Why Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson Fell on Friday

Motley Fool2021-12-18

What happened Two prominent U.S. coronavirus stocks ended the week on a down note. Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson both fell on the day by nearly 3%. This followed a prominent investment bank's rather ...

网页链接

免责声明：本文观点仅代表作者个人观点，不构成本平台的投资建议，本平台不对文章信息准确性、完整性和及时性做出任何保证，亦不对因使用或信赖文章信息引发的任何损失承担责任。

精彩评论

nancy88
2021-12-19
nancy88
Nice
Charging
2021-12-19
Charging
[smile]
rocketchoo2
2021-12-19
rocketchoo2
Probably due to booster not 'good' enough for omi? Wait for march 2022 for their new shot?
- Charging:
  [Happy]
SSVC
2021-12-19
SSVC
Mmm.. Appreciate your response and response Thanks
Rudyy
2021-12-19
Rudyy
Like
- Cynphony:
  F
- Ericlam:
  nice
andrew123
2021-12-19
andrew123
Like
- Ericlam:
  nice

发表看法

231

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"isChannel":false,"data":{"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1109831591?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","thumbnail":"","is_english":true,"pubTime":"2021-12-18 13:14","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","id":"1109831591","market":"us","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"Why Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson Fell on Friday","media":"Motley Fool","content":"<div>\n<p>What happened\nTwo prominent U.S. coronavirus stocks ended the week on a down note. Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson both fell on the day by nearly 3%. This followed a prominent investment bank's rather ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/12/17/why-pfizer-and-johnson-johnson-fell-on-friday/\">网页链接</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":null,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson Fell on Friday</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson Fell on Friday\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-12-18 13:14 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/12/17/why-pfizer-and-johnson-johnson-fell-on-friday/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>What happened\nTwo prominent U.S. coronavirus stocks ended the week on a down note. Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson both fell on the day by nearly 3%. This followed a prominent investment bank's rather ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/12/17/why-pfizer-and-johnson-johnson-fell-on-friday/\">网页链接</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":"PFE","symbol_name":"辉瑞","start_time":0,"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/12/17/why-pfizer-and-johnson-johnson-fell-on-friday/","article_id":"1109831591","we_media_id":null,"thumbnails":[],"rights":null,"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1109831591","pubTimestamp":1639804463,"columns":[],"sourceInfo":null,"weMediaInfo":null,"summary":"What happened\nTwo prominent U.S. coronavirus stocks ended the week on a down note. Pfizer and Johnso","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"fool.com","property":[],"viewcount":null,"language":"en","relate_stocks":{"PFE":"辉瑞","JNJ":"强生"},"translate_title":"为什么辉瑞和强生在周五沦陷","themeId":null,"isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":null,"symbols_score_info":{"JNJ":0.9,"PFE":0.9},"content_text":"What happened\nTwo prominent U.S. coronavirus stocks ended the week on a down note. Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson both fell on the day by nearly 3%. This followed a prominent investment bank's rather lukewarm take on their current prospects.\n\nSo what\nGoldman Sachs analyst Chris Shibutani initiated coverage on Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson on Friday, tagging both high-profile healthcare industry stocks with neutral recommendations.\nShibutani is concerned with what he considers to be Pfizer's somewhat cloudy future, despite the great success of the Comirnaty coronavirus vaccine it developed with Germanbiotech BioNTech.\n\"Our views on [Pfizer] come down to that we estimate around one-third of its current valuation is attributed to the COVID-19 vaccine and therapeutic [products], and we feel the trajectory for both remains highly uncertain,\" he wrote.\nAs for Johnson & Johnson, the prognosticator feels the stock is also fairly valued. However, he sounded a more optimistic note about the company's potential.\n\"With [Johnson & Johnson] in the midst of transitions across several domains for the organization ... we see possibilities -- even within an organization of [Johnson & Johnson]'s scale and scope -- for additional potentially disruptive opportunities to develop that could reshape the investment thesis, in our view,\" he wrote.\nLast month, Johnson & Johnson announced plans to spin off its sprawlingconsumer healthcare division.\nShibutani's price target on Pfizer stock is $51 per share, and that for Johnson & Johnson is $161.\nNow what\nPfizer and Johnson & Johnson are certainly heading into some uncertain waters -- both with the coronavirus and, in the latter company's case, the apparently looming spinoff. To my mind, though, the two companies have plenty of strength in numerous product areas outside of their respective vaccines, so investors shouldn't be too discouraged by Goldman Sachs' latest evaluations.","kind":"news","is_publish_news":true,"is_publish_highlight":true,"is_publish_live":false,"is_publish_wemedia":null,"editions":null,"column":"","sentiment":"0","news_tag":"","news_rank":0,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":1},"commentList":[{"id":699705239,"gmtCreate":1639887297459,"gmtModify":1639887297587,"author":{"id":"3582057436194036","authorId":"3582057436194036","name":"nancy88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f13797428448c51d0bc978c26e4c437c","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3582057436194036","authorIdStr":"3582057436194036"},"htmlText":"Nice","listText":"Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/699705239","repostId":1109831591,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1109831591","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1639804463,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1109831591?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-18 13:14","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson Fell on Friday","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1109831591","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"What happened\nTwo prominent U.S. coronavirus stocks ended the week on a down note. Pfizer and Johnso","content":"<p>What happened</p>\n<p>Two prominent U.S. coronavirus stocks ended the week on a down note.&nbsp;<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PFE\"><b>Pfizer</b></a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JNJ\"><b>Johnson &amp; Johnson</b></a>&nbsp;both fell on the day by nearly 3%. This followed a prominent investment bank's rather lukewarm take on their current prospects.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c6a2f152eebbe10f5ab65a99815f461c\" tg-width=\"975\" tg-height=\"637\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>\n<p>So what</p>\n<p><b>Goldman Sachs</b>&nbsp;analyst Chris Shibutani initiated coverage on Pfizer and Johnson &amp; Johnson on Friday, tagging both high-profile healthcare industry stocks with neutral recommendations.</p>\n<p>Shibutani is concerned with what he considers to be Pfizer's somewhat cloudy future, despite the great success of the Comirnaty coronavirus vaccine it developed with Germanbiotech&nbsp;<b>BioNTech</b>.</p>\n<p>\"Our views on [Pfizer] come down to that we estimate around one-third of its current valuation is attributed to the COVID-19 vaccine and therapeutic [products], and we feel the trajectory for both remains highly uncertain,\" he wrote.</p>\n<p>As for Johnson &amp; Johnson, the prognosticator feels the stock is also fairly valued. However, he sounded a more optimistic note about the company's potential.</p>\n<p>\"With [Johnson &amp; Johnson] in the midst of transitions across several domains for the organization ... we see possibilities -- even within an organization of [Johnson &amp; Johnson]'s scale and scope -- for additional potentially disruptive opportunities to develop that could reshape the investment thesis, in our view,\" he wrote.</p>\n<p>Last month, Johnson &amp; Johnson announced plans to spin off its sprawlingconsumer healthcare division.</p>\n<p>Shibutani's price target on Pfizer stock is $51 per share, and that for Johnson &amp; Johnson is $161.</p>\n<p>Now what</p>\n<p>Pfizer and Johnson &amp; Johnson are certainly heading into some uncertain waters -- both with the coronavirus and, in the latter company's case, the apparently looming spinoff. To my mind, though, the two companies have plenty of strength in numerous product areas outside of their respective vaccines, so investors shouldn't be too discouraged by Goldman Sachs' latest evaluations.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson Fell on Friday</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson Fell on Friday\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-12-18 13:14 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/12/17/why-pfizer-and-johnson-johnson-fell-on-friday/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>What happened\nTwo prominent U.S. coronavirus stocks ended the week on a down note. Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson both fell on the day by nearly 3%. This followed a prominent investment bank's rather ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/12/17/why-pfizer-and-johnson-johnson-fell-on-friday/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"JNJ":"强生","PFE":"辉瑞"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/12/17/why-pfizer-and-johnson-johnson-fell-on-friday/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1109831591","content_text":"What happened\nTwo prominent U.S. coronavirus stocks ended the week on a down note. Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson both fell on the day by nearly 3%. This followed a prominent investment bank's rather lukewarm take on their current prospects.\n\nSo what\nGoldman Sachs analyst Chris Shibutani initiated coverage on Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson on Friday, tagging both high-profile healthcare industry stocks with neutral recommendations.\nShibutani is concerned with what he considers to be Pfizer's somewhat cloudy future, despite the great success of the Comirnaty coronavirus vaccine it developed with Germanbiotech BioNTech.\n\"Our views on [Pfizer] come down to that we estimate around one-third of its current valuation is attributed to the COVID-19 vaccine and therapeutic [products], and we feel the trajectory for both remains highly uncertain,\" he wrote.\nAs for Johnson & Johnson, the prognosticator feels the stock is also fairly valued. However, he sounded a more optimistic note about the company's potential.\n\"With [Johnson & Johnson] in the midst of transitions across several domains for the organization ... we see possibilities -- even within an organization of [Johnson & Johnson]'s scale and scope -- for additional potentially disruptive opportunities to develop that could reshape the investment thesis, in our view,\" he wrote.\nLast month, Johnson & Johnson announced plans to spin off its sprawlingconsumer healthcare division.\nShibutani's price target on Pfizer stock is $51 per share, and that for Johnson & Johnson is $161.\nNow what\nPfizer and Johnson & Johnson are certainly heading into some uncertain waters -- both with the coronavirus and, in the latter company's case, the apparently looming spinoff. To my mind, though, the two companies have plenty of strength in numerous product areas outside of their respective vaccines, so investors shouldn't be too discouraged by Goldman Sachs' latest evaluations.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"CN"},{"id":699476894,"gmtCreate":1639884706320,"gmtModify":1639884706696,"author":{"id":"3574924744683779","authorId":"3574924744683779","name":"Charging","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bb132b01616074824a4d1a4b8478727e","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3574924744683779","authorIdStr":"3574924744683779"},"htmlText":"[smile]&nbsp;","listText":"[smile]&nbsp;","text":"[smile]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/699476894","repostId":1109831591,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1109831591","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1639804463,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1109831591?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-18 13:14","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson Fell on Friday","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1109831591","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"What happened\nTwo prominent U.S. coronavirus stocks ended the week on a down note. Pfizer and Johnso","content":"<p>What happened</p>\n<p>Two prominent U.S. coronavirus stocks ended the week on a down note.&nbsp;<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PFE\"><b>Pfizer</b></a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JNJ\"><b>Johnson &amp; Johnson</b></a>&nbsp;both fell on the day by nearly 3%. This followed a prominent investment bank's rather lukewarm take on their current prospects.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c6a2f152eebbe10f5ab65a99815f461c\" tg-width=\"975\" tg-height=\"637\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>\n<p>So what</p>\n<p><b>Goldman Sachs</b>&nbsp;analyst Chris Shibutani initiated coverage on Pfizer and Johnson &amp; Johnson on Friday, tagging both high-profile healthcare industry stocks with neutral recommendations.</p>\n<p>Shibutani is concerned with what he considers to be Pfizer's somewhat cloudy future, despite the great success of the Comirnaty coronavirus vaccine it developed with Germanbiotech&nbsp;<b>BioNTech</b>.</p>\n<p>\"Our views on [Pfizer] come down to that we estimate around one-third of its current valuation is attributed to the COVID-19 vaccine and therapeutic [products], and we feel the trajectory for both remains highly uncertain,\" he wrote.</p>\n<p>As for Johnson &amp; Johnson, the prognosticator feels the stock is also fairly valued. However, he sounded a more optimistic note about the company's potential.</p>\n<p>\"With [Johnson &amp; Johnson] in the midst of transitions across several domains for the organization ... we see possibilities -- even within an organization of [Johnson &amp; Johnson]'s scale and scope -- for additional potentially disruptive opportunities to develop that could reshape the investment thesis, in our view,\" he wrote.</p>\n<p>Last month, Johnson &amp; Johnson announced plans to spin off its sprawlingconsumer healthcare division.</p>\n<p>Shibutani's price target on Pfizer stock is $51 per share, and that for Johnson &amp; Johnson is $161.</p>\n<p>Now what</p>\n<p>Pfizer and Johnson &amp; Johnson are certainly heading into some uncertain waters -- both with the coronavirus and, in the latter company's case, the apparently looming spinoff. To my mind, though, the two companies have plenty of strength in numerous product areas outside of their respective vaccines, so investors shouldn't be too discouraged by Goldman Sachs' latest evaluations.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson Fell on Friday</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson Fell on Friday\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-12-18 13:14 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/12/17/why-pfizer-and-johnson-johnson-fell-on-friday/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>What happened\nTwo prominent U.S. coronavirus stocks ended the week on a down note. Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson both fell on the day by nearly 3%. This followed a prominent investment bank's rather ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/12/17/why-pfizer-and-johnson-johnson-fell-on-friday/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"JNJ":"强生","PFE":"辉瑞"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/12/17/why-pfizer-and-johnson-johnson-fell-on-friday/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1109831591","content_text":"What happened\nTwo prominent U.S. coronavirus stocks ended the week on a down note. Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson both fell on the day by nearly 3%. This followed a prominent investment bank's rather lukewarm take on their current prospects.\n\nSo what\nGoldman Sachs analyst Chris Shibutani initiated coverage on Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson on Friday, tagging both high-profile healthcare industry stocks with neutral recommendations.\nShibutani is concerned with what he considers to be Pfizer's somewhat cloudy future, despite the great success of the Comirnaty coronavirus vaccine it developed with Germanbiotech BioNTech.\n\"Our views on [Pfizer] come down to that we estimate around one-third of its current valuation is attributed to the COVID-19 vaccine and therapeutic [products], and we feel the trajectory for both remains highly uncertain,\" he wrote.\nAs for Johnson & Johnson, the prognosticator feels the stock is also fairly valued. However, he sounded a more optimistic note about the company's potential.\n\"With [Johnson & Johnson] in the midst of transitions across several domains for the organization ... we see possibilities -- even within an organization of [Johnson & Johnson]'s scale and scope -- for additional potentially disruptive opportunities to develop that could reshape the investment thesis, in our view,\" he wrote.\nLast month, Johnson & Johnson announced plans to spin off its sprawlingconsumer healthcare division.\nShibutani's price target on Pfizer stock is $51 per share, and that for Johnson & Johnson is $161.\nNow what\nPfizer and Johnson & Johnson are certainly heading into some uncertain waters -- both with the coronavirus and, in the latter company's case, the apparently looming spinoff. To my mind, though, the two companies have plenty of strength in numerous product areas outside of their respective vaccines, so investors shouldn't be too discouraged by Goldman Sachs' latest evaluations.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"CN"},{"id":699454604,"gmtCreate":1639881638280,"gmtModify":1639881638376,"author":{"id":"3574086622886620","authorId":"3574086622886620","name":"rocketchoo2","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e200608974e9d7fd71c2c66492464127","vip":1,"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3574086622886620","authorIdStr":"3574086622886620"},"htmlText":"Probably due to booster not 'good' enough for omi? Wait for march 2022 for their new shot?","listText":"Probably due to booster not 'good' enough for omi? Wait for march 2022 for their new shot?","text":"Probably due to booster not 'good' enough for omi? Wait for march 2022 for their new shot?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/699454604","repostId":1109831591,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1109831591","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1639804463,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1109831591?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-18 13:14","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson Fell on Friday","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1109831591","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"What happened\nTwo prominent U.S. coronavirus stocks ended the week on a down note. Pfizer and Johnso","content":"<p>What happened</p>\n<p>Two prominent U.S. coronavirus stocks ended the week on a down note.&nbsp;<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PFE\"><b>Pfizer</b></a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JNJ\"><b>Johnson &amp; Johnson</b></a>&nbsp;both fell on the day by nearly 3%. This followed a prominent investment bank's rather lukewarm take on their current prospects.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c6a2f152eebbe10f5ab65a99815f461c\" tg-width=\"975\" tg-height=\"637\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>\n<p>So what</p>\n<p><b>Goldman Sachs</b>&nbsp;analyst Chris Shibutani initiated coverage on Pfizer and Johnson &amp; Johnson on Friday, tagging both high-profile healthcare industry stocks with neutral recommendations.</p>\n<p>Shibutani is concerned with what he considers to be Pfizer's somewhat cloudy future, despite the great success of the Comirnaty coronavirus vaccine it developed with Germanbiotech&nbsp;<b>BioNTech</b>.</p>\n<p>\"Our views on [Pfizer] come down to that we estimate around one-third of its current valuation is attributed to the COVID-19 vaccine and therapeutic [products], and we feel the trajectory for both remains highly uncertain,\" he wrote.</p>\n<p>As for Johnson &amp; Johnson, the prognosticator feels the stock is also fairly valued. However, he sounded a more optimistic note about the company's potential.</p>\n<p>\"With [Johnson &amp; Johnson] in the midst of transitions across several domains for the organization ... we see possibilities -- even within an organization of [Johnson &amp; Johnson]'s scale and scope -- for additional potentially disruptive opportunities to develop that could reshape the investment thesis, in our view,\" he wrote.</p>\n<p>Last month, Johnson &amp; Johnson announced plans to spin off its sprawlingconsumer healthcare division.</p>\n<p>Shibutani's price target on Pfizer stock is $51 per share, and that for Johnson &amp; Johnson is $161.</p>\n<p>Now what</p>\n<p>Pfizer and Johnson &amp; Johnson are certainly heading into some uncertain waters -- both with the coronavirus and, in the latter company's case, the apparently looming spinoff. To my mind, though, the two companies have plenty of strength in numerous product areas outside of their respective vaccines, so investors shouldn't be too discouraged by Goldman Sachs' latest evaluations.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson Fell on Friday</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson Fell on Friday\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-12-18 13:14 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/12/17/why-pfizer-and-johnson-johnson-fell-on-friday/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>What happened\nTwo prominent U.S. coronavirus stocks ended the week on a down note. Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson both fell on the day by nearly 3%. This followed a prominent investment bank's rather ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/12/17/why-pfizer-and-johnson-johnson-fell-on-friday/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"JNJ":"强生","PFE":"辉瑞"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/12/17/why-pfizer-and-johnson-johnson-fell-on-friday/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1109831591","content_text":"What happened\nTwo prominent U.S. coronavirus stocks ended the week on a down note. Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson both fell on the day by nearly 3%. This followed a prominent investment bank's rather lukewarm take on their current prospects.\n\nSo what\nGoldman Sachs analyst Chris Shibutani initiated coverage on Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson on Friday, tagging both high-profile healthcare industry stocks with neutral recommendations.\nShibutani is concerned with what he considers to be Pfizer's somewhat cloudy future, despite the great success of the Comirnaty coronavirus vaccine it developed with Germanbiotech BioNTech.\n\"Our views on [Pfizer] come down to that we estimate around one-third of its current valuation is attributed to the COVID-19 vaccine and therapeutic [products], and we feel the trajectory for both remains highly uncertain,\" he wrote.\nAs for Johnson & Johnson, the prognosticator feels the stock is also fairly valued. However, he sounded a more optimistic note about the company's potential.\n\"With [Johnson & Johnson] in the midst of transitions across several domains for the organization ... we see possibilities -- even within an organization of [Johnson & Johnson]'s scale and scope -- for additional potentially disruptive opportunities to develop that could reshape the investment thesis, in our view,\" he wrote.\nLast month, Johnson & Johnson announced plans to spin off its sprawlingconsumer healthcare division.\nShibutani's price target on Pfizer stock is $51 per share, and that for Johnson & Johnson is $161.\nNow what\nPfizer and Johnson & Johnson are certainly heading into some uncertain waters -- both with the coronavirus and, in the latter company's case, the apparently looming spinoff. To my mind, though, the two companies have plenty of strength in numerous product areas outside of their respective vaccines, so investors shouldn't be too discouraged by Goldman Sachs' latest evaluations.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":7041262,"gmtCreate":1639884716246,"gmtModify":1639884716339,"authorId":3574924744683779,"author":{"id":3574924744683779,"idStr":"3574924744683779","authorId":3574924744683779,"name":"Charging","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bb132b01616074824a4d1a4b8478727e","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":699454604,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"[Happy]","text":"[Happy]","html":"[Happy]"}],"langContent":"CN"},{"id":699422738,"gmtCreate":1639879959339,"gmtModify":1639879961843,"author":{"id":"3574906731000207","authorId":"3574906731000207","name":"SSVC","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/545a5ea462ff4ac7cc100bd3d8d97f72","vip":1,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3574906731000207","authorIdStr":"3574906731000207"},"htmlText":"Mmm.. Appreciate your response and response Thanks&nbsp;","listText":"Mmm.. Appreciate your response and response Thanks&nbsp;","text":"Mmm.. Appreciate your response and response Thanks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/699422738","repostId":1109831591,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1109831591","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1639804463,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1109831591?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-18 13:14","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson Fell on Friday","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1109831591","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"What happened\nTwo prominent U.S. coronavirus stocks ended the week on a down note. Pfizer and Johnso","content":"<p>What happened</p>\n<p>Two prominent U.S. coronavirus stocks ended the week on a down note.&nbsp;<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PFE\"><b>Pfizer</b></a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JNJ\"><b>Johnson &amp; Johnson</b></a>&nbsp;both fell on the day by nearly 3%. This followed a prominent investment bank's rather lukewarm take on their current prospects.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c6a2f152eebbe10f5ab65a99815f461c\" tg-width=\"975\" tg-height=\"637\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>\n<p>So what</p>\n<p><b>Goldman Sachs</b>&nbsp;analyst Chris Shibutani initiated coverage on Pfizer and Johnson &amp; Johnson on Friday, tagging both high-profile healthcare industry stocks with neutral recommendations.</p>\n<p>Shibutani is concerned with what he considers to be Pfizer's somewhat cloudy future, despite the great success of the Comirnaty coronavirus vaccine it developed with Germanbiotech&nbsp;<b>BioNTech</b>.</p>\n<p>\"Our views on [Pfizer] come down to that we estimate around one-third of its current valuation is attributed to the COVID-19 vaccine and therapeutic [products], and we feel the trajectory for both remains highly uncertain,\" he wrote.</p>\n<p>As for Johnson &amp; Johnson, the prognosticator feels the stock is also fairly valued. However, he sounded a more optimistic note about the company's potential.</p>\n<p>\"With [Johnson &amp; Johnson] in the midst of transitions across several domains for the organization ... we see possibilities -- even within an organization of [Johnson &amp; Johnson]'s scale and scope -- for additional potentially disruptive opportunities to develop that could reshape the investment thesis, in our view,\" he wrote.</p>\n<p>Last month, Johnson &amp; Johnson announced plans to spin off its sprawlingconsumer healthcare division.</p>\n<p>Shibutani's price target on Pfizer stock is $51 per share, and that for Johnson &amp; Johnson is $161.</p>\n<p>Now what</p>\n<p>Pfizer and Johnson &amp; Johnson are certainly heading into some uncertain waters -- both with the coronavirus and, in the latter company's case, the apparently looming spinoff. To my mind, though, the two companies have plenty of strength in numerous product areas outside of their respective vaccines, so investors shouldn't be too discouraged by Goldman Sachs' latest evaluations.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson Fell on Friday</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson Fell on Friday\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-12-18 13:14 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/12/17/why-pfizer-and-johnson-johnson-fell-on-friday/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>What happened\nTwo prominent U.S. coronavirus stocks ended the week on a down note. Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson both fell on the day by nearly 3%. This followed a prominent investment bank's rather ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/12/17/why-pfizer-and-johnson-johnson-fell-on-friday/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"JNJ":"强生","PFE":"辉瑞"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/12/17/why-pfizer-and-johnson-johnson-fell-on-friday/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1109831591","content_text":"What happened\nTwo prominent U.S. coronavirus stocks ended the week on a down note. Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson both fell on the day by nearly 3%. This followed a prominent investment bank's rather lukewarm take on their current prospects.\n\nSo what\nGoldman Sachs analyst Chris Shibutani initiated coverage on Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson on Friday, tagging both high-profile healthcare industry stocks with neutral recommendations.\nShibutani is concerned with what he considers to be Pfizer's somewhat cloudy future, despite the great success of the Comirnaty coronavirus vaccine it developed with Germanbiotech BioNTech.\n\"Our views on [Pfizer] come down to that we estimate around one-third of its current valuation is attributed to the COVID-19 vaccine and therapeutic [products], and we feel the trajectory for both remains highly uncertain,\" he wrote.\nAs for Johnson & Johnson, the prognosticator feels the stock is also fairly valued. However, he sounded a more optimistic note about the company's potential.\n\"With [Johnson & Johnson] in the midst of transitions across several domains for the organization ... we see possibilities -- even within an organization of [Johnson & Johnson]'s scale and scope -- for additional potentially disruptive opportunities to develop that could reshape the investment thesis, in our view,\" he wrote.\nLast month, Johnson & Johnson announced plans to spin off its sprawlingconsumer healthcare division.\nShibutani's price target on Pfizer stock is $51 per share, and that for Johnson & Johnson is $161.\nNow what\nPfizer and Johnson & Johnson are certainly heading into some uncertain waters -- both with the coronavirus and, in the latter company's case, the apparently looming spinoff. To my mind, though, the two companies have plenty of strength in numerous product areas outside of their respective vaccines, so investors shouldn't be too discouraged by Goldman Sachs' latest evaluations.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"CN"},{"id":699579925,"gmtCreate":1639867892195,"gmtModify":1639867892404,"author":{"id":"3573013786940329","authorId":"3573013786940329","name":"Rudyy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bb9e738a6e83bd49057ffbf45051da2a","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3573013786940329","authorIdStr":"3573013786940329"},"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/699579925","repostId":1109831591,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1109831591","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1639804463,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1109831591?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-18 13:14","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson Fell on Friday","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1109831591","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"What happened\nTwo prominent U.S. coronavirus stocks ended the week on a down note. Pfizer and Johnso","content":"<p>What happened</p>\n<p>Two prominent U.S. coronavirus stocks ended the week on a down note.&nbsp;<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PFE\"><b>Pfizer</b></a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JNJ\"><b>Johnson &amp; Johnson</b></a>&nbsp;both fell on the day by nearly 3%. This followed a prominent investment bank's rather lukewarm take on their current prospects.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c6a2f152eebbe10f5ab65a99815f461c\" tg-width=\"975\" tg-height=\"637\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>\n<p>So what</p>\n<p><b>Goldman Sachs</b>&nbsp;analyst Chris Shibutani initiated coverage on Pfizer and Johnson &amp; Johnson on Friday, tagging both high-profile healthcare industry stocks with neutral recommendations.</p>\n<p>Shibutani is concerned with what he considers to be Pfizer's somewhat cloudy future, despite the great success of the Comirnaty coronavirus vaccine it developed with Germanbiotech&nbsp;<b>BioNTech</b>.</p>\n<p>\"Our views on [Pfizer] come down to that we estimate around one-third of its current valuation is attributed to the COVID-19 vaccine and therapeutic [products], and we feel the trajectory for both remains highly uncertain,\" he wrote.</p>\n<p>As for Johnson &amp; Johnson, the prognosticator feels the stock is also fairly valued. However, he sounded a more optimistic note about the company's potential.</p>\n<p>\"With [Johnson &amp; Johnson] in the midst of transitions across several domains for the organization ... we see possibilities -- even within an organization of [Johnson &amp; Johnson]'s scale and scope -- for additional potentially disruptive opportunities to develop that could reshape the investment thesis, in our view,\" he wrote.</p>\n<p>Last month, Johnson &amp; Johnson announced plans to spin off its sprawlingconsumer healthcare division.</p>\n<p>Shibutani's price target on Pfizer stock is $51 per share, and that for Johnson &amp; Johnson is $161.</p>\n<p>Now what</p>\n<p>Pfizer and Johnson &amp; Johnson are certainly heading into some uncertain waters -- both with the coronavirus and, in the latter company's case, the apparently looming spinoff. To my mind, though, the two companies have plenty of strength in numerous product areas outside of their respective vaccines, so investors shouldn't be too discouraged by Goldman Sachs' latest evaluations.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson Fell on Friday</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson Fell on Friday\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-12-18 13:14 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/12/17/why-pfizer-and-johnson-johnson-fell-on-friday/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>What happened\nTwo prominent U.S. coronavirus stocks ended the week on a down note. Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson both fell on the day by nearly 3%. This followed a prominent investment bank's rather ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/12/17/why-pfizer-and-johnson-johnson-fell-on-friday/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"JNJ":"强生","PFE":"辉瑞"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/12/17/why-pfizer-and-johnson-johnson-fell-on-friday/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1109831591","content_text":"What happened\nTwo prominent U.S. coronavirus stocks ended the week on a down note. Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson both fell on the day by nearly 3%. This followed a prominent investment bank's rather lukewarm take on their current prospects.\n\nSo what\nGoldman Sachs analyst Chris Shibutani initiated coverage on Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson on Friday, tagging both high-profile healthcare industry stocks with neutral recommendations.\nShibutani is concerned with what he considers to be Pfizer's somewhat cloudy future, despite the great success of the Comirnaty coronavirus vaccine it developed with Germanbiotech BioNTech.\n\"Our views on [Pfizer] come down to that we estimate around one-third of its current valuation is attributed to the COVID-19 vaccine and therapeutic [products], and we feel the trajectory for both remains highly uncertain,\" he wrote.\nAs for Johnson & Johnson, the prognosticator feels the stock is also fairly valued. However, he sounded a more optimistic note about the company's potential.\n\"With [Johnson & Johnson] in the midst of transitions across several domains for the organization ... we see possibilities -- even within an organization of [Johnson & Johnson]'s scale and scope -- for additional potentially disruptive opportunities to develop that could reshape the investment thesis, in our view,\" he wrote.\nLast month, Johnson & Johnson announced plans to spin off its sprawlingconsumer healthcare division.\nShibutani's price target on Pfizer stock is $51 per share, and that for Johnson & Johnson is $161.\nNow what\nPfizer and Johnson & Johnson are certainly heading into some uncertain waters -- both with the coronavirus and, in the latter company's case, the apparently looming spinoff. To my mind, though, the two companies have plenty of strength in numerous product areas outside of their respective vaccines, so investors shouldn't be too discouraged by Goldman Sachs' latest evaluations.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":7039770,"gmtCreate":1639878331682,"gmtModify":1639878331718,"authorId":3564628688986709,"author":{"id":3564628688986709,"idStr":"3564628688986709","authorId":3564628688986709,"name":"Cynphony","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0a4d7b3613c4c16a986696433173f5f7","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":699579925,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"F","text":"F","html":"F"},{"id":7037834,"gmtCreate":1639870228316,"gmtModify":1639870228350,"authorId":3559787818034959,"author":{"id":3559787818034959,"idStr":"3559787818034959","authorId":3559787818034959,"name":"Ericlam","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f2154f4bb8afd22f8e6fde60b57acb69","vip":1,"crmLevel":7,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":699579925,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"nice","text":"nice","html":"nice"}],"langContent":"CN"},{"id":699547761,"gmtCreate":1639867336179,"gmtModify":1639867337403,"author":{"id":"3576260758860416","authorId":"3576260758860416","name":"andrew123","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3576260758860416","authorIdStr":"3576260758860416"},"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/699547761","repostId":1109831591,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1109831591","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1639804463,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1109831591?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-18 13:14","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson Fell on Friday","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1109831591","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"What happened\nTwo prominent U.S. coronavirus stocks ended the week on a down note. Pfizer and Johnso","content":"<p>What happened</p>\n<p>Two prominent U.S. coronavirus stocks ended the week on a down note.&nbsp;<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PFE\"><b>Pfizer</b></a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JNJ\"><b>Johnson &amp; Johnson</b></a>&nbsp;both fell on the day by nearly 3%. This followed a prominent investment bank's rather lukewarm take on their current prospects.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c6a2f152eebbe10f5ab65a99815f461c\" tg-width=\"975\" tg-height=\"637\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>\n<p>So what</p>\n<p><b>Goldman Sachs</b>&nbsp;analyst Chris Shibutani initiated coverage on Pfizer and Johnson &amp; Johnson on Friday, tagging both high-profile healthcare industry stocks with neutral recommendations.</p>\n<p>Shibutani is concerned with what he considers to be Pfizer's somewhat cloudy future, despite the great success of the Comirnaty coronavirus vaccine it developed with Germanbiotech&nbsp;<b>BioNTech</b>.</p>\n<p>\"Our views on [Pfizer] come down to that we estimate around one-third of its current valuation is attributed to the COVID-19 vaccine and therapeutic [products], and we feel the trajectory for both remains highly uncertain,\" he wrote.</p>\n<p>As for Johnson &amp; Johnson, the prognosticator feels the stock is also fairly valued. However, he sounded a more optimistic note about the company's potential.</p>\n<p>\"With [Johnson &amp; Johnson] in the midst of transitions across several domains for the organization ... we see possibilities -- even within an organization of [Johnson &amp; Johnson]'s scale and scope -- for additional potentially disruptive opportunities to develop that could reshape the investment thesis, in our view,\" he wrote.</p>\n<p>Last month, Johnson &amp; Johnson announced plans to spin off its sprawlingconsumer healthcare division.</p>\n<p>Shibutani's price target on Pfizer stock is $51 per share, and that for Johnson &amp; Johnson is $161.</p>\n<p>Now what</p>\n<p>Pfizer and Johnson &amp; Johnson are certainly heading into some uncertain waters -- both with the coronavirus and, in the latter company's case, the apparently looming spinoff. To my mind, though, the two companies have plenty of strength in numerous product areas outside of their respective vaccines, so investors shouldn't be too discouraged by Goldman Sachs' latest evaluations.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson Fell on Friday</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson Fell on Friday\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-12-18 13:14 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/12/17/why-pfizer-and-johnson-johnson-fell-on-friday/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>What happened\nTwo prominent U.S. coronavirus stocks ended the week on a down note. Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson both fell on the day by nearly 3%. This followed a prominent investment bank's rather ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/12/17/why-pfizer-and-johnson-johnson-fell-on-friday/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"JNJ":"强生","PFE":"辉瑞"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/12/17/why-pfizer-and-johnson-johnson-fell-on-friday/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1109831591","content_text":"What happened\nTwo prominent U.S. coronavirus stocks ended the week on a down note. Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson both fell on the day by nearly 3%. This followed a prominent investment bank's rather lukewarm take on their current prospects.\n\nSo what\nGoldman Sachs analyst Chris Shibutani initiated coverage on Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson on Friday, tagging both high-profile healthcare industry stocks with neutral recommendations.\nShibutani is concerned with what he considers to be Pfizer's somewhat cloudy future, despite the great success of the Comirnaty coronavirus vaccine it developed with Germanbiotech BioNTech.\n\"Our views on [Pfizer] come down to that we estimate around one-third of its current valuation is attributed to the COVID-19 vaccine and therapeutic [products], and we feel the trajectory for both remains highly uncertain,\" he wrote.\nAs for Johnson & Johnson, the prognosticator feels the stock is also fairly valued. However, he sounded a more optimistic note about the company's potential.\n\"With [Johnson & Johnson] in the midst of transitions across several domains for the organization ... we see possibilities -- even within an organization of [Johnson & Johnson]'s scale and scope -- for additional potentially disruptive opportunities to develop that could reshape the investment thesis, in our view,\" he wrote.\nLast month, Johnson & Johnson announced plans to spin off its sprawlingconsumer healthcare division.\nShibutani's price target on Pfizer stock is $51 per share, and that for Johnson & Johnson is $161.\nNow what\nPfizer and Johnson & Johnson are certainly heading into some uncertain waters -- both with the coronavirus and, in the latter company's case, the apparently looming spinoff. To my mind, though, the two companies have plenty of strength in numerous product areas outside of their respective vaccines, so investors shouldn't be too discouraged by Goldman Sachs' latest evaluations.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":7037836,"gmtCreate":1639870245206,"gmtModify":1639870245298,"authorId":3559787818034959,"author":{"id":3559787818034959,"idStr":"3559787818034959","authorId":3559787818034959,"name":"Ericlam","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f2154f4bb8afd22f8e6fde60b57acb69","vip":1,"crmLevel":7,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":699547761,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"nice","text":"nice","html":"nice"}],"langContent":"CN"}],"isCommentEnd":false,"newsSizeData":{"likeSize":231,"commentSize":32,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false},"APP":{"userAgent":"Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)","isDev":false,"isTTM":false,"deviceId":"web-server-community-laohu8-v3","version":"4.29.3","shortVersion":"4.29.3","platform":"web","vendor":"web","appName":"laohu8","isIOS":false,"isAndroid":false,"isTiger":false,"isTHS":false,"isWeiXin":false,"isWeiXinMini":false,"isWeiBo":false,"isQQ":false,"isBaiduSwan":false,"isBaiduBox":false,"isDingTalk":false,"isToutiao":false,"isOnePlus":false,"isHuaWei":false,"isXiaomi":false,"isXiaomiWebView":false,"isOppo":false,"isVivo":false,"isSamsung":false,"isMobile":false},"href":"/m/news/1109831591"}