BlessedCyrus
2021-05-21
Tell me your opinion about this news...
India and Pfizer at impasse over vaccine indemnity demand -sources
免责声明:上述内容仅代表发帖人个人观点,不构成本平台的任何投资建议。
分享至
微信
复制链接
精彩评论
我们需要你的真知灼见来填补这片空白
打开APP,发表看法
APP内打开
发表看法
{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"detailType":1,"isChannel":false,"data":{"magic":2,"id":139379133,"tweetId":"139379133","gmtCreate":1621596403122,"gmtModify":1634187788852,"author":{"id":3570768873457401,"idStr":"3570768873457401","authorId":3570768873457401,"authorIdStr":"3570768873457401","name":"BlessedCyrus","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/eb301da67b54f9fd5d2fd2626595aada","vip":1,"userType":1,"introduction":"","boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"fanSize":3,"starInvestorFlag":false},"themes":[],"images":[],"coverImages":[],"extraTitle":"","html":"<html><head></head><body><p>Tell me your opinion about this news...</p></body></html>","htmlText":"<html><head></head><body><p>Tell me your opinion about this news...</p></body></html>","text":"Tell me your opinion about this news...","highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/139379133","repostId":2137906383,"repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2137906383","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1621591288,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2137906383?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-05-21 18:01","market":"us","language":"en","title":"India and Pfizer at impasse over vaccine indemnity demand -sources","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2137906383","media":"Reuters","summary":"By Neha Arora and Carl O'Donnell NEW DELHI/NEW YORK, May 21 (Reuters) - Pfizer and the Indian g","content":"<html><body><p>By Neha Arora and Carl O'Donnell</p><p> NEW DELHI/NEW YORK, May 21 (Reuters) - Pfizer and the Indian government are at loggerheads over a demand by the U.S. drugmaker for legal protection from any claims linked to the use of its COVID-19 vaccine in <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a> of the world's biggest markets, two sources told Reuters.</p><p> India has not given any manufacturer of a COVID-19 vaccine indemnity against the costs of compensation for any severe side effects, which is a condition Pfizer has obtained in many countries where its shots have already been widely rolled out, including Britain and the United States.</p><p> \"The whole problem with Pfizer is the indemnity bond. Why should we sign it?\" an Indian government source with direct knowledge of the matter told Reuters.</p><p> \"If something happens, a patient dies, we will not be able to question them (Pfizer). If somebody challenges in a court of law, the central government will be responsible for everything, not the company,\" the source added.</p><p> Pfizer and India's health ministry did not reply to Reuters requests for comment on Friday.</p><p> The second source said Pfizer was not going to change its position on the indemnity issue.</p><p> Both sources declined to be named as they were not authorised to talk to the media.</p><p> LOCAL TRIAL</p><p> India, which is facing a shortage of shots as coronavirus cases soar, pledged last month to fast-track approvals for overseas vaccine makers including Pfizer, Moderna and Johnson and Johnson . </p><p> However, none have since sought permission from India's drug regulator to sell their vaccine in the country, which has a population of 1.35 billion. </p><p> The second source said that the other issue being discussed between Pfizer and New Delhi was the Indian government's insistence on a local trial for any vaccine approval. </p><p> Pfizer withdrew its application for emergency use authorisation for the vaccine developed with Germany's BioNTech</p><p> in February after India insisted on such a trial.</p><p> But three other shots on sale in India, developed by AstraZeneca , Russia's Sputnik V and Bharat Biotech in collaboration with state-run Indian Council of Medical Research, have completed the small-scale safety trials.</p><p> Albert Bourla, Pfizer's chief executive said on May 4 that he was hopeful that the government would change its policy of local trials and that a path to delivering the drugmaker's shots in India could be found. </p><p> A third source told Reuters that India's foreign minister would visit the United States this month or in early June to try and address Pfizer's concerns and ease exports of vaccine raw materials to India. </p><p> The Indian foreign ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment. </p><p> (Reporting by Neha Arora and Carl O'Donnell; Additional reporting by Rupam Jain; Editing by Krishna N. Das and Alexander Smith)</p><p>((neha.dasgupta@tr.com;))</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>India and Pfizer at impasse over vaccine indemnity demand -sources</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIndia and Pfizer at impasse over vaccine indemnity demand -sources\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-05-21 18:01</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><body><p>By Neha Arora and Carl O'Donnell</p><p> NEW DELHI/NEW YORK, May 21 (Reuters) - Pfizer and the Indian government are at loggerheads over a demand by the U.S. drugmaker for legal protection from any claims linked to the use of its COVID-19 vaccine in <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a> of the world's biggest markets, two sources told Reuters.</p><p> India has not given any manufacturer of a COVID-19 vaccine indemnity against the costs of compensation for any severe side effects, which is a condition Pfizer has obtained in many countries where its shots have already been widely rolled out, including Britain and the United States.</p><p> \"The whole problem with Pfizer is the indemnity bond. Why should we sign it?\" an Indian government source with direct knowledge of the matter told Reuters.</p><p> \"If something happens, a patient dies, we will not be able to question them (Pfizer). If somebody challenges in a court of law, the central government will be responsible for everything, not the company,\" the source added.</p><p> Pfizer and India's health ministry did not reply to Reuters requests for comment on Friday.</p><p> The second source said Pfizer was not going to change its position on the indemnity issue.</p><p> Both sources declined to be named as they were not authorised to talk to the media.</p><p> LOCAL TRIAL</p><p> India, which is facing a shortage of shots as coronavirus cases soar, pledged last month to fast-track approvals for overseas vaccine makers including Pfizer, Moderna and Johnson and Johnson . </p><p> However, none have since sought permission from India's drug regulator to sell their vaccine in the country, which has a population of 1.35 billion. </p><p> The second source said that the other issue being discussed between Pfizer and New Delhi was the Indian government's insistence on a local trial for any vaccine approval. </p><p> Pfizer withdrew its application for emergency use authorisation for the vaccine developed with Germany's BioNTech</p><p> in February after India insisted on such a trial.</p><p> But three other shots on sale in India, developed by AstraZeneca , Russia's Sputnik V and Bharat Biotech in collaboration with state-run Indian Council of Medical Research, have completed the small-scale safety trials.</p><p> Albert Bourla, Pfizer's chief executive said on May 4 that he was hopeful that the government would change its policy of local trials and that a path to delivering the drugmaker's shots in India could be found. </p><p> A third source told Reuters that India's foreign minister would visit the United States this month or in early June to try and address Pfizer's concerns and ease exports of vaccine raw materials to India. </p><p> The Indian foreign ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment. </p><p> (Reporting by Neha Arora and Carl O'Donnell; Additional reporting by Rupam Jain; Editing by Krishna N. Das and Alexander Smith)</p><p>((neha.dasgupta@tr.com;))</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"PFE":"辉瑞","JNJ":"强生","MRNA":"Moderna, Inc.","BNTX":"BioNTech SE"},"source_url":"http://api.rkd.refinitiv.com/api/News/News.svc/REST/News_1/RetrieveStoryML_1","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2137906383","content_text":"By Neha Arora and Carl O'Donnell NEW DELHI/NEW YORK, May 21 (Reuters) - Pfizer and the Indian government are at loggerheads over a demand by the U.S. drugmaker for legal protection from any claims linked to the use of its COVID-19 vaccine in one of the world's biggest markets, two sources told Reuters. India has not given any manufacturer of a COVID-19 vaccine indemnity against the costs of compensation for any severe side effects, which is a condition Pfizer has obtained in many countries where its shots have already been widely rolled out, including Britain and the United States. \"The whole problem with Pfizer is the indemnity bond. Why should we sign it?\" an Indian government source with direct knowledge of the matter told Reuters. \"If something happens, a patient dies, we will not be able to question them (Pfizer). If somebody challenges in a court of law, the central government will be responsible for everything, not the company,\" the source added. Pfizer and India's health ministry did not reply to Reuters requests for comment on Friday. The second source said Pfizer was not going to change its position on the indemnity issue. Both sources declined to be named as they were not authorised to talk to the media. LOCAL TRIAL India, which is facing a shortage of shots as coronavirus cases soar, pledged last month to fast-track approvals for overseas vaccine makers including Pfizer, Moderna and Johnson and Johnson . However, none have since sought permission from India's drug regulator to sell their vaccine in the country, which has a population of 1.35 billion. The second source said that the other issue being discussed between Pfizer and New Delhi was the Indian government's insistence on a local trial for any vaccine approval. Pfizer withdrew its application for emergency use authorisation for the vaccine developed with Germany's BioNTech in February after India insisted on such a trial. But three other shots on sale in India, developed by AstraZeneca , Russia's Sputnik V and Bharat Biotech in collaboration with state-run Indian Council of Medical Research, have completed the small-scale safety trials. Albert Bourla, Pfizer's chief executive said on May 4 that he was hopeful that the government would change its policy of local trials and that a path to delivering the drugmaker's shots in India could be found. A third source told Reuters that India's foreign minister would visit the United States this month or in early June to try and address Pfizer's concerns and ease exports of vaccine raw materials to India. The Indian foreign ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment. (Reporting by Neha Arora and Carl O'Donnell; Additional reporting by Rupam Jain; Editing by Krishna N. Das and Alexander Smith)((neha.dasgupta@tr.com;))","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":21,"commentLimit":10,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"symbols":[],"verified":2,"subType":0,"readableState":1,"langContent":"EN","currentLanguage":"EN","warmUpFlag":false,"orderFlag":false,"shareable":true,"causeOfNotShareable":"","featuresForAnalytics":[],"commentAndTweetFlag":false,"andRepostAutoSelectedFlag":false,"upFlag":false,"length":33,"xxTargetLangEnum":"ORIG"},"commentList":[],"isCommentEnd":true,"isTiger":false,"isWeiXinMini":false,"url":"/m/post/139379133"}
精彩评论