HiDaya
2021-05-25
Like and comment guys
Investor opposition to U.S. CEO pay at its highest ever -report
免责声明：上述内容仅代表发帖人个人观点，不构成本平台的任何投资建议。
分享至
微信
复制链接
精彩评论
我们需要你的真知灼见来填补这片空白
打开APP，发表看法
APP内打开
发表看法
1
{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"detailType":1,"isChannel":false,"data":{"magic":2,"id":131762810,"tweetId":"131762810","gmtCreate":1621897558530,"gmtModify":1634185805507,"author":{"id":3584409189861115,"idStr":"3584409189861115","authorId":3584409189861115,"authorIdStr":"3584409189861115","name":"HiDaya","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bb87d9a1b7333340c5c703cd08909596","vip":1,"userType":1,"introduction":"","boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"fanSize":2,"starInvestorFlag":false},"themes":[],"images":[],"coverImages":[],"extraTitle":"","html":"<html><head></head><body><p>Like and comment guys</p></body></html>","htmlText":"<html><head></head><body><p>Like and comment guys</p></body></html>","text":"Like and comment guys","highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/131762810","repostId":2137308471,"repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2137308471","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1621857900,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2137308471?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-05-24 20:05","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Investor opposition to U.S. CEO pay at its highest ever -report","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2137308471","media":"Reuters","summary":"NEW YORK, May 24 (Reuters) - Investors have rejected a record number of executive compensation plans","content":"<p>NEW YORK, May 24 (Reuters) - Investors have rejected a record number of executive compensation plans in non-binding votes of U.S.-listed companies this year, objecting to pay rises and the easing of performance targets in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, according to an analysis by consulting firm <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ISFFF\">ISS</a> Corporate Solutions.</p><p>Some companies have argued that protecting executive pay in a downturn is necessary to keep top managers incentivized, given the crucial role they play in steering their business. That idea has been increasingly met with skepticism from investors who say that the shifting of performance goalposts is unwarranted and demoralizes employees who are not shielded in the same way.</p><p>A record 14 S&P 500 companies had more than 50% of investors reject executive pay packages so far this year. That number is set to rise as more executives face votes in the coming weeks, according to ISS Corporate Solutions. Investors voted down a total of 12 CEO pay plans in 2020.</p><p>\"We still have 200 or more meetings to go, and we are likely to see more failures,\" said Brian Johnson, an executive director at ISS Corporate Solutions.</p><p>The record was reached last week, when 53% of shareholders invested in oilfield services firm Halliburton Co voted down CEO Jeff Miller's $22.3 million pay plan, which is roughly $10 million more than he earned in 2019.</p><p>Cruise ship operator Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd</p><p>also faced a defeat from its investors on executive pay plans on Thursday, according to a securities filing.</p><p>Investors this year have also rejected executive pay plans at industrial company General Electric Co , coffee retailer Starbucks Corp and chip maker Intel Corp.</p><p>Losing the shareholder vote can put pressure on corporate boards and executives to negotiate new pay deals. Roughly two years ago, Walt Disney Co renegotiated the compensation of its chief executive at the time, Bob Iger, to toughen his performance targets after shareholders voted down his pay.</p><p>Roughly 10.6% of companies changed short-term incentive programs in the pay plans, and 3.3% adjusted long-term awards, ISS Corporate Solutions found, bolstering executive pay in many cases.</p><p>In most years, \"investors almost uniformly reject those changes because you're completely disrupting the link between pay and performance,\" Johnson said.</p><p>Pay plans at companies that underperformed financially, such as <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PSX\">Phillips 66</a> and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WBA\">Walgreens Boots Alliance</a> Inc , were also rejected by investors, Johnson said.</p><p>ISS Corporate Solutions found that automobile and auto part makers, real estate firms and technology hardware and equipment companies changed pay the most during the year compared to other industries.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Investor opposition to U.S. CEO pay at its highest ever -report</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nInvestor opposition to U.S. CEO pay at its highest ever -report\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-05-24 20:05</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>NEW YORK, May 24 (Reuters) - Investors have rejected a record number of executive compensation plans in non-binding votes of U.S.-listed companies this year, objecting to pay rises and the easing of performance targets in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, according to an analysis by consulting firm <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ISFFF\">ISS</a> Corporate Solutions.</p><p>Some companies have argued that protecting executive pay in a downturn is necessary to keep top managers incentivized, given the crucial role they play in steering their business. That idea has been increasingly met with skepticism from investors who say that the shifting of performance goalposts is unwarranted and demoralizes employees who are not shielded in the same way.</p><p>A record 14 S&P 500 companies had more than 50% of investors reject executive pay packages so far this year. That number is set to rise as more executives face votes in the coming weeks, according to ISS Corporate Solutions. Investors voted down a total of 12 CEO pay plans in 2020.</p><p>\"We still have 200 or more meetings to go, and we are likely to see more failures,\" said Brian Johnson, an executive director at ISS Corporate Solutions.</p><p>The record was reached last week, when 53% of shareholders invested in oilfield services firm Halliburton Co voted down CEO Jeff Miller's $22.3 million pay plan, which is roughly $10 million more than he earned in 2019.</p><p>Cruise ship operator Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd</p><p>also faced a defeat from its investors on executive pay plans on Thursday, according to a securities filing.</p><p>Investors this year have also rejected executive pay plans at industrial company General Electric Co , coffee retailer Starbucks Corp and chip maker Intel Corp.</p><p>Losing the shareholder vote can put pressure on corporate boards and executives to negotiate new pay deals. Roughly two years ago, Walt Disney Co renegotiated the compensation of its chief executive at the time, Bob Iger, to toughen his performance targets after shareholders voted down his pay.</p><p>Roughly 10.6% of companies changed short-term incentive programs in the pay plans, and 3.3% adjusted long-term awards, ISS Corporate Solutions found, bolstering executive pay in many cases.</p><p>In most years, \"investors almost uniformly reject those changes because you're completely disrupting the link between pay and performance,\" Johnson said.</p><p>Pay plans at companies that underperformed financially, such as <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PSX\">Phillips 66</a> and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WBA\">Walgreens Boots Alliance</a> Inc , were also rejected by investors, Johnson said.</p><p>ISS Corporate Solutions found that automobile and auto part makers, real estate firms and technology hardware and equipment companies changed pay the most during the year compared to other industries.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"HAL":"哈里伯顿","SBUX":"星巴克","09086":"华夏纳指-U","INTC":"英特尔","03086":"华夏纳指","GE":"GE航空航天"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2137308471","content_text":"NEW YORK, May 24 (Reuters) - Investors have rejected a record number of executive compensation plans in non-binding votes of U.S.-listed companies this year, objecting to pay rises and the easing of performance targets in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, according to an analysis by consulting firm ISS Corporate Solutions.Some companies have argued that protecting executive pay in a downturn is necessary to keep top managers incentivized, given the crucial role they play in steering their business. That idea has been increasingly met with skepticism from investors who say that the shifting of performance goalposts is unwarranted and demoralizes employees who are not shielded in the same way.A record 14 S&P 500 companies had more than 50% of investors reject executive pay packages so far this year. That number is set to rise as more executives face votes in the coming weeks, according to ISS Corporate Solutions. Investors voted down a total of 12 CEO pay plans in 2020.\"We still have 200 or more meetings to go, and we are likely to see more failures,\" said Brian Johnson, an executive director at ISS Corporate Solutions.The record was reached last week, when 53% of shareholders invested in oilfield services firm Halliburton Co voted down CEO Jeff Miller's $22.3 million pay plan, which is roughly $10 million more than he earned in 2019.Cruise ship operator Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltdalso faced a defeat from its investors on executive pay plans on Thursday, according to a securities filing.Investors this year have also rejected executive pay plans at industrial company General Electric Co , coffee retailer Starbucks Corp and chip maker Intel Corp.Losing the shareholder vote can put pressure on corporate boards and executives to negotiate new pay deals. Roughly two years ago, Walt Disney Co renegotiated the compensation of its chief executive at the time, Bob Iger, to toughen his performance targets after shareholders voted down his pay.Roughly 10.6% of companies changed short-term incentive programs in the pay plans, and 3.3% adjusted long-term awards, ISS Corporate Solutions found, bolstering executive pay in many cases.In most years, \"investors almost uniformly reject those changes because you're completely disrupting the link between pay and performance,\" Johnson said.Pay plans at companies that underperformed financially, such as Phillips 66 and Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc , were also rejected by investors, Johnson said.ISS Corporate Solutions found that automobile and auto part makers, real estate firms and technology hardware and equipment companies changed pay the most during the year compared to other industries.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":245,"commentLimit":10,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"symbols":[],"verified":2,"subType":0,"readableState":1,"langContent":"EN","currentLanguage":"EN","warmUpFlag":false,"orderFlag":false,"shareable":true,"causeOfNotShareable":"","featuresForAnalytics":[],"commentAndTweetFlag":false,"andRepostAutoSelectedFlag":false,"upFlag":false,"length":18,"xxTargetLangEnum":"ORIG"},"commentList":[],"isCommentEnd":true,"isTiger":false,"isWeiXinMini":false,"url":"/m/post/131762810"}
精彩评论