superduper的个人主页 - 老虎社区

superduper

superduper

暂无个人介绍

IP属地：未知

214关注

21粉丝

0主题

0勋章

2021-12-29

[Sad]

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-12-28

Why keep drilling [Spurting]

NIO Stock Alert: What Is Going on With Nio Today?<blockquote>蔚来股票警报：蔚来今天发生了什么？</blockquote>

2021-12-25

Merry Christmas

A Christmas Wish List For EV Makers<blockquote>电动汽车制造商的圣诞愿望清单</blockquote>

2021-12-23

Hope no other variant after this..

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-12-23

Waiting for buying opp

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-12-22

Ok

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-12-21

Like

Palantir: 3 Reasons Against It And Why It's Still A Buy<blockquote>Palantir：反对它的3个理由以及为什么它仍然值得买入</blockquote>

2021-12-19

What's thr TP?

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-12-18

Sad week

Wall Street ends down after mostly negative week<blockquote>华尔街在经历了大部分负面的一周后收盘下跌</blockquote>

2021-12-17

Nice

Toplines Before US Market Open on Friday<blockquote>周五美国市场开盘前的营收</blockquote>

2021-12-16

Buy!

Tesla Bags Top-Rated EV Badge From Edmunds, Rivian Gets Editor's Choice Crown<blockquote>特斯拉获得埃德蒙兹顶级电动汽车徽章，Rivian获得编辑选择桂冠</blockquote>

2021-12-15

Down more?

Tesla And These Stocks Are Seeing The Highest Interest On WallStreetBets Today<blockquote>今天WallStreetBets对特斯拉和这些股票的兴趣最高</blockquote>

2021-12-14

Boat is back

Singapore Stock Market May Take Further Damage On Tuesday<blockquote>新加坡股市周二可能进一步受损</blockquote>

2021-12-12

Nah

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-12-11

Whyyy

Sea Ltd stock dropped more than 5% in morning trading<blockquote>Sea Ltd股价早盘下跌超过5%</blockquote>

2021-12-10

Like

Tesla stops taking Model S and Model X orders outside North America<blockquote>特斯拉停止接受北美以外地区Model S和Model X订单</blockquote>

2021-12-08

Good news

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-12-07

Never sell?

Apple: A True 'Never Sell' Position<blockquote>苹果：真正的“永不出售”立场</blockquote>

2021-12-03

Woohoo!

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-12-02

Like

Apple stock slid more than 1% in premarket trading<blockquote>苹果股价在盘前交易中下跌超过1%</blockquote>

去老虎APP查看更多动态

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"3581550518409224","uuid":"3581550518409224","gmtCreate":1618457601597,"gmtModify":1632992196084,"name":"superduper","pinyin":"superduper","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/04a121c70123b41a7011f9ec45096505","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":21,"headSize":214,"tweetSize":104,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":1,"name":"萌萌虎","nameTw":"萌萌虎","represent":"呱呱坠地","factor":"评论帖子3次或发布1条主帖（非转发）","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":null,"userBadges":[{"badgeId":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969-3","templateUuid":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969","name":"传说交易员","description":"证券或期货账户累计交易次数达到300次","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/656db16598a0b8f21429e10d6c1cb033","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/03f10910d4dd9234f9b5702a3342193a","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0c767e35268feb729d50d3fa9a386c5a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.10.28","exceedPercentage":"93.48%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561-1","templateUuid":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561","name":"出道虎友","description":"加入老虎社区500天","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0e4d0ca1da0456dc7894c946d44bf9ab","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0f2f65e8ce4cfaae8db2bea9b127f58b","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5948a31b6edf154422335b265235809","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.08.29","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"228c86a078844d74991fff2b7ab2428d-2","templateUuid":"228c86a078844d74991fff2b7ab2428d","name":"投资总监虎","description":"证券账户累计交易金额达到30万美元","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9d20b23f1b6335407f882bc5c2ad12c0","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ada3b4533518ace8404a3f6dd192bd29","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/177f283ba21d1c077054dac07f88f3bd","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.07.14","exceedPercentage":"80.94%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101},{"badgeId":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37-1","templateUuid":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37","name":"博闻投资者","description":"累计交易超过10只正股","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a-1","templateUuid":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a","name":"实盘交易者","description":"完成一笔实盘交易","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":5,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":"未知","starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"post","tweets":[{"id":696446733,"gmtCreate":1640756374338,"gmtModify":1640756374590,"author":{"id":"3581550518409224","authorId":"3581550518409224","name":"superduper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/04a121c70123b41a7011f9ec45096505","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581550518409224","authorIdStr":"3581550518409224"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[Sad]&nbsp;","listText":"[Sad]&nbsp;","text":"[Sad]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/696446733","repostId":"1186633322","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":4210,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":696807358,"gmtCreate":1640657448305,"gmtModify":1640657448599,"author":{"id":"3581550518409224","authorId":"3581550518409224","name":"superduper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/04a121c70123b41a7011f9ec45096505","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581550518409224","authorIdStr":"3581550518409224"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Why keep drilling&nbsp;[Spurting]&nbsp;","listText":"Why keep drilling&nbsp;[Spurting]&nbsp;","text":"Why keep drilling [Spurting]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/696807358","repostId":"1199133469","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1199133469","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1640657018,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1199133469?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-28 10:03","market":"us","language":"en","title":"NIO Stock Alert: What Is Going on With Nio Today?<blockquote>蔚来股票警报：蔚来今天发生了什么？</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1199133469","media":"InvestorPlace","summary":"Chinese electric vehicle maker Nio(NYSE:NIO) is attracting a great deal of attention today, amid spe","content":"<p><div> Chinese electric vehicle maker Nio(NYSE:NIO) is attracting a great deal of attention today, amid speculation that the automaker could be preparing to enter the U.S. Although shares have since reversed...</p><p><blockquote><div>中国电动汽车制造商蔚来（纽约证券交易所股票代码：蔚来）今天引起了广泛关注，人们猜测该汽车制造商可能正准备进入美国。尽管此后股价出现逆转……</div></blockquote></p><p>  <a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2021/12/nio-stock-alert-what-is-going-on-with-nio-today/\">网页链接</a>  </div> </p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2021/12/nio-stock-alert-what-is-going-on-with-nio-today/\">网页连接</a></blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1606302653667","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>NIO Stock Alert: What Is Going on With Nio Today?<blockquote>蔚来股票警报：蔚来今天发生了什么？</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nNIO Stock Alert: What Is Going on With Nio Today?<blockquote>蔚来股票警报：蔚来今天发生了什么？</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">InvestorPlace</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-12-28 10:03</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><div> Chinese electric vehicle maker Nio(NYSE:NIO) is attracting a great deal of attention today, amid speculation that the automaker could be preparing to enter the U.S. Although shares have since reversed...</p><p><blockquote><div>中国电动汽车制造商蔚来（纽约证券交易所股票代码：蔚来）今天引起了广泛关注，人们猜测该汽车制造商可能正准备进入美国。尽管此后股价出现逆转……</div></blockquote></p><p>  <a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2021/12/nio-stock-alert-what-is-going-on-with-nio-today/\">网页链接</a>  </div> </p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2021/12/nio-stock-alert-what-is-going-on-with-nio-today/\">网页连接</a></blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2021/12/nio-stock-alert-what-is-going-on-with-nio-today/\">InvestorPlace</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NIO":"蔚来"},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2021/12/nio-stock-alert-what-is-going-on-with-nio-today/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1199133469","content_text":"Chinese electric vehicle maker Nio(NYSE:NIO) is attracting a great deal of attention today, amid speculation that the automaker could be preparing to enter the U.S. Although shares have since reversed course, NIO stock slid nearly 2% today. It is also a top-trending stock on Yahoo Financeand social media today.\nSince U.S. EV sales are growing rapidly and Nio is seen by some as China’s version of Tesla(NASDAQ:TSLA), Nio’s move into the U.S. could greatly boost its financial results down the road.  Such a development, in turn, is likely to meaningfully lift NIO stock.\nJob Ads Lift NIO Stock\nToday’s buzz was sparked by advertisements for U.S.-based positions that Nio recently posted on LinkedIn. Specifically, the firm has posted ads for 46 positions in America. Many of the jobs focus on managing technical operations, including software development and autonomous driving.\nAmong the U.S.-based positions that Niois currently seeking are Head of Architecture & Design, Head of Power Strategy, and Audio Systems Architect. Most of the positions are based in San Jose, California.\nA number of the advertisements went live a month ago, while others have been posted in recent days.\nBut why do investors care? Several months ago, investors determined that Nio was preparing to enter Norway based on job ads from LinkedIn.\nTherefore, it’s reasonable to believe that, with the EV manufacturer posting ads for jobs in the U.S., it may be preparing to start selling its automobiles in America.\nProgress in Norway and China\nAt the same time, Nio is making progress in its existing markets, which is likely to intrigue investors. Nio launched its ES8 sedan in Norway on Sept. 30. It’s planning to debut another electric sedan, the ET7, in the country in 2022. After Norway, Nio is expected to “gradually” enter additional markets in Europe.\nIn China, Nio’s sales have been growing rapidly. For example, in November, it announced that its deliveries had soared 105.6% year over year to 10,878 EVs. In the first 11 months of the year, its deliveries jumped 120.4% YOY to 80,940 EVs.\nThe Bottom Line\nToday’s news comes amid high interest by investors in both EV stocks and Chinese stocks. EV stocks have been an area of focus as sales rapidly ramp around the world and as many governments look to incentivize EV sales in order to reduce carbon emissions.\nMeanwhile, many investors have closely followed U.S.-listed Chinese stocks. It seems these two factors are also contributing to the interest in Nio shares today.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"NIO":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3628,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":698255325,"gmtCreate":1640417936896,"gmtModify":1640417937183,"author":{"id":"3581550518409224","authorId":"3581550518409224","name":"superduper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/04a121c70123b41a7011f9ec45096505","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581550518409224","authorIdStr":"3581550518409224"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Merry Christmas&nbsp;","listText":"Merry Christmas&nbsp;","text":"Merry Christmas","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/698255325","repostId":"1173048178","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1173048178","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1640393368,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1173048178?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-25 08:49","market":"us","language":"en","title":"A Christmas Wish List For EV Makers<blockquote>电动汽车制造商的圣诞愿望清单</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1173048178","media":"Benzinga","summary":"Wall Street is unanimous about the massive electric vehicle market opportunity set to unfold in the coming years. Against this backdrop, an analyst at Wedbush pondered what could be on Christmas wish lists for the EV makers.Christmas Wish List:The EV sectors would be hoping for two things heading into Christmas and the end of the year, Ives said.Moderation in the chip shortage that severely constrained production.Hope the EV demand inflection predicted for 2022 materializes.$5T Market Opportunit","content":"<p><div> Wall Street is unanimous about the massive electric vehicle market opportunity set to unfold in the coming years. Against this backdrop, an analyst at Wedbush pondered what could be on Christmas wish ...</p><p><blockquote><div>华尔街一致认为未来几年将出现的巨大电动汽车市场机遇。在这种背景下，韦德布什的一位分析师思考了圣诞愿望可能是什么...</div></blockquote></p><p>  <a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/analyst-ratings/analyst-color/21/12/24757706/a-christmas-wish-list-for-ev-makers\">网页链接</a>  </div> </p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/analyst-ratings/analyst-color/21/12/24757706/a-christmas-wish-list-for-ev-makers\">网页连接</a></blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1606299360108","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>A Christmas Wish List For EV Makers<blockquote>电动汽车制造商的圣诞愿望清单</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nA Christmas Wish List For EV Makers<blockquote>电动汽车制造商的圣诞愿望清单</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Benzinga</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-12-25 08:49</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><div> Wall Street is unanimous about the massive electric vehicle market opportunity set to unfold in the coming years. Against this backdrop, an analyst at Wedbush pondered what could be on Christmas wish ...</p><p><blockquote><div>华尔街一致认为未来几年将出现的巨大电动汽车市场机遇。在这种背景下，韦德布什的一位分析师思考了圣诞愿望可能是什么...</div></blockquote></p><p>  <a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/analyst-ratings/analyst-color/21/12/24757706/a-christmas-wish-list-for-ev-makers\">网页链接</a>  </div> </p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/analyst-ratings/analyst-color/21/12/24757706/a-christmas-wish-list-for-ev-makers\">网页连接</a></blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/analyst-ratings/analyst-color/21/12/24757706/a-christmas-wish-list-for-ev-makers\">Benzinga</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"F":"福特汽车","TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://www.benzinga.com/analyst-ratings/analyst-color/21/12/24757706/a-christmas-wish-list-for-ev-makers","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1173048178","content_text":"Wall Street is unanimous about the massive electric vehicle market opportunity set to unfold in the coming years. Against this backdrop, an analyst at Wedbush pondered what could be on Christmas wish lists for the EV makers.\nChristmas Wish List:The EV sectors would be hoping for two things heading into Christmas and the end of the year, Ives said.\n\nModeration in the chip shortage that severely constrained production.\nHope the EV demand inflection predicted for 2022 materializes.\n\n$5T Market Opportunity Over Next Decade: The EV revolution expected to materialize in 2022 and beyond will translate to a $5 trillion market opportunity over the next decade, Ives said in the note. Tesla Inc(NASDAQ:TSLA) will be the major beneficiary of the inflection, the analyst said.\nOthers such as traditional automakers General Motors Company(NYSE:GM), Volkswagen AG(OTC:VWAGY) and Ford Motor Company(NYSE:F), as well as EV-focused vendorsCanoo Inc(NASDAQ:GOEV), Lucid Group Inc(NASDAQ:LCID), Fisker Inc(NYSE:FSR) and Rivian Automotive Inc(NASDAQ:RIVN) also stand to capitalize, he added.\nEurope and China have seen a clear acceleration in EV adoption. The U.S., with just 2% penetration, lags behind, the analyst noted.\nEV supply chain plays such as Li-Cycle Holdings Corp(NYSE:LICY), ChargePoint Holdings Inc(NYSE:CHPT), Evgo Inc(NASDAQ:EVGO), Electric Last Mile Solutions Inc(NASDAQ:ELMS), Xos Inc(NASDAQ:XOS) and Hyzon Motors Inc(NASDAQ:HYZN), among others are well-positioned to benefit, Ives said.\nOn the software front, connected data plays such as Wejo Group Ltd(NASDAQ:WEJO) are likely to benefit from the next generation of EVs and adoption taking hold over the next 12 to 18 months, he added.\nEV Valuations Reflecting Future Growth: EV valuations continue to soar, leading many to wonder whether this is a bubble or the first stage of a decade-long EV metamorphosis, Ives said.\n\"The EV stocks are reflecting future parabolic growth and margin potential over the coming years, with now the execution/capacity story taking hold into 2022,\" the analyst wrote in the note.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"F":0.9,"TSLA":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3657,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":691557516,"gmtCreate":1640223793836,"gmtModify":1640223794081,"author":{"id":"3581550518409224","authorId":"3581550518409224","name":"superduper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/04a121c70123b41a7011f9ec45096505","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581550518409224","authorIdStr":"3581550518409224"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hope no other variant after this..&nbsp;","listText":"Hope no other variant after this..&nbsp;","text":"Hope no other variant after this..","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/691557516","repostId":"2193113147","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3039,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":691554490,"gmtCreate":1640223742415,"gmtModify":1640223742663,"author":{"id":"3581550518409224","authorId":"3581550518409224","name":"superduper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/04a121c70123b41a7011f9ec45096505","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581550518409224","authorIdStr":"3581550518409224"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Waiting for buying opp","listText":"Waiting for buying opp","text":"Waiting for buying opp","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/691554490","repostId":"1146715547","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3162,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":691643862,"gmtCreate":1640187828876,"gmtModify":1640187829169,"author":{"id":"3581550518409224","authorId":"3581550518409224","name":"superduper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/04a121c70123b41a7011f9ec45096505","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581550518409224","authorIdStr":"3581550518409224"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/691643862","repostId":"1122126959","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3917,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":693703427,"gmtCreate":1640072773173,"gmtModify":1640072773450,"author":{"id":"3581550518409224","authorId":"3581550518409224","name":"superduper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/04a121c70123b41a7011f9ec45096505","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581550518409224","authorIdStr":"3581550518409224"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/693703427","repostId":"1117226796","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1117226796","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1640057164,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1117226796?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-21 11:26","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Palantir: 3 Reasons Against It And Why It's Still A Buy<blockquote>Palantir：反对它的3个理由以及为什么它仍然值得买入</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1117226796","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"Summary\n\nPalantir Technologies is a battleground stock. Listening to the bears' arguments is a good ","content":"<p><b>Summary</b></p><p><blockquote><b>总结</b></blockquote></p><p> <ul>  <li>Palantir Technologies is a battleground stock. Listening to the bears' arguments is a good idea for bulls.</li>  <li>PLTR dilutes its shareholders, but that is not necessarily a huge problem.</li>  <li>Despite some interest rate headwinds, PLTR seems like a good investment to me, thanks to a strong moat and great growth outlook.</li> </ul> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7230cdd890b86f9941b99b1503d04049\" tg-width=\"1536\" tg-height=\"1044\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>spxChrome/E+ via Getty Images</span></p><p><blockquote><ul><li>Palantir Technologies是一只战场股票。听空头的论点对多头来说是个好主意。</li><li>PLTR稀释了其股东，但这不一定是一个大问题。</li><li>尽管存在一些利率阻力，但PLTR对我来说似乎是一项不错的投资，这要归功于强大的护城河和巨大的增长前景。</li></ul><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>spxChrome/E+来自Getty Images</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>Article Thesis</b></p><p><blockquote><b>文章论文</b></blockquote></p><p> Palantir Technologies (PLTR) is an embattled growth stock, and in recent weeks, bears have been winning as shares continued to decline. There are, indeed some important bear arguments, such as dilution, reliance on government contracts, and rising interest rates. I do, however, still believe that Palantir Technologies is an attractive long-term investment, due to the act that its technology could lead to massive growth for many years to come.</p><p><blockquote>Palantir Technologies(PLTR)是一只陷入困境的成长型股票，最近几周，随着股价持续下跌，空头一直在获胜。确实有一些重要的看跌论点，例如稀释、对政府合同的依赖以及利率上升。然而，我仍然相信Palantir Technologies是一项有吸引力的长期投资，因为其技术可能会在未来许多年带来巨大增长。</blockquote></p><p> <b>3 Issues Brought Up By Bears</b></p><p><blockquote><b>空头提出的3个问题</b></blockquote></p><p> Palantir is a growth stock that brings out highly convinced bulls as well as highly convinced bears. Generally, I am in the bullish camp here, but taking a look at the bear arguments can be a good idea as well. Three of the most common arguments against Palantir are the following ones:</p><p><blockquote>Palantir是一只成长型股票，可以带来高度确信的多头和高度确信的空头。总的来说，我在这里是看涨阵营，但看看看跌的论点也是一个好主意。反对Palantir的三个最常见的论点如下：</blockquote></p><p> <b>1. Shareholder Dilution</b></p><p><blockquote><b>1.股东稀释</b></blockquote></p><p> Growth on a company-wide basis is important, but growth on a per-share basis is even more important. There are many examples that show that changes in a company's share count can create or destroy a lot of shareholder value. Apple (AAPL), for example, has seen its net income grow by roughly 190% over the last decade:</p><p><blockquote>全公司的增长很重要，但每股的增长更重要。有许多例子表明，公司股票数量的变化可以创造或破坏大量股东价值。例如，苹果(AAPL)的净利润在过去十年中增长了约190%：</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2b5263c8346cfbbb898f1d1ac9a5bead\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"433\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Data by YCharts</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>数据来自YCharts</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Thanks to a declining share count, its earnings per share rose by a much more attractive 350%, however -- buybacks created a lot of shareholder value. There are also examples where a rising share count destroyed a lot of shareholder value, e.g. at Citigroup (C):</p><p><blockquote>然而，由于股票数量下降，其每股收益增长了更具吸引力的350%——回购创造了大量股东价值。也有股票数量增加破坏了大量股东价值的例子，例如花旗集团（C）：</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fc39008812f5e2d0082dedc95b025c68\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"433\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Data by YCharts</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>数据来自YCharts</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Massive share issuance during the Great Recession has resulted in a 75% earnings per share decline since 2007, even though net profits were up over the same time frame. Looking at the changes in a company's share count thus makes sense, as those changes can have a large impact in the long run. At Palantir, we see that the share count has been rising considerably since the company went public. During the most recent quarter, Palantir's share count looked like this:</p><p><blockquote>自2007年以来，大衰退期间的大规模股票发行导致每股收益下降75%，尽管同期净利润有所增长。因此，关注公司股票数量的变化是有意义的，因为从长远来看，这些变化可能会产生很大的影响。在Palantir，我们看到自公司上市以来，股票数量一直在大幅增加。最近一个季度，Palantir的股票数量如下所示：</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/917ca4d7a390ced61d7c92d528f84fc1\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"539\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Source: Palantir Press Release</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>资料来源：Palantir新闻稿</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Compared to the second quarter, Palantir's average share count was&nbsp;1.895 billion, which makes for a 3.5% quarterly increase, which pencils out to an annual growth rate in the mid-teens. That is, of course, not negligible at all, and bears to have an argument when they state that shareholders get diluted at a meaningful pace. On the other hand, Palantir's business growth rate is way higher than 3% per quarter, as the company has guided for ~40% revenue growth this year, and since Palantir should also deliver outsized business growth in the coming years. Even if Palantir's share count were to climb by 10%-15% a year going forward, revenue per share would still climb by 25%+ a year thanks to the fact that PLTR is growing rapidly. I also believe that dilution will, over the years, decline. Not only has this been the case at many other growth companies, e.g. Amazon (AMZN), Alphabet (GOOG), or Meta (FB), but it is also logical from an option rewards perspective. Option rewards are especially generous when a company is not yet publicly traded and when its future is still more uncertain, but as a company matures, employees get more comfortable as risks for the company decline, and they do not demand large option packages any longer. Last but not least, Palantir also generates strong free cash flows that should allow the company to do share buybacks in the future, which should help improve the dilution rate as well.</p><p><blockquote>与第二季度相比，Palantir的平均股票数量为18.95亿股，季度增长3.5%，年增长率在十几岁左右。当然，这一点根本不可忽视，当他们说股东以有意义的速度被稀释时，就值得争论。另一方面，Palantir的业务增长率远高于每季度3%，因为该公司预计今年的收入增长约为40%，而且Palantir也应该在未来几年实现巨大的业务增长。即使Palantir的股票数量未来每年增长10%-15%，由于PLTR的快速增长，每股收入仍将每年增长25%以上。我还相信，随着时间的推移，稀释度将会下降。这不仅适用于许多其他成长型公司，例如亚马逊（AMZN）、Alphabet（GOOG）或Meta（FB），但从期权回报的角度来看，这也是合乎逻辑的。当一家公司尚未公开交易且其未来仍然更加不确定时，期权奖励尤其丰厚，但随着公司成熟，随着公司风险的下降，员工会变得更加舒适，他们不再要求大笔期权套餐。最后但并非最不重要的是，Palantir还产生了强劲的自由现金流，这应该使该公司能够在未来进行股票回购，这也应该有助于提高稀释率。</blockquote></p><p> <b>2. Reliance on government contracts</b></p><p><blockquote><b>2.对政府合同的依赖</b></blockquote></p><p></p><p> In a recent bearish&nbsp;article, fellow Seeking Alpha contributor On The Pulse argued that Palantir was overvalued and that its reliance on government contracts was an issue. Palantir Technologies is, indeed, reliant on government contracts to a large degree today, but I do not believe that this is a major issue. First, Palantir has diversified away from government contracts in the recent past, thanks to massive growth in its commercial business:</p><p><blockquote>在最近的一篇看跌文章中，The Pulse的Seeking Alpha撰稿人认为Palantir被高估，其对政府合同的依赖是一个问题。Palantir Technologies如今确实在很大程度上依赖政府合同，但我不认为这是一个主要问题。首先，由于商业业务的大幅增长，Palantir最近实现了多元化，摆脱了政府合同：</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/de23409915ee3811691b986a42ece899\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"308\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Source: Palantir Technologies presentation</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>资料来源：Palantir技术演示</span></p></blockquote></p><p> In fact, Palantir's commercial business has been growing much faster than its government business in the recent past, which shows that commercial customers from all kinds of industries apparently see a lot of value in Palantir's technology -- otherwise, they wouldn't be buying at a rapid pace. With</p><p><blockquote>事实上，Palantir的商业业务近年来的增长速度远远快于其政府业务，这表明来自各个行业的商业客户显然看到了Palantir技术的巨大价值——否则，他们不会购买Palantir技术。速度很快。和</blockquote></p><p> With the commercial business growth rate outpacing the government business growth rate, Palantir will, over the years, become a company that is less and less dependent on government contracts, and that will ultimately turn into a B2B-focused software/technology player. Even if Palantir were to remain a government-focused company forever, which seems unlikely based on the current growth rates of the individual business units, that would not necessarily be an issue. Working for the government means that there is very little counterparty risk and that existing relations can easily be used to get future contracts. Last but not least, with government budgets rising relatively steadily, good government connections allow for considerable growth opportunities -- especially in the defense tech/security tech space Palantir is active in, as there is a huge need for further investments in this space.</p><p><blockquote>随着商业业务增长率超过政府业务增长率，Palantir将在多年后成为一家越来越不依赖政府合同的公司，并最终成为一家专注于B2B的软件/技术公司。即使Palantir永远是一家以政府为中心的公司（根据各个业务部门目前的增长率，这似乎不太可能），但这也不一定是一个问题。为政府工作意味着交易对手风险很小，现有关系可以很容易地用来获得未来的合同。最后但并非最不重要的一点是，随着政府预算相对稳定地增长，良好的政府关系带来了相当大的增长机会——特别是在Palantir活跃的国防技术/安全技术领域，因为该领域非常需要进一步投资。</blockquote></p><p> The claim that a government focus leads to lacking scalability is also false, I believe. Per Palantir's most recent quarterly report (linked above), its operating expenses rose by $9 million between Q3 2020 and Q3 2021 -- whereas revenues rose by $103 million in the same time frame. This backs out changes in share-based compensation. If one were to include those SBC expenses, Palantir's expenses actually<i>declined</i>year-over-year while the company managed to grow its revenue by close to 40%. The claim that Palantir will not generate any scale advantages over the years thus seems to be unfounded, I believe. Instead, the data suggest that Palantir will be able to grow its margins considerably -- the company was able to grow its adjusted gross profit by a massive $90 million while growing its adjusted operating expenses by just $9 million -- making for excellent operating leverage.</p><p><blockquote>我认为，政府关注导致缺乏可扩展性的说法也是错误的。根据Palantir最新的季度报告（上面链接），2020年第三季度至2021年第三季度期间，其运营费用增加了900万美元，而同期收入增加了1.03亿美元。这抵消了股权激励的变化。如果将这些SBC费用包括在内，Palantir的费用实际上<i>拒绝</i>而该公司的收入同比增长了近40%。因此，我认为Palantir多年来不会产生任何规模优势的说法似乎是没有根据的。相反，数据表明Palantir将能够大幅提高其利润率——该公司调整后毛利润大幅增长9000万美元，而调整后运营费用仅增长900万美元——从而实现出色的运营杠杆。</blockquote></p><p> <b>3. Exposure to rising rates</b></p><p><blockquote><b>3.利率上升的风险</b></blockquote></p><p> Massive inflation will force the Fed to raise rates in 2022 and beyond, and that could be an issue for growth stocks. Companies that are not profitable today, or that have the vast majority of their profits in the distant future, are more exposed to a rising discount rate compared to companies that have low or no growth and that generate a large amount of all future profits in the near term. This could result in outperformance of value stocks versus growth stocks in the coming years, I believe. Palantir, which is not profitable yet, naturally belongs in the \"growth\" bucket that could see an above-average impact from rising interest rates. There is no real counter-argument here, I believe -- it is indeed true that the impact of rising rates on Palantir, all else equal, will be larger compared to a value stock like AbbVie (ABBV), for example.</p><p><blockquote>大规模通胀将迫使美联储在2022年及以后加息，这可能是成长型股票的一个问题。与增长较低或没有增长且在短期内产生大量未来利润的公司相比，今天不盈利或绝大多数利润在遥远未来的公司更容易面临贴现率上升的风险。我相信，这可能会导致未来几年价值股优于成长股。Palantir尚未盈利，自然属于“增长”类别，利率上升可能会产生高于平均水平的影响。我认为，这里没有真正的反驳——确实，在其他条件相同的情况下，利率上升对Palantir的影响将比艾伯维(ABBV)等价值股更大。</blockquote></p><p> This being an incremental negative for Palantir doesn't mean that shares have to be avoided under any circumstances, however. Indeed, even despite some potential headwinds from rising rates, Palantir could still be an attractive investment if other arguments have a larger weight -- I believe this to be true, as I see PLTR's massive growth potential and huge moat outweighing some near-term headwinds from rising rates.</p><p><blockquote>然而，这对Palantir来说是一个增量负面影响，并不意味着在任何情况下都必须避免股票。事实上，即使利率上升带来了一些潜在的阻力，如果其他论点具有更大的权重，Palantir仍然可能是一项有吸引力的投资——我相信这是真的，因为我认为PLTR巨大的增长潜力和巨大的护城河超过了近期的一些阻力来自利率上升。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Why Palantir Is Still Attractive</b></p><p><blockquote><b>为什么Palantir仍然有吸引力</b></blockquote></p><p> Bears bring up a range of arguments against Palantir, and as shown above, those can have merit. I believe that they might be overblown in some cases, but taking a look at the bear's arguments doesn't hurt -- in fact, it seems like a good idea to look at both sides in order to make a more informed decision. Dilution is indeed an issue, although I do not believe that this will be too much of a headwind, since PLTR's business growth easily outpaces dilution and since dilution, overall, should slow down over the years. Government reliance will wane over the years due to an above-average commercial business growth rate, and in general, doing business with the government is not a bad thing anyway. The claim that PLTR lacks scalability seems to be false, from what I see in PLTR's data.</p><p><blockquote>看空者提出了一系列反对Palantir的论点，如上所示，这些论点可能有其优点。我相信在某些情况下他们可能被夸大了，但看看空头的论点并没有什么坏处——事实上，为了做出更明智的决定，看看双方似乎是个好主意。稀释确实是一个问题，尽管我不认为这会是太大的阻力，因为PLTR的业务增长很容易超过稀释，而且总体而言，稀释应该会在几年内放缓。由于高于平均水平的商业业务增长率，对政府的依赖将会随着时间的推移而减弱，总的来说，与政府做生意无论如何都不是一件坏事。从我在PLTR的数据中看到的来看，PLTR缺乏可扩展性的说法似乎是错误的。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> Palantir is, despite these arguments, attractive, I believe: The company is growing rapidly, has decades-long growth potential in both its government business as well as on the commercial side, and Palantir seems to have a very wide moat. This combination could turn Palantir into one of the largest and most important companies eventually -- although investors shouldn't expect this to happen in the very near term. Instead, I believe that there is a good chance that Palantir will grow at a considerable rate throughout the 2020s and beyond, as our world becomes ever more data-hungry -- both governments, as well as enterprises, will try to get the most value out of all of this data, and Palantir, with its tailored solutions, will be there to offer that value to its customers. With new tools such as the recently-showcased&nbsp;Foundry&nbsp;for crypto, Palantir is at the forefront of all kinds of emerging technologies. Thanks to the fact that Palantir has access to top talent -- the result of SBC and of an&nbsp;excellent working environment-- I believe that there is a good chance that Palantir will be able to be highly competitive in all kinds of future markets in the Big Data/AI space that may not even exist yet.</p><p><blockquote>尽管有这些论点，我相信Palantir仍然很有吸引力：该公司发展迅速，在政府业务和商业方面都具有数十年的增长潜力，而且Palantir似乎拥有非常宽的护城河。这种合并最终可能会将Palantir变成最大、最重要的公司之一——尽管投资者不应指望这种情况会在短期内发生。相反，我相信Palantir很有可能在整个2020年代及以后以相当大的速度增长，因为我们的世界变得越来越需要数据——政府和企业都将努力获得最大的价值从所有这些数据中获得，Palantir将凭借其量身定制的解决方案，为其客户提供这种价值。凭借最近展示的Foundry for Crypto等新工具，Palantir处于各种新兴技术的前沿。由于Palantir能够接触到顶尖人才——SBC的结果和良好的工作环境——我相信Palantir很有可能能够在未来的各种市场中具有高度竞争力。大数据/人工智能领域可能还不存在。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Takeaway</b></p><p><blockquote><b>外卖</b></blockquote></p><p> In general, I am not much of a growth investor -- instead, I primarily focus on attractively priced stocks with strong cash flows, oftentimes those that pay dividends. Palantir, however, is somewhat of an outlier in my portfolio -- it's a growth stock, it is not really profitable yet, and most of its potential is years away. Due to the highly attractive combination of a massive market opportunity, excellent talent, and a wide moat, Palantir still seems like an attractive long-term investment to me. This isn't a stock that will make investors rich quickly, but I believe that there is a very good chance that Palantir will turn into a very dominant, important company over the next 10+ years. At 19x next year's revenue, PLTR is not cheap, but when we expect that the company will grow at a strong rate for many years, that also doesn't seem outlandish to me at all. It makes sense to listen to the bears' arguments, but I believe that the pros outweigh the cons here.</p><p><blockquote>总的来说，我不是一个成长型投资者——相反，我主要关注价格有吸引力、现金流强劲的股票，通常是那些支付股息的股票。然而，Palantir在我的投资组合中有点异类——它是一只成长型股票，尚未真正盈利，而且其大部分潜力还需要数年时间。由于巨大的市场机会、优秀的人才和宽阔的护城河的极具吸引力的组合，Palantir对我来说仍然是一项有吸引力的长期投资。这不是一只能让投资者快速致富的股票，但我相信Palantir很有可能在未来10多年成为一家非常占主导地位的重要公司。PLTR明年收入的19倍并不便宜，但当我们预计该公司将在许多年内以强劲的速度增长时，这对我来说一点也不奇怪。听空头的论点是有道理的，但我相信这里利大于弊。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Palantir: 3 Reasons Against It And Why It's Still A Buy<blockquote>Palantir：反对它的3个理由以及为什么它仍然值得买入</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nPalantir: 3 Reasons Against It And Why It's Still A Buy<blockquote>Palantir：反对它的3个理由以及为什么它仍然值得买入</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Seeking Alpha</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-12-21 11:26</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><b>Summary</b></p><p><blockquote><b>总结</b></blockquote></p><p> <ul>  <li>Palantir Technologies is a battleground stock. Listening to the bears' arguments is a good idea for bulls.</li>  <li>PLTR dilutes its shareholders, but that is not necessarily a huge problem.</li>  <li>Despite some interest rate headwinds, PLTR seems like a good investment to me, thanks to a strong moat and great growth outlook.</li> </ul> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7230cdd890b86f9941b99b1503d04049\" tg-width=\"1536\" tg-height=\"1044\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>spxChrome/E+ via Getty Images</span></p><p><blockquote><ul><li>Palantir Technologies是一只战场股票。听空头的论点对多头来说是个好主意。</li><li>PLTR稀释了其股东，但这不一定是一个大问题。</li><li>尽管存在一些利率阻力，但PLTR对我来说似乎是一项不错的投资，这要归功于强大的护城河和巨大的增长前景。</li></ul><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>spxChrome/E+来自Getty Images</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>Article Thesis</b></p><p><blockquote><b>文章论文</b></blockquote></p><p> Palantir Technologies (PLTR) is an embattled growth stock, and in recent weeks, bears have been winning as shares continued to decline. There are, indeed some important bear arguments, such as dilution, reliance on government contracts, and rising interest rates. I do, however, still believe that Palantir Technologies is an attractive long-term investment, due to the act that its technology could lead to massive growth for many years to come.</p><p><blockquote>Palantir Technologies(PLTR)是一只陷入困境的成长型股票，最近几周，随着股价持续下跌，空头一直在获胜。确实有一些重要的看跌论点，例如稀释、对政府合同的依赖以及利率上升。然而，我仍然相信Palantir Technologies是一项有吸引力的长期投资，因为其技术可能会在未来许多年带来巨大增长。</blockquote></p><p> <b>3 Issues Brought Up By Bears</b></p><p><blockquote><b>空头提出的3个问题</b></blockquote></p><p> Palantir is a growth stock that brings out highly convinced bulls as well as highly convinced bears. Generally, I am in the bullish camp here, but taking a look at the bear arguments can be a good idea as well. Three of the most common arguments against Palantir are the following ones:</p><p><blockquote>Palantir是一只成长型股票，可以带来高度确信的多头和高度确信的空头。总的来说，我在这里是看涨阵营，但看看看跌的论点也是一个好主意。反对Palantir的三个最常见的论点如下：</blockquote></p><p> <b>1. Shareholder Dilution</b></p><p><blockquote><b>1.股东稀释</b></blockquote></p><p> Growth on a company-wide basis is important, but growth on a per-share basis is even more important. There are many examples that show that changes in a company's share count can create or destroy a lot of shareholder value. Apple (AAPL), for example, has seen its net income grow by roughly 190% over the last decade:</p><p><blockquote>全公司的增长很重要，但每股的增长更重要。有许多例子表明，公司股票数量的变化可以创造或破坏大量股东价值。例如，苹果(AAPL)的净利润在过去十年中增长了约190%：</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2b5263c8346cfbbb898f1d1ac9a5bead\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"433\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Data by YCharts</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>数据来自YCharts</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Thanks to a declining share count, its earnings per share rose by a much more attractive 350%, however -- buybacks created a lot of shareholder value. There are also examples where a rising share count destroyed a lot of shareholder value, e.g. at Citigroup (C):</p><p><blockquote>然而，由于股票数量下降，其每股收益增长了更具吸引力的350%——回购创造了大量股东价值。也有股票数量增加破坏了大量股东价值的例子，例如花旗集团（C）：</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fc39008812f5e2d0082dedc95b025c68\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"433\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Data by YCharts</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>数据来自YCharts</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Massive share issuance during the Great Recession has resulted in a 75% earnings per share decline since 2007, even though net profits were up over the same time frame. Looking at the changes in a company's share count thus makes sense, as those changes can have a large impact in the long run. At Palantir, we see that the share count has been rising considerably since the company went public. During the most recent quarter, Palantir's share count looked like this:</p><p><blockquote>自2007年以来，大衰退期间的大规模股票发行导致每股收益下降75%，尽管同期净利润有所增长。因此，关注公司股票数量的变化是有意义的，因为从长远来看，这些变化可能会产生很大的影响。在Palantir，我们看到自公司上市以来，股票数量一直在大幅增加。最近一个季度，Palantir的股票数量如下所示：</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/917ca4d7a390ced61d7c92d528f84fc1\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"539\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Source: Palantir Press Release</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>资料来源：Palantir新闻稿</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Compared to the second quarter, Palantir's average share count was&nbsp;1.895 billion, which makes for a 3.5% quarterly increase, which pencils out to an annual growth rate in the mid-teens. That is, of course, not negligible at all, and bears to have an argument when they state that shareholders get diluted at a meaningful pace. On the other hand, Palantir's business growth rate is way higher than 3% per quarter, as the company has guided for ~40% revenue growth this year, and since Palantir should also deliver outsized business growth in the coming years. Even if Palantir's share count were to climb by 10%-15% a year going forward, revenue per share would still climb by 25%+ a year thanks to the fact that PLTR is growing rapidly. I also believe that dilution will, over the years, decline. Not only has this been the case at many other growth companies, e.g. Amazon (AMZN), Alphabet (GOOG), or Meta (FB), but it is also logical from an option rewards perspective. Option rewards are especially generous when a company is not yet publicly traded and when its future is still more uncertain, but as a company matures, employees get more comfortable as risks for the company decline, and they do not demand large option packages any longer. Last but not least, Palantir also generates strong free cash flows that should allow the company to do share buybacks in the future, which should help improve the dilution rate as well.</p><p><blockquote>与第二季度相比，Palantir的平均股票数量为18.95亿股，季度增长3.5%，年增长率在十几岁左右。当然，这一点根本不可忽视，当他们说股东以有意义的速度被稀释时，就值得争论。另一方面，Palantir的业务增长率远高于每季度3%，因为该公司预计今年的收入增长约为40%，而且Palantir也应该在未来几年实现巨大的业务增长。即使Palantir的股票数量未来每年增长10%-15%，由于PLTR的快速增长，每股收入仍将每年增长25%以上。我还相信，随着时间的推移，稀释度将会下降。这不仅适用于许多其他成长型公司，例如亚马逊（AMZN）、Alphabet（GOOG）或Meta（FB），但从期权回报的角度来看，这也是合乎逻辑的。当一家公司尚未公开交易且其未来仍然更加不确定时，期权奖励尤其丰厚，但随着公司成熟，随着公司风险的下降，员工会变得更加舒适，他们不再要求大笔期权套餐。最后但并非最不重要的是，Palantir还产生了强劲的自由现金流，这应该使该公司能够在未来进行股票回购，这也应该有助于提高稀释率。</blockquote></p><p> <b>2. Reliance on government contracts</b></p><p><blockquote><b>2.对政府合同的依赖</b></blockquote></p><p></p><p> In a recent bearish&nbsp;article, fellow Seeking Alpha contributor On The Pulse argued that Palantir was overvalued and that its reliance on government contracts was an issue. Palantir Technologies is, indeed, reliant on government contracts to a large degree today, but I do not believe that this is a major issue. First, Palantir has diversified away from government contracts in the recent past, thanks to massive growth in its commercial business:</p><p><blockquote>在最近的一篇看跌文章中，The Pulse的Seeking Alpha撰稿人认为Palantir被高估，其对政府合同的依赖是一个问题。Palantir Technologies如今确实在很大程度上依赖政府合同，但我不认为这是一个主要问题。首先，由于商业业务的大幅增长，Palantir最近实现了多元化，摆脱了政府合同：</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/de23409915ee3811691b986a42ece899\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"308\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Source: Palantir Technologies presentation</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>资料来源：Palantir技术演示</span></p></blockquote></p><p> In fact, Palantir's commercial business has been growing much faster than its government business in the recent past, which shows that commercial customers from all kinds of industries apparently see a lot of value in Palantir's technology -- otherwise, they wouldn't be buying at a rapid pace. With</p><p><blockquote>事实上，Palantir的商业业务近年来的增长速度远远快于其政府业务，这表明来自各个行业的商业客户显然看到了Palantir技术的巨大价值——否则，他们不会购买Palantir技术。速度很快。和</blockquote></p><p> With the commercial business growth rate outpacing the government business growth rate, Palantir will, over the years, become a company that is less and less dependent on government contracts, and that will ultimately turn into a B2B-focused software/technology player. Even if Palantir were to remain a government-focused company forever, which seems unlikely based on the current growth rates of the individual business units, that would not necessarily be an issue. Working for the government means that there is very little counterparty risk and that existing relations can easily be used to get future contracts. Last but not least, with government budgets rising relatively steadily, good government connections allow for considerable growth opportunities -- especially in the defense tech/security tech space Palantir is active in, as there is a huge need for further investments in this space.</p><p><blockquote>随着商业业务增长率超过政府业务增长率，Palantir将在多年后成为一家越来越不依赖政府合同的公司，并最终成为一家专注于B2B的软件/技术公司。即使Palantir永远是一家以政府为中心的公司（根据各个业务部门目前的增长率，这似乎不太可能），但这也不一定是一个问题。为政府工作意味着交易对手风险很小，现有关系可以很容易地用来获得未来的合同。最后但并非最不重要的一点是，随着政府预算相对稳定地增长，良好的政府关系带来了相当大的增长机会——特别是在Palantir活跃的国防技术/安全技术领域，因为该领域非常需要进一步投资。</blockquote></p><p> The claim that a government focus leads to lacking scalability is also false, I believe. Per Palantir's most recent quarterly report (linked above), its operating expenses rose by $9 million between Q3 2020 and Q3 2021 -- whereas revenues rose by $103 million in the same time frame. This backs out changes in share-based compensation. If one were to include those SBC expenses, Palantir's expenses actually<i>declined</i>year-over-year while the company managed to grow its revenue by close to 40%. The claim that Palantir will not generate any scale advantages over the years thus seems to be unfounded, I believe. Instead, the data suggest that Palantir will be able to grow its margins considerably -- the company was able to grow its adjusted gross profit by a massive $90 million while growing its adjusted operating expenses by just $9 million -- making for excellent operating leverage.</p><p><blockquote>我认为，政府关注导致缺乏可扩展性的说法也是错误的。根据Palantir最新的季度报告（上面链接），2020年第三季度至2021年第三季度期间，其运营费用增加了900万美元，而同期收入增加了1.03亿美元。这抵消了股权激励的变化。如果将这些SBC费用包括在内，Palantir的费用实际上<i>拒绝</i>而该公司的收入同比增长了近40%。因此，我认为Palantir多年来不会产生任何规模优势的说法似乎是没有根据的。相反，数据表明Palantir将能够大幅提高其利润率——该公司调整后毛利润大幅增长9000万美元，而调整后运营费用仅增长900万美元——从而实现出色的运营杠杆。</blockquote></p><p> <b>3. Exposure to rising rates</b></p><p><blockquote><b>3.利率上升的风险</b></blockquote></p><p> Massive inflation will force the Fed to raise rates in 2022 and beyond, and that could be an issue for growth stocks. Companies that are not profitable today, or that have the vast majority of their profits in the distant future, are more exposed to a rising discount rate compared to companies that have low or no growth and that generate a large amount of all future profits in the near term. This could result in outperformance of value stocks versus growth stocks in the coming years, I believe. Palantir, which is not profitable yet, naturally belongs in the \"growth\" bucket that could see an above-average impact from rising interest rates. There is no real counter-argument here, I believe -- it is indeed true that the impact of rising rates on Palantir, all else equal, will be larger compared to a value stock like AbbVie (ABBV), for example.</p><p><blockquote>大规模通胀将迫使美联储在2022年及以后加息，这可能是成长型股票的一个问题。与增长较低或没有增长且在短期内产生大量未来利润的公司相比，今天不盈利或绝大多数利润在遥远未来的公司更容易面临贴现率上升的风险。我相信，这可能会导致未来几年价值股优于成长股。Palantir尚未盈利，自然属于“增长”类别，利率上升可能会产生高于平均水平的影响。我认为，这里没有真正的反驳——确实，在其他条件相同的情况下，利率上升对Palantir的影响将比艾伯维(ABBV)等价值股更大。</blockquote></p><p> This being an incremental negative for Palantir doesn't mean that shares have to be avoided under any circumstances, however. Indeed, even despite some potential headwinds from rising rates, Palantir could still be an attractive investment if other arguments have a larger weight -- I believe this to be true, as I see PLTR's massive growth potential and huge moat outweighing some near-term headwinds from rising rates.</p><p><blockquote>然而，这对Palantir来说是一个增量负面影响，并不意味着在任何情况下都必须避免股票。事实上，即使利率上升带来了一些潜在的阻力，如果其他论点具有更大的权重，Palantir仍然可能是一项有吸引力的投资——我相信这是真的，因为我认为PLTR巨大的增长潜力和巨大的护城河超过了近期的一些阻力来自利率上升。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Why Palantir Is Still Attractive</b></p><p><blockquote><b>为什么Palantir仍然有吸引力</b></blockquote></p><p> Bears bring up a range of arguments against Palantir, and as shown above, those can have merit. I believe that they might be overblown in some cases, but taking a look at the bear's arguments doesn't hurt -- in fact, it seems like a good idea to look at both sides in order to make a more informed decision. Dilution is indeed an issue, although I do not believe that this will be too much of a headwind, since PLTR's business growth easily outpaces dilution and since dilution, overall, should slow down over the years. Government reliance will wane over the years due to an above-average commercial business growth rate, and in general, doing business with the government is not a bad thing anyway. The claim that PLTR lacks scalability seems to be false, from what I see in PLTR's data.</p><p><blockquote>看空者提出了一系列反对Palantir的论点，如上所示，这些论点可能有其优点。我相信在某些情况下他们可能被夸大了，但看看空头的论点并没有什么坏处——事实上，为了做出更明智的决定，看看双方似乎是个好主意。稀释确实是一个问题，尽管我不认为这会是太大的阻力，因为PLTR的业务增长很容易超过稀释，而且总体而言，稀释应该会在几年内放缓。由于高于平均水平的商业业务增长率，对政府的依赖将会随着时间的推移而减弱，总的来说，与政府做生意无论如何都不是一件坏事。从我在PLTR的数据中看到的来看，PLTR缺乏可扩展性的说法似乎是错误的。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> Palantir is, despite these arguments, attractive, I believe: The company is growing rapidly, has decades-long growth potential in both its government business as well as on the commercial side, and Palantir seems to have a very wide moat. This combination could turn Palantir into one of the largest and most important companies eventually -- although investors shouldn't expect this to happen in the very near term. Instead, I believe that there is a good chance that Palantir will grow at a considerable rate throughout the 2020s and beyond, as our world becomes ever more data-hungry -- both governments, as well as enterprises, will try to get the most value out of all of this data, and Palantir, with its tailored solutions, will be there to offer that value to its customers. With new tools such as the recently-showcased&nbsp;Foundry&nbsp;for crypto, Palantir is at the forefront of all kinds of emerging technologies. Thanks to the fact that Palantir has access to top talent -- the result of SBC and of an&nbsp;excellent working environment-- I believe that there is a good chance that Palantir will be able to be highly competitive in all kinds of future markets in the Big Data/AI space that may not even exist yet.</p><p><blockquote>尽管有这些论点，我相信Palantir仍然很有吸引力：该公司发展迅速，在政府业务和商业方面都具有数十年的增长潜力，而且Palantir似乎拥有非常宽的护城河。这种合并最终可能会将Palantir变成最大、最重要的公司之一——尽管投资者不应指望这种情况会在短期内发生。相反，我相信Palantir很有可能在整个2020年代及以后以相当大的速度增长，因为我们的世界变得越来越需要数据——政府和企业都将努力获得最大的价值从所有这些数据中获得，Palantir将凭借其量身定制的解决方案，为其客户提供这种价值。凭借最近展示的Foundry for Crypto等新工具，Palantir处于各种新兴技术的前沿。由于Palantir能够接触到顶尖人才——SBC的结果和良好的工作环境——我相信Palantir很有可能能够在未来的各种市场中具有高度竞争力。大数据/人工智能领域可能还不存在。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Takeaway</b></p><p><blockquote><b>外卖</b></blockquote></p><p> In general, I am not much of a growth investor -- instead, I primarily focus on attractively priced stocks with strong cash flows, oftentimes those that pay dividends. Palantir, however, is somewhat of an outlier in my portfolio -- it's a growth stock, it is not really profitable yet, and most of its potential is years away. Due to the highly attractive combination of a massive market opportunity, excellent talent, and a wide moat, Palantir still seems like an attractive long-term investment to me. This isn't a stock that will make investors rich quickly, but I believe that there is a very good chance that Palantir will turn into a very dominant, important company over the next 10+ years. At 19x next year's revenue, PLTR is not cheap, but when we expect that the company will grow at a strong rate for many years, that also doesn't seem outlandish to me at all. It makes sense to listen to the bears' arguments, but I believe that the pros outweigh the cons here.</p><p><blockquote>总的来说，我不是一个成长型投资者——相反，我主要关注价格有吸引力、现金流强劲的股票，通常是那些支付股息的股票。然而，Palantir在我的投资组合中有点异类——它是一只成长型股票，尚未真正盈利，而且其大部分潜力还需要数年时间。由于巨大的市场机会、优秀的人才和宽阔的护城河的极具吸引力的组合，Palantir对我来说仍然是一项有吸引力的长期投资。这不是一只能让投资者快速致富的股票，但我相信Palantir很有可能在未来10多年成为一家非常占主导地位的重要公司。PLTR明年收入的19倍并不便宜，但当我们预计该公司将在许多年内以强劲的速度增长时，这对我来说一点也不奇怪。听空头的论点是有道理的，但我相信这里利大于弊。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4475960-palantir-3-reasons-against-it-and-why-its-still-a-buy\">Seeking Alpha</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"PLTR":"Palantir Technologies Inc."},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4475960-palantir-3-reasons-against-it-and-why-its-still-a-buy","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1117226796","content_text":"Summary\n\nPalantir Technologies is a battleground stock. Listening to the bears' arguments is a good idea for bulls.\nPLTR dilutes its shareholders, but that is not necessarily a huge problem.\nDespite some interest rate headwinds, PLTR seems like a good investment to me, thanks to a strong moat and great growth outlook.\n\nspxChrome/E+ via Getty Images\nArticle Thesis\nPalantir Technologies (PLTR) is an embattled growth stock, and in recent weeks, bears have been winning as shares continued to decline. There are, indeed some important bear arguments, such as dilution, reliance on government contracts, and rising interest rates. I do, however, still believe that Palantir Technologies is an attractive long-term investment, due to the act that its technology could lead to massive growth for many years to come.\n3 Issues Brought Up By Bears\nPalantir is a growth stock that brings out highly convinced bulls as well as highly convinced bears. Generally, I am in the bullish camp here, but taking a look at the bear arguments can be a good idea as well. Three of the most common arguments against Palantir are the following ones:\n1. Shareholder Dilution\nGrowth on a company-wide basis is important, but growth on a per-share basis is even more important. There are many examples that show that changes in a company's share count can create or destroy a lot of shareholder value. Apple (AAPL), for example, has seen its net income grow by roughly 190% over the last decade:\nData by YCharts\nThanks to a declining share count, its earnings per share rose by a much more attractive 350%, however -- buybacks created a lot of shareholder value. There are also examples where a rising share count destroyed a lot of shareholder value, e.g. at Citigroup (C):\nData by YCharts\nMassive share issuance during the Great Recession has resulted in a 75% earnings per share decline since 2007, even though net profits were up over the same time frame. Looking at the changes in a company's share count thus makes sense, as those changes can have a large impact in the long run. At Palantir, we see that the share count has been rising considerably since the company went public. During the most recent quarter, Palantir's share count looked like this:\nSource: Palantir Press Release\nCompared to the second quarter, Palantir's average share count was 1.895 billion, which makes for a 3.5% quarterly increase, which pencils out to an annual growth rate in the mid-teens. That is, of course, not negligible at all, and bears to have an argument when they state that shareholders get diluted at a meaningful pace. On the other hand, Palantir's business growth rate is way higher than 3% per quarter, as the company has guided for ~40% revenue growth this year, and since Palantir should also deliver outsized business growth in the coming years. Even if Palantir's share count were to climb by 10%-15% a year going forward, revenue per share would still climb by 25%+ a year thanks to the fact that PLTR is growing rapidly. I also believe that dilution will, over the years, decline. Not only has this been the case at many other growth companies, e.g. Amazon (AMZN), Alphabet (GOOG), or Meta (FB), but it is also logical from an option rewards perspective. Option rewards are especially generous when a company is not yet publicly traded and when its future is still more uncertain, but as a company matures, employees get more comfortable as risks for the company decline, and they do not demand large option packages any longer. Last but not least, Palantir also generates strong free cash flows that should allow the company to do share buybacks in the future, which should help improve the dilution rate as well.\n2. Reliance on government contracts\nIn a recent bearish article, fellow Seeking Alpha contributor On The Pulse argued that Palantir was overvalued and that its reliance on government contracts was an issue. Palantir Technologies is, indeed, reliant on government contracts to a large degree today, but I do not believe that this is a major issue. First, Palantir has diversified away from government contracts in the recent past, thanks to massive growth in its commercial business:\nSource: Palantir Technologies presentation\nIn fact, Palantir's commercial business has been growing much faster than its government business in the recent past, which shows that commercial customers from all kinds of industries apparently see a lot of value in Palantir's technology -- otherwise, they wouldn't be buying at a rapid pace. With\nWith the commercial business growth rate outpacing the government business growth rate, Palantir will, over the years, become a company that is less and less dependent on government contracts, and that will ultimately turn into a B2B-focused software/technology player. Even if Palantir were to remain a government-focused company forever, which seems unlikely based on the current growth rates of the individual business units, that would not necessarily be an issue. Working for the government means that there is very little counterparty risk and that existing relations can easily be used to get future contracts. Last but not least, with government budgets rising relatively steadily, good government connections allow for considerable growth opportunities -- especially in the defense tech/security tech space Palantir is active in, as there is a huge need for further investments in this space.\nThe claim that a government focus leads to lacking scalability is also false, I believe. Per Palantir's most recent quarterly report (linked above), its operating expenses rose by $9 million between Q3 2020 and Q3 2021 -- whereas revenues rose by $103 million in the same time frame. This backs out changes in share-based compensation. If one were to include those SBC expenses, Palantir's expenses actuallydeclinedyear-over-year while the company managed to grow its revenue by close to 40%. The claim that Palantir will not generate any scale advantages over the years thus seems to be unfounded, I believe. Instead, the data suggest that Palantir will be able to grow its margins considerably -- the company was able to grow its adjusted gross profit by a massive $90 million while growing its adjusted operating expenses by just $9 million -- making for excellent operating leverage.\n3. Exposure to rising rates\nMassive inflation will force the Fed to raise rates in 2022 and beyond, and that could be an issue for growth stocks. Companies that are not profitable today, or that have the vast majority of their profits in the distant future, are more exposed to a rising discount rate compared to companies that have low or no growth and that generate a large amount of all future profits in the near term. This could result in outperformance of value stocks versus growth stocks in the coming years, I believe. Palantir, which is not profitable yet, naturally belongs in the \"growth\" bucket that could see an above-average impact from rising interest rates. There is no real counter-argument here, I believe -- it is indeed true that the impact of rising rates on Palantir, all else equal, will be larger compared to a value stock like AbbVie (ABBV), for example.\nThis being an incremental negative for Palantir doesn't mean that shares have to be avoided under any circumstances, however. Indeed, even despite some potential headwinds from rising rates, Palantir could still be an attractive investment if other arguments have a larger weight -- I believe this to be true, as I see PLTR's massive growth potential and huge moat outweighing some near-term headwinds from rising rates.\nWhy Palantir Is Still Attractive\nBears bring up a range of arguments against Palantir, and as shown above, those can have merit. I believe that they might be overblown in some cases, but taking a look at the bear's arguments doesn't hurt -- in fact, it seems like a good idea to look at both sides in order to make a more informed decision. Dilution is indeed an issue, although I do not believe that this will be too much of a headwind, since PLTR's business growth easily outpaces dilution and since dilution, overall, should slow down over the years. Government reliance will wane over the years due to an above-average commercial business growth rate, and in general, doing business with the government is not a bad thing anyway. The claim that PLTR lacks scalability seems to be false, from what I see in PLTR's data.\nPalantir is, despite these arguments, attractive, I believe: The company is growing rapidly, has decades-long growth potential in both its government business as well as on the commercial side, and Palantir seems to have a very wide moat. This combination could turn Palantir into one of the largest and most important companies eventually -- although investors shouldn't expect this to happen in the very near term. Instead, I believe that there is a good chance that Palantir will grow at a considerable rate throughout the 2020s and beyond, as our world becomes ever more data-hungry -- both governments, as well as enterprises, will try to get the most value out of all of this data, and Palantir, with its tailored solutions, will be there to offer that value to its customers. With new tools such as the recently-showcased Foundry for crypto, Palantir is at the forefront of all kinds of emerging technologies. Thanks to the fact that Palantir has access to top talent -- the result of SBC and of an excellent working environment-- I believe that there is a good chance that Palantir will be able to be highly competitive in all kinds of future markets in the Big Data/AI space that may not even exist yet.\nTakeaway\nIn general, I am not much of a growth investor -- instead, I primarily focus on attractively priced stocks with strong cash flows, oftentimes those that pay dividends. Palantir, however, is somewhat of an outlier in my portfolio -- it's a growth stock, it is not really profitable yet, and most of its potential is years away. Due to the highly attractive combination of a massive market opportunity, excellent talent, and a wide moat, Palantir still seems like an attractive long-term investment to me. This isn't a stock that will make investors rich quickly, but I believe that there is a very good chance that Palantir will turn into a very dominant, important company over the next 10+ years. At 19x next year's revenue, PLTR is not cheap, but when we expect that the company will grow at a strong rate for many years, that also doesn't seem outlandish to me at all. It makes sense to listen to the bears' arguments, but I believe that the pros outweigh the cons here.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"PLTR":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2452,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":699781658,"gmtCreate":1639896779279,"gmtModify":1639896779569,"author":{"id":"3581550518409224","authorId":"3581550518409224","name":"superduper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/04a121c70123b41a7011f9ec45096505","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581550518409224","authorIdStr":"3581550518409224"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"What's thr TP?&nbsp;","listText":"What's thr TP?&nbsp;","text":"What's thr TP?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/699781658","repostId":"2192035909","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1998,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":699213363,"gmtCreate":1639807281853,"gmtModify":1639807282122,"author":{"id":"3581550518409224","authorId":"3581550518409224","name":"superduper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/04a121c70123b41a7011f9ec45096505","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581550518409224","authorIdStr":"3581550518409224"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Sad week","listText":"Sad week","text":"Sad week","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/699213363","repostId":"1116106959","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1116106959","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1639785552,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1116106959?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-18 07:59","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Wall Street ends down after mostly negative week<blockquote>华尔街在经历了大部分负面的一周后收盘下跌</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1116106959","media":"Reuters","summary":" - Wall Street finished lower on Friday, weighed down by Big Tech as investors worried about the Omicron coronavirus variant and digested the Federal Reserve's decision to end its pandemic-era stimulus faster.All three main U.S. stock indexes ended with a decline for the week after the Fed on Wednesday signaled three quarter-percentage-point interest rate hikes by the end of 2022 to combat surging inflation.Nvidia dropped 2.1% and Alphabet lost 1.9%, both weighing on the S&P 500 and Nasdaq.The S","content":"<p>(Reuters) - Wall Street finished lower on Friday, weighed down by Big Tech as investors worried about the Omicron coronavirus variant and digested the Federal Reserve's decision to end its pandemic-era stimulus faster.</p><p><blockquote>（路透社）-华尔街周五收低，受大型科技股拖累，投资者担心奥密克戎冠状病毒变种，并更快消化美联储结束大流行时期刺激措施的决定。</blockquote></p><p> All three main U.S. stock indexes ended with a decline for the week after the Fed on Wednesday signaled three quarter-percentage-point interest rate hikes by the end of 2022 to combat surging inflation.</p><p><blockquote>在美联储周三暗示在2022年底前加息三次0.25个百分点以应对通胀飙升后，美国三大主要股指本周均收跌。</blockquote></p><p> Nvidia dropped 2.1% and Alphabet lost 1.9%, both weighing on the S&amp;P 500 and Nasdaq.</p><p><blockquote>英伟达下跌2.1%，Alphabet下跌1.9%，均令标普500和纳斯达克承压。</blockquote></p><p> The S&amp;P 500 growth index lost 0.7% and the value index declined 1.4%.</p><p><blockquote>标普500增长指数下跌0.7%，价值指数下跌1.4%。</blockquote></p><p> All of the 11 major S&amp;P 500 sector indexes fell, with financials leading the way down with a 2.3% drop. Energy lost 2.2%.</p><p><blockquote>标普500 11大板块指数悉数下跌，金融股跌幅2.3%领跌。能源下跌2.2%。</blockquote></p><p> Adding to uncertainty, Pfizer said on Friday the pandemic could extend through next year. European countries geared up for further travel and social restrictions and a study warned that the rapidly spreading Omicron coronavirus variant was five times more likely to reinfect people than its predecessor, Delta.</p><p><blockquote>辉瑞周五表示，疫情可能会持续到明年，这增加了不确定性。欧洲国家为进一步的旅行和社会限制做好了准备，一项研究警告说，迅速传播的奥密克戎冠状病毒变种重新感染人类的可能性是其前身达美航空的五倍。</blockquote></p><p> Traders also pointed to year-end tax selling and the simultaneous expiration of stock options, stock index futures and index options contracts - known as triple witching - as potential causes for volatility.</p><p><blockquote>交易员还指出，年终税收抛售以及股票期权、股指期货和指数期权合约同时到期——被称为三重巫术——是波动的潜在原因。</blockquote></p><p> \"It's a big options expiration day,\" said Joe Saluzzi, co-manager of trading at Themis Trading in Chatham, New Jersey. \"And now you draw on top of that some Omicron, and you've got volatility, and I think it creates a lot of uncertainty amongst investors. Where are you going to position for the end of the year?\"</p><p><blockquote>新泽西州查塔姆Themis Trading交易联席经理Joe Saluzzi表示：“这是一个重要的期权到期日。”“现在你在此基础上利用一些奥密克戎，就会出现波动，我认为这给投资者带来了很多不确定性。今年年底你打算在哪里定位？”</blockquote></p><p> Heavyweight growth stocks including Nvidia and Microsoft have outperformed the broader market in 2021, while the Philadelphia SE Semiconductor index has surged about 35%. The benchmark S&amp;P 500 index gained around 23% in the same period.</p><p><blockquote>包括英伟达和微软在内的权重成长股在2021年的表现优于大盘，而费城SE半导体指数则飙升了约35%。基准标普500指数同期上涨约23%。</blockquote></p><p> In Friday's session, the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 1.48% to end at 35,365.44 points, while the S&amp;P 500 lost 1.03% to 4,620.64.</p><p><blockquote>周五交易中，道琼斯工业平均指数下跌1.48%，收于35,365.44点，标普500下跌1.03%，收于4,620.64点。</blockquote></p><p> The Nasdaq Composite dropped 0.07% to 15,169.68.</p><p><blockquote>纳斯达克综合指数下跌0.07%，至15,169.68点。</blockquote></p><p> On a positive note, the small-cap Russell 2000 index rallied 1% after having fallen more than 10% from a record high in early November.</p><p><blockquote>积极的一面是，小盘股罗素2000指数在从11月初的历史高点下跌超过10%后，上涨了1%。</blockquote></p><p> With options expiring, volume on U.S. exchanges jumped to 16.6 billion shares, far above the 11.9 billion average over the last 20 trading days.</p><p><blockquote>随着期权到期，美国交易所的成交量跃升至166亿股，远高于过去20个交易日119亿股的平均水平。</blockquote></p><p> For the week, the S&amp;P 500 fell 1.9%, the Dow lost 1.7% and the Nasdaq declined 2.9%.</p><p><blockquote>本周，标普500下跌1.9%，道琼斯指数下跌1.7%，纳斯达克下跌2.9%。</blockquote></p><p> In Friday's session, Oracle tumbled 6.4% after the Wall Street Journal reported the enterprise software maker is in talks to buy electronic medical records company Cerner in a deal that could be valued at $30 billion. Shares of Cerner surged 12.9%.</p><p><blockquote>周五交易中，甲骨文股价下跌6.4%，此前《华尔街日报》报道称，这家企业软件制造商正在就收购电子医疗记录公司Cerner进行谈判，交易价值可能达到300亿美元。Cerner股价飙升12.9%。</blockquote></p><p> FedEx Corp rose almost 5% after the delivery firm reinstated its original fiscal 2022 forecast on Thursday, even as persistent labor woes chipped away profits.</p><p><blockquote>尽管持续的劳工困境削弱了利润，但联邦快递公司周四恢复了最初的2022财年预测，该公司股价上涨近5%。</blockquote></p><p> Declining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 1.50-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.16-to-1 ratio favored advancers.</p><p><blockquote>纽约证券交易所下跌股与上涨股的比例为1.50比1；在纳斯达克，1.16比1的比率有利于上涨者。</blockquote></p><p> The S&amp;P 500 posted 22 new 52-week highs and seven new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 28 new highs and 341 new lows.</p><p><blockquote>标普500创下22个52周新高和7个新低；纳斯达克综合指数录得28个新高和341个新低。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Wall Street ends down after mostly negative week<blockquote>华尔街在经历了大部分负面的一周后收盘下跌</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWall Street ends down after mostly negative week<blockquote>华尔街在经历了大部分负面的一周后收盘下跌</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Reuters</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-12-18 07:59</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>(Reuters) - Wall Street finished lower on Friday, weighed down by Big Tech as investors worried about the Omicron coronavirus variant and digested the Federal Reserve's decision to end its pandemic-era stimulus faster.</p><p><blockquote>（路透社）-华尔街周五收低，受大型科技股拖累，投资者担心奥密克戎冠状病毒变种，并更快消化美联储结束大流行时期刺激措施的决定。</blockquote></p><p> All three main U.S. stock indexes ended with a decline for the week after the Fed on Wednesday signaled three quarter-percentage-point interest rate hikes by the end of 2022 to combat surging inflation.</p><p><blockquote>在美联储周三暗示在2022年底前加息三次0.25个百分点以应对通胀飙升后，美国三大主要股指本周均收跌。</blockquote></p><p> Nvidia dropped 2.1% and Alphabet lost 1.9%, both weighing on the S&amp;P 500 and Nasdaq.</p><p><blockquote>英伟达下跌2.1%，Alphabet下跌1.9%，均令标普500和纳斯达克承压。</blockquote></p><p> The S&amp;P 500 growth index lost 0.7% and the value index declined 1.4%.</p><p><blockquote>标普500增长指数下跌0.7%，价值指数下跌1.4%。</blockquote></p><p> All of the 11 major S&amp;P 500 sector indexes fell, with financials leading the way down with a 2.3% drop. Energy lost 2.2%.</p><p><blockquote>标普500 11大板块指数悉数下跌，金融股跌幅2.3%领跌。能源下跌2.2%。</blockquote></p><p> Adding to uncertainty, Pfizer said on Friday the pandemic could extend through next year. European countries geared up for further travel and social restrictions and a study warned that the rapidly spreading Omicron coronavirus variant was five times more likely to reinfect people than its predecessor, Delta.</p><p><blockquote>辉瑞周五表示，疫情可能会持续到明年，这增加了不确定性。欧洲国家为进一步的旅行和社会限制做好了准备，一项研究警告说，迅速传播的奥密克戎冠状病毒变种重新感染人类的可能性是其前身达美航空的五倍。</blockquote></p><p> Traders also pointed to year-end tax selling and the simultaneous expiration of stock options, stock index futures and index options contracts - known as triple witching - as potential causes for volatility.</p><p><blockquote>交易员还指出，年终税收抛售以及股票期权、股指期货和指数期权合约同时到期——被称为三重巫术——是波动的潜在原因。</blockquote></p><p> \"It's a big options expiration day,\" said Joe Saluzzi, co-manager of trading at Themis Trading in Chatham, New Jersey. \"And now you draw on top of that some Omicron, and you've got volatility, and I think it creates a lot of uncertainty amongst investors. Where are you going to position for the end of the year?\"</p><p><blockquote>新泽西州查塔姆Themis Trading交易联席经理Joe Saluzzi表示：“这是一个重要的期权到期日。”“现在你在此基础上利用一些奥密克戎，就会出现波动，我认为这给投资者带来了很多不确定性。今年年底你打算在哪里定位？”</blockquote></p><p> Heavyweight growth stocks including Nvidia and Microsoft have outperformed the broader market in 2021, while the Philadelphia SE Semiconductor index has surged about 35%. The benchmark S&amp;P 500 index gained around 23% in the same period.</p><p><blockquote>包括英伟达和微软在内的权重成长股在2021年的表现优于大盘，而费城SE半导体指数则飙升了约35%。基准标普500指数同期上涨约23%。</blockquote></p><p> In Friday's session, the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 1.48% to end at 35,365.44 points, while the S&amp;P 500 lost 1.03% to 4,620.64.</p><p><blockquote>周五交易中，道琼斯工业平均指数下跌1.48%，收于35,365.44点，标普500下跌1.03%，收于4,620.64点。</blockquote></p><p> The Nasdaq Composite dropped 0.07% to 15,169.68.</p><p><blockquote>纳斯达克综合指数下跌0.07%，至15,169.68点。</blockquote></p><p> On a positive note, the small-cap Russell 2000 index rallied 1% after having fallen more than 10% from a record high in early November.</p><p><blockquote>积极的一面是，小盘股罗素2000指数在从11月初的历史高点下跌超过10%后，上涨了1%。</blockquote></p><p> With options expiring, volume on U.S. exchanges jumped to 16.6 billion shares, far above the 11.9 billion average over the last 20 trading days.</p><p><blockquote>随着期权到期，美国交易所的成交量跃升至166亿股，远高于过去20个交易日119亿股的平均水平。</blockquote></p><p> For the week, the S&amp;P 500 fell 1.9%, the Dow lost 1.7% and the Nasdaq declined 2.9%.</p><p><blockquote>本周，标普500下跌1.9%，道琼斯指数下跌1.7%，纳斯达克下跌2.9%。</blockquote></p><p> In Friday's session, Oracle tumbled 6.4% after the Wall Street Journal reported the enterprise software maker is in talks to buy electronic medical records company Cerner in a deal that could be valued at $30 billion. Shares of Cerner surged 12.9%.</p><p><blockquote>周五交易中，甲骨文股价下跌6.4%，此前《华尔街日报》报道称，这家企业软件制造商正在就收购电子医疗记录公司Cerner进行谈判，交易价值可能达到300亿美元。Cerner股价飙升12.9%。</blockquote></p><p> FedEx Corp rose almost 5% after the delivery firm reinstated its original fiscal 2022 forecast on Thursday, even as persistent labor woes chipped away profits.</p><p><blockquote>尽管持续的劳工困境削弱了利润，但联邦快递公司周四恢复了最初的2022财年预测，该公司股价上涨近5%。</blockquote></p><p> Declining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 1.50-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.16-to-1 ratio favored advancers.</p><p><blockquote>纽约证券交易所下跌股与上涨股的比例为1.50比1；在纳斯达克，1.16比1的比率有利于上涨者。</blockquote></p><p> The S&amp;P 500 posted 22 new 52-week highs and seven new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 28 new highs and 341 new lows.</p><p><blockquote>标普500创下22个52周新高和7个新低；纳斯达克综合指数录得28个新高和341个新低。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/us-stocks-wall-street-ends-212015460.html\">Reuters</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/us-stocks-wall-street-ends-212015460.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1116106959","content_text":"(Reuters) - Wall Street finished lower on Friday, weighed down by Big Tech as investors worried about the Omicron coronavirus variant and digested the Federal Reserve's decision to end its pandemic-era stimulus faster.\nAll three main U.S. stock indexes ended with a decline for the week after the Fed on Wednesday signaled three quarter-percentage-point interest rate hikes by the end of 2022 to combat surging inflation.\nNvidia dropped 2.1% and Alphabet lost 1.9%, both weighing on the S&P 500 and Nasdaq.\nThe S&P 500 growth index lost 0.7% and the value index declined 1.4%.\nAll of the 11 major S&P 500 sector indexes fell, with financials leading the way down with a 2.3% drop. Energy lost 2.2%.\nAdding to uncertainty, Pfizer said on Friday the pandemic could extend through next year. European countries geared up for further travel and social restrictions and a study warned that the rapidly spreading Omicron coronavirus variant was five times more likely to reinfect people than its predecessor, Delta.\nTraders also pointed to year-end tax selling and the simultaneous expiration of stock options, stock index futures and index options contracts - known as triple witching - as potential causes for volatility.\n\"It's a big options expiration day,\" said Joe Saluzzi, co-manager of trading at Themis Trading in Chatham, New Jersey. \"And now you draw on top of that some Omicron, and you've got volatility, and I think it creates a lot of uncertainty amongst investors. Where are you going to position for the end of the year?\"\nHeavyweight growth stocks including Nvidia and Microsoft have outperformed the broader market in 2021, while the Philadelphia SE Semiconductor index has surged about 35%. The benchmark S&P 500 index gained around 23% in the same period.\nIn Friday's session, the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 1.48% to end at 35,365.44 points, while the S&P 500 lost 1.03% to 4,620.64.\nThe Nasdaq Composite dropped 0.07% to 15,169.68.\nOn a positive note, the small-cap Russell 2000 index rallied 1% after having fallen more than 10% from a record high in early November.\nWith options expiring, volume on U.S. exchanges jumped to 16.6 billion shares, far above the 11.9 billion average over the last 20 trading days.\nFor the week, the S&P 500 fell 1.9%, the Dow lost 1.7% and the Nasdaq declined 2.9%.\nIn Friday's session, Oracle tumbled 6.4% after the Wall Street Journal reported the enterprise software maker is in talks to buy electronic medical records company Cerner in a deal that could be valued at $30 billion. Shares of Cerner surged 12.9%.\nFedEx Corp rose almost 5% after the delivery firm reinstated its original fiscal 2022 forecast on Thursday, even as persistent labor woes chipped away profits.\nDeclining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 1.50-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.16-to-1 ratio favored advancers.\nThe S&P 500 posted 22 new 52-week highs and seven new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 28 new highs and 341 new lows.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2678,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":699386579,"gmtCreate":1639749760572,"gmtModify":1639749767373,"author":{"id":"3581550518409224","authorId":"3581550518409224","name":"superduper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/04a121c70123b41a7011f9ec45096505","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581550518409224","authorIdStr":"3581550518409224"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nice","listText":"Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/699386579","repostId":"1138605449","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1138605449","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1639746084,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1138605449?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-17 21:01","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Toplines Before US Market Open on Friday<blockquote>周五美国市场开盘前的营收</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1138605449","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"U.S. Stock futures headed for a lower open Friday morning after a rout in technology stocks during T","content":"<p>U.S.&nbsp;Stock futures headed for a lower open Friday morning after a rout in technology stocks during Thursday's regular trading day, as investors turned away from growth stocks in anticipation of tighter monetary policy next year.</p><p><blockquote>周四常规交易日科技股暴跌后，美国股指期货周五早盘低开，因投资者预期明年货币政策收紧而远离成长型股。</blockquote></p><p> At 8:00 a.m. ET, Dow e-minis were down 117 points, or 0.33%, S&amp;P 500 e-minis were down 24 points, or 0.52%, and Nasdaq 100 e-minis were down 153.5 points, or 0.97%.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/120d112226a9ec4591babf844729ca58\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"376\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">Investors' main focus this week has remained fixed on the Federal Reserve's updated outlook on monetary policy for next year, with the central bank's projections delivered mid-week suggesting the Fed&nbsp;could hike interest rates three times next year.</p><p><blockquote>截至美国东部时间上午8:00，道指e-mini下跌117点，跌幅0.33%，标普500 e-mini下跌24点，跌幅0.52%，纳斯达克100 e-mini下跌153.5点，跌幅0.97%。本周投资者的主要关注点仍然集中在美联储对明年货币政策的最新展望上，央行周中发布的预测表明美联储明年可能加息三次。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Stocks making the biggest moves premarket: </b></p><p><blockquote><b>盘前涨幅最大的股票：</b></blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DRI\">Darden Restaurants</a></b> – The parent of Olive Garden, Longhorn Steakhouse and other restaurant chains beat estimates by 5 cents with quarterly earnings of $1.48 per share and revenue that also topped forecasts. Same-restaurant sales jumped 34.4%, higher than the 32.6% consensus estimate compiled by StreetAccount, and Darden issued an upbeat forecast. Separately, Darden announced that CEO Eugene Lee will retire in May 2022, to be replaced by current President and Chief Operating Officer Ricardo Cardenas. Darden fell 5% in the premarket.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DRI\">达顿餐厅</a></b>–Olive Garden、Longhorn Steakhouse和其他连锁餐厅的母公司超出预期5美分，季度收益为每股1.48美元，收入也超出预期。同店销售额增长34.4%，高于StreetAccount编制的32.6%的普遍预期，达顿发布了乐观预测。另外，达顿宣布首席执行官Eugene Lee将于2022年5月退休，由现任总裁兼首席运营官Ricardo Cardenas接任。达顿盘前下跌5%。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WGO\">Winnebago</a></b> – The recreational vehicle maker added 3.4% in premarket trading after a sizable bottom-line beat for its fiscal first quarter. Winnebago earned $3.51 per share, compared with the consensus estimate of $2.26 and revenue that also came in above analyst forecasts.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WGO\">温尼贝戈</a></b>-这家休闲车制造商在第一财季盈利大幅增长后，盘前交易股价上涨3.4%。温尼贝戈每股收益3.51美元，而市场普遍预期为2.26美元，营收也高于分析师预测。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FDX\">FedEx</a></b> – The delivery service’s shares rallied 5.9% in the premarket after beating estimates on the top and bottom lines for its latest quarter. FedEx earned an adjusted $4.83 per share, beating the $4.28 consensus estimate, with higher shipping rates helping to make up for increased expenses.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FDX\">联邦快递</a></b>-该快递服务公司最近一个季度的营收和利润超出预期，盘前上涨5.9%。联邦快递调整后每股收益为4.83美元，超过市场普遍预期的4.28美元，运费上涨有助于弥补支出的增加。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/RIVN\">Rivian Automotive, Inc.</a></b> – The electric vehicle maker lost $1.23 billion for the third quarter stemming from expenses to begin production of its electric pickup truck. It was Rivian’s first quarterly report since going public, and revenue was $1 million from its first deliveries. The stock tumbled 7.9% in premarket trading.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/RIVN\">Rivian汽车公司。</a></b>-这家电动汽车制造商第三季度亏损12.3亿美元，原因是开始生产电动皮卡车的费用。这是Rivian上市以来的第一份季度报告，首次交付的收入为100万美元。该股在盘前交易中下跌7.9%。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/EPAY\">Bottomline</a></b> – Bottomline shares soared 15.1% in the premarket after the fintech company agreed to be acquired by private equity firm Thoma Bravo for $57 per share in cash, or $2.6 billion.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/EPAY\">底线</a></b>–在这家金融科技公司同意被私募股权公司Thoma Bravo以每股57美元现金（即26亿美元）收购后，Bottomline股价在盘前飙升15.1%。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CERN\">Cerner</a></b> – The healthcare information-technology company’s stock soared 18.9% in premarket trading after the Wall Street Journal reported that&nbsp;Oracle(ORCL) was in talks to buy Cerner in a potential $30 billion deal. Oracle fell 4.6%.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CERN\">塞尔纳</a></b>–在《华尔街日报》报道甲骨文(ORCL)正在洽谈以300亿美元的潜在交易收购Cerner后，这家医疗保健信息技术公司的股价在盘前交易中飙升18.9%。甲骨文跌4.6%。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JNJ\">Johnson &amp; Johnson</a></b> – <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JNJ\">Johnson &amp; Johnson</a></b> shares fell 2.1% in the premarket after the CDC recommended that adults receive the&nbsp;Pfizer(PFE) or&nbsp;Moderna(MRNA) Covid-19 vaccines rather than the J&amp;J shot. The CDC cited new data showing higher levels of a blood clotting condition than previously thought, although that condition remains rare.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JNJ\">强生公司</a></b>–<b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JNJ\">强生公司</a></b>在CDC建议成年人接种辉瑞(PFE)或Moderna(MRNA)Covid-19疫苗而不是强生疫苗后，股价在盘前下跌2.1%。疾病预防控制中心引用的新数据显示，凝血状况的水平比之前想象的要高，尽管这种情况仍然很少见。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AFRM\">Affirm Holdings, Inc.</a></b> – The “buy now pay later” company’s stock fell 2.3% in the premarket after the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau said it was launching an inquiry into firms that offer such plans.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AFRM\">确认控股公司。</a></b>–在消费者金融保护局表示正在对提供此类计划的公司展开调查后，这家“先买后付”公司的股价在盘前下跌2.3%。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVAX\">Novavax</a></b> – The drug maker’s stock rose 1.3% in premarket action on a Financial Times report that the European Medicines Agency may approve its Covid-19 vaccine for emergency use as early as next week.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVAX\">Novavax</a></b>–英国《金融时报》报道称，欧洲药品管理局最早可能于下周批准其Covid-19疫苗紧急使用，该制药商股价在盘前上涨1.3%。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/X\">U.S. Steel</a></b> – The steel maker’s stock slid 4.4% in the premarket after the company issued lower-than-expected current-quarter guidance, with higher expenses and cautious customer buying patterns offsetting improved steel pricing.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/X\">美国钢铁公司</a></b>-该钢铁制造商的股价在盘前下跌4.4%，此前该公司发布了低于预期的本季度指引，费用增加和谨慎的客户购买模式抵消了钢铁定价的改善。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SCS\">Steelcase</a></b> – The office furniture maker reported lower-than-expected profit and revenue for the third quarter, with Steelcase saying its results have been impacted by supply chain issues and higher costs. Steelcase fell 4.4% in premarket trading.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SCS\">Steelcase</a></b>-这家办公家具制造商公布的第三季度利润和收入低于预期，Steelcase表示其业绩受到供应链问题和成本上升的影响。Steelcase在盘前交易中下跌4.4%。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Toplines Before US Market Open on Friday<blockquote>周五美国市场开盘前的营收</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nToplines Before US Market Open on Friday<blockquote>周五美国市场开盘前的营收</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-12-17 21:01</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>U.S.&nbsp;Stock futures headed for a lower open Friday morning after a rout in technology stocks during Thursday's regular trading day, as investors turned away from growth stocks in anticipation of tighter monetary policy next year.</p><p><blockquote>周四常规交易日科技股暴跌后，美国股指期货周五早盘低开，因投资者预期明年货币政策收紧而远离成长型股。</blockquote></p><p> At 8:00 a.m. ET, Dow e-minis were down 117 points, or 0.33%, S&amp;P 500 e-minis were down 24 points, or 0.52%, and Nasdaq 100 e-minis were down 153.5 points, or 0.97%.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/120d112226a9ec4591babf844729ca58\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"376\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">Investors' main focus this week has remained fixed on the Federal Reserve's updated outlook on monetary policy for next year, with the central bank's projections delivered mid-week suggesting the Fed&nbsp;could hike interest rates three times next year.</p><p><blockquote>截至美国东部时间上午8:00，道指e-mini下跌117点，跌幅0.33%，标普500 e-mini下跌24点，跌幅0.52%，纳斯达克100 e-mini下跌153.5点，跌幅0.97%。本周投资者的主要关注点仍然集中在美联储对明年货币政策的最新展望上，央行周中发布的预测表明美联储明年可能加息三次。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Stocks making the biggest moves premarket: </b></p><p><blockquote><b>盘前涨幅最大的股票：</b></blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DRI\">Darden Restaurants</a></b> – The parent of Olive Garden, Longhorn Steakhouse and other restaurant chains beat estimates by 5 cents with quarterly earnings of $1.48 per share and revenue that also topped forecasts. Same-restaurant sales jumped 34.4%, higher than the 32.6% consensus estimate compiled by StreetAccount, and Darden issued an upbeat forecast. Separately, Darden announced that CEO Eugene Lee will retire in May 2022, to be replaced by current President and Chief Operating Officer Ricardo Cardenas. Darden fell 5% in the premarket.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DRI\">达顿餐厅</a></b>–Olive Garden、Longhorn Steakhouse和其他连锁餐厅的母公司超出预期5美分，季度收益为每股1.48美元，收入也超出预期。同店销售额增长34.4%，高于StreetAccount编制的32.6%的普遍预期，达顿发布了乐观预测。另外，达顿宣布首席执行官Eugene Lee将于2022年5月退休，由现任总裁兼首席运营官Ricardo Cardenas接任。达顿盘前下跌5%。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WGO\">Winnebago</a></b> – The recreational vehicle maker added 3.4% in premarket trading after a sizable bottom-line beat for its fiscal first quarter. Winnebago earned $3.51 per share, compared with the consensus estimate of $2.26 and revenue that also came in above analyst forecasts.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WGO\">温尼贝戈</a></b>-这家休闲车制造商在第一财季盈利大幅增长后，盘前交易股价上涨3.4%。温尼贝戈每股收益3.51美元，而市场普遍预期为2.26美元，营收也高于分析师预测。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FDX\">FedEx</a></b> – The delivery service’s shares rallied 5.9% in the premarket after beating estimates on the top and bottom lines for its latest quarter. FedEx earned an adjusted $4.83 per share, beating the $4.28 consensus estimate, with higher shipping rates helping to make up for increased expenses.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FDX\">联邦快递</a></b>-该快递服务公司最近一个季度的营收和利润超出预期，盘前上涨5.9%。联邦快递调整后每股收益为4.83美元，超过市场普遍预期的4.28美元，运费上涨有助于弥补支出的增加。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/RIVN\">Rivian Automotive, Inc.</a></b> – The electric vehicle maker lost $1.23 billion for the third quarter stemming from expenses to begin production of its electric pickup truck. It was Rivian’s first quarterly report since going public, and revenue was $1 million from its first deliveries. The stock tumbled 7.9% in premarket trading.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/RIVN\">Rivian汽车公司。</a></b>-这家电动汽车制造商第三季度亏损12.3亿美元，原因是开始生产电动皮卡车的费用。这是Rivian上市以来的第一份季度报告，首次交付的收入为100万美元。该股在盘前交易中下跌7.9%。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/EPAY\">Bottomline</a></b> – Bottomline shares soared 15.1% in the premarket after the fintech company agreed to be acquired by private equity firm Thoma Bravo for $57 per share in cash, or $2.6 billion.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/EPAY\">底线</a></b>–在这家金融科技公司同意被私募股权公司Thoma Bravo以每股57美元现金（即26亿美元）收购后，Bottomline股价在盘前飙升15.1%。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CERN\">Cerner</a></b> – The healthcare information-technology company’s stock soared 18.9% in premarket trading after the Wall Street Journal reported that&nbsp;Oracle(ORCL) was in talks to buy Cerner in a potential $30 billion deal. Oracle fell 4.6%.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CERN\">塞尔纳</a></b>–在《华尔街日报》报道甲骨文(ORCL)正在洽谈以300亿美元的潜在交易收购Cerner后，这家医疗保健信息技术公司的股价在盘前交易中飙升18.9%。甲骨文跌4.6%。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JNJ\">Johnson &amp; Johnson</a></b> – <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JNJ\">Johnson &amp; Johnson</a></b> shares fell 2.1% in the premarket after the CDC recommended that adults receive the&nbsp;Pfizer(PFE) or&nbsp;Moderna(MRNA) Covid-19 vaccines rather than the J&amp;J shot. The CDC cited new data showing higher levels of a blood clotting condition than previously thought, although that condition remains rare.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JNJ\">强生公司</a></b>–<b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JNJ\">强生公司</a></b>在CDC建议成年人接种辉瑞(PFE)或Moderna(MRNA)Covid-19疫苗而不是强生疫苗后，股价在盘前下跌2.1%。疾病预防控制中心引用的新数据显示，凝血状况的水平比之前想象的要高，尽管这种情况仍然很少见。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AFRM\">Affirm Holdings, Inc.</a></b> – The “buy now pay later” company’s stock fell 2.3% in the premarket after the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau said it was launching an inquiry into firms that offer such plans.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AFRM\">确认控股公司。</a></b>–在消费者金融保护局表示正在对提供此类计划的公司展开调查后，这家“先买后付”公司的股价在盘前下跌2.3%。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVAX\">Novavax</a></b> – The drug maker’s stock rose 1.3% in premarket action on a Financial Times report that the European Medicines Agency may approve its Covid-19 vaccine for emergency use as early as next week.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVAX\">Novavax</a></b>–英国《金融时报》报道称，欧洲药品管理局最早可能于下周批准其Covid-19疫苗紧急使用，该制药商股价在盘前上涨1.3%。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/X\">U.S. Steel</a></b> – The steel maker’s stock slid 4.4% in the premarket after the company issued lower-than-expected current-quarter guidance, with higher expenses and cautious customer buying patterns offsetting improved steel pricing.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/X\">美国钢铁公司</a></b>-该钢铁制造商的股价在盘前下跌4.4%，此前该公司发布了低于预期的本季度指引，费用增加和谨慎的客户购买模式抵消了钢铁定价的改善。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SCS\">Steelcase</a></b> – The office furniture maker reported lower-than-expected profit and revenue for the third quarter, with Steelcase saying its results have been impacted by supply chain issues and higher costs. Steelcase fell 4.4% in premarket trading.</p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SCS\">Steelcase</a></b>-这家办公家具制造商公布的第三季度利润和收入低于预期，Steelcase表示其业绩受到供应链问题和成本上升的影响。Steelcase在盘前交易中下跌4.4%。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1138605449","content_text":"U.S. Stock futures headed for a lower open Friday morning after a rout in technology stocks during Thursday's regular trading day, as investors turned away from growth stocks in anticipation of tighter monetary policy next year.\nAt 8:00 a.m. ET, Dow e-minis were down 117 points, or 0.33%, S&P 500 e-minis were down 24 points, or 0.52%, and Nasdaq 100 e-minis were down 153.5 points, or 0.97%.Investors' main focus this week has remained fixed on the Federal Reserve's updated outlook on monetary policy for next year, with the central bank's projections delivered mid-week suggesting the Fed could hike interest rates three times next year.\nStocks making the biggest moves premarket: \nDarden Restaurants – The parent of Olive Garden, Longhorn Steakhouse and other restaurant chains beat estimates by 5 cents with quarterly earnings of $1.48 per share and revenue that also topped forecasts. Same-restaurant sales jumped 34.4%, higher than the 32.6% consensus estimate compiled by StreetAccount, and Darden issued an upbeat forecast. Separately, Darden announced that CEO Eugene Lee will retire in May 2022, to be replaced by current President and Chief Operating Officer Ricardo Cardenas. Darden fell 5% in the premarket.\nWinnebago – The recreational vehicle maker added 3.4% in premarket trading after a sizable bottom-line beat for its fiscal first quarter. Winnebago earned $3.51 per share, compared with the consensus estimate of $2.26 and revenue that also came in above analyst forecasts.\nFedEx – The delivery service’s shares rallied 5.9% in the premarket after beating estimates on the top and bottom lines for its latest quarter. FedEx earned an adjusted $4.83 per share, beating the $4.28 consensus estimate, with higher shipping rates helping to make up for increased expenses.\nRivian Automotive, Inc. – The electric vehicle maker lost $1.23 billion for the third quarter stemming from expenses to begin production of its electric pickup truck. It was Rivian’s first quarterly report since going public, and revenue was $1 million from its first deliveries. The stock tumbled 7.9% in premarket trading.\nBottomline – Bottomline shares soared 15.1% in the premarket after the fintech company agreed to be acquired by private equity firm Thoma Bravo for $57 per share in cash, or $2.6 billion.\nCerner – The healthcare information-technology company’s stock soared 18.9% in premarket trading after the Wall Street Journal reported that Oracle(ORCL) was in talks to buy Cerner in a potential $30 billion deal. Oracle fell 4.6%.\nJohnson & Johnson – Johnson & Johnson shares fell 2.1% in the premarket after the CDC recommended that adults receive the Pfizer(PFE) or Moderna(MRNA) Covid-19 vaccines rather than the J&J shot. The CDC cited new data showing higher levels of a blood clotting condition than previously thought, although that condition remains rare.\nAffirm Holdings, Inc. – The “buy now pay later” company’s stock fell 2.3% in the premarket after the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau said it was launching an inquiry into firms that offer such plans.\nNovavax – The drug maker’s stock rose 1.3% in premarket action on a Financial Times report that the European Medicines Agency may approve its Covid-19 vaccine for emergency use as early as next week.\nU.S. Steel – The steel maker’s stock slid 4.4% in the premarket after the company issued lower-than-expected current-quarter guidance, with higher expenses and cautious customer buying patterns offsetting improved steel pricing.\nSteelcase – The office furniture maker reported lower-than-expected profit and revenue for the third quarter, with Steelcase saying its results have been impacted by supply chain issues and higher costs. Steelcase fell 4.4% in premarket trading.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".SPX":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2546,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":690143116,"gmtCreate":1639649349662,"gmtModify":1639649349903,"author":{"id":"3581550518409224","authorId":"3581550518409224","name":"superduper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/04a121c70123b41a7011f9ec45096505","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581550518409224","authorIdStr":"3581550518409224"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Buy!&nbsp;","listText":"Buy!&nbsp;","text":"Buy!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/690143116","repostId":"1174747764","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1174747764","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1639648142,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1174747764?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-16 17:49","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tesla Bags Top-Rated EV Badge From Edmunds, Rivian Gets Editor's Choice Crown<blockquote>特斯拉获得埃德蒙兹顶级电动汽车徽章，Rivian获得编辑选择桂冠</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1174747764","media":"Benzinga","summary":"Tesla Inc and Rivian Automotive Inc have secured top awards from automotive research agency Edmunds ","content":"<p><div> Tesla Inc and Rivian Automotive Inc have secured top awards from automotive research agency Edmunds as part of its 2022 rankings. What Happened: Tesla’s affordable, compact sedan Model 3 has been ...</p><p><blockquote><div>特斯拉公司和Rivian汽车公司获得了汽车研究机构埃德蒙兹2022年排名的最高奖项。发生了什么：特斯拉经济实惠的紧凑型轿车Model 3已经……</div></blockquote></p><p>  <a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/news/21/12/24637741/tesla-bags-top-rated-ev-badge-from-edmunds-rivian-gets-editors-choice-crown\">网页链接</a>  </div> </p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/news/21/12/24637741/tesla-bags-top-rated-ev-badge-from-edmunds-rivian-gets-editors-choice-crown\">网页连接</a></blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1606299360108","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tesla Bags Top-Rated EV Badge From Edmunds, Rivian Gets Editor's Choice Crown<blockquote>特斯拉获得埃德蒙兹顶级电动汽车徽章，Rivian获得编辑选择桂冠</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTesla Bags Top-Rated EV Badge From Edmunds, Rivian Gets Editor's Choice Crown<blockquote>特斯拉获得埃德蒙兹顶级电动汽车徽章，Rivian获得编辑选择桂冠</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Benzinga</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-12-16 17:49</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><div> Tesla Inc and Rivian Automotive Inc have secured top awards from automotive research agency Edmunds as part of its 2022 rankings. What Happened: Tesla’s affordable, compact sedan Model 3 has been ...</p><p><blockquote><div>特斯拉公司和Rivian汽车公司获得了汽车研究机构埃德蒙兹2022年排名的最高奖项。发生了什么：特斯拉经济实惠的紧凑型轿车Model 3已经……</div></blockquote></p><p>  <a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/news/21/12/24637741/tesla-bags-top-rated-ev-badge-from-edmunds-rivian-gets-editors-choice-crown\">网页链接</a>  </div> </p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/news/21/12/24637741/tesla-bags-top-rated-ev-badge-from-edmunds-rivian-gets-editors-choice-crown\">网页连接</a></blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/news/21/12/24637741/tesla-bags-top-rated-ev-badge-from-edmunds-rivian-gets-editors-choice-crown\">Benzinga</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉","RIVN":"Rivian Automotive, Inc."},"source_url":"https://www.benzinga.com/news/21/12/24637741/tesla-bags-top-rated-ev-badge-from-edmunds-rivian-gets-editors-choice-crown","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1174747764","content_text":"Tesla Inc and Rivian Automotive Inc have secured top awards from automotive research agency Edmunds as part of its 2022 rankings.\nWhat Happened: Tesla’s affordable, compact sedan Model 3 has been named the top-rated electric vehicle of the year and the recently launched R1T electric pickup truck from Rivian has been crowned the editor’s choice award.\nModel 3 has now bagged the title for three years in a row, the research agency said.\n“The first all-electric pickup truck to market, it offers an impressive combination of on- and off-road performance, cutting-edge technology and thoughtful utility,” Edmunds said on why R1T bagged editor’s choice award.\nThe recently-listed Rivian is backed by Amazon.com Inc and Ford Motor Co. The pre-revenue electric automaker has delivered just 156 electric vehicles but has secured a higher valuation than legacy rivals Ford and General Motors Co.\nThe development comes on the heels of Tesla CEO Elon Musk securing two back-to-back Person of The Year awards this week.\nAuthor's Take:Tesla has disrupted the automotive sector with electric vehicles despite resistance from traditional players.\nThose results are now showing as the entire industry, under pressure from governments and consumers, is taking big steps to shift to an all-electric future.\nPrice Action:Tesla shares closed 1.82% higher at $975.99 a share on Wednesday.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"TSLA":0.9,"RIVN":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":994,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":607591453,"gmtCreate":1639557520413,"gmtModify":1639557520666,"author":{"id":"3581550518409224","authorId":"3581550518409224","name":"superduper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/04a121c70123b41a7011f9ec45096505","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581550518409224","authorIdStr":"3581550518409224"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Down more?&nbsp;","listText":"Down more?&nbsp;","text":"Down more?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/607591453","repostId":"1100213723","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1100213723","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1639552120,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1100213723?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-15 15:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tesla And These Stocks Are Seeing The Highest Interest On WallStreetBets Today<blockquote>今天WallStreetBets对特斯拉和这些股票的兴趣最高</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1100213723","media":"Benzinga","summary":"Electric vehicle maker Tesla Inc.(NASDAQ:TSLA) has emerged as the most-discussed stock on Reddit’s r","content":"<p><div> Electric vehicle maker Tesla Inc.(NASDAQ:TSLA) has emerged as the most-discussed stock on Reddit’s r/WallStreetBets forum as of early Wednesday. What Happened: Exchange-traded fund SPDR S&P 500 ETF ...</p><p><blockquote><div>截至周三早些时候，电动汽车制造商特斯拉公司（纳斯达克股票代码：TSLA）已成为Reddit r/WallStreetBets论坛上讨论最多的股票。发生了什么：交易所交易基金SPDR标普500 ETF...</div></blockquote></p><p>  <a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/markets/cryptocurrency/21/12/24613509/tesla-and-these-stocks-are-seeing-the-highest-interest-on-wallstreetbets-today\">网页链接</a>  </div> </p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/markets/cryptocurrency/21/12/24613509/tesla-and-these-stocks-are-seeing-the-highest-interest-on-wallstreetbets-today\">网页连接</a></blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1606299360108","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tesla And These Stocks Are Seeing The Highest Interest On WallStreetBets Today<blockquote>今天WallStreetBets对特斯拉和这些股票的兴趣最高</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTesla And These Stocks Are Seeing The Highest Interest On WallStreetBets Today<blockquote>今天WallStreetBets对特斯拉和这些股票的兴趣最高</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Benzinga</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-12-15 15:08</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><div> Electric vehicle maker Tesla Inc.(NASDAQ:TSLA) has emerged as the most-discussed stock on Reddit’s r/WallStreetBets forum as of early Wednesday. What Happened: Exchange-traded fund SPDR S&P 500 ETF ...</p><p><blockquote><div>截至周三早些时候，电动汽车制造商特斯拉公司（纳斯达克股票代码：TSLA）已成为Reddit r/WallStreetBets论坛上讨论最多的股票。发生了什么：交易所交易基金SPDR标普500 ETF...</div></blockquote></p><p>  <a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/markets/cryptocurrency/21/12/24613509/tesla-and-these-stocks-are-seeing-the-highest-interest-on-wallstreetbets-today\">网页链接</a>  </div> </p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/markets/cryptocurrency/21/12/24613509/tesla-and-these-stocks-are-seeing-the-highest-interest-on-wallstreetbets-today\">网页连接</a></blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/markets/cryptocurrency/21/12/24613509/tesla-and-these-stocks-are-seeing-the-highest-interest-on-wallstreetbets-today\">Benzinga</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://www.benzinga.com/markets/cryptocurrency/21/12/24613509/tesla-and-these-stocks-are-seeing-the-highest-interest-on-wallstreetbets-today","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1100213723","content_text":"Electric vehicle maker Tesla Inc.(NASDAQ:TSLA) has emerged as the most-discussed stock on Reddit’s r/WallStreetBets forum as of early Wednesday.\nWhat Happened: Exchange-traded fund SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust(NYSE:SPY) is seeing the highest interest on the forum with 528 mentions as at press time, followed by Tesla with 289 mentions, data from Quiver Quantitative showed.\nVideogame retailer GameStop Corp.(NYSE:GME) and movie theatre chain AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc.(NYSE:AMC) are in the third and fourth positions, having attracted 272 and 215 mentions, respectively.\nWhy It Matters: Tesla CEO Elon Musk said in a tweet that the company would make some merchandise buyable with Dogecoin(CRYPTO:DOGE) and see how it goes. The move could eventually lead to the EV maker accepting Doge for vehicle purchase.\nMusk is a big proponent of Dogecoin and his tweets sometimes have an overwhelming impact on the price of the meme cryptocurrency.\nIt was also reported that Musk has been named as Time Magazine's2021 Person of the Year.\nShares of GameStop and AMC surged in Tuesday’s regular trading session, rebounding from the sharp losses in the previous session.\nA post on the forum noted a report by Barron’s that said retail investors are buying the dip in the two Reddit-favorite stocks.\nPrice Action: Tesla’s shares closed 0.8% lower in Tuesday’s regular trading session at $958.51 and further lost 0.5% in the after-hours session to $953.34.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"TSLA":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":740,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":604731395,"gmtCreate":1639444950290,"gmtModify":1639444950546,"author":{"id":"3581550518409224","authorId":"3581550518409224","name":"superduper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/04a121c70123b41a7011f9ec45096505","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581550518409224","authorIdStr":"3581550518409224"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Boat is back","listText":"Boat is back","text":"Boat is back","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/604731395","repostId":"1153452688","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1153452688","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1639440450,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1153452688?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-14 08:07","market":"sg","language":"en","title":"Singapore Stock Market May Take Further Damage On Tuesday<blockquote>新加坡股市周二可能进一步受损</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1153452688","media":"RTTNews","summary":"The Singapore stock market has finished lower in two straight sessions, sinking more than 20 points ","content":"<p>The Singapore stock market has finished lower in two straight sessions, sinking more than 20 points or 0.7 percent along the way. The Straits Times Index now sits just beneath the 3,120-point plateau and it may extend its losses on Tuesday.</p><p><blockquote>新加坡股市连续两个交易日收低，跌幅超过20点或0.7%。海峡时报指数目前略低于3,120点的高位，周二可能会扩大跌幅。</blockquote></p><p> The global forecast for the Asian&nbsp;markets&nbsp;is negative, likely led lower by weakness from the oil and technology stocks. The European and U.S. markets were down and the Asian bourses are tipped to follow that lead.</p><p><blockquote>全球对亚洲市场的预测是负面的，可能是受石油和科技股疲软的影响而走低。欧洲和美国市场下跌，亚洲股市预计也会效仿。</blockquote></p><p> The STI finished modestly lower on Monday as losses from the financial shares and industrials were mitigated by support from the property sector.</p><p><blockquote>由于房地产行业的支持缓解了金融股和工业股的跌幅，海指周一小幅收低。</blockquote></p><p> For the day, the index lost 15.66 points or 0.50 percent to finish at the daily low of 3,119.95 after peaking at 3,161.95. Volume was 1.7 billion shares worth 848.3 million Singapore dollars. There were 253 decliners and 202 gainers.</p><p><blockquote>当天，该指数下跌15.66点或0.50%，收于3119.95点的日低，此前曾触及3161.95点。成交量为17亿股，价值8.483亿新元。下跌股253家，上涨股202家。</blockquote></p><p> Among the actives, Ascendas REIT skidded 0.68 percent, while CapitaLand Integrated Commercial Trust added 0.49 percent, City Developments advanced 0.72 percent, Dairy Farm International plunged 1.34 percent, DBS Group eased 0.19 percent, Genting Singapore sank 0.63 percent, Keppel Corp tanked 1.15 percent, Mapletree Commercial Trust surrendered 0.98 percent, Mapletree Logistics Trust tumbled 1.05 percent, Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation fell 0.44 percent, SATS shed 0.51 percent, SembCorp Industries plummeted 2.49 percent, Singapore Airlines rose 0.20 percent, Singapore Exchange dropped 0.53 percent, Singapore Technologies Engineering slid 0.26 percent, SingTel retreated 0.82 percent, Thai Beverage jumped 1.50 percent, United Overseas Bank declined 0.86 percent, Wilmar International lost 0.48 percent and Comfort DelGro, Yangzijiang Shipbuilding, Singapore Press Holdings and Hongkong Land were unchanged.</p><p><blockquote>活跃股中，腾飞房地产投资信托下跌0.68%，凯德综合商业信托上涨0.49%，城市发展上涨0.72%，乳业国际下跌1.34%，星展集团下跌0.19%，云顶新加坡下跌0.63%，吉宝企业下跌1.15%，丰树商业信托退保0.98%，丰树物流信托下跌1.05%，华侨银行下跌0.44%，胜科工业暴跌2.49%，新加坡航空上涨0.20%，新加坡技术工程下跌0.53%，新加坡电信下跌0.82%，泰国饮料上涨1.50%，大华银行下跌0.86%，丰益国际下跌0.48%，康福德尔高、扬子江造船、新加坡报业控股和香港置地持平。</blockquote></p><p> The lead from Wall Street is soft as the major averages opened in the red on Monday and stayed under water throughout the trading day.</p><p><blockquote>华尔街的领先优势疲软，主要股指周一开盘下跌，并在整个交易日保持在水下。</blockquote></p><p> The Dow tumbled 320.04 points or 0.89 percent to finish at 35,650.95, while the NASDAQ sank 217.32 points or 1.39 percent to close at 15,413.28 and the S&amp;P 500 lost 43.05 points or 0.91 percent to end at 4,668.97.</p><p><blockquote>道琼斯指数下跌320.04点，跌幅0.89%，收于35,650.95点；纳斯达克下跌217.32点，跌幅1.39%，收于15,413.28点；标普500下跌43.05点，跌幅0.91%，收于4,668.97点。</blockquote></p><p> The pullback on Wall Street reflected profit taking, as traders cashed in on some of the strength in the markets last week. The major averages all moved sharply higher last week, with the S&amp;P 500 ending last Friday's trading at a new record closing high.</p><p><blockquote>华尔街的回调反映了获利了结，交易员从上周市场的部分走强中获利。主要股指上周均大幅走高，标普500上周五收盘创下历史新高。</blockquote></p><p> Traders may also have been moving money out of stocks and into safer havens ahead of the Federal Reserve's money policy announcement on Wednesday.</p><p><blockquote>在美联储周三宣布货币政策之前，交易员也可能一直在将资金从股市转移到更安全的避风港。</blockquote></p><p> The Fed is expected to discuss accelerating the pace of tapering its asset purchase program, with reports suggesting the central bank could double the rate to $30 billion per month.</p><p><blockquote>预计美联储将讨论加快缩减资产购买计划的步伐，有报道称美联储可能会将利率提高一倍至每月300亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> Crude oil futures settled lower on Monday on concerns about the outlook for energy demand amid worries about the impact of the Omicron variant of the&nbsp;coronavirus. West Texas Intermediate Crude oil futures for January ended down by $0.38 or 0.5 percent at $71.29 a barrel.</p><p><blockquote>原油期货周一收低，因担心新冠病毒奥密克戎变种的影响，对能源需求前景感到担忧。西德克萨斯中质原油1月期货收跌0.38美元或0.5%，报每桶71.29美元。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1626938412129","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Singapore Stock Market May Take Further Damage On Tuesday<blockquote>新加坡股市周二可能进一步受损</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSingapore Stock Market May Take Further Damage On Tuesday<blockquote>新加坡股市周二可能进一步受损</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">RTTNews</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-12-14 08:07</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>The Singapore stock market has finished lower in two straight sessions, sinking more than 20 points or 0.7 percent along the way. The Straits Times Index now sits just beneath the 3,120-point plateau and it may extend its losses on Tuesday.</p><p><blockquote>新加坡股市连续两个交易日收低，跌幅超过20点或0.7%。海峡时报指数目前略低于3,120点的高位，周二可能会扩大跌幅。</blockquote></p><p> The global forecast for the Asian&nbsp;markets&nbsp;is negative, likely led lower by weakness from the oil and technology stocks. The European and U.S. markets were down and the Asian bourses are tipped to follow that lead.</p><p><blockquote>全球对亚洲市场的预测是负面的，可能是受石油和科技股疲软的影响而走低。欧洲和美国市场下跌，亚洲股市预计也会效仿。</blockquote></p><p> The STI finished modestly lower on Monday as losses from the financial shares and industrials were mitigated by support from the property sector.</p><p><blockquote>由于房地产行业的支持缓解了金融股和工业股的跌幅，海指周一小幅收低。</blockquote></p><p> For the day, the index lost 15.66 points or 0.50 percent to finish at the daily low of 3,119.95 after peaking at 3,161.95. Volume was 1.7 billion shares worth 848.3 million Singapore dollars. There were 253 decliners and 202 gainers.</p><p><blockquote>当天，该指数下跌15.66点或0.50%，收于3119.95点的日低，此前曾触及3161.95点。成交量为17亿股，价值8.483亿新元。下跌股253家，上涨股202家。</blockquote></p><p> Among the actives, Ascendas REIT skidded 0.68 percent, while CapitaLand Integrated Commercial Trust added 0.49 percent, City Developments advanced 0.72 percent, Dairy Farm International plunged 1.34 percent, DBS Group eased 0.19 percent, Genting Singapore sank 0.63 percent, Keppel Corp tanked 1.15 percent, Mapletree Commercial Trust surrendered 0.98 percent, Mapletree Logistics Trust tumbled 1.05 percent, Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation fell 0.44 percent, SATS shed 0.51 percent, SembCorp Industries plummeted 2.49 percent, Singapore Airlines rose 0.20 percent, Singapore Exchange dropped 0.53 percent, Singapore Technologies Engineering slid 0.26 percent, SingTel retreated 0.82 percent, Thai Beverage jumped 1.50 percent, United Overseas Bank declined 0.86 percent, Wilmar International lost 0.48 percent and Comfort DelGro, Yangzijiang Shipbuilding, Singapore Press Holdings and Hongkong Land were unchanged.</p><p><blockquote>活跃股中，腾飞房地产投资信托下跌0.68%，凯德综合商业信托上涨0.49%，城市发展上涨0.72%，乳业国际下跌1.34%，星展集团下跌0.19%，云顶新加坡下跌0.63%，吉宝企业下跌1.15%，丰树商业信托退保0.98%，丰树物流信托下跌1.05%，华侨银行下跌0.44%，胜科工业暴跌2.49%，新加坡航空上涨0.20%，新加坡技术工程下跌0.53%，新加坡电信下跌0.82%，泰国饮料上涨1.50%，大华银行下跌0.86%，丰益国际下跌0.48%，康福德尔高、扬子江造船、新加坡报业控股和香港置地持平。</blockquote></p><p> The lead from Wall Street is soft as the major averages opened in the red on Monday and stayed under water throughout the trading day.</p><p><blockquote>华尔街的领先优势疲软，主要股指周一开盘下跌，并在整个交易日保持在水下。</blockquote></p><p> The Dow tumbled 320.04 points or 0.89 percent to finish at 35,650.95, while the NASDAQ sank 217.32 points or 1.39 percent to close at 15,413.28 and the S&amp;P 500 lost 43.05 points or 0.91 percent to end at 4,668.97.</p><p><blockquote>道琼斯指数下跌320.04点，跌幅0.89%，收于35,650.95点；纳斯达克下跌217.32点，跌幅1.39%，收于15,413.28点；标普500下跌43.05点，跌幅0.91%，收于4,668.97点。</blockquote></p><p> The pullback on Wall Street reflected profit taking, as traders cashed in on some of the strength in the markets last week. The major averages all moved sharply higher last week, with the S&amp;P 500 ending last Friday's trading at a new record closing high.</p><p><blockquote>华尔街的回调反映了获利了结，交易员从上周市场的部分走强中获利。主要股指上周均大幅走高，标普500上周五收盘创下历史新高。</blockquote></p><p> Traders may also have been moving money out of stocks and into safer havens ahead of the Federal Reserve's money policy announcement on Wednesday.</p><p><blockquote>在美联储周三宣布货币政策之前，交易员也可能一直在将资金从股市转移到更安全的避风港。</blockquote></p><p> The Fed is expected to discuss accelerating the pace of tapering its asset purchase program, with reports suggesting the central bank could double the rate to $30 billion per month.</p><p><blockquote>预计美联储将讨论加快缩减资产购买计划的步伐，有报道称美联储可能会将利率提高一倍至每月300亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> Crude oil futures settled lower on Monday on concerns about the outlook for energy demand amid worries about the impact of the Omicron variant of the&nbsp;coronavirus. West Texas Intermediate Crude oil futures for January ended down by $0.38 or 0.5 percent at $71.29 a barrel.</p><p><blockquote>原油期货周一收低，因担心新冠病毒奥密克戎变种的影响，对能源需求前景感到担忧。西德克萨斯中质原油1月期货收跌0.38美元或0.5%，报每桶71.29美元。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.rttnews.com/3248927/singapore-stock-market-may-take-further-damage-on-tuesday.aspx?type=glcom\">RTTNews</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"STI.SI":"富时新加坡海峡指数"},"source_url":"https://www.rttnews.com/3248927/singapore-stock-market-may-take-further-damage-on-tuesday.aspx?type=glcom","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1153452688","content_text":"The Singapore stock market has finished lower in two straight sessions, sinking more than 20 points or 0.7 percent along the way. The Straits Times Index now sits just beneath the 3,120-point plateau and it may extend its losses on Tuesday.\nThe global forecast for the Asian markets is negative, likely led lower by weakness from the oil and technology stocks. The European and U.S. markets were down and the Asian bourses are tipped to follow that lead.\nThe STI finished modestly lower on Monday as losses from the financial shares and industrials were mitigated by support from the property sector.\nFor the day, the index lost 15.66 points or 0.50 percent to finish at the daily low of 3,119.95 after peaking at 3,161.95. Volume was 1.7 billion shares worth 848.3 million Singapore dollars. There were 253 decliners and 202 gainers.\nAmong the actives, Ascendas REIT skidded 0.68 percent, while CapitaLand Integrated Commercial Trust added 0.49 percent, City Developments advanced 0.72 percent, Dairy Farm International plunged 1.34 percent, DBS Group eased 0.19 percent, Genting Singapore sank 0.63 percent, Keppel Corp tanked 1.15 percent, Mapletree Commercial Trust surrendered 0.98 percent, Mapletree Logistics Trust tumbled 1.05 percent, Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation fell 0.44 percent, SATS shed 0.51 percent, SembCorp Industries plummeted 2.49 percent, Singapore Airlines rose 0.20 percent, Singapore Exchange dropped 0.53 percent, Singapore Technologies Engineering slid 0.26 percent, SingTel retreated 0.82 percent, Thai Beverage jumped 1.50 percent, United Overseas Bank declined 0.86 percent, Wilmar International lost 0.48 percent and Comfort DelGro, Yangzijiang Shipbuilding, Singapore Press Holdings and Hongkong Land were unchanged.\nThe lead from Wall Street is soft as the major averages opened in the red on Monday and stayed under water throughout the trading day.\nThe Dow tumbled 320.04 points or 0.89 percent to finish at 35,650.95, while the NASDAQ sank 217.32 points or 1.39 percent to close at 15,413.28 and the S&P 500 lost 43.05 points or 0.91 percent to end at 4,668.97.\nThe pullback on Wall Street reflected profit taking, as traders cashed in on some of the strength in the markets last week. The major averages all moved sharply higher last week, with the S&P 500 ending last Friday's trading at a new record closing high.\nTraders may also have been moving money out of stocks and into safer havens ahead of the Federal Reserve's money policy announcement on Wednesday.\nThe Fed is expected to discuss accelerating the pace of tapering its asset purchase program, with reports suggesting the central bank could double the rate to $30 billion per month.\nCrude oil futures settled lower on Monday on concerns about the outlook for energy demand amid worries about the impact of the Omicron variant of the coronavirus. West Texas Intermediate Crude oil futures for January ended down by $0.38 or 0.5 percent at $71.29 a barrel.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"STI.SI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":770,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":604978815,"gmtCreate":1639323260442,"gmtModify":1639323260698,"author":{"id":"3581550518409224","authorId":"3581550518409224","name":"superduper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/04a121c70123b41a7011f9ec45096505","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581550518409224","authorIdStr":"3581550518409224"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nah","listText":"Nah","text":"Nah","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/604978815","repostId":"2190719916","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":871,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":605298082,"gmtCreate":1639177861779,"gmtModify":1639177862110,"author":{"id":"3581550518409224","authorId":"3581550518409224","name":"superduper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/04a121c70123b41a7011f9ec45096505","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581550518409224","authorIdStr":"3581550518409224"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Whyyy","listText":"Whyyy","text":"Whyyy","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/605298082","repostId":"1133027099","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1133027099","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1639152670,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1133027099?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-11 00:11","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Sea Ltd stock dropped more than 5% in morning trading<blockquote>Sea Ltd股价早盘下跌超过5%</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1133027099","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Sea Ltd stock dropped more than 5% in morning trading.","content":"<p>Sea Ltd stock dropped more than 5% in morning trading.</p><p><blockquote>Sea Ltd股价早盘下跌超过5%。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f6295277426435ac2c7135ba73dfbdef\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Sea Ltd stock dropped more than 5% in morning trading<blockquote>Sea Ltd股价早盘下跌超过5%</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSea Ltd stock dropped more than 5% in morning trading<blockquote>Sea Ltd股价早盘下跌超过5%</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-12-11 00:11</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Sea Ltd stock dropped more than 5% in morning trading.</p><p><blockquote>Sea Ltd股价早盘下跌超过5%。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f6295277426435ac2c7135ba73dfbdef\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SE":"Sea Ltd"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1133027099","content_text":"Sea Ltd stock dropped more than 5% in morning trading.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"SE":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":842,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":605871335,"gmtCreate":1639148582355,"gmtModify":1639148583676,"author":{"id":"3581550518409224","authorId":"3581550518409224","name":"superduper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/04a121c70123b41a7011f9ec45096505","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581550518409224","authorIdStr":"3581550518409224"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/605871335","repostId":"1165282830","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1165282830","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1639148461,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1165282830?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-10 23:01","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tesla stops taking Model S and Model X orders outside North America<blockquote>特斯拉停止接受北美以外地区Model S和Model X订单</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1165282830","media":"Electrek","summary":"Tesla announced to potential buyers today that it stopped taking new Model S and Model X orders outs","content":"<p>Tesla announced to potential buyers today that it stopped taking new Model S and Model X orders outside North America.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉今天向潜在买家宣布，停止接受北美以外的新Model S和Model X订单。</blockquote></p><p> It now expects deliveries in other markets to start during the second half of 2022.</p><p><blockquote>目前预计其他市场的交付将于2022年下半年开始。</blockquote></p><p> The news comes from an email that Tesla started sending out to people who have Model S and Model X vehicles on order in Europe.</p><p><blockquote>该消息来自特斯拉开始向在欧洲订购Model S和Model X车辆的人发送的一封电子邮件。</blockquote></p><p> Tesla writes in the email that it is not accepting any new orders (translated from German):</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉在电子邮件中写道，它不接受任何新订单（翻译自德语）：</blockquote></p><p>   In order to expedite the delivery of existing orders, including your Model X order, as much as possible, we are currently no longer accepting new orders for the Model S and Model X from markets outside of North America.  This is in response to Tesla likely having a large backlog of Model S/X orders in Europe and other markets, where there has been no new Model S/X shipment in a year.</p><p><blockquote>为了尽可能加快现有订单（包括您的Model X订单）的交付，我们目前不再接受来自北美以外市场的Model S和Model X的新订单。这是为了应对特斯拉可能在欧洲和其他市场积压了大量Model S/X订单，这些市场已经一年没有新的Model S/X出货。</blockquote></p><p> Tesla shut down Model S and Model X production in January of last year to update the vehicles.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉于去年1月关闭了Model S和Model X的生产以更新车辆。</blockquote></p><p> During that year, the automaker kept taking new orders, but production was delayed with new Model S starting to slowly come off the assembly line in June and&nbsp;Model X in October.</p><p><blockquote>那一年，该汽车制造商不断接受新订单，但生产被推迟，新款Model S于6月开始慢慢下线，Model X于10月开始下线。</blockquote></p><p> Tesla is still catching up to the backlog in North America while new orders kept coming in from Europe and Asia.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉仍在追赶北美的积压订单，而新订单不断来自欧洲和亚洲。</blockquote></p><p> In the email, Tesla says that it now aims to deliver the first Model S and Model X in Europe during the second half of next year:</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉在电子邮件中表示，目前的目标是明年下半年在欧洲交付首批Model S和Model X：</blockquote></p><p>   Your Model X is getting closer to delivery. We currently expect shipments outside of North America to begin in the second half of 2022.  This means that Europe would be without Model S and Model X for a year and a half.</p><p><blockquote>你的Model X离交付越来越近了。我们目前预计北美以外的发货将于2022年下半年开始。这意味着欧洲将有一年半的时间没有Model S和Model X。</blockquote></p><p> Here’s the email in full:</p><p><blockquote>以下是电子邮件全文：</blockquote></p><p>   Hello [redacted],    We are contacting you regarding the timing of your Model X order. As we expand production capacity, the launch dates for markets outside of North America have been postponed. We will inform you of the delivery times through your Tesla account when production begins.    Your Model X is getting closer to delivery. We currently expect shipments outside of North America to begin in the second half of 2022.    In order to expedite the delivery of existing orders, including your Model X order, as much as possible, we are currently no longer accepting new orders for the Model S and Model X from markets outside of North America.    The price of your Model X will continue to be the same as it was when you placed your order, unless your vehicle configuration has been changed. To apply your order fee to another model, or to receive a full refund, request a call to speak directly to a Tesla representative.    We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.    Kind regards,    Your Tesla Team Testa </p><p><blockquote>您好【已编辑】，我们正在就您订购Model X的时间与您联系。随着我们扩大产能，北美以外市场的上市日期已经推迟。当生产开始时，我们将通过您的特斯拉帐户通知您交货时间。你的Model X离交付越来越近了。我们目前预计北美以外的发货将于2022年下半年开始。为了尽可能加快现有订单（包括您的Model X订单）的交付，我们目前不再接受来自北美以外市场的Model S和Model X的新订单。您的Model X的价格将继续与您下订单时相同，除非您的车辆配置发生了变化。要将您的订单费用应用于其他型号，或获得全额退款，请要求看涨期权直接与特斯拉代表联系。对于由此可能造成的任何不便，我们深表歉意。亲切的问候，您的特斯拉团队Testa</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1627037122897","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tesla stops taking Model S and Model X orders outside North America<blockquote>特斯拉停止接受北美以外地区Model S和Model X订单</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTesla stops taking Model S and Model X orders outside North America<blockquote>特斯拉停止接受北美以外地区Model S和Model X订单</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Electrek</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-12-10 23:01</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Tesla announced to potential buyers today that it stopped taking new Model S and Model X orders outside North America.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉今天向潜在买家宣布，停止接受北美以外的新Model S和Model X订单。</blockquote></p><p> It now expects deliveries in other markets to start during the second half of 2022.</p><p><blockquote>目前预计其他市场的交付将于2022年下半年开始。</blockquote></p><p> The news comes from an email that Tesla started sending out to people who have Model S and Model X vehicles on order in Europe.</p><p><blockquote>该消息来自特斯拉开始向在欧洲订购Model S和Model X车辆的人发送的一封电子邮件。</blockquote></p><p> Tesla writes in the email that it is not accepting any new orders (translated from German):</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉在电子邮件中写道，它不接受任何新订单（翻译自德语）：</blockquote></p><p>   In order to expedite the delivery of existing orders, including your Model X order, as much as possible, we are currently no longer accepting new orders for the Model S and Model X from markets outside of North America.  This is in response to Tesla likely having a large backlog of Model S/X orders in Europe and other markets, where there has been no new Model S/X shipment in a year.</p><p><blockquote>为了尽可能加快现有订单（包括您的Model X订单）的交付，我们目前不再接受来自北美以外市场的Model S和Model X的新订单。这是为了应对特斯拉可能在欧洲和其他市场积压了大量Model S/X订单，这些市场已经一年没有新的Model S/X出货。</blockquote></p><p> Tesla shut down Model S and Model X production in January of last year to update the vehicles.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉于去年1月关闭了Model S和Model X的生产以更新车辆。</blockquote></p><p> During that year, the automaker kept taking new orders, but production was delayed with new Model S starting to slowly come off the assembly line in June and&nbsp;Model X in October.</p><p><blockquote>那一年，该汽车制造商不断接受新订单，但生产被推迟，新款Model S于6月开始慢慢下线，Model X于10月开始下线。</blockquote></p><p> Tesla is still catching up to the backlog in North America while new orders kept coming in from Europe and Asia.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉仍在追赶北美的积压订单，而新订单不断来自欧洲和亚洲。</blockquote></p><p> In the email, Tesla says that it now aims to deliver the first Model S and Model X in Europe during the second half of next year:</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉在电子邮件中表示，目前的目标是明年下半年在欧洲交付首批Model S和Model X：</blockquote></p><p>   Your Model X is getting closer to delivery. We currently expect shipments outside of North America to begin in the second half of 2022.  This means that Europe would be without Model S and Model X for a year and a half.</p><p><blockquote>你的Model X离交付越来越近了。我们目前预计北美以外的发货将于2022年下半年开始。这意味着欧洲将有一年半的时间没有Model S和Model X。</blockquote></p><p> Here’s the email in full:</p><p><blockquote>以下是电子邮件全文：</blockquote></p><p>   Hello [redacted],    We are contacting you regarding the timing of your Model X order. As we expand production capacity, the launch dates for markets outside of North America have been postponed. We will inform you of the delivery times through your Tesla account when production begins.    Your Model X is getting closer to delivery. We currently expect shipments outside of North America to begin in the second half of 2022.    In order to expedite the delivery of existing orders, including your Model X order, as much as possible, we are currently no longer accepting new orders for the Model S and Model X from markets outside of North America.    The price of your Model X will continue to be the same as it was when you placed your order, unless your vehicle configuration has been changed. To apply your order fee to another model, or to receive a full refund, request a call to speak directly to a Tesla representative.    We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.    Kind regards,    Your Tesla Team Testa </p><p><blockquote>您好【已编辑】，我们正在就您订购Model X的时间与您联系。随着我们扩大产能，北美以外市场的上市日期已经推迟。当生产开始时，我们将通过您的特斯拉帐户通知您交货时间。你的Model X离交付越来越近了。我们目前预计北美以外的发货将于2022年下半年开始。为了尽可能加快现有订单（包括您的Model X订单）的交付，我们目前不再接受来自北美以外市场的Model S和Model X的新订单。您的Model X的价格将继续与您下订单时相同，除非您的车辆配置发生了变化。要将您的订单费用应用于其他型号，或获得全额退款，请要求看涨期权直接与特斯拉代表联系。对于由此可能造成的任何不便，我们深表歉意。亲切的问候，您的特斯拉团队Testa</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://electrek.co/2021/12/10/tesla-stops-taking-model-s-x-orders-outside-north-america/\">Electrek</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://electrek.co/2021/12/10/tesla-stops-taking-model-s-x-orders-outside-north-america/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1165282830","content_text":"Tesla announced to potential buyers today that it stopped taking new Model S and Model X orders outside North America.\nIt now expects deliveries in other markets to start during the second half of 2022.\nThe news comes from an email that Tesla started sending out to people who have Model S and Model X vehicles on order in Europe.\nTesla writes in the email that it is not accepting any new orders (translated from German):\n\n In order to expedite the delivery of existing orders, including your Model X order, as much as possible, we are currently no longer accepting new orders for the Model S and Model X from markets outside of North America.\n\nThis is in response to Tesla likely having a large backlog of Model S/X orders in Europe and other markets, where there has been no new Model S/X shipment in a year.\nTesla shut down Model S and Model X production in January of last year to update the vehicles.\nDuring that year, the automaker kept taking new orders, but production was delayed with new Model S starting to slowly come off the assembly line in June and Model X in October.\nTesla is still catching up to the backlog in North America while new orders kept coming in from Europe and Asia.\nIn the email, Tesla says that it now aims to deliver the first Model S and Model X in Europe during the second half of next year:\n\n Your Model X is getting closer to delivery. We currently expect shipments outside of North America to begin in the second half of 2022.\n\nThis means that Europe would be without Model S and Model X for a year and a half.\nHere’s the email in full:\n\n Hello [redacted],\n\n\n We are contacting you regarding the timing of your Model X order. As we expand production capacity, the launch dates for markets outside of North America have been postponed. We will inform you of the delivery times through your Tesla account when production begins.\n\n\n Your Model X is getting closer to delivery. We currently expect shipments outside of North America to begin in the second half of 2022.\n\n\n In order to expedite the delivery of existing orders, including your Model X order, as much as possible, we are currently no longer accepting new orders for the Model S and Model X from markets outside of North America.\n\n\n The price of your Model X will continue to be the same as it was when you placed your order, unless your vehicle configuration has been changed. To apply your order fee to another model, or to receive a full refund, request a call to speak directly to a Tesla representative.\n\n\n We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.\n\n\n Kind regards,\n\n\n Your Tesla Team Testa","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"TSLA":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":838,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":602981159,"gmtCreate":1638957046283,"gmtModify":1638957132294,"author":{"id":"3581550518409224","authorId":"3581550518409224","name":"superduper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/04a121c70123b41a7011f9ec45096505","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581550518409224","authorIdStr":"3581550518409224"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good news&nbsp;","listText":"Good news&nbsp;","text":"Good news","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/602981159","repostId":"1149172224","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":917,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":606226200,"gmtCreate":1638887633962,"gmtModify":1638887634203,"author":{"id":"3581550518409224","authorId":"3581550518409224","name":"superduper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/04a121c70123b41a7011f9ec45096505","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581550518409224","authorIdStr":"3581550518409224"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Never sell?&nbsp;","listText":"Never sell?&nbsp;","text":"Never sell?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/606226200","repostId":"1162682713","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1162682713","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1638887298,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1162682713?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-07 22:28","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple: A True 'Never Sell' Position<blockquote>苹果：真正的“永不出售”立场</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1162682713","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"Summary\n\nWith $315B in authorized share buybacks and a 0.6% yield, Apple should return 4.3% on share","content":"<p><b>Summary</b></p><p><blockquote><b>总结</b></blockquote></p><p> <ul>  <li>With $315B in authorized share buybacks and a 0.6% yield, Apple should return 4.3% on shareholder-friendly practices alone.</li>  <li>In addition, the company will still see double-digit growth in wearables and services, even if iPhone slows down a little.</li>  <li>The Apple ecosystem also stands to get more intertwined with a potential Apple Car and AR/VR plays.</li> </ul> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/404c4a2883110ed556fd9700c5cffb83\" tg-width=\"1536\" tg-height=\"1024\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>CatLane/iStock Unreleased via Getty Images</span></p><p><blockquote><ul><li>凭借315B美元的授权股票回购和0.6%的收益率，苹果仅通过股东友好做法就应该获得4.3%的回报。</li><li>此外，该公司在可穿戴设备和服务方面仍将出现两位数的增长，即使iPhone稍微放缓。</li><li>苹果生态系统也将与潜在的苹果汽车和AR/VR游戏更加紧密地交织在一起。</li></ul><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>CatLane/iStock未通过Getty Images发布</span></p></blockquote></p><p> At an almost $3T market cap, I am still a holder of Apple (AAPL). While I absolutely wish I would have bought more of this powerhouse in years past, I've made do with incremental gains from dividend reinvestment.</p><p><blockquote>虽然市值接近3T美元，但我仍然是苹果(AAPL)的持有者。虽然我绝对希望在过去几年里购买更多这家巨头的股票，但我还是通过股息再投资获得了增量收益。</blockquote></p><p> The news cycle would have you believe that this behemoth has head-winds galore, and that the downfall could come any day now. With limited risk and potential galore, is the company worth buying today?</p><p><blockquote>新闻周期会让你相信这个庞然大物有很多阻力，垮台随时都可能到来。由于风险有限且潜力巨大，该公司今天值得购买吗？</blockquote></p><p> <b>Limited Risk</b></p><p><blockquote><b>风险有限</b></blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1fe4e9d4f4aca197052840240959df43\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"831\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Image: Forbes magazine cover, 2007</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>图片：福布斯杂志封面，2007年</span></p></blockquote></p><p> I am familiar with cellphone manufacturers of days past. Nokia, for example, used to be the titan of industry. It was thought to be untouchable and then came the iPhone. I mean, just look at the Forbes cover above, \"can anyone catch the cell phone king?\"</p><p><blockquote>我熟悉过去的手机制造商。例如，诺基亚曾经是工业巨头。它被认为是碰不得的，然后出现了iPhone。我的意思是，看看上面的福布斯封面，“有人能抓住手机大王吗？”</blockquote></p><p> That cover hit news stands on November 12, 2007, a few months after the iPhone had made its debut. The straw that broke Nokia's back, and the feature which gives Apple a moat wider than Apple Park today, The App Store launched in mid-2008.</p><p><blockquote>2007年11月12日，也就是iPhone首次亮相几个月后，这个封面登上了新闻站。压垮诺基亚的最后一根稻草，也是让苹果拥有比苹果公园更宽的护城河的功能，2008年年中推出的App Store。</blockquote></p><p> The App Store, as simple as it may seem, gave Apple the keys to the kingdom. Rather than be limited to the few apps that came on your Nokia device, you could use one of the thousands of apps sold by third-party developers on the iPhone. This was the beginning of a world-beating ecosystem.</p><p><blockquote>App Store看似简单，却给了苹果通往王国的钥匙。你可以在iPhone上使用第三方开发者销售的数千款应用，而不是局限于诺基亚设备上的几款应用。这是一个世界一流生态系统的开始。</blockquote></p><p> Today, Apple's ecosystem has grown in a significant way. The growth of that ecosystem means that Apple \"fanboys\" would have to spend thousands of dollars, or work through significant inconveniences to switch.</p><p><blockquote>今天，苹果的生态系统已经有了显著的发展。这个生态系统的增长意味着苹果的“粉丝”将不得不花费数千美元，或者克服巨大的不便来转换。</blockquote></p><p> Consider the user that has subscriptions to several apps, Air Pods, an Apple Watch, iPhone, iPad, and perhaps a MacBook. That person is not an outlier. If they consider switching to Android they'll have to cancel those several apps, throw their Apple Watch out, replace the AirPods, and would lose lots of great tie-in messaging functionality across the iPad and MacBook.</p><p><blockquote>考虑一下订阅了几个应用程序、Air Pods、苹果手表、iPhone、iPad，也许还有MacBook的用户。那个人不是局外人。如果他们考虑切换到Android，他们将不得不取消这几个应用程序，扔掉他们的苹果手表，更换AirPods，并将失去iPad和MacBook上许多出色的搭售消息功能。</blockquote></p><p> First-world problems, absolutely. The tie-in, however, is real. Apple make world-class products that users love. They get caught up in all the added accessories which deliver a great experience and then they are customers for life.</p><p><blockquote>绝对是第一世界的问题。然而，这种联系是真实的。苹果制造用户喜爱的世界级产品。他们被所有提供良好体验的附加配件所吸引，然后他们就成了终身顾客。</blockquote></p><p> Apple stock, for all intents and purposes, is a better place to keep your money than cash because of this lack of risk. Should something start to topple this house of cards, it wouldn't happen overnight, and it certainly won't happen as rapidly as it happened to Nokia because of the switching costs Apple has built up.</p><p><blockquote>无论出于何种意图和目的，苹果股票都是比现金更好的存放资金的地方，因为它缺乏风险。如果有什么事情开始推翻这座纸牌屋，它不会在一夜之间发生，而且肯定不会像诺基亚那样迅速发生，因为苹果已经积累了转换成本。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Enviable Metrics</b></p><p><blockquote><b>令人羡慕的指标</b></blockquote></p><p> Despite running up against the law of large numbers, Apple continues to look stellar when considering a number of different metrics.</p><p><blockquote>尽管违反了大数定律，但在考虑许多不同的指标时，苹果仍然看起来很出色。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/08f0199dd5d3c8dade8af08d884a5459\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"300\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Image: Apple's debt per 10-K (Page 45)</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>图片：苹果每10-K的债务（第45页）</span></p></blockquote></p><p> The worst metric, in my opinion, Apple has is a 1.7 debt-to-equity ratio. However, on that figure, my mind may be stuck in a good days of positive interest rates. Much of Apple's $109B of debt is at a negligible (0.03-2%) interest rate. Higher end servicing costs sit a hair below 5%, but this makes up a minority of Apple's debt&nbsp;per the company's 10-K filings.</p><p><blockquote>在我看来，苹果最差的指标是1.7的债务股本比率。然而，在这个数字上，我的思绪可能会停留在正利率的好日子里。苹果109B美元债务的大部分利率可以忽略不计（0.03-2%）。高端服务成本略低于5%，但根据该公司的10-K文件，这仅占苹果债务的一小部分。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/547e6241dab1a7aef3e649fb0f10d5ff\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"417\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Data by YCharts</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>数据来自YCharts</span></p></blockquote></p><p> All of that money did not go into internal projects, however, it went to share buybacks. Perhaps no company epitomizes share buybacks like Apple has over the last decade. The company has retired hundreds of billions of dollars' worth of stock to shareholders benefit, and it continues to do so today.</p><p><blockquote>所有这些资金并没有用于内部项目，而是用于股票回购。也许没有一家公司能像苹果那样体现过去十年的股票回购。为了股东利益，该公司已经退役了价值数千亿美元的股票，并且至今仍在继续这样做。</blockquote></p><p> These share buybacks are why Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.B) now owns 5.5% of Apple. Back when many lauded Buffett for being late to the Apple train, he has proven his conviction worthwhile and helped an already massive Berkshire portfolio continue to beat the market with this high concentration investment.</p><p><blockquote>这些股票回购是Berkshire Hathaway(BRK.B)现在拥有苹果5.5%股份的原因。当许多人称赞巴菲特错过了苹果的火车时，巴菲特已经证明了他的信念是值得的，并通过这种高度集中的投资帮助已经庞大的伯克希尔投资组合继续跑赢市场。</blockquote></p><p> Buffett aside, Apple does excel in several metrics one should be looking for when investing in high-quality stocks. Return on equity here sits at an eye-popping 140% due to a pandemic induced expansion in net income.</p><p><blockquote>撇开巴菲特不谈，苹果确实在投资优质股票时应该寻找的几个指标上表现出色。由于大流行导致净利润扩张，股本回报率达到了令人瞠目结舌的140%。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/af2a898072faa8c46eeaa734222ff059\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"417\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Data by YCharts</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>数据来自YCharts</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Given the amount of debt, return on invested capital, likely, is the better metric to take a look at here. Apple's ROIC has been consistently over the 20% mark, which is a sign of a fantastic business.</p><p><blockquote>考虑到债务金额，投资资本回报率可能是更好的指标。苹果的投资回报率一直超过20%，这是一家出色业务的标志。</blockquote></p><p> Oh, and it probably goes without mentioning, but this business is cash rich. Apple, as of its last report, has $35B in cash on hand and $155B in marketable securities (a mix of current and non-current). With $190B in capital that the company can still deploy, Apple is certainly in an enviable position.</p><p><blockquote>哦，这可能是不言而喻的，但这项业务现金充裕。截至上次报告，苹果手头有350亿美元现金和1550亿美元有价证券（流动和非流动的组合）。由于该公司仍可部署1900亿美元的资本，苹果无疑处于令人羡慕的地位。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Valuation: Rich</b></p><p><blockquote><b>估值：丰富</b></blockquote></p><p> Those metrics are not unknown, but they are incredible. It's no surprise that Apple will likely cross $3T market cap in the next year or so, but is the company worth buying at these high levels?</p><p><blockquote>这些指标并非未知，但却令人难以置信。毫不奇怪，苹果的市值可能会在未来一年左右突破3T美元，但该公司值得在如此高的水平上买入吗？</blockquote></p><p> As mentioned above, I view Apple as an almost cash like position. In a world of inflation, Apple has the balance sheet to carry it through, it has significant pricing power, and it has exceptionally high margins on its products to be able to weather the storm. Would you rather your money lose 5% of its buying power per year, or grow in an American titan like Apple?</p><p><blockquote>如上所述，我认为苹果几乎是现金头寸。在通货膨胀的世界里，苹果拥有能够承受通货膨胀的资产负债表，拥有强大的定价权，并且其产品利润率极高，能够渡过难关。你愿意你的钱每年失去5%的购买力，还是愿意在像苹果这样的美国巨头中增长？</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/159a160cc869ef1cc00bd4eb8db7bd93\" tg-width=\"1280\" tg-height=\"720\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Image: A mockup VR headset via BGR</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>图片：来自BGR的VR耳机模型</span></p></blockquote></p><p> A valuation of Apple also has to include the potential for an Apple Car, or the AR/VR headsets that will be with us within the next 18-months. These types of projects have been kept well under wraps, but considering the valuations of EV manufacturers like Tesla (TSLA) and Rivian (RIVN), the market will reward Apple rather richly for a well-executed product.</p><p><blockquote>对苹果的估值还必须包括苹果汽车的潜力，或者将在未来18个月内出现的AR/VR耳机。这些类型的项目一直处于保密状态，但考虑到特斯拉（TSLA）和Rivian（RIVN）等电动汽车制造商的估值，市场将对苹果执行良好的产品给予相当丰厚的奖励。</blockquote></p><p> An Apple car with deep iOS integration,as is speculated, would further drive the ecosystem flywheel. In fact, it would take that flywheel to unimaginable levels. Imagine trying to leave an ecosystem where you have to replace a $50K (and I'm probably being cheap) car, a phone, a computer... it's quite the lock in.</p><p><blockquote>据推测，深度集成iOS的苹果汽车将进一步推动生态系统飞轮。事实上，它会将飞轮提升到难以想象的水平。想象一下，试图离开一个生态系统，在这个生态系统中，你必须更换一辆5万美元（我可能很便宜）的汽车、一部电话、一台电脑...这是相当锁定。</blockquote></p><p> Taking AR/VR into account, one would have to consider that AR could be a cannibalizing force for the iPhone. If one can see all they need through lenses and control those lenses through gestures or the Apple Watch, Apple could cannibalize the phone market.</p><p><blockquote>考虑到AR/VR，人们不得不考虑AR可能会成为iPhone的蚕食力量。如果人们可以通过镜头看到他们需要的一切，并通过手势或苹果手表控制这些镜头，苹果可能会蚕食手机市场。</blockquote></p><p> That, however, is a good thing. Apple could price a novel item like AR glasses with higher margins than a phone. Fans and tech enthusiasts would pay that early adopter price and others would soon follow suit if the product lives up to the hype. It gets Apple out of the \"$1,000 for a phone\" line of thinking.</p><p><blockquote>然而，这是一件好事。苹果可以以比手机更高的利润率为AR眼镜等新颖产品定价。粉丝和技术爱好者将支付早期采用者的价格，如果产品不负众望，其他人很快就会效仿。它让苹果摆脱了“1000美元买一部手机”的思路。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/88a008b34566e3309b095ad284807d12\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"417\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Data by YCharts</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>数据来自YCharts</span></p></blockquote></p><p> All this to say, Apple's rich valuation today is a worthy one. At a PE of ~29, it's hardly extortionate, but it is outside of Apple's average over the last five years.</p><p><blockquote>综上所述，苹果今天的丰厚估值是当之无愧的。市盈率约为29，算不上过高，但超出了苹果过去五年的平均水平。</blockquote></p><p> The ecosystem, one that ties its customers in for life, is where the value lies here and Apple has plans to expand that with vehicles and wearables. Even at a PE of 29, I believe this to be a secure long-term investment that will pay investors a dividend, albeit small, along the way while continuing to retire billions of dollars in stock ($315B authorized ~10%).</p><p><blockquote>这个将客户终身联系在一起的生态系统是其价值所在，苹果计划通过车辆和可穿戴设备来扩展这一生态系统。即使市盈率为29，我相信这也是一项安全的长期投资，它将向投资者支付股息，尽管很小，同时继续收回数十亿美元的股票（315B美元授权约10%）。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Addressing The Risks</b></p><p><blockquote><b>应对风险</b></blockquote></p><p> Fear and inflation. Fear is the largest and most significant risk that Apple faces. Buyers told that bad times are coming tend to zip up their pocketbooks. Buyers who have to spend 10% more on groceries suddenly don't have enough to buy the latest iPhone.</p><p><blockquote>恐惧和通货膨胀。恐惧是苹果面临的最大、最重大的风险。被告知糟糕时期即将到来的买家往往会收紧钱包。不得不在食品杂货上多花10%的购物者突然没有足够的钱购买最新的iPhone。</blockquote></p><p> These are external concerns that Apple has little control over. The company has, over the years, introduced buy-now-pay-later and subscription programs that help buyers get the goods they want at an affordable monthly price, and, as discussed, Apple has substantial margins that it could use to overcome significant headwinds in this space.</p><p><blockquote>这些都是苹果几乎无法控制的外部担忧。多年来，该公司推出了先买后付和订阅计划，帮助买家以可承受的每月价格获得他们想要的商品，而且正如所讨论的，苹果拥有可观的利润，可以用来克服重大阻力在这个领域。</blockquote></p><p> Execution is another risk Apple faces, especially as we look to these \"futuristic\" products. A self-driving car could be worth trillions of dollars in lifetime revenues, or it could be a dud upon release that never gets full approval to operate on the streets. Likewise, an AR headset that no one wants to be seen wearing, or that proves difficult to wear through the day, could be a dead-on-arrival product.</p><p><blockquote>执行力是苹果面临的另一个风险，尤其是当我们关注这些“未来”产品时。一辆自动驾驶汽车的终身收入可能价值数万亿美元，也可能在发布后成为一个哑弹，永远不会获得在街道上运行的完全批准。同样，没有人想被看到佩戴的AR耳机，或者被证明很难全天佩戴的AR耳机，可能是一个到货就死的产品。</blockquote></p><p> Given the nature of these two products and the secrecy surrounding their development, one cannot truly assign a real risk rating to them. They're just things to be aware of. Apple does have a history of great execution (MacBook keyboard and Touch Bar aside), however, so an investor should feel at least somewhat comfortable that the company will put its best foot forward.</p><p><blockquote>鉴于这两种产品的性质及其开发的保密性，人们无法真正为它们分配真正的风险评级。它们只是需要注意的事情。然而，苹果确实有着出色执行力的历史（MacBook键盘和Touch Bar除外），因此投资者至少应该对该公司将全力以赴感到有些放心。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Final Thoughts</b></p><p><blockquote><b>最后的想法</b></blockquote></p><p></p><p> At a valuation nearing $3T one would assume there isn't much room left to run in Apple, but investors still stand to beat the overall market in this name thanks to excellent capital allocation.</p><p><blockquote>在估值接近3T美元的情况下，人们会认为苹果已经没有太多的运行空间了，但由于出色的资本配置，投资者仍然能够以这个名义击败整体市场。</blockquote></p><p> Apple has $315B in authorized buybacks and returns some $14.5B in dividends each year. Apple will likely buyback close to $100B in stock during its 2022 fiscal year which, alone, represents a 3.7% return on today's prices. Combined with a dividend yield of 0.6%, investors will make 4.3% on this name through shareholder friendly practices alone.</p><p><blockquote>苹果拥有$315B的授权回购，每年返还约$14.5 B的股息。苹果可能会在2022财年回购近1000亿美元的股票，仅此一项就相当于今天价格的3.7%的回报率。加上0.6%的股息收益率，仅通过股东友好的做法，投资者就可以在这个名字上获得4.3%的收益。</blockquote></p><p> Those numbers will compound too, another $100B in 2023, $100B in 2024, it all adds up. That $300B is all authorized too.</p><p><blockquote>这些数字也会复合，2023年再增加1000亿美元，2024年再增加1000亿美元，所有这些加起来。那300B美元也全部获得授权。</blockquote></p><p> Along with those buybacks and dividends, investors are buying into a company that, last year, defied laws of large numbers and grew its top-line at 33%. While unlikely this year, I still expect that the wearables and services divisions will grow at double digits which will allow Apple to see high single-digit revenue growth through the coming 3-5 years.</p><p><blockquote>除了这些回购和股息之外，投资者还买入了一家去年无视大数定律、营收增长33%的公司。虽然今年不太可能，但我仍然预计可穿戴设备和服务部门将以两位数的速度增长，这将使苹果在未来3-5年内实现高个位数的收入增长。</blockquote></p><p> Those with a bearish view on Apple act as though this juggernaut will vanish overnight, but that's simply not true. Sure, you're unlikely to pull down 30%+ annual returns going forward, but if you're looking for a high-quality stable business that can beat the market little-by-little, Apple is a great horse (or car) to back.</p><p><blockquote>那些看跌苹果的人表现得好像这个庞然大物会在一夜之间消失，但事实并非如此。当然，未来你不太可能降低30%以上的年回报率，但如果你正在寻找一家能够一点一点击败市场的高质量稳定业务，苹果是一匹很棒的马（或汽车）回来。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple: A True 'Never Sell' Position<blockquote>苹果：真正的“永不出售”立场</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple: A True 'Never Sell' Position<blockquote>苹果：真正的“永不出售”立场</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Seeking Alpha</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-12-07 22:28</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><b>Summary</b></p><p><blockquote><b>总结</b></blockquote></p><p> <ul>  <li>With $315B in authorized share buybacks and a 0.6% yield, Apple should return 4.3% on shareholder-friendly practices alone.</li>  <li>In addition, the company will still see double-digit growth in wearables and services, even if iPhone slows down a little.</li>  <li>The Apple ecosystem also stands to get more intertwined with a potential Apple Car and AR/VR plays.</li> </ul> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/404c4a2883110ed556fd9700c5cffb83\" tg-width=\"1536\" tg-height=\"1024\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>CatLane/iStock Unreleased via Getty Images</span></p><p><blockquote><ul><li>凭借315B美元的授权股票回购和0.6%的收益率，苹果仅通过股东友好做法就应该获得4.3%的回报。</li><li>此外，该公司在可穿戴设备和服务方面仍将出现两位数的增长，即使iPhone稍微放缓。</li><li>苹果生态系统也将与潜在的苹果汽车和AR/VR游戏更加紧密地交织在一起。</li></ul><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>CatLane/iStock未通过Getty Images发布</span></p></blockquote></p><p> At an almost $3T market cap, I am still a holder of Apple (AAPL). While I absolutely wish I would have bought more of this powerhouse in years past, I've made do with incremental gains from dividend reinvestment.</p><p><blockquote>虽然市值接近3T美元，但我仍然是苹果(AAPL)的持有者。虽然我绝对希望在过去几年里购买更多这家巨头的股票，但我还是通过股息再投资获得了增量收益。</blockquote></p><p> The news cycle would have you believe that this behemoth has head-winds galore, and that the downfall could come any day now. With limited risk and potential galore, is the company worth buying today?</p><p><blockquote>新闻周期会让你相信这个庞然大物有很多阻力，垮台随时都可能到来。由于风险有限且潜力巨大，该公司今天值得购买吗？</blockquote></p><p> <b>Limited Risk</b></p><p><blockquote><b>风险有限</b></blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1fe4e9d4f4aca197052840240959df43\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"831\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Image: Forbes magazine cover, 2007</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>图片：福布斯杂志封面，2007年</span></p></blockquote></p><p> I am familiar with cellphone manufacturers of days past. Nokia, for example, used to be the titan of industry. It was thought to be untouchable and then came the iPhone. I mean, just look at the Forbes cover above, \"can anyone catch the cell phone king?\"</p><p><blockquote>我熟悉过去的手机制造商。例如，诺基亚曾经是工业巨头。它被认为是碰不得的，然后出现了iPhone。我的意思是，看看上面的福布斯封面，“有人能抓住手机大王吗？”</blockquote></p><p> That cover hit news stands on November 12, 2007, a few months after the iPhone had made its debut. The straw that broke Nokia's back, and the feature which gives Apple a moat wider than Apple Park today, The App Store launched in mid-2008.</p><p><blockquote>2007年11月12日，也就是iPhone首次亮相几个月后，这个封面登上了新闻站。压垮诺基亚的最后一根稻草，也是让苹果拥有比苹果公园更宽的护城河的功能，2008年年中推出的App Store。</blockquote></p><p> The App Store, as simple as it may seem, gave Apple the keys to the kingdom. Rather than be limited to the few apps that came on your Nokia device, you could use one of the thousands of apps sold by third-party developers on the iPhone. This was the beginning of a world-beating ecosystem.</p><p><blockquote>App Store看似简单，却给了苹果通往王国的钥匙。你可以在iPhone上使用第三方开发者销售的数千款应用，而不是局限于诺基亚设备上的几款应用。这是一个世界一流生态系统的开始。</blockquote></p><p> Today, Apple's ecosystem has grown in a significant way. The growth of that ecosystem means that Apple \"fanboys\" would have to spend thousands of dollars, or work through significant inconveniences to switch.</p><p><blockquote>今天，苹果的生态系统已经有了显著的发展。这个生态系统的增长意味着苹果的“粉丝”将不得不花费数千美元，或者克服巨大的不便来转换。</blockquote></p><p> Consider the user that has subscriptions to several apps, Air Pods, an Apple Watch, iPhone, iPad, and perhaps a MacBook. That person is not an outlier. If they consider switching to Android they'll have to cancel those several apps, throw their Apple Watch out, replace the AirPods, and would lose lots of great tie-in messaging functionality across the iPad and MacBook.</p><p><blockquote>考虑一下订阅了几个应用程序、Air Pods、苹果手表、iPhone、iPad，也许还有MacBook的用户。那个人不是局外人。如果他们考虑切换到Android，他们将不得不取消这几个应用程序，扔掉他们的苹果手表，更换AirPods，并将失去iPad和MacBook上许多出色的搭售消息功能。</blockquote></p><p> First-world problems, absolutely. The tie-in, however, is real. Apple make world-class products that users love. They get caught up in all the added accessories which deliver a great experience and then they are customers for life.</p><p><blockquote>绝对是第一世界的问题。然而，这种联系是真实的。苹果制造用户喜爱的世界级产品。他们被所有提供良好体验的附加配件所吸引，然后他们就成了终身顾客。</blockquote></p><p> Apple stock, for all intents and purposes, is a better place to keep your money than cash because of this lack of risk. Should something start to topple this house of cards, it wouldn't happen overnight, and it certainly won't happen as rapidly as it happened to Nokia because of the switching costs Apple has built up.</p><p><blockquote>无论出于何种意图和目的，苹果股票都是比现金更好的存放资金的地方，因为它缺乏风险。如果有什么事情开始推翻这座纸牌屋，它不会在一夜之间发生，而且肯定不会像诺基亚那样迅速发生，因为苹果已经积累了转换成本。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Enviable Metrics</b></p><p><blockquote><b>令人羡慕的指标</b></blockquote></p><p> Despite running up against the law of large numbers, Apple continues to look stellar when considering a number of different metrics.</p><p><blockquote>尽管违反了大数定律，但在考虑许多不同的指标时，苹果仍然看起来很出色。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/08f0199dd5d3c8dade8af08d884a5459\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"300\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Image: Apple's debt per 10-K (Page 45)</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>图片：苹果每10-K的债务（第45页）</span></p></blockquote></p><p> The worst metric, in my opinion, Apple has is a 1.7 debt-to-equity ratio. However, on that figure, my mind may be stuck in a good days of positive interest rates. Much of Apple's $109B of debt is at a negligible (0.03-2%) interest rate. Higher end servicing costs sit a hair below 5%, but this makes up a minority of Apple's debt&nbsp;per the company's 10-K filings.</p><p><blockquote>在我看来，苹果最差的指标是1.7的债务股本比率。然而，在这个数字上，我的思绪可能会停留在正利率的好日子里。苹果109B美元债务的大部分利率可以忽略不计（0.03-2%）。高端服务成本略低于5%，但根据该公司的10-K文件，这仅占苹果债务的一小部分。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/547e6241dab1a7aef3e649fb0f10d5ff\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"417\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Data by YCharts</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>数据来自YCharts</span></p></blockquote></p><p> All of that money did not go into internal projects, however, it went to share buybacks. Perhaps no company epitomizes share buybacks like Apple has over the last decade. The company has retired hundreds of billions of dollars' worth of stock to shareholders benefit, and it continues to do so today.</p><p><blockquote>所有这些资金并没有用于内部项目，而是用于股票回购。也许没有一家公司能像苹果那样体现过去十年的股票回购。为了股东利益，该公司已经退役了价值数千亿美元的股票，并且至今仍在继续这样做。</blockquote></p><p> These share buybacks are why Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.B) now owns 5.5% of Apple. Back when many lauded Buffett for being late to the Apple train, he has proven his conviction worthwhile and helped an already massive Berkshire portfolio continue to beat the market with this high concentration investment.</p><p><blockquote>这些股票回购是Berkshire Hathaway(BRK.B)现在拥有苹果5.5%股份的原因。当许多人称赞巴菲特错过了苹果的火车时，巴菲特已经证明了他的信念是值得的，并通过这种高度集中的投资帮助已经庞大的伯克希尔投资组合继续跑赢市场。</blockquote></p><p> Buffett aside, Apple does excel in several metrics one should be looking for when investing in high-quality stocks. Return on equity here sits at an eye-popping 140% due to a pandemic induced expansion in net income.</p><p><blockquote>撇开巴菲特不谈，苹果确实在投资优质股票时应该寻找的几个指标上表现出色。由于大流行导致净利润扩张，股本回报率达到了令人瞠目结舌的140%。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/af2a898072faa8c46eeaa734222ff059\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"417\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Data by YCharts</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>数据来自YCharts</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Given the amount of debt, return on invested capital, likely, is the better metric to take a look at here. Apple's ROIC has been consistently over the 20% mark, which is a sign of a fantastic business.</p><p><blockquote>考虑到债务金额，投资资本回报率可能是更好的指标。苹果的投资回报率一直超过20%，这是一家出色业务的标志。</blockquote></p><p> Oh, and it probably goes without mentioning, but this business is cash rich. Apple, as of its last report, has $35B in cash on hand and $155B in marketable securities (a mix of current and non-current). With $190B in capital that the company can still deploy, Apple is certainly in an enviable position.</p><p><blockquote>哦，这可能是不言而喻的，但这项业务现金充裕。截至上次报告，苹果手头有350亿美元现金和1550亿美元有价证券（流动和非流动的组合）。由于该公司仍可部署1900亿美元的资本，苹果无疑处于令人羡慕的地位。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Valuation: Rich</b></p><p><blockquote><b>估值：丰富</b></blockquote></p><p> Those metrics are not unknown, but they are incredible. It's no surprise that Apple will likely cross $3T market cap in the next year or so, but is the company worth buying at these high levels?</p><p><blockquote>这些指标并非未知，但却令人难以置信。毫不奇怪，苹果的市值可能会在未来一年左右突破3T美元，但该公司值得在如此高的水平上买入吗？</blockquote></p><p> As mentioned above, I view Apple as an almost cash like position. In a world of inflation, Apple has the balance sheet to carry it through, it has significant pricing power, and it has exceptionally high margins on its products to be able to weather the storm. Would you rather your money lose 5% of its buying power per year, or grow in an American titan like Apple?</p><p><blockquote>如上所述，我认为苹果几乎是现金头寸。在通货膨胀的世界里，苹果拥有能够承受通货膨胀的资产负债表，拥有强大的定价权，并且其产品利润率极高，能够渡过难关。你愿意你的钱每年失去5%的购买力，还是愿意在像苹果这样的美国巨头中增长？</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/159a160cc869ef1cc00bd4eb8db7bd93\" tg-width=\"1280\" tg-height=\"720\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Image: A mockup VR headset via BGR</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>图片：来自BGR的VR耳机模型</span></p></blockquote></p><p> A valuation of Apple also has to include the potential for an Apple Car, or the AR/VR headsets that will be with us within the next 18-months. These types of projects have been kept well under wraps, but considering the valuations of EV manufacturers like Tesla (TSLA) and Rivian (RIVN), the market will reward Apple rather richly for a well-executed product.</p><p><blockquote>对苹果的估值还必须包括苹果汽车的潜力，或者将在未来18个月内出现的AR/VR耳机。这些类型的项目一直处于保密状态，但考虑到特斯拉（TSLA）和Rivian（RIVN）等电动汽车制造商的估值，市场将对苹果执行良好的产品给予相当丰厚的奖励。</blockquote></p><p> An Apple car with deep iOS integration,as is speculated, would further drive the ecosystem flywheel. In fact, it would take that flywheel to unimaginable levels. Imagine trying to leave an ecosystem where you have to replace a $50K (and I'm probably being cheap) car, a phone, a computer... it's quite the lock in.</p><p><blockquote>据推测，深度集成iOS的苹果汽车将进一步推动生态系统飞轮。事实上，它会将飞轮提升到难以想象的水平。想象一下，试图离开一个生态系统，在这个生态系统中，你必须更换一辆5万美元（我可能很便宜）的汽车、一部电话、一台电脑...这是相当锁定。</blockquote></p><p> Taking AR/VR into account, one would have to consider that AR could be a cannibalizing force for the iPhone. If one can see all they need through lenses and control those lenses through gestures or the Apple Watch, Apple could cannibalize the phone market.</p><p><blockquote>考虑到AR/VR，人们不得不考虑AR可能会成为iPhone的蚕食力量。如果人们可以通过镜头看到他们需要的一切，并通过手势或苹果手表控制这些镜头，苹果可能会蚕食手机市场。</blockquote></p><p> That, however, is a good thing. Apple could price a novel item like AR glasses with higher margins than a phone. Fans and tech enthusiasts would pay that early adopter price and others would soon follow suit if the product lives up to the hype. It gets Apple out of the \"$1,000 for a phone\" line of thinking.</p><p><blockquote>然而，这是一件好事。苹果可以以比手机更高的利润率为AR眼镜等新颖产品定价。粉丝和技术爱好者将支付早期采用者的价格，如果产品不负众望，其他人很快就会效仿。它让苹果摆脱了“1000美元买一部手机”的思路。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/88a008b34566e3309b095ad284807d12\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"417\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Data by YCharts</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>数据来自YCharts</span></p></blockquote></p><p> All this to say, Apple's rich valuation today is a worthy one. At a PE of ~29, it's hardly extortionate, but it is outside of Apple's average over the last five years.</p><p><blockquote>综上所述，苹果今天的丰厚估值是当之无愧的。市盈率约为29，算不上过高，但超出了苹果过去五年的平均水平。</blockquote></p><p> The ecosystem, one that ties its customers in for life, is where the value lies here and Apple has plans to expand that with vehicles and wearables. Even at a PE of 29, I believe this to be a secure long-term investment that will pay investors a dividend, albeit small, along the way while continuing to retire billions of dollars in stock ($315B authorized ~10%).</p><p><blockquote>这个将客户终身联系在一起的生态系统是其价值所在，苹果计划通过车辆和可穿戴设备来扩展这一生态系统。即使市盈率为29，我相信这也是一项安全的长期投资，它将向投资者支付股息，尽管很小，同时继续收回数十亿美元的股票（315B美元授权约10%）。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Addressing The Risks</b></p><p><blockquote><b>应对风险</b></blockquote></p><p> Fear and inflation. Fear is the largest and most significant risk that Apple faces. Buyers told that bad times are coming tend to zip up their pocketbooks. Buyers who have to spend 10% more on groceries suddenly don't have enough to buy the latest iPhone.</p><p><blockquote>恐惧和通货膨胀。恐惧是苹果面临的最大、最重大的风险。被告知糟糕时期即将到来的买家往往会收紧钱包。不得不在食品杂货上多花10%的购物者突然没有足够的钱购买最新的iPhone。</blockquote></p><p> These are external concerns that Apple has little control over. The company has, over the years, introduced buy-now-pay-later and subscription programs that help buyers get the goods they want at an affordable monthly price, and, as discussed, Apple has substantial margins that it could use to overcome significant headwinds in this space.</p><p><blockquote>这些都是苹果几乎无法控制的外部担忧。多年来，该公司推出了先买后付和订阅计划，帮助买家以可承受的每月价格获得他们想要的商品，而且正如所讨论的，苹果拥有可观的利润，可以用来克服重大阻力在这个领域。</blockquote></p><p> Execution is another risk Apple faces, especially as we look to these \"futuristic\" products. A self-driving car could be worth trillions of dollars in lifetime revenues, or it could be a dud upon release that never gets full approval to operate on the streets. Likewise, an AR headset that no one wants to be seen wearing, or that proves difficult to wear through the day, could be a dead-on-arrival product.</p><p><blockquote>执行力是苹果面临的另一个风险，尤其是当我们关注这些“未来”产品时。一辆自动驾驶汽车的终身收入可能价值数万亿美元，也可能在发布后成为一个哑弹，永远不会获得在街道上运行的完全批准。同样，没有人想被看到佩戴的AR耳机，或者被证明很难全天佩戴的AR耳机，可能是一个到货就死的产品。</blockquote></p><p> Given the nature of these two products and the secrecy surrounding their development, one cannot truly assign a real risk rating to them. They're just things to be aware of. Apple does have a history of great execution (MacBook keyboard and Touch Bar aside), however, so an investor should feel at least somewhat comfortable that the company will put its best foot forward.</p><p><blockquote>鉴于这两种产品的性质及其开发的保密性，人们无法真正为它们分配真正的风险评级。它们只是需要注意的事情。然而，苹果确实有着出色执行力的历史（MacBook键盘和Touch Bar除外），因此投资者至少应该对该公司将全力以赴感到有些放心。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Final Thoughts</b></p><p><blockquote><b>最后的想法</b></blockquote></p><p></p><p> At a valuation nearing $3T one would assume there isn't much room left to run in Apple, but investors still stand to beat the overall market in this name thanks to excellent capital allocation.</p><p><blockquote>在估值接近3T美元的情况下，人们会认为苹果已经没有太多的运行空间了，但由于出色的资本配置，投资者仍然能够以这个名义击败整体市场。</blockquote></p><p> Apple has $315B in authorized buybacks and returns some $14.5B in dividends each year. Apple will likely buyback close to $100B in stock during its 2022 fiscal year which, alone, represents a 3.7% return on today's prices. Combined with a dividend yield of 0.6%, investors will make 4.3% on this name through shareholder friendly practices alone.</p><p><blockquote>苹果拥有$315B的授权回购，每年返还约$14.5 B的股息。苹果可能会在2022财年回购近1000亿美元的股票，仅此一项就相当于今天价格的3.7%的回报率。加上0.6%的股息收益率，仅通过股东友好的做法，投资者就可以在这个名字上获得4.3%的收益。</blockquote></p><p> Those numbers will compound too, another $100B in 2023, $100B in 2024, it all adds up. That $300B is all authorized too.</p><p><blockquote>这些数字也会复合，2023年再增加1000亿美元，2024年再增加1000亿美元，所有这些加起来。那300B美元也全部获得授权。</blockquote></p><p> Along with those buybacks and dividends, investors are buying into a company that, last year, defied laws of large numbers and grew its top-line at 33%. While unlikely this year, I still expect that the wearables and services divisions will grow at double digits which will allow Apple to see high single-digit revenue growth through the coming 3-5 years.</p><p><blockquote>除了这些回购和股息之外，投资者还买入了一家去年无视大数定律、营收增长33%的公司。虽然今年不太可能，但我仍然预计可穿戴设备和服务部门将以两位数的速度增长，这将使苹果在未来3-5年内实现高个位数的收入增长。</blockquote></p><p> Those with a bearish view on Apple act as though this juggernaut will vanish overnight, but that's simply not true. Sure, you're unlikely to pull down 30%+ annual returns going forward, but if you're looking for a high-quality stable business that can beat the market little-by-little, Apple is a great horse (or car) to back.</p><p><blockquote>那些看跌苹果的人表现得好像这个庞然大物会在一夜之间消失，但事实并非如此。当然，未来你不太可能降低30%以上的年回报率，但如果你正在寻找一家能够一点一点击败市场的高质量稳定业务，苹果是一匹很棒的马（或汽车）回来。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4473801-apple-a-true-never-sell-position\">Seeking Alpha</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4473801-apple-a-true-never-sell-position","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1162682713","content_text":"Summary\n\nWith $315B in authorized share buybacks and a 0.6% yield, Apple should return 4.3% on shareholder-friendly practices alone.\nIn addition, the company will still see double-digit growth in wearables and services, even if iPhone slows down a little.\nThe Apple ecosystem also stands to get more intertwined with a potential Apple Car and AR/VR plays.\n\nCatLane/iStock Unreleased via Getty Images\nAt an almost $3T market cap, I am still a holder of Apple (AAPL). While I absolutely wish I would have bought more of this powerhouse in years past, I've made do with incremental gains from dividend reinvestment.\nThe news cycle would have you believe that this behemoth has head-winds galore, and that the downfall could come any day now. With limited risk and potential galore, is the company worth buying today?\nLimited Risk\nImage: Forbes magazine cover, 2007\nI am familiar with cellphone manufacturers of days past. Nokia, for example, used to be the titan of industry. It was thought to be untouchable and then came the iPhone. I mean, just look at the Forbes cover above, \"can anyone catch the cell phone king?\"\nThat cover hit news stands on November 12, 2007, a few months after the iPhone had made its debut. The straw that broke Nokia's back, and the feature which gives Apple a moat wider than Apple Park today, The App Store launched in mid-2008.\nThe App Store, as simple as it may seem, gave Apple the keys to the kingdom. Rather than be limited to the few apps that came on your Nokia device, you could use one of the thousands of apps sold by third-party developers on the iPhone. This was the beginning of a world-beating ecosystem.\nToday, Apple's ecosystem has grown in a significant way. The growth of that ecosystem means that Apple \"fanboys\" would have to spend thousands of dollars, or work through significant inconveniences to switch.\nConsider the user that has subscriptions to several apps, Air Pods, an Apple Watch, iPhone, iPad, and perhaps a MacBook. That person is not an outlier. If they consider switching to Android they'll have to cancel those several apps, throw their Apple Watch out, replace the AirPods, and would lose lots of great tie-in messaging functionality across the iPad and MacBook.\nFirst-world problems, absolutely. The tie-in, however, is real. Apple make world-class products that users love. They get caught up in all the added accessories which deliver a great experience and then they are customers for life.\nApple stock, for all intents and purposes, is a better place to keep your money than cash because of this lack of risk. Should something start to topple this house of cards, it wouldn't happen overnight, and it certainly won't happen as rapidly as it happened to Nokia because of the switching costs Apple has built up.\nEnviable Metrics\nDespite running up against the law of large numbers, Apple continues to look stellar when considering a number of different metrics.\nImage: Apple's debt per 10-K (Page 45)\nThe worst metric, in my opinion, Apple has is a 1.7 debt-to-equity ratio. However, on that figure, my mind may be stuck in a good days of positive interest rates. Much of Apple's $109B of debt is at a negligible (0.03-2%) interest rate. Higher end servicing costs sit a hair below 5%, but this makes up a minority of Apple's debt per the company's 10-K filings.\nData by YCharts\nAll of that money did not go into internal projects, however, it went to share buybacks. Perhaps no company epitomizes share buybacks like Apple has over the last decade. The company has retired hundreds of billions of dollars' worth of stock to shareholders benefit, and it continues to do so today.\nThese share buybacks are why Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.B) now owns 5.5% of Apple. Back when many lauded Buffett for being late to the Apple train, he has proven his conviction worthwhile and helped an already massive Berkshire portfolio continue to beat the market with this high concentration investment.\nBuffett aside, Apple does excel in several metrics one should be looking for when investing in high-quality stocks. Return on equity here sits at an eye-popping 140% due to a pandemic induced expansion in net income.\nData by YCharts\nGiven the amount of debt, return on invested capital, likely, is the better metric to take a look at here. Apple's ROIC has been consistently over the 20% mark, which is a sign of a fantastic business.\nOh, and it probably goes without mentioning, but this business is cash rich. Apple, as of its last report, has $35B in cash on hand and $155B in marketable securities (a mix of current and non-current). With $190B in capital that the company can still deploy, Apple is certainly in an enviable position.\nValuation: Rich\nThose metrics are not unknown, but they are incredible. It's no surprise that Apple will likely cross $3T market cap in the next year or so, but is the company worth buying at these high levels?\nAs mentioned above, I view Apple as an almost cash like position. In a world of inflation, Apple has the balance sheet to carry it through, it has significant pricing power, and it has exceptionally high margins on its products to be able to weather the storm. Would you rather your money lose 5% of its buying power per year, or grow in an American titan like Apple?\nImage: A mockup VR headset via BGR\nA valuation of Apple also has to include the potential for an Apple Car, or the AR/VR headsets that will be with us within the next 18-months. These types of projects have been kept well under wraps, but considering the valuations of EV manufacturers like Tesla (TSLA) and Rivian (RIVN), the market will reward Apple rather richly for a well-executed product.\nAn Apple car with deep iOS integration,as is speculated, would further drive the ecosystem flywheel. In fact, it would take that flywheel to unimaginable levels. Imagine trying to leave an ecosystem where you have to replace a $50K (and I'm probably being cheap) car, a phone, a computer... it's quite the lock in.\nTaking AR/VR into account, one would have to consider that AR could be a cannibalizing force for the iPhone. If one can see all they need through lenses and control those lenses through gestures or the Apple Watch, Apple could cannibalize the phone market.\nThat, however, is a good thing. Apple could price a novel item like AR glasses with higher margins than a phone. Fans and tech enthusiasts would pay that early adopter price and others would soon follow suit if the product lives up to the hype. It gets Apple out of the \"$1,000 for a phone\" line of thinking.\nData by YCharts\nAll this to say, Apple's rich valuation today is a worthy one. At a PE of ~29, it's hardly extortionate, but it is outside of Apple's average over the last five years.\nThe ecosystem, one that ties its customers in for life, is where the value lies here and Apple has plans to expand that with vehicles and wearables. Even at a PE of 29, I believe this to be a secure long-term investment that will pay investors a dividend, albeit small, along the way while continuing to retire billions of dollars in stock ($315B authorized ~10%).\nAddressing The Risks\nFear and inflation. Fear is the largest and most significant risk that Apple faces. Buyers told that bad times are coming tend to zip up their pocketbooks. Buyers who have to spend 10% more on groceries suddenly don't have enough to buy the latest iPhone.\nThese are external concerns that Apple has little control over. The company has, over the years, introduced buy-now-pay-later and subscription programs that help buyers get the goods they want at an affordable monthly price, and, as discussed, Apple has substantial margins that it could use to overcome significant headwinds in this space.\nExecution is another risk Apple faces, especially as we look to these \"futuristic\" products. A self-driving car could be worth trillions of dollars in lifetime revenues, or it could be a dud upon release that never gets full approval to operate on the streets. Likewise, an AR headset that no one wants to be seen wearing, or that proves difficult to wear through the day, could be a dead-on-arrival product.\nGiven the nature of these two products and the secrecy surrounding their development, one cannot truly assign a real risk rating to them. They're just things to be aware of. Apple does have a history of great execution (MacBook keyboard and Touch Bar aside), however, so an investor should feel at least somewhat comfortable that the company will put its best foot forward.\nFinal Thoughts\nAt a valuation nearing $3T one would assume there isn't much room left to run in Apple, but investors still stand to beat the overall market in this name thanks to excellent capital allocation.\nApple has $315B in authorized buybacks and returns some $14.5B in dividends each year. Apple will likely buyback close to $100B in stock during its 2022 fiscal year which, alone, represents a 3.7% return on today's prices. Combined with a dividend yield of 0.6%, investors will make 4.3% on this name through shareholder friendly practices alone.\nThose numbers will compound too, another $100B in 2023, $100B in 2024, it all adds up. That $300B is all authorized too.\nAlong with those buybacks and dividends, investors are buying into a company that, last year, defied laws of large numbers and grew its top-line at 33%. While unlikely this year, I still expect that the wearables and services divisions will grow at double digits which will allow Apple to see high single-digit revenue growth through the coming 3-5 years.\nThose with a bearish view on Apple act as though this juggernaut will vanish overnight, but that's simply not true. Sure, you're unlikely to pull down 30%+ annual returns going forward, but if you're looking for a high-quality stable business that can beat the market little-by-little, Apple is a great horse (or car) to back.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AAPL":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":980,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":601330004,"gmtCreate":1638490023195,"gmtModify":1638490023339,"author":{"id":"3581550518409224","authorId":"3581550518409224","name":"superduper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/04a121c70123b41a7011f9ec45096505","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581550518409224","authorIdStr":"3581550518409224"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Woohoo!&nbsp;","listText":"Woohoo!&nbsp;","text":"Woohoo!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/601330004","repostId":"2188580548","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":861,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":603402699,"gmtCreate":1638436003694,"gmtModify":1638436004034,"author":{"id":"3581550518409224","authorId":"3581550518409224","name":"superduper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/04a121c70123b41a7011f9ec45096505","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3581550518409224","authorIdStr":"3581550518409224"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/603402699","repostId":"1184715609","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1184715609","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1638435754,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1184715609?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-02 17:02","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple stock slid more than 1% in premarket trading<blockquote>苹果股价在盘前交易中下跌超过1%</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1184715609","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Apple stock slid more than 1% in premarket trading as the company told suppliers iPhone demand had s","content":"<p>Apple stock slid more&nbsp;than&nbsp;1% in premarket trading&nbsp;as&nbsp;the&nbsp;company&nbsp;told suppliers iPhone demand had slowed as holidays near.</p><p><blockquote>苹果股价在盘前交易中下跌超过1%，该公司告诉供应商，随着假期临近，iPhone需求放缓。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4998e48aaef0f93a3524641e871e1368\" tg-width=\"853\" tg-height=\"618\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> Apple Inc., suffering from a global supply crunch, is now confronting a different problem: slowing demand.</p><p><blockquote>饱受全球供应紧缩之苦的苹果公司现在面临着一个不同的问题：需求放缓。</blockquote></p><p> The company has told its component suppliers that demand for the iPhone 13 lineup has weakened, people familiar with the matter said, signaling that some consumers have decided against trying to get the hard-to-find item.</p><p><blockquote>知情人士称，该公司已告诉其零部件供应商，对iPhone 13系列产品的需求已经减弱，这表明一些消费者已经决定不尝试购买这款难以找到的产品。</blockquote></p><p> Already, Apple&nbsp;had cut&nbsp;its iPhone 13 production goal for this year by as many as 10 million units, down from a target of 90 million, because of a lack of parts, Bloomberg News reported. But the hope was to make up much of that shortfall next year -- when supply is expected to improve. The company is now informing its vendors that those orders may not materialize, according to the people, who asked not to be identified because the discussions are private.</p><p><blockquote>据彭博社报道，由于缺乏零部件，苹果已经将今年的iPhone 13产量目标从9000万部削减了多达1000万部。但希望明年当供应有望改善时，能够弥补大部分缺口。据知情人士透露，该公司目前正在通知其供应商，这些订单可能不会实现。由于讨论是私下进行的，这些人士要求匿名。</blockquote></p><p> The company is still on track for a record holiday season, with analysts projecting a sales increase of 6% to $117.9 billion in the final three months of the calendar year. But it won’t be the blockbuster quarter that Apple -- and Wall Street -- had originally envisioned. Shortages and delivery delays have frustrated many consumers. And with inflation and the omicron variant bringing fresh concerns to pandemic-weary shoppers, they may forego some purchases.</p><p><blockquote>该公司仍有望迎来创纪录的假期，分析师预计今年最后三个月的销售额将增长6%，达到1,179亿美元。但这不会是苹果和华尔街最初设想的一鸣惊人的季度。短缺和交货延迟让许多消费者感到沮丧。随着通货膨胀和奥密克戎变种给厌倦了流行病的购物者带来新的担忧，他们可能会放弃一些购买。</blockquote></p><p> That could mean skipping the iPhone 13 altogether and waiting to upgrade next year, when its successor comes out. The current lineup, which starts at $799 for the standard model and $999 for the Pro, is considered a modest update from the iPhone 12, which had a whole new design. Bigger changes are expected for the 2022 model, giving some shoppers a reason to wait.</p><p><blockquote>这可能意味着完全跳过iPhone 13，等待明年其继任者问世时进行升级。目前的产品线标准机型起价为799美元，Pro机型起价为999美元，被认为是iPhone 12的适度更新，iPhone 12采用了全新的设计。预计2022年的车型将会有更大的变化，这让一些购物者有理由等待。</blockquote></p><p> Apple, based in Cupertino, California, declined to comment.</p><p><blockquote>总部位于加州库比蒂诺的苹果拒绝置评。</blockquote></p><p> Apple suppliers across Asia extended their declines after Bloomberg’s report. In South Korea,LG Innotek Co.&nbsp;slid 11%, while Hong Kong-listed AAC Technologies Holdings Inc. fell as much as 4.8% and Japan’s&nbsp;TDK Corp. dropped as much as 4.8%.</p><p><blockquote>彭博社发布报告后，亚洲各地的苹果供应商延续了跌势。在韩国，LG Innotek Co.下跌11%，香港上市公司瑞声科技控股公司下跌4.8%，日本TDK Corp.下跌4.8%。</blockquote></p><p> The iPhone is Apple’s flagship product, accounting for about half of its $365.8 billion in revenue during the last fiscal year, and rolling out upgrades is a delicate dance. With the iPhone 13, Apple and wireless carriers unleashed aggressive rebate programs to spur purchases. In some cases, owners of an iPhone 12 or earlier models were able to buy an iPhone 13 at little to no cost. While discount programs are still available, some offer less dramatic savings than when new models first went on sale.</p><p><blockquote>iPhone是苹果的旗舰产品，约占其上一财年3658亿美元收入的一半，推出升级是一场微妙的舞蹈。随着iPhone 13的推出，苹果和无线运营商推出了积极的折扣计划来刺激购买。在某些情况下，iPhone 12或更早型号的用户能够以很少甚至没有成本购买iPhone 13。虽然折扣计划仍然有效，但有些计划提供的节省不如新型号首次上市时那么多。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/473a40069576053da8e3b091905ed20d\" tg-width=\"959\" tg-height=\"419\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> During Apple’s last earnings call in October, Chief Executive Officer Tim Cook said that demand for new products was “very robust” -- fueled by interest in the latest iPhones, iPads and other devices -- and that the company was on track for a record holiday quarter. It had sales of $111.4 billion in the year-earlier period.</p><p><blockquote>在苹果10月份的上一次财报看涨期权上，首席执行官蒂姆·库克(Tim Cook)表示，在对最新iPhone、iPad和其他设备的兴趣推动下，对新产品的需求“非常强劲”，并且该公司有望实现创纪录的假期季度。去年同期销售额为1114亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> He pointed to supply constraints as the company’s biggest challenge. Cook predicted that the struggle to get enough components, particularly chips, would cost Apple more than $6 billion in revenue during the holiday quarter.</p><p><blockquote>他指出供应限制是该公司最大的挑战。Cook预测，难以获得足够的零部件，尤其是芯片，将使苹果在假日季度损失超过60亿美元的收入。</blockquote></p><p> The constraints have hurt Apple partners as well. Sales for the company’s main chip supplier,Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., weakened recently, with October revenue falling 12% from the previous month to NT$134.5 billion ($4.8 billion).</p><p><blockquote>这些限制也伤害了苹果的合作伙伴。该公司主要芯片供应商台积电公司的销售最近疲软，10月份收入环比下降12%，至1345亿新台币（48亿美元）。</blockquote></p><p> Last month, Apple’s main iPhone assembler,Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., predicted that its business willshrinkthis quarter from a year earlier -- caused by declines in consumer electronics and computing -- as it continues to suffer from the chip shortage. On Oct. 24,IQE Plc&nbsp;saw its shares fall 24% after it&nbsp;warned of&nbsp;softening smartphone demand, although the semiconductor company didn’t name any particular customer.</p><p><blockquote>上个月，苹果主要的iPhone组装商鸿海精密工业股份有限公司预测，由于消费电子和计算行业的下滑，该公司本季度的业务将同比萎缩，因为该公司继续遭受芯片短缺的困扰。10月24日，IQE Plc警告智能手机需求疲软后，其股价下跌24%，但这家半导体公司没有透露任何特定客户的名字。</blockquote></p><p> And there’s now more strain on shoppers’ pocketbooks. U.S. consumer prices&nbsp;rose&nbsp;last month at the fastest annual pace since 1990. Surging&nbsp;costs&nbsp;for food, gas and housing are eroding purchasing power despite stronger wage growth.</p><p><blockquote>现在购物者的钱包承受了更大的压力。美国消费者价格上个月以1990年以来最快的年度速度上涨。尽管工资增长强劲，但食品、天然气和住房成本的飙升正在侵蚀购买力。</blockquote></p><p> Meanwhile, the iPhone 13 isn’t as hard to get as it once was. Apple shoppers in the U.S. had been waiting about a month for the much-prized Pro model to be delivered. Now wait times are down to two weeks or less.</p><p><blockquote>与此同时，iPhone 13不像以前那么难买到了。美国的苹果购物者已经等待了大约一个月的时间，等待备受推崇的Pro车型的交付。现在等待时间缩短到两周或更短。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple stock slid more than 1% in premarket trading<blockquote>苹果股价在盘前交易中下跌超过1%</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple stock slid more than 1% in premarket trading<blockquote>苹果股价在盘前交易中下跌超过1%</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-12-02 17:02</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Apple stock slid more&nbsp;than&nbsp;1% in premarket trading&nbsp;as&nbsp;the&nbsp;company&nbsp;told suppliers iPhone demand had slowed as holidays near.</p><p><blockquote>苹果股价在盘前交易中下跌超过1%，该公司告诉供应商，随着假期临近，iPhone需求放缓。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4998e48aaef0f93a3524641e871e1368\" tg-width=\"853\" tg-height=\"618\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> Apple Inc., suffering from a global supply crunch, is now confronting a different problem: slowing demand.</p><p><blockquote>饱受全球供应紧缩之苦的苹果公司现在面临着一个不同的问题：需求放缓。</blockquote></p><p> The company has told its component suppliers that demand for the iPhone 13 lineup has weakened, people familiar with the matter said, signaling that some consumers have decided against trying to get the hard-to-find item.</p><p><blockquote>知情人士称，该公司已告诉其零部件供应商，对iPhone 13系列产品的需求已经减弱，这表明一些消费者已经决定不尝试购买这款难以找到的产品。</blockquote></p><p> Already, Apple&nbsp;had cut&nbsp;its iPhone 13 production goal for this year by as many as 10 million units, down from a target of 90 million, because of a lack of parts, Bloomberg News reported. But the hope was to make up much of that shortfall next year -- when supply is expected to improve. The company is now informing its vendors that those orders may not materialize, according to the people, who asked not to be identified because the discussions are private.</p><p><blockquote>据彭博社报道，由于缺乏零部件，苹果已经将今年的iPhone 13产量目标从9000万部削减了多达1000万部。但希望明年当供应有望改善时，能够弥补大部分缺口。据知情人士透露，该公司目前正在通知其供应商，这些订单可能不会实现。由于讨论是私下进行的，这些人士要求匿名。</blockquote></p><p> The company is still on track for a record holiday season, with analysts projecting a sales increase of 6% to $117.9 billion in the final three months of the calendar year. But it won’t be the blockbuster quarter that Apple -- and Wall Street -- had originally envisioned. Shortages and delivery delays have frustrated many consumers. And with inflation and the omicron variant bringing fresh concerns to pandemic-weary shoppers, they may forego some purchases.</p><p><blockquote>该公司仍有望迎来创纪录的假期，分析师预计今年最后三个月的销售额将增长6%，达到1,179亿美元。但这不会是苹果和华尔街最初设想的一鸣惊人的季度。短缺和交货延迟让许多消费者感到沮丧。随着通货膨胀和奥密克戎变种给厌倦了流行病的购物者带来新的担忧，他们可能会放弃一些购买。</blockquote></p><p> That could mean skipping the iPhone 13 altogether and waiting to upgrade next year, when its successor comes out. The current lineup, which starts at $799 for the standard model and $999 for the Pro, is considered a modest update from the iPhone 12, which had a whole new design. Bigger changes are expected for the 2022 model, giving some shoppers a reason to wait.</p><p><blockquote>这可能意味着完全跳过iPhone 13，等待明年其继任者问世时进行升级。目前的产品线标准机型起价为799美元，Pro机型起价为999美元，被认为是iPhone 12的适度更新，iPhone 12采用了全新的设计。预计2022年的车型将会有更大的变化，这让一些购物者有理由等待。</blockquote></p><p> Apple, based in Cupertino, California, declined to comment.</p><p><blockquote>总部位于加州库比蒂诺的苹果拒绝置评。</blockquote></p><p> Apple suppliers across Asia extended their declines after Bloomberg’s report. In South Korea,LG Innotek Co.&nbsp;slid 11%, while Hong Kong-listed AAC Technologies Holdings Inc. fell as much as 4.8% and Japan’s&nbsp;TDK Corp. dropped as much as 4.8%.</p><p><blockquote>彭博社发布报告后，亚洲各地的苹果供应商延续了跌势。在韩国，LG Innotek Co.下跌11%，香港上市公司瑞声科技控股公司下跌4.8%，日本TDK Corp.下跌4.8%。</blockquote></p><p> The iPhone is Apple’s flagship product, accounting for about half of its $365.8 billion in revenue during the last fiscal year, and rolling out upgrades is a delicate dance. With the iPhone 13, Apple and wireless carriers unleashed aggressive rebate programs to spur purchases. In some cases, owners of an iPhone 12 or earlier models were able to buy an iPhone 13 at little to no cost. While discount programs are still available, some offer less dramatic savings than when new models first went on sale.</p><p><blockquote>iPhone是苹果的旗舰产品，约占其上一财年3658亿美元收入的一半，推出升级是一场微妙的舞蹈。随着iPhone 13的推出，苹果和无线运营商推出了积极的折扣计划来刺激购买。在某些情况下，iPhone 12或更早型号的用户能够以很少甚至没有成本购买iPhone 13。虽然折扣计划仍然有效，但有些计划提供的节省不如新型号首次上市时那么多。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/473a40069576053da8e3b091905ed20d\" tg-width=\"959\" tg-height=\"419\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> During Apple’s last earnings call in October, Chief Executive Officer Tim Cook said that demand for new products was “very robust” -- fueled by interest in the latest iPhones, iPads and other devices -- and that the company was on track for a record holiday quarter. It had sales of $111.4 billion in the year-earlier period.</p><p><blockquote>在苹果10月份的上一次财报看涨期权上，首席执行官蒂姆·库克(Tim Cook)表示，在对最新iPhone、iPad和其他设备的兴趣推动下，对新产品的需求“非常强劲”，并且该公司有望实现创纪录的假期季度。去年同期销售额为1114亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> He pointed to supply constraints as the company’s biggest challenge. Cook predicted that the struggle to get enough components, particularly chips, would cost Apple more than $6 billion in revenue during the holiday quarter.</p><p><blockquote>他指出供应限制是该公司最大的挑战。Cook预测，难以获得足够的零部件，尤其是芯片，将使苹果在假日季度损失超过60亿美元的收入。</blockquote></p><p> The constraints have hurt Apple partners as well. Sales for the company’s main chip supplier,Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., weakened recently, with October revenue falling 12% from the previous month to NT$134.5 billion ($4.8 billion).</p><p><blockquote>这些限制也伤害了苹果的合作伙伴。该公司主要芯片供应商台积电公司的销售最近疲软，10月份收入环比下降12%，至1345亿新台币（48亿美元）。</blockquote></p><p> Last month, Apple’s main iPhone assembler,Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., predicted that its business willshrinkthis quarter from a year earlier -- caused by declines in consumer electronics and computing -- as it continues to suffer from the chip shortage. On Oct. 24,IQE Plc&nbsp;saw its shares fall 24% after it&nbsp;warned of&nbsp;softening smartphone demand, although the semiconductor company didn’t name any particular customer.</p><p><blockquote>上个月，苹果主要的iPhone组装商鸿海精密工业股份有限公司预测，由于消费电子和计算行业的下滑，该公司本季度的业务将同比萎缩，因为该公司继续遭受芯片短缺的困扰。10月24日，IQE Plc警告智能手机需求疲软后，其股价下跌24%，但这家半导体公司没有透露任何特定客户的名字。</blockquote></p><p> And there’s now more strain on shoppers’ pocketbooks. U.S. consumer prices&nbsp;rose&nbsp;last month at the fastest annual pace since 1990. Surging&nbsp;costs&nbsp;for food, gas and housing are eroding purchasing power despite stronger wage growth.</p><p><blockquote>现在购物者的钱包承受了更大的压力。美国消费者价格上个月以1990年以来最快的年度速度上涨。尽管工资增长强劲，但食品、天然气和住房成本的飙升正在侵蚀购买力。</blockquote></p><p> Meanwhile, the iPhone 13 isn’t as hard to get as it once was. Apple shoppers in the U.S. had been waiting about a month for the much-prized Pro model to be delivered. Now wait times are down to two weeks or less.</p><p><blockquote>与此同时，iPhone 13不像以前那么难买到了。美国的苹果购物者已经等待了大约一个月的时间，等待备受推崇的Pro车型的交付。现在等待时间缩短到两周或更短。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1184715609","content_text":"Apple stock slid more than 1% in premarket trading as the company told suppliers iPhone demand had slowed as holidays near.\n\nApple Inc., suffering from a global supply crunch, is now confronting a different problem: slowing demand.\nThe company has told its component suppliers that demand for the iPhone 13 lineup has weakened, people familiar with the matter said, signaling that some consumers have decided against trying to get the hard-to-find item.\nAlready, Apple had cut its iPhone 13 production goal for this year by as many as 10 million units, down from a target of 90 million, because of a lack of parts, Bloomberg News reported. But the hope was to make up much of that shortfall next year -- when supply is expected to improve. The company is now informing its vendors that those orders may not materialize, according to the people, who asked not to be identified because the discussions are private.\nThe company is still on track for a record holiday season, with analysts projecting a sales increase of 6% to $117.9 billion in the final three months of the calendar year. But it won’t be the blockbuster quarter that Apple -- and Wall Street -- had originally envisioned. Shortages and delivery delays have frustrated many consumers. And with inflation and the omicron variant bringing fresh concerns to pandemic-weary shoppers, they may forego some purchases.\nThat could mean skipping the iPhone 13 altogether and waiting to upgrade next year, when its successor comes out. The current lineup, which starts at $799 for the standard model and $999 for the Pro, is considered a modest update from the iPhone 12, which had a whole new design. Bigger changes are expected for the 2022 model, giving some shoppers a reason to wait.\nApple, based in Cupertino, California, declined to comment.\nApple suppliers across Asia extended their declines after Bloomberg’s report. In South Korea,LG Innotek Co. slid 11%, while Hong Kong-listed AAC Technologies Holdings Inc. fell as much as 4.8% and Japan’s TDK Corp. dropped as much as 4.8%.\nThe iPhone is Apple’s flagship product, accounting for about half of its $365.8 billion in revenue during the last fiscal year, and rolling out upgrades is a delicate dance. With the iPhone 13, Apple and wireless carriers unleashed aggressive rebate programs to spur purchases. In some cases, owners of an iPhone 12 or earlier models were able to buy an iPhone 13 at little to no cost. While discount programs are still available, some offer less dramatic savings than when new models first went on sale.\n\nDuring Apple’s last earnings call in October, Chief Executive Officer Tim Cook said that demand for new products was “very robust” -- fueled by interest in the latest iPhones, iPads and other devices -- and that the company was on track for a record holiday quarter. It had sales of $111.4 billion in the year-earlier period.\nHe pointed to supply constraints as the company’s biggest challenge. Cook predicted that the struggle to get enough components, particularly chips, would cost Apple more than $6 billion in revenue during the holiday quarter.\nThe constraints have hurt Apple partners as well. Sales for the company’s main chip supplier,Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., weakened recently, with October revenue falling 12% from the previous month to NT$134.5 billion ($4.8 billion).\nLast month, Apple’s main iPhone assembler,Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., predicted that its business willshrinkthis quarter from a year earlier -- caused by declines in consumer electronics and computing -- as it continues to suffer from the chip shortage. On Oct. 24,IQE Plc saw its shares fall 24% after it warned of softening smartphone demand, although the semiconductor company didn’t name any particular customer.\nAnd there’s now more strain on shoppers’ pocketbooks. U.S. consumer prices rose last month at the fastest annual pace since 1990. Surging costs for food, gas and housing are eroding purchasing power despite stronger wage growth.\nMeanwhile, the iPhone 13 isn’t as hard to get as it once was. Apple shoppers in the U.S. had been waiting about a month for the much-prized Pro model to be delivered. Now wait times are down to two weeks or less.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AAPL":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":932,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":878552924,"gmtCreate":1637210814719,"gmtModify":1637210845783,"author":{"id":"3581550518409224","authorId":"3581550518409224","name":"superduper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/04a121c70123b41a7011f9ec45096505","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3581550518409224","idStr":"3581550518409224"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Oh no","listText":"Oh no","text":"Oh no","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":9,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/878552924","repostId":"2184510828","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":378,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":835489958,"gmtCreate":1629731616374,"gmtModify":1631893637917,"author":{"id":"3581550518409224","authorId":"3581550518409224","name":"superduper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/04a121c70123b41a7011f9ec45096505","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3581550518409224","idStr":"3581550518409224"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hi&nbsp;","listText":"Hi&nbsp;","text":"Hi","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":11,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/835489958","repostId":"2161747692","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":502,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":893010960,"gmtCreate":1628220177450,"gmtModify":1633752468461,"author":{"id":"3581550518409224","authorId":"3581550518409224","name":"superduper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/04a121c70123b41a7011f9ec45096505","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3581550518409224","idStr":"3581550518409224"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"When is nio turn","listText":"When is nio turn","text":"When is nio turn","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":9,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/893010960","repostId":"1112842219","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":296,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":850130951,"gmtCreate":1634564073436,"gmtModify":1634564073706,"author":{"id":"3581550518409224","authorId":"3581550518409224","name":"superduper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/04a121c70123b41a7011f9ec45096505","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3581550518409224","idStr":"3581550518409224"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/850130951","repostId":"1185155570","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1185155570","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1634511079,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1185155570?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-18 06:51","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tesla, AT&T, Netflix, ASML, Snap and Other Stocks for Investors to Watch This Week<blockquote>特斯拉、AT&amp;T、Netflix、ASML、Snap等本周值得投资者关注的股票</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1185155570","media":"Barrons","summary":"Seventy-two S&P 500 companies report earnings this week, as third-quarter earnings season ramps up. ","content":"<p>Seventy-two&nbsp;S&amp;P 500&nbsp;companies report earnings this week,&nbsp;as third-quarter earnings season ramps up. Several big U.S. banks got things off to a strong start last week. This week’s earnings highlights&nbsp;will include&nbsp;results from notable companies in telecom, consumer staples, energy, technology, health care, and the airline industry.</p><p><blockquote>随着第三季度财报季的临近，本周有72家标准普尔500指数公司公布了财报。美国几家大型银行上周开局良好。本周的财报亮点将包括电信、必需消费品、能源、科技、医疗保健和航空业著名公司的业绩。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/685ba1e7f4763c12a3c0159fc2469ded\" tg-width=\"1878\" tg-height=\"2461\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> Albertsons and&nbsp;State Street&nbsp;get the ball rolling on Monday.Procter &amp; Gamble,Halliburton,and&nbsp;Johnson &amp; Johnson&nbsp;are Tuesday morning’s highlights, followed by&nbsp;Netflix&nbsp;and&nbsp;United Airlines Holdings&nbsp;after the market closes.</p><p><blockquote>艾伯森(Albertsons)和道富银行(State Street)将于周一启动。宝洁(Procter&amp;Gamble)、哈里伯顿(Halliburton)和强生(Johnson&amp;Johnson)是周二上午的亮点，收盘后紧随其后的是Netflix和联合航空控股(United Airlines Holdings)。</blockquote></p><p> On Wednesday,Verizon Communications,IBM,and Tesla will get the most attention.AT&amp;T, American Airlines Group,Southwest Airlines,and&nbsp;Chipotle Mexican Grill&nbsp;report on Thursday, then&nbsp;American Express,Schlumberger,and&nbsp;Honeywell International&nbsp;close the week on Friday.</p><p><blockquote>周三，Verizon Communications、IBM和特斯拉将受到最多关注。AT&amp;T、美国航空集团、西南航空和Chipotle Mexican Grill将于周四发布报告，然后美国运通、Schlumberger和Honeywell International将于周五收盘。</blockquote></p><p> Economic data highlights this week include the Conference Board’s Leading Economic Index for September on Thursday and&nbsp;IHS Markit’s&nbsp;Manufacturing and Services Purchasing Managers’ indexes for October on Friday. All are seen easing back from their prior months’ levels.</p><p><blockquote>本周经济数据亮点包括周四公布的世界大型企业联合会9月份领先经济指数和周五公布的IHS Markit 10月份制造业和服务业采购经理人指数。所有这些都较前几个月的水平有所回落。</blockquote></p><p> Other releases this week include the Federal Reserve’s most recent Beige Book, describing economic conditions across the U.S., and a pair of September housing-market indicators: The Census Bureau reports new residential construction data on Tuesday and the National Association of Realtors reports existing-home sales on Thursday.</p><p><blockquote>本周发布的其他数据包括美联储最新的褐皮书，描述了美国各地的经济状况，以及两个9月份的房地产市场指标：人口普查局（Census Bureau）周二报告新的住宅建设数据，全国房地产经纪人协会（National Association of Realtors）周四报告现房销售。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Monday 10/18</b></p><p><blockquote><b>星期一10/18</b></blockquote></p><p> <b>The Federal Reserve</b>&nbsp;releases industrial production data for September. Economists are looking for a 0.20% rise after a 0.4% increase in August. Capacity utilization is expected at 76.5% for September, roughly in line with August’s 76.4%.</p><p><blockquote><b>美联储</b>公布9月份工业生产数据。继8月份增长0.4%后，经济学家预计增长0.20%。预计9月份产能利用率为76.5%，与8月份的76.4%大致一致。</blockquote></p><p> Albertsons, Philips, Steel Dynamics, and State Street are among companies releasing quarterly financial results.</p><p><blockquote>艾伯森、飞利浦、Steel Dynamics和道富银行等公司发布了季度财务业绩。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Tuesday 10/19</b></p><p><blockquote><b>星期二10/19</b></blockquote></p><p> <b>The Census Bureau</b> reports new residential construction data for September. Economists forecast a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 1.623 million housing starts, compared with 1.615 million in August.</p><p><blockquote><b>人口普查局</b>报告9月份新住宅建设数据。经济学家预测，经季节调整后的新屋开工年率为162.3万套，8月为161.5万套。</blockquote></p><p> Halliburton, Procter &amp; Gamble, Johnson &amp; Johnson, Synchrony, Travelers, Philip Morris International, Kansas City Southern, WD-40, Interactive Brokers Group, Netflix, ManpowerGroup, Dover, and Canadian National Railway are among companies hosting earnings conference calls.</p><p><blockquote>哈里伯顿、宝洁、强生、Synchrony、Travelers、Philip Morris International、Kansas City Southern、WD-40、盈透证券集团、Netflix、万宝盛华、Dover和加拿大国家铁路等公司在评级举办财报会议。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Wednesday 10/20</b></p><p><blockquote><b>星期三10/20</b></blockquote></p><p> <b>The Federal Reserve</b> releases its beige book about current economic conditions across the central bank’s 12 districts.</p><p><blockquote><b>美联储</b>发布了关于央行12个地区当前经济状况的褐皮书。</blockquote></p><p> Abbott Laboratories, Biogen, NextEra Energy, ASML Holding, Nasdaq, Canadian Pacific Railway, Verizon Communications, CSX, Lam Research, Tesla, IBM, and Anthem discuss quarterly financial results.</p><p><blockquote>雅培实验室、Biogen、NextEra Energy、ASML Holding、纳斯达克、加拿大太平洋铁路、Verizon Communications、CSX、Lam Research、特斯拉、IBM和Anthem讨论季度财务业绩。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Thursday 10/21</b></p><p><blockquote><b>星期四10/21</b></blockquote></p><p> <b>The National Association</b> of Realtors reports existing-home sales for September. Economists forecast a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 6.10 million homes sold, compared with 5.88 million homes in August.</p><p><blockquote><b>全国协会</b>房地产经纪人报告9月份现房销售情况。经济学家预测，经季节调整后的房屋销售量年率为610万套，而8月份为588万套。</blockquote></p><p> Dow, Freeport-McMoRan, Genuine Parts, Southwest Airlines, Valero Energy, Blackstone, Quest Diagnostics, Snap-on, Tractor Supply, Barclays, Danaher, AT&amp;T, Nucor, American Airlines Group, AutoNation, Valero Energy, SL Green Realty, Intel, Snap, Boston Beer, Mattel, and Chipotle Mexican Grill host earnings conference calls to discuss quarterly results.</p><p><blockquote>陶氏化学、自由港麦克莫兰、原厂零件、西南航空、Valero Energy、Blackstone、Quest Diagnostics、Snap-on、Tractor Supply、Barclays、Danaher、AT&amp;T、Nucor、美国航空集团、AutoNation、Valero Energy、SL Green Realty、英特尔、Snap、Boston Beer、Mattel和Chipotle Mexican Grill在评级举办财报会议，讨论季度业绩。</blockquote></p><p> <b>The Philadelphia Fed</b>&nbsp;diffusion index, a measure of overall manufacturing activity, is expected to fall to 24 in October from September’s 30.7 reading.</p><p><blockquote><b>费城联储</b>衡量整体制造业活动的扩散指数预计将从9月份的30.7降至10月份的24。</blockquote></p><p> <b>The Conference Board</b>&nbsp;releases its Leading Economic Index for September. Expectations are for a 0.50% rise, after August’s 0.90% gain.</p><p><blockquote><b>世界大型企业联合会</b>发布9月份领先经济指数。继8月份上涨0.90%后，预计上涨0.50%。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Friday 10/22</b></p><p><blockquote><b>星期五10/22</b></blockquote></p><p> <b>IHS Markit releases</b>&nbsp;the Manufacturing and Services Purchasing Managers’ indexes for October. Consensus estimate for the Manufacturing PMI is 60.3, while the Services PMI is expected to be 54.7, compared with 60.7 and 54.9, respectively, in September.</p><p><blockquote><b>IHS Markit发布</b>10月份制造业和服务业采购经理人指数。制造业PMI普遍预期为60.3，服务业PMI预计为54.7，9月份分别为60.7和54.9。</blockquote></p><p> Whirlpool, Honeywell, Cleveland-Cliffs, Celanese, HCA Healthcare, Schlumberger, Seagate Technology Holdings, VF Corp., and American Express host investor conference calls.</p><p><blockquote>Whirlpool、Honeywell、Cleveland-Cliffs、Celanese、HCA Healthcare、Schlumberger、Seagate Technology Holdings、VF Corp.和American Express在评级举办投资者大会。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tesla, AT&T, Netflix, ASML, Snap and Other Stocks for Investors to Watch This Week<blockquote>特斯拉、AT&amp;T、Netflix、ASML、Snap等本周值得投资者关注的股票</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTesla, AT&T, Netflix, ASML, Snap and Other Stocks for Investors to Watch This Week<blockquote>特斯拉、AT&amp;T、Netflix、ASML、Snap等本周值得投资者关注的股票</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Barrons</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-10-18 06:51</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Seventy-two&nbsp;S&amp;P 500&nbsp;companies report earnings this week,&nbsp;as third-quarter earnings season ramps up. Several big U.S. banks got things off to a strong start last week. This week’s earnings highlights&nbsp;will include&nbsp;results from notable companies in telecom, consumer staples, energy, technology, health care, and the airline industry.</p><p><blockquote>随着第三季度财报季的临近，本周有72家标准普尔500指数公司公布了财报。美国几家大型银行上周开局良好。本周的财报亮点将包括电信、必需消费品、能源、科技、医疗保健和航空业著名公司的业绩。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/685ba1e7f4763c12a3c0159fc2469ded\" tg-width=\"1878\" tg-height=\"2461\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> Albertsons and&nbsp;State Street&nbsp;get the ball rolling on Monday.Procter &amp; Gamble,Halliburton,and&nbsp;Johnson &amp; Johnson&nbsp;are Tuesday morning’s highlights, followed by&nbsp;Netflix&nbsp;and&nbsp;United Airlines Holdings&nbsp;after the market closes.</p><p><blockquote>艾伯森(Albertsons)和道富银行(State Street)将于周一启动。宝洁(Procter&amp;Gamble)、哈里伯顿(Halliburton)和强生(Johnson&amp;Johnson)是周二上午的亮点，收盘后紧随其后的是Netflix和联合航空控股(United Airlines Holdings)。</blockquote></p><p> On Wednesday,Verizon Communications,IBM,and Tesla will get the most attention.AT&amp;T, American Airlines Group,Southwest Airlines,and&nbsp;Chipotle Mexican Grill&nbsp;report on Thursday, then&nbsp;American Express,Schlumberger,and&nbsp;Honeywell International&nbsp;close the week on Friday.</p><p><blockquote>周三，Verizon Communications、IBM和特斯拉将受到最多关注。AT&amp;T、美国航空集团、西南航空和Chipotle Mexican Grill将于周四发布报告，然后美国运通、Schlumberger和Honeywell International将于周五收盘。</blockquote></p><p> Economic data highlights this week include the Conference Board’s Leading Economic Index for September on Thursday and&nbsp;IHS Markit’s&nbsp;Manufacturing and Services Purchasing Managers’ indexes for October on Friday. All are seen easing back from their prior months’ levels.</p><p><blockquote>本周经济数据亮点包括周四公布的世界大型企业联合会9月份领先经济指数和周五公布的IHS Markit 10月份制造业和服务业采购经理人指数。所有这些都较前几个月的水平有所回落。</blockquote></p><p> Other releases this week include the Federal Reserve’s most recent Beige Book, describing economic conditions across the U.S., and a pair of September housing-market indicators: The Census Bureau reports new residential construction data on Tuesday and the National Association of Realtors reports existing-home sales on Thursday.</p><p><blockquote>本周发布的其他数据包括美联储最新的褐皮书，描述了美国各地的经济状况，以及两个9月份的房地产市场指标：人口普查局（Census Bureau）周二报告新的住宅建设数据，全国房地产经纪人协会（National Association of Realtors）周四报告现房销售。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Monday 10/18</b></p><p><blockquote><b>星期一10/18</b></blockquote></p><p> <b>The Federal Reserve</b>&nbsp;releases industrial production data for September. Economists are looking for a 0.20% rise after a 0.4% increase in August. Capacity utilization is expected at 76.5% for September, roughly in line with August’s 76.4%.</p><p><blockquote><b>美联储</b>公布9月份工业生产数据。继8月份增长0.4%后，经济学家预计增长0.20%。预计9月份产能利用率为76.5%，与8月份的76.4%大致一致。</blockquote></p><p> Albertsons, Philips, Steel Dynamics, and State Street are among companies releasing quarterly financial results.</p><p><blockquote>艾伯森、飞利浦、Steel Dynamics和道富银行等公司发布了季度财务业绩。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Tuesday 10/19</b></p><p><blockquote><b>星期二10/19</b></blockquote></p><p> <b>The Census Bureau</b> reports new residential construction data for September. Economists forecast a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 1.623 million housing starts, compared with 1.615 million in August.</p><p><blockquote><b>人口普查局</b>报告9月份新住宅建设数据。经济学家预测，经季节调整后的新屋开工年率为162.3万套，8月为161.5万套。</blockquote></p><p> Halliburton, Procter &amp; Gamble, Johnson &amp; Johnson, Synchrony, Travelers, Philip Morris International, Kansas City Southern, WD-40, Interactive Brokers Group, Netflix, ManpowerGroup, Dover, and Canadian National Railway are among companies hosting earnings conference calls.</p><p><blockquote>哈里伯顿、宝洁、强生、Synchrony、Travelers、Philip Morris International、Kansas City Southern、WD-40、盈透证券集团、Netflix、万宝盛华、Dover和加拿大国家铁路等公司在评级举办财报会议。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Wednesday 10/20</b></p><p><blockquote><b>星期三10/20</b></blockquote></p><p> <b>The Federal Reserve</b> releases its beige book about current economic conditions across the central bank’s 12 districts.</p><p><blockquote><b>美联储</b>发布了关于央行12个地区当前经济状况的褐皮书。</blockquote></p><p> Abbott Laboratories, Biogen, NextEra Energy, ASML Holding, Nasdaq, Canadian Pacific Railway, Verizon Communications, CSX, Lam Research, Tesla, IBM, and Anthem discuss quarterly financial results.</p><p><blockquote>雅培实验室、Biogen、NextEra Energy、ASML Holding、纳斯达克、加拿大太平洋铁路、Verizon Communications、CSX、Lam Research、特斯拉、IBM和Anthem讨论季度财务业绩。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Thursday 10/21</b></p><p><blockquote><b>星期四10/21</b></blockquote></p><p> <b>The National Association</b> of Realtors reports existing-home sales for September. Economists forecast a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 6.10 million homes sold, compared with 5.88 million homes in August.</p><p><blockquote><b>全国协会</b>房地产经纪人报告9月份现房销售情况。经济学家预测，经季节调整后的房屋销售量年率为610万套，而8月份为588万套。</blockquote></p><p> Dow, Freeport-McMoRan, Genuine Parts, Southwest Airlines, Valero Energy, Blackstone, Quest Diagnostics, Snap-on, Tractor Supply, Barclays, Danaher, AT&amp;T, Nucor, American Airlines Group, AutoNation, Valero Energy, SL Green Realty, Intel, Snap, Boston Beer, Mattel, and Chipotle Mexican Grill host earnings conference calls to discuss quarterly results.</p><p><blockquote>陶氏化学、自由港麦克莫兰、原厂零件、西南航空、Valero Energy、Blackstone、Quest Diagnostics、Snap-on、Tractor Supply、Barclays、Danaher、AT&amp;T、Nucor、美国航空集团、AutoNation、Valero Energy、SL Green Realty、英特尔、Snap、Boston Beer、Mattel和Chipotle Mexican Grill在评级举办财报会议，讨论季度业绩。</blockquote></p><p> <b>The Philadelphia Fed</b>&nbsp;diffusion index, a measure of overall manufacturing activity, is expected to fall to 24 in October from September’s 30.7 reading.</p><p><blockquote><b>费城联储</b>衡量整体制造业活动的扩散指数预计将从9月份的30.7降至10月份的24。</blockquote></p><p> <b>The Conference Board</b>&nbsp;releases its Leading Economic Index for September. Expectations are for a 0.50% rise, after August’s 0.90% gain.</p><p><blockquote><b>世界大型企业联合会</b>发布9月份领先经济指数。继8月份上涨0.90%后，预计上涨0.50%。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Friday 10/22</b></p><p><blockquote><b>星期五10/22</b></blockquote></p><p> <b>IHS Markit releases</b>&nbsp;the Manufacturing and Services Purchasing Managers’ indexes for October. Consensus estimate for the Manufacturing PMI is 60.3, while the Services PMI is expected to be 54.7, compared with 60.7 and 54.9, respectively, in September.</p><p><blockquote><b>IHS Markit发布</b>10月份制造业和服务业采购经理人指数。制造业PMI普遍预期为60.3，服务业PMI预计为54.7，9月份分别为60.7和54.9。</blockquote></p><p> Whirlpool, Honeywell, Cleveland-Cliffs, Celanese, HCA Healthcare, Schlumberger, Seagate Technology Holdings, VF Corp., and American Express host investor conference calls.</p><p><blockquote>Whirlpool、Honeywell、Cleveland-Cliffs、Celanese、HCA Healthcare、Schlumberger、Seagate Technology Holdings、VF Corp.和American Express在评级举办投资者大会。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/tesla-at-t-netflix-chipotle-and-other-stocks-for-investors-to-watch-this-week-51634497206?mod=hp_LATEST\">Barrons</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉","T":"At&T",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","AAL":"美国航空","NFLX":"奈飞","IBM":"IBM",".DJI":"道琼斯","INTC":"英特尔","LUV":"西南航空","UAL":"联合大陆航空","AXP":"美国运通","JNJ":"强生","HAL":"哈里伯顿",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","CMG":"墨式烧烤"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/tesla-at-t-netflix-chipotle-and-other-stocks-for-investors-to-watch-this-week-51634497206?mod=hp_LATEST","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1185155570","content_text":"Seventy-two S&P 500 companies report earnings this week, as third-quarter earnings season ramps up. Several big U.S. banks got things off to a strong start last week. This week’s earnings highlights will include results from notable companies in telecom, consumer staples, energy, technology, health care, and the airline industry.\n\nAlbertsons and State Street get the ball rolling on Monday.Procter & Gamble,Halliburton,and Johnson & Johnson are Tuesday morning’s highlights, followed by Netflix and United Airlines Holdings after the market closes.\nOn Wednesday,Verizon Communications,IBM,and Tesla will get the most attention.AT&T, American Airlines Group,Southwest Airlines,and Chipotle Mexican Grill report on Thursday, then American Express,Schlumberger,and Honeywell International close the week on Friday.\nEconomic data highlights this week include the Conference Board’s Leading Economic Index for September on Thursday and IHS Markit’s Manufacturing and Services Purchasing Managers’ indexes for October on Friday. All are seen easing back from their prior months’ levels.\nOther releases this week include the Federal Reserve’s most recent Beige Book, describing economic conditions across the U.S., and a pair of September housing-market indicators: The Census Bureau reports new residential construction data on Tuesday and the National Association of Realtors reports existing-home sales on Thursday.\nMonday 10/18\nThe Federal Reserve releases industrial production data for September. Economists are looking for a 0.20% rise after a 0.4% increase in August. Capacity utilization is expected at 76.5% for September, roughly in line with August’s 76.4%.\nAlbertsons, Philips, Steel Dynamics, and State Street are among companies releasing quarterly financial results.\nTuesday 10/19\nThe Census Bureau reports new residential construction data for September. Economists forecast a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 1.623 million housing starts, compared with 1.615 million in August.\nHalliburton, Procter & Gamble, Johnson & Johnson, Synchrony, Travelers, Philip Morris International, Kansas City Southern, WD-40, Interactive Brokers Group, Netflix, ManpowerGroup, Dover, and Canadian National Railway are among companies hosting earnings conference calls.\nWednesday 10/20\nThe Federal Reserve releases its beige book about current economic conditions across the central bank’s 12 districts.\nAbbott Laboratories, Biogen, NextEra Energy, ASML Holding, Nasdaq, Canadian Pacific Railway, Verizon Communications, CSX, Lam Research, Tesla, IBM, and Anthem discuss quarterly financial results.\nThursday 10/21\nThe National Association of Realtors reports existing-home sales for September. Economists forecast a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 6.10 million homes sold, compared with 5.88 million homes in August.\nDow, Freeport-McMoRan, Genuine Parts, Southwest Airlines, Valero Energy, Blackstone, Quest Diagnostics, Snap-on, Tractor Supply, Barclays, Danaher, AT&T, Nucor, American Airlines Group, AutoNation, Valero Energy, SL Green Realty, Intel, Snap, Boston Beer, Mattel, and Chipotle Mexican Grill host earnings conference calls to discuss quarterly results.\nThe Philadelphia Fed diffusion index, a measure of overall manufacturing activity, is expected to fall to 24 in October from September’s 30.7 reading.\nThe Conference Board releases its Leading Economic Index for September. Expectations are for a 0.50% rise, after August’s 0.90% gain.\nFriday 10/22\nIHS Markit releases the Manufacturing and Services Purchasing Managers’ indexes for October. Consensus estimate for the Manufacturing PMI is 60.3, while the Services PMI is expected to be 54.7, compared with 60.7 and 54.9, respectively, in September.\nWhirlpool, Honeywell, Cleveland-Cliffs, Celanese, HCA Healthcare, Schlumberger, Seagate Technology Holdings, VF Corp., and American Express host investor conference calls.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"NFLX":0.9,".DJI":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,"CMG":0.9,"IBM":0.9,"INTC":0.9,"LUV":0.9,"TSLA":0.9,"T":0.9,"UAL":0.9,".SPX":0.9,"JNJ":0.9,"AXP":0.9,"HAL":0.9,"AAL":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":305,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":813940892,"gmtCreate":1630124627516,"gmtModify":1704956329068,"author":{"id":"3581550518409224","authorId":"3581550518409224","name":"superduper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/04a121c70123b41a7011f9ec45096505","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3581550518409224","idStr":"3581550518409224"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Cool&nbsp;","listText":"Cool&nbsp;","text":"Cool","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/813940892","repostId":"2162733980","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":679,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":604978815,"gmtCreate":1639323260442,"gmtModify":1639323260698,"author":{"id":"3581550518409224","authorId":"3581550518409224","name":"superduper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/04a121c70123b41a7011f9ec45096505","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3581550518409224","idStr":"3581550518409224"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nah","listText":"Nah","text":"Nah","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/604978815","repostId":"2190719916","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":871,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":871256403,"gmtCreate":1637075815863,"gmtModify":1637075816169,"author":{"id":"3581550518409224","authorId":"3581550518409224","name":"superduper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/04a121c70123b41a7011f9ec45096505","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3581550518409224","idStr":"3581550518409224"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Disney+","listText":"Disney+","text":"Disney+","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/871256403","repostId":"2183883197","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":585,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":851266078,"gmtCreate":1634910981783,"gmtModify":1634911338379,"author":{"id":"3581550518409224","authorId":"3581550518409224","name":"superduper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/04a121c70123b41a7011f9ec45096505","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3581550518409224","idStr":"3581550518409224"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Still can buy?&nbsp;","listText":"Still can buy?&nbsp;","text":"Still can buy?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":9,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/851266078","repostId":"1154277407","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1154277407","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1634910256,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1154277407?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-22 21:44","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tesla soared nearly 1% and reached an all-time high at 903.32<blockquote>特斯拉大涨近1%创903.32历史新高</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1154277407","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Tesla soared nearly 1% and reached an all-time high at 903.32.On the morning of October 21st, Tesla","content":"<p>Tesla&nbsp;soared nearly&nbsp;1% and reached an all-time high at&nbsp;903.32.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9efe14c5fd20d7c4f39cc2a21c93b034\" tg-width=\"1039\" tg-height=\"554\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">On the morning of October 21st, Tesla Motors announced its financial results for the third quarter of 2021.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉飙升近1%，达到903.32的历史新高。10月21日早间，特斯拉公布2021年第三季度财务业绩。</blockquote></p><p> The financial report shows that Tesla Motors's third-quarter revenue was 13.757 billion US dollars, a year-on-year increase of 57%; The net profit attributable to ordinary shareholders was US $1.618 billion, a year-on-year increase of 389%; Diluted earnings per share was $1.44, compared with $0.27 in the same period last year.</p><p><blockquote>财报显示，特斯拉第三季度营收137.57亿美元，同比增长57%；归属于普通股股东的净利润16.18亿美元，同比增长389%；摊薄后每股收益为1.44美元，上年同期为0.27美元。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tesla soared nearly 1% and reached an all-time high at 903.32<blockquote>特斯拉大涨近1%创903.32历史新高</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTesla soared nearly 1% and reached an all-time high at 903.32<blockquote>特斯拉大涨近1%创903.32历史新高</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-10-22 21:44</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Tesla&nbsp;soared nearly&nbsp;1% and reached an all-time high at&nbsp;903.32.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9efe14c5fd20d7c4f39cc2a21c93b034\" tg-width=\"1039\" tg-height=\"554\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">On the morning of October 21st, Tesla Motors announced its financial results for the third quarter of 2021.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉飙升近1%，达到903.32的历史新高。10月21日早间，特斯拉公布2021年第三季度财务业绩。</blockquote></p><p> The financial report shows that Tesla Motors's third-quarter revenue was 13.757 billion US dollars, a year-on-year increase of 57%; The net profit attributable to ordinary shareholders was US $1.618 billion, a year-on-year increase of 389%; Diluted earnings per share was $1.44, compared with $0.27 in the same period last year.</p><p><blockquote>财报显示，特斯拉第三季度营收137.57亿美元，同比增长57%；归属于普通股股东的净利润16.18亿美元，同比增长389%；摊薄后每股收益为1.44美元，上年同期为0.27美元。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1154277407","content_text":"Tesla soared nearly 1% and reached an all-time high at 903.32.On the morning of October 21st, Tesla Motors announced its financial results for the third quarter of 2021.\nThe financial report shows that Tesla Motors's third-quarter revenue was 13.757 billion US dollars, a year-on-year increase of 57%; The net profit attributable to ordinary shareholders was US $1.618 billion, a year-on-year increase of 389%; Diluted earnings per share was $1.44, compared with $0.27 in the same period last year.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"TSLA":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":626,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":862533533,"gmtCreate":1632888489839,"gmtModify":1632888564673,"author":{"id":"3581550518409224","authorId":"3581550518409224","name":"superduper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/04a121c70123b41a7011f9ec45096505","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3581550518409224","idStr":"3581550518409224"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Sigh&nbsp;","listText":"Sigh&nbsp;","text":"Sigh","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/862533533","repostId":"1179744266","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":593,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":884451316,"gmtCreate":1631928926135,"gmtModify":1632805293022,"author":{"id":"3581550518409224","authorId":"3581550518409224","name":"superduper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/04a121c70123b41a7011f9ec45096505","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3581550518409224","idStr":"3581550518409224"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":11,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/884451316","repostId":"2168716185","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":370,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":831250712,"gmtCreate":1629331386736,"gmtModify":1633685676488,"author":{"id":"3581550518409224","authorId":"3581550518409224","name":"superduper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/04a121c70123b41a7011f9ec45096505","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3581550518409224","idStr":"3581550518409224"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Sell off and wait?&nbsp;","listText":"Sell off and wait?&nbsp;","text":"Sell off and wait?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":11,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/831250712","repostId":"1161930198","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1161930198","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1629331022,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1161930198?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-19 07:57","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Investors compare 2021 stock-market rally to the pre-crash summer of 1987 — should they?<blockquote>投资者将2021年股市反弹与1987年崩盘前的夏季进行比较——他们应该这样做吗？</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1161930198","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"‘Strength often begets strength,’ but there’s no guarantee\n'Wall Street' in the pre-working from hom","content":"<p>‘Strength often begets strength,’ but there’s no guarantee</p><p><blockquote>“力量往往会产生力量”，但这并不能保证</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2d3b6031d3c2b32047dfe87035791cad\" tg-width=\"1050\" tg-height=\"708\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>'Wall Street' in the pre-working from home era. EVERETT COLLECTION</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>在家工作前时代的“华尔街”。埃弗雷特收藏</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Some investors are drawing parallels between the stock market’s 2021 climb and the pattern seen in 1987, a year that saw a seemingly relentless rally completely undone by the “Black Monday” crash in October, but there are some important differences, analysts note.</p><p><blockquote>分析师指出，一些投资者将2021年股市的上涨与1987年的模式进行了比较，1987年看似无情的反弹被10月份的“黑色星期一”崩盘彻底摧毁，但也存在一些重要差异。</blockquote></p><p> Granted, the comparison does feel appropriate, at least on the surface, said Nicholas Colas, co-founder of DataTrek Research, in a Wednesday note.</p><p><blockquote>DataTrek Research联合创始人尼古拉斯·科拉斯(Nicholas Colas)在周三的一份报告中表示，诚然，这种比较确实是合适的，至少从表面上看是这样。</blockquote></p><p> “Everyone, from plugged-in hedge-fund managers to retail investors, is making money. The movie ‘Wall Street’ debuted in late 1987 and, while this decade’s Bud Fox may be working from home, the overall societal vibe is similar.”</p><p><blockquote>“从对冲基金经理到散户投资者，每个人都在赚钱。电影《华尔街》于1987年底首映，虽然这十年的巴德·福克斯可能在家工作，但整体社会氛围是相似的。”</blockquote></p><p> But the comparison doesn’t look so apt when comparing the year-to-date performances of the S&amp;P 500 index,he said. The large-cap benchmark was up 36% through Aug. 17, 1987, versus just 18% for the same period in 2021.</p><p><blockquote>但他表示，在比较标普500指数今年迄今的表现时，这种比较看起来并不那么恰当。截至1987年8月17日，大盘股基准上涨了36%，而2021年同期仅上涨了18%。</blockquote></p><p> As for the two years prior, 1985 and 1986 saw S&amp;P 500 total returns of 31% and 18%, respectively, matching up identically with returns in 2019 and 2020 which Colas acknowledged is a bit “spooky.” However, he maintained, the 2021 rally is still a “pale comparison” to what was going on in 1987.</p><p><blockquote>至于前两年，1985年和1986年标普500的总回报率分别为31%和18%，与2019年和2020年的回报率相同，Colas承认这有点“怪异”。然而，他坚称，2021年的反弹与1987年的情况相比仍然“相形见绌”。</blockquote></p><p> Stocks were&nbsp;mostly lower&nbsp;on Wednesday, a day after the S&amp;P 500 and the Dow Jones Industrial Average&nbsp;each snapped a five-session streak of record finishes.</p><p><blockquote>周三，股市大多走低，此前一天，标普500和道琼斯工业平均指数均结束了连续五个交易日的创纪录收盘。</blockquote></p><p> Meanwhile, analysts at Bespoke Investment Group this week pointed out that the S&amp;P 500 is on pace to set a record for, well, records. Tuesday’s all-time closing high was not only the fifth in a row, it was also the 49th of 2021. That puts the index on track for 78 closing highs this year, which would edge out the record 77 seen in 1995.</p><p><blockquote>与此同时，Bespoke Investment Group的分析师本周指出，标普500即将创下纪录。周二的历史收盘高点不仅是连续第五次，也是2021年的第49次。这使得该指数今年有望创下78个收盘高点，这将超过1995年创下的77个收盘高点。</blockquote></p><p> It’s no sure thing, the Bespoke analysts cautioned, noting that even a 5% pullback could eat into the ability to maintain a record-breaking pace. They noted that since 1950, there have been five years where the S&amp;P 500 had more than 40 record highs through Aug. 16, and while both 1995 and 1964 were the leaders in those years, years like 1987, 1997, and 1998 also had more than 40 record highs at this point in the year, and none of them finished the year with more than 50.</p><p><blockquote>Bespoke分析师警告说，这并不确定，并指出即使是5%的回调也可能削弱保持破纪录步伐的能力。他们指出，自1950年以来，截至8月16日，标普500有五年创下了40多项历史新高，虽然1995年和1964年都是这些年份的领先者，但1987年、1997年和1998年等年份也创下了40多项历史新高，但没有一项在年底创下超过50项历史新高。</blockquote></p><p> But more important, what does such a rapid pace of closing highs mean for full-year performance? It’s mostly positive, as one would suspect, though there are exceptions, including, of course, 1987 (see table below).</p><p><blockquote>但更重要的是，如此快速的收高节奏对全年业绩意味着什么？正如人们所怀疑的那样，这基本上是积极的，尽管也有例外，当然包括1987年（见下表）。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/981c0baa3da755be710dba80091eb0fd\" tg-width=\"1050\" tg-height=\"647\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>BESPOKE INVESTMENT GROUP</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>定制投资集团</span></p></blockquote></p><p> The S&amp;P 500’s year-to-date gain is very similar to the median and average return of the five prior years in the table, the analysts noted.</p><p><blockquote>分析师指出，该标普500今年迄今的收益与表中前五年的中位数和平均回报率非常相似。</blockquote></p><p> “Looking ahead, the median rest of year performance for the index from the close on 8/16 through year-end was a gain of 7.7% with positive returns four out of five times and more than doubling the average rest of year performance for all years since 1950,” they wrote, noting that “the one exception was in 1987 and it was a doozy.”</p><p><blockquote>“展望未来，从8月16日收盘到年底，该指数今年剩余时间的中值表现为7.7%，五分之四为正回报，是今年剩余时间平均表现的两倍多。自1950年以来的所有年份，”他们写道，并指出“唯一的例外是1987年，这太棒了。”</blockquote></p><p> So what should investors make of it all?</p><p><blockquote>那么投资者应该如何看待这一切呢？</blockquote></p><p> The Bespoke analysts noted that the usual caveats apply — there’s no guarantee and past performance isn’t indicative of future results — but the data does underline the observation that “strength often begets strength in the market.”</p><p><blockquote>Bespoke分析师指出，通常的警告是适用的——没有保证，过去的表现并不代表未来的结果——但数据确实强调了“实力往往会带来市场实力”的观察结果。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Investors compare 2021 stock-market rally to the pre-crash summer of 1987 — should they?<blockquote>投资者将2021年股市反弹与1987年崩盘前的夏季进行比较——他们应该这样做吗？</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nInvestors compare 2021 stock-market rally to the pre-crash summer of 1987 — should they?<blockquote>投资者将2021年股市反弹与1987年崩盘前的夏季进行比较——他们应该这样做吗？</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">MarketWatch</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-08-19 07:57</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>‘Strength often begets strength,’ but there’s no guarantee</p><p><blockquote>“力量往往会产生力量”，但这并不能保证</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2d3b6031d3c2b32047dfe87035791cad\" tg-width=\"1050\" tg-height=\"708\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>'Wall Street' in the pre-working from home era. EVERETT COLLECTION</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>在家工作前时代的“华尔街”。埃弗雷特收藏</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Some investors are drawing parallels between the stock market’s 2021 climb and the pattern seen in 1987, a year that saw a seemingly relentless rally completely undone by the “Black Monday” crash in October, but there are some important differences, analysts note.</p><p><blockquote>分析师指出，一些投资者将2021年股市的上涨与1987年的模式进行了比较，1987年看似无情的反弹被10月份的“黑色星期一”崩盘彻底摧毁，但也存在一些重要差异。</blockquote></p><p> Granted, the comparison does feel appropriate, at least on the surface, said Nicholas Colas, co-founder of DataTrek Research, in a Wednesday note.</p><p><blockquote>DataTrek Research联合创始人尼古拉斯·科拉斯(Nicholas Colas)在周三的一份报告中表示，诚然，这种比较确实是合适的，至少从表面上看是这样。</blockquote></p><p> “Everyone, from plugged-in hedge-fund managers to retail investors, is making money. The movie ‘Wall Street’ debuted in late 1987 and, while this decade’s Bud Fox may be working from home, the overall societal vibe is similar.”</p><p><blockquote>“从对冲基金经理到散户投资者，每个人都在赚钱。电影《华尔街》于1987年底首映，虽然这十年的巴德·福克斯可能在家工作，但整体社会氛围是相似的。”</blockquote></p><p> But the comparison doesn’t look so apt when comparing the year-to-date performances of the S&amp;P 500 index,he said. The large-cap benchmark was up 36% through Aug. 17, 1987, versus just 18% for the same period in 2021.</p><p><blockquote>但他表示，在比较标普500指数今年迄今的表现时，这种比较看起来并不那么恰当。截至1987年8月17日，大盘股基准上涨了36%，而2021年同期仅上涨了18%。</blockquote></p><p> As for the two years prior, 1985 and 1986 saw S&amp;P 500 total returns of 31% and 18%, respectively, matching up identically with returns in 2019 and 2020 which Colas acknowledged is a bit “spooky.” However, he maintained, the 2021 rally is still a “pale comparison” to what was going on in 1987.</p><p><blockquote>至于前两年，1985年和1986年标普500的总回报率分别为31%和18%，与2019年和2020年的回报率相同，Colas承认这有点“怪异”。然而，他坚称，2021年的反弹与1987年的情况相比仍然“相形见绌”。</blockquote></p><p> Stocks were&nbsp;mostly lower&nbsp;on Wednesday, a day after the S&amp;P 500 and the Dow Jones Industrial Average&nbsp;each snapped a five-session streak of record finishes.</p><p><blockquote>周三，股市大多走低，此前一天，标普500和道琼斯工业平均指数均结束了连续五个交易日的创纪录收盘。</blockquote></p><p> Meanwhile, analysts at Bespoke Investment Group this week pointed out that the S&amp;P 500 is on pace to set a record for, well, records. Tuesday’s all-time closing high was not only the fifth in a row, it was also the 49th of 2021. That puts the index on track for 78 closing highs this year, which would edge out the record 77 seen in 1995.</p><p><blockquote>与此同时，Bespoke Investment Group的分析师本周指出，标普500即将创下纪录。周二的历史收盘高点不仅是连续第五次，也是2021年的第49次。这使得该指数今年有望创下78个收盘高点，这将超过1995年创下的77个收盘高点。</blockquote></p><p> It’s no sure thing, the Bespoke analysts cautioned, noting that even a 5% pullback could eat into the ability to maintain a record-breaking pace. They noted that since 1950, there have been five years where the S&amp;P 500 had more than 40 record highs through Aug. 16, and while both 1995 and 1964 were the leaders in those years, years like 1987, 1997, and 1998 also had more than 40 record highs at this point in the year, and none of them finished the year with more than 50.</p><p><blockquote>Bespoke分析师警告说，这并不确定，并指出即使是5%的回调也可能削弱保持破纪录步伐的能力。他们指出，自1950年以来，截至8月16日，标普500有五年创下了40多项历史新高，虽然1995年和1964年都是这些年份的领先者，但1987年、1997年和1998年等年份也创下了40多项历史新高，但没有一项在年底创下超过50项历史新高。</blockquote></p><p> But more important, what does such a rapid pace of closing highs mean for full-year performance? It’s mostly positive, as one would suspect, though there are exceptions, including, of course, 1987 (see table below).</p><p><blockquote>但更重要的是，如此快速的收高节奏对全年业绩意味着什么？正如人们所怀疑的那样，这基本上是积极的，尽管也有例外，当然包括1987年（见下表）。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/981c0baa3da755be710dba80091eb0fd\" tg-width=\"1050\" tg-height=\"647\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>BESPOKE INVESTMENT GROUP</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>定制投资集团</span></p></blockquote></p><p> The S&amp;P 500’s year-to-date gain is very similar to the median and average return of the five prior years in the table, the analysts noted.</p><p><blockquote>分析师指出，该标普500今年迄今的收益与表中前五年的中位数和平均回报率非常相似。</blockquote></p><p> “Looking ahead, the median rest of year performance for the index from the close on 8/16 through year-end was a gain of 7.7% with positive returns four out of five times and more than doubling the average rest of year performance for all years since 1950,” they wrote, noting that “the one exception was in 1987 and it was a doozy.”</p><p><blockquote>“展望未来，从8月16日收盘到年底，该指数今年剩余时间的中值表现为7.7%，五分之四为正回报，是今年剩余时间平均表现的两倍多。自1950年以来的所有年份，”他们写道，并指出“唯一的例外是1987年，这太棒了。”</blockquote></p><p> So what should investors make of it all?</p><p><blockquote>那么投资者应该如何看待这一切呢？</blockquote></p><p> The Bespoke analysts noted that the usual caveats apply — there’s no guarantee and past performance isn’t indicative of future results — but the data does underline the observation that “strength often begets strength in the market.”</p><p><blockquote>Bespoke分析师指出，通常的警告是适用的——没有保证，过去的表现并不代表未来的结果——但数据确实强调了“实力往往会带来市场实力”的观察结果。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/investors-are-comparing-the-2021-stock-market-to-the-summer-of-1987-should-they-11629301481?mod=home-page\">MarketWatch</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/investors-are-comparing-the-2021-stock-market-to-the-summer-of-1987-should-they-11629301481?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1161930198","content_text":"‘Strength often begets strength,’ but there’s no guarantee\n'Wall Street' in the pre-working from home era. EVERETT COLLECTION\nSome investors are drawing parallels between the stock market’s 2021 climb and the pattern seen in 1987, a year that saw a seemingly relentless rally completely undone by the “Black Monday” crash in October, but there are some important differences, analysts note.\nGranted, the comparison does feel appropriate, at least on the surface, said Nicholas Colas, co-founder of DataTrek Research, in a Wednesday note.\n“Everyone, from plugged-in hedge-fund managers to retail investors, is making money. The movie ‘Wall Street’ debuted in late 1987 and, while this decade’s Bud Fox may be working from home, the overall societal vibe is similar.”\nBut the comparison doesn’t look so apt when comparing the year-to-date performances of the S&P 500 index,he said. The large-cap benchmark was up 36% through Aug. 17, 1987, versus just 18% for the same period in 2021.\nAs for the two years prior, 1985 and 1986 saw S&P 500 total returns of 31% and 18%, respectively, matching up identically with returns in 2019 and 2020 which Colas acknowledged is a bit “spooky.” However, he maintained, the 2021 rally is still a “pale comparison” to what was going on in 1987.\nStocks were mostly lower on Wednesday, a day after the S&P 500 and the Dow Jones Industrial Average each snapped a five-session streak of record finishes.\nMeanwhile, analysts at Bespoke Investment Group this week pointed out that the S&P 500 is on pace to set a record for, well, records. Tuesday’s all-time closing high was not only the fifth in a row, it was also the 49th of 2021. That puts the index on track for 78 closing highs this year, which would edge out the record 77 seen in 1995.\nIt’s no sure thing, the Bespoke analysts cautioned, noting that even a 5% pullback could eat into the ability to maintain a record-breaking pace. They noted that since 1950, there have been five years where the S&P 500 had more than 40 record highs through Aug. 16, and while both 1995 and 1964 were the leaders in those years, years like 1987, 1997, and 1998 also had more than 40 record highs at this point in the year, and none of them finished the year with more than 50.\nBut more important, what does such a rapid pace of closing highs mean for full-year performance? It’s mostly positive, as one would suspect, though there are exceptions, including, of course, 1987 (see table below).\nBESPOKE INVESTMENT GROUP\nThe S&P 500’s year-to-date gain is very similar to the median and average return of the five prior years in the table, the analysts noted.\n“Looking ahead, the median rest of year performance for the index from the close on 8/16 through year-end was a gain of 7.7% with positive returns four out of five times and more than doubling the average rest of year performance for all years since 1950,” they wrote, noting that “the one exception was in 1987 and it was a doozy.”\nSo what should investors make of it all?\nThe Bespoke analysts noted that the usual caveats apply — there’s no guarantee and past performance isn’t indicative of future results — but the data does underline the observation that “strength often begets strength in the market.”","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":459,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":892325234,"gmtCreate":1628640284228,"gmtModify":1633745542047,"author":{"id":"3581550518409224","authorId":"3581550518409224","name":"superduper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/04a121c70123b41a7011f9ec45096505","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3581550518409224","idStr":"3581550518409224"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":9,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/892325234","repostId":"1195651017","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":290,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":691557516,"gmtCreate":1640223793836,"gmtModify":1640223794081,"author":{"id":"3581550518409224","authorId":"3581550518409224","name":"superduper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/04a121c70123b41a7011f9ec45096505","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3581550518409224","idStr":"3581550518409224"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hope no other variant after this..&nbsp;","listText":"Hope no other variant after this..&nbsp;","text":"Hope no other variant after this..","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/691557516","repostId":"2193113147","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3039,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":606226200,"gmtCreate":1638887633962,"gmtModify":1638887634203,"author":{"id":"3581550518409224","authorId":"3581550518409224","name":"superduper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/04a121c70123b41a7011f9ec45096505","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3581550518409224","idStr":"3581550518409224"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Never sell?&nbsp;","listText":"Never sell?&nbsp;","text":"Never sell?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/606226200","repostId":"1162682713","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1162682713","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1638887298,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1162682713?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-07 22:28","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple: A True 'Never Sell' Position<blockquote>苹果：真正的“永不出售”立场</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1162682713","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"Summary\n\nWith $315B in authorized share buybacks and a 0.6% yield, Apple should return 4.3% on share","content":"<p><b>Summary</b></p><p><blockquote><b>总结</b></blockquote></p><p> <ul>  <li>With $315B in authorized share buybacks and a 0.6% yield, Apple should return 4.3% on shareholder-friendly practices alone.</li>  <li>In addition, the company will still see double-digit growth in wearables and services, even if iPhone slows down a little.</li>  <li>The Apple ecosystem also stands to get more intertwined with a potential Apple Car and AR/VR plays.</li> </ul> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/404c4a2883110ed556fd9700c5cffb83\" tg-width=\"1536\" tg-height=\"1024\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>CatLane/iStock Unreleased via Getty Images</span></p><p><blockquote><ul><li>凭借315B美元的授权股票回购和0.6%的收益率，苹果仅通过股东友好做法就应该获得4.3%的回报。</li><li>此外，该公司在可穿戴设备和服务方面仍将出现两位数的增长，即使iPhone稍微放缓。</li><li>苹果生态系统也将与潜在的苹果汽车和AR/VR游戏更加紧密地交织在一起。</li></ul><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>CatLane/iStock未通过Getty Images发布</span></p></blockquote></p><p> At an almost $3T market cap, I am still a holder of Apple (AAPL). While I absolutely wish I would have bought more of this powerhouse in years past, I've made do with incremental gains from dividend reinvestment.</p><p><blockquote>虽然市值接近3T美元，但我仍然是苹果(AAPL)的持有者。虽然我绝对希望在过去几年里购买更多这家巨头的股票，但我还是通过股息再投资获得了增量收益。</blockquote></p><p> The news cycle would have you believe that this behemoth has head-winds galore, and that the downfall could come any day now. With limited risk and potential galore, is the company worth buying today?</p><p><blockquote>新闻周期会让你相信这个庞然大物有很多阻力，垮台随时都可能到来。由于风险有限且潜力巨大，该公司今天值得购买吗？</blockquote></p><p> <b>Limited Risk</b></p><p><blockquote><b>风险有限</b></blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1fe4e9d4f4aca197052840240959df43\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"831\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Image: Forbes magazine cover, 2007</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>图片：福布斯杂志封面，2007年</span></p></blockquote></p><p> I am familiar with cellphone manufacturers of days past. Nokia, for example, used to be the titan of industry. It was thought to be untouchable and then came the iPhone. I mean, just look at the Forbes cover above, \"can anyone catch the cell phone king?\"</p><p><blockquote>我熟悉过去的手机制造商。例如，诺基亚曾经是工业巨头。它被认为是碰不得的，然后出现了iPhone。我的意思是，看看上面的福布斯封面，“有人能抓住手机大王吗？”</blockquote></p><p> That cover hit news stands on November 12, 2007, a few months after the iPhone had made its debut. The straw that broke Nokia's back, and the feature which gives Apple a moat wider than Apple Park today, The App Store launched in mid-2008.</p><p><blockquote>2007年11月12日，也就是iPhone首次亮相几个月后，这个封面登上了新闻站。压垮诺基亚的最后一根稻草，也是让苹果拥有比苹果公园更宽的护城河的功能，2008年年中推出的App Store。</blockquote></p><p> The App Store, as simple as it may seem, gave Apple the keys to the kingdom. Rather than be limited to the few apps that came on your Nokia device, you could use one of the thousands of apps sold by third-party developers on the iPhone. This was the beginning of a world-beating ecosystem.</p><p><blockquote>App Store看似简单，却给了苹果通往王国的钥匙。你可以在iPhone上使用第三方开发者销售的数千款应用，而不是局限于诺基亚设备上的几款应用。这是一个世界一流生态系统的开始。</blockquote></p><p> Today, Apple's ecosystem has grown in a significant way. The growth of that ecosystem means that Apple \"fanboys\" would have to spend thousands of dollars, or work through significant inconveniences to switch.</p><p><blockquote>今天，苹果的生态系统已经有了显著的发展。这个生态系统的增长意味着苹果的“粉丝”将不得不花费数千美元，或者克服巨大的不便来转换。</blockquote></p><p> Consider the user that has subscriptions to several apps, Air Pods, an Apple Watch, iPhone, iPad, and perhaps a MacBook. That person is not an outlier. If they consider switching to Android they'll have to cancel those several apps, throw their Apple Watch out, replace the AirPods, and would lose lots of great tie-in messaging functionality across the iPad and MacBook.</p><p><blockquote>考虑一下订阅了几个应用程序、Air Pods、苹果手表、iPhone、iPad，也许还有MacBook的用户。那个人不是局外人。如果他们考虑切换到Android，他们将不得不取消这几个应用程序，扔掉他们的苹果手表，更换AirPods，并将失去iPad和MacBook上许多出色的搭售消息功能。</blockquote></p><p> First-world problems, absolutely. The tie-in, however, is real. Apple make world-class products that users love. They get caught up in all the added accessories which deliver a great experience and then they are customers for life.</p><p><blockquote>绝对是第一世界的问题。然而，这种联系是真实的。苹果制造用户喜爱的世界级产品。他们被所有提供良好体验的附加配件所吸引，然后他们就成了终身顾客。</blockquote></p><p> Apple stock, for all intents and purposes, is a better place to keep your money than cash because of this lack of risk. Should something start to topple this house of cards, it wouldn't happen overnight, and it certainly won't happen as rapidly as it happened to Nokia because of the switching costs Apple has built up.</p><p><blockquote>无论出于何种意图和目的，苹果股票都是比现金更好的存放资金的地方，因为它缺乏风险。如果有什么事情开始推翻这座纸牌屋，它不会在一夜之间发生，而且肯定不会像诺基亚那样迅速发生，因为苹果已经积累了转换成本。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Enviable Metrics</b></p><p><blockquote><b>令人羡慕的指标</b></blockquote></p><p> Despite running up against the law of large numbers, Apple continues to look stellar when considering a number of different metrics.</p><p><blockquote>尽管违反了大数定律，但在考虑许多不同的指标时，苹果仍然看起来很出色。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/08f0199dd5d3c8dade8af08d884a5459\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"300\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Image: Apple's debt per 10-K (Page 45)</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>图片：苹果每10-K的债务（第45页）</span></p></blockquote></p><p> The worst metric, in my opinion, Apple has is a 1.7 debt-to-equity ratio. However, on that figure, my mind may be stuck in a good days of positive interest rates. Much of Apple's $109B of debt is at a negligible (0.03-2%) interest rate. Higher end servicing costs sit a hair below 5%, but this makes up a minority of Apple's debt&nbsp;per the company's 10-K filings.</p><p><blockquote>在我看来，苹果最差的指标是1.7的债务股本比率。然而，在这个数字上，我的思绪可能会停留在正利率的好日子里。苹果109B美元债务的大部分利率可以忽略不计（0.03-2%）。高端服务成本略低于5%，但根据该公司的10-K文件，这仅占苹果债务的一小部分。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/547e6241dab1a7aef3e649fb0f10d5ff\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"417\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Data by YCharts</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>数据来自YCharts</span></p></blockquote></p><p> All of that money did not go into internal projects, however, it went to share buybacks. Perhaps no company epitomizes share buybacks like Apple has over the last decade. The company has retired hundreds of billions of dollars' worth of stock to shareholders benefit, and it continues to do so today.</p><p><blockquote>所有这些资金并没有用于内部项目，而是用于股票回购。也许没有一家公司能像苹果那样体现过去十年的股票回购。为了股东利益，该公司已经退役了价值数千亿美元的股票，并且至今仍在继续这样做。</blockquote></p><p> These share buybacks are why Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.B) now owns 5.5% of Apple. Back when many lauded Buffett for being late to the Apple train, he has proven his conviction worthwhile and helped an already massive Berkshire portfolio continue to beat the market with this high concentration investment.</p><p><blockquote>这些股票回购是Berkshire Hathaway(BRK.B)现在拥有苹果5.5%股份的原因。当许多人称赞巴菲特错过了苹果的火车时，巴菲特已经证明了他的信念是值得的，并通过这种高度集中的投资帮助已经庞大的伯克希尔投资组合继续跑赢市场。</blockquote></p><p> Buffett aside, Apple does excel in several metrics one should be looking for when investing in high-quality stocks. Return on equity here sits at an eye-popping 140% due to a pandemic induced expansion in net income.</p><p><blockquote>撇开巴菲特不谈，苹果确实在投资优质股票时应该寻找的几个指标上表现出色。由于大流行导致净利润扩张，股本回报率达到了令人瞠目结舌的140%。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/af2a898072faa8c46eeaa734222ff059\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"417\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Data by YCharts</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>数据来自YCharts</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Given the amount of debt, return on invested capital, likely, is the better metric to take a look at here. Apple's ROIC has been consistently over the 20% mark, which is a sign of a fantastic business.</p><p><blockquote>考虑到债务金额，投资资本回报率可能是更好的指标。苹果的投资回报率一直超过20%，这是一家出色业务的标志。</blockquote></p><p> Oh, and it probably goes without mentioning, but this business is cash rich. Apple, as of its last report, has $35B in cash on hand and $155B in marketable securities (a mix of current and non-current). With $190B in capital that the company can still deploy, Apple is certainly in an enviable position.</p><p><blockquote>哦，这可能是不言而喻的，但这项业务现金充裕。截至上次报告，苹果手头有350亿美元现金和1550亿美元有价证券（流动和非流动的组合）。由于该公司仍可部署1900亿美元的资本，苹果无疑处于令人羡慕的地位。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Valuation: Rich</b></p><p><blockquote><b>估值：丰富</b></blockquote></p><p> Those metrics are not unknown, but they are incredible. It's no surprise that Apple will likely cross $3T market cap in the next year or so, but is the company worth buying at these high levels?</p><p><blockquote>这些指标并非未知，但却令人难以置信。毫不奇怪，苹果的市值可能会在未来一年左右突破3T美元，但该公司值得在如此高的水平上买入吗？</blockquote></p><p> As mentioned above, I view Apple as an almost cash like position. In a world of inflation, Apple has the balance sheet to carry it through, it has significant pricing power, and it has exceptionally high margins on its products to be able to weather the storm. Would you rather your money lose 5% of its buying power per year, or grow in an American titan like Apple?</p><p><blockquote>如上所述，我认为苹果几乎是现金头寸。在通货膨胀的世界里，苹果拥有能够承受通货膨胀的资产负债表，拥有强大的定价权，并且其产品利润率极高，能够渡过难关。你愿意你的钱每年失去5%的购买力，还是愿意在像苹果这样的美国巨头中增长？</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/159a160cc869ef1cc00bd4eb8db7bd93\" tg-width=\"1280\" tg-height=\"720\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Image: A mockup VR headset via BGR</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>图片：来自BGR的VR耳机模型</span></p></blockquote></p><p> A valuation of Apple also has to include the potential for an Apple Car, or the AR/VR headsets that will be with us within the next 18-months. These types of projects have been kept well under wraps, but considering the valuations of EV manufacturers like Tesla (TSLA) and Rivian (RIVN), the market will reward Apple rather richly for a well-executed product.</p><p><blockquote>对苹果的估值还必须包括苹果汽车的潜力，或者将在未来18个月内出现的AR/VR耳机。这些类型的项目一直处于保密状态，但考虑到特斯拉（TSLA）和Rivian（RIVN）等电动汽车制造商的估值，市场将对苹果执行良好的产品给予相当丰厚的奖励。</blockquote></p><p> An Apple car with deep iOS integration,as is speculated, would further drive the ecosystem flywheel. In fact, it would take that flywheel to unimaginable levels. Imagine trying to leave an ecosystem where you have to replace a $50K (and I'm probably being cheap) car, a phone, a computer... it's quite the lock in.</p><p><blockquote>据推测，深度集成iOS的苹果汽车将进一步推动生态系统飞轮。事实上，它会将飞轮提升到难以想象的水平。想象一下，试图离开一个生态系统，在这个生态系统中，你必须更换一辆5万美元（我可能很便宜）的汽车、一部电话、一台电脑...这是相当锁定。</blockquote></p><p> Taking AR/VR into account, one would have to consider that AR could be a cannibalizing force for the iPhone. If one can see all they need through lenses and control those lenses through gestures or the Apple Watch, Apple could cannibalize the phone market.</p><p><blockquote>考虑到AR/VR，人们不得不考虑AR可能会成为iPhone的蚕食力量。如果人们可以通过镜头看到他们需要的一切，并通过手势或苹果手表控制这些镜头，苹果可能会蚕食手机市场。</blockquote></p><p> That, however, is a good thing. Apple could price a novel item like AR glasses with higher margins than a phone. Fans and tech enthusiasts would pay that early adopter price and others would soon follow suit if the product lives up to the hype. It gets Apple out of the \"$1,000 for a phone\" line of thinking.</p><p><blockquote>然而，这是一件好事。苹果可以以比手机更高的利润率为AR眼镜等新颖产品定价。粉丝和技术爱好者将支付早期采用者的价格，如果产品不负众望，其他人很快就会效仿。它让苹果摆脱了“1000美元买一部手机”的思路。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/88a008b34566e3309b095ad284807d12\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"417\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Data by YCharts</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>数据来自YCharts</span></p></blockquote></p><p> All this to say, Apple's rich valuation today is a worthy one. At a PE of ~29, it's hardly extortionate, but it is outside of Apple's average over the last five years.</p><p><blockquote>综上所述，苹果今天的丰厚估值是当之无愧的。市盈率约为29，算不上过高，但超出了苹果过去五年的平均水平。</blockquote></p><p> The ecosystem, one that ties its customers in for life, is where the value lies here and Apple has plans to expand that with vehicles and wearables. Even at a PE of 29, I believe this to be a secure long-term investment that will pay investors a dividend, albeit small, along the way while continuing to retire billions of dollars in stock ($315B authorized ~10%).</p><p><blockquote>这个将客户终身联系在一起的生态系统是其价值所在，苹果计划通过车辆和可穿戴设备来扩展这一生态系统。即使市盈率为29，我相信这也是一项安全的长期投资，它将向投资者支付股息，尽管很小，同时继续收回数十亿美元的股票（315B美元授权约10%）。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Addressing The Risks</b></p><p><blockquote><b>应对风险</b></blockquote></p><p> Fear and inflation. Fear is the largest and most significant risk that Apple faces. Buyers told that bad times are coming tend to zip up their pocketbooks. Buyers who have to spend 10% more on groceries suddenly don't have enough to buy the latest iPhone.</p><p><blockquote>恐惧和通货膨胀。恐惧是苹果面临的最大、最重大的风险。被告知糟糕时期即将到来的买家往往会收紧钱包。不得不在食品杂货上多花10%的购物者突然没有足够的钱购买最新的iPhone。</blockquote></p><p> These are external concerns that Apple has little control over. The company has, over the years, introduced buy-now-pay-later and subscription programs that help buyers get the goods they want at an affordable monthly price, and, as discussed, Apple has substantial margins that it could use to overcome significant headwinds in this space.</p><p><blockquote>这些都是苹果几乎无法控制的外部担忧。多年来，该公司推出了先买后付和订阅计划，帮助买家以可承受的每月价格获得他们想要的商品，而且正如所讨论的，苹果拥有可观的利润，可以用来克服重大阻力在这个领域。</blockquote></p><p> Execution is another risk Apple faces, especially as we look to these \"futuristic\" products. A self-driving car could be worth trillions of dollars in lifetime revenues, or it could be a dud upon release that never gets full approval to operate on the streets. Likewise, an AR headset that no one wants to be seen wearing, or that proves difficult to wear through the day, could be a dead-on-arrival product.</p><p><blockquote>执行力是苹果面临的另一个风险，尤其是当我们关注这些“未来”产品时。一辆自动驾驶汽车的终身收入可能价值数万亿美元，也可能在发布后成为一个哑弹，永远不会获得在街道上运行的完全批准。同样，没有人想被看到佩戴的AR耳机，或者被证明很难全天佩戴的AR耳机，可能是一个到货就死的产品。</blockquote></p><p> Given the nature of these two products and the secrecy surrounding their development, one cannot truly assign a real risk rating to them. They're just things to be aware of. Apple does have a history of great execution (MacBook keyboard and Touch Bar aside), however, so an investor should feel at least somewhat comfortable that the company will put its best foot forward.</p><p><blockquote>鉴于这两种产品的性质及其开发的保密性，人们无法真正为它们分配真正的风险评级。它们只是需要注意的事情。然而，苹果确实有着出色执行力的历史（MacBook键盘和Touch Bar除外），因此投资者至少应该对该公司将全力以赴感到有些放心。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Final Thoughts</b></p><p><blockquote><b>最后的想法</b></blockquote></p><p></p><p> At a valuation nearing $3T one would assume there isn't much room left to run in Apple, but investors still stand to beat the overall market in this name thanks to excellent capital allocation.</p><p><blockquote>在估值接近3T美元的情况下，人们会认为苹果已经没有太多的运行空间了，但由于出色的资本配置，投资者仍然能够以这个名义击败整体市场。</blockquote></p><p> Apple has $315B in authorized buybacks and returns some $14.5B in dividends each year. Apple will likely buyback close to $100B in stock during its 2022 fiscal year which, alone, represents a 3.7% return on today's prices. Combined with a dividend yield of 0.6%, investors will make 4.3% on this name through shareholder friendly practices alone.</p><p><blockquote>苹果拥有$315B的授权回购，每年返还约$14.5 B的股息。苹果可能会在2022财年回购近1000亿美元的股票，仅此一项就相当于今天价格的3.7%的回报率。加上0.6%的股息收益率，仅通过股东友好的做法，投资者就可以在这个名字上获得4.3%的收益。</blockquote></p><p> Those numbers will compound too, another $100B in 2023, $100B in 2024, it all adds up. That $300B is all authorized too.</p><p><blockquote>这些数字也会复合，2023年再增加1000亿美元，2024年再增加1000亿美元，所有这些加起来。那300B美元也全部获得授权。</blockquote></p><p> Along with those buybacks and dividends, investors are buying into a company that, last year, defied laws of large numbers and grew its top-line at 33%. While unlikely this year, I still expect that the wearables and services divisions will grow at double digits which will allow Apple to see high single-digit revenue growth through the coming 3-5 years.</p><p><blockquote>除了这些回购和股息之外，投资者还买入了一家去年无视大数定律、营收增长33%的公司。虽然今年不太可能，但我仍然预计可穿戴设备和服务部门将以两位数的速度增长，这将使苹果在未来3-5年内实现高个位数的收入增长。</blockquote></p><p> Those with a bearish view on Apple act as though this juggernaut will vanish overnight, but that's simply not true. Sure, you're unlikely to pull down 30%+ annual returns going forward, but if you're looking for a high-quality stable business that can beat the market little-by-little, Apple is a great horse (or car) to back.</p><p><blockquote>那些看跌苹果的人表现得好像这个庞然大物会在一夜之间消失，但事实并非如此。当然，未来你不太可能降低30%以上的年回报率，但如果你正在寻找一家能够一点一点击败市场的高质量稳定业务，苹果是一匹很棒的马（或汽车）回来。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple: A True 'Never Sell' Position<blockquote>苹果：真正的“永不出售”立场</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple: A True 'Never Sell' Position<blockquote>苹果：真正的“永不出售”立场</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Seeking Alpha</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-12-07 22:28</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><b>Summary</b></p><p><blockquote><b>总结</b></blockquote></p><p> <ul>  <li>With $315B in authorized share buybacks and a 0.6% yield, Apple should return 4.3% on shareholder-friendly practices alone.</li>  <li>In addition, the company will still see double-digit growth in wearables and services, even if iPhone slows down a little.</li>  <li>The Apple ecosystem also stands to get more intertwined with a potential Apple Car and AR/VR plays.</li> </ul> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/404c4a2883110ed556fd9700c5cffb83\" tg-width=\"1536\" tg-height=\"1024\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>CatLane/iStock Unreleased via Getty Images</span></p><p><blockquote><ul><li>凭借315B美元的授权股票回购和0.6%的收益率，苹果仅通过股东友好做法就应该获得4.3%的回报。</li><li>此外，该公司在可穿戴设备和服务方面仍将出现两位数的增长，即使iPhone稍微放缓。</li><li>苹果生态系统也将与潜在的苹果汽车和AR/VR游戏更加紧密地交织在一起。</li></ul><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>CatLane/iStock未通过Getty Images发布</span></p></blockquote></p><p> At an almost $3T market cap, I am still a holder of Apple (AAPL). While I absolutely wish I would have bought more of this powerhouse in years past, I've made do with incremental gains from dividend reinvestment.</p><p><blockquote>虽然市值接近3T美元，但我仍然是苹果(AAPL)的持有者。虽然我绝对希望在过去几年里购买更多这家巨头的股票，但我还是通过股息再投资获得了增量收益。</blockquote></p><p> The news cycle would have you believe that this behemoth has head-winds galore, and that the downfall could come any day now. With limited risk and potential galore, is the company worth buying today?</p><p><blockquote>新闻周期会让你相信这个庞然大物有很多阻力，垮台随时都可能到来。由于风险有限且潜力巨大，该公司今天值得购买吗？</blockquote></p><p> <b>Limited Risk</b></p><p><blockquote><b>风险有限</b></blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1fe4e9d4f4aca197052840240959df43\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"831\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Image: Forbes magazine cover, 2007</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>图片：福布斯杂志封面，2007年</span></p></blockquote></p><p> I am familiar with cellphone manufacturers of days past. Nokia, for example, used to be the titan of industry. It was thought to be untouchable and then came the iPhone. I mean, just look at the Forbes cover above, \"can anyone catch the cell phone king?\"</p><p><blockquote>我熟悉过去的手机制造商。例如，诺基亚曾经是工业巨头。它被认为是碰不得的，然后出现了iPhone。我的意思是，看看上面的福布斯封面，“有人能抓住手机大王吗？”</blockquote></p><p> That cover hit news stands on November 12, 2007, a few months after the iPhone had made its debut. The straw that broke Nokia's back, and the feature which gives Apple a moat wider than Apple Park today, The App Store launched in mid-2008.</p><p><blockquote>2007年11月12日，也就是iPhone首次亮相几个月后，这个封面登上了新闻站。压垮诺基亚的最后一根稻草，也是让苹果拥有比苹果公园更宽的护城河的功能，2008年年中推出的App Store。</blockquote></p><p> The App Store, as simple as it may seem, gave Apple the keys to the kingdom. Rather than be limited to the few apps that came on your Nokia device, you could use one of the thousands of apps sold by third-party developers on the iPhone. This was the beginning of a world-beating ecosystem.</p><p><blockquote>App Store看似简单，却给了苹果通往王国的钥匙。你可以在iPhone上使用第三方开发者销售的数千款应用，而不是局限于诺基亚设备上的几款应用。这是一个世界一流生态系统的开始。</blockquote></p><p> Today, Apple's ecosystem has grown in a significant way. The growth of that ecosystem means that Apple \"fanboys\" would have to spend thousands of dollars, or work through significant inconveniences to switch.</p><p><blockquote>今天，苹果的生态系统已经有了显著的发展。这个生态系统的增长意味着苹果的“粉丝”将不得不花费数千美元，或者克服巨大的不便来转换。</blockquote></p><p> Consider the user that has subscriptions to several apps, Air Pods, an Apple Watch, iPhone, iPad, and perhaps a MacBook. That person is not an outlier. If they consider switching to Android they'll have to cancel those several apps, throw their Apple Watch out, replace the AirPods, and would lose lots of great tie-in messaging functionality across the iPad and MacBook.</p><p><blockquote>考虑一下订阅了几个应用程序、Air Pods、苹果手表、iPhone、iPad，也许还有MacBook的用户。那个人不是局外人。如果他们考虑切换到Android，他们将不得不取消这几个应用程序，扔掉他们的苹果手表，更换AirPods，并将失去iPad和MacBook上许多出色的搭售消息功能。</blockquote></p><p> First-world problems, absolutely. The tie-in, however, is real. Apple make world-class products that users love. They get caught up in all the added accessories which deliver a great experience and then they are customers for life.</p><p><blockquote>绝对是第一世界的问题。然而，这种联系是真实的。苹果制造用户喜爱的世界级产品。他们被所有提供良好体验的附加配件所吸引，然后他们就成了终身顾客。</blockquote></p><p> Apple stock, for all intents and purposes, is a better place to keep your money than cash because of this lack of risk. Should something start to topple this house of cards, it wouldn't happen overnight, and it certainly won't happen as rapidly as it happened to Nokia because of the switching costs Apple has built up.</p><p><blockquote>无论出于何种意图和目的，苹果股票都是比现金更好的存放资金的地方，因为它缺乏风险。如果有什么事情开始推翻这座纸牌屋，它不会在一夜之间发生，而且肯定不会像诺基亚那样迅速发生，因为苹果已经积累了转换成本。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Enviable Metrics</b></p><p><blockquote><b>令人羡慕的指标</b></blockquote></p><p> Despite running up against the law of large numbers, Apple continues to look stellar when considering a number of different metrics.</p><p><blockquote>尽管违反了大数定律，但在考虑许多不同的指标时，苹果仍然看起来很出色。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/08f0199dd5d3c8dade8af08d884a5459\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"300\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Image: Apple's debt per 10-K (Page 45)</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>图片：苹果每10-K的债务（第45页）</span></p></blockquote></p><p> The worst metric, in my opinion, Apple has is a 1.7 debt-to-equity ratio. However, on that figure, my mind may be stuck in a good days of positive interest rates. Much of Apple's $109B of debt is at a negligible (0.03-2%) interest rate. Higher end servicing costs sit a hair below 5%, but this makes up a minority of Apple's debt&nbsp;per the company's 10-K filings.</p><p><blockquote>在我看来，苹果最差的指标是1.7的债务股本比率。然而，在这个数字上，我的思绪可能会停留在正利率的好日子里。苹果109B美元债务的大部分利率可以忽略不计（0.03-2%）。高端服务成本略低于5%，但根据该公司的10-K文件，这仅占苹果债务的一小部分。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/547e6241dab1a7aef3e649fb0f10d5ff\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"417\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Data by YCharts</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>数据来自YCharts</span></p></blockquote></p><p> All of that money did not go into internal projects, however, it went to share buybacks. Perhaps no company epitomizes share buybacks like Apple has over the last decade. The company has retired hundreds of billions of dollars' worth of stock to shareholders benefit, and it continues to do so today.</p><p><blockquote>所有这些资金并没有用于内部项目，而是用于股票回购。也许没有一家公司能像苹果那样体现过去十年的股票回购。为了股东利益，该公司已经退役了价值数千亿美元的股票，并且至今仍在继续这样做。</blockquote></p><p> These share buybacks are why Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.B) now owns 5.5% of Apple. Back when many lauded Buffett for being late to the Apple train, he has proven his conviction worthwhile and helped an already massive Berkshire portfolio continue to beat the market with this high concentration investment.</p><p><blockquote>这些股票回购是Berkshire Hathaway(BRK.B)现在拥有苹果5.5%股份的原因。当许多人称赞巴菲特错过了苹果的火车时，巴菲特已经证明了他的信念是值得的，并通过这种高度集中的投资帮助已经庞大的伯克希尔投资组合继续跑赢市场。</blockquote></p><p> Buffett aside, Apple does excel in several metrics one should be looking for when investing in high-quality stocks. Return on equity here sits at an eye-popping 140% due to a pandemic induced expansion in net income.</p><p><blockquote>撇开巴菲特不谈，苹果确实在投资优质股票时应该寻找的几个指标上表现出色。由于大流行导致净利润扩张，股本回报率达到了令人瞠目结舌的140%。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/af2a898072faa8c46eeaa734222ff059\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"417\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Data by YCharts</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>数据来自YCharts</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Given the amount of debt, return on invested capital, likely, is the better metric to take a look at here. Apple's ROIC has been consistently over the 20% mark, which is a sign of a fantastic business.</p><p><blockquote>考虑到债务金额，投资资本回报率可能是更好的指标。苹果的投资回报率一直超过20%，这是一家出色业务的标志。</blockquote></p><p> Oh, and it probably goes without mentioning, but this business is cash rich. Apple, as of its last report, has $35B in cash on hand and $155B in marketable securities (a mix of current and non-current). With $190B in capital that the company can still deploy, Apple is certainly in an enviable position.</p><p><blockquote>哦，这可能是不言而喻的，但这项业务现金充裕。截至上次报告，苹果手头有350亿美元现金和1550亿美元有价证券（流动和非流动的组合）。由于该公司仍可部署1900亿美元的资本，苹果无疑处于令人羡慕的地位。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Valuation: Rich</b></p><p><blockquote><b>估值：丰富</b></blockquote></p><p> Those metrics are not unknown, but they are incredible. It's no surprise that Apple will likely cross $3T market cap in the next year or so, but is the company worth buying at these high levels?</p><p><blockquote>这些指标并非未知，但却令人难以置信。毫不奇怪，苹果的市值可能会在未来一年左右突破3T美元，但该公司值得在如此高的水平上买入吗？</blockquote></p><p> As mentioned above, I view Apple as an almost cash like position. In a world of inflation, Apple has the balance sheet to carry it through, it has significant pricing power, and it has exceptionally high margins on its products to be able to weather the storm. Would you rather your money lose 5% of its buying power per year, or grow in an American titan like Apple?</p><p><blockquote>如上所述，我认为苹果几乎是现金头寸。在通货膨胀的世界里，苹果拥有能够承受通货膨胀的资产负债表，拥有强大的定价权，并且其产品利润率极高，能够渡过难关。你愿意你的钱每年失去5%的购买力，还是愿意在像苹果这样的美国巨头中增长？</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/159a160cc869ef1cc00bd4eb8db7bd93\" tg-width=\"1280\" tg-height=\"720\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Image: A mockup VR headset via BGR</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>图片：来自BGR的VR耳机模型</span></p></blockquote></p><p> A valuation of Apple also has to include the potential for an Apple Car, or the AR/VR headsets that will be with us within the next 18-months. These types of projects have been kept well under wraps, but considering the valuations of EV manufacturers like Tesla (TSLA) and Rivian (RIVN), the market will reward Apple rather richly for a well-executed product.</p><p><blockquote>对苹果的估值还必须包括苹果汽车的潜力，或者将在未来18个月内出现的AR/VR耳机。这些类型的项目一直处于保密状态，但考虑到特斯拉（TSLA）和Rivian（RIVN）等电动汽车制造商的估值，市场将对苹果执行良好的产品给予相当丰厚的奖励。</blockquote></p><p> An Apple car with deep iOS integration,as is speculated, would further drive the ecosystem flywheel. In fact, it would take that flywheel to unimaginable levels. Imagine trying to leave an ecosystem where you have to replace a $50K (and I'm probably being cheap) car, a phone, a computer... it's quite the lock in.</p><p><blockquote>据推测，深度集成iOS的苹果汽车将进一步推动生态系统飞轮。事实上，它会将飞轮提升到难以想象的水平。想象一下，试图离开一个生态系统，在这个生态系统中，你必须更换一辆5万美元（我可能很便宜）的汽车、一部电话、一台电脑...这是相当锁定。</blockquote></p><p> Taking AR/VR into account, one would have to consider that AR could be a cannibalizing force for the iPhone. If one can see all they need through lenses and control those lenses through gestures or the Apple Watch, Apple could cannibalize the phone market.</p><p><blockquote>考虑到AR/VR，人们不得不考虑AR可能会成为iPhone的蚕食力量。如果人们可以通过镜头看到他们需要的一切，并通过手势或苹果手表控制这些镜头，苹果可能会蚕食手机市场。</blockquote></p><p> That, however, is a good thing. Apple could price a novel item like AR glasses with higher margins than a phone. Fans and tech enthusiasts would pay that early adopter price and others would soon follow suit if the product lives up to the hype. It gets Apple out of the \"$1,000 for a phone\" line of thinking.</p><p><blockquote>然而，这是一件好事。苹果可以以比手机更高的利润率为AR眼镜等新颖产品定价。粉丝和技术爱好者将支付早期采用者的价格，如果产品不负众望，其他人很快就会效仿。它让苹果摆脱了“1000美元买一部手机”的思路。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/88a008b34566e3309b095ad284807d12\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"417\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Data by YCharts</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>数据来自YCharts</span></p></blockquote></p><p> All this to say, Apple's rich valuation today is a worthy one. At a PE of ~29, it's hardly extortionate, but it is outside of Apple's average over the last five years.</p><p><blockquote>综上所述，苹果今天的丰厚估值是当之无愧的。市盈率约为29，算不上过高，但超出了苹果过去五年的平均水平。</blockquote></p><p> The ecosystem, one that ties its customers in for life, is where the value lies here and Apple has plans to expand that with vehicles and wearables. Even at a PE of 29, I believe this to be a secure long-term investment that will pay investors a dividend, albeit small, along the way while continuing to retire billions of dollars in stock ($315B authorized ~10%).</p><p><blockquote>这个将客户终身联系在一起的生态系统是其价值所在，苹果计划通过车辆和可穿戴设备来扩展这一生态系统。即使市盈率为29，我相信这也是一项安全的长期投资，它将向投资者支付股息，尽管很小，同时继续收回数十亿美元的股票（315B美元授权约10%）。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Addressing The Risks</b></p><p><blockquote><b>应对风险</b></blockquote></p><p> Fear and inflation. Fear is the largest and most significant risk that Apple faces. Buyers told that bad times are coming tend to zip up their pocketbooks. Buyers who have to spend 10% more on groceries suddenly don't have enough to buy the latest iPhone.</p><p><blockquote>恐惧和通货膨胀。恐惧是苹果面临的最大、最重大的风险。被告知糟糕时期即将到来的买家往往会收紧钱包。不得不在食品杂货上多花10%的购物者突然没有足够的钱购买最新的iPhone。</blockquote></p><p> These are external concerns that Apple has little control over. The company has, over the years, introduced buy-now-pay-later and subscription programs that help buyers get the goods they want at an affordable monthly price, and, as discussed, Apple has substantial margins that it could use to overcome significant headwinds in this space.</p><p><blockquote>这些都是苹果几乎无法控制的外部担忧。多年来，该公司推出了先买后付和订阅计划，帮助买家以可承受的每月价格获得他们想要的商品，而且正如所讨论的，苹果拥有可观的利润，可以用来克服重大阻力在这个领域。</blockquote></p><p> Execution is another risk Apple faces, especially as we look to these \"futuristic\" products. A self-driving car could be worth trillions of dollars in lifetime revenues, or it could be a dud upon release that never gets full approval to operate on the streets. Likewise, an AR headset that no one wants to be seen wearing, or that proves difficult to wear through the day, could be a dead-on-arrival product.</p><p><blockquote>执行力是苹果面临的另一个风险，尤其是当我们关注这些“未来”产品时。一辆自动驾驶汽车的终身收入可能价值数万亿美元，也可能在发布后成为一个哑弹，永远不会获得在街道上运行的完全批准。同样，没有人想被看到佩戴的AR耳机，或者被证明很难全天佩戴的AR耳机，可能是一个到货就死的产品。</blockquote></p><p> Given the nature of these two products and the secrecy surrounding their development, one cannot truly assign a real risk rating to them. They're just things to be aware of. Apple does have a history of great execution (MacBook keyboard and Touch Bar aside), however, so an investor should feel at least somewhat comfortable that the company will put its best foot forward.</p><p><blockquote>鉴于这两种产品的性质及其开发的保密性，人们无法真正为它们分配真正的风险评级。它们只是需要注意的事情。然而，苹果确实有着出色执行力的历史（MacBook键盘和Touch Bar除外），因此投资者至少应该对该公司将全力以赴感到有些放心。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Final Thoughts</b></p><p><blockquote><b>最后的想法</b></blockquote></p><p></p><p> At a valuation nearing $3T one would assume there isn't much room left to run in Apple, but investors still stand to beat the overall market in this name thanks to excellent capital allocation.</p><p><blockquote>在估值接近3T美元的情况下，人们会认为苹果已经没有太多的运行空间了，但由于出色的资本配置，投资者仍然能够以这个名义击败整体市场。</blockquote></p><p> Apple has $315B in authorized buybacks and returns some $14.5B in dividends each year. Apple will likely buyback close to $100B in stock during its 2022 fiscal year which, alone, represents a 3.7% return on today's prices. Combined with a dividend yield of 0.6%, investors will make 4.3% on this name through shareholder friendly practices alone.</p><p><blockquote>苹果拥有$315B的授权回购，每年返还约$14.5 B的股息。苹果可能会在2022财年回购近1000亿美元的股票，仅此一项就相当于今天价格的3.7%的回报率。加上0.6%的股息收益率，仅通过股东友好的做法，投资者就可以在这个名字上获得4.3%的收益。</blockquote></p><p> Those numbers will compound too, another $100B in 2023, $100B in 2024, it all adds up. That $300B is all authorized too.</p><p><blockquote>这些数字也会复合，2023年再增加1000亿美元，2024年再增加1000亿美元，所有这些加起来。那300B美元也全部获得授权。</blockquote></p><p> Along with those buybacks and dividends, investors are buying into a company that, last year, defied laws of large numbers and grew its top-line at 33%. While unlikely this year, I still expect that the wearables and services divisions will grow at double digits which will allow Apple to see high single-digit revenue growth through the coming 3-5 years.</p><p><blockquote>除了这些回购和股息之外，投资者还买入了一家去年无视大数定律、营收增长33%的公司。虽然今年不太可能，但我仍然预计可穿戴设备和服务部门将以两位数的速度增长，这将使苹果在未来3-5年内实现高个位数的收入增长。</blockquote></p><p> Those with a bearish view on Apple act as though this juggernaut will vanish overnight, but that's simply not true. Sure, you're unlikely to pull down 30%+ annual returns going forward, but if you're looking for a high-quality stable business that can beat the market little-by-little, Apple is a great horse (or car) to back.</p><p><blockquote>那些看跌苹果的人表现得好像这个庞然大物会在一夜之间消失，但事实并非如此。当然，未来你不太可能降低30%以上的年回报率，但如果你正在寻找一家能够一点一点击败市场的高质量稳定业务，苹果是一匹很棒的马（或汽车）回来。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4473801-apple-a-true-never-sell-position\">Seeking Alpha</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4473801-apple-a-true-never-sell-position","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1162682713","content_text":"Summary\n\nWith $315B in authorized share buybacks and a 0.6% yield, Apple should return 4.3% on shareholder-friendly practices alone.\nIn addition, the company will still see double-digit growth in wearables and services, even if iPhone slows down a little.\nThe Apple ecosystem also stands to get more intertwined with a potential Apple Car and AR/VR plays.\n\nCatLane/iStock Unreleased via Getty Images\nAt an almost $3T market cap, I am still a holder of Apple (AAPL). While I absolutely wish I would have bought more of this powerhouse in years past, I've made do with incremental gains from dividend reinvestment.\nThe news cycle would have you believe that this behemoth has head-winds galore, and that the downfall could come any day now. With limited risk and potential galore, is the company worth buying today?\nLimited Risk\nImage: Forbes magazine cover, 2007\nI am familiar with cellphone manufacturers of days past. Nokia, for example, used to be the titan of industry. It was thought to be untouchable and then came the iPhone. I mean, just look at the Forbes cover above, \"can anyone catch the cell phone king?\"\nThat cover hit news stands on November 12, 2007, a few months after the iPhone had made its debut. The straw that broke Nokia's back, and the feature which gives Apple a moat wider than Apple Park today, The App Store launched in mid-2008.\nThe App Store, as simple as it may seem, gave Apple the keys to the kingdom. Rather than be limited to the few apps that came on your Nokia device, you could use one of the thousands of apps sold by third-party developers on the iPhone. This was the beginning of a world-beating ecosystem.\nToday, Apple's ecosystem has grown in a significant way. The growth of that ecosystem means that Apple \"fanboys\" would have to spend thousands of dollars, or work through significant inconveniences to switch.\nConsider the user that has subscriptions to several apps, Air Pods, an Apple Watch, iPhone, iPad, and perhaps a MacBook. That person is not an outlier. If they consider switching to Android they'll have to cancel those several apps, throw their Apple Watch out, replace the AirPods, and would lose lots of great tie-in messaging functionality across the iPad and MacBook.\nFirst-world problems, absolutely. The tie-in, however, is real. Apple make world-class products that users love. They get caught up in all the added accessories which deliver a great experience and then they are customers for life.\nApple stock, for all intents and purposes, is a better place to keep your money than cash because of this lack of risk. Should something start to topple this house of cards, it wouldn't happen overnight, and it certainly won't happen as rapidly as it happened to Nokia because of the switching costs Apple has built up.\nEnviable Metrics\nDespite running up against the law of large numbers, Apple continues to look stellar when considering a number of different metrics.\nImage: Apple's debt per 10-K (Page 45)\nThe worst metric, in my opinion, Apple has is a 1.7 debt-to-equity ratio. However, on that figure, my mind may be stuck in a good days of positive interest rates. Much of Apple's $109B of debt is at a negligible (0.03-2%) interest rate. Higher end servicing costs sit a hair below 5%, but this makes up a minority of Apple's debt per the company's 10-K filings.\nData by YCharts\nAll of that money did not go into internal projects, however, it went to share buybacks. Perhaps no company epitomizes share buybacks like Apple has over the last decade. The company has retired hundreds of billions of dollars' worth of stock to shareholders benefit, and it continues to do so today.\nThese share buybacks are why Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.B) now owns 5.5% of Apple. Back when many lauded Buffett for being late to the Apple train, he has proven his conviction worthwhile and helped an already massive Berkshire portfolio continue to beat the market with this high concentration investment.\nBuffett aside, Apple does excel in several metrics one should be looking for when investing in high-quality stocks. Return on equity here sits at an eye-popping 140% due to a pandemic induced expansion in net income.\nData by YCharts\nGiven the amount of debt, return on invested capital, likely, is the better metric to take a look at here. Apple's ROIC has been consistently over the 20% mark, which is a sign of a fantastic business.\nOh, and it probably goes without mentioning, but this business is cash rich. Apple, as of its last report, has $35B in cash on hand and $155B in marketable securities (a mix of current and non-current). With $190B in capital that the company can still deploy, Apple is certainly in an enviable position.\nValuation: Rich\nThose metrics are not unknown, but they are incredible. It's no surprise that Apple will likely cross $3T market cap in the next year or so, but is the company worth buying at these high levels?\nAs mentioned above, I view Apple as an almost cash like position. In a world of inflation, Apple has the balance sheet to carry it through, it has significant pricing power, and it has exceptionally high margins on its products to be able to weather the storm. Would you rather your money lose 5% of its buying power per year, or grow in an American titan like Apple?\nImage: A mockup VR headset via BGR\nA valuation of Apple also has to include the potential for an Apple Car, or the AR/VR headsets that will be with us within the next 18-months. These types of projects have been kept well under wraps, but considering the valuations of EV manufacturers like Tesla (TSLA) and Rivian (RIVN), the market will reward Apple rather richly for a well-executed product.\nAn Apple car with deep iOS integration,as is speculated, would further drive the ecosystem flywheel. In fact, it would take that flywheel to unimaginable levels. Imagine trying to leave an ecosystem where you have to replace a $50K (and I'm probably being cheap) car, a phone, a computer... it's quite the lock in.\nTaking AR/VR into account, one would have to consider that AR could be a cannibalizing force for the iPhone. If one can see all they need through lenses and control those lenses through gestures or the Apple Watch, Apple could cannibalize the phone market.\nThat, however, is a good thing. Apple could price a novel item like AR glasses with higher margins than a phone. Fans and tech enthusiasts would pay that early adopter price and others would soon follow suit if the product lives up to the hype. It gets Apple out of the \"$1,000 for a phone\" line of thinking.\nData by YCharts\nAll this to say, Apple's rich valuation today is a worthy one. At a PE of ~29, it's hardly extortionate, but it is outside of Apple's average over the last five years.\nThe ecosystem, one that ties its customers in for life, is where the value lies here and Apple has plans to expand that with vehicles and wearables. Even at a PE of 29, I believe this to be a secure long-term investment that will pay investors a dividend, albeit small, along the way while continuing to retire billions of dollars in stock ($315B authorized ~10%).\nAddressing The Risks\nFear and inflation. Fear is the largest and most significant risk that Apple faces. Buyers told that bad times are coming tend to zip up their pocketbooks. Buyers who have to spend 10% more on groceries suddenly don't have enough to buy the latest iPhone.\nThese are external concerns that Apple has little control over. The company has, over the years, introduced buy-now-pay-later and subscription programs that help buyers get the goods they want at an affordable monthly price, and, as discussed, Apple has substantial margins that it could use to overcome significant headwinds in this space.\nExecution is another risk Apple faces, especially as we look to these \"futuristic\" products. A self-driving car could be worth trillions of dollars in lifetime revenues, or it could be a dud upon release that never gets full approval to operate on the streets. Likewise, an AR headset that no one wants to be seen wearing, or that proves difficult to wear through the day, could be a dead-on-arrival product.\nGiven the nature of these two products and the secrecy surrounding their development, one cannot truly assign a real risk rating to them. They're just things to be aware of. Apple does have a history of great execution (MacBook keyboard and Touch Bar aside), however, so an investor should feel at least somewhat comfortable that the company will put its best foot forward.\nFinal Thoughts\nAt a valuation nearing $3T one would assume there isn't much room left to run in Apple, but investors still stand to beat the overall market in this name thanks to excellent capital allocation.\nApple has $315B in authorized buybacks and returns some $14.5B in dividends each year. Apple will likely buyback close to $100B in stock during its 2022 fiscal year which, alone, represents a 3.7% return on today's prices. Combined with a dividend yield of 0.6%, investors will make 4.3% on this name through shareholder friendly practices alone.\nThose numbers will compound too, another $100B in 2023, $100B in 2024, it all adds up. That $300B is all authorized too.\nAlong with those buybacks and dividends, investors are buying into a company that, last year, defied laws of large numbers and grew its top-line at 33%. While unlikely this year, I still expect that the wearables and services divisions will grow at double digits which will allow Apple to see high single-digit revenue growth through the coming 3-5 years.\nThose with a bearish view on Apple act as though this juggernaut will vanish overnight, but that's simply not true. Sure, you're unlikely to pull down 30%+ annual returns going forward, but if you're looking for a high-quality stable business that can beat the market little-by-little, Apple is a great horse (or car) to back.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AAPL":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":980,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":872050161,"gmtCreate":1637378498792,"gmtModify":1637378499116,"author":{"id":"3581550518409224","authorId":"3581550518409224","name":"superduper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/04a121c70123b41a7011f9ec45096505","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3581550518409224","idStr":"3581550518409224"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"What does this mean for stocks?&nbsp;","listText":"What does this mean for stocks?&nbsp;","text":"What does this mean for stocks?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/872050161","repostId":"2184984959","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":327,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":839459155,"gmtCreate":1629176012177,"gmtModify":1633686798983,"author":{"id":"3581550518409224","authorId":"3581550518409224","name":"superduper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/04a121c70123b41a7011f9ec45096505","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3581550518409224","idStr":"3581550518409224"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Go EV!&nbsp;","listText":"Go EV!&nbsp;","text":"Go EV!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/839459155","repostId":"1144644937","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":379,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":600041604,"gmtCreate":1638021470923,"gmtModify":1638021471020,"author":{"id":"3581550518409224","authorId":"3581550518409224","name":"superduper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/04a121c70123b41a7011f9ec45096505","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3581550518409224","idStr":"3581550518409224"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Black Fri sale&nbsp;","listText":"Black Fri sale&nbsp;","text":"Black Fri sale","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/600041604","repostId":"2186344334","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":573,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":879985877,"gmtCreate":1636676815795,"gmtModify":1636676816451,"author":{"id":"3581550518409224","authorId":"3581550518409224","name":"superduper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/04a121c70123b41a7011f9ec45096505","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3581550518409224","idStr":"3581550518409224"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":9,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/879985877","repostId":"1174358718","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":371,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":821514489,"gmtCreate":1633759494692,"gmtModify":1633759494918,"author":{"id":"3581550518409224","authorId":"3581550518409224","name":"superduper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/04a121c70123b41a7011f9ec45096505","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3581550518409224","idStr":"3581550518409224"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nice","listText":"Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/821514489","repostId":"1167388174","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":420,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":886283342,"gmtCreate":1631594651586,"gmtModify":1631888722749,"author":{"id":"3581550518409224","authorId":"3581550518409224","name":"superduper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/04a121c70123b41a7011f9ec45096505","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3581550518409224","idStr":"3581550518409224"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Oh no","listText":"Oh no","text":"Oh no","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":9,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/886283342","repostId":"1178276551","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1178276551","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1631574947,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1178276551?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-09-14 07:15","market":"us","language":"en","title":"S&P 500 snaps losing streak with tax hikes, inflation data on horizon<blockquote>标普500通过增税和通胀数据结束连跌</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1178276551","media":"Reuters","summary":"NEW YORK (Reuters) - The S&P 500 closed higher on Monday, ending a five-day losing streak as investo","content":"<p>NEW YORK (Reuters) - The S&amp;P 500 closed higher on Monday, ending a five-day losing streak as investors focused on potential corporate tax hikes and upcoming economic data.</p><p><blockquote>路透纽约3月1日电——标普500周一收高，结束五连跌，因投资者关注潜在的公司税上调和即将公布的经济数据。</blockquote></p><p> The Dow Jones Industrial Average also advanced, but the Nasdaq Composite Index ended lower.</p><p><blockquote>道琼斯工业平均指数也上涨，但纳斯达克综合指数收低。</blockquote></p><p> Investors favored value over growth, with stocks set to benefit most from a resurging economy enjoying the biggest percentage gains.</p><p><blockquote>投资者更青睐价值而非增长，股市将从经济复苏中受益最多，涨幅最大。</blockquote></p><p> “There are probably not a lot of positive surprises coming this month,” said Liz Young, head of investment strategy at SoFi in New York. “We’re having another period of volatility where I think that rotation could go back to cyclicals and the reopened trade, as the 10-year bond rate slowly grinds higher through the end of the year.”</p><p><blockquote>纽约SoFi投资策略主管Liz Young表示：“本月可能不会有太多积极的惊喜。”“我们正在经历另一个波动时期，我认为随着10年期债券利率在年底前慢慢走高，轮动可能会回到周期性和重新开放的交易。”</blockquote></p><p> Market participants are focused on the likely passage of U.S. President Joe Biden’s $3.5 trillion budget package, which is expected to include a proposed corporate tax rate hike to 26.5% from 21%.</p><p><blockquote>市场参与者关注美国总统拜登的3.5万亿美元预算方案可能获得通过，预计其中包括拟议将企业税率从21%上调至26.5%。</blockquote></p><p> Goldman Sachs analysts see the corporate tax rate increasing to 25% and the passage of about half of a proposed increase to tax rates on foreign income, which they estimate would reduce S&amp;P 500 earnings by 5% in 2022.</p><p><blockquote>高盛分析师预计，企业税率将提高至25%，外国收入税率拟议上调的约一半将获得通过，他们估计这将使标普500 2022年的盈利减少5%。</blockquote></p><p> The Labor Department is due to release its consumer price index data on Tuesday, which could shed further light on the current inflation wave and whether it is as transitory as the Fed insists.</p><p><blockquote>美国劳工部将于周二发布消费者价格指数数据，这可能会进一步揭示当前的通胀浪潮，以及它是否像美联储坚称的那样是暂时的。</blockquote></p><p> “I don’t see inflation settling back down under 2% where it was pre-pandemic,” Young added. “Even if some of those transitory forces weaken, we will still stay at a higher rate than we were before.”</p><p><blockquote>杨补充道：“我认为通胀率不会回落到大流行前的2%以下。”“即使其中一些过渡力量减弱，我们仍将保持比以前更高的速度。”</blockquote></p><p> Other key indicators due this week include retail sales and consumer sentiment, which could illuminate how much the demand boom driven by economic re-engagement has been dampened by the highly contagious COVID-19 Delta variant.</p><p><blockquote>本周公布的其他关键指标包括零售销售和消费者信心，这可能表明经济重新参与推动的需求繁荣在多大程度上受到了高度传染性的COVID-19德尔塔变异毒株的抑制。</blockquote></p><p> The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 261.91 points, or 0.76%, to 34,869.63, the S&amp;P 500 gained 10.15 points, or 0.23%, at 4,468.73 and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 9.91 points, or 0.07%, to 15,105.58.</p><p><blockquote>道琼斯工业平均指数上涨261.91点，涨幅0.76%，至34,869.63点；标普500上涨10.15点，涨幅0.23%，至4,468.73点；纳斯达克综合指数下跌9.91点，涨幅0.07%，至15,105.58点。</blockquote></p><p> Of the 11 major sectors in the S&amp;P 500, healthcare suffered the largest percentage loss, while energy, buoyed by rising crude prices was the biggest gainer.</p><p><blockquote>在标普500 11个主要板块中，医疗保健板块跌幅最大，而受原油价格上涨提振的能源板块涨幅最大。</blockquote></p><p> Shares of vaccine makers Moderna and Pfizer Inc sank 6.6% and 2.2%, respectively, after experts said COVID booster shots are not widely needed.</p><p><blockquote>在专家表示不广泛需要新冠加强注射后，疫苗制造商Moderna和辉瑞公司的股价分别下跌6.6%和2.2%。</blockquote></p><p> Coinbase Global Inc announced plans to raise about $1.5 billion through a debt offering aimed at funding product development and potential acquisitions. The cryptocurrency exchanges shares slid 2.2%.</p><p><blockquote>Coinbase Global Inc宣布计划通过发债筹集约15亿美元，旨在为产品开发和潜在收购提供资金。加密货币交易所股价下跌2.2%。</blockquote></p><p> Salesforce.com Inc dipped 1.2% as rival Freshworks Inc’s regulatory filing indicated that the business engagement and customer engagement software company is aiming for a nearly $9 billion valuation in it U.S. debut.</p><p><blockquote>Salesforce.com Inc下跌1.2%，竞争对手Freshworks Inc的监管文件显示，这家业务参与和客户参与软件公司的目标是在美国首次亮相时估值接近90亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> Advancing issues outnumbered declining ones on the NYSE by a 1.60-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.02-to-1 ratio favored advancers.</p><p><blockquote>纽约证券交易所上涨股与下跌股的比例为1.60比1；在纳斯达克，1.02比1的比率有利于上涨者。</blockquote></p><p> The S&amp;P 500 posted 12 new 52-week highs and one new low; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 53 new highs and 71 new lows.</p><p><blockquote>标普500创下12个52周新高和1个新低；纳斯达克综合指数录得53个新高和71个新低。</blockquote></p><p> Volume on U.S. exchanges was 10.30 billion shares, compared with the 9.29 billion average over the last 20 trading days.</p><p><blockquote>美国交易所成交量为103亿股，而过去20个交易日的平均成交量为92.9亿股。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>S&P 500 snaps losing streak with tax hikes, inflation data on horizon<blockquote>标普500通过增税和通胀数据结束连跌</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nS&P 500 snaps losing streak with tax hikes, inflation data on horizon<blockquote>标普500通过增税和通胀数据结束连跌</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Reuters</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-09-14 07:15</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>NEW YORK (Reuters) - The S&amp;P 500 closed higher on Monday, ending a five-day losing streak as investors focused on potential corporate tax hikes and upcoming economic data.</p><p><blockquote>路透纽约3月1日电——标普500周一收高，结束五连跌，因投资者关注潜在的公司税上调和即将公布的经济数据。</blockquote></p><p> The Dow Jones Industrial Average also advanced, but the Nasdaq Composite Index ended lower.</p><p><blockquote>道琼斯工业平均指数也上涨，但纳斯达克综合指数收低。</blockquote></p><p> Investors favored value over growth, with stocks set to benefit most from a resurging economy enjoying the biggest percentage gains.</p><p><blockquote>投资者更青睐价值而非增长，股市将从经济复苏中受益最多，涨幅最大。</blockquote></p><p> “There are probably not a lot of positive surprises coming this month,” said Liz Young, head of investment strategy at SoFi in New York. “We’re having another period of volatility where I think that rotation could go back to cyclicals and the reopened trade, as the 10-year bond rate slowly grinds higher through the end of the year.”</p><p><blockquote>纽约SoFi投资策略主管Liz Young表示：“本月可能不会有太多积极的惊喜。”“我们正在经历另一个波动时期，我认为随着10年期债券利率在年底前慢慢走高，轮动可能会回到周期性和重新开放的交易。”</blockquote></p><p> Market participants are focused on the likely passage of U.S. President Joe Biden’s $3.5 trillion budget package, which is expected to include a proposed corporate tax rate hike to 26.5% from 21%.</p><p><blockquote>市场参与者关注美国总统拜登的3.5万亿美元预算方案可能获得通过，预计其中包括拟议将企业税率从21%上调至26.5%。</blockquote></p><p> Goldman Sachs analysts see the corporate tax rate increasing to 25% and the passage of about half of a proposed increase to tax rates on foreign income, which they estimate would reduce S&amp;P 500 earnings by 5% in 2022.</p><p><blockquote>高盛分析师预计，企业税率将提高至25%，外国收入税率拟议上调的约一半将获得通过，他们估计这将使标普500 2022年的盈利减少5%。</blockquote></p><p> The Labor Department is due to release its consumer price index data on Tuesday, which could shed further light on the current inflation wave and whether it is as transitory as the Fed insists.</p><p><blockquote>美国劳工部将于周二发布消费者价格指数数据，这可能会进一步揭示当前的通胀浪潮，以及它是否像美联储坚称的那样是暂时的。</blockquote></p><p> “I don’t see inflation settling back down under 2% where it was pre-pandemic,” Young added. “Even if some of those transitory forces weaken, we will still stay at a higher rate than we were before.”</p><p><blockquote>杨补充道：“我认为通胀率不会回落到大流行前的2%以下。”“即使其中一些过渡力量减弱，我们仍将保持比以前更高的速度。”</blockquote></p><p> Other key indicators due this week include retail sales and consumer sentiment, which could illuminate how much the demand boom driven by economic re-engagement has been dampened by the highly contagious COVID-19 Delta variant.</p><p><blockquote>本周公布的其他关键指标包括零售销售和消费者信心，这可能表明经济重新参与推动的需求繁荣在多大程度上受到了高度传染性的COVID-19德尔塔变异毒株的抑制。</blockquote></p><p> The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 261.91 points, or 0.76%, to 34,869.63, the S&amp;P 500 gained 10.15 points, or 0.23%, at 4,468.73 and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 9.91 points, or 0.07%, to 15,105.58.</p><p><blockquote>道琼斯工业平均指数上涨261.91点，涨幅0.76%，至34,869.63点；标普500上涨10.15点，涨幅0.23%，至4,468.73点；纳斯达克综合指数下跌9.91点，涨幅0.07%，至15,105.58点。</blockquote></p><p> Of the 11 major sectors in the S&amp;P 500, healthcare suffered the largest percentage loss, while energy, buoyed by rising crude prices was the biggest gainer.</p><p><blockquote>在标普500 11个主要板块中，医疗保健板块跌幅最大，而受原油价格上涨提振的能源板块涨幅最大。</blockquote></p><p> Shares of vaccine makers Moderna and Pfizer Inc sank 6.6% and 2.2%, respectively, after experts said COVID booster shots are not widely needed.</p><p><blockquote>在专家表示不广泛需要新冠加强注射后，疫苗制造商Moderna和辉瑞公司的股价分别下跌6.6%和2.2%。</blockquote></p><p> Coinbase Global Inc announced plans to raise about $1.5 billion through a debt offering aimed at funding product development and potential acquisitions. The cryptocurrency exchanges shares slid 2.2%.</p><p><blockquote>Coinbase Global Inc宣布计划通过发债筹集约15亿美元，旨在为产品开发和潜在收购提供资金。加密货币交易所股价下跌2.2%。</blockquote></p><p> Salesforce.com Inc dipped 1.2% as rival Freshworks Inc’s regulatory filing indicated that the business engagement and customer engagement software company is aiming for a nearly $9 billion valuation in it U.S. debut.</p><p><blockquote>Salesforce.com Inc下跌1.2%，竞争对手Freshworks Inc的监管文件显示，这家业务参与和客户参与软件公司的目标是在美国首次亮相时估值接近90亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> Advancing issues outnumbered declining ones on the NYSE by a 1.60-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.02-to-1 ratio favored advancers.</p><p><blockquote>纽约证券交易所上涨股与下跌股的比例为1.60比1；在纳斯达克，1.02比1的比率有利于上涨者。</blockquote></p><p> The S&amp;P 500 posted 12 new 52-week highs and one new low; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 53 new highs and 71 new lows.</p><p><blockquote>标普500创下12个52周新高和1个新低；纳斯达克综合指数录得53个新高和71个新低。</blockquote></p><p> Volume on U.S. exchanges was 10.30 billion shares, compared with the 9.29 billion average over the last 20 trading days.</p><p><blockquote>美国交易所成交量为103亿股，而过去20个交易日的平均成交量为92.9亿股。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.reuters.com/article/usa-stocks/us-stocks-sp-500-snaps-losing-streak-with-tax-hikes-inflation-data-on-horizon-idUSL1N2QF2DB\">Reuters</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"https://www.reuters.com/article/usa-stocks/us-stocks-sp-500-snaps-losing-streak-with-tax-hikes-inflation-data-on-horizon-idUSL1N2QF2DB","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1178276551","content_text":"NEW YORK (Reuters) - The S&P 500 closed higher on Monday, ending a five-day losing streak as investors focused on potential corporate tax hikes and upcoming economic data.\nThe Dow Jones Industrial Average also advanced, but the Nasdaq Composite Index ended lower.\nInvestors favored value over growth, with stocks set to benefit most from a resurging economy enjoying the biggest percentage gains.\n“There are probably not a lot of positive surprises coming this month,” said Liz Young, head of investment strategy at SoFi in New York. “We’re having another period of volatility where I think that rotation could go back to cyclicals and the reopened trade, as the 10-year bond rate slowly grinds higher through the end of the year.”\nMarket participants are focused on the likely passage of U.S. President Joe Biden’s $3.5 trillion budget package, which is expected to include a proposed corporate tax rate hike to 26.5% from 21%.\nGoldman Sachs analysts see the corporate tax rate increasing to 25% and the passage of about half of a proposed increase to tax rates on foreign income, which they estimate would reduce S&P 500 earnings by 5% in 2022.\nThe Labor Department is due to release its consumer price index data on Tuesday, which could shed further light on the current inflation wave and whether it is as transitory as the Fed insists.\n“I don’t see inflation settling back down under 2% where it was pre-pandemic,” Young added. “Even if some of those transitory forces weaken, we will still stay at a higher rate than we were before.”\nOther key indicators due this week include retail sales and consumer sentiment, which could illuminate how much the demand boom driven by economic re-engagement has been dampened by the highly contagious COVID-19 Delta variant.\nThe Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 261.91 points, or 0.76%, to 34,869.63, the S&P 500 gained 10.15 points, or 0.23%, at 4,468.73 and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 9.91 points, or 0.07%, to 15,105.58.\nOf the 11 major sectors in the S&P 500, healthcare suffered the largest percentage loss, while energy, buoyed by rising crude prices was the biggest gainer.\nShares of vaccine makers Moderna and Pfizer Inc sank 6.6% and 2.2%, respectively, after experts said COVID booster shots are not widely needed.\nCoinbase Global Inc announced plans to raise about $1.5 billion through a debt offering aimed at funding product development and potential acquisitions. The cryptocurrency exchanges shares slid 2.2%.\nSalesforce.com Inc dipped 1.2% as rival Freshworks Inc’s regulatory filing indicated that the business engagement and customer engagement software company is aiming for a nearly $9 billion valuation in it U.S. debut.\nAdvancing issues outnumbered declining ones on the NYSE by a 1.60-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.02-to-1 ratio favored advancers.\nThe S&P 500 posted 12 new 52-week highs and one new low; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 53 new highs and 71 new lows.\nVolume on U.S. exchanges was 10.30 billion shares, compared with the 9.29 billion average over the last 20 trading days.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".IXIC":0.9,".SPX":0.9,".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":373,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}