AMD FSR 3.1 画质提升有限，仍落后于英伟达 DLSS 3.7 和英特尔 XeSS 1.3

ZOL中关村在线07-03

根据Digital Foundry最新一期的DF Direct Weekly播客，AMD的FSR 3.1在图像质量方面仍然落后于NVIDIA DLSS 3.7和英特尔XeSS 1.3等同类技术。尽管有所改进，但本次更新在图像清晰度方面仅带来轻微提升。与NVIDIA DLSS和英特尔XeSS最新版本相比，FSR 3.1在画质上仍存在明显差距。主要原因在于后两者能够对移动像素进行抗锯齿处理，这一点在《...

网页链接

免责声明：本文观点仅代表作者个人观点，不构成本平台的投资建议，本平台不对文章信息准确性、完整性和及时性做出任何保证，亦不对因使用或信赖文章信息引发的任何损失承担责任。

精彩评论

我们需要你的真知灼见来填补这片空白

发表看法

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"isChannel":false,"data":{"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2448937143?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","thumbnail":"","is_english":false,"pubTime":"2024-07-03 09:00","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","id":"2448937143","market":"hk","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"AMD FSR 3.1 画质提升有限，仍落后于英伟达 DLSS 3.7 和英特尔 XeSS 1.3","media":"ZOL中关村在线","content":"<div>\n<p>根据Digital Foundry最新一期的DF Direct Weekly播客，AMD的FSR 3.1在图像质量方面仍然落后于NVIDIA DLSS 3.7和英特尔XeSS 1.3等同类技术。尽管有所改进，但本次更新在图像清晰度方面仅带来轻微提升。与NVIDIA DLSS和英特尔XeSS最新版本相比，FSR 3.1在画质上仍存在明显差距。主要原因在于后两者能够对移动像素进行抗锯齿处理，这一点在《...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://tech.sina.cn/mobile/xp/2024-07-03/detail-incauhff7181785.d.html?vt=4\">网页链接</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"sina_tech","html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>AMD FSR 3.1 画质提升有限，仍落后于英伟达 DLSS 3.7 和英特尔 XeSS 1.3</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAMD FSR 3.1 画质提升有限，仍落后于英伟达 DLSS 3.7 和英特尔 XeSS 1.3\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2024-07-03 09:00 北京时间&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://tech.sina.cn/mobile/xp/2024-07-03/detail-incauhff7181785.d.html?vt=4><strong>ZOL中关村在线</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>根据Digital Foundry最新一期的DF Direct Weekly播客，AMD的FSR 3.1在图像质量方面仍然落后于NVIDIA DLSS 3.7和英特尔XeSS 1.3等同类技术。尽管有所改进，但本次更新在图像清晰度方面仅带来轻微提升。与NVIDIA DLSS和英特尔XeSS最新版本相比，FSR 3.1在画质上仍存在明显差距。主要原因在于后两者能够对移动像素进行抗锯齿处理，这一点在《...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://tech.sina.cn/mobile/xp/2024-07-03/detail-incauhff7181785.d.html?vt=4\">网页链接</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":"BK4581","symbol_name":"高盛持仓","start_time":0,"source_url":"https://tech.sina.cn/mobile/xp/2024-07-03/detail-incauhff7181785.d.html?vt=4","article_id":"2448937143","we_media_id":null,"thumbnails":[],"rights":{"source":"sina_tech","url":"https://tech.sina.cn/mobile/xp/2024-07-03/detail-incauhff7181785.d.html?vt=4","rn_cache_url":null,"customStyle":"body{padding-top:10px;}.art_tit_h1{#titleStyle#}a{#lv2TextColor#}.art_time, .art_cite{#sourceStyle#;} .art_cite{margin-left: 3px;}.weibo_user{#sourceStyle#; margin-bottom: 0; display: inline-block;}.weibo_time{#sourceStyle#};","selectors":".module-article, article","filters":"header, .voice2, .tags, #norm_qrcode_link_auto, .unfold-box, .action, .j_float_wbro, .j_article_wbreco","directOrigin":true},"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2448937143","pubTimestamp":1719968436,"sourceInfo":{"source_id":"sina_tech","name":"新浪科技"},"weMediaInfo":null,"summary":"根据Digital Foundry最新一期的DF Direct Weekly播客，AMD的FSR 3.1在图像质量方面仍然落后于NVIDIA DLSS 3.7和英特尔XeSS 1.3等同类技术。尽管有所改进，但本次更新在图像清晰度方面仅带来轻微提升。MxBenchmark PC制作的对比视频清晰地展示了FSR 3.1尚未改进的问题。因此，FSR 3.1最显著的变化是其帧生成组件，该组件现在可以与任何超分或抗锯齿解决方案搭配使用。这对于那些拥有NVIDIA RTX 2000和3000系列显卡但无法使用DLSS 3.0及之后帧生成功能的用户来说是个好消息。","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"sina.cn","property":[],"viewcount":null,"language":"zh","relate_stocks":{"BK4581":"高盛持仓","LU1951200564.SGD":"Natixis Thematics AI & Robotics Fund R/A SGD","LU0061475181.USD":"THREADNEEDLE (LUX) AMERICAN \"AU\" (USD) ACC","IE00B7KXQ091.USD":"Janus Henderson Balanced A Inc USD","INTC":"英特尔","LU0348723411.USD":"ALLIANZ GLOBAL HI-TECH GROWTH \"A\" (USD) INC","NVDA":"英伟达","IE00BFSS8Q28.SGD":"Janus Henderson Balanced A Inc SGD-H","FSR":"菲斯克","IE00BFSS7M15.SGD":"Janus Henderson Balanced A Acc SGD-H","LU0109391861.USD":"富兰克林美国机遇基金A Acc","LU0238689110.USD":"贝莱德环球动力股票基金","LU0234570918.USD":"高盛全球核心股票组合Acc Close","IE00B19Z9505.USD":"美盛-美国大盘成长股A Acc","LU0417517546.SGD":"Allianz US Equity Cl AT Acc SGD","LU0316494557.USD":"FRANKLIN GLOBAL FUNDAMENTAL STRATEGIES \"A\" ACC","LU1988902786.USD":"FULLERTON LUX FUNDS GLOBAL ABSOLUTE ALPHA \"I\" (USD) ACC","LU0072462426.USD":"贝莱德全球配置 A2","LU0053666078.USD":"摩根大通基金-美国股票A（离岸）美元","BK4592":"伊斯兰概念","LU0082616367.USD":"摩根大通美国科技A（dist）","LU0719512351.SGD":"JPMorgan Funds - US Technology A (acc) SGD","LU0080751232.USD":"富达环球多元动力基金A","IE00BMPRXR70.SGD":"Neuberger Berman 5G Connectivity A Acc SGD-H","LU0308772762.SGD":"Blackrock Global Allocation A2 SGD-H","LU0321505439.SGD":"Schroder ISF Global Dividend Maximiser A Acc SGD","IE00BMPRXN33.USD":"NEUBERGER BERMAN 5G CONNECTIVITY \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU0234572021.USD":"高盛美国核心股票组合Acc","BK4587":"ChatGPT概念","GFS":"GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc.","LU0353189763.USD":"ALLSPRING  US ALL CAP GROWTH FUND \"I\" (USD) ACC","BK4543":"AI","BK4527":"明星科技股","LU1064131342.USD":"Fullerton Lux Funds - Global Absolute Alpha A Acc USD","BK4573":"虚拟现实","BK4579":"人工智能","IE00BWXC8680.SGD":"PINEBRIDGE US LARGE CAP RESEARCH ENHANCED \"A5\" (SGD) ACC","LU2098885051.SGD":"JPMorgan Funds - Multi-Manager Alternatives A (acc) SGD","BK4588":"碎股","LU0061474705.USD":"THREADNEEDLE (LUX) GLOBAL DYNAMIC REAL RETURN \"AU\" (USD) ACC","LU0979878070.USD":"FULLERTON LUX FUNDS - ASIA ABSOLUTE ALPHA \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU1303367103.USD":"摩根大通多经理另类基金 A (acc)","BK4503":"景林资产持仓","LU0320765059.SGD":"FTIF - Franklin US Opportunities A Acc SGD","LU1852331112.SGD":"Blackrock World Technology Fund A2 SGD-H","AMD":"美国超微公司","LU0198837287.USD":"UBS (LUX) EQUITY SICAV - USA GROWTH \"P\" (USD) ACC","LU0289960550.SGD":"AB FCP I - GLOBAL EQUITY BLEND PORTFOLIO 'A' (SGD) ACC","LU0276348264.USD":"THREADNEEDLE (LUX) GLOBAL DYNAMIC REAL RETURN\"AUP\" (USD) INC","LU1951198990.SGD":"Natixis Thematics AI & Robotics Fund H-R/A SGD-H"},"translate_title":"AMD FSR 3.1 has limited image quality improvement, still lagging behind Nvidia DLSS 3.7 and Intel XeSS 1.3","themeId":null,"isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":null,"symbols_score_info":{"FSR":1,"GFS":1,"AMD":0.9,"NVDA":0.7,"INTC":0.6},"content_text":"根据Digital Foundry最新一期的DF Direct Weekly播客，AMD的FSR 3.1在图像质量方面仍然落后于NVIDIA DLSS 3.7和英特尔XeSS 1.3等同类技术。尽管有所改进，但本次更新在图像清晰度方面仅带来轻微提升。与NVIDIA DLSS和英特尔XeSS最新版本相比，FSR 3.1在画质上仍存在明显差距。主要原因在于后两者能够对移动像素进行抗锯齿处理，这一点在《地平线：西之绝境》等对比测试游戏中尤为明显。MxBenchmark PC制作的对比视频清晰地展示了FSR 3.1尚未改进的问题。因此，FSR 3.1最显著的变化是其帧生成组件，该组件现在可以与任何超分或抗锯齿解决方案搭配使用。这对于那些拥有NVIDIA RTX 2000和3000系列显卡但无法使用DLSS 3.0及之后帧生成功能的用户来说是个好消息。","kind":null,"is_publish_news":true,"is_publish_highlight":false,"is_publish_live":false,"is_publish_wemedia":null,"editions":null,"column":"","sentiment":"0","news_tag":"","news_rank":0,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":0},"commentList":[],"isCommentEnd":true,"newsSizeData":{"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false},"APP":{"userAgent":"Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)","isDev":false,"isTTM":false,"deviceId":"web-server-community-laohu8-v3","version":"4.29.2","shortVersion":"4.29.2","platform":"web","vendor":"web","appName":"laohu8","isIOS":false,"isAndroid":false,"isTiger":false,"isTHS":false,"isWeiXin":false,"isWeiXinMini":false,"isWeiBo":false,"isQQ":false,"isBaiduSwan":false,"isBaiduBox":false,"isDingTalk":false,"isToutiao":false,"isOnePlus":false,"isHuaWei":false,"isXiaomi":false,"isXiaomiWebView":false,"isOppo":false,"isVivo":false,"isSamsung":false,"isMobile":false},"href":"/m/news/2448937143"}