e","content":"<span style=\"-webkit-text-size-adjust: 100%; text-align: justify; white-space: pre-wrap; font-family: Arial;\">Apple Inc.'s win in federal court against a developer's antitrust claims against the App Store has erased <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a> legal headache. Now, it awaits a more high-profile decision on similar grounds. </span>\n<font face=\"Arial\"> <p> On Friday, a federal judge in Delaware dismissed a lawsuit from Blix Inc. because it failed to demonstrate how Apple <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">$(AAPL)$</a> harmed competition in the mobile operating-system market by requiring developers to offer an Apple-specific log-in function. </p> <p>Blix, which lost to Apple for the second time since December, is <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> of the founding members of Coalition for App Fairness in its antitrust lawsuit vs. Apple and the App Store. </p> <p>\"Apple's current policy of requiring Sign In With Apple whenever any SSO [single sign-on] product is offered permits new competitors and competition (including Blix) because it does not foreclose the use of other SSOs. Allowing competition is the opposite of unlawfully constraining competition, so, again, Blix has failed to state a claim,\" U.S. District Judge Leonard P. Stark wrote in his decision. </p> <p>Blix is likely to appeal the ruling, company co-founder Dan Volach told MarketWatch. </p> <p>The decision underscores fundamental flaws in the coalition members' premise that the App Store is punitive toward developers, according to a person close to Apple's legal team. Other coalition members include Spotify Technology <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SPOT\">$(SPOT)$</a> and Match Group Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MTCH\">$(MTCH)$</a>. </p> <p> \"Blix, a member of the Coalition for App Fairness and frequent complainer to press and regulators, alleged false conspiracy theories and anti-competitive claims against Apple,\" Apple said of the decision. \"The court correctly rejected these claims and threw out Blix's case. This case demonstrates that Apple has consistently acted legally by introducing its own innovative products and features that promote competition.\" </p> <p>Epic, whose lawsuit centers on the App Store's 30% commission fee for many developers, declined comment on Friday's court dismissal. </p> <p>Apple shares were flat in trading Monday. </p></font>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple's win in Blix case comes weeks before Epic decision</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple's win in Blix case comes weeks before Epic decision\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-07-13 04:56</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<span style=\"-webkit-text-size-adjust: 100%; text-align: justify; white-space: pre-wrap; font-family: Arial;\">Apple Inc.'s win in federal court against a developer's antitrust claims against the App Store has erased <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a> legal headache. Now, it awaits a more high-profile decision on similar grounds. </span>\n<font face=\"Arial\"> <p> On Friday, a federal judge in Delaware dismissed a lawsuit from Blix Inc. because it failed to demonstrate how Apple <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">$(AAPL)$</a> harmed competition in the mobile operating-system market by requiring developers to offer an Apple-specific log-in function. </p> <p>Blix, which lost to Apple for the second time since December, is <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> of the founding members of Coalition for App Fairness in its antitrust lawsuit vs. Apple and the App Store. </p> <p>\"Apple's current policy of requiring Sign In With Apple whenever any SSO [single sign-on] product is offered permits new competitors and competition (including Blix) because it does not foreclose the use of other SSOs. Allowing competition is the opposite of unlawfully constraining competition, so, again, Blix has failed to state a claim,\" U.S. District Judge Leonard P. Stark wrote in his decision. </p> <p>Blix is likely to appeal the ruling, company co-founder Dan Volach told MarketWatch. </p> <p>The decision underscores fundamental flaws in the coalition members' premise that the App Store is punitive toward developers, according to a person close to Apple's legal team. Other coalition members include Spotify Technology <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SPOT\">$(SPOT)$</a> and Match Group Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MTCH\">$(MTCH)$</a>. </p> <p> \"Blix, a member of the Coalition for App Fairness and frequent complainer to press and regulators, alleged false conspiracy theories and anti-competitive claims against Apple,\" Apple said of the decision. \"The court correctly rejected these claims and threw out Blix's case. This case demonstrates that Apple has consistently acted legally by introducing its own innovative products and features that promote competition.\" </p> <p>Epic, whose lawsuit centers on the App Store's 30% commission fee for many developers, declined comment on Friday's court dismissal. </p> <p>Apple shares were flat in trading Monday. </p></font>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果","09086":"华夏纳指-U","03086":"华夏纳指"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2151537170","content_text":"Apple Inc.'s win in federal court against a developer's antitrust claims against the App Store has erased one legal headache. Now, it awaits a more high-profile decision on similar grounds. \n On Friday, a federal judge in Delaware dismissed a lawsuit from Blix Inc. because it failed to demonstrate how Apple $(AAPL)$ harmed competition in the mobile operating-system market by requiring developers to offer an Apple-specific log-in function. Blix, which lost to Apple for the second time since December, is one of the founding members of Coalition for App Fairness in its antitrust lawsuit vs. Apple and the App Store. \"Apple's current policy of requiring Sign In With Apple whenever any SSO [single sign-on] product is offered permits new competitors and competition (including Blix) because it does not foreclose the use of other SSOs. Allowing competition is the opposite of unlawfully constraining competition, so, again, Blix has failed to state a claim,\" U.S. District Judge Leonard P. Stark wrote in his decision. Blix is likely to appeal the ruling, company co-founder Dan Volach told MarketWatch. The decision underscores fundamental flaws in the coalition members' premise that the App Store is punitive toward developers, according to a person close to Apple's legal team. Other coalition members include Spotify Technology $(SPOT)$ and Match Group Inc. $(MTCH)$. \"Blix, a member of the Coalition for App Fairness and frequent complainer to press and regulators, alleged false conspiracy theories and anti-competitive claims against Apple,\" Apple said of the decision. \"The court correctly rejected these claims and threw out Blix's case. This case demonstrates that Apple has consistently acted legally by introducing its own innovative products and features that promote competition.\" Epic, whose lawsuit centers on the App Store's 30% commission fee for many developers, declined comment on Friday's court dismissal. Apple shares were flat in trading Monday.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":213,"commentLimit":10,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"symbols":[],"verified":2,"subType":0,"readableState":1,"langContent":"EN","currentLanguage":"EN","warmUpFlag":false,"orderFlag":false,"shareable":true,"causeOfNotShareable":"","featuresForAnalytics":[],"commentAndTweetFlag":false,"andRepostAutoSelectedFlag":false,"upFlag":false,"length":17,"xxTargetLangEnum":"ORIG"},"commentList":[],"isCommentEnd":true,"isTiger":false,"isWeiXinMini":false,"url":"/m/post/142386138"}
精彩评论